Roxadustat Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Associated Anemia in Japanese Patients Not on Dialysis: A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Cardiovascular and renal safety outcomes of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor roxadustat for anemia patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the cardiac and kidney-related adverse effects of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in CKD patients. 18 trials with a total of 8806 participants were identified for analysis. We employed a fixed-effects model for analysis. The pooled result revealed no significant difference in the risk of occurrence of cardiac disorders when comparing CKD patients receiving roxadustat with the placebo (RR = 1.049; CI [0.918 to 1.200]) or ESA (RR = 1.066; CI [0.919 to 1.235]), in both dialysis-dependent (DD) (RR = 1.094; CI [0.925 to 1.293]) or non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) (RR = 1.036; CI [0.916 to 1.171]) CKD patients. No significant difference was observed in the risk of kidney-related adverse events when comparing roxadustat with the placebo (RR = 1.088; CI [0.980 to 1.209]) or ESA (RR = 0.968; CI [0.831 to 1.152]), in DD (RR = 2.649; CI [0.201 to 34.981]) or NDD (RR = 1.053; CI [0.965 to 1.149]) CKD patients. A high risk of hyperkalemia was observed in the roxadustat group in DD (RR = 0.939; CI [0.898 to 0.981]). Incidence of hypertension was higher in the roxadustat for NDD patients (RR = 1.198; CI [1.042 to 1.377]), or compared to the placebo (RR = 1.374; CI [1.153 to 1.638]). In summary, the risk of cardiac or kidney-related events observed in the roxadustat was not significantly increase whether in DD or NDD patients. However, attention must be paid to the occurrence of hyperkalemia for DD patients and hypertension in NDD patients using roxadustat.

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Purpose

To review current evidence on the efficacy and safety outcomes of HIF-PHIs in chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations with an emphasize on the safety profile.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted in the Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central databases. Randomized controlled trials that had assessed the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs for anemia in CKD were included. The efficacy outcome included change of hemoglobin and the safety outcomes any adverse events, severe adverse events, major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. The qualities of studies were assessed using the Cochrane ROB tool.

Results

47 studies encompassing 55 RCTs for the study outcomes were included in this study. All six commercially available HIF-PHIs had direct comparisons to ESA and placebo, yet lacked direct comparisons among each other. The network analysis demonstrated all six HIF-PHIs were able to effectively elevate hemoglobin in the general CKD patients compared to placebo. All HIF-PHIs did not differ among each other in the efficacy of correcting anemia. Roxadustat and daprodustat had the largest number of reports in terms of adverse events. The overall risk of each safety outcome did not increase in comparison to erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) or placebo, and did not differ among different types of HIF-PHIs.

Conclusion

HIF-PHIs can effectively elevate hemoglobin without causing higher risk of safety concerns in CKD patients with anemia. Further evidence from long-term studies and the ongoing post-market surveillance is necessary.

Roxadustat and Oral Iron Absorption in Chinese Patients with Anemia of Chronic Kidney Disease: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 4 Study (ALTAI)

INTRODUCTION

Anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has a high incidence and is associated with many disease conditions. Iron dysmetabolism is an important contributor to anemia in CKD patients.

METHODS

ALTAI, a randomized, active-controlled, phase 4 trial, investigated the efficacy of roxadustat versus recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) on gastrointestinal iron absorption in patients with anemia of CKD (stage 4/5). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to day 15 in gastrointestinal iron absorption (serum iron area under the concentration-time curve; AUC0-3h) following single-dose oral iron.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were randomized 1:1 to roxadustat (n = 13) or rHuEPO (n = 12). Baseline iron profiles were similar between treatment groups. Change from baseline to day 15 in serum iron AUC0-3h was not statistically significantly different between the roxadustat and rHuEPO groups. Mean (SD) change from baseline in serum iron AUC0-3h was 11.3 (28.2) g × 3 h/dl in the roxadustat group and - 0.3 (9.7) g × 3 h/dl in the rHuEPO group. Roxadustat treatment was associated with decreased hepcidin and also increased transferrin, soluble transferrin receptor, and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), with nominal significance. The proportion of patients experiencing one or more adverse events was 38.5% when treated with roxadustat and 16.7% with rHuEPO.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed no significant difference between roxadustat and rHuEPO in iron absorption but was underpowered because of recruitment challenges.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04655027.

Tubular Endogenous Erythropoietin Protects Renal Function against Ischemic Reperfusion Injury

Many large-scale studies show that exogenous erythropoietin, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, lack any renoprotective effects. We investigated the effects of endogenous erythropoietin on renal function in kidney ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) using the prolyl hydroxylase domain (PHD) inhibitor, Roxadustat (ROX). Four h of hypoxia (7% O2) and 4 h treatment by ROX prior to IRI did not improve renal function. In contrast, 24-72 h pretreatment by ROX significantly improved the decline of renal function caused by IRI. Hypoxia and 4 h ROX increased interstitial cells-derived Epo production by 75- and 6-fold, respectively, before IRI, and worked similarly to exogenous Epo. ROX treatment for 24-72 h increased Epo production during IRI by 9-fold. Immunohistochemistry revealed that 24 h ROX treatment induced Epo production in proximal and distal tubules and worked similarly to endogenous Epo. Our data show that tubular endogenous Epo production induced by 24-72 h ROX treatment results in renoprotection but peritubular exogenous Epo production by interstitial cells induced by hypoxia and 4 h ROX treatment did not. Stimulation of tubular, but not peritubular, Epo production may link to renoprotection.

Iron Supplements Concomitant within Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Prolyl Hydroxylase Domain Inhibitors in the Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease Anemia

Background

Anemia is a common and important complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Accordingly, the current treatment is based on erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and iron. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have been developed to treat renal anemia through a novel mechanism. HIF-PHIs increase erythropoietin at physiologic blood concentrations and also improve the supply of hematopoietic iron. Iron is the main component of hemoglobin, and ensuring efficient iron metabolism is essential in the treatment of anemia.

Summary

HIF-PHIs may have advantages in improving iron utilization and mobilization compared to ESAs. Most HIF-PHI trials revealed a significant decline of hepcidin, increase in transferrin level and total iron binding capacity in patients. From a clinical point of view, improvements in iron metabolism should translate into reductions in iron supplementation. There are differences in the iron treatment regimentation currently used, so it is important to evaluate and timely iron supplementation across studies.

Key Messages

This review summarizes the mechanism of HIF-PHIs on improved iron metabolism and the route of iron usage in the trials for dialysis-dependent CKD and non-dialysis CKD. And this review also makes an interpretation of the clinical practice guidelines in China and recommendation by Asia Pacific Society of Nephrology.

An updated meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor treatment of anemia in nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Renal anemia, a common complication and threat factor of chronic kidney disease (CKD), has long been treated with injectable erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs). As concerns regarding cardiovascular safety and erythropoietin resistance to ESAs have emerged, alternative therapies are urgently needed. Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), an oral agent, has been proven to be effective in improving renal anemia. However, the effects of HIF-PHIs on nondialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD) have yet to be supported by updated meta-analyses.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of clinical randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on HIF-PHI treatment of NDD-CKD patients based on PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases as of July 16th, 2023, was conducted. The primary outcomes were the level of hemoglobin (Hb) postintervention and the ratio of Hb responses. Most of the analysis was conducted via RevMan 5.3 software using a random-effects model. Stata (version 15.0) was used to analyze the publication bias.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies with a total of 7178 subjects in the HIF-PHI group, 3501 subjects in the ESA group and 2533 subjects in the placebo group were enrolled. HIF-PHIs increased the level of Hb and improved iron metabolism but were not inferior to ESAs in terms of safety.

CONCLUSIONS

HIF-PHIs may be a convenient and safe alternative to ESAs in patients with NDD-CKD and anemia.

Myeloid Hif2α is not essential to maintain systemic iron homeostasis

Dietary consumption serves as the primary source of iron uptake, and erythropoiesis acts as a major regulator of systemic iron demand. In addition to intestinal iron absorption, macrophages play a crucial role in recycling iron from senescent red blood cells. The kidneys are responsible for the production of erythropoietin (Epo), which stimulates erythropoiesis, whereas the liver plays a central role in producing the iron-regulatory hormone hepcidin. The transcriptional regulator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)2α has a central role in the regulation of Epo, hepcidin, and intestinal iron absorption and therefore plays a crucial role in coordinating the tissue crosstalk to maintain systemic iron demands. However, the precise involvement of Hif2α in macrophages in terms of iron homeostasis remains uncertain. Our study demonstrates that deleting Hif2α in macrophages does not disrupt the expression of iron transporters or basal erythropoiesis. Mice lacking Hif2α in myeloid cells exhibited no discernible differences in hemodynamic parameters, including hemoglobin concentrations and erythrocyte count, when compared with littermate controls. This similarity was observed under conditions of both dietary iron deficiency and acute erythropoietic demand. Notably, we observed a significant increase in the expression of iron transporters in the duodenum during iron deficiency, indicating heightened iron absorption. Therefore, our findings suggest that the disruption of Hif2α in myeloid cells does not significantly impact systemic iron homeostasis under normal physiologic conditions. However, its disruption induces adaptive physiologic changes in response to elevated iron demand, potentially serving as a mechanism to sustain increased erythropoietic demand.

FG-4592 relieves diabetic kidney disease severity by influencing metabolic profiles via gut microbiota reconstruction in both human and mouse models

Objective: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most prevalent complications of diabetes mellitus (DM) and is highly associated with devastating outcomes. Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), the main transcription factor that regulates cellular responses to hypoxia, plays an important role in regulating erythropoietin (EPO) synthesis. FG-4592 is the HIF stabilizer that is widely used in patients with renal anemia. We investigated the effect of FG-4592 on DKD phenotypes and the pharmacologic mechanism from the perspective of gut microbiota and systemic metabolism. Design: We collected the clinical data of 73 participants, including 40 DKD patients with combined renal anemia treated with FG-4592, and 33 clinical index-matched DKD patients without FG-4592 treatment from The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University at the beginning and after a 3-6-month follow-up period. We established DKD mouse models treated by FG-4592 and performed fecal microbiota transplantation from FG-4592-treated DKD mice to investigate the effects of FG-4592 on DKD and to understand this mechanism from a microbial perspective. Untargeted metabolome-microbiome combined analysis was implemented to globally delineate the mechanism of FG-4592 from both microbial and metabolomic aspects. Result: DKD phenotypes significantly improved after 3-6 months of FG-4592 treatment in DKD patients combined with renal anemia, including a decreased level of systolic blood pressure, serum creatinine, and increased estimated glomerular infiltration rate. Such effects were also achieved in the DKD mouse model treated with FG-4592 and can be also induced by FG-4592-influenced gut microbiota. Untargeted plasma metabolomics-gut microbiota analysis showed that FG-4592 dramatically altered both the microbial and metabolic profiles of DKD mice and relieved DKD phenotypes via upregulating beneficial gut microbiota-associated metabolites. Conclusion: FG-4592 can globally relieve the symptoms of DKD patients combined with renal anemia. In the animal experiment, FG-4592 can reconstruct the intestinal microbial profiles of DKD to further upregulate the production of gut-associated beneficial metabolites, subsequently improving DKD phenotypes.

Progress in the Detection of Erythropoietin in Blood, Urine, and Tissue

Detection of erythropoietin (Epo) was difficult until a method was developed by the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). WADA recommended the Western blot technique using isoelectric focusing (IEF)-PAGE to show that natural Epo and injected erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) appear in different pH areas. Next, they used sodium N-lauroylsarcosinate (SAR)-PAGE for better differentiation of pegylated proteins, such as epoetin β pegol. Although WADA has recommended the use of pre-purification of samples, we developed a simple Western blotting method without pre-purification of samples. Instead of pre-purification, we used deglycosylation of samples before SDS-PAGE. The double detection of glycosylated and deglycosylated Epo bands increases the reliability of the detection of Epo protein. All of the endogenous Epo and exogenous ESAs shift to 22 kDa, except for Peg-bound epoetin β pegol. All endogenous Epo and exogenous ESAs were detected as 22 kDa deglycosylated Epo by liquid chromatography/mass spectrum (LC/MS) analysis. The most important factor for the detection of Epo is the selection of the antibody against Epo. WADA recommended clone AE7A5, and we used sc-9620. Both antibodies are useful for the detection of Epo protein by Western blotting.

Relationship Between the Effect of Roxadustat and Comorbid Diabetes in Non-dialyzed Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Retrospective Observational Study

Introduction The dose of roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase (HIF-PH) inhibitor, required to treat anemia, the hemoglobin level and the rate of hemoglobin target achievement were retrospectively investigated in non-dialyzed chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with and without type 2 diabetes. Methods As the full analysis set, 25 subjects (10 with diabetes and 15 without diabetes) were observed over six months among 44 non-dialyzed CKD patients who received roxadustat. The target hemoglobin level was set at 110-130 g/L. Results The comorbidities of diabetes and body weight at baseline were significantly associated with each dose of roxadustat at six months and the change in each dose of roxadustat from the initiation of roxadustat treatment. There was no significant difference in the amount of increase in the hemoglobin level (14±11 g/L vs. 15±8 g/L) and the rate of hemoglobin target achievement (70% vs. 67%) between patients with and without diabetes. Each dose of roxadustat gradually decreased in patients without diabetes, whereas it increased in those with diabetes. Each dose of roxadustat was significantly higher in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes at 3 (60±21 mg vs. 42±14 mg) and 6 (61±22 mg vs. 41±14 mg) months after the initiation of roxadustat treatment. Conclusion Roxadustat is useful for the treatment of anemia in both CKD patients with and without diabetes. However, the dose required to achieve the target hemoglobin level may be higher in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes.

Cardiac and Kidney Adverse Effects of HIF Prolyl-Hydroxylase Inhibitors for Anemia in Patients With CKD Not Receiving Dialysis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are novel, orally administered agents for anemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We evaluated the cardiac and kidney-related adverse effects of HIF-PHIs among patients with CKD and anemia.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

SETTING & STUDY POPULATIONS

Patients with anemia and CKD not receiving maintenance dialysis.

SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES

RCTs comparing HIF-PHIs to placebo or an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) with primary outcomes of cardiac and kidney-related adverse events (AEs).

DATA EXTRACTION

Two independent reviewers evaluated RCTs for eligibility and extracted relevant data.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Dichotomous variables were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel method and presented as risk ratios (RRs). Subgroup analyses evaluated different intervention times and HIF-PHIs, as well as phase 2 versus phase 3 trials. The certainty of findings was rated according to GRADE criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies with 15,144 participants were included. No significant difference in the risk of cardiac AEs was observed between the HIF-PHIs group and the placebo (RR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.89-1.16]; moderate certainty) or ESA (RR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.98-1.14]; low certainty) groups. No significant difference in the risk of kidney-related AEs was observed between the HIF-PHIs group and the placebo (RR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.98-1.20]; moderate certainty) or ESA (RR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.94-1.06]; low certainty) groups. The occurrence of hypertension and hyperkalemia was higher in the HIF-PHIs group than in the placebo group (RRs of 1.35 [95% CI, 1.14-1.60] and 1.25 [95% CI, 1.03-1.51], respectively; both findings had high certainty). The occurrence of hypertension was lower in the HIF-PHIs group than in the ESA group (RR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.81-0.98]; moderate certainty).

LIMITATIONS

The reporting criteria of cardiac and kidney-related AEs and dosage of HIF-PHIs were inconsistent across trials.

CONCLUSIONS

The occurrence of cardiac or kidney-related AEs in the HIF-PHI groups were not different compared with placebo or ESA groups.

REGISTRATION

Registered at PROSPERO with registration number CRD42021228243.

A network meta-analysis of the efficacy of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitors in dialysis chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Five types of HIF-PHIs have been authorized for anemia treatment in CKD patients in China and Japan. These are enarodustat, roxadustat, daprodustat, vadadustat, and molidustat. How effectively they compare to ESAs about clinical results in CKD-DD patients is uncertain. This study examined the RCT evidence about the benefits and risks of HIF-PHIs and ESAs in dialysis CKD patients.

METHODS

We conducted an extensive investigation and network meta-analysis of RCTs. In these RCTs, patients with CKD-DD received one of five different HIF-PHI or ESAs, a placebo, and no medical intervention. Outcomes included hemoglobin, iron parameters, and adverse events, and there were four weeks of follow-up at least. A frequentist framework for multivariate random effects meta-analyzed the results. The effect sizes of categorical variables were displayed as odds ratios. Mean differences were employed for computing continuous outcomes with common units; otherwise, standardized mean differences were applied. The Cochrane tool evaluated the bias risk in RCTs.

RESULTS

26 RCTs with 14945 patients were qualified for inclusion. Compared to the placebo, HIF-PHIs and ESAs dramatically boosted hemoglobin without affecting serum iron. Roxadustat performed better hemoglobin levels than ESAs (MD 0.32, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.53) and daprodustat (0.46, 0.09 to 0.84). Roxadustat (91.8%) was the top hemoglobin treatment among all medical interventions, as determined by the SUCRA ranking. However, roxadustat caused more thrombosis and hypertension than ESAs (1.61, 1.22 to 2.12) and vadadustat (1.36, 1.01 to 1.82). The lowest rates of hypertension and thrombosis were seen in molidustat (80.7%) and ESAs (88.5%). Compared with a placebo, ESAs and HIF-PHIs all affected TSAT levels. Except for molidustat, the other four HIF-PHIs impact different iron parameters. Regarding ferritin reduction, roxadustat (90.9%) and daprodustat (60.9%) came out on top. Enarodustat (80.9%) and roxadustat (74%) placed best and second in lowering hepcidin levels. The former two medicines for TIBC improvement were vadadustat (98.7%) and enarodustat (80.9%).

CONCLUSION

The most effective treatment for hemoglobin correction is roxadustat. The superior efficacy of reducing hepcidin makes roxadustat and enarodustat appropriate for patients with inflammation. However, the increased risk of hypertension and thrombosis associated with roxadustat should be noted. In patients at risk for hypertension and thrombosis, molidustat and ESAs may be preferable options. When administering roxadustat and daprodustat, clinicians should check ferritin to assess iron storage. Lower TSAT in patients receiving HIF-PHIs and ESAs treatment suggests intravenous iron supplements are needed.

Roxadustat (FG-4592) abated lipopolysaccharides-induced depressive-like symptoms via PI3K signaling

Background

Despite its role in inflammation and the redox system under hypoxia, the effects and molecular mechanisms of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) in neuroinflammation-associated depression are poorly explored. Furthermore, Prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing proteins (PHDs) regulate HIF-1; however, whether and how PHDs regulate depressive-like behaviors under Lipopolysaccharides (LPS)-induced stress conditions remain covered.

Methods

To highlight the roles and underlying mechanisms of PHDs-HIF-1 in depression, we employed behavioral, pharmacological, and biochemical analyses using the LPS-induced depression model.

Results

Lipopolysaccharides treatment induced depressive-like behaviors, as we found, increased immobility and decreased sucrose preference in the mice. Concurrently, we examined increased cytokine levels, HIF-1 expression, mRNA levels of PHD1/PHD2, and neuroinflammation upon LPS administration, which Roxadustat reduced. Furthermore, the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin reversed Roxadustat-induced changes. Additionally, Roxadustat treatment attenuated LPS-induced synaptic impairment and improved spine numbers, ameliorated by wortmannin.

Conclusion

Lipopolysaccharides-dysregulates HIF-PHDs signaling may contribute to neuroinflammation-coincides depression via PI3K signaling.

Lower starting dose of roxadustat in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients with anaemia: a study protocol for a randomised, multicentre, open-label study

INTRODUCTION

Roxadustat is a first-in-class oral therapy that treats chronic kidney disease (CKD) anaemia with the benefit of a novel mechanism of action that consistently corrects and maintains haemoglobin (Hb) across the spectrum of non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD anaemia with an acceptable safety profile.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised, control, open-label, multicentre trial. About 250 adult Chinese participants with stage 3-5 CKD NDD in approximately 30 centres will be enrolled, randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, to receive a 16-week treatment and 4-week follow-up. The interventions for study arm are <60 kg: 50 mg TIW and ≥60 kg: 70 mg TIW; for control arm, <60 kg: 70 mg TIW and ≥60 kg: 100 mg TIW. The primary endpoint is the mean change in haemoglobin level from baseline to average over weeks 12-16. Secondary endpoints are to assess the proportion of subjects achieving an average Hb level of 100 to 120 g/L over weeks 12-16, the Hb variability, the rescue therapy requirement between two groups and the safety in two groups. The exploratory objectives are expected to evaluate the rate and time of Hb response, times of dose adjustment, the proportion of subjects with rapid Hb rise, overshooting during the treatment between two different starting dose groups, and subgroup analyses.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Medical Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital has approved this study (No. S2020-523-05) and will be performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participant consent will be obtained in writing. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100045359.

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors vs. erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on iron metabolism in non-dialysis-dependent anemic patients with CKD: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effects of five hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors (HIF-PHIs), two erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), and placebo on iron metabolism in renal anemia patients with non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD).

METHOD

Five electronic databases were searched for studies. Randomized controlled clinical trials comparing HIF-PHIs, ESAs, and placebo in NDD-CKD patients were selected. The statistical program used for network meta-analysis was Stata/SE 15.1. The main outcomes were the change in hepcidin and hemoglobin (Hb) levels. The merits of intervention measures were predicted by the surface under the cumulative ranking curve method.

RESULTS

Of 1,589 original titles screened, data were extracted from 15 trials (3,228 participants). All HIF-PHIs and ESAs showed greater Hb level-raising ability than placebo. Among them, desidustat demonstrated the highest probability of increasing Hb (95.6%). Hepcidin [mean deviation (MD) = -43.42, 95%CI: -47.08 to -39.76], ferritin (MD= -48.56, 95%CI: -55.21 to -41.96), and transferrin saturation (MD = -4.73, 95%CI: -5.52 to -3.94) were decreased, while transferrin (MD = 0.09, 95%CI: 0.01 to 0.18) and total iron-binding capacity (MD = 6.34, 95%CI: 5.71 to 6.96) was increased in HIF-PHIs versus those in ESAs. In addition, this study observed heterogeneity in the ability of HIF-PHIs to decrease hepcidin. Compared with darbepoetin, only daprodustat (MD = -49.09, 95% CI: -98.13 to -0.05) could significantly reduce hepcidin levels. Meanwhile, daprodustat also showed the highest hepcidin-lowering efficacy (84.0%), while placebo was the lowest (8.2%).

CONCLUSION

For NDD-CKD patients, HIF-PHIs could ameliorate functional iron deficiency by promoting iron transport and utilization, which may be achieved by decreasing hepcidin levels. Interestingly, HIF-PHIs had heterogeneous effects on iron metabolism.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=242777, Identifier CRD42021242777.

Effects of roxadustat on anemia, iron metabolism, and lipid metabolism in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease

Background

We determined the effects of roxadustat on the values of anemia, iron metabolism, renal function, proteinuria, and lipid metabolism and identified the associated factors of the change in hemoglobin levels after roxadustat administration in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who were receiving an erythropoietin-stimulating agent (ESA).

Methods

We conducted retrospective analysis of the changes in hemoglobin, serum ferritin, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglyceride levels; transferrin saturation; the estimated glomerular filtration rate; and the urinary protein/creatinine ratio over 24 weeks after the change from an ESA to roxadustat in 50 patients with non-dialysis CKD and anemia (roxadustat group). Seventy-two patients with non-dialysis CKD and anemia who proceeded ESA therapy were used as the control (ESA) group.

Results

We observed no significant between-group differences in clinical parameters at baseline except for the significantly lower hemoglobin concentration and lower proportion of diabetes mellitus in the roxadustat group. The hemoglobin concentration was significantly higher in the roxadustat group after 24 weeks (11.3 ± 1.2 versus 10.3 ± 1.0 g/dL; value of p < 0.05), whereas the transferrin saturation, ferritin concentration, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and urinary protein/creatinine ratio were not different between the two groups. TC (135.9 ± 40.0 versus 165.3 ± 38.4 mg/dL; value of p < 0.05), LDL-C (69.1 ± 28.3 versus 87.2 ± 31.5 mg/dL; value of p < 0.05), HDL-C (41.4 ± 13.5 versus 47.2 ± 15.3 mg/dL; value of p < 0.05), and triglyceride concentrations (101.5 ± 52.7 versus 141.6 ± 91.4 mg/dL, value of p < 0.05) were significantly lower in the roxadustat group compared with the ESA group at 24 weeks. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the roxadustat dose at baseline (standard coefficient [β] = 0.280, value of p = 0.043) was correlated with the change in the hemoglobin levels during the first 4 weeks of roxadustat treatment, whereas age (β = 0.319, value of p = 0.017) and the roxadustat dose at 24 weeks (β = -0.347, value of p = 0.010) were correlated with the hemoglobin concentration after 24 weeks of roxadustat administration.

Conclusion

Roxadustat can improve anemia and reduce serum cholesterol and triglyceride levels in non-dialysis CKD patients after the patients' treatment was switched from an ESA without affecting renal function or proteinuria. These results indicate that roxadustat has superior effects to ESAs regarding anemia and lipid metabolism at the dose selected for the comparison in patients with non-dialysis CKD.

Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials including 6,518 Patients

Background

Roxadustat is a newly listed oral hypoxia-inducible factor-proline enhancing enzyme inhibitor (HIF-PHI) in recent years. There have been some studies that have proved the efficacy of roxadustat on the treatment of renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but there are still different conclusions on its safety.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assess efficacy and safety of roxadustat treatment for anemia in CKD patients. The Cochrane Literature Quality Evaluation Scale was used to evaluate the quality of included literature. We choose fixed-effects model or random effects model for data processing based on heterogeneity. It was considered statistically significant when p value <0.05.

Results

A total of 842 articles were retrieved, and 16 trials in the 15 articles were finally included. Roxadustat treatment significantly increased Hb levels. Iron (SMD 1.43, 95% CI 0.31 to 2.55), total iron-binding capacity (SMD 2.06, 95% CI 0.91 to 3.22), ferritin (WMD 21.33, 95% CI 3.04 to 39.62), transferrin saturation (SMD 4.17, 95% CI 3.90 to 4.45), and LDL-cholesterol (SMD -0.64, 95% CI -0.73 to -0.55) showed statistical significance in dialysis-dependent (DD) study. And hepcidin (SMD -1.56, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.50), transferrin (SMD 1.80, 95% CI 1.53 to 2.06), total iron-binding capacity (SMD 1.62, 95% CI 1.39 to 1.86), total cholesterol (SMD -0.88, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.09), ferritin (WMD -52.68, 95% CI -62.68 to -42.67), transferrin saturation (SMD -5.57, 95% CI -7.47 to -3.68), and LDL-cholesterol (SMD -0.85, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.34) showed statistical significance in not dialysis-dependent (NDD) study. In terms of safety, roxadustat treatment did not increase risk of total adverse events either in dialysis-dependent or not dialysis-dependent patients.

Conclusion

Roxadustat can effectively improve anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. There was no significant difference in total adverse events compared with the control group.

Efficacy and safety of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized double-blind controlled clinical trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anemia in NDD-CKD patients to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a hemoglobin (Hb) response. Secondary efficacy endpoints were hepcidin, serum iron, serum ferritin (SF), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin saturation (TAST), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL). In addition, adverse events (AEs) were compared. Meta-analyses were performed using Revman 5.4 software. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. This study was conducted under a pre-established protocol registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42021252331).

RESULTS

Seven studies enrolled 4,764 patients, of whom 2,730 received roxadustat and 2,034 received placebo. The results of this meta-analysis showed that roxadustat increased Hb levels [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.68, P < 0.001, I 2 = 95%], and Hb response [relative ratio (RR) = 8.12, 95% CI: 5.80 to 11.37, P < 0.001, I 2 = 61%]. In addition, roxadustat significantly increased transferrin TAST. During the treatment period in patients with anemia, the AEs of roxadustat compared with placebo was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Roxadustat can improve anemia in NDD-CKD patients by increasing Hb levels and regulating iron metabolism, but does not increase the incidence of AEs.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021252331].

Effect of Roxadustat versus erythropoietin (EPO) for treating anemia in patients with diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Renal anemia of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) shows higher incidence rate, earlier onset and higher severity than other chronic kidney disease (CKD). Roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, improves CKD anemia. This retrospective cohort study evaluates if Roxadustat could effectively treat DKD anemia.

Methods

DKD anemia patients treated with either Roxadustat or erythropoietin (EPO) for 3 months in two hospitals were enrolled. EPO group were matched 1:1 to Roxadustat group based on age, gender and baseline Hb. Baseline data include age, sex, dialysis, height, weight, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Hct), serum albumin (ALB), serum creatinine (Scr), eGFR, C-reactive protein (CRP), and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH). Primary and secondary outcomes were change of Hb (ΔHb) and Hct (ΔHct), Hb response rate and Hb qualified rate. Sensitivity analyses were performed and the effect size were calculated.

Results

No significant differences were observed in body mass index (BMI), Scr, eGFR, Hct, CRP, and dialysis between the 2 groups (61 subjects each). ALB, iPTH, and DKD stage differed between the 2 groups. After 3-month treatment, Roxadustat significantly increased patients' Hb and Hct. Although ΔHb and ΔHct of the Roxadustat group was higher than those of EPO group, difference in the least-square mean changes (95% CI) were 4.9 (-2.4, 12.1) and 1.2 (-1.1, 3.4), while Cohen's d were 0.18 and 0.14, suggesting that Roxadustat's ability to increase Hb within 3-month was similar to EPO. 78.7% and 54.1% of the patients responded to anti-anemia therapy in the Roxadustat and EPO group, respectively. Logistic regression analysis showed the Hb response rate of Roxadustat was 3.30 (1.20, 9.94) times higher than that of EPO. Subgroup analysis suggested that Roxadustat might have better efficacy in treating patients in the advanced stage, with high CRP and iPTH, and low ALB levels.

Conclusions

In DKD patients, Roxadustat improves renal anemia. Effect of Roxadustat is similar to that of EPO.

Comparison of efficacy of roxadustat and erythropoietin for the treatment of renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a retrospective study

Background

Renal anemia is a common complication in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Both roxadustat and recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO) are alternative option for patients with renal anemia. However, the adverse events of rhEPO limited the wide use of it and the concrete difference of real clinical efficacy of rhEPO and roxadustat was still uncertain. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of roxadustat for improving renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 790 consecutive patients with renal anemia treated with roxadustat and rhEPO was conducted at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital. Patients were classified into two groups: roxadustat (n=95) and rhEPO (n=695). Baseline characteristics were compared in two groups. After propensity-score matching at a 1:3 ratio, we compared the efficacy of roxadustat and rhEPO in improving anemia, mainly using the Mann-Whitney U test. The follow-up period lasted 24 weeks.

Results

The baseline characteristics were comparable between the two groups after propensity-score matching. There were no significant differences in the hemoglobin levels and estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFRs) of the two groups before roxadustat or rhEPO treatment (P>0.05). The hemoglobin level after 4 weeks of treatment was 96 g/L in the roxadustat group, and the increase from baseline was 10 g/L; in the rhEPO group, these values were 87 and 6 g/L, respectively (P<0.001). After 12 weeks of treatment, the hemoglobin level and change from baseline were 105 and 15 g/L in the roxadustat group and 94 and 11 g/L in the rhEPO group, respectively (P<0.001). Similar results were observed after 24 weeks of treatment; the hemoglobin level and change from baseline were 105 and 17 g/L in the roxadustat group and 97 and 14 g/L in the rhEPO group (P=0.001).

Conclusions

This retrospective study demonstrated that orally administered roxadustat improved hemoglobin levels more than rhEPO in patients with CKD and anemia.

Changes in Iron Availability with Roxadustat in Nondialysis- and Dialysis-Dependent Patients with Anemia of CKD

Background

Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, increases hemoglobin by stimulating erythropoietin synthesis and improving iron availability through facilitation of iron uptake and/or release from stores. In this exploratory analysis, we assessed the effect of roxadustat treatment on laboratory parameters related to iron metabolism in patients with anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

Data were pooled from pivotal, randomized, phase 3 roxadustat trials: three placebo-controlled, double-blind trials in nondialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD and three open-label, active-comparator (epoetin alfa) trials in dialysis-dependent (DD) CKD. In this exploratory analysis, mean changes from baseline in hemoglobin, iron parameters, and hepcidin, and intravenous (iv) iron use were evaluated. Pooled results in NDD CKD and DD CKD patients are reported.

Results

Overall, 4277 patients with NDD CKD and 3890 patients with DD CKD were evaluated. Hemoglobin increases with roxadustat treatment were accompanied by increases in serum iron and total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) and decreases in serum ferritin and hepcidin from baseline through week 52. With epoetin alfa, the hemoglobin increase was accompanied by decreases in serum ferritin and hepcidin, but serum iron decreased, and there was no change in TIBC. With placebo, there were no changes in hemoglobin, iron parameters, or hepcidin. During treatment, iv iron use was reduced with roxadustat versus placebo and epoetin alfa.

Conclusions

In patients with NDD CKD and DD CKD, roxadustat treatment is associated with increases in serum iron and TIBC, accompanied by reduced hepcidin and indicative of improved iron kinetics. Patients treated with roxadustat achieved target hemoglobin levels with less iv iron use versus comparators. Practitioners treating patients with anemia of CKD with roxadustat should consider its unique effects when interpreting iron parameters.

Risk of infection in roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis

Background: Many studies demonstrated that roxadustat (FG-4592) could increase hemoglobin (Hb) levels effectively in anemia patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its safety remains controversial. This study aims to explore the risk of infection for CKD patients treated with roxadustat, especially focused on sepsis.

Methods: We thoroughly searched for the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing treatment with roxadustat versus erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, European Union Clinical Trials Register. Both on and not on dialysis anemia patients with CKD were included. Primary outcomes contained the incidence rates of sepsis. Secondary outcomes included infection-related consequences (septic shock and other infection events), general safety outcomes [all-cause mortality, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and treatment-emergent serious adverse events (TESAEs)] and iron parameters. Moreover, a trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to assess if the results were supposed to be a robust conclusion.

Results: Eighteen RCTs (n = 11,305) were included. Overall, the incidence of sepsis (RR: 2.42, 95% CI [1.50, 3.89], p = 0.0003) and cellulitis (RR: 2.07, 95% CI [1.24, 3.44], p = 0.005) were increased in the roxadustat group compared with placebo group. In non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients, the incidence of cellulitis (RR 2.01, 95% CI [1.23, 3.28], p = 0.005) was significantly higher in roxadustat group than that in the ESAs or placebo group. Both groups showed similar results in the incidence of septic shock (RR 1.29, 95% CI [0.86, 1.94], p = 0.22). A significant increased risk of all-cause mortality [risk ratios (RR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.05, 1.26], p = 0.002] was found in roxadustat treatment, and TSA confirmed the result. Compared with ESAs or placebo, both the incident rates of TEAEs (RR:1.03, 95% CI [1.01, 1.04], p = 0.008) and TESAEs (RR: 1.06, 95% CI [1.02, 1.11], p = 0.002) were significantly increased in roxadustat group. As for iron parameters, changes from baseline (Δ) of hepcidin (MD: -26.46, 95% CI [-39.83, -13.09], p = 0.0001), Δ ferritin and Δ TSAT were remarkably lower in the roxadustat group, while Δ Hb, Δ iron and Δ TIBC increased significantly versus those in ESAs or placebo group.

Conclusion: We found evidence that incidence rates of sepsis and cellulitis are higher in roxadustat group compared with placebo. This may be the result of improved iron homeostasis. The risk of all-cause mortality, TEAEs and TESAEs in CKD patients also increased in patients treated with roxadustat. We need more clinical and mechanistic studies to confirm whether roxadustat really causes infection.

Roxadustat: Not just for anemia

Roxadustat is a recently approved hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that has demonstrated favorable safety and efficacy in the treatment of renal anemia. Recent studies found it also has potential for the treatment of other hypoxia-related diseases. Although clinical studies have not yet found significant adverse or off-target effects of roxadustat, clinicians must be vigilant about these possible effects. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates the expression of many genes and physiological processes in response to a decreased level of oxygen, but its role in the pathogenesis of different diseases is complex and controversial. In addition to increasing the expression of hypoxia-inducible factor, roxadustat also has some effects that may be HIF-independent, indicating some potential off-target effects. This article reviews the pharmacological characteristics of roxadustat, its current status in the treatment of renal anemia, and its possible effects on other pathological mechanisms.

Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilisers for the anaemia of chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Anaemia occurs in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and is more prevalent with lower levels of kidney function. Anaemia in CKD is associated with death related to cardiovascular (CV) disease and infection. Established treatments include erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), iron supplementation and blood transfusions. Oral hypoxia-inducible factors (HIF) stabilisers are now available to manage anaemia in people with CKD.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the benefits and potential harms of HIF stabilisers for the management of anaemia in people with CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 22 November 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to our review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised studies evaluating hypoxia-inducible factors stabilisers compared to placebo, standard care, ESAs or iron supplementation in people with CKD were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Five authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Treatment estimates were summarised using random effects pair-wise meta-analysis and expressed as a relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD), with a corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 51 studies randomising 30,994 adults. These studies compared HIF stabilisers to either placebo or an ESA. Compared to placebo, HIF stabiliser therapy had uncertain effects on CV death (10 studies, 1114 participants): RR 3.68, 95% CI 0.19 to 70.21; very low certainty evidence), and nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) (3 studies, 822 participants): RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.31 to 5.36; I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), probably decreases the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion (8 studies, 4329 participants): RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.60; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and increases the proportion of patients reaching the target haemoglobin (Hb) (10 studies, 5102 participants): RR 8.36, 95% CI 6.42 to 10.89; I² = 37%; moderate certainty evidence). Compared to ESAs, HIF stabiliser therapy may make little or no difference to CV death (17 studies, 10,340 participants): RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.26; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), nonfatal MI (7 studies, 7765 participants): RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.10; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and nonfatal stroke (5 studies, 7285 participants): RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.56; I² = 8%; low certainty evidence), and had uncertain effects on fatigue (2 studies, 3471 participants): RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.16; I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence). HIF stabiliser therapy probably decreased the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusion (11 studies, 10,786 participants): RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.00; I² = 25%; moderate certainty evidence), but may make little or no difference on the proportion of patients reaching the target Hb (14 studies, 4601 participants): RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.07; I² = 70%; low certainty evidence), compared to ESA. The effect of HIF stabilisers on hospitalisation for heart failure, peripheral arterial events, loss of unassisted dialysis vascular access patency, access intervention, cancer, infection, pulmonary hypertension and diabetic nephropathy was uncertain. None of the included studies reported life participation. Adverse events were rarely and inconsistently reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

HIF stabiliser management of anaemia had uncertain effects on CV death, fatigue, death (any cause), CV outcomes, and kidney failure compared to placebo or ESAs. Compared to placebo or ESAs, HIF stabiliser management of anaemia probably decreased the proportion of patients requiring blood transfusions, and probably increased the proportion of patients reaching the target Hb when compared to placebo.

Roxadustat regulates iron metabolism in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

The effect of roxadustat on iron homeostasis in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of roxadustat for the treatment of iron metabolism disorders in dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) CKD patients.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Internet and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcomes were changes in serum iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin saturation (TSAT), ferritin, transferrin, and hepcidin. The secondary outcomes included the changes in hemoglobin (Hb) and the incidences of adverse events (AEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs).

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs comprising 4976 participants were included. Compared to the control group, increases in the serum iron (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.27, P < 0.00001), TIBC (SMD = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82 to 1.22, P < 0.00001) and transferrin levels (WMD = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.69, P < 0.00001) were found in the roxadustat group. Compared to the control group, decreases in the ferritin levels (WMD = -37.82, 95% CI: -59.89 to -15.74, P = 0.0008) and hepcidin levels (WMD = -24.04, 95% CI: -36.28 to -11.79, P = 0.0001) were observed in the roxadustat group. The meta-analysis showed that roxadustat significantly increases Hb levels (WMD = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.42 to 1.12, P < 0.0001). The incidences of AEs and SAEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the control group (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.07, P = 0.04; RR = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.15, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that roxadustat could effectively improve iron metabolism in patients with CKD.

The Efficacy and Safety of Roxadustat for Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a global public health problem, and anemia is a common complication in CKD patients. Roxadustat (FG-4592) is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizer. Roxadustat has been shown in studies to keep up with and increase hemoglobin better than placebo or erythropoietin. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat.

Methods: We searched CBM, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang Database, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in CKD patients. The papers were screened using rigorous criteria and their quality was assessed using the Cochrane 5.1.0 assessment manual for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RevMan 5.3 was used to extract and synthesize data for meta-analysis.

Results: There were 8 RCTs (7 articles) in all, and 1,364 patients with chronic kidney disease anemia were involved. The overall quality of the studies included was satisfactory. The meta-analysis findings revealed that roxadustat can considerably enhance hemoglobin, transferrin, and total iron binding capacity (TIBC) in both dialysis-dependent (DD) and non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) patients: Hemoglobin (Hb): DD: [SMD = 0.23, 95% CI (0.01, 0.44), p = 0.04], NDD: [SMD = 2.08, 95% CI (1.23, 2.93) p < 0.000001]; transferrin: DD: [SMD = 0.78, 95% CI (0.24, 1.32), p = 0.004], NDD: [SMD = 1.37, 95% CI (0.76, 1.98), p < 0.0001]; TIBC: DD [SMD = 0.97, 95% CI (0.64, 1.29), p < 0.00001], NDD [SMD = 1.34, 95% CI (0.9, 1.78), p < 0.00001]. After roxadustat therapy, patients’ serum iron levels were considerably higher in the dialysis group than in the control group, but there was no significant change in the NDD group [SMD = 0.42, 95% CI (0.27, 0.57), p < 0.00001]. In the NDD group, hepcidin, ferritin, and transferrin saturation (TSAT) were significantly reduced after roxadustat treatment: Hepcidin [SMD = −1.59, 95% CI (−2.69, −0.49), p = 0.005], ferritin [SMD = −0.51, 95% CI (−0.72, 0.3) p < 0.00001], TSAT [SMD = −0.41, 95% CI (−0.62, 0.2), p < 0.0001]. In terms of safety, adverse events (AE) [SMD = 1.08, 95% CI (0.98, 1.18) p = 0.11] and serious adverse events (SAE) [SMD = 1.32, 95% CI (0.97, 1.9) p = 0.08] were not significantly different between the two groups.

Conclusion: Roxadustat can improve anemia in NDD patients with chronic kidney disease, and its short-term safety was comparable to that of the comparison group.

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease patients: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Background

Roxadustat (ROX) is a new medication for anemia as a complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Our meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ROX, especially on the cardiovascular risks, for anemia in NDD-CKD patients.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched systematically from inception to July 2021 to look for randomized control trials (RCTs) that evaluated ROX NDD-CKD patients. Hemoglobin level and iron utilization parameters, including ferritin, serum iron, transferrin saturation (TSAT), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), transferrin, and hepcidin were analyzed for efficacy. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) were calculated and presented with their 95% confidential intervals (CIs).

Results

Nine RCTs included a total of 3,175 patients in the ROX group and 2,446 patients in the control group. When compared the control group, ROX increased Hb level significantly (SMD: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.08, 2.22; P< 0.00001) and improved iron utilization parameters by decreasing ferritin (SMD: -0.32; 95% CI: -0.51, -0.14; P = 0.0006), TSAT (SMD: -0.19; 95% CI: -0.32, -0.07; P = 0.003), and hepcidin (SMD: -0.74; 95% CI: -1.09, -0.39; P< 0.0001) and increasing TIBC (SMD: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.22; P< 0.00001) and transferrin (SMD: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.70, 1.71; P< 0.00001). As for safety, ROX was associated with higher serious adverse effects (RR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.13; P = 0.01), deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (RR: 3.80; 95% CI: 1.5, 9.64; P = 0.08), and hypertension (HTN) (RR: 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13, 1.65; P = 0.001).

Conclusion

We concluded that ROX increased Hb level and improved iron utilization parameters in NDD-CKD patients, but ROX was associated with higher serious adverse effects, especially DVT and HTN. Our results support the use of ROX for NDD-CKD patients with anemia. However, higher-quality RCTs are still needed to ensure its safety and risk of thrombosis.

Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome: Open-label, dose-selection, lead-in stage of a phase 3 study

Anemia is the predominant cytopenia in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and treatment options are limited. Roxadustat is a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor approved for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease in the UK, EU, China, Japan, South Korea, and Chile. MATTERHORN is a phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in anemia of lower risk-MDS. Eligible patients had baseline serum erythropoietin ≤ 400 mIU/mL, and a low packed RBC transfusion burden. In this open-label (OL), dose-selection, lead-in phase, enrolled patients were assigned to 1 of 3 roxadustat starting doses (n = 8 each): 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mg/kg. The primary efficacy endpoint of the OL phase was the proportion of patients with transfusion independence (TI) for ≥ 8 consecutive weeks in the first 28 treatment weeks. A secondary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients with a ≥ 50% reduction in RBC transfusions over an 8-week period compared with baseline. Adverse events were monitored. Patients were followed for 52 weeks. Of the 24 treated patients, TI was achieved in 9 patients (37.5%) at 28 and 52 weeks; 7 of these patients were receiving 2.5 mg/kg dose when TI was achieved. A ≥ 50% reduction in RBC transfusions was achieved in 54.2% and 58.3% of patients at 28 and 52 weeks, respectively. Oral roxadustat dosed thrice weekly was well tolerated. There were no fatalities or progression to acute myeloid leukemia. Based on these outcomes, 2.5 mg/kg was the chosen starting roxadustat dose for the ongoing double-blind study phase.

Randomised clinical trial: a phase 1b study of GB004, an oral HIF-1α stabiliser, for treatment of ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Epithelial barrier dysfunction contributes to a dysregulated intestinal immune response in ulcerative colitis (UC). GB004 is an orally administered, small molecule, gut-targeted stabiliser of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α, a transcription factor with protective roles at the epithelial layer of the inflamed gut.

AIMS

To evaluate safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and efficacy of GB004 in patients with active UC.

METHODS

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study randomised patients 2:1 to receive an oral solution of GB004 120 mg or placebo once daily for 28 days. Eligible patients had a Robarts Histopathology Index score ≥4 with neutrophils in the epithelium, total Mayo Clinic score 3-12, Mayo Clinic endoscopic subscore ≥1, and blood in the stool, despite treatment with 5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids or immunosuppressants.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were randomised. GB004 120 mg for 28 days was generally well-tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 27.3% (3/11) and 39.1% (9/23) of patients in the placebo and GB004 groups respectively. Nausea and dysgeusia were most commonly reported in the GB004 group (0% for placebo and 21.7% [5/23] and 13.0% [3/23] respectively for GB004). There were no treatment-related serious adverse events or deaths. GB004 exhibited minimal accumulation, with higher colonic concentrations relative to plasma. Exploratory pharmacodynamic and efficacy analyses demonstrated GB004 target engagement and numerically higher proportions of patients achieving improvement in multiple measures of disease activity, respectively, at day 28 for GB004 compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

Results from this phase 1b trial support evaluation of the full therapeutic potential of GB004 for the treatment of UC. A phase 2 study (NCT04556383) is ongoing. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT03860896.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Roxadustat

The pharmacokinetics of roxadustat are well characterized, with an apparent volume of distribution after oral administration of 22–57 L, apparent clearance of 1.2–2.65 L/h, and renal clearance of 0.030–0.026 L/h in healthy volunteers; the elimination half-life is 9.6–16 h. Plasma binding is 99% and the fraction eliminated by hemodialysis is 2.34%. As an interpretation of the pharmacodynamics of roxadustat, we proposed a concept with a hypothetical cascade of two subsequent effects, first on erythropoetin (EPO) and second on hemoglobin (delta Hb). The primary effect on EPO is observed within a few hours after roxadustat administration and can be modeled using the sigmoidal Hill equation. The concentration at half-maximum effect can be inferred at 10–36 µg/mL, the Hill coefficient at 3.3, and the effect bisection time at 10–17 h, corresponding to EPO half-life. The subsequent effect on hemoglobin (delta Hb) is observed after several weeks and can be interpreted as an irreversible, dose proportional, unsaturable effect, continuing in agreement with the lifespan of red blood cells of 63–112 days.

An evaluation of roxadustat for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Anemia is one of the major complications of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) have been the mainstay of renal anemia treatment. However, there are several safety drawbacks, and a safer and more effective alternative treatment has been sought.

AREAS COVERED

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) have been developed as a novel orally active therapeutic agent for renal anemia. HIF-PHIs stimulate endogenous EPO and optimize iron utilization. Roxadustat is a first-in-class HIF-PHI for the treatment of anemia in CKD patients approved in China, Japan, South Korea, and Chile. The authors herein evaluate the pharmacology of roxadustat and give their expert perspectives on its use.

EXPERT OPINION

Phase 3 clinical trials have demonstrated that roxadustat effectively increases and maintains hemoglobin (Hb) levels in both nondialysis-dependent and dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Roxadustat also improved iron metabolism and reduced intravenous (IV) iron requirements. However, pooled analyses of phase 3 studies have revealed frequent thromboembolic events in the roxadustat group, which might be attributed to rapid changes in Hb and inadequate iron supplementation. Roxadustat is an attractive alternative treatment especially for patients with ESA hyporesponsive due to impaired iron utilization, and so appropriate selection of target patients and its proper use are crucially important.

Safety and Efficacy of Roxadustat for Anemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis

Background: Roxadustat, a hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl-hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI), has been used to treat anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its safety and efficacy remain controversial.

Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Clinical Trial Registries databases were searched for relevant studies published up to April 2021. We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing roxadustat with placebo or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in anemia patients with CKD with or without dialysis.

Results: Eleven studies including 6,631 patients met the inclusion criteria. In non-dialysis-dependent (NDD-) and dialysis-dependent (DD-) CKD patients, the total adverse events were not significantly different between the roxadustat and control (placebo for NDD-CKD patients and ESA for DD-CKD patients) groups [relative risk (RR) = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.00, 1.04, P = 0.08, and RR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.91, 1.64, P = 0.18, respectively], and the trial sequential analysis (TSA) confirmed the result in the NDD-CKD groups. No significant differences in hyperkalemia and infection incidences were found between roxadustat and placebo in the DD-CKD groups. The pooled results showed that roxadustat significantly increased the hemoglobin response rate compared with placebo in the NDD-CKD group and had an effect similar to that of ESA in the DD-CKD group. However, iron metabolism parameters did not seem to be obviously optimized by roxadustat.

Conclusion: Roxadustat can be safely used in CKD patients. Oral roxadustat was more effective than placebo as a therapy for anemia in NDD-CKD patients and non-inferior to ESA in correcting anemia in DD-CKD patients. However, additional clinical trials are still needed to further prove whether roxadustat can optimize iron metabolism.

Efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anaemia in dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Renal anaemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Roxadustat is the first-in-class oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of anaemia. In this systematic review, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in the treatment of anaemia in CKD patients.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched from their inception to February 2021 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy and safety of roxadustat to those of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or a placebo in treating anaemia in CKD patients.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs involving 2743 patients were found. The meta-analysis showed that roxadustat increased haemoglobin (Hb) level by 0.91 g/dL (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.47-1.34, P < .05), transferrin level by 0.50 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.34-0.65, P < .05), and total iron-binding capacity by 50.64 μg/dL (95% CI: 36.21-65.07, P < .05) in CKD patients. Decreases in hepcidin (mean difference [MD] = -23.16, 95% CI: -37.12 to -9.19, P < .05) and ferritin (MD = -38.35, 95% CI: -67.41 to -9.29, P < .05) levels were also observed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) (OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.95-1.32, P = .17) between the roxadustat and control groups; however, the incidence of serious AEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the ESA group (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.06-1.68, P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Roxadustat can significantly improve renal anaemia in CKD patients by increasing Hb level and iron metabolism. However, attention must be paid to the risk of SAEs during treatment.

Safe and Effective Treatment for Anemic Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Roxadustat

Background: Roxadustat is a new oral drug for anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized controlled trial (RCT)-based studies that estimated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in anemia patients with non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) and dialysis-dependent (DD) CKD.

Methods: We searched the PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for related published studies. Moreover, we manually searched relevant pharmaceutical company websites and two international clinical trial registers to search for published and unpublished RCTs comparing roxadustat with erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo.

Results: Fifteen RCTs (seven for DD-CKD patients, eight for NDD-CKD patients) were included in the meta-analysis, with 10,189 patients, 4,810 DD-CKD patients, and 5,379 NDD-CKD patients enrolled. Compared with ESAs (epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa) and placebo, roxadustat raised the hemoglobin level [weighted mean difference (WMD): 0.82 g/dL; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43–1.21], transferrin level (WMD: 0.5 g/L; 95% CI: 0.34–0.65), and TIBC level (WMD: 41.79 μg/dL; 95% CI: 38.67–44.92) and lowered the hepcidin level (WMD: −37.38 ng/ml; 95% CI: −46.63– −28.12) in both the DD-CKD and NDD-CKD patients with renal anemia. Roxadustat improved hemoglobin response and lowered the ferritin and TAST levels in the NDD-CKD patients but not in the DD-CKD patients. Furthermore, there was no difference between the treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of roxadustat and that of ESAs or placebo. But the incidence of serious TEAEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher with NDD-CKD patients (OR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02–1.29).

Conclusion: This study confirmed that roxadustat therapy could alleviate the anemia of DD-CKD and NDD-CKD patients by raising the hemoglobin level and regulating iron metabolism, but increased serious incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in NDD-CKD patients.

A Randomized Trial of Roxadustat in Anemia of Kidney Failure: SIERRAS Study

INTRODUCTION

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, standard of care for anemia of end-stage kidney disease, are associated with cardiovascular events. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat, an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor that stimulates erythropoiesis.

METHODS

SIERRAS was a phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study enrolled adults on dialysis for end-stage kidney disease receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia. Patients were randomized (1:1) to thrice-weekly roxadustat or epoetin alfa. Doses were based on previous epoetin alfa dose and adjusted in the roxadustat arm to maintain hemoglobin at ∼11 g/dl during treatment. Epoetin alfa dosing was adjusted per US package insert. Primary efficacy endpoint was mean hemoglobin (g/dl) change from baseline averaged over weeks 28 to 52. Treatment-emergent adverse events were monitored.

RESULTS

Enrolled patients (roxadustat, n = 370 and epoetin alfa, n = 371) had similar mean (SD) baseline hemoglobin levels (10.30 [0.66] g/dl). Mean (SD) hemoglobin changes for weeks 28 to 52 were 0.39 (0.93) and -0.09 (0.84) in roxadustat and epoetin alfa, respectively. Roxadustat was noninferior (least squares mean difference: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.37, 0.59]; P < 0.001) to epoetin alfa. Tolerability was comparable between treatments.

CONCLUSION

In end-stage kidney disease, roxadustat was noninferior to epoetin alfa in up to 52 weeks of treatment in this erythropoietin-stimulating agent conversion study. Roxadustat had an acceptable tolerability profile.

Roxadustat treatment for anemia in peritoneal dialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Roxadustat, a first-in-class hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor, promotes erythropoiesis and regulates iron metabolism. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in Chinese patients with anemia on peritoneal dialysis (PD).

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-nine patients were randomized and treated with roxadustat (n = 86) or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) (n = 43) for 24 weeks. The primary end points were the mean hemoglobin (Hb) level at week 24, the change in average Hb levels from baseline to week 24, and the cumulative response rate throughout the treatment period. The secondary end points included changes in hepcidin and iron indices and serum lipid levels. Subgroup analysis examined the effect of inflammatory status on the efficacy of Hb. Safety was assessed as the occurrence of emergent adverse events after treatment.

RESULTS

The mean average Hb levels at week 24 and average change in Hb levels from baseline to week 24 were 11.5 g/dL and 2.5 g/dL in the roxadustat group and 11.2 g/dL and 2.2 g/dL in the ESAs group, respectively. The cumulative response rate was 96% in the roxadustat group and 92% in the ESAs group at week 24. Roxadustat decreased hepcidin levels and increased total iron-binding capacity. The decreases in total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were greater with roxadustat than with ESAs. Roxadustat-induced Hb increases were independent of baseline C-reactive protein levels. Common adverse events included hyperkalemia, hypertension, and insomnia.

CONCLUSION

Roxadustat effectively corrected and maintained target Hb levels in Chinese PD patients. This trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (ChiCTR2000035054).

Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney diseases: a meta-analysis

Background: Anemia is a common complication of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Treating renal anemia with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or erythropoietin analogs is effective but has side effects. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of roxadustat in treating CKD-induced anemia.

Methods: We searched publications online and conducted a meta-analysis and calculated relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data and mean differences (MD) with 95% CIs for continuous data.

Results: Of 110 articles, nine were included that contained 12 data sets and 11 randomized control trials on roxadustat. In the non-dialysis-dependent (NDD) high-dose/low-dose subgroups, the change in hemoglobin (Hb) levels was significantly higher in the roxadustat group than in the placebo group (P<0.0001, P=0.001, respectively). The Hb response rate of the roxadustat is higher in the NDD subgroup than in the placebo group (P<0.00001, MD=6.92, 95% CI: 4.03, 11.89). However, in the dialysis-dependent subgroup, there was no significant difference in the change in Hb levels or the Hb response rate between the roxadustat and ESA groups. There was no change in the mortality in the roxadustat group compared to that in the placebo/ESA group. Hyperkalemia may be a side effect of roxadustat.

Conclusions: Roxadustat elevated the serum Hb levels in a manner similar to that observed for ESAs. Roxadustat raised the Hb levels more significantly than the placebo and showed a higher Hb response rate than the placebo group in NDD patients. Roxadustat is a safe and effective drug for anemia in CKD patients.

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors in the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a promising new class of orally administered drugs currently in late-stage global clinical development for the treatment of anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD). HIF-PHIs activate the HIF oxygen-sensing pathway and are efficacious in correcting and maintaining hemoglobin levels in patients with non-dialysis- and dialysis-dependent CKD. In addition to promoting erythropoiesis through the increase in endogenous erythropoietin production, HIF-PHIs reduce hepcidin levels and modulate iron metabolism, providing increases in total iron binding capacity and transferrin levels, and potentially reducing the need for i.v. iron supplementation. Furthermore, HIF-activating drugs are predicted to have effects that extend beyond erythropoiesis. This review summarizes clinical data from current HIF-PHI trials in patients with anemia of CKD, discusses mechanisms of action and pharmacologic properties of HIF-PHIs, and deliberates over safety concerns and potential impact on anemia management in patients with CKD.

Roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis: a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (ALPS)

BACKGROUND

Roxadustat is an orally active hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) anemia.

METHODS

This Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study examined patients with Stages 3-5 CKD, not on dialysis (NCT01887600). Patients were randomized (2:1) to oral roxadustat or placebo three times weekly for 52-104 weeks. This study examined two primary efficacy endpoints: European Union (European Medicines Agency)-hemoglobin (Hb) response, defined as Hb ≥11.0 g/dL that increased from baseline (BL) by ≥1.0 g/dL in patients with Hb >8.0 g/dL or ≥2.0 g/dL in patients with BL Hb ≤8.0 g/dL, without rescue therapy, during the first 24 weeks of treatment; US Food and Drug Administration-change in Hb from BL to the average Hb level during Weeks 28-52, regardless of rescue therapy. Secondary efficacy endpoints and safety were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 594 patients were analyzed (roxadustat: 391; placebo: 203). Superiority of roxadustat versus placebo was demonstrated for both primary efficacy endpoints: Hb response [odds ratio = 34.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 20.48-58.93] and change in Hb from BL [roxadustat - placebo: +1.692 (95% CI 1.52-1.86); both P < 0.001]. Superiority of roxadustat was demonstrated for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol change from BL, and time to first use of rescue medication (both P < 0.001). The incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (roxadustat: 87.7%, placebo: 86.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Roxadustat demonstrated superior efficacy versus placebo in terms of both Hb response rate and change in Hb from BL. The safety profiles of roxadustat and placebo were comparable.

Identification of Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizer roxadustat and its possible metabolites in thoroughbred horses for doping control

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizer belongs to a novel class of pharmacologically active substances, which are capable of inducing the endogenous erythropoietic system. The transcriptional activator HIF has been shown to significantly increase blood hemoglobin and is well set for the treatment of anemia resulting from chronic kidney disease. This research work reports a comprehensive study of the most popular HIF stabilizer roxadustat and its metabolites in thoroughbred horse urine after oral administration. The plausible structures of the detected metabolites were postulated using liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry. Under the experimental condition 13 metabolites (7 phase I, 1 phase II, and 5 conjugates of phase I metabolism) were positively detected (M1-M13). The major phase I metabolites identified were formed by hydroxylation. Dealkylated and hydrolyzed phase I metabolites were also observed in this study. In phase II, a glucuronic acid conjugate of roxadustat was detected as the major metabolite. The sulfonic acid conjugates were observed to be formed from phase I metabolites. The characterized in vivo metabolites can potentially serve as target analytes for doping control analysis; hence, the result is an important tool for assessing its use and abuse in competitive sport.

Whether Prolyl Hydroxylase Blocker-Roxadustat-In the Treatment of Anemia in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease Is the Future?

In patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), anemia develops gradually, which is primarily due to an inadequate synthesis of erythropoietin by the kidneys, as well as to iron disorders in the body, blood loss, shortened erythrocyte survival and inflammation. The currently accepted treatment employs iron, vitamin B12, folic acid supplementation and the use of erythropoiesis stimulants, which are administered only parenterally. Research is currently underway on the new erythropoiesis drugs that can be orally administered, i.e., hypoxia-inducible factor-propyl hydroxylase inhibitor (HIF-PHI) inhibitors which temporarily block propyl hydroxylase [PHD] catalysis and promote a transient increase in the expression of genes regulated by HIF, including kidney and liver erythropoietin [EPO]. Roxadustat is the first oral drug in this class and a potent HIF-PHD inhibitor, exerted to treat anemia in patients with CKD. In phase 1, 2 and 3 studies with CKD-affected patients, roxadustat was more effective to stimulate erythropoiesis for anemia correction than previously used drugs. Roxadustat can be orally given, unlike other erythropoiesis drugs with parenteral administration only, which grants roxadustat a considerable advantage. Our paper presents the results of studies with roxadustat applied for the treatment of anemia in CKD patients with or without dialysis. We are currently not yet able to know the exact role of roxadustat in the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD, but time will tell. It is possible that roxadustat has benefits an iron metabolism and cardiovascular risk.

Roxadustat in treating anemia in dialysis patients (ROAD): protocol and rationale of a multicenter prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Roxadustat has been shown effective in treating patients with anemia due to chronic kidney disease. However, its long-term effect on clinical outcomes and socioeconomic burden and safety remains unclear.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a multicenter, prospective, longitudinal observational cohort study assessing if Roxadustat improves prognosis in dialysis patients. Primary outcomes will be major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as composites of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, cerebral infarction, hospitalization because of heart failure; all-cause mortality, and annual economic costs in two years. The data will be collected via Research electronic data capture (REDCap) based database as well as software-based dialysis registry of Sichuan province. The primary outcomes for the ROAD study participants will be compared with those in the dialysis registry cohort. Data at baseline and study follow up will also be compared to assess the association between Roxadustat and long-term clinical outcomes.

DISCUSSION

The main objective of this study is to the assess long-term association of Roxadustat on MACE, all-cause mortality, socio-economic burden, safety in dialysis patients, which will provide guidance for designing further large randomized controlled trials to investigate this clinic question.

STUDY REGISTRATION

The study has been registered in Chinese Clinical Trials Registry (ROAD, ROxadustat in treating Anemia in Dialysis patients, registration number ChiCTR1900025765) and provincial observational cohort database (Renal disEAse observational CoHort database, REACH, ChiCTR1900024926), registered 07 September 2019, http://www.chictr.org.cn .

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat treatment for anemia in patients with kidney disease: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Anemia is a common complication for patients with kidney disease. Roxadustat is an oral hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitor (PHI), which is a newly approved oral drug for anemia. We performed this study to build evidence regarding efficacy and safety of roxadustat in kidney disease patients with or without dialysis.

METHODS

We searched the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library and clinicaltrials.gov from the inception to July 20, 2020. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared roxadustat with placebo or other therapies in the treatment of anemia in kidney disease patients were included. Data were extracted from eligible studies and pooled in a meta-analysis model using RevMan5.3 and stata13.0 software.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs with 1010 patients were included in our analysis. We found that roxadustat significantly increased hemoglobin (Hb) level (1.10 g/dL, 95% CI [0.52 g/dL, 1.67 g/dL], p = 0.0002), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC) (58.71 µg/dL, 95% CI [44.10 µg/dL, 73.32 µg/dL], p < 0.00001), iron level (9.28 µg/dL, 95% CI [0.11 µg/dL, 18.45 µg/dL], p = 0.05) compared with control group in kidney disease patients. In addition, our result showed that a significant reduction in hepcidin level (- 31.96 ng/mL, 95% CI [- 35.05 ng/mL, - 28.87 ng/mL], p < 0.00001), ferritin (- 44.82 ng/mL, 95% CI [- 64.42 ng/mL, - 25.23 ng/mL], p < 0.00001) was associated with roxadustat. No difference was found between roxadustat and control group in terms of oral iron supplementation, adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), infection, myocardial infraction, stroke, heart failure and death.

CONCLUSIONS

Roxadustat has higher mean Hb level than placebo or EPO. Due to the short follow-up period and the lack of critical data, more RCTs are needed to prove long-term safety and effectiveness of roxadustat in the future.

Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline Hydroxylase Inhibitor in the Treatment of Renal Anemia

Background

Anemia is a common complication in CKD patients. Despite the use of iron and erythropoietin-stimulating agents, the control rate of anemia in CKD is not satisfying. Novel drugs are needed for anemia correction.

Summary

HIF-PHI, hypoxia-inducible factor-proline hydroxylase inhibitor, a novel class of therapeutic agents, has been developed to treat anemia in CKD patients. Its main effects comprised boosting EPO production, enhancing iron utilization, and suppressing hepcidin production. Several stage 2 and stage 3 clinical trials have been run to test its efficacy and safety in both nondialysis and dialysis patients, of which the results are very encouraging. Here, we summarize the mechanism, clinical applications, and clinical trials of HIF-PHI in treating renal anemia in order to give an overview of the new drug in clinical practices.

Key Messages

HIF-PHI is a novel therapeutic agent of treating renal anemia in CKD patients. It is quite effective in improving anemia, which is unaffected by inflammation. Besides, it may ameliorate lipid metabolism as well. Furthermore, the oral form may improve patients' compliances with treatment. Thus, it may be a good alternative of anemia correction in CKD patients.

Recommendations by the Asian Pacific society of nephrology (APSN) on the appropriate use of HIF-PH inhibitors

Renal anaemia is a common and important complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The current standard‐of‐care treatment for renal anaemia in CKD patients involves ensuring adequate iron stores and administration of erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA). Hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) is a key transcription factor primarily involved in the cellular regulation and efficiency of oxygen delivery. Manipulation of the HIF pathway by the use of HIF‐prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF‐PHI) has emerged as a novel approach for renal anaemia management. Despite it being approved for clinical use in various Asia‐Pacific countries, its novelty mandates the need for nephrologists and clinicians generally in the region to well understand potential benefits and harms when prescribing this class of drug. The Asian Pacific society of nephrology HIF‐PHI Recommendation Committee, formed by a panel of 11 nephrologists from the Asia‐Pacific region who have clinical experience or have been investigators in HIF‐PHI studies, reviewed and deliberated on the clinical and preclinical data concerning HIF‐PHI. This recommendation summarizes the consensus views of the committee regarding the use of HIF‐PHI, taking into account both available data and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains scarce.

The Asian Pacific society of nephrology HIF‐PHI Recommendation Committee summarizes the consensus views of the committee regarding the use of HIF‐PHI, taking into account both available data and expert opinion in areas where evidence remains scarce.

A new insight into the treatment of renal anemia with HIF stabilizer

The long-term clinical experiences with recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) and its analog derivatives have clearly proven that correction of anemia with erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) not only reduces blood transfusion and improves patients’ QOL but has multiple benefits for the concurrent complications of CKD such as Cardio-Renal–Anemia (CRA) syndrome and/or malnutrition-inflammation-atherosclerosis (MIA) syndrome.

Unlike ESA, the newly available agent, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) stabilizer, stimulates endogenous erythropoietin (EPO) by mimicking hypoxia with HIF prolyl hydroxylase domain enzyme (HIF-PHD) inhibition. The phase 2 and 3 clinical studies have shown that HIF stabilizers are as efficacious as ESA in ameliorating renal anemia. Whether the same clinical benefits on CRA and MIA syndrome hold true in patients given HIF stabilizers is a matter for future debate. Given that HIF stabilizers act on the multiple target genes, the use of this novel agent may lead to unwanted adverse events.

Launching HIF stabilizers into the treatment of renal anemia provokes a concern about how this alternative treatment will be taken up in the daily clinical practice. However, guideline-oriented strategies on how to use HIF stabilizer is not available at this limited point due to scant clinical information. Nevertheless, this opinion-based review provides a future insight into the management of renal anemia with HIF stabilizer by reference to the past experiences with ESA. HIF stabilizers can preferably be indicated for CRA syndrome at pre-dialysis stage, ESA resistant anemia at advanced CKD stage, and perhaps for dysregulated iron metabolism akin to MIA syndrome in patients on dialysis.

Effect of hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on anemia in patients with CKD: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including 2804 patients

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are orally active first-in-class new generation drugs for renal anemia. This extensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was designed to provide clear information on the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs on anemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Searches included PubMed, Web of Science, Ovid MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library database up to October 2019. RCTs of patients with CKD comparing HIF-PHIs with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or placebo in the treatment of anemia. The primary outcome was hemoglobin change from baseline (Hb CFB); the secondary outcomes included iron-related parameters and the occurrence of each adverse event. 26 trials in 17 articles were included, with a total of 2804 dialysis or patients with CKD. HIF-PHIs treatment produced a significant beneficial effect on Hb CFB compared with the placebo group (MD, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.36 to 1.02). However, this favored effect of HIF-PHIs treatment was not observed in subgroup analysis among trials compared with ESAs (MD, 0.06; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.31). The significant reduction in hepcidin by HIF-PHIs was observed in all subgroups when compared with the placebo group, whereas this effect was observed only in NDD-CKD patients when compared with ESAs. HIF-PHIs increased the risk of nausea (RR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.06 to 4.53) and diarrhea (RR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.06 to 2.92). We conclude that orally given HIF-PHIs are at least as efficacious as ESAs treatment to correct anemia short term in patients with CKD. In addition, HIF-PHIs improved iron metabolism and utilization in patients with CKD.

Effects of hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors on iron regulation in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients with anemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies showed that hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) efficiently increased hemoglobin levels in both dialysis-dependent and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. However, the effects of HIF-PHIs on iron regulation have not been consistent among clinical trials. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the effects of six HIF-PHIs on iron regulation in non-dialysis CKD patients. Electronic databases were searched from inception to April 20, 2020, for eligible studies. Changes from baseline in transferrin saturation (TSAT), total iron-binding capacity (TIBC), iron, ferritin, and hepcidin levels were pooled using the inverse-variance method and presented as the mean difference (MD) or standardized MD (SMD) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Meta-analysis of the included studies showed that, in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients, HIF-PHIs decreased TSAT (MD, -4.51; 95 % CI, -5.81 to -3.21), ferritin (MD, -47.29; 95 % CI, -54.59 to -40.00) and hepcidin (SMD, -0.94; 95 % CI, -1.25 to -0.62), increased TIBC (MD, 9.15; 95 % CI, 7.08-11.22), and did not affect serum iron (MD, -0.31; 95 % CI, -2.05 to 1.42) despite enhanced erythropoiesis. This systematic review suggests that HIF-PHIs promote iron utilization in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients. Importantly, HIF-PHIs are associated with increased transferrin levels (and TIBC), leading to reduced TSAT. Therefore, the reduction of TSAT after HIF-PHIs should not be interpreted as iron deficiency.

The efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasing public health issue. Anemia, which is a complication of CKD, is associated with reduced quality of life and increased morbidity and mortality. Currently quite a few clinical studies have been conducted to compare roxadustat with epoetin alfa [all for dialysis-dependent (DD) patients] or placebo [all for nondialysis-dependent (NDD) patients]. Our meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of roxadustat for anemia in patients with CKD.

METHODS

We thoroughly searched eight electronic resource databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy and safety between roxadustat versus epoetin alfa or placebo for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.

RESULTS

Four Phase 2 and two Phase 3 studies with 1010 participants were included. Hemoglobin (Hb) and transferrin levels were increased significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo {standard mean difference [SMD] 1.57 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.98]; SMD 1.81 [95% CI 1.53-2.08]; respectively, both low-quality evidence} or epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.47 (95% CI 0.02-0.93), very low-quality evidence; SMD 1.05 (95% CI 0.81-1.29), low-quality evidence; respectively]. Hepcidin levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo [SMD -1.72 (95% CI -3.03 to -0.41), very low-quality evidence] or epoetin alfa group [SMD -0.23 (95% CI -0.43 to -0.02), low-quality evidence]. Ferritin and serum transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels were reduced significantly in the roxadustat group versus those in the placebo group [SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.31 to -0.33); SMD -0.54 (95% CI -0.76 to -0.32), respectively; both low-quality evidence] and ferritin and TSAT levels in the roxadustat group were comparable to those in the epoetin alfa group [SMD 0.02 (95% CI -0.18-0.21); SMD 0.15 (95% CI -0.04-0.35), respectively, both low-quality evidence]. As for safety, the incidence of adverse events (AEs) in the roxadustat group was insignificantly different from that of the placebo group [risk ratio (RR) 0.99 (95% CI 0.83-1.18); P = 0.89, very low-quality evidence]. But the incidence of AEs in the roxadustat group was significantly higher than that in the epoetin alfa group [RR 1.25 (95% CI 1.01-1.54); P = 0.04, low-quality evidence]. There was no significant association between roxadustat and the incidence of serious AEs (SAEs) for both NDD and DD patients [RR 1.08 (95% CI 0.51-2.28) and RR 1.43 (95% CI 0.85-2.40), respectively, both very low-quality evidence].

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis of RCTs, we found evidence that after the oral administration of roxadustat, NDD patients' Hb levels were increased effectively and DD patients' Hb levels were maintained effectively. The risk of SAEs was not observed with the short-term use of roxadustat. These findings support roxadustat for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.