Outcomes of patients with end-stage kidney disease hospitalized with COVID-19

Cellular and humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine BNT162b2 in adults with Chronic Kidney Disease G4/5

The mRNA vaccines have proven to be very effective in preventing severe disease and death from SARS-CoV-2 in the general population. However, in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in dialysis or with kidney transplants (KT) the vaccine responses vary, with severe breakthrough infections as a consequence. In this intervention study we investigated the magnitude and quality of the responses to mRNA vaccination administered prior to kidney replacement therapy (KRT). Twenty patients with CKD G4/5 and nine healthy controls were followed for 12 months after receiving two doses of BNT162b2 four weeks apart and a booster dose after 3-6 months. Induction of anti-Spike and anti-RBD IgG in plasma followed the same kinetics in CKD patients and controls, with a trend towards higher titers in controls. In accordance, there was no differences in the establishment of Spike-specific memory B-cells between groups. In contrast, the CKD patients showed lower levels of anti-Spike IgG in saliva and Spike-specific CD8+ T-cells in blood, possibly influencing the capacity of viral clearance which can contribute to an elevated risk of severe breakthrough infections. In conclusion, we found that CKD patients, despite having a reduced mucosal and cytotoxic immunity to BNT162b2, demonstrated a serological response in plasma similar to healthy controls. This suggests that immunization prior to RRT is efficient and motivated. (EudraCT-nr 2021-000988-68).

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-Positive Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Study from India

Background

This study describes to the clinical features and outcomes of patients on maintenance hemodialysis infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) delta variant.

Materials and Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of case records of patients on maintenance hemodialysis admitted for management of coronavirus disease (COVID) infection. Our teaching hospital, being a state-designated referral center, had COVID admissions from March 2020 till December 2020. Epidemiological and clinical data were collected and analyzed. Factors influencing survival and the survival curve analysis were assessed.

Results

Of a total of 21,228 admissions during the period, 400 patients were referred for nephrology services. Of the 400 referrals, 226 were maintenance hemodialysis patients. Mean age of the group was 50 years, and fever was the most common presenting symptom. On multivariate analysis, factors influencing mortality were found to be older age, presence of diabetes, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypoxemia, need for support, and a higher qSOFA score. The probability of survival of dialysis patients at the end of 19 days was 60%.

Conclusion

During the pandemic by SARS-CoV-2 delta variant, majority of the nephrology referrals were for maintenance hemodialysis patients. Mortality was 38% in the study group, and the factors associated with mortality with a significant hazard ratio were older age and diabetes.

Incorporation of Chest Computed Tomography Quantification to Predict Outcomes for Patients on Hemodialysis with COVID-19

Introduction

Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis are vulnerable to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), exhibiting a high risk of hospitalization and mortality. Thus, early identification and intervention are important to prevent disease progression in these patients.

Methods

This was a two-center retrospective observational study of patients on hemodialysis diagnosed with COVID-19 at the Lingang and Xuhui campuses of Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital. Patients were randomized into the training (130) and validation cohorts (54), while 59 additional patients served as an independent external validation cohort. Artificial intelligence-based parameters of chest computed tomography (CT) were quantified, and a nomogram for patient outcomes at 14 and 28 days was created by screening quantitative CT measures, clinical data, and laboratory examination items, using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models.

Results

The median dialysis duration was 48 (interquartile range, 24-96) months. Age, diabetes mellitus, serum phosphorus level, lymphocyte count, and chest CT score were identified as independent prognostic indicators and included in the nomogram. The concordance index values were 0.865, 0.914, and 0.885 in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration plots showed good agreement between the expected and actual outcomes.

Conclusion

This is the first study in which a reliable nomogram was developed to predict short-term outcomes and survival probabilities in patients with COVID-19 on hemodialysis. This model may be helpful to clinicians in treating COVID-19, managing serum phosphorus, and adjusting the dialysis strategies for these vulnerable patients to prevent disease progression in the context of COVID-19 and continuous emergence of novel viruses.

Clinical Characteristics of Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19 and Their Association With the Progression to Critical Illness and Death: A Single-Center Retrospective Study From Northwestern Mexico

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to associate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 with the progression to critical illness and death in northwestern Mexico.

METHODS

From March to October 2020, we collected the demographic and clinical characteristics of 464 hospitalized patients from northwestern Mexico.

RESULTS

Sixty-four percent (295/464) of the patients became critically ill. Age, occupation, steroid and antibiotic use at previous hospitalization, and underlying diseases (hypertension, obesity, and chronic kidney disease) were associated with critical illness or death (p: < 0.05). No symptoms were associated with critical illness. However, the parameters such as the heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and diastolic pressure and the laboratory parameters such as the glucose, creatinine, white line cells, hemoglobin, D-dimer, and C-reactive protein, among others, were associated with critical illness (p: < 0.05). Finally, advanced age, previous hospital treatment, and the presence of one or more underlying diseases were associated with critical illness and death (p: < 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Several epidemiological (e.g., age and occupation) and clinical factors (e.g., previous treatment, underlying diseases, and vital signs and laboratory parameters) were associated with critical illness and death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. These data provide us with possible markers to avoid critical illness or death from COVID-19 in our region.

Comparison of homologous and heterologous inactivated and mRNA vaccination programme against SARS-CoV-2 in dialysis patients

AIM

To evaluate the vaccine response and the effect of the booster dose on COVID-19 positivity in haemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients who received and did not receive BNT162b2 as a booster dose after two doses of CoronaVac.

METHODS

The study included 80 PD and 163 HD patients, who had been administered two doses of the CoronaVac. Antibody levels were measured on Days 42 and 90 after the first dose. Measurements were repeated on Day 181 after the first dose in the patients that received two vaccine doses and on Day 28 after the third dose in those that also received the booster dose. Antibody levels below 50 AU/mL were considered negative.

RESULTS

The seropositivity rate was similar in the HD and PD group on Days 42 and 90 (p = 0.212 and 0.720). All patients were seropositive in the booster group. The antibody level was lower in the patients that received CoronaVac as the booster compared to those administered BNT162b2 in HD and PD groups (p < 0.001 and 0.002). COVID-19 positivity was detected in 11 patients (7 = had not received the booster dose, 4 = had received third dose of CoronaVac). The multivariate analysis revealed that as age increased, COVID-19 positivity also increased (OR: 1.080, 95% CI: 1.017 - 1.146, p = 0.012), while booster dose administration decreased this positivity (OR: 0.113, 95% CI: 0.028 - 0.457, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Our results may indicate the need for additional vaccination doses in patients with HD and PD. Our findings indicate a higher antibody response in dialysis patients with heterologous BNT162b2 as a booster dose after two doses of CoronaVac compared to homologous CoronaVac.

Impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes following percutaneous nephrolithotomy in older persons: evidence from the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample

To evaluate the impact of frailty on perioperative outcomes of older patients undergoing PCNL, utilizing the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. Data of hospitalized patients ≥ 60 years who received PCNL were extracted from the 2010 to 2020 NIS database, and included demographics, clinical, and hospital-related information. Patients were assigned to low (< 5), medium (5-15), and high frailty risk (> 15) groups based on the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS). Associations between frailty risk and perioperative outcomes including total hospital cost were determined using population-weighted linear and logistic regression analyses. Data of 30,829 hospitalized patients were analyzed (mean age 72.5 years; 55% male; 78% white). Multivariable analyses revealed that compared to low frailty risk, increased frailty risk was significantly associated with elevated in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 10.70, 95% confidence interval (CI): 6.38-18.62), higher incidence of unfavorable discharge (aOR = 5.09, 95% CI: 4.43-5.86), prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS; aOR = 7.67, 95% CI: 6.38-9.22), increased transfusion risk (aOR = 8.05, 95% CI: 6.55-9.90), increased total hospital costs (adjusted Beta = 37.61, 95% CI: 36.39-38.83), and greater risk of complications (aOR = 8.52, 95% CI: 7.69-9.45). Frailty is a significant prognostic indicator of adverse perioperative outcomes in older patients undergoing PCNL, underscoring importance of recognizing and managing frailty in older patients.

Association of renal function with mortality among hospitalized patients treated with remdesivir for COVID-19

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Renal dysfunction is associated with poor outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In an effort to improve outcomes, intravenous remdesivir has been broadly used for the treatment of COVID-19 even in patients with low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Our study assessed the residual risk of outcomes of patients with low eGFR despite treatment with remdesivir for COVID-19, during a timeframe prior to the expanded label across all levels of renal function.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective, multi-site cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 treated with at least one dose of remdesivir between November 6, 2020, and November 5, 2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed to obtain patient characteristics, related laboratory data, and outcomes. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality by day 28. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate association between groups.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 3024 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 and treated with remdesivir. The median age was 67 [IQR 55, 77] years; 42.7% were women, and 88.6% were white. The median eGFR was 76.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [IQR 52.5, 95.2]; the majority (67.2%) of patients had an eGFR ≥ 60, while 9% had an eGFR <30. All-cause mortality by day 28 was 8.7%. All-cause mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with impaired renal function (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.63 for patients with eGFR 30-59; OR 1.46 for eGFR 15-29; OR 2.42 for eGFR <15 and OR 5.44 for patients on dialysis) compared to patients with eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m2.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower eGFR remains an independent risk factor for mortality in COVID-19 even in patients treated with remdesivir.

Quality of Life and Illness Acceptance among End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Patients on Hemodialysis: The Moderating Effect of Death Anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic

The purpose of the study was to examine the quality of life and illness acceptance among ESRD patients with the moderating effects of death anxiety. The cross-sectional design was incorporated. The sample was comprised of 240 participants. Individuals with ESRD on hemodialysis were approached above 20 years of age. A self-administered questionnaire was used for data collection. The results revealed that COVID-19 has a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and their illness acceptance. Covid-19 affected the general health of patients, their psychological health, as well as their social relationships. The results also confirmed that death anxiety negatively moderates the relationship between quality of life and illness acceptance among ESRD patients. This study will shed light on the need to provide appropriate psychosocial care as well as supportive therapies to people with end-stage renal disease who are experiencing mental distress during and after the COVID-19 outbreak.

Retrospective Analysis of Acute Kidney Injury in COVID-19 Infection: A Single-Center Study From Kerala

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. While primarily a respiratory illness, COVID-19 can lead to multi-organ involvement, including acute kidney injury (AKI). This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI in COVID-19 patients. Methods A single-center retrospective study involving 232 severe COVID-19 patients requiring ICU admission was analyzed. Patients were categorized into two groups based on renal involvement: group A (with AKI or worsening of pre-existing chronic kidney disease) and group B (without renal injury). Data on demographics, comorbidities, clinical presentation, inflammatory markers, management strategies, and outcomes were collected and analyzed. Results AKI or worsening of pre-existing chronic renal disease was noted in 50.87% of cases, while the remaining 49.13% had severe COVID-19 pneumonia without renal injury. The mean age of patients in group A (with renal involvement) was higher compared to group B (without renal injury), with a significant male predominance observed in group A. AKI occurred within a short duration of fever, and cough was not a significant symptom. Comorbidities such as diabetes, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease were common in both groups, with hypertension significantly associated with AKI. Other significant comorbidities as risk factors for kidney injury included chronic liver disease, coronary artery disease, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy. Elevated inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein (CRP), serum ferritin, and interleukin-6, were significantly associated with renal injury. There was no significant difference in the mortality rate between the two groups studied. Conclusion AKI or worsening of pre-existing kidney disease is a common event in severe COVID-19 infection. Patients, especially elderly males with comorbidities as mentioned, should be thoroughly monitored for worsening renal function, and steps like avoidance of nephrotoxic drugs and timely hemodynamic support may help avoid this dreaded complication to a certain extent and improve the prognosis in severe COVID-19 infection. Supportive care remains crucial in managing COVID-19 patients with renal involvement, emphasizing the need for the early detection and treatment of renal abnormalities. Long-term follow-up is essential to assess the impact of AKI on future kidney health.

18-month longitudinal SARS COV-2 neutralizing antibody dynamics in haemodialysis patients receiving heterologous 3-dose vaccination (AZD-1222- AZD-1222- BNT162b2) in a lower middle income setting

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease on haemodialysis (HD) were given priority COVID-19 vaccination due to increased disease risk. The immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in patients on HD was diminished compared to healthy individuals in 2-dose studies. This study aimed to evaluate seroconversion rate, neutralizing antibody (nAB) levels and longitudinal antibody dynamics to 3-dose heterologous vaccination against COVID-19 in a cohort of HD patients compared to healthy controls and assess patient factors associated with antibody levels.

METHODS

This study was a case-control longitudinal evaluation of nAB dynamics in 74 HD patients compared to 37 healthy controls in a low/middle income setting. Corresponding samples were obtained from the two cohorts at time-points (TP) 1-1-month post 2nd dose of AZD1222 vaccine, TP2- 4 months post 2nd dose, TP4- 2 weeks post 3rd dose with BNT162b2 vaccine, TP5-5 months post 3rd dose and TP6-12 months post 3rd dose. Additional data is available at TP0- pre 2nd dose and TP3- 6 months post 2nd dose in HC and HD cohorts respectively. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 nAB were detected using Genscript cPassTM pseudoviral neutralization kit. Demographic and clinical details were obtained using an interviewer administered questionnaire.

RESULTS

Cohorts were gender matched while mean age of the HD cohort was 54.1yrs (vs HCs mean age, 42.6yrs, p < 0.05). Percentage seroconverted and mean/median antibody level (MAB) in the HD cohort vs HCs at each sampling point were, TP1-83.7% vs 100% (p < 0.05), MAB-450 IU/ml vs 1940 IU/ml (p < 0.0001); TP2-71.4% vs 100%, (p < 0.001), MAB- 235 IU/ml vs 453 IU/ml, (p < 0.05); TP4-95.2% vs 100% (p > 0.05), MAB-1029 IU/ml vs 1538 IU/ml (p < 0.0001); TP5-100% vs 100%, MAB-1542 IU/ml vs 1741IU/ml (p > 0.05); TP6-100% vs 100%, MAB-1961 IU/ml vs 2911 IU/ml (p > 0.05). At TP2, patients aged < 60 years (p < 0.001) were associated with maintaining seropositivity compared to patients > 60 years.

CONCLUSION

Two dose vaccination of haemodialysis patients provided poor nAB levels which improved markedly following 3rd dose vaccination, the effect of which was long- lasting with high nAB levels in both patients and controls detectable at 1 year follow-up.

SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness and clinical outcomes in hemodialysis patients: the NHIS-COVID-19 cohort study in South Korea

Background

Patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) have a high risk of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and poor clinical outcomes. This study aimed to investigate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine effectiveness against infection and deaths in the South Korean population undergoing HD.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study to compare the incidence of COVID-19 and post-diagnosis mortality between patients who were either never vaccinated or fully or partially vaccinated. The Korean nationwide COVID-19 registry and the Korean National Health Insurance Service databases were used. Adult patients without a history of COVID-19 were included between October 8, 2020, and December 31, 2021. The study outcomes were COVID-19 diagnosis, severe clinical COVID-19-related events, and post-diagnosis death.

Results

Eighty-five thousand eighteen patients undergoing HD were included, of whom 69,601 were fully vaccinated, 2,213 were partially vaccinated and 13,204 were unvaccinated. Compared with the unvaccinated group, the risk of being diagnosed with COVID-19 in patients who were fully vaccinated decreased during the study period (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.147; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.135-0.159). There were 1,140 (1.3%) patients diagnosed with COVID-19. After diagnosis, fully vaccinated patients were significantly less likely to die than unvaccinated patients (aOR = 0.940; 95% CI = 0.901-0.980) and to experience severe clinical events (aOR = 0.952; 95% CI = 0.916-0.988).

Conclusion

Full vaccination against COVID-19 was associated with a reduced risk of both infection and severe clinical outcomes in the South Korean population undergoing HD. These findings support the use of vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 among patients undergoing HD.

Analysis of Risk Factors for Death in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Population: Data Analysis from a Large General Hospital in Anhui, China

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, clinical prevention, early diagnosis, and hematological monitoring were challenging areas. This study aims to compare risk factors and hematological and biochemical data in non-survivor group patients with COVID-19 versus survivor group patients. A total of 204 patients with COVID-19 were selected as research subjects from December 2022 to January 2023. We analyzed the age, sex, time from onset to admission, and laboratory test indicators upon admission. The differences between surviving and deceased patients and mortality-related risk factors were examined. Among the 204 patients, 168 survived, whereas 36 died during hospitalization. Significant differences were observed between the two groups with COVID-19 across various factors, including age (p < 0.0001), WBC count (p < 0.0001), RBC count (p < 0.05), neutrophils (p < 0.0001), lymphocytes (p < 0.05), mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) (p < 0.0001), RBC distribution width-standard deviation (RDW-SD) (p < 0.0001), RBC distribution width coefficient of variation (RDW-CV) (p < 0.0001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (p < 0.05), albumin (ALB) (p < 0.0001), creatinine (CR) (p < 0.0001), uric acid (UA) (p < 0.0001), blood urea nitrogen (BUN) (p < 0.0001), plasma thrombin time (TT) (p < 0.05), prothrombin time (PT) (p < 0.0001), and D-dimer (p < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that older age, CR, UA, and ALB were independent factors associated with death (p < 0.05). Elderly patients with underlying diseases, abnormal routine blood test indices, and abnormal renal function and coagulation indices are at an increased worse prognosis and should be identified early. Age, UA, CR, and ALB can be used as predictors to assess the worse prognosis in the hospital.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes in COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients: a propensity score matched cohort study

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on dialysis or who have received a kidney transplant (KT), are considered more vulnerable to severe COVID-19. This susceptibility is attributed to advanced age, a higher frequency of comorbidities, and the chronic immunosuppressed state, which may exacerbate their susceptibility to severe outcomes. Therefore, our study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in KT patients with those on chronic dialysis and non-CKD patients in a propensity score-matched cohort study. This multicentric retrospective cohort included adult COVID-19 laboratory-confirmed patients admitted from March/2020 to July/2022, from 43 Brazilian hospitals. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Propensity score analysis matched KT recipients with controls - patients on chronic dialysis and those without CKD (within 0.25 standard deviations of the logit of the propensity score) - according to age, sex, number of comorbidities, and admission year. This study included 555 patients: 163 KT, 146 on chronic dialysis, and 249 non-CKD patients (median age 57 years, 55.2% women). With regards to clinical outcomes, chronic dialysis patients had a higher prevalence of acute heart failure, compared to KT recipients, furthermore, both groups presented high in-hospital mortality, 34.0 and 28.1%, for KT and chronic dialysis patients, respectively. When comparing KT and non-CKD patients, the first group had a higher incidence of in-hospital dialysis (26.4% vs. 8.8%, p < 0.001), septic shock (24.1% vs. 12.0%, p = 0.002), and mortality (32.5% vs. 23.3%, p = 0.039), in addition to longer time spent in the intensive care unit (ICU). In this study, chronic dialysis patients presented a higher prevalence of acute heart failure, compared to KT recipients, whereas KT patients had a higher frequency of complications than those without CKD, including septic shock, dialysis during hospitalization, and in-hospital mortality as well as longer time spent in the ICU.

A pilot study of intensive short-time continuous renal replacement therapy to substitute maintenance hemodialysis during transitional period of COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

There is a lack of perfect solutions for maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) in patients with a high transmission risk of SARS-CoV-2.

METHODS

MHD patients with a high risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from April 1 to June 30, 2022, were recruited. We performed 4-h continuous renal replacement therapy with Prismaflex dialysis machine and ST100 suite using continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) mode with a fluid exchange volume of 8000 mL/h.

RESULTS

Forty-five MHD patients were included with a median dialysis age of 91 months. Overall spKt/V reached 0.96 ± 0.19. Urea reduction ratio was 50.29 ± 7.60% with the ultrafiltration of 2.18 ± 0.79 kg. Dry weight was significantly inversely correlated with spKt/V (R = -0.563, p < 0.001). Female gender was a significant positive factor of spKt/V. Preheating of replacement solution using an incubator solved the complication of shivering in most patients.

CONCLUSION

Intensive short-time CVVHDF may be considered as an alternative for routine MHD during COVID-19 transitional period.

Impact of COVID-19 versus other pneumonia on in-hospital mortality and functional decline among Japanese dialysis patients: a retrospective cohort study

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects both life and health. However, the differentiation from other types of pneumonia and effect of kidney disease remains uncertain. This retrospective observational study investigated the risk of in-hospital death and functional decline in ≥ 20% of Barthel Index scores after COVID-19 compared to other forms of pneumonia among Japanese adults, both with and without end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The study enrolled 123,378 patients aged 18 years and older from a national inpatient administrative claims database in Japan that covers the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. After a 1:1:1:1 propensity score matching into non-COVID-19/non-dialysis, COVID-19/non-dialysis, non-COVID-19/dialysis, and COVID-19/dialysis groups, 2136 adults were included in the analyses. The multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed greater odds ratios (ORs) of death [5.92 (95% CI 3.62-9.96)] and functional decline [1.93 (95% CI 1.26-2.99)] only in the COVID-19/dialysis group versus the non-COVID-19/non-dialysis group. The COVID-19/dialysis group had a higher risk of death directly due to pneumonia (OR 6.02, 95% CI 3.50-10.8) or death due to other diseases (OR 3.00, 95% CI 1.11-8.48; versus the non-COVID-19/non-dialysis group). COVID-19 displayed a greater impact on physical function than other types of pneumonia particularly in ESKD.

A multicenter study of severity and prognosis of symptomatic COVID-19 in end-stage renal disease and non-dialysis patients in East of Iran

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the severity and related factors of symptomatic COVID-19 in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients from several centers in Eastern Iran.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, after obtaining ethical approval, 410 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were included for analysis. Patients were categorized into two groups based on their dialysis status: the dialysis group (ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis) and the non-dialysis group (those without chronic dialysis). Demographic information, clinical symptoms, laboratory tests at admission, length of hospitalization, ICU admission, need for mechanical ventilation, and mortality data were extracted from their medical records and entered into researcher-developed checklists.

RESULTS

In this multicenter study, 104 dialysis patients with a mean age of 64.81 ± 16.04 were compared to 316 non-dialysis patients with a mean age of 60.92 ± 17.89. Patients were similar in terms of age and gender, but a higher percentage of the dialysis group was aged over 65 years (p = .008). Altered consciousness, dyspnea, headache, myalgia, anorexia, and cough were statistically significantly more common in the dialysis group when evaluating clinical symptoms (p < .05). The dialysis group had significantly higher levels of white blood cell (WBC), potassium, calcium, urea, creatinine, blood pH, INR, ALT, ESR, and CRP, and lower levels of red blood cell, Hb, platelets, sodium, and LDH compared to the non-dialysis group. Profoundly altered consciousness was more common among deceased patients (p < .001), and this group had higher WBC counts, urea levels, AST, ALT (p < .05), and lower blood pH (p = .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of this study, it is plausible to suggest a hypothesis of greater severity and worse prognosis of COVID-19 in ESRD patients. Underlying comorbidities, such as liver disorders or more severe clinical symptoms like altered consciousness, may also be indicative of a worse prognosis in dialysis patients with COVID-19.

COVID-19 and outcomes in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Reports on COVID-19 in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients are scarce in China. This study aimed to describe the characteristics and outcomes of PD patients with COVID-19 after China abandoned the 'zero-COVID' policy.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective study included patients receiving PD who underwent testing for COVID-19 infections between 7 December 2022 and 7 January 2023. Outcomes of interest included factors associated with positive COVID-19 testing result and clinical outcomes including COVID-19-related hospitalisation and severe COVID-19, which were analysed using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 349 PD patients (male 53.6%, age 49 ± 13 years old) were included, and 235 patients (67.3%) were infected. There were no significant differences between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients other than higher proportion of vaccinated patients and slow transporters in the patients who tested positive for COVID-19 (44.7% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.003; 8.7% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.03, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed COVID-19 was associated with vaccination (odds ratio (OR): 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.02-2.86) and slow transport type (compared with average transport type, OR: 4.52, 95% CI: 1.01-20.21). Among the patients with infection, 38 (16.2%) patients were hospitalised, 18 (7.7%) patients had severe disease and 9 (3.8%) patients died. In multivariate logistic analysis, both age (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07; OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11) and hyponatremia (OR: 5.44, 95% CI: 1.63-18.13; OR: 6.50, 95% CI: 1.77-23.85) were independent risk factors for COVID-19-related hospitalisation and severe disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Although vaccinated patients were more likely to have tested positive for COVID-19 infection, they appeared to have less severe infection and less need for hospitalisation. Patients who were older with a history of hyponatremia were more likely to experience adverse outcomes from COVID-19.

S. J, Balasubramanian CM, Devaraju PK, Murugesan V, P. S, Lamech TM, Arumugam V, Gopalakrishnan N. SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Seroprevalence and Humoral Response to Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis: A Prospective Cohort Study

Introduction

COVID-19, caused by SARS-CoV-2, has resulted in significant mortality and morbidity worldwide. Patients of chronic kidney disease who are on maintenance hemodialysis represent a vulnerable population cohort that is susceptible to severe disease. Hence, it is of utmost importance to prioritize vaccination in this population and to assess their response to said vaccination.

Methods

This prospective analytical study was conducted at the Institute of Nephrology, Madras Medical College, between August 2021 and February 2022. Patients of chronic kidney disease stage 5 dialysis (CKD5D) who were on maintenance hemodialysis and who consented to receive COVID-19 vaccine were studied. Serum samples were obtained before vaccination, ≥28 days after receiving the first dose of the vaccine, and ≥28 days after receiving the second dose. Antibody titers against the spike protein were estimated using the Roche chemiluminescent immunosorbent assay. Patients were grouped into non-responders/seronegative (<0.8 U/ml) and responders/seropositive (≥0.8 U/ml), with a value ≥250 U/ml considered as robust response.

Results

A total of 96 patients were included. The mean age was 36.70 (±11.53) years and 77.1% of them were male. The median dialysis vintage was 2 (IQR: 0.95-5) years. Twelve patients (9.9%) had a prior COVID-19 infection. Sixty-seven (69.8%) patients had received Covaxin and 29 (30.2%) had received Covishield vaccines. Among the 17 patients who were seronegative at baseline, 4 (23.52%) became seropositive after the first dose of the vaccine, and 11 (64.7%) were seropositive after the second dose, with high titers ("robust response") achieved in two patients (11.76%). No antibody response, despite two doses of the vaccine, was noted in six patients (35.29%).

Conclusion

Our study showed a high baseline seropositivity rate, even prior to vaccination, which indicated a high rate of subclinical COVID infection. Among those who were seronegative at baseline, the seroconversion rate after two doses of Covaxin or Covishield was 64.70%.

Chronological Changes in Emotional Status and Vaccine Implementation Rate Among Patients on the Waiting List for Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplantation During the Prolonged COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

To investigate the emotional attributes and vaccine implementation rate of patients waiting for kidney transplants during the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic.

METHODS

We included 145 patients who were on the waiting list at our institution. Clinical information was obtained from medical charts, and emotional changes were assessed using a telephone questionnaire comprising 13 questions, including vaccine implementation. We also investigated factors affecting the decision to accept or decline deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

RESULTS

Of the 145 patients, 121 (83.4%) provided informed consent and completed the questionnaire. The median age at registration on the waiting list for deceased-donor kidney transplantation and the median waiting period was 45.5 years and 103 months, respectively. This cohort comprised 84 males and 37 females. Twenty patients (16.5%) were diagnosed with COVID-19, and 15 (12.4%) were more curious about deceased-donor kidney transplantation. One hundred patients (82.6%) were vaccinated against COVID-19 more than thrice. Thirty patients (24.8%) declined, and 91 patients (75.2%) accepted an organ transplant offer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multivariate analysis revealed that the long-term waiting period (P = .038) and anxiety about COVID-19, such as visiting the transplant facility (P < .0001) and prudence over time (P < .0001), were independent factors influencing the decline of a kidney transplant offer.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that some patients hesitated to undergo deceased-donor kidney transplantation during the pandemic. There is a need to develop an appropriate system to ensure safe and secure kidney transplantation during prolonged pandemics.

Risk Factors and Drug Efficacy for Severe Illness in Hemodialysis Patients Infected with the Omicron Variant of COVID-19

INTRODUCTION

The Omicron variant of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) has been spreading more rapidly and is more infectious, posing a higher risk of death and treatment difficulty for patients undergoing hemodialysis. This study aims to explore the severity rate and risk factors for hemodialysis patients infected with the Omicron variant and to conduct a preliminary analysis of the clinical efficacy of drugs.

METHODS

Clinical and biochemical indicators of 219 hemodialysis patients infected with the Omicron variant were statistically analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups based on whether they were severely ill or not, and multiple regression analysis was conducted to determine the risk factors for severe illness. The severely ill patients were then grouped based on discharge or death, and the treatment drugs were included as influencing factors for multiple regression analysis to determine the risk factors and protective factors for death of severely ill patients, and drug efficacy analysis was conducted.

RESULTS

Analysis showed that diabetes, low oxygen saturation, and high C-reactive protein (CRP) were independent risk factors for severe illness in hemodialysis patients infected with the Omicron variant. A history of diabetes and high C-reactive significantly increased the risk of severe illness in patients (aOR: 1.450; aOR: 1.011), while a high oxygen saturation level can reduce this risk (aOR: 0.871). In addition, respiratory distress was an independent risk factor for death in severely patients, significantly reducing the probability of discharge for patients (aOR: 0.152). The drugs thymalfasin and Tanreqing significantly increased the probability of discharge for patients (aOR: 1.472; aOR: 3.104), with the latter having a higher correlation, but with a relatively longer effective course.

CONCLUSION

Hemodialysis patients infected with the Omicron variant of COVID-19 should pay special attention to their history of diabetes, CRP, and oxygen saturation levels, as well as respiratory distress symptoms, to reduce the risk of severe illness and death. In addition, thymalfasin and Tanreqing may be considered in treatment.

Reduced COVID-19 morbidity and mortality in hemodialysis patients across the various Omicron sublineages-A retrospective analysis

Introduction

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are a COVID-19 high risk population due to comorbidities and impaired immune response. Vaccines, advent of effective treatment and the emergence of novel variants have fundamentally changed the pandemic. We aimed to assess temporal changes of COVID-19 in HD patients of our catchment area, and risk factors for severe and fatal course.

Methods and materials

We retrospectively collected data from 274 patients admitted to the Medical University Graz, Austria for HD between 1st of May 2020 and 31st of August 2022. We analyzed clinical and demographic data between different COVID-19 waves and assessed factors associated with hospitalization, ICU admission and mortality by logistic regression. To further evaluate the dialysis at-risk population, we collected demographic and vaccination data between August 2021 and August 2022.

Results

Time of infection and SARS-CoV-2 sequencing data allowed for distinction of five separate waves of infection with different impact on the dialysis population: While in the initial four waves frequencies of hospitalization, necessity of critical care and mortality were around 60%, 10% and 20%, respectively. These events became rare during the large fifth wave, when Omicron had become the dominant variant. Although only 16.9% had to be hospitalized, this resulted in 29 hospital admissions, due to the high prevalence of COVID-19 during the Omicron era. Furthermore, we observed similar clinical outcomes with BA.4/5 as with BA.1/BA.2 Omicron sublineages. The proportion of previously infected increased simultaneously with the number of vaccination doses in our dialysis population. Vaccination at time of positivity and infection with an Omicron variant conferred protection against hospitalization and mortality in univariate analysis, but only infection with an Omicron variant remained a robust predictor for these outcomes in multivariable analysis.

Discussion

While a fourth of our at-risk population became infected during the Omicron wave, mortality was almost non-existent. Several concomitant factors have contributed to the decrease of COVID-19 severity in HD patients. This trend appears to be continued with BA.4/5, which was equally mild as BA.1 and BA.2 in our well vaccinated dialysis population.

The Impact of COVID-19 Infection Control Measures on End-Stage Renal Disease Patients in a Community Hemodialysis Setting

INTRODUCTION

Several non-pharmaceutical infection control measures have been implemented at community-based hemodialysis centers to reduce the risk of Coronavirus Disease of 2019 (COVID-19) transmission, caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, there have been concerns that such measures may disrupt the routine and timely care required by patients, with adverse effects on their health outcomes. This cross-sectional study aims to determine the unintended consequences of COVID-19 infection control measures on hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

 Electronic medical records were extracted from patients enrolled in community-based hemodialysis centers in Singapore. A baseline group prior of patients consisted of those enrolled in 2017, which was three years prior to the SARS-CoV-2-related pandemic (n = 548). This was compared with the study group of patients enrolled in 2019 (n = 426), just before the COVID-19 pandemic started. Medical records for these two groups were extracted from January to July 2018 for the baseline group and from January to July 2020, respectively. Three regression models were built to study dialysis adherence, kidney disease biomarkers, and hospitalization episodes.

RESULTS

 There was no statistically significant difference in hospitalization and mortality outcomes, adherence to dialysis management, laboratory results for dialysis-related clearance, and anemia outcomes. There was a higher proportion of patients hospitalized for vascular access-related reasons in the study group as compared to the baseline group (OR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.29, P = 0.014). Patients in the study group had albumin levels 2.13% higher (95% CI: 0.88 to 3.39, P < 0.001) and alkaline phosphatase levels 7.3% lower (95% CI: 1.17 to 13.02, P = 0.020) than those in the baseline group.

CONCLUSIONS

 From this community-based hemodialysis study in Singapore, it was shown that the COVID-19 pandemic did not disrupt regular healthcare services for these patients. With strategies instituted for a coordinated health delivery workflow, ensuring sufficient capacity in the various healthcare delivery sites and overall pandemic preparedness, the patient clinical outcomes measures continued to be met with no adverse consequences noted. Some improvements in dialysis-related laboratory values and quality of care targets may be due to more stringent measures instituted to protect these vulnerable patients in the community.

Comparison of Humoral Antibody Responses and Seroconversion Rates between Two Homologous ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273 Vaccination in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis patients are at an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and are excluded from preauthorization COVID-19 vaccine trials; therefore, their immunogenicity is uncertain.

METHODS

To compare the antibody responses to homologous ChAdOx1 and mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in hemodialysis patients, 103 age- and sex-matched hemodialysis patients with two homologous prime-boost vaccinations were recruited to detect anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) IgG levels and seroconversion rates (SCRs) 14 days after a prime dose (PD14), before and 28 days after a boost dose (pre-BD0 and BD28).

RESULTS

Both mRNA-1273 and ChAdOx1 vaccinations elicited immunogenicity in study subjects, and the former induced higher anti-RBD IgG levels than the latter. The SCRs of both groups increased over time and varied widely from 1.82% to 97.92%, and were significantly different at PD14 and pre-BD0 regardless of different thresholds. At BD28, the SCRs of the ChAdOx1 group and the mRNA-1273 group were comparable using a threshold ≥ 7.1 BAU/mL (93.96% vs. 97.92%) and a threshold ≥ 17 BAU/mL (92.73% vs. 97.92%), respectively, but they were significantly different using a threshold ≥ 20.2% of convalescent serum anti-RBD levels (52.73% vs. 95.83%). The seroconversion (≥20.2% of convalescent level) at BD28 was associated with mRNA-1273 vaccination after being adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and the presence of solicited reactogenicity after a prime vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Our prospective, observational cohort indicates that a full prime-boost mRNA-1273 vaccination is likely to provide higher immune protection in hemodialysis patients compared to ChAdOx1, and this population with a prime-boost ChAdOx1 vaccination should be prioritized for a third dose.

Impact of COVID-19 on Disease Self-management Among Patients With Advanced CKD: A Qualitative Study

Rationale & Objective

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their care partners experienced decreased access to care, and worse physical and emotional health during the Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. Few studies have explored how COVID-19-related challenges affected disease self-management among those with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their care partners. Leventhal's self-regulation model offers a comprehensive framework for understanding disease self-management through the interplay of cognitive beliefs, emotional reactions and social influences. The study aims to examine the impact of COVID-19 on self-management activities among patients with CKD and care partners.

Study Design

Qualitative study.

Setting & Participants

Adults with advanced CKD, including dialysis and transplant recipients, and their carepartners.

Analytical Approach

Thematic Analysis.

Results

Among 42 participants, 12 had stage 4 CKD, 5 had stage 5 CKD, 6 were receiving in-center hemodialysis, 5 had a kidney transplant, and 14 were care partners. We identified 4 patient-related themes with corresponding subthemes related to the impact of COVID-19 on self-management: 1) cognitive understanding that COVID-19 is an additional health threat to existing kidney disease, 2) heightened anxiety and vulnerability driven by perceived risk, 3) coping with isolation through virtual interactions with healthcare services and social circles, 4) increased protective behaviors to maximize survival. Three care partner-related themes emerged: 1) hypervigilance in family care and protection, 2) interaction with health system and adaptations to self-management, and 3) increased intensity in caregiving role to facilitate patient self-management.

Limitations

The qualitative study design limits the ability to generate generalizable data. Grouping patients with Stage 3 and 4 CKD, in-center hemodialysis, and kidney transplants together limited our ability to examine self-management challenges specific to each treatment requirement.

Conclusions

When faced with the COVID-19 pandemic, patients with CKD and their care partners experienced heightened vulnerability and thus increased cautionary activities to maximize survival. Our study provides the groundwork for future interventions to help patients and care partners live with kidney disease during future crises.

Immune response of heterologous versus homologous prime-boost regimens with adenoviral vectored and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in immunocompromised patients

Due to rare but major adverse reactions to the AstraZeneca adenoviral ChAdOx1-S-nCoV-19 vaccine (ChAd), German health authorities recommended adults under 60 who received one dose of ChAd, to receive a second dose of the BioNTech mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine (BNT) as a booster. Studies in the general population suggest an enhanced efficacy of the heterologous (ChAd-BNT) compared to the homologous (BNT-BNT) vaccination regimen. However, an analysis of the efficacy in patient populations with a high risk of severe COVID-19 due to acquired immunodeficiency is still missing. We therefore compared both vaccination regimens in healthy controls, patients with gynecological tumors after chemotherapy, patients on dialysis and patients with rheumatic diseases concerning the humoral and cellular immune response. The humoral and cellular immune response differed substantially in healthy controls compared to patients with acquired immunodeficiency. Overall, the most significant differences between the two immunization regimens were found in neutralizing antibodies. These were always higher after a heterologous immunization. Healthy controls responded well to both vaccination regimens. However, the formation of neutralizing antibodies was more pronounced after a heterologous immunization. Dialysis patients, on the other hand, only developed an adequate humoral and particularly cellular immune response after a heterologous immunization. Tumor and rheumatic patients also - to a weaker extent compared to dialysis patients - benefited from a heterologous immunization. In conclusion, the heterologous COVID-19 vaccination regimens (ChAd-BNT) seem to have an advantage over the homologous vaccination regimens, especially in immunocompromised patients such as patients with end-stage kidney disease treated with hemodialysis.

What data collection methods work best for COVID19 outbreak surveillance for people with end stage kidney disease? An observational cohort study using the UK Renal Registry

BACKGROUND

Patients on kidney replacement therapy (KRT) are vulnerable to severe illness from COVID-19. Timely, accurate surveillance is essential for planning and implementing infection control at local, regional and national levels. Our aim was to compare two methods of data collection for COVID-19 infections amongst KRT patients in England.

METHODS

Adults receiving KRT in England were linked to two sources of data on positive COVID-19 tests recorded March-August 2020: (1) submissions from renal centres to the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) and (2) Public Health England (PHE) laboratory data. Patient characteristics, cumulative incidence by modality (in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD), home HD, peritoneal dialysis (PD) and transplant), and 28-day survival were compared between the two sources.

RESULTS

2,783/54,795 patients (5.1%) had a positive test in the combined UKRR-PHE dataset. Of these 2,783, 87% had positive tests in both datasets. Capture was consistently high for PHE (> 95% across modalities) but varied for UKRR (ranging from ICHD 95% to transplant 78%, p < 0.0001). Patients captured only by PHE were more likely to be on transplant or home therapies (OR 3.5 95% CI [2.3-5.2] vs. ICHD) and to be infected in later months (OR 3.3 95%CI [2.4-4.6] for May-June, OR 6.5 95%CI [3.8-11.3] for July-August, vs. March-April), compared to patients in both datasets. Stratified by modality, patient characteristics and 28-day survival were similar between datasets.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients undergoing ICHD treatment the collection of data submitted directly by renal centres allows constant monitoring in real time. For other KRT modalities, using a national swab test dataset through frequent linkage may be the most effective method. Optimising central surveillance can improve patient care by informing interventions and assisting planning at local, regional and national levels.

Impact of COVID-19 on maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients and providers: A review

The COVID-19 pandemic exerted complex pressures on the nephrology community. Despite multiple prior reviews on acute peritoneal dialysis during the pandemic, the effects of COVID-19 on maintenance peritoneal dialysis patients remain underexamined. This review synthesizes and reports findings from 29 total cases of chronic peritoneal dialysis patients with COVID-19, encompassing 3 case reports, 13 case series, and 13 cohort studies. When available, data for patients with COVID-19 on maintenance hemodialysis are also discussed. Finally, we present a chronological timeline of evidence regarding the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in spent peritoneal dialysate and explore trends in telehealth as they relate to peritoneal dialysis patients during the pandemic. We conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the efficacy, flexibility, and utility of peritoneal dialysis.

The effect of psychosocial interventions on depression, anxiety, and quality of life in hemodialysis patients: a systematic review and a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Hemodialysis has become a standard therapy for adults with end-stage renal diseases. Adults undergoing hemodialysis have to cope with unique psychological issues that make their care journey particularly fatiguing. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize and evaluate the effects of psychosocial interventions on the reduction of anxiety and depression in adults with HDs.

METHODS

We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that measure change in depression, anxiety, and quality of life.

RESULTS

We identify three categories of psychosocial interventions delivered to adults undergoing hemodialysis. Based on our analysis, there was a medium effect of psychosocial intervention on depression (SMD - 0.85, 95%CI - 1.17; - 0.52, I2 = 80%, p < 0.01) and anxiety (SMD - 0.99, 95%CI - 1.65; - 0.33, I2 = 88%, p < 0.01) in adults undergoing hemodialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychosocial interventions, such as psychological support or relaxation-based therapy, seems all to reduce depression and anxiety in adults undergoing HD. Preliminary evidence suggests that there may be a benefit of psychosocial interventions on the quality of life for adults undergoing HD.

Prevalence and predictors of outcomes among ESRD patients with COVID-19

BACKGROUND

 End-stage renal disease patients on hemodialysis (ESRD) patients are at high risk for contracting COVID-19. In this propensity matched cohort study, we examined the prevalence of COVID-19 in emergency room (ER) patients and examined whether clinical outcomes varied by ESRD status.

METHODS

Patients who visited George Washington University Hospital ER from April 2020 to April 2021 were reviewed for COVID-19 and ESRD status. Among COVID-positive ER patients, the propensity for ESRD was calculated using a logistic regression model to create a propensity-matched sample of ESRD vs non-ESRD COVID-19 patients. A multivariable model examined whether ESRD was an independent predictor of death and other outcomes in COVID-19 patients.

RESULTS

Among the 27,106 ER patients, 2689 of whom were COVID-positive (9.9%). The odds of testing positive for COVID-19 were 0.97 ([95% CI: 0.78-1.20], p = 0.76) in ESRD vs non-ESRD patients after adjusting for age, sex, and race. There were 2414 COVID-positive individuals with non-missing data, of which 98 were ESRD patients. In this COVID-positive sample, ESRD patients experienced a higher incidence of stroke, sepsis, and pneumonia than non-ESRD individuals. Significant independent predictors of death included age, race, sex, insurance status, and diabetes mellitus. Those with no insurance had odds of death that was 212% higher than those with private insurance (3.124 [1.695-5.759], p < 0.001). ESRD status was not an independent predictor of death (1.215 [0.623-2.370], p = 0.57). After propensity-matching in the COVID-positive patients, there were 95 ESRD patients matched with 283 non-ESRD individuals. In this sample, insurance status continued to be an independent predictor of mortality, while ESRD status was not. ESRD patients were more likely to have lactic acidosis (36% vs 15%) and length of hospital stay ≥ 7 days (48% vs 31%), but no increase in odds for any studied adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

In ER patients, ESRD status was not associated with higher odds for testing positive for COVID-19. Among ER patients who were COVID positive, ESRD was not associated with mortality. However, insurance status had a strong and independent association with death among ER patients with COVID-19.

Impact of COVID-19 infection on the dialysis population prospective, observational, nationwide study

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis (HD) patients are at increased risk of severe COVID-19 infection but infection rates vary. Our objectives are to describe COVID-19 positive HD patients' characteristics, infection rates, and factors associated with mortality in HD COVID-19 cases in Kuwait.

METHODS

Data on demographics, comorbidities, and treatments received, as well as mortality for HD patients admitted to hospitals for COVID-19, from 1/March to 31/July 2020, prospectively collected and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 141 infected HD patients were admitted (Mean age 58 ± 16.1; Males 56%), representing 7% of the total HD population and 0.2% of all COVID-19 cases during the study period. Of those 141 infected HD patients, 27 (19%) died, and this represents 6% of total COVID-19-related mortality and 27% of the total HD mortality. In contrast, total covid-19-related mortality of all positive cases was only 0.7%, and total HD mortality during the study period was only 5%. COVID-19-positive HD patients who died were older and 59% were males. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Of the 61 infected HD patients who needed to be switched to continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT), 34% died, and of the 29 infected HD patients who needed admission to intensive care, 65% died.

CONCLUSION

HD population represents a small fraction of the total population; however, positive HD COVID-19 cases represent a sizable proportion of COVID-19 cases and a significant percentage of total COVID-19-related mortality, and total HD mortality.

Prevalence of Asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection in Hemodialysis Patients and the Risk of Hypercoagulability: Should we Consider Routine Screening?

Introduction

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a pandemic in late 2019. Its clinical presentation varies from asymptomatic infection to severe respiratory failure. Infection control strategies to minimize the risk of transmission of COVID-19 in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving in-center hemodialysis (HD) have been implemented. Development of humoral response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in adult patients with ESRD receiving HD has not been sufficiently reported.

Methods

A total of 179 asymptomatic HD patients undergoing regular HD were screened for COVID-19 infection. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 was confirmed through a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assay of nasopharyngeal swab specimens. They were classified into positive and negative groups according to the results of PCR.

Results

Of the 179 asymptomatic patients, we found that 23 patients (12.8%) were positive for COVID-19. Their mean age was 45.61 ± 13.38 years. There was a significant difference between both groups regarding C-reactive protein, lymphocytes, and platelet counts (P < 0.001). Also, TAT (thrombin-antithrombin complex) and D-dimer levels were significantly increased among the positive group (11.47 ± 1.51 vs. 7.53 ± 1.64 mcq/L, P < 0.001; 1171.52 ± 267.6 vs. 542.76 ± 107.06 ng/mL, P < 0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is detected in HD patients. They carry the risk of hypercoagulability complications. We need more strict infection control measures and proactive diagnosis to limit the spread of the infection and lethal thromboembolic complications.

SARS-CoV-2 infection in chronic kidney disease patients with pre-existing dialysis: description across different pandemic intervals and effect on disease course (mortality)

PURPOSE

Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD) are in general at high risk for severe coronavirus disease (COVID-19) but dialysis-dependency (CKD5D) is poorly understood. We aimed to describe CKD5D patients in the different intervals of the pandemic and to evaluate pre-existing dialysis dependency as a potential risk factor for mortality.

METHODS

In this multicentre cohort study, data from German study sites of the Lean European Open Survey on SARS-CoV-2-infected patients (LEOSS) were used. We multiply imputed missing data, performed subsequent analyses in each of the imputed data sets and pooled the results. Cases (CKD5D) and controls (CKD not requiring dialysis) were matched 1:1 by propensity-scoring. Effects on fatal outcome were calculated by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 207 patients suffering from CKD5D and 964 potential controls. Multivariable regression of the whole cohort identified age (> 85 years adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 7.34, 95% CI 2.45-21.99), chronic heart failure (aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.25-2.23), coronary artery disease (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.05-1.89) and active oncological disease (aOR 1.73, 95% CI 1.07-2.80) as risk factors for fatal outcome. Dialysis-dependency was not associated with a fatal outcome-neither in this analysis (aOR 1.08, 95% CI 0.75-1.54) nor in the conditional multivariable regression after matching (aOR 1.34, 95% CI 0.70-2.59).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present multicentre German cohort, dialysis dependency is not linked to fatal outcome in SARS-CoV-2-infected CKD patients. However, the mortality rate of 26% demonstrates that CKD patients are an extreme vulnerable population, irrespective of pre-existing dialysis-dependency.

Factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in people with kidney disease: an OpenSAFELY cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To characterise factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake among people with kidney disease in England.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study using the OpenSAFELY-TPP platform, performed with the approval of NHS England.

SETTING

Individual-level routine clinical data from 24 million people across GPs in England using TPP software. Primary care data were linked directly with COVID-19 vaccine records up to 31 August 2022 and with renal replacement therapy (RRT) status via the UK Renal Registry (UKRR).

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of adults with stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) or receiving RRT at the start of the COVID-19 vaccine roll-out was identified based on evidence of reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or inclusion in the UKRR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Dose-specific vaccine coverage over time was determined from 1 December 2020 to 31 August 2022. Individual-level factors associated with receipt of a 3-dose or 4-dose vaccine series were explored via Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

992 205 people with stage 3-5 CKD or receiving RRT were included. Cumulative vaccine coverage as of 31 August 2022 was 97.5%, 97.0% and 93.9% for doses 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and 81.9% for dose 4 among individuals with one or more indications for eligibility. Delayed 3-dose vaccine uptake was associated with younger age, minority ethnicity, social deprivation and severe mental illness-associations that were consistent across CKD severity subgroups, dialysis patients and kidney transplant recipients. Similar associations were observed for 4-dose uptake.

CONCLUSION

Although high primary vaccine and booster dose coverage has been achieved among people with kidney disease in England, key disparities in vaccine uptake remain across clinical and demographic groups and 4-dose coverage is suboptimal. Targeted interventions are needed to identify barriers to vaccine uptake among under-vaccinated subgroups identified in the present study.

Waning Humoral Response 6 Month after Double Vaccination with the mRNA-BNT162b2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients

Introduction

Although most hemodialysis patients (HDP) exhibit an initial seroresponse to vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), studies have shown this response to be lower compared to healthy subjects. This fact raised concerns regarding the durability of the immune response and effective protection against severe Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in this vulnerable population. The aim of our study was to evaluate the change in antibody levels over time in HDP population.

Materials and Methods

We performed a prospective multicenter study, evaluating antibody response among HDP at 2 and at 6 months after complete two-dose vaccination course with the mRNA-BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. The study was performed in 14 hemodialysis units of a private dialysis provider in Lithuania. The serum samples of 189 HDP were tested for SARS-CoV-2 IgG against the Spike glycoprotein.

Results

189 HDP participated in the study. Patients were 64.3±15.7 years of age, 116 (61.4%) were males and 73 (38.6%) were females. Among them, 183 (96.8%) were seropositive for anti-S IgG at 2 months after the second immunization dose. Six months after the second dose only 145 (76.7%) of study participants had positive anti-S IgG titers. The median level of anti-S IgG titers after 2 months was 383.1 BAU/mL (166.2-995.6) and after 6 months this level significantly decreased to 51.4 BAU/mL (22.0-104.0) (p<0.001). Seroresponses at both time points inversely correlated with increasing patient's age. Risk factor for absent response after 2 months included oncologic disease. Systemic autoimmune disease and a history of myocardial infarction increased risk to be seronegative 6 months after the second vaccine dose.

Conclusions

The majority of hemodialysis patients seroresponded after BNT162b2/Pfizer vaccination, but vaccine-induced humoral immunity wanes over time.

The predictive markers of severity and mortality in hospitalized hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 during Omicron epidemic

INTRODUCTION

Predictive markers and prognosis remain unclear in hospitalized hemodialysis (HD) patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) during the Omicron epidemic.

METHODS

We evaluated characteristics, laboratory parameters, and outcomes in hospitalized HD patients with COVID-19 (n = 102) at two centers between January and April 2022.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality rate was higher in moderate-critical group (n = 43) than mild group (n = 59) (16.3% vs. 1.7%; p = 0.007), and higher in patients with lower CC chemokine ligand 17 (CCL17) levels (<95.0 pg/mL) compared with normal CCL17 levels (19.0% versus 4.9%; p = 0.03). In multivariate analyses, a low CCL17 level (p = 0.003) was associated with moderate-critical conditions, and moderate-critical conditions (p = 0.04) were associated with 30-day mortality, whereas CCL17 was not associated with 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

COVID-19 remains a fatal complication, and CCL17 was a predictive marker of severity in hospitalized HD patients during the Omicron epidemic.

High Plasma Levels of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 Are Associated with Increased Risk of COVID-19 in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Hemodialysis: Results of a Prospective Cohort

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients are a population with high rates of COVID-19 and mortality. These patients present a low response to anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunization, which is associated with immune dysfunction. ESRD patients also present high plasma titers of Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23), a protein hormone that reduces immune response in vivo and in vitro. Increased FGF23 levels associate with higher infection-related hospitalizations and adverse infectious outcomes. Thus, we evaluated whether ESRD patients with high FGF23 titers have an increased rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort of ESRD patients in hemodialysis who had measurements of plasma intact FGF23 in 2019. We determined COVID-19 infections, hospitalizations, and mortality between January 2020 and December 2021.

RESULTS

We evaluated 243 patients. Age: 60.4 ± 10.8 years. Female: 120 (49.3%), diabetes: 110 (45.2%). During follow-up, 45 patients developed COVID-19 (18.5%), 35 patients were hospitalized, and 12 patients died (mortality rate: 26.6%). We found that patients with higher FGF23 levels (defined as equal or above median) had a higher rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection versus those with lower levels (18.8% versus 9.9%; Hazard ratio: 1.92 [1.03-3.56], p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis showed that increased plasma FGF23 was independently associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that high plasma FGF23 levels are a risk factor for developing COVID-19 in ESRD patients. These data support the potential immunosuppressive effects of high circulating FGF23 as a factor implicated in the association with worse clinical outcomes. Further data are needed to confirm this hypothesis.

Hemodialysis-Associated Immune Dysregulation in SARS-CoV-2-Infected End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

Patients on hemodialysis show dysregulated immunity, basal hyperinflammation and a marked vulnerability to COVID-19. We evaluated the immune profile in COVID-19 hemodialysis patients and the changes associated with clinical deterioration after the hemodialysis session. Recruited patients included eight hemodialysis subjects with active, PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, five uninfected hemodialysis patients and five healthy controls. In SARS-CoV-2-infected hemodialysis patients TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-8 were particularly increased. Lymphopenia was mostly due to reduction in CD4+ T, B and central memory CD8+ T cells. There was a predominance of classical and intermediate monocytes with reduced HLA-DR expression and enhanced production of pro-inflammatory molecules. Immune parameters were analysed pre- and post-hemodialysis in three patients with COVID-19 symptoms worsening after the hemodialysis session. There was a higher than 2.5-fold increase in GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-6, IL-17A and IL-21 in serum, and augmentation of monocytes-derived TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-8 and CXCL10 (p < 0.05). In conclusion, COVID-19 in hemodialysis patients associates with alteration of lymphocyte subsets, increasing of pro-inflammatory cytokines and monocyte activation. The observed worsening during the hemodialysis session in some patients was accompanied by augmentation of particular inflammatory cytokines, which might suggest biomarkers and therapeutic targets to prevent or mitigate the hemodialysis-related deterioration during SARS-CoV-2 infection.

COVID-19 effect on patients with noncommunicable diseases: A narrative review

Background and Aims

On March 11, 2020, the WHO has declared COVID-19 a global pandemic, affecting our day-to-day lives. Physical distancing and lockdown made significant obstacles to populations, particularly healthcare systems. Most healthcare workers were reallocated to COVID-19 facilities. Noncommunicable disease patients were given low priority and are at a higher risk of severe COVID-19 infection, which disrupted the treatment and disease management of these patients. This review aimed to assess the effect of COVID-19 on different types of noncommunicable diseases and the severity it may cause to patients.

Methods

We have conducted a review of the literature on COVID-19 and noncommunicable diseases from December 2019 until January 2022. The search was done in PubMed and Cochrane for relevant articles using variety of searching terms. Data for study variables were extracted. At the end of the selection process, 46 papers were selected for inclusion in the literature review.

Result

The result from this review found that the COVID-19 pandemic has affected the efficiency of the patient's treatment indirectly by either delaying or canceling sessions, which solidified the need to rely more on telemedicine, virtual visits, and in-home visits to improve patient education and minimize the risk of exposure to the patients. The major and most common types of noncommunicable diseases are known to be related to the severe outcomes of COVID-19 infection. It is strongly recommended to prioritize these patients for vaccinations against COVID-19 to provide them with the protection that will neutralize the risk imposed by their comorbidities.

Conclusion

We recommend conducting more studies with larger population samples to further understand the role of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) in this pandemic. However, this pandemic has also affected the efficiency of NCDs treatment indirectly by delaying or canceling sessions and others.

Chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 cared for by the public health system have higher mortality than those treated in private facilities: analysis of the Brazilian dialysis registry

PURPOSE

Brazil is the third country globally in dialysis patients. Little is known about the impact of the type of health insurance on the outcome of these patients after COVID-19.

METHODS

We analyzed comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and dialysis-related parameters from a retrospective cohort study of 1866 Brazilian chronic hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 from Feb 2020-July 2021. We evaluated the influence of health insurance (private vs. public) on the intensive care unit admission and 90 day fatality risk.

RESULTS

From 1866 hemodialysis patients, 455 (24%) were admitted to the intensive care unit, and 350 (19%) died. The mean age was 57.5 years, 88% had public health insurance. Crude case-fatality rate was not different between groups (private vs. public risk ratio 1.11; 95% CI 0.82-1.52, p = 0.498). In fully adjusted multivariate models, patients with private health insurance did not have a higher chance to be admitted to an intensive care unit (odds ratio 0.97; 95% CI 0.63-1.50, p = 0.888), but they presented a lower death risk (hazard ratio 0.56; 95% CI 0.37-0.85, p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

The type of health insurance did not influence the access of hemodialysis patients with COVID-19 to an intensive care unit, but patients with private health insurance had a lower mortality risk.

Factors associated with the humoral response after three doses of COVID-19 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients

Introduction

Kidney transplant recipients showed a weak humoral response to the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine despite receiving three cumulative doses of the vaccine. New approaches are still needed to raise protective immunity conferred by the vaccine administration within this group of high-risk patients.

Methods

To analyze the humoral response and identify any predictive factors within these patients, we designed a prospective monocentric longitudinal study of Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) who received three doses of mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccine. Specific antibody levels were measured by chemiluminescence. Parameters related to clinical status such as kidney function, immunosuppressive therapy, inflammatory status and thymic function were analyzed as potential predictors of the humoral response.

Results

Seventy-four KTR and sixteen healthy controls were included. One month after the administration of the third dose of the COVID-19 vaccine, 64.8% of KTR showed a positive humoral response. As predictive factors of seroconversion and specific antibody titer, we found that immunosuppressive therapy, worse kidney function, higher inflammatory status and age were related to a lower response in KTR while immune cell counts, thymosin-a1 plasma concentration and thymic output were related to a higher humoral response. Furthermore, baseline thymosin-a1 concentration was independently associated with the seroconversion after three vaccine doses.

Discussion

In addition to the immunosuppression therapy, condition of kidney function and age before vaccination, specific immune factors could also be relevant in light of optimization of the COVID-19 vaccination protocol in KTR. Therefore, thymosin-a1, an immunomodulatory hormone, deserves further research as a potential adjuvant for the next vaccine boosters.

Vaccination, regular exercise, and prevention of chronic lung disease reduce exacerbation of COVID-19 severity in northern Okinawa, Japan: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

As at June 14, 2023, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had affected more than 767 million people and caused more than 6.9 million deaths worldwide. This study aimed to clarify the lifestyle factors that influence the exacerbation of COVID-19 severity.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study of patients with COVID-19 whose severity classification of "moderate or severe" (COVID-19 exacerbation) was defined as an objective variable. The 1,353 participants were selected from 4,899 patients with COVID-19 between August 10, 2020 and December 10, 2022. Participants who underwent a specific health checkup before the date for a COVID-19 consultation were included. Using binominal logistic regression analysis, we evaluated the odds ratios (ORs) for COVID-19 exacerbation according to lifestyle-related factors. Limitations were discussed using a target trial emulation framework which clarifies problems in observational studies.

RESULTS

The explanatory variables extracted as factors that exacerbated COVID-19 severity were gender (OR [man vs. woman]: 2.533, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.484-4.322); age (OR [50s vs. 10s, 20s, or 30s]: 4.858, 95% CI 2.319-10.177; OR [60s]: 9.738, 95% CI 4.355-21.777; OR [70s + 80s + 90s]: 8.327, 95% CI 3.224-21.507); and comorbid chronic lung disease (OR ['yes' vs. 'no']: 2.892, 95% CI 1.227-6.818). The explanatory variables extracted as factors that reduce the severity of COVID-19 were hospital consultation year (OR [2022, predominantly Omicron variant prevalent vs. 2020, predominantly Alpha variant prevalent]: 0.180, 95% CI 0.058-0.559); number of vaccinations (OR [2 doses vs. 0 or one doses]: 0.223, 95% CI 0.114-0.436; OR [≥3 doses vs. 0 or one doses]: 0.090, 95% CI 0.035-0.229); regular exercise (exercising ≥2 days/week ≥30 minutes each at an intensity that causes a slight sweat for ≥1 year) (OR ['yes' vs. 'no']: 0.458, 95% CI 0.242-0.866).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest the importance of vaccination, regular exercise, and prevention of chronic lung disease as measures against exacerbation of COVID-19 severity.

Availability and prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccines among patients with advanced chronic kidney disease and kidney failure during the height of the pandemic: a global survey by the International Society of Nephrology

OBJECTIVE

Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or kidney failure receiving replacement therapy (KFRT) are highly vulnerable to COVID-19 infection, morbidity and mortality. Vaccination is effective, but access differs around the world. We aimed to ascertain the availability, readiness and prioritisation of COVID-19 vaccines for this group of patients globally.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Collaborators from the International Society of Nephrology (ISN), Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study and ISN-Global Kidney Health Atlas developed an online survey that was administered electronically to key nephrology leaders in 174 countries between 2 July and 4 August 2021.

RESULTS

Survey responses were received from 99 of 174 countries from all 10 ISN regions, among which 88/174 (50%) were complete. At least one vaccine was available in 96/99 (97%) countries. In 71% of the countries surveyed, patients on dialysis were prioritised for vaccination, followed by patients living with a kidney transplant (KT) (62%) and stage 4/5 CKD (51%). Healthcare workers were the most common high priority group for vaccination. At least 50% of patients receiving in-centre haemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or KT were estimated to have completed vaccination at the time of the survey in 55%, 64% and 51% of countries, respectively. At least 50% of patients in all three patient groups had been vaccinated in >70% of high-income countries and in 100% of respondent countries in Western Europe.The most common barriers to vaccination of patients were vaccine hesitancy (74%), vaccine shortages (61%) and mass vaccine distribution challenges (48%). These were reported more in low-income and lower middle-income countries compared with high-income countries.

CONCLUSION

Patients with advanced CKD or KFRT were prioritised in COVID-19 vaccination in most countries. Multiple barriers led to substantial variability in the successful achievement of COVID-19 vaccination across the world, with high-income countries achieving the most access and success.

Multi-omics identify falling LRRC15 as a COVID-19 severity marker and persistent pro-thrombotic signals in convalescence

Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) are at high risk of severe COVID-19. Here, we perform longitudinal blood sampling of ESKD haemodialysis patients with COVID-19, collecting samples pre-infection, serially during infection, and after clinical recovery. Using plasma proteomics, and RNA-sequencing and flow cytometry of immune cells, we identify transcriptomic and proteomic signatures of COVID-19 severity, and find distinct temporal molecular profiles in patients with severe disease. Supervised learning reveals that the plasma proteome is a superior indicator of clinical severity than the PBMC transcriptome. We show that a decreasing trajectory of plasma LRRC15, a proposed co-receptor for SARS-CoV-2, is associated with a more severe clinical course. We observe that two months after the acute infection, patients still display dysregulated gene expression related to vascular, platelet and coagulation pathways, including PF4 (platelet factor 4), which may explain the prolonged thrombotic risk following COVID-19.

Humoral and cellular immune response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine in pediatric kidney transplant recipients compared with dialysis patients and healthy children

BACKGROUND

Compared with the general population, the immune response to COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is lower in adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). However, data is limited for pediatric KTRs. In this study, we aimed to assess humoral and cellular immune responses to the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine in pediatric KTRs.

METHODS

This multicenter, prospective, case-control study included 63 KTRs (37 male, aged 12-21 years), 19 dialysis patients, and 19 controls. Humoral (anti-SARS-CoV2 IgG, neutralizing Ab (nAb)) and cellular (interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA)) immune responses were assessed at least one month after two doses of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine.

RESULTS

Among COVID-19 naïve KTRs (n = 46), 76.1% tested positive for anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG, 54.3% for nAb, and 63% for IGRA. Serum levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and nAb activity were significantly lower in KTRs compared to dialysis and control groups (p < 0.05 for all). Seropositivity in KTRs was independently associated with shorter transplant duration (p = 0.005), and higher eGFR (p = 0.007). IGRA titer was significantly lower than dialysis patients (p = 0.009). Twenty (43.4%) KTRs were positive for all immune parameters. Only four of 11 seronegative KTRs were IGRA-positive. COVID-19 recovered KTRs had significantly higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG and nAb activity levels than COVID-19 naïve KTRs (p = 0.018 and p = 0.007, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine are lower in pediatric KTRs compared to dialysis patients. Further prospective studies are required to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of the mRNA vaccine in KTRs. This prospective study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05465863, registered retrospectively at 20.07.2022). A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Assessment of inflammatory markers and their association with disease mortality in severe COVID-19 patients of tertiary care hospital in South India

Background

COVID-19 infection involves a complex interplay of the immunological and inflammatory responses. Low blood-oxygen levels have been a hallmark in COVID-19 patients. The lung tissue damage infiltered by the viral-mediated inflammation decreases oxygen saturation to cause silent hypoxia and cell death. This study aimed to evaluate the association of inflammatory biomarkers with oxygen saturation (SpO₂) and mortality in severe COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A total of 190 severe COVID-19 patients were included in this study after confirmed by the RT-PCR assay. The laboratory tests were performed for biochemical assessment. Serum levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and ferritin were determined and compared between survivors and nonsurvivors using independent sample t-test. The correlation of these inflammatory markers was studied using Spearman’s correlation, and their association with mortality was studied using logistic regression.

Results

All the COVID-19 patients were severe with SpO₂< 90% and respiratory rate > 30/min. While the serum levels of CRP, LDH, ferritin, aspartate transaminase (AST), urea, and random blood sugar (RBS) were elevated, hemoglobin (Hb) and SpO₂ levels were reduced in COVID-19 patients. LDH and ferritin levels were significantly higher in nonsurvivors compared to survivors with p values of 0.001 and 0.022 respectively. Spearman’s correlation showed a significant correlation of the inflammatory markers with SpO₂, serum electrolytes (potassium, chloride), liver enzymes (AST and alanine transaminase (ALT)), and markers of kidney damage (urea, creatinine).

Conclusion

Inflammatory markers could effectively discriminate the risk of mortality in severe COVID-19 patients. As CRP, LDH, and ferritin levels determine the tissue oxygen availability, they seem to be valuable biomarkers in the prognosis of COVID-19.

Significance of PPD Test for the Relationship Between BCG Vaccine and COVID-19 in Patients on Kidney Transplant Waiting List

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between purified protein derivative of tuberculin (PPD) values, an indicator of BCG protection, and COVID-19 disease in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on the kidney transplant waiting list.

METHODS

Age, sex, dialysis type, ERSD etiologies, and PPD values of patients on the renal transplant waiting list were recorded. SARS-CoV-2 PCR data, whether the patients were previously infected with the virus, and, if infected, the severity of the disease were noted. Data were statistically compared.

RESULTS

PCR of 87 (47.02%) of 185 patients were studied; 107 of the patients were male and 78 were female, with a mean age of 52.8 years. The test result was positive for 28 patients. Of the patients for whom PCR was studied, 41 had a negative PPD result, while 46 had a positive PPD result. There was no correlation with SARS-CoV-2 PCR positivity in patients with a PPD ≤ 5 mm and > 5 mm. However, patients with pneumonic infiltration who required hospitalization had a significantly higher PPD value.

CONCLUSIONS

The PPD measurement, which is an indicator of BCG protection, might be a significant parameter for predicting the course of the disease in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia.

Humoral and T-cell mediated response after administration of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 in frail populations

Patients with frailty are considered to be at greater risk to get severe infection from SARS-CoV-2. One of the most effective strategies is vaccination. In our study we evaluated both the humoral immune response elicited by the vaccination at different time points, and the T-cell response in terms of interferon (IFN)-γ production in frail patients and healthy donors. Fifty-seven patients (31 patients undergoing hemodialysis and 26 HIV positive subjects) and 39 healthcare workers were enrolled. All participants received two doses of the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2. Healthcare workers showed a significantly higher antibody titer than patients twenty-one days after the first dose (p < 0.001). From the same time point we observed for both groups a decay of the antibody levels with a steeper slope of decline in the patients group. Regarding T-cell response the only significant difference between non-reactive and reactive subjects was found in median antibody levels, higher in the responders group than in non-responders. The healthcare workers seem to better respond to the vaccination in terms of antibodies production; the lack of T-cell response in about 50% of the participants seems to suggest that in our study population both humoral and cell-mediated response decline over time remarking the importance of the booster doses, particularly for frail patients.

A Simple Non-Invasive Score Based on Baseline Parameters Can Predict Outcome in Patients with COVID-19

We evaluated the role of CRP and other laboratory parameters in predicting the worsening of clinical conditions during hospitalization, ICU admission, and fatal outcome among patients with COVID-19. Consecutive adult inpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection and respiratory symptoms treated in three different COVID centres were enrolled, and they were tested for laboratory parameters within 48 h from admission. Three-hundred ninety patients were enrolled. Age, baseline CRP, and LDH were associated with a P/F ratio < 200 during hospitalization. Male gender and CRP > 60 mg/L were shown to be independently associated with ICU admission. Lymphocytes < 1000 cell/μL were associated with the worst P/F ratio. CRP > 60 mg/L predicted exitus. We subsequently devised an 11-points numeric ordinary scoring system based on age, sex, CRP, and LDH at admission (ASCL score). Patients with an ASCL score of 0 or 2 were shown to be protected against a P/F ratio < 200, while patients with an ASCL score of 6 to 8 were shown to be at risk for P/F ratio < 200. Patients with an ASCL score ≥ 7 had a significantly increased probability of death during hospitalization. In conclusion, patients with elevated CRP and LDH and an ASCL score > 6 at admission should be prioritized for careful respiratory function monitoring and early treatment to prevent a progression of the disease.

Risk of COVID-19 and Cost Burden in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients and Policy Implications for Managing Nephrology Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of COVID-19 in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, the cost burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management of ESRD and the cost of catheter infections. In this multicentre, retrospective study, data were obtained from the records of four dialysis centres providing care for ESRD patients in Northern Cyprus. Of the 358 ESRD patients that were receiving haemodialysis (HD) 13 were diagnosed with COVID-19. The average cost of HD treatment per patient was $4822.65 in 2019 and $3759.45 in 2020 (p ≤ 0.001). The average control cost of HD treatment per patient was $618.80 in 2019 and $474.03 in 2020 (p ≤ 0.001). The outpatient treatment costs of catheter infections were not significantly different in 2019 (before) compared to 2020 (after) the pandemic ($54.61 in 2019 compared to $54.74 in 2020, p = 0.793). However, the inpatient treatment costs were significantly greater before the pandemic compared to after the pandemic ($315.33 in 2019 compared to $121.03 in 2020, p = 0.015). The costs for monitoring COVID-19 transmission in patients having ESRD management were significantly higher in HD compared to in peritoneal dialysis (PD) and transplants. Since there is a high risk of transmission of infections in the hospital environment during a pandemic, it is important to implement alternative ESRD management methods, such as enhancing transplants in populations, switching to PD, and implementing home dialysis programmes to reduce the risk of infection and associated complications, as well as the health costs associated with infection monitoring.