1
|
Wu J, Qiu L, Li J, Zhou Q, Xie W, Shen Y. Choice intention for the national volume-based procurement drug and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study on patients with late-life depression in China. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:580. [PMID: 39192190 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06026-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The national volume-based procurement (NVBP) policy has significantly decreased prices and increased the accessibility of NVBP drugs. Nevertheless, issues such as heightened adverse reactions and suboptimal efficacy have arisen. Concerns regarding the quality of low-cost medications and the absence of long-term research have been widely recognized. This has led to caution among patients with late-life depression (LLD) due to their delicate health and the severity of their condition. This study evaluated the choice intention for NVBP drugs and associated factors in older patients with LLD. METHODS A weighted sample of 408 participants between December 2022 and March 2023 were included. Data were collected via face-to-face interviews and questionnaires. To identify significant associated factors of choice intention, a multilevel logistic regression model was employed. RESULTS Over half (53.68%) of older patients with LLD intended to choose NVBP drugs. Associated factors included self-assessed poor economy, higher out-of-pocket expenses, monthly household income exceeding CNY 6000, absence of other non-communicable chronic diseases, ordinary registration, urban employee medical insurance, no requirements for brand-name drugs, adverse reactions after using NVBP drugs, and rejection of physicians' recommendation for NVBP drugs. The interaction effect between the real economic condition and patients self-assessed economy significantly influences choice intention for NVBP drugs. Among 124 patients with self-assessed poor economy, 75 showed a higher intention to use NVBP drugs. In these patients, age, medical insurance reimbursement, and brand awareness were significantly associated with choice intention. CONCLUSION Economic factors, physical conditions, medical needs, and physician recommendations significantly influenced the choice intention for NVBP drugs. The choice intention can be improved by strengthening physician-patient communication, increasing the scope and proportion of medical insurance reimbursement, improving substitution studies, and conducting post-marketing re-evaluations of NVBP drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianhong Wu
- The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214151, China
| | - Linghe Qiu
- The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214151, China
| | - Jun Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210000, China
| | - Qin Zhou
- The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214151, China
| | - Weiming Xie
- The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214151, China
| | - Yuan Shen
- The Affiliated Mental Health Center of Jiangnan University, Wuxi Central Rehabilitation Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, 214151, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rieger C, Dean JA, Hall L, Vasquez P, Merlo G. Barriers and Enablers Affecting the Uptake of Biosimilar Medicines Viewed Through the Lens of Actor Network Theory: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2024; 38:541-555. [PMID: 38879730 PMCID: PMC11247062 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00659-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Biosimilars represent an opportunity to realise savings against the costs of innovative medicines. Despite efforts made by stakeholders, there are numerous barriers to the uptake of biosimilars. To realise the promise of biosimilars reducing costs, barriers must be identified, understood, and overcome, and enablers magnified. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars through the application of a classification system to organise them into healthcare professional (HCP), patient, or systemic categories. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, eConlit, and Embase. Included were primary research studies published in English between Jan 2017 through June 2023 focused on enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars. Excluded studies comprised comparisons of biosimilar efficacy and safety versus the reference biologic. One reviewer extracted data that included classification of barriers or enablers, the sub-classification, and the identification of the degree of agency associated with the actor through their role and associations as a mediator within their network, through the application of Actor Network Theory. The data were validated by a second reviewer (PV). RESULTS Of the 94 studies included, 59 were cross-sectional, 20 were qualitative research, 12 were cohort studies, and three were economic evaluations. Within the review, 51 of the studies included HCP populations and 35 included patients. Policies and guidelines were the most cited group of enablers, overall. Systemic enablers were addressed in 29 studies. For patients, the most frequently cited enabler was positive framing of a biosimilar, while for HCPs, cost benefit was the most frequently noted enabler. The most frequently discussed systemic barrier to biosimilar acceptance was lack of effective policies or guidelines, followed by lack of financial incentives, while the most significant barriers for HCPs and patients, respectively, were their lack of general knowledge about biosimilars and concerns about safety and efficacy. Systemic actors and HCPs most frequently acted with broad degree of agency as mediators, while patient most frequently acted with a narrow degree of agency as mediators within their networks. CONCLUSIONS Barriers and enablers affecting uptake of biosimilars are interconnected within networks, and can be divided into systemic, HCP, and patient categories. Understanding the agency of actors within networks may allow for more comprehensive and effective approaches. Systemic enablers in the form of policies appear to be the most effective overall levers in affecting uptake of biosimilars, with policy makers advised to give careful consideration to appropriately educating HCPs and positively framing biosimilars for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Rieger
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Judith A Dean
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lisa Hall
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paola Vasquez
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gregory Merlo
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gasteiger C, Lobo M, Stanley R, Wong LS, Murdoch R, Dalbeth N. Rheumatology Patients' Experiences of a Mandatory Nationwide Transition to an Adalimumab Biosimilar. ACR Open Rheumatol 2024; 6:64-71. [PMID: 37994689 PMCID: PMC10867291 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Transitions to biosimilars are common to reduce the cost burden of biologics. While brand changes can be daunting for patients, few studies have explored patients' experiences with the transitioning process. This study examined rheumatology patients' experiences with a mandatory nationwide brand change to an adalimumab biosimilar. METHODS People with rheumatic diseases involved in the adalimumab transition in Aotearoa New Zealand completed a nationwide online survey. Participants (n = 117, 48% with rheumatoid arthritis) reported their satisfaction with the biosimilar, logistics and supply, information and communication, and availability of support. They also reported what did and did not go well during the transition and provided recommendations for future transitions. RESULTS The mean [SD] satisfaction score with the transition was 6.2 [3.2] on a 0-10 scale, with 10 indicating high satisfaction. Participants were the least satisfied with the support and information from patient support organizations, and training for the device during the transition. Participants were most satisfied with the biosimilar supply, support from pharmacists, and how early they were informed before the transition occurred. After the transition, participants were less satisfied with the device quality, patient support program, biosimilar safety and efficacy, and the provision of alcohol wipes and sharps bins (p < 0.05 for all). Satisfaction with training for the biosimilar device (B = .25, p = .036) predicted overall satisfaction. Participants appreciated less injection pain and the ease of the biosimilar device. The lack of alcohol wipes and loss of the bio-originator support program were viewed negatively. CONCLUSION Future biosimilar transitions should ensure the availability of alcohol wipes, sharps bins, and a comparable patient support program. Patient support organizations could be involved in providing information to patients about the change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Lobo
- Te Toka Tumai AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
| | | | | | | | - Nicola Dalbeth
- University of Auckland and Te Toka Tumai AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gioia C, Picchianti Diamanti A, Perricone R, Chimenti MS, Afeltra A, Navarini L, Migliore A, Massafra U, Bruzzese V, Scolieri P, Meschini C, Paroli M, Caccavale R, Scapato P, Scrivo R, Conti F, Laganà B, Di Franco M. Anti-tumor necrosis factor α: originators versus biosimilars, comparison in clinical response assessment in a multicenter cohort of patients with inflammatory arthropathies. Reumatismo 2023; 75. [PMID: 38115772 DOI: 10.4081/reumatismo.2023.1602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare etanercept and adalimumab biosimilars (SB4 and ABP501) and respective bioriginators in terms of safety and efficacy in a real-life contest. METHODS We consequently enrolled patients affected by rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and ankylosing spondylitis, treated with SB4, and ABP501, or with corresponding originators, belonging to the main biological prescribing centers in the Lazio region (Italy), from 2017 to 2020. Data were collected at recruitment and after 4, 8, 12, and 24 months of therapy. RESULTS The multicenter cohort was composed by 455 patients treated with biosimilars [SB4/ABP501 276/179; female/male 307/146; biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (b-DMARD) naïve 56%, median age/ interquartile range 55/46-65 years] and 436 treated with originators (etanercept/adalimumab 186/259, female/ male 279/157, b-DMARD naïve 67,2%, median age/interquartile range 53/43-62 years). No differences were found about safety, but the biosimilar group presented more discontinuations due to inefficacy (p<0.001). Female gender, being a smoker, and being b-DMARD naïve were predictive factors of reduced drug survival (p=0.05, p=0.046, p=0.001 respectively). The retention rate at 24 months was 81.1% for bioriginators and 76.5% for biosimilars (median retention time of 20.7 and 18.9 months, respectively) (p=0.002). Patients with remission/low disease activity achievement at 4 months showed a cumulative survival of 90% to biosimilar therapy until 24 months (p=0.001); early adverse reactions instead represented a cause of subsequent drug discontinuation (p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS Real-life data demonstrated a similar safety profile between biosimilars and originators, but a reduced biosimilar retention rate at 24 months. Biosimilars could be considered a valid, safe, and less expensive alternative to originators, allowing access to treatments for a wider patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gioia
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome.
| | - A Picchianti Diamanti
- Rheumatology, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome.
| | - R Perricone
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome.
| | - M S Chimenti
- Rheumatology, Allergology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University, Rome.
| | - A Afeltra
- Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Bio-Medical Campus, University of Rome.
| | - L Navarini
- Allergology, Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Bio-Medical Campus, University of Rome.
| | - A Migliore
- San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome.
| | - U Massafra
- San Pietro Fatebenefratelli Hospital, Rome.
| | - V Bruzzese
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome.
| | - P Scolieri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Gastroenterology, Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome.
| | - C Meschini
- General Medicine, Belcolle Hospital, Viterbo.
| | - M Paroli
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University, Latina.
| | - R Caccavale
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnology, Polo Pontino, Sapienza University, Latina.
| | - P Scapato
- Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, S. Camillo de Lellis Hospital, Rieti.
| | - R Scrivo
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome.
| | - F Conti
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome.
| | - B Laganà
- Rheumatology, Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome.
| | - M Di Franco
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiologic and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Q, Wang Z, Wang X, Yu H, Sun J. Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2023; 37:829-841. [PMID: 37676537 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00620-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize and evaluate the findings of existing studies about patients' perceptions of biosimilars by assessing their attitudes and knowledge. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of published studies concerning patients' perceptions of biosimilars, using databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 2197 Chinese or English papers published between 1 January 2018, and 1 October 2022. We assessed the quality of the included studies by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included in the review, with the majority originating from Europe (n = 22) and North America (n = 10). Of these studies, 37 were cross-sectional quantitative studies, three were quasi-experimental studies, and the remaining three were qualitative studies based on semi-structured interviews. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 9 to 6554 patients. Twenty-two out of 31 studies investigating patients' acceptance of biosimilars found that most participants expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars. However, doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway could negatively influence patients' attitudes. The majority of patients understood the economic advantages of biosimilars; however, some incorrectly connected lower prices with lower quality. Patients generally lacked knowledge about biosimilars. There were 6-51% of participants who were familiar with biosimilars, and 25-58% thought they did not know enough about biosimilars. Physicians, pharmacists, medicines agencies, academia, and patient associations were identified as the main sources of information on biosimilars for patients. Healthcare providers not informing or advising patients about switching may hinder patients from acquiring enough knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars, but limited knowledge continued to impede their perceptions. Doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway were identified as major factors that negatively influenced patients' attitudes towards biosimilars, while the impact of a price advantage was mixed. It is essential to maintain a focus on educating healthcare professionals about biosimilars, including their clinical outcomes and the regulatory pathway, which equips them to provide comprehensive and informed guidance to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyou Wu
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhitao Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jing Sun
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tano M, Paubel P, Ribault M, Degrassat-Théas A. What About Offering a Financial Incentive Directly to Clinical Units to Encourage the Use of Biosimilars? Results of a Two-Year National Experiment in France. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:799-811. [PMID: 37253898 PMCID: PMC10228890 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00812-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regarding the low penetration of biosimilars in the French market, in 2018, the government introduced two mutually exclusive financial incentives to increase biosimilar use. They redirect 20% (general case) or 30% (experimental case) of the price difference between the reference product and its biosimilar to hospitals for every biosimilar delivered in retail pharmacies from these hospital prescriptions. The experimental case specifically targets prescribing clinical units. OBJECTIVES Our study aimed to assess whether the new payment scheme closer to physicians (experimental case) improved etanercept biosimilar penetration after 25 months. METHOD We evaluated hospital prescriptions using IQVIA Xponent data. The monthly number of etanercept boxes delivered in retail pharmacies was linked to the corresponding hospital prescription. The impact of the experimental case on the etanercept biosimilar rate was assessed by a difference-in-difference method. RESULTS Among the 39 hospitals studied in the experimental case compared with the 169 belonging to the general case, a similar growing trend of etanercept biosimilar use was observed before October 2018. At the start of the experiment, there was an acceleration of biosimilar penetration in the experimental group, until both groups reached a plateau. A significant double difference estimator of 9.72 percentage points in favor of the experiment confirmed this (p < 2.2.10-16). CONCLUSION The French experimental incentive appeared to be more effective at increasing biosimilar use. As it is expected to be implemented in all hospitals, the knowledge gained during this testing phase should allow adjustment of some of its terms and increase physician engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Tano
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, Rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005 Paris Cedex, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 4 Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006 Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 6, France
| | - Pascal Paubel
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, Rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005 Paris Cedex, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 4 Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006 Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 6, France
| | - Matthieu Ribault
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, Rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005 Paris Cedex, France
| | - Albane Degrassat-Théas
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, Rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005 Paris Cedex, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 4 Avenue de l’Observatoire, 75006 Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 Rue des Saints-Pères, 75270 Paris Cedex 6, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fautrel B, Bouhnik Y, Dieude P, Richette P, Dougados M, Freudensprung U, Brigui A, Addison J. Real-world evidence of the use of the infliximab biosimilar SB2: data from the PERFUSE study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2023; 7:rkad031. [PMID: 37122809 PMCID: PMC10130189 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkad031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective PERFUSE is a non-interventional study of 1233 adult patients (rheumatology, n = 496; IBD, n = 737) receiving routine infliximab (IFX) biosimilar SB2 therapy. The aim of this report was to investigate the 12-month persistence, effectiveness and safety outcomes of routine SB2 treatment in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease. Methods Patients with a diagnosis of RA, PsA or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) were assigned to one of three study cohorts according to whether SB2 treatment initiated after September 2017 had been the first IFX treatment (IFX naïve) or followed transition from reference IFX (IFX ref) or another IFX biosimilar (IFX bs). Outcomes to month 12 (±2) included persistence (primary outcome), SB2 dose, disease status, immunogenicity and safety. Results At month 12, persistence on SB2 in IFX-naïve, IFX ref and IFX bs cohorts, respectively, [mean percentage (95% CI)] by indication was as follows: 59% (36.1, 76.2), 75% (57.5, 86.1) and 85% (69.6, 93.0) for RA (n = 98); 64% (34.3, 83.3), 87% (65.6, 95.7) and 83% (60.0, 93.1) for PsA (n = 62); and 56% (44.4, 66.5), 80% (70.8, 86.1) and 80% (72.5, 85.6) for axSpA (n = 336). Disease activity was comparable at baseline and month 12 within the IFX ref and bs subgroups of all cohorts by indication. No immunogenicity concerns or new safety signals were detected. Conclusion SB2 was safe and effective in IFX-naïve patients and in patients transitioned from prior IFX ref or bs. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03662919.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Fautrel
- Correspondence to Bruno Fautrel, Rheumatology Department, Sorbonne University, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, 47–83 boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - Yoram Bouhnik
- Paris IBD Center, Groupe Hospitalier Privé Ambroise Paré—Hartmann, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
| | - Philippe Dieude
- Department of Rheumatology, Paris-Cité University, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, INSERM UMR1152, Paris, France
| | - Pascal Richette
- Rheumatology Department, Hôpital Lariboisière, AP-HP, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Department of Rheumatology, Paris-Cité University, Hôpital Cochin, AP-HP, Paris, France
- Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, INSERM (U1153): PRES Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gasteiger C, Gasteiger N, Petrie KJ. Pharmacists' confidence in explaining biosimilars to patients before a nationwide medicine change: A cross-sectional study. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2022; 8:100199. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2022.100199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
9
|
Pope J, Hall S, Bombardier C, Haraoui B, Jones G, Naik L, Etzel CJ, Ramey DR, Infante R, Miguelez M, Falcao S, Sahakian S, Wu D. Post-switch Effectiveness of Etanercept Biosimilar Versus Continued Etanercept in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients with Stable Disease: A Prospective Multinational Observational Study. Adv Ther 2022; 39:5259-5273. [PMID: 36136243 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02303-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To better inform clinicians about the use of etanercept biosimilar (SB4) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), COMPANION-B, a prospective real-world observational study, evaluated the effectiveness of the voluntary switch from originator (etanercept, ETN) to SB4 in patients with stable RA (low-disease activity/remission). METHODS The study recruited adult patients (18 years or older) with RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology criteria) prescribed ETN as their first or second biologic for at least 6 months across 14 sites in Canada and five in Australia. Patients had stable disease (Disease Activity Score-28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate [DAS28-ESR] less than 3.2) at enrollment with no evidence of flare within the previous 3 months. Concomitant disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) were permitted. Patients could elect to continue ETN or voluntarily switch to SB4 in consultation with their doctors. The primary effectiveness measure was the proportion of patients with disease worsening (defined as a DAS28-ESR increase of at least 1.2 from baseline and minimum score of at least 3.2 or a defined modification in RA treatment) during 12 months of follow-up. The secondary effectiveness measure was the proportion of patients with disease worsening at month 6. Serious adverse events (SAEs) and non-serious adverse reactions (NSARs) were recorded. RESULTS Of 163 patients enrolled, 109 elected to continue on ETN and 54 switched to SB4; 65.8% of patients received non-biologic DMARD(s), 52.6% methotrexate, and 10.5% oral corticosteroid(s). At month 12, the proportion of patients with disease worsening was comparable in the ETN group (22.8% [95% CI 15.0-32.2]) and SB4 group (17.6% [95% CI 8.4-30.9]). Similarly, the proportions of patients with disease worsening were also comparable at month 6 (ETN: 7.9% [95% CI 3.5-15.0]; SB4: 7.8% [95% CI 2.2-18.9]). SAEs were low and similar across both groups (ETN: 8.7%; SB4: 5.7%). NSARs were slightly higher in the SB4 vs. ETN group (13.2% vs. 2.9%). CONCLUSIONS SB4 demonstrated comparable effectiveness to ETN over 12 months in patients with stable RA who voluntarily switched to the biosimilar in a real-world setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janet Pope
- University of Western Ontario and St. Joseph's Hospital, London, ON, Canada.
| | | | | | - Boulos Haraoui
- Rheumatology Institute of Montreal, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Graeme Jones
- University of Tasmania-Lionheart Rheumatology, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Latha Naik
- University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Maia Miguelez
- Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc., Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | | | - David Wu
- Merck & Co., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kiltz U, Tsiami S, Baraliakos X, Andreica I, Kiefer D, Braun J. Effectiveness and safety of a biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch of the TNF inhibitor etanercept in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2022; 14:1759720X221119593. [PMID: 36051634 PMCID: PMC9424877 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x221119593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Biosimilar disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bsDMARDs) has created a
financial incentive to encourage switching to cheaper products. Objectives: We aim to study the effectiveness and safety of a non-medical
bsDMARD-to-bsDMARD switch from originator etanercept (ETN) to bsDMARD ETN
(SB4) and successive to another bsDMARD ETN (GP2015) in patients with
chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases in a real-life setting. Methods: Retrospective chart review of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA),
psoriatic arthritis (PsA) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) who had been
treated with originator ETN and were switched twice to ETN bsDMARD for
non-medical reasons thereafter. All patients received ETN 50 mg/week.
Disease activity and physical function was assessed every 12 weeks with
standardized questionnaires. Results: A total of 100 patients who switched twice [54 RA, 27 axSpA, 19 PsA, mean age
54.3 (15.1), 46% male] were included. Patients with axSpA were younger than
RA and PsA patients. Patients with SpA were less likely to receive
conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) than
RA patients. Duration of treatment with originator ETN before the first
switch was 3.3 (2.3) years. Retention rate 6 months after the second ETN
bsDMARD switch was 89%. Disease activity and physical function scores
remained rather unchanged in patients with RA and axSpA longitudinally,
while there was some more fluctuation in PsA patients. Six patients lost
efficacy and were switched back to originator ETN in month 6
(n = 4) or to another mode of action
(n = 2). There were 14 adverse events (AE) reported in
eight patients. One patient re-administered bsDMARD GP2015 successfully
3 months after healing of mucosal erosions. Conclusion: No relevant change in disease activity and physical function were observed in
a non-medical bsDMARD-to-bsDMARD switch scenario. The retention rate after
switches from originator ETN to two ETN bsDMARD was close to 90%. Multiple
switches resulted in a high adherence rate without clinically important
efficacy or safety signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Claudiusstrasse 45, 44649 Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Styliani Tsiami
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Xenofon Baraliakos
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Ioana Andreica
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - David Kiefer
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jürgen Braun
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany.,Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liu Y, Skup M, Yang M, Qi CZ, Wu EQ. Discontinuation and Switchback After Non-Medical Switching from Originator Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF) Inhibitors to Biosimilars: A Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies from 2012 to 2018. Adv Ther 2022; 39:3711-3734. [PMID: 35737227 PMCID: PMC9309144 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-022-02173-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To examine the prevalence rates of biosimilar discontinuation and switchback to the originator tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF) inhibitors following non-medical switch (NMS) in patients. METHODS Real-world studies reporting biosimilar discontinuation and switchback rates following NMS published between January 2012 and August 2018 were identified through a systematic literature review. A meta-analysis estimated the annualized discontinuation and switchback rates. A subsequent meta-analysis assessed annualized incremental discontinuation rate among studies reporting both discontinuation rates in patients who underwent an NMS (switchers) and patients who remained on originators (non-switchers). RESULTS A total of 66 publications were identified: 31 in gastroenterology, 32 in rheumatology, and 3 in both. Half of the studies reported switchback rates; only 9 studies reported discontinuation rates for both switchers and non-switchers. Across studies, the mean/range sample size of the NMS patient population was 136/9-1641; mean/range follow-up was 10/3-24 months. Annualized biosimilar discontinuation rate was 21% (95% confidence interval [CI] 18%, 25%). Switchback rate was 14% (95% CI 10%, 17%) among all NMS patients and 62% (95% CI 44%, 80%) among discontinuers. The mean/range sample size of switchers and non-switchers was 344/89-1621 and 768/19-2870, respectively; mean/range follow-up was 11/6-18 and 12/6-8 months, respectively. Annualized incremental biosimilar discontinuation rate was 18% (95% CI 4%, 31%). CONCLUSION Biosimilar discontinuation was found to be prevalent among patients who underwent an NMS from an originator TNF inhibitor to its biosimilar(s) in the real world. In addition, switchback to the originator TNF inhibitors was common following biosimilar discontinuation. Careful consideration is necessary when switching patients already on an originator TNF inhibitor to its biosimilar(s). Main limitations included the heterogeneity of the studies and the limited comparability of the data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifei Liu
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Pharmacy, 1228 Health Sciences Building, 2464 Charlotte Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, USA.
| | | | - Min Yang
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Eric Q Wu
- Analysis Group, Inc., Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cooksey R, Brophy S, Kennedy J, Seaborne M, Choy E. Real-world use of an etanercept biosimilar including selective versus automatic substitution in inflammatory arthritis patients: a UK-based electronic health records study. Rheumatol Adv Pract 2022; 6:rkac056. [PMID: 35910710 PMCID: PMC9336562 DOI: 10.1093/rap/rkac056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Biosimilars are approved as an alternative treatment to their originators. We compared the clinical outcomes of etanercept (ETN) biosimilar compared with ETN originator in real-world practice, from two local health boards in Wales with different policies on switching: automatic vs selective. Methods Data from the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage (SAIL) databank in Wales were used to create a retrospective cohort study using linked primary and secondary care data. Patients aged ≥18 years with diagnosis codes for RA, PsA or AS were included. Outcomes included treatment failure and DAS-28 score (for RA). The local health board with a policy of automatic switching (i.e. clinician/nurse involvement not mandated) is labelled as automatic switch area, and the other, which required clinician/nurse supervision, as selective switch. Results Of 8925 individuals with inflammatory arthritis, 13.3% (365) received ETN biosimilar and 31.5% (863) ETN originator. The treatment discontinuation rate was similar for ETN biosimilar and originator by Kaplan-Meier analysis. More biosimilar failure patients were treated in the automatic switch area (15 vs 4.8%). In the automatic switch area, 28.8% (75 of 260) of patients switched automatically from ETN originator to biosimilar compared with 10.5% (11 of 105) in the selective switch area. ETN biosimilar reduced DAS-28 by 1.6 ± 1.8 in the selective switch area vs 0.4 ± 0.6 in the automatic switch area. Conclusion The ETN biosimilar was well tolerated. Fewer people were switched using selective policy, but this was associated with lower failure rates. Automatic switch policy led to more patients being switched and did not lead to significant worsening of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne Cooksey
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| | - Sinead Brophy
- Health Data Research UK, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Jonathan Kennedy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| | - Michael Seaborne
- Health Data Research UK, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
| | - Ernest Choy
- CREATE Centre, Section of Rheumatology, Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fisher A, Kim JD, Carney G, Dormuth C. Rapid monitoring of health services use following a policy to switch patients from originator to biosimilar etanercept—a cohort study in British Columbia. BMC Rheumatol 2022; 6:5. [PMID: 35081991 PMCID: PMC8793256 DOI: 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Drug coverage policies that incentivize switching patients from originator to biosimilar products may result in significant health care savings. Our study aimed to detect early impacts on health services utilization following a mandated switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept in British Columbia (BC), Canada. Methods We conducted a prospective, population-based cohort study using linked administrative health data from BC (2010–2020). The policy cohort consisted of patients with inflammatory arthritis who used originator etanercept in 2019, prior to BC’s Biosimilars Initiative switching policy. Three historical cohorts included patients with inflammatory arthritis who used originator etanercept in the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. We compared the daily cumulative incidences of drug refills and outpatient and inpatient services between the policy and historical cohorts. A likelihood ratio sustained (≥ 31 days) at 7.1 or higher compared with the null hypothesis was chosen a priori as a threshold for a potential impact of the policy. Results Each cohort contained between 1694 and 1963 patients. We detected several potential impacts: 1) a transient increase in etanercept refills between months three and eight (cumulative incidence difference of + 3.0%); 2) an anticipated increase in visits to physicians of any specialty between months three and eight (+ 2.6%); and 3) an anticipated increase in visits to a rheumatologist from the end of month three onwards (+ 12.8%). The policy had no impact on incidences of switching to a different biologic antirheumatic drug, visits to emergency departments, or admissions to hospitals. Conclusions Only transient and/or anticipated increases in drug refills and physician visits were observed during the study period. Additional research on clinical outcomes is recommended to strengthen the evidence that no long-term unintended negative health impacts are associated with BC’s Biosimilars Initiative [switching policy]. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-021-00235-x.
Collapse
|
14
|
Levivien C, Bottois C, Lopez-Medina C, Dumas S, Hubert J, Belo S, Roux C, Conort O, Dougados M. Impact of a clinical pharmacist in a multidisciplinary consultation on the switch to a biosimilar for inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 89:105322. [PMID: 34896303 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite several studies proving the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with original drugs, switching to a biosimilar remains challenging when the decision is at the discretion of physicians with mandatory consent from patients. Educating patients about biosimilars seems important to increase the prescription rate of biosimilars. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of a clinical pharmacist consultation on the switch to and retention rate of a biosimilar for patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. METHODS This retrospective study compared 2 groups of adult patients receiving (intervention) or not (control) a consultation with a pharmacist right before the rheumatologist consultation. The primary outcome was the frequency of patients who switched to a biosimilar at the end of the rheumatologist visit. RESULTS We analysed 141 patients (50% women, 50±15 years old, on original adalimumab (62%) or etanercept (38%)) who had never used biosimilars: 85 in the intervention group and 56 in the control group. The switch rate to a biosimilar significantly differed between the groups: 69.4% versus 41.1% in the intervention group versus the control group respectively (p<0.01). After a 1-year follow-up period, 72.5% versus 81.3% of patients who switched were still on biosimilar in the intervention versus control group respectively. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the positive impact of a pharmacist consultation before the physician's one on switching to a biosimilar, but more studies are needed to assess the impact of this pharmacist consultation on preventing the nocebo effect and therefore on improving the retention rate of biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Levivien
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
| | - Cécile Bottois
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Clementina Lopez-Medina
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; Rheumatology Department, Reina Sofia University Hospital, IMIBIC, University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Spain
| | - Sophie Dumas
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Julien Hubert
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Sephora Belo
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Christian Roux
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM (U1153): Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRESS Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Ornella Conort
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Pharmacie clinique - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Maxime Dougados
- Université de Paris - APHP.Centre, Département de Rhumatologie - Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France; INSERM (U1153): Clinical epidemiology and biostatistics, PRESS Sorbonne Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meijboom RW, Gardarsdottir H, Egberts TCG, Giezen TJ. Patients Retransitioning from Biosimilar TNFα Inhibitor to the Corresponding Originator After Initial Transitioning to the Biosimilar: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2021; 36:27-39. [PMID: 34870802 PMCID: PMC8847209 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00508-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Transitioning patients from an originator to a corresponding biosimilar has been extensively studied in both randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Although transitioning is considered well-tolerated, with no negative impacts on efficacy and/or safety, 2.6–25.8% of patients restart treatment with the originator (retransitioning). Retransitioning to the originator can be considered an indication of biosimilar treatment failure or dissatisfaction with biosimilar treatment. Increasing our knowledge of patients who retransition might help to reduce the number of patients retransitioning. Objective Our objective was to estimate the cumulative incidence of patients who retransitioned from a tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitor biosimilar to originator and to explore potential patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy factors associated with retransitioning. Method We conducted a systematic literature search in the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of controlled trials databases until March 2021. Studies on TNFα inhibitors, biosimilar transitioning, and retransitioning were included. Transitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar, and retransitioning was defined as switching from an originator to a biosimilar and back to the originator. Characteristics of the studies were descriptively analyzed. Studies were weighted by the number of patients transitioning, and the primary outcome was the median cumulative incidence of retransitioning. For each of the factors related to patient, disease, and treatment and implementation strategy, studies were stratified according to the categories of that factor. The weighted medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) of the cumulative incidence of retransitioning in these studies were calculated and compared to explore whether a potential association existed between these factors and the cumulative incidence of retransitioning. Results Of 994 screened publications, 37 were included. The weighted median cumulative incidence of retransitioning was 7.6% (IQR 6.8–17.2). Studies that included only patients with inflammatory bowel disease (6.6 vs. 15.1–17.7% for other indications), included only patients with stable disease (7.0 vs. 13.7% for including all patients), and did not offer retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar (7.0 vs. 11.1% for studies that offered retransitioning) reported less retransitioning. In addition, the incidence of retransitioning was lower when extra laboratory monitoring was part of the implementation strategy (1.6 vs. 6.1%) and when gainsharing (patients’ healthcare directly benefits from financial savings from transitioning) (1.4 vs. 7.2% for studies without gainsharing) was applied. Conclusions In studies on transitioning patients from TNFα originator to biosimilar, 8% of patients retransitioned. Retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that included only patients with stable disease and in studies that did not offer patients the option of retransitioning at the introduction of the biosimilar. In addition, retransitioning appeared to be lower in studies that implemented extra laboratory monitoring as part of the biosimilar implementation strategy. Clinicians should consider implementing these suggestions as they might reduce retransitioning rates and improve the introduction of biosimilars in clinical practice. PROSPERO registration ID: CRD42021226381 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00508-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanne W Meijboom
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Toine C G Egberts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs J Giezen
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands.
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Changes in Etanercept and Adalimumab Biosimilar Prescriptions for the Initial Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in France: Data from the ART-SFR Registry. Joint Bone Spine 2021; 89:105310. [PMID: 34838991 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
17
|
Incidence of and Reasons and Determinants Associated with Retransitioning from Biosimilar Etanercept to Originator Etanercept. BioDrugs 2021; 35:765-772. [PMID: 34704199 PMCID: PMC8613120 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-021-00501-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients in clinical practice are transitioned from originator etanercept (OR-ETA) to biosimilar etanercept (BS-ETA), but some subsequently retransition. Insights into the incidence of and reasons for retransitioning and the characteristics of these patients could help clinicians successfully introduce biosimilars. Objective Our objective was to assess the incidence of and reasons for retransitioning from BS-ETA to OR-ETA in patients with a rheumatic disease (RD) and to explore the determinants thereof. Methods This cohort study included all patients with RD who had transitioned from OR-ETA to BS-ETA in a large hospital in the Netherlands in 2016. The incidence of retransitioning to OR-ETA and the 1-year persistence with BS-ETA were assessed using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Reasons for retransitioning were classified as related to (1) efficacy, (2) adverse events, (3) the administration device, and (4) other. Determinants for retransitioning, including baseline and treatment characteristics, were assessed in a nested case–control study using conditional logistic regression. Results We included 342 patients (median age 57.8 years; 53.5% females). At 1 year after transitioning, 9.4% of patients had retransitioned to OR-ETA and 69.7% were persistent with BS-ETA. At the end of follow-up (median 4.4 years), 47 patients (13.7%) had retransitioned to OR-ETA. The median time until retransitioning was 0.55 years (interquartile range 0.2–1.3). Most patients (n = 34 [72.3%]) retransitioned because of a (perceived) loss of effect, followed by adverse events (23.4%). In total 3.8% of patients switched to another biological treatment or a Janus kinase inhibitor; 17.1% of patients discontinued BS-ETA without retransitioning or switching within the first year. Univariate determinants for retransitioning included initiating corticosteroids or intensifying immunomodulator treatment (odds ratio [OR] 2.37; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03–5.45) and the number of visits to the rheumatology department (OR 2.06; 95% CI 1.55–2.74). In the multivariate analysis, only the number of visits to the rheumatology department remained significantly associated with retransitioning (OR 2.19; 95% CI 1.60–3.01). Conclusion When introducing a biosimilar in clinical care, clinicians should anticipate that one in seven patients will retransition to the originator. A (perceived) loss of effect was the most frequently reported reason for retransitioning. Patients who visited the rheumatology department more frequently had an increased risk of retransitioning, which is likely to be related to patients reporting a loss of effect and to adverse events resulting in more visits to the rheumatology department. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-021-00501-x.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gasteiger C, Scholz U, Petrie KJ, Dalbeth N. A bio-what? Medical companions' perceptions towards biosimilars and information needs in rheumatology. Rheumatol Int 2021; 42:1993-2002. [PMID: 34705051 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05037-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Patient perceptions influence biosimilar uptake in non-mandatory transitions. Companions (support people) are often actively involved in the patient's medical journey and are likely to have unique perceptions of biosimilars, which may shape patient attitudes. This study explores the congruence between patient and companion perceptions towards biosimilars and their information needs. Patients taking bio-originators for rheumatic diseases (59% for rheumatoid arthritis) and their companions received an explanation about biosimilars. Participants (N = 78) completed questionnaires assessing their familiarity with biosimilars, perceptions, concerns, and benefits of being accompanied. Contingency tables and paired sample t-tests were used to explore differences in familiarity, confidence in knowledge, and perceptions. Intra-class correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the degree of congruence for perceptions towards biosimilars. Companions were significantly less familiar with biosimilars (p = 0.014, Cramer's V = 0.28) and reported lower confidence in their knowledge (p = 0.006, Cohen's d = 0.47) than patients. Companions and patients had moderate to good congruency for perceptions toward confidence in biosimilar use and safety, efficacy, and side-effect expectations (intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.75 to 0.81). Companions and patients were most concerned about safety and effectiveness. Companions also reported concerns about cost savings driving the transition, while patients had concerns about uncertainty and testing. Patients reported the ability for discussion, improved understanding, and validation as benefits of being accompanied. Companions and patients have similar levels of perceptions and expectations towards biosimilars but report some unique information needs. Future educational interventions should involve companions and address their concerns to help improve biosimilar acceptance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Gasteiger
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Urte Scholz
- Department of Psychology-Applied Social and Health Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Petit J, Antignac M, Poilverd RM, Baratto R, Darthout S, Desouches S, Louati K, Deparis N, Berenbaum F, Beauvais C. Multidisciplinary team intervention to reduce the nocebo effect when switching from the originator infliximab to a biosimilar. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2020-001396. [PMID: 33495387 PMCID: PMC7839879 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate an intervention to reduce the nocebo effect (NE) when switching from the originator infliximab (OI) to the infliximab biosimilar SB2 in chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (CIRD). Methods An intervention was built with healthcare professionals (HPs) and a patient representative, based on a systematic review of interventions reducing the NE in musculoskeletal diseases and semi-directed questioning of five patients. Our strategy consisted of training HPs, switch information given by the nurses, a consistent vocabulary. All CIRD patients switched from OI to SB2 were included for the intervention. The primary outcome was the SB2 retention rate (RR) at 34 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the SB2 RR at 12 months, discontinuation rates due to a possible NE and comparison with a historical cohort of CIRD patients receiving the OI and 6 published European cohorts. Results 45 patients were included from March 2018 (rheumatoid arthritis, n=17, spondylarthritis, n=28). After 34 weeks, the SB2 RR was 91.2%, similar to the historical cohort RR (p=0.41) but higher than the 3 European cohort RRs (p<0.05). At 12 months, the SB2 RR was 84.5% vs 88.4% for the historical cohort (p=0.52). SB2 discontinuation due to a possible NE was 6.6% after 12 months. Conclusions A tailored communication with a prominent role of nurses reduced the NE in non-medical switches from the OI to SB2 as compared to published results. The RR was similar to the historical cohort RR. The methodology used to construct this intervention may help improve the outcomes of switches with upcoming biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Petit
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Régine Baratto
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Darthout
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Sandra Desouches
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Karine Louati
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Nathalie Deparis
- Association ANDAR (Association Nationale de Défense Contre l'Arthrite Rhumatoïde), Paris, France
| | - Francis Berenbaum
- Rheumatology, Hopital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Smolen JS, Caporali R, Doerner T, Fautrel B, Benedetti F, Pieper B, Jang M. Treatment journey in rheumatoid arthritis with biosimilars: from better access to good disease control through cost savings and prevention of nocebo effects. RMD Open 2021; 7:rmdopen-2021-001637. [PMID: 34099538 PMCID: PMC8186742 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-001637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Early diagnosis and treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are of critical importance to halt the progression of the disease. Optimal use of advanced imaging techniques or biomarkers may facilitate early diagnosis of RA. Even though many disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available for RA treatment, biological DMARDs (bDMARDs) offer expanding therapeutic options and good outcomes in patients with RA who do not have a sufficient response to conventional synthetic DMARDs. However, high costs of bDMARDs have limited patient access to optimised disease management and increased the cost burden for healthcare systems. The advent of biosimilars led to significant cost savings driven by price competition among the reference products, which could be beneficial for healthcare systems. Healthcare provider (HCP)–patient communication and informed shared decision-making are crucial to prevent the occurrence of a nocebo effect, which results from negative perceptions that patients may have and could lead to less effective outcomes. Research has demonstrated that effective communication between HCPs and patients utilising positive framing can improve acceptance by patients to be initiated on or switched to a biosimilar and can help to integrate biosimilars into routine clinical practice to maximise benefits for patients with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josef S Smolen
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine 3, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roberto Caporali
- Division of Clinical Rheumatology, ASST Gaetano Pini-CTO Institute, Milano, Italy.,Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Research Center for Adult and Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Thomas Doerner
- Department of Medicine and Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Rheumatism Research Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, Île-de-France, France
| | - Fabrizio Benedetti
- Neuroscience Department, University of Turin Medical School, Turin, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Gasteiger C, den Broeder AA, Stewart S, Gasteiger N, Scholz U, Dalbeth N, Petrie KJ. The mode of delivery and content of communication strategies used in mandatory and non-mandatory biosimilar transitions: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2021; 17:148-168. [PMID: 34409923 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2021.1970610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Effective patient-provider communication is crucial to promote shared decision-making. However, it is unclear how to explain treatment changes to ensure patient acceptance, such as when transitioning from a bio-originator to a biosimilar. This review investigates communication strategies used to educate patients on transitioning to biosimilars and explores whether the willingness to transition and treatment persistence differs for the delivery (verbal or written) and the amount of information provided. MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and relevant conference databases were systematically searched. Communication strategies from 33 studies (88% observational cohort studies) published from 2012 to 2020 were synthesized and willingness to transition, persistence, and subjective adverse events explored. Patients only received information verbally in 11 studies. The remaining 22 studies also provided written information. Cost-saving was the main reason provided for the transition. Patients were most willing to transition when receiving written and verbal information (χ2 = 5.83, p = .02) or written information that only addressed a few (3-5) concerns (χ2 = 16.08, p < .001). There was no significant difference for persistence or subjective adverse events (p's > .05). Few randomized controlled trials have been conducted. Available data shows more willingness to transition when patients received written and verbal information. Initial documents should contain basic information and consultations or telephone calls used to address concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Gasteiger
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Sarah Stewart
- Bone & Joint Research Group, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Norina Gasteiger
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Urte Scholz
- Department of Psychology- Applied Social and Health Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University Research Priority Program 'Dynamics of Healthy Aging', University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Nicola Dalbeth
- Department of Rheumatology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Keith J Petrie
- Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
From peptide hormones to monoclonal antibodies, advances in biotherapeutic medicines, or biologics, have brought incalculable benefits to patients, especially for conditions where previous classes of therapy were ineffective or non-existent. At the same time, the development of biologics has been accompanied by questions of access and cost. The advent of biosimilars, molecules highly similar to their reference biologics, has offered the promise of ameliorating cost and access challenges. However, issues regarding biosimilar uptake remain. Multiple factors impact the utilization of biosimilars by healthcare providers and perhaps the best recognized of these is education. This paper discusses the importance of education to biosimilar adoption and lists action-items that various stakeholders in healthcare can adopt to improve the overall understanding of this important class of therapeutics.
Collapse
|
23
|
Rathore AS, Stevenson JG, Chhabra H, Maharana C. The global landscape on interchangeability of biosimilars. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:133-148. [PMID: 33567923 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2021.1889511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Biosimilars hold the potential to be an integral healthcare component that can significantly improve affordability and thereby accessibility of the otherwise expensive biotherapeutic products. Regulators, payors, and policymakers, each have a major role to play in successful adoption of biosimilars. One of the issues that has been a point of frequent discussion is that of interchangeability of biosimilars. AREAS COVERED This article aims to review the position that the major regulatory bodies have taken on interchangeability of biosimilars. Key issues that remain are also discussed. Adalimumab and etanercept have been chosen as real-world case studies to demonstrate interchangeability considerations. The need for gaining global harmonization on interchangeability is highlighted. EXPERT OPINION A global harmonization on the interchangeability can likely accelerate biosimilar adoption and result in better accessibility to biologics. Experience gained with real-world studies supports switching to biosimilars from originators however post-marketing pharmacovigilance should be in place to assess the risk-benefit profile of biosimilars in the long run.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anurag S Rathore
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - James G Stevenson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Hemlata Chhabra
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| | - Chinmoyee Maharana
- Department of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kovitwanichkanont T, Raghunath S, Wang D, Kyi L, Pignataro S, Morton S, Morand E, Leech M. Who is afraid of biosimilars? Openness to biosimilars in an Australian cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Intern Med J 2021; 50:374-377. [PMID: 32141205 DOI: 10.1111/imj.14753] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Revised: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Biosimilars are increasingly adopted to improve affordability of biologics. An effective introduction of biosimilars requires an understanding of patient acceptance of these agents. We performed a cross-sectional study of 132 patients with rheumatoid arthritis prior to the introduction of biosimilar switching or prescribing in this cohort. Despite being unfamiliar with biosimilars, most patients are willing to accept biosimilar medicines if recommended by their rheumatologist. Patient concerns about biosimilar uptake mainly focus on concerns about its efficacy. There is a significant correlation between patient attitudes towards biosimilar and generic medicines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Kovitwanichkanont
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sudha Raghunath
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Dorothy Wang
- Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Leo Kyi
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Silvana Pignataro
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Susan Morton
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Eric Morand
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michelle Leech
- Department of Rheumatology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Barbosa CMM, Rodríguez de Castro B, Labeaga Beramendi Y, Terroba Alonso P, Barbazán Vázquez J. Patient satisfaction survey: substitution of reference etanercept with a biosimilar product. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2021. [PMID: 33608440 DOI: 10.16066/j.1672-7002.2021.02.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess patient satisfaction after pharmacy-mediated replacement of the originator etanercept prefilled syringe with its biosimilar prefilled pen. METHODS Prospective observational study from March to May 2018, to assess satisfaction with the new drug dispensed. Patients were asked to answer a paper questionnaire with three questions: pain at injection site, ease of administration, and overall patient satisfaction with the change, rated on a scale from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied). RESULTS The questionnaire was given to 134 patients (74 men, 60 women), with an average age of 55 years. 118 patients (88%) were from the Rheumatology Service and 16 patients (12%) from Dermatology. The median treatment duration with etanercept was 61 months. 87 (65%) completed questionnaires were collected. The mean pain score was 3.4. Most patients found administration easy with the biosimilar pen, with an average score of 3.7. Mean overall satisfaction was rated at 3.3, being higher among men, younger patients, and those with shorter duration of treatment. CONCLUSIONS The change of the original product from etanercept to a biosimilar product was acceptable for most of the patients who responded to the survey. Surveys allow us to determine the opinion and preferences of patients, thus achieving higher satisfaction with their treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of automatic replacement. A collaborative multidisciplinary switching programme should be implemented based on the feedback provided by patients.
Collapse
|
26
|
Informing Patients about Biosimilar Medicines: The Role of European Patient Associations. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14020117. [PMID: 33557030 PMCID: PMC7913743 DOI: 10.3390/ph14020117] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Biosimilar medicines support the sustainability of national healthcare systems, by reducing costs of biological therapies through increased competition. However, their adoption into clinical practice largely depends on the acceptance of healthcare providers and patients. Patients are different from health care professionals (HCPs), who are informing themselves professionally. For patients, the biosimilar debate only becomes actual when they are confronted with disease and drug choices. This paper provides a literature review on how patients are and should be informed about biosimilars, searching in scientific databases (i.e., Medline, Embase). Several large surveys have shown a lack of knowledge and trust in biosimilars among European patients in recent years. This review identified five main strategies to inform patients about biosimilars: (1) provide understandable information, (2) in a positive and transparent way, (3) tailored to the individual’s needs, (4) with one voice, and (5) supported by audiovisual material. Moreover, the importance of a multistakeholder approach was underlined by describing the role of each stakeholder. Patients are a large and diffuse target group to be reached by educational programs. Therefore, patient associations have become increasingly important in correctly informing patients about biosimilar medicines. This has led to widespread biosimilar information for patients among European patient associations. Therefore, a web-based screening of European Patients’ Forum (EPF) and International Alliance of Patients’ Organizations (IAPO) member organizations on publicly available information about biosimilars was performed. We found that the level of detail, correctness, and the tone of the provided information varied. In conclusion, it is paramount to set up a close collaboration between all stakeholders to communicate, develop, and disseminate factual information about biosimilars for patients.
Collapse
|
27
|
Ebbers HC, Fehrmann B, Ottosen M, Hvorslev N, Høier P, Hwang JW, Chung J, Lim HT, Lee S, Hong J, Rezk MF. Batch-to-Batch Consistency of SB4 and SB2, Etanercept and Infliximab Biosimilars. BioDrugs 2021; 34:225-233. [PMID: 31925703 PMCID: PMC7113226 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-019-00402-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Biosimilars must meet stringent regulatory requirements, both at the time of authorization and during their lifecycle. Yet it has been suggested that divergence in quality attributes over time may lead to clinically meaningful differences between two versions of a biologic. Therefore, this study investigated the batch-to-batch consistency across a range of parameters for released batches of the etanercept biosimilar (SB4) and infliximab biosimilar (SB2). Methods SB4 (Benepali®) and SB2 (Flixabi®) were both developed by Samsung Bioepis and are manufactured in Europe by Biogen at their facility in Hillerød, Denmark. A total of 120 batches of SB4 and 25 batches of SB2 were assessed for consistency and compliance with specified release parameters, including purity, post-translational glycosylation (SB4 only), protein concentration, and biological activity. Results The protein concentration, purity, tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) binding, and TNF-α neutralization of all batches of SB4 and SB2 were within the strict specification limits set by regulatory agencies, as was the total sialic acid (TSA) content of all batches of SB4. Conclusions Quality attributes of SB4 and SB2 batches showed little variation and were consistently within the rigorous specifications defined by regulatory agencies. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s40259-019-00402-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans C Ebbers
- Biogen International GmbH, Neuhofstrasse 30, 6340, Baar, Switzerland.
| | | | - Mette Ottosen
- Biogen (Denmark) Manufacturing APS, Hillerød, Denmark
| | | | - Pia Høier
- Biogen (Denmark) Manufacturing APS, Hillerød, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Barbier L, Simoens S, Vulto AG, Huys I. European Stakeholder Learnings Regarding Biosimilars: Part I-Improving Biosimilar Understanding and Adoption. BioDrugs 2020; 34:783-796. [PMID: 33141421 PMCID: PMC7669769 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-020-00452-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the benefits offered by biosimilars in terms of cost savings and improved patient access to biological therapies, and an established regulatory pathway in Europe, biosimilar adoption is challenged by a lack of knowledge and understanding among stakeholders such as healthcare professionals and patients about biosimilars, impacting their trust and willingness to use them. In addition, stakeholders are faced with questions about clinical implementation aspects such as switching. OBJECTIVE This study aims to provide recommendations on how to improve biosimilar understanding and adoption among stakeholders based on insights of healthcare professionals (physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses), patient(s) (representatives) and regulators across Europe. METHOD The study consists of a structured literature review gathering original research data on stakeholder knowledge about biosimilars, followed by semi-structured interviews across five stakeholder groups including physicians, hospital pharmacists, nurses, patient(s) (representatives) and regulators across Europe. RESULTS Although improvement in knowledge was observed over time, generally low to moderate levels of awareness, knowledge and trust towards biosimilars among healthcare professionals and patients are identified in literature (N studies = 106). Based on the provided insights from interviews with European experts (N = 44), a number of challenges regarding biosimilar stakeholder understanding are identified, including a lack of practical information about biosimilars and their use, a lack of understanding about biosimilar concepts and a lack of knowledge about biologicals in general. Misinformation by originator industry is also believed to have impacted stakeholder trust. In terms of possible solutions and actions to improve stakeholder understanding, broad support exists to (1) organize initiatives focussed on explaining the rationale behind biosimilar concepts and the approval pathway, (2) invest in education about biologicals in general, (3) develop clear and one-voice regulatory guidance about biosimilar interchangeability and switching across Europe, (4) disseminate real-world clinical biosimilar (switch) data, (5) share biosimilar experiences by key opinion leaders and among peers, (6) provide practical biosimilar product information, (7) provide guidance about biosimilar use, (8) actively counterbalance misinformation and organize information initiatives by neutral entities, (9) organize multi-stakeholder informational and educational efforts, aligning information between involved stakeholder groups and (10) design initiatives in a way that ensures active information uptake. Furthermore, interviewees argue that governments should be proactive in these regards. CONCLUSIONS This study argues in favour of a structural, multi-stakeholder framework at both European and national level to improve stakeholder biosimilar understanding and acceptance. It proposes a number of actionable recommendations that can inform policy making and guide stakeholders, which can contribute to realizing healthcare system benefits offered by biosimilar competition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liese Barbier
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N II Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N II Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N II Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, O&N II Herestraat 49, Box 521, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Feagan BG, Marabani M, Wu JJ, Faccin F, Spronk C, Castañeda-Hernández G. The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence. Adv Ther 2020; 37:4491-4518. [PMID: 32910420 PMCID: PMC7547992 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-020-01472-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
With the increasing availability of biosimilars, the practice of switching therapies for non-medical reasons between an originator biologic and an analogous biosimilar has become more common. The evidence to support this practice mostly comes from single-switch randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and real-world (RW) evidence studies. However, as more biosimilars of the same originator enter the market, multiple switching events between originators and biosimilars is becoming a reality, despite limited evidence to support the efficacy and safety of such practice. Some countries have established guidelines, policies, or laws related to interchangeability and/or automatic substitution, whereas others have left these practices unregulated or controlled by other components of the healthcare system. Collectively, guidelines on single non-medical switching are often vague, with even less focus given to multiple non-medical switching, leaving this practice mostly unregulated. This narrative review will first discuss the current regulatory perspectives on non-medical switching and challenges associated with switching therapies, particularly with the availability of multiple biosimilars. We will then review the current evidence from RCTs and RW studies in the light of three different multiple-switch scenarios currently taking place in clinical practice: switching between an originator and a single biosimilar, switching between biosimilars of the same originator, and the clinical practice of switching back to the originator (i.e., switchbacks) after a failure of the initial non-medical switch to the analogous biosimilar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian G Feagan
- Department of Medicine, Western University, Robarts Clinical Trials, St. Joseph's Health Care, London, ON, Canada.
| | - Mona Marabani
- Department of Medicine, Canterbury Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jashin J Wu
- Dermatology Research and Education Foundation, Irvine, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Gilberto Castañeda-Hernández
- Departamento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kim JW, Jung JY, Suh CH. Real-world observational study of biosimilars in inflammatory arthritis treatment: a systematic literature review. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2020; 21:57-73. [PMID: 32808557 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1812575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of biological agents in patients with rheumatic diseases has achieved the therapeutic target, i.e., remission or low disease activity. The share of biological agents has been growing with the approval of biosimilars, which have been recognized for their equivalent efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity to the original as well as their reduced economic burden. AREA COVERED Biosimilars are being examined for their bioequivalence to reference products in randomized-controlled trials; however, the use of biosimilars in actual clinical practice is complicated owing to issues with switching and comorbidities. Therefore, this review describes real-world data in the rapidly evolving field of biosimilars in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy, including ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis. EXPERT OPINION According to published data, the use of biosimilars for inflammatory arthritis led to no significant inferiority in treatment outcomes and resulted in considerable cost savings in the real-world. Currently, beyond the use of biosimilars, issues with the interchangeability of biosimilars, including immunogenicity, should be addressed. Strategies to overcome these concerns will improve treatment efficacy and safety in patients with inflammatory arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Won Kim
- Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine , Suwon, Korea
| | - Ju-Yang Jung
- Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine , Suwon, Korea
| | - Chang-Hee Suh
- Department of Rheumatology, Ajou University School of Medicine , Suwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Bruni C, Gentileschi S, Pacini G, Baldi C, Capassoni M, Tofani L, Bardelli M, Cometi L, Cantarini L, Nacci F, Vietri M, Bartoli F, Fiori G, Frediani B, Matucci-Cerinic M. The switch from etanercept originator to SB4: data from a real-life experience on tolerability and persistence on treatment in joint inflammatory diseases. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2020; 12:1759720X20964031. [PMID: 33133246 PMCID: PMC7576915 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x20964031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: Switching from originator to biosimilar is part of current practice in inflammatory rheumatic musculoskeletal diseases (iRMDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA), with evidences derived from both etanercept (ETN) to SB4-switching randomized controlled trials and real-life registries. We investigated the safety and treatment persistence of ETN/SB4 in a multi-iRMD cohort derived from two rheumatology departments in our region. Methods: Adult patients with iRMDs, treated with ETN for at least 6 months and switched to SB4 in stable clinical condition, were eligible for this retrospective evaluation. Retrospective data on adverse events, loss of efficacy and persistence on treatment were collected until latest available follow-up. Results: A total of 220 patients (85 RA, 81 PsA, 33 axSpA, 14 juvenile idiopathic arthritis and seven other conditions; 142 females, mean age 58 ± 7 years, disease duration 12 ± 4 years, ETN duration 7 ± 4 years) were enrolled, with median follow-up of 12.1 (9.7–15.8) months. A total of 50 patients (22.7%) presented with at least one adverse event, with 36 (16.4%) disease flares and 30 (13.6%: 11 for safety and 19 loss of efficacy) SB4 withdrawals. Cumulative SB4 treatment persistence was 99.1%, 88.6% and 64.6% at 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. Back-switch to ETN was performed in 17/30 cases, the remaining cases were managed with change of biologic disease modifying or conventional synthetic anti-rheumatic drug. Age was the only significant predictor of SB4 interruption at 6 months. Conclusion: Our real-life data confirm the safety profile of switching from ETN to SB4, with slightly higher treatment persistence rates compared with other real-life registries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cosimo Bruni
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Firenze, Via delle Oblate 4, 50141, Firenze, Italy
| | - Stefano Gentileschi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Giovanni Pacini
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Caterina Baldi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Marco Capassoni
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Tofani
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Bardelli
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Laura Cometi
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Cantarini
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Francesca Nacci
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Michele Vietri
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Bartoli
- Department Geriatric Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Ginevra Fiori
- Department Geriatric Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Department of Medical Sciences, Surgery and Neurosciences, Rheumatology Unit, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Department Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fragoulis GE, Evangelatos G, Arida A, Bournia VK, Fragiadaki K, Karamanakos A, Kravvariti E, Laskari K, Panopoulos S, Pappa M, Mitsikostas DD, Tektonidou MG, Sfikakis PP. Nocebo-Prone Behaviour in Patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2020; 31:288-294. [PMID: 33196007 PMCID: PMC7656135 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.31.3.288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with emotional distress and significant disruptions in health-care services. These are key players in the development of nocebo phenomena. We aimed to investigate nocebo-prone behaviour in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARD) amid the COVID-19 pandemic-associated lockdown. METHODS Consecutive patients were telephone-interviewed during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. Clinical and socioeconomic characteristics (eg, level of education) were recorded. For nocebo behaviour, a four-item validated questionnaire (Q-No, cut-off score>15), was used. Results were compared with pre-COVID-19 Q-No scores collected from patients followed-up in our department. RESULTS Nocebo behaviour was detected in 51/500 (10.2%) individuals. In patients with nocebo behaviour, use of anti-hypertensives was less common (17.6% vs 31.8%, p=0.04), but a higher level of education was more common (58.8% vs 35.9%, p=0.002), compared with patients with Q-No score ≤15; the latter retained statistical significance in multivariate regression analysis (p=0.009, OR [95%CI]: 2.29, [1.23-4.25]). Total Q-No scores were higher in the COVID-19-period compared to the pre-COVID-19 era [median (range); 12 (4-20) vs 11 (4-20), p=0.02]. Among 78 patients with available Q-No questionnaires in the pre-COVID-19 era, 11 (14.1%) displayed nocebo behaviour, which increased to 16 (20.5%) amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Interim development of nocebo behaviour was also associated with higher educational level (p=0.049, OR: 3.65, 95%CI: 1.005-13.268). CONCLUSION A considerable proportion of ARD patients manifested nocebo-prone behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic, which was more common among those with high educational level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George E. Fragoulis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Evangelatos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Aikaterini Arida
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Vasiliki-Kalliopi Bournia
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Kalliopi Fragiadaki
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Anastasios Karamanakos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Evrydiki Kravvariti
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Katerina Laskari
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Stylianos Panopoulos
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria Pappa
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Dimos D. Mitsikostas
- First Neurology Department, Aeginition Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Maria G. Tektonidou
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P. Sfikakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, “Laiko” General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cohen JD, Tropé S, Paubel P, Munos A, Bocquet F. Preconceived notions about biosimilars—a French experience. Clin Rheumatol 2020; 39:2251-2254. [DOI: 10.1007/s10067-020-05229-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 05/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
34
|
Fleischmann R, Jairath V, Mysler E, Nicholls D, Declerck P. Nonmedical Switching From Originators to Biosimilars: Does the Nocebo Effect Explain Treatment Failures and Adverse Events in Rheumatology and Gastroenterology? Rheumatol Ther 2020; 7:35-64. [PMID: 31950442 PMCID: PMC7021884 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-00190-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The act of nonmedical switching, defined as switching stable patients who are generally doing well with their current therapy from an originator biologic to its biosimilar, has been endorsed as a reasonable treatment strategy. The safety and efficacy of nonmedical switching have been evaluated in randomized controlled and real-world evidence studies, which have demonstrated that although many patients maintain treatment response after the switch, some patients experience therapy failure, resulting in therapy discontinuation. It has been postulated that the vast majority, if not all, of these treatment failures result from a "nocebo effect", defined as patients' negative expectations toward the therapy change. Reports suggest that the risk of a nocebo effect is higher following a mandated nonmedical switch. Although the nocebo effect is a well-recognized phenomenon in pain studies, evidence is limited in immune-mediated diseases primarily because it is difficult to quantify, especially retrospectively. In spite of this, numerous biosimilar studies in patients with immune-mediated diseases have concluded that nonmedical switching failures are due to a nocebo effect. The objective of this narrative review was to explore the reasons for nonmedical switch failure or discontinuation and the role of the nocebo effect among patients with inflammatory rheumatic and gastrointestinal diseases who switched from an originator biologic to its biosimilar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Fleischmann
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Metropleac Clinical Research Center, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA.
| | - Vipul Jairath
- Division of Gastroenterology, Departments of Medicine, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital, Western University, Room A10-228, London, ON, Canada
| | - Eduardo Mysler
- Organización Médica de Investigación, Callao 384 Piso 2 Dto 6, CABA, C1022AAQ, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Dave Nicholls
- Coast Joint Care, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochy Waters Shopping Centre, Denna Street, Maroochydore, QLD, 4558, Australia
| | - Paul Declerck
- University of Leuven, Campus Gasthuisberg O&N 2, Herestraat 49, P.B. 820, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Luttropp K, Dalén J, Svedbom A, Dozier M, Black CM, Puenpatom A. Real-World Patient Experience of Switching Biologic Treatment in Inflammatory Arthritis and Ulcerative Colitis - A Systematic Literature Review. Patient Prefer Adherence 2020; 14:309-320. [PMID: 32109997 PMCID: PMC7034967 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s238843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To obtain an up-to-date overview of the measurement of patient experience of switching biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) or ulcerative colitis (UC). Secondary objectives included summarizing the types of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) used (if any), and related findings; and summarizing medical and non-medical reasons for treatment switch and/or discontinuation. METHODS A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed, searching Medline and Embase for relevant publications. RESULTS In total, 70 relevant publications were identified. While the majority of these reported reasons for switching and/or discontinuing treatment, only four provided information explicitly regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. All four utilized ranking tools to assess patient experience of switching biologic treatment. The most common reason for switching and/or discontinuing treatment was loss of efficacy, while the least common reason was patient preference. CONCLUSION Although the number of available treatments in IA and UC have increased, there is a sparsity of information regarding patient-reported experience of switching biologic treatment. Further research regarding patient preference and/or experience would benefit this therapeutic area and help guide treatment choices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johan Dalén
- ICON Clinical Research, Plc., Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Mary Dozier
- ICON Clinical Research, Plc., Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christopher M Black
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Puenpatom
- Center for Observational and Real-World Evidence, Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
[Biosimilars and the nocebo effect]. Z Rheumatol 2019; 79:267-275. [PMID: 31802197 DOI: 10.1007/s00393-019-00729-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Biosimilars have been approved for use in Germany for many years and in the meantime also in rheumatology but only a few years ago. Biosimilars, which are biotechnologically manufactured products the same as reference biologicals, have actually now achieved a substantial proportion of the market in some regions but there are still doubters among patients and physicians who fear a loss of quality even if there is no evidence for this. A part of this problem can be explained by the nocebo effect but which furthermore also has a substantial medical importance. This effect is described and explained in this article. Psychosocial and context-related factors, such as the relationship between patient and physician, previous experience with treatment and treatment expectations can either improve or impair the efficacy of treatment interventions. These phenomena are commonly known as placebo and nocebo effects. As placebo and nocebo effects can influence the development of symptoms, the frequency of undesired events and the efficacy of treatment, it is decisive to know these effects and to develop strategies for prevention in order to optimize the treatment results. Although in recent years experimental studies have achieved substantial progress in the clarification of the psychosocial and neurobiological mechanisms of placebo effects, detailed mechanisms of nocebo effects are still widely unexplored. An improved understanding of these mechanisms promises the development of user-friendly strategies for the clinical care to improve treatment results and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
|
37
|
Efficacy and safety of original and biosimilar etanercept (SB4) in active rheumatoid arthritis – A comparison in a real-world national cohort. Biologicals 2019; 62:27-32. [DOI: 10.1016/j.biologicals.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
|
38
|
Tolonen HM, Airaksinen MS, Ruokoniemi P, Hämeen-Anttila K, Shermock KM, Kurki P. Medication safety risks to be managed in national implementation of automatic substitution of biological medicines: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e032892. [PMID: 31662405 PMCID: PMC6830661 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore relevant Finnish stakeholders' perceptions on the automatic substitution of biological medicines with particular focus on medication safety and issues that need to be considered to create an appropriate model for automatic biological product substitution. DESIGN Qualitative interview study. METHODS Data were collected in semistructured individual (n=17), pair (n=7) and group (n=8) interviews (32 interviews, 62 participants) in 2018. Participants represented a wide range of stakeholders involved in the pharmacotherapy process: community pharmacists (n=8 interviews), authorities (n=7), prescribers (n=7), pharmaceutical industry and wholesalers (n=6), patients/customers (n=2), hospital pharmacists (n=1) and nurses (n=1). Inductive content analysis was performed. RESULTS Benefits of automatic substitution were identified as cost savings, more patients receiving biological treatments and enhanced continuity of treatment. Six major risk categories were identified: (1) the patient's medication is interrupted or complicated temporarily or permanently, (2) the patient uses two products with the same active substance, (3) the traceability of the product is compromised, (4) the patient cannot get into healthcare in case of problems, (5) the patient does not receive substitution-related advice from a pharmacy and (6) the patient is distracted by the support material he/she receives. Several risk mitigation measures were commonly mentioned: medication and device counselling by pharmacists (n=23), infrequent substitution interval (n=15) and better knowledge on biosimilars among healthcare providers (n=13). CONCLUSION Automatic substitution of biologics is associated with risks that should be prospectively managed before implementing the procedure. The substitution also introduces new tasks and communication needs to those involved in actual medication use process, particularly to community pharmacists who will be responsible for substitution and counselling the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna M Tolonen
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- HUS Pharmacy, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Marja Sa Airaksinen
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | | | - Kenneth M Shermock
- Center for Medication Quality and Outcomes, The Johns Hopkins Health System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
- Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Araújo FC, Gonçalves J, Fonseca JE. Biosimilars in rheumatology. Pharmacol Res 2019; 149:104467. [PMID: 31568820 DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2019] [Revised: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 09/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Biotechnologicals are an invaluable resource in the treatment of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) non-responsive or intolerant to conventional therapies. However, they are the main driver for increase in direct costs and represent a significant economic burden to healthcare systems worldwide. Since biosimilars are similar and more affordable versions of previously licenced biotechnologicals, they are expected to contribute to healthcare system sustainability and reduce inequities in treatment access. The landmark approval of CT-P13 as the first infliximab biosimilar paved the way for new infliximab but also etanercept, adalimumab and rituximab biosimilars. In Europe, North America and some countries of Asia, development is strictly regulated and only those presenting a totality-of-evidence dossier with highly similar physicochemical, biological and clinical performances are endorsed by regulatory agencies as biosimilars. The current article addresses the importance of biosimilar medicines in the treatment of IRD, as well as their innovative development and regulatory pathways, clinical evidence of similarity and challenges that may undermine their widespread use and success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filipe César Araújo
- Rheumatology and Osteoporosis Unit, Hospital de Sant'Ana, Rua de Benguela, 501, 2775-229 Parede, Portugal.
| | - João Gonçalves
- iMed - Research Institute for Medicines, Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Professor Gama Pinto, 1649-003 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - João Eurico Fonseca
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Instituto de Medicina Molecular da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisboa, Portugal; Rheumatology and Metabolic Bone Diseases Department, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisbon Academic Medical Centre, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Barbosa CMM, Rodríguez de Castro B, Labeaga Beramendi Y, Terroba Alonso P, Barbazán Vázquez J. Patient satisfaction survey: substitution of reference etanercept with a biosimilar product. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2019; 28:109-111. [PMID: 33608440 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2019-001999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess patient satisfaction after pharmacy-mediated replacement of the originator etanercept prefilled syringe with its biosimilar prefilled pen. METHODS Prospective observational study from March to May 2018, to assess satisfaction with the new drug dispensed. Patients were asked to answer a paper questionnaire with three questions: pain at injection site, ease of administration, and overall patient satisfaction with the change, rated on a scale from 1 (not satisfied) to 5 (extremely satisfied). RESULTS The questionnaire was given to 134 patients (74 men, 60 women), with an average age of 55 years. 118 patients (88%) were from the Rheumatology Service and 16 patients (12%) from Dermatology. The median treatment duration with etanercept was 61 months. 87 (65%) completed questionnaires were collected. The mean pain score was 3.4. Most patients found administration easy with the biosimilar pen, with an average score of 3.7. Mean overall satisfaction was rated at 3.3, being higher among men, younger patients, and those with shorter duration of treatment. CONCLUSIONS The change of the original product from etanercept to a biosimilar product was acceptable for most of the patients who responded to the survey. Surveys allow us to determine the opinion and preferences of patients, thus achieving higher satisfaction with their treatment. Further research is needed to evaluate the effect of automatic replacement. A collaborative multidisciplinary switching programme should be implemented based on the feedback provided by patients.
Collapse
|
41
|
Ebbers HC, Pieper B, Issa A, Addison J, Freudensprung U, Rezk MF. Real-World Evidence on Etanercept Biosimilar SB4 in Etanercept-Naïve or Switching Patients: A Systematic Review. Rheumatol Ther 2019; 6:317-338. [PMID: 31385263 PMCID: PMC6702587 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-019-00169-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In 2016, SB4 (Benepali®) became the first etanercept (ETN) biosimilar to obtain marketing authorisation in Europe. Despite robust analytical and clinical comparisons, outstanding questions remain on SB4 use in routine practice. METHODS A systematic search for publications on real-world evidence of SB4 effectiveness, safety and drug survival was undertaken using search terms (SB4 OR Benepali OR biosimilar etanercept OR innovator etanercept) in the BIOSIS® Toxicology, BIOSIS Previews®, Embase® and MEDLINE® databases up to 17 January 2019. RESULTS Of 959 articles identified, eight journal articles, two journal letters and 23 congress abstracts were selected on criteria of original real-world evidence with a clinical focus. As expected with real-world evidence, quality scoring showed that the evidence had high external validity but lower internal validity. A total of 13,552 patients were described across nine European countries and all approved SB4 indications: 2499 were ETN-naïve and 11,053 switched from reference ETN to SB4 (switchers). Switch acceptance rates (a combination of clinicians offering and patients accepting initiation on SB4) ranged between 51.6% and 99.0%; patient support programmes positively contributed to acceptance. Disease activity was generally similar pre- and post-switch (typically 3-month timeframe). Retention rates across studies were at least 75% (up to 12 months follow-up). No new safety signals were identified. Differences in discontinuation rates versus historic controls reported in some studies may have been influenced by differences in treatment practices, lack of clinician confidence and nocebo effects. CONCLUSION Nearly 2500 ETN-naïve patients have been initiated on SB4 and outcomes are similar to those patients receiving reference ETN. Overall this systematic review of real-world evidence provides additional reassurance that SB4 is as effective and safe as reference ETN in both switched and naïve patients. FUNDING Biogen International GmbH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Amine Issa
- Biogen International GmbH, Baar, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kravvariti E, Kitas GD, Mitsikostas DD, Sfikakis PP. Nocebos in rheumatology: emerging concepts and their implications for clinical practice. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2019; 14:727-740. [PMID: 30361674 DOI: 10.1038/s41584-018-0110-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Nocebo effects are noxious reactions to therapeutic interventions that occur because of negative expectations of the patient. In the past decade, neurobiological data have revealed specific neural pathways induced by nocebos (that is, interventions that cause nocebo effects), as well as the associated mechanisms and predisposing factors of nocebo effects. Epidemiological data suggest that nocebos can have a notable effect on medication adherence, clinical outcomes and health-care policy. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) indicate that withdrawal of treatment by placebo-arm participants owing to adverse events is common; a proportion of these events could be nocebo effects. Moreover, in large-scale, open-label studies of patients with RMDs who transition from bio-originator to biosimilar therapeutics, biosimilar retention rates were much lower than in previous double-blind switch RCTs. This discrepancy suggests that in addition to the lack of response in some patients because of intrinsic differences between the drugs, nocebos might have an important role in low biosimilar retention, thus increasing the need for awareness and early identification of nocebo effects by rheumatologists and allied health-care professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evrydiki Kravvariti
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - George D Kitas
- Clinical Research Unit, Dudley Group NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.,Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Dimos D Mitsikostas
- First Department of Neurology, Aeginition Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece
| | - Petros P Sfikakis
- First Department of Propaedeutic Internal Medicine, Joint Rheumatology Program, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Glintborg B, Ibsen R, Bilbo REQ, Lund Hetland M, Kjellberg J. Does a mandatory non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept lead to increase in healthcare use and costs? A Danish register-based study of patients with inflammatory arthritis. RMD Open 2019; 5:e001016. [PMID: 31452931 PMCID: PMC6691512 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2019-001016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 07/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives In year 2016, Danish national guidelines included a mandatory switch of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases treated with originator etanercept (ETA) to biosimilar SB4 in routine care. We aimed to explore if switching lead to increased healthcare utilisation and costs. Methods Observational cohort study. Adult patients who switched from ETA to SB4 were identified in the Danish nationwide DANBIO registry. In the National Patient Registry, we identified health utilisation (hospital admissions/hospital days/outpatient visits/prescription medication use) and comorbidities. Estimation of health utilisation included average use and costs 1 year before/after switch, changes after the switch, and whether patient characteristics affected changes. Analyses were by adjusted two-step gamma distributed regression models, and for changes over time a generalized estimation equations (GEE) model was applied. Impact of comorbidities was explored as interaction terms in the model. Medication costs of ETA and SB4 were not included in model. Results 1620 patients were included (mean age 55 years (SD 14.7), 40% male). Costs before and after switching were mainly driven by outpatient visits (67%/72% of all costs). Monthly fluctuations of costs were similar before/after switch. After switching, use (8%) and costs (7%) of outpatient services increased, whereas costs of admissions (55%) and medication (5%) decreased. Patients with longer ETA treatment duration had an increase in use and costs of healthcare resources, whereas gender and comorbidities had no impact. Higher age was associated with an increase in costs of inpatient services. Conclusion We demonstrated no obvious changes in overall use and costs of healthcare services following switch from originator to biosimilar etanercept.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | | | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- DANBIO and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopedics, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Jakob Kjellberg
- The Danish Centre for Social Science Research, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kaltsonoudis E, Pelechas E, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Maintained Clinical Remission in Ankylosing Spondylitis Patients Switched from Reference Infliximab to Its Biosimilar: An 18-Month Comparative Open-Label Study. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8070956. [PMID: 31269678 PMCID: PMC6679061 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8070956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Switching from reference infliximab (RI) to biosimilar infliximab (BI) had no detrimental effects on efficacy and safety. However, long-term follow-up data is missing. OBJECTIVE To evaluate patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS) in clinical remission who were switching from RI to BI, in terms of the safety and efficacy of this, in a long-term fashion. METHODS One hundred and nine consecutive unselected AS patients were investigated. All were naïve to other biologics and were followed-up at predefined times receiving RI. Patients in clinical remission were asked to switch from RI to BI. Those who switched to BI were compared with a matched control-group receiving continuous RI. During follow-up, several parameters were recorded for at least 18 months. Disease activity was measured using the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index (BASDAI), and the Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity score (ASDAS), using the C-reactive protein. Remission was defined as BASDAI < 4 and ASDAS < 1.3. RESULTS Eighty-eight patients were evaluated (21 excluded for different reasons). From those, 45 switched to BI, while 43 continued receiving RI. No differences between groups regarding demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters were observed. All patients were in clinical remission. During follow-up, five patients from the BI-group and three from the maintenance-group discontinued the study (4 patients nocebo effect, 1 loss of efficacy). After 18 months of treatment, all patients in both groups remained in clinical remission. No significant adverse events were noted between groups. CONCLUSION BI is equivalent to RI in maintaining AS in clinical remission for at least 18 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evripidis Kaltsonoudis
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Eleftherios Pelechas
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Paraskevi V. Voulgari
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | - Alexandros A. Drosos
- Rheumatology Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Müskens WD, Rongen-van Dartel SAA, Adang EMM, van Riel PLCM. Biosimilars in the management of chronic inflammatory diseases: The Dutch experience. Mediterr J Rheumatol 2019; 30:76-81. [PMID: 32524082 PMCID: PMC7280871 DOI: 10.31138/mjr.30.1.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 05/20/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
These days, the use of biosimilars for the treatment of bio-naive patients is well established. However, the transition of patients being treated with a bio-originator to its biosimilar is still a topic of discussion. The main issue is which approach to use when initiating the non-medical transition. The first real-world examples contain both mandatory and non-mandatory approaches, resulting in a variety of acceptance and discontinuation rates. At this moment a non-mandatory approach, based on shared decision making, is preferred by international guidelines and the Task Force on the Use of Biosimilars to Treat Rheumatological Diseases. However, clear definitions of mandatory and non-mandatory are lacking, as a result of which these terms may be wrongly used in some studies. This article aims to provide an overview of transition approaches used in the Netherlands, and how the approach used relates to acceptance and discontinuation rates of the biosimilar.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sanne A A Rongen-van Dartel
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Eddy M M Adang
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Piet L C M van Riel
- Department of IQ Healthcare, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Rheumatology, Bernhoven, Uden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Alten R, Batko B, Hala T, Kameda H, Radominski SC, Tseluyko V, Babic G, Cronenberger C, Hackley S, Rehman M, von Richter O, Zhang M, Cohen S. Randomised, double-blind, phase III study comparing the infliximab biosimilar, PF-06438179/GP1111, with reference infliximab: efficacy, safety and immunogenicity from week 30 to week 54. RMD Open 2019; 5:e000876. [PMID: 30997153 PMCID: PMC6446180 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-06438179/GP1111 (PF-SZ-IFX) compared with European reference infliximab (Remicade®; ref-IFX) in patients with moderate-to-severe, active rheumatoid arthritis after continued long-term use of PF-SZ-IFX, and in patients who were switched from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX. Methods REFLECTIONS B537-02 was a double-blind, active-controlled, multinational study in which patients (N=650) were initially randomised to PF-SZ-IFX or ref-IFX for 30 weeks (treatment period [TP] 1). During weeks 30–54 (TP2), the PF-SZ-IFX group (n=280) continued treatment with PF-SZ-IFX (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) and patients in the ref-IFX group (n=286) were rerandomised (1:1) to continue ref-IFX (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) (n=143) or switch to PF-SZ-IFX (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) (n=143) for a further 24 weeks. Efficacy, safety, immunogenicity and pharmacokinetics were evaluated. Results During TP2, patients in all three treatment groups continued to maintain comparable treatment response. At week 54, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response rates were 71.1% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 64.3% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 70.6% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX). Observations for other endpoints, including ACR50/70, Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints Based on High-Sensitivity C Reactive Protein(DAS28-CRP) remission, and mean change in DAS28-CRP and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, were also comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 36.8% (PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX), 33.6% (ref-IFX/ref-IFX) and 37.8% (ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX) of patients; there were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between groups. The percentage of patients who were antidrug antibody-positive was generally stable through the treatment period and comparable overall between the PF-SZ-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (52.1%; neutralising: 80.8%), ref-IFX/ref-IFX (60.1%; neutralising: 84.9%) and ref-IFX/PF-SZ-IFX (58.0%; neutralising 78.3%) groups. Conclusions The similar efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of PF-SZ-IFX compared with ref-IFX were maintained for up to 54 weeks and were not affected by blinded treatment switch from ref-IFX to PF-SZ-IFX at week 30. Trial registration number NCT02222493.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke Alten
- University Medicine, Schlosspark Klinik, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Tomas Hala
- Center for Clinical and Basic Research, Pardubice, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Vira Tseluyko
- Kharkiv Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | - Goran Babic
- Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal (a Sandoz company), Holzkirchen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Oliver von Richter
- Sandoz Biopharmaceuticals, Hexal (a Sandoz company), Holzkirchen, Germany
| | | | - Stanley Cohen
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Glintborg B, Loft AG, Omerovic E, Hendricks O, Linauskas A, Espesen J, Danebod K, Jensen DV, Nordin H, Dalgaard EB, Chrysidis S, Kristensen S, Raun JL, Lindegaard H, Manilo N, Jakobsen SH, Hansen IMJ, Pedersen DD, Sørensen IJ, Andersen LS, Grydehøj J, Mehnert F, Krogh NS, Lund Hetland M. Response to ''To switch or not to switch': the missing piece in the puzzle of biosimilar literature?' by Scherlinger et al. Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:e37. [PMID: 30674476 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 01/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Glintborg
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Glostrup, Denmark .,Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Anne Gitte Loft
- Department of Rheumatology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Emina Omerovic
- Department of Rheumatology, Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark
| | | | - Asta Linauskas
- Department of Rheumatology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Jakob Espesen
- Department of Rheumatology, Vejle Hospital, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Kamilla Danebod
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Dorte Vendelbo Jensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Gentofte and Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Gentofte, Denmark
| | - Henrik Nordin
- Department of Rheumatology, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | | | | | - Salome Kristensen
- Department of Rheumatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Hanne Lindegaard
- Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Natalia Manilo
- Department of Rheumatology, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Inge Juul Sørensen
- The DANBIO Registry and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research (COPECARE), Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Glostrup, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Jolanta Grydehøj
- Department of Rheumatology, Holstebro Hospital, Holstebro, Denmark
| | - Frank Mehnert
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Merete Lund Hetland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Scherlinger M, Schaeverbeke T. 'To switch or not to switch': the missing piece in the puzzle of biosimilar literature? Ann Rheum Dis 2019; 79:e36. [PMID: 30610068 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 12/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Scherlinger
- Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France .,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,UMR-CNRS 5164 Immunoconcept, Bordeaux, France
| | - Thierry Schaeverbeke
- Service de Rhumatologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Scherlinger M, Pellegrin JL, Germain V, Lazaro E, Duffau P, Schaeverbeke T. [Biosimilars in France, to understand the stakes in order to use them well]. Rev Med Interne 2018; 40:5-8. [PMID: 30396704 DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2018.10.383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- M Scherlinger
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France.
| | - J-L Pellegrin
- Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Service de médecine interne, hôpital Haut-Levêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - V Germain
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - E Lazaro
- Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Service de médecine interne, hôpital Haut-Levêque, CHU de Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - P Duffau
- Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Service de médecine interne, hôpital Saint-André, CHU de Bordeaux, 1, rue Jean-Burguet, 33000 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| | - T Schaeverbeke
- Service de rhumatologie, hôpital Pellegrin, CHU de Bordeaux, place Amélie-Raba-Léon, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Université de Bordeaux, 146, rue Léo-Saignat, 33076 Bordeaux, France; Centre de référence maladies auto-immunes et systémiques rare Est/Sud-Ouest, CHU de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|