1
|
Hayes A, Raghunandan R, Killedar A, Smith S, Cvejic E, Howell M, Petrou S, Lancsar E, Wong G, Craig J, Howard K. Reliability, acceptability, validity and responsiveness of the CHU9D and PedsQL in the measurement of quality of life in children and adolescents with overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2023:10.1038/s41366-023-01305-5. [PMID: 37072461 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-023-01305-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Paediatric Quality of life Inventory (PedsQLTM) Generic Core Scales and the Child Health Utilities 9 Dimensions (CHU9D) are two paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measures commonly used in overweight and obesity research. However, no studies have comprehensively established the psychometric properties of these instruments in the context of paediatric overweight and obesity. The aim of this study was to assess the reliability, acceptability, validity and responsiveness of the PedsQL and the CHU9D in the measurement of HRQoL among children and adolescents living with overweight and obesity. SUBJECTS/METHODS Subjects were 6544 child participants of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children, with up to 3 repeated measures of PedsQL and CHU9D and aged between 10 and 17 years. Weight and height were measured objectively by trained operators, and weight status determined using World Health Organisation growth standards. We examined reliability, acceptability, known group and convergent validity and responsiveness, using recognised methods. RESULTS Both PedsQL and CHU9D demonstrated good internal consistency reliability, and high acceptability. Neither instrument showed strong convergent validity, but PedsQL appears to be superior to the CHU9D in known groups validity and responsiveness. Compared with healthy weight, mean (95%CI) differences in PedsQL scores for children with obesity were: boys -5.6 (-6.2, -4.4); girls -6.7 (-8.1, -5.4) and differences in CHU9D utility were: boys -0.02 (-0.034, -0.006); girls -0.035 (-0.054, -0.015). Differences in scores for overweight compared with healthy weight were: PedsQL boys -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4) and girls -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6) and CHU9D boys: no significant difference; girls -0.014 (-0.026, -0.003). CONCLUSION PedsQL and CHU9D overall demonstrated good psychometric properties, supporting their use in measuring HRQoL in paediatric overweight and obesity. CHU9D had poorer responsiveness and did not discriminate between overweight and healthy weight in boys, which may limit its use in economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison Hayes
- University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Rakhee Raghunandan
- University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anagha Killedar
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah Smith
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Erin Cvejic
- University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Martin Howell
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Emily Lancsar
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Australia National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Germaine Wong
- University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Craig
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- University of Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng F, Nie P, Sousa-Poza A. The intangible costs of overweight and obesity in Germany. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2023; 13:14. [PMID: 36809392 PMCID: PMC9942367 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-023-00426-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous literature documents the direct and indirect economic costs of obesity, yet none has attempted to quantify the intangible costs of obesity. This study focuses on quantifying the intangible costs of one unit body mass index (BMI) increase and being overweight and obese in Germany. METHODS By applying a life satisfaction-based compensation value analysis to 2002-2018 German Socio-Economic Panel Survey data for adults aged 18-65, the intangible costs of overweight and obesity are estimated. We apply individual income as a reference for estimating the value of the loss of subjective well-being due to overweight and obesity. RESULTS The intangible costs of overweight and obesity in 2018 amount to 42,450 and 13,853 euros, respectively. A one unit increase in BMI induced a 2553 euros annual well-being loss in the overweight and obese relative to those of normal weight. When extrapolated to the entire country, this figure represents approximately 4.3 billion euros, an intangible cost of obesity similar in magnitude to the direct and indirect costs documented in other studies for Germany. These losses, our analysis reveals, have remained remarkably stable since 2002. CONCLUSIONS Our results underscore how existing research into obesity's economic toll may underestimate its true costs, and they strongly imply that if obesity interventions took the intangible costs of obesity into account, the economic benefits would be considerably larger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fan Meng
- Institute for Health Care & Public Management, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Peng Nie
- Institute for Health Care & Public Management, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany
- School of Economics and Finance, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, 710061, China
- IZA, Bonn, Germany
- Health Econometrics and Data Group, University of York, York, UK
| | - Alfonso Sousa-Poza
- Institute for Health Care & Public Management, University of Hohenheim, 70599, Stuttgart, Germany.
- IZA, Bonn, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Onyimadu O, Violato M, Astbury NM, Jebb SA, Petrou S. Health Economic Aspects of Childhood Excess Weight: A Structured Review. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 9:461. [PMID: 35455505 PMCID: PMC9028108 DOI: 10.3390/children9040461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
An economic perspective is crucial to understand the broad consequences of childhood excess weight (CEW). These can manifest in the form of elevated health care and societal costs, impaired health status, or inefficiencies in the allocation of resources targeted at its prevention, management, or treatment. Although existing systematic reviews provide summaries of distinct economic research strands covering CEW, they have a restricted focus that overlooks relevant evidence. The overarching aim of this structured review was to update and enhance recent key reviews of four strands of economic evidence in this area, namely, (1) economic costs associated with CEW, (2) health utilities associated with CEW, (3) economic evaluations of interventions targeting CEW, and (4) economic determinants and broader consequences of CEW. Our de novo searches identified six additional studies for the first research strand, five studies for the second, thirty-one for the third, and two for the fourth. Most studies were conducted in a small number of high-income countries. Our review highlights knowledge gaps across all the research strands. Evidence from this structured review can act as data input into future economic evaluations in this area and highlights areas where future economic research should be targeted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olu Onyimadu
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (O.O.); (N.M.A.); (S.A.J.)
| | - Mara Violato
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK;
| | - Nerys M. Astbury
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (O.O.); (N.M.A.); (S.A.J.)
| | - Susan A. Jebb
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (O.O.); (N.M.A.); (S.A.J.)
| | - Stavros Petrou
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK; (O.O.); (N.M.A.); (S.A.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Derwig M, Tiberg I, Björk J, Welander Tärneberg A, Hallström IK. A child-centered health dialogue for the prevention of obesity in child health services in Sweden - A randomized controlled trial including an economic evaluation. Obes Sci Pract 2022; 8:77-90. [PMID: 35127124 PMCID: PMC8804939 DOI: 10.1002/osp4.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevention of child obesity is an international public health priority and believed to be effective when started in early childhood. Caregivers often ask for an early and structured response from health professionals when their child is identified with overweight, yet cost-effective interventions for children aged 2-6 years and their caregivers in Child Health Services are lacking. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the effects and cost-effectiveness of a child-centered health dialogue in the Child Health Services in Sweden on 4-year-old children with normal weight and overweight. METHODS Thirty-seven Child Health Centers were randomly assigned to deliver intervention or usual care. The primary outcome was zBMI-change. RESULTS A total of 4598 children with normal weight (zBMI: 0.1 [SD = 0.6] and 490 children with overweight (zBMI: 1.6 [SD = 0.3]) (mean age: 4.1 years [SD = 0.1]; 49% females) were included. At follow-up, at a mean age of 5.1 years [SD = 0.1], there was no intervention effect on zBMI-change for children with normal weight. Children with overweight in the control group increased zBMI by 0.01 ± 0.50, while children in the intervention group decreased zBMI by 0.08 ± 0.52. The intervention effect on zBMI-change for children with overweight was -0.11, with a 95% confidence interval of -0.24 to 0.01 (p = 0.07). The estimated additional costs of the Child-Centered Health Dialogue for children with overweight were 167 euros per child with overweight and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 183 euros per 0.1 zBMI unit prevented. CONCLUSIONS This low-intensive multicomponent child-centered intervention for the primary prevention of child obesity did not show statistical significant effects on zBMI, but is suggested to be cost-effective with the potential to be implemented universally in the Child Health Services. Future studies should investigate the impact of socio-economic factors in universally implemented obesity prevention programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariette Derwig
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Irén Tiberg
- Department of Health SciencesFaculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| | - Jonas Björk
- Department of Laboratory MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zanganeh M, Adab P, Li B, Pallan M, Liu WJ, Hemming K, Lin R, Liu W, Martin J, Cheng KK, Frew E. Cost-Effectiveness of a School-and Family-Based Childhood Obesity Prevention Programme in China: The "CHIRPY DRAGON" Cluster-Randomised Controlled Trial. Int J Public Health 2021; 66:1604025. [PMID: 34531712 PMCID: PMC8439195 DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2021.1604025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Rapid socioeconomic and nutrition transitions in Chinese populations have contributed to the growth in childhood obesity. This study presents a cost-effectiveness analysis of a school- and family-based childhood obesity prevention programme in China. Methods: A trial-based economic evaluation assessed cost-effectiveness at 12 months. Forty schools with 1,641 children were randomised to either receive the multi-component (diet and physical activity) intervention or to continue with usual activities. Both public sector and societal perspectives were adopted. Costs and benefits in the form of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were compared and uncertainty was assessed using established UK and US thresholds. Results: The intervention cost was 35.53 Yuan (£7.04/US$10.01) per child from a public sector perspective and 536.95 Yuan (£106/US$151) from a societal perspective. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was 272.7 Yuan (£54/US$77)/BMI z-score change. The ICER was 8,888 Yuan (£1,760/US$2,502) and 73,831 Yuan (£14,620/US$20,796) per QALY from a public sector and societal perspective, respectively and was cost-effective using UK (£20,000) and US (US$50,000) per QALY thresholds. Conclusion: A multi-component school-based prevention programme is a cost-effective means of preventing childhood obesity in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandana Zanganeh
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom
| | - Peymane Adab
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Bai Li
- School for Public Studies, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Miranda Pallan
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Wei Jia Liu
- Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China
| | - Karla Hemming
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rong Lin
- Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Liu
- Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China
| | - James Martin
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Kar Keung Cheng
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute for Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ramponi F, Walker S, Griffin S, Parrott S, Drummond C, Deluca P, Coulton S, Kanaan M, Richardson G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of public health interventions with impacts on health and criminal justice: An applied cross-sectoral analysis of an alcohol misuse intervention. HEALTH ECONOMICS 2021; 30:972-988. [PMID: 33604984 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Cost-effectiveness analyses of health care programs often focus on maximizing health and ignore nonhealth impacts. Assessing the cost-effectiveness of public health interventions from a narrow health care perspective would likely underestimate their full impact, and potentially lead to inefficient decisions about funding. The aim of this study is to provide a practical application of a recently proposed framework for the economic evaluation of public health interventions, evaluating an intervention to reduce alcohol misuse in criminal offenders. This cross-sectoral analysis distinguishes benefits and opportunity costs for different sectors, makes explicit the value judgments required to consider alternative perspectives, and can inform heterogeneous decision makers with different objectives in a transparent manner. Three interventions of increasing intensity are compared: client information leaflet, brief advice, and brief lifestyle counseling. Health outcomes are measured in quality-adjusted life-years and criminal justice outcomes in reconvictions. Costs considered include intervention costs, costs to the NHS and costs to the criminal justice system. The results are presented for four different perspectives: "narrow" health care perspective; criminal justice system perspective; "full" health care perspective; and joint "full" health and criminal justice perspective. Conclusions and recommendations differ according to the normative judgment on the appropriate perspective for the evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ramponi
- Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, York, UK
| | - Simon Walker
- Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, York, UK
| | - Susan Griffin
- Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, York, UK
| | - Steve Parrott
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Deluca
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Simon Coulton
- Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, Kent, UK
| | - Mona Kanaan
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Gerry Richardson
- Centre for Health Economics, Alcuin A Block, University of York, York, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Castor C, Derwig M, Borg SJ, Ollhage ME, Tiberg I. A challenging balancing act to engage children and their families in a healthy lifestyle - Nurses' experiences of child-centred health dialogue in child health services in Sweden. J Clin Nurs 2021; 30:819-829. [PMID: 33377556 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15622] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To describe nurses' experiences of a child-centred family guided intervention of obesity tested within the child health services targeting children identified with overweight and their caregivers. BACKGROUND Interventions aiming to support families towards a healthier lifestyle can lead to decreased risk of overweight evolving into obesity in a child. At the same time, nurses have found dialogues on weight challenging and may therefore avoid them. DESIGN Qualitative descriptive inductive design following content analysis applying to the COREQ guidelines. METHODS Content analysis was used to analyse 13 individual semi-structured interviews with nurses in the child health service in Sweden after completed training in CCHD, including how to facilitate the dialogue with the use of illustrations. RESULTS The theme Health dialogue about weight is a challenging balancing act facilitated by a supportive intervention emerged through eight subcategories in three main categories. Nurses experienced that CCHD with children identified with overweight and their caregivers provoked an emotional response both for themselves and for the caregivers of the child. The training in child-centred health dialogues promoted the nurses' work with structure and professionalism, as the nurses carefully took tentative steps to engage the family for a healthy lifestyle. CONCLUSIONS Emotional and practical challenges in performing CCHD still remained among nurses after customised training, which might comprise the child's rights to be involved in his or her own care when the child was identified as overweight. However, training for nurses, including lectures and tutorials, was found to increase the quality and professionalism of performing CCHD by providing structure, tools and tutorial support. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Customised training and illustrations can support nurses when performing a structured intervention such as child-centred health dialogues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Castor
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Mariette Derwig
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | - Iren Tiberg
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Brown V, Tan EJ, Hayes A, Baur L, Campbell K, Taylor R, Byrne R, Wen LM, Hesketh KD, Moodie M. Cost comparison of five Australasian obesity prevention interventions for children aged from birth to two years. Pediatr Obes 2020; 15:e12684. [PMID: 32558343 DOI: 10.1111/ijpo.12684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the absence of rigorous evidence of cost-effectiveness for early childhood obesity prevention interventions, the next-best option may be for decision-makers to consider the relevant costs of interventions when allocating resources. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to estimate systematically the cost of five obesity prevention interventions in children aged 0-2 years, undertaken in research settings in Australia and New Zealand. METHODS A standardised costing protocol informed the costing methodology, ensuring comparability of results across interventions. Micro-costing was undertaken, with intervention costs defined from the funder perspective and valued in 2018 Australian dollars using unit costs from the trials or market rates. RESULTS Interventions varied widely in their resource use. The total cost per participant ranged from $80 for the CHAT SMS intervention arm (95% UI $77-$82) to $1135 for the Healthy Beginnings intervention (95% UI $1059-$1189). Time costs of personnel delivering interventions contributed >50% of total intervention costs for all included studies. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of the costs associated with intervention delivery modes is important, alongside effectiveness. Telephone delivery may include unexpected costs associated with connection to intervention participants at convenient times. A SMS-based intervention had the lowest delivery cost in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vicki Brown
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eng J Tan
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alison Hayes
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Louise Baur
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Karen Campbell
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachael Taylor
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Rebecca Byrne
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Exercise and Nutrition Science, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Li Ming Wen
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Population Health Research and Evaluation Hub, Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kylie D Hesketh
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marjory Moodie
- Centre for Research Excellence in Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zanganeh M, Adab P, Li B, Frew E. A Systematic Review of Methods, Study Quality, and Results of Economic Evaluation for Childhood and Adolescent Obesity Intervention. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16030485. [PMID: 30743995 PMCID: PMC6388206 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16030485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 02/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Many suggested policy interventions for childhood and adolescent obesity have costs and effects that fall outside the health care sector. These cross-sectorial costs and consequences have implications for how economic evaluation is applied and although previous systematic reviews have provided a summary of cost-effectiveness, very few have conducted a review of methods applied. We undertook this comprehensive review of economic evaluations, appraising the methods used, assessing the quality of the economic evaluations, and summarising cost-effectiveness. Nine electronic databases were searched for full-economic evaluation studies published between January 2001 and April 2017 with no language or country restrictions. 39 economic evaluation studies were reviewed and quality assessed. Almost all the studies were from Western countries and methods were found to vary by country, setting and type of intervention. The majority, particularly "behavioural and policy" preventive interventions, were cost-effective, even cost-saving. Only four interventions were not cost effective. This systematic review suggests that economic evaluation of obesity interventions is an expanding area of research. However, methodological heterogeneity makes evidence synthesis challenging. Whilst upstream interventions show promise, an expanded and consistent approach to evaluate cost-effectiveness is needed to capture health and non-health costs and consequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandana Zanganeh
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Peymane Adab
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Bai Li
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| | - Emma Frew
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Oosterhoff M, Bosma H, van Schayck OCP, Evers SMAA, Dirksen CD, Joore MA. A systematic review on economic evaluations of school-based lifestyle interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds: Issues and ways forward. Prev Med 2018; 114:115-122. [PMID: 29959951 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2018] [Revised: 06/22/2018] [Accepted: 06/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Current guidelines for economic evaluations do not provide specific recommendations for the evaluation of school-based lifestyle interventions. This study examined and discussed the key aspects in the design of economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting weight-related behaviours among 4-12 year olds. The PubMed and CRD databases (NHS EED) were searched. Grey literature was identified from reference lists and websites of relevant organizations. Full economic evaluations on school-based interventions targeting physical activity, sedentariness, or diet were selected. Key aspects included the objective, audience, intervention, comparator, population, type of analysis, perspective, costs, outcomes, and time horizon. Information was also extracted on measuring and valuing costs and outcomes, linking and extrapolating outcomes, and the maintenance of intervention effects. The 23 included studies reported on cost-effectiveness (CEAs) (N = 12), cost-utility (CUAs) (N = 9), social cost benefit (SCBA) (N = 2), and social return on investment (SROI) (N = 1) analysis. The usual practice comparator was generally not clearly defined. The SROI analysis was the single study that included outcomes in other persons than the child. Healthcare costs (N = 14), productivity costs (N = 4), and costs to the household (N = 3), or education (N = 2) sector were examined. The outcome in trial-based CEAs consisted of a variety of weight-related measures. Seven distinctive models were used to extrapolate health and/or productivity costs. To enhance the usefulness of economic evaluations on school-based lifestyle interventions in allocating public health budgets, transparent reporting on key aspects, broadening the scope of economic evaluations, and standardizing the measurement, valuation, and extrapolation of costs and outcomes should be improved. This study was conducted in Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marije Oosterhoff
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
| | - Hans Bosma
- Department of Social Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Social Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Onno C P van Schayck
- Department of Family Medicine, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Family Medicine, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Health Services Research, P.O. Box 616, 6200, MD, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Trimbos, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Trimbos, P.O. Box 725, 3500, AS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Carmen D Dirksen
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Manuela A Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment (KEMTA), Maastricht University Medical Centre MUMC+/Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), KEMTA, P. Debyelaan 25, P.O. Box 5800, 6202, AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sweeney R, Moodie M, Nguyen P, Fraser P, Bolton K, Brown A, Marks J, Crooks N, Strugnell C, Bell C, Millar L, Orellana L, Allender S. Protocol for an economic evaluation of WHO STOPS childhood obesity stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2018; 8:e020551. [PMID: 29764881 PMCID: PMC5961569 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prevention of overweight and obesity in childhood is a priority because of associated acute and chronic conditions in childhood and later in life, which place significant burden on health systems. Evidence suggests prevention should engage a range of actions and actors and target multiple levels. The Whole of Systems Trial Of Prevention Strategies for childhood obesity (WHO STOPS) will evaluate the outcomes of a novel systems-based intervention that aims to engage whole communities in a locally led multifaceted response. This paper describes the planned economic evaluation of WHO STOPS and examines the methodological challenges for economic evaluation of a complex systems-based intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS Economic evaluation alongside a stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial in regional and rural communities in Victoria, Australia. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses will provide estimates of the incremental cost (in $A) per body mass index unit saved and quality adjusted life year gained. A Markov cohort model will be employed to estimate healthcare cost savings and benefits over the life course of children. The dollar value of community resources harnessed for the community-led response will be estimated. Probabilistic uncertainty analyses will be undertaken to test sensitivity of results to plausible variations in all trial-based and modelled variables. WHO STOPS will also be assessed against other implementation considerations (such as sustainability and acceptability to communities and other stakeholders). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial is registered by the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12616000980437). Full ethics clearances have been received for all methods described below: Deakin University's Human Research Ethics Committee 2014-279, Deakin University's Human Ethics Advisory Group-Health (HEAG-H) HEAG-H 194_2014, HEAG-H 17 2015, HEAG-H 155_2014, HEAG-H 197_2016, HEAG-H 118_2017, the Victorian Department of Education and Training 2015_002622 and the Catholic Archdiocese of Ballarat. Trial findings (including economic evaluation) will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at international conferences. Collected data and analyses will be made available in accordance with journal policies and study ethics approvals. Results will be presented to relevant government authorities with an interest in cost-effectiveness of these types of interventions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12616000980437; Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan Sweeney
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marj Moodie
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Phuong Nguyen
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penny Fraser
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kristy Bolton
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Andrew Brown
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Marks
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nic Crooks
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Claudia Strugnell
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Bell
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Lynne Millar
- Australian Health Policy Collaboration, Victoria University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liliana Orellana
- Biostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Steven Allender
- Global Obesity Centre, Centre for Population Health Research, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zanganeh M, Adab P, Li B, Frew E. Protocol for a systematic review of methods and cost-effectiveness findings of economic evaluations of obesity prevention and/or treatment interventions in children and adolescents. Syst Rev 2018; 7:54. [PMID: 29609652 PMCID: PMC5879570 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-018-0718-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2017] [Accepted: 03/22/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a major global public health problem, with governments increasingly having to undertake various strategies to reduce excess weight in their populations. Considering the increasing number of well-conducted intervention studies in the field of childhood obesity prevention, there are relatively few published economic evaluations. The proposed systematic review will explore the methods of these economic evaluations, examine the limitations and establish the evidence base for cost-effectiveness analyses. METHODS/DESIGN Systematic review methodology will be applied to identify, select and extract data from published economic evaluation studies (trial-based, non-trial based, simulation-based, decision model and trial based model economic evaluations) of obesity prevention and/or treatment interventions in children and adolescents. A systematic literature search will be conducted using bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, EconLit, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD) and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) Registry). The review will only include full economic evaluations. There will be no restrictions based on language, perspective, follow-up duration, sample size, country or setting. To minimise selection bias, translation of non-English language articles will be undertaken. The quality of included studies will be assessed. Following data extraction, a narrative synthesis of the results from the included studies will be undertaken. Subgroup analysis will be considered where deemed appropriate. DISCUSSION The findings from this review, which will include primary studies, will provide evidence to assist health policy decision makers interpret economic evaluations in this field. In addition, we will identify gaps in the current literature to inform future-related research. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION Prospero CRD42017062236.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mandana Zanganeh
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Peymane Adab
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Bai Li
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Emma Frew
- Health Economics Unit, Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Döring N, Zethraeus N, Tynelius P, de Munter J, Sonntag D, Rasmussen F. Economic Evaluation of PRIMROSE-A Trial-Based Analysis of an Early Childhood Intervention to Prevent Obesity. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2018; 9:104. [PMID: 29593658 PMCID: PMC5861136 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2017] [Accepted: 03/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Childhood obesity is a major clinical and economic health concern. Alongside the clinical understanding of obesity, there is a growing interest in designing and implementing interventions that are worth their money given the scarce resources in the health care sector. This study is one of the first efforts to provide evidence by assessing the effects and costs of a population-based primary prevention intervention targeting pre-school children attending child health centers in Sweden. METHODS The economic evaluation is based on the PRIMROSE cluster-randomized controlled trial aiming to establish healthy eating and physical activity among pre-school children (9-48 months of age) through motivational interviewing applied by trained nurses at child health centers. The cost-effectiveness is assessed over the trial period from a societal perspective. The primary outcome was BMI at age 4. Cost data was prospectively collected alongside the trial. Scenario analyses were carried out to identify uncertainty. RESULTS The estimated additional mean total costs of the PRIMROSE intervention were 342 Euro (95% CI: 334; 348) per child. During pre-school years direct costs mainly consist of training costs and costs for the additional time used by nurses to implement the intervention compared to usual care. Early indirect costs mainly consist of parents' absence from work due to their participation in the intervention. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in the base case analysis was 3,109 Euro per 1 BMI unit prevented. CONCLUSION We cannot provide evidence that the PRIMROSE intervention is cost-effective, given the uncertainty in the effect measure. Until further evidence is provided, we recommend resources to be spent elsewhere within the field of obesity prevention. Furthermore, to achieve valid and reliable cost-effectiveness results, the economic evaluation of obesity prevention programs in early childhood should incorporate the life time impact to capture all relevant costs and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nora Döring
- Prevention, Intervention and Mechanisms in Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- *Correspondence: Nora Döring,
| | - Niklas Zethraeus
- Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Tynelius
- Prevention, Intervention and Mechanisms in Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jeroen de Munter
- Prevention, Intervention and Mechanisms in Public Health, Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Diana Sonntag
- Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Mannheim Institute of Public Health, Social Prevention and Medicine (MIPH), Mannheim, Germany
- Department of Health Science, University of York, York, United Kingdom
| | - Finn Rasmussen
- Department of Health Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Economic Evaluation of Obesity Prevention in Early Childhood: Methods, Limitations and Recommendations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2016; 13:ijerph13090911. [PMID: 27649218 PMCID: PMC5036744 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph13090911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2016] [Revised: 08/29/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite methodological advances in the field of economic evaluations of interventions, economic evaluations of obesity prevention programmes in early childhood are seldom conducted. The aim of the present study was to explore existing methods and applications of economic evaluations, examining their limitations and making recommendations for future cost-effectiveness assessments. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, Cochrane Library, the British National Health Service Economic Evaluation Databases and EconLit. Eligible studies included trial-based or simulation-based cost-effectiveness analyses of obesity prevention programmes targeting preschool children and/or their parents. The quality of included studies was assessed. Of the six studies included, five were intervention studies and one was based on a simulation approach conducted on secondary data. We identified three main conceptual and methodological limitations of their economic evaluations: Insufficient conceptual approach considering the complexity of childhood obesity, inadequate measurement of effects of interventions, and lack of valid instruments to measure child-related quality of life and costs. Despite the need for economic evaluations of obesity prevention programmes in early childhood, only a few studies of varying quality have been conducted. Moreover, due to methodological and conceptual weaknesses, they offer only limited information for policy makers and intervention providers. We elaborate reasons for the limitations of these studies and offer guidance for designing better economic evaluations of early obesity prevention.
Collapse
|