C-reactive protein as an aid in the differentiation of functional and inflammatory bowel disorders

Unraveling the intricacies of neutrophil extracellular traps in inflammatory bowel disease: Pathways, biomarkers, and promising therapies

The development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, involves various factors and is characterized by persistent inflammation of the mucosal lining. However, the role of neutrophils in this process remains controversial. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which consist of chromatin, antimicrobial proteins, and oxidative enzymes, are released by neutrophils to trap pathogens. They are also involved in various immune-mediated and vascular diseases. NETs act as a vital defense mechanisms at the gut-mucosal interface and are frequently exposed to bacterial, viral, and fungal threats. However, they can also contribute to inflammation and worsen imbalances in the gut bacteria. Recent studies have suggested that NETs have a significant impact on IBD development. Previous studies have shown increased levels of NETs in tissue and blood samples from patients with IBD, as well as in experimental colitis mouse models. Therefore, this review discusses how NETs are formed and their role in the pathophysiology of IBD. It discusses how NETs may lead to tissue damage and contribute to IBD-associated complications. Moreover, non-invasive biomarkers are needed to replace invasive procedures such as endoscopy to better evaluate the disease status. Given the crucial role of NETs in IBD progression, this review focuses on potential NET biomarkers that can help predict the evolution of IBD. Furthermore, this review identifies potential therapeutic targets for regulating NET production, which could expand the range of available treatment options for IBD.

Systemic C-Reactive Protein Predicts Cerebral Vasospasm and Delayed Cerebral Ischemia Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is often complicated by cerebral vasospasm (CVS) and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI), which significantly impact patient outcomes. The study aimed to investigate the predictive value of systemic serum biomarker levels for CVS and DCI following aSAH.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data for 450 aSAH patients admitted to University Hospital Düsseldorf between January 2011 and October 2021. Serum biomarkers were measured on admission. The occurrence of CVS and DCI was assessed based on clinical and radiological criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent association of serum biomarkers with CVS and DCI. We compared the predictive values of various models using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Of the 450 patients, 126 (28.0%) developed CVS, 123 (27.3%) developed DCI, and 62 (13.8%) developed co-occurring CVS and DCI. Patients with CVS, DCI, or both had significantly higher admission C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than those without these complications (P < 0.001). Elevated CRP levels were independently associated with an increased risk of CVS, DCI, and co-occurring CVS and DCI (P < 0.05). CRP demonstrated a higher predictive value for CVS (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.811) and co-occurring CVS and DCI (AUC: 0.802) compared to DCI alone (AUC: 0.690).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that admission systemic CRP levels can serve as a more valuable predictor for developing CVS than DCI following aSAH. Incorporating CRP into clinical assessments may aid in risk stratification and early intervention strategies for patients at high risk of these complications.

Biomarkers in inflammatory bowel disease: a practical guide

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), comprising ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD), is a costly condition in terms of morbidity and healthcare utilization, with an increasing prevalence now approaching 1% in the Western world. Endoscopic assessment of IBD remains the gold standard for diagnosis, evaluation of treatment response and determination of post-operative recurrence, but is expensive and invasive. Biomarkers can facilitate non-invasive disease assessment, with C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin as the most widely available biomarkers in current clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes the evidence for their use in both UC and CD and offers practical guidance for healthcare providers taking into account the limitations of biomarker interpretation. We present evidence for the future use of novel biomarkers in IBD and discuss how biomarker discovery could deliver the goal of precision medicine in IBD.

Selected Cytokines and Metalloproteinases in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a collective term for two diseases: ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). There are many factors, e.g., genetic, environmental and immunological, that increase the likelihood of these diseases. Indicators of IBDs include extracellular matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The aim of this review is to present data on the role of selected cytokines and metalloproteinases in IBD. In recent years, more and more transcriptomic studies are emerging. These studies are improving the characterization of the cytokine microenvironment inside inflamed tissue. It is observed that the levels of several cytokines are consistently increased in inflamed tissue in IBD, both in UC and CD. This review shows that MMPs play a major role in the pathology of inflammatory processes, cancer, and IBD. IBD-associated inflammation is associated with increased expression of MMPs and reduced ability of tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs) to inhibit their action. In IBD patients in tissues that are inflamed, MMPs are produced in excess and TIMP activity is not sufficient to block MMPs. This review is based on our personal selection of the literature that was retrieved by a selective search in PubMed using the terms "Inflammatory bowel disease" and "pathogenesis of Inflammatory bowel diseases" that includes systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical trials. The involvement of the immune system in the pathophysiology of IBD is reviewed in terms of the role of the cytokines and metalloproteinases involved.

Signs and Symptoms of Acute Bowel Inflammation and the Risk of Progression to Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Analysis

Episodes of acute ileitis or colitis have been associated with future development of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Nevertheless, the rate of future IBD among patients diagnosed with signs or symptoms of acute bowel inflammation is unknown. We aimed to assess the risk of IBD development among patients presenting with signs or symptoms of ileitis or colitis. We searched for all patients that visited the emergency department (ED) and underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) who were eventually diagnosed with IBD during gastroenterology follow-ups within 9 years from the index admission. Multivariable models identified possible predictors of patients to develop IBD. Overall, 488 patients visited the ED and underwent abdominal imaging with abnormal findings, and 23 patients (4.7%) were eventually diagnosed with IBD (19 Crohn’s, 4 ulcerative colitis). Patients with a future IBD diagnosis were significantly younger (28 vs. 56 years, p < 0.001) with higher rates of diarrhea as a presenting symptom (17.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.015) compared to non-IBD patients. On multivariable analysis, age (p < 0.001), colitis (p = 0.004) or enteritis (p < 0.001) on imaging and a diagnosis of diarrhea in the ED (p = 0.02) were associated with development of IBD. Although alarming to patients and families, ED admission with intestinal inflammatory symptoms leads to eventual diagnosis of IBD in <5% of patients during long-term follow-up.

Gelsolin as a Potential Biomarker for Endoscopic Activity and Mucosal Healing in Ulcerative Colitis

The therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis is mucosal healing, which requires improved non-invasive biomarkers to evaluate disease activity. Gelsolin is associated with several autoimmune diseases, and here, we aimed to analyze its usefulness as a serological biomarker for clinical and endoscopic activities in ulcerative colitis. Patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 138) who had undergone blood tests and colonoscopy were included. Serum gelsolin was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and correlation between the gelsolin level and clinical and endoscopic activities was examined. The serum gelsolin level in patients with ulcerative colitis was significantly lower than that in healthy subjects, and it decreased in proportion to increasing Mayo score and Mayo endoscopic subscore. The area under the curve for correlation between clinical and endoscopic remission and serum gelsolin level was higher than that for C-reactive protein. Furthermore, in C-reactive protein-negative patients, the serum gelsolin level was lower in the active phase than in remission. Our findings indicate that the serum gelsolin level correlates with clinical and endoscopic activities in ulcerative colitis, has a higher sensitivity and specificity than C-reactive protein, and can detect mucosal healing, suggesting that gelsolin can be used as a biomarker for ulcerative colitis.

Role of Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The number of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing worldwide. Endoscopy is the gold standard to assess the condition of IBD. The problem with this procedure is that the burden and cost on the patient are high. Therefore, the identification of a reliable biomarker to replace endoscopy is desired. Biomarkers are used in various situations such as diagnosis of IBD, evaluation of disease activity, prediction of therapeutic effect, and prediction of relapse. C-reactive protein and fecal calprotectin have a lot of evidence as objective biomarkers of disease activity in IBD. The usefulness of the fecal immunochemical test, serum leucine-rich glycoprotein, and urinary prostaglandin E major metabolite have also been reported. Herein, we comprehensively review the usefulness and limitations of biomarkers that can be used in daily clinical practice regarding IBD. To date, no biomarker is sufficiently accurate to replace endoscopy; however, it is important to understand the characteristics of each biomarker and use the appropriate biomarker at the right time in daily clinical practice.

The Role of Biomarkers in Surgery for Ulcerative Colitis: A Review

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an inflammatory condition that generally affects the rectum and extends proximally into the colon in a continuous, distal-to-proximal pattern. Surgical resection (total proctocolectomy) is the only cure for UC and is often necessary in managing complicated or refractory disease. However, recent advances in biologically targeted therapies have resulted in improved disease control, and surgery is required in only a fraction of cases. This ever-increasing array of options for medical management has added complexity to surgical decision-making. In some circumstances, the added time required to ensure failure of medical therapy can delay colectomy in patients who will ultimately need it. Indeed, many patients with severe disease undergo trials of multiple medical therapies prior to considering surgery. In severe cases of UC, continued medical management has been associated with a delay to surgical intervention and higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Biomarkers represent a burgeoning field of research, particularly in inflammatory bowel disease and cancer. This review seeks to highlight the different possible settings for surgery in UC and the role various biomarkers might play in each.

Assessing Severity of Disease in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease that can present at various stages of disease activity and severity. Traditionally, severity scoring has focused on disease activity during a single moment with various tools, including patient-reported symptoms, as well as clinical, laboratory-based, endoscopic, histologic, and imaging variables. Optimal delivery of care depends on the accurate assessment of disease severity, which must take longitudinal variables into account. This article reviews the history of severity scoring in UC and provides a concise, clinically oriented approach to assessing disease severity.

New Insights into Inflammatory Bowel Diseases from Proteomic and Lipidomic Studies

Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) represent the two main forms of chronic inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). The exact IBD etiology is not yet revealed but CD and UC are likely induced by an excessive immune response against normal constituents of the intestinal microbial flora. IBD diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms often combined with invasive and costly procedures. Thus, the need for more non-invasive markers is urgent. Several routine laboratory investigations have been explored as indicators of intestinal inflammation in IBD, including blood testing for C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and specific antibodies, in addition to stool testing for calprotectin and lactoferrin. However, none has been universally adopted, some have been well-characterized, and others hold great promise. In recent years, the technological developments within the field of mass spectrometry (MS) and bioinformatics have greatly enhanced the ability to retrieve, characterize, and analyze large amounts of data. High-throughput research allowed enhancing the understanding of the biology of IBD permitting a more accurate biomarker discovery than ever before. In this review, we summarize currently used IBD serological and stool biomarkers and how proteomics and lipidomics are contributing to the identification of IBD biomarkers.

Use of C-Reactive Protein and Ferritin Biomarkers in Daily Pediatric Practice

Recent pediatric clinical research has begun to focus on risk stratification tools using multibiomarker models. C-reactive protein (CRP) and ferriti biomarkers are widely available and used to varying degrees in daily practice, but there is no single source examining the evidence behind their use.We set out to summarize the evidence behind the use of CRP and ferritin biomarkers in pediatric practice and to begin development of a consensus for their future use for pediatricians.All the literature involving CRP and ferritin in pediatrics available on PubMed was surveyed. Research applicable to daily pediatric practice was summarized in the body of the article. Pediatric clinicians of various subspecialties contributed to the summary of the use of CRP and ferritin biomarkers in clinical practice in various disease processes. A clinical decision pathway is described, and evidence is summarized.CRP and ferritin biomarkers have diverse uses with various cutoff values in the literature, making their use in daily practice difficult. Elevation of these markers coincides with their significant elevation in uncontrolled inflammation.CRP and ferritin biomarkers are widely used in pediatrics. This review provides a resource summarizing evidence into a single source. There is sufficient evidence to indicate that these biomarkers of inflammation can be useful in guiding clinical decision making in specific clinical scenarios; however, further work is needed to improve their use in clinical practice.

AGA Technical Review on the Evaluation of Functional Diarrhea and Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome in Adults (IBS-D)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The evaluation of patients with chronic watery diarrhea represents a diagnostic challenge for clinicians because organic causes, including inflammatory bowel disease, microscopic colitis, and chronic infection, must be differentiated from functional diarrhea and diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome. The purpose of this review is to summarize the available evidence on the usefulness of diagnostic tests in such patients.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID, from 1978 until April 2017. We included diagnostic test accuracy studies reporting on the use of fecal and blood tests for the evaluation of adult patients with functional diarrhea, including irritable bowel syndrome. We assessed the risk of bias of included studies using a modified version of the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies II, and the certainty in the evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. We calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity, and the proportion of patients with true and false positive and negative results. We evaluated the following tests: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, C-reactive protein, fecal lactoferrin, fecal calprotectin, serologic tests for celiac disease, tests for bile acid diarrhea, the commercially available version of anti-cytolethal distending toxin B and anti-vinculin antibodies, and tests for Giardia infection. We did not evaluate breath tests for small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, as they are not part of a standard diarrhea workup.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight studies proved eligible to evaluate 1 or more of these tests. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate and C-reactive protein were similar at discriminating organic from functional disease, with sensitivity and specificity, respectively, of 0.54-0.78 and 0.46-0.95 for erythrocyte sedimentation rate and 0.73 and 0.78 for C-reactive protein. Among fecal tests, fecal calprotectin in a range of 50-60 μg/g (pooled sensitivity 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.86; pooled specificity 0.87; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92) and fecal lactoferrin in a range of 4.0-7.25 μg/g (pooled sensitivity 0.79; 95% CI, 0.73-0.84; pooled specificity 0.93; 95%CI 0.63-0.99) presented the lowest proportion of false-negative results (low certainty in the evidence). Among tests for celiac disease, IgA tissue transglutaminase presented the best diagnostic test accuracy (sensitivity range, 0.79-0.99; specificity range, 0.90-0.99) with moderate certainty in the evidence. Among tests for bile acid diarrhea, the ⁷⁵selenium homotaurocholic acid test performed better than serum fibroblast growth factor 19 and 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one, but is not available in the United States. There was insufficient evidence to recommend serologic tests for irritable bowel syndrome at this time. There are several good diagnostic tests for Giardia infection.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate to low certainty in the evidence indicates that available fecal and blood tests may play a role in the diagnostic workup of adult patients with functional diarrhea. At the moment, no tests are available to reliably rule in irritable bowel syndrome.

Cost-effectiveness of faecal calprotectin used in primary care in the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic, autoimmune, gastrointestinal disorder. Canada has one of the highest prevalence and incidence rates of IBD in the world. Diagnosis is challenging due to the similarity of symptoms to functional gastrointestinal disorders. Faecalcalprotectin (FC) is a biomarker for active mucosal inflammation and has proven effective in the diagnosis of IBD. Our study objective was to assess the cost-effectiveness of adding an FC test compared with standard practice (blood test) in primary care among adult patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms.

DESIGN

We constructed a decision analytic tree with a 1-year time horizon. The cut-off level of 100 µg/g was used for FC testing. Probabilistic analyses were conducted for the base case and all scenarios.

SETTING

Canadian health sector perspective.

POPULATION

A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with gastrointestinal symptoms in the primary care setting.

INTERVENTIONS

FC test compared with blood test.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of FC test expressed as cost per QALY gained compared with blood test and time to IBD diagnosis.

RESULTS

FC testing is expected to cost more ($C295.1 vs $C273.9) than standard practice but yield little higher QALY (0.751vs0.750). The ICER of FC test was $C20 323 per QALY. Probabilistic analysis demonstrated that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $C50 000 per QALY, there was 81.3% probability of FC test being cost-effective. The use of FC test in primary care reduced the time to IBD diagnosis by 40.0 days (95% CI 16.3 to 65.3 days), compared with blood testing alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this analysis of short-term outcomes, screening adult patients in primary care using FC test at a cut-off level of 100 µg/g is expected to be cost-effective in Canada.

Epithelial Barrier Function in Gut-Bone Signaling

The intestinal epithelial barrier plays an essential role in maintaining host homeostasis. The barrier regulates nutrient absorption as well as prevents the invasion of pathogenic bacteria in the host. It is composed of epithelial cells, tight junctions, and a mucus layer. Several factors, such as cytokines, diet, and diseases, can affect this barrier. These factors have been shown to increase intestinal permeability, inflammation, and translocation of pathogenic bacteria. In addition, dysregulation of the epithelial barrier can result in inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease. Our lab and others have also shown that barrier disruption can have systemic effects including bone loss. In this chapter, we will discuss the current literature to understand the link between intestinal barrier and bone. We will discuss how inflammation, aging, dysbiosis, and metabolic diseases can affect intestinal barrier-bone link. In addition, we will highlight the current suggested mechanism between intestinal barrier and bone.

Serum miRNA signature diagnoses and discriminates murine colitis subtypes and predicts ulcerative colitis in humans

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is difficult to diagnose due to nonspecific and variable symptoms, and lack of reliable diagnostic tests. Current methods are invasive, non-sensitive, non-predictive, and do not easily discriminate between its two main forms. Consequently, there remains a great need for reliable serum markers for IBD. Here, using a longitudinal study of various mouse models of colitis, we identified a serum miRNA signature that indicated the development of colitis and discriminated between inflammations of various origins (colitis from arthritis). Unlike the existing biomarkers, the newly identified signature also serves to distinguish individuals at risk, predict the type of inflammation, and evaluate the response to therapeutics. Moreover, the miRNA signature identified in mice predicted ulcerative colitis with 83.3% accuracy. In future, the signature identified herein could play a central role in monitoring inflammatory disorders and therapeutic responses in patients, thereby paving the way for personalized medicine.

The Role of Laboratory Tests in Crohn's Disease

In the past, laboratory tests were considered of limited value in Crohn's disease (CD). In the era of biologics, laboratory tests have become essential to evaluate the inflammatory burden of the disease (C-reactive protein, fecal calprotectin) since symptoms-based scores are subjective, to predict the response to pharmacological options and the risk of relapse, to discriminate CD from ulcerative colitis, to select candidates to anti-tumor necrosis factors [screening tests looking for hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus status and latent tuberculosis], to assess the risk of adverse events (testing for thiopurine metabolites and thiopurine-methyltransferase activity), and to personalize and optimize therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring). Pharmacogenetics, though presently confined to the assessment of thiopurineme methyltransferase polymorphisms and hematological toxicity associated with thiopurine treatment, is a promising field that will contribute to a better understanding of the molecular mechanisms of the variability in response to the drugs used in CD with the attempt to expand personalized care and precision medicine strategies.

Current application of proteomics in biomarker discovery for inflammatory bowel disease

Recently, the field of proteomics has rapidly expanded in its application towards clinical research with objectives ranging from elucidating disease pathogenesis to discovering clinical biomarkers. As proteins govern and/or reflect underlying cellular processes, the study of proteomics provides an attractive avenue for research as it allows for the rapid identification of protein profiles in a biological sample. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) encompasses several heterogeneous and chronic conditions of the gastrointestinal tract. Proteomic technology provides a powerful means of addressing major challenges in IBD today, especially for identifying biomarkers to improve its diagnosis and management. This review will examine the current state of IBD proteomics research and its use in biomarker research. Furthermore, we also discuss the challenges of translating proteomic research into clinically relevant tools. The potential application of this growing field is enormous and is likely to provide significant insights towards improving our future understanding and management of IBD.

A meta-analysis of the utility of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin to exclude inflammatory bowel disease in adults with IBS

OBJECTIVES

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is viewed as a diagnosis of exclusion by most providers. The aim of our study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the utility of C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), fecal calprotectin, and fecal lactoferrin to distinguish between patients with IBS and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and healthy controls (HCs).

METHODS

A systematic online database search was performed. Included studies were prospective, adult, diagnostic cohort studies with any of the four tests. The means and s.d. values of biomarker logarithms were estimated based on studies that gave medians and either confidence intervals for the median, interquartile ranges, or ranges. We used a Naive Bayes approach to estimate the probability of being a HC, having IBS, or having IBD based on the biomarker values.

RESULTS

Systematic review identified 1,252 citations. After cross-referencing medical subject headings, detailed evaluation identified 140 potentially relevant journal articles/abstracts for CRP, ESR, calprotectin, and lactoferrin of which 4, 4, 8, and 2 fulfilled our inclusion criteria, respectively. None of the biomarkers reliably distinguished between IBS and healthy controls. At a CRP level of ≤0.5 or calprotectin level of ≤40 μg/g, there was a ≤1% probability of having IBD. Individual analysis of ESR and lactoferrin had little clinical utility.

CONCLUSION

CRP and calprotectin of ≤0.5 or 40, respectively, essentially excludes IBD in patients with IBS symptoms. The addition of CRP and calprotectin to symptom-based criteria may improve the confident diagnosis of IBS.

Physician global assessments or blood tests do not predict mucosal healing in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Mucosal healing has been proposed as the therapeutic end point in the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between physician global assessment (PGA) and laboratory blood tests (complete blood count, ferritin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and endoscopic findings in UC to determine whether they could be adequate surrogates for endoscopy.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of patients known to have UC from July 2008 to November 2012 was performed at the Health Sciences Centre, Winnipeg, Manitoba. Patients included individuals with UC who underwent colonoscopy within one month of clinic assessment. Blood tests were standard at the time of colonoscopy. Patients presenting through the emergency department, those with colonoscopies performed outside the authors' institution, or whose colonoscopies and clinical assessments were undertaken more than one month apart were excluded. The PGA was used to determine disease activity in patients before colonoscopy. The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity, a validated scoring system to rate endoscopic disease severity in ulcerative colitis, was adapted.

RESULTS

A total of 154 patients (mean [± SD] age 44 ± 15.7 years) with UC were identified including 82 (53%) men. Mean hemoglobin level was 139 g/L, mean platelet level was 296×10(9)/L, mean ferritin level was 102 μg/L, mean C-reactive protein level was 10 mg/L and mean albumin level was 40 g/L. Using endoscopy as the 'gold standard' for assessing UC activity (moderate-severe), abnormalities in laboratory parameters and PGA were both highly specific but not sensitive for identifying individuals with at least moderately active endoscopic disease. The PGA had higher positive and negative predictive values than the laboratory parameters.

CONCLUSION

Neither blood tests nor PGA could replace endoscopy for assessing mucosal healing. When patients experienced active symptoms and abnormal serum markers, they were highly likely to have abnormal endoscopy. However, inactive symptoms or normal laboratory values did not preclude having active endoscopic disease.

C-reactive protein in Crohn's disease: how informative is it?

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an important acute-phase marker, produced mainly in the liver. Its production by mesenteric adipocytes has been recently stressed in Crohn's disease (CD). There are many factors affecting CRP levels, both environmental and genetics. The short-life of this biomarker makes it of pertinent use in the assessment of inflammation. There are inconsistent results concerning the association of clinical activity indices, mucosal healing, histological activity and CRP. This review summarizes the role of CRP in CD, namely its importance in the differential diagnosis of CD; its relationship with clinical activity indices, other markers of inflammation and endoscopic and radiological cross sectional imaging; prediction of response to anti-TNF treatment and prediction of outcome.

Clinical epidemiology and phenotypic characteristics of Crohn's disease in the central region of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite the remarkable increase in the incidence of Crohn's disease among Saudis in recent years, data about Crohn's disease in Saudi Arabia are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the clinical epidemiology and phenotypic characteristics of Crohn's disease in the central region of Saudi Arabia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A data registry, Inflammatory Bowel Disease Information System (IBDIS), was used to register Crohn's disease patients who presented to the gastroenterology clinics in four tertiary care centers in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia between September 2009 and February 2013. Patients' characteristics, disease location, behavior, age at diagnosis according to the Montreal classification, course of the disease, and extraintestinal manifestation were recorded.

RESULTS

Among 497 patients with Crohn's disease, 59% were males with a mean age at diagnosis of 25 years [95% Confidence Interval (CI): 24-26, range 5-75 years]. The mean duration from the time of complaint to the day of the diagnosis was 11 months, and the mean duration of the disease from diagnosis to the day of entry to the registry was 40 months. Seventy-seven percent of our patients were aged 17-40 years at diagnosis, 16.8% were ≤16 years of age, and 6.6% were >40 years of age. According to the Montreal classification of disease location, 48.8% of patients had ileocolonic involvement, 43.5% had limited disease to the terminal ileum or cecum, 7.7% had isolated colonic involvement, and 16% had an upper gastrointestinal involvement. Forty-two percent of our patients had a non-stricturing, non-penetrating behavior, while 32.8% had stricturing disease and 25.4% had penetrating disease.

CONCLUSION

Crohn's disease is frequently encountered in Saudi Arabia. The majority of patients are young people with a predilection for males, while its behavior resembled that of western societies in terms of age of onset, location, and behavior.

Exploring the use of adalimumab for patients with moderate Crohn's disease: subanalyses from induction and maintenance trials

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF agents are often reserved for patients with severe Crohn's disease (CD).

AIMS

We explored the predictive value of baseline disease activity and C-reactive protein (CRP) for disease course, adalimumab efficacy for remission (induction and maintenance) in patients with moderate and severe CD, and adalimumab efficacy in moderate CD by CRP category.

METHODS

Post hoc analyses of remission data were performed for all randomized patients from induction (CLASSIC I) and maintenance (CHARM, EXTEND) adalimumab trials in patients with moderate (CDAI≤300) or severe (CDAI>300) CD, and in high (≥10 mg/L) or low (<10 mg/L) CRP moderate CD subgroups. Placebo-treated CHARM patients were evaluated for disease activity over time and time to CD-related hospitalization, by baseline disease severity and CRP.

RESULTS

Moderate CD patients had the highest clinical remission rate and largest treatment effect size compared with placebo at week 4 after 160/80 mg induction (46.3% adalimumab, 17.4% placebo; versus 22.9%, 3.6% for severe patients). Moderate-CD/high-CRP patients had the most pronounced efficacy (57.1% adalimumab, 6.7% placebo; versus 40.7%, 20.0% for lower CRP group). Adalimumab maintenance treatment (40 mg every-other-week) achieved superior remission versus placebo at one year in moderate (32.9% versus 13.7%) and severe (27.2% versus 7.5%) cohorts. Among moderate patients, efficacy was similar by CRP category. Moderate-CD/high-CRP placebo-treated patients experienced disease activity and hospitalization rates at week 56 of CHARM approaching those of severe CD patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggests that moderate CD patients can be treated effectively with adalimumab, and supports using CRP to identify moderate CD patients at greatest risk of disease progression.

Early prediction of adverse events in enhanced recovery based upon the host systemic inflammatory response

AIM

Early identification of patients experiencing postoperative complications is imperative for successful management. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a nonspecific marker of inflammation used in many specialties to monitor patient condition. The role of CRP measurement early in the elective postoperative colorectal patient is unclear, particularly in the context of enhanced recovery (ERAS).

METHODS

Five hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between October 2008 and October 2010 within an established ERAS programme were studied. Patients were separated into a development group of 265 patients and a validation group of 268 patients by chronological order. CRP and white cell count were added to a prospectively maintained ERAS database. The primary outcome of the study was all adverse events (including infective complications, postoperative organ dysfunction and prolonged length of stay) during the initial hospital admission. Significant predictors for adverse events on univariate analysis were submitted to multivariate regression analysis and the resulting model applied to the validation group. The validity and predictive accuracy of the regression model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curve/area under the curve (AUC) analysis.

RESULTS

CRP levels >150 mg/l on postoperative day 2 and a rising CRP on day 3 were independently associated with all adverse events during the hospital admission. A weighted model was applied to the validation group yielding an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.58-0.73) indicating, at best, modest discrimination and predictive accuracy for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Measurement of CRP in patients after elective colorectal surgery in the first few days after surgery within ERAS can assist in identifying those at risk of adverse events and a prolonged hospital stay. A CRP value of >150 mg/l on day 2 and a rising CRP on day 3 should alert the surgeon to an increased likelihood of such events.

Fecal MMP-9: a new noninvasive differential diagnostic and activity marker in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by frequent relapses, with the presence of colorectal inflammation and mucosal lesions. Matrix-metalloprotease 9 (MMP-9) is elevated in colonic biopsies, urine, and blood plasma of UC patients. MMP-9 has been suggested as a predictor of UC in the urine of children; however, 20% of the controls tested positive. So far, fecal MMP-9 levels have never been measured. Our aims were: 1) to compare fecal MMP-9 levels in UC patients to control subjects and a functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by diarrhea (IBS-D); 2) to test the correlation between UC disease activity and fecal levels of MMP-9; and 3) to correlate fecal MMP-9 levels with a known fecal marker of UC activity, calprotectin.

METHODS

UC (n = 47), IBS-D (n = 23) patients, and control subjects (n = 24) provided fecal samples for MMP-9 analysis. In UC patients, disease severity was evaluated by the Mayo score. Fecal MMP-9 and calprotectin levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and lateral flow assay, respectively.

RESULTS

MMP-9 was undetectable or ≤0.22 ng/mL in the feces of all controls and IBS-D patients. In UC patients, fecal MMP-9 levels significantly correlated with the overall Mayo score (P < 0.001), the endoscopic score (P < 0.001), and the serum C-reactive protein levels (P = 0.002). Additionally, in UC patients fecal MMP-9 levels showed a significant correlation with a known disease activity marker, fecal calprotectin (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight fecal MMP-9 as a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of diarrheic disorders and in the noninvasive evaluation of disease activity and mucosal healing in UC.

Mean platelet volume: a controversial marker of disease activity in Crohn's disease

Background

We investigated and compared the capacity of mean platelet volume (MPV) and other inflammatory markers in detecting Crohn’s disease (CD) activity and differentiating CD patients from healthy controls.

Methods

MPV, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cells were measured in 61 CD patients and 50 healthy subjects. Disease activity was assessed by the Crohn’s Disease Activity Index.

Results

A significant decrease in MPV was noted in patients with CD compared with healthy controls (P <0.0001), but statistical difference was not found between active and inactive CD groups. In CD, no significant correlation was found between MPV and other inflammatory markers. The overall accuracy of MPV (cutoff: 10.35 fl), CRP (cutoff: 4.85 mg/dl) and ESR (cutoff: 8.5 mm/hour) in differentiating CD patients from healthy controls was 76.6%, 65.8% and 72.1% respectively. The overall accuracy of CRP (cutoff: 4.95 mg/dl) and ESR (cutoff: 16.5 mm/hour) in determination of active CD was 80.3% and 73.8%.

Conclusions

MPV declined in CD patients compared with healthy subjects. MPV had the best accuracy in determination of CD patients and healthy controls. MPV did not show a discriminative value in disease activity.

The utility of biomarkers in the diagnosis and therapy of inflammatory bowel disease

Fecal and serologic biomarkers can be used in the diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Fecal markers such as calprotectin and lactoferrin have been studied for their ability to identify patients with IBD, assess disease activity, and predict relapse. Antibodies against Saccharomyces cerevisiae and perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic proteins have been used in diagnosis of IBD, to distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) from ulcerative colitis, and to predict the risk of complications of CD. Tests for C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate have been used to assess inflammatory processes and predict the course of IBD progression. Levels of drug metabolites and antibodies against therapeutic agents might be measured to determine why patients do not respond to therapy and to select alternative treatments. This review addresses the potential for biomarker assays to improve treatment strategies and challenges to their use and development.

Inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review on the value of diagnostic testing in primary care

AIM

The clinical presentation of inflammatory bowel disease in primary care represents a diagnostic challenge as its symptoms are heterogeneous and common. To assist the primary care physician, we have summarized the available evidence on diagnostic tests in patients with abdominal symptoms.

METHOD

We searched PubMed and Embase and screened references. Studies were selected if the design was a primary diagnostic study. Patients were adults attending with nonacute abdominal symptoms. Tests included clinical assessment, blood or faecal tests or abdominal ultrasonography. Quality assessment using a modified version of the QUADAS tool and data extraction was performed by two reviewers independently. Diagnostic two-by-two tables and pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity are given. We refrained from pooling when there was considerable clinical or statistical heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 24 studies were included. While the diagnostic performance of the individual symptoms was highly variable (range sensitivity 0.0-0.96, specificity 0.09-1.0), the performance of symptom-based classification systems was both more consistent and better (sensitivity 0.65-1.0, specificity 0.17-0.82). Among faecal and blood tests, calprotectin was studied most frequently and showed the best results (sensitivity 0.61-1.0, specificity 0.71-1.0). Statistical pooling for ultrasonography resulted in a sensitivity of 0.73 (0.65-0.80) and a specificity of 0.95 (0.91-0.97).

CONCLUSION

Although calprotectin and ultrasonography showed consistent and promising findings, none of the studies was performed in primary care. To assist primary care physicians in diagnostic decision making, we urgently need high quality studies performed in primary care.

Clinical utility of C-reactive protein in patients with ileal pouch anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory and noninflammatory complications of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) are common after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis (UC). The clinical utility of C-reactive protein (CRP) in ileal pouch disorders has not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All IPAA patients with underlying UC who had serum CRP tested within 2 weeks of pouch endoscopy were included. The correlation between the level of serum CRP and the Pouch Disease Activity Index (PDAI) scores were evaluated. Diagnostic accuracy of CRP in assessing disease activity by PDAI endoscopy subscores was evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 83 patients (with a total 88 CRP tests), including normal pouches (n = 7), active pouchitis (n = 6), chronic pouchitis (n = 18), Crohn's disease of the pouch (n = 23), cuffitis (n = 13), irritable pouch syndrome (n = 10), and surgery-associated complications (n = 11). Levels of CRP did not differ significantly among healthy and diseased pouch groups. CRP levels significantly correlated with the PDAI endoscopy subscores in the pouch body (P = 0.006) and afferent limb (P = 0.03). A CRP level of greater than 0.7 mg/dL for CRP using the receiver operating characteristics curve obtained the best sensitivity of 69.7% and specificity of 63.6% to detect active pouch inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum CRP levels correlated with endoscopic inflammation in the pouch and afferent limb. Elevated CRP levels might be useful to monitor the degree of inflammatory activity in pouch noninvasively. However, the CRP level as a snapshot had a limited role in distinction between healthy and diseased pouch conditions diagnosed based on longitudinal clinical and endoscopic evaluation.

Fecal lactoferrin, myeloperoxidase and serum C-reactive are effective biomarkers in the assessment of disease activity and severity in patients with idiopathic ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Disease activity and severity of ulcerative colitis (UC) is assessed using colonoscopy, which is invasive, costly and has poor patient acceptability. The role of non-invasive biomarkers of intestinal inflammation in the evaluation of patients with UC is not known. The aim of the study was to examine the role of serum C-reactive protein (SCRP), fecal myeloperoxidase (FMPO) and fecal lactoferrin (FLF) in assessing disease severity, activity and response to therapy.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with idiopathic UC (IUC) attending our hospital from July 2005 to September 2006 were studied. All underwent clinical, endoscopic and histological assessment for disease activity, extent, severity and estimation of SCRP, FMPO and FLF levels at baseline and follow up (FU). An equal number of healthy age-matched controls were studied for biomarker levels.

RESULTS

A total of 37 patients (mean age 37 +/- 12 years) were studied. All three biomarkers were elevated more often in the cases than in the controls (all P = 0.000). Cases with severe IUC had higher CRP, MPO and FLF titers than those without severe IUC. At FU, a significant fall in biomarker levels paralleled the reduction in Mayo's scores. All three biomarkers showed a high degree of correlation with each other. The areas under the curve for FLF, MPO and CRP were 1.00, 0.867 and 0.622, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of markers were: FLF (94%, 100%), FMPO (89%, 51%) and SCRP (24%, 100%).

CONCLUSION

Biomarkers are useful in assessing disease activity, severity and response to therapy in patients with UC. They showed a high degree of correlation with each other.

An overlooked indicator of disease activity in ulcerative colitis: mean platelet volume

Many non-invasive tests have been studied for diagnosis and determining the activation degree of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Nevertheless, an ideal test has not been found yet. Mean platelet volume (MPV) is influenced by the inflammation. In a few study, decreased platelet volume have been reported in IBD. The aim of this study is to determine whether platelet volume would be useful in ulcerative colitis (UC) activity. Additionally we have analyzed overall accuracy of MPV in disease activity and compared with other inflammatory markers. A total of 61 UC patients (male/female : 41/20), and 27 healthy subjects (male/female : 18/9) were enrolled into the study. For all subjects following tests were performed; ESR, CRP, white blood cell count and mean platelet volume. A statistically significant decrease in MPV was noted in patients with UC (8.29 +/- 1.02 fL) compared with healthy controls (8.65 +/- 0.79 fL). MPV of active UC (8.06 +/- 1.19 fL) patients were significantly lower than that of inactive UC (8.45 +/- 0.87 fL). Overall accuracy of MPV in determination of active UC was 71% (with sensitivity 67%, specificity 73%). A negative correlation was found between MPV and endoscopic activity index (r : -0.358 p : 0.005). In UC, MPV did not correlate with ESR, CRP and white blood cell. Our study showed that MPV reduced in UC, particularly in patients with active UC. Decreased MPV may be an indicator for increased disease activity in patients with UC.

Increased incidence of urinary matrix metalloproteinases as predictors of disease in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of metal-dependent enzymes responsible for the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix and basement membrane proteins that occurs during both normal physiologic activity and disease. It has been suggested that MMPs may also play a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) by mediating mucosal breakdown in response to an enhanced inflammatory cascade. We previously demonstrated that elevated urinary MMP levels are independent predictors of disease status in cancer patients. Here we demonstrate that elevated urinary MMP levels may be biomarkers of disease activity in patients with IBD.

METHODS

We analyzed 95 urine samples prospectively collected from 55 children and young adults with known or suspected IBD who presented for evaluation to the Gastrointestinal Procedure Unit at Children's Hospital Boston. Urinary MMPs were analyzed in patients by zymography and compared to 40 age- and sex-matched controls.

RESULTS

Urinary MMP levels were significantly elevated (P < 0.0001) in patients with IBD, as well as in each subgroup (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), relative to controls. Multiple logistic regression revealed that urinary MMP-2 and MMP-9 NGAL levels were independent predictors of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data are the first to demonstrate that urinary MMPs may represent novel noninvasive biomarkers for use in the evaluation of patients with IBD.

C-reactive protein levels during a relapse of Crohn’s disease are associated with the clinical course of the disease

AIM: To explore if C-reactive protein (CRP) levels might serve as a prognostic factor with respect to the clinical course of Crohn’s disease and might be useful for classification.

METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study we enrolled 94 patients from the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) database of the University Medical Centre Utrecht. CRP levels during relapse were correlated with the number of relapses per year. Severity of relapses was based on endoscopic reports and prednisone use. Furthermore, patients were categorized in a low or high CRP group based on their CRP response during relapse and demographic and clinical features were compared.

RESULTS: Overall, a positive correlation between CRP levels, number of relapses, and severity of relapse was found (respectively r_s = 0.31, P < 0.01 and r_s = 0.50, P < 0.001). Employing a cut-off level of 15 mg/L, the index CRP level was found to discriminate patients with respect to the number of relapses per year, as well as for severity of relapses (respectively 0.25 ± 0.16 vs 0.36 ± 0.24, P < 0.05 and 4.4 ± 1.2 vs 3.2 ± 1.1 on a 10-point visual analogue scale, P < 0.001 for the high CRP and low CRP groups respectively). In addition, the high CRP group showed more cumulative days of prednisone use per year (107 ± 95 vs 58 ± 48, P < 0.05), as well as a better response to infliximab (93 % vs 33 %, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION: A higher CRP level during relapse seems to be associated with a more severe clinical course of disease.

Discriminating IBD from IBS: comparison of the test performance of fecal markers, blood leukocytes, CRP, and IBD antibodies

BACKGROUND

Symptoms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can overlap. We aimed to determine the accuracy of fecal markers, C-reactive protein (CRP), blood leukocytes, and antibody panels for discriminating IBD from IBS and to define a "best test."

METHODS

We prospectively included 64 patients with IBD (36 Crohn's disease [CD], 28 ulcerative colitis [UC]), 30 with IBS, and 42 healthy controls. Besides CRP and blood leukocytes, blinded fecal samples were measured for calprotectin (PhiCal Test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]), lactoferrin (IBD-SCAN, ELISA), Hexagon-OBTI (immunochromatographic test for detection of human hemoglobin), and LEUKO-TEST (lactoferrin latex-agglutination test). Blinded serum samples were measured for the antibodies ASCA (ELISA) and pANCA (immunofluorescence).

RESULTS

Overall accuracy of tests for discriminating IBD from IBS: IBD-SCAN 90%, PhiCal Test 89%, LEUKO-TEST 78%, Hexagon-OBTI 74%, CRP 73%, blood leukocytes 63%, CD antibodies (ASCA+/pANCA- or ASCA+/pANCA+) 55%, UC antibodies (pANCA+/ASCA-) 49%. ASCA and pANCA had an accuracy of 78% for detecting CD and 75% for detecting UC, respectively. The overall accuracy of IBD-SCAN and PhiCal Test combined with ASCA/pANCA for discriminating IBD from IBS was 92% and 91%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The PhiCal Test and IBD-SCAN are highly accurate for discriminating IBD from IBS. There is only marginal additional diagnostic accuracy when the PhiCal Test and IBD-SCAN are combined with ASCA and pANCA. ASCA and pANCA have a high specificity for IBD.

Current and future diagnostic approaches: from serologies to imaging

Advances in serologic markers and imaging modalities continue to revolutionize diagnostic approaches to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Autoimmune and antimicrobial antibodies demonstrate diagnostic value in those patients with a moderate pretest probability of disease. Emerging data also support the use of antimicrobial antibody levels as a predictive tool for small bowel complications and the need for future surgery. In addition to being a prognostic marker in patients with acute severe colitis, serum C-reactive protein has been shown to correlate with clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic measures of disease activity. Capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy allow for visualization of the entire small bowel, and double-balloon endoscopy also has the capability to treat lesions. CT enterography is beginning to replace small bowel follow-through because of its high sensitivity and specificity for disease of the small intestine. Both CT and magnetic resonance enterography detect luminal and extraluminal abnormalities, with MRI serving as a safe imaging option in cases of pregnancy and renal insufficiency. These newer modalities add to the armamentarium clinicians can use for evaluation of IBD.

Accuracy of four fecal assays in the diagnosis of colitis

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of four different fecal markers in discriminating between irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and other forms of colitis and to examine the feasibility of collecting fecal samples in outpatients.

METHODS

We prospectively included 20 patients with irritable bowel syndrome, 36 with inflammatory bowel disease (24 Crohn's disease, 12 ulcerative colitis), and 18 with other forms of colitis (8 infectious colitis, 5 ischemic colitis, 5 medication-induced colitis). Diagnosis was established by clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic workup. Blinded fecal samples were measured for calprotectin (PhiCal-Test, ELISA), lactoferrin (IBD-SCAN, ELISA), Hexagon OBTI (immunochromatographic test for detection of human hemoglobin), and LEUKO-TEST (lactoferrin latex-agglutination test).

RESULTS

Overall accuracy for discriminating irritable bowel syndrome from inflammatory bowel disease or other forms of colitis was recorded, respectively: IBD-SCAN 91/100 percent, PhiCal-Test 89/100 percent, LEUKO-TEST 83/89 percent, Hexagon OBTI 77/84 percent, C-reactive protein 71/79 percent, and blood leukocytes 63/68 percent. Differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease from other forms of colitis with fecal markers was as follows: range of overall accuracy from 43 to 50 percent. Overall accuracy (in percent) for discrimination of irritable bowel syndrome from patients with Crohn's disease in remission (CDAI<150) was: IBD-SCAN 90, PhiCal-Test 90, LEUKO-TEST 85, Hexagon OBTI 77. Calprotectin and lactoferrin were significantly elevated in patients with Crohn's disease with CDAI>150 compared with those in remission. Fecal sampling feasibility in outpatients was high (acceptance rate 95 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

IBD-SCAN and PhiCal-Test have the best overall accuracy for detection of colitis, followed by LEUKO-TEST, Hexagon OBTI, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Accuracy of fecal markers is high even in patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Fecal sampling feasibility was high in outpatients. Because fecal markers are unspecific, endoscopic workup remains crucial to determine the underlying cause of colitis.

Effect of oral lactulose on clinical and immunohistochemical parameters in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a pilot study

Background

The prebiotic potential of lactulose is well established and preclinical studies demonstrated a protective effect of lactulose in murine models of colitis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the clinical and histological efficacy of lactulose in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), for which probiotic therapy yielded promising results.

Methods

Patients were treated with standard medication alone or combined with 10 g lactulose daily as adjuvant therapy for 4 months. Clinical efficacy of treatment was assessed using clinical activity indices, a quality of life index (IBDQ), endoscopic scores, defecation frequency and monitoring corticosteroid medication. Orsomucoid, alpha1-antitrypsin and other laboratory parameters were determined. In addition, in some participants colonic biopsies were analyzed with haematoxylin-eosin staining or with antibodies against HLA-DR, CD68, IgA and CD3, and evaluated systematically. All measurements were performed both at enrolment and at the end of the trial.

Results

14 patients presenting ulcerative colitis (UC) and 17 patients presenting Crohn's disease (CD), most of them in a clinically active state, were enrolled in this pilot study. After 4 month no significant improvement of clinical activity index, endoscopic score or immunohistochemical parameters was observed in CD or UC patients receiving lactulose in comparison to the control group. However, significant improvement of quality of life was observed in UC patients receiving lactulose compared to the control group (p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The findings of the present pilot study indicate that oral lactulose has no beneficial effects in IBD patients in particular with regard to clinical activity, endoscopic score or immunohistochemical parameters. The importance of the beneficial effect of lactulose in UC patients regarding the quality of life needs further evaluation in larger controlled clinical trials.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN92101486

Fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin after ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease

PURPOSE

This study was designed to assess the role of fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin as markers of intestinal inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease who have undergone ileocolonic resection.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who had undergone ileocolonic resection for Crohn's disease with a median follow-up of 40.5 (range, 5-102) months were enrolled. Clinical examination and blood test were performed, and fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin levels were dosed. The predictors for fecal lactoferrin and calprotectin levels that resulted to be significant at the univariate analyses were included in two multiple regression analysis models.

RESULTS

The mean lactoferrin level was 21 +/- 3.9 microg/g and the mean calprotectin fecal level was 247 +/- 22.7 ng/ml. C-reactive protein levels (P < 0.01), calprotectin levels (P < 0.01), and the presence of clinical recurrence (P = 0.04) resulted to be independent predictors of lactoferrin levels. Only lactoferrin levels resulted to be an independent predictor for calprotectin fecal levels (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Crohn's disease patients maintain high fecal levels of lactoferrin and calprotectin at long-term follow-up after resection of the diseased bowel even in case of clinical remission. The significant correlation between the two fecal markers may be the expression of the ongoing intestinal inflammation. Only lactoferrin significantly correlated with C-reactive protein and showed a reliable threshold value for systemic inflammation. Lactoferrin fecal levels may be a reliable indicator for intestinal inflammation influencing the systemic inflammatory status. The third predictor of lactoferrin fecal level was the presence of episodes of clinical recurrence during the postoperative follow-up.

[Role of biological markers in inflammatory bowel disease]

The role played by the distinct biological markers in chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains insufficiently characterized. C-reactive protein (CRP) has a short half-life and consequently it is elevated early after the onset of the inflammatory process and rapidly decreases after its resolution, making it an attractive marker of disease activity. Moreover, this test is inexpensive and easy to perform and is unaffected by medication. While Crohn's disease is associated with a marked CRP response, there is little or no elevation in the synthesis of this protein in ulcerative colitis. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate provides some advantages such as its ease of determination, availability, and reduced cost. Nevertheless, it also has several disadvantages, notably the fact that its concentration depends on age, the presence of anemia, smoking, and the use of certain drugs. Moreover, its utility is limited by its long half life and consequent prolonged latency period after changes in chronic IBD activity. In theory, fecal markers have the advantages of showing greater specificity in the diagnosis of chronic IBD. Several gastrointestinal diseases, including chronic IBD, show greater leukocyte elimination in feces and a close correlation has been described between fecal calprotectin concentration and leukocyte excretion quantified by 111indium. Advantages of this fecal marker are that it can be detected through a simple and inexpensive technique and also shows excellent stability in feces for prolonged periods. Like calprotectin, fecal lactoferrin is also quantified by a simple and inexpensive ELISA method, although there is considerably less experience with this latter marker.

A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled study of alicaforsen, an antisense inhibitor of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, for the treatment of subjects with active Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of alicaforsen, a first-generation antisense inhibitor of intercellular adhesion molecule 1, with placebo in subjects with active Crohn's disease, a disorder in which intercellular adhesion molecule 1 is overexpressed.

METHODS

In 2 identical double-masked, placebo-controlled studies, 331 subjects with active Crohn's disease were treated with either alicaforsen (221 subjects) or placebo (110 subjects) administered via 2-hour intravenous infusion 3 times a week for 4 weeks. Patients then returned for follow-up every 2 weeks. The primary end point was clinical remission by week 12. Secondary end points included clinical response and remission in relation to previous use of other biologics including tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists and presence of fistulous disease.

RESULTS

The results, whether combined or analyzed individually, failed to demonstrate statistical significance as a measure of its primary outcome (alicaforsen 33.9% vs placebo 34.5%; P = .89). In addition, no statistical differences in response were observed between alicaforsen and placebo in subjects who were previously treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy or had baseline fistulizing disease. There were no significant differences in adverse events from placebo apart from a higher infusion reaction rate.

CONCLUSIONS

In the subject population studied, alicaforsen failed to demonstrate efficacy in any of its primary outcome measures. Alicaforsen was well-tolerated.

Use of serologic markers as a screening tool in inflammatory bowel disease compared with elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate and anemia

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the use of serologic testing as a screening test for inflammatory bowel disease compared with erythrocyte sedimentation rate and hemoglobin in a referred patient population with suspected inflammatory bowel disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was performed, reviewing medical charts of patients who had inflammatory bowel disease serology performed at Prometheus Laboratories from September 2002 to September 2004. Patients were divided into 4 categories: ulcerative colitis, Crohn disease, indeterminate colitis, and noninflammatory bowel disease groups. Patients were categorized based on clinical evaluation by board-certified pediatric gastroenterologists.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients seen at the Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Gastroenterology Clinic had inflammatory bowel disease serology performed at or before the time of diagnosis. Seventeen charts were excluded secondary to inadequate information. Forty children were found to have inflammatory bowel disease, a prevalence of 19%. Overall, serologic testing for inflammatory bowel disease had 60% sensitivity and 92% specificity. A positive laboratory test for anemia or an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate had 83% sensitivity, whereas the combination of anemia and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate had 96% specificity. The positive predictive value of serologic testing was 60% compared with 79% in patients with anemia and elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The positive predictive value of serologic testing in the subgroup of subjects without rectal bleeding (139 subjects) was only 35% compared with 60% using routine tests. Almost one third of all positive serologic tests were in patients with no demonstrable inflammatory bowel disease.

CONCLUSIONS

As a pediatric inflammatory bowel disease screening strategy for the general pediatrician or gastroenterologist, the measurement of the combination of erythrocyte sedimentation rate and hemoglobin has a higher positive predictive value and is more sensitive, more specific, and less costly than commercial serologic testing.

Evolving diagnostic strategies for inflammatory bowel disease

Advances in serologic markers, endoscopy, and radiology have led to rapid expansion of diagnosis and disease activity assessment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Serologic markers may have diagnostic value in patients with an intermediate pretest probability of IBD, but these serology tests lack complete sensitivity, and a negative serology result does not exclude the possibility of IBD. Several recent studies have confirmed the utility of serologies in predicting intestinal complications and need for surgery in Crohn's disease. Serum C-reactive protein concentrations correlate with clinical, endoscopic, and radiologic measures of disease activity and appear to have prognostic value in acute severe colitis. Capsule and double balloon endoscopy allow visual inspection of previously inaccessible areas of the small intestine and are useful for patients with suspected small bowel involvement but negative results on conventional testing. CT enterography, which entails oral ingestion of a large volume of a neutral or negative contrast agent and scanning that highlights differences in contrast between the lumen and the bowel wall, appears to be more sensitive than small bowel follow-through for detecting small bowel Crohn's disease and provides extraluminal information. Magnetic resonance enterography uses principles similar to those for CT enterography, and early results are encouraging.

Acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of ulcerative colitis: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Acupuncture has traditionally been used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in China and is increasingly applied in Western countries. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis (UC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial 29 patients with mild to moderately active UC (mean age 37.8 +/- 12.0 years) were randomly assigned to receive either traditional acupuncture and moxa (TCM group, n = 15), or sham acupuncture consisting of superficial needling at non-acupuncture points (control group, CG, n = 14). All patients were treated in 10 sessions over a period of 5 weeks and followed-up for 16 weeks. The main outcome measure was the change in the Colitis Activity Index (CAI) after treatment; secondary outcome measures were changes in quality of life, general well-being and serum markers of inflammation.

RESULTS

In the TCM group, the CAI decreased from 8.0 (+/- 3.7) to 4.2 (+/- 2.4) points and in the control group from 6.5 (+/- 3.4) to 4.8 (+/- 3.9) points (TCM versus CG: p = 0.048). In both groups these changes were associated with significant improvements in general well-being (TCM group: from 3.0 (+/- 1.8) to 1.8 (+/- 1.0); CG: from 3.2 (+/- 1.9) to 2.2 (+/- 1.7)) and quality of life (TCM group: from 146 (+/- 23) to 182 (+/- 18); CG: from 157 (+/- 20) to 183 (+/- 23)). No significant differences between the TCM and CG were found regarding these secondary outcome measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in efficacy between traditional acupuncture and sham acupuncture were small and significant only for CAI as the main outcome measure. Both traditional and sham acupuncture seem to offer an additional therapeutic benefit in patients with mild to moderately active UC.

Diagnostic value of C-reactive protein for predicting activity level of Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Measuring Crohn's disease (CD) activity is useful in clinical trials as well as in clinical practice, but each available instrument to measure such activity has some limitations. C-reactive protein (CRP) is a sensitive marker for inflammation and tissue injury. The aims of the study were: to assess the diagnostic value of low level of CRP for predicting a low CD activity, and to calculate optimal CRP cutoff value for selecting patients with moderate or high CD activity.

METHODS

One hundred fifty consecutive patients with active or nonactive CD were included in the study without any pre-selection criteria. CRP was measured, and CD activity was calculated by means of the van Hees index (VHI).

RESULTS

The median VHI score was 154.4 (interquartile range, 126.0-193.4), and the median CRP was 19.1 mg/L (interquartile range, 6.1-50.1 mg/L; upper limit of normal [N], 4 mg/L). Forty-nine percent of our patients had CRP >20 mg/L. CRP was significantly correlated to VHI (P = .0001). The probability that VHI was <150 if CRP was below upper limit of normal was equal to 1 (confidence interval, 0.891-1.000). The diagnostic value for CRP predicting a VHI > or =150 was high; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was equal to 0.844 (confidence interval, 0.783-0.906; P = .0001) with an optimal cutoff value of 21.6 mg/L, about 5 x N.

CONCLUSIONS

CRP appears useful to evaluate CD activity, especially to predict inactive or low activity CD.

The role of C-reactive protein as an inflammatory marker in gastrointestinal diseases

C-reactive protein (CRP) is an acute-phase protein that is produced in large amounts by hepatocytes, upon stimulation by the cytokines interleukin-6, tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha and interleukin-1beta, during an acute-phase response. CRP is an objective marker of inflammation and, in gastrointestinal diseases such as Crohn's disease and acute pancreatitis, its levels correlate well with clinical disease activity. In contrast to its use as a marker in Crohn's disease, however, CRP is a less reliable marker of inflammation and disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis, except perhaps for severe, extensive colitis. The increased production of CRP after an acute-phase stimulus, such as active gut inflammation, might explain why strong anti-inflammatory agents, such as anti-tumor-necrosis-factor-alpha antibodies and other biologic agents, work particularly well in patients with increased levels of CRP. CRP is also useful as a laboratory marker to predict prognosis and relapse in patients with Crohn's disease and acute pancreatitis. Elevated CRP levels have been associated with an increased risk of colorectal cancer and are a marker of poor prognosis, indicating more advanced disease and, possibly, reduced survival. An important question that remains is how often CRP levels should be measured. Until there are more data, the use of CRP and of other biomarkers should be seen as an additional tool that aids clinical observation and physical examination, but that cannot replace it.

How accurate are clinical activity indices for scoring of disease activity in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)?

Clinical activity indices are essential instruments in monitoring inflammatory bowel diseases such as Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). To subclassify components of disease indices in CD and UC, investigate technical noise in estimation of the indices, establish a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), evaluate correlation between indices and calculate the reference change value (RCV) for selected biochemical variables in individual cases, 50 patients with CD and 49 patients with UC were included in the study. Qualitative index variables were assessed for scoring errors. The standard deviation (SD) was estimated according to a rectangular model, while SD in biochemical variable scoring was estimated according to a Gaussian model; a combined SD was also calculated. These values were investigated for their individual contribution to variation. The 95% CI of an index value was based on +/- 1.96 x SD(combined) and a change in separate biochemical variables was calculated as RCV 1.96 x radical2 x SD(combined). Correlation between different disease activity indices was assessed for unexplained variation. The Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI) had the highest variation compared to the van Hees (Hees) and the Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) in CD, but it also had the best SNR, whereas HBI had the lowest. In UC the clinical activity index (CAI) showed the highest variance, but the best SNR compared to Seo's activity index (AI). The 95% CI of the CDAI discriminatory activity sum of 150 in individual cases was 105-195, whereas the 95% interval for a change was +/-62.4. Self-reported wellness contributed 40% to total variance in the CDAI. Factors of clinical importance increased errors in estimates and variance of the indices. Poor correlation was obtained between activity indices, with up to 70% unexplained variance. The SD(combined) for estimated errors was as high as 23 points, with the best SNR being approximately 20. Index factors increase the sensitivity of SNRs to errors and lower the disease specificity. Sensitivity optimisation may be achieved by standardisation of the variables and their use.