1
|
Adams RS, Corrigan JD, Ritter GA, Pringle ZA, Zolotusky G, Blayney R, Reif S. Association of Disability Status and Type With Binge Drinking and Prescription Opioid Misuse Among Adults From a 3-State Sample. SUBSTANCE USE & ADDICTION JOURNAL 2024; 45:453-465. [PMID: 38509844 DOI: 10.1177/29767342241236027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Research examining at-risk substance use by disability status is limited, with little investigation into differences by disability type. We investigated binge drinking and prescription opioid misuse among adults with and without disabilities, and by type of disability, to inform need for assessment and intervention within these populations. METHODS Secondary analyses of adults who completed the disability, alcohol, and prescription opioid misuse items in the 2018 Ohio, Florida, or Nebraska Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys (n = 28 341), the only states that included prescription opioid misuse in 2018. Self-reported disability status (yes/no) relied on 6 standardized questions assessing difficulties with: vision, hearing, mobility, cognition, self-care, and independent living (dichotomous, nonmutually exclusive, for each disability). Logistic regression models estimated the association of disability status and type with (1) past 30-day binge drinking and (2) past-year prescription opioid misuse. Additional models were restricted to separate subsamples of adults who: (a) currently drink, (b) received a past-year prescription opioid, and (c) did not receive a past-year prescription opioid. RESULTS One-third reported at least one disability, with mobility (19.5%), cognitive (11.5%), and hearing (10.2%) disability being the most common. Disability status was associated with lower odds of binge drinking (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.74, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.80, P ≤ .01). However, among adults who currently drink, people with disabilities had higher odds of binge drinking (AOR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01-1.22, P ≤ .05]. Disability was associated with higher odds of past-year prescription opioid misuse (AOR = 2.51, 95% CI 2.17-2.91, P ≤ .01). CONCLUSIONS Adults with disabilities had higher odds of prescription opioid misuse, and among adults who currently drink, higher odds for binge drinking were observed. The magnitude of the association between disability status and prescription opioid misuse was particularly concerning. Providers should be trained to screen and treat for substance use problems for people with disabilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Sayko Adams
- Department of Health Law Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - John D Corrigan
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Wexner Medical Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Grant A Ritter
- Schneider Institutes for Health Policy and Research, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Zoe A Pringle
- The Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Galina Zolotusky
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Rachel Blayney
- Ohio Department of Health, Violence and Injury Epidemiology and Surveillance Section, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Sharon Reif
- Institute for Behavioral Health, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Banda A, Naaldenberg J, Timen A, van Eeghen A, Leusink G, Cuypers M. Cancer risks related to intellectual disabilities: A systematic review. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7210. [PMID: 38686623 PMCID: PMC11058689 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with intellectual disabilities (ID) face barriers in cancer care contributing to poorer oncological outcomes. Yet, understanding cancer risks in the ID population remains incomplete. AIM To provide an overview of cancer incidence and cancer risk assessments in the entire ID population as well as within ID-related disorders. METHODS This systematic review examined cancer risk in the entire ID population and ID-related disorders. We systematically searched PubMed (MEDLINE) and EMBASE for literature from January 1, 2000 to July 15, 2022 using a search strategy combining terms related to cancer, incidence, and ID. RESULTS We found 55 articles assessing cancer risks in the ID population at large groups or in subgroups with ID-related syndromes, indicating that overall cancer risk in the ID population is lower or comparable with that of the general population, while specific disorders (e.g., Down's syndrome) and certain genetic mutations may elevate the risk for particular cancers. DISCUSSION The heterogeneity within the ID population challenges precise cancer risk assessment at the population level. Nonetheless, within certain subgroups, such as individuals with specific ID-related disorders or certain genetic mutations, a more distinct pattern of varying cancer risks compared to the general population becomes apparent. CONCLUSION More awareness, and personalized approach in cancer screening within the ID population is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amina Banda
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud university medical centreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Jenneken Naaldenberg
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud university medical centreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Aura Timen
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud university medical centreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Agnies van Eeghen
- Emma Children's HospitalAmsterdam University Medical CentersAmsterdamthe Netherlands
- 'S Heeren LooAmersfoortthe Netherlands
| | - Geraline Leusink
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud university medical centreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| | - Maarten Cuypers
- Department of Primary and Community CareRadboud university medical centreNijmegenthe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shen L, Xu X, Yue S, Yin S. A predictive model for depression in Chinese middle-aged and elderly people with physical disabilities. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:305. [PMID: 38654170 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05766-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities exhibit more common and severe depressive symptoms than those without physical disabilities. Such symptoms can greatly affect the physical and mental health and life expectancy of middle-aged and older persons with disabilities. METHOD This study selected 2015 and 2018 data from the China Longitudinal Study of Health and Retirement. After analyzing the effect of age on depression, we used whether middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities were depressed as the dependent variable and included a total of 24 predictor variables, including demographic factors, health behaviors, physical functioning and socialization, as independent variables. The data were randomly divided into training and validation sets on a 7:3 basis. LASSO regression analysis combined with binary logistic regression analysis was performed in the training set to screen the predictor variables of the model. Construct models in the training set and perform model evaluation, model visualization and internal validation. Perform external validation of the model in the validation set. RESULT A total of 1052 middle-aged and elderly persons with physical disabilities were included in this study, and the prevalence of depression in the elderly group > middle-aged group. Restricted triple spline indicated that age had different effects on depression in the middle-aged and elderly groups. LASSO regression analysis combined with binary logistic regression screened out Gender, Location of Residential Address, Shortsightedness, Hearing, Any possible helper in the future, Alcoholic in the Past Year, Difficulty with Using the Toilet, Difficulty with Preparing Hot Meals, and Unable to work due to disability constructed the Chinese Depression Prediction Model for Middle-aged and Older People with Physical Disabilities. The nomogram shows that living in a rural area, lack of assistance, difficulties with activities of daily living, alcohol abuse, visual and hearing impairments, unemployment and being female are risk factors for depression in middle-aged and older persons with physical disabilities. The area under the ROC curve for the model, internal validation and external validation were all greater than 0.70, the mean absolute error was less than 0.02, and the recall and precision were both greater than 0.65, indicating that the model performs well in terms of discriminability, accuracy and generalisation. The DCA curve and net gain curve of the model indicate that the model has high gain in predicting depression. CONCLUSION In this study, we showed that being female, living in rural areas, having poor vision and/or hearing, lack of assistance from others, drinking alcohol, having difficulty using the restroom and preparing food, and being unable to work due to a disability were risk factors for depression among middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities. We developed a depression prediction model to assess the likelihood of depression in Chinese middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities based on the above risk factors, so that early identification, intervention, and treatment can be provided to middle-aged and older adults with physical disabilities who are at high risk of developing depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianwei Shen
- Rehabitation Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 250000, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaoqian Xu
- Rehabitation Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 250000, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Shouwei Yue
- Rehabitation Center, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, 250000, Jinan, Shandong, China.
| | - Sen Yin
- Neurology Department, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aram J, Slopen N, Cosgrove C, Arria A, Liu H, Dallal CM. Self-Reported Disability Type and Risk of Alcohol-Induced Death - A Longitudinal Study Using Nationally Representative Data. Subst Use Misuse 2024; 59:1323-1330. [PMID: 38635979 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2024.2340993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Disability is associated with alcohol misuse and drug overdose death, however, its association with alcohol-induced death remains understudied. OBJECTIVE To quantify the risk of alcohol-induced death among adults with different types of disabilities in a nationally representative longitudinal sample of US adults. METHODS Persons with disabilities were identified among participants ages 18 or older in the Mortality Disparities in American Communities (MDAC) study (n = 3,324,000). Baseline data were collected in 2008 and mortality outcomes were ascertained through 2019 using the National Death Index. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated for the association between disability type and alcohol-induced death, controlling for demographic and socioeconomic covariates. RESULTS During a maximum of 12 years of follow-up, 4000 alcohol-induced deaths occurred in the study population. In descending order, the following disability types displayed the greatest risk of alcohol-induced death (compared to adults without disability): complex activity limitation (aHR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.3-2.3), vision limitation (aHR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0), mobility limitation (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.7), ≥2 limitations (aHR = 1.4; 95% CI = 1.3-1.6), cognitive limitation (aHR = 1.2; 95% CI = 1.0-1.4), and hearing limitation (aHR = 1.0; 95% CI = 0.9-1.3). CONCLUSIONS The risk of alcohol-induced death varies considerably by disability type. Efforts to prevent alcohol-induced deaths should be tailored to meet the needs of the highest-risk groups, including adults with complex activity (i.e., activities of daily living - "ALDs"), vision, mobility, and ≥2 limitations. Early diagnosis and treatment of alcohol use disorder within these populations, and improved access to educational and occupational opportunities, should be considered as prevention strategies for alcohol-induced deaths.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Aram
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, USA
| | - Natalie Slopen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, USA
| | - Candace Cosgrove
- Mortality Research Group, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau, USA
| | - Amelia Arria
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, USA
| | - Hongjie Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, USA
| | - Cher M Dallal
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foy JG, Kechichian S, Foy MR, Ziadni M. Psychological/behavioral interventions for emerging adults with chronic pain. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2024; 5:1253700. [PMID: 38476354 PMCID: PMC10927809 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1253700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Emerging adults, of whom significant numbers report chronic pain, are characterized as having unique needs and challenges. Psychological/behavioral treatments found to be beneficial for reducing pain outcomes in children and adults are understudied in emerging adults. Following a systematic review of the literature, our objective is to report on quantitative studies of psychological/behavioral interventions for chronic pain in emerging adults. Method We conducted a search of six databases (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Google Scholar, ProQuest, PsycINFO, PubMed, and Web of Science) and reference sections in dissertations and systematic reviews to 4/29/2023. Keywords and phrases were search term combinations of "chronic/persistent pain", "emerging/young adults," and "intervention/treatment" using Boolean logic. Results Our review resulted in identifying 37 articles, of which 2 duplicates were removed, and 31 were further excluded by a screening process based on various inclusionary and exclusionary criteria. The search yielded four studies on psychological/behavioral interventions (yoga, acceptance and commitment therapy and relaxation), all of which positively affected the pain experience and/or pain-related outcomes. These studies presented issues in design such as not being blinded or randomized, having a small sample size, and potential confounds that were not reported or examined. Discussion The low number of studies reveals a large gap in the literature and is a call-to-action to further expand our understanding of effective and safer psychological/behavioral therapies for chronic pain in emerging adults. Successful pain management during this developmental phase may help young adults achieve positive trajectories for personal, occupational, relational, and health aspects of their lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith G. Foy
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Sandra Kechichian
- Graduate School of Education and Psychology, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA, United States
| | - Michael R. Foy
- Department of Psychological Science, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Maisa Ziadni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xie Z, Stallings-Smith S, Stetten N, Hamadi HY, Marlow NM. Marijuana use disorder among adults with functional disabilities-A US population-based cross-sectional study. Am J Addict 2024; 33:26-35. [PMID: 37821239 DOI: 10.1111/ajad.13485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Recent studies suggest a growing trend in marijuana use, compared to a stable prevalence of marijuana use disorder among US adults over the first 15 years of the 21st century. This study investigated the recent patterns of marijuana use disorder among people with disabilities (PWD). METHODS We extracted a nationally representative sample (N = 209,058) from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health data set and examined associations by functional disability status (any disability, disability by type, and number of disabling limitations) with marijuana use disorder using a series of independent multivariable logistic regression models. We also performed trend analyses during the study period. RESULTS The prevalence of marijuana use disorder (from 1.7% to 2.3%) increased significantly among PWD between 2015 and 2019 (p-trend < .001). PWD were significantly more likely to report marijuana use disorder (odds ratio [OR], 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.52) than people without disability (PWoD). Those with cognitive limitation only (OR, 1.78, 95% CI, 1.53-2.06) and ≥2 limitations (OR, 1.29, 95% CI, 1.10-1.51) were more likely to report marijuana use disorder than PWoD. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS PWD had a consistently higher prevalence of marijuana use disorder than PWoD. Additionally, the level of risk for marijuana use disorder varied by disability type and number of disabling limitations. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE Our study provided new nuance on disparities in marijuana use disorder between PWD and PWoD and further revealed the varied risks for marijuana use disorder across different disability statuses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhigang Xie
- Department of Public Health, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | | | - Nichole Stetten
- Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Hanadi Y Hamadi
- Department of Health Administration, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Nicole M Marlow
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cypel YS, DePhilippis D, Davey VJ. Substance Use in U.S. Vietnam War Era Veterans and Nonveterans: Results from the Vietnam Era Health Retrospective Observational Study. Subst Use Misuse 2023; 58:858-870. [PMID: 37096682 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2023.2188427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023]
Abstract
Background: Substance use (SU) is associated with physical injury and mental health disorders in older persons, but recent research has scarcely examined SU in U.S. Vietnam-era veterans who are mostly in or near their eighth decade of life. Objectives: We compared the prevalence of self-reported lifetime and current SU and modeled current usage patterns in a nationally representative sample of veterans versus a matched nonveteran cohort. Methods: Cross-sectional, self-reported survey data were analyzed from the 2016-2017 Vietnam Era Health Retrospective Observational Study (VE-HEROeS) (n = 18,866 veterans, n = 4,530 nonveterans). We assessed lifetime and current alcohol and drug use disorders; lifetime and current use of cannabis, opioids, stimulants, sedatives, "other drugs" (psychedelics, prescription or over-the-counter drugs not prescribed/used as intended); and current SU patterns (alcohol-use-only, drug-use-only, dual-SU, no SU). Weighted descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable statistics were calculated. Covariates in multinomial modeling included sociodemographic characteristics, lifetime cigarette smoking, depression, potentially traumatic events (PTEs), and current pain (SF-8TM). Results: Prevalence of lifetime opioid and sedative use (p ≤ .01), drug and alcohol use disorders (p < .001), and current "other drug" use (p < .001) were higher in veterans versus nonveterans. Current use of alcohol and cannabis was high in both cohorts. In veterans, very severe/severe pain, depression, and PTEs were highly associated with drug-use-only (p < .001) and dual-SU (p < .01), but these associations were fewer for nonveterans. Conclusion: This research confirmed existing concerns over substance misuse in older individuals. Vietnam-era veterans may be at particular risk due to service-related experiences and later-life tribulations. Era veterans' unique perceptions toward healthcare assistance for SU may need greater provider focus to maximize self-efficacy and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin S Cypel
- Epidemiology Program, Health Outcomes Military Exposures (HOME) (12POP5), Office of Patient Care Services, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - D DePhilippis
- Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention, Veterans Health Administration, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - V J Davey
- Office of Research & Development (14RD), U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aram J, Slopen N, Arria AM, Liu H, Dallal CM. Drug and alcohol use disorders among adults with select disabilities: The national survey on drug use and health. Disabil Health J 2023:101467. [PMID: 37088676 DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2023.101467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deaths caused by drugs and alcohol have reached high levels in the US, and prior research shows a consistent association between disability status and substance misuse. OBJECTIVE Using national data, this study quantifies the association between disability status and drug and alcohol use disorders among US adults. METHODS The most recent pre-pandemic years (2018-2019) of the cross-sectional National Survey on Drug Use and Health (n = 83,439) were used to examine how the presence of any disability, and specific disabilities, were associated with past year drug and alcohol use disorders. Logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) controlling for potential sociodemographic confounders. RESULTS Adults with any disability had increased odds of drug (aOR = 2.7; 95% CI = 2.5-3.0), and alcohol use disorder (aOR = 1.8; 95% CI = 1.6-2.0), compared to adults without disability. Examining specific types of disabilities, adults with cognitive limitations only had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.1; 95% CI = 2.6-3.6), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.2; 95% CI = 1.9-2.5), compared to adults without disability. Smaller associations were observed between vision and complex activity limitations and drug use disorder. Adults with two or more types of limitations had increased odds of drug (aOR = 3.7; 95% CI = 3.3-4.3), and alcohol use disorders (aOR = 2.3; 95% CI = 2.0-2.6). CONCLUSIONS The presence of disability, especially cognitive limitation only, or two or more types of limitations, is associated with elevated odds of drug and alcohol use disorder among US adults. Additional research should examine the temporal relationship between and mechanisms linking disability and substance misuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Aram
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| | - Natalie Slopen
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave. Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Amelia M Arria
- Department of Behavioral & Community Health, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| | - Hongjie Liu
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| | - Cher M Dallal
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of Maryland School of Public Health, 4200 Valley Drive, Suite 2242, University of Maryland College Park, MD 20742, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Predictors of alcohol screening quality in a US general population sample and subgroups of heavy drinkers. Prev Med Rep 2022; 29:101932. [PMID: 36161112 PMCID: PMC9501990 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Revised: 06/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol screening is one of the most cost-effective clinical preventive services and important for intervening in the development of alcohol problems. We examine predictors of the quality of alcohol screening, approximated by alcohol quantity screening, which is a prerequisite for appropriate counseling, and compare conventional regression approach with Classification and Regression Trees (CART). Data come from the 2020 National Alcohol Survey, a population survey of US adults aged 18 years and over. Analyses focus on those reporting any alcohol screening at all (N = 989). The primary outcome was whether a healthcare profession had ever asked how much they drink, which is necessary to identify heavy drinking. We examined 12 potential predictors of alcohol quantity: gender, age, race and ethnicity, education, marital status, having a usual source of primary care, insurance, and health conditions. Analyses were replicated in heavy episodic drinking (HED) and high intensity drinking (HID) subgroups, both warranting alcohol counseling. Logistic regression results show that having diabetes and not having a college degree predict missed alcohol quantity screening in the sample overall, and younger age predicts missed alcohol quantity screening in the HED/HID subgroups. CART identified Black and Hispanic respondents who had not attended college at high risk of missed screening for heavy drinking in the overall sample, and those with public insurance at high risk of missed screening for heavy drinking in the HED/HID subgroups. The quality of alcohol screening needs improvement in general, and to avoid unintended disparities in alcohol-related health services.
Collapse
|
10
|
Nicholson J, Valentine A, Ledingham E, Reif S. Peer Support at the Intersection of Disability and Opioid (Mis)Use: Key Stakeholders Provide Essential Considerations. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:9664. [PMID: 35955019 PMCID: PMC9368223 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Revised: 07/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Individuals with disabilities may experience higher rates of opioid/substance use disorders (OUD/SUD) than other individuals and are likely vulnerable to unmet treatment needs. Peer support may be beneficial to these individuals, given the evidence of benefits in target populations with similar needs and the potential for overcoming barriers to treatment suggested in the available literature. The objective of this exploratory study was to specify essential considerations in adapting peer support for this population. Diverse key stakeholders (n = 16) were interviewed to explore the experiences, needs, and available supports for individuals with disabilities and OUD/SUD. A Peer Support Work Group including members with lived experience advised each component of the study. Semi-structured interview data were content analyzed and memos generated to summarize themes related to the research question. Participants reported extensive professional and personal experience in human services, disability, and recovery. Emergent themes included the importance of accessibility and model fit, the notion of "peerness" and peer match, and essential aspects of peer recruitment, training, and support. An accessible, acceptable, effective model of peer support requires particular attention to the needs of this diverse and varied population, and the contexts in which they are identified, referred, and engaged in services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanne Nicholson
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
| | - Anne Valentine
- Lurie Institute for Disability Policy, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
| | - Emily Ledingham
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
| | - Sharon Reif
- Institute for Behavioral Health, The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02453, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19159187. [PMID: 35954534 PMCID: PMC9367955 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
People with disabilities, who represent a rapidly growing and seriously disadvantaged segment of the U.S. population, face unremitting barriers to equal and accessible healthcare and a high prevalence of chronic health conditions. A slowly growing body of research suggests multiple cancer-related disparities between people with and without disabilities. This commentary identifies multiple aspects of the cancer experience and highlights ways cancer is impacted by disability. This includes vulnerabilities to risk factors, barriers to accessing healthcare, and disparities in screening, diagnosis, and treatment. The authors offer six essential pathways for reducing cancer disparities faced by people with disabilities. It is clear that reducing cancer health disparities experienced by people with disabilities will require the commitment and cooperation of a wide range of stakeholders.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kerr WC, Ye Y, Martinez P, Karriker-Jaffe KJ, Patterson D, Greenfield TK, Mulia N. Longitudinal assessment of drinking changes during the pandemic: The 2021 COVID-19 follow-up study to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2022; 46:1050-1061. [PMID: 35753040 PMCID: PMC9350305 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Background Surveys of changes in drinking during the COVID‐19 pandemic have primarily relied on retrospective self‐report. Further, most such surveys have not included detailed measures of alcohol use patterns, such as beverage‐specific consumption, nor measures of alcohol use disorder (AUD) symptoms that would allow a comprehensive understanding of changes in alcohol use. Methods Data from 1819 completed interviews from the N14C follow‐up survey to the 2019 to 2020 National Alcohol Survey (N14) were conducted between January 30 and March 28, 2021. Questions on alcohol use from the Graduated Frequency series, beverage‐specific quantity and frequency, and DSM‐5 AUD items were asked in both surveys and used to estimate changes from pre‐pandemic drinking to drinking during the pandemic. Analyses focus on changes in these measures over time and comparisons between key subgroups defined by gender, race/ethnicity, and age. Results Key findings include particularly large increases in drinking and AUD for African Americans and women, reduced drinking and heavy drinking prevalence among men and White respondents, and a concentration of increased drinking and AUD among respondents aged 35 to 49. Increases in alcohol use were found to be driven particularly by increases in drinking frequency and the consumption of spirits. Conclusions Results confirm prior findings of overall increases and subgroup‐specific changes, and importantly, provide detailed information on the patterns of change across major socio‐demographic subgroups. Substantial increases in the prevalence of DSM‐5 moderate to severe AUDs are a novel finding that is of particular concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| | - Priscilla Martinez
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| | | | - Deidre Patterson
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| | - Thomas K Greenfield
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| | - Nina Mulia
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reif S, Mitra M. The Complexities of Substance Use Disorder and People with Disabilities: Current Perspectives. Disabil Health J 2022; 15:101285. [DOI: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2022.101285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|