Effect of Ultrashort-Acting β-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis With Persistent Tachycardia Despite Initial Resuscitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Effect of heart rate control with ivabradine on hemodynamic in patients with sepsis: study protocol for a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis, a life-threatening syndrome, is often accompanied by tachycardia in spite of hypovolemia and hypotension have been corrected. Recently, relevant studies have shown that sustained tachycardia in sepsis was related to high mortality, and appropriate control of heart rate (HR) could improve prognosis. Ivabradine reduces HR directly without a negative inotropic effect through inhibition of the If ionic current, which is different from the traditional rate control drug (beta-blockers).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, open label study designed to investigate the effect of heart rate control with ivabradine on hemodynamic in patients with sepsis. Our study will enroll 172 patients with sepsis as defined by The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock criteria with sinus rate of 95 bpm or higher despite a hemodynamic optimization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard treatment group (GS) or ivabradine group (GI, standard treatment for sepsis plus enteral ivabradine). Patients in GI will receive ivabradine to maintain HR between 70 and 94 bpm. The primary outcome is the difference of a reduction in HR below 95 bpm and the effect of ivabradine on hemodynamics between GI and GS group within the first 96 h after randomization. The secondary outcomes include organ function measures, the difference in SOFA score, incidence of adverse events, need for organ support, length of ICU stay, and 28-day overall mortality.

DISCUSSION

There are limited studies on ivabradine to control heart rate in patients with sepsis. Our study aims to evaluate whether direct sinus node inhibition can improve hemodynamics, as well as its impact on organ function and prognosis in patients with sepsis, so as to provide evidence for the safe usage in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05882708. Registered on May 11, 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05882708 .

Association of beta blockers and mortality in adults with septic shock: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trial

Introduction

Septic shock still entails significant morbidity and mortality, with the heart being affected due to catecholamine overexpression and direct injury from sepsis. Therefore, the effect of β-blocking the receptors to improve performance is promising when attempting to reverse tachycardia and reduce mortality.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases for studies published up to 28 January 2024, using a PICO strategy. Ten studies were identified for quantitative analysis and included in our meta-analysis.

Results

Our meta-analysis evaluated 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1,121 adults with septic shock. We found an association between β-blocker use and reduced overall mortality (OR 0.57; 95% CI 0.34-0.98; I 2: 56%). This effect was significant in the esmolol subgroup (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.26-0.82; I 2: 32%), but not in the landiolol subgroup (OR 0.98; 95% CI 0.0-1,284.5; I 2: 72%). Additionally, the intervention group shows a significant reduction in HR and lactate levels, as well as an increase in stroke volume index (SVI).

Conclusion

In adults with septic shock, β-blockers are associated with a reduction in 28-day in-hospital mortality, a benefit primarily observed with esmolol rather than landiolol. Furthermore, improvements in heart rate (HR) control, lactate levels, and SVI were noted. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution, and further high-quality RCTs comparing different β-blockers are necessary to better elucidate these effects.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42024513610.

The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with a high incidence and mortality and poses a significant challenge to the treatment. Although esmolol has shown promise in sepsis treatment, its efficacy and safety remain contentious. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the role of esmolol in sepsis management.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched and references of relevant reviews and meta-analysis were also screened for appropriate studies. Keywords and free words of 'sepsis', 'esmolol' and 'randomized controlled trials' were used for search. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 1100 patients were included. Compared with the control group, patients receiving esmolol exhibited significantly decreased 28-day mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81; P < 0.0001), heart rate (HR) (SMD, -1.15; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.96; P < 0.0001), cardiac troponin I levels (cTnI) (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.64; P < 0.0001), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.3; P < 0.0001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.09; P = 0.004) and significantly increased central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; P < 0.0001).While, esmolol had no significant influence on norepinephrine dosage (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.29; P = 0.46), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.4; P = 0.16), central venous pressure (CVP) (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.11) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.7; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Esmolol reduces 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in sepsis patients. Furthermore, esmolol improves oxygen metabolism, mitigates myocardial injury and decreases heart rate without significantly affecting hemodynamic parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number: CRD42023484884).

Mortality in Patients With Sepsis Treated With Esmolol or Landiolol: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials With Trial Sequential Analysis

BACKGROUND

The latest meta-analysis indicated potential survival benefits from ultra-short-acting β-blockers in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, subsequent multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting findings, prompting the need for an updated meta-analysis to incorporate these newly published RCTs.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does the use of ultra-short-acting β-blockers (esmolol or landiolol) in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia improve mortality?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted an updated systematic search through April 2, 2024, exploring the MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase databases for RCTs reporting mortality in adult patients with sepsis treated with esmolol or landiolol as compared with those treated with neither of these or receiving placebo and published in English. Meta-analyses were conducted with the random effects model. The primary outcome was mortality at the longest follow-up, with subgroup analysis separating single-center RCTS from large multicenter RCTs.

RESULTS

Eight RCTs (885 patients) were included in the primary analysis. Ultra-short-acting β-blockers did not improve mortality significantly at the longest follow-up (risk ratio [RR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.68-1.02; P = .08; I2 = 51%; very low certainty of the evidence) and 28-day mortality (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.59-1.00; P = .05; I2 = 62%). Subgroup analyses of mortality outcomes pointed toward different results between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Trial sequence analyses showed that both mortality outcomes were not robust. The sensitivity analyses suggested a significant reduction in mortality by adding RCTs published in non-English languages.

INTERPRETATION

In this updated meta-analysis, the use of esmolol or landiolol did not reduce mortality in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia. However, results were not robust and outcomes differed between single-center and multicenter RCTs. Moreover, sensitivity analyses showed the fragility of the primary outcome. Further studies regarding ultra-short-acting β-blockers with advanced cardiac monitoring or serial echocardiography are warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRY

International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; No.: CRD42024503570; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.

Impact of β-blockers on in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure: a retrospective propensity-score matched analysis based on MIMIC-IV database

Introduction

This study assessed the relationship between β-blockers treatment and in-hospital mortality among individuals diagnosed with heart failure (HF).

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was carried out on 9,968 HF patients sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to balance the baseline differences. A multivariate regression analysis was utilized to evaluate the impact of β-blockers therapy on in-hospital mortality.

Results

Among the 9,968 patients, 6,439 (64.6%) were β-blockers users. Before matching, the overall in-hospital mortality rate was 12.2% (1,217/9,968). Following PSM, a total of 3,212 patient pairs were successfully matched. The analysis revealed a correlation between β-blockers therapy and decreased in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.51 [0.43-0.60], P < 0.001), as well as shorter Los (length of stay) hospital (β -1.43 [-1.96∼-0.09], P < 0.001). Notably, long-acting β-blockers treatment was linked to a decreased risk of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.55 [0.46-0.65], P < 0.001) and a shorter Los hospital (β -1.21 [-1.80∼-0.63], P < 0.001). Conversely, the research results did not show a notable decrease in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.66 [0.44-1.01], P = 0.051) or Los hospital (β -1.01 [-2.2∼-0.25], P = 0.117) associated with short-acting β-blocker therapy.

Discussion

β-blockers therapy in the intensive care unit demonstrates potential benefits in lowering the risk of in-hospital mortality and reducing the duration of hospitalization among patients with HF. Specifically, long-acting β-blockers exhibit a protective effect by significantly decreasing both in-hospital mortality and Los hospital. Conversely, the study did not observe a substantial impact on in-hospital mortality or Los hospital duration in this cohort of patients following the administration of short-acting β-blockers.

Impact of premorbid use of beta‑blockers on survival outcomes of patients with sepsis: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

It is unclear if premorbid use of beta-blockers affects sepsis outcomes. The present systematic review aimed to assess the impact of premorbid beta-blocker use on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation in patients with sepsis. Embase, Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies comparing outcomes of patients with sepsis based on the premorbid use of beta-blockers. The primary outcome was mortality, and the secondary outcome was the need for mechanical ventilation. The results were reported as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 17 studies including 64,586 patients with sepsis were included. Of them, 8,665 patients received premorbid beta-blockers and 55,921 patients were not treated with premorbid beta-blockers and served as a control group. Pooled analysis of mortality rates revealed that premorbid use of beta-blockers did not affect in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.78, 1.18; and I2=63%) but significantly reduced one-month mortality rates (OR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.96; and I2=63%). Combined analysis of adjusted data showed that premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a significant survival advantage in patients with sepsis (OR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.92; and I2=70%). However, there was no effect of premorbid use of beta-blockers on the need for mechanical ventilation (OR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.30); and I2=72%). The results of the present study indicated that premorbid use of beta-blockers is associated with improved survival in patients with sepsis. However, it does not impact the need for mechanical ventilation. The results should be interpreted with caution as the data is observational and unadjusted.

Effect of ultrashort-acting β-blockers on 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and trial sequential analysis

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to identify whether patients with sepsis who have persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation can benefit from ultrashort-acting β-blockers.

Materials and methods

Relevant studies from MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched by two independent investigators. RevMan version 5.3 (Cochrane Collaboration) was used for statistical analysis.

Results

A total of 10 studies were identified and incorporated into the meta-analysis. The results showed that the administration of ultrashort-acting β-blockers (esmolol/landiolol) in patients with sepsis with persistent tachycardia despite initial resuscitation was significantly associated with a lower 28-day mortality rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.93; and p˂0.01). Subgroup analysis showed that the administration of esmolol in patients with sepsis was significantly associated with a lower 28-day mortality rate (RR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.55-0.84; and p˂0.001), while there was no significant difference between the landiolol and control groups (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.41-2.34; and p = 0.96). No significant differences between the two groups were found in 90-day mortality, mean arterial pressure (MAP), lactate (Lac) level, cardiac index (CI), and troponin I (TnI) at 24 h after enrollment.

Conclusion

The meta-analysis indicated that the use of esmolol in patients with persistent tachycardia, despite initial resuscitation, was linked to a notable reduction in 28-day mortality rates. Therefore, this study advocates for the consideration of esmolol in the treatment of sepsis in cases where tachycardia persists despite initial resuscitation.

Beta-blockade for the treatment of refractory hypoxaemia during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: An in-silico study

INTRODUCTION

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is used for refractory hypoxemia, although despite this, in high cardiac output states, hypoxaemia may persist. The administration of beta-blockers has been suggested as an approach in this scenario, however the physiological consequences of this intervention are not clear.

METHODS

We performed an in-silico study using a previously described mathematical model to evaluate the effect of beta-blockade on mixed venous and arterial saturations (S v ¯ O 2 , SaO2), in three different clinical scenarios and considered the potential effects of beta-blockers on, cardiac output, oxygen consumption and recirculation. Additionally we assessed the interaction of beta-blockade with haemoglobin concentration.

RESULTS

In scenario 1: simulating a patient with high cardiac output and partial lung shunt S v ¯ O 2 decreased from increased 53.5% to 44.7% despite SaO2 rising from 74.2% to 79.2%. In scenario 2 simulating a patient with high cardiac output and complete lung shunt S v ¯ O 2 remained unchanged at 52.2% and SaO2 rose from 71.9% to 85%. In scenario 3 a patient with normal cardiac output and high recirculation S v ¯ O 2 fell from 50.8% to 25.5% and also fell from 82.4% to to 78.3%. Across the remaining modelling examples the effect on S v ¯ O 2 varied but oxygen delivery was consistently reduced across all scenarios.

CONCLUSION

The administration of beta-blockers for refractory hypoxemia during VV ECMO are unpredictable and may reduce oxygen delivery, although this will vary with patient and circuit features. This study does not support the use of beta-blockers for this indication.

The concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with vasopressors and inotropes in critically ill patients with septic shock: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Septic shock is associated with systemic inflammatory response, hemodynamic instability, impaired sympathetic control, and the development of multiorgan dysfunction that requires vasopressor or inotropic support. The regulation of immune function in sepsis is complex and varies over time. However, activating Beta-2 receptors and blocking Beta-1 receptors reduces the proinflammatory response by influencing cytokine production. Evidence that supports the concomitant use of ultra short beta-blockers with inotropes and vasopressors in patients with septic shock is still limited. This study aimed to evaluate the use of ultra short beta-blockers and its impact on the ICU related outcomes such as mortality, length of stay, heart rate control, shock resolution, and vasopressors/inotropes requirements.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including critically ill patients with septic shock who received inotropes and vasopressors. Patients who received either epinephrine or norepinephrine without beta-blockers "control group" were compared to patients who received ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine "Intervention group". MEDLINE and Embase databases were utilized to systematically search for studies investigating the use of ultra short beta-blockers in critically ill patients on either epinephrine or norepinephrine from inception to October 10, 2023. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality. While, length of stay, heart rate control, and inotropes/ vasopressors requirements were considered secondary outcomes.

Results

Among 47 potentially relevant studies, nine were included in the analysis. The 28-day mortality risk was lower in patients with septic shock who used ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine compared with the control group (RR (95%CI): 0.69 (0.53, 0.89), I2=26%; P=0.24). In addition, heart rate was statistically significantly lower with a standardized mean difference (SMD) of -22.39 (95% CI: -24.71, -20.06) among the beta-blockers group than the control group. The SMD for hospital length of stay and the inotropes requirement were not statistically different between the two groups (SMD (95%CI): -0.57 (-2.77, 1.64), and SMD (95%CI): 0.08 (-0.02, 0.19), respectively).

Conclusion

The use of ultra short beta-blockers concomitantly with either epinephrine or norepinephrine in critically ill patients with septic shock was associated with better heart rate control and survival benefits without increment in the inotropes and vasopressors requirement.

Prolonged elevated heart rate and 90-Day mortality in acute pancreatitis

Prolonged elevated heart rate (peHR) is recognized as a risk factor for poor prognosis among critically ill patients. However, there is currently a lack of studies investigating the association between peHR and patients with acute pancreatitis. Multiparameter Intelligent Monitoring in Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database was used to identify patients with acute pancreatitis. PeHR was defined as a heart rate exceeding 100 beats per minute for at least 11 out of 12 consecutive hours. Cox regression analysis was used to assess the association between peHR and the 90-Day mortality. A total of 364 patients (48.9%) experienced a peHR episode. The 90-day mortality was 25%. PeHR is an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality (HR, 1.98; 95% CI 1.53-2.56; P < 0.001). KM survival curves exhibited a significant decrease in the survival rate at 90 days among patients who experienced a peHR episode (P < 0.001, 84.5% vs. 65.1%). We revealed a significant association of peHR with decreased survival in a large cohort of ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.

Ivabradine in Septic Shock: A Narrative Review

In patients with septic shock, compensatory tachycardia initially serves to maintain adequate cardiac output and tissue oxygenation but may persist despite appropriate fluid and vasopressor resuscitation. This sustained elevation in heart rate and altered heart rate variability, indicative of autonomic dysfunction, is a well-established independent predictor of adverse outcomes in critical illness. Elevated heart rate exacerbates myocardial oxygen demand, reduces ventricular filling time, compromises coronary perfusion during diastole, and impairs the isovolumetric relaxation phase of the cardiac cycle, contributing to ventricular-arterial decoupling. This also leads to increased ventricular and atrial filling pressures, with a heightened risk of arrhythmias. Ivabradine, a highly selective inhibitor of the sinoatrial node's pacemaker current (If or "funny" current), mitigates heart rate by modulating diastolic depolarization slope without affecting contractility. By exerting a selective chronotropic effect devoid of negative inotropic properties, ivabradine shows potential for improving hemodynamics in septic shock patients with cardiac dysfunction. This review evaluates the plausible mechanisms and existing evidence regarding the utility of ivabradine in managing patients with septic shock.

Ozanimod Therapy in Patients With COVID-19 Requiring Oxygen Support: A Randomized Open-Label Pilot Trial

BACKGROUND

Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor ligands (SRLs) dampen immunopathologic damages in models of viral pneumonia.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is it feasible to administer an SRL therapy, here ozanimod (OZA), to acutely ill patients infected with SARS-CoV-2?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The prospective randomized open-label COVID-19 Ozanimod Intervention (COZI) pilot trial was conducted in three Canadian hospitals. Patients admitted for COVID-19 requiring oxygen were eligible. Randomization was stratified for risk factors of poor outcome and oxygen needs at inclusion. Participants were allocated to standard of care or to standard of care plus OZA. OZA (oral, once daily, incremental dosage) was administered for a maximum of 14 days. Primary end point investigated for size effect and variance over time was the assessment of safety and efficacy, evaluated by the daily score on the World Health Organization-adapted six-point ordinal scale for clinical improvement analyzed under the intention-to-treat principle.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were randomized to the standard of care arm, and 20 were randomized to the OZA arm from September 2020 to February 2022. Evaluation of efficacy showed nonsignificant reductions of median (interquartile range) duration of respiratory support (6 [3-10] vs 9 [4-12] days; P = .34), median duration of hospitalization (9 [6-12] vs 10 [6-18] days; P = .20), and median time to clinical improvement (4 [3-7] vs 7 [3-11] days; P = .12) for OZA compared with standard of care, respectively. Heart rate was significantly lower with OZA (65 [ 63-67] vs 71 [69-72] beats/min; P < .0001). However, QT and PR intervals were not affected. No severe adverse drug reaction was reported.

INTERPRETATION

To our knowledge, SRL utility in severe pneumonia has never been tested in patients. This study shows for the first time that this new pharmacologic agent may safely be administered to patients hospitalized for viral pneumonia, with potential clinical benefits. Bradycardia was frequent but well tolerated.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04405102; URL: www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov.

Beyond the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines: a systematic review of interventions affecting mortality in sepsis

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis-related mortality is decreasing over time after the introduction of "Surviving Sepsis Campaign" Guidelines in 2004. The last Guidelines version collects 93 recommendations, but several interventions supported by randomized evidence of mortality reduction are not included.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We performed a systematic review of all randomized controlled trials reporting a statistically significant mortality reduction in septic patients and compared the identified studies to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines 2021 to highlight discrepancies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

We identified 83 randomized controlled trials (58 interventions) influencing mortality in sepsis. Only 9/58 of these interventions were included in the Guidelines: lactate measurement and lactate-guided hemodynamic management, procalcitonin-guided antibiotics discontinuation, balanced crystalloids as first choice fluids, albumin infusion, avoidance of starches, noradrenaline as first line vasopressor, vasopressin as an adjunctive vasopressor to noradrenaline, neuromuscular blocking agents in moderate-severe sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, and corticosteroids use. Only 11/93 Guidelines recommendations were supported by randomized evidence with mortality difference. Five of the interventions with survival benefit in literature (vitamin C, terlipressin, polymyxin B, liberal transfusion strategy and immunoglobulins) were recommended to avoid in the Guidelines, while 44 interventions were not mentioned, including three interventions (esmolol, omega 3, and external warming) with at least two randomized controlled trials with a documented survival benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Several discrepancies exist between the randomized controlled trials with mortality difference in septic patients and the latest Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines. This systematic review can be of help for improving future guidelines and may guide research on specific promising topics.

Prevalence and prognosis of hyperdynamic left ventricular systolic function in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The prevalence of hyperdynamic left ventricular (LV) systolic function in septic patients and its impact on mortality remain controversial. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the prevalence and association of hyperdynamic LV systolic function with mortality in patients with sepsis.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase. Primary outcomes were the prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function in adult septic patients and the associated short-term mortality as compared to normal LV systolic function. Hyperdynamic LV systolic function was defined using LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 70% as cutoff. Secondary outcomes were heart rate, LV end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and E/e' ratio.

RESULTS

Four studies were included, and the pooled prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function was 18.2% ([95% confidence interval (CI) 12.5, 25.8]; I2 = 7.0%, P < 0.0001). Hyperdynamic LV systolic function was associated with higher mortality: odds ratio of 2.37 [95%CI 1.47, 3.80]; I2 = 79%, P < 0.01. No difference was found in E/e' (P = 0.43) between normal and hyperdynamic LV systolic function, while higher values of heart rate (mean difference: 6.14 beats/min [95%CI 3.59, 8.69]; I2 = 51%, P < 0.0001) and LVEDD (mean difference: - 0.21 cm [95%CI - 0.33, - 0.09]; I2 = 73%, P < 0.001) were detected in patients with hyperdynamic LV systolic function.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of hyperdynamic LV systolic function is not negligible in septic patients. Such a finding is associated with significantly higher short-term mortality as compared to normal LV systolic function.

Astilbin protects from sepsis-induced cardiac injury through the NRF2/HO-1 and TLR4/NF-κB pathway

Cardiac dysfunction and arrhythmia are severe complications of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy and are associated with an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Currently, the precise mechanism for sepsis-induced myocardial damage remains unclear. Astilbin, a flavonoid, is reported to have anti-inflammatory, antioxidative, and antiapoptotic properties. However, the effects of astilbin on sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy have not been studied so far. This study aims to investigate the effect of astilbin in sepsis-induced myocardial injury and elucidate the underlying mechanism. In vivo and in vitro sepsis models were created using lipopolysaccharide (LPS) as an inducer in H9C2 cardiomyocytes and C57BL/6 mice, respectively. Our results demonstrated that astilbin reduced myocardial injury and improved cardiac function. Moreover, astilbin prolonged the QT and corrected QT intervals, attenuated myocardial electrical remodeling, and promoted gap junction protein (Cx43) and ion channels expression, thereby reducing the susceptibility of ventricular fibrillation. In addition, astilbin alleviated LPS-induced inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis. Astilbin suppressed the toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway in vivo and in vitro models. Astilbin remarkedly upregulated the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) and heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1) expression. The in vitro treatment with an NRF2 inhibitor reversed the inhibition of the TLR4/NF-κB pathway and antioxidant properties of astilbin. Astilbin attenuated LPS-induced myocardial injury, cardiac dysfunction, susceptibility to VF, inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis by activating the NRF2/HO-1 pathway and inhibiting TLR4/ NF-κB pathway. These results suggest that astilbin could be an effective and promising therapeutics target for the treatment of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy.

Heart rate/temperature ratio: A practical prognostic indicator for critically ill patients with sepsis

Background

We hypothesize that the heart rate/temperature ratio can predict intensive care unit (ICU) mortality in critical ill patients with sepsis. We aimed to explore the association between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods

We conducted this study utilizing a comprehensive critical care medicine database. The primary endpoint assessed was ICU mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was employed to determine the independent impact of the heart rate to temperature ratio on ICU mortality.

Results

The study included 12,321 patients. A nonlinear relationship was observed between the heart rate/temperature ratio and ICU mortality, with an inflection point identified at 2.22. The results from the Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that the heart rate/temperature ratio independently contributed to the risk of ICU mortality. In model II, there was a 55 % higher ICU mortality rate with a heart rate/temperature ratio greater than 2.22 than with that less than 2.22 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.55, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.35-1.77). Moreover, an elevated heart rate/temperature ratio as a continuous variable showed a positive association with ICU mortality (OR = 2.14; 95 % CI: 1.87-2.45). The impact of the heart rate/temperature ratio on ICU mortality remained consistent across all subgroup variables. The sensitivity analysis results consistently supported the primary outcome, with an E value of 2.47. This suggests that the influence of unmeasured confounders on the observed outcomes was minimal, thereby confirming the robustness of the findings.

Conclusions

The heart rate/temperature ratio is a readily available and convenient indicator in a clinical setting. Elevated heart rate/temperature ratios, particularly those exceeding 2.22, are strongly linked to a high ICU mortality rate among critically ill sepsis patients.

Mechanisms of landiolol-mediated positive inotropy in critical care settings

PURPOSE

To present the potential mechanisms by which landiolol enhances a positive inotropic response in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Analysis of preclinical, animal, and clinical data to provide novel knowledge and translate research findings into potential clinical application.

RESULTS

The super-selective β1-antagonist landiolol may increase inotropy and may be associated with positive outcomes in critically ill patients with acute decompensated heart failure or sepsis.

CONCLUSION

This review sheds light on the potential mechanisms by which landiolol enhances a positive inotropic response, potentially alleviating the long-held concern over possible negative hemodynamic effects in critically ill patients.

The "CHEOPS" bundle for the management of Left Ventricular Diastolic Dysfunction in critically ill patients: an experts' opinion

The impact of left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD) on the outcome of patients with heart failure was established over three decades ago. Nevertheless, the relevance of LVDD for critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit has seen growing interest recently, and LVDD is associated with poor prognosis. Whilst an assessment of LV diastolic function is desirable in critically ill patients, treatment options for LVDD are very limited, and pharmacological possibilities to rapidly optimize diastolic function have not been found yet. Hence, a proactive approach might have a substantial role in improving the outcomes of these patients. Recalling historical Egyptian parallelism suggesting that Doppler echocardiography has been the "Rosetta stone" to decipher the study of LV diastolic function, we developed a potentially useful acronym for physicians at the bedside to optimize the management of critically ill patients with LVDD with the application of the bundle. We summarized the bundle under the acronym of the famous ancient Egyptian pharaoh CHEOPS: Chest Ultrasound, combining information from echocardiography and lung ultrasound; HEmodynamics assessment, with careful evaluation of heart rate and rhythm, as well as afterload and vasoactive drugs; OPtimization of mechanical ventilation and pulmonary circulation, considering the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on both right and left heart function; Stabilization, with cautious fluid administration and prompt fluid removal whenever judged safe and valuable. Notably, the CHEOPS bundle represents experts' opinion and are not targeted at the initial resuscitation phase but rather for the optimization and subsequent period of critical illness.

Impact of norepinephrine on immunity and oxidative metabolism in sepsis

Sepsis is a major health problem in the United States (US), constituting a leading contributor to mortality among critically ill patients. Despite advances in treatment the underlying pathophysiology of sepsis remains elusive. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have a significant role in antimicrobial host defense and inflammation and its dysregulation leads to maladaptive responses because of excessive inflammation. There is growing evidence for crosstalk between the central nervous system and the immune system in response to infection. The hypothalamic-pituitary and adrenal axis and the sympathetic nervous system are the two major pathways that mediate this interaction. Epinephrine (Epi) and norepinephrine (NE), respectively are the effectors of these interactions. Upon stimulation, NE is released from sympathetic nerve terminals locally within lymphoid organs and activate adrenoreceptors expressed on immune cells. Similarly, epinephrine secreted from the adrenal gland which is released systemically also exerts influence on immune cells. However, understanding the specific impact of neuroimmunity is still in its infancy. In this review, we focus on the sympathetic nervous system, specifically the role the neurotransmitter norepinephrine has on immune cells. Norepinephrine has been shown to modulate immune cell responses leading to increased anti-inflammatory and blunting of pro-inflammatory effects. Furthermore, there is evidence to suggest that norepinephrine is involved in regulating oxidative metabolism in immune cells. This review attempts to summarize the known effects of norepinephrine on immune cell response and oxidative metabolism in response to infection.

Association between the β-blocker use and patients with sepsis: a cohort study

Objective

This study aimed to assess whether β-blockers are associated with mortality in patients with sepsis.

Method

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with sepsis using the Medical Information Market for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-IV and the emergency intensive care unit (eICU) databases. The primary outcome was the in-hospital mortality rate. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to reduce confounder bias. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the conclusions.

Results

We included a total of 61,751 patients with sepsis, with an overall in-hospital mortality rate of 15.3% in MIMIC-IV and 13.6% in eICU. The inverse probability-weighting model showed that in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the β-blockers group than in the non-β-blockers group [HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, p < 0.001 in MIMIC-IV, and HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.45-0.52, p < 0.001 in eICU]. In subgroups grouped according to sex, age, heart rate, APSIII, septic shock, and admission years, the results did not change.

Conclusion

β-blocker use is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis, further randomized trials are required to confirm this association.

The role of beta-blocker drugs in critically ill patients: a SIAARTI expert consensus statement

BACKGROUND

The role of β-blockers in the critically ill has been studied, and data on the protective effects of these drugs on critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature over the last two decades. However, consensus and guidelines by scientific societies on the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients are still lacking. The purpose of this document is to support the clinical decision-making process regarding the use of β-blockers in critically ill patients. The recipients of this document are physicians, nurses, healthcare personnel, and other professionals involved in the patient's care process.

METHODS

The Italian Society of Anesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (SIAARTI) selected a panel of experts and asked them to define key aspects underlying the use of β-blockers in critically ill adult patients. The methodology followed by the experts during this process was in line with principles of modified Delphi and RAND-UCLA methods. The experts developed statements and supportive rationales in the form of informative text. The overall list of statements was subjected to blind votes for consensus.

RESULTS

The literature search suggests that adrenergic stress and increased heart rate in critically ill patients are associated with organ dysfunction and increased mortality. Heart rate control thus seems to be critical in the management of the critically ill patient, requiring careful clinical evaluation aimed at both the differential diagnosis to treat secondary tachycardia and the treatment of rhythm disturbance. In addition, the use of β-blockers for the treatment of persistent tachycardia may be considered in patients with septic shock once hypovolemia has been ruled out. Intravenous application should be the preferred route of administration.

CONCLUSION

β-blockers protective effects in critically ill patients have been repeatedly reported in the literature. Their use in the acute treatment of increased heart rate requires understanding of the pathophysiology and careful differential diagnosis, as all causes of tachycardia should be ruled out and addressed first.

The Association Between Tachycardia and Mortality in Septic Shock Patients According to Serum Lactate Level: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate whether the effect of tachycardia varies according to the degree of tissue perfusion in septic shock.

METHODS

Patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care units were categorized into the tachycardia (heart rate > 100 beats/min) and non-tachycardia (≤ 100 beats/min) groups. The association of tachycardia with hospital mortality was evaluated in each subgroup with low and high lactate levels, which were identified through a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot analysis.

RESULTS

In overall patients, hospital mortality did not differ between the two groups (44.6% vs. 41.8%, P = 0.441), however, tachycardia was associated with reduced hospital mortality rates in patients with a lactate level ≥ 5.3 mmol/L (48.7% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.030; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.99, P = 0.045), not in patients with a lactate level < 5.3 mmol/L (36.5% vs. 29.7%, P = 0.156; adjusted OR, 1.39, 95% CI, 0.82-2.35, P = 0.227).

CONCLUSION

In septic shock patients, the effect of tachycardia on hospital mortality differed by serum lactate level. Tachycardia was associated with better survival in patients with significantly elevated lactate levels.

Association of preoperative electrocardiographic markers with sepsis in elderly patients after general surgery

BACKGROUND

Electrocardiographic markers, as surrogates for sympathetic excitotoxicity, are widely predictive of cardiovascular adverse events, but whether these markers can predict postsurgical sepsis (SS) is unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent abdominal surgery from March 2013 to May 2023. We collected basic data, comorbidities, blood samples, echocardiology, electrocardiogram, and surgical data, as well as short-term outcome. The primary endpoints were postsurgical SS, in which logistic regression analyses can identify independent risk factors. The optimal cut-off value predictive postsurgical SS both P wave and PR interval were calculated in the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC).

RESULTS

A total of 1988 subjects were analyzed, and the incidence of postsurgical SS was 3.8%. The mean age at enrollment was 68.6 ± 7.1 years, and 53.2% of the participants were men. In the ROC analysis, the areas under the curve (AUC) for P wave and PR interval predictive postsurgical SS were 0.615 (95%CI, 0.548-0.683; p = 0.001) and 0.618 (95%CI, 0.554-0.682; p = 0.001), respectively. The P wave and PR interval predicted postoperative sepsis with optimal discrimination of 103 and 157 ms, with a sensitivity of 0.744 and 0.419, and a specificity of 0.427 and 0.760. P-wave less than 103 ms or PR interval less than 157 ms associated with a 2.06 or 2.33 fold increase occurred risk postsurgical SS.

CONCLUSIONS

Shorter P-wave and PR intervals were both independently associated with postsurgical SS. These preoperative electrophysiological markers could have potential useful for early recognition of postoperative SS.

Sepsis-Induced myocardial dysfunction: heterogeneity of functional effects and clinical significance

Sepsis is a life-threatening disease state characterized by organ dysfunction and a dysregulated response to infection. The heart is one of the many organs affected by sepsis, in an entity termed sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. This was initially used to describe a reversible depression in ejection fraction with ventricular dilation but advances in echocardiography and introduction of new techniques such as speckle tracking have led to descriptions of other common abnormalities in cardiac function associated with sepsis. This includes not only depression of systolic function, but also supranormal ejection fraction, diastolic dysfunction, and right ventricular dysfunction. These reports have led to inconsistent definitions of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Just as there is heterogeneity among patients with sepsis, there is heterogeneity in the cardiac response; thus resuscitating these patients with a single approach is likely suboptimal. Many factors affect the heart in sepsis including inflammatory mediators, catecholamine responsiveness, and pathogen related toxins. This review will discuss different functional effects characterized by echocardiographic changes in sepsis and their prognostic and management implications.

Role of aspirin, beta-blocker, statins, and heparin therapy in septic patients under mechanical ventilation: a narrative review

Sepsis is the main cause of death among patients admitted to intensive care units. Management of sepsis includes fluid resuscitation, vasopressors, intravenous antimicrobials, source control, mechanical ventilation, and others. New insights into the potential benefits of non-antimicrobial drugs in sepsis have evolved based on the pathophysiology of the disease and the mechanism of action of some drugs, but the findings are still controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, and heparin as adjunctive treatments in septic patients under mechanical ventilation with non-cardiovascular diseases and their effect on mortality. We searched PubMed with relevant keywords (beta-blockers, aspirin, statins, or heparin, and critically ill or sepsis) for the last 10 years and some personal collection of relevant articles, and then we assessed studies according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. Our results show that beta-blockers, aspirin, and heparin may have promising feedback on reducing mortality. However, new well-controlled, randomized, multicenter studies are needed to confirm that, and multiple issues regarding their usage need to be addressed. On the other hand, the feedback regarding the effectiveness of statins was not as strong as that of the other drugs studied, and we suggest that further research is needed to confirm these results.

Optimal use of intravenous landiolol in acute cardiac care

INTRODUCTION

B-blockers are regarded as beneficial pharmacologic agents in cardiac care, but their role in the acute setting remains ambiguous. Increasing evidence supports the important role of landiolol in critical care, a highly cardioselective intravenous b-blocker with rapid onset of action and short elimination time. Among its most valuable properties, which may aid to overcome special reservations related to b-blocker therapy in the acute setting, landiolol has a potent negative chronotropic effect while at the same time it exhibits a mild negative inotropic effect.

AREAS COVERED

This expert opinion review aims to present basic pharmacologic aspects of landiolol and provide current clinical research focused on its efficacy and safety.

EXPERT OPINION

Landiolol is a valuable and safe pharmacologic agent in acute cardiac care. Japanese and European guidelines have incorporated its use for the management of atrial tachyarrhythmia in patients with cardiac dysfunction. Although emerging clinical trials have experimented its use in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous intervention and in patients with septic cardiomyopathy, more studies are needed in order to establish its value in such cardiac conditions.

Is Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Associated With Increased Mortality Among Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock?

BACKGROUND

The impact of left ventricular (LV) systolic function on outcomes in patients with sepsis and septic shock remains uncertain. The association, if any, may be nonlinear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is LV systolic dysfunction associated with increased mortality among patients with sepsis and septic shock?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study comprising all adult patients admitted to the medical ICU from January 1, 2011, through December 31, 2020, with sepsis and septic shock as defined by the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock guidelines. All adult patients with sepsis or septic shock who underwent transthoracic echocardiography within 3 days from admission to the medical ICU were included. We divided patients into five groups based on LV ejection fraction (LVEF). In addition to univariate analysis, we also performed multivariate logistic regression analysis adjusting for patients' baseline characteristics and severity of illness. The primary outcome was the association between each classification of LVEF and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 3,151 patients were included in this study (LVEF < 25%, 133 patients; 25% ≤ LVEF < 40%, 305 patients; 40% ≤ LVEF < 55%, 568 patients; 55% ≤ LVEF < 70%, 1,792 patients; and LVEF ≥ 70%, 353 patients). In-hospital mortalities in each LVEF category were 51.1%, 34.8%, 26.6%, 26.2%, and 41.9%, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, LVEF of < 25% (OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.82-4.17; P < .001) and LVEF of ≥ 70% (OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.09-1.88; P = .010) were associated independently with significantly higher in-hospital mortality compared with the reference LVEF category of 55% to 70%.

INTERPRETATION

The association of LVEF to in-hospital mortality in sepsis and septic shock was U-shaped. Both severe LV systolic dysfunction (LVEF < 25%) and hyperdynamic LVEF (LVEF ≥ 70%) were associated independently with significantly higher in-hospital mortality.

Norepinephrine dose, lactate or heart rate: what impacts prognosis in sepsis and septic shock? Results from a prospective, monocentric registry

OBJECTIVE

The study comprehensively investigates the prognostic value of norepinephrine (NE) dose, lactate and heart rate in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

BACKGROUND

Limited data regarding the prognostic value of NE dose, lactate and heart rate in patients meeting the sepsis-3 criteria is available.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included. The prognostic value of NE dose, lactate and heart rate was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman's correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as one-factorial repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Cox proportional regression analyses.

RESULTS

339 patients with sepsis or septic shock were included. With an area under the curve (AUC) of up to 0.638 and 0.685, NE dose and lactate revealed moderate prognostic accuracy for 30-day all-cause mortality, whereas heart rate was not associated with prognosis. Very high NE doses (i.e. > 1.0 mcg/kg/min) (HR = 2.938; 95% CI 1.933 - 4.464; p = .001) and lactate levels (i.e. ≥ 4 mmol/l) (HR = 2.963; 95% CI 2.095 - 4.191; p = .001) on admission were associated with highest risk of death. Finally, increasing NE doses and lactate levels from day 1 to 3 indicated increased risk of death, which was consistent after multivariable adjustment.

CONCLUSION

Both very high NE doses and lactate levels - but not heart rate - were associated with increased risk of 30-d all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

The Chronological Demographics of Ventricular-Arterial Decoupling in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Ventricular-arterial coupling (V-A coupling) recently gathers attention from clinicians to evaluate the interaction between afterload and left ventricular systolic function. We aimed to describe the chronological demographics of V-A decoupling in patients with sepsis and septic shock through the clinical course.

METHOD

We conducted a single-center prospective observational study comprising adult patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted to the tertiary care hospital between 04/2017 and 03/2019. Patients' characteristics, lab data on admission, and echocardiographic parameters including Ea and Ees on the day- 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14-28 were collected. V-A decoupling was defined as Ea/Ees ≥ 1.36.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients with sepsis or septic shock were enrolled. The prevalence of V-A decoupling was as follows; day-1: 25.4%, day-2: 23.8%, day-3: 13.3%, day-7: 18.5%, day-14-28: 30.3%, respectively. Ea was higher in patients with V-A decoupling than those without throughout the clinical course (day1; 2.8 vs. 1.8, p < 0.01, day2; 2.7 vs. 1.9, p < 0.01, day3; 2.8 vs. 2.1, p = 0.06, day7; 2.7 vs. 1.9, p = 0.02, day14-28; 2.4 vs. 1.8, p = 0.08). This increase in Ea was mainly induced by reduced stroke volume (SV) as well as high systolic blood pressure (SBP) in the earlier course of sepsis but only by increased SBP in the later course of sepsis. Ees was lower in patients with V-A decoupling than those without throughout the clinical course (day1; 1.3 vs. 2.1, p < 0.01, day2; 1.5 vs. 2.3, p < 0.01, day3; 1.6 vs. 2.3, p = 0.02, day7; 1.8 vs. 2.3, p = 0.01, day14-28; 1.2 vs. 1.9, p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

We reported that V-A decoupling was commonly seen in patients with sepsis and septic shock. In patients with V-A decoupling, both Ea and Ees were significantly altered, but the causes of these alterations appeared to be changing over the clinical course of sepsis.

Effect of β-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis: A propensity-score matched analysis

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the association between β-blocker therapy and mortality in patients with sepsis.

Methods

Patients with sepsis were selected from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline differences. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to assess the relationship between β-blocker therapy and mortality. The primary outcome was the 28-day mortality.

Results

A total of 12,360 patients were included in the study, involving 3,895 who received β-blocker therapy and 8,465 who did not. After PSM, 3,891 pairs of patients were matched. The results showed that β-blockers were associated with improved 28- (hazards ratio (HR) 0.78) and 90-day (HR 0.84) mortality. Long-acting β-blockers were associated with improved 28-day survival (757/3627 [20.9%] vs. 583/3627 [16.1%], P &lt; 0.001, HR0.76) and 90-day survival (1065/3627 [29.4%] vs.921/3627 [25.4%], P &lt; 0.001, HR 0.77). Short-acting β-blocker treatment did not reduce the 28-day and 90-day mortality (61/264 [23.1%] vs. 63/264 [23.9%], P = 0.89 and 83/264 [31.4%] vs. 89/264 [31.7%], P = 0.8, respectively).

Conclusions

β-blockers were associated with improved 28- and 90-day mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Long-acting β-blocker therapy may have a protective role in patients with sepsis, reducing the 28-day and 90-day mortality. However, short-acting β-blocker (esmolol) treatment did not reduce the mortality in sepsis.

Evaluating the effects of Esmolol on cardiac function in patients with Septic cardiomyopathy by Speck-tracking echocardiography-a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Esmolol as one treatment of sepsis induced cardiomyopathy (SIC) is still controversial. The objective of this study is to evaluate cardiac function after reducing heart rate by Esmolol in patients with SIC using speck-tracking echocardiography.

METHODS

This study was a single-center, prospective, and randomized controlled study. A total of 100 SIC patients with a heart rate more than 100/min, admitted to the Intensive Care Department of Tianjin Third Central Hospital from March 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021, were selected as the research subjects. They were randomly divided into the Esmolol group (Group E) and the conventional treatment group (Group C), each with 50 cases. The target heart rate of patients in Group E was controlled between 80/min and 100/min. Speck-tracking echocardiography (STE) and pulse indicating continuous cardiac output monitoring (PICCO) were performed in both groups at 1 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 96 h and 7 d after admission, with data concerning left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and global ejection fraction (GEF), left ventricular systolic force index (dP/dtmx) were obtained, respectively. Hemodynamics and other safety indicators were monitored throughout the whole process. These subjects were followed up to 90 d, with their mortality recorded at Day 28 and Day 90, respectively. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 21.

RESULTS

With 24 h of Esmolol, all patients in Group E achieved the target heart rate, and there was no deterioration of GLS, or adverse events. However, compared with those in Group C, their GLS, GEF and dP/dtmx were increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P > 0.05). Compared with patients in Group C, those in Group E had lower short-term mortality, and logistic regression analysis also suggested that Esmolol improved patient outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In SIC patients, the application of Esmolol to lower heart rate decreased their short-term mortality while not making any impairment on the myocardial contractility.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100047513. Registered June 20, 2021- Retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx . The study protocol followed the CONSORT guidelines. The study protocol was performed in the relevant guidelines.

Sympathetic System in Wound Healing: Multistage Control in Normal and Diabetic Skin

In this review, we discuss sympathetic regulation in normal and diabetic wound healing. Experimental denervation studies have confirmed that sympathetic nerve endings in skin have an important and complex role in wound healing. Vasoconstrictor neurons secrete norepinephrine (NE) and neuropeptide Y (NPY). Both mediators decrease blood flow and interact with inflammatory cells and keratinocytes. NE acts in an ambiguous way depending on receptor type. Beta2-adrenoceptors could be activated near sympathetic endings; they suppress inflammation and re-epithelialization. Alpha1- and alpha2-adrenoceptors induce inflammation and activate keratinocytes. Sudomotor neurons secrete acetylcholine (ACh) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). Both induce vasodilatation, angiogenesis, inflammation, keratinocytes proliferation and migration. In healthy skin, all effects are important for successful healing. In treatment of diabetic ulcers, mediator balance could be shifted in different ways. Beta2-adrenoceptors blockade and nicotinic ACh receptors activation are the most promising directions in treatment of diabetic ulcers with neuropathy, but they require further research.

Hemodynamic and Rhythmologic Effects of Push-Dose Landiolol in Critical Care-A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

The highly β1-selective beta-blocker Landiolol is known to facilitate efficient and safe rate control in non-compensatory tachycardia or dysrhythmia when administered continuously. However, efficacy and safety data of the also-available bolus formulation in critically ill patients are scarce.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study on a real-life cohort of critical care patients, who had been treated with push-dose Landiolol due to sudden-onset non-compensatory supraventricular tachycardia. Continuous hemodynamic data had been acquired via invasive blood pressure monitoring.

RESULTS

Thirty patients and 49 bolus applications were analyzed. Successful heart rate control was accomplished in 20 (41%) cases, rhythm control was achieved in 13 (27%) episodes, and 16 (33%) applications showed no effect. Overall, the heart rate was significantly lower (145 (130-150) vs. 105 (100-125) bpm, p < 0.001) in a 90 min post-application observational period in all subgroups. The median changes in blood pressure after the bolus application did not reach clinical significance. Compared with the ventilation settings before the bolus application, the respiratory settings including the required FiO2 after the bolus application did not differ significantly. No serious adverse events were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

Push-dose Landiolol was safe and effective in critically ill ICU patients. No clinically relevant impact on blood pressure was noted.

Association between Pre-Existing Long-Term β-Blocker Therapy and the Outcomes of Sepsis-Associated Coagulopathy: A Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Previous studies have suggested that long-term β-blocker therapy before sepsis is associated with reduced mortality. Sepsis-associated coagulopathy (SAC) remains a common complication in patients with sepsis and is associated with increased mortality. Adrenergic pathways are involved in the regulation of the coagulation system. Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy may have potentially beneficial effects on SAC and has yet to be well characterized. We aimed to assess the potential association between pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy and the outcomes of patients with SAC. Materials and Methods: This study retrospectively screened the clinical data of adult patients with SAC admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and respiratory ICU between May 2020 and October 2022. Patients with SAC who took any β-blocker for at least one year were considered pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy. All enrolled patients were followed up for 28 days or until death. Results: Among the 228 SAC patients, 48 received long-term β-blocker therapy before septic episodes. Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy was associated with reduced vasopressor requirements and a decreased 28-day mortality (log-rank test: p = 0.041). In particular, long-term β-blocker therapy was related to substantially lower D-dimer levels and a trend of improved activated partial thromboplastin time in patients with SAC during initial ICU admission. Multivariable regression analysis showed that long-term β-blocker therapy was significantly and independently associated with a 28-day mortality among patients with SAC (adjusted odds ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, (0.32-0.94); p = 0.030). Conclusions: Pre-existing long-term β-blocker therapy might be associated with reduced vasopressor requirements and a decreased 28-day mortality among patients with SAC, providing evidence for the protective effect of β-blockers against SAC in managing sepsis.

Premorbid beta blockade in sepsis is associated with a lower risk of a lactate concentration above the lactate threshold, a retrospective cohort study

Sepsis and septic shock represent a significant worldwide mortality burden. A lactate greater than 4 mmol/L is associated with increased mortality in septic patients. This is the concentration at the "lactate threshold" where serum lactate concentrations rise markedly with increased workload in exercise. Hyperlactatemia in both sepsis and exercise is contributed to by adrenergic agonism which stimulates aerobic glycolysis, increasing lactate production and decreasing lactate clearance. Our hypothesis is that in patients with sepsis, treatment with beta blockers in the community will be associated with a lower probability of initial lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L. This was single centre retrospective cohort study. We used an in-house SQL Database for all admissions to ICU/HDU for the 2017-2020 calendar years. The dataset was filtered for an APACHE III Diagnosis of sepsis. T-tests were used for continuous data, Chi squared and Fisher's exact test were used as appropriate to compare proportions. Logistic regression was used to investigate covariate effects. Of the 160 patient records analysed, 49 were prescribed beta blockers. A greater proportion of patients not prescribed beta blockers in the community had a first lactate ≥ 4 mmol/L (p = 0.049). This was robust to regression analysis. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with lactate ≥ 2 mmol/L (p = 0.52). In our cohort patients previously prescribed beta blockers were less likely to have a lactate of ≥ 4 mmol/mL. This supports the proposed mechanism that treatment with beta blockers increases the lactate threshold in sepsis. Further study is warranted.

Beta-blocker treatment in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Critical illness may lead to activation of the sympathetic system. The sympathetic stimulation may be further increased by exogenous catecholamines, such as vasopressors and inotropes. Excessive adrenergic stress has been associated with organ dysfunction and higher mortality. β-Blockers may reduce the adrenergic burden, but they may also compromise perfusion to vital organs thus worsening organ dysfunction. To assess the effect of treatment with β-blockers in critically ill adults, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a search from three major databases: Ovid Medline, the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials and Scopus database. Two independent reviewers screened, selected, and assessed the included articles according to prespecified eligibility criteria. We assessed risk of bias of eligible articles according to the Cochrane guidelines. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

RESULTS

Sixteen randomized controlled trials comprising 2410 critically ill patients were included in the final review. A meta-analysis of 11 trials including 2103 patients showed a significant reduction in mortality in patients treated with β-blockers compared to control (risk ratio 0.65, 95%CI 0.53-0.79; p < .0001). There was no significant difference in mean arterial pressure or vasopressor load. Quality of life, biventricular ejection fraction, blood lactate levels, cardiac biomarkers and mitochondrial function could not be included in meta-analysis due to heterogenous reporting of outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review we found that β-blocker treatment reduced mortality in critical illness. Use of β-blockers in critical illness thus appears safe after initial hemodynamic stabilization. High-quality RCT's are needed to answer the questions concerning optimal target group of patients, timing of β-blocker treatment, choice of β-blocker, and choice of physiological and hemodynamic parameters to target during β-blocker treatment in critical illness.KEY MESSAGESA potential outcome benefit of β-blocker treatment in critical illness exists according to the current review and meta-analysis. Administration of β-blockers to resuscitated patients in the ICU seems safe in terms of hemodynamic stability and outcome, even during concomitant vasopressor administration. However, further studies, preferably large RCTs on β-blocker treatment in the critically ill are needed to answer the questions concerning timing and choice of β-blocker, patient selection, and optimal hemodynamic targets.

Benefits of esmolol in adults with sepsis and septic shock: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis affects millions of patients annually, resulting in substantial health and economic burdens globally. The role of esmolol potentially plays in the treatment of sepsis and septic shock in adult patients remains controversial.

METHODS

We undertook a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from their inception to May 12, 2022, for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the efficacy of esmolol for sepsis and septic shock. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. Two investigators independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies.

RESULTS

Eight studies from 7 randomized controlled trials were included in our meta-analysis of 503 patients with sepsis and/or septic shock. Compared with standard treatment, esmolol significantly decreased 28-day mortality (risk ratio 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.88; P = .004), heart rate (standardized mean difference [SMD] -1.83, 95% CI -2.95 to -0.70, P = .001), tumor necrosis factor-a (SMD -0.48, 95% CI -0.94 to -0.02, P = .04), and the troponin I level (SMD -0.59, 95% CI -1.02 to -0.16, P = .008) 24 hours after treatment. No significant effect was found in terms of length of intensive care unit stay; mean arterial pressure, lactic acid, central venous pressure, or central venous oxygen saturation, interleukin 6, or white blood cell levels; stroke volume index; or the PaO2/FiO2 ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol treatment may be safe and effective in decreasing 28-day mortality, controlling heart rate, and providing cardioprotective function, but has no effect on lung injury in patients with sepsis or septic shock after early fluid resuscitation. Improvement in cardiac function may be related to changes in serum inflammatory mediators. No significant adverse effects on tissue perfusion and oxygen utilization were observed.

Beta-blockers in septic shock: What is new?

The use of beta(β)-blockers during septic shock aimed at countering peripheral adrenergic stress may be justified by the early reduction in deleterious effects resulting from sympathetic overactivation, and could improve the prognosis of patients in septic shock. Animal studies have demonstrated either a maintenance or increase in cardiac output (CO) despite the decrease in heart rate (HR) associated with improved myocardial performance. The mechanism by which β-blockers alter hemodynamics in septic shock is debated; however, preclinical and clinical data show that β-blockers are safe when started at a low dose. Recent publications (2019-2021) on adrenergic β1 receptor antagonists used in septic shock indicate that esmolol and landiolol should not be used in the early phase. While there is no optimal timing for their administration, a minimum of 12 h after the initiation of vasopressor therapy in stabilized euvolemic patients is a reasonable option. Patients should have a normal cardiac function, although a slight depression is compatible with landiolol use under hemodynamic monitoring. Slow titration in patients who remain tachycardic is preferable to rapid titration. When used to decrease HR, landiolol is also effective in reducing the incidence of new arrhythmias. Results of a well-performed and well-powered randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrating a positive effect on survival - or at least on hard surrogates such as the incidence/duration of organ failure - are pending.

[Heart rate control in shock]

Heart rate is well established in the diagnosis of shock; however, the mechanisms regulating heart rate, systemic resistance and blood pressure remain unclear. The concept of heart rate control in shock-related tachycardia has been known for about 50 years. Elevated heart rates in septic shock have been identified as an indicator of increasingly inefficient hemodynamics, worsening perfusion and organ function as well as of an unfavourable prognosis. Many drugs used for heart rate control also lower blood pressure. The challenge of this therapeutic concept is achieving optimal heart rate control without provoking critical hypotension. Only in recent years has the development of highly cardioselective, short- and ultrashort-acting β‑blockers such as esmolol and landiolol made it possible to prove the feasibility and usefulness of heart rate control in certain types of shock.

OUP accepted manuscript

Tachyarrhythmias are common complications of critically ill patients treated on intensive care units. Landiolol is an ultra-short acting beta-blocker with a very high beta1-selectivity. Therefore, landiolol effectively reduces heart rate with only minimal negative effects on blood pressure and inotropy. This article describes two cases of successful treatment of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardias with landiolol in critically ill patients.

Septic cardiomyopathy: Diagnosis and management

There is an extensive body of literature focused on sepsis-induced myocardial dysfunction, but results are conflicting and no objective definition of septic cardiomyopathy (SCM) has been established. SCM may be defined as a sepsis-associated acute syndrome of non-ischemic cardiac dysfunction with systolic and/or diastolic left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and/or right ventricular dysfunction. Physicians should consider this diagnosis in patients with sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, and particularly in cases of septic shock that require vasopressors. Echocardiography is currently the gold standard for diagnosis of SCM. Left ventricular ejection fraction is the most common parameter used to describe LV function in the literature, but its dependence on loading conditions, particularly afterload, limits its use as a measure of intrinsic myocardial contractility. Therefore, repeated echocardiography evaluation is mandatory. Evaluation of global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be more sensitive and specific for SCM than LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Standard management includes etiological treatment, adapted fluid resuscitation, use of vasopressors, and monitoring. Use of inotropes remains uncertain, and heart rate control could be an option in some patients.

Effect of Premorbid Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Patients With Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of premorbid beta-blockers on mortality in patients with sepsis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and MEDLINE for eligible studies. The protocol was registered at the PROSPERO (CRD42021256813).

STUDY SELECTION

Two authors independently evaluated the following inclusion criteria: (1) randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross-sectional studies; (2) patients with sepsis aged ≥18 years, and (3) premorbid beta-blocker use.

DATA EXTRACTION

Two authors extracted the patients' characteristics and outcomes independently. All analyses were performed using the random-effects models. The primary outcome was short-term mortality, defined as mortality within 30 days, in-hospital or intensive care unit mortality.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Ten studies (n = 24 748 patients) were included. The pooled odds ratio (OR) of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.69-1.04; P = .12; I² = 50%). Five studies reported an adjusted OR of short-term mortality. The pooled adjusted OR of short-term mortality associated with the premorbid use of beta-blockers was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.65-0.83; P < .001; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Premorbid beta-blockers were associated with a lower short-term mortality in patients with sepsis.

Beta-Adrenergic Blockade in Critical Illness

Catecholamine upregulation is a core pathophysiological feature in critical illness. Sustained catecholamine β-adrenergic induction produces adverse effects relevant to critical illness management. β-blockers (βB) have proposed roles in various critically ill disease states, including sepsis, trauma, burns, and cardiac arrest. Mounting evidence suggests βB improve hemodynamic and metabolic parameters culminating in decreased burn healing time, reduced mortality in traumatic brain injury, and improved neurologic outcomes following cardiac arrest. In sepsis, βB appear hemodynamically benign after acute resuscitation and may augment cardiac function. The emergence of ultra-rapid βB provides new territory for βB, and early data suggest significant improvements in mitigating atrial fibrillation in persistently tachycardic septic patients. This review summarizes the evidence regarding the pharmacotherapeutic role of βB on relevant pathophysiology and clinical outcomes in various types of critical illness.