1
|
Pawson M, Kelly BC. Hemp-based psychoactive use and risk among young adults: Trend theory, policy, and regulation beyond legality. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2024; 130:104523. [PMID: 39024688 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/20/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hemp-based psychoactives comprise a burgeoning legal substance market with rising trends in use across the U.S. and Canada as well as parts of Europe. Currently, scant empirical research on the use of these Novel Psychoactive Substances (NPS) exists. By examining policy, market conditions, consumer uptake, and related risks, this research extends theory on drug trends by describing the regulatory environments that shape the emergence and popularity of psychoactive hemp-based products among young adults. METHODS Relying on ethnographic fieldwork of hemp-based markets across 3 U.S. state hemp and cannabis policy contexts as well as in-depth interviews with 40 young adult cannabis consumers recruited across 10 U.S. states, we examined how regulatory conditions shape hemp-based psychoactive markets, trends in their use, and associated risks. RESULTS Young adults are motivated to consume hemp-based psychoactives due to the regulatory and market environments that facilitate the production of highly potent products that are inexpensive and easily accessible. States that regulate hemp-based psychoactives as cannabis, do not provide hemp markets with a competitive advantage and as such see minimal uptake. In the absence of hemp specific policies, substantial variations in product potencies, insufficient dosing information, and unscrupulous product packaging practices may increase related risks. CONCLUSION Trend theory provides insight into the complex relationships that exist between drug policy, markets, and the proliferation of legal highs. Understanding the contextual significance that both market and regulatory conditions have on legal drug production, distribution, and consumption may better inform approaches to reduce the risks commonly associated with novel psychoactive substances like hemp-based psychoactives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Pawson
- Department of Sociology, Purdue University 700 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States.
| | - Brian C Kelly
- Department of Sociology, Purdue University 700 W State St, West Lafayette, IN 47907, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pechmann C'C, Calder D, Timberlake D, Rhee J, Padon A, Silver L. Young adult retail purchases of cannabis, product category preferences and sales trends in California 2018-21: Differences compared with older adults. Addiction 2024. [PMID: 38988183 DOI: 10.1111/add.16617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this study is to identify cannabis products according to their appeal among young adults and measure product sales trends. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective comparative study using point-of-sale data from licensed recreational cannabis retailers that include buyer age with birth year entered by retailers, set in California, USA. Cannabis purchases by young adults (aged 21-24, GenZ) were compared with older adults (age 25+) over 4 years (2018-21). MEASUREMENTS Sales for six cannabis product categories were analyzed using a commercial data set with imputations and a raw data set. Age-appeal metrics were dollar and unit sales to young adults, and dollar and unit share ratios (young adults/older adults), where a share ratio of 100 denotes age-appeal comparability. A product category was considered more young-adult appealing than others if its mean on a metric was at least one standard deviation above the grand mean across all product categories. FINDINGS Flower (cannabis plant material) and vapor pen appealed to young adults based on absolute dollar sales, dominating young-adult spending compared with other cannabis products (37.24 and 31.83%, respectively). Vapor pen and concentrate appealed to young adults based on dollar share ratios of 152, meaning these products comprised a 52% greater share of young-adult cannabis spending relative to older-adult spending (31.83/20.97% and 10.47/6.88%, respectively). Less appealing to young adults were pre-roll, edible/beverage and absorbable products (tincture/sublingual, capsule and topical). Flower showed the largest dollar sales growth (B = +$3.50 million/month), next to vapor pen (B = +$1.55 million/month). Vapor pen tied for highest growth in the percent of product dollars from the largest package size (B = +0.85%/month) and showed the steepest price decline (B = -0.53 price per gram/month). CONCLUSIONS In California, USA, from 2018 to 2021, relative to older adults, young adults spent a greater share of their cannabis dollars on vapor pen and concentrate (products with high potency of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Douglas Calder
- Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - David Timberlake
- Program in Public Health, Susan & Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Joshua Rhee
- Program in Public Health, Susan & Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bijlsma L, Simpson B, Gerber C, van Nuijs ALN, Burgard D. Making waves: Wastewater-based surveillance of cannabis use. WATER RESEARCH 2024; 255:121522. [PMID: 38552484 DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2024.121522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/24/2024]
Abstract
Monitoring cannabis consumption holds great interest due to the increasing trend towards its legalization for both medicinal and recreational purposes, despite the potential risks and harms involved. Wastewater-based surveillance (WBS) offers a valuable tool for assessing shifts and patterns in drug consumption and to evaluate law enforcement strategies and harm reduction programs. However, WBS-derived cannabis use estimates have been linked to greater uncertainties compared to other drugs, in part due to the many different routes of administration and a substantial excretion of metabolites in faecal matter. Therefore, the usual approach for estimating consumed amounts and scaling consumption compared to other problem drugs requires a rethink. This viewpoint highlights the progress made in this area and describes the current existing barriers related to in-sewer and in-sample behaviour (e.g., adsorption/desorption mechanisms), analytical procedures used (e.g., sample preparation), and pharmacokinetic aspects (e.g., administration route) linked to cannabis biomarkers in influent wastewater. These need to be addressed to improve the estimation of cannabis use and reflect spatial and temporal trends in the same way as for other drugs. Until then, we recommend being cautious when interpreting wastewater-based cannabis consumption estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lubertus Bijlsma
- Environmental and Public Health Analytical Chemistry, Research Institute for Pesticides and Water, University Jaume I, E-12071, Castelló, Spain.
| | - Bradley Simpson
- Clinical and Health Sciences, Health and Biomedical Innovation, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | - Cobus Gerber
- Clinical and Health Sciences, Health and Biomedical Innovation, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5000, South Australia, Australia
| | | | - Dan Burgard
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Puget Sound, Tacoma, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borodovsky JT, Hasin DS, Shmulewitz D, Walsh C, Livne O, Aharonovich E, Struble CA, Habib MI, Budney AJ. Typical Hits, Grams, or Joints: Evaluating Cannabis Survey Measurement Strategies for Quantifying Consumption. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2024; 9:646-658. [PMID: 36577020 PMCID: PMC10998027 DOI: 10.1089/can.2022.0237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Standardized survey measures that capture diverse cannabis consumption patterns are needed to inform public health and policy. Our team is developing a flexible, personalized, low-burden survey item inventory to measure cannabis use patterns and estimate milligrams of THC (mgTHC) consumption in large samples. This study aimed to identify measurement gaps and analysis implications associated with an initial pool of candidate items that assessed use of cannabis flower and concentrate products (smoked and/or vaporized). Methods: Adult cannabis consumers (n=4247) completed an online survey assessing cannabis use frequency, quantity, product types, product potencies (%THC), and methods of administration. Participants chose to report their consumption quantities using one of three units: "hits per day," "grams per week," or "joints per week." Respondents also indicated whether their past 7-day consumption pattern represented their typical pattern. Results: Eighty-one percent had used cannabis daily in the past week. Thirty-two percent, 53%, and 15% chose to report flower and concentrate consumption quantity in hits, grams, and joints, respectively. Approximately 80-90% of responses for the number of hits, grams, and joints consumed were less than the maximum response option-suggesting that response options captured the full range of potential cannabis consumption behaviors. Those who chose grams or joints units were generally more likely to endorse higher risk cannabis use (e.g., morning use, high %THC products) in the past week than those who chose the hits unit (adjusted Odds Ratio range: 1.2-3.9). Among those who reported that the past week represented their typical behavior (83%), past 30-day and past 7-day frequencies were highly correlated (Spearman's Rho=0.77)-supporting the feasibility of using lower burden "typical week" items to extrapolate patterns beyond a 1-week time frame. Conclusion: Results from this online convenience sample of frequent cannabis consumers suggest that the current items yield coherent and expected response patterns. Although additional testing is required, a standardized, flexible survey instrument for large-scale assessment of cannabis patterns and calculation of mgTHC seems within reach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob T. Borodovsky
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Deborah S. Hasin
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dvora Shmulewitz
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Claire Walsh
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ofir Livne
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Efrat Aharonovich
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
- New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York, USA
| | - Cara A. Struble
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Mohammad I. Habib
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Alan J. Budney
- Center for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Castro-Navarro I, McGuire MA, Williams JE, Holdsworth EA, Meehan CL, McGuire MK. Maternal Cannabis Use during Lactation and Potential Effects on Human Milk Composition and Production: A Narrative Review. Adv Nutr 2024; 15:100196. [PMID: 38432590 PMCID: PMC10997876 DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Cannabis use has increased sharply in the last 20 y among adults, including reproductive-aged women. Its recent widespread legalization is associated with a decrease in risk perception of cannabis use during breastfeeding. However, the effect of cannabis use (if any) on milk production and milk composition is not known. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge related to maternal cannabis use during breastfeeding and provides an overview of possible pathways whereby cannabis might affect milk composition and production. Several studies have demonstrated that cannabinoids and their metabolites are detectable in human milk produced by mothers who use cannabis. Due to their physicochemical properties, cannabinoids are stored in adipose tissue, can easily reach the mammary gland, and can be secreted in milk. Moreover, cannabinoid receptors are present in adipocytes and mammary epithelial cells. The activation of these receptors directly modulates fatty acid metabolism, potentially causing changes in milk fatty acid profiles. Additionally, the endocannabinoid system is intimately connected to the endocrine system. As such, it is probable that interactions of exogenous cannabinoids with the endocannabinoid system might modify release of critical hormones (e.g., prolactin and dopamine) that regulate milk production and secretion. Nonetheless, few studies have investigated effects of cannabis use (including on milk production and composition) in lactating women. Additional research utilizing robust methodologies are needed to elucidate whether and how cannabis use affects human milk production and composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irma Castro-Navarro
- Margaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States.
| | - Mark A McGuire
- Department of Animal, Veterinary, and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| | - Janet E Williams
- Department of Animal, Veterinary, and Food Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| | | | - Courtney L Meehan
- Department of Anthropology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, United States
| | - Michelle K McGuire
- Margaret Ritchie School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mennis J, Mason MJ, Coatsworth JD, Russell M, Zaharakis NM. Young Adult Depression and Cannabis Use: Associations Before and After Recreational Legalization. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:333-341. [PMID: 37778528 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The co-occurrence of depression with cannabis use worsens both mood and substance use disorder outcomes, with young adults particularly at risk of co-occurrence. This research investigates whether the association of state-level prevalence rates of young adult (age 18-25) depression and cannabis use in the U.S. changed following enactment of recreational (adult use) cannabis legalization between 2008 and 2019. METHODS Annual, state prevalence data on past-year major depressive episode (hereafter, depression) and past-month cannabis use were extracted from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (N=600 state-year observations). Moderated regression models tested whether the association of depression with cannabis use differed before versus after recreational legalization by comparing prevalence rates of depression and cannabis use in states that enacted recreational legalization to those that did not, while fixing state, year, and medical legalization effects. Data were accessed and analyzed in 2023. RESULTS Prevalence rates of both depression and cannabis use increased throughout the study period. The positive statistical effect of depression on cannabis use more than doubled in magnitude after legalization (β=0.564, 95% CI=0.291, 0.838) as compared to before (β=0.229, 95% CI=0.049, 0.409), representing a significant change (β=0.335, 95% CI=0.093, 0.577). CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that the association between prevalence rates of young adult depression and cannabis use strengthened following recreational legalization in the U.S. This is potentially due to increases in cannabis accessibility and the acceptance of the health benefits of cannabis, which may enhance the use of cannabis as a coping mechanism among young adults with depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Mennis
- Department of Geography and Urban Studies, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Michael J Mason
- Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - J Douglas Coatsworth
- Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| | - Michael Russell
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
| | - Nikola M Zaharakis
- Center for Behavioral Health Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guttmannova K, Fleming CB, Rhew IC, Delawalla MLM, Fairlie AM, Larimer ME, Kilmer JR. Changes in Cannabis Use From 2014 to 2019 Among Young Adults in Washington State. Am J Prev Med 2024; 66:252-259. [PMID: 37793557 PMCID: PMC10842380 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2023.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Understanding changes in cannabis use in the legalized nonmedical cannabis context is critical. Washington State, one the earliest states to implement legalization, presents a unique opportunity to examine how cannabis use and its consequences changed after the implementation of legalization for adults. With a focus on Washington State young adults, this study conducted in 2022-2023 examined changes in (1) cannabis use by sex and age, (2) preferred mode of use, and (3) cannabis use disorder symptoms. METHODS Using repeated cross-sectional data on young adults aged 18-25 years in Washington State from 2014 (premarket opening) to 2019 (N=12,945), logistic regression models assessed trends over time in the prevalence of any and frequent (20+ days) past-month cannabis use. Among individuals reporting use, multinomial logistic regressions estimated trends over time in the preferred mode of use and negative binomial regressions examined trends in the count of cannabis use disorder symptoms. RESULTS From 2014 to 2019, the prevalence of cannabis use converged by sex, with females being equally likely as males to report both any and frequent use by 2019. Among young adults reporting past-month use, smoking as the preferred mode of use decreased relative to other modes. Number of cannabis use disorder symptoms reported increased, which was not accounted for by changes in preferred mode of use. CONCLUSIONS During the 5-year period following the implementation of legalization, patterns of young adult cannabis use shifted, including particularly sharp increases among females and increases in cannabis use disorder symptoms. Future studies should investigate underlying causes for these important changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarina Guttmannova
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
| | - Charles B Fleming
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Isaac C Rhew
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Miranda L M Delawalla
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anne M Fairlie
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mary E Larimer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Jason R Kilmer
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Vaziri S, McGarry ME, Huang CY, Cuneo AA, Willen SM, Iwanaga K, Neemuchwala F, Gibb ER, Chan M, Ly NP. Time to be blunt: Substance use in cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2024. [PMID: 38251844 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the population of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) continues to age, attention is shifting towards addressing the unique challenges teenagers and adults face, including substance use. Changing attitudes and legality regarding marijuana and cannabidiol (CBD) may influence their use among pwCF, but data on the rate of use, reasons for use, and administration methods are lacking. OBJECTIVE Investigate marijuana, CBD, e-cigarette, and cigarette usage among pwCF and explore differences in demographics, disease severity, and cystic fibrosis transmembrane receptor (CFTR) modulator use between recent users and nonusers. METHODS This cross-sectional study used a one-time electronic survey to assess marijuana, CBD, e-cigarette, and cigarette use in pwCF aged >13 years. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between recent users and nonusers. The association between recent substance use and CFTR modulator use was analyzed using logistic regressions. RESULTS Among 226 participants, 29% used marijuana, 22% used CBD, 27% used e-cigarettes, and 22% used cigarettes in the last 12 months. Users of all substances were more likely to be college-educated or aged 29-39 years than nonusers. E-cigarette users were 2.9 times more likely to use CFTR modulators (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.98-11.00, p = .08) and marijuana users were 2.5 times more likely to use CFTR modulators compared to nonusers, adjusted for confounders. CBD, e-cigarettes, and cigarettes users were more likely to have an abnormal mental health screen compared to nonusers. A high proportion of never-users of marijuana and CBD expressed interest in using. CONCLUSION Substance use is more prevalent among pwCF than previously reported and needs to be addressed by healthcare providers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanaz Vaziri
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Meghan E McGarry
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Chiung-Yu Huang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Addison A Cuneo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Shaina M Willen
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA
| | - Kensho Iwanaga
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Fatima Neemuchwala
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth R Gibb
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Marilynn Chan
- Department of Pediatrics, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California, USA
| | - Ngoc P Ly
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Skumlien M, Craft S. Commentary on Allaf et al.: Comparing countries with different legal cannabis markets can inform on the impact of regulating product type and potency. Addiction 2023; 118:2275-2276. [PMID: 37544881 PMCID: PMC10952587 DOI: 10.1111/add.16312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Martine Skumlien
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of PsychologyUniversity of BathBathUK
| | - Sam Craft
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of PsychologyUniversity of BathBathUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Wadsworth E, Driezen P, Pacula RL, Kilmer B, Hammond D. Prices and Purchase Sources for Dried Cannabis Flower in the United States, 2019-2020. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res 2023; 8:923-932. [PMID: 35363550 DOI: 10.1089/can.2021.0232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The price of cannabis has major implications for public health, public safety, social equity, and government revenues. This article examines prices and sources of purchased dried cannabis flower among consumers facing different state laws in the United States. Methods: Repeat cross-sectional survey data were collected from the International Cannabis Policy Study in 2019 and 2020. U.S. respondents were recruited through online commercial panels, ages 16-65, and purchased dried flower in the past year (n=9766). Weighted binary logistic regression models examined legal purchasing in states that had legalized recreational cannabis. Results: Compared with respondents in states with recreational stores, respondents living in "illegal," "medical," and "recreational" states without stores were associated with paying a higher unit price of dried flower (+20.5%, +23.6%, +27.4%, respectively; all p<0.05). The majority of respondents in states with recreational stores last purchased from stores/dispensaries (2019: 66.6%; 2020: 62.0%) and the odds of purchasing legally was greater with each additional year after stores opened (adjusted odds ratio=1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.37, 1.60). Conclusions: Cannabis prices and purchase behaviors are strongly influenced by its legal status and presence of stores. After states legalize for recreational purposes, it takes multiple years for the legal market to become established as the number of retail stores increase and prices decrease. The findings demonstrate that consumers use sources that they are legally allowed to access, suggesting an increased number of physical retail stores and online delivery services could expand uptake of legal sources in states with recreational cannabis laws.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elle Wadsworth
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Pete Driezen
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
- Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
- Sol Price School of Public Policy and Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Beau Kilmer
- RAND Drug Policy Research Center, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California, USA
| | - David Hammond
- School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dilley JA, Johnson JK, Colby AM, Sheehy TJ, Muse EJ, Filley JR, Segawa MB, Schauer GL, Kilmer B. Cannabis Retail Market Indicators in Five Legal States in the United States: A Public Health Perspective. Clin Ther 2023; 45:778-786. [PMID: 37455228 PMCID: PMC10521148 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2023.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adult-use cannabis markets are operating in multiple US states and abroad. Sales and licensing data for alcohol and tobacco are often used to understand consumption patterns and evaluate policy changes. Cannabis market data may provide similar insights, although these newly legal markets are complex and evolving, and the state data structures can differ. This study describes variations in market indicators and discusses the utility of cannabis market metrics from a public health perspective. METHODS We collected data from 5 early-adopting adult-use cannabis states: Alaska, Colorado, Massachusetts, Oregon, and Washington. Analyses focused on licensed retail outlets and retail sales revenues (pretax). Monthly data were collected from the opening of each state's adult-use market through June 2022. Joinpoint software was used to assess state trends and identify points of inflection in trends. Average sales per retailer for June 2019 and June 2022 were compared. Also described are retailers and revenue per population for 2022. FINDINGS All states showed 4 distinct periods of growth in retail licensee numbers. The greatest increases typically occurred in the first 3 to 4 months. Growth rates slowed to <1% per month for Colorado, Oregon, and Washington at months 25, 24, and 34, respectively. The number of cannabis retailers per 100,000 residents in June 2022 ranged widely, from 16.8 in Oregon to 3.0 in Massachusetts. Colorado, Oregon, and Washington each showed 4 distinct trend periods in adult-use retail sales: early rapid growth lasting <1 year, subsequent varied growth periods, and then declining sales in the most recent months, following early coronavirus disease 2019 period increases. Sales in Alaska and Massachusetts displayed more stable, consistent growth patterns. Sales per state resident for July 2021 to June 2022 also ranged widely, from $382.97 in Alaska to $180.94 in Washington. IMPLICATIONS We found some consistencies and some variations in both point-in-time measures and trends in states' adult-use cannabis markets. Differences may relate to varied state policies and general contexts (eg, economies). Market data can be useful for public health monitoring, including understanding the effects of policies intended to protect health and safety. States providing publicly accessible cannabis market data create opportunities for such use. Our results underscore the importance of considering individual state regulatory frameworks and implementation timelines in studies of cannabis legalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia A Dilley
- Program Design and Evaluation Services (PDES), Multnomah County Health Department and Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon, USA.
| | - Julie K Johnson
- Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (CCC), Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander M Colby
- Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission (CCC), Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas J Sheehy
- Oregon Liquor and Cannabis Commission (OLCC), Milwaukie, Oregon, USA
| | - Eliza J Muse
- Alaska Department of Health, Anchorage, Alaska, USA
| | | | - Mary B Segawa
- Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board (WSLCB), Olympia, Washington, USA
| | - Gillian L Schauer
- The Cannabis Regulators Association (CANNRA), Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Beau Kilmer
- RAND Drug Policy Research Center, Santa Monica, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Panchalingam T, Cooper M, Shang C, Shi Y. Behavioral economic relationship between cannabis flower and concentrates: Evidence from simulated purchase tasks. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol 2023; 31:694-703. [PMID: 36355683 PMCID: PMC10169544 DOI: 10.1037/pha0000618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Cannabis users use different forms of cannabis, which are associated with distinct public health concerns. Policies that aim to regulate one specific form may have unintended impacts on other forms. This study examined the behavioral economic relationship between flower and concentrates, the two most common forms of cannabis. We surveyed 605 adult cannabis users (21+) who lived in one of the U.S. states that had legalized recreational cannabis by the time of interview in 2019. The participants completed simulated purchase tasks, which asked how much cannabis flower and concentrates they would purchase in the next 30 days at escalating prices. We estimated (a) demand indices and own-price elasticities using nonlinear exponential demand models and (b) group- and individual-level cross-price elasticities using log-linear demand models. The estimated rate of change in demand elasticity (α) was 0.00066 for cannabis flower (SE = 0.00002, p < .001) and 0.00058 for cannabis concentrate (SE = 0.00002, p < .001). Group-level cross-price elasticity estimate (slope = -0.075, SE = 0.0135, p < .001) indicated that cannabis flower and concentrates were weak complements. Individual-level cross-price elasticity estimates showed that flower and concentrates were treated as independent by 76.2% of the users, as complements by 19.0% of the users, and as substitutes by 4.8% of the users. The findings suggested that cannabis flower and concentrates were overall weak complements and for most adult cannabis users were treated as independent of each other. Price and tax policies regulating either cannabis form may have minimal impacts on the other form. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thadchaigeni Panchalingam
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego. 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Michael Cooper
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego. 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Ce Shang
- Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University. 281 W Lane Ave, Columbus, OH 43120, USA
| | - Yuyan Shi
- Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego. 9500 Gilman Dr., La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cuttler C, Petrucci AS, LaFrance EM. Cognitive test performance in chronic cannabis flower users, concentrate users, and non-users. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8068. [PMID: 37202444 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-35217-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Extremely high-potency cannabis concentrates are becoming increasingly available and popular among consumers. While prior research indicates these products are perceived to have greater detrimental effects relative to cannabis flower, few studies have examined their relative objective effects, and no existing studies have compared the cognitive test performance of sober flower users, concentrate users, and non-users. A total of 198 healthy adults (98 non-users, 46 exclusive flower users, and 54 concentrate users) were administered a battery of tests of memory, psychomotor speed, attention, and executive functioning under sober laboratory-controlled conditions. Significant group differences were detected on tests of verbal free recall and episodic prospective memory, with both the flower users and concentrate users demonstrating significantly worse performance than non-users. Concentrate (but not flower) users performed worse than non-users on a measure of source memory, but contrary to our hypothesis, there were no significant differences between flower and concentrate users on any of the cognitive tests. Results indicate that, under sober conditions, individuals who regularly use concentrates are no more cognitively impacted than those who exclusively use flower. These null findings may reflect the tendency for concentrate users to self-titrate and use significantly lower quantities of concentrates than flower.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie Cuttler
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA.
| | - Aria S Petrucci
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA
| | - Emily M LaFrance
- Department of Psychology, Washington State University, PO Box 644820, Pullman, WA, 99164-4820, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Han J, Ng’ombe JN. The supply-side effects of cannabis legalization. J Cannabis Res 2022; 4:40. [PMID: 35864509 PMCID: PMC9306049 DOI: 10.1186/s42238-022-00148-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The purpose of this study is to examine how cannabis legalization and corresponding taxation would affect the supply-side of the cannabis market. Specifically, the study considers various scenarios in which Oklahoma legalizes recreational cannabis for adult use and simulates changes in state-level market sales for other legal states and the average grower profits in Oklahoma. We assume that legalizing recreational cannabis in medical-only states would significantly increase the demand quantity in the legalized states and the local government would levy a significant level of tax on recreational cannabis. These assumptions are based on the post-legalization phenomena in other legalized US states. Method We simulate outcomes in the cannabis industry under the assumption of representative consumers with constant elasticity of substitution demand behavior and profit-maximizing firms with a Cobb-Douglas profit function. All agents are assumed to take exogenous prices as given. We calibrate the model using state-level sales data from 2020 and explore potential policies in Oklahoma and at the federal level. Results We find that, under the scenarios we consider, legalization of recreational cannabis in Oklahoma would lead to a decrease in the quantity of cannabis sold in Oklahoma’s medical cannabis market as well as decreases in the quantity of cannabis sold in other states on average. Furthermore, we find that as the excise tax rate on recreational cannabis in Oklahoma is increased, the demand quantity in recreational cannabis market would decrease while the other markets’ demand quantity would increase on average. As the elasticity of substitution between state-level products increases, the overall demand quantity would increase and the market quantity across states become more sensitive to Oklahoma’s tax policies. This pattern could become starker as the elasticity of substitution between recreational and medical cannabis increases. In terms of profit, heavy taxation and price decrease due to legalization would significantly decrease cannabis producers’ production and profit levels unless the cost reduction strategies complement legalization. Conclusion Based on our results, the legalization of recreational cannabis has the potential to generate tax revenue to fund critical government projects and services. However, such legalization would have to be done carefully because heavy excise taxes would decrease the legal cannabis market demand and growers’ profit, which would incentivize producers and consumers to move to the illicit cannabis market. Policymakers would have to compromise between the levels of interstate transportation and taxation to ensure that cannabis suppliers also realize some profit within the cannabis supply chain.
Collapse
|
15
|
Does cannabidiol make cannabis safer? A randomised, double-blind, cross-over trial of cannabis with four different CBD:THC ratios. Neuropsychopharmacology 2022; 48:869-876. [PMID: 36380220 PMCID: PMC10156730 DOI: 10.1038/s41386-022-01478-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
As countries adopt more permissive cannabis policies, it is increasingly important to identify strategies that can reduce the harmful effects of cannabis use. This study aimed to determine if increasing the CBD content of cannabis can reduce its harmful effects. Forty-six healthy, infrequent cannabis users participated in a double-blind, within-subject, randomised trial of cannabis preparations varying in CBD content. There was an initial baseline visit followed by four drug administration visits, in which participants inhaled vaporised cannabis containing 10 mg THC and either 0 mg (0:1 CBD:THC), 10 mg (1:1), 20 mg (2:1), or 30 mg (3:1) CBD, in a randomised, counter-balanced order. The primary outcome was change in delayed verbal recall on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Task. Secondary outcomes included change in severity of psychotic symptoms (e.g., Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] positive subscale), plus further cognitive, subjective, pleasurable, pharmacological and physiological effects. Serial plasma concentrations of THC and CBD were measured. THC (0:1) was associated with impaired delayed verbal recall (t(45) = 3.399, d = 0.50, p = 0.001) and induced positive psychotic symptoms on the PANSS (t(45) = -4.709, d = 0.69, p = 2.41 × 10-5). These effects were not significantly modulated by any dose of CBD. Furthermore, there was no evidence of CBD modulating the effects of THC on other cognitive, psychotic, subjective, pleasurable, and physiological measures. There was a dose-response relationship between CBD dose and plasma CBD concentration, with no effect on plasma THC concentrations. At CBD:THC ratios most common in medicinal and recreational cannabis products, we found no evidence that CBD protects against the acute adverse effects of cannabis. This should be considered in health policy and safety decisions about medicinal and recreational cannabis.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kerr WC, Ye Y. Characteristics of the Washington cannabis market from 2014 to 2016. J Cannabis Res 2022; 4:35. [PMID: 35788247 PMCID: PMC9251922 DOI: 10.1186/s42238-022-00147-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The state of Washington legalized cannabis for adult use in 2012 and retail stores began to open in 2014. While details of the legal market have been tracked by the state, the total market for cannabis and characteristics of purchasers can only be identified through surveys. METHODS Six cross-sectional samples of the Privatization of Spirits in Washington (PSW) surveys were collected between January 2014 and October 2016 with two in each year. Random digit dial procedures were used to recruit a sample aged 18 and older, with 40% of cases from mobile phones. A total of 5492 respondents participated. Analyses of the population-weighted sample utilized purchasing amounts and frequencies, use frequency and related measures to estimate total and mean amounts and expenditures. Sensitivity analyses were conducted for key assumptions. RESULTS The market for cannabis flower is estimated to have increased from 158 metric tons and $1.23 billion in 2014 to 222 metric tons and $1.7 billion in 2016, with little change from 2014 to 2015. Purchases from legal sources, retail and dispensaries, were estimated at 69% of the total market. Daily or near daily (DND) users accounted for about 83% of sales in 2014, rising to 91% in 2016. The prevalence of past year use rose substantially from 25% in 2014 to 32% in 2016, with DND use rising from 10.2 to 11.3%. Average purchase amounts for DND users rose from 291 g in 2014 to 374 g in 2016, while mean amounts among non-DND users declined from 78 to 28.6 g. CONCLUSIONS The expansion of retail cannabis stores in Washington appears to have led to increased market size in 2016 with all of the increase attributed to DND users. Frequent users may be important to consider in legalization evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C. Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dobbins M, Rakkar M, Cunnane K, Pennypacker SD, Wagoner KG, Reboussin BA, Romero-Sandoval EA. Association of Tetrahydrocannabinol Content and Price in Herbal Cannabis Products Offered by Dispensaries in California: A Purview of Consumers/Patients. Front Public Health 2022; 10:893009. [PMID: 35784239 PMCID: PMC9247604 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and AimsThe U.S. legal cannabis market is saturated with products containing high levels of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), with no distinction between medical and recreational programs. This omnipresence of potent cannabis products seems to be driven by the recreational realm, where cannabis with the highest THC content is prized. This prevalence of highly potent cannabis is conveyed to medical programs, which places consumers (patients) at higher risk for over consumption and cannabis use disorder. Thus, understanding what factors influence the market that patients face in medical cannabis programs could shed light on the risks of legal cannabis. The supply and demand dynamic of the US for-profit cannabis market could explain the current market composition; therefore, we postulate that a financial gain could influence the perpetuation of the prevalence of high THC products in legal cannabis dispensaries. We investigate whether THC content in popular cannabis products correlates with higher prices and assess whether some attributes (type of product, chemovars, or presence of cannabidiol (CBD) affect the association of THC with price.MethodsWe focus on the world's largest cannabis market, California. We randomly selected dispensaries across the state, screened for a web presence and product menu, determined the most prevalent product type, and collected THC and CBD concentration, price, and other product attributes.ResultsWe observed that herbal products were more common, they had THC concentrations greater than 10%, and THC concentrations positively correlated with price. This correlation existed in flower and preroll presentations, all chemovar, and independently of the level of CBD. CBD did not correlate with price; however, the presence of CBD diminished the THC and price correlation particularly in products with high THC (>15%).ConclusionsOverall, highly potent herbal cannabis products (>15% THC) are the majority of products offered and more expensive regardless of product type or chemovar in California dispensaries, suggesting that a financial gain contributes to the current market composition. Efforts to limit the availability of highly potent THC products and educate consumers about potential harms are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- MaryBeth Dobbins
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Mannat Rakkar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Katharine Cunnane
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Sarah D. Pennypacker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Kimberly G. Wagoner
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Beth A. Reboussin
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - E. Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- *Correspondence: E. Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pennypacker SD, Cunnane K, Cash MC, Romero-Sandoval EA. Potency and Therapeutic THC and CBD Ratios: U.S. Cannabis Markets Overshoot. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:921493. [PMID: 35734402 PMCID: PMC9207456 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.921493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims: The effects exuded by cannabis are a result of the cannabinoids trans-Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), and is dependent upon their pharmacological interaction and linked to the two cannabinoids’ concentrations and ratios. Based on current literature and trends of increasing cannabis potency, we postulate that most medical cannabis products with THC and CBD have ratios capable of producing significant acute intoxication and are similar to recreational products. We will test this by organizing products into clinically distinct categories according to TCH:CBD ratios, evaluating the data in terms of therapeutic potential, and comparing the data obtained from medical and recreational programs and from states with differing market policies. Methods: We utilized data encompassing online herbal dispensary product offerings from nine U.S. states. The products were analyzed after being divided into four clinically significant THC:CBD ratio categories identified based on the literature: CBD can enhance THC effects (THC:CBD ratios ≥1:1), CBD has no significant effect on THC effects (ratios ∼ 1:2), CBD can either have no effect or can mitigate THC effects (ratios 1:>2 < 6), or CBD is protective against THC effects (ratios ≤1:6). Results: A significant number of products (58.5%) did not contain any information on CBD content. Across all states sampled, the majority (72–100%) of both medical and recreational products with CBD (>0%) fall into the most intoxicating ratio category (≥1:1 THC:CBD), with CBD likely enhancing THC’s acute effects. The least intoxicating categories (1:>2 < 6 and ≤1:6 THC:CBD) provided the smallest number of products. Similarly, the majority of products without CBD (0%) contained highly potent amounts of THC (>15%). These results were consistent, regardless of differing market policies in place. Conclusions: Despite the distinct goals of medical and recreational cannabis users, medical and recreational program product offerings are nearly identical. Patients seeking therapeutic benefits from herbal cannabis products are therefore at a substantial risk of unwanted side effects, regardless of whether they obtain products from medical or recreational programs. Efforts are needed to better inform patients of the risks associated with high potency cannabis and the interaction between THC and CBD, and to help shape policies that promote more therapeutic options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah D Pennypacker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Katharine Cunnane
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - Mary Catherine Cash
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
- Department of Pharmacy, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | - E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain Mechanisms Laboratory, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Padwa H, Huang D, Mooney L, Grella CE, Urada D, Bell DS, Bass B, Boustead AE. Medical conditions of primary care patients with documented cannabis use and cannabis use disorder in electronic health records: a case control study from an academic health system in a medical marijuana state. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:36. [PMID: 35527269 PMCID: PMC9080201 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-022-00467-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 3.8% of adults worldwide have used cannabis in the past year. Understanding how cannabis use is associated with other health conditions is crucial for healthcare providers seeking to understand the needs of their patients, and for health policymakers. This paper analyzes the relationship between documented cannabis use disorders (CUD), cannabis use (CU) and other health diagnoses among primary care patients during a time when medical use of marijuana was permitted by state law in California, United States of America. METHODS The study utilized primary care electronic health record (EHR) data from an academic health system, using a case-control design to compare diagnoses among individuals with CUD/CU to those of matched controls, and those of individuals with CUD diagnoses with individuals who had CU otherwise documented. Associations of documented CU and CUD with general medical conditions and health conditions associated with cannabis use (both medical and behavioral) were analyzed using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS Of 1,047,463 patients with ambulatory encounters from 2013-2017, 729 (0.06%) had CUD diagnoses and 3,731 (0.36%) had CU documented in their EHR. Patients with documented CUD and CU patients had significantly (p < 0.01) higher odds of most medical and behavioral diagnoses analyzed. Compared to matched controls, CUD-documented patients had highest odds of other substance use disorders (OR = 21.44: 95% CI 9.43-48.73), any mental health disorder (OR = 6.99; 95% CI 5.03-9.70) social anxiety disorder (OR = 13.03; 95% CI 2.18-77.94), HIV/AIDS (OR = 7.88: 95% CI 2.58-24.08), post-traumatic stress disorder (OR = 7.74: 95% CI 2.66-22.51); depression (OR = 7.01: 95% CI 4,79-10.27), and bipolar disorder (OR = 6.49: 95% CI 2.90-14.52). Compared to matched controls, CU-documented patients had highest odds of other substance use disorders (OR = 3.64; 95% CI 2.53-5.25) and post-traumatic stress disorder (OR = 3.41; 95% CI 2.53-5.25). CUD-documented patients were significantly more likely than CU-documented patients to have HIV/AIDS (OR = 6.70; 95% CI 2.10-21.39), other substance use disorder (OR = 5.88; 95% CI 2.42-14.22), depression (OR = 2.85; 95% CI 1.90-4.26), and anxiety (OR = 2.19: 95% CI 1.57-3.05) diagnoses. CONCLUSION The prevalence of CUD and CU notation in EHR data from an academic health system was low, highlighting the need for improved screening in primary care. CUD and CU documentation were associated with increased risk for many health conditions, with the most elevated risk for behavioral health disorders and HIV/AIDS (among CUD-documented, but not CU-documented patients). Given the strong associations of CUD and CU documentation with health problems, it is important for healthcare providers to be prepared to identify CU and CUD, discuss the pros and cons of cannabis use with patients thoughtfully and empathically, and address cannabis-related comorbidities among these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Padwa
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA.
| | - David Huang
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - Larissa Mooney
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - Christine E Grella
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - Darren Urada
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - Douglas S Bell
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
- Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, USA
| | - Brittany Bass
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California, 11075 Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 200, Los Angeles, CA, 90025, USA
| | - Anne E Boustead
- School of Government & Public Policy, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ilan Y. Digital Medical Cannabis as Market Differentiator: Second-Generation Artificial Intelligence Systems to Improve Response. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:788777. [PMID: 35141242 PMCID: PMC8818992 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.788777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Legalized use of cannabis products and the rising interest in their therapeutic benefits have opened up new opportunities for therapy and marketing. However, the marked variability in formulations, administration modes, therapeutic regimens, and inter- and intra-subject responses make the standardization of medical cannabis-based regimens difficult. Legalization has made the cannabis market highly competitive and lowered the revenue margins. This study reviews some of the challenges in medical cannabis use and difficulties in standardizing its therapeutic regimens that hinder maximizing its beneficial effects. The development of tolerance toward cannabis and low adherence to chronic administration further impair its long-term beneficial effects. Digital medical cannabis is a cannabis product controlled by a second-generation artificial intelligence (AI) system that improves patient responses by increasing adherence and dealing with tolerance. Second-generation AI systems focus on a single patient's outcome and deal with the inter- and intra-subject variability in responses. The use of digital medical cannabis is expected to improve product standardization, maximize therapeutic benefits, reduce health care costs, and increase the revenue of companies. Digital medical cannabis offers several market differentiators for cannabis companies. This study presents a model for promoting the use of digital medical cannabis and presents its advantages for patients, clinicians, health care authorities, insurance companies, and cannabis manufacturers. Ongoing trials and real-world data on the use of these systems further support the use of digital medical cannabis for improved global health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yaron Ilan
- Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
- Department of Medicine, Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
- *Correspondence: Yaron Ilan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Meinhofer A, Rubli A. Illegal drug market responses to state recreational cannabis laws. Addiction 2021; 116:3433-3443. [PMID: 33998087 PMCID: PMC8578142 DOI: 10.1111/add.15517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In the United States, 15 states and the District of Columbia have implemented recreational cannabis laws (RCLs) legalizing recreational cannabis use. We aimed to estimate the association between RCLs and street prices, potency, quality and law enforcement seizures of illegal cannabis, methamphetamine, cocaine, heroin, oxycodone, hydrocodone, morphine, amphetamine and alprazolam. DESIGN We pooled crowdsourced data from 2010-19 Price of Weed and 2010-19 StreetRx, and administrative data from the 2006-19 System to Retrieve Information from Drug Evidence (STRIDE) and the 2007-19 National Forensic Laboratory Information System (NFLIS). We employed a difference-in-differences design that exploited the staggered implementation of RCLs to compare changes in outcomes between RCL and non-RCL states. SETTING AND CASES Eleven RCL and 40 non-RCL US states. MEASURES The primary outcome was the natural log of prices per gram, overall and by self-reported quality. The primary policy was an indicator of RCL implementation, defined using effective dates. FINDINGS The street price of cannabis decreased by 9.2% [β = -0.092; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.15-, -0.03] in RCL states after RCL implementation, with largest declines among low-quality purchases (β = -0.195; 95% CI = -0.282, -0.108). Price declines were accompanied by a 93% (β = -0.93; 95% CI = -1.51, -0.36) reduction in law enforcement seizures of cannabis in RCL states. Among illegal opioids, including heroin, oxycodone and hydrocodone, street prices increased and law enforcement seizures decreased in RCL states. CONCLUSIONS Recreational cannabis laws in US states appear to be associated with illegal drug market responses in those states, including reductions in the street price of cannabis. Changes in the street prices of illegal opioids analyzed may suggest that in states with recreational cannabis laws the markets for other illegal drugs are not independent of legal cannabis market regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angélica Meinhofer
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, United States
| | - Adrian Rubli
- Department of Business Administration, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México (ITAM), Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pacula RL, Blanchette JG, Lira MC, Smart R, Naimi TS. Current U.S. State Cannabis Sales Limits Allow Large Doses for Use or Diversion. Am J Prev Med 2021; 60:701-705. [PMID: 33589301 PMCID: PMC8068584 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Legal limits on the amount of cannabis sold per transaction in states with recreational cannabis may promote moderate use and limit diversion. However, state sales limits are heterogeneous and difficult to interpret in terms of tetrahydrocannabinol dose equivalents. METHODS This cross-sectional study examined how transaction sales limits on recreational cannabis translate to tetrahydrocannabinol doses among U.S. states allowing commercial cannabis sales as of January 1, 2020. Weight-based quantity limits by cannabis type (flower/bud, concentrates, and edibles) were converted into grams of tetrahydrocannabinol content per transaction using known potency values in 2020. RESULTS Weight-based sales limits for flower and concentrate vary considerably across states (range=1.0-2.5 oz for flower and 3.5-15.0 g for concentrate), whereas limits for edible cannabis are heterogeneous. A total of 4 states have independent limits for each product category, and 6 states place limits across all products sold in the transaction. Because no states impose limits on the potency of flower or concentrates, the small differences in the weight-based limits translate into large differences in grams of tetrahydrocannabinol allowed to be sold. Assuming a typical dose of 10 mg of tetrahydrocannabinol, current laws allow for sales of up to 560 (Alaska) to 2,283 (Michigan) doses per transaction on the basis of median product potencies. CONCLUSIONS All states allow a large number of tetrahydrocannabinol doses per transaction, larger than what is typically consumed by daily users over a month. States concerned about public health and diversion should consider reducing sales limits and basing them on total tetrahydrocannabinol content across all purchased products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Price School of Public Policy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
| | - Jason G Blanchette
- Department of Health Law, Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Marlene C Lira
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Timothy S Naimi
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Community Health Sciences, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pacula RL. The need to more effectively regulate END markets: A primary public health lesson of the U.S. vaping associated lung injury outbreak. Addiction 2021; 116:994-995. [PMID: 32754924 PMCID: PMC9273308 DOI: 10.1111/add.15179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalie Liccardo Pacula
- Department of Health Policy and Management, USC Price School of Public Policy Senior Fellow, USC Leonard D. Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic Research
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Effects of daily Δ 9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) alone or combined with cannabidiol (CBD) on cognition-based behavior and activity in adolescent nonhuman primates. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 221:108629. [PMID: 33640678 PMCID: PMC8204682 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 02/06/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Daily use of marijuana is rising in adolescents, along with consumption of high potency marijuana products (high % Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol or THC). These dual, related trends have opened gaps in understanding the long-term effects of daily consumption of a high dose of THC in adolescents and whether a therapeutic dose of cannabidiol (CBD) modulates THC effects. METHODS Adolescent squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis) were treated daily for four months with vehicle (n = 4), a high THC dose (1 mg/kg i.m.; n = 4), or THC + CBD (1 mg/kg +3 mg/kg i.m.; n = 4), to investigate whether: (1) a daily high THC dose affects performance in tasks of cognition (repeated acquisition, discrimination reversal); (2) a daily high THC dose affects spontaneous behavior and day/night activity (3) tolerance develops to the behavioral effects of THC; (4) whether CBD modulates THC effects. RESULTS THC impaired performance of adolescent monkeys in a cognitive test initially, but not performance on a task of cognitive flexibility. THC reduced motor activity and increased sedentary behavior, with tolerance developing after weeks of daily treatment. Co-administered with THC, CBD did not modulate THC effects on cognitive performance, activity or tolerance, but prevented THC-induced emesis on the first day of daily treatment. CONCLUSIONS Daily high dosing with THC compromised performance on a task of cognition, and reduced activity in adolescent primates, with tolerance developing within weeks. Whether our observations are relevant to a broader range of cognitive tasks vital for daily function in human adolescents is uncertain.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wilkins C, Rychert M. Assessing New Zealand's Cannabis Legalization and Control Bill: prospects and challenges. Addiction 2021; 116:222-230. [PMID: 32621400 DOI: 10.1111/add.15144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few countries have developed detailed legislative proposals for legalizing cannabis. New Zealand recently released the Cannabis Legalization and Control Bill (CLCB) that will be the subject of a referendum in September 2020. AIMS To assess the CLCB, drawing on emerging evidence from cannabis legalization overseas, public health research on alcohol and tobacco and the attempt to establish a regulated market for 'legal highs' in New Zealand. DISCUSSION The CLCB proposes a strictly regulated commercial cannabis market that resembles the Canadian approach, but notably without on-line sales or regional heterogeneity in retail distribution. The objective of the CLCB of lowering cannabis use over time appears at odds with the largely commercial cannabis sector that will focus on expanding sales. The CLCB includes provision for home cultivation and social benefit operators, but it is not clear what priority these operators will receive. A potency cap of 15% tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for cannabis plants is included, and this is at the high end of black-market cannabis. The proposed progressive product tax based on THC will be challenging to implement. There is no formal minimum price, but rather discretionary powers to raise the excise if the price drops too much. The CLCB includes a comprehensive ban on advertising, but non-conventional on-line promotion will be difficult to suppress. The central government cannabis authority is tasked with developing local retail outlet policies. We caution against the temptation to employ an interim regulatory regime following a positive referendum result, because a partially regulated market will expose users to health risks and undermine public support. CONCLUSIONS New Zealand's Cannabis Legalization and Control Bill's objective of reducing cannabis use via a commercial market will be challenging to achieve. The bill could be strengthened with formal minimum pricing, lower potency cap and greater clarity concerning social benefit operators and the role of local government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chris Wilkins
- SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, P.O. Box 6137, Victoria Street West, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| | - Marta Rychert
- SHORE & Whariki Research Centre, Massey University, P.O. Box 6137, Victoria Street West, Auckland, 1142, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Freeman TP, Lynskey MT. Minimum THC unit pricing: an opportunity for harm reduction. Addiction 2021; 116:232-233. [PMID: 33073421 DOI: 10.1111/add.15264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tom P Freeman
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK
| | - Michael T Lynskey
- National Addiction Centre, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Morel A, Lebard P, Dereux A, Azuar J, Questel F, Bellivier F, Marie-Claire C, Fatséas M, Vorspan F, Bloch V. Clinical Trials of Cannabidiol for Substance Use Disorders: Outcome Measures, Surrogate Endpoints, and Biomarkers. Front Psychiatry 2021; 12:565617. [PMID: 33692705 PMCID: PMC7937926 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.565617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cannabidiol (CBD) is a cannabinoid of potential interest for the treatment of substance use disorders. Our aim was to review the outcome measures, surrogate endpoints, and biomarkers in published and ongoing randomized clinical trials. Methods: We conducted a search in PubMed, Web of Science, PMC, PsycINFO, EMBASE, CENTRAL Cochrane Library, "clinicalTrials.gov," "clinicaltrialsregister.eu," and "anzctr.org.au" for published and ongoing studies. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) examining the use of CBD alone or in association with other cannabinoids, in all substance use disorders. The included studies were analyzed in detail and their qualities assessed by a standardized tool (CONSORT 2010). A short description of excluded studies, consisting in controlled short-term or single administration in non-treatment-seeking drug users, is provided. Findings: The screening retrieved 207 published studies, including only 3 RCTs in cannabis use disorder. Furthermore, 12 excluded studies in cannabis, tobacco, and opioid use disorders are described. Interpretation: Primary outcomes were validated withdrawal symptoms scales and drug use reduction in the three RCTs. In the short-term or crossover studies, the outcome measures were visual analog scales for subjective states; self-rated scales for withdrawal, craving, anxiety, or psychotomimetic symptoms; and laboratory tasks of drug-induced craving, effort expenditure, attentional bias for substance, impulsivity, or anxiety to serve as surrogate endpoints for treatment efficacy. Of note, ongoing studies are now adding peripheral biomarkers of the endocannabinoid system status to predict treatment response. Conclusion: The outcome measures and biomarkers assessed in the ongoing CBD trials for substance use disorders are improving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alix Morel
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Lebard
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France
| | - Alexandra Dereux
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Julien Azuar
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Frank Questel
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Frank Bellivier
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,UFR Médecine, Université de Paris, 3 rue Thomas Mann, Paris, France
| | - Cynthia Marie-Claire
- INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mélina Fatséas
- University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,CNRS-UMR 5287- Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d'Aquitaine (INCIA), Bordeaux, France.,Pôle d'addictologie, CHU de Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-Lévêque, Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, France
| | - Florence Vorspan
- Département de Psychiatrie et de Médecine Addictologique, Hôpital Lariboisière-Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France.,INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,UFR Médecine, Université de Paris, 3 rue Thomas Mann, Paris, France
| | - Vanessa Bloch
- INSERM UMRS1144, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, Paris, France.,FHU NOR-SUD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.,Service de Pharmacie, Hôpital Fernand Widal, GHU NORD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, 200 rue du Fg St Denis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gartner C, Bonevski B, Hall W. Miscommunication about the causes of the US outbreak of lung diseases in vapers by public health authorities and the media. Drug Alcohol Rev 2020; 39:3-6. [PMID: 31930631 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Coral Gartner
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Queensland Alliance for Environmental Health Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Billie Bonevski
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Wayne Hall
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Armstrong MJ. Legal cannabis market shares during Canada's first year of recreational legalisation. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 88:103028. [PMID: 33221614 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.103028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study estimated legal products' share of Canada's total cannabis consumption during the first year of recreational legalisation, October 2018 to September 2019. METHODS Government data was used to estimate monthly recreational sales in dollars per capita, grams per user, and percentage share of kilograms or litres consumed. As explanatory factors, the analysis considered provincial differences in retail pricing (percentage mark-ups) and store density (stores per million users), as well as national monthly production of dry cannabis (kilograms) and cannabis oil (litres) finished products. RESULTS Legal recreational products' share of Canada's overall cannabis consumption began at 7.8% in October 2018 and grew to 23.7% by September 2019, with an average of 14.5% over the first 12 months. Sales growth was delayed by shortages of both dry cannabis products and licensed stores, but not cannabis oils. Across the 10 provinces, legal recreational shares in September 2019 varied from 13% to 70%; differences in store densities and retail prices partly explained the variation. Prince Edward Island's large 70% share seemed due to it having minimal product shortages, high store densities, and low prices. CONCLUSIONS Legal recreational products captured market share to the extent they were available, accessible, and low-priced. Problems with those factors slowed the initial expansion of legal product sales but also suggested ways to gradually increase their market share.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J Armstrong
- Goodman School of Business, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaak Brock Way, St Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fischer B, Daldegan‐Bueno D, Boden JM. Facing the option for the legalisation of cannabis use and supply in New Zealand: An overview of relevant evidence, concepts and considerations. Drug Alcohol Rev 2020; 39:555-567. [PMID: 32436274 PMCID: PMC7383663 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
ISSUES Non-medical cannabis policies are changing, including towards legalisation-with-regulation frameworks. New Zealand will hold a public referendum on cannabis legalisation in 2020. We reviewed data on cannabis use and health/social harms; policy reform options; experiences with and outcomes of reforms elsewhere; and other relevant considerations towards informing policy choices in the upcoming referendum. APPROACH Relevant epidemiological, health, social, criminal justice and policy studies and data were identified and comprehensively reviewed. KEY FINDINGS Cannabis use is common (including in New Zealand) and associated with risks for health and social harms, mainly concentrated in young users; key harms are attributable to criminalisation. 'Decriminalisation' reforms have produced ambivalent results. Existing cannabis legalisation frameworks vary considerably in main parameters. Legalisation offers some distinct advantages, for example regulated use, products and user education, yet outcomes depend on essential regulation parameters, including commercialisation, and policy ecologies. While major changes in use are not observed, legalisation experiences are inconclusive to date, including mixed health and social outcomes, with select harms increasing and resilient illegal markets. It is unclear whether legalisation reduces cannabis exposure or social harms (e.g. from enforcement) for youth. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS No conclusive overall evidence on the outcomes of legalisation elsewhere exists, nor is evidence easily transferable to other settings. Legalisation offers direct social justice benefits for adults, yet overall public health impacts are uncertain. Legalisation may not categorically improve health or social outcomes for youth. Legalisation remains a well-intended, while experimental policy option towards more measured and sensible cannabis control and overall greater policy coherence, requiring close monitoring and possible adjustments depending on setting-specific outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benedikt Fischer
- Schools of Population Health and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and AddictionSimon Fraser UniversityVancouverCanada
- Department of PsychiatryFederal University of Sao PauloSao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Dimitri Daldegan‐Bueno
- Schools of Population Health and Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical and Health SciencesUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
| | - Joseph M. Boden
- Department of Psychological MedicineUniversity of OtagoChristchurchNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Withey SL, Bergman J, Huestis MA, George SR, Madras BK. THC and CBD blood and brain concentrations following daily administration to adolescent primates. Drug Alcohol Depend 2020; 213:108129. [PMID: 32593153 PMCID: PMC7371526 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cannabis availability with high concentrations of Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and a range of THC to cannabidiol (CBD) ratios has increased in parallel with a rise in daily cannabis consumption by adolescents. Unanswered questions in adolescents include: 1) whether THC blood concentrations and THC metabolites remain stable or change with prolonged daily dosing, 2) whether CBD modulates THC pharmacokinetic properties and alters THC accumulation in brain, 3) whether blood THC levels reflect brain concentrations. METHODS In adolescent squirrel monkeys (Saimiri boliviensis), we determined whether a four-month regimen of daily THC (1 mg/kg) or CBD (3 mg/kg) + THC (1 mg/kg) administration (IM) affects THC, THC metabolites, and CBD concentrations in blood or brain. RESULTS Blood THC concentrations, THC metabolites and CBD remained stable during chronic treatment. 24 h after the final THC or CBD + THC injection, blood THC and CBD concentrations remained relatively high (THC: 6.0-11 ng/mL; CBD: 9.7-19 ng/mL). THC concentrations in cerebellum and occipital cortex were approximately twice those in blood 24 h after the last dose and did not significantly differ in subjects given THC or CBD + THC. CONCLUSIONS In adolescent monkeys, blood levels of THC, its metabolites or CBD remain stable after daily dosing for four months. Our model suggests that any pharmacological interactions between CBD and THC are unlikely to result from CBD modulation of THC pharmacokinetics. Finally, detection of relatively high brain THC concentrations 24 h after the final dose of THC suggests that the prolonged actions of THC may contribute to persistent cognitive and psychomotor disruption after THC- or cannabis-induced euphoria wane.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- SL Withey
- Laboratory of Addiction Neurobiology, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - J Bergman
- Behavioral Biology Program, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - MA Huestis
- Institute of Emerging Health Professions, Thomas Jefferson University, 130 S. 9th Street Philadelphia, PA 19107
| | - SR George
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - BK Madras
- Laboratory of Addiction Neurobiology, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill St, Belmont, MA 02478, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Caulkins JP, Pardo B, Kilmer B. Intensity of cannabis use: Findings from three online surveys. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2020; 79:102740. [PMID: 32334336 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2020.102740] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug use is often measured in terms of prevalence, meaning the number of people who used any amount in the last month or year, but measuring the quantity consumed is critical for making informed regulatory decisions and estimating the effects of policy changes. Quantity is the product of frequency (e.g., number of use days in the last month) and intensity (amount consumed per use day). Presently, there is imperfect understanding of the extent to which more frequent users also consume more intensively. METHODS AND DATA We examine cannabis flower consumption reported in three similar online surveys fielded in times and places where cannabis was and was not legal. These convenience samples returned enough valid responses (n = 2,618) to examine consumption across different frequencies of use via analyses of measures of central tendency, data visualizations, and multivariate regressions. Additional calculations incorporate data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health. FINDINGS Respondents who reported using daily (i.e., 30 days in the past month) consumed almost twice as much per day of use on average as did those reporting less than daily. We find only modest increases in intensity among those using less than daily, but then a substantial increase (p< 0.001) for those who use daily. Most respondents report that on heavy or light use days their consumption differs from a typical day of use by a factor of 2 or more, but only about 25% of days were described as heavy or light. We estimate those using cannabis 21+ days a month account for 80% of consumption vs. 71% of the days of use. DISCUSSION Daily cannabis users consume more intensively than others, including near-daily users. When possible, survey questions should move beyond the presence or absence of use and number of days used.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Caulkins
- Carngie Mellon University, Heinz College, 5000 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Bryce Pardo
- RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA.
| | - Beau Kilmer
- RAND Drug Policy Research Center, 1776 Main St., Santa Monica, CA 90401, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Callaghan RC, Sanches M, Benny C, Stockwell T, Sherk A, Kish SJ. Who consumes most of the cannabis in Canada? Profiles of cannabis consumption by quantity. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 205:107587. [PMID: 31600617 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.107587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/10/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM To establish whether the population-level pattern of cannabis use by quantity is similar to the distributions previously reported for alcohol, in which a small subset of drinkers accounts for a majority of total population alcohol consumption. METHOD The current study pooled Waves 1-3 of the 2018 National Cannabis Survey (n = 18,900; 2584 past-three-month cannabis users), a set of stratified, population-based surveys designed to assess cannabis consumption and related behaviors in Canada. Each survey systematically measured self-reported cannabis consumption by quantity across seven of the major cannabis-product types. In order to enable the conversion of self-reported consumption of non-flower cannabis products into a standard joint equivalent (SJE: equal to 0.5 g of dried cannabis), we created conversion metrics for physical production equivalencies across cannabis products. RESULTS Similar to the findings in the alcohol literature, study results show that cannabis consumption is highly concentrated in a small subset of users: the upper 10% of cannabis users accounted for approximately two-thirds of all cannabis consumed in the country. Males reported consuming more cannabis by volume than females (approximately 60% versus 40%), with young males (15-34 years old) being disproportionately represented in the heaviest-using subgroups. CONCLUSIONS Most of the cannabis used in Canada is consumed by a relatively small population of very heavy cannabis users. Future research should attempt to identify the characteristics of the heaviest-using groups, as well as how population-level cannabis consumption patterns relate to the calculus of cannabis-related harms in society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Russell C Callaghan
- University of Northern British Columbia, Northern Medical Program, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Human Brain Laboratory, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada; University of Victoria, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, British Columbia, V8N 5M8, Canada.
| | - Marcos Sanches
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Biostatistical Consulting Unit, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada
| | - Claire Benny
- University of British Columbia, School of Population and Public Health, 2206 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Tim Stockwell
- University of Victoria, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, British Columbia, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Adam Sherk
- University of Victoria, Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), 2300 McKenzie Avenue, Victoria, British Columbia, V8N 5M8, Canada
| | - Stephen J Kish
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CAMH), Human Brain Laboratory, 250 College Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8, Canada
| |
Collapse
|