Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage

The Status of Fertility Preservation (FP) Insurance Mandates and Their Impact on Utilization and Access to Care

Fertility preservation (FP) is the use of a specific medical intervention to protect the fertility of individuals whose disease or disease treatment may lead to infertility. These medical interventions include the cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, ovarian tissue, sperm, and testicular tissue; oocyte and embryo cryopreservation are the most widely used interventions in the United States. Although guidelines recommend FP prior to undergoing gonadotoxic treatments, cost barriers are high. For example, the average cost of an oocyte cryopreservation cycle in the United States exceeds $10,000. High cost and lack of insurance coverage are two of the most cited reasons explaining the low Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) referral rates and limited FP utilization. Broadening insurance mandates for FP prior to gonadotoxic treatments could improve utilization and provide cancer survivors with improved quality of life post treatment.

Fertility care for all: impact of New York State's Medicaid expansion on infertility care

PURPOSE

To assess whether the New York State (NYS) mandate expanding Medicaid coverage of fertility diagnostic testing and treatment is successfully increasing patient access to and utilization of fertility care.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed of NYS Medicaid patients who presented for fertility services to a large academic reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) clinic. Information on patient demographics, medical history, diagnostic testing, treatments, and outcomes was collected. Patients presenting to the clinic in the 1 year prior to the mandate (October 1, 2018-September 30, 2019) were compared to patients presenting in the 1 year after the mandate (October 1, 2019-September 30, 2020). Primary outcomes of the study were differences in presentation to the clinic between the two cohorts and differences in utilization of infertility diagnostic testing and treatment. Secondary outcomes were differences in treatment outcomes.

RESULTS

A significantly larger percentage of Medicaid patients presented to the clinic for fertility assessment post-mandate (22%) as compared to pre-mandate (9%, p < 0.05). There were no demographic differences between the pre- and post-mandate patient groups. A similar percentage of patients completed diagnostic testing pre- vs. post-mandate. Post-mandate patients underwent more treatment cycles with ovulation induction medications compared to natural treatment cycles. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rates pre- vs. post-mandate.

CONCLUSION

The NYS Medicaid mandate allowed a significantly larger percentage of Medicaid patients to present for fertility evaluation. The patients in the post-mandate cohort underwent more treatment cycles with ovulation induction medications compared to natural cycles.

The burden of very early dropout in infertility care: a nationwide population-based cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

What is the frequency and the associated factors of very early dropout following unsuccessful clomiphene citrate (CC)/gonadotropin treatment in the context of full coverage of treatment cost.

SUMMARY ANSWER

Despite free treatment, almost one in four women had a very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment, with patients below the poverty line being more likely to drop out early.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Success of infertility care is tarnished by very high dropout rates. Infertility care dropout has been considered as resulting principally from financial barriers because of the high cost of treatment. Nearly all previous work addressed dropout following IVF/ICSI. Factors associated with dropout following CC/gonadotropins may be different and also need to be investigated.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Nationwide population-based cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Using the French national health insurance and hospital databases, we included in the cohort 27 416 women aged 18-49 years unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins in 2017. The main outcome was very early dropout, defined as discontinuation of all infertility treatment after unsuccessful treatment for 1-3 months. Very early treatment dropout was analysed by multivariate logistic regression.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among women unsuccessfully treated with CC/gonadotropins, 22% dropped out of infertility care within 3 months. In multivariate analysis, higher early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment was associated with older and younger ages (≥35 and <25 years), being below the poverty line, being treated with CC prescribed by a general practitioner and lack of infertility tests or monitoring.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is based on health administrative data that do not include reasons for dropout and record only a limited amount of information. It is thus not possible to analyse the reason for early dropout.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Despite full coverage of all infertility treatment, women under the poverty line have a higher risk of very early dropout following unsuccessful CC/gonadotropin treatment. Better understanding is needed of the non-financial barriers and difficulties faced by these patients. To address disparities in infertility treatment, practitioner training could be reinforced to adapt to patients from different social and cultural backgrounds.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the ANR StimHo project, grant ANR-17-CE36-0011-01 from the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Economics of Fertility Care

Family building is a human right. The high cost and lack of insurance coverage associated with fertility treatments in the United States have made treatment inaccessible for many patients. The universal uptake of "add-on" services has further contributed to high out-of-pocket costs. Expansion in access to infertility care has occurred in several states through implementation of insurance mandates, and more employers are offering fertility benefits to attract and retain employees. An understanding of the economic issues shaping fertility should inform future policies aimed at promoting evidence-based practices and improving access to care in the United States.

Breaking Down Barriers: Advancing Toward Health Equity in Fertility Care for Black and Hispanic Patients

Infertility can affect all people, regardless of race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic status. Barriers to quality fertility care include access, financial limitations, education, and social stigmas. Although racial disparities in outcomes of assisted reproductive technology can be largely attributed to the influences of systemic racism (not race), we can make changes to improve equity of care. We propose strategies in the areas of advocacy, clinical setting, community, and outcomes to address the racial disparities.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access to and Outcomes of Infertility Treatment and Assisted Reproductive Technology in the United States

Infertility disproportionately affects the minority, non-White populace, with Black women having twofold higher odds than White women. Despite higher infertility rates, minority racial and ethnic groups access and utilize fertility care less frequently. Even once care is accessed, racial and ethnic disparities exist in infertility treatment and ART outcomes. Preliminary studies indicate that Asian and American Indian women have lower intrauterine insemination pregnancy rates. Many robust studies indicate significant racial and ethnic disparities in rates of clinical pregnancy, live birth, pregnancy loss, and obstetrical complications following in vitro fertilization, with lower favorable outcomes in Black, Asian, and Hispanic women.

Strong social disparities in access to IVF/ICSI despite free cost of treatment: a French population-based nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Access to IVF/ICSI is facilitated when the financial barrier is removed. In a national context where in vitro fertilisation (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm Injection (ICSI) treatment is cost-free, how many women do not access IVF/ICSI and what are the factors associated with non-access?

METHODS

Using French national health insurance databases, the cohort included 20,240 women aged 18-43 years living in France who underwent unsuccessful treatment (no pregnancy) with clomiphene citrate (CC) and/or gonadotropins with treatment started between January and August 2016. The outcome measure was non-access to IVF/ICSI during the 24-month following start of infertility care. Factors associated with non-access to IVF/ICSI were explored using mixed effects logistic regression.

RESULTS

In the cohort, 65.4% of women did not access IVF/ICSI. In multivariable analysis, non-access to IVF/ICSI was higher in younger women (18-25 years: (OR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.85-2.54) and in older women (40-43 years: (OR=3.60, 95% CI: 3.25-3.98)). Non-access was higher among women below the poverty line (OR=3.76, 95% CI: 3.34-4.23) and showed a significant upward trend with increasing deprivation of place of residence. Distance to the nearest fertility centre was not significantly associated with non-access to IVF/ICSI.

CONCLUSIONS

In a national context of cost-free ART treatment, a large proportion of women did not access treatment, with a strong social gradient that raises important issues. We need to understand the underlying social mechanisms to develop an efficient and equitable health policy regarding infertility care.

Racial disparities in telehealth use during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on initial infertility consultations.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Fertility practice in an academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Patients presenting for initial infertility consultation between January 2019 and June 2021 were randomly selected for prepandemic (n = 500) and pandemic (n = 500) cohorts.

EXPOSURE

Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was a change in the proportion of African American patients using telehealth after pandemic onset compared with all other patients. Secondary outcomes included presentation to an appointment vs. no-show or cancellation. Exploratory outcomes included appointment length and in vitro fertilization initiation.

RESULTS

The prepandemic cohort vs. the pandemic cohort had fewer patients with commercial insurance (64.4% vs. 72.80%) and more African American patients (33.0% vs. 27.0%), although the racial makeup did not differ significantly between the two cohorts. Rates of missed appointments did not differ between the cohorts, but the prepandemic cohort vs. the pandemic cohort was more likely to no-show (49.4% vs. 27.8%) and less likely to cancel (50.6% vs. 72.2%). African American patients, compared with all other patients, during the pandemic were less likely to use telehealth (57.0% vs. 66.8%). African American patients, compared with all other patients, were less likely to have commercial insurance (prepandemic: 41.2% vs. 75.8%; pandemic: 57.0% vs. 78.6%), present to their scheduled appointment (prepandemic: 52.7% vs. 73.7%; pandemic: 48.1% vs. 74.8%), and cancel vs. no-show (prepandemic: 30.8% vs. 68.2%, pandemic: 64.3% vs. 78.3%). On multivariable analysis, African American patients were less likely (odds ratio 0.37, 95% confidence interval 0.28-0.50) and telehealth users were more likely (odds ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.27) to present to their appointments vs. no-show or cancel when controlling for insurance type and timing relative to the onset of the pandemic.

CONCLUSION

Telehealth implementation during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic decreased the overall no-show rate, but this shift did not apply to African American patients. This analysis highlights disparities in insurance coverage, telehealth utilization, and presentation for an initial consultation in the African American population during the pandemic.

Navigating Unequal Paths: Racial Disparities in the Infertility Journey

Infertility is one of the most emotionally devastating conditions experienced during the reproductive window. Although not life-threatening, it significantly erodes quality of life for those with the diagnosis. Disturbingly, data demonstrate the existence of profound racial disparities that persist along the entire journey of infertility. Though most of the scientific literature emphasizes disparities in clinical outcomes after infertility treatment, it is important to recognize that these inequities are the downstream effect of a series of distinct challenges encountered by historically marginalized people on their path to parenthood. In this review, we explore the current state of knowledge concerning the inequities at each "step" in the path to overcome infertility challenges and propose solutions to create a future in which reproductive medicine is truly equitable, accessible, and supportive for everyone.

The impact of socioeconomic status on bulk semen parameters, fertility treatment, and fertility outcomes in a cohort of subfertile men

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of socioeconomic status on the use of fertility treatment and the rate of live birth in men with subfertility.

DESIGN

A retrospective, time-to-event analysis of men with subfertility in Utah stratified by socioeconomic status.

SETTING

Patients seen in fertility clinics throughout Utah.

PATIENT(S)

All men in Utah undergoing semen analysis between 1998 and 2017 at the state's 2 largest health care networks.

INTERVENTION(S)

Socioeconomic status (defined as area deprivation index of patients' residential location).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Categorical use of fertility treatment, the count of fertility treatments (in patients with ≥1 treatment), and live birth after semen analysis.

RESULT(S)

When controlling for age, ethnicity, and semen parameters (count and concentration), men from low socioeconomic areas were only 60%-70% as likely to use fertility treatment depending on type compared with men from high socioeconomic areas (intrauterine insemination [IUI] hazards ratio [HR] = 0.691 (0.581-0.821), P<.001; in vitro fertilization [IVF] HR = 0.602 (0.466-0.778), P<.001). Of men undergoing fertility treatment, those from low socioeconomic areas had 75%-80% the number of treatments as men from high socioeconomic areas depending on type (IUI incident rate ratio = 0.740 (0.645-0.847), P<.001; IVF incident rate ratios = 0.803 (0.585-1.094), P=.170). When controlling for age, ethnicity, semen parameters, and use of fertility treatment, men from low socioeconomic areas were only 87% as likely to experience a live birth as men from high socioeconomic areas (HR = 0.871 (0.820-0.925), P<.001). Given the overall higher likelihood of live birth in men from high socioeconomic areas, as well as their greater chance of using fertility treatment, we predicted an annual disparity of 5 additional live births in high socioeconomic men compared with low for every 100 men.

CONCLUSION(S)

Men from low socioeconomic areas undergoing semen analyses are significantly less likely to use fertility treatment and experience a live birth than their counterparts from high socioeconomic areas. Mitigation programs to increase access to fertility treatment may help to reduce this bias; however, our results suggest that additional discrepancies beyond fertility treatment require addressing.

Reproductive Health Counseling among Youth with Sickle Cell Disease

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Reproductive health counseling is important for youth with sickle cell disease (SCD) given they experience potential infertility risks from SCD and its treatments and high rates of unplanned pregnancies. Thus, the objective was to describe documented occurrences of reproductive health counseling among youth with SCD and examine differences in counseling by sociodemographic and treatment characteristics.

METHODS

Data were abstracted from 167 electronic medical records (age=14-21, 54% female) with SCD (1/01/2015-12/31/19) at two sites (Nationwide Children's Hospital [NCH] and Hassenfeld Children's Hospital at NYU Langone [HCH]). Descriptive statistics, Point-biserial correlations and Chi Square tests were used to examine sample characteristics and relationships between sociodemographic factors, clinical characteristics, site, and reproductive health counseling (fertility, contraception, and genetic counseling).

RESULTS

Seven of 167 (4%) youth had documented discussions about potential impacts of SCD on fertility. Fertility counseling was also low among those who received a bone marrow transplant (BMT) or hydroxyurea (n=1/2; 50% and n=1/104; 1% respectively). Only 57% of youth received contraception counseling and only 55% of sexually active youth used birth control; birth control use was associated with older age (p=0.028), severe clinical disease (p=0.003), and documentation of contraception counseling (p=0.047). Most youth received genetic counseling (80%), though more genetic counseling occurred at NCH (p<0.001). There was no association between gender and any type of counseling.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest reproductive health counseling gaps in this population with important implications for future infertility distress and unplanned pregnancies. Future research should examine barriers to counseling, explore fertility impacts of SCD and treatments, and inform evidence-based guidelines for reproductive health care in SCD.

Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review

There is emergent scientific literature examining the disparities in reproductive care of women in the United States. Reproduction is a basic human right and there are unique challenges that racial and ethnic minorities face in accessing fertility care and assisted reproductive technology. The identification of these disparities can aid in identifying areas for interventions to improve and resolve, the inequities that exist in providing care for minority populations. A literature search was performed using PubMed to identify articles with data specific to racial and ethnic differences in study populations as it related to infertility, access to care, and treatment outcomes. The following review and collection of articles provide a comprehensive overview of the disparities that exist, the factors that contribute to these disparities, and recommendations for how providers and health care systems may begin to resolve the gaps in equitable care.

State insurance mandates for in vitro fertilization are not associated with improving racial and ethnic disparities in utilization and treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization and clinical outcomes following fertility care with in vitro fertilization in the United States are well-documented. Given the cost of fertility care, lack of insurance is a barrier to access across all races and ethnicities.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine how state insurance mandates are associated with racial and ethnic disparities in in vitro fertilization utilization and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a cohort study using data from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinical Outcome Reporting System from 2014 to 2019 for autologous in vitro fertilization cycles. The primary outcomes were utilization-defined as the number of in vitro fertilization cycles per 10,000 reproductive-aged women-and cumulative live birth-defined as the delivery of at least 1 liveborn neonate resulting from a single stimulation cycle and its corresponding fresh or thawed transfers.

RESULTS

Most (72.9%) of the 1,096,539 cycles from 487,191 women occurred in states without an insurance mandate. Although utilization was higher across all racial and ethnic groups in mandated states, the increase in utilization was greatest for non-Hispanic Asian and non-Hispanic White women. For instance, in the most recent study year (2019), the utilization rates for non-Hispanic White women compared with non-Hispanic Black/African American women were 23.5 cycles per 10,000 women higher in nonmandated states and 56.2 cycles per 10,000 women higher in mandated states. There was no significant interaction between race and ethnicity and insurance mandate status on any of the clinical outcomes (all P-values for interaction terms > .05).

CONCLUSION

Racial and ethnic disparities in utilization of in vitro fertilization and clinical outcomes for autologous cycles persist regardless of state health insurance mandates.

Association of state insurance coverage mandates with assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation

BACKGROUND

Insurance coverage for fertility services may reduce the financial burden of high-cost fertility care such as assisted reproductive technology and improve its utilization. Patients who exit care after failing to reach their reproductive goals report higher rates of mental health problems and a lower sense of well-being. It is important to understand the relationship between state-mandated insurance coverage for fertility services and assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess whether state-mandated insurance coverage for fertility services is associated with lower rates of care discontinuation after an initial assisted reproductive technology cycle that did not result in a live birth.

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study using data from United States fertility clinics reporting to the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System during 2016 and 2018. Patients who began their first autologous assisted reproductive technology cycle during 2016 and 2017 and did not have a live birth were included. We describe the rate of assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation (no additional cycle within 12 months of the previous cycle's date of failure). Multivariable analyses were conducted to evaluate factors independently associated with care discontinuation, including the scope of fertility services included in state coverage mandate at assisted reproductive technology cycle initiation that were as follows: comprehensive (≥3 assisted reproductive technology cycles), limited (1, 2, or an unspecified number of assisted reproductive technology cycles), mandate not including assisted reproductive technology, and no mandate.

RESULTS

Among 91,324 patients who underwent their first autologous assisted reproductive technology cycle that did not result in live birth, 24,072 (26.4%) discontinued care. Compared with patients who lived in states with mandates for comprehensive assisted reproductive technology coverage, those in states with mandates for fertility services coverage that did not include assisted reproductive technology or states with no mandate were 46% (adjusted relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.63) and 26% (adjusted relative risk, 1.26; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.39) more likely to discontinue care, respectively, after controlling for patient and cycle characteristics. Increasing patient age, distance from clinic ≥50 miles, previous live birth, fewer oocytes retrieved, and not having embryos cryopreserved were also associated with higher rates of discontinuation. Non-Hispanic Black, non-Hispanic Asian, and Hispanic patients had higher rates of care discontinuation than non-Hispanic White patients regardless of the existence or scope of state-mandated assisted reproductive technology coverage.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive state-mandated insurance coverage for assisted reproductive technology is associated with lower rates of assisted reproductive technology care discontinuation.

Social disparities in the use of ART treatment: a national register-based cross-sectional study among women in Denmark

STUDY QUESTION

How are educational level, labor market attachment and income associated with receiving a first ART treatment in either the public or private healthcare sector among women in Denmark?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Higher educational level and income as well as labor market attachment were associated with higher probability of initiating ART treatment at public and private fertility clinics among women in Denmark.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Infertility is common in populations worldwide, and the approach to this issue differs between societies and healthcare systems. In the public Danish healthcare system, ART treatment is free of charge, and the direct cost for patients is therefore low. In the private healthcare sector in Denmark, ART treatment is self-financed. There is limited knowledge about the association between socioeconomic factors and seeking ART treatment, although previous studies have indicated that higher socioeconomic status is associated with seeking ART treatment.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Women undergoing ART treatment during 1994-2016 registered in the Danish IVF register were individually linked with data from sociodemographic population registers using the Danish Personal Identification number. The study population consisted of 69 018 women treated with ART and 670 713 age-matched comparison women from the background population with no previous history of ART treatment.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The women included in the analyses were aged 18-45 years. The associations between attained educational level, labor market attachment and income and receiving a first ART treatment attempt were investigated for women either initiating treatment in the public sector or in the private sector, respectively. Information on age and origin was included as potential confounders, and odds ratios (ORs) were estimated in logistic regression models. In addition, analyses were stratified by age group to investigate potential differences across the age span.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Adjusted results showed increased odds of receiving a first ART treatment in either the public or private sector among women with a higher educational level. Furthermore, women in employment were more likely to receive a first ART treatment in the public or private sector compared to women outside the workforce. The odds of receiving a first ART treatment increased with increasing income level. Surprisingly, income level had a greater impact on the odds of receiving a first ART treatment in the public sector than in the private sector. Women in the highest income group had 10 times higher odds of receiving a first ART treatment in the public sector (OR: 10.53 95% CI: 10.13, 10.95) compared to women in the lowest income group. Sub-analyses in different age groups showed significant associations between ART treatment and income level and labor market attachment in all age groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Our study does not include non-ART treatments, as the national IVF register did not register these types of fertility treatments before 2007.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

In Denmark, there is equal access to medically assisted reproduction treatment in the publicly funded healthcare system, and since there is no social inequality in the prevalence of infertility, social inequality in the use of ART treatment would not be expected as such. However, our results show that social inequality is found for a first ART treatment attempt across publicly and privately funded ART treatment across the socioeconomic indicators, educational level, labor market attachment and income.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The funding for the establishment of the Danish National ART-Couple II Cohort (DANAC II Cohort) was obtained from the Rosa Ebba Hansen Foundation. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Accessing medical care for infertility: a study of women in Mexico

Objective

To investigate barriers in accessing care for infertility in Mexico, because little is known about this issue for low and middle-income countries, which comprise 80% of the world's population.

Design

Cross-sectional analysis.

Setting

Mexcian Teachers' Cohort.

Patients

A total of 115,315 female public school teachers from 12 states in Mexico.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

The participants were asked detailed questions about their demographics, lifestyle characteristics, access to the health care system, and infertility history via a self-reported questionnaire. Log-binomial models, adjusted a priori for potential confounding factors, were used to estimate the prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% confidence intervals ( CIs) of accessing medical care for infertility among women reporting a history of infertility.

Results

A total of 19,580 (17%) participants reported a history of infertility. Of those who experienced infertility, 12,470 (63.7%) reported seeking medical care for infertility, among whom 8,467 (67.9%) reported undergoing fertility treatments. Among women who reported a history of infertility, women who taught in a rural school (PR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.92-0.97), spoke an indigenous language (PR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.84-0.92), or had less than a university degree (PR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.97) were less likely to access medical care for fertility. Women who had ever had a mammogram (PR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.05-1.10), had a pap smear in the past year (PR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.06-1.10), or who had used private health care regularly or in times of illness were more likely to access medical care for fertility.

Conclusions

The usage of infertility care varied by demographic, lifestyle, and access characteristics, including speaking an indigenous language, teaching in a rural school, and having a private health care provider.

Polycystic ovary syndrome in Latin American populations: What is known and what remains unresolved

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is one of the main endocrine and reproductive disorders affecting women in their reproductive age. The syndrome is considered a multifactorial pathology. Therefore, genetic susceptibility and environmental factors contribute to PCOS development and phenotypic manifestation. Ethnicity and socioeconomic factors influence the development of PCOS and could affect the possibility of its diagnosis. Latin America is a unique case of study because of the heterogeneity within the region, complex socioeconomic status, and the mixed ancestry found in these populations. Up-to-date, most studies have focused on developed countries' populations, and there is a lack of evidence regarding Latin-American countries. We propose to review the state of the art of PCOS knowledge regarding Latin American populations, including the metabolic and reproductive aspects of the syndrome and the different influencing factors, and suggest future directions to deepen the study of PCOS.

Sexual health and intimacy after cancer treatment in women of color: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Cancer diagnosis and treatment can significantly affect women's sexual health and intimacy, leading to diminished quality of life in survivorship. The perspectives and experiences of women of color (WOC) with cancer are critical to inform comprehensive, inclusive sexual wellbeing care in survivorship. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize contemporary literature describing sexual wellbeing experiences of WOC treated for cancer.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of CINAHL, PubMed, Embase and PsycInfo and Scopus identified studies that addressed sex and intimacy of U.S. WOC treated for cancer published in the last 15 years. The authors identified emergent themes from the literature through thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies (10 qualitative, 8 quantitative) met the inclusion criteria, all with breast or gynecologic cancer samples. Studies include African American (13), Asian American (3), and Latina (10) women, as well as Non-Hispanic Whites and 'other' race/ethnicity women. Overarching themes identified were: 1) impacts of treatment on sexual health and body image, 2) process of accepting and overcoming, 3) value of an engaged and supportive partner, and 4) current clinical practice and barriers to sexual health care.

CONCLUSIONS

WOC experience changes in sex and intimacy after cancer treatment, and experiences of sexual function, sexual communication, and sexual healthcare are often shaped by sociocultural experiences. An understanding of WOC's sexual health and intimacy after cancer treatment can inform inclusive, culturally responsive sexual health interventions.

Emergency department utilization for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a rare, but serious, risk of assisted reproductive technologies. In severe cases, patients may present to the emergency department (ED) for assessment, treatment of related complications, and even in-patient admission. Significant effort has been made to reduce the incidence and complications of OHSS; however, it is unknown if these strategies have decreased patient presentation for treatment in the ED.

PURPOSE

To assess ED utilization for OHSS over time and to examine admission rates, patient demographics, and charges.

METHODS

Retrospective longitudinal study utilizing data from the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample Database and the National ART Surveillance System. All ED visits between 2006 and 2016 with an ICD-9 or -10 diagnosis of OHSS were included. Demographics including age, geographic location, and income quartile and alternative diagnoses, admission rates, overall charges, and number of stimulation cycles annually were assessed.

RESULTS

The number of ovarian stimulation cycles steadily increased from 2006 (n = 110,183) to 2016 (n = 157,721), while the number of OHSS-related ED visits remained relatively stable (APC 2.08, p = 0.14). Admission rates for OHSS decreased from 52.7% in 2006 to 33.1% in 2016 (APC -4.43%, p < 0.01). The average charge for OHSS-related ED visits almost doubled from 2006 to 2016 (APC 8.53, p < 0.01) and was significantly higher than charges for non-OHSS-related visits for age-matched controls (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Despite an increase in total stimulation cycles, there was no significant change in the estimated number of patients presenting to the ED; however, admission rates significantly declined. These observations suggest a possible shift in the severity and/or management of OHSS during the study period.

Impact of in vitro fertilization state mandates for third party insurance coverage in the United States: a review and critical assessment

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine estimates that fewer than a quarter of infertile couples have sufficient access to infertility care. Insurers in the United States (US) have long considered infertility to be a socially constructed condition, and thus in-vitro fertilization (IVF) an elective intervention. As a result, IVF is cost prohibitive for many patients in the US. State infertility insurance mandates are a crucial mechanism for expanding access to fertility care in the US in the absence of federal legislation. The first state insurance mandate for third party coverage of infertility services was passed by West Virginia in 1977, and Maryland passed the country's first IVF mandate in 1985. To date, twenty states have passed legislation requiring insurers to cover or offer coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Ten states currently have "comprehensive" IVF mandates, meaning they require third party coverage for IVF with minimal restrictions to patient eligibility, exemptions, and lifetime limits. Several studies analyzing the impact of infertility and IVF mandates have been published in the past 20 years. In this review, we characterize and contextualize the existing evidence of the impact of state insurance mandates on access to infertility treatment, IVF practice patterns, and reproductive outcomes. Furthermore, we summarize the arguments in favor of insurance coverage for infertility care and assess the limitations of state insurance mandates as a strategy for increasing access to infertility treatment. State mandates play a key role in the promotion of evidence-based practices and represent an essential and impactful strategy for the advancement of gender equality and reproductive rights.

Impact of comprehensive state insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization, embryo transfer practices, and outcomes in the United States

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have demonstrated that state mandated coverage of in vitro fertilization may be associated with increased utilization, fewer embryos per transfer, and lower multiple birth rates, but also lower overall live birth rates. Given new legislation and the delay between enactment and effect, a revisit of this analysis is warranted.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize the current impact of comprehensive state in vitro fertilization insurance mandates on in vitro fertilization utilization, live birth rates, multiple birth rates, and embryo transfer practices.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of in vitro fertilization cycles reported by the 2018 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic Success Rates Report in the United States. In vitro fertilization cycles were stratified according to state mandate as follows: comprehensive (providing coverage for in vitro fertilization with minimal restrictions) and noncomprehensive. The United States census estimates for 2018 were used to calculate the number of reproductive-aged women in each state. Outcomes of interest (stratified by state mandate status) included utilization rate of in vitro fertilization per 1000 women aged 25 to 44 years, live birth rate, multiple birth rate, number of embryo transfer procedures (overall and subdivided by fresh vs frozen cycles), and percentage of transfers performed with frozen embryos. Additional subanalyzes were performed with stratification of outcomes by patient age group.

RESULTS

In 2018, 134,997 in vitro fertilization cycles from 456 clinics were reported. Six states had comprehensive mandates; 32,029 and 102,968 cycles were performed in states with and without comprehensive in vitro fertilization mandates, respectively. In vitro fertilization utilization in states with comprehensive mandates was 132% higher than in noncomprehensive states after age adjustment; increased utilization was observed regardless of age stratification. Live birth rate per cycle was significantly higher in states with comprehensive mandates (35.4% vs 33.4%; P<.001), especially among older age groups. Multiple birth rate as a percentage of all births was significantly lower in states with comprehensive mandates (10.2% vs 13.8%; P<.001), especially among younger patients. Mean number of embryos per transfer was significantly lower in states with comprehensive mandates (1.30 vs 1.36; P<.001). Significantly fewer frozen transfers were performed as a percentage of all embryo transfers in states with comprehensive mandates (66.1% vs 76.3%; P<.001). Among fresh embryo transfers, significantly fewer embryos were transferred in comprehensive states among all patients (1.55 vs 1.67; P<.001).

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive state mandated insurance coverage for in vitro fertilization services is associated with greater utilization of these services, fewer embryos per transfer, fewer frozen embryo transfers, lower multiple birth rates, and higher live birth rates. These findings have important public health implications for reproductive-aged individuals in the United States and present notable opportunities for research on access to fertility care.

Racial disparities in access to reproductive health and fertility care in the United States

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To examine the status of racial and ethnic inequalities in fertility care in the United States (U.S.) at inception of 2022. This review highlights addressable underpinnings for the prevalent differentials in access to and utilization of infertility treatments and underscores gaps in preventive care as key contributors to racial and ethnic disparities in risk burden for subfertility and infertility.

RECENT FINDINGS

Significant gaps in access to and utilization of fertility care are consistently reported among racial and ethnic minorities, particularly Black and Hispanic women. Access to and utilization of contraceptives, human papilloma virus vaccination rates, preexposure prophylaxis use, and differentials in treatment of common gynecologic disorders are relevant to the prevalent racial and ethnic disparities in reproductive health. The spectrum of differential in reproductive wellness and the magnitude of reproductive health burden afflicting racial minorities in the U.S. raise concerns regarding systemic and structural racism as plausible contributors to the prevalent state of affairs.

SUMMARY

Despite efforts to reform unequal reproductive health practices and policies, racial and ethnic disparities in fertility care are pervasive and persistent. In addition to measures aimed at reducing barriers to care, societal efforts must prioritize health disparity research to systematically examine underpinnings, and addressing structural racism and interpersonal biases, to correct the prevalent racial inequities and mitigate disparities.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patient Fertility Care

The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the healthcare system have been widespread, with many institutions in the United States pausing elective procedures to redirect resources to critical care. Fertility care and assisted reproductive procedures were classified as elective procedures and similarly paused. We conducted qualitative interviews with patients and/or their partners (n = 25 female patients; n = 3 male partners) receiving care at a fertility clinic in the Midwest to understand patient appraisal of COVID-19 risk on the resumption of care following a month-long closure of an infertility clinic, and patient agreement with the clinic closure. Interview transcripts were thematically analyzed from a grounded theory approach. Study participants reported an increased sense of urgency due to the delay in fertility procedures. This urgency often superseded concerns of potential COVID-19 infection, motivating patients to continue fertility treatment during a pandemic. In hindsight, some participants did not agree with the clinic's closure and treatment cessation, feeling that these steps negatively interrupted time-sensitive reproductive goals. Patient responses highlight the need for additional resources to support decision-making during times of crisis. Triaging patients based on time-sensitivity of treatment instead of a total shutdown respects patient autonomy for continuing treatment amidst uncertain COVID-19-impact.

Provision of infertility care for the underserved in reproductive endocrinology and infertility practices associated with obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs in the United States

Objective

To survey practice patterns designed to increase access to infertility care and evaluate the exposure of obstetrics and gynecology residents to infertility care for the underserved.

Design

Cross-sectional.

Setting

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) practices associated with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited obstetrics and gynecology residency training programs.

Patient(s)

None.

Intervention(s)

Questionnaire survey.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Presence of clinical programs designed to improve access to REI care, resident involvement in such programs, and perceived barriers to expanding access to care.

Result(s)

Clinical initiatives to expand access included discounted infertility services (38%, n = 30), utilization of a low-cost in vitro fertilization (IVF) program (28%, n = 22), and utilization of a resident- and/or fellow-staffed clinic to provide infertility care (39%, n = 31). The most commonly discounted infertility services were IVF (73%, n = 22), clinical consultation (70%, n = 21), and intrauterine insemination (53%, n = 16). The provision of discounted prices was correlated with the increasing practice size (odds ratio [OR], 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23–4.24) and number of assisted reproductive technology cycles performed annually (OR, 3.65; 95% CI, 1.48–9.02). Academic REI practices (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.98–13.25) were more likely to have a low-cost IVF program. Less than half of obstetrics and gynecology residency programs (39%, n = 31) had an associated REI clinic in which obstetrics and gynecology residents provide direct infertility care to the medically underserved. Frequency and services offered in trainee clinics varied. Multiple barriers to expanding access to care were reported.

Conclusion(s)

Reproductive endocrinology and infertility practices associated with obstetrics and gynecology residency programs utilize a diverse range of approaches to provide infertility care to the underserved in the backdrop of considerable challenges and barriers, but significant gaps persist.

See one, do one, teach one: Reimagining reproductive endocrinology and infertility training programs to expand access to care

Objective

To provide a review of the current literature surrounding barriers to reproductive medicine and present examples of how resident and fellow education can be used to overcome these barriers.

Design

A review of the relevant literature addressing barriers to reproductive medicine, resident and fellow education, and related materials was completed.

Setting

Academic medical institutions.

Patient(s)

None.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Health disparities and barriers in access to care.

Result(s)

Of barriers in access to care, 3 were reviewed in detail: cost of health care, racial inequities, and marginalization of immigrant communities. The suggested strategies to mitigate these barriers include the following: reducing racial inequities through improved diversity within reproductive medicine and through antiracism training, developing opportunities for trainees to engage in advocacy, strengthening reproductive endocrinology and infertility clinical exposure and educational curricula in training programs, inclusion of residents and fellows in clinical care, and improving the accessibility of fertility care through implementing approaches to optimize the management of infertility in challenging, resource-constrained settings.

Conclusion(s)

Infertility is one of the most prevalent reproductive health diseases, yet profound disparities and inequities in access to care exist today in the United States. Lower-income, minority, and immigrant communities are among those most marginalized. Improved access to care begins with broadened obstetrics and gynecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility trainee education, which acknowledges the barriers these communities face and provides strategies to help overcome these obstacles to care.

The Disparities in ART (DART) Hypothesis of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Access and Outcomes of IVF Treatment in the USA

We propose the Disparities in ART (DART) hypothesis which identifies underlining causes that contribute to racial disparities in access and outcomes of ART treatment in the USA. Reasons for disparities in access and outcomes of ART treatment for infertility are derived from some relative contribution of four identified causes. They are simply stated as delays in obtaining treatment, higher dropout during and following unsuccessful ART treatment, provider factors, and differences in patient biological factors. Each of these causes has a subset of 4-6 factors that contribute to each of the 4 broad categorical causes that are discussed. This hypothesis may serve as a platform for better understanding the scope of the challenges and potential research inquiries that may lead to narrowing of racial/ethnic disparities in access and outcomes in ART.

Racial/ethnic disparities in infertility treatment utilization in the US, 2011-2019

With delayed child-bearing age, there has been an increase in infertility rates globally and in the United States (US). Unsurprisingly, there has been a concomitant substantial increase in the number of individuals seeking infertility treatments over the last decade. This study aimed to examine the relationship between race/ethnicity and the utilization of different infertility treatments over the previous decade. We conducted this retrospective cohort study using the United States (US) Birth data files 2011-2019. We calculated the rates of infertility treatment and its subtypes over the study period. Descriptive statistics were utilized to examine the sociodemographic and birth characteristics for overall births and those associated with any infertility treatment and each of its subtypes. We calculated the level of association between race/ethnicity and utilization of infertility treatment and the subtypes using adjusted logistic regression models. We found that the rate of infertility treatments for all subtypes considered, had steadily increased by 63.7% within the past decade. In contrast, fertility enhancing drugs or Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) increased by 134%, and in vitro fertilization (IVF), gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), and zygote intrafallopian transfer (ZIFT) treatments increased by 40% over the 9-year study period. Non-Hispanic (NH) Asian women had the highest rate of any infertility treatment with a rate of 25 per 1000 births whereas Hispanic women had the lowest rate of any infertility treatment at 5.8 per 1000 births. When compared with NH-White women, NH-Asian women had a modest 7% lower likelihood (OR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.92-0.94) of receiving any infertility treatment while NH-Black and Hispanic women had about 70% lower likelihood of receiving any infertility treatment. Our report of increased assisted reproductive technology (ART) utilization rates, and marked racial/ethnic differences in ART utilization highlight the importance of expanding knowledge of inequities that continue to impact marginalized groups, a critical step for informing actionable strategy formulations (i.e., advocacy, policy change, patient education, provider training) to address these inequities.

'Just have some IVF!': A longitudinal ethnographic study of couples' experiences of seeking fertility treatment

We present findings from a longitudinal ethnographic study of infertile couples seeking treatment following initial GP referral to specialist fertility services. Repeated observations and interviews were undertaken with the same 14 heterosexual participants over an 18-month period. Heterosexual, non-donor couples comprise the majority of fertility clinic patients; however, research interest in this group has dwindled over time as IVF cycles have increased. In the United Kingdom, IVF is presented as a logical response to involuntary childlessness, and as an entirely predictable, and linear, course of action. The market is well-developed and often patients' first experience of privatised health care in the NHS. Our couples were challenged by this, and while they felt expected to move on to IVF, some wished to explore other options. While IVF is ubiquitous, the discomfort and challenge around fertility treatments remain; experiences are prolonged and characterised by recursive narratives and expressions of disequilibrium, which are rarely acknowledged and reflected in ongoing clinic-patient interactions. Our findings develop understanding of the process of 'mazing' (Image - The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 1989, 21, 220), the pursuit of parenthood, by showing that the routine and normative status of IVF, at least in the current health care context, is at odds with the lived experiences of individuals.

Fertility trends and comparisons in a historical cohort of US women with primary infertility

BACKGROUND

There is growing interest in long-term outcomes following infertility and infertility treatment. However, there are few detailed longitudinal cohorts available for this work. This study aimed to assemble a historical cohort of women with primary infertility and age-matched controls to evaluate fertility trends, sequelae, and sociodemographic differences. Described here are cohort group characteristics and associated reproductive trends over time.

METHODS

A population-based historical cohort was created using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) record-linkage system (Olmsted County, MN). The cohort included women aged 18-50 with a diagnosis of primary infertility between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 1999. As part of a case-control study, we identified 1:1 age-matched female controls from the same community and era.

RESULTS

A total of 1001 women with primary infertility and 1001 age-matched controls were identified. The women with primary infertility were significantly more likely to be married, college educated, use barrier contraception, and non-smokers compared to age-matched controls. The incidence of primary infertility increased from 14 to 20 per 10,000 person years from 1980-1985 to 1995-1999. Ovulatory dysfunction and unexplained infertility were the most common causes of primary infertility and clomiphene was the most widely used fertility medication. Rates of in vitro fertilization (IVF) increased from 1.8% during 1980-1985 to 26.0% during 1995-1999.

CONCLUSION

Women with primary infertility were found to have unique sociodemographic characteristics compared to age-matched control women, which is consistent with previous research. The incidence of diagnosed primary infertility increased from 1980 to 1999, as did use of IVF.

A review of disparities in access to infertility care and treatment outcomes among Hispanic women

Hispanic women have lower rates of use of infertility services than non-Hispanic White women. There are many barriers that impede access to infertility care including economic, geographic, cultural, and societal factors and there are disparities in treatment outcomes. Hispanic women are less likely to seek infertility care than non-Hispanic White women and even after infertility evaluation, Hispanic women are less likely to receive treatment for their infertility. Lower use of infertility treatments among Hispanic women is unlikely to be driven solely by economic factors. There is disappointingly little data on in-vitro fertilization treatment outcomes including the population of Hispanic women, and existing data has yielded conflicting results. Incomplete and variable reporting of race data across clinics raises the potential for misclassification bias and invalid study conclusions. Addressing disparities in access to reproductive medicine in the Hispanic population will required a multifaceted approach including expanded insurance coverage, improved education for both patients and providers, and additional research on barriers to care.

Tubal Factor Infertility, In Vitro Fertilization, and Racial Disparities: A Retrospective Cohort in Two US Clinics

BACKGROUND

Nearly 14% of US women report any lifetime infertility which is associated with health care costs and psychosocial consequences. Tubal factor infertility (TFI) often occurs as a result of sexually transmitted diseases and subsequent pelvic inflammatory disease. We sought to evaluate for and describe potential racial disparities in TFI and in vitro fertilization (IVF) prevalence.

METHODS

Records of women aged 19 to 42 years in our retrospective cohort from 2 US infertility clinics were reviewed. We calculated TFI prevalence, IVF initiation prevalence, and prevalence ratios (PRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each estimate, overall and by race.

RESULTS

Among 660 infertile women, 110 (16.7%; 95% CI, 13.8-19.5%) had TFI which was higher in Black compared with White women (30.3% [33/109] vs 13.9% [68/489]; PR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.5-3.1]). For women with TFI, IVF was offered to similar proportions of women by race (51.5% [17/33] vs 52.9% [36/68] for Black vs White women); however, fewer Black than White women with TFI started IVF (6.7% [1/15] vs 31.0% [9/29]; PR, 0.2 [95% CI, 0-1.0]), although the difference was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS

Tubal factor infertility prevalence was 2-fold higher among Black than White women seeking care for infertility. Among women with TFI, data suggested a lower likelihood of Black women starting IVF than White women. Improved sexually transmitted disease prevention and treatment might ameliorate disparities in TFI.

Barriers and factors associated with significant delays to initial consultation and treatment for infertile patients and partners of infertile patients

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the key drivers and barriers for infertile patients and their partners to see an infertility specialist and initiate treatment?

DESIGN

An online, international, 30-minute quantitative survey collected data from 1944 respondents from nine countries. Respondents were infertile patients (n = 1037) or partners of infertile patients (n = 907; but not necessarily partners of the patient sample), at different stages of the treatment journey.

RESULTS

The overall average times were 3.2 years to receiving a medical infertility diagnosis, 2.0 years attempting to achieve pregnancy without assistance before treatment, and 1.6 years of treatment before successful respondents achieved pregnancy. The most common driver for considering treatment after a consultation (n = 1025) was an equal desire within the couple to have a child (40.8%). Of the partners (n = 356), 29.8% reported that transparency of information from healthcare professionals about treatment expectations was important. A significantly higher proportion of respondents seeking treatment reported that healthcare professionals offered supportive services (61.2%) and mental health services (62.0%), than of the 207 respondents who did not seek treatment (32.4% and 36.7%, respectively; P < 0.001). Perceived cost was the most commonly reported barrier for respondents not seeking a consultation (37.5% of n = 352) or treatment (42.0% of n = 207). Of the 95 respondents who discontinued treatment, 34.7% discontinued due to the financial impact.

CONCLUSIONS

Respondents reported significant delays to seeking treatment, probably negatively impacting the chances of achieving pregnancy. Motivational coherence within couples was a key driver and cost of treatment was the main barrier. Reported supportive service offerings by healthcare professionals were significantly associated with continuation of the treatment journey.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Fertility Awareness Among Reproductive-Aged Women

Background: Despite the rising prevalence of infertility, studies have indicated that in the United States fertility awareness remains low. No published study to date, however, has investigated the impact of any racial or ethnic disparities in fertility awareness. Materials and Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of people self-identifying as female, aged 18-45 years, via Amazon Mechanical Turk in August 2020. The study was approved by the institutional review board at the University of Colorado. The survey consisted of demographic questions and a validated questionnaire, the Fertility and Infertility Treatment Knowledge Score (FIT-KS). Participants were classified as non-Hispanic White (NHW) or "Minority" race/ethnicity. Results: A total of 476 women completed the survey, 405 of which were included in analysis. Of those, 54.6% self-identified as NHW and 45.4% were in the Minority group. The median FIT-KS was 51.7% (16 items answered correctly). The Minority group scored significantly lower than the NHW participants overall (58.6% vs. 48.3%, p < 0.001) and in all three subscales (p < 0.05). The Minority group was significantly more likely to underestimate the rate of miscarriage (47.3% vs. 32.6%, p = 0.003) and had a lower awareness of risk factors that can impact fertility including smoking (88.7% vs. 71.6%, p < 0.001), obesity (90.5% vs. 70.5%, p < 0.001), and/or a history of gonorrhea/chlamydia infection (83.7% vs. 64.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Minority women appear to have a lower fertility awareness than their NHW counterparts. Addressing these disparities and improving fertility education in diverse communities may lead to a reduction in clinically significant infertility disparities.

Disparities in access to effective treatment for infertility in the United States: an Ethics Committee opinion

In the United States, economic, racial, ethnic, geographic, and other disparities prevent access to fertility treatment and affect treatment outcomes. This opinion examines the factors that contribute to these disparities, proposes actions to address them, and replaces the document of the same name, last published in 2015.

Health disparities of African Americans in reproductive medicine

The first paper describing an association between African American race, infertility prevalence, and outcomes of fertility treatments was published more than 20 years ago, calling initial attention to differences in how infertility is experienced, diagnosed, and managed in African Americans. Since that initial publication, multiple other studies have explored African American race and its association with elements of the fertility spectrum-disparities that have been durable over time. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of the evolution of aspects of this research focusing on the outcomes of infertility treatments and barriers to access. A consideration of the system-based practice issues that interface with timely fertility evaluation and treatment in ways that challenge reproductive health equity will be presented.

Infertility in the Midwest: perceptions and attitudes of current treatment

BACKGROUND

Although infertility affects an estimated 6.1 million individuals in the United States, only half of those individuals seek fertility treatment and the majority of those patients are White and of high socioeconomic status. Research has shown that insurance mandates are not enough to ensure equal access. Many workplaces, schools, and medical education programs have made efforts in recent years to improve the cultural humility of providers in efforts to engage more racially and economically underrepresented groups in medical care. However, these efforts have not been assessed on a population of patients receiving fertility care, an experience that is uniquely shaped by individual social, cultural, and economic factors.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to better understand the racial, cultural, economic, and religious factors that impact patient experiences obtaining fertility care.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional self-administered survey was administered at an academic fertility center in Chicago, Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive fertility care patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample. No interventions were used. Descriptive univariate frequencies and percentages were calculated to summarize sociodemographic and other relevant patient characteristics (eg, race or ethnicity, age, household income, religious affiliation, insurance coverage). Rates of endorsing perceived physician cultural competency were compared among demographic subgroups using Pearson chi-squared tests with 2-sided P<.05 indicative of statistical significance. To identify the key determinants of patient-reported worry regarding 9 different fertility treatment outcomes and related concerns, a series of multiple logistic regression models were fit to examine factors associated with patient report of being "very worried" or "extremely worried."

RESULTS

Members of our sample (N=1460) were between 20 and 58 years of age (mean_adjusted, 36.2; standard deviation, 4.4). Among Black participants, 42.3% reported that their physician does not understand their cultural background compared with 16.5% of White participants (P<.0001). Participants who identified as Latinx were significantly more likely than White participants to report being very/extremely worried about side effects of treatment, a miscarriage, ectopic pregnancies, and birth defects (P<.05, P=.02, P=.002, P=.001, respectively). Individuals who identify as Hindu were nearly 4 times more likely to report being very/extremely worried about experiencing an ectopic pregnancy than nonreligious participants (P<.0002). Respondents most strongly identified the biology or physiology of the couple (mean_adjusted, 21.6; confidence interval, 20.4-22.7) and timing or age (mean_adjusted, 27.8; confidence interval, 26.5-29.1) as being associated with fertility. Overall, respondents most strongly disagreed that the ability to bear children rests upon God's will (mean_adjusted, 65.4; confidence interval, 63.7-67.1), which differed most significantly by race (P<.0001) and religion (P<.0001).

CONCLUSION

Of the patient characteristics investigated, racial and ethnic subgroups showed the greatest degree of variation in regard to worries and concerns surrounding the experience of fertility treatment. Our findings emphasize a need for improved cultural humility on behalf of physicians, in addition to affordable psychological support for all patients seeking fertility care.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes in women of racial minorities aged 40 years and older undergoing IVF

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do women of racial minorities aged 40 years or older have similar reproductive and obstetric outcomes as white women undergoing IVF?

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study conducted at a single academic university-affiliated centre. The study population included women aged 40 years or older undergoing their first IVF cycle with fresh cleavage-stage embryo transfer stratified by racial minority status: minority (black or Asian) versus white. Clinical intrauterine pregnancy and live birth rate were the primary outcomes. Preterm delivery (<37 weeks) and small for gestational age were the secondary outcomes. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were estimated. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 2050 cycles in women over the age of 40 years were analysed, 561 (27.4%) of which were undertaken by minority women and 1489 (72.6%) by white women. Minority women were 30% less likely to achieve a pregnancy compared with their white (non-Hispanic) counterparts (adjusted OR 0.68, CI 0.54 to 0.87). Once pregnant, however, the odds of live birth were similar (adjusted OR 1.23, CI 0.91 to 1.67). Minority women were significantly more likely to have lower gestational ages at time of delivery (38.5 versus 39.2 weeks, P = 0.009) and were more likely to have extreme preterm birth delivery 24-28 weeks (5.5 versus 1.0%, P = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Minority women of advanced reproductive age are less likely to achieve a pregnancy compared with white (non-Hispanic) women. Once pregnancy is achieved, however, live birth rates are similar albeit with minority women experiencing higher rates of preterm delivery.

Emotional stress and reproduction: what do fertility patients believe?

PURPOSE

To better understand the beliefs about a causal role of emotional stress maintained by women seeking fertility care.

METHODS

A cross-sectional, self-administered survey was distributed to fertility care patients at an academic fertility center in Illinois. Of 5000 consecutive patients, 1460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample.

RESULTS

Members of our sample (N = 1460) were between 20 and 58 years (mean = 36.2, SD = 4.4). Most respondents were White (72.2%), were in a heterosexual relationship (86.8%), and felt that their physician understood their cultural background (79.4%). Of the sample, 28.9% believed emotional stress could cause infertility, 69.0% believed emotional stress could reduce success with fertility treatment, and 31.3% believed that emotional stress could cause a miscarriage, with evidence of significant racial differences. Less than a quarter (23.8%) of the sample believed emotional stress had no impact on fertility. Lower household income and educational attainment were associated with a greater belief in emotional stress as a causative factor in reproduction with regard to infertility, fertility treatment, and miscarriage.

CONCLUSION

The majority of women seeking fertility care believe emotional stress could reduce the success of fertility treatment. Furthermore, beliefs about emotional stress and reproduction significantly differ based on race/ethnicity, income, and education. Particular attention should be paid to specific groups of women who may more likely not be aware of the lack of a proven biological relationship between emotional stress and reproduction.

The association of adverse outcomes with pregnancy conception methods among low-risk term pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

To compare composite neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among low-risk singleton pregnancies at 37-41 weeks among conception methods: spontaneously-conceived (SC) pregnancy; infertility medications and/or intrauterine insemination (IFM/IUI); and assisted reproductive technology (ART).

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

US Vital Statistics datasets 2013-2017.

PATIENT(S)

Low-risk pregnancies (without hypertensive disorders, pregestational or gestational diabetes, or history of preterm birth) of women ≥20 years with nonanomalous singletons, who labored, delivered at 37-41 weeks, and had data on pregnancy conception method.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was the composite neonatal adverse outcome (CNAO). The secondary outcome was the composite maternal adverse outcome (CMAO).

RESULT(S)

Of the 19.7 million deliveries during the study period, 54.0% (N = 10,676,184) met the inclusion criteria, with 99.0% (N = 10,573,741) being conceived spontaneously, 0.4% (N = 47,227) by IFM/IUI, and 0.5% (N = 55,216) by ART. The overall rate of CNAO was 6.68 per 1,000 live births. Compared with SC, the risk of CNAO was significantly higher among IFM/IUI (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18-1.41) and ART (aRR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.18-1.39). The overall rate of CMAO was 2.50 per 1,000 live births. Compared with SC, the risk of CMAO was significantly increased among IFM/IUI (aRR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.50-1.97) and ART (aRR, 2.40; 95% CI, 2.17-2.65).

CONCLUSION(S)

Among low-risk term singleton pregnancies, IFM/IUI and ART have modestly higher rates of adverse outcomes to maternal-neonatal dyad than SC.

Self-reported barriers to accessing infertility care: patient perspectives from urban gynecology clinics

PURPOSE

(1) To test the hypothesis that under-represented minority women, including Hispanic/Latina and African American or Black women, will be more likely to report greater socioeconomic and cultural barriers to infertility care compared with white women. (2) To identify gaps in knowledge that can guide future educational interventions.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was completed by 242 women, ages 18-44, at five gynecology clinics in the greater Boston, Massachusetts area from February 27, 2018, to February 25, 2019.

RESULTS

Of the respondents, 61.4% identified as Hispanic/Latina, 24.5% as white, and 6.6% as Black or African American. Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to care (62.8%) regardless of race/ethnicity or insurance status. Only 8.9% of participants were aware of personal insurance coverage for infertility treatment. Compared with white patients, Hispanic/Latina patients were less likely to know if their own insurance covered infertility treatment: 14.3% vs 6.8%; aRR 0.36 (95% CI 0.17-0.74), after adjusting for a personal history of infertility.

CONCLUSION

Cost was the most commonly reported barrier to care. Most women were unaware of their insurance coverage despite the state insurance mandate to cover infertility treatment in Massachusetts. Education and outreach will be instrumental in helping address disparities in access to care.

Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies have demonstrated substantial differences in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women. We sought to determine if disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes between cycles from black non-Hispanic and white non-Hispanic women have changed and to identify factors that may have influenced change and determine racial differences in cumulative live birth rates.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of the SARTCORS database outcomes for 2014-2016 compared with those previously reported in 2004-2006 and 1999/2000. Patient demographics, etiology of infertility, and cycle outcomes were compared between black non-hispanic and white non-hispanic patients. Categorical values were compared using Chi-squared testing. Continuous variables were compared using t-test. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess confounders.

RESULTS

We analyzed 122,721 autologous, fresh, non-donor embryo cycles from 2014 to 2016 of which 13,717 cycles from black and 109,004 cycles from white women. The proportion of cycles from black women increased from 6.5 to 8.4%. Cycles from black women were almost 3 times more likely to have tubal and/or uterine factor and body mass index ≥30 kg/m². Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that black women had a lower live birth rate (OR 0.71;P < 0.001) and a lower cumulative live birth rate for their initial cycle (OR 0.64; P < 0.001) independent of age, parity, body mass index, etiology of infertility, ovarian reserve, cycle cancellation, past spontaneous abortions, use of intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection or number of embryos transferred. A lower proportion of cycles in black women were represented among non-mandated states (P < 0.001) and cycles in black women were associated with higher clinical live birth rates in mandated states (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in assisted reproductive technology outcomes in the US have persisted for black women over the last 15 years. Limited access to state mandated insurance may be contributory. Race has continued to be an independent prognostic factor for live birth and cumulative live birth rate from assisted reproductive technology in the US.

Disparities in access to fertility care: who's in and who's out

Objective

To study the racial and socioeconomic characteristics of women seeking fertility care in a state with mandated insurance coverage for fertility testing and treatment.

Design

Cross-sectional, self-administered survey.

Setting

Academic fertility center in Illinois.

Patients

Of 5,000 consecutive fertility care patients, 1,460 completed the survey and were included in the study sample.

Interventions

None.

Main Outcome Measures

Details about demographic characteristics and health care access on the basis of patient race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

Results

The mean age of participants was 36.1 years; 75.5% were White, 10.2% Asian, 7.3% Black, 5.7% Latinx, and 1.3% Other. Most women had a bachelor's (35.5%) or master's degree (40.5%) and an annual household income of >$100,000 (81.5%). Black and Hispanic women traveled twice as far (median 10 miles) as White and Asian women (median 5 miles for both) for treatment. Black women (14.7%) were more likely to report that their race was a barrier to getting fertility treatment compared with White (0.0%), Hispanic (5.1%), and Asian (5.4%) women. Black and Hispanic women were approximately twice as likely to report income level (26.5% and 20.3%, respectively) and weight (7.8% and 8.9%, respectively) as barriers compared with White and Asian respondents.

Conclusions

Significant racial and socioeconomic disparities exist among fertility patients accessing care. Beyond providing all Americans with health insurance that covers fertility treatment, further research in the general population is needed to understand the complex social, cultural, racial, and economic factors that prohibit many individuals from accessing needed fertility care.

Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City

Purpose

To compare the racial and ethnic make-up of patients who accessed medically indicated fertility preservation services (MIFP) against the overall racial diversity (including Hispanic origin) across women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer in New York City (NYC).

Methods

All patients who completed at least one MIFP between January 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed. Race was self-reported. A calculation of the expected racial distribution across women of reproductive age with cancer in NYC was determined using the most recent NYC census data. Statistical analysis included chi-square goodness of fit and test for independence and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results

A total of 107 patients who accessed MIFP were included. A total of 55 (51.4%) identified as White, 3 (2.8%) as Black, 13 (12.2%) as Asian, 6 (5.6%) as Hispanic, 3 (2.8%) as other, and 27 (25.2%) did not report. A total of 78.5% of patients had insurance. There was no significant difference in racial distribution by cancer type (p = 0.255). A subgroup analysis excluding the BRCA+ patients and races not reported by the census (n = 69) was then performed, showing a statistically significant difference between observed (O) and expected (E) cases of fertility preservation (FP) by race at our center—White 47O/32E, Black 3O/15E, Asian 13O/7E, and Hispanic 6O/15E (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in racial distribution by FP type was observed.

Conclusions

There is a difference in the observed vs expected racial distribution of patients accessing MIFP. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to better ensure equal opportunity to all patients.

Self-reported physical health status of donor sperm-conceived adults

Donor-conceived neonates have poorer birth outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm delivery that are associated with poorer long-term health in adulthood through the developmental origins of health and disease (DOHaD) theory. The aim of this study was to conduct the first investigation of the adult health outcomes of donor-conceived people. An online health survey was completed by 272 donor sperm-conceived adults and 877 spontaneously conceived adults from around the world. Donor and spontaneously conceived groups were matched for age, sex, height, smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, own fertility and maternal smoking. Donor sperm-conceived adults had significantly higher reports of being diagnosed with type 1 diabetes (P = 0.031), thyroid disease (P = 0.031), acute bronchitis (P = 0.008), environmental allergies (P = 0.046), sleep apnoea (P = 0.037) and having ear tubes/grommets surgically implanted (P = 0.046). This is the first study to investigate the health outcomes of adult donor sperm-conceived people. Donor sperm-conceived adults self-reported elevated frequencies of various health conditions. The outcomes are consistent with birth defect data from donor sperm treatment and are consistent with the DOHaD linking perturbed early growth and chronic disease in adulthood.

Is a Fetal Echocardiography Necessary in IVF-ICSI Pregnancies After Anatomic Survey?

PURPOSE

In vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI) is generally regarded as an indication for fetal echocardiography due to a reported increased risk of congenital abnormalities including cardiac anomalies. In this study we evaluated the utility of fetal echocardiography after anatomic survey in an experienced center.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case review of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancies who had echocardiography in our institution from January 1996 to October 2010.

RESULTS

Records from 85 mothers and 110 fetuses were identified. During anatomic survey, six cardiac anomalies were identified, including four ventricular septal defects, one pulmonary-aortic disproportion, and one post-valvular pulmonary artery dilatation. At fetal echocardiography, two of the four ventricular septal defects were confirmed and an additional three were identified. The most common cardiac anomaly seen in our population of IVF-ICSI pregnancies was ventricular septal defect, which was identified in 3.6% of all cases in the neonatal period. Of ventricular septal defects identified in the prenatal period, 71% resolved before birth.

CONCLUSION

In experienced centers, a fetal echocardiography may not be necessary if the 3 vessels tracheal view of the heart is evaluated and the heart is evaluated carefully for a ventricular septal defect.

The impact of IVF on birthweight from 1991 to 2015: a cross-sectional study

STUDY QUESTION

Has birthweight (BW) changed over time among IVF-conceived singletons?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Singleton BW has increased markedly over the past 25 years.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

IVF conceived singletons have had a higher incidence of low BW compared to spontaneously conceived singletons, and this has raised concerns over long-term increased risks of cardio-metabolic disease. However, few causal links between IVF procedures and BW have been robustly established, and few studies have examined whether BW has changed over time as IVF techniques have developed.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A total of 2780 live born singletons conceived via IVF or ICSI treated in the reproductive medicine department of a single publicly funded tertiary care centre between 1991 and 2015 were included in this retrospective study. The primary outcome measure was singleton BW adjusted for gestational age, maternal parity and child gender. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate the associations between patient prognostic factors and IVF treatment procedures with adjusted BW.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All singletons conceived at the centre following IVF/ICSI using the mother's own oocytes, and non-donated fresh or frozen/thawed embryos with complete electronic data records, were investigated. Available electronic records were retrieved from the Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority for dataset collation. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate associations between IVF treatment parameters and BW, after adjusting for the year of treatment and patient characteristics and pregnancy factors.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the primary multivariable model, singleton BW increased by 7.4 g per year (95% CI: 3.2-11.6 g, P = 0.001), an increase of close to 180 g throughout the 25-year period after accounting for gestational age, maternal parity, child gender, IVF treatment parameters, patient prognostic characteristics and pregnancy factors. Fresh and frozen embryo transfer-conceived singletons showed a similar increase in BW. Frozen/thawed embryo transfer conceived singletons were on average 53 g heavier than their fresh embryo conceived counterparts (95% CI: 3.7-103.3 g, P = 0.035).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The independent variables included in the study were limited to those that have been consistently recorded and stored electronically over the past two decades.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

There has been a progressive BW increase in IVF singletons over time in one large centre with consistent treatment eligibility criteria. Such a change is not seen in the general population of live born singletons in the UK or other developed countries, and seems to be specific to this IVF population. This may be a reflection of changes in practice such as undisturbed extended embryo culture to the blastocyst stage, optimized commercial culture media composition, single embryo transfer and ICSI. Moreover, singletons conceived from frozen/thawed embryos had higher birth weights when compared to their fresh embryo transfer counterparts. The causal pathway is unknown; however, it could be due to the impact on embryos of the freeze/thaw process, self-selection of embryos from couples who produce a surplus of embryos, and/or embryo replacement into a more receptive maternal environment.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This work was supported by the EU FP7 project grant, EpiHealthNet (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-317146). The authors have no competing interests to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model

Objective: To adapt a fertility care wellness model.Background: Despite availability of a range of diagnostic and therapeutic services for infertility, many do not seek care or discontinue care prior to achieving a live birth. Wellness models can inform research on patient decisions to seek and continue fertility care, as many barriers and drivers are represented within the dimensions of wellness.Methods: A mixed-methods online survey was completed by 135 people of reproductive age who experienced infertility in the USA. Outcomes included drivers and barriers to seeking or continuing fertility care. Identified factors were compared by treatment history using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Themes and patterns were identified within 174 responses to 6 open-response items through conventional content analysis.Results: Thematic analysis revealed practical (environmental, financial, and physical) and affective (emotional, social and spiritual) dimensions of wellness in decisions to seek care (67%), with affective rationales more prominent in decisions to return for care (78%).Conclusion: Decisions to seek fertility care and return after failed treatment integrate practical and affective rationales from financial, physical, environmental, emotional, social and spiritual wellness dimensions. Drivers and barriers within these dimensions should be considered to encourage care seeking and improve patient retention.