Characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of patients with preserved systolic function hospitalized for heart failure: a report from the OPTIMIZE-HF Registry

Effects of angiotensin-neprilysin inhibition in women vs men: Insights from PARAGLIDE-HF

BACKGROUND

Sub-analyses of key trials suggest a preferential benefit for specific heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) therapies in women. This work investigated treatment effects between women and men in the PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF) trial.

METHODS

In this prespecified subgroup analysis, we examined outcomes according to sex in the PARAGLIDE-HF trial. The primary endpoint was time-average proportional change in amino terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through Weeks 4 and 8. We also examined secondary outcomes and tolerability.

RESULTS

Overall, 242 women (52%) and 224 men (48%) were randomized. Women had significantly higher LVEF, worse renal function, and less comorbidities than men. In the overall population, the time-averaged reduction in NT-proBNP was significantly greater for sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) than valsartan (ratio of change 0.85, 95% CI, 0.73-0.999). When examined according to sex, the time-averaged reduction in NT-proBNP was numerically greater with sac/val in both women (ratio of change = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.69-1.070) and men (ratio of change 0.84, 95% CI, 0.67-1.05) with no differential treatment effect (P interaction = .91). Similarly, the secondary hierarchical endpoint favored sac/val over valsartan in both women and men but was not statistically significant. Study drug dosage levels were similar across women and men and there were no sex-specific differences in the incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with mildly reduced or preserved EF >40% and a recent worsening HF event, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of sac/val vs valsartan were similar in both women and men, suggesting consistent effects across appropriately selected patients regardless of sex. Future prospective studies are needed to further evaluate sex-specific differences in treatment response of HFpEF therapies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF; NCT03988634; https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov/study/NCT03988634.

Timing of acute decompensated heart failure in patients with heart failure and mildly reduced ejection fraction

This study investigates the prognosis of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) on admission (i.e., primary ADHF) as compared to ADHF onset during course of hospitalization (i.e., secondary ADHF) in patients hospitalized with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). Limited data regarding the prognostic impact of the timing of onset of ADHF is available. Consecutive patients with HFmrEF and ADHF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with primary ADHF were compared to patients with secondary ADHF with regard to the primary endpoint all-cause mortality at 30 months. Kaplan-Meier, uni- and multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses were applied for statistics. From a total of 484 patients hospitalized with HFmrEF and ADHF, 67.98% (n = 329) were admitted with primary ADHF. Patients with secondary ADHF had higher rates of concomitant acute myocardial infarction, alongside with a higher extend of coronary artery disease. The risk of all-cause mortality at 30 months was not affected by the timing of ADHF (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.853; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.653-1.115; p = 0.246). However, patients with primary ADHF were associated with a higher risk of HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months (HR = 2.513; 95% CI 1.555-4.065; p = 0.001), which was still evident after multivariable adjustment (HR = 2.347; 95% CI 1.418-3.883; p = 0.001). The timing of onset of ADHF was not associated with long-term mortality in HFmrEF, however primary ADHF was associated with a higher risk of HF-related rehospitalization.

Differential Associations of Cardiac, Pulmonary, Arterial, and Muscle Physiological Parameters and Biomarkers With the Incidence of HFpEF and HFrEF

BACKGROUND

Postulated differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) include greater contributions of noncardiac dysfunction to HFpEF.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate associations of cardiac and noncardiac physiological measures with prevalent and incident HFpEF and HFrEF.

METHODS

Among 5,484 Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants attending the fifth visit (2011-2013), this study assessed associations of cardiac structure and function by echocardiogram, pulmonary function by spirometry, arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity, muscle strength by handgrip, fat mass by bioimpedance, inflammation by plasma biomarkers, and renal function with prevalent and incident adjudicated HFpEF (ejection fraction [EF] ≥50%) and HFrEF (EF <50%) by using adjusted logistic and Cox models.

RESULTS

Mean age was 75 ± 5 years, 59% were women, left ventricular (LV) EF was 65% ± 7%, 246 patients had prevalent HFpEF, and 81 patients had prevalent HFrEF. Worse LV and right ventricular systolic function and larger LV size were associated more strongly with prevalent HFrEF; a higher body mass index (BMI) was associated more strongly with prevalent HFpEF. Among heart failure-free participants, 220 incident HFpEF and 187 HFrEF events occurred over a median 7 years (range: 6-8 years) of follow-up. Worse LV systolic function and larger LV size were more strongly associated with incident HFrEF, whereas higher pulmonary artery systolic pressure demonstrated a greater association with incident HFpEF. Most noncardiac dysfunctions, including greater BMI, fat mass, and systemic inflammation, showed similar magnitudes of association with incident HFpEF and HFrEF.

CONCLUSIONS

Among older adults, subclinical LV systolic dysfunction and remodeling differentially predicted the risk of incident HFrEF, whereas diastolic and most noncardiac dysfunctions were associated similarly with both incident HFpEF and HFrEF.

Renal-Cardiac Crosstalk in the Pathogenesis and Progression of Heart Failure

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) represents a global health issue with a high socioeconomic impact. Beyond a progressive decline of kidney function, patients with CKD are at increased risk of cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure (HF) and sudden cardiac death. HF in CKD can manifest both as HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction, with the latter further increasing in relative importance in the more advanced stages of CKD. Typical cardiac remodeling characteristics in uremic cardiomyopathy include left ventricular hypertrophy, myocardial fibrosis, cardiac electrical dysregulation, capillary rarefaction, and microvascular dysfunction, which are triggered by increased cardiac preload, cardiac afterload, and preload and afterload-independent factors. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying cardiac remodeling in CKD are multifactorial and include neurohormonal activation (with increased activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, the sympathetic nervous system, and mineralocorticoid receptor signaling), cardiac steroid activation, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, innate immune activation, and oxidative stress. Furthermore, disturbances in cardiac metabolism and calcium homeostasis, macrovascular and microvascular dysfunction, increased cellular profibrotic responses, the accumulation of uremic retention solutes, and mineral and bone disorders also contribute to cardiovascular disease and HF in CKD. Here, we review the current knowledge of HF in CKD, including the clinical characteristics and pathophysiological mechanisms revealed in animal studies. We also elaborate on the detrimental impact of comorbidities of CKD on HF using hypertension as an example and discuss the clinical characteristics of hypertensive heart disease and the genetic predisposition. Overall, this review aims to increase the understanding of HF in CKD to support future research and clinical translational approaches for improved diagnosis and therapy of this vulnerable patient population.

Demographic and Clinical Determinants of Conjugated Pneumococcal Vaccine Uptake and Short-Term All-Cause Mortality in Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Cohorts in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background and Objectives: Patients with heart failure (HF) are at risk of increased morbidity and mortality related to pneumococcal pneumonia, and routine vaccination with a conjugated pneumococcal vaccine (PCV) for HF patients is strongly endorsed by all major international guidelines. Despite this, data on the factors associated with vaccine uptake remain scarce. The aim of this study was to understand the demographic and clinical factors associated with vaccine uptake in patients with HF and analyze the all-cause mortality in the vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts. Materials and Methods: Four hundred and fifty patients with HF and a reduced ejection fraction followed up at a single center were enrolled. Patients were followed up for a median of 164.0 (148.0-181.0) days. Results: In total, 193 of the 450 patients (42.9%) were vaccinated with PCV-13 at enrollment. Vaccinated patients were more likely to have an implantable device, namely an implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD), cardiac resynchronization treatment (CRT) or left ventricular assist device (LVAD), and less likely to have a past medical history of hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) at baseline. After multivariable adjustment, the presence of an ICD (OR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.98-5.08), CRT (OR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.45-5.20) and COPD (OR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.19-0.94) remained as determinants of vaccination. All-cause mortality was not different across vaccinated or unvaccinated patients either in the unmatched (log-rank p = 0.67) or matched (log-rank p = 0.52) cohorts. Conclusions: The presence of implantable devices and coexisting COPD was associated with a higher and lower likelihood of vaccination with PCV-13, respectively. No difference in mortality across cohorts was observed in this observational analysis.

ANMCO position paper: diagnosis and treatment of heart failure with preserved systolic function

Heart failure is the leading cardiovascular cause of hospitalization with an increasing prevalence, especially in older patients. About 50% of patients with heart failure have preserved ventricular function, a form of heart failure that, until a few years ago, was orphaned by pharmacological treatments effective in reducing hospitalization and mortality. New trials, which have tested the use of gliflozins in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), have for the first time demonstrated their effectiveness in changing the natural history of this insidious and frequent form of heart failure. Therefore, diagnosing those patients early is crucial to provide the best treatment. Moreover, the diagnosis is influenced by the patient's comorbidities, and some HFpEF patients have symptoms common to other rare diseases that, if unrecognized, develop an unfavourable prognosis. This position paper aims to provide the clinician with a useful tool for diagnosing and treating patients with HFpEF, guiding the clinician towards the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic pathway.

Prior hospitalizations as a predictor of prognosis in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the prognostic impact of the presence and type of prior hospitalizations in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

BACKGROUND

Data investigating the prognostic impact of the present and type of previous all-cause hospitalizations in HFmrEF is limited.

METHODS

Consecutive patients hospitalized with HFmrEF at a single medical center were retrospectively included from 2016 to 2022. The prognosis of patients with a prior hospitalization < 12 months was compared to patients without. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up), the key secondary endpoint was heart failure (HF)-related rehospitalization at 30 months.

RESULTS

Two thousand one hundred eighty four patients with HFmrEF were included, 34.8% had a previous hospitalization < 12 months (admission to internal medicine and geriatrics: 60.8%, surgical department: 23.5%). The presence of a previous hospitalization was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (38.6% vs. 27.4%; HR = 1.51; 95% CI 1.30-1.76; p = 0.01) and HF-related rehospitalization at 30 months (21.2% vs. 9.1%; HR = 2.48; 95% CI 1.96-3.14; p = 0.01), even after multivariable adjustments. However, the department of previous hospitalization (internal medicine vs. surgical) did not significantly affect the risk of 30-months all-cause mortality (37.1% vs. 43.2%; HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.63-1.08; p = 0.16) or HF-related rehospitalization (24.0% vs. 16.8%; HR = 1.47, 95% CI 0.98-2.24; p = 0.07). Finally, the type of previous admission (i.e., elective, emergency vs. HF-related admission) (log-rank p = 0.29) did not affect the risk of 30-months all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Prior hospitalizations within 12 months were independently associated with impaired long-term mortality in patients with HFmrEF, irrespective of the department or type of prior admission.

A multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Fuzheng Yangxin Granule in treating heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (Qi-Yin deficiency and blood stasis syndrome): study protocol

Introduction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a widespread public health issue worldwide. Despite recent advances in pharmacologic treatments and the introduction of new diagnostic approaches, HFpEF remains underdiagnosed and under-recognized in clinical practice. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) may offer a potentially effective treatment for HFpEF. Nevertheless, few clinical trials employ rigorous research methodologies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TCM in treating HFpEF. Consequently, we propose to assess the hypothesis that patients with HFpEF may benefit from Fuzheng Yangxin Granule (FZYX) and evaluate its safety in a rigorously designed clinical trial.

Methods

This multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial will be conducted across seven tertiary hospitals in China. We will enroll 150 participants aged 18-80 years with confirmed HFpEF (Qi-Yin deficiency and blood stasis syndrome) meeting inclusion criteria. Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to the FZYX group or the placebo group, ​with both groups receiving standardized Western medical therapy according to the National Heart Failure Guideline 2023. The 12-week intervention phase will be followed by 40-week safety follow-up. The primary outcome will be maximal peak oxygen uptake (peak VO2). Secondary outcomes will include composite endpoint events, all-cause mortality, 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), echocardiographic variables, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, TCM syndrome scores, and the FRAIL scale.

Discussion

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of FZYX in treating HFpEF (Qi-Yin deficiency and blood stasis syndrome), thereby providing a high-quality, reliable evidence-based foundation for clinical practice.

Clinical Trial Registration

China Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2400087293), Registered on July 24, 2024.

The use of left ventricular ejection fraction in the diagnosis and management of heart failure. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS)

This clinical consensus statement revisits the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a measurement of cardiac function, a prognostic marker and a major criterion to classify patients with heart failure, and gives new advice for clinical practice. Heart failure is traditionally classified on the basis of LVEF thresholds and this has major implications for treatment recommendations. However, the reproducibility of LVEF measurement is poor and its prognostic and diagnostic value lessens when it is above 45%, with no relationship with the severity of either cardiac dysfunction or outcomes at higher values. These limitations dictate the need for a more comprehensive approach to classify and assess heart failure focusing more on the trajectory of LVEF rather than to its absolute value. Furthermore, the assessment of LVEF is not required for the initiation of treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics in patients with suspected de novo heart failure and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Future research utilizing advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers which can better characterize myocardial structure, metabolism and performance may facilitate the identification of alternative therapeutic targets and better ways to monitor heart failure therapies across the entire spectrum of LVEF.

Protein O-GlcNAcylation and hexokinase mitochondrial dissociation drive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, but its pathophysiology remains unclear. Here, we report a mouse model of HFpEF and show that hexokinase (HK)-1 mitochondrial binding in endothelial cells (ECs) is critical for protein O-GlcNAcylation and the development of HFpEF. We demonstrate increased mitochondrial dislocation of HK1 within ECs in HFpEF mice. Mice with deletion of the mitochondrial-binding domain of HK1 spontaneously develop HFpEF and display impaired angiogenesis. Spatial proximity of dislocated HK1 and O-linked N-acetylglucosamine transferase (OGT) causes increased OGT activity, shifting the balance of the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway intermediates into the O-GlcNAcylation machinery. EC-specific overexpression of O-GlcNAcase and an OGT inhibitor reverse angiogenic defects and the HFpEF phenotype, highlighting the importance of protein O-GlcNAcylation in the development of HFpEF. Our study demonstrates a new mechanism for HFpEF through HK1 cellular localization and resultant protein O-GlcNAcylation, and provides a potential therapy for HFpEF.

Characteristics of comparatively young heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: PurSuit-HFpEF registry

Because heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is mainly a disease of elderly, there are a few reports focusing young patients. This study aims to elucidate characteristics of comparatively young HFpEF patients. We divided HFpEF patients in PURSUIT-HFpEF registry into younger HFpEF group (age ≤ 65 years) and older HFpEF group and compared the all-cause mortality and HF readmission (HFR) between the two groups and identified discharge factors correlated with HFR among younger HFpEF patients. The younger HFpEF group comprised 51 patients (4.1%). In this group, body mass index and smoking were significantly higher, while hypertension was significantly lower compared to older HFpEF group. Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated no significant difference in HFR between the groups, although all-cause mortality was significantly lower in younger HFpEF group (p < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis indicated that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) were inversely correlated with HFR, whereas mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were positively correlated with HFR in younger HFpEF patients (p = 0.004 and p = 0.007, respectively). In conclusion, younger HFpEF is rare (approximately 4%), with obesity and smoking being significant modifiable factors. HFR was similar between younger and older HFpEF patients. Administration of ACEI/ARB and unnecessity of MRA at discharge may be associated with reducing HFR in younger HFpEF patients.

The use of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction in the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC, the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA), and the Japanese Heart Failure Society (JHFS)

This clinical consensus statement revisits the role of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as a measurement of cardiac function, a prognostic marker and a major criterion to classify patients with heart failure, and gives new advice for clinical practice. Heart failure is traditionally classified on the basis of LVEF thresholds and this has major implications for treatment recommendations. However, the reproducibility of LVEF measurement is poor and its prognostic and diagnostic value lessens when it is above 45%, with no relationship with the severity of either cardiac dysfunction or outcomes at higher values. These limitations dictate the need for a more comprehensive approach to classify and assess heart failure focusing more on the trajectory of LVEF rather than to its absolute value. Furthermore, the assessment of LVEF is not required for the initiation of treatments like sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and diuretics in patients with suspected de novo heart failure and elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Future research utilizing advanced imaging techniques and biomarkers which can better characterize myocardial structure, metabolism and performance may facilitate the identification of alternative therapeutic targets and better ways to monitor heart failure therapies across the entire spectrum of LVEF.

Association between road traffic noise exposure and heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between road traffic noise exposure and heart failure.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted.

METHODS

We systematically searched eight databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database) through July 2024 to identify cohort studies on road traffic noise exposure and heart failure according to a priori inclusion criteria. The random effect model was adopted to summarize the effect estimates. Using the piecewise linear model, the dose-response relationship between road traffic noise exposure and heart failure was also estimated.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included eight cohort studies including 8,601,385 participants and 221,842 patients with heart failure. Overall, higher road traffic noise exposure was associated with an increased risk of heart failure (pooled HR = 1.12, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.18) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 87.8 %, p < 0.001, τ2 = 0.004, Q-statistic = 57.31). Piecewise linear model showed an obvious linear relationship between exposure to road traffic noise above 50 dB and heart failure (p < 0.001), and the risk of heart failure increased by 7 % per 10 dB increase in road traffic noise exposure.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing evidence showed a significant correlation between road traffic noise exposure and the incidence of heart failure. Further studies are required to explain the potential biological mechanisms.

Digoxin Discontinuation in Patients With HFrEF on Beta-Blockers: Implication for Future 'Knock-Out Trials' in Heart Failure

BACKGROUND

National heart failure guidelines recommend quadruple therapy with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), most of whom also receive loop diuretics. However, the guidelines are less clear about the safe approaches to discontinuing older drugs whose decreasing or residual benefit is less well understood. The objective of this study was to examine whether digoxin can be safely discontinued in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers.

METHODS

In OPTIMIZE-HF, of 2477 patients with HFrEF (EF ≤45%) receiving beta-blockers and digoxin, digoxin was discontinued in 450 patients. We assembled a propensity score-matched cohort of 433 pairs of patients in which digoxin continuation vs. discontinuation groups were balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Using the same approach, from 992 patients not on beta-blockers, we assembled a matched cohort of 198 pairs of patients also balanced on 51 baseline characteristics. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for 1-year outcomes were estimated.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving beta-blockers, digoxin discontinuation had no association with the combined endpoint of heart failure readmission or death (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.19), heart failure readmission (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.85-1.25) or death (HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.72-1.14). Respective HRs (95% CIs) among patients not receiving beta-blockers were 1.60 (1.25-2.04), 1.62 (1.18-2.22) and 1.43 (1.08-1.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Digoxin can be discontinued without increasing the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with HFrEF receiving beta-blockers. Future studies need to examine the residual benefit of older heart failure drugs to ensure their safe discontinuation in patients with HFrEF receiving newer guideline-directed medical therapy.

An international modified Delphi consensus study on the optimal diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF

OBJECTIVE

The global burden of HFpEF is high and, despite developments in available therapies, patient outcomes have not improved significantly. This study aimed to explore the optimal approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF and to develop recommendations on how guideline directed medical therapy can be introduced in a more equitable and universal manner.

METHODS

Using a modified Delphi methodology led by an independent facilitator, a steering group of healthcare practitioners with experience of managing HFpEF identified 41 Likert scale statements across five main domains of focus. This generated an online survey distributed by a third-party provider using a convenience sampling approach to HCPs with experience managing patients with HFpEF.

RESULTS

A total of 213 responses were analyzed with 35/41 statements attaining very strong (≥90%) agreement, 4/41 strong (≥75%) agreement, and 2/41 failing to meet the threshold established for consensus (75%). From these results, a total of 8 recommendations to define the optimal approach to diagnosis and treatment of patients with HFpEF are proposed.

CONCLUSION

The burden of HFpEF is set to increase in the future. The high levels of consensus achieved in this study show that there is willingness to implement change and improve patient outcomes for those with this condition. A series of actionable recommendations have been developed based on the levels of agreement attained. It is hoped that the putting the current recommendations into practice will support international efforts to improve HFpEF care.

Cardiac Myosin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Normal and Supranormal Ejection Fraction: Primary Results of the EMBARK-HFpEF Trial

Importance

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) who have left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 60% or greater have limited treatment options.

Objective

To examine the effects of cardiac myosin inhibition with mavacamten in patients with HFpEF with LVEF of 60% or greater.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The EMBARK-HFpEF trial was a phase 2a, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial conducted from November 6, 2020, to February 26, 2024, at 20 sites in the US and Canada. Patients with symptomatic HFpEF (defined as a New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II or III), LVEF of 60% or greater, elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), and left ventricular hypertrophy were eligible for inclusion.

Intervention

Mavacamten treatment for 26 weeks, starting at 2.5 mg and potentially titrated up to 5 mg at week 14 based on prespecified LVEF and NTproBNP criteria.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary efficacy end points (measured as the change from baseline to week 26) included NTproBNP and high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT); additional efficacy end points included changes in high-sensitivity troponin I (hsTnI), NYHA functional class, and echocardiographic parameters (resting and peak exercise). Safety end points included treatment-emergent adverse events and reductions in LVEF to less than 30%.

Results

A total of 30 patients were enrolled and treated with mavacamten. Median (IQR) patient age was 76 (70-80) years, and 16 patients (53.3%) were female. From baseline to week 26, mavacamten was associated with reductions in NTproBNP (mean reduction, -26%; 95% CI, -44% to -4%; P = .04), hsTnT (mean reduction, -13%; 95% CI, -23% to -3%; P = .02), and hsTnI (mean reduction, -20%; 95% CI, -32% to -6%; P = .01). Cardiac biomarker values returned toward baseline levels 8 weeks after drug discontinuation. NYHA class improved in 10 of 24 patients (41.7%) who had evaluable NYHA class data at the end of treatment, and improvements in echocardiographic markers of LV diastolic function were observed. Mean LVEF decreased by 3.2 absolute percentage points (95% CI, 1.1-5.4; P = .005) during treatment. Mavacamten was interrupted in 3 patients (10% of the study population; 95% CI, 2.1%-26.5%) due to protocol prespecified criteria of LVEF less than 50% (n = 2) or a more than 20% relative decrease from baseline (n = 1; nadir LVEF, 58%), with LVEF recovery observed in all 3 patients. There were no deaths or instances of LVEF less than 30%; 1 patient had worsening heart failure deemed unrelated to the study drug.

Conclusions and Relevance

In an open-label trial in patients with HFpEF with LVEF of 60% or greater, mavacamten was associated with improvements in biomarkers of cardiac wall stress and injury, with no sustained reductions in LVEF observed.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04766892.

Pharmacologic Management of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) in Older Adults

There are several pharmacologic agents that have been touted as guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, it is important to recognize that older adults with HFpEF also contend with an increased risk for adverse effects from medications due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications, as well as the concurrence of geriatric conditions such as polypharmacy and frailty. With this review, we discuss the underlying evidence for the benefits of various treatments in HFpEF and incorporate key considerations for older adults, a subpopulation that may be at higher risk for adverse drug events. Key considerations for older adults include: the use of loop diuretics, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for most; angiotensin receptor blockers/ angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors (ARB/ARNIs) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) as add-on therapies for some, though risk of geriatric conditions such as falls, malnutrition, and/or sarcopenia must be considered; and beta blockers for a smaller subset of patients (with consideration of deprescribing for some, though data are lacking on this approach). Naturally, when making clinical decisions for older adults with cardiovascular disease, it is critical to consider the complexity of their conditions, including cognitive and physical function and social and environmental factors, and ensure alignment of care plans with the patient's health goals and priorities.

Caloric restriction and its mimetics in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: mechanisms and therapeutic potential

The global increase in human life expectancy, coupled with an unprecedented rise in the prevalence of obesity, has led to a growing clinical and socioeconomic burden of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Mechanistically, the molecular and cellular hallmarks of aging are omnipresent in HFpEF and are further exacerbated by obesity and associated metabolic diseases. Conversely, weight loss strategies, particularly caloric restriction, have shown promise in improving health status in patients with HFpEF and are considered the gold standard for promoting longevity and healthspan (disease-free lifetime) in model organisms. In this review, we implicate fundamental mechanisms of aging in driving HFpEF and elucidate how caloric restriction mitigates the disease progression. Furthermore, we discuss the potential for pharmacologically mimicking the beneficial effects of caloric restriction in HFpEF using clinically approved and emerging caloric restriction mimetics. We surmise that these compounds could offer novel therapeutic avenues for HFpEF and alleviate the challenges associated with the implementation of caloric restriction and other lifestyle modifications to reduce the burden of HFpEF at a population level.

Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

INTRODUCTION

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, the long-term outcomes and subclinical HF after nonparoxysmal AF ablation in HFpEF patients have not been fully evaluated.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One-hundred-ninety nonparoxysmal AF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50% who underwent first-time AF ablation were studied. HFpEF was diagnosed from a history of congestive HF and/or combined criteria of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) concentration and transthoracic echocardiogram parameters, including average septal-lateral E/e' and tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Ninety-five patients with HFpEF (HFpEF group) were compared with 95 patients without HF (CNT group). Low voltage area (LVA) was defined as an area with a bipolar electrogram of <0.5 mV covering >5% of the total left atrial surface. The primary endpoint was a composite of death from any cause or hospitalization for worsening HF. The secondary endpoint was subclinical HFpEF defined from NT-proBNP concentration and average septal-lateral E/e' or tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity at 6-12 months after the procedure irrespective of the rhythm. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the primary composite endpoint did not differ between the two groups (mean follow-up period 707 ± 75 days, log-rank p = 0.5330). However, significantly more patients in the HFpEF group reached the secondary endpoint (42 [44%] vs. 13 [14%], p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that a high preablation NT-proBNP (odds ratio [OR] 1.001, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.001-1.002, p = 0.0040) and the existence of LVA (OR 5.983, 95% CI 1.463-31.768, p = 0.0194) independently predicted the secondary endpoint in HFpEF patients.

CONCLUSION

After nonparoxysmal AF ablation, mortality of HFpEF patients was not inferior compared to patients without coexisting HF. However, subclinical HF occasionally persisted especially in HFpEF patients with a high preprocedure NT-proBNP concentration and LVA.

Prognostic Value of Epicardial Adipose Tissue in Heart Failure With Mid-Range and Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Epicardial adipose tissue (EAT) accumulation is thought to play a role in the pathophysiology of heart failure (HF) with mid-range ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction, but its effect on outcome is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 692 patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction or HF with preserved ejection fraction who underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 2 medical centers in China between October 2016 and October 2022 were included in this study. EAT volume and extracellular volume were calculated using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. The main outcome was the composite of all-cause mortality and first HF hospitalization. Of 692 participants, 41.3% were women. The mean age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and EAT volume were 57.0 years, 27.2 kg/m2, 50.0%, and 67.1 mL/m2, respectively. During a median follow-up of 34 months, 169 patients (24.4%) died or were hospitalized for HF. EAT volume exhibited a strong unadjusted association with the composite outcome (hazard ratio per 1 mL/m2 [HR], 1.57 [95% CI, 1.40-1.76], P<0.001). After fully adjusting, EAT remained associated with the outcome (HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.42-1.86], P<0.001). We constructed a baseline multivariable model including comorbidities, New York Heart Association functional class, extracellular volume, age, body mass index, left ventricular ejection fraction, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. Addition of EAT volume to the baseline multivariable model significantly improved model performance (C statistic improvement: 0.711-0.760; P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

EAT accumulation is associated with an adverse prognosis in patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction and those with HF with preserved ejection fraction. In addition, EAT provides incremental prognostic value beyond left ventricular ejection fraction and New York Heart Association class.

Effects of calcium channel blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

In contrast to beta-blockers and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, the role of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains uncertain. Despite several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies exploring the effects of CCBs on prognosis and exercise capacity in HFpEF patients, the findings have been inconsistent, likely due to limited statistical power and/or variations in study design. We aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the effects of CCBs in HFpEF patients. The search of electronic databases identified 2 RCTs including 35 patients and 4 cohort studies including 25,078 patients. In cases of significant heterogeneity (I2 > 50 %), data were pooled using a random-effects model; otherwise, a fixed-effects model was used. In pooled analysis of the cohort studies, use of CCBs was not associated with the risk of all-cause death (hazard ratio [95 % CI] = 0.913 [0.732, 1.139], P random  = 0.420) or hospitalization for heart failure (1.050 [0.970, 1.137], P fix  = 0.230). Separate analyses for dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine CCBs revealed similar results. In pooled analysis of the RCTs, verapamil increased exercise time (weighted mean difference [95 % CI] = 0.953 [0.109, 1.797] min; P fix  = 0.027) and decreased the congestive heart failure score (2.019 [1.673, 2.365] points; P fix  < 0.001) compared with placebo. In conclusion, in HFpEF patients, verapamil may improve exercise capacity and symptoms but use of CCBs, regardless of subclass, may not be associated with better prognosis. Our meta-analysis is limited by the inclusion of only several studies for each outcome and further research is necessary to confirm our findings.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block

BACKGROUND

It is unknown whether cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) would improve or halt the progression of heart failure (HF) in patients with mild to moderately reduced ejection fraction (HFmmrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of CRT in patients with HFmmrEF and left ventricular conduction delay.

METHODS

A prospective, randomized clinical trial sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute included 76 patients who met the study inclusion criteria (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] of 36%-50% and LBBB). Patients received CRT-pacemaker and were randomized to CRT-OFF (right ventricular pacing 40 beats/min) or CRT-ON (biventricular pacing 60-150 beats/min). At a 6-month follow-up, pacing programming was changed to the opposite settings. New York Heart Association class, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels, and echocardiographic variables were collected at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. The primary study end point was the left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV) change from baseline, and the primary randomized comparison was the comparison of 6-month to 12-month changes between randomized groups.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 68.4 ± 9.8 years (male, 71%). Baseline characteristics were similar between the 2 randomized groups (all P > .05). In patients randomized to CRT-OFF first, then CRT-ON, LVESV was reduced from baseline only after CRT-ON (baseline, 116.1 ± 36.5 mL; CRT-ON, 87.6 ± 26.0 mL; P < .0001). The randomized analysis of LVEF showed a significantly better change from 6 to 12 months in the OFF-ON group (P = .003). LVEF was improved by CRT (baseline, 41.3% ±.7%; CRT-ON, 46.0% ± 8.0%; P = .002). In patients randomized to CRT-ON first, then CRT-OFF, LVESV was reduced after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 109.8 ± 23.5 mL; CRT-ON, 91.7 ± 30.5 mL [P < .0001]; CRT-OFF, 99.3 ± 28.9 mL [P = .012]). However, the LVESV reduction effect became smaller between CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (P = .027). LVEF improved after both CRT-ON and CRT-OFF (baseline, 42.7% ± 4.3%; CRT-ON, 48.5% ± 8.6% [P < .001]; CRT-OFF, 45.9% ± 7.7% [P = .025]).

CONCLUSION

CRT for patients with HFmmrEF significantly improves LVEF and ventricular remodeling after 6 months of CRT. The study provides novel evidence that early CRT benefits patients with HFmmrEF with LBBB.

Effects of baroreflex activation therapy on cardiac function and morphology

AIMS

Arterial hypertension (aHTN) plays a fundamental role in the pathogenesis and prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The risk of heart failure increases with therapy-resistant arterial hypertension (trHTN), defined as inadequate blood pressure (BP) control ≥140/90 mmHg despite taking ≥3 antihypertensive medications including a diuretic. This study investigates the effects of the BP lowering baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) on cardiac function and morphology in patients with trHTN with and without HFpEF.

METHODS

Sixty-four consecutive patients who had been diagnosed with trHTN and received BAT implantation between 2012 and 2016 were prospectively observed. Office BP, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected before and after BAT implantation.

RESULTS

Mean patients' age was 59.1 years, 46.9% were male, and mean body mass index (BMI) was 33.2 kg/m2. The prevalence of diabetes mellitus was 38.8%, atrial fibrillation was 12.2%, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage ≥3 was 40.8%. Twenty-eight patients had trHTN with HFpEF, and 21 patients had trHTN without HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF were significantly older (64.7 vs. 51.6 years, P < 0.0001), had a lower BMI (30.0 vs. 37.2 kg/m2, P < 0.0001), and suffered more often from CKD-stage ≥3 (64 vs. 20%, P = 0.0032). After BAT implantation, mean office BP dropped in patients with and without HFpEF (from 169 ± 5/86 ± 4 to 143 ± 4/77 ± 3 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0403 for diastolic BP] and from 170 ± 5/95 ± 4 to 149 ± 6/88 ± 5 mmHg [P = 0.0019 for systolic BP and 0.0763 for diastolic BP]), while a significant reduction of the intake of calcium-antagonists, α2-agonists and direct vasodilators, as well as a decrease in average dosage of ACE-inhibitors and α2-agonists could be seen. Within the study population, a decrease in heart rate from 74 ± 2 to 67 ± 2 min-1 (P = 0.0062) and lengthening of QRS-time from 96 ± 3 to 106 ± 4 ms (P = 0.0027) and QTc-duration from 422 ± 5 to 432 ± 5 ms (P = 0.0184) were detectable. The PQ duration was virtually unchanged. In patients without HF, no significant changes of echocardiographic parameters could be seen. In patients with HFpEF, posterior wall diameter decreased significantly from 14.0 ± 0.5 to 12.7 ± 0.3 mm (P = 0.0125), left ventricular mass (LVM) declined from 278.1 ± 15.8 to 243.9 ± 13.4 g (P = 0.0203), and e' lateral increased from 8.2 ± 0.4 to 9.0 ± 0.4 cm/s (P = 0.0471).

CONCLUSIONS

BAT reduced systolic and diastolic BP and was associated with morphological and functional improvement of HFpEF.

Methods for the Assessment of Volume Overload and Congestion in Heart Failure

Acute decompensated heart failure entails a dysregulation of renal and cardiac function, with fluid volume excess or congestion being a key component. We provide an overview of methods for its assessment in clinical practice. Evaluation of congestion can be achieved using different methods including plasma biomarkers, measurement of blood volume from the volume of distribution of [131I]-human serum albumin, sonographic modalities, implantable devices, invasive measurements of volume status including right heart catheterization, and impedance methods. Integration into clinical practice of accessible, cost-effective, and evidence-based modalities for volume assessment will be pivotal in the management of acute decompensated heart failure.

Global epidemiology of heart failure

Heart failure (HF) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome marked by substantial morbidity and mortality. The natural history of HF is well established; however, epidemiological data are continually evolving owing to demographic shifts, advances in treatment and variations in access to health care. Although the incidence of HF has stabilized or declined in high-income countries over the past decade, its prevalence continues to increase, driven by an ageing population, an increase in risk factors, the effectiveness of novel therapies and improved survival. This rise in prevalence is increasingly noted among younger adults and is accompanied by a shift towards HF with preserved ejection fraction. However, disparities exist in our epidemiological understanding of HF burden and progression in low-income and middle-income countries owing to the lack of comprehensive data in these regions. Therefore, the current epidemiological landscape of HF highlights the need for periodic surveillance and resource allocation tailored to geographically vulnerable areas. In this Review, we highlight global trends in the burden of HF, focusing on the variations across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. We also discuss evolving population-based estimates of HF incidence and prevalence, the risk factors for and aetiologies of this disease, and outcomes in different geographical regions and populations.

Clinical Update in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trends in cardiometabolic interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction makes up approximately half of overall heart failure and is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and overall burden on the healthcare system. It is a complex, heterogenous syndrome and clinical trials, to this point, have not revealed quite as many effective treatment options when compared to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Nevertheless, there is an expanding amount of data insight into the pathogenesis of this disease and the potential for newer therapies and management strategies. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction pathology has been found to be linked to abnormal energetics, myocyte hypertrophy, cell signaling, inflammation, ischemia, and fibrosis. These mechanisms also intricately overlap with the significant comorbidities often associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction including, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, obesity and coronary artery disease. Treatment of this disease, therefore, should focus on the management and strict regulation of these comorbidities by pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic means. In this review, a clinical update is provided reviewing the most recent clinical trials and data regarding epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with an emphasis on the recent trend in cardiometabolic interventions.

Artificial intelligence approaches for phenotyping heart failure in U.S. Veterans Health Administration electronic health record

AIMS

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome with no definitive diagnostic tests. HF registries are often based on manual reviews of medical records of hospitalized HF patients identified using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. However, most HF patients are not hospitalized, and manual review of big electronic health record (EHR) data is not practical. The US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has the largest integrated healthcare system in the nation, and an estimated 1.5 million patients have ICD codes for HF (HF ICD-code universe) in their VA EHR. The objective of our study was to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models to phenotype HF in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The model development cohort (n = 20 000: training, 16 000; validation 2000; testing, 2000) included 10 000 patients with HF and 10 000 without HF who were matched by age, sex, race, inpatient/outpatient status, hospital, and encounter date (within 60 days). HF status was ascertained by manual chart reviews in VA's External Peer Review Program for HF (EPRP-HF) and non-HF status was ascertained by the absence of ICD codes for HF in VA EHR. Two clinicians annotated 1000 random snippets with HF-related keywords and labelled 436 as HF, which was then used to train and test a natural language processing (NLP) model to classify HF (positive predictive value or PPV, 0.81; sensitivity, 0.77). A machine learning (ML) model using linear support vector machine architecture was trained and tested to classify HF using EPRP-HF as cases (PPV, 0.86; sensitivity, 0.86). From the 'HF ICD-code universe', we randomly selected 200 patients (gold standard cohort) and two clinicians manually adjudicated HF (gold standard HF) in 145 of those patients by chart reviews. We calculated NLP, ML, and NLP + ML scores and used weighted F scores to derive their optimal threshold values for HF classification, which resulted in PPVs of 0.83, 0.77, and 0.85 and sensitivities of 0.86, 0.88, and 0.83, respectively. HF patients classified by the NLP + ML model were characteristically and prognostically similar to those with gold standard HF. All three models performed better than ICD code approaches: one principal hospital discharge diagnosis code for HF (PPV, 0.97; sensitivity, 0.21) or two primary outpatient encounter diagnosis codes for HF (PPV, 0.88; sensitivity, 0.54).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that NLP and ML models are efficient AI tools to phenotype HF in big EHR data to create contemporary HF registries for clinical studies of effectiveness, quality improvement, and hypothesis generation.

Differential impacts of body composition on oxygen kinetics and exercise tolerance of HFrEF and HFpEF patients

This study aims to (1) compare the kinetics of pulmonary oxygen uptake (VO2p), skeletal muscle deoxygenation ([HHb]), and microvascular O2 delivery (QO2mv) between heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and those with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and (2) explore the correlation between body composition, kinetic parameters, and exercise performance. Twenty-one patients (10 HFpEF and 11 HFrEF) underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing to assess VO2 kinetics, with near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) employed to measure [HHb]. Microvascular O2 delivery (QO2mv) was calculated using the Fick principle. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) was performed to evaluate body composition. HFrEF patients exhibited significantly slower VO2 kinetics (time constant [t]: 63 ± 10.8 s vs. 45.4 ± 7.9 s; P < 0.05) and quicker [HHb] response (t: 12.4 ± 9.9 s vs. 25 ± 11.6 s; P < 0.05). Microvascular O2 delivery (QO2mv) was higher in HFrEF patients (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 1.7 ± 0.8; P < 0.05), who also experienced shorter time to exercise intolerance (281.6 ± 84 s vs. 405.3 ± 96 s; P < 0.05). Correlation analyses revealed a significant negative relationship between time to exercise and both QO2mv (ρ= -0.51; P < 0.05) and VO2 kinetics (ρ= -0.63). Body adiposity was negatively correlated with [HHb] amplitude (ρ= -0.78) and peak VO2 (ρ= -0.54), while a positive correlation was observed between lean muscle percentage, [HHb] amplitude, and tau (ρ= 0.74 and 0.57; P < 0.05), respectively. HFrEF patients demonstrate more severely impaired VO2p kinetics, skeletal muscle deoxygenation, and microvascular O2 delivery compared to HFpEF patients, indicating compromised peripheral function. Additionally, increased adiposity and reduced lean mass are linked to decreased oxygen diffusion capacity and impaired oxygen uptake kinetics in HFrEF patients.

Two-year clinical outcome of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction: insights from the prospective KAMIR-NIH Registry

Background

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a crucial prognostic indicator of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, there is a lack of studies on the clinical characteristics and prognosis of patients with mildly reduced ejection fraction (EF) after AMI.

Methods

We categorized 6,553 patients with AMI from the Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institutes of Health (KAMIR-NIH) between November 2011 and December 2015 into three groups based on their EF, as assessed by echocardiography during index hospitalization: reduced EF (LVEF ≤40%), mildly reduced EF (LVEF 41%-49%), and preserved EF (LVEF ≥50%). The primary outcome was all-cause death within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included myocardial infarction (MI), revascularization, and patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE), which was defined as a composite of all-cause death, any MI, or revascularization.

Results

Of the total 6,553 patients, 884 (13.5%) were classified into the reduced EF group, 1,749 (26.7%) into the mildly reduced EF group, and 3,920 (59.8%) into the preserved EF group. Patients with mildly reduced EF exhibited intermediate mortality (reduced EF, 24.7%; mildly reduced EF, 8.3%; preserved EF, 4.6%; p < 0.0001), MI (3.9% vs. 2.7% vs. 2.6%; p < 0.0046), and POCE (33.0% vs. 15.6% vs. 12.4%; p < 0.0001) rates, albeit closer to those of the preserved EF. After adjustment for demographics, risk factors, admission status, and discharge medications, patients with mildly reduced EF showed a lower risk of all-cause death than those with reduced EF (mildly reduced EF group as a reference: HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.40-2.18; p < 0.001), but it did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF (HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.75-1.18; p = 0.999).

Conclusions

Over a 2-year follow-up period, patients with AMI and mildly reduced EF demonstrated better prognoses than those with reduced EF, but did not differ significantly from those with preserved EF.

Clinical Trial Registration

cris.nih.go.kr, identifier: KCT-0000863.

Anthracyclines, Diastolic Dysfunction and the road to Heart Failure in Cancer survivors: An untold story

Many cardiovascular diseases are characterized by diastolic dysfunction, which associates with worse clinical outcomes like overall mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HF). Diastolic dysfunction has also been suspected to represent an early manifestation of cardiotoxicity induced by cancer drugs, with most of the information deriving from patients treated with anthracyclines; however, the prognostic implications of diastolic dysfunction in the anthracycline-treated patient have remained poorly explored or neglected. Here the molecular, pathophysiologic and diagnostic aspects of anthracycline-related diastolic dysfunction are reviewed in the light of HF incidence and phenotype in cancer survivors. We describe that the trajectories of diastolic dysfunction toward HF are influenced by a constellation of patient- or treatment- related factors, such as comorbidities and exposure to other cardiotoxic drugs or treatments, but also by prospective novel opportunities to treat diastolic dysfunction. The importance of a research-oriented multidimensional approach to patient surveillance or treatment is discussed within the framework of what appears to be a distinct pathophysiologic entity that develops early during anthracycline treatment and gradually worsens over the years.

Eligibility of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Insights from the Colombian heart failure registry (RECOLFACA)

Background

The value of Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 inhibitor) therapy in individuals with heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF) was unknown until the EMPEROR-Preserved trial. We aimed to assess the proportion of patients with HFpEF that are eligible for empagliflozin therapy within the Colombian Heart Failure Registry (RECOLFACA).

Methods

RECOLFACA enrolled adult patients with a HF diagnosis during 2017-2019 from 60 medical centers in Colombia. Criteria of the EMPEROR-Preserved Trial were used to recruit participants. The main outcome was individual eligibility with N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) criteria, while the secondary outcome was eligibility without NT-proBNP data.

Results

RECOLFACA had 799 patients with HFpEF (mean age70.7 ± 13.5; 50.7 % males). According to the major selection criteria of the EMPEROR Preserved Trial, 73.7 % patients would be eligible for empagliflozin therapy initiation when considering the NT-proBNP threshold. The NT-proBNP threshold represented the main determinant of ineligibility in patients with this biomarker measure (13.6 %; n = 16). In patients without NT-proBNP data, the main reasons for exclusion were the diagnosis of symptomatic hypotension or a systolic blood pressure below 100 mmHg (7.5 %), having an eGFR < 20 ml/min/1.73 m2 (4.3 %), and haemoglobin < 9 g/dl (3.1 %). Excluding NT-proBNP criteria increased empagliflozin eligibility to 80.6 %.

Conclusion

Most patients with HFpEF from RECOLFACA are potential candidates for empagliflozin therapy initiation according to the EMPEROR-Preserved trial criteria. These findings favor the utilization of SGLT-2 inhibitor medications in daily medical practice, which may further decrease morbidity and mortality in HF patients, regardless of their EF classification.

Impact of Sex and Diabetes in Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with a growing global health burden. This review explores the intersection of HF, diabetes mellitus, and sex, highlighting epidemiological patterns, pathophysiological mechanisms, and treatment implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite similar HF prevalence in men and women, diabetes mellitus (DM) appears to exert a more pronounced impact on HF outcomes in women. Pathophysiological differences involve cardiovascular risk factors, severe left ventricular dysfunction, and coronary artery disease, as well as hormonal influences and inflammatory markers. Diabetic cardiomyopathy introduces a sex-specific challenge, with women experiencing common adverse outcomes related to increased fibrosis and myocardial remodeling. Treatment strategies, particularly sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, exhibit cardiovascular benefits, but their response may differ in women. The link between HF and DM is bidirectional, with diabetes significantly increasing the risk of HF, and vice versa. Additionally, the impact of diabetes on mortality appears more pronounced in women than in men, leading to a modification of the traditional gender gap observed in HF outcomes. A personalized approach is crucial, and further research to improve outcomes in the complex interplay of HF, diabetes, and sex is needed.

Sex differences in the nutritional status and its association with long-term prognosis in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a prospective cohort study

AIMS

Many studies show the association between malnutrition and poor prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. Our research aimed to analyse sex differences in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), emphasizing nutritional status and the influence of selected parameters on the prognosis.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We enrolled 276 consecutive patients diagnosed with HFrEF. Nutritional status was assessed using Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI), and body mass index (BMI). The mean follow-up period was 564.4 ± 346.3 days. The analysed group included 81.2% of men. The median age was 58, interquartile range (IQR) 49-64 years. Among all patients, almost 60% were classified as NYHA III or IV. Half of the participants were at risk of malnutrition, and 2.9% were malnourished. During follow-up, 72 (26.1%) patients died. The female sex was not associated with a higher occurrence of malnutrition (P = 0.99) or nutritional risk (P = 0.85), according to MNA. Coherently, GNRI scores did not differ significantly between the sexes (P = 0.29). In contrast, BMI was significantly higher in males (29.4 ± 5.3 vs. 25.9 ± 4.7; P < 0.001). Impaired nutritional status assessed with any method (MNA, GNRI, BMI) was not significantly associated with a worse prognosis. In multivariable analysis, NYHA class, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, higher B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), higher N-terminal fragment of proBNP, and higher uric acid were independent of sex and age predictors of all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

There were no sex differences in the nutritional status in the HFrEF patients, apart from lower BMI in females. Impaired nutritional status was not associated with mortality in both men and women.

Effectiveness of self-management programmes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Chronic disease self-management (CDSM) is a vital component of congestive heart failure (CHF) programmes. Recent CHF guidelines have downgraded CDSM programmes citing a lack of gold-standard evidence. This protocol describes the aims and methods of a systematic review to collate and synthesise the published research evidence to determine the effectiveness of CDSM programmes and interventions for patients treated for CHF.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, SCOPUS, Web of Science, the Science Citation Index and registers of clinical trials will be searched from 1966 to 2024. In addition, the reference lists of shortlisted articles will be reviewed. Randomised controlled trials, with case management interventions of CDSM and CHF with reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), will be extracted and analysed. There is no restriction on language. Study protocol template developed from Cochrane Collaboration and Reporting adheres to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol guidelines for systematic review and meta-analyses 2020. Two independent authors will apply inclusions and exclusion criteria to limit article search and assess bias and certainty of evidence rating. Data extraction and study description of included studies will include quality appraisal of studies and quantitative synthesis of data will then be undertaken to ascertain evidence for the study aims. Subgroup analyses will be conducted for different CDSM programmes. The primary outcome will be a significant change in MACE parameters between intervention and control arms. Meta-analysis will be conducted using statistical software, if feasible.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not sought as the study is not collecting primary patient data. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed scientific journals and also presented to audiences through meetings and scientific conferences.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023431539.

Blood pressure and heart failure: focused on treatment

Heart failure (HF) remains a significant global health burden, and hypertension is known to be the primary contributor to its development. Although aggressive hypertension treatment can prevent heart changes in at-risk patients, determining the optimal blood pressure (BP) targets in cases diagnosed with HF is challenging owing to insufficient evidence. Notably, hypertension is more strongly associated with HF with preserved ejection fraction than with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Patients with acute hypertensive HF exhibit sudden symptoms of acute HF, especially those manifested with severely high BP; however, no specific vasodilator therapy has proven beneficial for this type of acute HF. Since the majority of medications used to treat HF contribute to lowering BP, and BP remains one of the most important hemodynamic markers, targeted BP management is very concerned in treatment strategies. However, no concrete guidelines exist, prompting a trend towards optimizing therapies to within tolerable ranges, rather than setting explicit BP goals. This review discusses the connection between BP and HF, explores its pathophysiology through clinical studies, and addresses its clinical significance and treatment targets.

Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction-A Phenotype Waiting to Be Explored

Heart failure (HF) presents a significant global health challenge recognised by frequent hospitalisation and high mortality rates. The assessment of left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) plays a crucial role in diagnosing and predicting outcomes in HF, leading to its classification into preserved (HFpEF), reduced (HFrEF), and mildly reduced (HFmrEF) EF. HFmrEF shares features of both HFrEF and HFpEF but also exhibits distinct characteristics. Despite advancements, managing HFmrEF remains challenging due to its diverse presentation. Large-scale studies are needed to identify the predictors of clinical outcomes and treatment responses. Utilising biomarkers for phenotyping holds the potential for discovering new treatment targets. Given the uncertainty surrounding optimal management, individualised approaches are imperative for HFmrEF patients. This chapter examines HFmrEF, discusses the rationale for its re-classification, and elucidates HFmrEF's key attributes. Furthermore, it provides a comprehensive review of current treatment strategies for HFmrEF patients.

In-hospital complications after MitraClip in patients with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction in the United States

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits of transcatheter edge to edge mitral valve repair have been well established in patients with heart failure and severe mitral regurgitation (MR) who have prohibitive surgical risk. In March of 2019, the FDA approved the MitraClip for treatment of selected patients with HF and severe secondary MR. However, the relative outcomes of patients with HFrEF and HFpEF treated with MitraClip are largely unknown. We therefore sought to investigate the incidence and characteristics of in-hospital mortality in patients with HFpEF and HFrEF following MitraClip.

METHODS

The study sample analyzed was originated from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) registry which includes data from hospitalized patients in the United States (US) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2020. Data were extracted from the entire NIS registry using ICD-9 codes. Patients with the primary or secondary diagnosis of MitraClip were identified. Hospitalizations for HFpEF and HFrEF were identified based on ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes. Demographics, conventional risk factors, and in-hospital outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

23,260 hospitalizations for MitraClip implantation between 2016 and 2020 were analyzed. The HFrEF group had higher absolute rates of complications as well as a higher observed in-hospital mortality (2.4 % vs 1.7 %; OR 0.75 95 % CI 0.44-1.26; p 0.28) which did not meet statistical significance. Absolute rates of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute kidney injury (AKI) and respiratory failure necessitating invasive mechanical ventilation were observed to be higher among HFrEF patients. Post-procedural shock was significantly more common in patients with HFrEF (9.0 % vs 2.8 %: OR 0.34 95 % CI 0.25-0.48 p < 0.001). Significantly longer hospitalizations were observed in the HFrEF cohort (5.3 ± 11.2 days vs 4.2 ± 7.3 days; p < 0.001) as well as a higher total hospitalization cost (61,723 ± 56,728 USD vs 57,278 ± 46,143).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study of US patients, those with HFrEF were observed to have statistically higher risk of in-hospital post-procedural shock and longer hospitalization length of stay when compared with patients with HFpEF who underwent MitraClip implantation. Additionally, patients with HFrEF undergoing MitraClip procedure were observed to have higher absolute rates of certain post-procedural complications, however these observations did not reach statistical significance. Understanding of the aforementioned differences after MitraClip implantation may be useful in-patient selection, prognostic guidance, and hypothesis generation to propel future large clinical studies.

Prognostic significance of left atrial strain combined with left ventricular strain using cardiac magnetic resonance feature tracking in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and left atrial strain (LAS) obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) feature tracking in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We retrospectively enrolled consecutive patients with HFpEF admitted to our hospital who underwent cardiac MRI. LVGLS and LAS were obtained from cine MRI by feature tracking. The end point was defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, and hospitalization due to decompensated HF. One-hundred patients with HFpEF were enrolled. Mean LVGLS and LAS were - 13.7 ± 3.7% and 22.5 ± 11.6%, respectively. During follow-up of 4.4 ± 1.9 years, 24 events occurred. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis demonstrated LAS was independently associated with adverse cardiac events. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis revealed that the patients with both LVGLS and LAS worse than the median (LVGLS ≥ - 12.2% and LAS ≤ 13.8%) had a significantly lower event-free rate compared to those with preserved strain (Log-rank P < 0.001). Simultaneous assessment of LVGLS and LAS using MRI was useful for risk stratification in the patients with HFpEF.

Drug Therapy for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Hypertension: A State-of-the-Art Review

In this comprehensive state-of-the-art review, we provide an evidence-based analysis of current drug therapies for patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) in the acute and chronic phases with concurrent hypertension. Additionally, we explore the latest developments and emerging evidence on the efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes of common and novel drug treatments in the management of HFpEF with concurrent hypertension. During the acute phase of HFpEF, intravenous diuretics, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), and vasodilators are pivotal, while in the chronic phase, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers have proven effective in enhancing clinical outcomes. However, the use of calcium channel blockers in HFpEF with hypertension should be approached with caution, owing to their potential negative inotropic effects. We also explored emerging drug therapies for HFpEF, such as sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators, novel MRAs, and ivabradine. Notably, SGLT2 inhibitors have shown promise in reducing heart failure hospitalizations and cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFpEF, regardless of their diabetic status. Additionally, ARNI and sGC stimulators have demonstrated potential in improving symptoms, functional capacity, and quality of life. Nonetheless, additional research is necessary to pinpoint optimal treatment strategies for HFpEF with concurrent hypertension. Furthermore, long-term studies are essential to assess the durability and sustained benefits of emerging drug therapies. Identification of novel targets and mechanisms underlying HFpEF pathophysiology will pave the way for innovative drug development approaches in the management of HFpEF with concurrent hypertension.

Acute Heart Failure: From The Emergency Department to the Intensive Care Unit

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a frequent cause of hospitalization around the world and is associated with high in-hospital and post-discharge morbidity and mortality. This review summarizes data on diagnosis and management of AHF from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. While more evidence is needed to guide risk stratification and care of patients with AHF, hospitalization is a key opportunity to optimize evidence-based medical therapy for heart failure. Close linkage to outpatient care is essential to improve post-hospitalization outcomes.

Sotagliflozin versus dapagliflozin to improve outcome of patients with diabetes and worsening heart failure: a cost per outcome analysis

Background and aim

Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure.

Method

The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOIST-WHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses.

Result

The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage.

Conclusion

In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes.

Heart Failure Statistics 2024 Update: A Report From the Korean Society of Heart Failure

Background and Objectives

The number of people with heart failure (HF) is increasing worldwide, and the social burden is increasing as HF has high mortality and morbidity. We aimed to provide updated trends on the epidemiology of HF in Korea to shape future social measures against HF.

Methods

We used the National Health Information Database of the National Health Insurance Service to determine the prevalence, incidence, hospitalization rate, mortality rate, comorbidities, in-hospital mortality, and healthcare cost of patients with HF from 2002 to 2020 in Korea.

Results

The prevalence of HF in the total Korean population rose from 0.77% in 2002 to 2.58% (1,326,886 people) in 2020. Although the age-standardized incidence of HF decreased over the past 18 years, the age-standardized prevalence increased. In 2020, the hospitalization rate for any cause in patients with HF was 1,166 per 100,000 persons, with a steady increase from 2002. In 2002, the HF mortality was 3.0 per 100,000 persons, which rose to 15.6 per 100,000 persons in 2020. While hospitalization rates and in-hospital mortality for patients with HF increased, the mortality rate for patients with HF did not (5.8% in 2020), and the one-year survival rate from the first diagnosis of HF improved. The total healthcare costs for patients with HF were approximately $2.4 billion in 2020, a 16-fold increase over the $0.15 billion in 2002.

Conclusions

The study's results underscore the growing socioeconomic burden of HF in Korea, driven by an aging population and increasing HF prevalence.

Comorbidity of patients with noncommunicable diseases in general practice. Eurasian guidelines

Создание руководства поддержано Советом по терапевтическим наукам отделения клинической медицины Российской академии наук.

Heart Failure with Preserved vs. Reduced Ejection Fraction: Patient Characteristics, In-hospital Treatment and Mortality-DanAHF, a Nationwide Prospective Study

This study aims to describe baseline characteristics and in-hospital management of a patient cohort hospitalized with acute heart failure (AHF). Adult patients in Denmark admitted with a medical diagnosis during a 7-day period were reviewed for symptoms and clinical findings suggestive of AHF. HFpEF was defined as LVEF ≥ 45%. Of 5194 patients, 290 (6%) had AHF. Sixty-two percent (n = 179) was diagnosed with HFpEF. Compared to HFrEF patients, HFpEF patients were more often women (48% vs. 31%, p = 0.004), less likely to have ischemic heart disease (31% vs. 53%, p = 0.002) and a pacemaker/ICD (7% vs. 21%, p < 0.001/1% vs. 8%, p < 0.001). Fewer HFpEF patients received intravenous diuretics (43% vs. 73%, p < 0.001) and inotropes (2% vs. 7%, p = 0.02), while more HFpEF patients received nitro-glycerine (59% vs. 44%, p = 0.02). Intubation/NIV, ICU admission, and revascularization were used similarly. Hospitalization was shorter for HFpEF patients (4 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001), with no significant difference in survival to discharge (96% vs. 91%, p = 0.07). Of AHF admissions, nearly two-thirds was due to HFpEF. Compared to HFrEF, HFpEF patients had a lower cardiac comorbidity and a 2-day shorter hospitalization.

Burden from Study Questionnaire on Patient Fatigue in Qualitative Congestive Heart Failure Research

Mixed methods research forms the backbone of translational research methodologies. Qualitative research and subjective data lead to hypothesis generation and ideas that are then proven via quantitative methodologies and gathering objective data. In this vein, clinical trials that generate subjective data may have limitations, when they are not followed through with quantitative data, in terms of their ability to be considered gold standard evidence and inform guidelines and clinical management. However, since many research methods utilise qualitative tools, an initial factor is that such tools can create a burden on patients and researchers. In addition, the quantity of data and its storage contributes to noise and quality issues for its primary and post hoc use. This paper discusses the issue of the burden of subjective data collected and fatigue in the context of congestive heart failure (CHF) research. The CHF population has a high baseline morbidity, so no doubt the focus should be on the content; however, the lengths of the instruments are a product of their vigorous validation processes. Nonetheless, as an important source of hypothesis generation, if a choice of follow-up qualitative assessment is required for a clinical trial, shorter versions of the questionnaire should be used, without compromising the data collection requirements; otherwise, we need to invest in this area and find suitable solutions.

Leucine Supplementation Prevents the Development of Skeletal Muscle Dysfunction in a Rat Model of HFpEF

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with exercise intolerance due to alterations in the skeletal muscle (SKM). Leucine supplementation is known to alter the anabolic/catabolic balance and to improve mitochondrial function. Thus, we investigated the effect of leucine supplementation in both a primary and a secondary prevention approach on SKM function and factors modulating muscle function in an established HFpEF rat model. Female ZSF1 obese rats were randomized to an untreated, a primary prevention, and a secondary prevention group. For primary prevention, leucine supplementation was started before the onset of HFpEF (8 weeks of age) and for secondary prevention, leucine supplementation was started after the onset of HFpEF (20 weeks of age). SKM function was assessed at an age of 32 weeks, and SKM tissue was collected for the assessment of mitochondrial function and histological and molecular analyses. Leucine supplementation prevented the development of SKM dysfunction whereas it could not reverse it. In the primary prevention group, mitochondrial function improved and higher expressions of mitofilin, Mfn-2, Fis1, and miCK were evident in SKM. The expression of UCP3 was reduced whereas the mitochondrial content and markers for catabolism (MuRF1, MAFBx), muscle cross-sectional area, and SKM mass did not change. Our data show that leucine supplementation prevented the development of skeletal muscle dysfunction in a rat model of HFpEF, which may be mediated by improving mitochondrial function through modulating energy transfer.