Do orexin/hypocretin neurons signal stress or reward?

Hypocretin-1 receptor antagonism improves inhibitory control during the Go/No-Go task in highly motivated, impulsive male mice

RATIONALE

Motivation and inhibitory control are dominantly regulated by the dopaminergic (DA) and noradrenergic (NA) systems, respectively. Hypothalamic hypocretin (orexin) neurons provide afferent inputs to DA and NA nuclei and hypocretin-1 receptors (HcrtR1) are implicated in reward and addiction. However, the role of the HcrtR1 in inhibitory control is not well understood.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of HcrtR1 antagonism and motivational state in inhibitory control using the go/no-go task in mice.

METHODS

n = 23 male C57Bl/6JArc mice were trained in a go/no-go task. Decision tree dendrogram analysis of training data identified more and less impulsive clusters of animals. A HcrtR1 antagonist (BI001, 12.5 mg/kg, per os) or vehicle were then administered 30 min before go/no-go testing, once daily for 5 days, under high (food-restricted) and low (free-feeding) motivational states in a latin-square crossover design. Compound exposure levels were assessed in a satellite group of animals.

RESULTS

HcrtR1 antagonism increased go accuracy and decreased no-go accuracy in free-feeding animals overall, whereas it decreased go accuracy and increased no-go accuracy only in more impulsive, food restricted mice. HcrtR1 antagonism also showed differential effects in premature responding, which was increased in response to the antagonist in free-feeding, less impulsive animals, and decreased in food restricted, more impulsive animals. HcrtR1 receptor occupancy by BI001 was estimated at ~ 66% during the task.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate that hypocretin signalling plays roles in goal-directed behaviour and inhibitory control in a motivational state-dependant manner. While likely not useful in all settings, HcrtR1 antagonism may be beneficial in improving inhibitory control in impulsive subpopulations.

Orexin neurons track temporal features of blood glucose in behaving mice

Does the brain track how fast our blood glucose is changing? Knowing such a rate of change would enable the prediction of an upcoming state and a timelier response to this new state. Hypothalamic arousal-orchestrating hypocretin/orexin neurons (HONs) have been proposed to be glucose sensors, yet whether they track glucose concentration (proportional tracking) or rate of change (derivative tracking) is unknown. Using simultaneous recordings of HONs and blood glucose in behaving male mice, we found that maximal HON responses occur in considerable temporal anticipation (minutes) of glucose peaks due to derivative tracking. Analysis of >900 individual HONs revealed glucose tracking in most HONs (98%), with derivative and proportional trackers working in parallel, and many (65%) HONs multiplexed glucose and locomotion information. Finally, we found that HON activity is important for glucose-evoked locomotor suppression. These findings reveal a temporal dimension of brain glucose sensing and link neurobiological and algorithmic views of blood glucose perception in the brain's arousal orchestrators.

Lesion of NPY Receptor-expressing Neurons in Perifornical Lateral Hypothalamus Attenuates Glucoprivic Feeding

Glucoprivic feeding is one of several counterregulatory responses (CRRs) that facilitates restoration of euglycemia following acute glucose deficit (glucoprivation). Our previous work established that glucoprivic feeding requires ventrolateral medullary (VLM) catecholamine (CA) neurons that coexpress neuropeptide Y (NPY). However, the connections by which VLM CA/NPY neurons trigger increased feeding are uncertain. We have previously shown that glucoprivation, induced by an anti-glycolygic agent 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2DG), activates perifornical lateral hypothalamus (PeFLH) neurons and that expression of NPY in the VLM CA/NPY neurons is required for glucoprivic feeding. We therefore hypothesized that glucoprivic feeding and possibly other CRRs require NPY-sensitive PeFLH neurons. To test this, we used the ribosomal toxin conjugate NPY-saporin (NPY-SAP) to selectively lesion NPY receptor-expressing neurons in the PeFLH of male rats. We found that NPY-SAP destroyed a significant number of PeFLH neurons, including those expressing orexin, but not those expressing melanin-concentrating hormone. The PeFLH NPY-SAP lesions attenuated 2DG-induced feeding but did not affect 2DG-induced increase in locomotor activity, sympathoadrenal hyperglycemia, or corticosterone release. The 2DG-induced feeding response was also significantly attenuated in NPY-SAP-treated female rats. Interestingly, PeFLH NPY-SAP lesioned male rats had reduced body weights and decreased dark cycle feeding, but this effect was not seen in female rats. We conclude that a NPY projection to the PeFLH is necessary for glucoprivic feeding, but not locomotor activity, hyperglycemia, or corticosterone release, in both male and female rats.

The Orexin/Hypocretin System, the Peptidergic Regulator of Vigilance, Orchestrates Adaptation to Stress

The orexin/hypocretin neuropeptide family has emerged as a focal point of neuroscientific research following the discovery that this family plays a crucial role in a variety of physiological and behavioral processes. These neuropeptides serve as powerful neuromodulators, intricately shaping autonomic, endocrine, and behavioral responses across species. Notably, they serve as master regulators of vigilance and stress responses; however, their roles in food intake, metabolism, and thermoregulation appear complementary and warrant further investigation. This narrative review provides a journey through the evolution of our understanding of the orexin system, from its initial discovery to the promising progress made in developing orexin derivatives. It goes beyond conventional boundaries, striving to synthesize the multifaceted activities of orexins. Special emphasis is placed on domains such as stress response, fear, anxiety, and learning, in which the authors have contributed to the literature with original publications. This paper also overviews the advancement of orexin pharmacology, which has already yielded some promising successes, particularly in the treatment of sleep disorders.

Inactivation of hypocretin receptor-2 signaling in dopaminergic neurons induces hyperarousal and enhanced cognition but impaired inhibitory control

Hypocretin/Orexin (HCRT/OX) and dopamine (DA) are both key effectors of salience processing, reward and stress-related behaviors and motivational states, yet their respective roles and interactions are poorly delineated. We inactivated HCRT-to-DA connectivity by genetic disruption of Hypocretin receptor-1 (Hcrtr1), Hypocretin receptor-2 (Hcrtr2), or both receptors (Hcrtr1&2) in DA neurons and analyzed the consequences on vigilance states, brain oscillations and cognitive performance in freely behaving mice. Unexpectedly, loss of Hcrtr2, but not Hcrtr1 or Hcrtr1&2, induced a dramatic increase in theta (7-11 Hz) electroencephalographic (EEG) activity in both wakefulness and rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS). DAHcrtr2-deficient mice spent more time in an active (or theta activity-enriched) substate of wakefulness, and exhibited prolonged REMS. Additionally, both wake and REMS displayed enhanced theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling. The baseline waking EEG of DAHcrtr2-deficient mice exhibited diminished infra-theta, but increased theta power, two hallmarks of EEG hyperarousal, that were however uncoupled from locomotor activity. Upon exposure to novel, either rewarding or stress-inducing environments, DAHcrtr2-deficient mice featured more pronounced waking theta and fast-gamma (52-80 Hz) EEG activity surges compared to littermate controls, further suggesting increased alertness. Cognitive performance was evaluated in an operant conditioning paradigm, which revealed that DAHcrtr2-ablated mice manifest faster task acquisition and higher choice accuracy under increasingly demanding task contingencies. However, the mice concurrently displayed maladaptive patterns of reward-seeking, with behavioral indices of enhanced impulsivity and compulsivity. None of the EEG changes observed in DAHcrtr2-deficient mice were seen in DAHcrtr1-ablated mice, which tended to show opposite EEG phenotypes. Our findings establish a clear genetically-defined link between monosynaptic HCRT-to-DA neurotransmission and theta oscillations, with a differential and novel role of HCRTR2 in theta-gamma cross-frequency coupling, attentional processes, and executive functions, relevant to disorders including narcolepsy, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and Parkinson's disease.

Association between peripheral orexin A/B levels and depression with childhood trauma

BACKGROUND

Orexin dysfunction has previously been demonstrated to be associated with depression. However, no studies reported the different effects of orexin A/B on depression with and without childhood trauma (CT). In this study，we assessed the correlation between expression of orexin A/B and depression severity in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients and healthy controls.

METHODS

A total of 97 MDD patients and 51 healthy controls were recruited in this study. According to the total scores of childhood trauma questionnaire (CTQ), the MDD patients were further divided into two subgroups, MDD with CT and MDD without CT. The 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17), and plasma orexin A and orexin B concentrations were measured in all participants using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Orexin B plasma levels were significantly higher in MDD patients with CT and without CT than that in the healthy control group (P < 0.05), whereas there was no statistical difference between the two depression groups. After adjusting age and BMI for covariates, the LASSO regression revealed significant association between the plasma orexin B levels and the total scores of HAMD (β = 3.348), CTQ (β = 2.005). There was no difference in plasma orexin A levels among three groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although peripheral orexin B levels are associated with the depression, rather than orexin A, CT appear to play a role in the association between orexin B levels and depression. China Clinical Trial Registration Center (Registration No.: ChiCTR2000039692).

Male mice engaging differently in emotional eating present distinct plasmatic and neurological profiles

Objective: Stressed individuals tend to turn to calorie-rich food, also known as 'comfort food' for the temporary relief it provides. The emotional eating drive is highly variable among subjects. Using a rodent model, we explored the plasmatic and neurobiological differences between 'high and low emotional eaters' (HEE and LEE).Methods: 40 male mice were exposed for 5 weeks to a protocol of unpredictable chronic mild stress. Every 3 or 4 days, they were submitted to a 1-h restraint stress, immediately followed by a 3-h period during which a choice between chow and chocolate sweet cereals was proposed. The dietary intake was measured by weighing. Plasmatic and neurobiological characteristics were compared in mice displaying high vs low intakes.Results: Out of 40 mice, 8 were considered as HEE because of their high post-stress eating score, and 8 as LEE because of their consistent low intake. LEE displayed higher plasma corticosterone and lower levels of NPY than HEE, but acylated and total ghrelin were similar in both groups. In the brain, the abundance of NPY neurons in the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus was similar in both groups, but was higher in the ventral hippocampus and the basal lateral amygdala of LEE. The lateral hypothalamus LEE had also more orexin (OX) positive neurons. Both NPY and OX are orexigenic peptides and mood regulators.Discussion: Emotional eating difference was reflected in plasma and brain structures implicated in emotion and eating regulation. These results concur with the psychological side of food consumption.

Restraint stress potentiates sensitivity to the antinociceptive effect of morphine through orexin receptors in the ventral tegmental area

Orexin signaling in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) plays a critical role in stress and addictive behaviors. On the other hand, exposure to stress potentiates behavioral sensitization to drugs of abuse such as morphine. This study aimed to elucidate the role of orexin receptors within the VTA in restraint stress (RS)-induced morphine sensitization. Adult male albino Wistar rats underwent stereotaxic surgery, and two stainless steel guide cannulae were bilaterally implanted into the VTA. Different doses of SB334867 or TCS OX2 29 as orexin-1 (OX1) and orexin-2 (OX2) receptor antagonists were microinjected into the VTA five min before exposure to RS, respectively. A duration of three hours was considered for applying the RS, and 10 min after RS exposure, animals received a subcutaneous injection of an ineffective dose of morphine (1 mg/kg) for three consecutive days followed by a five-day drug/stress-free period. On the ninth day, the tail-flick test evaluated the sensitivity to the antinociceptive effects of morphine. The results demonstrated that the sole application of RS or morphine (1 mg/kg) could not induce morphine sensitization; however, concurrent application of RS and morphine could induce morphine sensitization. Besides, intra-VTA administration of OX1 R or OX2 R antagonists before paired administration of morphine and RS blocked morphine sensitization. The role of OX1 R and OX2 R in the induction of stress-induced morphine sensitization was almost identical. This study provides new insight into the role of orexin signaling in the VTA in the potentiation of morphine sensitization induced by RS and morphine co-administration.

Effect of different doses of almorexant on learning and memory in 8-month-old APP/PS1 (AD) mice

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effects of different doses of almorexant (an dual orexin receptor antagonist) on learning and memory in Alzheimer's disease (AD) mice.

METHODS

Forty-four APP/PS1 (model of Alzheimer's disease; AD) mice were randomly divided into 4 groups: the control group (CON) and those that received 10mg/kg almorexant (low dose; LOW), 30mg/kg almorexant (medium dose; MED) and 60mg/kg almorexant (high dose; HIGH). During the 28-day intervention period, mice received an intraperitoneal injection at the beginning of the light period (6:00 am). The effects of different doses of almorexant on learning and memory and 24-hour sleep-wake behaviour were assessed by immunohistochemical staining. The above continuous variables are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and then univariate regression analysis and generalized estimating equations were performed to compare the groups; these results are expressed as the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The statistical software used STATA 17.0 MP.

RESULTS

Forty-one mice completed the experiment (3 died: 2 mice in the HIGH group and 1 mouse in the CON group). Compared with the CON group, the LOW group (MD=6,803s, 95% CI: 4,470 to 9,137s), MED group (MD=14,473s, 95% CI: 12,140 to 16,806s) and the HIGH group (MD=24,505s, 95% CI: 22,052 to 26,959s) had significantly longer sleep durations. The Y maze results showed that LOW group (MD=0.14,95%CI: 0.078 to 0.20) and MED group (MD=0.14,95%CI = 0.074 to 0.20) mice compared to the CON group, and the low-medium dose of Almorexant did not damage the short-term learning and memory performance of APP / PS1 (AD) mice.Compared with the CON, LOW, and MED groups, the HIGH group exhibited a significant decrease in the Aβ plaque-positive area in the cortex (MD= -0.030, 95% CI: -0.035 to -0.025; MD=-0.049, 95% CI: -0.054 to -0.044; and MD=-0.07, 95% CI: -0.076 to -0.066, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The moderate dose of almorexant (30mg/kg) prolonged the sleep duration of APP/PS1 (AD) mice to a greater extent than the low dose (10mg/kg) without altering learning and memory. The MED mice showed a good sleep response and a small residual effect on the next day. High-dose (60mg / kg) almorexant impaired behavioral learning and memory performance in mice.Compared to the CON group and the LOW group, the MED group exhibited improved working memory. Thus, treatment with almorexant may reduce β-amyloid deposition in AD, slowing neurodegeneration. Additional studies are needed to determine the mechanism of action.

Orexin dual receptor antagonists, zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone, and cognitive research: A comprehensive dose-response meta-analysis

Background

About one-third of adults have trouble sleeping, ranging from occasional difficulty to chronic insomnia, along with difficulty maintaining sleep. Many studies reported that the long-term use of hypnotics can cause brain dysfunction and damage cognition.

Objective

The objective of the study is to evaluate whether low, medium, and high doses of orexin dual receptor antagonists (DORA), zopiclone (ZOP), eszopiclone (ESZ), and zolpidem (ZST) can impair cognition.

Methods

From the beginning through September 20, 2022, PubMed, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the therapeutic effects of DORA, eszopiclone, and zopiclone for sleep and cognitive function were included. The primary outcomes were indices related to the cognitive profile, including memory, alertness, execution and control function, and attention and orientation. The secondary outcomes were indices related to sleep and adverse events. The standard mean difference (SMD) was generated for continuous variables. Certain data were captured from figures by GetData 2.26 and analyzed using RStudio 4.2.

Results

Finally, a total of 8,702 subjects were included in 29 studies. Compared with the placebo, the DSST (Digit Symbol Substitution Test) scores of low, medium, and high doses of DORA were SMD = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.33-1.20; SMD = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.11-2.05; and SMD = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.33-1.36, respectively. The DSST scores of zolpidem at low, medium, and high doses were SMD = -0.39; 95% CI: 0.85-0.07; SMD = -0.88, 95% CI: -2.34-0.58; and SMD = -0.12, 95% CI: -0.85-0.60, respectively. Zopiclone's DSST scale score was SMD = -0.18; 95% CI: -0.54-0.18. In addition, the total sleep time (TST) of low, medium, and high doses of DORA was SMD = 0.28, 95% CI: -0.15-0.70; SMD = 1.36, 95% CI: 0.87-1.86; and SMD = 2.59, 95% CI: 1.89-3.30, respectively. The TST of zolpidem with low, medium, and high doses was SMD = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.18-1.83; SMD = 1.94, 95% CI: 0.46-3.43; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.86-2.56, respectively. The TST of low, medium, and high doses of eszopiclone was relatively SMD = 2.03, 95% CI: -0.21-4.27; SMD = 2.38, 95% CI: 1.35-3.42; and SMD = 1.71, 95% CI: 0.60-2.82. Zopiclone's TST was SMD = 2.47, 95% CI: 1.36-3.58.

Conclusion

We recommend DORA as the best intervention for insomnia because it is highly effective in inducing and maintaining sleep without impairing cognition. Although zolpidem has a more pronounced effect on maintaining sleep, it is best to reduce its use because of its side effects. Eszopiclone and zopiclone improved sleep quality, but their safety in cognition remains to be verified.

Orexin facilitates the ventilatory and behavioral responses of rats to hypoxia

Orexin neurons are sensitive to CO2 and contribute to cardiorespiratory homeostasis as well as sensorimotor control. Whether orexin facilitates respiratory and behavioral responses to acute hypoxia is unclear. We hypothesized that orexin neurons are activated by acute hypoxia and that orexin facilitates the hypoxic ventilatory response (HVR), as well as the arterial blood pressure (ABP) and behavioral (movement) responses to acute hypoxia. We further hypothesized that orexin has greater effects in the active phase of the rat circadian cycle, when orexin neurons have high activity. Using whole body plethysmography with EEG, EMG, and the dual-orexin receptor (OxR) antagonist suvorexant (20 mg/kg ip), we determined the effect of OxR blockade on the respiratory, ABP, and behavioral responses of adult rats to acute, graded hypoxia ([Formula: see text]= 0.15, 0.13, 0.11, and 0.09) and hyperoxic hypercapnia ([Formula: see text]= 0.05; [Formula: see text]= 0.95). OxR blockade had no effect on eupnea. OxR blockade significantly reduced the HVR in both inactive and active phases, with a stronger effect in the active phase. OxR blockade reduced the behavioral response to acute hypoxia in the active phase. The central component of the ventilatory and the ABP responses to hypercapnia were reduced by OxR blockade solely in the inactive phase. In the inactive phase, hypoxia activated ∼10% of orexin neurons in the perifornical hypothalamus. These data suggest that orexin neurons participate in the peripheral chemoreflex to facilitate the ventilatory and behavioral responses to acute hypoxia in rats, particularly in the active phase. Orexin also facilitates central chemoreflex responses to CO2 in the inactive phase.

What evidence is there for implicating the brain orexin system in neuropsychiatric symptoms in dementia?

Neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) affect people with dementia (PwD) almost universally across all stages of the disease, and regardless of its exact etiology. NPS lead to disability and reduced quality of life of PwD and their caregivers. NPS include hyperactivity (agitation and irritability), affective problems (anxiety and depression), psychosis (delusions and hallucinations), apathy, and sleep disturbances. Preclinical studies have shown that the orexin neuropeptide system modulates arousal and a wide range of behaviors via a network of axons projecting from the hypothalamus throughout almost the entire brain to multiple, even distant, regions. Orexin neurons integrate different types of incoming information (e.g., metabolic, circadian, sensory, emotional) and convert them into the required behavioral output coupled to the necessary arousal status. Here we present an overview of the behavioral domains influenced by the orexin system that may be relevant for the expression of some critical NPS in PwD. We also hypothesize on the potential effects of pharmacological interference with the orexin system in the context of NPS in PwD.