Induction kinetics of delayed light emission in spinach chloroplasts

Frequently asked questions about chlorophyll fluorescence, the sequel

Using chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence many aspects of the photosynthetic apparatus can be studied, both in vitro and, noninvasively, in vivo. Complementary techniques can help to interpret changes in the Chl a fluorescence kinetics. Kalaji et al. (Photosynth Res 122:121-158, 2014a) addressed several questions about instruments, methods and applications based on Chl a fluorescence. Here, additional Chl a fluorescence-related topics are discussed again in a question and answer format. Examples are the effect of connectivity on photochemical quenching, the correction of F V /F M values for PSI fluorescence, the energy partitioning concept, the interpretation of the complementary area, probing the donor side of PSII, the assignment of bands of 77 K fluorescence emission spectra to fluorescence emitters, the relationship between prompt and delayed fluorescence, potential problems when sampling tree canopies, the use of fluorescence parameters in QTL studies, the use of Chl a fluorescence in biosensor applications and the application of neural network approaches for the analysis of fluorescence measurements. The answers draw on knowledge from different Chl a fluorescence analysis domains, yielding in several cases new insights.

Detecting the phase transition in thylakoid membranes of maize inbred lines by means of delayed fluorescence

In this paper the changes on growth, photosynthesis and water relations were tested by non-invasive fluorescence method. The applications of this method allow to determine some functional properties of prestigious maize inbred lines with erect top leaves. So the temperature dependency of delayed fluorescence intensity maximum of ZPPL 16 is observed at higher temperatures than for ZPPZ 62. This fact correlates with low values of phase transition of activation energy Ea in thylakoid membrane and accompanied by a decrease of the angle and area of the leaf, as well as with the content and the rate of water release from the seed. It seems reasonable to assume that, DF can be applied in breeding and maize hybrid seed production for the estimation of prestigious maize inbred lines and their resistance adaptability to increased and high temperatures, as well as, to drought.

Experimental in vivo measurements of light emission in plants: a perspective dedicated to David Walker

This review is dedicated to David Walker (1928-2012), a pioneer in the field of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence. We begin this review by presenting the history of light emission studies, from the ancient times. Light emission from plants is of several kinds: prompt fluorescence (PF), delayed fluorescence (DF), thermoluminescence, and phosphorescence. In this article, we focus on PF and DF. Chlorophyll a fluorescence measurements have been used for more than 80 years to study photosynthesis, particularly photosystem II (PSII) since 1961. This technique has become a regular trusted probe in agricultural and biological research. Many measured and calculated parameters are good biomarkers or indicators of plant tolerance to different abiotic and biotic stressors. This would never have been possible without the rapid development of new fluorometers. To date, most of these instruments are based mainly on two different operational principles for measuring variable chlorophyll a fluorescence: (1) a PF signal produced following a pulse-amplitude-modulated excitation and (2) a PF signal emitted during a strong continuous actinic excitation. In addition to fluorometers, other instruments have been developed to measure additional signals, such as DF, originating from PSII, and light-induced absorbance changes due to the photooxidation of P700, from PSI, measured as the absorption decrease (photobleaching) at about 705 nm, or increase at 820 nm. In this review, the technical and theoretical basis of newly developed instruments, allowing for simultaneous measurement of the PF and the DF as well as other parameters is discussed. Special emphasis has been given to a description of comparative measurements on PF and DF. However, DF has been discussed in greater details, since it is much less used and less known than PF, but has a great potential to provide useful qualitative new information on the back reactions of PSII electron transfer. A review concerning the history of fluorometers is also presented.

Simultaneous in vivo recording of prompt and delayed fluorescence and 820-nm reflection changes during drying and after rehydration of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis

A new instrument (M-PEA), which measures simultaneously kinetics of prompt fluorescence (PF), delayed fluorescence (DF) and modulated light reflection at 820nm (MR), was used to screen dark-adapted leaves of the resurrection plant Haberlea rhodopensis during their progressive drying, down to 1% relative water content (RWC), and after their re-watering. This is the first investigation using M-PEA, which employs alternations of actinic light (627-nm peak, 5000 micromol photons m(-2) s(-1)) and dark intervals, where PF-MR and DF kinetics are respectively recorded, with the added advantages: (a) all kinetics are recorded with high time resolution (starting from 0.01 ms), (b) the dark intervals' duration can be as short as 0.1 ms, (c) actinic illumination can be interrupted at different times during the PF transient (recorded up to 300 s), with the earliest interruption at 0.3 ms. Analysis of the simultaneous measurements at different water-content-states of H. rhodopensis leaves allowed the comparison and correlation of complementary information on the structure/function of the photosynthetic machinery, which is not destroyed but only inactivated (reversibly) at different degrees; the comparison and correlation helped also to test current interpretations of each signal and advance their understanding. Our results suggest that the desiccation tolerance of the photosynthetic machinery in H. rhodopensis is mainly based on mechanism(s) that lead to inactivation of photosystem II reaction centres (transformation to heat sinks), triggered already by a small RWC decrease.

Delayed fluorescence in photosynthesis

Photosynthesis is a very efficient photochemical process. Nevertheless, plants emit some of the absorbed energy as light quanta. This luminescence is emitted, predominantly, by excited chlorophyll a molecules in the light-harvesting antenna, associated with Photosystem II (PS II) reaction centers. The emission that occurs before the utilization of the excitation energy in the primary photochemical reaction is called prompt fluorescence. Light emission can also be observed from repopulated excited chlorophylls as a result of recombination of the charge pairs. In this case, some time-dependent redox reactions occur before the excitation of the chlorophyll. This delays the light emission and provides the name for this phenomenon-delayed fluorescence (DF), or delayed light emission (DLE). The DF intensity is a decreasing polyphasic function of the time after illumination, which reflects the kinetics of electron transport reactions both on the (electron) donor and the (electron) acceptor sides of PS II. Two main experimental approaches are used for DF measurements: (a) recording of the DF decay in the dark after a single turnover flash or after continuous light excitation and (b) recording of the DF intensity during light adaptation of the photosynthesizing samples (induction curves), following a period of darkness. In this paper we review historical data on DF research and recent advances in the understanding of the relation between the delayed fluorescence and specific reactions in PS II. An experimental method for simultaneous recording of the induction transients of prompt and delayed chlorophyll fluorescence and decay curves of DF in the millisecond time domain is discussed.

Simultaneous analysis of prompt and delayed chlorophyll a fluorescence in leaves during the induction period of dark to light adaptation

An attempt is made to reveal the relation between the induction curves of delayed fluorescence (DF) registered at 0.35-5.5 ms and the prompt chlorophyll fluorescence (PF). A simple formulation was proposed to link the ratio of the transient values of delayed and variable fluorescence with the redox state of the primary electron acceptor of Photosystem II--QA, and the thylakoid membrane energization. The term luminescence potential (UL) was introduced, defined as the sum of the redox potential of QA and the transmembrane proton gradient. It was shown that UL is proportional to the ratio of DF to the variable part of PF. The theoretical model was verified and demonstrated by analysing induction courses of PF and millisecond DF, simultaneously registered from leaves of barley--wild-type and the chlorophyll b-less mutant chlorina f2. A definitive correlation between PF and DF was established. If the luminescence changes are strictly due to UL, the courses of DF and PF are reciprocal and the millisecond DF curve resembles the first derivative of the PFt function.

Advances on photosystem II investigation by measurement of delayed chlorophyll fluorescence by a phosphoroscopic methods

A method for data acquisition based on recording of light signal from a conventional phophoroscope fluorometer with high-speed digitalization is proposed to extract more information from a delayed chlorophyll a fluorescence (DF) signal. During the signal processing from all points registered by the fluorometer, we obtain simultaneously a large number of induction curves of DF decaying at different time ranges. In addition, it is possible to register a series of dark relaxation kinetics of DF, recorded at different moments during the induction period or at different temperatures. This allows the evaluation of the contribution of DF kinetic components during the induction period or at different temperatures and the comparison between DF signals registered with different phophoroscopes. With the phosphoroscope system used in this study, we have shown that the contribution of the millisecond components (with lifetimes 0.6 and 2-4 ms) predominates during the first second of the induction period. After 1 s of illumination, the amplitudes of the 0.6 ms and 2-4 ms components and of the slower one (with lifetime more than 10 ms) become approximately equal. The change in lifetime of the different components during the induction and during gradual heating is also observed. It is shown that all registered DF kinetic components have different temperature dependences.

The relationship between millisecond luminescence and fluorescence in tobacco leaves during the induction period

Millisecond luminescence and fluorescence, from an intact tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) leaf, were measured simultaneously during the induction period, as a function of the time. This was accomplished using a luminescence apparatus which separated out the faster luminescence components by subtraction of the accumulated slow-decaying ones. An antiparallel correlation between the two was observed, but only during a part of the induction period starting with the first fluorescence peak where the fluorescence decreases to a quasi plateau level. During this induction phase, luminescence rose very prominently to a maximum while fluorescence decreased. This correlation fits a linear dependence of the luminescence on the extent of RCs openness, as monitored by the photochemical quenching of the fluorescence. It may be concluded that during this induction phase, all other factors, which modulate luminescence (e.g. membrane potential), have become already steady and that the millisecond delayed luminescence reflects the photochemical reaction in an open center (i.e. with QA oxidized). This is further supported by steady-state experiments in thylakoid membranes. No correlations between luminescence and either momentary (F) or maximum (Fm) fluorescence during later induction phases can be pinpointed with confidence, although a trend of a parallel decrease at certain time intervals can be seen occasionally. Likewise, there is no relationship between the two in the very initial induction phase, during the rise of fluorescence from Fo to Fm, as noted earlier. This lack of correlation is presumably due to the dependence of luminescence on other parameters, which vary during these induction phases. The implications of these observations are discussed.

Induction patterns of delayed luminescence fromisolated chloroplasts. I. Response of delayed luminescence to changes in the prompt fluorescence yield

1. Using a phosphoroscope, delayed luminescence and prompt chlorophyll fluorescence from isolated chloroplasts have been compared during the induction period. 2. Two distinct decay components of delayed luminescence were measured a "fast" component (from approximately 1 ms to approximately 6 ms) and a "slow" component (at approximately 6 ms). 3. The fast luminescence component often did not correlate with the fluorescence changes while the slow component significantly changed its intensity during the induction period in a manner which could usually be linearly correlated with variable portion of the fluorescence yield change. 4. This correlation was evident after preillumination with far-red light or after allowing a considerable time for dark relaxation. 5. The close relationship between the slow luminescence component and variable fluorescence yield was observed with a large range of light intensities and also in the presence of 3-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,1-dimethylurea which considerably changes the fluorescence induction kinetics. 6. Valinomycin and other antibiotics reduced the amplitude of the 6 ms (slow) luminescence without affecting its relation with the fluorescence induction suggesting possibly that a constant electrical gradient exist in the dark or formed very rapidly in the light, which effects the emission intensity. 7. Changes in salt levels of suspending media equally affected the amplitude of both delayed luminescence and variable fluorescence under conditions when the reduction of Q is maximal and constant. 8. The results are discussed in terms of several models. It is concluded that the model of independent Photosystem II units together with photosynthetic back reaction concept is incompatible with the data. Other alternative models (the "lake" model and photosynthetic back reaction; recombination of charges in the antenna chlorophyll; the "w" hypothesis) were in closer agreement with the results.