Quality of life evolution after lung cancer surgery in septuagenarians: a prospective study

Surgical intervention for lung cancer in patients aged 75 and above: potential associations with increased mortality rates-a single-center observational study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer, which is diagnosed two to three times more frequently in patients over the age of 70, is a leading cause of cancer-specific mortality. Given the elevated risk of morbidity and mortality, surgical intervention may not always be the most appropriate primary treatment option. This study aims to evaluate specific risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality in elderly patients and to optimize patient selection therefore improving surgical outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study encompassed a cohort of 73 patients aged 75 and above who underwent surgical treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at the Department of Thoracic Surgery of the P. Hertsen Moscow Oncological Research Institute between 2015 and 2021. All patients underwent preoperative evaluation, including PET/CT staging and functional assessment, carried out by a multidisciplinary team comprising thoracic surgeons, anesthesiologists, and other medical specialists.

RESULTS

The investigation revealed a postoperative mortality rate of 5.5% and a postoperative morbidity incidence of 16.4%, with occurrences of atrial fibrillation in 41.6%, persistent air leak in 33.3%, and pneumonia in 25% of complicated cases. At the one-year follow-up, 88% of patients remained free from relapse, whereas at three years, this rate stood at 66%. During the follow-up period, 16 patients (22%) passed away, with a median survival duration of 44 months. Survival rates at one year, three years, and five years were 71%, 66%, and 35%, respectively. Multivariate analysis disclosed several significant factors predicting a complex postoperative period, including stage IIIb (p = 0.023), pN1 (p = 0.049), pN2 (p = 0.030), and central location (p = 0.007). Additionally, overall survival was primarily influenced by a Charlson comorbidity index of 6 (p = 0.044), stage Ia2 (p = 0.033), and the necessity for thoracotomy (p = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Each case of lung cancer in patients aged 75 and older necessitates an individualized approach. Given the higher mortality rate relative to younger patients, comprehensive risk assessment and preoperative management of underlying comorbidities are imperative, with the involvement of anesthesiologists, intensive care physicians, cardiologists, and other relevant specialists as needed.

Perioperative Evaluation of the Physical Quality of Life of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Study

Surgery is the most effective treatment for early-stage lung cancer; however, it poses a higher physical burden than other treatment options. Therefore, understanding the perioperative course of patients is important. Using the Short Form Health Survey 36, we prospectively measured the physical quality of life of patients who underwent anatomical pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer at Shonan Kamakura General Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan (n = 87). In the preoperative setting, patients who had lower performance status and lived alone had significantly worse physical quality of life scores on multivariate analysis (regression coefficient (95% confidence interval), -9.37 (-13.43--5.32) and -10.22 (-13.74--7.40), respectively, p < 0.0001 for both). At 6 months postoperatively, patients who stopped smoking within 1 year preoperatively (stopped smoking within 1 year vs. remote or never smokers, 41.0 ± 10.5 vs. 48.6 ± 7.2, p = 0.002), had lower performance status (0 vs. 1-2, 49.3 ± 6.6 vs. 38.6 ± 9.6, p < 0.0001), lived alone (living alone vs. living with somebody, 41.6 ± 9.7 vs. 48.1 ± 7.9, p = 0.021), and had higher comorbid burden (Charlson comorbidity index <3 vs. ≥3, 48.2 ± 6.9 vs. 39.1 ± 14.7, p = 0.003) had significantly worse physical quality of life scores on univariate analysis. More recent smoking (regression coefficient (95% confidence interval), -4.90 (-8.78-1.0), p = 0.014), lower performance status (8.90 (5.10-12.70), p < 0.0001), living alone (5.76 (1.39-10.13), p = 0.01), and higher comorbid burden (-6.94 (-11.78--2.10), p = 0.006) were significant independent predictors of worse postoperative physical quality of life on multivariate analysis. Therefore, patients with these conditions might need additional support to maintain their physical condition after anatomical lung cancer surgery.

Relationship between changes in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes of lung cancer surgery

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between changes in pulmonary function (PF) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of lung cancer surgery.

METHODS

We recruited 262 patients who underwent lung resection for lung cancer, to evaluate the PROs, using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ)-C30 and the Lung Cancer 13-question supplement (LC13). The patients underwent PF tests and PRO assessments preoperatively (Pre) and 1 year after surgery (Y1). Changes were calculated by subtracting the value at Pre from the value at Y1. We set two cohorts: patients under the ongoing protocol (Cohort 1) and patients who were eligible for lobectomy with clinical stage I lung cancer (Cohort 2).

RESULTS

Cohorts 1 and 2 comprised 206 and 149 patients, respectively. In addition to dyspnea, changes in PF were also correlated with scores for global health status, physical and role function scores, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, and financial difficulties. Absolute correlation coefficient values ranged from 0.149 to 0.311. Improvement of emotional and social function scores was independent of PF. Sublobar resection preserved PF more than lobectomy did. Wedge resection mitigated dyspnea in both cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The correlation between PF and PROs was found to be weak; therefore, further studies are needed to improve the patient's postoperative experience.

Quality of life after lung cancer surgery: sublobar resection versus lobectomy

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the postoperative quality of life (PQOL) between non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic sublobar resection (subsegment, segment, or wedge) and lobectomy. Meanwhile, we developed a PQOL scale for patients with NSCLC after optimization.

METHODS

Developing and evaluating the postoperative quality-of-life scale of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC-PQOL) followed by the international principles for developing quality-of-life scale. Therefore, we used the NSCLC-PQOL scale to evaluate the PQOL of patients who underwent different surgeries.

RESULTS

The overall PQOL of patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and sublobar resection gradually worsened from discharge to 3 months postoperatively and progressively improved from three to 6 months postoperatively. And the sublobar resection group showed better PQOL in chest tightness, breath shortness, breathlessness, cough and expectoration than the lobectomy group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The final version of the NSCLC-PQOL contained three dimensions: "signs-symptoms", "psychological and psychiatric", and "social-life" dimensions.

CONCLUSIONS

The sublobar resection group showed better PQOL in "chest tightness", "breath shortness", "breathlessness", "cough", and "expectoration" than the lobectomy group. Twenty-two items formed a well-behaved PQOL scale after being validated satisfactorily. The scale was a suitable rating tool for evaluating the NSCLC-PQOL of patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

As this study was a retrospective study and not a clinical trial, we did not register this study in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry.

Association of Wildfire Exposure While Recovering From Lung Cancer Surgery With Overall Survival

Importance

With a changing climate, wildfire activity in the US has increased dramatically, presenting multifaceted and compounding health hazards. Individuals discharged from the hospital following surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are potentially at higher risk from wildfires' health hazards.

Objective

To assess the association between wildfire exposure and postoperative long-term overall survival among patients with lung cancer in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

In this cohort study, individuals who underwent curative-intent NSCLC resection between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2019, were selected from the National Cancer Database. Daily wildfire information was aggregated at the zip code level from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Fire Information for Resource Management System. The data analysis was performed between July 19, 2022, and April 14, 2023.

Exposure

An active wildfire detected at the zip code of residence between 0 and 3, 4 and 6, or 7 and 12 months after NSCLC surgery.

Main Outcome

Overall survival was defined as the interval between age at hospital discharge and age at death, last contact, or study end, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazards were used for estimating hazard ratios (HRs) adjusted for sex, region, metropolitan category, health insurance type, comorbidities, tumor size, lymph node involvement, era, and facility type.

Results

A total of 466 912 individuals included in the study (249 303 female and [53.4] and 217 609 male [46.6%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 67.3 [9.9] years), with 48 582 (10.4%) first exposed to a wildfire between 0 and 3 months, 48 328 (10.6%) between 4 and 6 months, and 71 735 (15.3%) between 7 and 12 months following NSCLC surgery. Individuals exposed to a wildfire within 3 months (adjusted HR [AHR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.41-1.45), between 4 and 6 months (AHR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.37-1.41), and between 7 and 12 months (AHR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.15-1.19) after discharge from the hospital following stage I to III NSCLC resection had worse overall survival than unexposed individuals.

Conclusions

In this cohort study, wildfire exposure was associated with worse overall survival following NSCLC surgical resection, suggesting that patients with lung cancer are at greater risk from the health hazards of wildfires and need to be prioritized in climate adaptation efforts.

The efficacy of three-ball breathing apparatus exercise based on the concept of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients after lung cancer surgery

BACKGROUND

Postoperative patients with lung cancer mostly experience different degrees of dyspnea and decreased activity tolerance, and these symptoms all significantly affect postoperative quality of life. The concept of pulmonary rehabilitation applicable to patients with chronic respiratory diseases is also applicable to patients with postoperative lung cancer. The current application of postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for lung cancer is inconsistent, and reliable guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study was to further verify the efficacy and feasibility of postoperative pulmonary rehabilitation for lung cancer patients, and to find a suitable local pulmonary rehabilitation program for postoperative patients with lung cancer that is clinically promoted in our department through this study.

METHODS

We collected the clinical data of patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) wedge resection or lobectomy. The patients were divided into rehabilitation group (using three-ball breathing apparatus after discharge) and control group (routine follow-up after discharge) according to whether the patients were trained with three-ball breathing apparatus after operation. The detailed method using three-ball apparatus is as follows. To begin with, patients are required to put themselves in a comfortable position. Then, after the three-ball breathing apparatus put on the same plane of their eyes, patients hold the tube in their mouth closely and control their breath slowly. When patients inhale to their largest extent, the balls will rise up accordingly. Then they exhale. The evaluation results of pulmonary function, activity tolerance, anxiety scores and others were collected. All data was gathered at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation training on wedge resection and lobectomy were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 210 patients were included in this study, including 126 patients with VATS wedge resection and 84 patients with VATS lobectomies. No discrepancy was noticed when FEV₁ loss between two groups were compared in the wedge resection patients, and the same results were also shown in patients undergoing lobectomy (12.8% ± 2.0% vs. 12.7% ± 1.9%, P = 0.84, wedge resection; 12.6% ± 2.9% vs. 12.1% ± 1.8%, P = 0.37, lobectomy). The loss of FVC in the control group was greater than that in the rehabilitation group for patients undergoing lobectomy (11.7% ± 5.2%, vs. 17.1% ± 5.6%, P < 0.001, lobectomy). No difference was found in the wedge resection patients between the control and rehabilitation groups (6.6% ± 2.8%, vs. 6.4% ± 3.2%, P = 0.76, lobectomy). Moreover, all patients showed no significant difference in 6MWD regardless of surgical procedure and with or without breathing exercises at T3 (392.6 ± 50.6 m, rehabilitation group vs. 394.0 ± 46.6 m, control group. P = 0.87, wedge resection; 381.3 ± 38.9 m, rehabilitation group vs. 369.1 ± 49.3 m, control group. P = 0.21, lobectomy).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients after thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection, the use of three-ball apparatus did not significantly improve postoperative pulmonary function and activity tolerance, dyspnea, and anxiety symptoms. In patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy, respiratory trainers were able to improve postoperative lung function but were unable to significantly improve dyspnea and anxiety symptoms. There was a significant benefit for the use of three-ball apparatus in patients after thoracoscopic lobectomy, whereas there was no significant benefit for the use of respiratory trainers after wedge resection. Registry: Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

no. 2022455.

The value of perioperative physical activity in older patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

With a median age at diagnosis of 70, lung cancer represents an enormous public health problem among older Americans. An estimated 19,000 people age 65 and older undergo lung cancer surgery annually in the US. Older adults undergoing lung cancer surgery are often frail with limited physiologic reserves, multi-morbidities, and functional impairments. Physical function, dyspnea, and quality of life return to baseline slower in older adults compared with younger adults after lung surgery.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we summarize available data about perioperative physical activity interventions that may improve outcomes for older adults undergoing lung cancer surgery. We also review the limitations of existing studies and discuss emerging data on the roles of telehealth and family caregiver inclusion in peri-operative physical activity interventions.

EXPERT OPINION

We propose that future perioperative physical activity interventions in older adults undergoing lung cancer surgery should include a comprehensive geriatric assessment to guide personalized interventions. Interventions should be conceptually based, with a focus on enhancing self-efficacy, motivation, and adherence through classic behavior change strategies that are proven to impact outcomes. Finally, interventions should be designed with attention to feasibility and scalability. Exercise programs delivered via telehealth (telephone or tele-video) may improve access and convenience for patients.

Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and patient-reported outcomes after lung cancer surgery

Background

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, but the decline in pulmonary function after surgery is noticeable and requires attention. This study aimed to evaluate longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and integrated patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after lung cancer surgery.

Methods

Data were obtained from a prospective cohort study, the Coordinate Approach to Cancer Patients’ Health for Lung Cancer. Changes in forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery, and the corresponding modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and chronic obstructive lung disease assessment test (CAT) scores were evaluated. Mixed effects model was used to investigate changes in pulmonary function and PROs.

Results

Among 620 patients, 477 (76.9%) underwent lobectomy, whereas 120 (19.4%) and 23 (3.7%) were treated with wedge resection/segmentectomy and bilobectomy/pneumonectomy, respectively. Both FVC and FEV₁ markedly decreased 2 weeks after surgery and improved thereafter; however, they did not recover to baseline values. The corresponding mMRC dyspnea scale and CAT scores worsened immediately after surgery. The dyspnea scale of the mMRC was still higher, while CAT scores returned to baseline one year after surgery, although breathlessness and lack of energy persisted. Compared to the changes from baseline of FVC and FEV₁ in patients who underwent lobectomy, patients who underwent bilobectomy/pneumonectomy showed a greater decrease in FVC and FEV₁, while wedge resection/segmentectomy patients had smaller decreases in FVC and FEV₁ at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Bilobectomy/pneumonectomy patients had the highest mMRC dyspnea grade among the three groups, but the difference was not statistically significant one year after surgery.

Conclusions

After lung cancer surgery, pulmonary function and PROs noticeably decreased in the immediate post-operative period and improved thereafter, except for dyspnea and lack of energy. Proper information on the timeline of changes in lung function and symptoms following lung cancer surgery could guide patient care approaches after surgery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT03705546; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-022-02149-9.

A guide for managing patients with stage I NSCLC: deciding between lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, SBRT and ablation-part 2: systematic review of evidence regarding resection extent in generally healthy patients

Background

Clinical decision-making for patients with stage I lung cancer is complex. It involves multiple options (lobectomy, segmentectomy, wedge, stereotactic body radiotherapy, thermal ablation), weighing multiple outcomes (e.g., short-, intermediate-, long-term) and multiple aspects of each (e.g., magnitude of a difference, the degree of confidence in the evidence, and the applicability to the patient and setting at hand). A structure is needed to summarize the relevant evidence for an individual patient and to identify which outcomes have the greatest impact on the decision-making.

Methods

A PubMed systematic review from 2000-2021 of outcomes after lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection in generally healthy patients is the focus of this paper. Evidence was abstracted from randomized trials and non-randomized comparisons with at least some adjustment for confounders. The analysis involved careful assessment, including characteristics of patients, settings, residual confounding etc. to expose degrees of uncertainty and applicability to individual patients. Evidence is summarized that provides an at-a-glance overall impression as well as the ability to delve into layers of details of the patients, settings and treatments involved.

Results

In healthy patients there is no short-term benefit to sublobar resection vs. lobectomy in randomized and non-randomized comparisons. A detriment in long-term outcomes is demonstrated by adjusted non-randomized comparisons, more marked for wedge than segmentectomy. Quality-of-life data is confounded by the use of video-assisted approaches; evidence suggests the approach has more impact than the resection extent. Differences in pulmonary function tests by resection extent are not clinically meaningful in healthy patients, especially for multi-segmentectomy vs. lobectomy. The margin distance is associated with the risk of recurrence.

Conclusions

A systematic, comprehensive summary of evidence regarding resection extent in healthy patients with attention to aspects of applicability, uncertainty and effect modifiers provides a foundation on which to build a framework for individualized clinical decision-making.

[Surgical treatment of lung cancer in patients over 75 years old]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze surgical treatment of lung cancer in patients over 75 years old.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study enrolled 73 patients. Lobectomy was performed in 50 (68.5%) patients, segmentectomy - 14 (19.2%), pneumonectomy - 4 (5.5%), bilobectomy - 3 (4.1%), wedge resection - 2 (2.7%) patients. The most common clinical scenario was lobectomy for lung adenocarcinoma stage I. Metastases in lymph nodes were noted in 32.9% of cases. Among 9 patients with pN2 (12.9%), lesion of mediastinal lymph nodes was preoperatively diagnosed in 4 (44%) cases. Mean tumor size was 3 (1-14) cm.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity was 16.4%, mortality 5.5%. Multivariate analysis revealed the most significant risk factors such as stage IIIb (OR 9.3, 95% CI 1.365-63.816, p=0.023), pN1 (OR 3.889, 95% CI 1.008-14.999, p=0.049), pN2 (OR 5.300, 95% CI 1.170-23.999, p=0.030), central cancer (OR 7.572, 95% CI 1.742-32.884, p=0.007).

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of lung cancer patients over 75 years old may be completed safely and effectively in careful preoperative selection of patients. The most important risk factors of postoperative complications are cancer stage IIIb stage, lymph node lesion and central cancer.

The Survival Advantage of Lobectomy over Wedge Resection Lessens as Health-Related Life Expectancy Decreases

Introduction

Patients with early-stage NSCLC typically must choose between a surgery with superior local control (lobectomy) or one that preserves lung parenchyma (wedge). Recognizing that many patients with cancer have competing mortality risks unrelated to cancer, we investigated whether an established model of predicting life expectancy could be used to identify patients with stage I NSCLC for whom survival after wedge is not different from lobectomy.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study using the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare was performed to evaluate survival among treatment-naive patients, diagnosed 2005-2015, who underwent lobectomy or wedge for stage I (≤2 cm tumors) NSCLC. Comorbidity-related life expectancy (CR-LE) was estimated using a standard life-table approach based on comorbid conditions, sex, and age. Cox models and perioperative complications were stratified by 5-year CR-LE.

Results

A total of 4560 patients (median age 74, interquartile range 70-78) were identified. CR-LE was greater than or equal to 5 years for 4016 patients (wedge = 23%). CR-LE was less than 5 years for 544 patients (wedge = 41%). Among patients with CR-LE greater than or equal to 5, wedge resection was associated with higher risk of mortality than lobectomy (hazard ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-1.86, p < 0.001). For those with CR-LE less than 5, there was no significant difference in mortality risk between lobectomy and wedge (hazard ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.47; p = 0.11). CR-LE less than five patients who underwent a lobectomy had higher 90-day mortality compared with wedge (9% versus 4%, p = 0.04).

Conclusion

The survival advantage of lobectomy over wedge for stage I NSCLC seems to dissipate among patients with shorter life expectancy owing to age and comorbidities. Wedge resection may be a reasonable option for patients at high risk of dying from non-cancer-related causes.

Quality of Life in Octogenarians After Lung Resection Compared to Younger Patients

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate postoperative outcome and quality of life (QOL), comparing patients <80 years old to patients ≥ 80.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EORTC questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 was used to assess QOL, in patients after surgery. Results were evaluated according to 3 age groups: <70, 70 to 79, and ≥80.

RESULTS

106 patients were enrolled with 33 (<70), 25 (70-79), and 48 (≥80) patients per group. The median age was 74 years. 79% of patients had minimally invasive procedures, including 91% of those ≥80. Fifteen patients underwent wedge resections. Complication rates (18%, 32%, and 29%, P = .4) and median length of stay (4, 6, and 5 days, P = .2) were similar in all age groups, with no hospital mortality. One hundred one patients completed the questionnaires. Global QOL was highest among octogenarians. Overall functional and role QOL was higher among octogenarians than 70- to 79-year-olds, with emotional QOL higher than those <70 (P < .05). Social QOL in octogenarians was marginally lower than younger patients. Lung-specific symptom scores were at least 1.5 times lower than those <80 (P = .052). Patients aged 70 to 79 had the worst symptomatic and emotional effect on QOL. Surgical access and preoperative performance status did not affect final QOL across all age groups (P = .9 and P = .065). Among anatomical lung resections, QOL was higher in octogenarians than those 70 to 79 in all domains, and similar or higher than those <70 in most domains.

CONCLUSION

Quality of life among octogenarians after surgery remains similar to younger patients even after anatomical lung resection. Surgery in octogenarians is safe, with minimal impact on postoperative QOL.

Preoperative predictors of restoration in quality of life after surgery for lung cancer

Background

The preoperative predictors of quality of life (QOL) in patients who undergo lung resection for lung cancer are poorly known. Here, we investigated these predictors in such patients using two QOL measures.

Methods

In this single‐institutional prospective cohort study, we administered the EQ‐5D‐5 levels (EQ‐5D‐5L) from January 2015, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire with 30 items from April 2015 to April 2018 preoperatively (Pre) and at one month postoperatively (M1), and one year postoperatively (Y1). General health status was measured by the EQ‐5D visual analogue scale (VAS) and EORTC global health status/QOL (GHS) scores. Multivariable linear regression analyses were used to explore the preoperative predictors of QOL at Y1.

Results

A total of 223 patients were included in the study. The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores, at Pre, M1, and Y1, were 80 ± 15, 77 ± 15, and 84 ± 11; and 74 ± 19, 65 ± 20, and 78 ± 17, respectively. In the multivariable analyses, the albumin level, preoperative VAS score, and preoperative pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression were identified as predictors by the EQ‐5D VAS score. The preoperative EORTC GHS score, absence of diabetes mellitus, preoperative cognitive function score, and preoperative symptom score of pain were identified as predictors by the EORTC GHS score.

Conclusions

The EQ‐5D VAS and EORTC GHS scores traced similar trajectories of QOL. In both QOL measures, preoperative pain was found as a common predictor. These predictors may help improve patient/survivor care in the future.

Health-Related Quality of Life After Lobectomy for Lung Cancer: Conceptual Framework and Measurement

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer surgery has a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). In prior studies of HRQOL after lung cancer surgery, researchers selected the HRQOL domains of interest. To increase the patient-centeredness of these studies, we conducted a qualitative study to ascertain which aspects of HRQOL are most relevant to them postoperatively and to identify Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System measures most germane to patients undergoing lobectomy for lung cancer.

METHODS

We conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with 25 patients after lobectomy for lung cancer to solicit input regarding the physical, social, and emotional HRQOL domains relevant after surgery. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, and a thematic content analysis to identify HRQOL themes was performed. Themes were integrated to create a conceptual framework to guide outcome measurement selection.

RESULTS

Qualitative analysis indicated that within the physical health domain, patients were most concerned about general physical function (100% of participants), pain (96%), fatigue (96%), and dyspnea (76%). Neuropathic pain was reported by 28% of participants. Instrumental (100%) and emotional social support (88%) and positive emotions/relief/hope (96%) were also important. Two cross-cutting themes were the desire to maintain independence (32%) and preparing for surgery/expectations (92%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that a number of physical, social, and emotional HRQOL domains are relevant after lobectomy for lung cancer. These domains are currently represented by Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System measures and can be readily assessed for clinical or research purposes.

Inpatient Step Counts, Symptom Severity, and Perceived Health Status After Lung Resection Surgery

BACKGROUND

The clinical relevance of inpatient step counts after lung surgery remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify those factors related to physical activity measured by step count, during the inpatient stay, and its relationship with symptom severity and perceived health status at hospital admission, discharge, and 1 month after discharge.

METHODS

We studied the inpatient step count of 73 participants who underwent lung resection surgery. The number of steps was measured using a triaxial accelerometer. The health status and the severity of symptoms were examined at hospital admission, discharge, and 1 month after discharge.

RESULTS

Of the 73 participants, 35 were active and 38 were sedentary during the hospitalization. The mean number of steps walked during 3 inpatient days was 6689 ± 3261 and 523 ± 2273 (P < .001) for the active and sedentary groups, respectively. The dyspnea and fatigue scores in the sedentary group across data collection points (hospital admission, discharge, and follow-up) were significantly worse (P < .01). In regard to pain, the sedentary group presented worse results, than the active group, at discharge and follow-up (P < .01). The correlation analysis indicated significant but weak correlations (r < 0.500) between inpatient steps per day and symptom severity at 1-month follow-up (T2) after surgery.

CONCLUSION

Inpatient step count may be a risk factor for symptom severity and perceived health status during hospitalization and within the first month after lung resection surgery.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Nurses should consider recommending physical activity during hospitalization for patients after lung resection.

Treatment strategy and decision-making for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer

Among elderly cancer patients of the same chronological age, there is a wide range of heterogeneity in their ability to tolerate surgery. When an elderly patient comes to a thoracic surgeon, the surgeon first considers how healthy the patient is. If the patient looks healthy or in fit condition, the surgeon offers lobectomy plus mediastinal lymph node dissection. On the other hand, if the patient looks frail, the surgeon may offer, instead of a standard treatment, lobectomy without lymph node dissection, sublobar resection, or radiotherapy or may not offer any kind of treatment. This review was conducted to obtain an overview of these options and compare the treatment outcomes reported in the literature for the purpose of making a good decision for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer.

Patient reported outcome data as performance indicators in surgically treated lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Quality in lung cancer care is in Denmark routinely evaluated using quality indicators. The indicators are reported from national registries and are based on data from health care professionals. However, data based on the patients' perspective are rarely reported. The aim of this study was to propose a model for the use of patient reported outcomes (PROs) as quality indicators, enabling us to compare PROs across the surgical departments in Denmark.

METHODS

All patients registered in the Danish Lung Cancer Registry (DLCR) from 1 October 2013 until 30 September 2015 who received surgical treatment were eligible (N = 1718). They were asked to complete the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire six months after surgery. From QLQ-C30 we chose global health status (GHS) and role function (RF) as indicators to be tested. An indicator threshold for good performance was set to ≥ 65 points (on a scale 0-100 where 100 was the best). Results were compared between the four thoracic surgical departments in Denmark.

RESULTS

Of 1615 patients alive six months after surgery, questionnaires were completed by 1002 patients (62.0%). The patients from the four departments differed significantly in clinical variables at diagnosis, and the departments differed significantly in the surgical procedures performed. After adjustment for case-mix, the patients in Department 2 had a better RF than patients from the other departments.

CONCLUSION

Significant differences in RF and in the fulfilment of the indicator requirement for RF were observed. Since these findings might indicate differences in the quality of performance between participating departments, subsequent audit is recommended. The analyses and results indicate that it is feasible to use PROs as supplementary outcome indicators in the evaluation of the quality of surgical treatment for lung cancer. Our model could serve as a useful foundation for further research.

Outcomes of pulmonary resection in non-small cell lung cancer patients older than 70 years old

BACKGROUND

An appropriate treatment of older lung cancer patients has become an important issue. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short and long-term surgical outcomes in lung cancer patients using 70 years as a cut-point, and to identify prognostic factors of cancer-specific mortality in patients older than 70 years.

METHODS

Medical records of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who underwent pulmonary resection at Chiang Mai University Hospital from January 2002 through December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into age less than 70 years (control group) and 70 years or more (study group). Primary outcomes were major post-operative complications and in-hospital death (POM); secondary outcome was long-term survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used.

RESULTS

This study included 583 patients, 167 for study group, and 416 for control group. There were no differences in POM, both at univariable and multivariable analyses, however, for long-term cancer-specific mortality, the study group was more likely to die (HR_adj = 1.40, 95%CI = 1.03-1.89). Adverse prognostic factors for long-term mortality in study group were having universal coverage scheme (HR_adj = 1.70, 95%CI = 1.03-2.79), the presence of intratumoral lymphatic invasion (HR_adj = 2.83, 95%CI = 1.28-6.29), perineural invasion (HR_adj = 2.80, 95%CI = 1.13-6.94), underwent lymph node sampling (HR_adj = 2.23, 95%CI = 1.16-4.30) and higher stage of disease (HR_adj = 2.02, 95%CI = 1.06-3.85 for stage III, HR_adj = 3.40, 95%CI = 1.29-8.94 for stage IV).

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality and composite post-operative complications are acceptable in pulmonary resection for NSCLC patients older than 70 years. However, these patients had shorter long-term survival, especially who have some adverse prognostic factors. Further studies with larger sample size are warranted.

Pneumonectomy - permanent injury or still effective method of treatment? Early and long-term results and quality of life after pneumonectomy due to non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Despite the constant decrease of performed pneumonectomies (PN) in recent years, it is still necessary for 15-20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to undergo total lung resection due to the local progression of the disease.

AIM

To assess the frequency and type of postoperative complications, quality of life, and the early and long-term results after PN performed due to NSCLC.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In the total group of 1160 patients, operated on in 2008-2011 due to NSCLC, 192 of them underwent PN (16.6%). The quality of life was analysed using EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

RESULTS

Perioperative mortality after PN was 4%. Five-year survival reached 45%. The factors that significantly affected the 5-year survival in multivariate analysis were: pTNM stage, pN stage, intrapericardial resection, and additional extrapulmonary structures resection. The mean Global Quality of Life was 50.8. The Symptom Scale ranged from 7 to 54.3, the Functional Scale from 58.2 to 76.3 and the rate for NSCLC symptoms ranged from 2.2 to 48.1.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumonectomies in patients with NSCLC is associated with higher risk of postoperative complications but it does not significantly increase the perioperative mortality. Long-term results in this group of patients are encouraging. According to the questionnaire, the quality of life is favourable. Low intensity of typical NSCLC symptoms was observed. The appropriate qualification for right-sided PN and exclusion of metastasis in N2 nodes are crucial.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for early-stage lung cancer in the elderly

Early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is on the rise due to the implementation of screening guidelines for patients at risk for developing lung cancer. It is anticipated that as the US population continues to age, there will be a higher percentage of medically inoperable early-stage lung cancer patients. For this reason, noninvasive ablative therapies are necessary. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an effective modality in addressing early-stage NSCLC. SBRT consists of high-dose radiation delivered over 3-5 treatments. Several randomized trials comparing surgery to SBRT in early-stage operable patients have unfortunately closed early due to poor accrual. However, a recent pooled analysis from 2 randomized trials (StereoTActic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Or Surgery for operable Early-stage non-small cell Lung cancer) comparing surgery to SBRT did show comparable local control and overall survival rates between surgery and SBRT, offering a very effective, noninvasive modality for older adult patients with early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we summarize the role of SBRT in early-stage NSCLC, in particularly applied to the older adult population.

Improvements in health-related quality of life among smokers who quit after hospitalization

Few rigorous longitudinal assessments have examined health-related quality of life (HRQoL) changes after smoking cessation, especially among recently-hospitalized smokers. We compared the change in HRQoL between those who did or did not quit smoking 6 months after hospital discharge. Participants were 1357 smokers recruited for a cessation trial between 2012 and 2014 while hospitalized at two hospitals in Massachusetts and one in Pennsylvania. Cessation was defined as biochemically confirmed 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6 months or as self-reported continuous abstinence at 1, 3, or 6 months post discharge. HRQoL measures included a single-item global health measure (SF1); the Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4) screening tool for psychological distress; and the EQ-5D-5L health utilities measure. Multivariable models controlled for age, sex, race, education, insurance, study site, study arm, discharge diagnoses, and baseline HRQoL. Improvements in HRQoL were evident in the first month after discharge among those achieving abstinence compared to continuing smokers. At 6 months post-discharge, those with biochemically confirmed cessation were 30% more likely to report at least good health by the SF1 (aRR 95% CI 1.14-1.45), 19% less likely to screen positive for psychological distress (aRR, 95% CI 0.68-0.93), and had EQ-5D-5L health utility scores 0.05 points (95% CI 0.02-0.08) higher than continuing smokers. Results were similar when assessed as a function of self-reported cessation. Hospital-initiated smoking cessation is associated with rapid statistically and clinically significant improvements in a range of HRQoL measures, providing an additional tool clinicians and health systems could use to encourage smoking cessation.

Regional Emphysema Score Predicting Overall Survival, Quality of Life, and Pulmonary Function Recovery in Early-Stage Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary emphysema is a frequent comorbidity in lung cancer, but its role in tumor prognosis remains obscure. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of the regional emphysema score (RES) on a patient's overall survival, quality of life (QOL), and recovery of pulmonary function in stage I to II lung cancer.

METHODS

Between 1997 and 2009, a total of 1073 patients were identified and divided into two surgical groups-cancer in the emphysematous (group 1 [n = 565]) and nonemphysematous (group 2 [n = 435]) regions-and one nonsurgical group (group 3 [n = 73]). RES was derived from the emphysematous region and categorized as mild (≤5%), moderate (6%-24%), or severe (25%-60%).

RESULTS

In group 1, patients with a moderate or severe RES experienced slight decreases in postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second, but increases in the ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity compared with those with a mild RES (p < 0.01); however, this correlation was not observed in group 2. Posttreatment QOL was lower in patients with higher RESs in all groups, mainly owing to dyspnea (p < 0.05). Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with a higher RES had significantly poorer survival in both surgical groups, with adjusted hazard ratios of 1.41 and 1.43 for a moderate RES and 1.63 and 2.04 for a severe RES, respectively; however, this association was insignificant in the nonsurgical group (adjusted hazard ratio of 0.99 for a moderate or severe RES).

CONCLUSIONS

In surgically treated patients with cancer in the emphysematous region, RES is associated with postoperative changes in lung function. RES is also predictive of posttreatment QOL related to dyspnea in early-stage lung cancer. In both surgical groups, RES is an independent predictor of survival.

Exercise training for people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized controlled trial

•

Lung resection for lung cancer is associated with marked reductions in exercise capacity.

•

Exercise training increased exercise capacity in people with non-small cell lung cancer.

•

Exercise training did not improve other outcomes.

Objective

In people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, to investigate the effects of supervised exercise training on exercise capacity, physical activity and sedentary behavior, peripheral muscle force, health-related quality of life, fatigue, feelings of anxiety and depression, and lung function.

Method

This pilot randomized controlled trial included participants 6–10 weeks after lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer or, for those who required adjuvant chemotherapy, 4–8 weeks after their last cycle. Participants were randomized to either 8 weeks of supervised exercise training (exercise group) or 8 weeks of usual care (control group). Prior to and following the intervention period, both groups completed measurements of exercise capacity, physical activity and sedentary behavior, quadriceps and handgrip force, HRQoL, fatigue, feelings of anxiety and depression, and lung function. Intention-to-treat analysis was undertaken.

Results

Seventeen participants (mean age 67, SD = 9 years; 12 females) were included. Nine and eight participants were randomized to the exercise and control groups, respectively. Four participants (44%) adhered to exercise training. Compared with any change seen in the control group, those in the exercise group demonstrated greater gains in the peak rate of oxygen consumption (mean difference, 95% confidence interval for between-group difference: 0.19 [0.04–0.33] L min⁻¹) and 6-minute walk distance (52 [12–93] m). No other between-group differences were demonstrated.

Conclusions

In people following curative intent treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, 8 weeks of supervised exercise training improved exercise capacity, measured by both laboratory- and field-based exercise tests. These results suggest that this clinical population may benefit from attending exercise training programs.

Patient-Reported Symptom Interference as a Measure of Postsurgery Functional Recovery in Lung Cancer

CONTEXT

Few empirical studies have combined the patient's perspective (patient-reported outcomes [PROs]) with clinical outcomes (risk for complications, length of hospital stay, return to planned treatment) to assess the effectiveness of treatment after thoracic surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

OBJECTIVES

Quantitatively measure PROs to assess functional recovery postsurgery.

METHODS

Treatment-naïve patients (N = 72) with NSCLC who underwent either open thoracotomy or video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) used the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) to report symptom interference with general activity, work, walking, mood, relations with others, and enjoyment of life for three months after surgery. Functional recovery was defined as interference scores returning to presurgery levels. The MDASI's sensitivity to change in functional recovery over time was evaluated via its ability to distinguish between surgical techniques.

RESULTS

Interference scores increased sharply by Day 3 after surgery (all P < 0.001), then returned to baseline levels via different trajectories. Patients who had unscheduled clinic visits during the study period reported higher scores on all six MDASI interference items (all P < 0.05). Compared with the open-thoracotomy group, the VATS group returned more quickly to baseline interference levels for walking (18 vs. 43 days), mood (8 vs. 19 days), relations with others (4 vs. 16 days), and enjoyment of life (15 vs. 41 days) (all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Repeated measurement of MDASI interference characterized functional recovery after thoracic surgery for NSCLC and was sensitive to VATS' ability to enhance postoperative recovery. Further study of the clinical applicability of measuring recovery outcomes using PRO-based functional assessment is warranted.

Patient features predicting long-term survival and health-related quality of life after radical surgery for non-small cell lung cancer

Background

This study presents a retrospective evaluation of patient, disease, and treatment features predicting long‐term survival and health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients who underwent surgery for non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Between January 2000 and June 2009, 586 patients underwent surgery at the Helsinki University Hospital. The 276 patients still alive in June 2011 received two validated quality of life questionnaires (QLQ): the generic 15D and the cancer‐specific EORTC QLQ‐C30 + QLQ‐LC13. We used binary and linear regression analysis modeling to identify patient, disease, and treatment characteristics that predicted survival and long‐term HRQoL.

Results

When taking into account patient, disease, and treatment characteristics, long‐term survival was quite predictable (69.5% correct), but not long‐term HRQoL (R² between 0.041 and 0.119). Advanced age at the time of surgery, male gender, comorbidity (measured with the Charlson comorbidity index), clinical and pathological stages II‐IV, and postoperative infectious complications predicted a lower survival rate. Features associated with poorer long‐term HRQoL (measured with the 15D) were comorbidity, postoperative complications, and the use of the video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) technique.

Conclusions

Long‐term HRQoL is only moderately predictable, while prediction of long‐term survival is more reliable. Lower HRQoL is associated with comorbidities, complications, use of the VATS technique, and reduced pulmonary function, while adjuvant therapy is associated with higher HRQoL.

Bronchial sleeve resection or pneumonectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a propensity-matched analysis of long-term results, survival and quality of life

BACKGROUND

No randomized studies exist comparing pneumonectomy (PN) and sleeve lobectomy (SL). We evaluated surgical results and long-term quality of life in patients operated on for central non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using either SL or PN.

METHODS

A total of 641 NSCLC patients underwent surgery 2000-2010. SL was performed in 40 (6.2%) and PN in 67 (10.5%). In 2011, all surviving patients were sent a 15D Quality of Life Questionnaire which 83% replied. Propensity-score-matching analysis was utilized to compare the groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-two bronchial (18 right/14 left), seven vasculobronchial (3 right/4 left), one right wedge SL, and 18 right and 22 left PN were performed. Preoperatively, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and diffusion capacity did not differ between groups. The perioperative complication rate and pattern were similar, but SL group had less major complications (P<0.027). One perioperative death (2.5%) occurred in SL group and four (6%) in PN. The 90-day mortality rate was 5% (n=2) for SL and 7.5% (n=5) for PN. In the follow-up total cancer recurrence did not differ (P=0.187). Quality of life measured by 15D showed no significant difference in separate dimensions or total score, except tendency to favor SL in moving or breathing. The 5-year survival did not differ between groups (P=0.458), but no deaths were observed in SL group after 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to less major operative complications and better long-term survival, we would advocate using SL when feasible, but in patients tolerating PN it should be considered if SL seems not to be oncologically sufficiently radical.

Use of the lung cancer-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire EORTC QLQ-LC13 in clinical trials: A systematic review of the literature 20 years after its development

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Lung Cancer 13 (QLQ-LC13) covers 13 typical symptoms of lung cancer patients and was the first module developed in conjunction with the EORTC core quality-of-life (QL) questionnaire. This review investigates how the module has been used and reported in cancer clinical trials in the 20 years since its publication. Thirty-six databases were searched with a prespecified algorithm. This search plus an additional hand search generated 770 hits, 240 of which were clinical studies. Two raters extracted data using a coding scheme. Analyses focused on the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Of the 240 clinical studies that were identified using the LC13, 109 (45%) were RCTs. More than half of the RCTs were phase 3 trials (n = 58). Twenty RCTs considered QL as the primary endpoint, and 68 considered it as a secondary endpoint. QL results were addressed in the results section of the article (n = 89) or in the abstract (n = 92); and, in half of the articles, QL results were presented in the form of tables (n = 53) or figures (n = 43). Furthermore, QL results had an impact on the evaluation of the therapy that could be clearly demonstrated in the 47 RCTs that yielded QL differences between treatment and control groups. The EORTC QLQ-LC13 fulfilled its mission to be used as a standard instrument in lung cancer clinical trials. An update of the LC13 is underway to keep up with new therapeutic trends and to ensure optimized and relevant QL assessment in future trials.

Surgical treatment of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Surgical resection remains the standard of care for functionally operable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and resectable stage IIIA disease. The role of invasive staging and restaging techniques is currently being debated, but they provide the largest biopsy samples which allow for precise mediastinal staging. Different types of operative procedures are currently available to the thoracic surgeon, and some of these interventions can be performed by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with the same oncological results as those by open thoracotomy. The principal aim of surgical treatment for NSCLC is to obtain a complete resection which has been precisely defined by a working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC). Intraoperative staging of lung cancer is of utmost importance to decide on the extent of resection according to the intraoperative tumour (T) and nodal (N) status. Systematic nodal dissection is generally advocated to evaluate the hilar and mediastinal lymph nodes which are subdivided into seven zones according to the most recent 7th tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) classification. Lymph-node involvement not only determines prognosis but also the administration of adjuvant therapy.

In 2011, a new multidisciplinary adenocarcinoma classification was published introducing the concepts of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. This classification has profound surgical implications. The role of limited or sublobar resection, comprising anatomical segmentectomy and wide wedge resection, is reconsidered for early-stage lesions which are more frequently encountered with the recently introduced large screening programmes. Numerous retrospective non-randomised studies suggest that sublobar resection may be an acceptable surgical treatment for early lung cancers, also when performed by VATS.

More tailored, personalised therapy has recently been introduced. Quality-of-life parameters and surgical quality indicators become increasingly important to determine the short-term and long-term impact of a surgical procedure. International databases currently collect extensive surgical data, allowing more precise calculation of mortality and morbidity according to predefined risk factors. Centralisation of care has been shown to improve results. Evidence-based guidelines should be further developed to provide optimal staging and therapeutic algorithms.

Trajectories of Symptom Occurrence and Severity From Before Through Five Months After Lung Cancer Surgery

CONTEXT

Limited information is available about lung cancer patients' symptoms in the pre- and postoperative periods.

OBJECTIVES

Study purposes were to evaluate for changes in symptom occurrence and severity from the preoperative period to five months after surgery and to evaluate for predictors of the occurrence and trajectories of these symptoms.

METHODS

Patients completed the Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale before and at one and five months after surgery. Changes in the six most common physical symptoms and the most common psychological symptom were evaluated using multilevel growth mixture modeling. Age, gender, comorbidity, and receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy were included as covariates in the conditional models for symptom occurrence and severity.

RESULTS

The total number of symptoms increased significantly from the preoperative to the one month assessment. At five months, the number of symptoms was lower than at one month but significantly higher than at the preoperative assessment. The occurrence of five of the symptoms (i.e., pain, lack of energy, shortness of breath, feeling drowsy, and worrying) increased significantly from before through the first month after surgery and then decreased over time. Cough and difficulty sleeping persisted over the five months of the study. In general, the effect of the four covariates was to increase patients' overall symptom burden.

CONCLUSION

Changes in the occurrence and severity of these seven symptoms were variable. All seven symptoms occurred at relatively high rates and were of moderate severity. Findings can be used to identify patients who are at higher risk for more severe symptoms.

Validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions as a measure of recovery after pulmonary resection

BACKGROUND

Surgical innovations advocated to improve patient recovery are often costly. Economic evaluation requires preference-based measures that reflect the construct of patient recovery. We investigated the responsiveness and construct validity of the EuroQol-5 dimensions (EQ-5D) as a measure of postoperative recovery after planned pulmonary resection for suspected malignant tumors.

METHODS

Patients undergoing pulmonary resection completed the EQ-5D questionnaire and visual analog scales (VAS) for pain and fatigue at baseline (preoperatively) and at 1 and 3 mo postoperatively. Responsiveness and construct validity (discriminant and convergent) were investigated by testing a priori hypotheses.

RESULTS

Fifty-five patients were analyzed (45% male, 62 ± 12 y, 29% video-assisted). There was no significant difference between median EQ-5D scores obtained at baseline (0.83 [interquartile range {IQR 0.80-1}]) compared to scores at 1 mo (0.83 [0.80-1], P = 0.86) and 3 mo after surgery (1 [0.83-1]; P = 0.09). At 1 mo after surgery, EQ-5D scores were significantly lower in patients undergoing thoracotomy versus video-assisted surgery (0.82 [IQR 0.77-0.89] versus 1 [0.83-1], P = 0.003), but there were no significant differences between patients ≥ 70-y old versus younger (0.95 [IQR 0.82-1] versus 0.83 [0.77-1], P = 0.09) or between patients with versus without complications (0.82 [IQR 0.79-0.95] versus 0.83 [0.80-1], P = 0.10). There was a low but significant correlation between EQ-5D and VAS scores of pain and fatigue (Rho -0.30 to -0.47, P ≤ 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence of convergent validity, the EQ-5D was not sensitive to the hypothesized trajectory of postoperative recovery and showed limited discriminant validity. This study suggests that the EQ-5D may not be appropriate to value recovery after lung resection.

Comprehensive long-term care of patients with lung cancer: development of a novel thoracic survivorship program

BACKGROUND

Recent advances have improved the likelihood of long-term survival for patients with lung cancer. However, little attention has been given to the growing need for dedicated survivorship care for these patients. To address this unmet need, we developed a unique follow-up care model.

METHODS

In 2006, we convened a multidisciplinary working group to design a thoracic survivorship program (TSP) that provides follow-up by a nurse practitioner (NP) trained in survivorship care. Patients with early-stage lung cancer who were disease free for at least 1 year after resection were eligible for the program, which incorporates a standardized approach to cancer surveillance. Data on symptoms and outcomes were prospectively collected. Real-time electronic medical documentation was developed to optimize communication with primary physicians.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed for the initial phase of the program, which comprised 655 patients. Ninety-two percent of eligible survivors who remained disease free chose to continue their care in the TSP, rather than receive follow-up with their thoracic surgeon. Clinically significant posttreatment symptoms were common, including fatigue (46%), anxiety (32%), chronic pain (25%), dyspnea (14%), and depression (12%). The majority of recurrences (72%) and second primary cancers (91%) in this cohort were identified by scheduled chest computed tomography at TSP visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Survivorship care for patients with lung cancer, delivered in our NP-led TSP, is feasible, effective, and well accepted by patients. Through the implementation of a uniform self-sustaining patient-centered system, the TSP model improves on the variation of physician-led follow-up care.

[Consequences of pneumonectomy in the early and late phases]

Pneumonectomy can represent the appropriate surgical treatment option in advanced or centrally localized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A satisfactory oncologic tumor surgery can be reached in these cases although pneumonectomy is associated with a significantly higher mortality and morbidity than less extensive resection of the lung parenchyma.The aim of this article is a systematic review and the presentation of possible postoperative consequences of pneumonectomy in the early and late phases, which depend not only on the underlying disease but are also primarily affected by the state and function of the remaining contralateral lung parenchyma. Cardiopulmonary complications, especially pneumonia, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrhythmia or myocardial infarction lead to increased 30-day mortality in the early postoperative period. Moreover, advanced ages over 70 years can be identified as a significant risk factor for poor quality of life after pneumonectomy.

Minimally invasive lung surgery and postoperative quality of life

Quality of life (QOL) after medical interventions is paramount to the patient considering treatment recommendations. To understand QOL in thoracic surgery patients, one must examine the outcomes patients prioritize (preferences) from successful surgical therapy, overall functional status of thoracic surgery patients, the literature addressing QOL after thoracic surgery (TS) and the possible benefit of minimally invasive TS, and, finally, future directions of TS postoperative QOL research. The primary focus of this article is lung cancer surgery with mention of other thoracic disease such as empyema, pneumothorax, or emphysema, as well.

Radical treatment of non-small cell lung cancer during the last 5 years

The management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has continued to improve over the last 5 years due to advances in surgery, radiological staging, combined modality therapies and advances in radiation technology. We have an updated staging classification (7th Edition American Joint Committee on Cancer staging) and now in 2011, a new histology classification introducing the concepts of adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. This classification has profound surgical implications as the role of limited resection is reconsidered for early stage lesions. Surgery is curative in early stage disease. The role of surgery in locally advanced NSCLC remains controversial. The principal aim is a complete resection as this will determine long-term prognosis. Intraoperative staging of lung cancer is extremely important to determine the extent of resection according to the tumour and nodal status. Systematic nodal dissection is generally advocated to obtain accurate intraoperative staging and to help decide on adjuvant therapy. Radiotherapy currently plays a major role in the management of lung cancer as most patients are not surgical candidates due to disease stage, fitness and co-morbidities. In the last 5 years we have seen continuing optimisation of chemo-radiotherapy combinations and technological advances including the development of image guided radiotherapy (IGRT), stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Quality of life evaluation is becoming increasingly important and should be considered when deciding on a specific treatment, especially in a multimodality setting.

The impact on quality of life after en-bloc resection for non-small-cell lung cancer involving the chest wall

BACKGROUND

  En-bloc resection for non-small cell lung cancer with chest-wall involvement may achieve a 5-year survival rate higher than 40%, but the impact on postoperative quality of life is not yet known.

METHODS

  Twenty-six patients undergoing en-bloc lung resections were included. Life quality ratings were assessed through a Short-Form 36 questionnaire preoperatively and at six, 12, 18 and 24 month follow-up visits. The degree of dyspnea, pain level, and flow-volume curves were also obtained at the same time periods. Changes occurring over time were analyzed by means of repeated-measure ANOVA.

RESULTS

  As a whole, the Physical Component Summary score declined six months postoperatively (P < 0.0001) and failed to improve thereafter. Patients with preoperative Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV₁ ), <80% predicted (P = 0.029), resected ribs >2 (P = 0.03), and chest wall defect ≥50 cm² (P = 0.007) experienced a greater and lasting impairment. Net postoperative decrease in FVC (P = 0.02; r = 0.48) and dyspnea worsening (P = 0.03; r =-043 at six months, P = 0.05; r =-0.39 at 12 months) were also correlated with the extent of physical deterioration, whereas age (P = 0.92), gender (P = 0.51), type of resection (P = 0.71), and adjuvant therapy (P = 0.68) did not. The Physical Component Summary didn't change significantly in patients with high pain levels (VAS >7). The Mental Component Summary score increased slightly at six months, with no difference in any patients' subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

  The extent of chest wall resection, preoperative FEV₁ , and postoperative decline in FVC were the main indicators of quality of life impairment after en-bloc resection for lung cancer. The impact upon quality of life should be considered in a cost-to-benefit ratio of planning this surgery in suboptimal candidates.

Patient-reported quality of life after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Deterioration in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is frequently observed after surgery for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer. As stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) can result in local control percentages exceeding 90%, we studied baseline and post-treatment HRQOL in SABR patients.

METHODS

HRQOL data were collected prospectively using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire in 382 consecutive patients treated with SABR. Patients were referred from 68 Dutch centers, with 86% judged unfit for surgery, and 14% declining surgery. An SABR dose of 60 Gy was delivered in three-, five-, or eight treatment fractions, depending on tumor diameter and location. HRQOL data were available for 382 patients at baseline (pre-SABR), and for 282, 212, 144, 56, and 43 patients at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-SABR, respectively.

RESULTS

Median survival was 40 months, with a 2-year survival of 66%. Local, regional, and distant failure percentages at 2 years were 6%, 13%, and 22%, respectively. Mean baseline global HRQOL and physical functioning scores were 62.9 ± 1.1 and 61.7 ± 1.1, respectively. Baseline symptom scores were highest for dyspnea (47.1 ± 1.7) and fatigue (37.4 ± 1.3). Except for a nonsignificant decrease in 2 to 3 points per year in physical functioning, no statistically or clinically significant worsening of any of the HRQOL functioning or symptom scores at any follow-up time point was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients referred for SABR have substantially worse baseline HRQOL scores than those reported in the surgical literature. Clinically relevant deteriorations in HRQOL subscale scores were not observed after SABR.

Short-term outcomes after thoracoscopic lobectomy in elderly compared to younger patients

OBJECTIVE

: As the population continues to age, more benign and malignant lung lesions requiring surgical intervention are being identified in elderly patients. Historically, advanced age has been used to justify performing wedge resection rather than a lobectomy in elderly patients. The introduction of thoracoscopic surgery has resulted in improved short-term outcomes compared with thoracotomy. The objective of this study is to compare short-term outcomes of thoracoscopic lung resection in elderly patients to that in younger patients.

METHODS

: A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing thoracoscopic anatomic lobectomy without previous chemotherapy or radiation between April 2006 and April 2009. Patient charts were reviewed to determine risk factors, perioperative complications, and length of stay. Student's t test was used for comparison between groups.

RESULTS

: Over the period studied, 86 patients underwent thoracoscopic lobectomy. Forty of them were 70 years or older. Baseline pulmonary function testing showed an average FEV1 of 85% predicted (81% younger vs 90% older, P = nonsignificant). Median chest tube duration was 3 days and median length of stay was 4 days in both groups. The overall incidence of perioperative complications was 21% and was not different in the two groups (20% younger vs 22% older).

CONCLUSIONS

: Elderly patients with good baseline pulmonary function tolerate thoracoscopic lobectomy as well as younger patients. Advanced age alone should not be considered a contraindication to lobectomy in the era of thoracoscopy. Elderly patients should be offered lobectomy rather than wedge resection on the basis of the same criteria used in younger patients.

Quality of life in pulmonary surgery: choosing, using, and developing assessment tools

There is mounting recognition that, to aid surgical decision making, treatment efficacy needs to be measured in a variety of ways, with health-related quality of life now widely regarded as an important outcome in pulmonary surgical populations. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the key issues to consider if an investigator wishes to incorporate health-related quality of life assessment into trials and studies of pulmonary surgery, drawing on recent studies of lung cancer surgery as an example.

Optimal management of pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer

The incidence of colorectal cancers is rising worldwide and pulmonary metastases were seen in approximately 10-15% of all patients. Surgical metastasectomy is a widely accepted procedure in selected patients and is considered as the only curative option in patients with secondary pulmonary malignancy. But surgical resection remains controversial due to the lack of randomized trials, comparing pulmonary metastasectomy to control, either medical therapy, or observation. This article will discuss the differentiated therapeutic strategies for patients with pulmonary metastases of colorectal cancer, focusing on surgical resection, patient evaluation, prognostic factors, interdisciplinary therapeutic approaches and current trials.

Differences in psychological perception of lung cancer between patients, medical staff and medical students

OBJECTIVES

In clinical practice, medical staff is often unaware that what they think about patient's disease differs much from the perceptions and feelings of the patient. The aim of the study was to analyse the differences in psychological perception of lung cancer between patients treated with combined regimen for lung cancer (n = 30), medical staff (n = 94) and medical students (n = 303).

METHODS

A total of 427 persons were enrolled in this questionnaire study using Imagination and Perception of Illness Scale (IPIS) by Sak. The IPIS scale items described: loss of motivation to carry out specific activities (eight items), mental sphere destruction (six items), physical sphere destruction (eight items), pessimism (four items), being a burden to others (three items) and loss of control over the illness (three items). A seven-point scale from '0', meaning the choice of maximum positive feature, to '6', meaning the choice of maximum negative feature, was used. The higher result obtained within a given factor signified the more negative perception of the illness.

RESULTS

In all IPIS items, the results among patients were significantly lower than among medical staff or students (P = 0.018 and P = 0.001, respectively). Medical staff and students perceive lung cancer as causing more profound destruction in patient's mental and physical spheres than patients do.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients treated for lung cancer with combined regimen perceive their disease more optimistically than what is imagined by medical staff and students, and may underestimate the threat. It may be explained by psychological adaptation of patients to their disease during prolonged treatment. We believe that informing lung cancer patients in detail about their illness should be recommended to enhance self-awareness and doctor-patient cooperation.

Long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to examine the long-term health-related quality of life following surgery for lung cancer.

METHODS

We performed a prospective population-based cohort study to explore health-related quality of life after lung surgery. We used a validated quality-of-life instrument (Short Form-36 (SF-36)) to gather information on health-related quality of life at baseline, 6 months, and 2 years after surgery. The main outcome measures were the SF-36 physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2008, 249 patients were included. The response rate at 6 months was 85% and, at 2 years of follow-up, was 95%. The study population consisted of 166 patients who completed all three SF-36 questionnaires. The PCS score decreased from baseline to 6 months (47.4 vs 41.1; p < 0.001) and remained unchanged at the 2-year follow-up (41.1 vs 41.4). The MCS score increased from baseline to 6 months (40.5 vs 44.6; p = 0.001), with a further improvement at 2 years (44.6 vs 46.9; p = 0.005). At 2-year follow-up, both the PCS score and the MCS score of the study population were lower than that of an age- and gender-matched reference population (41.4 vs 44.0; p = 0.013 and 46.9 vs 50.6; p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer had an early decrease in the physical aspect of health-related quality of life at 6 months after surgery, which was still present at 2 years of follow-up. A moderate clinically relevant improvement was noted in the mental aspect at 6 months and further improvement was reported at 2 years of follow-up.