1
|
Lee J, Choi A, Kim S. Effects of Psychiatric Comorbidities on the Prognosis of New-Onset Pediatric Epilepsy: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4500. [PMID: 39124767 PMCID: PMC11312610 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/31/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To determine the impact of psychiatric disorders on epilepsy treatment outcomes and healthcare utilization in children with epilepsy (CWE) based on the presence or timing of the onset of psychiatric disorders. Methods: This retrospective controlled study enrolled children (age < 18 years) with newly diagnosed epilepsy into four groups stratified by the presence and timing of the onset of psychiatric disorders (None: no psychiatric disorders; Before: psychiatric disorders only preceding the epilepsy diagnosis; After: new psychiatric disorders diagnosed only after the epilepsy diagnosis; Mixed: different psychiatric disorders diagnosed both before and after epilepsy diagnosis) and compared the intergroup differences in epilepsy treatment outcomes and healthcare utilization. Results: Among the CWE (n = 37,678), 13,285 (35.26%) had comorbid psychiatric disorders. The After (n = 7892), Mixed (n = 3105), and Before (n = 2288) groups had significantly longer treatment periods than those in the None group (p < 0.001). Compared with the None group, the remaining groups had significantly higher frequencies of outpatient visits, emergency room visits, and admissions and higher rates of status epilepticus and drug-resistant epilepsy (p < 0.001, respectively), with higher odds ratios [95% confidence interval] for status epilepticus (2.92 [2.68-3.18]) and drug-resistant epilepsy (3.01 [2.85-3.17]) in the After group. Conclusions: Psychiatric comorbidities, diagnosed before and after epilepsy diagnosis, negatively affected the treatment outcomes. CWE without prior psychiatric disorders that were newly diagnosed during epilepsy treatment had the worst outcomes and the highest healthcare utilization rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jooyoung Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 03312, Republic of Korea;
| | - Arum Choi
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sukil Kim
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 06591, Republic of Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Montgomery CJ, Faurholdt IM, Cullen AE, Taipale H, Mittendorfer-Rutz E, Krasnik A, Norredam M. Involuntary admissions for non-affective psychotic disorders in young refugees and peers in Denmark: A population cohort study. Schizophr Res 2024; 270:366-371. [PMID: 38971014 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2024.06.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION People with psychotic disorders are at increased risk of experiencing involuntary hospital admissions relative to other psychiatric patients. Within this group, refugees and other minority groups may be at even greater risk. However, little is known about the role of migration background in the risk of involuntary admissions around the time of first psychosis-related treatment. METHOD We utilized nationwide administrative data from Denmark covering the period 2006-2018. We included all persons aged 18-35 years in first treatment for psychotic disorders [inpatient and hospital-based outpatient settings (N = 11,871)]. We estimated odds ratios (OR) of any involuntary inpatient admission within three months of first treatment using logistic regression, and rate ratios (RR) of further involuntary admissions, total number of involuntary admissions, and days of involuntary care among patients initially admitted involuntarily using Poisson regression. We compared refugees with majority peers (native-born with native-born parent), other migrants, and descendants of non-refugee migrants. RESULTS Compared with the majority group, refugees, non-refugee migrants and descendants were at increased risk of involuntarily admissions (ORrange = 2.12-2.69). Differences in sex, age, education, household income and family situation did not explain these disparities. In contrast, the risk of subsequent involuntary care did not differ between groups (RRrange = 0.77-1.31). CONCLUSIONS The findings highlight the need to review if and why processes of needs detection and voluntary treatment enrolment are less effective for minorities in Denmark. Further studies should investigate the pathways to care across population groups to inform interventions that address disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Jamil de Montgomery
- Department of Public Health, Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health (MESU), University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | - Alexis E Cullen
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Psychosis Studies, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi Taipale
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland; School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
| | - Ellenor Mittendorfer-Rutz
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Division of Insurance Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Section for Science of Complex Systems, CeMSIIS, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Allan Krasnik
- Department of Public Health, Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health (MESU), University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark
| | - Marie Norredam
- Department of Public Health, Danish Research Centre for Migration, Ethnicity and Health (MESU), University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014 Copenhagen K, Denmark; Section of Immigrant Medicine, Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haran M, Killeen D, Healy M, Brophy P, Donohue A, Whyte I, Doody B. Prevalence and correlates of restrictive interventions in an Irish child and adolescent psychiatric unit: a 4-year retrospective study. Ir J Med Sci 2023; 192:2929-2936. [PMID: 36813877 PMCID: PMC10692034 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03316-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There has been a global effort to reduce the use of restrictive interventions (RIs) in healthcare settings. In order to reduce unnecessary RIs, it is essential to understand their use in mental health settings. To date, there have been few studies examining the use of RIs in child and adolescent mental health settings, with no such studies in Ireland. AIMS The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and frequency of physical restraints and seclusion and to identify any associated demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS This is a 4-year retrospective study of the use of seclusion and physical restraint in an Irish child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit from 2018 to 2021. Computer-based data collection sheets and patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Eating disorder and non-eating disorder samples were analysed. RESULTS Of 499 hospital admissions from 2018 to 2021, 6% (n = 29) had at least one episode of seclusion and 18% (n = 88) had at least one episode of physical restraint. Age, gender and ethnicity were not significantly associated with rates of RI. Unemployment, prior hospitalization, involuntary legal status and longer length of stay were significantly associated with higher rates of RIs in the non-eating disorder group. Involuntary legal status was associated with higher rates of physical restraint in the eating disorder group. Patients with a diagnosis of eating disorder and psychosis had the highest prevalence of physical restraints and seclusions respectively. CONCLUSIONS Identifying youth who are at greater risk of requiring RIs may allow early and targeted intervention and prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maeve Haran
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
- Children's Health Ireland at Crumlin, Dublin, D12N512, Ireland.
| | - David Killeen
- Dublin North City and County CAMHS - Ballymun CAMHS, Ballymun Civic Centre, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Mike Healy
- Linn Dara Inpatient Unit, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Ballyfermot Rd, Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Peadar Brophy
- Linn Dara Inpatient Unit, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Ballyfermot Rd, Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aoife Donohue
- Linn Dara Inpatient Unit, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Ballyfermot Rd, Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Imelda Whyte
- Linn Dara Inpatient Unit, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Ballyfermot Rd, Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Brendan Doody
- Linn Dara Inpatient Unit, Cherry Orchard Hospital, Ballyfermot Rd, Cherry Orchard, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
O’Donoghue B, Roche E, Lyne J, Renwick L, Clarke M. Outcomes 1 year after a first episode of psychosis in migrants to the Republic of Ireland. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2023; 69:1617-1625. [PMID: 37211684 PMCID: PMC10657506 DOI: 10.1177/00207640231174360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migration is a robust risk factor for developing a psychotic disorder, yet there is a paucity of research on the outcomes of migrants who develop a psychotic disorder. Identifying sub-groups within FEP cohorts who have a poorer outcome, could assist in the development and delivery of more targeted interventions. AIMS There is a paucity of research on the outcomes of migrants who develop a psychotic disorder. This study aimed to evaluate a broad range of outcomes for those with a FEP who migrated to the Republic of Ireland, including: (i) symptomatic; (ii) functional; (iii) hospitalisation and (iv) engagement with psychosocial services. METHODS All individuals with a FEP aged 18 to 65 who presented between 01.02.2006 and 01.07.2014 were included. Structured and validated instruments were used to measure positive, negative, depressive symptoms and insight. RESULTS Of the 573 individuals with a FEP, 22.3% were first-generation migrants and 63.4% (n = 363) were followed up at 1 year. At this time, 72.4% of migrants were in remission of positive psychotic symptoms compared to 78.5% of the Irish born (OR = 0.84, 95% CI [0.50-1.41], p = .51). In relation to negative symptoms, 60.5% of migrants were in remission compared to 67.2% of the Irish born (OR = 0.75, 95% CI [0.44-1.27], p = .283). There was no difference in the severity of positive, negative or depressive symptoms between groups and there was a trend for the Irish born to have better insight (p = .056). The functional outcomes were similar across groups. One third of migrants were admitted to hospital compared to 28.7% of the Irish born (OR = 1.24, 95% CI [0.73-2.13], p = .426). Just over half of both groups attended CBT and 46.2% of caregivers for migrants attended the psychoeducation programme, compared to 39.7% for the Irish born (OR = 1.30, 95% CI [0.79-2.16], p = .306). CONCLUSIONS These findings demonstrate that migrants have broadly similar outcomes to the native-born populations, however there is still considerable scope for the outcomes for all individuals affected by psychotic disorders to be improved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian O’Donoghue
- Department of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC, Australia
| | - Eric Roche
- Cluain Mhuire Mental Health Services, Newtownpark Avenue, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
| | - John Lyne
- Department of Psychiatry, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland
- Wicklow Mental Health Services, Newcastle Hospital, Greystones, Co. Wicklow, Ireland
| | - Laoise Renwick
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK
| | - Mary Clarke
- Department of Psychiatry, University College Dublin, Ireland
- DETECT Early Intervention for Psychosis Service, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loyal JP, Lavergne MR, Shirmaleki M, Fischer B, Kaoser R, Makolewksi J, Small W. Trends in Involuntary Psychiatric Hospitalization in British Columbia: Descriptive Analysis of Population-Based Linked Administrative Data from 2008 to 2018. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2023; 68:257-268. [PMID: 36200433 PMCID: PMC10037746 DOI: 10.1177/07067437221128477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Involuntary psychiatric hospitalization occurs when someone with a serious mental disorder requires treatment without their consent. Trends vary globally, and currently, there is limited data on involuntary hospitalization in Canada. We examine involuntary hospitalization trends in British Columbia, Canada, and describe the social and clinical characteristics of people ages 15 and older who were involuntarily hospitalized between 2008/2009 and 2017/2018. METHOD We used population-based linked administrative data to examine and compare trends in involuntary and voluntary hospitalizations for mental and substance use disorders. We described patient characteristics (sex/gender, age, health authority, income, urbanity/rurality, and primary diagnosis) and tracked the count of involuntarily hospitalized people over time by diagnosis. Finally, we examined population-based prevalence over time by age and sex/gender. RESULTS Involuntary hospitalizations among British Columbians ages 15 and older rose from 14,195 to 23,531 (65.7%) between 2008/2009 and 2017/2018. Apprehensions involving police increased from 3,502 to 8,009 (128.7%). Meanwhile, voluntary admissions remained relatively stable, with a minimal increase from 17,651 in 2008/2009 to 17,751 in 2017/2018 (0.5%). The most common diagnosis for involuntary patients in 2017/2018 was mood disorders (25.1%), followed by schizophrenia (22.3%), and substance use disorders (18.8%). From 2008/2009 to 2017/2018, the greatest increase was observed for substance use disorders (139%). Over time, population-based prevalence increased most rapidly among women ages 15-24 (162%) and men ages 15-34 (81%) and 85 and older (106%). CONCLUSION Findings highlight the need to strengthen the voluntary care system for mental health and substance use, especially for younger adults, and people who use substances. They also signal a need for closer examination of the use of involuntary treatment for substance use disorders, as well as further research exploring forces driving police involvement and its implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson P Loyal
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia
| | - M Ruth Lavergne
- Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Mehdi Shirmaleki
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ridhwana Kaoser
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jack Makolewksi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Will Small
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
- BC Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Freitas DF, Walker S, Nyikavaranda P, Downs J, Patel R, Khondoker M, Bhui K, Hayes RD. Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission under the Mental Health Act: an exploration of mediation effects of clinical care prior to the first admission. Br J Psychiatry 2023; 222:27-36. [PMID: 36281471 PMCID: PMC10250681 DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2022.141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies show ethnic inequalities in rates of involuntary admission and types of clinical care (such as psychological therapies). However, few studies have investigated if there is a relationship between clinical care practices and ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission. AIMS This study investigated the impact of ethnicity and clinical care on involuntary admission and the potential mediation effects of prior clinical care. METHOD In this retrospective cohort study, we used data from the electronic records of the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and identified patients with a first hospital admission between January 2008 and May 2021. Logistic regression and mediation analyses were used to investigate the association between ethnicity and involuntary admission, and whether clinical care, in the 12 months preceding admission, mediates the association. RESULTS Compared with White British people, higher odds of involuntary admission were observed among 10 of 14 minority ethnic groups; with more than twice the odds observed among people of Asian Chinese, of Asian Bangladeshi and of any Black background. There were some ethnic differences in clinical care prior to admission, but these had a minimal impact on the inequalities in involuntary admission. More out-patient appointments and home treatment were associated with higher odds of involuntary admission, whereas psychological therapies and having a care plan were associated with reduced odds of involuntary admission. CONCLUSIONS Ethnic inequalities in involuntary admission persist after accounting for potential mediating effects of several types and frequencies of clinical care. Promoting access to psychological therapies and ensuring that care plans are in place may reduce involuntary admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Fonseca Freitas
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK and Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Susan Walker
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, UK and Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK
| | - Patrick Nyikavaranda
- Department of Primary Care & Public Health, Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, UK
| | - Johnny Downs
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rashmi Patel
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | | | - Kamaldeep Bhui
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, UK and Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, UK
| | - Richard D. Hayes
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schneider M, Back M, Krückl JS, Moeller J, Lang UE, Huber CG. Compulsory psychiatric admissions in the canton of Basel-Stadt between September 2013 and April 2022: Analysis of the cantonal database of the Health Department of Basel-Stadt. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2022:207640221141020. [PMID: 36453089 DOI: 10.1177/00207640221141020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to federal and cantonal law, persons with an acute mental illness can be admitted to a psychiatric hospital or another suitable institution against their will, when other therapeutic options are not available or have been exhausted. In the canton of Basel-Stadt, this is the responsibility of public health officers employed by the division of Social Medicine of the cantonal Health Department. AIMS This study aims to elucidate which factors influence the decision-making of public health officers regarding compulsory admissions over the period from September 2013 to April 2022 in the canton of Basel-Stadt. METHOD Leveraging comprehensive clinical data from the health department of the canton Basel-Stadt (N = 5,'550), we estimated a mixed effects logistic regression model to identify factors contributing to the decision of public-health officers to compulsorily admit patients, while controlling for potential clustering effects among public health officers. RESULTS The risk for compulsory admissions was most strongly predicted by the presence of potential self-harm. In comparison, while being a strong predictor, potential harm to others played a considerably lesser role. Furthermore, psychiatric syndrome, previous compulsory admissions, and the specific context of evaluation were significant predictors. Finally, we found no meaningful personal bias among public health officers. CONCLUSION The results suggest that public health officers' decision-making regarding compulsory admissions focuses on preventing self-harm and, to a lesser degree, harm to others. This indicates that such measures are only used as a measure of last resort, which is in line with current evidence regarding the detrimental effects of compulsory measures on treatment outcomes in psychiatry. Our findings suggest that all relevant stakeholders, including the police, share this perspective. Decision-making regarding compulsory admissions was mostly free of personal biases, suggesting adherence to shared professional standards by public health officers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Schneider
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Moritz Back
- Health Department of Basel-Stadt, Cantonal Medical Service, Social Medicine, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jana S Krückl
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Julian Moeller
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.,Division of Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Undine E Lang
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Christian G Huber
- University Psychiatric Clinics Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kaikoushi K, Nystazaki M, Chatzittofis A, Middleton N, Karanikola NKM. Involuntary psychiatric admission in Cyprus: A descriptive correlational study. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2022; 40:32-42. [PMID: 36064243 DOI: 10.1016/j.apnu.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Studies on the clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of those involuntarily admitted to psychiatric settings could help professionals and researchers to develop effective, targeted interventions, alternative to compulsory psychiatric care. AIM The association between socio-demographic and clinical characteristics in adults under involuntary hospitalization for psychiatric treatment in the Republic of Cyprus was assessed. METHOD This was a descriptive, cross-sectional and correlational study. Data collection was achieved (December 2016 to February 2018) via a census sampling method. Socio-demographic and clinical data of individuals involuntarily admitted to the reference psychiatric hospital of Cyprus with psychotic symptomatology were recorded. RESULTS The sample encompassed 144 females and 262 males. The most frequent diagnosis was schizophrenia or a relevant psychotic disorder (72.9%). The most frequent cause of admission was "Disorganized behaviour" along with non-adherence to pharmacotherapy (53.7%). Approximately 42.8% of the participants confirmed positive substance use history, which was more frequently reported in males than in females (88.5% vs. 11.5%, respectively, p < 0.001). Additionally, males were more frequently admitted due to Disorganized behaviour with substance use compared to females (31.3% vs. 4.9%, respectively, p < 0.001), while females were more frequently admitted due to d"Disorganized behaviour with non-adherence to pharmacotherapy (70.1% vs. 44.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Also, males were more frequently involuntarily hospitalized due to suicidal/self-harming behaviour compared to females (12.2% vs. 5.6%, respectively, p = 0.031). CONCLUSION Gender differences were noted in relation to clinical characteristics of the participants, highlighting the need for gender-specific interventions to decrease compulsory psychiatric care, including enhancement of adherence to therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Kaikoushi
- Cyprus University of Technology, School of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - M Nystazaki
- Second Department of Psychiatry, University and General Hospital Attikon, Athens, Greece
| | | | - N Middleton
- Cyprus University of Technology, School of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - N K M Karanikola
- Cyprus University of Technology, School of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Limassol, Cyprus.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Peters SJ, Schmitz-Buhl M, Karasch O, Zielasek J, Gouzoulis-Mayfrank E. Determinants of compulsory hospitalisation at admission and in the course of inpatient treatment in people with mental disorders-a retrospective analysis of health records of the four psychiatric hospitals of the city of Cologne. BMC Psychiatry 2022; 22:471. [PMID: 35836146 PMCID: PMC9284734 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-022-04107-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We aimed to identify differences in predictors of involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation depending on whether the inpatient stay was involuntary right from the beginning since admission or changed from voluntary to involuntary in the course of in-patient treatment. METHODS We conducted an analysis of 1,773 mental health records of all cases treated under the Mental Health Act in the city of Cologne in the year 2011. 79.4% cases were admitted involuntarily and 20.6% were initially admitted on their own will and were detained later during the course of in-patient stay. We compared the clinical, sociodemographic, socioeconomic and environmental socioeconomic data (ESED) of the two groups. Finally, we employed two different machine learning decision-tree algorithms, Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID) and Random Forest. RESULTS Most of the investigated variables did not differ and those with significant differences showed consistently low effect sizes. In the CHAID analysis, the first node split was determined by the hospital the patient was treated at. The diagnosis of a psychotic disorder, an affective disorder, age, and previous outpatient treatment as well as the purchasing power per 100 inhabitants in the living area of the patients also played a role in the model. In the Random Forest, age and the treating hospital had the highest impact on the accuracy and decrease in Gini of the model. However, both models achieved a poor balanced accuracy. Overall, the decision-tree analyses did not yield a solid, causally interpretable prediction model. CONCLUSION Cases with detention at admission and cases with detention in the course of in-patient treatment were largely similar in respect to the investigated variables. Our findings give no indication for possible differential preventive measures against coercion for the two subgroups. There is no need or rationale to differentiate the two subgroups in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sönke Johann Peters
- LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411097.a0000 0000 8852 305XUniversity Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Mario Schmitz-Buhl
- LVR Clinics Cologne, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Olaf Karasch
- LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jürgen Zielasek
- LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109 Cologne, Germany ,grid.411327.20000 0001 2176 9917Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
- LVR Institute for Healthcare Research, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109, Cologne, Germany. .,LVR Clinics Cologne, Wilhelm-Griesinger-Strasse 23, 51109, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ma Y, Zhang J, Rosenheck R, He H. Why did China's mental health law have a limited effect on decreasing rates of involuntary hospitalization? Int J Ment Health Syst 2022; 16:32. [PMID: 35780209 PMCID: PMC9250239 DOI: 10.1186/s13033-022-00543-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND China's Mental Health Law (MHL) implemented in 2013 required increased consideration of the rights of people with mental illness and was expected to lead to a reduction in involuntary hospitalization (IH). This study aimed to examine the rates and correlates of IH in a large psychiatric hospital in Guangzhou from 2014 to 2017 after the implementation of MHL and a structured assessment of the need for IH. METHODS Unduplicated electronic medical records concerning all inpatients admitted to the hospital with a primary psychiatric diagnose were examined. Diagnostic, sociodemographic and socioeconomic data were used to identify correlates of IH using bivariate chi-square tests followed by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS Of 10, 818 hospitalized patients, there was a significant but small increase, from 71.6 to 74.9% in rates of IH in the years after a structured assessment of need for IH was implemented. Logistic regression analysis showed IH was positively associated with being younger, having a local residence, and a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia spectrum disorders or a substance abuse disorder as compared to those diagnosed with major depressive disorder. CONCLUSIONS IH did not decrease over the first four years after the implementation of China's MHL and a structured assessment in 2013 perhaps, reflecting the initiation of a systematic assessment of the need for IH and the relatively low number of psychiatric beds in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yarong Ma
- Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), 36 Mingxin Rd. Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), 36 Mingxin Rd. Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China
| | - Robert Rosenheck
- Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Hongbo He
- Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Guangzhou Huiai Hospital), 36 Mingxin Rd. Liwan District, Guangzhou, 510370, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rotenberg M, Tuck A, Anderson KK, McKenzie K. The Incidence of Psychotic Disorders and Area-level Marginalization in Ontario, Canada: A Population-based Retrospective Cohort Study. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2022; 67:216-225. [PMID: 33896210 PMCID: PMC8935600 DOI: 10.1177/07067437211011852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited Canadian evidence on the impact of socio-environmental factors on psychosis risk. We sought to examine the relationship between area-level indicators of marginalization and the incidence of psychotic disorders in Ontario. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all people aged 14 to 40 years living in Ontario in 1999 using health administrative data and identified incident cases of psychotic disorders over a 10-year follow-up period. Age-standardized incidence rates were estimated for census metropolitan areas (CMAs). Poisson regression models adjusting for age and sex were used to calculate incidence rate ratios (IRRs) based on CMA and area-level marginalization indices. RESULTS There is variation in the incidence of psychotic disorders across the CMAs. Our findings suggest a higher rate of psychotic disorders in areas with the highest levels of residential instability (IRR = 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.35), material deprivation (IRR = 1.30, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.45), ethnic concentration (IRR = 1.61, 95% CI, 1.38 to 1.89), and dependency (IRR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.18 to 1.54) when compared to areas with the lowest levels of marginalization. Marginalization attenuates the risk in some CMAs. CONCLUSIONS There is geographic variation in the incidence of psychotic disorders across the province of Ontario. Areas with greater levels of marginalization have a higher incidence of psychotic disorders, and marginalization attenuates the differences in risk across geographic location. With further study, replication, and the use of the most up-to-date data, a case may be made to consider social policy interventions as preventative measures and to direct services to areas with the highest risk. Future research should examine how marginalization may interact with other social factors including ethnicity and immigration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rotenberg
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrew Tuck
- Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelly K Anderson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kwame McKenzie
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Knight S, Jarvis GE, Ryder AG, Lashley M, Rousseau C. Ethnoracial Differences in Coercive Referral and Intervention Among Patients With First-Episode Psychosis. Psychiatr Serv 2022; 73:2-8. [PMID: 34253035 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using a retrospective sample, the authors sought to determine whether Black patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) in Canada were at a higher risk for coercive referral and coercive intervention than non-Black patients with FEP. METHODS Retrospective data from patients referred to an FEP program in 2008-2018 were collected via chart review (N=208). The authors used chi-square and logistic regression analyses to explore the relationships among race-ethnicity, diagnosis of psychosis, and coercive referral and intervention. RESULTS Results showed that Black persons of Caribbean or African descent with FEP were significantly more likely to be coercively referred (χ2=9.24, df=2, p=0.010) and coercively treated (χ2=9.21, df=2, p=0.010) than were non-Black individuals with FEP. Age and violent or threatening behavior were predictors of coercive referral. Ethnoracial status, age, and violent or threatening behavior were predictors of coercive intervention. CONCLUSIONS This study contributes to the dearth of research on Black Canadians and offers insight into factors that may place patients with FEP at risk for coercive treatment. More research is needed to explore the role that ethnoracial status may play in hospital admissions and to uncover the role of racial prejudices in the assessment of danger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sommer Knight
- Department of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (all authors); First Episode Psychosis Program (FEPP), Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Jarvis); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal (Ryder)
| | - G Eric Jarvis
- Department of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (all authors); First Episode Psychosis Program (FEPP), Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Jarvis); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal (Ryder)
| | - Andrew G Ryder
- Department of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (all authors); First Episode Psychosis Program (FEPP), Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Jarvis); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal (Ryder)
| | - Myrna Lashley
- Department of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (all authors); First Episode Psychosis Program (FEPP), Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Jarvis); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal (Ryder)
| | - Cécile Rousseau
- Department of Social and Transcultural Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal (all authors); First Episode Psychosis Program (FEPP), Institute of Community and Family Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal (Jarvis); Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts and Science, Concordia University, Montreal (Ryder)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sociodemographic, Circumstantial, and Psychopathological Predictors of Involuntary Admission of Patients with Acute Psychosis. PSYCHIATRY INTERNATIONAL 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/psychiatryint2030024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Studies have consistently determined that patients with acute psychosis are more likely to be involuntarily admitted, although few studies examine specific risk factors of involuntary admission (IA) among this patient group. Data from all patients presenting in the psychiatric emergency department (PED) over a period of one year were extracted. Acute psychosis was identified using specific diagnostic criteria. Predictors of IA were determined using logistic regression analysis. Out of 2533 emergency consultations, 597 patients presented with symptoms of acute psychosis, of whom 118 were involuntarily admitted (19.8%). Involuntarily admitted patients were more likely to arrive via police escort (odds ratio (OR) 10.94) or ambulance (OR 2.95), live in a psychiatric residency/nursing home (OR 2.76), report non-adherence to medication (OR 2.39), and were less likely to suffer from (comorbid) substance abuse (OR 0.53). Use of mechanical restraint was significantly associated with IA (OR 13.31). Among psychopathological aspects, aggressiveness was related to the highest risk of IA (OR 6.18), followed by suicidal intent (OR 5.54), disorientation (OR 4.66), tangential thinking (OR 3.95), and suspiciousness (OR 2.80). Patients stating fears were less likely to be involuntarily admitted (OR 0.25). By understanding the surrounding influencing factors, patient care can be improved with the aim of reducing the use of coercion.
Collapse
|
14
|
Symptomatic, functional and service utilization outcomes of migrants with a first episode of psychosis. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2021; 56:1389-1397. [PMID: 33399882 DOI: 10.1007/s00127-020-02011-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Certain migrant groups have been identified as being at increased risk of developing a psychotic disorder, but there is limited research on the outcomes for migrants who develop a first episode of psychosis (FEP). We investigated symptomatic outcomes (remission and relapse rates), functional outcomes (occupational status and relationships) and service utilization (hospital admission and engagement). METHODS Young people, aged between 15 and 24, who presented with FEP to the Early Psychosis Prevention and Intervention Centre (EPPIC) at Orygen between 01.01.11 and 31.12.16 were included. Place of birth was recorded at the time of presentation. To determine remission, symptoms were scored at three-month intervals using the short-form Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms. RESULTS A total of 1220 young people presented with FEP over the six-year period (mean age = 19.6 ± 2.8). Of these, 58.1% were male and 24.0% were first-generation migrants. While there was no difference in overall rates of admission after presentation, migrants were more likely to have an involuntary admission after presentation (31.4% vs. 24.6%, aHR = 1.54, 95% CI [1.19, 2.01]) and this risk was greatest for African migrants (HR = 1.98, 95% C.I. [1.37, 2.86]. The rates of remission and relapse were similar in migrants and those born in Australia and there was no difference in functional outcomes, such as employment rates at follow-up. DISCUSSION The outcomes for migrants who experience FEP appear to be largely similar to those for the Australian-born population. Our finding that a greater rate of involuntary admission for migrants at presentation supports existing literature and needs further exploration to improve clinical care.
Collapse
|
15
|
Durns TA, O'Connell PH, Shvartsur A, Grey JS, Kious BM. Effects of temporary psychiatric holds on length of stay and readmission risk among persons admitted for psychotic disorders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2021; 76:101695. [PMID: 33761439 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101695] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The practice of involuntary psychiatric commitment is central to the acute treatment of persons with severe mental illness and others in psychiatric crisis. Deciding whether a patient should be admitted involuntarily requires weighing respect for autonomy against beneficence, considering the clinical needs of the patient, and navigating ambiguous legal standards. The relative dearth of information about the impact of involuntary commitment on objective patient outcomes complicates matters ethically, legally, and clinically. To address this gap in the literature, we sought to determine the association between temporary psychiatric holds and length of stay and readmission rates among a retrospective sample of adult patients admitted to a large psychiatric hospital with diagnoses of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, mania, and other psychotic disorders. In total, we identified 460 patients and 559 unique encounters meeting our inclusion criteria; 90 of the encounters were voluntary (involving a temporary psychiatric hold) and 469 were involuntary. Univariable and multivariable analyses suggested that temporary psychiatric holds were not significantly associated with either length of stay or readmission rate. These findings are relevant to clinicians who must decide whether to admit a patient involuntarily, as they suggest that making a patient involuntary is not associated with differences in length of stay or readmission risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler A Durns
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 501 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| | - Patrick H O'Connell
- University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Anna Shvartsur
- University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Jessica S Grey
- University of Utah School of Medicine, 30 N 1900 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA.
| | - Brent M Kious
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, 501 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Maina G, Rosso G, Carezana C, Mehanović E, Risso F, Villari V, Gariglio L, Cardano M. Factors associated with involuntary admissions: a register-based cross-sectional multicenter study. Ann Gen Psychiatry 2021; 20:3. [PMID: 33413499 PMCID: PMC7792311 DOI: 10.1186/s12991-020-00323-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the EU recommendations on mental health, involuntary admission has been under researched in Italy for a long time and the overall picture of involuntary admission still appears fragmentary. The aims of this study are to evaluate involuntary admission rates in the Piedmont Region (Italy) and to investigate clinical and service-related variables associated with involuntary admission. METHODS This is a cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study involving all psychiatric inpatients units of the general hospitals of Piedmont Region. Data on hospitalizations during 2016 were collected by consulting hospital discharge registers. The analyses were performed on two samples: 6018 patients (data analysis was run on first hospitalization during the study period for those with multiple admissions) and 7881 inpatient episodes. The association between involuntary admission and socio-demographic and clinical characteristics was examined through t-test for continuous variables, and Pearson's Chi-square test for categorical variables. Multilevel modeling was applied in logistic regression models with two levels: for the first model center and participants and for the second model center and inpatient episodes. RESULTS Of 6018 inpatients, 10.1% were admitted involuntarily at first hospitalization, while the overall compulsory treatment rate was slightly lower (9.1%) in the inpatient episodes sample (n = 7881). The involuntary admission rates ranged from 0.8 to 21% among study centers. Involuntary admissions were primarily associated with younger age, diagnosis of schizophrenia or substance use disorders, longer duration of hospital stay, mechanical restraint episodes, and fewer subsequent hospitalizations during the study period. CONCLUSIONS The rate of involuntary admission in the Piedmont Region was lower than the mean rate across countries worldwide. There were noteworthy differences in rates of involuntary admission among psychiatric units, although no relationship was found with characteristics of the psychiatric wards or of the areas where hospitals are located.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Maina
- Department of Neurosciences 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Psychiatric Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital of Orbassano, Torino, Italy
| | - G Rosso
- Department of Neurosciences 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Torino, Italy. .,Psychiatric Unit, San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital of Orbassano, Torino, Italy.
| | - C Carezana
- Psychiatric Unit, Martini Hospital, ASL Città Di Torino, Piedmont Region, Torino, Italy
| | - E Mehanović
- Department of Neurosciences 'Rita Levi Montalcini', University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - F Risso
- Mental Health Department of Cuneo, Piedmont Region, Italy
| | - V Villari
- Neuroscience and Mental Health Department, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Torino, Italy
| | - L Gariglio
- Departments of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| | - M Cardano
- Departments of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, Torino, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wasserman D, Apter G, Baeken C, Bailey S, Balazs J, Bec C, Bienkowski P, Bobes J, Ortiz MFB, Brunn H, Bôke Ö, Camilleri N, Carpiniello B, Chihai J, Chkonia E, Courtet P, Cozman D, David M, Dom G, Esanu A, Falkai P, Flannery W, Gasparyan K, Gerlinger G, Gorwood P, Gudmundsson O, Hanon C, Heinz A, Dos Santos MJH, Hedlund A, Ismayilov F, Ismayilov N, Isometsä ET, Izakova L, Kleinberg A, Kurimay T, Reitan SK, Lecic-Tosevski D, Lehmets A, Lindberg N, Lundblad KA, Lynch G, Maddock C, Malt UF, Martin L, Martynikhin I, Maruta NO, Matthys F, Mazaliauskiene R, Mihajlovic G, Peles AM, Miklavic V, Mohr P, Ferrandis MM, Musalek M, Neznanov N, Ostorharics-Horvath G, Pajević I, Popova A, Pregelj P, Prinsen E, Rados C, Roig A, Kuzman MR, Samochowiec J, Sartorius N, Savenko Y, Skugarevsky O, Slodecki E, Soghoyan A, Stone DS, Taylor-East R, Terauds E, Tsopelas C, Tudose C, Tyano S, Vallon P, Van der Gaag RJ, Varandas P, Vavrusova L, Voloshyn P, Wancata J, Wise J, Zemishlany Z, Öncü F, Vahip S. Compulsory admissions of patients with mental disorders: State of the art on ethical and legislative aspects in 40 European countries. Eur Psychiatry 2020; 63:e82. [PMID: 32829740 PMCID: PMC7576531 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.79] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. Compulsory admission procedures of patients with mental disorders vary between countries in Europe. The Ethics Committee of the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) launched a survey on involuntary admission procedures of patients with mental disorders in 40 countries to gather information from all National Psychiatric Associations that are members of the EPA to develop recommendations for improving involuntary admission processes and promote voluntary care. Methods. The survey focused on legislation of involuntary admissions and key actors involved in the admission procedure as well as most common reasons for involuntary admissions. Results. We analyzed the survey categorical data in themes, which highlight that both medical and legal actors are involved in involuntary admission procedures. Conclusions. We conclude that legal reasons for compulsory admission should be reworded in order to remove stigmatization of the patient, that raising awareness about involuntary admission procedures and patient rights with both patients and family advocacy groups is paramount, that communication about procedures should be widely available in lay-language for the general population, and that training sessions and guidance should be available for legal and medical practitioners. Finally, people working in the field need to be constantly aware about the ethical challenges surrounding compulsory admissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Wasserman
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Apter
- French Federation of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Groupe Hospitalier du Havre, Université de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - C Baeken
- Flemish Association of Psychiatry, Kortenberg, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychiatry, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - S Bailey
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,University of Central Lancashire, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - J Balazs
- Hungarian Psychiatric Association, Budapest, Hungary.,Department of Developmental and Clinical Child Psychology at the Institute Psychology Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - C Bec
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - P Bienkowski
- Polish Psychiatric Association, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Psychiatry, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - J Bobes
- Spanish Society of Psychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain
| | - M F Bravo Ortiz
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Mental Health, La Paz University Hospital, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Brunn
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Danish Psychiatric Association, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Institute of regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Ö Bôke
- Psychiatric Association of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.,Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, Samsun, Turkey
| | - N Camilleri
- Maltese Association of Psychiatry, Attard, Malta.,University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - B Carpiniello
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Italian Psychiatric Association, Roma, Italy.,Department of Public Health, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Università degli studi di Cagliari, Sardinia, Italy
| | - J Chihai
- Society of Psychiatrists, Narcologists, Psychotherapists, and Clinical Psychologists from the Republic of Moldova, Chișinău, Moldova.,Department of State Medical and Pharmaceutical University "Nicolae Testemitanu", Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - E Chkonia
- Society of Georgian Psychiatrists, Tbilisi, Georgia.,Department of Psychiatry, Tbilisi State Medical University, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | - P Courtet
- French Congress of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,University of Montpellier, CHRU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,Department of Emergency Psychiatry and Acute Care, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - D Cozman
- Romanian Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bucharest, Romania.,Medical Psychology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-NapocaRomania
| | - M David
- French Federation of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Fondation Bon Sauveur, Bégard, France
| | - G Dom
- Belgium Professional Association of Medical Specialists in Psychiatry, Brussel, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry, Antwerp University (UA), Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - A Esanu
- Society of Psychiatrists, Narcologists, Psychotherapists, and Clinical Psychologists from the Republic of Moldova, Chișinău, Moldova.,Department of Psychiatry, Narcology and Medical Psychology, State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Chișinău, Republic of Moldova
| | - P Falkai
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany.,Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W Flannery
- College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,Department of Adult Psychiatry, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - K Gasparyan
- Armenian Psychiatric Association, Yerevan, Armenia.,Medical Psychology Department, Yerevan State Mkhitar Herats Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - G Gerlinger
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Gorwood
- French Congress of Psychiatry, Paris, France.,Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), University of ParisParis, France
| | - O Gudmundsson
- Icelandic Psychiatric Association, Kopavogur, Iceland.,Psychiatric Department, Landspitali, University Hospital of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - C Hanon
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Regional Resource Center of old age Psychiatry, AP-HP Centre - Université de Paris, Corentin-Celton Hospital, Paris, France
| | - A Heinz
- German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Berlin, Germany.,Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M J Heitor Dos Santos
- Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.,Institute of Environmental Health (ISAMB) of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Lisbon (FMUL), Lisbon, Portugal
| | - A Hedlund
- Swedish Psychiatry Association, Sundsvall, Sweden.,North Stockholm Psychiatry, Stockholm County Medical Area (SLSO), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - F Ismayilov
- Azerbaijan Psychiatric Association, Baku, Azerbaijan.,National Mental Health Centre, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - N Ismayilov
- Azerbaijan Psychiatric Association, Baku, Azerbaijan.,Department of Psychiatry, Azerbaijan Medical University, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - E T Isometsä
- Finnish Psychiatric Association, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - L Izakova
- Slovak Psychiatric Association, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine Comenius University and University Hospital, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - A Kleinberg
- Estonian Psychiatric Association, Tartu, Estonia.,Children Mental Health Centre of Tallinn Children Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - T Kurimay
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Teaching Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - S Klæbo Reitan
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Teaching Department of Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.,Norwegian Psychiatric Association, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norweigan University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - D Lecic-Tosevski
- Serbian Psychiatric Association, Belgrade, Serbia.,Psychiatric Association of Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Athens, Greece.,Department of Medical Sciences, Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - A Lehmets
- Estonian Psychiatric Association, Tartu, Estonia.,Psychiatric Centre of the Tallinn West Central Hospital, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - N Lindberg
- Finnish Psychiatric Association, Helsinki, Finland.,Forensic Psychiatry, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinski, Finland
| | - K A Lundblad
- Swedish Psychiatry Association, Sundsvall, Sweden.,Adult Psychiatry, Stockholm County Medical Area (SLSO), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - G Lynch
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - C Maddock
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - U F Malt
- Norwegian Psychiatric Association, Oslo, Norway.,Faculty of Medicine, Psychiatry and Psychosomatic Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - L Martin
- College of Psychiatrists of Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.,St Loman's Hospital, Mullingar, Ireland
| | - I Martynikhin
- Russian Society of Psychiatrists, Moscow, Russian Federation.,First Pavlov State Medical University of St Petersburg, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - N O Maruta
- Association of Neurologists, Psychiatrists and Narcologists of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.,Institute of Neurology, Psychiatry and Narcology of the NAMS of Ukraine State Insitution, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - F Matthys
- Flemish Association of Psychiatry, Kortenberg, Belgium.,Department of Psychiatry, Universitair Ziekenhuis, Brussel, Belgium
| | - R Mazaliauskiene
- Lithuanian Psychiatric Association, Vilnius, Lithuania.,Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Psychiatric Clinic, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - G Mihajlovic
- Serbian Psychiatric Association, Belgrade, Serbia.,Clinic for Psychiatry, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
| | - A Mihaljevic Peles
- Croatian Psychiatric Association, Zagreb, Croatia.,Zagreb School of Medicine and Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - V Miklavic
- Slovenian Psychiatric Association, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Ljubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - P Mohr
- Czech Psychiatric Association, Prague, Czech Republic.,Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - M Munarriz Ferrandis
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain
| | - M Musalek
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Institute for Social Aesthetics and Mental Health, Vienna, Austria.,Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Neznanov
- Russian Society of Psychiatrists, Moscow, Russian Federation.,St. Petersburg V.M. Bekhterev Psychoneurological Research Institute, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | | | - I Pajević
- Psychiatric Association of Bosnia-Herzegovina, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina.,Department of Psychiatry, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - A Popova
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,College Private Psychiatry of Bulgaria, Sofia, Bulgaria.,Nikola Shipkovenski Mental Health Centre, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - P Pregelj
- Slovenian Psychiatric Association, Ljubljana, Slovenia.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - E Prinsen
- Netherlands Psychiatric Association, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - C Rados
- Austrian Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapeutic Medicine, Villach State Hospital, Villach, Austria
| | - A Roig
- Association of Psychiatrists of Spanish Association of Neuropsychiatry, Madrid, Spain.,Mental Health Centre, Horta-Guinardó, Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Rojnic Kuzman
- Croatian Psychiatric Association, Zagreb, Croatia.,Zagreb School of Medicine and Zagreb University Hospital Centre, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - J Samochowiec
- Polish Psychiatric Association, Warsaw, Poland.,European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland
| | - N Sartorius
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Association for the Improvement of Mental Health Programmes (AMH), Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Y Savenko
- Independent Psychiatric Association of Russia, Moscow, Russian Federation
| | - O Skugarevsky
- Belarusian Psychiatric Association, Minsk, Belarus.,Psychiatry and Medical Psychology Department, Belarusian State Medical University, Minsk, Belarus
| | - E Slodecki
- Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, United Kingdom
| | - A Soghoyan
- Armenian Psychiatric Association, Yerevan, Armenia.,Center of Psychosocial Recovery, Yerevan State Medical University, Yerevan, Armenia
| | - D S Stone
- National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention of Mental-Ill Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R Taylor-East
- Maltese Association of Psychiatry, Attard, Malta.,University of Malta, Msida, Malta
| | - E Terauds
- Latvian Psychiatric Association, Riga, Latvia.,Department of Psychiatry and Narcology, Rīga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia
| | - C Tsopelas
- Psychiatric Association of Eastern Europe and the Balkans, Athens, Greece.,Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - C Tudose
- Romanian Association of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Psychiatry "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - S Tyano
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France
| | - P Vallon
- Swiss Society of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R J Van der Gaag
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy Stradina Department, University of Riga, Riga, Latvia
| | - P Varandas
- Portuguese Society of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Lisbon, Portugal.,Casa de Saúde da Idanha and San José Psychiatric Clinic Instituto das Irmãs Hospitaleiras do Sagrado Coração de Jesus, Belas, Portugal
| | - L Vavrusova
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,Slovak Psychiatric Association, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - P Voloshyn
- Association of Neurologists, Psychiatrists and Narcologists of Ukraine, Kharkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery of Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - J Wancata
- Austrian Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Vienna, Austria.,Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Wise
- European Psychiatric Association, Committee on Ethical Issues, Strasbourg, France.,CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Z Zemishlany
- Israel Psychiatric Association, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - F Öncü
- Psychiatric Association of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.,Forensic Psychiatry Department, Bakirkoy Research and Training Hospital for Psychiatry, Neurology, and Neurosurgery, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - S Vahip
- European Psychiatric Association Council of National Psychiatric Associations, Strasbourg, France.,Department of Psychiatry, Ege University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Maguire J, Sizer H, Mifsud N, O'Donoghue B. Outcomes for migrants with a first episode of psychosis: A systematic review. Schizophr Res 2020; 222:42-48. [PMID: 32561236 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.05.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Migrants are at a greater risk of developing a psychotic disorder, but knowledge about their outcomes has not yet been collated. We reviewed the literature concerning outcomes (symptomatic, functional, morbidity and mortality and service utilisation) for migrants with first-episode psychosis. Medline, EMBASE and PsycINFO were systematically searched for studies whose population included first- or second-generation migrants with first-episode psychosis, where outcome measures were examined after a minimum follow-up period of 6 months. Fourteen of the 1554 articles identified in the search fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Remission and disengagement rates in migrants were equal or greater than those in non-migrants. Migrants experienced more negative and fewer positive symptoms at follow-up. Functioning scores varied, with studies reporting lower, equivalent or higher functioning at follow-up for migrants. Migrants were less likely to die by suicide compared to native-born individuals affected by first-episode psychosis. Most included studies showed greater rates of involuntary hospitalisation among migrant populations but there were mixed findings regarding number of hospitalisations. Level of insight at follow-up and occupational outcomes for migrants was not found to be different than for non-migrants. No studies were identified which examined relapse rates or physical health outcomes. Migrants affected by psychotic disorders have been shown to be more likely to achieve remission, and often experience higher rates of involuntary admission and disengagement. For all other outcomes, migrants have largely similar outcomes to native-born populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Maguire
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Holly Sizer
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Mifsud
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Brian O'Donoghue
- Orygen, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Youth Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rodrigues R, Beswick A, Anderson KK. Psychiatric hospitalization following psychosis onset: A retrospective cohort study using health administrative data. Early Interv Psychiatry 2020; 14:235-240. [PMID: 31696672 DOI: 10.1111/eip.12893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM There is limited evidence examining admissions in early psychosis. We sought to estimate the proportion of people with a psychiatric admission within 2 years of the first diagnosis of psychosis, and to identify associated risk factors. METHOD We constructed a cohort of incident non-affective psychosis cases using health administrative data and identified the first psychiatric hospitalization after psychosis onset. We compared hospitalization rates across sociodemographic, clinical and service-use factors. RESULTS One in three patients had an admission within 2 years of first diagnosis. Younger age, migrant status, diagnosis of psychosis not otherwise specified, and prior substance use were associated with increased hospitalization rates, whereas family physician involvement in diagnosis was protective. CONCLUSIONS Adolescents, immigrants and people presenting with diagnostic instability or prior substance use issues may benefit from interventions aimed at reducing hospitalization risk. Increasing primary care access and utilization among youth with early psychosis may also reduce hospitalization rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Rodrigues
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adam Beswick
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kelly K Anderson
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.,ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Walker S, Mackay E, Barnett P, Sheridan Rains L, Leverton M, Dalton-Locke C, Trevillion K, Lloyd-Evans B, Johnson S. Clinical and social factors associated with increased risk for involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis. Lancet Psychiatry 2019; 6:1039-1053. [PMID: 31777340 PMCID: PMC7029280 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(19)30406-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 09/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Use of involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation varies widely within and between countries. The factors that place individuals and populations at increased risk of involuntary hospitalisation are unclear, and evidence is needed to understand these disparities and inform development of interventions to reduce involuntary hospitalisation. We did a systematic review, meta-analysis, and narrative synthesis to investigate risk factors at the patient, service, and area level associated with involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation of adults. METHODS We searched MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, and the Cochrane Controlled Clinical Register of Trials from Jan 1, 1983, to Aug 14, 2019, for studies comparing the characteristics of voluntary and involuntary psychiatric inpatients, and studies investigating the characteristics of involuntarily hospitalised individuals in general population samples. We synthesised results using random effects meta-analysis and narrative synthesis. Our review follows Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and is registered on PROSPERO, CRD42018095103. FINDINGS 77 studies were included from 22 countries. Involuntary rather than voluntary hospitalisation was associated with male gender (odds ratio 1·23, 95% CI 1·14-1·32; p<0·0001), single marital status (1·47, 1·18-1·83; p<0·0001), unemployment (1·43, 1·07-1·90; p=0·020), receiving welfare benefits (1·71, 1·28-2·27; p<0·0001), being diagnosed with a psychotic disorder (2·18, 1·95-2·44; p<0·0001) or bipolar disorder (1·48, 1·24-1·76; p<0·0001), and previous involuntary hospitalisation (2·17, 1·62-2·91; p<0·0001). Using narrative synthesis, we found associations between involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation and perceived risk to others, positive symptoms of psychosis, reduced insight into illness, reduced adherence to treatment before hospitalisation, and police involvement in admission. On a population level, some evidence was noted of a positive dose-response relation between area deprivation and involuntary hospitalisation. INTERPRETATION Previous involuntary hospitalisation and diagnosis of a psychotic disorder were factors associated with the greatest risk of involuntary psychiatric hospitalisation. People with these risk factors represent an important target group for preventive interventions, such as crisis planning. Economic deprivation on an individual level and at the population level was associated with increased risk for involuntary hospitalisation. Mechanisms underpinning the risk factors could not be identified using the available evidence. Further research is therefore needed with an integrative approach, which examines clinical, social, and structural factors, alongside qualitative research into clinical decision-making processes and patients' experiences of the detention process. FUNDING Commissioned by the Department of Health and funded by the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) via the NIHR Mental Health Policy Research Unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Walker
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Euan Mackay
- Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK
| | - Phoebe Barnett
- Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, University College London, London, UK
| | - Luke Sheridan Rains
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Leverton
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Christian Dalton-Locke
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Kylee Trevillion
- National Institute of Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK; Section of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Brynmor Lloyd-Evans
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Mental Health Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Risk of involuntary admission among first-generation ethnic minority groups with early psychosis: a retrospective cohort study using health administrative data. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci 2019; 29:e59. [PMID: 31610825 PMCID: PMC8061249 DOI: 10.1017/s2045796019000556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Ethnic minority groups often have more complex and aversive pathways to mental health care. However, large population-based studies are lacking, particularly regarding involuntary hospitalisation. We sought to examine the risk of involuntary admission among first-generation ethnic minority groups with early psychosis in Ontario, Canada. METHODS Using health administrative data, we constructed a retrospective cohort (2009-2013) of people with first-onset non-affective psychotic disorder aged 16-35 years. This cohort was linked to immigration data to ascertain migrant status and country of birth. We identified the first involuntary admission within 2 years and compared the risk of involuntary admission for first-generation migrant groups to the general population. To control for the role of migrant status, we restricted the sample to first-generation migrants and examined differences by country of birth, comparing risk of involuntary admission among ethnic minority groups to a European reference. We further explored the role of migrant class by adjusting for immigrant vs refugee status within the migrant cohort. We also explored effect modification of migrant class by ethnic minority group. RESULTS We identified 15 844 incident cases of psychotic disorder, of whom 19% (n = 3049) were first-generation migrants. Risk of involuntary admission was higher than the general population in five of seven ethnic minority groups. African and Caribbean migrants had the highest risk of involuntary admission (African: risk ratio (RR) = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.34-1.73; Caribbean: RR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.37-1.82), and were the only groups where the elevated risk persisted when compared to the European reference group within the migrant cohort (African: RR = 1.24, 95% CI = 1.04-1.48; Caribbean: RR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.07-1.56). Refugee status was independently associated with involuntary admission (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.02-1.32); however, this risk varied by ethnic minority group, with Caribbean refugees having an elevated risk of involuntary admission compared with Caribbean immigrants (RR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.15-2.58). CONCLUSIONS Our findings are consistent with the international literature showing increased rates of involuntary admission among some ethnic minority groups with early psychosis. Interventions aimed at improving pathways to care could be targeted at these groups to reduce disparities.
Collapse
|