Prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in diabetic patients treated with aspirin

Comparative Study of Ex Vivo Antiplatelet Activity of Aspirin and Cilostazol in Patients with Diabetes and High Risk of Cardiovascular Disease

BACKGROUND

The role of aspirin in primary cardiovascular disease prevention in patients with diabetes remains controversial. However, some studies have suggested beneficial effects of cilostazol on cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. We prospectively investigated the antiplatelet effects of cilostazol compared with aspirin in patients with diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 116 patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors but no evident cardiovascular disease to receive aspirin at a dose of 100 mg or cilostazol at a dose of 200 mg daily for 14 days. The primary efficacy outcome was antiplatelet effects of aspirin and cilostazol assessed with the VerifyNow system (aspirin response units [ARU]) and PFA-100 (closure time [CT]). Secondary outcomes were changes of clinical laboratory data (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02933788).

RESULTS

After 14 days, there was greater decrease in ARU in aspirin (-28.9%±9.9%) compared cilostazol (-0.4%±7.1%, P<0.001) and was greater increase in CT in aspirin (99.6%±63.5%) compared cilostazol (25.7%±54.1%, P<0.001). The prevalence of aspirin resistance was 7.5% according to VerifyNow (defined by ARU ≥550) and 18.9% according to PFA-100 (CT <192 seconds). Compared with aspirin, cilostazol treatment was associated with increased high density lipoprotein cholesterol (7.1%±12.7% vs. 4.2%±18.0%, P=0.006) and decreased triglycerides (-9.4%±33.7% vs. 4.4%±17.57%, P=0.016). However, there were no significant changes in total and low density lipoprotein cholesterol, C-reactive protein level, and cluster of differentiation 40 ligand between cilostazol and aspirin groups.

CONCLUSION

Aspirin showed better antiplatelet effects assessed with VerifyNow and PFA-100 compared with cilostazol. However, there were favorable changes in atherogenic dyslipidemia only in the cilostazol.

Aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia in women with pre-existing diabetes: Systematic review

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of evidence for pre-eclampsia prophylaxis with aspirin in women with pre-existing diabetes mellitus (DM).

AIMS

To examine the evidence for aspirin in pre-eclampsia prophylaxis in women with pre-existing DM.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An electronic search using Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, CinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane CENTRAL register of controlled trials through to February 2021 was performed. Reference lists of identified studies, previous review articles, clinical practice guidelines and government reports were manually searched. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of aspirin vs placebo for pre-eclampsia prophylaxis were included. Articles were manually reviewed to determine if cohorts included women with DM. The systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Data from included trials were extracted independently by two authors who also independently assessed risk of bias as per the Cochrane Handbook criteria version 5.1.0. Data were analysed using Rev-Man 5.4.

RESULTS

Forty RCTs were identified, of which 11 included a confirmed subset of women with DM; however, data were insufficient for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 930 women with DM, from individual patient data included in a systematic review and unpublished data from one of the 11 RCTs, showed a non-significant difference in the outcome of pre-eclampsia in participants treated with aspirin compared to placebo (odds ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.20-1.71; P = 0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-eclampsia risk reduction with aspirin prophylaxis in women with pre-existing DM may be similar to women without pre-existing DM. However, randomised data within this meta-analysis were insufficient, warranting the need for further studies within this high-risk group of women.

Excess Mortality in Aspirin and Dipyrone (Metamizole) Co-Medicated in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study

Background

Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome.

Methods and Results

We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin‐dipyrone co‐medication compared with aspirin‐alone medication. Permanent aspirin‐alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin–dipyrone co‐medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin–dipyrone co‐medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin‐only group versus 24.4% in the co‐medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56–1.76], P<0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05–1.32]; P=0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11–1.35]; P<0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82).

Conclusions

In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co‐medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co‐medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin‐treated patients for secondary prevention.

Thrombopoietin Contributes to Enhanced Platelet Activation in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). Enhanced platelet reactivity is considered a main determinant of the increased atherothrombotic risk of diabetic patients. Thrombopoietin (THPO), a humoral growth factor able to stimulate megakaryocyte proliferation and differentiation, also modulates the response of mature platelets by enhancing both activation and binding to leukocytes in response to different agonists. Increased THPO levels have been reported in different clinical conditions characterized by a generalized pro-thrombotic state, from acute coronary syndromes to sepsis/septic shock, and associated with elevated indices of platelet activation. To investigate the potential contribution of elevated THPO levels in platelet activation in T1DM patients, we studied 28 T1DM patients and 28 healthy subjects. We measured plasma levels of THPO, as well as platelet-leukocyte binding, P-selectin, and THPO receptor (THPOR) platelet expression. The priming activity of plasma from diabetic patients or healthy subjects on platelet–leukocyte binding and the role of THPO on this effect was also studied in vitro. T1DM patients had higher circulating THPO levels and increased platelet–monocyte and platelet–granulocyte binding, as well as platelet P-selectin expression, compared to healthy subjects, whereas platelet expression of THPOR did not differ between the two groups. THPO concentrations correlated with platelet–leukocyte binding, as well as with fasting glucose and Hb1Ac. In vitro, plasma from diabetic patients, but not from healthy subjects, primed platelet–leukocyte binding and platelet P-selectin expression. Blocking THPO biological activity using a specific inhibitor prevented the priming effect induced by plasma from diabetic patients. In conclusion, augmented THPO may enhance platelet activation in patients with T1DM, potentially participating in increasing atherosclerotic risk.

Biomarkers for Antiplatelet Therapies in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Clinical Review

Stroke is one of the world's leading causes of disability and death. Antiplatelet agents are administered to acute ischemic stroke patients as secondary prevention. Clopidogrel involves biotransformation by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes into an active metabolite, and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) can influence the efficacy of this biotransformation. Despite the therapeutic advantages of aspirin, there is significant inter-individual heterogeneity in response to this antiplatelet drug. In this clinical review, the recent advances in the biomarkers of antiplatelet agents in acute ischemic stroke are discussed. The studies reviewed herein highlight the clinical relevance of antiplatelet resistance, pharmacotherapy of antiplatelet agents predicting drug response, strategies for identifying aspirin resistance, pharmacogenetic variants of antiplatelet agents, miRNAs, and extracellular vesicles (EVs) as biomarkers toward the personalized approach in the management of acute ischemic stroke. The precise pathways contributing to antiplatelet resistance are not very well known but are presumably multi-factorial. It is essential to understand the clinical relevance of clopidogrel and aspirin-related single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) as potential predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Prasugrel is a next-generation antiplatelet agent that prevents ADP-platelet activation by binding irreversibly to P2Y12 receptor. There are sporadic reports of prasugrel resistance and polymorphisms in the Platelet endothelial aggregation receptor-1 (PEAR1) that may contribute to a change in the pharmacodynamics response. Ticagrelor, a direct-acting P2Y12-receptor antagonist, is easily absorbed and partly metabolized to major AR-C124910XX metabolite (ARC). Ticagrelor's primary active metabolite, ARC124910XX (ARC), is formed via the most abundant hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme, CYP3A4, and CYP3A5. The integration of specific biomarkers, genotype as well as phenotype-related data in antiplatelet therapy stratification in patients with acute ischemic stroke will be of great clinical significance and could be used as a guiding tool for more effective, personalized therapy.

Once- versus Twice-Daily Aspirin in Patients at High Risk of Thrombotic Events: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is a frequently used antiplatelet agent, although some individuals have reduced antiplatelet responses on ASA, with recurrent ischemic events. It has been proposed that shortening the ASA dosing interval may overcome the time-dependent renewal of the drug target, leading to a greater antiplatelet effect. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to determine the efficacy of once- versus twice-daily ASA in conditions with increased platelet turnover.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching the CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase databases for RCTs assessing once- versus twice-daily ASA. Data were screened, extracted, and appraised by two independent reviewers, and were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2). Other pharmacodynamic measures were retrieved as secondary outcomes. Results were reported as mean differences with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included, enrolling 379 participants overall. None of the studies reported clinical outcomes. Pooled results showed that compared with once-daily ASA, twice-daily ASA was associated with a decrease in mean TxB2 of 1.42 ng/mL (95% CI - 2.71 to - 0.13; I² = 66%). We found no differences in subgroup analyses based on disease subtype, trial blinding, or trial design. A greater antiplatelet activity of the twice-daily regimen was also found when using PFA-100-ADP methods, although not when using the VerifyNow, LTA-AA, and multiplate methods.

CONCLUSIONS

Twice-daily ASA was associated with a greater antiplatelet effect compared with standard once-daily ASA.

Platelet aggregation is not altered among men with diabetes mellitus

AIMS

Platelets are pivotal in arterial thrombosis, and platelet hyperresponsiveness may contribute to the increased incidence of cardiovascular events in diabetes mellitus. Consequently, we hypothesized that increased in vitro platelet aggregation responses exist in men with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS) is a community-based cardiovascular screening trial including men aged 65-74 years. Platelet aggregation was tested using 96-well light transmission aggregometry with thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP), adenosine diphosphate, collagen type 1, arachidonic acid and protease-activated receptor-4 in three concentrations. Further, cardiovascular risk factors and coronary artery calcification (CAC), estimated by CT scans and ankle-brachial index, were obtained.

RESULTS

Included were 720 men aged 65-74 years, 110 with diabetes mellitus. Overall, there was no difference in platelet aggregation among men with versus without diabetes mellitus when adjusting for or excluding platelet inhibitor treatment and men with established cardiovascular disease (CVD). This was true for all agonists, e.g., 10 µM TRAP-induced platelet aggregation of median 69% (IQR 53-75) versus 70% (IQR 60-76) in men with versus without diabetes mellitus. Platelet aggregation did not correlate with HbA_1c or CAC. Men with diabetes mellitus displayed higher CAC, median 257 Agatston units (IQR 74-1141) versus median 111 Agatston units (IQR 6-420) in the remaining individuals, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Among outpatients with diabetes mellitus, but no CVD and no platelet inhibitor treatment, neither are platelets hyperresponsive in diabetes mellitus, nor is platelet aggregation associated with glycemic status or with the degree of coronary atherosclerosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN12157806.

Determinants of aspirin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Numerous patients with T2DM show resistance to aspirin treatment, which may explain the higher rate of major adverse cardiovascular events observed compared with non-diabetes patients, and it has recently been shown that aspirin resistance is mainly related to accelerated platelet turnover with persistent high platelet reactivity (HPR) 24h after last aspirin intake. The mechanism behind HPR is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the precise rate and mechanisms associated with HPR in a population of T2DM patients treated with aspirin.

METHODS

Included were 116 consecutive stable T2DM patients who had attended our hospital for their yearly check-up. HPR was assessed 24h after aspirin intake using light transmission aggregometry (LTA) with arachidonic acid (AA) and serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2) measurement. Its relationship with diabetes status, insulin resistance, inflammatory markers and coronary artery disease (CAD) severity, using calcium scores, were investigated.

RESULTS

Using LTA, HPR was found in 27 (23%) patients. There was no significant difference in mean age, gender ratio or cardiovascular risk factors in patients with or without HPR. HPR was significantly related to duration of diabetes and higher fasting glucose levels (but not consistently with HbA_1c), and strongly related to all markers of insulin resistance, especially waist circumference, HOMA-IR, QUICKI and leptin. There was no association between HPR and thrombopoietin or inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-10, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity, TNF-α, C-reactive protein), whereas HPR was associated with more severe CAD. Similar results were found with TXB2.

CONCLUSION

Our results reveal that 'aspirin resistance' is frequently found in T2DM, and is strongly related to insulin resistance and severity of CAD, but weakly related to HbA_1c and not at all to inflammatory parameters. This may help to identify those T2DM patients who might benefit from alternative antiplatelet treatments such as twice-daily aspirin and thienopyridines.

Metabolomic Analysis of Platelets of Patients With Aspirin Non-Response

Background: Aspirin is the most commonly used antiplatelet agent for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. However, a certain proportion of patients do not respond to aspirin therapy. The mechanisms of aspirin non-response remain unknown. The unique metabolomes in platelets of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with aspirin non-response may be one of the causes of aspirin resistance.

Materials and Methods: We enrolled 29 patients with CAD who were aspirin non-responders, defined as a study subject who were taking aspirin with a platelet aggregation time less than 193 s by PFA-100, and 31 age- and sex-matched patients with CAD who were responders. All subjects had been taking 100 mg of aspirin per day for more than 1 month. Hydrophilic metabolites from the platelet samples were extracted and analyzed by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Both 1D ¹H and 2D J-resolved NMR spectra were obtained followed by spectral processing and multivariate statistical analysis, such as partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA).

Results: Eleven metabolites were identified. The PLS-DA model could not distinguish aspirin non-responders from responders. Those with low serum glycine level had significantly shorter platelet aggregation time (mean, 175.0 s) compared with those with high serum glycine level (259.5 s). However, this association became non-significant after correction for multiple tests.

Conclusions: The hydrophilic metabolic profile of platelets was not different between aspirin non-responders and responders. An association between lower glycine levels and higher platelet activity in patients younger than 65 years suggests an important role of glycine in the pathophysiology of aspirin non-response.

Aspirin for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes: a Review of the Evidence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

People with diabetes are at a higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared with those without diabetes. Though aspirin has been shown to have an overall net clinical benefit when used for secondary prevention of ASCVD in people with and without diabetes, the evidence for primary prevention, especially in those with diabetes, remains inconsistent. In this article, we review the latest studies examining the risks and benefits of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD in adults with diabetes, discuss key aspects in assessing the risk-benefit ratio of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD, and summarize current guidelines from professional societies on aspirin use for primary prevention in adults with diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the general population, past studies have shown no difference in the beneficial effect of aspirin for primary cardiovascular disease prevention by diabetes status. However, several randomized controlled studies and meta-analyses in adults with diabetes have shown lack of net clinical benefit of aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD. The recent ASCEND trial documented cardiovascular benefit of aspirin for primary prevention in adults with diabetes but suggested that the increased risk of bleeding may outweigh the cardiovascular benefit. The decision to initiate aspirin for primary prevention of ASCVD must be considered carefully on an individual basis to balance the cardiovascular benefit and bleeding risk in all patients, especially those with diabetes. A multifactorial approach that focuses on managing ASCVD risk factors such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, dysglycemia, and smoking is recommended in all patients. More research is needed to identify subgroups of people with diabetes who are more likely to benefit from aspirin use for primary prevention of ASCVD and develop better antithrombotic strategies that shift the risk-benefit balance toward an overall net clinical benefit.

Prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with diabetes mellitus: from antithrombotic therapies to new-generation glucose-lowering drugs

Diabetes mellitus is an important risk factor for a first cardiovascular event and for worse outcomes after a cardiovascular event has occurred. This situation might be caused, at least in part, by the prothrombotic status observed in patients with diabetes. Therefore, contemporary antithrombotic strategies, including more potent agents or drug combinations, might provide greater clinical benefit in patients with diabetes than in those without diabetes. In this Consensus Statement, our Working Group explores the mechanisms of platelet and coagulation activity, the current debate on antiplatelet therapy in primary cardiovascular disease prevention, and the benefit of various antithrombotic approaches in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. While acknowledging that current data are often derived from underpowered, observational studies or subgroup analyses of larger trials, we propose antithrombotic strategies for patients with diabetes in various cardiovascular settings (primary prevention, stable coronary artery disease, acute coronary syndromes, ischaemic stroke and transient ischaemic attack, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, and venous thromboembolism). Finally, we summarize the improvements in cardiovascular outcomes observed with the latest glucose-lowering drugs, and on the basis of the available evidence, we expand and integrate current guideline recommendations on antithrombotic strategies in patients with diabetes for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Diabetes and Platelet Response to Low-Dose Aspirin

CONTEXT

Previous studies have suggested less cardioprotective benefit of aspirin in adults with diabetes, raising concerns about "aspirin resistance" and potentially reduced effectiveness for prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).

OBJECTIVE

To examine differences in platelet response to aspirin by diabetes status.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS

We examined platelet response before and after aspirin (81 mg/day for 14 days) in 2113 adults (175 with diabetes, 1,938 without diabetes), in the Genetic Study of Aspirin Responsiveness cohort, who had family history of early-onset CVD.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In vivo platelet activation (urinary thromboxane B2), in vitro platelet aggregation to agonists (arachidonic acid, adenosine diphosphate, collagen), and platelet function analyzer-100 closure time.

RESULTS

Although adults with diabetes had higher in vivo platelet activation before aspirin, the reduction in in vivo platelet activation after aspirin was similar in those with vs without diabetes. Likewise, the reduction in multiple in vitro platelet measures was similar after aspirin by diabetes status. In regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, BMI, smoking, platelet counts, and fibrinogen levels, in vivo platelet activation remained higher in adults with vs without diabetes after aspirin (P = 0.04), but this difference was attenuated after additional adjustment for preaspirin levels (P = 0.10). No differences by diabetes status were noted for any of the in vitro platelet measures after aspirin in fully adjusted models that also accounted for preaspirin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In vitro platelet response to aspirin does not differ by diabetes status, suggesting no intrinsic differences in platelet response to aspirin. Instead, factors extrinsic to platelet function should be investigated to give further insights into aspirin use for primary prevention in diabetes.

Dose reduction, oral application, and order of intake to preserve aspirin antiplatelet effects in dipyrone co-medicated chronic artery disease patients

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone comedication in aspirin-treated patients is associated with impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). Additionally, in small observational studies, an association with impaired outcome has been described. In this uncontrolled, hypothesis-generating study, we aimed to investigate strategies to prevent this drug-drug interaction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We analyzed pharmacodynamic response to aspirin in 80 dipyrone co-medicated CAD patients. Aspirin antiplatelet effects were measured using arachidonic acid (AA)-induced light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Platelet reactivity was associated with daily dose, administration form, and frequency. Additionally, we conducted a time-series analysis in patients with HTPR to aspirin with re-evaluation of pharmacodynamic response to aspirin after 5 days.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 75.5 ± 9.8 years. Forty-three (54%) were male, 22 (27.5%) obese, and 38 (47.5%) diabetics. Baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, comedication, or laboratory parameters did not differ between patients with or without HTPR. HTPR to aspirin occurred in 34 out of 80 patients (42.5%). The incidence of HTPR was associated with dipyrone daily dose (< 1 g/day: HTPR 20% vs. > 3 g/day: HTPR 50%, p > 0.0001) and form of administration (i.v. 87.5% vs. oral 37.5%; p < 0.0001). A strict order of intake (aspirin 30 min prior to dipyrone) restored aspirin antiplatelet effects in all patients (HTPR before 100% vs. HTPR after 0%, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients. If dipyrone seems indispensable, the lowest effective dose and a strict order of intake seem favorable.

Associations Between PFA-Measured Aspirin Resistance, Platelet Count, Renal Function, and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

Aspirin resistance is used to describe patients who are undergoing aspirin therapy but fail for the inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis in platelets. Although the true mechanism is unclear, drug–drug interaction remains a possible factor. The study aimed to determine whether there was association between aspirin resistance and the concomitant cardiovascular medication. Using the Platelet Function Analyzer-100 system, aspirin resistance was evaluated in aspirin-treated patients from the outpatient department. The associations between aspirin resistance and their concomitant common cardiovascular medication were analyzed. Aspirin resistance was prevalent in 147 (17.7%) of 831 patients. Concomitant angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) treatment and low platelet count were associated with aspirin response (P = .04, .02, respectively). Multivariate logistic regression analysis results showed an association between aspirin response and ARB therapy (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.48; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.08-2.18). And the association was blunted when platelet count was considered (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.92-2.23). In ARB-treated patients, increased creatinine and decreased hematocrit laboratory data increased the risk of aspirin resistance (P = .02, .04, respectively), and the effect of platelet count on aspirin resistance was diminished by ARB therapy. Concomitant ARB treatment in aspirin-treated patients decreased the risk of aspirin resistance, and the effect was dependent on low platelet count. In ARB-treated patients, increased creatinine and decreased hematocrit data increased the risk of aspirin resistance. In addition, the effect of platelet count on aspirin resistance was diminished by ARB treatment.

Platelets, diabetes and myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury

Mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of ischemia/reperfusion injury are particularly complex, multifactorial and highly interconnected. A complex and entangled interaction is also emerging between platelet function, antiplatelet drugs, coronary diseases and ischemia/reperfusion injury, especially in diabetic conditions. Here we briefly summarize features of antiplatelet therapy in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We also treat the influence of T2DM on ischemia/reperfusion injury and how anti-platelet therapies affect post-ischemic myocardial damage through pleiotropic properties not related to their anti-aggregating effects. miRNA-based signature associated with T2DM and its cardiovascular disease complications are also briefly considered. Influence of anti-platelet therapies and different effects of healthy and diabetic platelets on ischemia/reperfusion injury need to be further clarified in order to enhance patient benefits from antiplatelet therapy and revascularization. Here we provide insight on the difficulty to reduce the cardiovascular risk in diabetic patients and report novel information on the cardioprotective role of widely used anti-aggregant drugs.

Safety and tolerability of extended-release acetylsalicylic acid capsules: a summary of double-blind comparative studies

Aim: To evaluate tolerability of a new extended-release acetylsalicylic acid (ER-ASA). Materials & methods: Daily ER-ASA (162.5–1300 mg) for up to 6 weeks was evaluated (four studies; n = 565). Safety of ER-ASA, immediate-release (IR; 150–1200 mg) ASA and enteric-coated ASA (75 mg) was assessed. Results: Forty-three out of 184 (23.4%) patients with atherosclerosis (ER-ASA 162.5 mg group) experienced adverse events versus 51/195 (26.2%) patients receiving IR-ASA 150 mg. Overall, 48.7 and 51.3% of patients in the ER-ASA group experienced no gastrointestinal discomfort or any gastrointestinal symptoms, respectively, versus 42.1 and 57.9% of patients in the IR-ASA group, respectively. In healthy volunteers, adverse event incidence was comparable between ER-ASA and IR-ASA and between ER-ASA and enteric-coated ASA. Conclusion: Safety of the new ER-ASA formulation was consistent with other ASA formulations.

Increased Benefit With Vorapaxar Use in Patients With a History of Myocardial Infarction and Diabetes Mellitus: What the Data Show Us

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive and multifactorial metabolic disease mainly characterized by hyperglycemia and insulin resistance. Abnormal platelet reactivity associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is also a feature characteristic of patients with T2DM. Dual antiplatelet therapy consisting of aspirin and an adenosine diphosphate platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist, such as clopidogrel, represents the standard antithrombotic regimen for the secondary prevention of CVD risk in T2DM. However, a high proportion of patients with T2DM exhibit high on-treatment platelet reactivity to aspirin and/or clopidogrel, associated with a greater risk of adverse cardiovascular events compared with nondiabetic patients. Consequently, novel antiplatelet therapeutic approaches may be required in order to avoid such events. Vorapaxar is a novel antiplatelet agent that targets the platelet protease-activated receptor 1 and inhibits thrombin-induced platelet activation. Vorapaxar has been studied in 2 phase III clinical trials and has been approved for use in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events in patients with a previous myocardial infarction (MI) or peripheral arterial disease. New data from the Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2°P)-TIMI 50 trial MI cohort demonstrate that the subgroup of patients with T2DM exhibits increased benefit from vorapaxar use compared with non-T2DM patients. The aim of the present work is to critically review the current knowledge concerning vorapaxar use in patients with T2DM as well as to discuss the possible mechanism(s) underlying vorapaxar's beneficial effect in T2DM.

Aspirin in the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes

Diabetes imparts a substantial increased risk for cardiovascular disease-related mortality and morbidity. Because of this, current medical guidelines recommend prophylactic treatment with once-daily, low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular (CV) events in high-risk patients. However, only modest reductions in CV events and mortality have been observed with once-daily aspirin treatment in patients with diabetes, including patients with a previous CV event, perhaps because of disparity between aspirin pharmacokinetics and diabetes-related platelet abnormalities. Once-daily aspirin irreversibly inactivates platelets for only a short duration (acetylsalicylic acid half-life, approximately 15-20 minutes), after which time newly generated, active platelets enter the circulation and weaken aspirin's effect. Platelets from patients with diabetes are more reactive and are turned over more rapidly than platelets from normal individuals; the short inhibitory window provided by once-daily aspirin may therefore be insufficient to provide 24-h protection against CV events. Alternative conventional aspirin regimens (e.g. higher daily dose, twice-daily dosing, combination with clopidogrel) and newer formulations (e.g. 24-h, extended-release) have been proposed to overcome the apparent limited efficacy of conventional aspirin in patients with diabetes; however, tolerability concerns and limited clinical efficacy data need to be taken into account when considering the use of such regimens.

On-treatment platelet reactivity: State of the art and perspectives

High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HcPR) during dual-antiplatelet therapy is a marker of vascular risk, in particular stent thrombosis, in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Genetic determinants (CYP2C19*2 polymorphism), advanced age, female gender, diabetes and reduced ventricular function are related to a higher risk to develop HcPR. In addition, inflammation and increased platelet turnover, as revealed by the elevated percentage of reticulated platelets in patients' blood, that characterize the acute phase of acute coronary syndromes, are associated with HcPR. To overcome the limitation of clopidogrel, new antiplatelet agents (prasugrel and ticagrelor) were developed and the demonstration of their superiority over clopidogrel was obtained in the two randomized trials, TRITON TIMI 38 and PLATO. Emerging evidence is accumulating on the role of high-on aspirin platelet reactivity (HaPR), especially in the clinical context of diabetes. Finally, the presence of new, potent antiplatelet drugs has shifted the focus from thrombotic to bleeding risk. Recent data document that low on-treatment platelet reactivity (LPR) is associated with a significantly higher bleeding risk. Due to the current possibility to choose between multiple antiplatelet strategies, the future perspective is to include in the management of ACS, in addition to clinical data and classical risk factors, the definition of platelet function during treatment in order to set a tailored therapy.

A randomized trial to assess the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of a single dose of an extended-release aspirin formulation

AIMS

Low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA; aspirin) for secondary prevention reduces cardiovascular disease mortality risk. ASA acetylates cyclooxygenase in the portal circulation and is rapidly (half-life, 20 min) hydrolyzed. Certain patients with cardiovascular disease may exhibit high on-therapy platelet reactivity as a result of high platelet turnover, a process whereby platelets are produced and are active beyond the duration of antiplatelet coverage provided by once-daily immediate-release (IR) ASA. A once-daily, extended-release (ER) ASA formulation using ER microcapsule technology was developed to release ASA over the 24-h dosing interval and reduce maximal plasma concentrations to spare peripheral endogenous endothelial prostacyclin production.

METHODS

Healthy adults (n = 50) were randomized in a crossover study to receive two different ER-ASA single doses (up to 325 mg) and two different IR-ASA single doses (up to 81 mg) in four periods, each separated by ≥14 days. Pharmacodynamics was assessed by measuring serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2), urine 11-dehydro-TXB2, and arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation. Pharmacokinetics was determined for ASA and salicylic acid (SA).

RESULTS

Both formulations produced dose-dependent inhibition on all pharmacodynamic parameters. Marked inhibition of TXB2 and 11-dehydro-TXB2 was maintained over the 24-h dosing interval after a dose of ≥81 mg ER-ASA or ≥40 mg IR-ASA. The dose required to achieve 50% of maximum TXB2 inhibition with ER-ASA was 49.9 mg versus 29.6 mg for IR-ASA, for a similar maximum pharmacodynamic effect (98.9% TXB2 inhibition). This suggests that an approximately twofold greater ER-ASA dose (162.5 mg) is necessary to obtain the same response as that of IR-ASA 81 mg. Peak ASA concentrations were lower and Tmax was longer with ER-ASA versus IR-ASA. Administration of IR-ASA resulted in a dose-normalized mean Cmax of ASA that was approximately sixfold higher than that for ER-ASA and a Cmax of SA approximately two- to threefold higher than that for ER-ASA.

CONCLUSION

Both ASA formulations showed dose-dependent antiplatelet activity. Compared with the IR-ASA, ER-ASA released active drug more slowly, resulting in prolonged absorption and lower systemic drug concentrations, which is expected for an ER (24-h) formulation.

Increased platelet expression of glycoprotein IIIa following aspirin treatment in aspirin-resistant but not aspirin-sensitive subjects

AIMS

Aspirin is widely used as an anti-platelet agent for cardiovascular prophylaxis. Despite aspirin treatment, many patients experience recurrent thrombotic events, and aspirin resistance may contribute to this. We examined the prevalence of aspirin resistance in a healthy population, and investigated whether the platelet proteome differed in aspirin-resistant subjects.

METHODS

Ninety-three healthy subjects received aspirin 300 mg daily for 28 days. Before and at the end of treatment, urine was taken to determine 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 , and blood was taken to measure arachidonic acid (AA)-induced aggregation of platelet-rich plasma and to interrogate the platelet proteome by mass spectrometric analysis with further confirmation of findings using Western blotting.

RESULTS

In two of the 93 subjects, neither AA-induced aggregation nor urinary 11-dehydrothromboxane B2 was effectively suppressed by aspirin, despite measurable plasma salicylate concentrations, suggesting the presence of true aspirin resistance. Despite no detectable differences in the platelet proteome at baseline, following aspirin a marked increase was seen in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression in the aspirin-resistant but not aspirin-sensitive subjects. An increase in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression with aspirin resistance was confirmed in a separate cohort of 17 patients with stable coronary artery disease on long term aspirin treatment, four of whom exhibited aspirin resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

In a healthy population, true aspirin resistance is uncommon but exists. Resistance is associated with an increase in platelet glycoprotein IIIa expression in response to aspirin. These data shed new light on the mechanism of aspirin resistance, and provide the potential to identify aspirin-resistant subjects using a novel biomarker.

Younger age, higher body mass index and lower adiponectin concentration predict higher serum thromboxane B2 level in aspirin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: an observational study

Background

Evidence from the literature suggests diminished acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) treatment efficacy in type 2 diabetes (DM2). High on-aspirin platelet reactivity (HAPR) in DM2 has been linked to poor glycemic and lipid control. However, there are no consistent data on the association between HAPR and insulin resistance or adipose tissue metabolic activity. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between laboratory response to ASA and metabolic control, insulin resistance and adipokines in DM2.

Methods

A total of 186 DM2 patients treated with oral antidiabetic drugs and receiving 75 mg ASA daily were included in the analysis. Response to ASA was assessed by measuring serum thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) concentration and expressed as quartiles of TXB₂ level. The achievement of treatment targets in terms of glycemic and lipid control, insulin resistance parameters (including Homeostatic Model Assessment-Insulin Resistance, HOMA-IR, index), and serum concentrations of high-molecular weight (HMW) adiponectin, leptin and resistin, were evaluated in all patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the predictive factors of serum TXB₂ concentration above the upper quartile and above the median.

Results

Significant trends in age, body mass index (BMI), HOMA-IR, HMW adiponectin concentration, C-reactive protein concentration and the frequency of achieving target triglyceride levels were observed across increasing quartiles of TXB₂. In a multivariate analysis, only younger age and higher BMI were independent predictors of TXB₂ concentration above the upper quartile, while younger age and lower HMW adiponectin concentration were predictors of TXB₂ concentration above the median.

Conclusions

These results suggest that in DM2, the most important predictor of HAPR is younger age. Younger DM2 patients may therefore require total daily ASA doses higher than 75 mg, preferably as a twice-daily regimen, to achieve full therapeutic effect. Higher BMI and lower HMW adiponectin concentration were also associated with less potent ASA effect. This is the first study to demonstrate an association of lower adiponectin concentration with higher serum TXB₂ level in patients treated with ASA.