Capecitabine therapy of central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

A comprehensive review of current treatment modalities for leptomeningeal carcinomatosis in breast cancer

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a metastatic complication of breast cancer that imparts a very poor prognosis and distressing neurologic symptoms in affected patients. While the incidence of LC has risen with improving survival rates for cancer patients, there remains no established treatment protocol for LC and clinical trial data comparing available therapies is limited. Here, a comprehensive literature search of the pubmed and Cochrane databases was performed. Current treatment modalities and their safety/ efficacy profiles are summarized for LC in breast cancer. Roles for emerging therapies in LC are discussed, including targeted agents, CAR-T, immune checkpoint inhibitors, CDK inhibitors and novel antibody conjugates. A treatment pathway for LC is also proposed to guide clinicians through management of this severe metastatic complication of breast cancer.

High expression of SULF1 is associated with adverse prognosis in breast cancer brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women, and in advanced stages, it often metastasizes to the brain. However, research on the biological mechanisms of breast cancer brain metastasis and potential therapeutic targets are limited.

METHODS

Differential gene expression analysis (DEGs) for the datasets GSE43837 and GSE125989 from the GEO database was performed using online analysis tools such as GEO2R and Sangerbox. Further investigation related to SULF1 was conducted using online databases such as Kaplan-Meier Plotter and cBioPortal. Thus, expression levels, variations, associations with HER2, biological processes, and pathways involving SULF1 could be analyzed using UALCAN, cBioPortal, GEPIA2, and LinkedOmics databases. Moreover, the sensitivity of SULF1 to existing drugs was explored using drug databases such as RNAactDrug and CADSP.

RESULTS

High expression of SULF1 was associated with poor prognosis in advanced breast cancer brain metastasis and was positively correlated with the expression of HER2. In the metastatic breast cancer population, SULF1 ranked top among the 16 DEGs with the highest mutation rate, reaching 11%, primarily due to amplification. KEGG and GSEA analyses revealed that the genes co-expressed with SULF1 were positively enriched in the 'ECM-receptor interaction' gene set and negatively enriched in the 'Ribosome' gene set. Currently, docetaxel and vinorelbine can act as treatment options if the expression of SULF1 is high.

CONCLUSIONS

This study, through bioinformatics analysis, unveiled SULF1 as a potential target for treating breast cancer brain metastasis (BM).

An overview of the therapeutic strategies for neoplastic meningitis due to breast cancer: when and why?

INTRODUCTION

Neoplastic meningitis (NM), also known as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, is characterized by the infiltration of tumor cells into the meninges, and poses a significant therapeutic challenge owing to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Breast cancer is a common cause of NM among solid tumors, further highlighting the urgent need to explore effective therapeutic strategies. This review aims to provide insights into the evolving landscape of NM therapy in breast cancer by collating existing research, evaluating current treatments, and identifying potential emerging therapeutic options.

AREAS COVERED

This review explores the clinical features, therapeutic strategies, recent advances, and challenges of managing NM in patients with breast cancer. Its management includes multimodal strategies, including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and supportive care. This review also emphasizes targeted drug options and optimal drug concentrations, and discusses emerging therapies. Additionally, it highlights the variability in treatment outcomes and the potential of combination regimens to effectively manage NM in breast cancer.

EXPERT OPINION

Challenges in treating NM include debates over clinical trial end points and the management of adverse effects. Drug resistance and low response rates are significant hurdles, particularly inHER2-negative breast cancer. The development of more precise and cost-effective medications with improved selectivity is crucial. Additionally, global efforts are needed for infrastructure development and cancer control considering the diverse nature of the disease.

Systemic Treatment for Brain Metastasis and Leptomeningeal Disease in Breast Cancer Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Breast cancer with brain metastasis (BCBM) and leptomeningeal disease (LMD) are important clinical problems. Traditionally, patients with metastases to the brain and meninges were excluded from clinical trials; hence, robust, evidence-based treatment recommendations are lacking. In this review, we outline the systemic treatment options and ongoing clinical trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several recent studies have added to the systemic treatment options available. Antibody-drug conjugates have changed the therapeutic landscape. Combination treatment modalities that target multiple mechanisms including disruption of the blood brain barrier are increasingly being studied. Breast cancer with brain metastases and LMD is a heterogenous disease. While the prognosis remains grim, with more systemic treatment options, patients with BCBM are now living longer. Many ongoing clinical trials hold promise to further improve outcomes.

Novel approaches to treatment of leptomeningeal metastases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The incidence of leptomeningeal metastases is increasing in the setting of improved survival from systemic cancers. In more recent years, our understanding of leptomeningeal metastasis pathogenesis, how to diagnose and treat has been evolving.

RECENT FINDINGS

Diagnosing leptomeningeal metastasis has been challenging due to the limitations of cytology and neuroimaging; However, newer techniques detecting circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have shown potential advantage with diagnosis, quantification and detection of oncogenic mutations. The use of small molecule inhibitors and immunotherapy has shown some promise in specific leptomeningeal metastasis subtypes.

SUMMARY

These new discoveries have improved clinical trials' ability to assess treatment response and thereby more optimally compare different treatments. Furthermore, they have helped the individual clinician better diagnose, monitor the disease and provide novel therapies.

Activity of capecitabine for central nervous system metastases from breast cancer

Purpose

Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a significant burden in breast cancer (BC). Capecitabine is a frequent choice in this scenario, but data supporting its single-agent activity are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of capecitabine in CNS metastases from BC.

Methods

This retrospective cohort included patients with CNS metastases from BC treated with capecitabine at a single centre. Study endpoints were intracranial CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), intracranial CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), intracranial CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

209 patients were included; 41.6% hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR + HER2-), 33.9% human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), and 26.4% triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Radiotherapy was performed in 90.4% and CNS surgery in 27.5%. Among patients accessible for intracranial response, 3-month CNS-ORR and CNS-DCR were 41.6% and 81.2%. CNS-ORR was numerically higher among TNBC (61% versus 38% in HR + HER2-BC and 35% in HER2 + BC) (p = 0.194). When considering patients who were not evaluable at 3-month as non-responders, the 3-month CNS-ORR was 19.1% (18.4% in HR + HER2-, 18.3% in HER2+, and 21.6% in TNBC). Nevertheless, TNBC was associated with lower CNS-PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Median PFS was 8.3 months in HR + HER2-, 5.0 months in HER2+, and 3.0 months in TNBC. Median OS was 8.7, 9.1 and 4.5 months, respectively.

Conclusion

Among patients with BC and CNS metastases accessible for intracranial response at 3 months, intracranial activity was observed with capecitabine. These patients have a poor prognosis regardless of the BC subtype, especially in scenarios where newer therapeutic options are unavailable.

Favorable prognosis of breast cancer brain metastases patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM) are highly heterogenous with widely differing survival. The prognosis of the oligometastatic breast cancer (BC) patients with brain metastases (BM) has not been well studied. We aimed to investigate the prognosis of BCBM patients with limited intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions.

METHODS

Four hundred and forty-five BCBM patients treated between 1st January 2008 and 31st December 2018 at our institute were included. Clinical characteristics and treatment information were obtained from patient's medical records. The updated breast Graded Prognostic Assessment (Breast GPA) was calculated.

RESULTS

The median OS after diagnosis of BM were 15.9 months. Median OS for patients with GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2, 2.5-3 and 3.5-4 were 6.9, 14.2, 21.8, 42.6 months respectively. The total number of intracranial and extracranial metastatic lesions, in addition to the Breast GPA, salvage local therapy and systemic therapy (anti-HER2 therapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy) were demonstrated to be associated with prognosis. One hundred and thirteen patients (25.4%) had 1-5 total metastatic lesions at BM diagnosis. Patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions had a significantly longer median OS of 24.3 months compared to those with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions with a median OS of 12.2 months (P < 0.001; multivariate HR 0.55, 95% CI, 0.43-0.72). Among the patients with 1-5 metastatic lesions, median OS for GPA 0-1.0 was 9.8 months, compared to 22.8, 28.8 and 71.0 for GPA 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0 respectively, which is much longer than the corresponding patients with greater than 5 total metastatic lesions, with medium OS of 6.8, 11.6, 18.6 and 42.6 months respectively for GPA 0-1.0, 1.5-2.0, 2.5-3.0 and 3.5-4.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with 1-5 total metastatic lesions demonstrated better OS. The prognostic value of the Breast GPA and the survival benefit of salvage local therapy and continuation of systemic therapy after BM were confirmed.

Therapies beyond Physiological Barriers and Drug Resistance: A Pilot Study and Review of the Literature Investigating If Intrathecal Trastuzumab and New Treatment Options Can Improve Oncologic Outcomes in Leptomeningeal Metastases from HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are a rare but rapidly fatal complication defined by the spread of tumor cells within the leptomeninges and the subarachnoid space, found in approximately 10% of patients with HER2-positive breast cancers. This pilot study evaluated the efficacy of local treatment with intrathecal Trastuzumab (IT) added to systemic treatment. The oncologic outcome of 14 patients with HER2-positive LM is reported. Seven received IT, and seven received standard of care (SOC). The mean number of IT cycles administered was 12.14 ± 4.00. The response rate to CNS after IT treatment + SOC was 71.4%, and three patients (42.8%) obtained durable responses lasting more than 12 months. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) after LM diagnosis was six months, and the median overall survival (mOS) was ten months. The mean values of the PFS in favor of IT therapy (10.6 mo vs. 6.6 mo) and OS (13.7 vs. 9.3 mo) suggest a non-negligible investigation direction in the sense of exploiting intrathecal administration as a possible treatment modality in these patients. Adverse events reported were local pain related to intrathecal administration and one case of arachnoiditis, hematoma, and CSF fistulae. Intrathecal administration of Trastuzumab, alongside systemic treatment and radiotherapy, might improve oncologic outcomes in LM HER2-positive breast cancer with manageable toxicity.

Systematic review of the management of brain metastases from hormone receptor positive breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases are a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with breast cancer. Local central nervous system (CNS) directed therapies are usually the first line treatment for breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM), but those must be followed by systemic therapies to achieve long-term benefit. Systemic therapy for hormone receptor (HR+) breast cancer has evolved in the last 10 years, but their role when brain metastases occur is uncertain.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on management of HR+ BCBM by searching Medline/PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane databases. The PRISMA guidelines were used for systematic review.

RESULTS

Out of 807 articles identified, 98 fulfilled the inclusion criteria in their relevance to the management of HR+ BCBM.

CONCLUSIONS

Similar to brain metastases from other neoplasms, local CNS directed therapies are the first line treatment for HR+ BCBM. Although the quality of evidence is low, after local therapies, our review supports the combination of targeted and endocrine therapies for both CNS and systemic management. Upon exhaustion of targeted/endocrine therapies, case series and retrospective reports suggest that certain chemotherapy agents are active against HR+ BCBM. Early phase clinical trials for HR+ BCBM are ongoing, but there is a need for prospective randomized trials to guide management and improve patients' outcome.

Systemic treatments for breast cancer brain metastasis

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in females and BC brain metastasis (BCBM) is considered as the second most frequent brain metastasis. Although the advanced treatment has significantly prolonged the survival in BC patients, the prognosis of BCBM is still poor. The management of BCBM remains challenging. Systemic treatments are important to maintain control of central nervous system disease and improve patients' survival. BCBM medical treatment is a rapidly advancing area of research. With the emergence of new targeted drugs, more options are provided for the treatment of BM. This review features currently available BCBM treatment strategies and outlines novel drugs and ongoing clinical trials that may be available in the future. These treatment strategies are discovered to be more efficacious and potent, and present a paradigm shift in the management of BCBMs.

Leveraging Molecular and Immune-Based Therapies in Leptomeningeal Metastases

Leptomeningeal metastases represent an aggressive stage of cancer with few durable treatment options. Improved understanding of cancer biology, neoplastic reliance on oncogenic driver mutations, and complex immune system interactions have resulted in an explosion in cancer-directed therapy in the last two decades to include small molecule inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Most of these therapeutics are underexplored in patients with leptomeningeal metastases, limiting extrapolation of extracranial and even intracranial efficacy outcomes to the unique leptomeningeal space. Further confounding our interpretation of drug activity in the leptomeninges is an incomplete understanding of drug penetration through the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier of the choroid plexus. Nevertheless, a number of retrospective studies and promising prospective trials provide evidence of leptomeningeal activity of several small molecule and immune checkpoint inhibitors and underscore potential areas of further therapeutic development for patients harboring leptomeningeal disease.

Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions

Brain metastases occur commonly in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Yet, less is known about brain metastases than cancer-related entities of similar incidence. Advances in oncologic care have heightened the importance of intracranial management. Here, in this consensus review supported by the Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO), we review the landscape of brain metastases with particular attention to management approaches and ongoing efforts with potential to shape future paradigms of care. Each coauthor carried an area of expertise within the field of brain metastases and initially composed, edited, or reviewed their specific subsection of interest. After each subsection was accordingly written, multiple drafts of the manuscript were circulated to the entire list of authors for group discussion and feedback. The hope is that the these consensus guidelines will accelerate progress in the understanding and management of patients with brain metastases, and highlight key areas in need of further exploration that will lead to dedicated trials and other research investigations designed to advance the field.

Update on the Management of Brain Metastasis

Brain metastases occur in almost one-third of adult patients with solid tumor malignancies and lead to considerable patient morbidity and mortality. The rising incidence of brain metastases has been ascribed to the development of better imaging and screening techniques and the formulation of better systemic therapies. Until recently, the multimodal management of brain metastases focused primarily on the utilization of neurosurgical techniques, with varying combinations of whole-brain radiation therapy and stereotactic radio-surgical procedures. Over the past 2 decades, in particular, the increment in knowledge pertaining to molecular genetics and the pathogenesis of brain metastases has led to significant developments in targeted therapies and immunotherapies. This review article highlights the recent updates in the management of brain metastases with an emphasis on novel systemic therapies.

Leptomeningeal Metastases: New Opportunities in the Modern Era

Leptomeningeal metastases arise from cancer cell entry into the subarachnoid space, inflicting significant neurologic morbidity and mortality across a wide range of malignancies. The modern era of cancer therapeutics has seen an explosion of molecular-targeting agents and immune-mediated strategies for patients with breast, lung, and melanoma malignancies, with meaningful extracranial disease control and improvement in patient survival. However, the clinical efficacy of these agents in those with leptomeningeal metastases remains understudied, due to the relative rarity of this patient population, the investigational challenges associated with studying this dynamic disease state, and brisk disease pace. Nevertheless, retrospective studies, post hoc analyses, and small prospective trials in the last two decades provide a glimmer of hope for patients with leptomeningeal metastases, suggesting that several cancer-directed strategies are not only active in the intrathecal space but also improve survival against historical odds. The continued development of clinical trials devoted to patients with leptomeningeal metastases is critical to establish robust efficacy outcomes in this patient population, define drug pharmacokinetics in the intrathecal space, and uncover new avenues for treatment in the face of leptomeningeal therapeutic resistance.

Systemic Therapy Approaches for Breast Cancer Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases

OPINION STATEMENT

Brain metastasis arising from breast cancer is associated with a poor prognosis. Various systemic chemotherapy and targeted therapies which are effective against breast cancer often fail to provide benefits against brain metastasis. This is mainly due to limited penetration of the therapies across the blood-brain barrier, and divergent evolution of brain metastasis compared to the primary tumor. Thus, brain metastasis is typically treated upfront with local therapies, such as surgery and radiation, followed by systemic therapies. Systemic therapies with CNS permeability are favored in patients with brain metastasis. This paper reviews various systemic therapy options for breast cancer brain metastasis.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guideline of systemic therapy and management of brain central nervous system metastases (2021)

Central nervous system (CNS) dissemination is a severe complication in cancer and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common types of malignant intracranial tumors and are reported in approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancers. The recent increase in incidence of BMs is due to several factors including better diagnostic assessments and the development of improved systemic therapies that have lower activity on the CNS. However, newer systemic therapies are being developed that can cross the blood-brain barrier giving us additional tools to treat BMs. The guidelines presented here focus on the efficacy of new targeted systemic therapies and immunotherapies on CNS BMs from breast, melanoma, and lung cancers.

Durable Effect of Pyrotinib and Metronomic Vinorelbine in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

Leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are rare and catastrophic for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The prognosis of HER2-positive breast cancer (BC) with LM is extremely poor. There is no high-quality evidence of treatment regimens in HER2-positive BC with LM yet. Here, we present a case of LM in a 50-year-old woman with HER2-positive BC. Immunohistochemistry revealed invasive ductal carcinoma, estrogen receptor negative, progesterone receptor negative, HER2 3+, P53 positive 80%, and Ki-67 positive 35%. Reported for the first time, the patient was given pyrotinib-targeted therapy (400 mg, oral, every day), metronomic vinorelbine (40 mg, oral, three times a week), and intrathecal methotrexate (10 mg, infrequent and irregular use due to poor compliance) synchronously. The patient received and benefited from the treatment regimen for 16 months. And the quality of life, as self-reported, improved significantly. We also comprehensively summarized all the case reports, observational studies, and clinical trials related to HER2-positive BC with LM in the PubMed database and ClinicalTrials.gov. Intrathecal chemotherapy (methotrexate, cytarabine, thiotepa), intrathecal trastuzumab, whole-brain radiotherapy, and systemic therapy are commonly used treatment options according to a review of the literature and research. Pembrolizumab and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DS-8201) as novel drugs are promising in LM. Furthermore, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as tucatinib and neratinib have exhibited good efficacy in HER2-positive BC with central nervous system (CNS) metastases and deserve further exploration. In our report, combining pyrotinib-targeted therapy with metronomic chemotherapy is a potential regimen, which has presented satisfactory therapeutic efficacy and also warrants additional investigation in HER2-positive BC with LM.

Intracranial Response Rate in Patients with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases after Systemic Therapy

Simple Summary

For many years, patients with breast cancer and brain metastases were excluded from participation in clinical trials. It was believed that anticancer drugs could not cross the blood–brain barrier. However, recent evidence strongly suggests that some drugs can act against brain metastases, with the greatest intracranial response rate reported in the case of capecitabine, neratinib plus capecitabine, trastuzumab deruxtecan and tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine. In this article, we discuss the achievements in systemic therapy of breast cancer patients with brain metastases. We stress on the newest clinical trial results which indicate tremendous progress in HER2-positive breast cancer. On the other hand, in patients with triple-negative breast cancer or hormone-receptor-positive brain metastases, much fewer compounds were discovered. Based on the presented results, patients with active brain metastases should be routinely included in clinical trials with novel agents.

Abstract

Brain metastases are detected in 5% of patients with breast cancer at diagnosis. The rate of brain metastases is higher in HER2-positive and triple-negative breast cancer patients (TNBC). In patients with metastatic breast cancer, the risk of brain metastases is much higher, with up to 50% of the patients having two aggressive biological breast cancer subtypes. The prognosis for such patients is poor. Until recently, little was known about the response to systemic therapy in brain metastases. The number of trials dedicated to breast cancer with brain metastases was scarce. Our review summarizes the current knowledge on this topic including very significant results of clinical trials which have been presented very recently. We focus on the intracranial response rate of modern drugs, including new antibody–drug conjugates, HER2- targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other targeted therapies. We highlight the most effective and promising drugs. On the other hand, we also suggest that further efforts are needed to improve the prognosis, especially patients with TNBC and brain metastases. The information contained in this article can help oncologists make treatment-related decisions.

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis and breast cancer: a systematic review of current evidence on diagnosis, treatment and prognosis

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC) is a rare but challenging manifestation of advanced breast cancer with a severe impact on morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review of the evidence published over the last two decades, focusing on recent advances in the diagnostic and therapeutic options of LC. Lobular histology and a triple-negative intrinsic subtype are well-known risk factors for LC. Clinical manifestations are diverse and often aspecific. There is no gold standard for LC diagnosis: MRI and cerebrospinal fluid cytology are the most frequently used modalities despite the low accuracy. Current standard of care involves a multimodal strategy including systemic and intrathecal chemotherapy in combination with brain radiotherapy. Intrathecal chemotherapy has been widely used through the years despite the lack of data from randomized controlled trials and conflicting evidence on patient outcomes. No specific chemotherapeutic agent has shown superiority over others for both intrathecal and systemic treatment. Although endocrine therapy was heuristically considered unable to exert significant control on central nervous system metastatic disease, retrospective data suggest a favourable toxicity profile and even a possible positive impact on survival. In recent years, encouraging data on the use of targeted agents has emerged but further research in this field is required. Palliative treatment in the form of whole brain or stereotactic radiotherapy is associated with improvement in clinical manifestations and quality of life, with no proven impact on survival. The most investigated prognostic factors include performance status, non-triple-negative disease and multimodal treatment. Validation of prognostic scores is necessary to aid clinicians in the identification of patient subgroups that are most likely to benefit from an intensive therapeutic approach.

Malignant Meningitis Associated with Hydrocephalus

Malignant meningitis (MM) is the diffuse involvement of the leptomeninges by infiltrating cancer cells, most frequently from lung and breast cancers. This review is aimed to discuss the current advances in the diagnosis and management of MM, along with management of MM-associated hydrocephalus. We reviewed the literature using PubMed and Google Scholar search engines, focusing on various recent randomized controlled trials and clinical trials on MM. Given the hallmark multifocal involvement, the clinical symptoms and signs are also random and asymmetric. There are three important pillars for establishing a diagnosis of MM: clinical examination, neuroimaging, and CSF cytological findings. Several factors should be considered in decision-making, including performance status, neurological findings (clinical, MRI, and CSF flow dynamic), and evaluation of the primary tumor (nature and systemic dissemination). Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group recommended the objective assessment of disease for evaluating the progression and response to therapy. Pillars of current management are mainly focal irradiation and intrathecal or systemic chemotherapy. Symptomatic hydrocephalus is managed with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt, lumboperitoneal shunt, or endoscopic third ventriculostomy as palliative procedures, providing significant improvement in performance scores in the limited survival time of patients with MM. Studies using novel therapeutic approaches, such as new biological or cytotoxic compounds, are ongoing. Despite the use of all the combinations, the overall prognosis remains grim; therefore, decision-making for treatment should predominantly be based on attaining an optimal quality of life.

Primary neuroendocrine tumor of the pineal gland: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Primary intracranial neuroendocrine tumors are exceedingly rare, with few cases in the literature. We present a case of a primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the pineal gland, which is the second that has ever been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old male patient presented with vomiting, weakness, and headaches. Imaging revealed a lesion in the pineal region, which was surgically resected. This mass was characterized by histology as a neuroendocrine carcinoma, given the presence of neuroendocrine markers and cytokeratin markers with absence of a primary lesion elsewhere on imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

There are currently no guidelines on the management of primary intracranial neuroendocrine tumors. In this case, the patient underwent surgical resection and craniospinal radiotherapy. He subsequently received one cycle of chemotherapy with temozolomide, an alkylating agent, but he unfortunately did not tolerate treatment. A multidisciplinary decision was made along with the patient and his family to focus on palliative care. Eighteen months after the initial presentation, disease recurred in the patient's neck. The patient underwent resection to control the metastases, with a plan to follow with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Unfortunately, the patient became unwell and died at 21 months after initial diagnosis. This demonstrates a need for continued research and reporting on this uncommon disease entity.

Analysis Survival of Breast Cancer with Brain Metastases Treated with Different Fraction Whole Brain Radiotherapy Concomitant with Capecitabine

Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide. The main therapeutic modality for breast cancer with brain metastases is radiation. Whole Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT) is a treatment that provides moderate doses of radiotherapy to all brain tissue. Capecitabine was found to be effective for the treatment of breast cancer with metastases and its metabolites can cross the BBB in animal models.   Objective: This study aims to determine the response and survival of breast cancer patient with brain metastases treated with different fractionation WBRT combined with capecitabine administration.   Materials and methods: This is a prospective, randomized-blind cohort analytic study. Subjects were randomized into two groups by giving different fraction of WBRT (Group I WBRT 10x3Gy and Group II WBRT 20x2Gy) concomitant with capecitabine 850-1000mg/m2. OS was calculated from brain metastases diagnosis. Median follow-up was 5.6 months.   Results: A total of 22 breast cancer patients with brain metastases participated in this study. Group I obtained results of 5 (45.5%) out of 11 are responding to therapy and median OS was 4.4 months. Whereas in group II found 11 (100%) out of 11 patients responded to therapy and median OS was 9.4 months. The results of statistical analysis showed that there were significant differences of response between the two groups with p value= 0.012. The differences of survival of each group also statistically significant with p value=0.004   Conclusions: WBRT with 20x2Gy concomitant with Capecitabine gives a better response rate and OS.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis: Molecular Landscape, Current Management, and Emerging Therapies

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is a devastating consequence of late-stage cancer, and despite multimodal treatment, remains rapidly fatal. Definitive diagnosis requires identification of malignant cells in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), or frank disease on MRI. Therapy is generally palliative and consists primarily of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, which is administered intrathecally or systemically. Immunotherapies and novel experimental therapies have emerged as promising options for decreasing patient morbidity and mortality. In this review, the authors discuss a refined view of the molecular pathophysiology of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, current approaches to disease management, and emerging therapies.

US Food and Drug Administration regulatory updates in neuro-oncology

Objective

Contemporary management of patients with neuro-oncologic disease requires an understanding of approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) related to nervous system tumors. To summarize FDA updates applicable to neuro-oncology practitioners, we sought to review oncology product approvals and Guidances that were pertinent to the field in the past year.

Methods

Oncology product approvals between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2020, were reviewed for clinical trial outcomes involving tumors of the nervous system. FDA Guidances relevant to neuro-oncology were also reviewed.

Results

Five oncology product approvals described outcomes for nervous system tumors in the year 2020. These included the first regulatory approval for neurofibromatosis type 1: selumetinib for children with symptomatic, inoperable plexiform neurofibromas. Additionally, there were 4 regulatory approvals for non-central nervous system (CNS) cancers that described clinical outcomes for patients with brain metastases. These included the approval of tucatinib for metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer including patients with brain metastases, brigatinib for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and pralsetinib and selpercatinib for RET fusion-positive NSCLC. Finally, two FDA Guidances for Industry, “Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Criteria: Brain Metastases” and “Evaluating Cancer Drugs in Patients with Central Nervous System Metastases” were published to facilitate drug development for and inclusion of patients with CNS metastases in clinical trials.

Conclusions

Despite the challenges of the past year brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, progress continues to be made in neuro-oncology. These include first-of-their-kind FDA approvals and Guidances that are relevant to the management of patients with nervous system tumors.

Prodrug Delivery Using Dual-Targeting Nanoparticles To Treat Breast Cancer Brain Metastases

Brain metastases from breast cancer are the most frequent brain metastasis in women, which are often difficult to be surgically removed due to the multifocal and infiltrative intracranial growth patterns. Cytotoxic drugs have potent anti-breast cancer properties. However, owing to the toxic side effects and the blood-brain barrier (BBB), these drugs cannot be fully and aggressively exploited with systemic administration and hence have very limited application for brain metastases. In this study, hyaluronidase-activated prodrug hyaluronic-doxorubicin (hDOX) was assembled by the BBB and metastatic breast cancer dual-targeting nanoparticles (NPs), which were constructed based on transcytosis-targeting peptide and hyaluronic acid co-modified poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ε-carbobenzoxy-l-lysine). hDOX showed enzyme-recovered DNA insertion, selective cytotoxicity to metastatic breast cancer cells rather than astrocytes, and efficient loading into dual-targeting NPs. hDOX@NPs displayed the ability of dually targeting the BBB and metastatic breast cancer and significantly extended the median survival time of mice with intracranial metastatic breast cancer. Based on these improvements, this prodrug delivery tactic may serve as an important direction for drug therapy against brain metastases.

Effects of systemic therapy and local therapy on outcomes of 873 breast cancer patients with metastatic breast cancer to brain: MD Anderson Cancer Center experience

Outcomes of treatments for patients with breast cancer brain metastasis (BCBM) remain suboptimal, especially for systemic therapy. To evaluate the effectiveness of systemic and local therapy (surgery [S], stereotactic radiosurgery [SRS] and whole brain radiotherapy [WBRT]) in BCBM patients, we analyzed the data of 873 BCBM patients from 1999 to 2012. The median overall survival (OS) and time to progression in the brain (TTP-b) after diagnosis of brain metastases (BM) were 9.1 and 7.1 months, respectively. WBRT prolonged OS in patients with multiple BM (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.52-0.88; P = .004). SRS alone, and surgery or SRS followed by WBRT (S/SRS + WBRT), were equivalent in OS and TTP-b (median OS, 14.9 vs 17.2 months; median TTP-b, 8.2 vs 8.6 months). Continued chemotherapy prolonged OS (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.30-0.41; P < .001) and TTP-b (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.33-0.70; P < .001), however, with no advantage of capecitabine over other chemotherapy agents used (median OS, 11.8 vs 12.4 months; median TTP-b, 7.2 vs 7.4 months). Patients receiving trastuzumab at diagnosis of BM, continuation of anti-HER2 therapy increased OS (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.34-0.83; P = .005) and TTP-b (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.23-0.74; P = .003); no additional benefit was seen with switching over between trastuzumab and lapatinib (median OS, 18.4 vs 22.7 months; median TTP-b: 7.4 vs 8.7 months). In conclusion, SRS or S/SRS + WBRT were equivalent for patients' OS and local control. Continuation systemic chemotherapy including anti-HER2 therapy improved OS and TTP-b with no demonstrable advantage of capecitabine and lapatinib over other agents of physicians' choice was observed.

Metastasis to the Central Nervous System

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Management of metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS) has evolved, and molecular characterization of metastatic disease is now routinely done. Targeted therapies, once few in number with limited penetration into the CNS, have multiplied in number and increased in CNS coverage. This article addresses recent advances in the evaluation and clinical management of patients with CNS metastasis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Metastasis of cancer to the CNS can be diagnosed and characterized with novel techniques, including molecular analyses of the spinal fluid, so-called liquid biopsies. Resected parenchymal CNS metastases are now routinely subjected to genomic sequencing. For patients with CNS metastases displaying targetable mutations, a wide variety of treatment options are available, including deferral of radiation therapy in favor of a trial of an orally bioavailable targeted therapy or immunotherapy. For patients without a molecularly targetable lesion, local treatment in the form of radiation therapy, now most often stereotactic radiosurgery, is supplanting untargeted whole-brain radiation therapy.

SUMMARY

Technologic advances in diagnosis and management have resulted in new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to patients with metastasis to the CNS, with resulting improvements in progression-free and overall survival.

Craniospinal irradiation(CSI) in patients with leptomeningeal metastases: risk-benefit-profile and development of a prognostic score for decision making in the palliative setting

BACKGROUND

The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with spinal (SI) or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and to suggest a prognostic score as to which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment.

METHODS

Nineteen patients treated with CSI at our institution were eligible for the study. Demographic data, primary tumor characteristics, outcome and toxicity were assessed retrospectively. The extent of extra-CNS disease was defined by staging CT-scans before the initiation of CSI. Based on outcome parameters a prognostic score was developed for stratification based on patient performance status and tumor staging.

RESULTS

Median follow-up and overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 3.4 months (range 0.5-61.5 months). The median overall survival (OS) for patients with LM from breast cancer was 4.7 months and from NSCLC 3.3 months. The median OS was 7.3 months, 3.3 months and 1.5 months for patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors according to the proposed prognostic score (KPS < 70 and the presence of extra-CNS disease) respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild.

CONCLUSION

CSI demonstrated clinically meaningful survival that is comparable to the reported outcome of intrathecal chemotherapy. A simple scoring system could be used to better select patients for treatment with CSI in this palliative setting. In our opinion, the feasibility of performing CSI with modern radiotherapy techniques with better sparing of healthy tissue gives a further rationale for its use also in the palliative setting.

Hypomethylating Agent Azacitidine Is Effective in Treating Brain Metastasis Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Through Regulation of DNA Methylation of Keratin 18 Gene

Breast cancer patients presenting with symptomatic brain metastases have poor prognosis, and current chemotherapeutic agents are largely ineffective. In this study, we evaluated the hypomethylating agent azacitidine (AZA) for its potential as a novel therapeutic in preclinical models of brain metastasis of breast cancer. We used the parental triple-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 (231) cells and their brain colonizing counterpart (231Br) to ascertain phenotypic differences in response to AZA. We observed that 231Br cells have higher metastatic potential compared to 231 cells. With regard to therapeutic value, the AZA IC50 value in 231Br cells is significantly lower than that in parental cells (P < .01). AZA treatment increased apoptosis and inhibited the Wnt signaling transduction pathway, angiogenesis, and cell metastatic capacity to a significantly higher extent in the 231Br line. AZA treatment in mice with experimental brain metastases significantly reduced tumor burden (P = .0112) and increased survival (P = .0026) compared to vehicle. Lastly, we observed a decreased expression of keratin 18 (an epithelial maker) in 231Br cells due to hypermethylation, elucidating a potential mechanism of action of AZA in treating brain metastases from breast cancer.

Long-term complete response to intrathecal trastuzumab in a patient with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis due to her2- overexpressing breast cancer: Case report

INTRODUCTION

Leptomeningeal dissemination due to HER2-overexpressing breast cancer is a rare and hard to treat complication with short-term dismal prognosis.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 34-year-old female previously treated because of HER2+ breast cancer is admitted to the Neurology Department in December 2016 due to sensory-motor neurological semiology.

DIAGNOSIS

A wide set of diagnostic tests is performed and finally cytologic findings after repeated CSF confirm leptomeningeal infiltration by breast carcinoma (panCK+, GATA3+).

INTERVENTIONS

Weekly intrathecal triple therapy with methotrexate, cytarabine and hydrocortisone plus trastuzumab is carried out during 4 months.

OUTCOMES

Clinical and pathological response that lasts more than 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Leptomeningeal carcinomatosis is an oncological situation where conventional therapies have limited activity. In HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients, intrathecal therapy with anti-HER2 therapy (trastuzumab) is feasible and may reach long-term disease control, especially in cases of low-tumor burden.

Breast leptomeningeal disease: a review of current practices and updates on management

PURPOSE

Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is an advanced metastatic disease presentation portending a poor prognosis with minimal treatment options. The advent and widespread use of new systemic therapies for metastatic breast cancer has improved systemic disease control and extended survival; however, as patients live longer, the rates of breast cancer LMD are increasing.

METHODS

In this review, a group of medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, breast surgeons, and neurosurgeons specializing in treatment of breast cancer reviewed the available published literature and compiled a comprehensive review on the current state of breast cancer LMD.

RESULTS

We discuss the pathogenesis, epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment options (including systemic, intrathecal, surgical, and radiotherapy treatment modalities), and treatment response evaluation specific to breast cancer patients. Furthermore, we discuss the controversies within this unique clinical setting and identify potential clinical opportunities to improve upon the diagnosis, treatment, and treatment response evaluation in the management of breast LMD.

CONCLUSIONS

We recognize the shortcomings in our current understanding of the disease and explore the future role of genomic/molecular disease characterization, technological innovations, and ongoing clinical trials attempting to improve the prognosis for this advanced disease state.

Phase II Study of Systemic High-dose Methotrexate and Intrathecal Liposomal Cytarabine for Treatment of Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis From Breast Cancer

Metastatic breast cancer frequently leads to brain metastases and, less commonly, leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LC). Once cerebrospinal fluid involvement occurs, the prognosis is poor. There are limited treatment options available, but none offer significant survival benefit. Methotrexate, given systemically at high doses (3.5-8 gm/m²), achieves cytotoxic concentrations in the CSF and has been shown to prolong survival in patients with LC. Intrathecal liposomal cytarabine has been shown to increase time to neurologic progression in patients with breast cancer and LC. The combination of these 2 agents in LC has not been studied extensively. Here, we present the results of the phase II study with this combination showing promising efficacy and very good tolerability.

Brain metastases

An estimated 20% of all patients with cancer will develop brain metastases, with the majority of brain metastases occurring in those with lung, breast and colorectal cancers, melanoma or renal cell carcinoma. Brain metastases are thought to occur via seeding of circulating tumour cells into the brain microvasculature; within this unique microenvironment, tumour growth is promoted and the penetration of systemic medical therapies is limited. Development of brain metastases remains a substantial contributor to overall cancer mortality in patients with advanced-stage cancer because prognosis remains poor despite multimodal treatments and advances in systemic therapies, which include a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy and targeted therapies. Thus, interest abounds in understanding the mechanisms that drive brain metastases so that they can be targeted with preventive therapeutic strategies and in understanding the molecular characteristics of brain metastases relative to the primary tumour so that they can inform targeted therapy selection. Increased molecular understanding of the disease will also drive continued development of novel immunotherapies and targeted therapies that have higher bioavailability beyond the blood-tumour barrier and drive advances in radiotherapies and minimally invasive surgical techniques. As these discoveries and innovations move from the realm of basic science to preclinical and clinical applications, future outcomes for patients with brain metastases are almost certain to improve.

SEOM clinical guidelines in advanced and recurrent breast cancer (2018)

Although the metastasic breast cancer is still an incurable disease, recent advances have increased significantly the time to progression and the overall survival. However, too much information has been produced in the last 2 years, so a well-based guideline is a valuable document in treatment decision making. The SEOM guidelines are intended to make evidence-based recommendations on how to manage patients with advanced and recurrent breast cancer to achieve the best patient outcomes based on a rational use of the currently available therapies. To assign a level of certainty and a grade of recommendation the United States Preventive Services Task Force guidelines methodology was selected as reference.

Leptomeningeal metastasis

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) results from dissemination of cancer cells to both the leptomeninges (pia and arachnoid) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) compartment. Breast cancer, lung cancer, and melanoma are the most common solid tumors that cause LM. Recent approval of more active anticancer therapies has resulted in improvement in survival that is partly responsible for an increased incidence of LM. Neurologic deficits, once manifest, are mostly irreversible, and often have a significant impact on patient quality of life. LM-directed therapy is based on symptom palliation, circumscribed use of neurosurgery, limited field radiotherapy, intra-CSF and systemic therapies. Novel methods of detecting LM include detection of CSF circulating tumor cells and tumor cell-free DNA. A recent international guideline for a standardization of response assessment in LM may improve cross-trial comparisons as well as within-trial evaluation of treatment. An increasing number of retrospective studies suggest that molecular-targeted therapy, such as EGFR and ALK inhibitors in lung cancer, trastuzumab in HER2+ breast cancer, and BRAF inhibitors in melanoma, may be effective as part of the multidisciplinary management of LM. Prospective randomized trials with standardized response assessment are needed to further validate these preliminary findings.

Activity of Eribulin Mesylate in Brain Metastasis from Breast Cancer: A Stone in a Pond?

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases develop in approximately 10-25% of patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and are associated with a very poor prognosis.

CASE REPORT

We report the case of a 40-year-old woman with MBC and associated lung, bone, liver, and brain metastases, who experienced a time to progression of several months with eribulin after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), 2 lines of chemotherapy, and 1 line of hormonal therapy, maintaining a good toxicity profile.

DISCUSSION

Eribulin, in association with local treatment such as WBRT, can be well tolerated and effective in achieving a long progression-free survival and a good control of brain metastases in patients with MBC who have received multiple lines of treatment. The vascular remodeling properties of eribulin, combined with brain radiotherapy, might facilitate the passage of eribulin across the blood brain barrier, improving brain response.

CONCLUSION

Our anecdotal experience suggests that eribulin may have a potentially beneficial effect on brain metastases while maintaining a good systemic control of the disease in patients with MBC.

Reactive astrocytic S1P3 signaling modulates the blood-tumor barrier in brain metastases

Brain metastases are devastating complications of cancer. The blood-brain barrier (BBB), which protects the normal brain, morphs into an inadequately characterized blood-tumor barrier (BTB) when brain metastases form, and is surrounded by a neuroinflammatory response. These structures contribute to poor therapeutic efficacy by limiting drug uptake. Here, we report that experimental breast cancer brain metastases of low- and high permeability to a dextran dye exhibit distinct microenvironmental gene expression patterns. Astrocytic sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor 3 (S1P3) is upregulated in the neuroinflammatory response of the highly permeable lesions, and is expressed in patients' brain metastases. S1P3 inhibition functionally tightens the BTB in vitro and in vivo. S1P3 mediates its effects on BTB permeability through astrocytic secretion of IL-6 and CCL2, which relaxes endothelial cell adhesion. Tumor cell overexpression of S1P3 mimics this pathway, enhancing IL-6 and CCL-2 production and elevating BTB permeability. In conclusion, neuroinflammatory astrocytic S1P3 modulates BTB permeability.

Management of leptomeningeal metastasis in breast cancer

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM), which occurs when malignant cells spread to the central nervous system, is becoming an increasingly common complication in patients with breast cancer. Diagnosis and treatment of LM is challenging. Moreover, prognosis of patients with LM is poor, with a median survival of 6 months after diagnosis. This review highlights the strengths and limitations of currently available diagnostic tools and therapies for LM. The current treatments for LM, including radiotherapy, systemic therapy, and intrathecal treatment, aim to maintain the quality of life of patients by correcting neurological deficits and arresting neurological degeneration. However, there is no standardized therapy for LM because of a lack of randomized trials on this condition.

Medical management of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease in patients with breast carcinoma

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women and accounts for the second highest number of cancer-related deaths. With patients surviving longer due to advances in systemic control, the incidence of CNS involvement is increasing; however, the management of CNS metastases has not undergone parallel advancements. The blood–brain barrier limits the efficacy of most systemic chemotherapies, and the utilization of surgery and radiation beyond first-line therapy is limited. We will explore the recent developments in the medical management of breast cancer brain metastasis. Beyond traditional chemotherapy, we will also discuss targeted therapies and immunotherapies which may provide a survival benefit to this population and thus, offer further treatment options and a path for future research and treatment advances.

Leptomeningeal metastasis from systemic cancer: Review and update on management

Leptomeningeal metastasis is an uncommon and typically late complication of cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Diagnosis is often challenging, with nonspecific presenting symptoms ranging from headache and confusion to focal neurologic deficits, such as cranial nerve palsies. Standard diagnostic evaluation involves a neurologic examination, magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine with gadolinium, and cytologic evaluation of the cerebral spinal fluid. Therapy entails a multimodal approach focused on palliation with surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy, which may be administered systemically or directly into the cerebral spinal fluid. Limited trial data exist to guide treatment, and current regimens are based primarily on expert opinion. Although newer targeted and immunotherapeutic agents are under investigation and have shown promise, an improved understanding of the biology of leptomeningeal metastasis and treatment resistance as well as additional randomized controlled studies are needed to guide the optimal treatment of this devastating disease. Cancer 2018;124:21-35. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Systemic therapy for brain metastases

Central nervous system metastases cause grave morbidity in patients with advanced malignancies. Lung cancer, breast cancer, and melanoma are the three most common causes of brain metastases. Although the exact incidence of brain metastases is unclear, there appears to be an increasing incidence which has been attributed to longer survival, better control of systemic disease, and better imaging modalities. Until recently surgical resection of solitary or symptomatic brain metastases, and radiation therapy (either whole-brain radiation therapy or stereotactic radiation) were the mainstay of treatment for patients with brain metastases. The majority of traditional chemotherapies have shown limited activity in the central nervous system, which has been attributed to the blood-brain barrier and the molecular structure of the used agents. The discovery of driver mutations and drugs targeting these mutations has changed the treatment landscape. Several of these targeted small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors do cross the blood-brain barrier and/or have shown activity in the central nervous system. Another major advance in the care of brain metastases has been the advent of new immunotherapeutic agents, for which initial studies have shown intracranial activity. In this chapter, we will review the unique challenges in the treatment of brain metastases. The pertinent clinical studies of chemotherapy in brain metastases will be discussed. The currently reported clinical trials and evidence for use of targeted therapies and immunotherapeutic agents will be emphasized.

Breast Cancer in the Central Nervous System: Multidisciplinary Considerations and Management

Breast cancer is the second most common primary tumor associated with central nervous system (CNS) metastases. Patients with metastatic HER2-positive or triple-negative (estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, HER2-negative) breast cancer are at the highest risk of developing parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal disease is less frequent but is distributed across breast cancer subtypes, including lobular breast cancer. Initial treatment strategies can include surgery, radiation, intravenous or intrathecal chemotherapy, and/or targeted approaches. In this article, we review the epidemiology of breast cancer brain metastases, differences in clinical behavior and natural history by tumor subtype, and important considerations in the multidisciplinary treatment of these patients. We will highlight new findings that impact current standards of care, clinical controversies, and notable investigational approaches in clinical testing.

Leptomeningeal Carcinomatosis in Colorectal Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience

BACKGROUND

Leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) is an uncommon form of metastatic disease in many cancers. There remains a paucity of literature with regard to the course and management of LM in colorectal cancers (CRCs). The aim of this study was to estimate the incidence of LM in patients with CRC seen at our institution over a 15-year period, and to describe the clinical course and outcome of these cases.

METHODS

LM in CRC primary cases between 2000 and 2014 were identified in the Mayo Clinic databases. The charts were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 17,095 CRC primaries, we identified 10 patients with LM (0.058%) in this 15-year period. Nine cases were included in the analysis. Four had metastatic disease at the time of their initial CRC diagnosis. Median overall survival after CRC diagnosis was 25.7 months (range, 4.7-74.8 months). Median time to diagnosis of LM after CRC diagnosis was 25.3 months (range, 0-68.1 months). All patients had magnetic resonance imaging findings consistent with LM: 3 patients with spinal LM, 5 patients with intracranial LM, and 1 with both. Neurologic symptoms correlated with site of the lesions, with headache, cranial nerve palsy, lower extremity weakness, and gait disturbance among the most frequently reported. However, not all patients had neurologic findings, with LM lesions found incidentally in 2 cases. Seven patients (78%) had palliative radiotherapy for LM. Three patients continued to receive systemic chemotherapy after diagnosis of LM. Median survival after LM diagnosis was 7 weeks (range, 2-39 weeks).

CONCLUSIONS

LM is an exceedingly rare development in the natural course of CRC. It confers a poor prognosis with limited treatment options. At our institution, most patients had their disease addressed by palliative means, with many receiving radiotherapy to control their neurologic symptoms. Based on our series, supportive care remains a sensible approach to the management of LM in CRC.