1
|
Adetunji A, Venishetty N, Gombakomba N, Jeune KR, Smith M, Winer A. Genomics in active surveillance and post-prostatectomy patients: A review of when and how to use effectively. Curr Urol Rep 2024; 25:253-260. [PMID: 38869692 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-024-01219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/05/2024] [Indexed: 06/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate cancer (PCa) represents a significant health burden globally, ranking as the most diagnosed cancer among men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Conventional treatment methods such as radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy have significant side effects which often impact quality of life. As our understanding of the natural history and progression of PCa has evolved, so has the evolution of management options. RECENT FINDINGS Active surveillance (AS) has become an increasingly favored approach to the management of very low, low, and properly selected favorable intermediate risk PCa. AS permits ongoing observation and postpones intervention until definitive treatment is required. There are, however, challenges with selecting patients for AS, which further emphasizes the need for more precise tools to better risk stratify patients and choose candidates more accurately. Tissue-based biomarkers, such as ProMark, Prolaris, GPS (formerly Oncotype DX), and Decipher, are valuable because they improve the accuracy of patient selection for AS and offer important information on the prognosis and severity of disease. By enabling patients to be categorized according to their risk profiles, these biomarkers help physicians and patients make better informed treatment choices and lower the possibility of overtreatment. Even with their potential, further standardization and validation of these biomarkers is required to guarantee their broad clinical utility. Active surveillance has emerged as a preferred strategy for managing low-risk prostate cancer, and tissue-based biomarkers play a crucial role in refining patient selection and risk stratification. Standardization and validation of these biomarkers are essential to ensure their widespread clinical use and optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adedayo Adetunji
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
| | - Nikit Venishetty
- Paul L. Foster School of Medicine, Texas Tech Health Sciences Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Nita Gombakomba
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Karl-Ray Jeune
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Smith
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Winer
- Department of Urology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nguyen JK, Harik LR, Klein EA, Li J, Corrigan D, Liu S, Chan E, Hawley S, Auman H, Newcomb LF, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Filson CP, Simko JP, Nelson PS, Tretiakova MS, Troyer D, True LD, Vakar-Lopez F, Weight CJ, Lin DW, Brooks JD, McKenney JK. Proposal for an optimised definition of adverse pathology (unfavourable histology) that predicts metastatic risk in prostatic adenocarcinoma independent of grade group and pathological stage. Histopathology 2024; 85:598-613. [PMID: 38828674 PMCID: PMC11365761 DOI: 10.1111/his.15231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Histological grading of prostate cancer is a powerful prognostic tool, but current criteria for grade assignment are not fully optimised. Our goal was to develop and test a simplified histological grading model, based heavily on large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, with optimised sensitivity for predicting metastatic potential. METHODS AND RESULTS Two separate non-overlapping cohorts were identified: a 419-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort with long term clinical follow-up and a 209-patient post-radical prostatectomy cohort in which all patients had pathologically confirmed metastatic disease. All prostatectomies were re-reviewed for high-risk histological patterns of carcinoma termed 'unfavourable histology'. Unfavourable histology is defined by any classic Gleason pattern 5 component, any large cribriform morphology (> 0.25 mm) or intraductal carcinoma, complex intraluminal papillary architecture, grade 3 stromogenic carcinoma and complex anastomosing cord-like growth. For the outcome cohort, Kaplan-Meier analysis compared biochemical recurrence, metastasis and death between subjects with favourable and unfavourable histology, stratified by pathological stage and grade group. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated adding unfavourable histology to the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) post-prostatectomy nomogram and stratification by percentage of unfavourable histology. At 15 years unfavourable histology predicted biochemical recurrence, with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 88%, metastatic disease at 100 and 48% and death at 100 and 46%. Grade group 2 prostate cancers with unfavourable histology were associated with metastasis independent of pathological stage, while those without had no risk. Histological models for prediction of metastasis based on only large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma or increasing diameter of cribriform size improved specificity, but with lower sensitivity. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that unfavourable histology significantly improved discriminatory power of the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram for biochemical failure (likelihood ratio test P < 0.001). In the retrospective review of a separate RP cohort in which all patients had confirmed metastatic disease, none had unequivocal favourable histology. CONCLUSIONS Unfavourable histology at radical prostatectomy is associated with metastatic risk, predicted adverse outcomes better than current grading and staging systems and improved the MSKCC post-prostatectomy nomogram. Most importantly, unfavourable histology stratified grade group 2 prostate cancers into those with and without metastatic potential, independent of stage. While unfavourable histology is driven predominantly by large cribriform/intraductal carcinoma, the recognition and inclusion of other specific architectural patterns add to the sensitivity for predicting metastatic disease. Moreover, a simplified dichotomous model improves communication and could increase implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane K. Nguyen
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Lara R. Harik
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Eric A. Klein
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jianbo Li
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Dillon Corrigan
- Lerner Research Institute, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Shiguang Liu
- Department of Pathology, University of Florida Health, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Emily Chan
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Sarah Hawley
- Canary Foundation, Palo Alto, CA
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Lisa F. Newcomb
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Peter R. Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | | | | | - Jeff P. Simko
- Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Peter S. Nelson
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Maria S. Tretiakova
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Dean Troyer
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA
| | - Lawrence D. True
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Daniel W Lin
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA
| | - James D. Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - Jesse K. McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Institute of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petkov VI, Byun JS, Ward KC, Schussler NC, Archer NP, Bentler S, Doherty JA, Durbin EB, Gershman ST, Cheng I, Insaf T, Gonsalves L, Hernandez BY, Koch L, Liu L, Monnereau A, Morawski BM, Schwartz SM, Stroup A, Wiggins C, Wu XC, Bonds S, Negoita S, Penberthy L. Reporting tumor genomic test results to SEER registries via linkages. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:168-179. [PMID: 39102888 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Precision medicine has become a mainstay of cancer care in recent years. The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program has been an authoritative source of cancer statistics and data since 1973. However, tumor genomic information has not been adequately captured in the cancer surveillance data, which impedes population-based research on molecular subtypes. To address this, the SEER Program has developed and implemented a centralized process to link SEER registries' tumor cases with genomic test results that are provided by molecular laboratories to the registries. METHODS Data linkages were carried out following operating procedures for centralized linkages established by the SEER Program. The linkages used Match*Pro, a probabilistic linkage software, and were facilitated by the registries' trusted third party (an honest broker). The SEER registries provide to NCI limited datasets that undergo preliminary evaluation prior to their release to the research community. RESULTS Recently conducted genomic linkages included OncotypeDX Breast Recurrence Score, OncotypeDX Breast Ductal Carcinoma in Situ, OncotypeDX Genomic Prostate Score, Decipher Prostate Genomic Classifier, DecisionDX Uveal Melanoma, DecisionDX Preferentially Expressed Antigen in Melanoma, DecisionDX Melanoma, and germline tests results in Georgia and California SEER registries. CONCLUSIONS The linkages of cancer cases from SEER registries with genomic test results obtained from molecular laboratories offer an effective approach for data collection in cancer surveillance. By providing de-identified data to the research community, the NCI's SEER Program enables scientists to investigate numerous research inquiries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina I Petkov
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jung S Byun
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Natalie P Archer
- Cancer Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Suzanne Bentler
- Iowa Cancer Registry, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Hunstman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Eric B Durbin
- Cancer Research Informatics Shared Resource Facility, Markey Cancer Center, Kentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | | | - Iona Cheng
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tabassum Insaf
- New York State Department of Health, New York State Cancer Registry, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Lou Gonsalves
- Connecticut Department of Public Health, Connecticut Tumor Registry, Hartford, CT, USA
| | | | - Lori Koch
- Illinois State Cancer Registry, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - Lihua Liu
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alain Monnereau
- Public Health Institute, Cancer Registry of Greater California, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Stephen M Schwartz
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Charles Wiggins
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - Xiao-Cheng Wu
- School of Medicine, Louisiana State University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Sarah Bonds
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Serban Negoita
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lynne Penberthy
- Surveillance Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nourmohammadi Abadchi S, Salles DC, Flannery C, Sama V, Baehner FL, Zambon JP, Mendes AA, DePaula Oliveira L, Han M, Jing Y, Partin AW, Trock BJ, Lotan TL. Association of Genomic Prostate Score at positive margin with recurrence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2024. [PMID: 38953550 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the utility of the 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score® (GPS; MDxHealth, Irvine, CA, USA) performed on prostate cancer at the positive margin of the radical prostatectomy (RP) for its association with risk of subsequent biochemical recurrence (BCR). PATIENTS AND METHODS We designed a case-cohort for the outcome of BCR, selecting 223 from a cohort of 813 RP patients treated at Johns Hopkins from 2008 to 2017 with positive margins and available clinical data; of these, 213 had available tissue and clinical data. RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue adjacent to the positive surgical margin and the GPS was evaluable in 203 of these patients with a score ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher risk. All patients underwent RP with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (ART). The statistical analysis employed Cox proportional hazards regression models for outcome of BCR weighted for case-cohort design. RESULTS In univariable analysis, every 20-unit increase in the GPS was associated with a nearly threefold increase in risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] per 20 units 2.82, P < 0.001). In a multivariable Cox model adjusted for age, race, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Postsurgical score, Grade Group at the positive margin, and ART, the GPS was significantly associated with BCR (HR 1.56 per 20 units; 95% confidence interval 1.11-2.19; P = 0.011). The study is limited by its retrospective and single institution design. CONCLUSIONS The GPS at the positive surgical margin could help stratify prognosis and inform clinical decision-making regarding adjuvant therapy after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Daniela C Salles
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Adrianna A Mendes
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lia DePaula Oliveira
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Misop Han
- MDX Health Corporation, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Yuezhou Jing
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alan W Partin
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Bruce J Trock
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Tamara L Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nguyen AM, Carter GC, Wilson LAM, Canfield S. Real-world utilization, patient characteristics, and treatment patterns among men with localized prostate cancer tested with the 17-gene genomic prostate score® (GPS TM) assay. Prostate 2024; 84:922-931. [PMID: 38666513 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 06/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Descriptive study focusing on real-world utilization and characteristics of men with prostate cancer tested with the 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score® (GPS™) assay by linking administrative claims and electronic health record (EHR) data with GPS results. METHODS This retrospective, observational cohort study (January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2020) included men aged 40-80 years with localized prostate cancer claims, continuous enrollment in Optum's Integrated Claims data set, ≥1 day of EHR clinical activity, and a GPS result. Men were classified as undergoing definitive therapy (DT) (prostatectomy, radiation, or focal therapy) or active surveillance (AS). AS and DT distribution were analyzed across GPS results, National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) risk, and race. Costs were assessed 6 months after the first GPS result (index); clinical outcomes and AS persistence were assessed during the variable follow-up. All variables were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS Of 834 men, 650 (77.9%) underwent AS and 184 (22.1%) DT. Most men had Quan-Charlson comorbidity scores of 1-2 and a tumor stage of T1c (index). The most common Gleason patterns were 3 + 3 (79.6%) (AS cohort) and 3 + 4 (55.9%) (DT cohort). The mean (standard deviation) GPS results at index were 23.2 (11.3) (AS) and 30.9 (12.9) (DT). AS decreased with increasing GPS result and NCCN risk. Differences between races were minimal. Total costs were substantially higher in the DT cohort. CONCLUSIONS Most men with GPS-tested localized prostate cancer underwent AS, indicating the GPS result can inform clinical management. Decreasing AS with increasing GPS result and NCCN risk suggests the GPS complements NCCN risk stratification.
Collapse
|
6
|
Charlton PV, O'Reilly D, Philippou Y, Rao SR, Lamb ADG, Mills IG, Higgins GS, Hamdy FC, Verrill C, Buffa FM, Bryant RJ. Molecular analysis of archival diagnostic prostate cancer biopsies identifies genomic similarities in cases with progression post-radiotherapy, and those with de novo metastatic disease. Prostate 2024; 84:977-990. [PMID: 38654435 PMCID: PMC11253896 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to identify molecular features that improve prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification before radical treatment with curative intent. Molecular analysis of historical diagnostic formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) prostate biopsies from cohorts with post-radiotherapy (RT) long-term clinical follow-up has been limited. Utilizing parallel sequencing modalities, we performed a proof-of-principle sequencing analysis of historical diagnostic FFPE prostate biopsies. We compared patients with (i) stable PCa (sPCa) postprimary or salvage RT, (ii) progressing PCa (pPCa) post-RT, and (iii) de novo metastatic PCa (mPCa). METHODS A cohort of 19 patients with diagnostic prostate biopsies (n = 6 sPCa, n = 5 pPCa, n = 8 mPCa) and mean 4 years 10 months follow-up (diagnosed 2009-2016) underwent nucleic acid extraction from demarcated malignancy. Samples underwent 3'RNA sequencing (3'RNAseq) (n = 19), nanoString analysis (n = 12), and Illumina 850k methylation (n = 8) sequencing. Bioinformatic analysis was performed to coherently identify differentially expressed genes and methylated genomic regions (MGRs). RESULTS Eighteen of 19 samples provided useable 3'RNAseq data. Principal component analysis (PCA) demonstrated similar expression profiles between pPCa and mPCa cases, versus sPCa. Coherently differentially methylated probes between these groups identified ~600 differentially MGRs. The top 50 genes with increased expression in pPCa patients were associated with reduced progression-free survival post-RT (p < 0.0001) in an external cohort. CONCLUSIONS 3'RNAseq, nanoString and 850k-methylation analyses are each achievable from historical FFPE diagnostic pretreatment prostate biopsies, unlocking the potential to utilize large cohorts of historic clinical samples. Profiling similarities between individuals with pPCa and mPCa suggests biological similarities and historical radiological staging limitations, which warrant further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Vincent Charlton
- Department of OncologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of OncologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | | | - Yiannis Philippou
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | - Srinivasa Rao Rao
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Alastair David Gordon Lamb
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | | | - Geoff Stuart Higgins
- Department of OncologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of OncologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | - Freddie Charles Hamdy
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
- Department of PathologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
| | | | - Richard John Bryant
- Department of UrologyOxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxfordUK
- Nuffield Department of Surgical SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ledesma-Bazan S, Cascardo F, Bizzotto J, Olszevicki S, Vazquez E, Gueron G, Cotignola J. Predicting prostate cancer progression with a Multi-lncRNA expression-based risk score and nomogram integrating ISUP grading. Noncoding RNA Res 2024; 9:612-623. [PMID: 38576998 PMCID: PMC10993238 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncrna.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease; therefore, estimating patient prognosis accurately is challenging due to the lack of biomarkers with sufficient specificity and sensitivity. One of the current challenges lies in integrating genomic and transcriptomic data with clinico-pathological features and in incorporating their application in everyday clinical practice. Therefore, we aimed to model a risk score and nomogram containing long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) expression and clinico-pathological data to better predict the probability of prostate cancer progression. We performed bioinformatics analyses to identify lncRNAs differentially expressed across various prostate cancer stages and associated with progression-free survival. This information was further integrated into a prognostic risk score and nomogram containing transcriptomic and clinico-pathological features to estimate the risk of disease progression. We used RNA-seq data from 5 datasets from public repositories (total n = 178) comprising different stages of prostate cancer: pre-treatment primary prostate adenocarcinomas, post-treatment tumors and metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer. We found 30 lncRNAs with consistent differential expression in all comparisons made using two R-based packages. Multivariate progression-free survival analysis including the ISUP group as covariate, revealed that 7/30 lncRNAs were significantly associated with time-to-progression. Next, we combined the expression of these 7 lncRNAs into a multi-lncRNA score and dichotomized the patients into low- or high-score. Patients with a high-score showed a 4-fold risk of disease progression (HR = 4.30, 95 %CI = 2.66-6.97, p = 3.1e-9). Furthermore, we modelled a combined risk-score containing information on the multi-lncRNA score and ISUP group. We found that patients with a high-risk score had nearly 8-fold risk of progression (HR = 7.65, 95 %CI = 4.05-14.44, p = 3.4e-10). Finally, we created and validated a nomogram to help uro-oncologists to better predict patient's risk of progression at 3- and 5-years post-diagnosis. In conclusion, the integration of lncRNA expression data and clinico-pathological features of prostate tumors into predictive models might aid in tailored disease risk assessment and treatment for patients with prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Ledesma-Bazan
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Florencia Cascardo
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Juan Bizzotto
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Universidad Argentina de la Empresa (UADE), Instituto de Tecnología (INTEC), Buenos Aires C1073AAO, Argentina
| | - Santiago Olszevicki
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Elba Vazquez
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Geraldine Gueron
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Javier Cotignola
- Universidad de Buenos Aires, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Departamento de Química Biológica, Laboratorio de Inflamación y Cáncer, C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- CONICET - Universidad de Buenos Aires, Instituto de Química Biológica de la Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (IQUIBICEN), C1428EGA, CABA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tosoian JJ, Zhang Y, Xiao L, Xie C, Samora NL, Niknafs YS, Chopra Z, Siddiqui J, Zheng H, Herron G, Vaishampayan N, Robinson HS, Arivoli K, Trock BJ, Ross AE, Morgan TM, Palapattu GS, Salami SS, Kunju LP, Tomlins SA, Sokoll LJ, Chan DW, Srivastava S, Feng Z, Sanda MG, Zheng Y, Wei JT, Chinnaiyan AM. Development and Validation of an 18-Gene Urine Test for High-Grade Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol 2024; 10:726-736. [PMID: 38635241 PMCID: PMC11190811 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0455] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
Importance Benefits of prostate cancer (PCa) screening with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) alone are largely offset by excess negative biopsies and overdetection of indolent cancers resulting from the poor specificity of PSA for high-grade PCa (ie, grade group [GG] 2 or greater). Objective To develop a multiplex urinary panel for high-grade PCa and validate its external performance relative to current guideline-endorsed biomarkers. Design, Setting, and Participants RNA sequencing analysis of 58 724 genes identified 54 markers of PCa, including 17 markers uniquely overexpressed by high-grade cancers. Gene expression and clinical factors were modeled in a new urinary test for high-grade PCa (MyProstateScore 2.0 [MPS2]). Optimal models were developed in parallel without prostate volume (MPS2) and with prostate volume (MPS2+). The locked models underwent blinded external validation in a prospective National Cancer Institute trial cohort. Data were collected from January 2008 to December 2020, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023. Exposure Protocolized blood and urine collection and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures Multiple biomarker tests were assessed in the validation cohort, including serum PSA alone, the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial risk calculator, and the Prostate Health Index (PHI) as well as derived multiplex 2-gene and 3-gene models, the original 2-gene MPS test, and the 18-gene MPS2 models. Under a testing approach with 95% sensitivity for PCa of GG 2 or greater, measures of diagnostic accuracy and clinical consequences of testing were calculated. Cancers of GG 3 or greater were assessed secondarily. Results Of 761 men included in the development cohort, the median (IQR) age was 63 (58-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.6-7.2) ng/mL; of 743 men included in the validation cohort, the median (IQR) age was 62 (57-68) years, and the median (IQR) PSA level was 5.6 (4.1-8.0) ng/mL. In the validation cohort, 151 (20.3%) had high-grade PCa on biopsy. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values were 0.60 using PSA alone, 0.66 using the risk calculator, 0.77 using PHI, 0.76 using the derived multiplex 2-gene model, 0.72 using the derived multiplex 3-gene model, and 0.74 using the original MPS model compared with 0.81 using the MPS2 model and 0.82 using the MPS2+ model. At 95% sensitivity, the MPS2 model would have reduced unnecessary biopsies performed in the initial biopsy population (range for other tests, 15% to 30%; range for MPS2, 35% to 42%) and repeat biopsy population (range for other tests, 9% to 21%; range for MPS2, 46% to 51%). Across pertinent subgroups, the MPS2 models had negative predictive values of 95% to 99% for cancers of GG 2 or greater and of 99% for cancers of GG 3 or greater. Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a new 18-gene PCa test had higher diagnostic accuracy for high-grade PCa relative to existing biomarker tests. Clinically, use of this test would have meaningfully reduced unnecessary biopsies performed while maintaining highly sensitive detection of high-grade cancers. These data support use of this new PCa biomarker test in patients with elevated PSA levels to reduce the potential harms of PCa screening while preserving its long-term benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey J. Tosoian
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Yuping Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lanbo Xiao
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Cassie Xie
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nathan L. Samora
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Zoey Chopra
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Javed Siddiqui
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Heng Zheng
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Grace Herron
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | - Hunter S. Robinson
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | - Bruce J. Trock
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ashley E. Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Todd M. Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | | | | | | | - Scott A. Tomlins
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Strata Oncology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lori J. Sokoll
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Daniel W. Chan
- Departments of Pathology and Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sudhir Srivastava
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ziding Feng
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | | - Yingye Zheng
- Department of Biostatistics, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - John T. Wei
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Arul M. Chinnaiyan
- Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cui F, Tang X, Man C, Fan Y. Prognostic value of 17-Gene genomic prostate score in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:628. [PMID: 38783246 PMCID: PMC11112896 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12389-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 17-gene Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) test has been clinically employed to predict adverse prognosis in prostate cancer. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the 17-gene GPS in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS Potentially relevant studies were obtained by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase databases from their inception to December 1, 2023. Studies were considered eligible if they evaluated the association of the 17-gene GPS with distant metastases, biochemical recurrence, or prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) in prostate cancer patients. To estimate the prognostic value, we pooled the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the high versus low GPS group or per 20-unit increase in GPS. RESULTS Seven cohort studies that reported on 8 articles comprising 1,962 patients satisfied the eligibility criteria. Meta-analysis showed that per 20-unit increase in GPS was significantly associated with distant metastases (HR 2.99; 95% CI 1.97-4.53), biochemical recurrence (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.64-2.89), and PCSM (HR 3.14; 95% CI 1.86-5.30). Moreover, patients with high GPS (> 40 points) had an increased risk of distant metastases (HR 5.22; 95% CI 3.72-7.31), biochemical recurrence (HR 4.41; 95% CI 2.29-8.49), and PCSM (HR 3.81; 95% CI 1.74-8.33) than those with low GPS (≤ 40 points). CONCLUSIONS A higher 17-gene GPS significantly predicts distant metastases, biochemical recurrence, and PCSM in men with clinically localized prostate cancer. However, large-scale multicenter prospective studies are necessary to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feilun Cui
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Taizhou Second People's Hospital of Yangzhou University, Taizhou, 225500, China
- Department of Urology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212001, China
| | - Xuan Tang
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, 212002, China
| | - Changfeng Man
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
| | - Yu Fan
- Cancer Institute, The Affiliated People's Hospital, Jiangsu University, No. 8 Dianli Road, Zhenjiang, Zhenjiang, 212002, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Braun AE, Chan JM, Neuhaus J, Cowan JE, Kenfield SA, Van Blarigan EL, Tenggara I, Broering JM, Simko JP, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. The impact of genomic biomarkers on a clinical risk prediction model for upgrading/upstaging among men with favorable-risk prostate cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:1766-1772. [PMID: 38280206 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The challenge of distinguishing indolent from aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) complicates decision-making for men considering active surveillance (AS). Genomic classifiers (GCs) may improve risk stratification by predicting end points such as upgrading or upstaging (UG/US). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of GCs on UG/US risk prediction in a clinicopathologic model. METHODS Participants had favorable-risk PCa (cT1-2, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤15 ng/mL, and Gleason grade group 1 [GG1]/low-volume GG2). A prediction model was developed for 864 men at the University of California, San Francisco, with standard clinical variables (cohort 1), and the model was validated for 2267 participants from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE) registry (cohort 2). Logistic regression was used to compute the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to develop a prediction model for UG/US at prostatectomy. A GC (Oncotype Dx Genomic Prostate Score [GPS] or Prolaris) was then assessed to improve risk prediction. RESULTS The prediction model included biopsy GG1 versus GG2 (odds ratio [OR], 5.83; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.73-9.10); PSA (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.01-1.20; per 1 ng/mL), percent positive cores (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1.01-1.02; per 1%), prostate volume (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-0.99; per mL), and age (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07; per year), with AUC 0.70 (cohort 1) and AUC 0.69 (cohort 2). GPS was associated with UG/US (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; p < .01) and AUC 0.72, which indicates a comparable performance to the prediction model. CONCLUSIONS GCs did not substantially improve a clinical prediction model for UG/US, a short-term and imperfect surrogate for clinically relevant disease outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avery E Braun
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - June M Chan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John Neuhaus
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Janet E Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Stacey A Kenfield
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Erin L Van Blarigan
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Imelda Tenggara
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeanette M Broering
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hu C, Qiao X, Huang R, Hu C, Bao J, Wang X. Development and Validation of a Multimodality Model Based on Whole-Slide Imaging and Biparametric MRI for Predicting Postoperative Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2024; 6:e230143. [PMID: 38758079 PMCID: PMC11148661 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.230143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 02/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a machine learning multimodality model based on preoperative MRI, surgical whole-slide imaging (WSI), and clinical variables for predicting prostate cancer (PCa) biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP). Materials and Methods In this retrospective study (September 2015 to April 2021), 363 male patients with PCa who underwent RP were divided into training (n = 254; median age, 69 years [IQR, 64-74 years]) and testing (n = 109; median age, 70 years [IQR, 65-75 years]) sets at a ratio of 7:3. The primary end point was biochemical recurrence-free survival. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox algorithm was applied to select independent clinical variables and construct the clinical signature. The radiomics signature and pathomics signature were constructed using preoperative MRI and surgical WSI data, respectively. A multimodality model was constructed by combining the radiomics signature, pathomics signature, and clinical signature. Using Harrell concordance index (C index), the predictive performance of the multimodality model for BCR was assessed and compared with all single-modality models, including the radiomics signature, pathomics signature, and clinical signature. Results Both radiomics and pathomics signatures achieved good performance for BCR prediction (C index: 0.742 and 0.730, respectively) on the testing cohort. The multimodality model exhibited the best predictive performance, with a C index of 0.860 on the testing set, which was significantly higher than all single-modality models (all P ≤ .01). Conclusion The multimodality model effectively predicted BCR following RP in patients with PCa and may therefore provide an emerging and accurate tool to assist postoperative individualized treatment. Keywords: MR Imaging, Urinary, Pelvis, Comparative Studies Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Renpeng Huang
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Chunhong Hu
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Jie Bao
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| | - Ximing Wang
- From the Departments of Radiology (Chenhan Hu, X.Q., Chunhong Hu,
J.B., X.W.) and Pathology (R.H.), the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow
University, 188 Shizi Road, Suzhou 215006, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yin W, Chen G, Li Y, Li R, Jia Z, Zhong C, Wang S, Mao X, Cai Z, Deng J, Zhong W, Pan B, Lu J. Identification of a 9-gene signature to enhance biochemical recurrence prediction in primary prostate cancer: A benchmarking study using ten machine learning methods and twelve patient cohorts. Cancer Lett 2024; 588:216739. [PMID: 38395379 DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a prevalent malignancy among men worldwide, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is a critical turning point commonly used to guide the development of treatment strategies for primary PCa. However, the clinical parameters currently in use are inadequate for precise risk stratification and informing treatment choice. To address this issue, we conducted a study that collected transcriptomic data and clinical information from 1662 primary PCa patients across 12 multicenter cohorts globally. We leveraged 101 algorithm combinations that consisted of 10 machine learning methods to develop and validate a 9-gene signature, named BCR SCR, for predicting the risk of BCR after RP. Our results demonstrated that BCR SCR generally outperformed 102 published prognostic signatures. We further established the clinical significance of these nine genes in PCa progression at the protein level through immunohistochemistry on Tissue Microarray (TMA). Moreover, our data showed that patients with higher BCR SCR tended to have higher rates of BCR and distant metastasis after radical radiotherapy. Through drug target prediction analysis, we identified nine potential therapeutic agents for patients with high BCR SCR. In conclusion, the newly developed BCR SCR has significant translational potential in accurately stratifying the risk of patients who undergo RP, monitoring treatment courses, and developing new therapies for the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenjun Yin
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Guo Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Yutong Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China
| | - Ruidong Li
- Genetics, Genomics, and Bioinformatics Program, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA
| | - Zhenyu Jia
- Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA, 92521, USA
| | - Chuanfan Zhong
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Shuo Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Xiangming Mao
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China
| | - Zhouda Cai
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junhong Deng
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Weide Zhong
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Taipa, 999078, Macau, China.
| | - Bin Pan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510630, China.
| | - Jianming Lu
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, South China University of Technology, 510180, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Gao Y, Kim H, Kitata RB, Lin TT, Swensen AC, Shi T, Liu T. Multiplexed quantitative proteomics in prostate cancer biomarker development. Adv Cancer Res 2024; 161:31-69. [PMID: 39032952 DOI: 10.1016/bs.acr.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/23/2024]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common non-skin cancer among men in the United States. However, the widely used protein biomarker in PCa, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), while useful for initial detection, its use alone cannot detect aggressive PCa and can lead to overtreatment. This chapter provides an overview of PCa protein biomarker development. It reviews the state-of-the-art liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based proteomics technologies for PCa biomarker development, such as enhancing the detection sensitivity of low-abundance proteins through antibody-based or antibody-independent protein/peptide enrichment, enriching post-translational modifications such as glycosylation as well as information-rich extracellular vesicles, and increasing accuracy and throughput using advanced data acquisition methodologies. This chapter also summarizes recent PCa biomarker validation studies that applied those techniques in diverse specimen types, including cell lines, tissues, proximal fluids, urine, and blood, developing novel protein biomarkers for various clinical applications, including early detection and diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic intervention of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqian Gao
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Hyeyoon Kim
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Reta Birhanu Kitata
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tai-Tu Lin
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Adam C Swensen
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tujin Shi
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Tao Liu
- Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wen RM, Qiu Z, Marti GEW, Peterson EE, Marques FJG, Bermudez A, Wei Y, Nolley R, Lam N, Polasko AL, Chiu CL, Zhang D, Cho S, Karageorgos GM, McDonough E, Chadwick C, Ginty F, Jung KJ, Machiraju R, Mallick P, Crowley L, Pollack JR, Zhao H, Pitteri SJ, Brooks JD. AZGP1 deficiency promotes angiogenesis in prostate cancer. J Transl Med 2024; 22:383. [PMID: 38659028 PMCID: PMC11044612 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05183-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Loss of AZGP1 expression is a biomarker associated with progression to castration resistance, development of metastasis, and poor disease-specific survival in prostate cancer. However, high expression of AZGP1 cells in prostate cancer has been reported to increase proliferation and invasion. The exact role of AZGP1 in prostate cancer progression remains elusive. METHOD AZGP1 knockout and overexpressing prostate cancer cells were generated using a lentiviral system. The effects of AZGP1 under- or over-expression in prostate cancer cells were evaluated by in vitro cell proliferation, migration, and invasion assays. Heterozygous AZGP1± mice were obtained from European Mouse Mutant Archive (EMMA), and prostate tissues from homozygous knockout male mice were collected at 2, 6 and 10 months for histological analysis. In vivo xenografts generated from AZGP1 under- or over-expressing prostate cancer cells were used to determine the role of AZGP1 in prostate cancer tumor growth, and subsequent proteomics analysis was conducted to elucidate the mechanisms of AZGP1 action in prostate cancer progression. AZGP1 expression and microvessel density were measured in human prostate cancer samples on a tissue microarray of 215 independent patient samples. RESULT Neither the knockout nor overexpression of AZGP1 exhibited significant effects on prostate cancer cell proliferation, clonal growth, migration, or invasion in vitro. The prostates of AZGP1-/- mice initially appeared to have grossly normal morphology; however, we observed fibrosis in the periglandular stroma and higher blood vessel density in the mouse prostate by 6 months. In PC3 and DU145 mouse xenografts, over-expression of AZGP1 did not affect tumor growth. Instead, these tumors displayed decreased microvessel density compared to xenografts derived from PC3 and DU145 control cells, suggesting that AZGP1 functions to inhibit angiogenesis in prostate cancer. Proteomics profiling further indicated that, compared to control xenografts, AZGP1 overexpressing PC3 xenografts are enriched with angiogenesis pathway proteins, including YWHAZ, EPHA2, SERPINE1, and PDCD6, MMP9, GPX1, HSPB1, COL18A1, RNH1, and ANXA1. In vitro functional studies show that AZGP1 inhibits human umbilical vein endothelial cell proliferation, migration, tubular formation and branching. Additionally, tumor microarray analysis shows that AZGP1 expression is negatively correlated with blood vessel density in human prostate cancer tissues. CONCLUSION AZGP1 is a negative regulator of angiogenesis, such that loss of AZGP1 promotes angiogenesis in prostate cancer. AZGP1 likely exerts heterotypical effects on cells in the tumor microenvironment, such as stromal and endothelial cells. This study sheds light on the anti-angiogenic characteristics of AZGP1 in the prostate and provides a rationale to target AZGP1 to inhibit prostate cancer progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ru M Wen
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| | - Zhengyuan Qiu
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - G Edward W Marti
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Eric E Peterson
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Fernando Jose Garcia Marques
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Abel Bermudez
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Yi Wei
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Rosalie Nolley
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Nathan Lam
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Alex LaPat Polasko
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Chun-Lung Chiu
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Dalin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Sanghee Cho
- GE HealthCare Technology and Innovation Center, Niskayuna, NY, 12309, USA
| | | | | | - Chrystal Chadwick
- GE HealthCare Technology and Innovation Center, Niskayuna, NY, 12309, USA
| | - Fiona Ginty
- GE HealthCare Technology and Innovation Center, Niskayuna, NY, 12309, USA
| | - Kyeong Joo Jung
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Raghu Machiraju
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA
| | - Parag Mallick
- Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Laura Crowley
- Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan R Pollack
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Hongjuan Zhao
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Sharon J Pitteri
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
- Canary Center at Stanford for Cancer Early Detection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chappidi MR, Sjöström M, Greenland NY, Cowan JE, Baskin AS, Shee K, Simko JP, Chan E, Stohr BA, Washington SL, Nguyen HG, Quigley DA, Davicioni E, Feng FY, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Expansile Cribriform and Other Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer Subtypes. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:222-230. [PMID: 37474400 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 06/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancers featuring an expansile cribriform (EC) pattern are associated with worse clinical outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP). However, studies of the genomic characteristics of Gleason pattern 4 subtypes are limited. OBJECTIVE To explore transcriptomic characteristics and heterogeneity within Gleason pattern 4 subtypes (fused/poorly formed, glomeruloid, small cribriform, EC/intraductal carcinoma [IDC]) and the association with biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a retrospective cohort study including 165 men with grade group 2-4 prostate cancer who underwent RP at a single academic institution (2016-2020) and Decipher testing of the RP specimen. Patients with Gleason pattern 5 were excluded. IDC and EC patterns were grouped. Median follow-up was 2.5 yr after RP for patients without BCR. OUTCOMES MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Prompted by heterogeneity within pattern 4 subtypes identified via exploratory analyses, we investigated transcriptomic consensus clusters using partitioning around medoids and hallmark gene set scores. The primary clinical outcome was BCR, defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen measurements >0.2 ng/ml at least 8 wk after RP, or any additional treatment. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models were used to determine factors associated with BCR-free survival. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In this cohort, 99/165 patients (60%) had EC and 67 experienced BCR. Exploratory analyses and clustering demonstrated transcriptomic heterogeneity within each Gleason pattern 4 subtype. In the multivariable model controlled for pattern 4 subtype, margin status, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment Post-Surgical score, and Decipher score, a newly identified steroid hormone-driven cluster (hazard ratio 2.35 95% confidence interval 1.01-5.47) was associated with worse BCR-free survival. The study is limited by intermediate follow-up, no validation cohort, and lack of accounting for intratumoral and intraprostatic heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS Transcriptomic heterogeneity was present within and across each Gleason pattern 4 subtype, demonstrating there is additional biologic diversity not captured by histologic subtypes. This heterogeneity can be used to develop novel signatures and to classify transcriptomic subtypes, which may help in refining risk stratification following RP to further guide decision-making on adjuvant and salvage treatments. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied prostatectomy specimens and found that tumors with similar microscopic appearance can have genetic differences that may help to predict outcomes after prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Our results demonstrate that further gene expression analysis of prostate cancer subtypes may improve risk stratification after prostatectomy. Future studies are needed to develop novel gene expression signatures and validate these findings in independent sets of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meera R Chappidi
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Martin Sjöström
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Y Greenland
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Janet E Cowan
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Avi S Baskin
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kevin Shee
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jeffry P Simko
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Emily Chan
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Bradley A Stohr
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Samuel L Washington
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hao G Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David A Quigley
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hashemi Gheinani A, Kim J, You S, Adam RM. Bioinformatics in urology - molecular characterization of pathophysiology and response to treatment. Nat Rev Urol 2024; 21:214-242. [PMID: 37604982 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00805-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
The application of bioinformatics has revolutionized the practice of medicine in the past 20 years. From early studies that uncovered subtypes of cancer to broad efforts spearheaded by the Cancer Genome Atlas initiative, the use of bioinformatics strategies to analyse high-dimensional data has provided unprecedented insights into the molecular basis of disease. In addition to the identification of disease subtypes - which enables risk stratification - informatics analysis has facilitated the identification of novel risk factors and drivers of disease, biomarkers of progression and treatment response, as well as possibilities for drug repurposing or repositioning; moreover, bioinformatics has guided research towards precision and personalized medicine. Implementation of specific computational approaches such as artificial intelligence, machine learning and molecular subtyping has yet to become widespread in urology clinical practice for reasons of cost, disruption of clinical workflow and need for prospective validation of informatics approaches in independent patient cohorts. Solving these challenges might accelerate routine integration of bioinformatics into clinical settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Hashemi Gheinani
- Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
- Department for BioMedical Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jina Kim
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Sungyong You
- Department of Urology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Computational Biomedicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rosalyn M Adam
- Department of Urology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Talwar R, Akinsola O, Penson DF. What is cancer? A focus on Grade Group 1 prostate cancer. BJU Int 2024; 133:360-364. [PMID: 38229478 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2024]
Abstract
Since the widespread adoption of prostate-specific antigen-based screening for prostate cancer, the prevalence of Grade Group 1 (GG1) prostate cancer has risen. Historically, these patients were subjected to overtreatment of this otherwise indolent disease process, leading to significant quality-of-life detriments. Active surveillance as a primary management strategy has allowed for a focus on early detection while minimising morbidity from unnecessary intervention. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of the characteristics of GG1 prostatic adenocarcinoma, including its histological features, genomic differentiators, clinical progression, and implications for treatment guidelines, all supporting the movement to reclassify GG1 disease as a non-cancerous entity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchika Talwar
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | | | - David F Penson
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bologna E, Ditonno F, Licari LC, Franco A, Manfredi C, Mossack S, Pandolfo SD, De Nunzio C, Simone G, Leonardo C, Franco G. Tissue-Based Genomic Testing in Prostate Cancer: 10-Year Analysis of National Trends on the Use of Prolaris, Decipher, ProMark, and Oncotype DX. Clin Pract 2024; 14:508-520. [PMID: 38525718 PMCID: PMC10961791 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract14020039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2024] [Revised: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) management is moving towards patient-tailored strategies. Advances in molecular and genetic profiling of tumor tissues, integrated with clinical risk assessments, provide deeper insights into disease aggressiveness. This study aims to offer a comprehensive overview of the pivotal genomic tests supporting PCa treatment decisions, analyzing-through real-world data-trends in their use and the growth of supporting literature evidence. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted using the extensive PearlDiver™ Mariner database, which contains de-identified patient records, in compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were employed to identify patients diagnosed with PCa during the study period-2011 to 2021. We determined the utilization of primary tissue-based genetic tests (Oncocyte DX®, Prolaris®, Decipher®, and ProMark®) across all patients diagnosed with PCa. Subsequently, within the overall PCa cohort, patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and received genetic testing postoperatively were identified. The yearly distribution of these tests and the corresponding trends were illustrated with graphs. RESULTS During the study period, 1,561,203 patients with a PCa diagnosis were recorded. Of these, 20,748 underwent tissue-based genetic testing following diagnosis, representing 1.3% of the total cohort. An increasing trend was observed in the use of all genetic tests. Linear regression analysis showed a statistically significant increase over time in the use of individual tests (all p-values < 0.05). Among the patients who underwent RP, 3076 received genetic analysis following surgery, representing 1.27% of this group. CONCLUSIONS Our analysis indicates a growing trend in the utilization of tissue-based genomic testing for PCa. Nevertheless, they are utilized in less than 2% of PCa patients, whether at initial diagnosis or after surgical treatment. Although it is anticipated that their use may increase as more scientific evidence becomes available, their role requires further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Bologna
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, 37134 Verona, Italy
| | - Leslie Claire Licari
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Spencer Mossack
- Department of Urology, Rush University, Chicago, IL 60612, USA; (E.B.); (F.D.); (L.C.L.); (A.F.); (C.M.); (S.M.)
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80138 Naples, Italy;
| | - Cosimo De Nunzio
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Costantino Leonardo
- Department of Urology, “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy; (G.S.); (C.L.)
| | - Giorgio Franco
- Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University Rome, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, 00161 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lawisch GKDS, Dexheimer GM, Biolchi V, Seewald RA, Chies JAB. Prostate tumor markers: diagnosis, prognosis and management. Genet Mol Biol 2024; 46:e20230136. [PMID: 38407310 PMCID: PMC10895695 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2023-0136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCA) is the second most common type of cancer in the world. Nevertheless, diagnosis is still based on nonspecific methods, or invasive methods which makes clinical decision and diagnosis difficult, generating risk of both underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis. Given the high prevalence, morbidity and mortality of PCA, new strategies are needed for its diagnosis. A review of the literature on available biomarkers for PCA was performed, using the following terms: prostate cancer AND marker OR biomarker. The search was carried out in Pubmed, Science Direct, Web of Science and Clinical Trial. A total of 35 articles were used, and PHI (Prostate Health Index) and the 4Kscore tests were identified as the best well-established serum markers. These tests are based on the evaluation of expression levels of several molecules. For analysis of urine samples, Progensa, ExoDXProstate, and Mi Prostate Score Urine Test are available. All these tests have the potential to help diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary biopsies, but they are used only in association with digital rectal examination and PSA level data. The search for biomarkers that can help in the diagnosis and therapeutic management of PCA is still in its initial phase, requiring more efforts for an effective clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Kniphoff da Silva Lawisch
- Universidade do Vale do Taquari (Univates), Lajeado, RS, Brasil
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Genética, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| | | | | | - Rafael Armando Seewald
- Universidade do Vale do Taquari (Univates), Lajeado, RS, Brasil
- Hospital Bruno Born, Centro de Oncologia, Lajeado, RS, Brasil
| | - José Artur Bogo Chies
- Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Departamento de Genética, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Rasmussen M, Fredsøe J, Salachan PV, Blanke MPL, Larsen SH, Ulhøi BP, Jensen JB, Borre M, Sørensen KD. Stroma-specific gene expression signature identifies prostate cancer subtype with high recurrence risk. NPJ Precis Oncol 2024; 8:48. [PMID: 38395986 PMCID: PMC10891092 DOI: 10.1038/s41698-024-00540-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Current prognostic tools cannot clearly distinguish indolent and aggressive prostate cancer (PC). We hypothesized that analyzing individual contributions of epithelial and stromal components in localized PC (LPC) could improve risk stratification, as stromal subtypes may have been overlooked due to the emphasis on malignant epithelial cells. Hence, we derived molecular subtypes of PC using gene expression analysis of LPC samples from prostatectomy patients (cohort 1, n = 127) and validated these subtypes in two independent prostatectomy cohorts (cohort 2, n = 406, cohort 3, n = 126). Stroma and epithelium-specific signatures were established from laser-capture microdissection data and non-negative matrix factorization was used to identify subtypes based on these signatures. Subtypes were functionally characterized by gene set and cell type enrichment analyses, and survival analysis was conducted. Three epithelial (E1-E3) and three stromal (S1-S3) PC subtypes were identified. While subtyping based on epithelial signatures showed inconsistent associations to biochemical recurrence (BCR), subtyping by stromal signatures was significantly associated with BCR in all three cohorts, with subtype S3 indicating high BCR risk. Subtype S3 exhibited distinct features, including significantly decreased cell-polarity and myogenesis, significantly increased infiltration of M2-polarized macrophages and CD8 + T-cells compared to subtype S1. For patients clinically classified as CAPRA-S intermediate risk, S3 improved prediction of BCR. This study demonstrates the potential of stromal signatures in identification of clinically relevant PC subtypes, and further indicated that stromal characterization may enhance risk stratification in LPC and may be particularly promising in cases with high prognostic ambiguity based on clinical parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rasmussen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Jacob Fredsøe
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Paul Vinu Salachan
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Marcus Pii Lunau Blanke
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Stine Hesselby Larsen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark
| | - Michael Borre
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Urology, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Karina Dalsgaard Sørensen
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital (AUH), Aarhus, Denmark.
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sood A, Kishan AU, Evans CP, Feng FY, Morgan TM, Murphy DG, Padhani AR, Pinto P, Van der Poel HG, Tilki D, Briganti A, Abdollah F. The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:27-43. [PMID: 37423774 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation. OBJECTIVE To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3). CONCLUSIONS Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akshay Sood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christopher P Evans
- Department of Urologic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Felix Y Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Todd M Morgan
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, Middlesex, UK
| | - Peter Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Henk G Van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Baston C, Preda A, Iordache A, Olaru V, Surcel C, Sinescu I, Gingu C. How to Integrate Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Urology Clinical Practice: An Update. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:316. [PMID: 38254807 PMCID: PMC10813985 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/07/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the management of prostate cancer has become more and more challenging due to the increasing number of available treatment options, therapeutic agents, and our understanding of its carcinogenesis and disease progression. Moreover, currently available risk stratification systems used to facilitate clinical decision-making have limitations, particularly in providing a personalized and patient-centered management strategy. Although prognosis and prostate cancer-specific survival have improved in recent years, the heterogenous behavior of the disease among patients included in the same risk prognostic group negatively impacts not only our clinical decision-making but also oncological outcomes, irrespective of the treatment strategy. Several biomarkers, along with available tests, have been developed to help clinicians in difficult decision-making scenarios and guide management strategies. In this review article, we focus on the scientific evidence that supports the clinical use of several biomarkers considered by professional urological societies (and included in uro-oncological guidelines) in the diagnosis process and specific difficult management strategies for clinically localized or advanced prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catalin Baston
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Adrian Preda
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Alexandru Iordache
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Vlad Olaru
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Cristian Surcel
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ioanel Sinescu
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Constantin Gingu
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (C.B.); (V.O.); (C.S.); (I.S.); (C.G.)
- Center of Uronephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, 258 Fundeni Street, 022328 Bucharest, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Dudka I, Lundquist K, Wikström P, Bergh A, Gröbner G. Metabolomic profiles of intact tissues reflect clinically relevant prostate cancer subtypes. J Transl Med 2023; 21:860. [PMID: 38012666 PMCID: PMC10683247 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-023-04747-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PC) is a heterogenous multifocal disease ranging from indolent to lethal states. For improved treatment-stratification, reliable approaches are needed to faithfully differentiate between high- and low-risk tumors and to predict therapy response at diagnosis. METHODS A metabolomic approach based on high resolution magic angle spinning nuclear magnetic resonance (HR MAS NMR) analysis was applied on intact biopsies samples (n = 111) obtained from patients (n = 31) treated by prostatectomy, and combined with advanced multi- and univariate statistical analysis methods to identify metabolomic profiles reflecting tumor differentiation (Gleason scores and the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade) and subtypes based on tumor immunoreactivity for Ki67 (cell proliferation) and prostate specific antigen (PSA, marker for androgen receptor activity). RESULTS Validated metabolic profiles were obtained that clearly distinguished cancer tissues from benign prostate tissues. Subsequently, metabolic signatures were identified that further divided cancer tissues into two clinically relevant groups, namely ISUP Grade 2 (n = 29) and ISUP Grade 3 (n = 17) tumors. Furthermore, metabolic profiles associated with different tumor subtypes were identified. Tumors with low Ki67 and high PSA (subtype A, n = 21) displayed metabolite patterns significantly different from tumors with high Ki67 and low PSA (subtype B, n = 28). In total, seven metabolites; choline, peak for combined phosphocholine/glycerophosphocholine metabolites (PC + GPC), glycine, creatine, combined signal of glutamate/glutamine (Glx), taurine and lactate, showed significant alterations between PC subtypes A and B. CONCLUSIONS The metabolic profiles of intact biopsies obtained by our non-invasive HR MAS NMR approach together with advanced chemometric tools reliably identified PC and specifically differentiated highly aggressive tumors from less aggressive ones. Thus, this approach has proven the potential of exploiting cancer-specific metabolites in clinical settings for obtaining personalized treatment strategies in PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilona Dudka
- Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | | - Pernilla Wikström
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
| | - Anders Bergh
- Department of Medical Biosciences, Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Krzyzanowska A, Barron S, Higgins DF, Loughman T, O'Neill A, Sheehan KM, Wang CJA, Fender B, McGuire L, Fay J, O'Grady A, O'Leary D, Watson RW, Bjartell A, Gallagher WM. Development, Validation, and Clinical Utility of a Six-gene Signature to Predict Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:983-991. [PMID: 37105783 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Molecular signatures in prostate cancer (PCa) tissue can provide useful prognostic information to improve the understanding of a patient's risk of harbouring aggressive disease. OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a gene signature that adds independent prognostic information to clinical parameters for better treatment decisions and patient management. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Expression of 14 genes was evaluated in radical prostatectomy (RP) tissue from an Irish cohort of PCa patients (n = 426). A six-gene molecular risk score (MRS) was identified with strong prognostic performance to predict adverse pathology (AP) at RP or biochemical recurrence (BCR). The MRS was combined with the Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) score, to create a molecular and clinical risk score (MCRS), and validated in a Swedish cohort (n = 203). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary AP outcome was assessed by the likelihood ratio statistics and area under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) from logistic regression models. The secondary time to BCR outcome was assessed by likelihood ratio statistics and C-indexes from Cox proportional hazard regression models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The six-gene signature was significantly (p < 0.0001) prognostic and added significant prognostic value to clinicopathological features for AP and BCR outcomes. For both outcomes, both the MRS and the MCRS increased the AUC/C-index when added to European Association of Urology (EAU) and CAPRA scores. Limitations include the retrospective nature of this study. CONCLUSIONS The six-gene signature has strong performance for the prediction of AP and BCR in an independent clinical validation study. MCRS improves prognostic evaluation and can optimise patient management after RP. PATIENT SUMMARY We found that the expression panel of six genes can help predict whether a patient is likely to have a disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Krzyzanowska
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | | | | | | | - Amanda O'Neill
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Katherine M Sheehan
- Pathology, RCSI Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | | | | | - Joanna Fay
- RCSI Biobank, RCSI Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anthony O'Grady
- Pathology, RCSI Education and Research Centre, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | | - R William Watson
- UCD School of Medicine, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Anders Bjartell
- Department of Translational Medicine, Division of Urological Cancers, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - William M Gallagher
- OncoAssure Ltd, NovaUCD, Dublin, Ireland; UCD School of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, UCD Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Research, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stoyanova R, Zavala-Romero O, Kwon D, Breto AL, Xu IR, Algohary A, Alhusseini M, Gaston SM, Castillo P, Kryvenko ON, Davicioni E, Nahar B, Spieler B, Abramowitz MC, Dal Pra A, Parekh DJ, Punnen S, Pollack A. Clinical-Genomic Risk Group Classification of Suspicious Lesions on Prostate Multiparametric-MRI. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5240. [PMID: 37958414 PMCID: PMC10647832 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The utilization of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in clinical decisions regarding prostate cancer patients' management has recently increased. After biopsy, clinicians can assess risk using National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk stratification schema and commercially available genomic classifiers, such as Decipher. We built radiomics-based models to predict lesions/patients at low risk prior to biopsy based on an established three-tier clinical-genomic classification system. Radiomic features were extracted from regions of positive biopsies and Normally Appearing Tissues (NAT) on T2-weighted and Diffusion-weighted Imaging. Using only clinical information available prior to biopsy, five models for predicting low-risk lesions/patients were evaluated, based on: 1: Clinical variables; 2: Lesion-based radiomic features; 3: Lesion and NAT radiomics; 4: Clinical and lesion-based radiomics; and 5: Clinical, lesion and NAT radiomic features. Eighty-three mpMRI exams from 78 men were analyzed. Models 1 and 2 performed similarly (Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.835 and 0.838, respectively), but radiomics significantly improved the lesion-based performance of the model in a subset analysis of patients with a negative Digital Rectal Exam (DRE). Adding normal tissue radiomics significantly improved the performance in all cases. Similar patterns were observed on patient-level models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that machine learning radiomics-based models can predict patients' risk using combined clinical-genomic classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radka Stoyanova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Olmo Zavala-Romero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Adrian L. Breto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Isaac R. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Ahmad Algohary
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Mohammad Alhusseini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sandra M. Gaston
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Patricia Castillo
- Department of Radiology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Oleksandr N. Kryvenko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Elai Davicioni
- Research and Development, Veracyte Inc., San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Bruno Nahar
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Benjamin Spieler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Matthew C. Abramowitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Alan Dal Pra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Dipen J. Parekh
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Alan Pollack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lautert-Dutra W, Melo CM, Chaves LP, Souza FC, Crozier C, Sundby AE, Woroszchuk E, Saggioro FP, Avante FS, dos Reis RB, Squire JA, Bayani J. Identification of tumor-agnostic biomarkers for predicting prostate cancer progression and biochemical recurrence. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1280943. [PMID: 37965470 PMCID: PMC10641020 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1280943] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The diverse clinical outcomes of prostate cancer have led to the development of gene signature assays predicting disease progression. Improved prostate cancer progression biomarkers are needed as current RNA biomarker tests have varying success for intermediate prostate cancer. Interest grows in universal gene signatures for invasive carcinoma progression. Early breast and prostate cancers share characteristics, including hormone dependence and BRCA1/2 mutations. Given the similarities in the pathobiology of breast and prostate cancer, we utilized the NanoString BC360 panel, comprising the validated PAM50 classifier and pathway-specific signatures associated with general tumor progression as well as breast cancer-specific classifiers. This retrospective cohort of primary prostate cancers (n=53) was stratified according to biochemical recurrence (BCR) status and the CAPRA-S to identify genes related to high-risk disease. Two public cohort (TCGA-PRAD and GSE54460) were used to validate the results. Expression profiling of our cohort uncovered associations between PIP and INHBA with BCR and high CAPRA-S score, as well as associations between VCAN, SFRP2, and THBS4 and BCR. Despite low levels of the ESR1 gene compared to AR, we found strong expression of the ER signaling signature, suggesting that BCR may be driven by ER-mediated pathways. Kaplan-Meier and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated the expression of ESR1, PGR, VCAN, and SFRP2 could predict the occurrence of relapse events. This is in keeping with the pathways represented by these genes which contribute to angiogenesis and the epithelial-mesenchymal transition. It is likely that VCAN works by activating the stroma and remodeling the tumor microenvironment. Additionally, SFRP2 overexpression has been associated with increased tumor size and reduced survival rates in breast cancer and among prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR. ESR1 influences disease progression by activating stroma, stimulating stem/progenitor prostate cancer, and inducing TGF-β. Estrogen signaling may therefore serve as a surrogate to AR signaling during progression and in hormone-refractory disease, particularly in prostate cancer patients with stromal-rich tumors. Collectively, the use of agnostic biomarkers developed for breast cancer stratification has facilitated a precise clinical classification of patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and highlighted the therapeutic potential of targeting estrogen signaling in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Lautert-Dutra
- Department of Genetics, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Camila M. Melo
- Department of Genetics, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Luiz P. Chaves
- Department of Genetics, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Francisco C. Souza
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Cheryl Crozier
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adam E. Sundby
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Elizabeth Woroszchuk
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Fabiano P. Saggioro
- Department of Pathology, Ribeirao Preto Medical School, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Filipe S. Avante
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Rodolfo B. dos Reis
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
| | - Jeremy A. Squire
- Department of Genetics, Medical School of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| | - Jane Bayani
- Diagnostic Development, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Figiel S, Yin W, Doultsinos D, Erickson A, Poulose N, Singh R, Magnussen A, Anbarasan T, Teague R, He M, Lundeberg J, Loda M, Verrill C, Colling R, Gill PS, Bryant RJ, Hamdy FC, Woodcock DJ, Mills IG, Cussenot O, Lamb AD. Spatial transcriptomic analysis of virtual prostate biopsy reveals confounding effect of tissue heterogeneity on genomic signatures. Mol Cancer 2023; 22:162. [PMID: 37789377 PMCID: PMC10546768 DOI: 10.1186/s12943-023-01863-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genetic signatures have added a molecular dimension to prognostics and therapeutic decision-making. However, tumour heterogeneity in prostate cancer and current sampling methods could confound accurate assessment. Based on previously published spatial transcriptomic data from multifocal prostate cancer, we created virtual biopsy models that mimic conventional biopsy placement and core size. We then analysed the gene expression of different prognostic signatures (OncotypeDx®, Decipher®, Prostadiag®) using a step-wise approach with increasing resolution from pseudo-bulk analysis of the whole biopsy, to differentiation by tissue subtype (benign, stroma, tumour), followed by distinct tumour grade and finally clonal resolution. The gene expression profile of virtual tumour biopsies revealed clear differences between grade groups and tumour clones, compared to a benign control, which were not reflected in bulk analyses. This suggests that bulk analyses of whole biopsies or tumour-only areas, as used in clinical practice, may provide an inaccurate assessment of gene profiles. The type of tissue, the grade of the tumour and the clonal composition all influence the gene expression in a biopsy. Clinical decision making based on biopsy genomics should be made with caution while we await more precise targeting and cost-effective spatial analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandy Figiel
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Wencheng Yin
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Dimitrios Doultsinos
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Andrew Erickson
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Ninu Poulose
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Reema Singh
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Anette Magnussen
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Thineskrishna Anbarasan
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Renuka Teague
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Mengxiao He
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Joakim Lundeberg
- Science for Life Laboratory, Department of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Solna, Sweden
| | - Massimo Loda
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Clare Verrill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard Colling
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Pelvender S Gill
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Richard J Bryant
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Freddie C Hamdy
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Dan J Woodcock
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Ian G Mills
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Olivier Cussenot
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK
| | - Alastair D Lamb
- Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
- Department of Urology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
- Oxford NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Renavikar PS, LaGrange CA, Lele SM. Pathology Data-Based Risk Group Stratification Is Equivalent to That Obtained by Oncotype DX Testing in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2023; 147:1158-1163. [PMID: 36596267 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0225-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Low-risk (Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6) and intermediate-risk (Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7) prostate carcinoma cases diagnosed on needle biopsies are frequently referred for gene expression studies such as Oncotype DX to help validate the risk. Risk assessment helps in determining prognosis and therapeutic decision making. OBJECTIVE.— To determine if addition of molecular testing is necessary, by evaluating its correlation with risk stratification provided by pathology report (Gleason score, Grade Group, proportion of positive cores) and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. DESIGN.— Our institutional database was searched for cases that had Oncotype DX testing after prostate biopsy. The final risk category determined by molecular testing was compared to the risk stratification predicted by the pathology report and serum PSA levels. Cases were classified as concordant if they fell under the same National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk and recommended initial therapy group. Follow-up information on discordant cases was obtained and used to determine if risk stratification by molecular testing was superior to that obtained from the clinicopathologic data. RESULTS.— A total of 4967 prostate biopsies (2015-2020) were screened. Of these, 131 prostate carcinoma cases (2.6%) had Oncotype DX testing and 111 of 131 cases (85%) had follow-up information. There was risk stratification concordance in 93 of 111 cases (84%). All 18 of 111 cases (16%) that were discordant had a follow-up course that matched the risk predicted by pathology data and serum PSA. CONCLUSIONS.— Risk stratification provided by information in the pathology report on routine biopsy assessment coupled with the serum PSA level is equivalent to that obtained by Oncotype DX testing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pranav S Renavikar
- From the Department of Pathology and Microbiology (Renavikar, Lele), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Chad A LaGrange
- The Division of Urologic Surgery in the Department of Surgery (LaGrange), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Subodh M Lele
- From the Department of Pathology and Microbiology (Renavikar, Lele), University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patel P, Harmon S, Iseman R, Ludkowski O, Auman H, Hawley S, Newcomb LF, Lin DW, Nelson PS, Feng Z, Boyer HD, Tretiakova MS, True LD, Vakar-Lopez F, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR, Chan E, Simko J, Fazli L, Gleave M, Hurtado-Coll A, Thompson IM, Troyer D, McKenney JK, Wei W, Choyke PL, Bratslavsky G, Turkbey B, Siemens DR, Squire J, Peng YP, Brooks JD, Jamaspishvili T. Artificial Intelligence-Based PTEN Loss Assessment as an Early Predictor of Prostate Cancer Metastasis After Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Mod Pathol 2023; 36:100241. [PMID: 37343766 PMCID: PMC10592257 DOI: 10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss is associated with adverse outcomes in prostate cancer and can be measured via immunohistochemistry. The purpose of the study was to establish the clinical application of an in-house developed artificial intelligence (AI) image analysis workflow for automated detection of PTEN loss on digital images for identifying patients at risk of early recurrence and metastasis. Postsurgical tissue microarray sections from the Canary Foundation (n = 1264) stained with anti-PTEN antibody were evaluated independently by pathologist conventional visual scoring (cPTEN) and an automated AI-based image analysis pipeline (AI-PTEN). The relationship of PTEN evaluation methods with cancer recurrence and metastasis was analyzed using multivariable Cox proportional hazard and decision curve models. Both cPTEN scoring by the pathologist and quantification of PTEN loss by AI (high-risk AI-qPTEN) were significantly associated with shorter metastasis-free survival (MFS) in univariable analysis (cPTEN hazard ratio [HR], 1.54; CI, 1.07-2.21; P = .019; AI-qPTEN HR, 2.55; CI, 1.83-3.56; P < .001). In multivariable analyses, AI-qPTEN showed a statistically significant association with shorter MFS (HR, 2.17; CI, 1.49-3.17; P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (HR, 1.36; CI, 1.06-1.75; P = .016) when adjusting for relevant postsurgical clinical nomogram (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment [CAPRA] postsurgical score [CAPRA-S]), whereas cPTEN does not show a statistically significant association (HR, 1.33; CI, 0.89-2; P = .2 and HR, 1.26; CI, 0.99-1.62; P = .063, respectively) when adjusting for CAPRA-S risk stratification. More importantly, AI-qPTEN was associated with shorter MFS in patients with favorable pathological stage and negative surgical margins (HR, 2.72; CI, 1.46-5.06; P = .002). Workflow also demonstrated enhanced clinical utility in decision curve analysis, more accurately identifying men who might benefit from adjuvant therapy postsurgery. This study demonstrates the clinical value of an affordable and fully automated AI-powered PTEN assessment for evaluating the risk of developing metastasis or disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Adding the AI-qPTEN assessment workflow to clinical variables may affect postoperative surveillance or management options, particularly in low-risk patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palak Patel
- Department of Cell Biology at The Arthur and Sonia Labatt Brain Tumour Research Centre at the Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie Harmon
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Artificial Intelligence Resource, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Rachael Iseman
- Division of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Olga Ludkowski
- University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Lisa F Newcomb
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel W Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter S Nelson
- Division of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ziding Feng
- Program of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hilary D Boyer
- Program of Biostatistics and Biomathematics, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Maria S Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Larry D True
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Funda Vakar-Lopez
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Peter R Carroll
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Matthew R Cooperberg
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Emily Chan
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California
| | - Jeff Simko
- Department of Urology, University of California San Francisco and Helen Diller Family, Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California; Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ladan Fazli
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Martin Gleave
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Antonio Hurtado-Coll
- The Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - Dean Troyer
- Department of Pathology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia; Department of Microbiology and Molecular Cell Biology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | | | - Wei Wei
- Department of Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Peter L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland; Artificial Intelligence Resource, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - D Robert Siemens
- Department of Urology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jeremy Squire
- Department of Genetics, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
| | - Yingwei P Peng
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - James D Brooks
- Department of Urology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Tamara Jamaspishvili
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Carbunaru S, Sun Z, McCall C, Ofori B, Marshall N, Wang H, Abern M, Liu L, Hollowell CMP, Sharifi R, Vidal P, Kajdacsy‐Balla A, Sekosan M, Ferrer K, Wu S, Gallegos M, Gann PH, Moreira D, Sharp LK, Ferrans CE, Murphy AB. Impact of genomic testing on urologists' treatment preference in favorable risk prostate cancer: A randomized trial. Cancer Med 2023; 12:19690-19700. [PMID: 37787097 PMCID: PMC10587942 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The Oncotype Dx Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) is a 17-gene relative expression assay that predicts adverse pathology at prostatectomy. We conducted a novel randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of GPS on urologist's treatment preference for favorable risk prostate cancer (PCa): active surveillance versus active treatment (i.e., prostatectomy/radiation). This is a secondary endpoint from the ENACT trial which recruited from three Chicago hospitals from 2016 to 2019. METHODS Ten urologists along with men with very low to favorable-intermediate risk PCa were included in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to standardized counseling with or without GPS assay. The main outcome was urologists' preference for active treatment at Visit 2 by study arm (GPS versus Control). Multivariable best-fit binary logistic regressions were constructed to identify factors independently associated with urologists' treatment preference. RESULTS Two hundred men (70% Black) were randomly assigned to either the Control (96) or GPS arm (104). At Visit 2, urologists' preference for prostatectomy/radiation almost doubled in the GPS arm to 29.3% (29) compared to 14.1% (13) in the Control arm (p = 0.01). Randomization to the GPS arm, intermediate NCCN risk level, and lower patient health literacy were predictors for urologists' preference for active treatment. DISCUSSION Limitations included sample size and number of urologists. In this study, we found that GPS testing reduced urologists' likelihood to prefer active surveillance. CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate how obtaining prognostic biomarkers that predict negative outcomes before treatment decision-making might influence urologists' preference for recommending aggressive therapy in men eligible for active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Carbunaru
- Department of UrologyNew York University Langone School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Zequn Sun
- Department of Preventive MedicineNorthwestern UniversityChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Cordero McCall
- Medical College of Wisconsin Medical SchoolMilwaukeeWisconsinUSA
| | - Bernice Ofori
- Department of UrologyNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Norma Marshall
- Department of UrologyNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Heidy Wang
- Division of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Michael Abern
- Division of UrologyDuke UniversityDurhamNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Li Liu
- Division of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Marin Sekosan
- Department of PathologyCook County Health and Hospital SystemChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Karen Ferrer
- Department of PathologyCook County Health and Hospital SystemChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Shoujin Wu
- Pathology and Laboratory ServicesJesse Brown VA Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Marlene Gallegos
- Pathology and Laboratory ServicesJesse Brown VA Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Peter H. Gann
- Department of PathologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Daniel Moreira
- Department of UrologyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Lisa K. Sharp
- Institute for Health Research and PolicyUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Carol E. Ferrans
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing ScienceUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoIllinoisUSA
| | - Adam B. Murphy
- Department of UrologyNorthwestern University, Feinberg School of MedicineChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Division of UrologyCook County HealthChicagoIllinoisUSA
- Division of UrologyJesse Brown VA Medical CenterChicagoIllinoisUSA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Logotheti S, Papadaki E, Zolota V, Logothetis C, Vrahatis AG, Soundararajan R, Tzelepi V. Lineage Plasticity and Stemness Phenotypes in Prostate Cancer: Harnessing the Power of Integrated "Omics" Approaches to Explore Measurable Metrics. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4357. [PMID: 37686633 PMCID: PMC10486655 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa), the most frequent and second most lethal cancer type in men in developed countries, is a highly heterogeneous disease. PCa heterogeneity, therapy resistance, stemness, and lethal progression have been attributed to lineage plasticity, which refers to the ability of neoplastic cells to undergo phenotypic changes under microenvironmental pressures by switching between developmental cell states. What remains to be elucidated is how to identify measurements of lineage plasticity, how to implement them to inform preclinical and clinical research, and, further, how to classify patients and inform therapeutic strategies in the clinic. Recent research has highlighted the crucial role of next-generation sequencing technologies in identifying potential biomarkers associated with lineage plasticity. Here, we review the genomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic events that have been described in PCa and highlight those with significance for lineage plasticity. We further focus on their relevance in PCa research and their benefits in PCa patient classification. Finally, we explore ways in which bioinformatic analyses can be used to determine lineage plasticity based on large omics analyses and algorithms that can shed light on upstream and downstream events. Most importantly, an integrated multiomics approach may soon allow for the identification of a lineage plasticity signature, which would revolutionize the molecular classification of PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Souzana Logotheti
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Eugenia Papadaki
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
- Department of Informatics, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece;
| | - Vasiliki Zolota
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| | - Christopher Logothetis
- Department of Genitourinary Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | | | - Rama Soundararajan
- Department of Translational Molecular Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vasiliki Tzelepi
- Department of Pathology, University of Patras, 26504 Patras, Greece; (S.L.); (E.P.); (V.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
San Francisco IF, Rojas PA, Bravo JC, Díaz J, Ebel L, Urrutia S, Prieto B, Cerda-Infante J. Can We Predict Prostate Cancer Metastasis Based on Biomarkers? Where Are We Now? Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:12508. [PMID: 37569883 PMCID: PMC10420177 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241512508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence of prostate cancer (PC) has risen annually. PC mortality is explained by the metastatic disease (mPC). There is an intermediate scenario in which patients have non-mPC but have initiated a metastatic cascade through epithelial-mesenchymal transition. There is indeed a need for more and better tools to predict which patients will progress in the future to non-localized clinical disease or already have micrometastatic disease and, therefore, will clinically progress after primary treatment. Biomarkers for the prediction of mPC are still under development; there are few studies and not much evidence of their usefulness. This review is focused on tissue-based genomic biomarkers (TBGB) for the prediction of metastatic disease. We develop four main research questions that we attempt to answer according to the current evidence. Why is it important to predict metastatic disease? Which tests are available to predict metastatic disease? What impact should there be on clinical guidelines and clinical practice in predicting metastatic disease? What are the current prostate cancer treatments? The importance of predicting metastasis is fundamental given that, once metastasis is diagnosed, quality of life (QoL) and survival drop dramatically. There is still a need and space for more cost-effective TBGB tests that predict mPC disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio F. San Francisco
- Environ Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile;
| | - Pablo A. Rojas
- Servicio de Urología, Complejo Asistencial Dr. Sotero del Río, Santiago 8150215, Chile;
| | - Juan C. Bravo
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Regional Libertador Bernardo O’Higgins, Rancagua 2820000, Chile;
| | - Jorge Díaz
- Servicio de Urología, Instituto Oncológico Fundación Arturo López Pérez, Santiago 7500921, Chile;
| | - Luis Ebel
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Base de Valdivia, Universidad Austral, Valdivia 5090000, Chile;
| | - Sebastián Urrutia
- Servicio de Urología, Hospital Dr. Hernán Henríquez Aravena, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile;
| | - Benjamín Prieto
- Environ Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile;
| | - Javier Cerda-Infante
- Environ Innovation Laboratory, Avenida Providencia 1208 Oficina 207, Providencia, Santiago 7500000, Chile;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bitting RL, Wu Y, Somarelli JA, Proudfoot JA, Liu Y, Davicioni E, George DJ, Armstrong AJ. Transcriptomic Signatures Associated With Outcomes in Recurrent Prostate Cancer Treated With Salvage Radiation, Androgen-Deprivation Therapy, and Enzalutamide: Correlative Analysis of the STREAM Trial. JCO Precis Oncol 2023; 7:e2300214. [PMID: 37595184 PMCID: PMC10581641 DOI: 10.1200/po.23.00214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Men with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may progress despite radiation and androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). Tissue-based transcriptomic signatures can identify who may benefit from a more aggressive systemic approach. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective phase II multicenter trial of enzalutamide, ADT, and salvage radiotherapy in men with rising PSA after RP. Tumor tissue was analyzed using the Decipher platform for gene expression, including a novel prostate subtyping classifier, PTEN loss, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and ADT response. Cox models were used to associate signature scores with progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS Of the 38 men enrolled, 31 had tissue with sufficient-quality RNA for genomic analysis. Luminal differentiated (LD) subtype tumors had the longest 3-year PFS at 89% compared with 19% in the luminal proliferating subtype. Men with signatures of PTEN loss (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.64; P = .01) or HRD (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.39; P = .009) had worse PFS, while those with higher ADT response signature scores (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.94; P = .01) were associated with improved PFS. Analysis of these signatures in a large cohort (n = 5,330) of RP samples from patients with biochemical recurrence found that these signatures provide complementary information related to outcomes with salvage radiation. CONCLUSION Despite aggressive systemic therapy with salvage radiation, nearly 50% of high-risk men relapse within 3 years. We show that LD and higher ADT sensitivity tumors had favorable outcomes. Those with a luminal proliferating subtype, PTEN loss, and/or HRD signatures had poor outcomes despite ADT/radiation and enzalutamide and may benefit from alternative approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhonda L. Bitting
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC
| | - Yuan Wu
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC
| | - Jason A. Somarelli
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC
| | | | - Yang Liu
- Veracyte, Inc, San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Daniel J. George
- Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Durham, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Laajala TD, Sreekanth V, Soupir AC, Creed JH, Halkola AS, Calboli FCF, Singaravelu K, Orman MV, Colin-Leitzinger C, Gerke T, Fridley BL, Tyekucheva S, Costello JC. A harmonized resource of integrated prostate cancer clinical, -omic, and signature features. Sci Data 2023; 10:430. [PMID: 37407670 PMCID: PMC10322899 DOI: 10.1038/s41597-023-02335-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic and transcriptomic data have been generated across a wide range of prostate cancer (PCa) study cohorts. These data can be used to better characterize the molecular features associated with clinical outcomes and to test hypotheses across multiple, independent patient cohorts. In addition, derived features, such as estimates of cell composition, risk scores, and androgen receptor (AR) scores, can be used to develop novel hypotheses leveraging existing multi-omic datasets. The full potential of such data is yet to be realized as independent datasets exist in different repositories, have been processed using different pipelines, and derived and clinical features are often not provided or not standardized. Here, we present the curatedPCaData R package, a harmonized data resource representing >2900 primary tumor, >200 normal tissue, and >500 metastatic PCa samples across 19 datasets processed using standardized pipelines with updated gene annotations. We show that meta-analysis across harmonized studies has great potential for robust and clinically meaningful insights. curatedPCaData is an open and accessible community resource with code made available for reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teemu D Laajala
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| | - Varsha Sreekanth
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alex C Soupir
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jordan H Creed
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Anni S Halkola
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Federico C F Calboli
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), F-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
| | | | - Michael V Orman
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Travis Gerke
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Svitlana Tyekucheva
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - James C Costello
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Canter DJ, Branch C, Shelnutt J, Foreman AJ, Lehman AM, Sama V, Edwards DK, Abran J. The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Assay Is Prognostic for Biochemical Failure in Men With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radiation Therapy at a Community Cancer Center. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101193. [PMID: 37152483 PMCID: PMC10157115 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objective of this study was to assess the association between the Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay and long-term outcomes in men with localized prostate cancer (PCa) after radiation therapy (RT). We hypothesized that the GPS assay is prognostic for biochemical failure (BCF), along with distant metastasis (DM) and PCa-specific mortality in patients with PCa receiving RT. Methods and Materials We retrospectively studied men with localized PCa treated with definitive RT at Georgia Urology from 2010 to 2016. The primary objective was to assess the association between GPS results and time to BCF per the Phoenix criteria; we also assessed time to DM and PCa-specific mortality. We used Cox proportional hazards regression models for all analyses, with clinicopathologic covariates determined a priori for multivariable modeling. Results A total of 450 patients (median age, 65 years; 35% Black) met eligibility criteria. There was a strong univariable association between GPS result and time to BCF (hazard ratio [HR] per 20-unit increase = 3.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11-4.46; P < .001), which persisted after adjusting for clinicopathologic characteristics in multivariable analyses. We also observed this association for time to DM (HR = 5.19; 95% CI, 3.06-8.77; P < .001) and PCa-specific mortality (HR = 13.07; 95% CI, 4.42-49.39; P < .001). Race was not a predictor of time to BCF or DM, and the GPS assay was strongly prognostic for all endpoints in Black and White patients. Conclusions In a community-based cohort, the GPS assay was strongly prognostic for time to BCF as well as long-term outcomes in men treated with RT for localized PCa.
Collapse
|
36
|
Perera M, Jibara G, Tin AL, Haywood S, Sjoberg DD, Benfante NE, Carlsson SV, Eastham JA, Laudone V, Touijer KA, Fine S, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Outcomes of Grade Group 2 and 3 Prostate Cancer on Initial Versus Confirmatory Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:662-668. [PMID: 36566100 PMCID: PMC10285029 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active surveillance (AS) is recommended as the preferred treatment for men with low-risk disease. In order to optimize risk stratification and exclude undiagnosed higher-grade disease, most AS protocols recommend a confirmatory biopsy. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare outcomes among men with grade group (GG) 2/3 prostate cancer on initial biopsy with those among men whose disease was initially GG1 but was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We reviewed patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) in two cohorts: "immediate RP group," with GG2/3 cancer on diagnostic biopsy, and "AS group," with GG1 cancer on initial biopsy that was upgraded to GG2/3 on confirmatory biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Probabilities of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and salvage therapy were determined using multivariable Cox regression models with risk adjustment. Risks of adverse pathology at RP were also compared using logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The immediate RP group comprised 4009 patients and the AS group comprised 321 patients. The AS group had lower adjusted rates of adverse pathology (27% vs 35%, p = 0.003). BCR rates were lower in the AS group, although this did not reach conventional significance (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-1.06, p = 0.10) compared with the immediate RP group. Risk-adjusted 1- and 5-yr BCR rates were 4.6% (95% CI 3.0-6.5%) and 10.4% (95% CI 6.9-14%), respectively, for the AS group compared with 6.3% (95% CI 5.6-7.0%) and 20% (95% CI 19-22%), respectively, in the immediate RP group. A nonsignificant association was observed for salvage treatment-free survival favoring the AS group (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.06, p = 0.087). CONCLUSIONS We found that men with GG1 cancer who were upgraded on confirmatory biopsy tend to have less aggressive disease than men with the same grade found at initial biopsy. These results must be confirmed in larger series before recommendations can be made regarding a more conservative approach in men with upgraded pathology on surveillance biopsy. PATIENT SUMMARY We studied men with low-risk prostate cancer who were initially eligible for active surveillance but presented with more aggressive cancer on confirmatory biopsy. We found that outcomes for these men were better than the outcomes for those diagnosed initially with more serious cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlon Perera
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ghalib Jibara
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy L Tin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samuel Haywood
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Daniel D Sjoberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nicole E Benfante
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sigrid V Carlsson
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - James A Eastham
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vincent Laudone
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Samson Fine
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter T Scardino
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrew J Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Behfar Ehdaie
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Campistol M, Triquell M, Regis L, Celma A, de Torres I, Semidey ME, Mast R, Mendez O, Planas J, Trilla E, Morote J. Relationship between Proclarix and the Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer. Mol Diagn Ther 2023; 27:487-498. [PMID: 37081322 DOI: 10.1007/s40291-023-00649-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proclarix is a CE-marked test that provides the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), ranging from 0% to 100%, based on the serum measurement of Thrombospondin-1, cathepsin D, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and percentage of free PSA in addition to age. We hypothesize that Proclarix could be correlated with PCa aggressiveness. We analyzed the association of this new biomarker with four surrogates of aggressiveness: grade group (GG) in the biopsy, clinical stage, risk of biochemical recurrence after primary treatment of localized PCa, and pathology in the surgical specimen. MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a retrospective study from 606 men with suspicion of PCa [PSA of ≥ 3.0 ng/mL and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE)], in whom Proclarix was assessed (0-100%). The GG was defined by the International Society of Urological Pathology categories. The TNM was used for clinical staging (cT based on DRE, whereas cN and cM were established with computed tomography and 99-technetium bone scintigraphy). The risk of biochemical recurrence of localized PCa after primary treatment was defined by combining PSA, GG, and cT. Finally, an unfavorable pathology in a surgical specimen was defined as GG > 2 or pT ≥ 3. RESULTS The median age of the cohort was 67 years old, with a median PSA of 7 ng/mL and a rate of abnormal DRE of 23.3%. CsPCa was detected in 254 men (41.9%), with a median Proclarix of 60.1% compared with 37.3% obtained in patients with insignificant PCa and 20.7% in men without PCa. Among patients with GG > 3, Proclarix was significantly higher (58.2%) than in those with GG of 3 or lower (33.1%, p < 0.001). Men with localized tumors exhibited a Proclarix median of 37.3% compared with those with advanced disease (60.1%, p < 0.001). Proclarix levels among 197 patients with low and intermediate risk of biochemical recurrence were 24.9% and 35.0%, respectively, significantly lower compared with patients with high-risk disease (58.7%, p < 0.001). Unfavorable pathology was observed in 35 patients out of the 79 who underwent radical prostatectomy, with a Proclarix median of 35.7% compared with 23.7% obtained in patients with favorable pathology (p = 0.013). Proclarix and magnetic resonance imaging were independent predictors of the four surrogates of aggressiveness analyzed. CONCLUSION There is a correlation between Proclarix and the aggressiveness of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miriam Campistol
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain.
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Marina Triquell
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucas Regis
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Celma
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Inés de Torres
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - María E Semidey
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pathology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Richard Mast
- Department of Radiology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olga Mendez
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jacques Planas
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Enrique Trilla
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Juan Morote
- Department of Urology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Passeig de la Vall d'Hebron 119, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Prostate Cancer Research Group, Vall d'Hebron, Research Institute, 08035, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Surgery, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
O'Sullivan NJ, Kelly ME. Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Pelvic Oncology: Current Applications and Future Directions. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4936-4945. [PMID: 37232830 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiomics refers to the conversion of medical imaging into high-throughput, quantifiable data in order to analyse disease patterns, guide prognosis and aid decision making. Radiogenomics is an extension of radiomics that combines conventional radiomics techniques with molecular analysis in the form of genomic and transcriptomic data, serving as an alternative to costly, labour-intensive genetic testing. Data on radiomics and radiogenomics in the field of pelvic oncology remain novel concepts in the literature. We aim to perform an up-to-date analysis of current applications of radiomics and radiogenomics in the field of pelvic oncology, particularly focusing on the prediction of survival, recurrence and treatment response. Several studies have applied these concepts to colorectal, urological, gynaecological and sarcomatous diseases, with individual efficacy yet poor reproducibility. This article highlights the current applications of radiomics and radiogenomics in pelvic oncology, as well as the current limitations and future directions. Despite a rapid increase in publications investigating the use of radiomics and radiogenomics in pelvic oncology, the current evidence is limited by poor reproducibility and small datasets. In the era of personalised medicine, this novel field of research has significant potential, particularly for predicting prognosis and guiding therapeutic decisions. Future research may provide fundamental data on how we treat this cohort of patients, with the aim of reducing the exposure of high-risk patients to highly morbid procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niall J O'Sullivan
- The Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Michael E Kelly
- The Trinity St. James's Cancer Institute, D08 NHY1 Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Herberts C, Wyatt AW, Nguyen PL, Cheng HH. Genetic and Genomic Testing for Prostate Cancer: Beyond DNA Repair. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2023; 43:e390384. [PMID: 37207301 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_390384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Significant progress has been made in genetic and genomic testing for prostate cancer across the disease spectrum. Molecular profiling is increasingly relevant for routine clinical management, fueled in part by advancements in testing technology and integration of biomarkers into clinical trials. In metastatic prostate cancer, defects in DNA damage response genes are now established predictors of benefit to US Food and Drug Administration-approved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors, and trials are actively investigating these and other targeted treatment strategies in earlier disease states. Excitingly, opportunities for molecularly informed management beyond DNA damage response genes are also maturing. Germline genetic variants (eg, BRCA2 or MSH2/6) and polygenic germline risk scores are being investigated to inform cancer screening and active surveillance in at-risk carriers. RNA expression tests have recently gained traction in localized prostate cancer, enabling patient risk stratification and tailored treatment intensification via radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy for localized or salvage treatment. Finally, emerging minimally invasive circulating tumor DNA technology promises to enhance biomarker testing in advanced disease pending additional methodological and clinical validation. Collectively, genetic and genomic tests are rapidly becoming indispensable tools for informing the optimal clinical management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cameron Herberts
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alexander W Wyatt
- Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Paul L Nguyen
- Harvard Medical School, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, MA
| | - Heather H Cheng
- University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Weiner AB, Liu Y, Hakansson A, Zhao X, Proudfoot JA, Ho J, Zhang JH, Li EV, Karnes RJ, Den RB, Kishan AU, Reiter RE, Hamid AA, Ross AE, Tran PT, Davicioni E, Spratt DE, Attard G, Lotan TL, Lee Kiang Chua M, Sweeney CJ, Schaeffer EM. A novel prostate cancer subtyping classifier based on luminal and basal phenotypes. Cancer 2023. [PMID: 37060201 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is a clinically heterogeneous disease. The creation of an expression-based subtyping model based on prostate-specific biological processes was sought. METHODS Unsupervised machine learning of gene expression profiles from prospectively collected primary prostate tumors (training, n = 32,000; evaluation, n = 68,547) was used to create a prostate subtyping classifier (PSC) based on basal versus luminal cell expression patterns and other gene signatures relevant to PCa biology. Subtype molecular pathways and clinical characteristics were explored in five other clinical cohorts. RESULTS Clustering derived four subtypes: luminal differentiated (LD), luminal proliferating (LP), basal immune (BI), and basal neuroendocrine (BN). LP and LD tumors both had higher androgen receptor activity. LP tumors also had a higher expression of cell proliferation genes, MYC activity, and characteristics of homologous recombination deficiency. BI tumors possessed significant interferon γactivity and immune infiltration on immunohistochemistry. BN tumors were characterized by lower androgen receptor activity expression, lower immune infiltration, and enrichment with neuroendocrine expression patterns. Patients with LD tumors had less aggressive tumor characteristics and the longest time to metastasis after surgery. Only patients with BI tumors derived benefit from radiotherapy after surgery in terms of time to metastasis (hazard ratio [HR], 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.71; n = 855). In a phase 3 trial that randomized patients with metastatic PCa to androgen deprivation with or without docetaxel (n = 108), only patients with LP tumors derived survival benefit from docetaxel (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.51). CONCLUSIONS With the use of expression profiles from over 100,000 tumors, a PSC was developed that identified four subtypes with distinct biological and clinical features. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY Prostate cancer can behave in an indolent or aggressive manner and vary in how it responds to certain treatments. To differentiate prostate cancer on the basis of biological features, we developed a novel RNA signature by using data from over 100,000 prostate tumors-the largest data set of its kind. This signature can inform patients and physicians on tumor aggressiveness and susceptibilities to treatments to help personalize cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam B Weiner
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Yang Liu
- Veracyte Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Xin Zhao
- Veracyte Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | | | - Julian Ho
- Veracyte Inc, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jj H Zhang
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Eric V Li
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Robert B Den
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amar U Kishan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Robert E Reiter
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anis A Hamid
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ashely E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Phuoc T Tran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Daniel E Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Tamara L Lotan
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Melvin Lee Kiang Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Medical Sciences, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher J Sweeney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Edward M Schaeffer
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lu J, Chen J, Lin Z, Liu Q, Zhong C, Cai Z, Jia Z, Zhong W, Liang Y, Cai C. A prognostic signature consisting of N6-methyladenosine modified mRNAs demonstrates clinical potential in prediction of biochemical recurrence and guidance on precision therapy in prostate cancer. Transl Oncol 2023; 33:101670. [PMID: 37060728 PMCID: PMC10130690 DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Novel biomarkers are urgently needed to improve the prediction of clinical outcomes and guide personalized treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. However, the role of N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications in PCa initiation and progression remains largely elusive. In our study, we collected benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH), localized PCa, and metastatic PCa samples from patients and performed methylated RNA immunoprecipitation sequencing (MeRIP-Seq) to map m6A-methylated mRNAs. Furthermore, we developed a prognostic signature based on 239 differentially methylated RNAs and the TCGA-PRAD dataset, which can be used to calculate an m6A-modified mRNA (MMM) score for a PCa patient, validated by independent multi-center cohorts. Our findings revealed that differential m6A modifications were positively correlated with altered expressions of mapped m6A-modified mRNAs. Higher MMM scores were associated with shorter times to biochemical recurrence (BCR) in PCa patients, and the MMM scoring system outperformed three well-established signatures in nine independent validation cohorts, as demonstrated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, C-index and ROC. Patients who did not respond to androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) therapy and immunotherapy were found to have high MMM scores. Two hub genes, TLE1 and PFKL, were confirmed to have m6A sites through MeRIP-qPCR, and their knockdown promoted PCa cell invasion. Bioinformatics analysis of single-cell databases identified cell types with high transcript abundance levels of these two genes. In summary, our study is the first to perform transcriptome-wide m6A mapping in prostate tissues. The translational potential of a prognostic signature, comprising m6A-methylated mRNAs, in predicting clinical outcomes and therapy responses for PCa patients, is demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianming Lu
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology; Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Jiahong Chen
- Department of Urology, Huizhou Municipal Central Hospital, Huizhou, Guangdong 516001, China
| | - Zhuoyuan Lin
- Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qinwei Liu
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology; Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China
| | - Chuanfan Zhong
- Department of Urology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510282, China
| | - Zhouda Cai
- Department of Andrology, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Zhenyu Jia
- Department of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA
| | - Weide Zhong
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology; Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China; Macau Institute for Applied Research in Medicine and Health, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, China
| | - Yingke Liang
- Department of Urology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Clinical Molecular Medicine and Diagnostics, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Chao Cai
- Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University; Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology; Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Quinn TJ, Chapman D, Parzen J, Wahl DR, McNamara A, Dess R, Chan J, Feng F, Jackson WC, Hamstra D. Validation of the Combination Gleason Score as an Independent Favorable Prognostic Factor in Prostate Cancer Treated With Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e166-e175. [PMID: 36503624 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic factors for prostate cancer include tumor, node, metastases stage, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen, and pathology (via Gleason score [GS] or grade group). Of these, GS yields the largest effect on prostate cancer specific mortality. It was previously determined that those with cores with a mix of higher and lower GS at biopsy (which was termed a "ComboGS") had decreased risk for prostate cancer specific mortality after either surgical or radiation treatment. We validate the effect of ComboGS in an independent cohort of patients with prostate cancer treated with definitive dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) at 2 institutions. METHODS AND MATERIALS DE-RT was administered to 2539 men, of which 687 men had a ComboGS. To further ascertain the ComboGS effect we employed the modified Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (mCAPRA) score. Rates of biochemical event-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival were compared across CAPRA scores, with and without modification, and the prognostic value of the CAPRA scores was compared using Harrel's concordance index. RESULTS On univariate analysis in Gleason 7 to 10 patients the presence of ComboGS improved 10-year biochemical event-free survival from 76.6% to 82.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; confidence interval [CI], 0.59-0.96; P = .021), 10-year distant metastasis-free survival from 89.3% to 93.2% (HR, 0.57; CI, 0.39-0.85; P = .005), 10-year prostate cancer specific survival from 93.9% to 97.4% (HR, 0.39; CI, 0.21-0.7; P = .001), and 10-year overall survival from 65.7% to 75.6% (HR, 0.69; CI, 0.57-0.83; P < .001). Multivariable analysis also supported that ComboGS is protective for biochemical failure (HR, 0.64; CI, 0.50-0.83; P < .001), distant metastasis (HR, 0.42; CI, 0.28-0.63; P < .001), death from prostate cancer (HR, 0.32; CI, 0.17-0.58; P < .001), and overall mortality (HR, 0.65; CI, 0.54-0.79; P < .001). Additionally, adjusting the mCAPRA score for ComboGS decreased the risk of biochemical failure by nearly 30% (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55-0.88; P = .003) and by 50% (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.37-0.80; P = .002) for distant metastasis. CONCLUSIONS ComboGS is a useful and readily available independent prognostic factor for all clinical endpoints evaluated. Moreover, the ComboGS can be used in conjunction with the extensively validated CAPRA scoring to better risk stratify patients being treated with definitive DE-RT for GS 7 to 10 disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jason Chan
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Felix Feng
- University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Improving the Post-Operative Prediction of BCR-Free Survival Time with mRNA Variables and Machine Learning. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15041276. [PMID: 36831619 PMCID: PMC9954694 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Predicting the risk of, and time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) in prostate cancer patients post-operatively is critical in patient treatment decision pathways following surgical intervention. This study aimed to investigate the predictive potential of mRNA information to improve upon reference nomograms and clinical-only models, using a dataset of 187 patients that includes over 20,000 features. Several machine learning methodologies were implemented for the analysis of censored patient follow-up information with such high-dimensional genomic data. Our findings demonstrated the potential of inclusion of mRNA information for BCR-free survival prediction. A random survival forest pipeline was found to achieve high predictive performance with respect to discrimination, calibration, and net benefit. Two mRNA variables, namely ESM1 and DHAH8, were identified as consistently strong predictors with this dataset.
Collapse
|
44
|
Daza J, Salomé B, Okhawere K, Bane O, Meilika KN, Korn TG, Qi J, Xe H, Patel M, Brody R, Kim-Schulze S, Sfakianos JP, Lewis S, Rich JM, Zuluaga L, Badani KK, Horowitz A. Urine supernatant reveals a signature that predicts survival in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 2023. [PMID: 36797809 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To profile the cell-free urine supernatant and plasma of a small cohort of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) patients by measuring the relative concentrations of 92 proteins related to inflammation. Using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we then performed a targeted mRNA analysis of genes encoding the above proteins and defined their effects on overall survival (OS). SUBJECTS/PATIENTS AND METHODS Samples were collected prospectively from ccRCC patients. A multiplex proximity extension assay was used to measure the concentrations of 92 inflammation-related proteins in cell-free urine supernatants and plasma. Transcriptomic and clinical information from ccRCC patients was obtained from TCGA. Unsupervised clustering and differential protein expression analyses were performed on protein concentration data. Targeted mRNA analysis on genes encoding significant differentially expressed proteins was performed using TCGA. Backward stepwise regression analyses were used to build a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram and clinical benefit was assessed by discrimination and calibration, and a decision curve analysis, respectively. RESULTS Unsupervised clustering analysis revealed inflammatory signatures in the cell-free urine supernatant of ccRCC patients. Backward stepwise regressions using TCGA data identified transcriptomic risk factors and risk groups associated with OS. A nomogram to predict 2-year and 5-year OS was developed using these risk factors. The decision curve analysis showed that our model was associated with a net benefit improvement compared to the treat-all/none strategies. CONCLUSION We defined four novel biomarkers using proteomic and transcriptomic data that distinguish severity of prognosis in ccRCC. We showed that these biomarkers can be used in a model to predict 2-year and 5-year OS in ccRCC across different tumour stages. This type of analysis, if validated in the future, provides non-invasive prognostic information that could inform either management or surveillance strategies for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Daza
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bérengère Salomé
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kennedy Okhawere
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Octavia Bane
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kirolos N Meilika
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Talia G Korn
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jingjing Qi
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Hui Xe
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Manishkumar Patel
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel Brody
- Department of Pathology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seunghee Kim-Schulze
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Sara Lewis
- Department of Diagnostic, Molecular and Interventional Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- BioMedical Engineering and Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jordan M Rich
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Laura Zuluaga
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ketan K Badani
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amir Horowitz
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Belkacemi Y, Debbi K, Coraggio G, Bendavid J, Nourieh M, To NH, Cherif MA, Saldana C, Ingels A, De La Taille A, Loganadane G. Genomic Prostate Score: A New Tool to Assess Prognosis and Optimize Radiation Therapy Volumes and ADT in Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030945. [PMID: 36765902 PMCID: PMC9913491 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Revised: 01/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Genomic classifiers such as the Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) could help to personalize treatment for men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (I-PCa). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the ability of the GPS to change therapeutic decision making in I-PCa. Only patients in the intermediate NCCN risk group with Gleason score 3 + 4 were considered. The primary objective was to assess the impact of the GPS on risk stratification: NCCN clinical and genomic risk versus NCCN clinical risk stratification alone. We also analyzed the predictive role of the GPS for locally advanced disease (≥pT3+) and the potential change in treatment strategy. Thirty patients were tested for their GPS between November 2018 and March 2020, with the median age being 70 (45-79). Twenty-three patients had a clinical T1 stage. Eighteen patients were classified as favorable intermediate risk (FIR) based on the NCCN criteria. The median GPS score was 39 (17-70). Among the 23 patients who underwent a radical prostatectomy, Gleason score 3 + 4 was found in 18 patients. There was a significant correlation between the GPS and the percentage of a Gleason grade 4 or higher pattern in the surgical sample: correlation coefficient r = 0.56; 95% CI = 0.2-0.8; p = 0.005. In this study, the GPS combined with NCCN clinical risk factors resulted in significant changes in risk group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-149814522 or +33-677439810
| | - Kamel Debbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Gabriele Coraggio
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Jérome Bendavid
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Maya Nourieh
- Department of Pathology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Nhu Hanh To
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Mohamed Aziz Cherif
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Carolina Saldana
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Alexandre De La Taille
- Department of Urology, Henri Mondor Hospital, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), 94000 Créteil, France
| | - Gokoulakrichenane Loganadane
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Henri Mondor Breast Center, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, University of Paris Est Créteil (UPEC), IMRB, INSERM U 955, 94000 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Laajala TD, Sreekanth V, Soupir A, Creed J, Calboli FCF, Singaravelu K, Orman M, Colin-Leitzinger C, Gerke T, Fidley BL, Tyekucheva S, Costello JC. curatedPCaData: Integration of clinical, genomic, and signature features in a curated and harmonized prostate cancer data resource. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.17.524403. [PMID: 36711769 PMCID: PMC9882125 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.17.524403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Genomic and transcriptomic data have been generated across a wide range of prostate cancer (PCa) study cohorts. These data can be used to better characterize the molecular features associated with clinical outcomes and to test hypotheses across multiple, independent patient cohorts. In addition, derived features, such as estimates of cell composition, risk scores, and androgen receptor (AR) scores, can be used to develop novel hypotheses leveraging existing multi-omic datasets. The full potential of such data is yet to be realized as independent datasets exist in different repositories, have been processed using different pipelines, and derived and clinical features are often not provided or unstandardized. Here, we present the curatedPCaData R package, a harmonized data resource representing >2900 primary tumor, >200 normal tissue, and >500 metastatic PCa samples across 19 datasets processed using standardized pipelines with updated gene annotations. We show that meta-analysis across harmonized studies has great potential for robust and clinically meaningful insights. curatedPCaData is an open and accessible community resource with code made available for reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Teemu D Laajala
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Varsha Sreekanth
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Alex Soupir
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jordan Creed
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Federico CF Calboli
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), F-31600, Jokioinen, Finland
| | | | - Michael Orman
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Travis Gerke
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Brooke L. Fidley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Svitlana Tyekucheva
- Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - James C Costello
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Janes JL, Boyer MJ, Bennett JP, Thomas VM, De Hoedt AM, Edwards V DK, Singla PK, Abran JM, Aboushwareb T, Salama JK, Freedland SJ. The 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score Test Is Prognostic for Outcomes After Primary External Beam Radiation Therapy in Men With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:120-131. [PMID: 36306979 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The Oncotype DX Genomic Prostate Score (GPS) assay has been validated as a strong prognostic indicator of adverse pathology, biochemical recurrence, distant metastasis (DM), and prostate cancer (PCa)-related death (PCD) in men with localized PCa after radical prostatectomy. However, it has yet to be tested in men undergoing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), for whom assessing PCa progression risk could inform decisions on treatment intensity. We analyzed whether GPS results are associated with time to biochemical failure (BCF), DM, and PCD after EBRT in men with localized PCa and whether the association is modified by race. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a retrospective study of men with localized PCa treated with EBRT at the VA Health Care System in Durham, NC from 2000 to 2016. Study endpoints were time to BCF per the Phoenix criteria, DM, and PCD. The association of GPS results, per 20-unit increase or dichotomous variable (0-40 vs 41-100), was evaluated with each endpoint using univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Results were then stratified by race. RESULTS A total of 238 patients (69% Black) met the eligibility criteria. Median follow-up for patients who did not experience BCF was 7.6 years. GPS results per 20-unit increase were significantly associated with BCF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.59-5.02), DM (HR, 4.48; 95% CI, 2.75-7.38), and PCD (HR, 5.36; 95% CI, 3.06-9.76) in univariable analysis. GPS results remained significant in multivariable models adjusted for baseline clinical and pathological factors, with HRs being similar to the univariable analysis. There was no significant interaction between the GPS assay and race (P = .923). HRs for BCF were similar in Black men (HR, 3.88; 95% CI, 2.40-6.24) versus non-Black men (HR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.42-6.45). CONCLUSIONS Among men treated with EBRT, the GPS assay is a strong, independent prognostic indicator of time to BCF, DM, and PCD, and performs similarly in Black and non-Black men.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica L Janes
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Matthew J Boyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Vanessa M Thomas
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Amanda M De Hoedt
- Research Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | | | - John M Abran
- Exact Sciences Corporation, Redwood City, California
| | | | - Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; Radiation Oncology Service, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Stephen J Freedland
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California; Department of Surgery, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, North Carolina.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
The CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 Prognostic Model Is Significantly Associated with Adverse Post-Surgical Pathology Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15:cancers15010262. [PMID: 36612262 PMCID: PMC9818961 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 12/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate the association of the prognostic risk score CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9 as measured on pre-surgical diagnostic needle biopsy tissue with pathological outcomes after radical prostatectomies in a clinically low−intermediate-risk patient cohort. Patients and Methods: RNA was extracted from biopsy punches of diagnostic needle biopsies. The patient cohort comprises n = 151 patients; of those n = 84 had low−intermediate clinical risk based on the CAPRA score and DRE clinical stage <cT3. This cohort (n = 84) was investigated for pathology outcomes in this study. RT-qPCR was performed to determine PDE4D5, PDE4D7 and PDE4D9 transcript scores in the cohorts. The CAPRA score was inferred from the relevant clinical data (patient age, PSA, cT, biopsy Gleason, and percentage tumor positive biopsy cores). Logistic regression was used to combine the PDE4D5, PDE4D7 and PDE4D9 scores to build a PDE4D5/7/9_BCR regression model. The CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score used was same as previously published. Results: We investigated three post-surgical outcomes in this study: (i) Adverse Pathology (any ISUP pathological Gleason grade >2, or pathological pT stage > pT3a, or tumor penetrated prostate capsular status, or pN1 disease); (ii) any ISUP pathological Gleason >2; (iii) any ISUP pathological Gleason >1. In the n = 84 patients with low to intermediate clinical risk profiles, the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score was significantly lower in patients with favorable vs. unfavorable outcomes. In univariable logistic regression modeling the genomics PDE4D5/7/9_BCR as well as the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR combination model were significantly associated with all three post-surgical pathology outcomes (p = 0.02, p = 0.0004, p = 0.04; and p = 0.01, p = 0.0002, p = 0.01, respectively). The clinically used PRIAS criteria for the selection of low-risk candidate patients for active surveillance (AS) were not significantly associated with any of the three tested post-operative pathology outcomes (p = 0.3, p = 0.1, p = 0.1, respectively). In multivariable analysis adjusted for the CAPRA score, the genomics PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score remained significant for the outcomes of adverse pathology (p = 0.04) and ISUP pathological Gleason >2 (p = 0.004). The negative predictive value of the CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk score using the low-risk cut-off (0.1) for the three pathological endpoints was 82.0%, 100%, and 59.1%, respectively for a selected low-risk cohort of n = 22 patients (26.2% of the entire cohort) compared to 72.1%, 94.4%, and 55.6% for n = 18 low-risk patients (21.4% of the total cohort) selected based on the PRIAS inclusion criteria. Conclusion: In this study, we have shown that the previously reported clinical-genomics prostate cancer risk model CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR which was developed to predict biological outcomes after surgery of primary prostate cancer is also significantly associated with post-surgical pathology outcomes. The risk score predicts adverse pathology independent of the clinical risk metrics. Compared to clinically used active surveillance inclusion criteria, the clinical-genomics CAPRA&PDE4D5/7/9_BCR risk model selects 22% (n = 8) more low-risk patients with higher negative predictive value to experience unfavorable post-operative pathology outcomes.
Collapse
|
49
|
Almowallad S, Alqahtani LS, Mobashir M. NF-kB in Signaling Patterns and Its Temporal Dynamics Encode/Decode Human Diseases. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12122012. [PMID: 36556376 PMCID: PMC9788026 DOI: 10.3390/life12122012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Defects in signaling pathways are the root cause of many disorders. These malformations come in a wide variety of types, and their causes are also very diverse. Some of these flaws can be brought on by pathogenic organisms and viruses, many of which can obstruct signaling processes. Other illnesses are linked to malfunctions in the way that cell signaling pathways work. When thinking about how errors in signaling pathways might cause disease, the idea of signalosome remodeling is helpful. The signalosome may be conveniently divided into two types of defects: phenotypic remodeling and genotypic remodeling. The majority of significant illnesses that affect people, including high blood pressure, heart disease, diabetes, and many types of mental illness, appear to be caused by minute phenotypic changes in signaling pathways. Such phenotypic remodeling modifies cell behavior and subverts normal cellular processes, resulting in illness. There has not been much progress in creating efficient therapies since it has been challenging to definitively confirm this connection between signalosome remodeling and illness. The considerable redundancy included into cell signaling systems presents several potential for developing novel treatments for various disease conditions. One of the most important pathways, NF-κB, controls several aspects of innate and adaptive immune responses, is a key modulator of inflammatory reactions, and has been widely studied both from experimental and theoretical perspectives. NF-κB contributes to the control of inflammasomes and stimulates the expression of a number of pro-inflammatory genes, including those that produce cytokines and chemokines. Additionally, NF-κB is essential for controlling innate immune cells and inflammatory T cells' survival, activation, and differentiation. As a result, aberrant NF-κB activation plays a role in the pathogenesis of several inflammatory illnesses. The activation and function of NF-κB in relation to inflammatory illnesses was covered here, and the advancement of treatment approaches based on NF-κB inhibition will be highlighted. This review presents the temporal behavior of NF-κB and its potential relevance in different human diseases which will be helpful not only for theoretical but also for experimental perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanaa Almowallad
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Sciences, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia
| | - Leena S. Alqahtani
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah 23445, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: (L.S.A.); (M.M.)
| | - Mohammad Mobashir
- SciLifeLab, Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box 1031, S-17121 Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Biosciences, Faculty of Natural Science, Jamia Millia Islamia, New Delhi 110025, India
- Special Infectious Agents Unit—BSL3, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21362, Saudi Arabia
- Correspondence: (L.S.A.); (M.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chen HY, Bok RA, Cooperberg MR, Nguyen HG, Shinohara K, Westphalen AC, Wang ZJ, Ohliger MA, Gebrezgiabhier D, Carvajal L, Gordon JW, Larson PEZ, Aggarwal R, Kurhanewicz J, Vigneron DB. Improving multiparametric MR-transrectal ultrasound guided fusion prostate biopsies with hyperpolarized 13 C pyruvate metabolic imaging: A technical development study. Magn Reson Med 2022; 88:2609-2620. [PMID: 35975978 PMCID: PMC9794017 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop techniques and establish a workflow using hyperpolarized carbon-13 (13 C) MRI and the pyruvate-to-lactate conversion rate (kPL ) biomarker to guide MR-transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsies. METHODS The integrated multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) exam consisted of a 1-min hyperpolarized 13 C-pyruvate EPI acquisition added to a conventional prostate mpMRI exam. Maps of kPL values were calculated, uploaded to a picture archiving and communication system and targeting platform, and displayed as color overlays on T2 -weighted anatomic images. Abdominal radiologists identified 13 C research biopsy targets based on the general recommendation of focal lesions with kPL >0.02(s-1 ), and created a targeting report for each study. Urologists conducted transrectal ultrasound-guided MR fusion biopsies, including the standard 1 H-mpMRI targets as well as 12-14 core systematic biopsies informed by the research 13 C-kPL targets. All biopsy results were included in the final pathology report and calculated toward clinical risk. RESULTS This study demonstrated the safety and technical feasibility of integrating hyperpolarized 13 C metabolic targeting into routine 1 H-mpMRI and transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy workflows, evaluated via 5 men (median age 71 years, prostate-specific antigen 8.4 ng/mL, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment score 2) on active surveillance undergoing integrated scan and subsequent biopsies. No adverse event was reported. Median turnaround time was less than 3 days from scan to 13 C-kPL targeting, and scan-to-biopsy time was 2 weeks. Median number of 13 C targets was 1 (range: 1-2) per patient, measuring 1.0 cm (range: 0.6-1.9) in diameter, with a median kPL of 0.0319 s-1 (range: 0.0198-0.0410). CONCLUSIONS This proof-of-concept work demonstrated the safety and feasibility of integrating hyperpolarized 13 C MR biomarkers to the standard mpMRI workflow to guide MR-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Yu Chen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Robert A. Bok
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Matthew R. Cooperberg
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Hao G. Nguyen
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Katsuto Shinohara
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Antonio C. Westphalen
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Zhen J. Wang
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Michael A. Ohliger
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Daniel Gebrezgiabhier
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Lucas Carvajal
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Jeremy W. Gordon
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Peder E. Z. Larson
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Rahul Aggarwal
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - John Kurhanewicz
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| | - Daniel B. Vigneron
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California United States
| |
Collapse
|