Development of the PedsQL™ Epilepsy Module: Focus group and cognitive interviews

The eACT study design and methods: A sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial of A novel adherence intervention for youth with epilepsy

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a common, chronic pediatric neurological condition predominately treated with anti-seizure medications (ASMs) to control or reduce seizures. Approximately 60 % of youth with epilepsy demonstrate suboptimal adherence to their ASM. This paper describes the methodology, recruitment, design, and baseline participant characteristics of a sequential, multiple assignment, randomized trial (SMART) designed to test the effectiveness of a behavioral health intervention to improve adherence in families of young children with epilepsy.

METHODS

Using a two-stage SMART, youth ages 2-12 years old with newly diagnosed epilepsy and their families were enrolled. Following an 8-week run-in phase, families with ≤95 % adherence were randomized to control (education + automated digital reminders) or intervention (education + automated digital reminders + individualized feedback) arms. After three months, families in the intervention group who remained non-adherent (i.e., ≤ 95 %) were re-randomized to 1) continue with same intervention or 2) receive two telehealth problem-solving sessions with an interventionist over the next two months. Study measures were completed at baseline, 8-, 14-, and 20-months post-baseline.

RESULTS

Of the n = 466 ethnically and racially diverse study participants, n = 268 participants were non-adherent and were randomized. The primary outcome was electronically monitored ASM adherence at post-intervention, while secondary outcomes included seizure freedom, health care utilization, and epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Novel aspects of the trial design (e.g., sequential, recruitment of racial and ethnic diverse youth), modifications to the protocol related to the COVID-19 pandemic and evolving socio-political and medical climate, as well as recruitment and retention challenges are discussed.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov Number: NCT03817229.

Examining change in the mental health of young people with epilepsy following a successful psychological intervention

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the cognitive, behavioural and affective processes involved in therapeutic change for young people with epilepsy and mental health difficulties receiving an integrated mental health intervention.

METHODS

As part of a mixed methods convergent design, qualitative data were gathered in parallel to quantitative data at two timepoints in a randomised controlled trial testing the Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy in addition to usual care. Twenty-five young people and/or their families were interviewed before and after the intervention about the young person's mental and physical health, and their experience of therapy. Interview data were analysed inductively, idiographically and longitudinally using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis combined with Framework Analysis.

RESULTS

The young people's emotional and behaviour problems improved, mirroring the trial's quantitative outcomes. Their anxiety decreased and behaviour improved as they acquired tools and understanding through therapy. Problems, like aggressive behaviours and emotional outbursts, were also reduced, with young people gaining increased awareness and ability to self-regulate and parents learning to contain their child's impulsive behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

The qualitative findings complement the MICE trial's significant positive quantitative results by providing insight and context to the therapeutic change, providing vivid insight into the mechanisms of therapy for individual families.

Including Young Children in the Development and Testing of Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Instruments: A Scoping Review of Children's Involvement and Qualitative Methods

BACKGROUND

Qualitative research during the development/testing of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) is recommended to support content validity. However, it is unclear if and how young children (≤ 7 years) can be involved in this research because of their unique cognitive needs.

OBJECTIVES

Here we investigate the involvement of children (≤ 7 years) in qualitative research for PROM development/testing. This review aimed to identify (1) which stages of qualitative PROM development children ≤ 7 years had been involved in, (2) which subjective health concepts had been explored within qualitative PROM development with this age group, and (3) which qualitative methods had been reported and how these compared with existing methodological recommendations.

METHODS

This scoping review systematically searched three electronic databases (searches re-run prior to final analysis on 29 June 2022) with no date restrictions. Included studies had samples of at least 75% aged ≤ 7 years or reported distinct qualitative methods for children ≤ 7 years in primary qualitative research to support concept elicitation or PROM development/testing. Articles not in English and PROMs that did not enable children ≤ 7 years to self-report were excluded. Data on study type, subjective health and qualitative methods were extracted and synthesised descriptively. Methods were compared with recommendations from guidance.

RESULTS

Of 19 included studies, 15 reported concept elicitation research and 4 reported cognitive interviewing. Most explored quality of life (QoL)/health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Some concept elicitation studies reported that creative/participatory activities had supported children's engagement, but results and reporting detail varied considerably across studies. Cognitive interviewing studies reported less methodological detail and fewer methods adapted for young children compared with concept elicitation studies. They were limited in scope regarding assessments of content validity, mostly focussing on clarity while relevance and comprehensiveness were explored less.

DISCUSSION

Creative/participatory activities may be beneficial in concept elicitation research with children ≤ 7 years, but future research needs to explore what contributes to the success of young children's involvement and how researchers can adopt flexible methods. Cognitive interviews with young children are limited in frequency, scope and reported methodological detail, potentially impacting PROM content validity for this age group. Without detailed reporting, it is not possible to determine the feasibility and usefulness of children's (≤ 7 years) involvement in qualitative research to support PROM development and assessment.

Quality of Life of Developmentally Normal Children With Epilepsy and Their Siblings

BACKGROUND

Quality of life (QOL) is a fundamental and multidimensional concept that should be considered with health problems, specifically chronic diseases, such as epilepsy. There have been limited studies on how pediatric epilepsy impacts the QOL of siblings of affected individuals. Hence, we studied the impact of epilepsy on the QOL of affected children and their siblings.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the QOL of developmentally normal children with epilepsy and their siblings and the association of QOL scores with the clinicodemographic profile.

METHODS

This study was conducted at the University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Tegh Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India, a tertiary care hospital. The QOL of children (4-12 years) with epilepsy was assessed using epilepsy-specific questionnaires, i.e., Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy Questionnaire-55 (QOLCE-55), which covers the cognitive, emotional, social, and physical domains, and Pediatric Quality of Life Epilepsy Module (Peds QL EM), which covers the impact, cognitive, sleep, executive, and mood/ behavior domains. QOL in siblings was assessed using the Peds QL Inventory, which covers the following domains: physical, emotional, social, and school. The principal investigator administered these questionnaires to parents in Hindi/ English. Scoring was done as per standard instructions of the questionnaire. Clinical and demographic data were recorded in a pro forma.

RESULT

The median QOLCE-55 score was 81.12, with a range of 74.65-86.34, and the median Peds QL EM score was 89.31, with a range of 75.58-94.48. Overall, Cronbach's alpha of QOLCE-55 and Peds QL EM was >0.8. Breakthrough seizures (≥10) affected the overall QOL (p=0.001) and all domains of QOLCE-55 (except emotional function (p=0.44)) and Peds QL EM (except sleep/fatigue domain (p=0.59)). Age, sex, parental education, socioeconomic status, and type of epilepsy did not affect the overall QOL (p>0.05). The QOL of siblings was not affected as per the Peds QL Inventory score (median score 100) and self-made questionnaire.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that the QOL of children with epilepsy was compromised, whereas the QOL of their siblings was not affected.

Pilot randomized controlled clinical trial of an adherence social norms intervention for adolescents with epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

Non-adherence to anti-seizure medications (ASMs) is common for adolescents with epilepsy, with potentially devastating consequences. Existing adherence interventions in epilepsy do not meet the unique challenges faced by adolescents. Leveraging social norms capitalizes on the increased importance of peer influence while simultaneously targeting the low motivation levels of many adolescents. The current study examined the feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction of a social norms adherence intervention in adolescents with epilepsy.

METHODS

A pilot RCT of a mHealth social norms intervention was conducted with adolescents with epilepsy who demonstrated non-adherence (≤95% adherence) during baseline. Adolescents were randomized to either (1) mHealth social norms (reminders, individualized and social norms adherence feedback) or (2) control (reminders and individualized adherence feedback). Primary outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, and satisfaction. Exploratory outcomes included electronically monitored adherence, seizure severity, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL).

RESULTS

One hundred four adolescents were recruited (53% female; Mage = 15.4 ± 1.4 years; 81% White: Non-Hispanic; 5% Black, 10% Bi/Multiracial; 2% White: Hispanic; 1% Other: Hispanic; 1% Bi/Multiracial-Hispanic). Forty-five percent screen-failed due to high adherence, 16% withdrew, and 38% were randomized to treatment (n = 19) or control (n = 21). Recruitment (75%), retention (78%), and treatment satisfaction were moderately high. Engagement with the intervention was moderate, with 64% of participants engaging with intervention notifications. Exploratory analyses revealed that after controlling for COVID-19 impact, the social norms intervention group maintained higher adherence over time compared to the control group. Small to moderate effect sizes were noted for seizure severity and HRQOL between groups.

CONCLUSION

This pilot intervention appeared feasible and acceptable. Increases in adherence in the treatment versus control group were modest, but a future larger more adequately powered study is needed to detect effects. Notably, it appeared the COVID pandemic influenced adherence behaviors during our trial.

PedsQL Multiple Sclerosis Module Domain and Item Development: Qualitative Methods

BACKGROUND

The objective of this qualitative methods study was to develop the domains and items to support the content validity for the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Multiple Sclerosis Module for youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis.

METHODS

A literature review of multiple sclerosis-specific questionnaires and clinical research was conducted to generate domains. An expert panel composed of 12 neurologists who were pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis specialists provided feedback on the conceptual framework. Focus interviews with 9 youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and 6 parents were conducted to develop the relevant domains and item content from the patient and parent perspective. In the cognitive interviews phase, 9 youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and 6 parents provided feedback on item content, relevance, importance, and understandability of the pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis-specific domains and items. The final interview phase with 5 youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and 5 parents comprised a pilot testing of the new PedsQL MS Module.

RESULTS

Eighteen domains were derived from the qualitative methods with item content saturation achieved at 100 items based on 40 interviews with 23 youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis aged 10-21 years and 17 parents. The domains derived include general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue, cognitive functioning, tingling sensations, numbness sensations, physical weakness, pain, speech, balance, fine motor, vision, urination, constipation, bowel incontinence, worry, communication, treatment, and medicines.

CONCLUSIONS

Qualitative methods involving 23 youth with pediatric-onset multiple sclerosis and 17 parents in the domain and item development process support the content validity for the new PedsQL MS Module. Future plans include a national field test of the PedsQL MS Module scales and items.

Pilot Executive Functioning Intervention in Epilepsy: Behavioral and Quality of Life Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in emotional and behavioral functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) following a web-based executive functioning (EF) intervention open pilot trial (e.g., Epilepsy Journey) for adolescents with epilepsy.

METHODS

Adolescents with an established diagnosis of epilepsy, EF deficits, and without developmental disorders participated in a single-arm trial of Epilepsy Journey. Epilepsy Journey is a gamified, online learning environment comprised of 10 learning modules targeting EF deficits (e.g., working memory, organization) and tailored to epilepsy with accompanying telehealth problem-solving sessions. Adolescents completed questionnaires assessing emotional and behavioral functioning and HRQOL at baseline, posttreatment, and 2 follow-ups . Longitudinal mixed models and logistic regression analyses were used for these secondary analyses.

RESULTS

39 adolescents were recruited for Epilepsy Journey (Mage=15.3 years; 67% female; 87% White: Non-Hispanic; 39% experienced seizures in the past 3 months). Preliminary data indicate significant improvements in caregiver-reported Externalizing symptoms, Behavioral Symptom Index scores and Adaptive Skills from baseline to 5-month follow-up. Significant improvements were observed for caregiver-reported Mood/Behavior and self-reported Impact, Cognitive Functioning, Executive Functioning, and Sleep subscales of the PedsQL Epilepsy Module. Clinically significant improvements (e.g., clinical/at-risk to normative levels) in behavioral and quality of life domains were also noted.

CONCLUSION

Epilepsy Journey appears to contribute to changes in emotional and behavioral functioning and HRQOL in adolescents with epilepsy. Given the proof of concept trial format of this study, an important future direction is to conduct a randomized controlled trial with a larger, generalizable cohort of adolescents with epilepsy.

M.I.C.E-Mental Health Intervention for Children with Epilepsy: a randomised controlled, multi-centre clinical trial evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of MATCH-ADTC in addition to usual care compared to usual care alone for children and young people with common mental health disorders and epilepsy-study protocol

BACKGROUND

Mental health disorders in the context of long-term conditions in children and young people are currently overlooked and undertreated. Evidence-based psychological treatments for common childhood mental health disorders (anxiety, depression and disruptive behaviour disorders) have not been systematically evaluated in young people with epilepsy despite their high prevalence in this population. The aim of this multi-site randomised controlled trial is to determine the clinical and cost-effectiveness of adding a modular psychological intervention to usual care for the mental health disorders in comparison to assessment-enhanced usual care alone.

METHODS

In total, 334 participants aged 3-18 years attending epilepsy services will be screened for mental health disorders with the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and the diagnostic Development and Wellbeing Assessment (DAWBA). Those identified as having a mental health disorder and consenting to the trial will be randomised to either receive up to 22 sessions of the modular psychological intervention (MATCH-ADTC) delivered over the telephone over 6 months by non-mental health professionals in addition to usual care or to assessment-enhanced usual care alone. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months post-randomisation. It is hypothesised that MATCH-ADTC plus usual care will be superior to assessment-enhanced usual care in improving emotional and behavioural symptoms. The primary outcome is the SDQ reported by parents at 6 months. Secondary outcomes include parent-reported mental health measures such as the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale, quality of life measures such as the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory and physical health measures such as the Hague Seizure Severity Scale. Outcome assessors will be blinded to group assignment. Qualitative process evaluations and a health economic evaluation will also be completed.

DISCUSSION

This trial aims to determine whether a systematic and integrated approach to the identification and treatment of mental health disorders in children and young people with epilepsy is clinically and cost-effective. The findings will contribute to policies and practice with regard to addressing mental health needs in children and young people with other long-term conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN ISRCTN57823197 . Registered on 25 February 2019.

The development of a social norms adherence intervention for adolescents with epilepsy

INTRODUCTION

Adherence is suboptimal in adolescents with epilepsy. Social norms comparison (i.e., feedback about someone else's behavior related to one's own behavior) strategies may be beneficial in improving medication adherence. Using a novel model of behavioral intervention development, the aim of the current study was to create a social norms intervention for adolescents with epilepsy via focus groups and usability studies.

METHODS

A focus group, individual interviews, short-term usability, and extended usage testing studies were conducted. Across all study phases, content and images of intervention components were displayed to participants as mock-ups in PowerPoint slide decks. After each phase, updated iterations were shown to participants to refine the intervention. Several questionnaires were completed by adolescents and caregivers to characterize the samples.

RESULTS

Twelve adolescents participated in the focus group/individual interviews and usability studies. The final Behavioral Economic Adherence for Teens (BEAT) intervention consists of a text messaging system and a graphical user interface. General feedback indicated the need for simplicity and ease of use regarding obtaining the graphical messages (e.g., no extra login and passwords); engaging visual images; and weekly comparisons of a target patient's medication adherence to other adolescents' performance. The average system usability system (SUS) rating was 88.3 + 3.8.

CONCLUSIONS

Our final intervention had high usability ratings and was perceived as engaging and easy to understand. An important next step is to test the BEAT intervention in a Phase 2 randomized trial.

Mapping epilepsy-specific patient-reported outcome measures for children to a proposed core outcome set for childhood epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of the study were to (1) map questions in epilepsy-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) to a proposed core outcome set (COS) for childhood epilepsy research and (2) gain insight into the acceptability of two leading candidate PROMs.

METHOD

We identified 11 epilepsy-specific PROMs of children's HRQoL (17 questionnaire versions) in a previous systematic review. Each item from the PROMs was mapped to 38 discrete outcomes across 10 domains of the COS: seizures, sleep, social functioning, mental health, cognition, physical functioning, behavior, adverse events, family life, and global quality of life. We consulted with three children with epilepsy and six parents of children with epilepsy in Patient Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) work to gain an understanding of the acceptability of the two leading PROMs from our review of measurement properties: Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QOLCE-55) and Health-Related Quality of Life Measure for Children with Epilepsy (CHEQOL).

RESULTS

Social Functioning is covered by all PROMs except DISABKIDS and G-QOLCE and Mental Health is covered by all PROMs except G-QOLCE and Hague Restrictions in Childhood Epilepsy Scale (HARCES). Only two PROMs (Epilepsy and Learning Disability Quality of Life (ELDQOL) and Glasgow Epilepsy Outcome Scale (GEOS-YP)) have items that cover the Seizure domain. The QOLCE-55 includes items that cover the domains of Physical Functioning, Social Functioning, Behavior, Mental Health, and Cognition. The CHEQOL parent and child versions cover the same domains as QOLCE-55 except for Physical Functioning and Behavior, and the child version has one item that covers the discrete outcome of Overall Quality of Life and one item that covers the discrete outcome of Relationship with parents and siblings. The QOLCE-55 parent version was acceptable to the parents we consulted with, and CHEQOL parent and child versions were described as acceptable to our child and parent advisory panel members.

SIGNIFICANCE

Mapping items from existing epilepsy-specific PROMs for children is an important step in operationalizing our COS for childhood epilepsy research, alongside evaluation of their measurement properties. Two leading PROMS, QOLCE-55 and CHEQOL, cover a wide range of domains from our COS and would likely be used in conjunction with assessment tools selected for specific study objectives. The PPIE work provided practical insights into the administration and acceptability of candidate PROMs in appropriate context. We promote our COS as a framework for selecting outcomes and PROMs for future childhood epilepsy evaluative research.

A Systematic Review of the Use and Quality of Qualitative Methods in Concept Elicitation for Measures with Children and Young People

BACKGROUND

Qualitative research is recommended in concept elicitation for patient-reported outcome measures to ensure item content validity, and those developing measures are encouraged to report qualitative methods in detail. However, in measure development for children and young people, direct research can be challenging due to problems with engagement and communication.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review was to (i) explore the qualitative and adapted data collection techniques that research teams have used with children and young people to generate items in existing measures and (ii) assess the quality of qualitative reporting.

METHODS

Three electronic databases were searched with forward citation and reference list searching of key papers. Papers included in the review were empirical studies documenting qualitative concept elicitation with children and young people. Data on qualitative methods were extracted, and all studies were checked against a qualitative reporting checklist.

RESULTS

A total of 37 studies were included. The quality of reporting of qualitative approaches for item generation was low, with information missing on sampling, data analysis and the research team, all of which are key to facilitating judgements around measure content validity. Few papers reported adapting methods to be more suitable for children and young people, potentially missing opportunities to more meaningfully engage children in concept elicitation work.

CONCLUSIONS

Research teams should ensure that they are documenting detailed and transparent processes for concept elicitation. Guidelines are currently lacking in the development and reporting of item generation for children, with this being an important area for future research.

Epilepsy-specific patient-reported outcome measures of children's health-related quality of life: A systematic review of measurement properties

OBJECTIVE

To identify and appraise published evidence of the measurement properties for epilepsy-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of children's health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for studies evaluating the measurement properties of English-language epilepsy-specific PROMs of children's HRQoL. We assessed the methodological quality using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. We extracted data about the content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, proxy reliability, responsiveness, and precision, and assessed the measurement properties with reference to standardized criteria.

RESULTS

We identified 27 papers that evaluated 11 PROMs. Methodological quality was variable. Construct validity, test-retest reliability, and internal consistency were more commonly assessed. Quality of Life in Childhood Epilepsy (QoLCE) questionnaires are parent-reported and evaluated more than other PROMs; QoLCE-55 has good and replicated evidence for structural and construct validity and internal consistency. Health-Related Quality of Life Measure for Children with Epilepsy (CHEQoL) has both child and parent-reported versions and good evidence of content, structural, and construct validity.

SIGNIFICANCE

This review identified two leading candidate epilepsy-specific PROMs for measuring health-related quality of life in children. Establishing evidence of the responsiveness of PROMs is a priority to help the interpretation of meaningful change scores.

Establishing clinical cutoffs for the PedsQL™ Epilepsy Module

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the present study was to establish clinical cutoffs for the PedsQL Epilepsy Module scales by dichotomizing scores into normative or impaired. We predicted that these cutoffs would be useful in identifying children at greater risk for impairments in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) including those who exhibit effects of ongoing seizures, antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and polytherapy.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-seven youth (2-18 years old) and their caregivers were recruited from five tertiary care hospitals across the United States. Caregivers and youth (5 years and older) completed the parent- or self-report versions of the PedsQL Epilepsy Module. Caregivers also completed measures of behavior and mood, AED side effects, and executive functioning in children. Clinical cutoffs were calculated in two ways: anchor-based (receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve) and distribution-based (0.5 standard deviation (SD)). Medical characteristics were abstracted from the medical chart. t-Tests and chi-square tests were used to determine whether children's HRQOL classified as normative or impaired in epilepsy quality of life differed on seizure freedom, AED side effects, and polytherapy.

RESULTS

The final clinical cutoffs were as follows for each PedsQL Epilepsy Module subscale (caregiver and child): Impact (Parent = 60.7; Child = 64.39), Cognitive (Parent = 38.11; Child = 50.97), Executive Functioning (Parent = 46.65; Child = 57.15), Sleep (Parent = 42.07; Child = 43.90), and Mood/Behavior (Parent = 54.14; Child = 53.30). Youth with more severe AED side effects, ongoing seizures, and/or on polytherapy were more likely to have impaired quality of life across domains.

CONCLUSION

Clinical cutoffs extend this instrument's utility in surveilling common psychosocial comorbidities, tracking changes in functioning over time, and informing clinical decision-making in youth with epilepsy including recommendations for additional assessment and intervention by a range of health providers serving youth with epilepsy (YWE).

Caring electronically for young outpatients who have epilepsy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review electronic tools that might improve the delivery of epilepsy care, reduce medical care costs, and empower families to improve self-management capability.

METHOD

We reviewed the epilepsy-specific literature about self-management, electronic patient-reported or provider-reported outcomes, on-going remote surveillance, and alerting/warning systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The improved care delivery system that we envision includes self-management, electronic patient (or provider)-reported outcomes, on-going remote surveillance, and alerting/warning systems. This system and variants have the potential to reduce seizure burden through improved management, keep children out of the emergency department and hospital, and even reduce the number of outpatient visits.

Psychological treatments for adults and children with epilepsy: Evidence-based recommendations by the International League Against Epilepsy Psychology Task Force

Given the significant impact that psychosocial factors and epilepsy treatments can have on the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of individuals with epilepsy and their families, there is great clinical interest in the role of psychological evaluation and treatments to improve HRQOL and comorbidities. Therefore, the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) charged the Psychology Task Force with the development of recommendations for clinical care based on evaluation of the evidence from their recent Cochrane review of psychological treatments in individuals with epilepsy. The literature search for a recent Cochrane review of randomized controlled trials investigating psychological treatments for individuals with epilepsy constitutes the key source of evidence for this article. To provide practical guidance to service providers, we provide ratings on study research designs based on (1) the American Academy of Neurology's Level of Evidence system and (2) the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. This paper is the culmination of an international collaboration process involving pediatric and adult psychologists, neurologists, psychiatrists, and neuropsychiatrists. The process and conclusions were reviewed and approved by the ILAE Executive Committee. The strongest evidence for psychological interventions was identified for the most common mental health problems, including depression, neurocognitive disturbances, and medication adherence. Psychological interventions targeting the enhancement of HRQOL and adherence and a decrease in comorbidity symptoms (anxiety, depression) should be incorporated into comprehensive epilepsy care. There is a range of psychological strategies (ie, cognitive behavioral therapy and mindfulness-based therapies) that show promise for improving the lives of persons with epilepsy, and clinical recommendations are provided to assist epilepsy health care providers in treating the comorbidities and challenges associated with epilepsy and its treatments.

A training program for nurse scientists to promote intervention translation

BACKGROUND

To reduce the burden of chronic illness, prevention and management interventions must be efficacious, adopted and implemented with fidelity, and reach those at greatest risk. Yet, many research-tested interventions are slow to translate into practice.

PURPOSE

This paper describes how The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing's NINR-funded institutional pre- and postdoctoral research-training program is addressing the imperative to speed knowledge translation across the research cycle.

METHODS

The training emphasizes six research methods ("catalysts") to speed translation: stakeholder engagement, patient-centered outcomes, intervention optimization and sequential multiple randomized trials (SMART), pragmatic trials, mixed methods approaches, and dissemination and implementation science strategies. Catalysts are integrated into required coursework, biweekly scientific and integrative seminars, and experiential research training. Trainee and program success is evaluated based on benchmarks applicable to all PhD program students, supplemented by indicators specific to the catalysts. Trainees must also demonstrate proficiency in at least two of the six catalysts in their scholarly products. Proficiency is assessed through their works in progress presentations and peer reviews at T32 integrative seminars.

DISCUSSION

While maintaining the emphasis on theory-based interventions, we have integrated six catalysts into our ongoing research training to expedite the dynamic process of intervention development, testing, dissemination and implementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a variety of training activities, our research training focused on theory-based interventions and the six catalysts will generate future nurse scientists who speed translation of theory-based interventions into practice to maximize health outcomes for patients, families, communities and populations affected by chronic illness.

Validation of the PedsQL Epilepsy Module: A pediatric epilepsy-specific health-related quality of life measure

OBJECTIVE

To validate a brief and reliable epilepsy-specific, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measure in children with various seizure types, treatments, and demographic characteristics.

METHODS

This national validation study was conducted across five epilepsy centers in the United States. Youth 5-18 years and caregivers of youth 2-18 years diagnosed with epilepsy completed the PedsQL Epilepsy Module and additional questionnaires to establish reliability and validity of the epilepsy-specific HRQOL instrument. Demographic and medical data were collected through chart reviews. Factor analysis was conducted, and internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas), test-retest reliability, and construct validity were assessed.

RESULTS

Questionnaires were analyzed from 430 children with epilepsy (M_age = 9.9 years; range 2-18 years; 46% female; 62% white: non-Hispanic; 76% monotherapy, 54% active seizures) and their caregivers. The final PedsQL Epilepsy Module is a 29-item measure with five subscales (i.e., Impact, Cognitive, Sleep, Executive Functioning, and Mood/Behavior) with parallel child and caregiver reports. Internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.70-0.94. Construct validity and convergence was demonstrated in several ways, including strong relationships with seizure outcomes, antiepileptic drug (AED) side effects, and well-established measures of executive, cognitive, and emotional/behavioral functioning.

SIGNIFICANCE

The PedsQL Epilepsy Module is a reliable measure of HRQOL with strong evidence of its validity across the epilepsy spectrum in both clinical and research settings.

Implementation of psychological clinical trials in epilepsy: Review and guide

The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Neuropsychiatry commission and United States Institute of Medicine report both identified cognitive and psychological comorbidities as a significant issue for individuals with epilepsy, with rates as high as 60%. However, there is a paucity of evidence-based treatments for many psychological conditions (e.g., learning disorders, cognitive disorders, behavioral disorders). Because of inherent challenges in the implementation of psychological therapy trials and specific considerations for the population with epilepsy, the focus of the current review was to provide guidance and recommendations to conduct psychological trials for individuals with epilepsy. Several key areas will be discussed, including selection of patients, trial design, psychological intervention considerations, outcomes and evaluation of results, publication of trial results, and special issues related to pediatric clinical trials. Rigorously designed psychological therapy trials will set the stage for evidence-based practice in the care of individuals with epilepsy, with the goal of improving seizures, side effects, and HRQOL.

The health-related quality of life of children, adolescents, and young adults with neurofibromatosis type 1 and their families: Analysis of narratives

PURPOSE

Provide an in-depth description of the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in youth diagnosed with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and their families.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Data were drawn from qualitative interviews conducted for a larger study aimed at developing the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory™ (PedsQL™) NF1 module.

RESULTS

Youth with NF1 and their families experience a wide range of concerns related to HRQoL due to the varied symptom expression and uncertain trajectory of the disorder.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Pediatric nurses should routinely assess for HRQoL in this population and develop strategies tailored to those concerns that require intervention.