1
|
Blake N, Siddiq H, Brecht ML, Warda U, Villacorte F, Banawa J. Social Determinants of Health and Satisfaction With Sources of Information About COVID-19 Related to Vaccine Uptake in a Safety Net Healthcare System. Nurs Res 2024; 73:261-269. [PMID: 38498855 DOI: 10.1097/nnr.0000000000000732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination is a critical tool to combat the COVID-19 pandemic. Yet, vaccine uptake varies across communities and is often affected by sociodemographic factors and accessibility. OBJECTIVES This article outlines a pilot study aimed to examine factors associated with COVID-19 patients within one of the nation's largest safety net healthcare systems. METHODS A cross-sectional survey design was conducted with adults over 18 years of age eligible to receive the COVID-19 vaccine. Descriptive analysis of survey data collected in 2021-2022 was employed. Unconditional and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine associations between sociodemographics, social factors, and COVID-19 vaccine uptake. RESULTS Study participants ( N = 280) were a diverse patient population, primarily low-income and majority Hispanic/Latinx, with low education levels, but with a high level of COVID-19 vaccine uptake and a high rate of intent to vaccinate again. Approximately 22% report having unstable housing, and 46% experiencing food insecurity. Most trusted sources for COVID-19 data included mainstream media, including TV, radio, and newspapers, and friends, family, or other informal networks. We found that respondents who were satisfied or very satisfied with COVID-19 information received from healthcare providers or the government had higher odds of vaccine uptake rates. DISCUSSION These findings highlight the critical role of access to the COVID-19 vaccine and sources of information as an independent factor in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among patients within a safety net healthcare system. This study expands the literature on COVID-19 vaccine uptake, particularly in an underresourced region of the South Los Angeles community. Future research is needed to better understand the mechanisms between social determinants of health, perceived discrimination, and vaccine uptake.
Collapse
|
2
|
Muñoz Bohorquez J, Channell Doig A, Goldring S, Campos E, Burton K, Delacey JL, McCoy LH, Sorenson C, Crist G, Terhune C, Kim J. Access Barriers, Trusted Channels, and Misconceptions About the COVID-19 Vaccine Among Rural Immigrant Farmworkers. HISPANIC HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL 2024:15404153241262050. [PMID: 38881300 DOI: 10.1177/15404153241262050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Background: Although COVID-19 has disproportionately impacted immigrant agricultural workers, vaccination efforts have been challenging. Barriers to immunization include language, visa status, and access to medical care. Additionally, vaccine hesitancy, mistrust, and misinformation contributed to low uptake. Methods: A community needs assessment was conducted with immigrant agricultural workers (n = 9) and community stakeholders (n = 15) in rural areas of Maryland and Delaware. In-depth interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using template analysis. Results: The participants named trusted and untrusted sources, sources of misinformation, and barriers to accessing information and physical locations to receive the vaccine as reasons for not getting the vaccine. Trusted sources included known community leaders and television programs. Some barriers mentioned were fear of deportation, lack of paid time off, language barriers, and difficulty navigating the U.S. healthcare system. Discussion: There is a need for culturally-tailored programs that address misinformation and barriers and use community-based programming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana Muñoz Bohorquez
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Amara Channell Doig
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Goldring
- Cooperative Extension, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Esmeralda Campos
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Kiarra Burton
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Jennifer Lynne Delacey
- Department of Health Policy and Management, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Lisa H McCoy
- University of Maryland Extension, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Catherine Sorenson
- University of Maryland Extension, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Gina Crist
- Cooperative Extension, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA
| | - Crystal Terhune
- University of Maryland Extension, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| | - Jinhee Kim
- University of Maryland Extension, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levy MS, Hunt KN, Rinehart S, Brown AD, Kelly AG, Sundaram P, Crump A, Sinclair TJ, Dey K, Zoroufy A, Caban-Martinez AJ, Plowden TC. COVID-19 Vaccine Information and Infertility Posts on X: Insights on a Misinformation Pandemic. Perm J 2024; 28:47-54. [PMID: 38698715 PMCID: PMC11232903 DOI: 10.7812/tpp/23.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate misinformation surrounding infertility and the COVID-19 vaccine on X (formerly known as Twitter) by analyzing the prevalence and content of this misinformation across a sample of posts on X. METHODS This study is a retrospective review of posts on X (formerly known as tweets) from the COVID-19-TweetIDs dataset from July 2021 and November 2021. Included posts were from crucial time points in the COVID-19 vaccine discourse and contained at least one word related to COVID-19 vaccination and fertility. Posts were analyzed and categorized based on factuality, common words, and hashtags. Descriptive statistics on total followers, account verification status, and engagement were obtained. Differences between posts on X classified as factual and misinformation were examined using analysis of variance or χ2 tests. Sentiment analysis determined if post content was generally positive, neutral, or negative. RESULTS A total of 17,418 relevant posts on X were reviewed: 11,436 from timeframe 1 (July 2021) and 5982 from timeframe 2 (December 2021). Misinformation posts rose from 29.9% in July 2021 to 45.1% in November 2021. In both timeframes, accounts sharing factual information had more followers (p < 0.001), and verified users were more likely to share accurate posts (p ≤ 0.001). Factual and misinformation posts had similar engagement. Sentiment analysis identified that real posts were more positive and misinformation posts were more negative (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Misinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine and fertility is highly prevalent on X and threatens vaccine uptake in patients desiring future fertility. Accounts sharing factual information were likely to have more followers and be verified; therefore, verifying more physicians sharing accurate information is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Morgan S Levy
- Department of Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Kelby N Hunt
- Department of Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Sarah Rinehart
- Department of Medical Education, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Alyssa D Brown
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Amelia G Kelly
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Padmaja Sundaram
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts, Springfield, MA, USA
| | - Alisha Crump
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Kally Dey
- Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine, Midwestern University, Downers Grove, IL, USA
| | | | - Alberto J Caban-Martinez
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Torie Comeaux Plowden
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nolan MB, Chrenka E, Walker P, Steiner A, Rodrigues KK, Michel JJ, Yun K, Payton C, Young J, Mamo B, Frumholtz M, DeSilva M. COVID-19 vaccine uptake among non-US-born populations in the United States, 2020-2022. Vaccine 2024; 42:3115-3121. [PMID: 38604910 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States (US), COVID-19 vaccination rates among non-US-born individuals (i.e., refugees, immigrants, and migrants [RIM]) are variable. Understanding baseline COVID-19 vaccine coverage among these populations and determining if disparities exist is essential for quality improvement initiatives and public health interventions. METHODS Baseline COVID-19 vaccination rates for both primary series and booster doses were calculated at four health systems located in Minnesota, Colorado, and Pennsylvania participating in the Minnesota Department of Health's Center of Excellence in Newcomer Health. Patients aged ≥5 years as of 1/1/22, seen for ≥1 primary care visit during 7/1/2019-6/30/22 were included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for three measures of COVID-19 vaccine coverage during 12/14/2020-6/30/2022: 1) initiation of primary series; 2) completion of primary series; 3) completion of first booster. We calculated vaccine coverage rates for the entire population and stratified by subgroup including country of origin, refugee status, and primary language preference. RESULTS We included 1,624,573 patients eligible for COVID-19 primary series vaccine and 907,749 eligible for COVID-19 booster vaccination. The percent of eligible patients who completed a COVID-19 primary series (63.4 %) and booster dose (66.2 %) were similar. Completion of the primary series was higher for non-US-born persons (72.7 %) compared with US born persons (65.4 %), similar among refugees (63.5 %) and non-refugees (63.4 %), and lower in patients with language preference other than English (62.7 %) compared with English preferring patients (63.6 %). Booster completion was lower for non-US-born persons (61.8 %), refugees (46.7 %), and patients with language preference other than English (55.3 %) compared with US-born (70 %), non-refugees (66.3 %), and English preferring patients (67.3 %) respectively. CONCLUSIONS This evaluation identified disparities in COVID-19 vaccination rates among non-US-born persons and persons with a language preference other than English living in the US. Targeted outreach efforts may be beneficial in reaching these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret B Nolan
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA.
| | - Ella Chrenka
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA
| | - Patricia Walker
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA
| | - Abigail Steiner
- Denver Health & Hospital Authority, 777 Bannock Street, Denver, CO 80204, USA
| | | | - Jeremy J Michel
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Katherine Yun
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Colleen Payton
- Thomas Jefferson University, 4201 Henry Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19144, USA; Moravian University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Janine Young
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Blain Mamo
- Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Malini DeSilva
- HealthPartners Institute, 8170 33rd Ave S, Bloomington, MN 55425, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wong J, Lao C, Dino G, Donyaei R, Lui R, Huynh J. Vaccine Hesitancy among Immigrants: A Narrative Review of Challenges, Opportunities, and Lessons Learned. Vaccines (Basel) 2024; 12:445. [PMID: 38793696 PMCID: PMC11126062 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12050445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Vaccination reluctance is a major worldwide public health concern as it poses threats of disease outbreaks and strains on healthcare systems. While some studies have examined vaccine uptake within specific countries, few provide an overview of the barriers and trends among migrant groups. To fill this knowledge gap, this narrative review analyzes immunization patterns and vaccine hesitancy among immigrant populations. (2) Methods: Four researchers independently evaluated the quality and bias risk of the 18 identified articles using validated critical appraisal tools. (3) Results: Most studies focused on vaccine hesitancy among migrants in the United States and Canada, with a higher COVID-19 vaccine reluctance than native-born residents. Contributing factors to this hesitancy include demographics, cultural views, obstacles to healthcare access, financial hardship, and distrust in health policies. Additionally, immigrants in North America and Europe face unfair vaccine challenges due to misinformation, safety concerns, personal perspectives, language barriers, immigration status, and restricted healthcare access. (4) Conclusions: Tailored vaccine education programs and outreach campaigns sensitive to immigrants' diversity should be developed to address this issue. It is also important to investigate community-specific obstacles and assess the long-term sustainability of current efforts to promote vaccination among marginalized migrant groups. Further research into global immunization disparities among immigrant populations is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Wong
- College of Pharmacy, Western University of Health Sciences, 309 E. Second St., Pomona, CA 91766, USA; (C.L.); (G.D.); (R.D.); (R.L.); (J.H.)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson ESJ, Howe E, Kenworthy LaMarca T, Natale R, Jent JF. Diverse Parents Decision-Making to Vaccinate Their Child under Five Attending Childcare Programs. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2299. [PMID: 38673572 PMCID: PMC11051460 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: On 18 June 2022, Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines were authorized under an Emergency Use Authorization by the United States Food and Drug Administration to prevent severe coronavirus disease in children six months to four years of age. Despite approval of the COVID-19 vaccinations for young children, there remain ongoing challenges reaching widespread coverage due to parental decision-making. Parental decision-making plays a pivotal, yet understudied, role governing vaccine adoption among this priority demographic. Methods: This cross-sectional analysis examined COVID-19 vaccine intentions for 320 predominately Hispanic parents of two to five-year-olds attending Miami-Dade County childcare programs in Florida USA, several months following the June 2022 emergency authorization. Parent's self-reported survey data encompassed vaccine choices and rationales, social determinants of health, and parent immigrant status. Data analyses illustrate the associations between parent decision-making and these variables. Regression modeling and tests of independence identified predicting factors for parental vaccine decision-making. Results: Only 25% of parents intended to vaccinate their young child, while 34% resisted and 41% felt unsure, despite 70% personal vaccination rates. Household income under $25,000, identifying as a migrant, or testing COVID-19-positive significantly predicted unsure decision-making. The majority of hesitant groups expressed concerns around side effects (20%), safety (2.9%), and sufficiency of vaccine knowledge (3.3%). Conclusions: In this sample, the predominance of parents were unsure and resistant rather than accepting of having their child vaccinated despite emergency approval of the pediatric vaccine. Associations and predictive factors are examined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Jason F. Jent
- Mailman Center for Child Development, Department of Pediatrics, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA (T.K.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shea S, Nguyen T, Kim DH, Gee GC, Wang MC, Umemoto K. Lessons Learned From TranslateCovid, a Multilingual Online Resource Hub for Asian American and Pacific Islander Communities and Beyond. Public Health Rep 2024:333549241236092. [PMID: 38584484 DOI: 10.1177/00333549241236092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/09/2024] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic exacerbated health disparities among immigrant communities. Delivering accurate information and addressing misinformation on protective measures and vaccination to linguistically disadvantaged groups was critical for mitigating the effects of the pandemic. One group that was especially vulnerable to miscommunication about COVID-19 was non-native English-speaking immigrants. To address these disparities, the Asian American Studies Center and the Fielding School of Public Health at the University of California, Los Angeles, partnered to create a multilingual resource hub, TranslateCovid.org, to disseminate credible and reliable information about COVID-19 safety measures, the science behind the vaccines, and vaccine safety. We identified >1300 verified resources in 60 languages from government, academic, and nonprofit organizations and reposted them on the TranslateCovid website. We also developed public service announcement videos on handwashing, use of face masks, and social distancing in 10 languages and a fact sheet for frequently asked questions in 20 languages. We used a participatory approach to develop strategies for disseminating these resources. We discuss lessons learned, including strategies for forming government, community, and academic partnerships to support the timely development and dissemination of information. We conclude with a discussion on the unique role of universities in promoting equitable access to public health resources among immigrant communities in times of crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheila Shea
- Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tom Nguyen
- Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daniel H Kim
- Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gilbert C Gee
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - May C Wang
- Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Karen Umemoto
- Asian American Studies Center, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
González-Salinas AI, Andrade EL, Abroms LC, Gómez K, Favetto C, Gómez VM, Collins KK. Latino Parents' Reactions to and Engagement With a Facebook Group-Based COVID-19 Vaccine Promotion Intervention: Mixed Methods Pilot Study. JMIR Form Res 2024; 8:e51331. [PMID: 38483457 PMCID: PMC10979334 DOI: 10.2196/51331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Misinformation in Spanish on social media platforms has contributed to COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Latino parents. Brigada Digital de Salud was established to disseminate credible, science-based information about COVID-19 in Spanish on social media. OBJECTIVE This study aims to assess participants' reactions to and engagement with Brigada Digital content that sought to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake among US Latino parents and their children. METHODS We conducted a 5-week intervention in a private, moderator-led Facebook (Meta Platforms, Inc) group with Spanish-speaking Latino parents of children aged ≤18 years (N=55). The intervention participants received 3 to 4 daily Brigada Digital posts and were encouraged to discuss the covered topics through comments and polls. To assess participants' exposure, reactions, and engagement, we used participants' responses to a web-based survey administered at 2 time points (baseline and after 5 weeks) and Facebook analytics to calculate the average number of participant views, reactions, and comments. Descriptive statistics were assessed for quantitative survey items, qualitative responses were thematically analyzed, and quotes were selected to illustrate the themes. RESULTS Overall, 101 posts were published. Most participants reported visiting the group 1 to 3 times (22/55, 40%) or 4 to 6 (18/55, 33%) times per week and viewing 1 to 2 (23/55, 42%) or 3 to 4 (16/55, 29%) posts per day. Facebook analytics validated this exposure, with 36 views per participant on average. The participants reacted positively to the intervention. Most participants found the content informative and trustworthy (49/55, 89%), easy to understand, and presented in an interesting manner. The participants thought that the moderators were well informed (51/55, 93%) and helpful (50/55, 91%) and praised them for being empathic and responsive. The participants viewed the group environment as welcoming and group members as friendly (45/55, 82%) and supportive (19/55, 35%). The 3 most useful topics for participants were the safety and efficacy of adult COVID-19 vaccines (29/55, 53%), understanding child risk levels (29/55, 53%), and the science behind COVID-19 (24/55, 44%). The preferred formats were educational posts that could be read (38/55, 69%) and videos, including expert (28/55, 51%) and instructional (26/55, 47%) interviews. Regarding engagement, most participants self-reported reacting to posts 1 to 2 (16/55, 29%) or 3 to 4 (15/55, 27%) times per week and commenting on posts 1 to 2 (16/55, 29%) or <1 (20/55, 36%) time per week. This engagement level was validated by analytics, with 10.6 reactions and 3 comments per participant, on average, during the 5 weeks. Participants recommended more opportunities for engagement, such as interacting with the moderators in real time. CONCLUSIONS With adequate intervention exposure and engagement and overall positive participant reactions, the findings highlight the promise of this digital approach for COVID-19 vaccine-related health promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Kaitlyn Gómez
- California State University, Fullerton, CA, United States
| | - Carla Favetto
- George Washington University, Washington, DC, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cénat JM, Moshirian Farahi SMM, Broussard C, Dalexis RD. The state of COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need in Black individuals in Canada: Understanding the role of sociodemographic factors, health literacy, conspiracy theories, traumatic stressors and racial discrimination. Vaccine 2024; 42:960-968. [PMID: 37891050 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.10.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Black communities in Canada have been among the most affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, in terms of number of infections and deaths. They are also among those most hesitant about vaccination against COVID-19. However, while a few studies have documented the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy, those related to vaccine confidence remain unknown. To respond to this gap, this study aims to investigate factors associated to vaccine confidence in Black individuals in Canada. METHODS A total of 2002 participants (1034 women) aged 14 to 89 years old (Mean age = 29.34, SD = 10.13) completed questionnaires assessing sociodemographic information, COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need, health literacy, conspiracy beliefs, major racial discrimination, and traumatic stressors related to COVID-19. RESULTS Results showed an average score of COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need of 33.27 (SD = 7.24), with no significant difference between men (33.48; SD = 7.24) and women (33.08; SD = 7.91), t (1999) = 1.19, p = 0.234. However, there were significant differences according to employment status, migration status, age, inhabited province, spoken language, education, marital status, religion, and income. The linear regression model explained 25.8 % of the variance and showed that health literacy (B = 0.12, p < 0.001) and traumatic stressors related to COVID-19 (B = 0.21, p < .001) predicted COVID-19 vaccine confidence and need positively, while conspiracy beliefs (B = -1.14, p < 0.001) and major racial discrimination (B = -0.20, p = 0.044) predicted it negatively. CONCLUSIONS This study showed that building the confidence of Black communities in vaccines requires health education, elimination of racial discrimination in the Canadian society and a focus on certain groups (e.g., young people, those living in Quebec and Ontario). The results also argue in favor of involving community leaders and organizations in the development and implementation of vaccination-related tools, strategies and programs by city, provincial and federal public health agencies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jude Mary Cénat
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Interdisciplinary Centre for Black Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; University of Ottawa Research Chair on Black Health, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Cathy Broussard
- School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rose Darly Dalexis
- Interdisciplinary School of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Martin MA, Cook S, Spring B, Echeverria Garcia JC, Moskowitz D, Delaughter-Young J, Silva A, Hartstein M, De Pablo M, Peek M, Lynch E, Battalio S, Vu M. Delivering COVID-19 Vaccine via Trusted Social Services: Program Evaluation Results from the Chicagoland CEAL Program. J Community Health 2024; 49:61-69. [PMID: 37438456 PMCID: PMC10996394 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-023-01242-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
To describe the reach, implementation, and sustainability of COVID-19 vaccination programs delivered by social service community organizations. Five academic institutions in the Chicagoland CEAL (Community Engagement Alliance) program partnered with 17 community organizations from September 2021-April 2022. Interviews, community organizations program implementation tracking documents, and health department vaccination data were used to conduct the evaluation. A total of 269 events were held and 5,432 COVID-19 vaccines delivered from May 2021-April 2022. Strategies that worked best included offering vaccinations in community settings with flexible and reliable hours; pairing vaccinations with ongoing social services; giving community organizations flexibility to adjust programs; offering incentives; and vaccinating staff first. These strategies and partnership structures supported vaccine uptake, community organization alignment with their missions and communities' needs, and trust. Community organizations delivering social services are local community experts and trusted messengers. Pairing social service delivery with COVID-19 vaccination built individual and community agency. Giving COs creative control over program implementation enhanced trust and vaccine delivery. When given appropriate resources and control, community organizations can quickly deliver urgently needed health services in a public health crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara Cook
- University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Milkie Vu
- Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Artna E, Abi-Jaoudé A, Sockalingam S, Perry C, Johnson A, Wun C, Kozloff N, Henderson J, Levinson A, Buchman DZ. Understanding attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccines among transitional-aged youth with mental health concerns: a youth-led qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e080707. [PMID: 38238177 PMCID: PMC10806589 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transitional-aged youth (16-29 years) with mental health concerns have experienced a disproportionate burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination is limited in this population; however, determinants of its vaccine hesitancy are not yet thoroughly characterised. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to answer the following research question: What are the beliefs and attitudes of youth with mental illness about COVID-19 vaccines, and how do these perspectives affect vaccine acceptance? The study aims to generate findings to inform the development of vaccine resources specific to youth with mental health concerns. METHODS A qualitative methodology with a youth engagement focus was used to conduct in-depth semistructured interviews with transitional-aged youth aged 16-29 years with one or more self-reported mental health diagnoses or concerns. Mental health concerns encompassed a wide range of symptoms and diagnoses, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders and personality disorders. Participants were recruited from seven main mental health clinical and support networks across Canada. Transcripts from 46 youth and 6 family member interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Two major themes were generated: (1) factors affecting trust in COVID-19 vaccines and (2) mental health influences and safety considerations in vaccine decision-making. Subthemes included trust in vaccines, trust in healthcare providers, trust in government and mistreatment towards racialised populations, and direct and indirect influences of mental health. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis suggests how lived experiences of mental illness affected vaccine decision-making and related factors that can be targeted to increase vaccine uptake. Our findings provide new insights into vaccine attitudes among youth with mental health concerns, which is highly relevant to ongoing vaccination efforts for new COVID-19 strains as well as other transmissible diseases and future pandemics. Next steps include cocreating youth-specific public health and clinical resources to encourage vaccination in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Artna
- University of Toronto Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexxa Abi-Jaoudé
- Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sanjeev Sockalingam
- Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Perry
- Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Johnson
- Department of Education, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Charlotte Wun
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicole Kozloff
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Slaight Family Centre for Youth in Transition, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jo Henderson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Margaret and Wallace McCain Centre for Child, Youth and Family Mental Health, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Levinson
- Health & Wellness Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel Z Buchman
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, and Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Krembil Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sharp M, Lozano P, Southworth A, Peters A, Lam H, Randal FT, Quinn M, Kim KE. Mixed methods approach to understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among immigrants in the Chicago. Vaccine 2024:S0264-410X(23)01508-6. [PMID: 38199924 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.12.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been particularly high among immigrant populations, whose experience is shaped by a history of racism and discriminations, and distrust of the healthcare system. In this study we draw from the Theory of Planned Behavior to examine COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among immigrants in Chicago. METHODS A mixed-methods approach comprising of both focus groups and a health survey was conducted from February to August 2022. Five focus groups were held (N = 35) among Black, Asian and Arab/Palestine participants to understand attitudes and beliefs around the COVID-19 vaccine. Focus groups were analyzed using a modified template approach to text analysis. Based on these findings and themes, we developed a survey that was conducted among 413 immigrants from the mentioned communities. We used hierarchical ordinal regression analyses to examine the relationship between COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and vaccination status. RESULTS Qualitative analysis suggest that the major factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy included fear of adverse reactions, misinformation around COVID-19 and the vaccine, negative social norms around vaccination, and external pressure to get vaccinated. From our quantitative analysis we found that 24% of participants were unvaccinated, 5% were partially vaccinated, 32.3% were vaccinated but not boosted, and 39% were vaccinated and boosted for COVID-19. Hierarchical regression models suggest that immigrants who hold negative attitudes and social norms around the COVID-19 vaccine are less likely to vaccinate. CONCLUSIONS Understanding vaccine hesitancy among immigrants allows for the creation of culturally and linguistically tailored education that can be utilized to increase vaccine confidence and uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paula Lozano
- University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Aven Peters
- University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Helen Lam
- University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity, Chicago, IL, United States
| | | | - Michael Quinn
- University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Karen E Kim
- University of Chicago Center for Asian Health Equity, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ghebrendrias S, Mody S, Washington S, Hussein B, Jama F, Jacobs M. A Cervical Cancer Screening Toolkit for Somali Women: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. J Immigr Minor Health 2023; 25:1307-1314. [PMID: 37071376 PMCID: PMC10111298 DOI: 10.1007/s10903-023-01455-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
This study aims to determine whether a novel cervical cancer screening toolkit will increase rates of pap test completion and HPV vaccination among Somali women living in the United States. We conducted a randomized controlled, pilot trial from June 2021 to February 2022. Somali women aged 21 to 70 were randomized to either receive a toolkit (infographic, video and an in-person health seminar) or not. Health passports confirming a completed pap test and/or HPV vaccination by clinician signature were used to measure outcomes. The primary outcome was pap test completion and the secondary outcome was HPV vaccination. We enrolled 57 participants. Patients randomized to the treatment arm were significantly more likely to have had a pap test (53.7% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.0001) and were also more likely to have received the HPV vaccine (10.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.6110). This toolkit increased rates of pap test completion and more participants in the intervention arm received HPV vaccination, though numbers were low. The study design may serve as a reproducible model to determine the effectiveness of patient education materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Selemawit Ghebrendrias
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, M:9300 Campus Point Drive, MC 7433, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92037 USA
| | - Sheila Mody
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, M:9300 Campus Point Drive, MC 7433, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92037 USA
| | - Sierra Washington
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stony Brook University School of Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, HSC T9 Room 090, Stony Brook, NY 11794-8091 USA
| | - Balquiso Hussein
- Somali Family Service, Community Health Worker, 5348 University Ave Unit 203, San Diego, CA 92105 USA
| | - Fadumo Jama
- Somali Family Service, Community Health Worker, 5348 University Ave Unit 203, San Diego, CA 92105 USA
| | - Marni Jacobs
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, M:9300 Campus Point Drive, MC 7433, La Jolla, San Diego, CA 92037 USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Rossi MM, Parisi MA, Cartmell KB, McFall D. Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the Hispanic adult population of South Carolina: a complex mixed-method design evaluation study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2359. [PMID: 38017470 PMCID: PMC10685550 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16771-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In August 2021, only 47.6% of all eligible residents in South Carolina (SC) had received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, with only 41% having completed their vaccination series. Additionally, only 27% of all Hispanics in SC had completed their vaccination series compared to 34.1% of non-Hispanics. Vaccine hesitancy is a complex phenomenon that is context and vaccine-specific. Focusing on unvaccinated Hispanics living in rural areas of SC, this study aimed to identify barriers to vaccination and provide an educational intervention designed to address vaccine hesitancy. METHODS A complex mixed-methods evaluation design was used to conduct this study. First, in-person vaccine educational sessions were implemented, along with a pre-post-test survey, to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, motivations, barriers, and intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination. Second, in-person follow-up focus groups were held with the same participants to gather in-depth insight about participants' knowledge and attitudes about the COVID-19 vaccination. Third, an online follow-up survey was conducted to assess the effect of the training and discussion session on COVID-19 vaccination. Study outcomes were assessed among the 17 individuals who participated in the educational sessions and focus group discussions. RESULTS Findings revealed that for unvaccinated Hispanics living in South Carolina; vaccine hesitancy was primarily driven by: 1) misinformation and information coming from unverified sources and 2) negative perceptions of the safety and effectiveness of the COVID-19 vaccines. Specifically, participants were fearful that the vaccine development was rushed and that the vaccines might contain questionable ingredients that could cause strong side effects or even death. Participants were also concerned that vaccination might cause them to get sick and be hospitalized, which would have financial implications since they could not afford healthcare or take time off work. CONCLUSIONS Program implementation and mass communication campaigns should focus on COVID-19 vaccine safety and effectiveness, including side effects, what to expect after being vaccinated, and how to look for information from reputable sources. The educational session implemented proved to be effective and helped reduce vaccine hesitancy since most participants (80%) self-reported receiving a COVID-19 vaccine after program participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Mercedes Rossi
- Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Sciences, C228 Pool Agricultural Center, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, 29631, USA.
| | - Michelle A Parisi
- Department Nutritional Sciences, University of Georgia, 206 Hoke Smith Annex, Athens, GA, 30602, USA
| | - Kathleen B Cartmell
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 534 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
| | - Danielle McFall
- Rural Health and Nutrition Program Team, Clemson University, 120 Lehotsky Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Schagen CRV, Andrade EL, Chandarana S, Lu N, González A, Favetto C, Gomez V, Palacios C, Díaz-Ramírez M, Edberg MC. Assessing Changes in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake and Intentions among the Brigada Digital Latino Social Media Audience: A Repeated Cross-Sectional Study. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3611896. [PMID: 38045354 PMCID: PMC10690320 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3611896/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND U.S. Latinos experienced disproportionate COVID-19 impacts in terms of morbidity and mortality. Vaccination against COVID-19 is an important strategy for mitigating health impacts, and yet, vaccine uptake was slower among U.S. Latino adults compared to other racial/ethnic groups. Vaccine hesitancy has been a significant barrier within Latino communities, and exposure to misinformation has been associated with negative attitudes toward vaccination. While some COVID-19 mitigation efforts have included community-based outreach, few studies have explored the impact of community-based digital messaging in Spanish to counter COVID-19 misinformation, build trust, and promote vaccination. METHODS To address this gap, we conducted a one-year repeated cross-sectional study to assess changes in COVID-19 vaccine uptake, intentions, and perceived norms, as well as barriers to accessing reliable information and levels of trust in COVID-19 information sources among Latino adults exposed to Brigada Digital de Salud social media content. This culturally-tailored content disseminated on Facebook, Instagram, and X platforms was amplified by community health workers and partners, and focused on COVID-19 risk and prevention, vaccine safety and efficacy, and correcting related misinformation. RESULTS Statistically significant increases in COVID-19 vaccination, intentions to vaccinate children, and vaccination subjective norms were observed from May 2022 (wave 1) to April 2023 (wave 2). Among perceived difficulties accessing information, respondents indicated the most difficulty in judging the reliability of COVID-19 information in the media; however, a statistically significant decrease in perceived difficulty was observed between waves. With regard to trust in COVID-19 information sources, levels of trust were highest for healthcare providers in both waves. From wave 1 to wave 2, there were statistically significant increases in trust in the FDA to ensure COVID-19 vaccine safety and trust in the federal government to ensure child COVID-19 vaccine safety. CONCLUSIONS Social media messaging by trusted community-based sources shows promise as a strategy for combating health misinformation and ameliorating information access gaps for language minority populations. This digital approach represents an important tool for deploying critical information to underserved populations in public health emergency and crisis contexts, and for supporting changes in attitudes, trust, and behaviors to improve health outcomes.
Collapse
|
16
|
Sanchez M, Martel I, Cox E, Crary I, Baxter C, Every E, Munson J, Stapley S, Stonehill A, Adams Waldorf KM. Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake among Spanish-Speaking Pregnant People. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1726. [PMID: 38006058 PMCID: PMC10674421 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exposed the vulnerability of pregnant women to excess morbidity and mortality, as well as the disproportionate disease burden in certain racial, ethnic, and sociodemographic groups. Vaccine hesitancy represents a major threat to public health, and crafting messages that reach vulnerable groups and address their intersectionality remains a weakness for pandemic preparedness. We sought to investigate factors that influenced vaccine acceptance and social media ad response in a mixed-methods study of Spanish-speaking women living in the rural Western United States who were pregnant or recently pregnant between November 2022 and June 2023. Direct interviews were translated, transcribed, and coded, while the ad ratings were analyzed using linear mixed models. Participants most favorably rated ads that featured doctors and text-heavy content describing benefits of vaccination. Qualitative data illustrated how information from trusted medical providers along with generational and cultural history of vaccine acceptance positively impacted perspectives on vaccination. Immigration status had varying influences on vaccination perspectives. Future vaccination campaigns targeting Spanish-speaking pregnant individuals in rural communities should use medical providers as ad messengers and dispel fears that vaccine acceptance may lead to problems with immigration status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magali Sanchez
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Iveliz Martel
- Department of Drama, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA;
| | - Elizabeth Cox
- Department of Health Systems and Population Health, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Isabelle Crary
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Carly Baxter
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Emma Every
- School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jeff Munson
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Simone Stapley
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Alex Stonehill
- Department of Communication, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Kristina M. Adams Waldorf
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Neighbors CE, Faldowski RA, Pieper CF, Taylor J, Gaines M, Sloane R, Wixted D, Woods CW, Newby LK. Factors Associated with COVID-19 Vaccination Promptness after Eligibility in a North Carolina Longitudinal Cohort Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1639. [PMID: 38005971 PMCID: PMC10674190 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11111639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Many studies identified factors associated with vaccination intention and hesitancy, but factors associated with vaccination promptness and the effect of vaccination intention on vaccination promptness are unknown. This study identified factors associated with COVID-19 vaccination promptness and evaluated the role of vaccination intention on vaccination promptness in 1223 participants in a community-based longitudinal cohort study (June 2020 to December 2021). Participants answered questions regarding COVID-19 vaccination intention, vaccination status, and reasons for not receiving a vaccine. The association of baseline vaccine hesitancy with vaccination was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Follow-up analyses tested the importance of other variables predicting vaccination using the Cox proportional hazards model. Older age was associated with shorter time to vaccination (HR = 1.76 [1.37-2.25] 85-year-old versus 65-year-old). Lower education levels (HR = 0.80 [0.69-0.92]), household incomes (HR = 0.84 [0.72-0.98]), and baseline vaccination intention of 'No' (HR = 0.16 [0.11-0.23]) were associated with longer times to vaccination. The most common reasons for not being vaccinated (N = 58) were vaccine safety concerns (n = 33), side effects (n = 28), and vaccine effectiveness (n = 25). Vaccination campaigns that target populations prone to hesitancy and address vaccine safety and effectiveness could be helpful in future vaccination rollouts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coralei E. Neighbors
- Department of Population Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Richard A. Faldowski
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Carl F. Pieper
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Joshua Taylor
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA (L.K.N.)
| | - Megan Gaines
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA (L.K.N.)
| | - Richard Sloane
- Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Douglas Wixted
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA (L.K.N.)
| | - Christopher W. Woods
- Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - L. Kristin Newby
- Duke Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA (L.K.N.)
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC 27701, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Poghosyan H, Dinan MA, Tamamyan G, Nelson L, Jeon S. Racial and Ethnic Variation in COVID-19 Vaccination Uptake Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Cancer History. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:2354-2362. [PMID: 36149576 PMCID: PMC9510246 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01415-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 09/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to estimate COVID-19 vaccination rate among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer history and determine whether COVID-19 vaccine uptake is higher among non-Hispanic White beneficiaries compared with racially and ethnically minoritized beneficiaries. METHODS We used US representative, cross-sectional data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey COVID-19 Winter 2021 Rapid Response Community Supplement Survey. A total of 1,863 respondents with self-reported cancer history (other than skin cancer) were included. The outcome was self-reported receipt of at least one coronavirus vaccine dose since vaccines became available. The key independent variable of interest was self-reported race and ethnicity. We applied sample weights to account for the survey design and provide population estimates to 9.6 million beneficiaries with cancer history. Weighted descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS During the first 4 months of vaccine availability, 69.6% of beneficiaries received at least one vaccine dose of which 65.4% had two vaccine doses. A larger proportion of non-Hispanic White beneficiaries (71.9%) had at least one vaccine dose compared with non-Hispanic Black (60.4%) and Hispanic (57.4%) beneficiaries. An estimated 30.4% of beneficiaries were still unvaccinated, that represents approximately 2.9 million unvaccinated beneficiaries with cancer history. Hispanic beneficiaries were 42% (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.33-0.99; p = .048) less likely to be vaccinated compared with non-Hispanic White beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS Results indicate racial and ethnic differences in vaccine uptake among Medicare beneficiaries with cancer history. Effective strategies are needed to help increase vaccine confidence and uptake among adults with cancer history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermine Poghosyan
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA
- Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale Cancer Center and Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Michaela A. Dinan
- Yale School of Public Health, Co-Leader of the Cancer Prevention and Control Research Program, Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Gevorg Tamamyan
- Institute of Cancer and Crisis, Yerevan, Armenia
- Pediatric Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Armenia, Hematology Center After Prof. R.H. Yeolyan, Yerevan, Armenia
- Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
- Immune Oncology Research Institute, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - LaRon Nelson
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA
- Global Affairs & Planetary Health Independence Foundation, Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA
| | - Sangchoon Jeon
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chatterjee K, Markham Shaw C, Brannon GE, Jang CY, Christie TB, Rodriguez J, Sinta V. COVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancies: A Spanish-Language Focus Group Analysis in Texas. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2023:1-12. [PMID: 37712138 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2023.2258310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
COVID-19 related health disparities are prevalent among higher risk populations like the Hispanic community. Vaccination is one readily available public health tool, yet vaccine uptake is lower among minority populations and hesitations and concerns are high. In the present study, interpersonal and media sources of information about COVID-19 were discussed in a series of six focus groups with Spanish-language dominant and bilingual English-Spanish respondents in a large metropolitan area in Texas. Participants reported using legacy media as a main source of information about COVID-19 vaccines and encountered conspiracy theories and misinformation on social media. Using the Health Belief Model as the theoretical lens, we found individuals' and family members' perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 played a part in participants wanting to find and get the vaccine. Provider recommendations may have served as cues to action. Ease of receiving the vaccines at church and pharmacies may have served to boost participants self-efficacy. Perceived barriers include vaccine specific reasons such as the fast pace of initial authorization, side effects, and long-term effects along with conspiracy theories. Prevailing information gaps regarding the COVID-19 vaccines and the resulting uncertainty are discussed. Understanding information sources and the trust Hispanic communities place in these sources is important in designing effective health messages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Chyng-Yang Jang
- Department of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington
| | | | | | - Vinicio Sinta
- Department of Communication, University of Texas at Arlington
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lohr AM, Neumbo KC, Njeru JW, Molina L, Hasley R, Ahmed Y, Quirindongo-Cedeno O, Torres-Herbeck GA, Goodson ML, Osman A, Weis JA, Wieland ML, Sia IG. Addressing COVID-19 inequities using bidirectional crisis and emergency risk communication and vaccine clinic interventions: a descriptive study. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:1517. [PMID: 37558981 PMCID: PMC10413496 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-16410-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Im/migrants (immigrants and migrants, including refugees, asylum seekers, and individuals without legal documentation) experience unique assets and needs in relation to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is one way to engage im/migrant communities. Rochester Healthy Community Partnership (RHCP) is a CBPR partnership in Rochester, Minnesota. RHCP partners noted that credible COVID-19 information was not available to their communities. In response, RHCP formed a COVID-19 Task Force and adapted the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication (CERC) framework to create an intervention that prioritized im/migrant groups experiencing health disparities. In the CERC intervention, communication leaders delivered COVID-19 health messages to their social networks and documented related concerns. RHCP relayed these concerns to regional leaders to ensure that im/migrant experiences were included in decision making. Once vaccines were available, RHCP continued to deploy the CERC intervention to promote vaccination equity. The aims of this paper are to (1) describe the implementation of a bidirectional CERC intervention for vaccination equity, and (2) describe a community-engaged and community-based vaccine clinic intervention. METHODS First, we surveyed participants (n = 37) to assess COVID-19 experiences, acceptability of the CERC intervention, and motivation to receive a COVID-19 vaccination. Second, we collaborated with community partners to hold vaccine clinics. We report descriptive statistics from each intervention. RESULTS When asked about the acceptability of the CERC intervention for vaccine equity, most participants either reported that they 'really liked it' or 'thought it was just ok'. Most participants stated that they would recommend the program to family or friends who have not yet received the COVID-19 vaccine. Almost all participants reported that they felt 'much more' or 'somewhat more' motivated to receive a COVID-19 vaccine after the intervention. We administered 1158 vaccines at the vaccination clinics. CONCLUSIONS We found that participants viewed the CERC intervention for vaccination equity as an acceptable way to disseminate COVID-19-related information. Nearly all participants reported that the intervention convinced them to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. In our experience, community-engaged and community-based clinics are a successful way to administer vaccines to im/migrant communities during a pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abby M Lohr
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA.
| | | | - Jane W Njeru
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Luz Molina
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Community Based Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | | | - Yahye Ahmed
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Community Based Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Onelis Quirindongo-Cedeno
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Gloria A Torres-Herbeck
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Community Based Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Alliance of Chicanos, Hispanics, and Latin Americans, Rochester, USA
| | - Miriam L Goodson
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Community Based Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
- Alliance of Chicanos, Hispanics, and Latin Americans, Rochester, USA
| | - Ahmed Osman
- Intercultural Mutual Assistance Association, Rochester, USA
| | - Jenny A Weis
- Research Administrative Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Mark L Wieland
- Division of Community Internal Medicine, Geriatrics, and Palliative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| | - Irene G Sia
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kaliba AR, Andrews DR. The Impact of Meso-Level Factors on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Early Hesitancy in the United States. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6313. [PMID: 37444159 PMCID: PMC10341526 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20136313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
The extant literature on the U.S. SARS-CoV-2 virus indicates that the vaccination campaign was lagging, insufficient, and uncoordinated. This study uses the spatial model to identify the drivers of vaccine hesitancy (in the middle of the pandemic), one of the critical steps in creating impactful and effective interventions to influence behavioral changes now and in the future. The applied technique accounted for observed and unobserved homogeneity and heterogeneity among counties. The results indicated that political and religious beliefs, quantified by Cook's political bipartisan index and the percentage of the population affiliated with the main Christian groups, were the main drivers of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy. The past vaccination experience and other variables determining the demand and supply of vaccines were also crucial in influencing hesitancy. The results imply that vaccination campaigns require engaging community leaders at all levels rather than depending on politicians alone and eliminating barriers to the supply and demand of vaccines at all levels. Coordination among religious and community leaders would build a practical institutional arrangement to facilitate (rather than frustrate) the vaccination drives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aloyce R. Kaliba
- College of Business, Southern University and A&M, Baton Rouge, LA 70813, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chipman SA, Meagher K, Barwise AK. A Public Health Ethics Framework for Populations with Limited English Proficiency. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2023:1-16. [PMID: 37379053 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2224263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
25.6 Million people in the United States have Limited English Proficiency (LEP), defined as insufficient ability to read, write, or understand English. We will (1) Delineate the merits of approaching language as a social determinant of health, (2) highlight pertinent public health values and guidelines which are most relevant to the plight of populations with LEP and (3) Use the COVID-19 pandemic as an example of how a breakdown in public health ethics values created harm for populations and patients with LEP. We define a framework to tease out public health responsibilities given some populations' limited proficiency in a society's predominant language. The American Public Health Association (APHA) public health ethics core values serve as a framework to interrogate current practices. We use the COVID-19 case to illustrate gaps between health policy and healthcare disparities experienced by populations with LEP.
Collapse
|
23
|
Demeke J, Ramos SR, McFadden SM, Dada D, Nguemo Djiometio J, Vlahov D, Wilton L, Wang M, Nelson LE. Strategies That Promote Equity in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake for Latinx Communities: a Review. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:1349-1357. [PMID: 35524004 PMCID: PMC9075141 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01320-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Latinx people in the USA have had a high burden of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and death, yet rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Latinx individuals were lower than other demographic groups. Effective strategies to promote vaccine uptake among Latinx communities are needed. We conducted a rapid review of information available between December 2020 and August 2021. Our search strategy used PUBMED, Google, and print media with a prescribed set of definitions and search terms for two reasons: there were limited peer-reviewed studies during early period of roll-out and real-time perspectives were crucially needed. Analyses included expert opinion, descriptions of project implementation and outcomes. We found that approaches varied. An integral component with all interventions was the use of local Latinx community leaders. They could understand the nuances of vaccine hesitancy, access issues, and structural inequities experienced by Latinx communities. The mechanisms for messaging included the use of social media, radio, and promotora outreach workers to disseminate information about COVID-19 vaccines and counter misinformation. Phone hotlines for scheduling were reported. Promoting access involved pop-up clinics at shopping malls, farmer's markets, and nearby grocery stores which were popularly used to vaccinate Latinx community members. Other practices included limited registration requirements, avoiding online-only communication, and training staff to provide specialized support to Latinx clients. This rapid review provides a basis for developing strategic implementation to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this ongoing pandemic and planning to promote health equity for future bio-events and health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemal Demeke
- St Michael's Hospital, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Debbie Dada
- St Michael's Hospital, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Yale College, New Haven, CT, USA
| | | | - David Vlahov
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, USA
- School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Leo Wilton
- State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA
- Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mengzu Wang
- Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC"), Reston, VA, USA
| | - LaRon E Nelson
- St Michael's Hospital, MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vernon-Wilson E, Tetui M, Nanyonjo A, Adil M, Bala A, Nelson D, Sayers E, Waite N, Grindrod K. Unintended consequences of communicating rapid COVID-19 vaccine policy changes- a qualitative study of health policy communication in Ontario, Canada. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:932. [PMID: 37221519 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15861-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The success of the COVID-19 vaccination roll-out depended on clear policy communication and guidance to promote and facilitate vaccine uptake. The rapidly evolving pandemic circumstances led to many vaccine policy amendments. The impact of changing policy on effective vaccine communication and its influence in terms of societal response to vaccine promotion are underexplored; this qualitative research addresses that gap within the extant literature. METHODS Policy communicators and community leaders from urban and rural Ontario participated in semi-structured interviews (N = 29) to explore their experiences of COVID-19 vaccine policy communication. Thematic analysis was used to produce representative themes. RESULTS Analysis showed rapidly changing policy was a barrier to smooth communication and COVID-19 vaccine roll-out. Continual amendments had unintended consequences, stimulating confusion, disrupting community outreach efforts and interrupting vaccine implementation. Policy changes were most disruptive to logistical planning and community engagement work, including community outreach, communicating eligibility criteria, and providing translated vaccine information to diverse communities. CONCLUSIONS Vaccine policy changes that allow for prioritized access can have the unintended consequence of limiting communities' access to information that supports decision making. Rapidly evolving circumstances require a balance between adjusting policy and maintaining simple, consistent public health messages that can readily be translated into action. Information access is a factor in health inequality that needs addressing alongside access to vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Vernon-Wilson
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada.
| | - Moses Tetui
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Agnes Nanyonjo
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Maisha Adil
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada
| | - Arthi Bala
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada
| | - David Nelson
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Emma Sayers
- Lincoln International Institute for Rural Health, University of Lincoln, Brayford Pool, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, Lincolnshire, UK
| | - Nancy Waite
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada
| | - Kelly Grindrod
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, N2L3G1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Holdbrook LE, Hassan N, Clarke SK, Coakley A, Norrie E, Yemane M, Youssef MR, Sahilie A, Antonio M, Cerino ER, Pendharkar SR, Lake D, Spitzer DL, Pottie K, Edwards ST, Fabreau GE. Vaccines For All: a formative evaluation of a multistakeholder community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic for migrant communities. J Migr Health 2023; 7:100188. [PMID: 37007284 PMCID: PMC10040088 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Racialized, low-income, and migrant populations experience persistent barriers to vaccines against COVID-19. These communities in East and Northeast Calgary were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19, yet faced vaccine access barriers. Diverse multi-stakeholder coalitions and community partnerships can improve vaccine outreach strategies, but how stakeholders perceive these models is unknown. Methods We conducted a formative evaluation of a low-barrier, community-engaged vaccine outreach clinic in Calgary, Alberta, Canada, on June 5-6, 2021. We delivered an online post-clinic survey to clinic stakeholders, to assess whether the clinic achieved its collectively derived pre-specified goals (effective, efficient, patient-centered, and safe), was scalable, and to solicit improvement recommendations. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Overall, 166/195 (85%) stakeholders responded. The majority were from non-healthcare positions (59%), between 30-49 years of age (87/136; 64%), and self-identified as racialized individuals (96/136; 71%). Respondents felt the clinic was effective (99.2%), efficient (96.9%), patient-centered (92.3%), and safe (90.8%), and that the outreach model was scalable 94.6% (123/130). There were no differences across stakeholder categories. The open-ended survey responses supported the scale responses. Improvement suggestions describe increased time for clinic planning and promotion, more multilingual staff, and further efforts to reduce accessibility barriers, such as priority check-in for people with disabilities. Conclusion Diverse stakeholders almost universally felt a community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine outreach clinic achieved its goals and was scalable. These findings support the value of community-engaged outreach to improve vaccine equity among other marginalized newcomer communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda E. Holdbrook
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Nour Hassan
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | | | - Annalee Coakley
- Mosaic Refugee Health Clinic, Canada
- Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Eric Norrie
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Mussie Yemane
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Michael R. Youssef
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Adanech Sahilie
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Minnella Antonio
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Edna Ramirez Cerino
- Department of Medicine, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Sachin R. Pendharkar
- Department of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, CSM, University of Calgary, Canada
| | - Deidre Lake
- Alberta International Medical Graduates Association (AIMGA), Canada
| | | | - Kevin Pottie
- Departments of Family Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, ON, Canada
- Institute du Saviour Montfort, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Samuel T. Edwards
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, United States
- Department of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University
| | - Gabriel E. Fabreau
- Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, AB, Canada
- Corresponding author at: TRW Building, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Frietze GA, Mancera BM, Kenney MJ. COVID-19 Testing, Vaccine Perceptions, and Trust among Hispanics Residing in an Underserved Community. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:5076. [PMID: 36981984 PMCID: PMC10049437 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20065076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
The Borderplex region has been profoundly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Borderplex residents live in low socioeconomic (SES) neighborhoods and lack access to COVID-19 testing. The purpose of this study was two-fold: first, to implement a COVID-19 testing program in the Borderplex region to increase the number of residents tested for COVID-19, and second, to administer a community survey to identify trusted sources of COVID-19 information and factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake. A total of 4071 community members were tested for COVID-19, and 502 participants completed the survey. COVID-19 testing resulted in 66.8% (n = 2718) positive cases. The community survey revealed that the most trusted sources of COVID-19 information were doctors or health care providers (67.7%), government websites (e.g., CDC, FDA, etc.) (41.8%), and the World Health Organization (37.8%). Logistic regression models revealed several statistically significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake such as having a trusted doctor or health care provider, perceiving the COVID-19 vaccine to be effective, and perceiving that the COVID-19 vaccine does not cause side-effects. Findings from the current study highlight the need for utilizing an integrated, multifactorial approach to increase COVID-19 testing and to identify factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in underserved communities.
Collapse
|
27
|
Tjilos M, Tamlyn AL, Ragan EJ, Assoumou SA, Barnett KG, Martin P, Perkins RB, Linas BP, Drainoni ML. "Community members have more impact on their neighbors than celebrities": leveraging community partnerships to build COVID-19 vaccine confidence. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:350. [PMID: 36797724 PMCID: PMC9933023 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15198-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccines are a strong public health tool to protect against severe disease, hospitalization, and death from COVID-19. Still, inequities in COVID-19 vaccination rates and health outcomes continue to exist among Black and Latino populations. Boston Medical Center (BMC) has played a significant role in vaccinating medically underserved populations, and organized a series of community-engaged conversations to better understand community concerns regarding the COVID-19 vaccine. This paper describes the themes which resulted from these community-engaged conversations and proposes next steps for healthcare leaders. METHODS We accessed nine publicly available recordings of the community-engaged conversations which were held between March 2021 and September 2021 and ranged from 8 to 122 attendees. Six conversations prioritized specific groups: the Haitian-Creole community, the Cape Verdean community, the Latino community, the Black Christian Faith community, guardians who care for children living with disabilities, and individuals affected by systemic lupus erythematosus. Remaining conversations targeted the general public of the Greater Boston Area. We employed a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research-driven codebook to code our data. Our analysis utilized a modified version of qualitative rapid analysis methods. RESULTS Five main themes emerged from these community-engaged conversations: (1) Structural factors are important barriers to COVID-19 vaccination; (2) Mistrust exists due to the negative impact of systemic oppression and perceived motivation of the government; (3) There is a desire to learn more about biological and clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 vaccine as well as the practical implications of being vaccinated; (4) Community leaders emphasize community engagement for delivering COVID-19 information and education and; (5) Community leaders believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is a solution to address the pandemic. CONCLUSION This study illustrates a need for community-engaged COVID-19 vaccine messaging which reflects the nuances of the COVID-19 vaccine and pandemic without oversimplifying information. In highlighting common concerns of the Greater Boston Area which contribute to a lack of confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine, we underscore important considerations for public health and healthcare leadership in the development of initiatives which work to advance health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Tjilos
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Autumn L. Tamlyn
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Elizabeth J. Ragan
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Sabrina A. Assoumou
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 E Concord St, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Katherine Gergen Barnett
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 1 Boston Medical Center Place, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, MA 02118 Boston, United States
- Harvard Center for Primary Care, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, MA 02115 Boston, US
| | - Petrina Martin
- Boston Medical Center, Boston Medical Center Health System, 85 East Concord Street, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Rebecca B. Perkins
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston University Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, 72 E Concord St, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston Medical Center, 775 Albany St, MA 02118 Boston, US
| | - Benjamin P. Linas
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston Medical Center, 801 Massachusetts Ave. Crosstown Center, 2nd Floor, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 E Concord St, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, 02118 Boston, MA US
| | - Mari-Lynn Drainoni
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University Chobanian & Edward Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, 72 E Concord St, 02118 Boston, MA US
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany St, MA 02118 Boston, US
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Understanding COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in People Living with HIV: A pan-Canadian Survey. AIDS Behav 2023:10.1007/s10461-023-03991-8. [PMID: 36738344 PMCID: PMC9898854 DOI: 10.1007/s10461-023-03991-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the roots of Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in at-risk groups, such as persons living with HIV (PLWH), is of utmost importance. We developed a modified Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) questionnaire using items from the National Advisory Committee on Immunization Acceptability Matrix. To examine factors associated with receiving COVID-19 vaccine and the link between vaccine attitudes and beliefs with vaccine behavior, PLWH were recruited via social media and community-based organizations (February-May 2022). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize results. Total VHS score was generated by adding Likert scale scores and linear regression models used to compare results between participants who received or did not receive COVID-19 vaccines. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with vaccine uptake. A total of 246 PLWH indicated whether they received a COVID-19 vaccine. 89% received ≥ 1 dose. Mean total VHS(SD) for persons having received ≥ 1 COVID-19 vaccine was 17.8(6.2) vs. 35.4(9.4) for participants not having received any COVID-19 vaccine. Persons who received ≥ 1 dose were significantly older than those who had not received any (48.4 ± 13.8 vs. 34.0 ± 7.7 years, p < 0.0001). The majority of participants considered COVID-19 vaccination important for their health(81.3%) and the health of others(84.4%). Multivariate logistic regression revealed the odds of taking ≥ 1dose were increased 2.4-fold [95% CI 1.6, 3.5] with each increase in age of 10 years (p < 0.0001). Sex and ethnicity were not different between groups. In conclusion, PLWH accept COVID-19 vaccines for both altruistic and individual reasons. With evolving recommendations and increasing numbers of booster vaccines, we must re-examine the needs of PLWH regularly.
Collapse
|
29
|
Crawshaw AF, Hickey C, Lutumba LM, Kitoko LM, Nkembi S, Knights F, Ciftci Y, Goldsmith LP, Vandrevala T, Forster AS, Hargreaves S. Codesigning an intervention to strengthen COVID-19 vaccine uptake in Congolese migrants in the UK (LISOLO MALAMU): a participatory qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e063462. [PMID: 36639215 PMCID: PMC9842599 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migrants positively contribute to host societies yet experience barriers to health and vaccination services and systems and are considered to be an underimmunised group in many European countries. The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted stark inequities in vaccine uptake, with migrants facing access and informational barriers and lower vaccine confidence. A key challenge, therefore, is developing tailored vaccination interventions, services and systems which account for and respond to the unique drivers of vaccine uptake in different migrant populations. Participatory research approaches, which meaningfully involve communities in co-constructing knowledge and solutions, have generated considerable interest in recent years for those tasked with designing and delivering public health interventions. How such approaches can be used to strengthen initiatives for COVID-19 and routine vaccination merits greater consideration. METHODS AND ANALYSIS LISOLO MALAMU ('Good Talk') is a community-based participatory research study which uses qualitative and coproduction methodologies to involve adult Congolese migrants in developing a tailored intervention to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Led by a community-academic coalition, the study will involve (1) semistructured in-depth interviews with adult Congolese migrants (born in Democratic Republic of Congo, >18 years), (2) interviews with professional stakeholders and (3) codesign workshops with adult Congolese migrants. Qualitative data will be analysed collaboratively using reflexive thematic analysis, and behaviour change theory will be used in parallel to support the coproduction of interventions and make recommendations across socioecological levels. The study will run from approximately November 2021 to November 2022. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval was granted by the St George's University Research Ethics Committee (REC reference: 2021.0128). Study findings will be disseminated to a range of local, national and international audiences, and a community celebration event will be held to show impact and recognise contributions. Recommendations for implementation and evaluation of prototyped interventions will be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison F Crawshaw
- Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Caroline Hickey
- Hackney Refugee and Migrant Forum, Hackney Council for Voluntary Service, London, UK
| | | | | | - Sarah Nkembi
- Hackney Congolese Women Support Group, London, UK
| | - Felicity Knights
- Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Lucy Pollyanna Goldsmith
- Institute for Infection and Immunity and Population Health Research Institute, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| | - Tushna Vandrevala
- Faculty of Health, Science, Social Care and Education, Centre for Applied Health and Social Care Research, Kingston University, Kingston, UK
| | | | - Sally Hargreaves
- Migrant Health Research Group, Institute for Infection and Immunity, St George's, University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Meltzer GY, Harris J, Hefner M, Lanternier P, Gershon RR, Vlahov D, Merdjanoff AA. Associations Between COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy and Socio-Spatial Factors in NYC Transit Workers 50 Years and Older. Int J Aging Hum Dev 2023; 96:76-90. [PMID: 35702009 PMCID: PMC9204133 DOI: 10.1177/00914150221106709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
This analysis investigates how age, race/ethnicity, and geographic location contributed to vaccine hesitancy in a sample of 645 New York City (NYC) Transport Workers Union (TWU), Local 100 members surveyed in August 2020. Union members ages 50+ were 46% less likely to be vaccine hesitant than their younger counterparts (OR 0.64; 95% CI 0.42, 0.97). Non-Whites (OR 3.95; 95% 2.44, 6.39) and those who did not report their race (OR 3.10; 95% CI 1.87, 5.12) were significantly more likely to be vaccine hesitant than Whites. Those who were not concerned about contracting COVID-19 in the community had 1.83 greater odds (95% CI 1.12, 2.98) of being vaccine hesitant than those who were concerned. Older respondents tended to reside in Queens while vaccine hesitant and non-White respondents were clustered in Brooklyn. General trends observed in COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy persist in a population of high risk, non-healthcare essential workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Y. Meltzer
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan Harris
- College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Michelle Hefner
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Paula Lanternier
- College of Natural Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Robyn R.M. Gershon
- Department of Epidemiology, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - David Vlahov
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, USA
| | - Alexis A. Merdjanoff
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University School of Global Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Scheiber A, Prinster TB, Stecko H, Wang T, Scott S, Shah SH, Wyne K. COVID-19 Vaccination Rates and Vaccine Hesitancy Among Spanish-Speaking Free Clinic Patients. J Community Health 2023; 48:127-135. [PMID: 36315301 PMCID: PMC9619016 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01150-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
We sought to assess COVID-19 vaccination rates, as well as attitudes and beliefs towards the vaccine, of patients in a Spanish-speaking student-run free clinic in Columbus, Ohio. A cross-sectional study was performed. Surveys were distributed to all individuals over 18 years who presented to La Clínica Latina between July, 2022 and September, 2022. A convenience sample was used: patients in the waiting room and their accompanying family members or friends were invited to participate. Subjects were excluded if under the age of 18 or over the age of 75, or if non-Spanish speaking. Of the 158 individuals who agreed to participate in our study, 146 responded to the question regarding vaccination status, revealing 90.4% of respondents had received a COVID-19 vaccination. Most respondents learned about the vaccine from social media (26.4%) or television (22.7%). The majority of participants sought answers to questions surrounding the vaccine by asking their doctor (49.1%). The most common reason among unvaccinated participants for not undergoing vaccination was fear of an adverse reaction to the vaccine (n = 11). We found that a large proportion (90.4%) of individuals seeking care at a Spanish-speaking free clinic were vaccinated against COVID-19. Our study also provides perspective on the means of health knowledge acquisition and behaviors in this predominantly Latinx patient population in central Ohio. We can utilize our results to optimize and tailor clinic services and initiatives for COVID-19 boosters to meet the needs of this community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Scheiber
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Teresa B. Prinster
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Hunter Stecko
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Tina Wang
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, 370 W 9th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Sara Scott
- Contra Costa Regional Medical Center, Martinez, CA USA
| | - Summit H. Shah
- Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH USA
| | - Kathleen Wyne
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Moore R, Rojo MO, Purvis RS, Marin LP, Yáñez J, Reece S, Wells C, Vaughn B, McElfish PA. Overcoming barriers and enhancing facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination in the Hispanic community. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:2393. [PMID: 36539771 PMCID: PMC9765355 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14825-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hispanic communities in the United States have been disproportionately affected by COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and death. Vaccination against COVID-19 is critical for controlling the pandemic; however, higher levels of vaccine hesitancy and reduced vaccine uptake constrain efforts to mitigate the pandemic and could perpetuate disparities. The aim of this study was to understand barriers and facilitators to COVID-19 vaccination through the lived experiences of Hispanic persons living in Arkansas. METHODS Bilingual community partners facilitated recruitment, made initial contact with potential participants, and scheduled interviews and focus groups. Individuals over the age of 18 who identified as Hispanic were invited to participate. Data was collected from 49 participants in 10 individual interviews and five focus groups. This study used a qualitative exploratory design and thematic analysis. RESULTS Five themes emerged as barriers for Hispanic participants: technological literacy and pre-registration, language and literacy, health insurance/health care costs, immigration status, and location and transportation. Three themes emerged as facilitators: workplace vaccination, health care provider recommendations, and engagement through schools. CONCLUSIONS Based on the findings of this study, a multi-modal and flexible approach will be implemented by the authors to address barriers to vaccine uptake among the Hispanic community in Arkansas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramey Moore
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| | - Martha O. Rojo
- grid.241054.60000 0004 4687 1637College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
| | - Rachel S. Purvis
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| | - Luis Paganelli Marin
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999Office of Community Health and Research, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| | - Judith Yáñez
- RootED Northwest Arkansas, 610B, E. Emma Ave, Springdale, AR 72764 USA
| | - Sharon Reece
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| | - Cheryl Wells
- grid.241054.60000 0004 4687 1637College of Nursing, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR 72205 USA
| | - Brittany Vaughn
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| | - Pearl A. McElfish
- grid.411017.20000 0001 2151 0999College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Northwest, 1125 N. College Ave, Fayetteville, AR 72703 USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Chiou H, Voegeli C, Wilhelm E, Kolis J, Brookmeyer K, Prybylski D. The Future of Infodemic Surveillance as Public Health Surveillance. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:S121-S128. [PMID: 36502389 DOI: 10.3201/eid2813.220696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Public health systems need to be able to detect and respond to infodemics (outbreaks of misinformation, disinformation, information overload, or information voids). Drawing from our experience at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the COVID-19 State of Vaccine Confidence Insight Reporting System has been created as one of the first public health infodemic surveillance systems. Key functions of infodemic surveillance systems include monitoring the information environment by person, place, and time; identifying infodemic events with digital analytics; conducting offline community-based assessments; and generating timely routine reports. Although specific considerations of several system attributes of infodemic surveillance system must be considered, infodemic surveillance systems share several similarities with traditional public health surveillance systems. Because both information and pathogens are spread more readily in an increasingly hyperconnected world, sustainable and routine systems must be created to ensure that timely interventions can be deployed for both epidemic and infodemic response.
Collapse
|
34
|
Poghosyan H, Ni Z, Vlahov D, Nelson L, Nam S. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Medicare Beneficiaries with and Without Cancer History: A US Population-based Study. J Community Health 2022; 48:315-324. [PMID: 36427111 PMCID: PMC9702715 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01174-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Understanding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Medicare beneficiaries is critical for increasing COVID-19 vaccine uptake in the US. This study aimed to estimate and compare the vaccine hesitancy rate among community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries with and without cancer history, also to investigate factors associated with vaccine hesitancy during the first four months after COVID-19 vaccine became available. We used population-based, cross-sectional data on 3,034 community-living Medicare beneficiaries from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey COVID-19 Winter 2021 Supplement. Sample weights were applied to account for the complex survey design with results generalizable to 16.4 million Medicare beneficiaries. Weighted multivariable logistic regression model was conducted to investigate the association between cancer history and vaccine hesitancy adjusting for covariates. A total of 39.6% were hesitant about getting COVID-19 vaccine. Those with cancer history were significantly less likely to be hesitant to get vaccinated than those without cancer history (adjusted odds ratio = 0.80, 95% confidence interval: 0.64, 0.99, p = .050). The most common reason for being hesitant to get COVID-19 vaccine was that the vaccine could have side effects or was viewed as not safe (19.2%), followed by not trusting what government says about vaccine (11.4%). Those with cancer history were more likely to report ongoing health conditions, lack of recommendation from a doctor, and doctor recommending against COVID-19 vaccination as reasons for not getting the vaccine compared to participants without cancer history. Increasing the confidence and knowledge about vaccine benefits among high-risk and more hesitant individuals are urgently needed to increase the vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hermine Poghosyan
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
- COPPER Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| | - Zhao Ni
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David Vlahov
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - LaRon Nelson
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Soohyun Nam
- Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Hyder A, Graffagnino C, Barbeau R, Bennett S, Dent LD, French G, Glover A, Jones A, McAdams J, Nawaz S, Wontumi GM, Baryeh N. Addressing Health Equity Goals for COVID-19 Vaccination Using Integrated Data and Mapping Tools: A Collaboration Between Academia, Public Health, and Health Care Systems in Columbus and Franklin County, Ohio. JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MANAGEMENT AND PRACTICE 2022; 28:739-748. [PMID: 35976747 PMCID: PMC9555580 DOI: 10.1097/phh.0000000000001550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Data sharing between local health departments and health care systems is challenging during public health crises. In early 2021, the supply of COVID-19 vaccine was limited, vaccine appointments were difficult to schedule, and state health departments were using a phased approach to determine who was eligible to get the vaccine. PROGRAM Multiple local health departments and health care systems with the capacity for mobile and pop-up vaccine clinics came together in Columbus and Franklin County, Ohio, with a common objective to coordinate where, when, and how to set up mobile/pop-up COVID-19 vaccine clinics. To support this objective, the Equity Mapping Tool, which is a set of integrated tools, workflows, and processes, was developed, implemented, and deployed in partnership with an academic institution. IMPLEMENTATION The Equity Mapping Tool was designed after a rapid community engagement phase. Our analytical approaches were informed by community engagement activities, and we translated the Equity Mapping Tool for stakeholders, who typically do not share timely and granular data, to build capacity for data-enabled decision making. DISCUSSION We discuss our observations related to the sustainability of the Equity Mapping Tool, lessons learned for public health scientists/practitioners, and future directions for extending the Equity Mapping Tool to other jurisdictions and public health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaz Hyder
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Cheryl Graffagnino
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Rebecca Barbeau
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Suellen Bennett
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Lisa D. Dent
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Gavin French
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Autumn Glover
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Alexandria Jones
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Jennie McAdams
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Saira Nawaz
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Gold-Marie Wontumi
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| | - Nana Baryeh
- Division of Environmental Health Science, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Hyder); Columbus Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Graffagnino and Bennett and Mr French); Franklin County Public Health, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Dent, Jones, and McAdams and Drs Wontumi and Baryeh); OhioHealth, Columbus, Ohio (Mss Barbeau and Glover); Center for HOPES, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio (Dr Nawaz); and Resolve to Save Lives, an initiative of Vital Strategies, New York, New York (Ms Wontumi and Dr Baryeh)
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Al Janabi T, Petrillo G, Chung S, Pino M. Predictors of Vaccine Uptake among Migrants in the United States: A Rapid Systematic Review. EPIDEMIOLOGIA (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 3:465-481. [PMID: 36547256 PMCID: PMC9777676 DOI: 10.3390/epidemiologia3040035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Evaluating challenges to vaccine uptake in non-US-born individuals is necessary for increasing national vaccination rates. This rapid review was conducted to investigate predictors of vaccine utilization among US migrants. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist was utilized, along with the Rayyan webtool, to facilitate the process of identifying primary research articles. Data were independently extracted by using a piloted, customized form. This was tabulated and the results were reported. Of the 186 abstracts reviewed, nine articles were included. Populations included in this review were refugees (n = 1), undocumented migrants (n = 1), migrants crossing the US-Mexico border (n = 2), Blacks (n = 1), and US-born vs. non-US-born adults (n = 1). Three studies focused on "foreign-born" children. The vaccines included in the literature reviewed were both combined series and individual, with one study addressing immunization instead of specific vaccines. Detailed characteristics of these studies and their quality evaluations were also reported. This review identified gaps in research regarding immunization among different migrant groups. Multilevel interventions should be considered to leverage the existing facilitators and address the known modifiable barriers to creating an accessible and supportive environment for marginalized populations.
Collapse
|
37
|
Santavicca T, Ngov C, Frounfelker R, Miconi D, Levinsson A, Rousseau C. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among young adults in Canada. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH = REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE 2022; 114:10-21. [PMID: 36207641 PMCID: PMC9542468 DOI: 10.17269/s41997-022-00693-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Vaccine hesitancy is a multifaceted decision process that encompasses various factors for which an individual may choose to get vaccinated or not. We aimed to identify the relationship between COVID-19 conspiracy theories, general attitudes towards vaccines, current COVID-19 vaccine factors, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. METHODS The present research is a multi-province cross-sectional study design. Survey data were collected in May and June 2021 (n=4905) in the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Ontario, and Quebec. Multivariate ordinal regression models were used to assess the association between vaccine hesitant profiles and COVID-19 conspiracy theories, general attitudes towards vaccines, and specific factors pertaining to COVID-19 vaccines. RESULTS Participants were aged 18 to 40 years and 59% were women. Individuals with low income, with low educational attainment, and/or who are unemployed were more likely to be vaccine hesitant. COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs and general attitudes towards vaccines are significantly associated with greater hesitancy for the COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccine factors including pro-vaccine actions and opinions of friends and family and trust in scientists and government as well as the country in which a vaccine is manufactured are associated with less vaccine hesitancy. CONCLUSION Conspiracy theories are distinct from criticism and concerns regarding the vaccine. Nevertheless, poverty, low level of education, and distrust towards the government are associated with higher odds of being vaccine hesitant. Results suggest it is imperative to deliver transparent and nuanced health communications to address legitimate distrust towards political and scientific actors and address the societal gap regarding general attitudes towards vaccines as opposed to focusing solely on COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cindy Ngov
- MUHC Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec Canada
| | - Rochelle Frounfelker
- Department of Community and Population Health, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA USA
| | - Diana Miconi
- Department of Psychopedagogy and Andragogy, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec Canada
| | | | - Cécile Rousseau
- MUHC Research Institute, Montreal, Quebec Canada ,Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec Canada
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Buro AW, Roman Candelaria K, Bailey R, Luna F, Albizu-Jacob A, Stern M, Redwine L. Exploration of Multilevel Barriers and Strategies That Affected Early COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing in Rural Latino Communities in Southwest Florida. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:11785. [PMID: 36142059 PMCID: PMC9517188 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted multiple racial and ethnic minority groups, including Latinos residing in rural communities. Low rates of vaccination and testing combined with social determinants of health have contributed significantly to this disparate impact. Given the needs and constraints unique to rural Latino migrant and immigrant communities, this qualitative study examined multilevel barriers and strategies that affect COVID-19 vaccination and testing uptake among these communities in southwest Florida. Four focus groups (n = 25) were conducted between March and April 2021 with various key stakeholders, including rural Latino community members, local leaders, and community health workers ('Promotoras de Salud'). Themes that aligned with barriers to COVID-19 vaccination and testing included fear, lack of control, misinformation, lack of accessibility, and institutional/policy issues; themes that aligned with strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccination and testing uptake included faith, taking care of self, and community and family resilience. Recommendations for improving future pandemic responses for rural Latino communities include incorporating multiple levels of intervention, such as consideration of the role of the family, involving trusted community members, and ensuring the development and implementation of fair and consistent policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Acadia W. Buro
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33617, USA
| | - Kevin Roman Candelaria
- Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | | | | | - Alexandra Albizu-Jacob
- Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Marilyn Stern
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL 33617, USA
- Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Laura Redwine
- Department of Child and Family Studies, College of Behavioral and Community Sciences, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wu C. Racial concentration and dynamics of COVID-19 vaccination in the United States. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19:101198. [PMID: 35996681 PMCID: PMC9387067 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This article considers how county-level concentrations of Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites are associated with COVID-19 vaccination differently. I argue that racially specific mechanisms-differential concentrations of social vulnerability and political ideology by race-are likely to create diverse associations between racial concentration and COVID-19 vaccination not only across racial groups but also within racial groups over time from early rollout to the time after COVID-19 vaccines became widely available. I test this argument by drawing on data from multiple sources that include county-level information on COVID-19 vaccination rates, racial population make-ups, and measures of political ideology and community vulnerability. Results show that the association between racial concentration and COVID-19 vaccination changes substantially across and within racial groups over time. Counties with higher percent of Asians and percent of Whites have higher vaccination rates at earlier time intervals whereas counties with higher percent of Latinos and percent of Blacks show lower vaccination rates. This trend flips at later dates for percent of Blacks, percent of Latinos, and percent of Whites. Results from multilevel regression models and mediation analysis controlling for vaccine hesitancy show that social vulnerability and political ideology are the underlying factors and their differential associations with diverse racial concentrations help create the racially specific and time-varying patterns. Racial concentration and COVID-19 vaccination are associated differently across race groups. Racial concentration and COVID-19 vaccination are associated differently within race groups over time . Social vulnerability and political dynamics are the underlying factors for the racially specific and time varying patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cary Wu
- Department of Sociology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
A Framework for Inspiring COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence in African American and Latino Communities. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10081319. [PMID: 36016207 PMCID: PMC9416715 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10081319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Revised: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately impacted racial and ethnic minority communities, particularly African American and Latino communities. The impacts of social determinants of health, structural racism, misinformation, and mistrust have contributed to a decreased COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Effective methods of addressing and combatting these barriers are essential. Accurate and targeted messaging delivered by trusted voices from community-based organizations, government health systems and organizations, and healthcare and academic systems is imperative. Outreach and communication should be culturally sensitive, provided in the preferred language of the community, flexible, and tailored for in-person and virtual outlets. This communication must also increase trust, combat misinformation, and inspire COVID-19 vaccine confidence. In this manuscript, we outline a framework for inspiring COVID-19 vaccine confidence in African American and Latino communities. These methods of targeted outreach should be considered and implemented for urgent and nonurgent community public health efforts beyond the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., monkeypox) and as a framework to inspire vaccine confidence in those living in racial and ethnic minority communities globally.
Collapse
|
41
|
Ortiz AC, Akgün KM, Bazan IS. Embracing the Diversity of Latinx Communities to Promote Vaccinations. THE YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2022; 95:257-263. [PMID: 35782479 PMCID: PMC9235259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
While vaccine hesitancy is well documented in the literature among the Latinx community, little attention or effort is given to the nuances among the members of individual communities, such as country of origin, immigration status, generational status, primary language, race, age, sex, gender, or rural residence and how these complexities affect vaccine messaging and uptake. We have evidence that this heterogeneity causes differences in access to healthcare, attitudes towards vaccines, and degree of health disparities. In this review we will describe their impact on vaccination rates in the Latinx community, highlighting missed opportunities for public health outreach, and how targeted messaging could improve vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander C. Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New
Haven, CT, USA,To whom all correspondence should be addressed:
Alexander Ortiz, MD, MS, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School
of Medicine;
| | - Kathleen M. Akgün
- Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, VA
Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA,Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep
Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Isabel S. Bazan
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, & Sleep
Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Nwaozuru U, Obiezu-Umeh C, Diallo H, Graham D, Whembolua GL, Bourgeau MJ, Ritchwood TD, Nelson LE, Shato T, Mathews A, Moise R, Ward MC, Raude J, Ahonkhai AA, Young DJ, Conserve DF. Perceptions of COVID-19 self-testing and recommendations for implementation and scale-up among Black/African Americans: implications for the COVID-19 STEP project. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1220. [PMID: 35725400 PMCID: PMC9207861 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-13619-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 self-testing (ST) is an innovative strategy with the potential to increase the access and uptake of testing and ultimately to limit the spread of the virus. To maximize the uptake and reach of this promising strategy and inform intervention development and scale up, research is needed to understand the acceptability of and willingness to use this tool. This is vital to ensure that Black/African Americans are reached by the Biden-Harris Administration's free national COVID-19 ST program. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and recommendations to promote and scale-up the uptake of COVID-19 ST among Black/African Americans. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using a semi-structured questionnaire to assess barriers and facilitators to the uptake of COVID-19 ST among a convenience sample of 28 self-identified Black/African Americans from schools, community centers, and faith-based institutions in Ohio and Maryland. Inductive content analysis was conducted to identify categories and subcategories related to acceptability and recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST in communities. RESULTS Participants perceived COVID-19 self-testing as an acceptable tool that is beneficial to prevent transmission and address some of the barriers associated with health facility testing, such as transportation cost and human contact at the health facility. However, concerns were raised regarding the accurate use of the kits and costs. Recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST included engagement of community stakeholders to disseminate information about COVID-19 self-testing and creating culturally appropriate education tools to promote knowledge of and clear instructions about how to properly use COVID-19 ST kits. Based on these recommendations, the COVID-19 STEP (Self-Testing Education and Promotion) Project is being developed and will involve engaging community partners such as barbers, church leaders, and other community-based organizations to increase the uptake and use of free COVID-19 ST kits among Black/African Americans. CONCLUSION Findings showed that most participants considered COVID-19 ST valuable for encouraging COVID-19 testing. However, cost and accuracy concerns may pose barriers. Future work should consider implementing interventions that leverage the benefits of COVID-19 ST and further assess the extent to which these identified facilitators and barriers may influence COVID-19 ST uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ucheoma Nwaozuru
- grid.241167.70000 0001 2185 3318Department of Implementation Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, 475 Vine Street, Winston-Salem, NC 27101 USA
| | - Chisom Obiezu-Umeh
- grid.262962.b0000 0004 1936 9342College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette Ave, Saint Louis, MO 63104 USA
| | - Hassim Diallo
- grid.164295.d0000 0001 0941 7177School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742 USA
| | - Danielle Graham
- grid.24827.3b0000 0001 2179 9593Department of Africana Studies, University of Cincinnati, 2815 Commons Way, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0370 USA
| | - Guy-Lucien Whembolua
- grid.24827.3b0000 0001 2179 9593Department of Africana Studies, University of Cincinnati, 2815 Commons Way, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0370 USA
| | - Marie Janeeca Bourgeau
- grid.262273.00000 0001 2188 3760Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, 65-30 Kissena Blvd, Queens, New York, NY 11567 USA
| | - Tiarney D. Ritchwood
- grid.26009.3d0000 0004 1936 7961Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, 2200 W Main St, Durham, NC 27705 USA
| | - LaRon E. Nelson
- grid.47100.320000000419368710School of Nursing, Yale University, 400 West Campus Drive, Orange, CT 06477 USA
| | - Thembekile Shato
- grid.4367.60000 0001 2355 7002Washington University in Saint Louis, Brown School, 1 Brookings Drive, Saint Louis, MO 63130 USA
| | - Allison Mathews
- grid.241167.70000 0001 2185 3318Gilead COMPASS Faith Coordinating Center, School of Divinity, Wake Forest University, 2596 Reynolda Rd., Suite 215C, Winston-Salem, NC 27106 USA
| | - Rhoda Moise
- Rhoda Moise, LLC, 127 Church Road, Elkins Park, PA 19027 USA
| | - Maranda C. Ward
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510School of Medicine and Health Science, The George Washington University, 2600 Virginia Ave, NW, Washington, DC, 20036 USA
| | - Jocelyn Raude
- grid.414412.60000 0001 1943 5037EHESP School of Public Health, Avenue du Pr Leon Bernard, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Aima A. Ahonkhai
- grid.412807.80000 0004 1936 9916Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Diane J. Young
- grid.430001.60000 0004 0623 0683Prince George’s County Health Department, Family Health Services, Largo, MD 20774 USA
| | - Donaldson F. Conserve
- grid.253615.60000 0004 1936 9510The George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, 950 New Hampshire Ave, NW, Washington, DC, 20052 USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Demeke J, McFadden SM, Dada D, Djiometio JN, Vlahov D, Wilton L, Wang M, Nelson LE. Strategies that Promote Equity in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake for Undocumented Immigrants: A Review. J Community Health 2022; 47:554-562. [PMID: 35084639 PMCID: PMC8793094 DOI: 10.1007/s10900-022-01063-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
There has been a dearth of reports that examine the effect of immigration status on COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy. While intention to be vaccinated has been higher among adults in immigrant families than non-immigrant adults, uptake of the vaccine has been lower among immigrants and especially those who are undocumented. Concerns raised by immigrants usually centered on the lack of access to information, language barriers, conflicts between work and clinic hours, and fears over their precarious status in the U.S. To perform a rapid review, our time frame was December 2020 through August 2021. Our search strategy used the PUBMED and Google search engines with a prescribed set of definitions and search terms for two reasons: there were limited peer-reviewed studies during the early period of roll-out and real-time perspectives were crucially needed. Strategies used to promote equity include the use of trusted leaders as well as direct communication styles. Other strategies centered informational messaging from government agencies and the medical community, with a strong emphasis on coalescing broad engagement of the community and being responsive to language and cultural needs. In addition to communication and messaging to educate about COVID-19 vaccines, another important aspect of COVID-19 vaccine uptake was overcoming multiple obstacles that affect ease of access. This report suggests that vaccine uptake, and more generally pandemic response, in vulnerable communities may be better able to launch when they build on existing, trusted, culturally intelligent community-based organizations and local sociocultural processes. These organizations need continued support to contribute to population health equity in emerging health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jemal Demeke
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Debbie Dada
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Yale College, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph Nguemo Djiometio
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Vlahov
- Yale University School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, USA
| | - Leo Wilton
- State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA
- Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mengzhu Wang
- Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC"), Reston, VA, USA
| | - LaRon E Nelson
- MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Unity Health Toronto - St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Dong L, Bogart LM, Gandhi P, Aboagye JB, Ryan S, Serwanga R, Ojikutu BO. A qualitative study of COVID-19 vaccine intentions and mistrust in Black Americans: Recommendations for vaccine dissemination and uptake. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268020. [PMID: 35503797 PMCID: PMC9064113 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 vaccination rates among Black Americans have been lower than White Americans and are disproportionate to their population size and COVID-19 impact. This study examined reasons for low vaccination intentions and preferred strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccination. METHODS Between November 2020 and March 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 24 participants who expressed low vaccination intentions in a RAND American Life Panel survey; we also interviewed five stakeholders who represent organizations or subgroups in Black communities that have been highly affected by COVID-19. RESULTS Many interviewees discussed the "wait-and-see" approach, citing that more time and evidence for vaccine side effects and efficacy are needed. Perceived barriers to COVID-19 vaccination included structural barriers to access (e.g., transportation, technology) and medical mistrust (e.g., towards the vaccines themselves, the government, healthcare providers and healthcare systems, and pharmaceutical companies) stemming from historical and contemporary systematic racism against Black communities. Interviewees also discussed strategies to promote COVID-19 vaccines, including acknowledging systemic racism as the root cause for mistrust, preferred messaging content (e.g., transparent messages about side effects), modes, and access points (e.g., a variety of medical and non-medical sites), and trusted information sources (e.g., trusted leaders, Black doctors and researchers). CONCLUSIONS These insights can inform ways to improve initial and booster vaccination uptake as the COVID-19 pandemic progresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Dong
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America
| | - Laura M. Bogart
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America
| | - Priya Gandhi
- RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, United States of America
| | - James B. Aboagye
- UCLA Center for HIV Identification, Prevention, and Treatment Services, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Samantha Ryan
- RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Rosette Serwanga
- African Immigrants Community, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Bisola O. Ojikutu
- Boston Public Health Commission, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Division of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Infectious Disease Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ghaznavi C, Eguchi A, Tanoue Y, Yoneoka D, Kawashima T, Suzuki M, Hashizume M, Nomura S. Pre- and post-COVID-19 all-cause mortality of Japanese citizens versus foreign residents living in Japan, 2015–2021. SSM Popul Health 2022; 18:101114. [PMID: 35601222 PMCID: PMC9118913 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2021] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Cyrus Ghaznavi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Medical Education Program, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Saint Louis, USA
| | - Akifumi Eguchi
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuta Tanoue
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Institute for Business and Finance, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Yoneoka
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Infectious Disease Surveillance Center, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kawashima
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Mathematical and Computing Science, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoi Suzuki
- Center for Surveillance, Immunization, and Epidemiologic Research, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Hashizume
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuhei Nomura
- Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Global Health Policy, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research, Tokyo, Japan
- Corresponding author. Department of Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Keio University, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Kader F, Kruchten S, Campo M, Collica-Cox K, Davidson C, Wald A, Hewlett D. Dialogic health education to reduce COVID-19 disparities and increase health literacy in community and correctional settings: Protocol (Preprint). JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e37713. [PMID: 36194870 PMCID: PMC9591706 DOI: 10.2196/37713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 vaccines significantly reduce rates of hospitalization and death for those infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Those facing social oppression, including people of color, experience heightened risk for COVID-19 and comorbidities, but are often mistrustful of governmental agencies and initiatives, contributing to low vaccine uptake and a reluctance to access vital health care services. Dialogue-based health literacy interventions may mitigate mistrust and increase access to health services and information, subsequently increasing rates of vaccination and other behaviors that reduce COVID-19 risk. Objective To improve health literacy and reduce COVID-19 disparities, the Westchester County Department of Health, in partnership with two universities, community- and faith-based organizations, and the Westchester County Department of Correction, co-developed a health education program for community members, correctional officers, and incarcerated jail residents in Westchester, New York. Specific objectives are to increase preventative health behaviors, positive attitudes toward use of public health protocols, full vaccination or intentions to vaccinate, health care information understanding, health provider care access, clear communication with health care providers, and personal health care decision-making. Methods Grounded in dialogic learning, the program entails training community-based “trusted messengers” and correctional officers to lead health information sessions in community and correctional settings. During the grant period, the program intends for 80 community-based trusted messengers to receive training from the Department of Health and will be expected to reach a goal of 100 members (N=8000) of their communities. Correctional staff with experience delivering educational programs will be trained to facilitate sessions among 400 correctional facility residents and 600 correctional staff. Results Pre-post surveys will assess changes in health behaviors, attitudes, and perceptions. The program has been administered in the correctional facility since February 2022, with information sessions expected to cease for correctional staff and residents in June 2022 and November 2022, respectively. An initial cohort of community-based trusted messengers began training in February 2022, and information sessions have been scheduled in various virtual and community settings since March 2022. As of April 2022, the two-pronged health education program has reached 439 correctional officers, 98 jail residents, and 201 community members countywide. Program evaluation findings will be released in future publications after study implementation is complete. Conclusions Few studies have evaluated the combined effects of training-of-trainers (ToT) and dialogical learning models on behavior and health literacy. As the first known COVID-19–specific dialogue-based health education program that applies a ToT model in the community-based, correctional, and virtual settings simultaneously, this study fills a gap in current knowledge about health literacy and health behavior in marginalized populations. Thus, this evidence-based framework can remedy COVID-19 disparities while also addressing risks for a host of health-related issues at the community level, potentially serving as a best-practice model for future health programs. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/37713
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Kader
- Westchester County Department of Health, White Plains, NY, United States
| | - Stephanie Kruchten
- Westchester County Department of Health, White Plains, NY, United States
| | - Marc Campo
- School of Health and Natural Sciences, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, NY, United States
| | - Kimberly Collica-Cox
- Dyson College of Arts and Sciences, Pace University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Charis Davidson
- School of Health and Natural Sciences, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, NY, United States
| | - Adrienne Wald
- School of Health and Natural Sciences, Mercy College, Dobbs Ferry, NY, United States
| | - Dial Hewlett
- Westchester County Department of Health, White Plains, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Nwaozuru U, Obiezu-Umeh C, Diallo H, Graham D, Whembolua GL, Bourgeau MJ, Ritchwood T, Nelson LE, Shato T, Mathews A, Moise R, Ward MC, Raude J, Ahonkhai AA, Young DJ, Conserve DF. Perceptions of COVID-19 Self-Testing and Recommendations for Implementation and Scale up Among Black/African Americans: Implications for the COVID-19 STEP Project. RESEARCH SQUARE 2022:rs.3.rs-1277219. [PMID: 35194597 PMCID: PMC8863154 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1277219/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Background COVID-19 self-testing (ST) is an innovative strategy with the potential to increase the access and uptake of testing and ultimately to limit the spread of the virus. To maximize the uptake and reach of this promising strategy and inform intervention development and scale up, research is needed to understand the acceptability of and willingness to use this tool. This is vital to ensure that Black/African Americans are reached by the Biden-Harris Administration’s free national COVID-19 ST program. This study aimed to explore the acceptability and recommendations to promote and scale up the uptake of COVID-19 ST among Black/African Americans. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study using a semi-structured survey to assess barriers and facilitators to the uptake of COVID-19 ST among a convenience sample of 28 self-identified Black/African Americans from schools, community centers, and faith-based institutions in Ohio and Maryland. Inductive content analysis was conducted to identify categories and subcategories related to acceptability and recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST in communities. Results Participants perceived COVID-19 self-testing as an acceptable tool that is beneficial to prevent transmission and address some of the barriers associated with health facility testing, such as transportation cost and human contact at the health facility. However, concerns were raised regarding the accurate use of the kits and costs. Recommendations for implementing and scaling up COVID-19 ST included engagement of community stakeholders to disseminate information about COVID-19 self-testing and creating culturally appropriate education tools to promote knowledge of and clear instructions about how to properly use COVID-19 ST kits. Based on these recommendations, the COVID-19 STEP (Self-Testing Education and Promotion) Project is being developed and will involve engaging community partners such as barbers, church leaders, and other community-based organizations to increase the uptake and use of free COVID-19 ST kits among Black/African Americans. Conclusion Findings showed that most participants considered COVID-19 ST valuable for encouraging COVID-19 testing. However, cost and accuracy concerns may pose barriers. Future work should consider implementing interventions that leverage the benefits of COVID-19 ST and further assess the extent to which these identified facilitators and barriers may influence COVID-19 ST uptake.
Collapse
|
48
|
Dada D, Djiometio JN, McFadden SM, Demeke J, Vlahov D, Wilton L, Wang M, Nelson LE. Strategies That Promote Equity in COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake for Black Communities: a Review. J Urban Health 2022; 99:15-27. [PMID: 35018612 PMCID: PMC8751469 DOI: 10.1007/s11524-021-00594-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Black communities have had a high burden of COVID-19 cases, hospitalizations, and death, yet rates of COVID-19 vaccine uptake among Blacks lag behind other demographic groups. This has been due in part to vaccine hesitancy and multi-level issues around access to COVID-19 vaccines. Effective strategies to promote vaccine uptake among Black communities are needed. To perform a rapid review covering December 2020-August 2021, our search strategy used PubMed, Google, and print media with a prescribed set of definitions and search terms for two reasons: there were limited peer-reviewed studies during the early period of vaccine roll-out and real-time perspectives were crucially needed. Analyses included expert opinion, descriptions of implemented projects, and project outcomes. The strategies described in these reports largely converged into three categories: (a) addressing mistrust, (b) combatting misinformation, and (c) improving access to COVID-19 vaccines. When working to reduce hesitancy, it is important to consider messaging content, messengers, and location. To address mistrust, reports detailed the importance of communicating through trusted channels, validating the real, history- and experience-based reasons why people may be hesitant to establish common ground, and addressing racism embedded within the healthcare system. To combat misinformation, strategies included dispelling myths and answering questions through town halls and culturally intelligent outreach. Black physicians and clinicians are considered trusted messengers and partnering with community leaders such as pastors can help to reach more people. The settings of vaccination sites should be convenient and trusted such as churches, barbershops, and community sites. While a number of individual and combination efforts have been developed and implemented, data that disentangle components that are the most effective are sparse. This rapid review provides a basis for developing strategic implementation to increase COVID-19 vaccine uptake in this ongoing pandemic and planning to promote health equity for future bio-events and health crises.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - SarahAnn M McFadden
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, Campus Office #11501, P.O. Box 27399, West Haven, CT, 06516-0972, USA
| | - Jemal Demeke
- St Michael's Hospital Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Vlahov
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, Campus Office #11501, P.O. Box 27399, West Haven, CT, 06516-0972, USA
- School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Leo Wilton
- State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY, USA
- Faculty of Humanities, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Mengzu Wang
- Science Applications International Corporation ("SAIC"), Reston, VA, USA
| | - LaRon E Nelson
- Yale University School of Nursing, Orange, Campus Office #11501, P.O. Box 27399, West Haven, CT, 06516-0972, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Casillas A, Rosas LG, Carson SL, Orechwa A, North G, AuYoung M, Kim G, Guereca JA, Ramers CB, Burke NJ, Corchado CG, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Cheney A, Rabin BA, Stadnick NA, Oswald W, Cabrera A, Sorkin DH, Zaldivar F, Wong W, Yerraguntala AS, Vassar SD, Wright AL, Washington DL, Norris KC, Brown AF. STOP COVID-19 CA: Community engagement to address the disparate impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic in California. FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES 2022; 2:935297. [PMID: 36925779 PMCID: PMC10012632 DOI: 10.3389/frhs.2022.935297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Objective To describe the early activities and lessons of the Share, Trust, Organize, Partner COVID-19 California Alliance (STOP COVID-19 CA), the California awardee of the NIH-funded multi-state Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL) against COVID-19. The Alliance was established to ensure equity in Coronavirus-19 disease (COVID-19) research, clinical practice, and public health for communities most impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Study setting The STOP COVID-19 CA Alliance network of 11 universities and affiliated partner community-based organizations (CBOs) across California. Study design Mixed methods evaluation consisting of an analysis of activity (August 2020 to December 2021) detailed in reports submitted by community-academic teams and a survey (August 2021) of academic investigators and affiliated community-based organization (CBO) partners. Data collection We summarized activities from the 11 community-academic teams' progress reports and described results from an online survey of academic investigators and CBO partners in the California Alliance. Principal findings A review of progress reports (n = 256) showed that teams fielded surveys to 11,000 Californians, conducted 133 focus groups, partnered with 29 vaccine/therapeutics clinical trials, and led more than 300 town halls and vaccine events that reached Californians from communities disproportionately impacted by COVID-19. Survey responses from academic investigators and CBO partners emphasized the importance of learning from the successes and challenges of the California Alliance teams' COVID-19 initiatives. Both academic and CBO respondents highlighted the need for streamlined federal and institutional administrative policies, and fiscal practices to promote more effective and timely operations of teams in their efforts to address the numerous underlying health and social disparities that predispose their communities to higher rates of, and poor outcomes from, COVID-19. Conclusions STOP COVID-19 CA represents a new and potentially sustainable statewide community engagement model for addressing health disparities in multiethnic/multicultural and geographically dispersed communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Casillas
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Lisa G Rosas
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States.,Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Savanna L Carson
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Allison Orechwa
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Gemma North
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | | | - Gloria Kim
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Jesus A Guereca
- Laura Rodriguez Research Institute Family Health Centers of San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Christian B Ramers
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Nancy J Burke
- Public Health Department, University of California, Merced, Merced, CA, United States
| | | | - Sergio Aguilar-Gaxiola
- Center for Reducing Health Disparities and Community Engagement Program of the Clinical and Translational Science Center, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States
| | - Ann Cheney
- Department of Social Medicine Population and Public Health, School of Medicine, University of California, Riverside, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - Borsika A Rabin
- UC San Diego Altman Clinical Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States
| | - Nicole A Stadnick
- UC San Diego Altman Clinical Translational Research Institute Dissemination and Implementation Science Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.,Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - William Oswald
- The Global Action Research Center, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Abby Cabrera
- Center for Excellence in Primary Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Dara H Sorkin
- Department of Medicine, Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Frank Zaldivar
- Department of Pediatrics, Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, United States
| | - Wennie Wong
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Anusha S Yerraguntala
- Southern California Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Stefanie D Vassar
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Aziza Lucas Wright
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,South Central Prevention Coalition, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Donna L Washington
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Keith C Norris
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Arleen F Brown
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.,Olive View Medical Center, Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Sylmar, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|