Nemolizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: Randomized, phase II, long-term extension study

Current and Emerging Biologics for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic pruritic inflammatory skin disease that affects all ages and is recognized as a global health problem. Pathophysiology is complex with skin barrier abnormalities, immune dysregulation, and microbial dysbiosis all implicated. Markers of immune and inflammatory activation in the circulation provide a rationale for systemic therapy. Type 2 immune polarization is central, though other cytokine pathways including Th22 and Th17/IL-23 have been described, suggesting additional therapeutic targets in a subset of patients. Dupilumab and tralokinumab are monoclonal antibodies currently approved for moderate-to-severe AD with lebrikizumab and nemolizumab in late stages of development.

Emerging Biologic Therapies for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory skin disease having a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Conventional treatments, including topical therapies and systemic immunosuppressants, often have limited efficacy and long-term safety concerns. Emerging biologic therapies target specific immune pathways implicated in AD pathogenesis, offering new therapeutic options in a disease known for its complex immune pathomechanisms. This review focuses on novel biologics under investigation, particularly those targeting specific immune pathways such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and OX40-OX40L axis. Interleukin-4 and IL-13 inhibitors aim to reduce Th2-driven inflammation, while IL-22 inhibitors focus on restoring skin barrier function. Interleukin-31 inhibitors help alleviate pruritus, a major symptom in AD. OX40-OX40L pathway inhibitors can selectively suppress the activity of pathogenic T cells, without inducing significant immunosuppression. Bispecific antibodies targeting both IL-4 and IL-31 pathways are emerging as potential dual-action treatment for AD. Thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitors offer a novel strategy to control inflammation. While many of these therapies offer promising safety and efficacy profiles, long-term studies and real-world data are essential to confirm their lasting impact. This review highlights the potential of these emerging systemic therapies to continue transforming AD management and improve patient outcomes.

A case of bullous pemphigoid following administration of anti-IL-31 receptor A antibody

Bullous pemphigoid (BP), an autoimmune bullous dermatosis, occurs predominantly in older individuals. Nemolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL)-31 receptor A, is used to treat severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in Japan. However, it can cause several adverse events, such as exacerbation of AD, erythema, and eosinophilia. Herein, we describe a case of prurigo-type AD developing BP after nemolizumab administration. A 62-year-old man with prurigo-type AD and asthma presented with serious, refractory itching. After nemolizumab injection, his pruritus was relieved for 2 days. However, on day 3, erythema with blisters and erosions suddenly appeared throughout his body. Pathological examination showed typical BP and the patient's serum anti-BP180-NC16a antibody level was 882.5 U/mL. Oral prednisolone (PSL) was initiated and nemolizumab was never used again. Despite high-dose PSL, new blisters continued to develop, with a rapid elevation of anti-BP180-NC16a antibodies to 6930 U/mL. Adding high-dose cyclosporine and intravenous gamma globulin reduced new blister formation after 9 weeks, and PSL and cyclosporine were gradually tapered. Dupilumab, an anti-IL-4 receptor antibody, was initiated after 16 weeks, resulting in continued remission without PSL and cyclosporine. The sudden occurrence of BP in this case suggested that the patient had occult BP before the nemolizumab initiation and that nemolizumab exacerbated BP and made it overt. Blocking the IL-31 pathway may exacerbate inflammation in AD or BP, resulting in the acceleration of blister formation. This may be countered by blocking the IL-4/13 pathway with dupilumab. To our knowledge, this is the first case of nemolizumab-exacerbated BP.

The role of nemolizumab in the treatment of atopic dermatitis for the adult population

Atopic dermatitis (AD) often requires long-term treatment that may be associated with adverse effects. This review aims to characterize nemolizumab as a treatment for AD in adults. A literature search was performed to assess nemolizumab's role in moderate-to-severe AD in adults. Currently, clinical trials are being conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety profile and optimal dosing of nemolizumab for adults with moderate-to-severe AD. The most common adverse effects include nasopharyngitis, AD exacerbation and increased blood creatinine phosphokinase. Recent data from clinical trials suggest nemolizumab may be an acceptable treatment in adults with moderate-to-severe AD.

Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials.

METHODS

ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349).

FINDINGS

Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved.

FUNDING

Galderma.

Biologic and small-molecule therapy for treating moderate to severe atopic dermatitis: Mechanistic considerations

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex and heterogeneous skin disease for which achieving complete clinical clearance for most patients has proven challenging through single cytokine inhibition. Current studies integrate biomarkers and evaluate their role in AD, aiming to advance our understanding of the diverse molecular profiles implicated. Although traditionally characterized as a TH2-driven disease, extensive research has recently revealed the involvement of TH1, TH17, and TH22 immune pathways as well as the interplay of pivotal immune molecules, such as OX40, OX40 ligand (OX40L), thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and IL-33. This review explores the mechanistic effects of treatments for AD, focusing on mAbs and Janus kinase inhibitors. It describes how these treatments modulate immune pathways and examines their impact on key inflammatory and barrier biomarkers.

Monoclonal antibodies for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a look at phase III and beyond

INTRODUCTION

The understanding of atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis has rapidly expanded in recent years, catalyzing the development of new targeted monoclonal antibody treatments for AD.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to summarize the latest clinical and molecular data about monoclonal antibodies that are in later stages of development for AD, either in Phase 3 trials or in the pharmacopoeia for up to 5 years, highlighting the biologic underpinning of each drug's mechanism of action and the potential modulation of the AD immune profile.

EXPERT OPINION

The therapeutic pipeline of AD treatments is speedily progressing, introducing the potential for a personalized medical approach in the near future. Understanding how targeting pathogenic players in AD modifies disease progression and symptomatology is key in improving therapeutic choices for patients and identifying ideal patient candidates.

A critical evaluation of nemolizumab for prurigo nodularis

INTRODUCTION

Prurigo nodularis (PN) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that presents with intensely pruritic, hyperkeratotic nodules. The pathophysiology underlying PN is not entirely clear, making treatment challenging. Patients often require a multimodal approach, although many of the available therapies have low efficacy or adverse effects.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the use of nemolizumab for the treatment of PN in adults. Nemolizumab is a biological therapy that reduces type 2 cytokines and the neuroimmune response implicated in the pathophysiology of PN. It also helps maintain skin barrier integrity, which may be damaged during the vicious itch-scratch cycle. Nemolizumab has demonstrated great efficacy in improving itch and clearing lesions in recent clinical trials with respectable tolerance.

EXPERT OPINION

Nemolizumab is a promising drug for PN that seems comparable to the recently approved dupilumab in terms of its therapeutic effect and excellent safety profile, although nemolizumab may work more rapidly on itch. JAK inhibitors are also emerging as competitors of biologics for PN, however, their safety profile in this population may differ. Trials evaluating these drugs are needed to assess which is preferable. Additional data on the durability and longevity of nemolizumab for PN treatment is highly anticipated.

Borneol exerts its antipruritic effects by inhibiting TRPA1 and activating TRPM8

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Borneol is a long-established traditional Chinese medicine that has been found to be effective in treating pain and itchy skin. However, whether borneol has a therapeutic effect on chronic itch and its related mechanisms remain unclear.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To investigate the antipruritic effect of borneol and its molecular mechanism.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

DrugBAN framework and molecular docking were applied to predict the targets of borneol, and the calcium imaging or patch-clamp recording analysis were used to detect the effects of borneol on TRPA1, TRPM8 or TRPV3 channels in HEK293T cells. In addition, various mouse models of acute itch and chronic itch were established to evaluate the antipruritic effects of borneol on C57BL/6J mice. Then, the borneol-induced pruritic relief was further investigated in Trpa1-/-, Trpm8-/-, or Trpa1-/-/Trpm8-/- mice. The effects of borneol on the activation of TRPM8 and the inhibition of TRPA1 were also measured in dorsal root ganglia neurons of wild-type (WT), Trpm8-/- and Trpv1-/- mice. Lastly, a randomized, double-blind study of adult patients was conducted to evaluate the clinical antipruritic effect of borneol.

RESULTS

TRPA1, TRPV3 and TRPM8 are the potential targets of borneol according to the results of DrugBAN algorithm and molecular docking. Calcium imaging and patch-clamp recording analysis demonstrated that borneol activates TRPM8 channel-induced cell excitability and inhibits TRPA1 channel-mediated cell excitability in transfected HEK293T cells. Animal behavior analysis showed that borneol can significantly reduce acute and chronic itch behavior in C57BL/6J mice, but this effect was eliminated in Trpa1-/-, Trpm8-/- mice, or at least in Trpa1-/-/Trpm8-/- mice. Borneol elicits TRPM8 channel induced [Ca2+]i responses but inhibits AITC or SADBE-induced activation of TRPA1 channels in dorsal root ganglia neurons of WT and Trpv1-/- mice, respectively. Furthermore, the clinical results indicated that borneol could reduce itching symptoms in patients and its efficacy is similar to that of menthol.

CONCLUSION

Borneol has therapeutic effects on multiple pruritus models in mice and patients with chronic itch, and the mechanism may be through inhibiting TRPA1 and activating TRPM8.

Off-label use of Baricitinib improves moderate and severe atopic dermatitis in China through inhibiting MAPK and PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway via targeting JAK-STAT signaling of CD4+ cells

As an inflammatory disease with a disrupted immune system, cytokine disorders in atopic dermatitis (AD) are closely related to the abnormal activation of JAK-STAT signal pathway. The critical relevance of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway to the pathogenesis of AD provides a strong rationale for JAK inhibitor research. Baricitinib, a small-molecule oral JAK inhibitor, has been proven to inhibit JAK-STAT signaling in a variety of diseases, including AD. It is currently available in China for off-label use. However, its efficacy in China and its mechanism are rarely reported. In our study, we found that the immune status of patients with moderate and severe AD was hyperactive. Among the 49 known immunotherapy targets, JAK1 and JAK2 genes on lymphocytes of AD patients were significantly upregulated, which was closely related to the symptom severity in moderate and severe AD patients. Baricitinib can improve immune hyperresponsiveness and clinical symptoms in moderate and severe AD by inhibiting the activation of Th2 cell subsets and the secretion of Th2-type cytokines through MAPK, mTOR and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, providing an important theoretical basis for clinical off-label use of Baricitinib to treat moderate and severe AD.

Blockade of OSMRβ signaling ameliorates skin lesions in a mouse model of human atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by severe pruritus and eczematous skin lesions. Although IL-31, a type 2 helper T (Th2)-derived cytokine, is important to the development of pruritus and skin lesions in AD, the blockade of IL-31 signaling does not improve the skin lesions in AD. Oncostatin M (OSM), a member of IL-6 family of cytokines, plays important roles in the regulation of various inflammatory responses through OSM receptor β subunit (OSMRβ), a common receptor subunit for OSM and IL-31. However, the effects of OSM on the pathogenesis of AD remain to be elucidated. When AD model mice were treated with OSM, skin lesions were exacerbated and IL-4 production was increased in the lymph nodes. Next, we investigated the effects of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) against OSMRβ on the pathogenesis of AD. Treatment with the anti-OSMRβ mAb (7D2) reduced skin severity score in AD model mice. In addition to skin lesions, scratching behavior was decreased by 7D2 mAb with the reduction in the number of OSMRβ-positive neurons in the dorsal root ganglia of AD model mice. 7D2 mAb also reduced the serum concentration of IL-4, IL-13, and IgE as well as the gene expressions of IL-4 and IL-13 in the lymph nodes of AD model mice. Blockade of both IL-31 and OSM signaling is suggested to suppress both pruritus and Th2 responses, resulting in the improvement of skin lesions in AD. The anti-OSMRβ mAb may be a new therapeutic candidate for the treatment of AD.

How Do Classical Subtypes Correspond to Endotypes in Atopic Dermatitis?

Since atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous condition, the subtyping of AD is a crucial issue. The classical subtypes of AD are represented by extrinsic and intrinsic subtypes, European-American and Asian subtypes, and adult and pediatric subtypes. While the subtyping of AD was historically conducted based on the phenotype, recent findings on the mechanisms of AD have revealed the importance of the endotype, which can characterize individual patients more accurately. Considering the current development of AD therapies, AD endotyping is a prerequisite for a personalized therapeutic choice. Endotypes of AD can be stratified from different viewpoints, including cytokine expression patterns, allergen properties, epidermal barrier conditions, ceramide variation, the involvement of innate immunity, and serum biomarkers. Among them, the cytokine-based endotype seems to be the most useful one and is categorized into type 2 cytokine (IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31)-high, type 1 cytokine (IFN-γ)-high, and/or type 3 cytokine (IL-22 and IL-17)-high, or mixed subtypes. Recently proposed biomarker endotyping aims at individualized treatment options, although the daily clinical use of endotypes is a future issue. To better understand the endotypes for clinicians, attempts to adjust each of the classical subtypes to endotypes are required. This review will discuss the correspondence of the classical subtypes to the various endotypes that have recently been proposed.

Efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in paediatric patients aged 6-12 years with atopic dermatitis with moderate-to-severe pruritus: results from a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition affecting up to one-quarter of children. Uncontrolled pruritus associated with childhood AD, and the accompanying scratching, negatively impacts quality of life (QoL), sleep and development. The humanized monoclonal antibody nemolizumab, used concomitantly with topical agents, was shown to reduce pruritus and improve QoL in patients with AD aged ≥ 13 years. However, data relating to its efficacy and safety in younger children (aged < 13 years) have been lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab, administered concomitantly with topical agents, in Japanese paediatric patients (aged 6-12 years) with AD and inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe pruritus.

METHODS

This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre, 16-week, phase III study. Patients aged ≥ 6 and < 13 years, with confirmed AD, and an inadequate pruritic response despite treatment with topical agents and oral antihistamines were randomly assigned (1 : 1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg or placebo every 4 weeks (Q4W). The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the weekly mean 5-level itch score from baseline to week 16; secondary efficacy endpoints were related to pruritus, indicators for AD and QoL. Safety was assessed via adverse events (AEs) and laboratory test results.

RESULTS

In total, 89 patients were enrolled, received either nemolizumab 30 mg (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44) Q4W, and completed the study. The mean patient age was 9.1 (SD 1.9) years, and mean duration of AD was 8.5 (2.7) years. The change in 5-level itch score from baseline to week 16 showed a statistically significant difference in the nemolizumab treatment group (-1.3) compared with placebo (-0.5; least-squares mean difference -0.8, 95% confidence interval -1.1 to -0.5; P < 0.0001). Improvements with nemolizumab were observed from the second day of administration. Secondary endpoints were in favour of nemolizumab. No AEs resulted in discontinuation, and the overall safety profile in patients aged 6-12 years was comparable with that in older patients (aged ≥ 13 years) with AD.

CONCLUSIONS

Nemolizumab is a potential new treatment option for paediatric patients with AD whose pruritus has not been sufficiently improved with topical treatments and antihistamines.

The role of Janus kinase signaling in the pathology of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous, chronic, relapsing, inflammatory skin disease associated with considerable physical, psychological, and economic burden. The pathology of AD includes complex interactions involving abnormalities in immune and skin barrier genes, skin barrier disruption, immune dysregulation, microbiome disturbance, and other environmental factors. Many of the cytokines involved in AD pathology, including IL-4, IL-13, IL-22, IL-31, thymic stromal lymphopoietin, and IFN-γ, signal through the Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) pathway. The JAK family includes JAK1, JAK2, JAK3, and tyrosine kinase 2; the STAT family includes STAT1, STAT2, STAT3, STAT4, STAT5A/B, and STAT6. Activation of the JAK-STAT pathway has been implicated in the pathology of several immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, including AD. However, the exact mechanisms of JAK-STAT involvement in AD have not been fully characterized. This review aims to discuss current knowledge about the role of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway and, specifically, the role of JAK1 in the pathology and symptomology of AD.

An update on mechanisms of pruritus and their potential treatment in primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma

Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL), which include mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS), are a group of lymphoproliferative disorders characterized by clonal accumulation of neoplastic T-lymphocytes in the skin. Severe pruritus, one of the most common and distressing symptoms in primary CTCL, can significantly impair emotional well-being, physical functioning, and interpersonal relationships, thus greatly reducing quality of life. Unfortunately, effectively managing pruritus remains challenging in CTCL patients as the underlying mechanisms are, as of yet, not fully understood. Previous studies investigating the mechanisms of itch in CTCL have identified several mediators and their corresponding antagonists used for treatment. However, a comprehensive overview of the mediators and receptors contributing to pruritus in primary CTCL is lacking in the current literature. Here, we summarize and review the mediators and receptors that may contribute to pruritus in primary CTCL to explore the mechanisms of CTCL pruritus and identify effective therapeutic targets using the PubMed and Web of Science databases. Studies were included if they described itch mediators and receptors in MF and SS. Overall, the available data suggest that proteases (mainly tryptase), and neuropeptides (particularly Substance P) may be of greatest interest. At the receptor level, cytokine receptors, MRGPRs, and TRP channels are most likely important. Future drug development efforts should concentrate on targeting these mediators and receptors for the treatment of CTCL pruritus.

Phase 3 Trial of Nemolizumab in Patients with Prurigo Nodularis

BACKGROUND

Prurigo nodularis is a chronic, debilitating, and severely pruritic neuroimmunologic skin disease. Nemolizumab, an interleukin-31 receptor alpha antagonist, down-regulates key pathways in the pathogenesis of prurigo nodularis.

METHODS

In this phase 3, double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial, we assigned adults with moderate-to-severe prurigo nodularis to receive an initial 60-mg dose of nemolizumab followed by subcutaneous injections of 30 mg or 60 mg (depending on baseline weight) every 4 weeks for 16 weeks or matching placebo. The primary end points were an itch response (a reduction of ≥4 points on the Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale [PP-NRS; scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe itch]) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response (a score of 0 [clear] or 1 [almost clear] on the IGA [scores range from 0 to 4] and a reduction from baseline to week 16 of ≥2 points). There were five key secondary end points.

RESULTS

A total of 274 patients underwent randomization; 183 were assigned to the nemolizumab group, and 91 to the placebo group. Treatment efficacy was shown with respect to both primary end points at week 16; a greater percentage of patients in the nemolizumab group than in the placebo group had an itch response (56.3% vs. 20.9%; strata-adjusted difference, 37.4 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26.3 to 48.5), and a greater percentage in the nemolizumab group had an IGA response (37.7% vs. 11.0%; strata-adjusted difference, 28.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 18.8 to 38.2) (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Benefits were observed for the five key secondary end points: itch response at week 4 (41.0% vs. 7.7%), PP-NRS score of less than 2 at week 4 (19.7% vs. 2.2%) and week 16 (35.0% vs. 7.7%), and an improvement of 4 or more points on the sleep disturbance numerical rating scale (range, 0 [no sleep loss] to 10 [unable to sleep at all]) at week 4 (37.2% vs. 9.9%) and week 16 (51.9% vs. 20.9%) (P<0.001 for all comparisons). The most common individual adverse events were headache (6.6% vs. 4.4%) and atopic dermatitis (5.5% vs. 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Nemolizumab monotherapy significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of prurigo nodularis. (Funded by Galderma; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04501679; EudraCT number, 2019-004789-17.).

IL-31-dependent neurogenic inflammation restrains cutaneous type 2 immune response in allergic dermatitis

Despite robust literature associating IL-31 with pruritic inflammatory skin diseases, its influence on cutaneous inflammation and the interplay between inflammatory and neurosensory pathways remain unmapped. Here, we examined the consequences of disrupting Il31 and its receptor Il31ra in a mouse model of house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic dermatitis. Il31-deficient mice displayed a deficit in HDM dermatitis-associated scratching, consistent with its well-established role as a pruritogen. In contrast, Il31 deficiency increased the number and proportion of cutaneous type 2 cytokine-producing CD4+ T cells and serum IgE in response to HDM. Furthermore, Il4ra+ monocytes and macrophages capable of fueling a feedforward type 2 inflammatory loop were selectively enriched in Il31ra-deficient HDM dermatitis skin. Thus, IL-31 is not strictly a proinflammatory cytokine but rather an immunoregulatory factor that limits the magnitude of type 2 inflammatory responses in skin. Our data support a model wherein IL-31 activation of IL31RA+ pruritoceptors triggers release of calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP), which can mediate neurogenic inflammation, inhibit CD4+ T cell proliferation, and reduce T cell production of the type 2 cytokine IL-13. Together, these results illustrate a previously unrecognized neuroimmune pathway that constrains type 2 tissue inflammation in the setting of chronic cutaneous allergen exposure and may explain paradoxical dermatitis flares in atopic patients treated with anti-IL31RA therapy.

S100 Proteins in the Pathogenesis of Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis

The skin, the outermost layer of the human body, is exposed to various external stimuli that cause inflammatory skin reactions. These external stimulants trigger external epithelial cell damage and the release of intracellular substances. Following cellular damage or death, intracellular molecules are released that enhance tissue inflammation. As an important substance released from damaged cells, the S100 protein is a low-molecular-weight acidic protein with two calcium-binding sites and EF-hand motif domains. S100 proteins are widely present in systemic organs and interact with other proteins. Recent studies revealed the involvement of S100 in cutaneous inflammatory disorders, psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis. This review provides detailed information on the interactions among various S100 proteins in inflammatory diseases.

IL-31-Pruritus Interleukin: Serum Values and Clinical Impact in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria-A Romanian Retrospective Study

(1) Background: This study aimed to evaluate the implications of interleukin-31 (IL-31) in the pathogenesis of chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and to assess the differences that occur between its serum values compared to controls. Additionally, the serum IL-31 levels were measured alongside other clinical and paraclinical parameters that were identified in the patients to understand its immunological importance in this skin disease and to determine if it could potentially serve as a therapeutic target in CSU in the future. (2) Methods: The serum levels of IL-31 were estimated in 50 patients diagnosed with CSU according to the accepted international guidelines. Additionally, 38 controls who had not experienced any episodes of urticaria during their lifetime were included. (3) Results: Significantly elevated serum IL-31 levels were observed in CSU patients compared to the controls (p < 0.0001). Although no direct correlations were found between IL-31 and inflammatory markers (erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP)), eosinophils, or total immunoglobulins E (IgE), significant differences in IL-31 levels were identified based on CSU severity, quality of life impact, itch intensity, and response to histamine H1 receptor antagonists (H1 antihistamines) (p < 0.05 for all). (4) Conclusions: Our findings underscore that IL-31 is not directly associated with general inflammation, eosinophilic response, or atopy in CSU. Nevertheless, its expression is influenced by key disease characteristics: severity, pruritus, and H1 antihistamine response. This investigation provides essential insights into CSU pathogenesis, potentially leading to novel therapeutic interventions. An enhanced understanding of these mechanisms is crucial due to the limitations of current treatment modalities in terms of fully managing CSU symptoms.

Canine interleukin-31 binds directly to OSMRβ with higher binding affinity than to IL-31RA

Interleukin-31 (IL-31) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine involved in skin inflammation and tumor progression. The IL-31 signaling cascade is initiated by its binding to two receptors, IL-31 receptor alpha (IL-31RA) and oncostatin M receptor subunit beta (OSMRβ). The previous study suggested that human IL-31 (hIL-31) directly interacts with IL-31RA and OSMRβ, independently, but the binding ability of hIL-31 to IL-31RA is stronger than to OSMRβ. In different to its human ortholog, feline IL-31 (fIL-31) has a higher binding affinity for feline OSMRβ. However, the binding pattern of canine IL-31 to its receptors remains to be elucidated. In this study, we purified the recombinant canine IL-31 (rcIL-31) protein and revealed its secondary structure to be mainly composed of alpha-helices. Moreover, in vitro studies show that rcIL-31 has the ability to induce the phosphorylation of signal transducer activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) and STAT5 in DH-82 cells. In the following, the binding efficacies of bioactive rcIL-31 for its individual receptor components have been measured using a flow cytometry assay. The result demonstrates that correctly refolded rcIL-31 binds independently with cIL-31RA and cOSMRβ which were expressed on the cell surface. Of note, rcIL-31 has a greater than tenfold higher affinity to OSMRβ than to IL-31RA. Additionally, we demonstrated that D1-D4, especially D4 of cOSMRβ, is crucial for its binding to cIL-31. Furthermore, this study proved that rcIL-31 has a high binding affinity to the soluble cOSMRβ with a KD value of 3.59 × 10-8 M. The results presented in the current study will have a significant implication in the development of drugs or antibodies against diseases induced by cIL-31 signaling.

Biologics and oral small-molecule inhibitors for treatment of pediatric atopic dermatitis: Opportunities and challenges

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a complex disease characterized by recurrent eczematous lesions and refractory pruritus that drastically impairs quality of life. Due to the chronic and relapsing course, patients are easily trapped in the debilitating condition. Classical therapies show limitations, especially for patients with moderate-to-severe phenotypes. Advanced new insights in targeted therapies exhibit great application prospects which were reinforced by the more profound understanding of the disease pathogenesis. However, the sustained efficiency, biosafety, and long-term benefits still remain in further exploration. This review summarizes recent clinical studies on oral small-molecule inhibitors and biological agents for pediatric AD patients, which provides the latest frontiers to clinicians.

Anti-inflammatory and biologic drugs for atopic dermatitis: a therapeutic approach in children and adolescents

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a heterogeneous pathogenesis correlated with dysregulation of the immune system and a prevalence of the T2-mediated immune pathway. Recent understanding of the pathogenesis of AD has allowed the development of new drugs targeting different mechanisms and cytokines that have changed the treatment approach. The aim of this review is to update knowledge on the standard of care and recent advancements in the control of skin inflammation. In light of recent guidelines, we report on the clinical efficacy of novel treatments, with special attention to situations where biologics and small molecules are involved.

Basic mechanisms of itch

Pruritus (or itch) is an unpleasant sensation leading to a desire to scratch. In the epidermis, there are selective C or Aδ epidermal nerve endings that are pruriceptors. At their other ends, peripheral neurons form synapses with spinal neurons and interneurons. Many areas in the central nervous system are involved in itch processing. Although itch does not occur solely because of parasitic, allergic, or immunologic diseases, it is usually the consequence of neuroimmune interactions. Histamine is involved in a minority of itchy conditions, and many other mediators play a role: cytokines (eg, IL-4, IL-13, IL-31, IL-33, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin), neurotransmitters (eg, substance P, calcitonin gene-related peptide, vasoactive intestinal peptide, neuropeptide Y, NBNP, endothelin 1, and gastrin-releasing peptide), and neurotrophins (eg, nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Moreover, ion channels such as voltage-gated sodium channels, transient receptor potential vanilloid 1, transient receptor ankyrin, and transient receptor potential cation channel subfamily M (melastatin) member 8 play a crucial role. The main markers of nonhistaminergic pruriceptors are PAR-2 and MrgprX2. A notable phenomenon is the sensitization to pruritus, in which regardless of the initial cause of pruritus, there is an increased responsiveness of peripheral and central pruriceptive neurons to their normal or subthreshold afferent input in the context of chronic itch.

Nemolizumab Improves Patient-Reported Symptoms of Atopic Dermatitis with Pruritus: Post Hoc Analysis of a Japanese Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD), with its signs and symptoms of pruritus, dryness, and erythema, severely reduces the quality of life (QOL) of affected patients. We investigated the impact of nemolizumab 60 mg on QOL in Japanese patients aged ≥ 13 years with AD and inadequately controlled moderate-to-severe pruritus, using data derived from patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures.

METHODS

PROs were the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Atopic Dermatitis questionnaire (WPAI-AD). Correlations between PRO scores and symptom severity, assessed by the pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) and the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), were explored.

RESULTS

The mean percent change (standard error) from baseline in the pruritus VAS and EASI scores at week 16 was, respectively, -45.6% (2.7) and -46.0% (3.2) in the nemolizumab group, and -24.1% (3.7) and -33.2% (4.9) in the placebo group. By week 16, significantly more patients in the nemolizumab group versus the placebo group had an ISI score of 0 for difficulty falling asleep (41.6% versus 13.1%, nominal p < 0.01) or difficulty staying asleep (45.4% versus 10.9%; nominal p < 0.01). Similarly, more nemolizumab- than placebo-treated patients had a DLQI score of 0 for interference with shopping, or home/garden activities (45.2% versus 18.6%, nominal p < 0.01), and 0 days per week of nighttime sleep disturbance (50.8% versus 16.9%, nominal p < 0.01) or bleeding skin (43.4% versus 7.5%, nominal p < 0.01) measured by POEM at week 16. Based on WPAI-AD scores, long-term administration of nemolizumab also improved the ability to conduct work activities.

CONCLUSIONS

Subcutaneous administration of nemolizumab ameliorated pruritus and skin signs, and thereby produced improvement in patient QOL across multiple PRO measures, including sleep, interpersonal relationships, and the ability to conduct social or work activities.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

JapicCTI-173740 (registered 20 October 2017).

Clinically meaningful improvements in cutaneous lesions and quality of life measures in patients with atopic dermatitis with greater pruritus reductions after treatment with 60 mg nemolizumab subcutaneously every 4 weeks: Subgroup analysis from a phase 3, randomized, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Data from the Japanese phase 3 Nemolizumab-JP01 study (JapicCTI-173740) found that nemolizumab in combination with topical treatments reduced pruritus associated with atopic dermatitis inadequately controlled with current therapies.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis examined associations between improvements in pruritus (visual analog scale [VAS]) and eczema (Eczema Area and Severity Index [EASI]), and achievement of other clinically relevant endpoints including the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM).

RESULTS

Pruritus VAS responders (≥50% improvement from baseline to week 16) showed greater improvements from baseline in these additional endpoints as early as week 1, compared with non-responders. Responders also had EASI improvement, and more than 80% achieved an ISI score ≤7, or had improvement in the DLQI or POEM. The percent change from baseline in VAS and EASI scores at week 16 was in favor of nemolizumab in all subgroups based on baseline characteristics. No specific factor affecting treatment response to nemolizumab was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post-hoc analysis, nemolizumab-treated patients who had greater pruritus reductions also showed improvements in other eczema symptoms; pruritus alleviation appeared to be responsible for the improvements in eczema, sleep and daily life.

Blockage of the IL-31 Pathway as a Potential Target Therapy for Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD), a pruritic, inflammatory chronic disease with multifactorial pathogenesis, has been a therapeutic challenge. Novel target treatments aim to reduce not only the immunologic dysfunction and microbiome dysbiosis but also the recovery of the damaged skin barrier. The current review focuses on the interleukin 31 (IL-31) pathway and AD and offers an overview of the current clinical studies with monoclonal antibodies blocking this cascade. Pruritus, the key symptom of AD, has substantial participation of the IL-31 complex and activation of relevant signaling pathways. Epidermal keratinocytes, inflammatory cells, and cutaneous peripheral nerves express the interleukin-31 receptor α-chain (IL-31RA), upregulated by Staphylococcus aureus toxins or Th2 cytokines involved in AD. Nemolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that antagonizes IL-31RA, inhibiting the IL-31 cascade and therefore contributing to reducing the pruritus and inflammation and recovering the damaged skin barrier in AD patients. Phases 2 and 3 clinical trials with nemolizumab in AD show a suitable safety profile, with a fast, efficient, and sustained reduction of pruritus and severity scores, especially when associated with topical treatment. Deciphering the full interplay of the IL-31 pathway and AD may expand the potential of nemolizumab as a targeted therapy for AD and other pruritic conditions.

Neural Regulation of Innate Immunity in Inflammatory Skin Diseases

As the largest barrier organ of the body, the skin is highly innervated by peripheral sensory neurons. The major function of these sensory neurons is to transmit sensations of temperature, pain, and itch to elicit protective responses. Inflammatory skin diseases are triggered by the aberrant activation of immune responses. Recently, increasing evidence has shown that the skin peripheral nervous system also acts as a regulator of immune responses, particularly innate immunity, in various skin inflammatory processes. Meanwhile, immune cells in the skin can express receptors that respond to neuropeptides/neurotransmitters, leading to crosstalk between the immune system and nervous system. Herein, we highlight recent advances of such bidirectional neuroimmune interactions in certain inflammatory skin conditions.

The evolving landscape of biologic therapies for atopic dermatitis: Present and future perspective

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common, chronic inflammatory skin diseases with a significant physical, emotional and socioeconomic burden. In recent years the understanding of AD pathogenesis has expanded from the Th2-centred perspective, with the recognition of the involvement of other immune axes. In different AD endotypes, influenced by environment, genetics and race, transcriptomic profiles have identified differing contributions of multiple immune axes such as, Th17, Th22 and Th1. The enriched pathogenic model of AD has catalysed the development of numerous biologic therapies targeting a range of key molecules implicated in disease progression. Currently, dupilumab and tralokinumab, which both target the Th2 pathway, are the only approved biologic therapies for AD in the United States and Europe. New biologic therapies in development, however, target different Th2-pathway molecules along with cytokines in other immune axes, including Th17 and Th22, offering promise for varied treatments for this heterogeneous disease. As the biologic pipeline advances, the integration into clinical practice and approval of these experimental biologics may provide more effective, tailored therapeutic solutions and illuminate on the pathologic processes of AD across a broader, more diverse patient population.

Insights into atopic dermatitis pathogenesis lead to newly approved systemic therapies

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin disease characterized by scaly, oozing skin and itch. In moderate-to-severe AD, treatment options have been historically very limited and off-label use has been a common method for disease management. For decades, ciclosporin A was the only systemic immunosuppressive drug approved in most European countries to address this major unmet medical need. However, increased understanding of the pathophysiology of AD has led to a revolution in the treatment of this potentially debilitating disease. Following the approval of the first biological therapy for AD in 2017, there has been a rapid expansion of compounds under development and four additional systemic therapies have been approved in Europe and the USA within the past 3 years alone. In this review, we underscore how key breakthroughs have transformed the therapeutic landscape of AD, leading to a major expansion of type 2 immunity-targeted biological therapies, exploration of neuroimmune modulatory agents, and interest in Janus kinase inhibition.

Involvement of Atopic Dermatitis in the Development of Systemic Inflammatory Diseases

The skin is recognized as a peripheral lymphoid organ that plays an essential defensive action against external environmental stimuli. However, continuous stimulation of these factors causes chronic inflammation at the local site and occasionally causes tissue damage. Chronic inflammation is recognized as a trigger for systemic organ inflammation. Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that is influenced by various external environmental factors, such as dry conditions, chemical exposure, and microorganisms. The pathogenesis of AD involves various Th2 and proinflammatory cytokines. Recently updated studies have shown that atopic skin-derived cytokines influence systemic organ function and oncogenesis. In this review, we focus on AD’s influence on the development of systemic inflammatory diseases and malignancies.

Immunotherapy in atopic dermatitis

In the past decade, the emergence of biologics targeting human cytokine networks has advanced a new era in atopic dermatitis therapy. Dupilumab, in particular, the most widely studied and used IL-4/IL-13 inhibitor, has been considered a milestone in the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. In addition to the IL-4 and IL-13 pathways, many other cytokines and receptors have been newly targeted as therapeutic options. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the approved and tested biologics and JAK inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, including their advantages and limitations.

Nemolizumab: First Approval

Nemolizumab is a subcutaneously administered humanized anti-interleukin-31 (IL-31) receptor A (IL-31RA) monoclonal antibody that is being developed by Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd, Maruho Co. Ltd and Galderma Pharma S.A. for the treatment of skin diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), AD associated pruritus (ADaP), prurigo nodularis (PN), chronic kidney disease associated pruritus (CKDaP) and systemic sclerosis (SSc). IL-31 is a neuroimmune cytokine that induces itch, inflammation, keratinocyte differentiation and fibroblast activation in chronic pruritic skin diseases. Nemolizumab (Mitchga^® Syringes) was approved in Japan on 28 March 2022 for use in adults and children over the age of 13 years for the treatment of itch associated with AD (only when existing treatment is insufficiently effective). This article summarizes the milestones in the development of nemolizumab leading to this first approval.

IL-31: State of the Art for an Inflammation-Oriented Interleukin

Interleukin 31 belongs to the IL-6 superfamily, and it is an itch mediator already studied in several diseases, comprising atopic dermatitis, allergic pathologies, and onco-hematological conditions. This research aims to assess the role of this cytokine in the pathogenesis of these conditions and its potential therapeutic role. The research has been conducted on articles, excluding reviews and meta-analysis, both on animals and humans. The results showed that IL-31 plays a crucial role in the pathogenesis of systemic skin manifestations, prognosis, and itch severity. Traditional therapies target this interleukin indirectly, but monoclonal antibodies (Mab) directed against it have shown efficacy and safety profiles comparable with biological drugs that are already available. Future perspectives could include the development of new antibodies against IL-31 both for humans and animals, thus adding a new approach to the therapy, which often has proven to be prolonged and specific for each patient.

Annoying Psoriasis and Atopic Dermatitis: A Narrative Review

Skin is an important organ that mainly functions as a barrier. Skin diseases can damage a person's self-confidence and reduce their willingness to socialize, as well as their social behavior and willingness. When the skin appearance is abnormal, in addition to affecting the quality of life, it often leads to personal, social, and psychological dysfunction and even induces depression. Psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are common chronic skin diseases. Their prevalence in the world is 3-10%, and there is an increasing trend year by year. These congenital or acquired factors cause the dysfunction of the immune system and then destroy the barrier function of the skin. Because these patients are flooded with a variety of inflammatory mediators, this causes skin cells to be in chronic inflammation. Therefore, psoriasis and atopic dermatitis are also considered systemic chronic inflammatory diseases. In the healthcare systems of developed countries, it is unavoidable to spend high costs to relieve symptoms of psoriasis and atopic dermatitis patients, because psoriasis and atopic dermatitis have a great influence on individuals and society. Giving a lot of attention and developing effective treatment methods are the topics that the medical community must work on together. Therefore, we used a narrative review manuscript to discuss pathogenesis, clinical classification, incidence, and treatment options, including topical medication, systemic therapeutics, immunosuppressive medication for psoriasis, and atopic dermatitis, as well as also comparing the differences between these two diseases. We look forward to providing readers with comprehensive information on psoriasis and atopic dermatitis through this review article.

Neuro-immune communication regulating pruritus in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic-relapsing inflammatory skin disease with significant disease burden. Genetic and environmental trigger factors contribute to AD, activating two of our largest organs, the nervous and immune system. Dysregulation of neuro-immune circuits plays a key role in the pathophysiology of AD causing inflammation, pruritus, pain, and barrier dysfunction. Sensory nerves can be activated by environmental or endogenous trigger factors transmitting itch stimuli to the brain. Upon stimulation, sensory nerve endings also release neuromediators into the skin contributing again to inflammation, barrier dysfunction and itch. Additionally, dysfunctional peripheral and central neuronal structures contribute to neuroinflammation, sensitization, nerve elongation, neuropathic itch, thus chronification and therapy-resistance. Consequently, neuro-immune circuits in skin and central nervous system may be targets to treat pruritus in AD. Cytokines, chemokines, proteases, lipids, opioids, ions excite/sensitize sensory nerve endings not only induce itch but further aggravate/perpetuate inflammation, skin barrier disruption, and pruritus. Thus, targeted therapies for neuro-immune circuits as well as pathway inhibitors (e.g., kinase inhibitors) may be beneficial to control pruritus in AD either in systemic and/or topical form. Understanding neuro-immune circuits and neuronal signaling will optimize our approach to control all pathological mechanisms in AD, inflammation, barrier dysfunction and pruritus.

Mechanistic Insights into the Anti-Pruritic Effects of Lebrikizumab, an Anti-IL-13 Monoclonal Antibody

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease with persistent and severe itch among its hallmark features. Significant increases in type 2 cytokines (i.e., IL-4, IL-13, IL-31) have been documented in acute AD lesions and lead to multi-faceted downstream effects, including inflammation, epidermal barrier dysfunction, and itch.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of preclinical studies reported here was to test direct effects of IL-13 and the anti-IL-13 monoclonal antibody, lebrikizumab, in a human dorsal root ganglion (hDRG) model in itch amplification, neuronal excitability, and transcriptional downstream targets.

METHODS

Neuroactive effects were assessed via live cell calcium imaging, electric field stimulation, and RNA sequencing of hDRGs stimulated with IL-13 alone or in combination with lebrikizumab.

RESULTS

These preclinical findings suggest that IL-13 has a direct enhancer role in multiple itch and neuroactive pathways, as well as transcriptional downstream effects, and provide key insights into the mechanistic basis for lebrikizumab's anti-itch effects.

CONCLUSION

IL-13 is a potent enhancer of neuronal responses to different itch stimuli, consistent with the neuro-immune axis contributing to chronic itch-associated inflammatory skin disease, and that blockade of this cytokine pathway may provide a therapeutic approach.

Biological medication in atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with intense itch/pruritus and skin lesions. Several modalities of treatment including topical therapy, systemic agents, and biologics are available for the treatment of disease. Despite this, management poses challenge due to chronic nature and recurrent episodes in many patients. Biologics represent an important option of treatment for patients who do not respond to the traditional treatment.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, we focused on efficacy and safety of biologics in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Other therapies are out of the scope of this review. Articles from PubMed and Google scholar and cross references of retrieved articles were used to write the narrative review.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologics play an important role in the treatment of atopic dermatitis. Every biologic has its own place in the treatment considering pharmacological profile, efficacy, and safety. Several biologics have been studied in the treatment of moderate-to-severe cases who failed to provide adequate response to traditional treatment. Dupilumab, is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Tralokinumab and nemolizumab have shown promising results in patients with atopic dermatitis.

Consensus Update for Systemic Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Background

In 2015, the Korean Atopic Dermatitis Association (KADA) working group published consensus guidelines for treating atopic dermatitis (AD).

Objective

We aimed to provide updated consensus recommendations for systemic treatment of AD in South Korea based on recent evidence and experience.

Methods

We compiled a database of references from relevant systematic reviews and guidelines on the systemic management of AD. Evidence for each statement was graded and classified based on thestrength of the recommendation. Forty-two council members from the KADA participated in three rounds of voting to establish a consensus on expert recommendations.

Results

We do not recommend long-term treatment with systemic steroids forpatients with moderate-to-severe AD due to the risk of adverse effects. We recommend treatment with cyclosporine or dupilumab and selective treatment with methotrexate or azathioprine for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We suggest treatment with antihistamines as an option for alleviating clinical symptoms of AD. We recommend selective treatment with narrowband ultraviolet B for patients with chronic moderate-to-severe AD. We do not recommend treatment with oral antibiotics for patients with moderate-to-severe AD but who have no signs of infection. We did not reach a consensus on recommendations for treatment with allergen-specific immunotherapy, probiotics, evening primrose oil, orvitamin D for patients with moderate-to-severe AD. We also recommend educational interventions and counselling for patients with AD and caregivers to improve the treatment success rate.

Conclusion

We look forward to implementing a new and updated consensus of systemic therapy in controlling patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

A New Era with the Development of Cytokine-Based Therapy for Pruritus

Pruritus is a common dermatological condition and negatively impacts QOL. Persistent pruritus and excessive scratching behavior can lead to the itch-scratch cycle that exacerbates inflammatory skin diseases. Conventional antipruritic drugs, such as antihistamines, corticosteroids, or anticonvulsants, are sometimes insufficient. Recently, however, molecularly targeted drugs, such as IL-31 or IL-4 receptor-targeting antibodies, have become available or are under clinical trials, dramatically changing the clinical situation. In fact, some of these drugs can improve pruritus without the need for topical steroids. Taken together, these observations point to the importance of cytokine-mediated pruritus, further understanding of which may guide improved therapies.

Baricitinib: The First Jak Inhibitor Approved in Europe for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Adult Patients

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is an inflammatory skin disease characterized by a wide phenotypic variety with a very complex pathophysiological mechanism that has led to the identification of new therapeutic targets, such as janus kinasis (JAK) inhibitors. Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of baricitinib, the first JAK 1 and 2 inhibitor approved in Europe for the treatment of adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD. Methods: The efficacy and safety data available from the Phase III studies belonging to the BREEZE AD program are presented. Results: Results from BREEZE-AD1, AD2, AD4, and AD7 showed the efficacy of Baricitib 4 mg, administered orally, once daily, as monotherapy or in combination with topical corticosteroid (TCS), with a significant proportion of patients achieving primary endpoints IGA 0-1 (16.4% vs. 4.8%; 13.8% vs. 4.5%; 21.7% vs. 9.7%; 30.6% vs. 14.7%) and EASI75 (24.8% vs. 8.8%; 21.1% vs. 6.1%; 31.5% vs. 17.2%; 47.7% vs. 22.9%) at week 16 (W16) compared to placebo, respectively. Baricitinib showed rapid improvement in symptoms, starting from week 1 of treatment at 4 mg dosage, with a good safety profile. Nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infections (URIs), creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevations, and headache were the most frequently reported adverse events. Conclusions: Following the efficacy and safety data on W 16 from the phase III BREEZE-AD studies, baricitinib has recently been approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in adult patients. Further data to evaluate long-term efficacy and safety in a real-life setting are needed.

Nemolizumab plus topical agents in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and moderate-to-severe pruritus provide improvement in pruritus and signs of AD for up to 68 weeks: results from two phase III, long-term studies

Background

Interleukin (IL)‐31 affects the inflammatory response, is involved in epidermal barrier disruption in atopic dermatitis (AD) and plays a key role in pruritus. Nemolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against IL‐31 receptor A, reduced pruritus in patients with AD after a 16‐week administration period.

Objectives

To examine the long‐term effectiveness and safety of nemolizumab in patients aged ≥ 13 years with AD and inadequately controlled moderate‐to‐severe pruritus.

Methods

In two long‐term phase III studies, nemolizumab 60 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) was administered subcutaneously, concomitantly with topical treatments. Study‐JP01 patients received double‐blind nemolizumab or placebo for 16 weeks, and then entered a 52‐week extension period in which all patients received nemolizumab (nemolizumab/nemolizumab and placebo/nemolizumab groups). Study‐JP02 patients received nemolizumab for 52 weeks. Both studies included an 8‐week follow‐up period.

Results

Study‐JP01 nemolizumab/nemolizumab and placebo/nemolizumab, and Study‐JP02 nemolizumab groups comprised 143, 72 and 88 patients, respectively. In the nemolizumab/nemolizumab group, there were clinically meaningful improvements from the start of treatment to week 68 in the pruritus visual analogue scale (66% decrease) and Eczema Area and Severity Index (78% decrease). Quality of life (QoL) indicators improved after the first nemolizumab dose; improvements were maintained during the follow‐up period. The long‐term safety profile was consistent with previous studies, with no unexpected late‐onset adverse events.

Conclusions

Nemolizumab 60 mg Q4W with concomitant topical treatments in patients with AD and inadequately controlled moderate‐to‐severe pruritus produced a continuous improvement in pruritus, signs of AD, and QoL for up to 68 weeks, with a favourable safety profile.

New Insights and Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a complex, chronic inflammatory skin disorder with significant morbidity. It is often a frustrating condition for both children and parents due to chronic and relapsing course. There is now an increasing understanding of the disease pathogenesis resulting in discovery of much wanted newer therapeutics and targeted therapies after a long time. Whether these interventions will result in sustained benefits or long term cure remains to be seen.

Interleukin-31: The "itchy" cytokine in inflammation and therapy

The cytokine interleukin-31 has been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple atopic disorders such as atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinitis, and airway hyper-reactivity. In AD, IL-31 has been identified as one of the main "drivers" of its cardinal symptom, pruritus. Here, we summarize the mechanisms by which IL-31 modulates inflammatory and allergic diseases. T_H 2 cells play a central role in AD and release high levels of T_H 2-associated cytokines including IL-31, thereby mediating inflammatory responses, initiating immunoregulatory circuits, stimulating itch, and neuronal outgrowth through activation of the heterodimeric receptor IL-31 receptor A (IL31RA)/Oncostatin M receptor (OSMRβ). IL31RA expression is found on human and murine dorsal root ganglia neurons, epithelial cells including keratinocytes and various innate immune cells. IL-31 is a critical cytokine involved in neuroimmune communication, which opens new avenues for cytokine modulation in neuroinflammatory diseases including AD/pruritus, as validated by recent clinical trials using an anti-IL-31 antibody. Accordingly, inhibition of IL-31-downstream signaling may be a beneficial approach for various inflammatory diseases including prurigo. However, as to whether downstream JAK inhibitors directly block IL-31-mediated-signaling needs to be clarified. Targeting the IL-31/IL31RA/OSMRβ axis appears to be a promising approach for inflammatory, neuroinflammatory, and pruritic disorders in the future.

High-dimensional analysis defines multicytokine T-cell subsets and supports a role for IL-21 in atopic dermatitis

BACKGROUND

Flow cytometry is a well-accepted approach for immune profiling; however, its value is restricted by the limited number of markers that can be analyzed simultaneously. Mass cytometry/CyTOF offers broad-scale immune characterization integrating large number of parameters. While partial blood phenotyping was reported in atopic dermatitis (AD), patients' comprehensive profiling, critical for leveraging new targeted treatments, is not available. IL-21 may be involved in inflammatory skin diseases but its role in AD is not well established.

METHODS

We studied T-cell polarization in the blood of 20 moderate-to-severe AD and 15 controls. Using CyTOF and an unsupervised analysis, we measured the frequencies and mean metal intensities of activated polar CD4⁺ /CD8⁺ T-cell subsets. Immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and qRT-PCR were used to analyze skin samples.

RESULTS

Examining 24 surface, intracellular markers, and transcription factors, we identified six CD4⁺ and five CD8⁺ T-cell metaclusters. A CD4⁺ skin-homing IL-13⁺ monocytokine and a novel IL-13⁺ IL-21⁺ multicytokine metaclusters were increased in AD vs. controls (p < .01). While IL-13 signature characterized both clusters, levels were significantly higher in the IL-21⁺ group. Both clusters correlated with AD severity (r = 0.49, p = .029). Manual gating corroborated these results and identified additional multicytokine subsets in AD. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, validated by mRNA expression, displayed significantly increasedIL-21 counts and colocalization with IL-13/IL-4R in AD skin.

CONCLUSION

A multicytokine signature characterizes moderate-to-severe AD, possibly explaining partial therapeutic responses to one cytokine targeting, particularly in severe patients. Prominent IL-21 signature in blood and skin hints for a potential pathogenic role of IL-21 in AD.

From Emollients to Biologicals: Targeting Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease and significantly impacts patients' lives, particularly in its severe forms. AD clinical presentation varies over the course of the disease, throughout different age groups, and across ethnicities. AD is characterized by a spectrum of clinical phenotypes as well as endotypes. Starting from the current description of AD pathogenesis, this review explores the rationale of approved AD therapies from emollients to biologicals and introduces novel promising drugs.

A new era has begun: Treatment of atopic dermatitis with biologics

The era of biologics for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) began in 2017 with the approval of dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that binds to the α-subunit of the interleukin IL-4 receptor. Until then, only conventional immunosuppressants were available for systemic treatment, of which only cyclosporine is approved for the treatment of severe AD. In the meantime, the therapeutic landscape of AD has been changing rapidly, and additional biologics have been developed which target IL-13, the IL-31 receptor, OX40, and OX40L, among others. Many of these substances have already shown promising results in phase 1, 2, and in some cases also phase 3 trials. In June 2021, tralokinumab, an IL-13 antibody, has been approved in Europe for the treatment of moderate-to-severe AD in adults. In addition to antibody-based therapies, “small molecules” that, e.g., inhibit Janus kinases enrich the armamentarium of systemic AD therapies. With all these agents, not only will many more targeted therapies become available, but also will the complex and heterogeneous pathophysiological processes of this disease be better understood.

Systematic Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis

Background: Atopic dermatitis is a chronic, relapsing and remitting disease that can be difficult to treat despite a recently approved biologic therapy targeting IL-4/IL-13 receptor. Oral janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi) represent a novel therapeutic class of targeted therapy to treat moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Objective: To review the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral JAKi in the treatment of AD. Methods: A PRISMA systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE (Ovid), and PubMed databases for studies assessing the efficacy, safety, and/or pharmacokinetic properties of oral forms of JAKi in the treatment of AD in pediatric or adult populations from inception to June 2021. Results: 496 papers were reviewed. Of 28 articles that underwent full text screening, 11 met our inclusion criteria for final qualitative review. Four studies examined abrocitinib; three studies examined baricitinib; three examined upadacitinib and one examined gusacitinib (ASN002). Significant clinical efficacy and a reassuring safety profile was reported for all JAKi agents reviewed. Rapid symptom control was reported for abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib. Limitations: Given the relatively limited evidence for each JAKi and the differences in patient eligibility criteria between studies, the data was not deemed suitable for a meta-analysis at this time. Conclusion: Given their ability to achieve rapid symptom control with a reassuring safety profile, we recommend considering the use of JAKi as a reliable systemic treatment option for adult patients with moderate-to-severe AD, who are unresponsive to topical or skin directed treatments.

Atopic dermatitis: an expanding therapeutic pipeline for a complex disease

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathophysiology that underlies a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes. AD remains challenging to treat owing to the limited response to available therapies. However, recent advances in understanding of disease mechanisms have led to the discovery of novel potential therapeutic targets and drug candidates. In addition to regulatory approval for the IL-4Ra inhibitor dupilumab, the anti-IL-13 inhibitor tralokinumab and the JAK1/2 inhibitor baricitinib in Europe, there are now more than 70 new compounds in development. This Review assesses the various strategies and novel agents currently being investigated for AD and highlights the potential for a precision medicine approach to enable prevention and more effective long-term control of this complex disease.

Recent advances in understanding of the complex phenotype and mechanisms underlying atopic dermatitis (AD) have revealed multiple new potential targets for pharmacological intervention. Here, Bieber reviews therapeutic strategies and assesses the expanding pipeline for the therapy of AD, highlighting the potential for a precision medicine approach to the management of this complex disorder.