Effects of candesartan on mortality and morbidity in patients with chronic heart failure: the CHARM-Overall programme

Identification of angiotensin II-responsive circadian clock gene expression in adrenal zona glomerulosa cells and human adrenocortical H295R cells

The mammalian circadian timing system is organized in a hierarchy, with the master clock residing in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus and subsidiary peripheral clocks in peripheral tissues. Because of the diversity of peripheral tissues and cell-types in the body, the existence of autonomous clock and identification of its potential entrainment signals need to be empirically defined on a cell type-by-cell type basis. In this study, we characterized the basic circadian clock properties of the adrenal zona glomerulosa cells, or ZG cells. Using isolated adrenal explants from Per2Luc mice, dissociated ZG cells from Per2-dluc rats, and a related human adrenocortical cell line H295R, we showed that ZG cells possess genetically-encoded, self-sustained and cell-autonomous circadian clock. As to the potential entrainment signals, angiotensin II (Ang II) caused phase-dependent phase-shifts of adrenal ZG cells in cultured slices. Ang II treatment also drove initiation (or reset) of circadian clock gene expression in H295R cells with associated immediate up-regulation of PER1 and E4BP4 mRNA expression. We found that the type I Ang II receptor blocker CV11974, one of the most widely used clinical drugs for hypertensive diseases, caused attenuation of the phase resetting of H295R cells. Our in vitro data provide a basis to understand and argue for the adrenal gland ZG cells as a component of autonomous and entrainable peripheral clocks.

New strategies for the treatment of hyperkalemia

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASi) and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are key drugs in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVD), particularly those with hypertension, diabetes, chronic kidney disease and heart failure (HF), given their demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the risk of both surrogate and hard endpoints. Despite their positive impact on the outcome, patients with RAASi and MRAs are particularly vulnerable to hyperkalaemia, with approximately 50 % of these individuals experiencing two or more recurrences annually. The common practice of reducing the dose or discontinuing the treatment with RAASi and MRAs in conditions of hyperkalaemia results in suboptimal management of these patients, with a potential impact on their mortality and morbidity risk. Recent guidelines from cardiovascular and renal international societies increasingly recognize the need for alternative strategies to manage the risk of hyperkalaemia, allowing the continuation of RAASi and MRA therapies. In this review, we summarise the new potential options available to manage hyperkalaemia in patients with CVD and the recommendations of the most recent guidelines on the topic.

Adjusted win ratio using the inverse probability of treatment weighting

The win ratio method has been increasingly applied in the design and analysis of clinical trials. However, the win ratio method is a univariate approach that does not allow for adjusting for baseline imbalances in covariates, although a stratified win ratio can be calculated when the number of strata is small. This paper proposes an adjusted win ratio to control for such imbalances by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. We derive the adjusted win ratio with its variance and suggest three IPTW adjustments: IPTW-average treatment effect (IPTW-ATE), stabilized IPTW-ATE (SIPTW-ATE) and IPTW-average treatment effect in the treated (IPTW-ATT). The proposed adjusted methods are applied to analyse a composite outcome in the CHARM trial. The statistical properties of the methods are assessed through simulations. Results show that adjusted win ratio methods can correct the win ratio for covariate imbalances at baseline. Simulation results show that the three proposed adjusted win ratios have similar power to detect the treatment difference and have slightly lower power than the corresponding adjusted Cox models when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true but have consistently higher power than adjusted Cox models when the proportional hazard assumption is violated.

Current Status and Future Perspective of Onco-Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Hypertension and cancer are both increasing with age. Recently, the new concept of "Onco-Hypertension" has been proposed to address the mutual risks posed by hypertension and cancer and to provide comprehensive care for patients with these two conditions in an aging society.

METHODS

In this review, we provide an overview of the current status and future perspective of the "Onco-Hypertension," including our research findings.

RESULTS

Hypertension and cancer share common risk factors and may be interrelated in pathogenesis: Hypertension is involved in the development of certain cancers, and cancer survivors have a higher incidence of hypertension. With recent advances in cancer therapy, the number of cancer survivors has increased. Cancer survivors not only have a higher risk of incident hypertension but also an increased risk of future cardiovascular events, highlighting the growing importance of comprehensive care.

CONCLUSIONS

There exists a diverse array of epidemiological and pathophysiological relationships between hypertension and cancer. It is imperative to move the emerging scientific field of "Onco-Hypertension" forward through relentless research efforts.

Comparative analysis of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction

Introduction

To clarify the efficacy of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors/angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (RASI/ARNI) in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF).

Methods

This study assessed the association between these medications and outcomes in HFmrEF using data from the National Taiwan University Hospital-integrated Medical Database. The primary outcome was cardiovascular mortality/heart failure hospitalization (HHF). Inverse probability of treatment weighting balanced baseline patient characteristics. The exposure of primary interest was use of MRA and use of RASI/ARNI, while the non-user group was also likely to receive other heart failure medication treatment.

Results

Among 2,584 HFmrEF patients, 17% received MRA and 43% received RASI/ARNI. Predictors of MRA use included older age, slightly higher ejection fraction, and lower NT-proBNP level. RASI/ARNI use was predicted by higher BMI, lower NT-proBNP level, normal uric acid and potassium levels. MRA use was not associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death [hazard ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.02] or HHF (hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.94-1.09). Conversely, RASI//ARNI use was linked to a lower risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.71-0.94) but not HHF (hazard ratio = 0.995, 95% CI: 0.924-1.07). Landmark analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes for follow-up durations exceeding 2 years.

Conclusion

MRA had a neutral effect on cardiovascular death and HHF, while RASI/ARNI was associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular death. RASI/ARNI may be more beneficial than MRA for HFmrEF patients. Regular re-evaluation is essential to adjust heart failure treatment.

Treating sleep disordered breathing for cardiovascular outcomes: observational and randomised trial evidence

Sleep disordered breathing (SDB) is considered a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) can be treated with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP), and central sleep apnoea (CSA), in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), by peak flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation. Presently, there is equipoise as to whether treating SDB prevents cardiovascular events. Some propose treatment for this indication, based on observational data, while others argue against because of the lack of randomised trial evidence. This review evaluates literature concerning the cardiovascular effects of treating SDB with PAP devices in individuals with and without CVDs. Nine observational studies report significantly lower cardiovascular event rates in those treated, than in those not treated, for SDB. Conversely, 12 randomised trials in which excessive daytime sleepiness was generally an exclusion criterion showed no reduction in cardiovascular event rates. The SERVE-HF trial showed an increase in mortality with use of minute ventilation-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation for CSA in patients with HFrEF. In the ADVENT-HF trial, treating HFrEF patients with coexisting OSA or CSA using peak flow-triggered adaptive servo-ventilation was safe and improved sleep structure and heart failure-related quality of life but did not reduce all-cause mortality or cardiovascular events. More evidence is required to determine whether treating CSA in patients with HFrEF prevents cardiovascular events and improves survival. Presently, the rationale for treating SDB with PAP remains improving sleep structure and quality of life, as well as relieving excessive daytime sleepiness, but not reducing cardiovascular events.

An Observational Study of Evidence-Based Therapies in Older Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Insights from a Dedicated Heart Failure Clinic

Background/Objectives: Despite significant advances in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), data concerning older patients remain limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in older patients with HFrEF along with cardiac events and variation in clinical and echocardiographic parameters during follow-up in a heart failure (HF) clinic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational analysis of patients with HFrEF aged ≥ 80 years who attended an HF clinic between March 2022 and February 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of the first episode of worsening HF or cardiovascular death. All-cause death was also recorded. Results: We included 110 patients (30.9% females; mean age 82.9 years). After a median follow-up of 25.5 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improved (mean difference 12.5% (p < 0.001)). New York Heart Association class improved in 37% of patients, and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels decreased (3091 (158-53354) to 1802 (145-19509), p < 0.001). The primary outcome occurred in 34 patients (30.9%). Patients without the primary outcome were more likely to receive sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) (23.5% versus 67.1%, p < 0.001) and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or angiotensin-receptor blockers (67.6% versus 84.2%, p < 0.05). These patients also received a greater number of GDMT medications (2 (0-4) versus 3 (1-4), p < 0.01) and demonstrated a higher LVEF at the last visit (41.2 ± 10.2% versus 47.1 ± 9.4%, p < 0.05). Survival analysis demonstrated a significant association between LVEF recovery (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, p < 0.01), treatment with two or more GDMT medications (HR 0.29, p < 0.01), vasodilator use (HR 0.36, p < 0.01), and SGLT2i prescription (HR 0.17, p < 0.001) and a reduced risk of the primary endpoint. Conclusions: The optimization of HF treatment is achievable in older patients and may be associated with a reduction in cardiac events.

Phase III randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety of amlodipine and candesartan cilexetil combination for hypertension treatment

Effective antihypertensive therapy is essential for achieving optimal blood pressure (BP) control and reducing cardiovascular events. This double-blind, multicenter, randomized trial aimed to compare the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a combination of amlodipine (AML) and candesartan cilexetil (CC) versus AML monotherapy in patients with essential hypertension (HTN). After a 4-week run-in period with AML 5 mg, patients whose HTN remained uncontrolled (diastolic BP [DBP]) ≥ 90 mmHg and < 120 mmHg) were randomized to receive either AML + CC or AML alone for 8 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in DBP and systolic BP (SBP). The primary safety measure was the incidence of adverse events (AEs). A total of 174 participants were included in the efficacy analysis. After 8 weeks, DBP decreased by -9.92 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML + CC arm and - 2.08 ± 0.86 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). SBP decreased by -14.27 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML + CC arm versus - 2.77 ± 1.39 mmHg in the AML arm (p < 0.0001). AEs occurred in 11.24% of the AML + CC group and 5.62% of the AML group (p = 0.1773). AML + CC combination therapy demonstrated superior efficacy with good tolerance, making it a promising option for patients with inadequately controlled hypertension on amlodipine alone.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for nearly half of all heart failure cases and has a prevalence that is expected to rise with the growing ageing population. HFpEF is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Specific HFpEF risk factors include age, diabetes, hypertension, obesity and atrial fibrillation. Haemodynamic contributions to HFpEF include changes in left ventricular structure, diastolic and systolic dysfunction, left atrial myopathy, pulmonary hypertension, right ventricular dysfunction, chronotropic incompetence, and vascular dysfunction. Inflammation, fibrosis, impaired nitric oxide signalling, sarcomere dysfunction, and mitochondrial and metabolic defects contribute to the cellular and molecular changes observed in HFpEF. HFpEF impacts multiple organ systems beyond the heart, including the skeletal muscle, peripheral vasculature, lungs, kidneys and brain. The diagnosis of HFpEF can be made in individuals with signs and symptoms of heart failure with abnormality in natriuretic peptide levels or evidence of cardiopulmonary congestion, facilitated by the use of HFpEF risk scores and additional imaging and testing with the exclusion of HFpEF mimics. Management includes initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy and management of comorbidities. Given the significant impact of HFpEF on quality of life, future research efforts should include a particular focus on how patients can live better with this disease.

Big data approach in the field of gastric and colorectal cancer research

Big data is characterized by three attributes: volume, variety,, and velocity. In healthcare setting, big data refers to vast dataset that is electronically stored and managed in an automated manner and has the potential to enhance human health and healthcare system. In this review, gastric cancer (GC) and postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer (PCCRC) will be used to illustrate application of big data approach in the field of gastrointestinal cancer research. Helicobacter pylori (HP) eradication only reduces GC risk by 46% due to preexisting precancerous lesions. Apart from endoscopy surveillance, identifying medications that modify GC risk is another strategy. Population-based cohort studies showed that long-term use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) associated with higher GC risk after HP eradication, while aspirin and statins associated with lower risk. While diabetes mellitus conferred 73% higher GC risk, metformin use associated with 51% lower risk, effect of which was independent of glycemic control. Nonetheless, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NA-NSAIDs) are not associated with lower GC risk. CRC can still occur after initial colonoscopy in which no cancer was detected (i.e. PCCRC). Between 2005 and 2013, the rate of interval-type PCCRC-3y (defined as CRC diagnosed between 6 and 36 months of index colonoscopy which was negative for CRC) was 7.9% in Hong Kong, with >80% being distal cancers and higher cancer-specific mortality compared with detected CRC. Certain clinical and endoscopy-related factors were associated with PCCRC-3 risk. Medications shown to have chemopreventive effects on PCCRC include statins, NA-NSAIDs, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers.

Drug repurposing: A multi targetted approach to treat cardiac disease from existing classical drugs to modern drug discovery

Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are characterized by abnormalities in the heart, blood vessels, and blood flow. CVDs comprise a diverse set of health issues. There are several types of CVDs like stroke, endothelial dysfunction, thrombosis, atherosclerosis, plaque instability and heart failure. Identification of a new drug for heart disease takes longer duration and its safety efficacy test takes even longer duration of research and approval. This chapter explores drug repurposing, nano-therapy, and plant-based treatments for managing CVDs from existing drugs which saves time and safety issues with testing new drugs. Existing drugs like statins, ACE inhibitor, warfarin, beta blockers, aspirin and metformin have been found to be useful in treating cardiac disease. For better drug delivery, nano therapy is opening new avenues for cardiac research by targeting interleukin (IL), TNF and other proteins by proteome interactome analysis. Nanoparticles enable precise delivery to atherosclerotic plaques, inflammation areas, and damaged cardiac tissues. Advancements in nano therapeutic agents, such as drug-eluting stents and drug-loaded nanoparticles are transforming CVDs management. Plant-based treatments, containing phytochemicals from Botanical sources, have potential cardiovascular benefits. These phytochemicals can mitigate risk factors associated with CVDs. The integration of these strategies opens new avenues for personalized, effective, and minimally invasive cardiovascular care. Altogether, traditional drugs, phytochemicals along with nanoparticles can revolutionize the future cardiac health care by identifying their signaling pathway, mechanism and interactome analysis.

Medical treatment of heart failure with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and beta-blockers in aortic stenosis: association with long-term outcome after aortic valve replacement

Aims

There is a lack of robust data on the optimal medical treatment of heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis, with no randomized controlled trials guiding treatment. The study aimed to study the association between exposure to renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAS) inhibitors or beta-blockers and outcome after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis and heart failure.

Methods and results

The study included all patients with heart failure undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis in Sweden between 2008 and 2016 (n = 4668 patients). Exposure to treatment was assessed by a continuous tracking of drug dispensations, and outcome events were all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure collected from national patient registries. After adjustment for age, sex, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and prior myocardial infarction, Cox regression analysis showed that RAS inhibition was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) [hazard ratio (HR) 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.51-0.65] and preserved LV-EF (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85). Beta-blockade was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality in patients with reduced LV-EF (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71-0.92), but not in preserved LV-EF (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69-1.10). There was no association between RAS inhibition or beta-blockade and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure.

Conclusion

The RAS inhibition was associated with a lower all-cause mortality after valve replacement in patients with both reduced and preserved LV-EF. Beta-blockade was associated with lower all-cause mortality only in patients with reduced LV-EF.

A hierarchical kidney outcome using win statistics in patients with heart failure from the DAPA-HF and DELIVER trials

Win statistics offer a new approach to the analysis of outcomes in clinical trials, allowing the combination of time-to-event and longitudinal measurements and taking into account the clinical importance of the components of composite outcomes, as well as their relative timing. We examined this approach in a post hoc analysis of two trials that compared dapagliflozin to placebo in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (DAPA-HF) and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (DELIVER). The effect of dapagliflozin on a hierarchical composite kidney outcome was assessed, including the following: (1) all-cause mortality; (2) end-stage kidney disease; (3) a decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≥57%; (4) a decline in eGFR of ≥50%; (5) a decline in eGFR of ≥40%; and (6) participant-level eGFR slope. For this outcome, the win ratio was 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.15) in the combined dataset, 1.08 (95% CI = 1.01-1.16) in the DAPA-HF trial and 1.12 (95% CI = 1.05-1.18) in the DELIVER trial; that is, dapagliflozin was superior to placebo in both trials. The benefits of treatment were consistent in participants with and without baseline kidney disease, and with and without type 2 diabetes. In heart failure trials, win statistics may provide the statistical power to evaluate the effect of treatments on kidney as well as cardiovascular outcomes.

Irbesartan ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by activating the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and suppressing NLRP3 inflammasomes in vivo and in vitro

OBJECTIVES

Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is characterized by albuminuria and renal dysfunction caused by diabetes. At present there is no specific treatment for DN. Irbesartan (IRB) is an angiotensin receptor inhibitor indicated for the treatment of hypertension and DN. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of IRB on DN remains obscure.

METHODS

RAW264.7 macrophages were incubated in RPMI-1640, cell viability was evaluated by CCK-8 assays, transcriptional level of proinflammatory cytokines and was measured by ELISA and qPCR, NLRP3 inflammasome and Nrf2/Keap1 related proteins were measured by Western blotting and immunohistochemistry. Streptozotocin (STZ)-induced diabetic male C57BL/6 mice were used to evaluate the therapeutic effect of IRB on DN. Key findings First, we found that IRB improved high glucose-induced cell inflammation by inhibiting the transcription of IL-1β and IL-18. IRB activated the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and decreased the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS). IRB also suppressed the expression of NLRP3 and caspase-1. IRB combined with the N-acetylcysteine (NAC) significantly inhibited the activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes. Conversely, IRB combined with the Nrf2-related inhibitor ML385 enhanced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, suggesting that IRB suppressed NLRP3 inflammasome via the Nrf2 pathway. In vivo study, HE staining and immunohistochemistry analysis further showed that IRB ameliorated high glucose-induced renal injury by elevating the expression of the Nrf2/Keap1 signaling pathway and suppressing the proinflammatory cytokine and NLRP3 inflammasome activation.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that IRB ameliorates diabetic nephropathy by activating the Nrf2/Keap1 pathway and suppressing the NLRP3 inflammasomes in vivo and in vitro. These findings provide new therapeutic strategies of diabetic nephropathy.

Implications of Atrial Fibrillation for Guideline-Directed Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) are common cardiovascular conditions that frequently coexist. Among patients with HF, more than one-half also have AF. Both are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Moreover, the prevalence of each is increasing globally, and this trend is expected to continue owing to an aging population and increased life expectancy. Diagnosis of AF in a patient with HF is associated with greater symptom burden, more frequent hospitalizations, and a worse prognosis. Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HF can affect the incidence of AF. Once present, AF can influence the efficacy of some components of GDMT for HF. In this review, we discuss the effect of GDMT for HF across the spectrum of ejection fraction on prevention of AF as well as the benefit of GDMT in patients with vs without AF.

Rationale and design of the United Kingdom Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry

OBJECTIVE

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a common heterogeneous syndrome that remains imprecisely defined and consequently has limited treatment options and poor outcomes.

METHODS

The UK Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Registry (UK HFpEF) is a prospective data-enabled cohort and platform study. The study will develop a large, highly characterised cohort of patients with HFpEF. A biobank will be established. Deep clinical phenotyping, imaging, multiomics and centrally held national electronic health record data will be integrated at scale, in order to reclassify HFpEF into distinct subgroups, improve understanding of disease mechanisms and identify new biological pathways and molecular targets. Together, these will form the basis for developing diagnostics and targeted therapeutics specific to subgroups. It will be a platform for more effective and efficient trials, focusing on subgroups in whom targeted interventions are expected to be effective, with consent in place to facilitate rapid recruitment, and linkage for follow-up. Patients with a diagnosis of HFpEF made by a heart failure specialist, who have had natriuretic peptide levels measured and a left ventricular ejection fraction >40% are eligible. Patients with an ejection fraction between 40% and 49% will be limited to no more than 25% of the cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

UK HFpEF will develop a rich, multimodal data resource to enable the identification of disease endotypes and develop more effective diagnostic strategies, precise risk stratification and targeted therapeutics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05441839.

Management of Hypertension in Patients With Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome: A Mini-Review

Polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) is a common problem among young women. It is characterized mainly by hyperandrogenism features, such as hirsutism, menstrual problems, and anovulation. Diagnosis is based on the existence of 2 items out of, oligo-ovulation, hyperandrogenism features, and ultrasounds findings. Cardiovascular complications such as hypertension are a prevalent serious condition in these patients which is mainly predisposed by the high levels of androgens, and insulin resistance. High blood pressure should be controlled well to prevent the progression of other serious conditions. Various antihypertensive drugs could be prescribed. However, in selecting an antihypertensive medication, other therapeutic properties of the drug should also be considered. Up to now, many clinicians do not differ between PCOS patients with hypertension and other hypertensive patients. However, being aware of the potential effects of each hypertension drug could help to choose better options for the patient. Here is a brief review of how each antihypertensive drug could affect PCOS women and if they cause any improvement in the disorder progression.

Implementation of evidence-based heart failure management: Regional variations between Japan and the USA

The implementation of optimal medical therapy is a crucial step in the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Over the prior three decades, there have been substantial advancements in this field. Early and accurate detection and diagnosis of the disease allow for the appropriate initiation of optimal therapies. The initiation and uptitration of optimal medical therapy including renin-angiotensin system inhibitor, beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor in the early stage would prevent the progression and morbidity of HF. Concurrently, individualized surveillance to recognize and treat signs of disease progression is critical given the progressive nature of HF, even among stable patients on optimal therapy. However, there remains a wide variation in regional practice regarding the initiation, titration, and long-term monitoring of this therapy. To cover the differences in approaches toward HFrEF management and the implementation of guideline-based medical therapy, we discuss the current evidence in this arena, differences in present guideline recommendations, and compare practice patterns in Japan and the USA using a case of new-onset HF as an example. We will discuss pros and cons of the way HF is managed in each region, and highlight potential areas for improvement in care.

Rethinking the Impact and Management of Diabetes in Heart Failure Patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The following overview article summarizes the most important aspects of diagnosis and screening and provides an overview on the current evidence of glucose-lowering and heart failure treatment in patients with diabetes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with diabetes exhibit an increased risk to develop heart failure and the presence of both comorbidities has a major impact on the prognosis of these patients. Thus, it is of utmost importance to detect heart failure in patients with diabetes and to screen all patients with heart failure for the presence of diabetes. Moreover, the diagnosis of heart failure in diabetes often requires an adjustment of medical therapy. The presence of the 2 comorbidities, heart failure and diabetes, in a given patient which has a major impact on the prognosis and implementation of guideline-directed therapies to reduce cardiovascular risk in this high-risk population is of critical importance.

Coagulation Disorders and Thrombotic Complications in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is associated with multiple cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors which increase the risk of thrombotic complications, such as atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Subsequently, thromboembolic risk stratification in this population poses a great challenge. Since date from the large randomized clinical trials mostly include both patients with truly preserved EF, and those with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, there is an unmet need to characterize the patients with truly preserved EF. Considering the significant evidence gap in this area, we sought to describe the coagulation disorders and thrombotic complications in patients with HFpEF and discuss the specific thromboembolic risk factors in patients with HFpEF, with the goal to tailor risk stratification to an individual patient.

Medicinal (Radio) Chemistry: Building Radiopharmaceuticals for the Future

Radiopharmaceuticals are increasingly playing a leading role in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating disease. In comparison with conventional pharmaceuticals, the development of radiopharmaceuticals does follow the principles of medicinal chemistry in the context of imaging-altered physiological processes. The design of a novel radiopharmaceutical has several steps similar to conventional drug discovery and some particularity. In the present work, we revisited the insights of medicinal chemistry in the current radiopharmaceutical development giving examples in oncology, neurology, and cardiology. In this regard, we overviewed the literature on radiopharmaceutical development to study overexpressed targets such as prostate-specific membrane antigen and fibroblast activation protein in cancer; β-amyloid plaques and tau protein in brain disorders; and angiotensin II type 1 receptor in cardiac disease. The work addresses concepts in the field of radiopharmacy with a special focus on the potential use of radiopharmaceuticals for nuclear imaging and theranostics.

Exploring Heart Failure Mortality Trends and Disparities in Women: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

Heart failure (HF) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in women. Population-level analyses shed light on existing disparities and promote targeted interventions. We evaluated HF-related mortality data in women in the United States to identify disparities based on race/ethnicity, urbanization level, and geographic region. We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis utilizing the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database to identify HF-related mortality in the death files from 1999 to 2020. Age-adjusted HF mortality rates were standardized to the 2000 US population. We fit log-linear regression models to analyze mortality trends. Age-adjusted HF mortality rates in women have decreased significantly over time, from 97.95 in 1999 to 89.19 in 2020. Mortality mainly downtrended from 1999 to 2012, followed by a significant increase from 2012 to 2020. Our findings revealed disparities in mortality rates based on race and ethnicity, with the most affected population being non-Hispanic Black (age-adjusted mortality rates [AAMR] 90.36), followed by non-Hispanic White (AAMR 83.25), American Indian/Alaska Native (AAMR 64.27), and Asian/Pacific Islander populations (AAMR 37.46). We also observed that nonmetropolitan (AAMR 103.36) and Midwestern (AAMR 90.45) regions had higher age-adjusted mortality rates compared with metropolitan (AAMR 78.43) regions and other US census regions. In conclusion, significant differences in HF mortality rates were observed based on race/ethnicity, urbanization level, and geographic region. Disparities in HF outcomes persist and efforts to reduce HF-related mortality rates should focus on targeted interventions that address social determinants of health, including access to care and socioeconomic status.

Sacubitril/Valsartan in the Treatment of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Focusing on the Impact on the Quality of Life: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

There exists a paucity of research data reported by analyses performed on randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that encompass quality of life (QOL) and the aftermath for patients suffering from heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have been done to evaluate the drug sacubitril/valsartan in the treatment of heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) with a clear focus on the effect it bestows on measures of physical exercise tolerance and quality of life. A thorough systematic search was done in databases including Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, and PubMed from 1 January 2010 to 1 January 2023. The search only included published RCTs on adult patients aged 18 and above, with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Data analysis was performed by using the software RevMan 5.4 (Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). The included studies' bias risk was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias tool. The quality of evidence for the primary outcome was done using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. This systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs yielded 458 studies, of which eight randomized clinical trials were included and analyzed. The meta-analysis of the included trials shows that the I2 value is 61% (i.e., I2 > 50%), demonstrating a substantial heterogeneity within the studies. The left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) expressed in percentage was reported in the five studies, and thereby, a subgroup analysis that yielded a confidence interval (CI) of 95% had the standard mean difference of 0.02 (-0.02, 0.07). The trials had disparity between the reporting of effect on peak oxygen consumption (VO2), measured through cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) methods, six-minute walking test (6MWT), overall physical activity, and exercise capacity. Sacubitril/valsartan did not exponentially improve peak VO2 or 6MWT in these trials; however, the patient-reported data suggested that the quality of life was modestly influenced by the drug. A subgroup analysis was performed using the pooled effect value by the random effects model. The findings showed that the sacubitril/valsartan group significantly was better than the control group in improving HFrEF-associated health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials that evaluated the drug sacubitril/valsartan in treating heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and focused on its tangible effect on the measures of physical exercise tolerance and quality of life. It depicts that the statistical scrutiny due to the lack of significant data and parity across studies did not impart significant improvement of either LVEF, peak VO2, or 6MWT with the use of sacubitril/valsartan; however, the reported exercise tolerance, including daytime physical activity, had a modest impact with the said drug. The pooled values demonstrated that the sacubitril/valsartan group significantly outperformed the control group in improving HFrEF HRQoL.

Hallmarks of cardiovascular ageing

Normal circulatory function is a key determinant of disease-free life expectancy (healthspan). Indeed, pathologies affecting the cardiovascular system, which are growing in prevalence, are the leading cause of global morbidity, disability and mortality, whereas the maintenance of cardiovascular health is necessary to promote both organismal healthspan and lifespan. Therefore, cardiovascular ageing might precede or even underlie body-wide, age-related health deterioration. In this Review, we posit that eight molecular hallmarks are common denominators in cardiovascular ageing, namely disabled macroautophagy, loss of proteostasis, genomic instability (in particular, clonal haematopoiesis of indeterminate potential), epigenetic alterations, mitochondrial dysfunction, cell senescence, dysregulated neurohormonal signalling and inflammation. We also propose a hierarchical order that distinguishes primary (upstream) from antagonistic and integrative (downstream) hallmarks of cardiovascular ageing. Finally, we discuss how targeting each of the eight hallmarks might be therapeutically exploited to attenuate residual cardiovascular risk in older individuals.

Quality improvement collaborative to optimize heart failure care in patients from a network of clinics in Argentina during the COVID-19 pandemic

Heart failure (HF) is a major clinical and public health problem associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and health-care costs. Despite the existence of evidence-based guidelines for the optimal treatment of HF, the quality of care remains suboptimal. Our aim was to increase the use a care bundle in 50% of enrolled subjects during their hospitalization and discharge and to reduce their readmission for HF causes by 10%. We conducted an uncontrolled before-after study in eight hospitals in Argentina to evaluate the effect of a quality improvement intervention on the use of an HF care bundle in patients with HF New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-III. The HF bundle of care included medication, continuum of care, lifestyle habits, and predischarge examinations. Training and follow-up of multidisciplinary teams in each center were performed through learning sessions and plan-do-study-act improvement cycles. Data collectors reviewed bundle compliance in the health records of recruited patients after their hospital discharge and verified readmissions through phone calls to patients within 30-40 days after discharge. We recruited 200 patients (83 before and 127 during the intervention phase), and bundle compliance increased from 9.6% to 28.3% [odds ratio 3.71, 95% confidence interval (8.46; 1.63); P = .002]. Despite a slow improvement during the first months, bundle compliance gained momentum near the end of the intervention surpassing 80%. We observed a non-significant decreased readmission rate within 30 days of discharge due to HF in the postintervention period [8.4% vs. 5.5%, odds ratio 0.63, 95% CI (1.88; 0.21); P = .410]. Qualitative analysis showed that members of the intervention teams acknowledged the improvement of work organization and standardization of care, teamwork, shared mental model, and health record completeness as well as the utility of training fellows. Despite the challenges related to the pandemic, better care of patients with HF NYHA Class II-III was possible through simple interventions and collaborative work. Graphical abstract.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure: Are There Thresholds and Inflection Points in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Thresholds Justifying a Clinical Classification?

BACKGROUND

Recent guidelines proposed a classification for heart failure (HF) on the basis of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), although it remains unclear whether the divisions chosen were biologically rational. Using patients spanning the full range of LVEF, we examined whether there was evidence of LVEF thresholds in patient characteristics or inflection points in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Using patient-level information, we created a merged dataset of 33 699 participants who had been enrolled in 6 randomized controlled HF trials including patients with reduced and preserved ejection fraction. The relationship between the incidence of all-cause death (and specific causes of death) and HF hospitalization, and LVEF, was evaluated using Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

As LVEF increased, age, the proportion of women, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation and diabetes increased, whereas ischemic pathogenesis, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) decreased. As LVEF increased >50%, age and the proportion of women continued to increase, and ischemic pathogenesis and NT-proBNP decreased, but other characteristics did not change meaningfully. The incidence of most clinical outcomes (except noncardiovascular death) decreased as LVEF increased, with a LVEF inflection point of around 50% for all-cause death and cardiovascular death, around 40% for pump failure death, and around 35% for HF hospitalization. Higher than those thresholds, there was little further decline in the incidence rate. There was no evidence of a J-shaped relationship between LVEF and death; no evidence of worse outcomes in patients with high-normal ("supranormal") LVEF. Similarly, in a subset of patients with echocardiographic data, there were no structural differences in patients with a high-normal LVEF suggestive of amyloidosis, and NT-proBNP levels were consistent with this conclusion.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with HF, there was a LVEF threshold of around 40% to 50% where the pattern of patient characteristics changed, and event rates began to increase compared with higher LVEF values. Our findings provide evidence to support current upper LVEF thresholds defining HF with mildly reduced ejection fraction on the basis of prognosis.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifiers: NCT00634309, NCT00634400, NCT00634712, NCT00095238, NCT01035255, NCT00094302, NCT00853658, and NCT01920711.

Therapies for patients with coexisting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are two common comorbidities that share similar pathophysiological mechanisms. There is a growing interest in the potential of targeted therapies to improve outcomes in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. This manuscript reviews current and potential therapies for patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. Pharmacological therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce fibrosis and fat deposits in the liver. However, there are currently no data showing the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, hydralazine, isosorbide nitrates, digoxin, or beta blockers on NAFLD in patients with HFrEF. This study highlights the importance of considering HFrEF and NAFLD when developing treatment plans for patients with these comorbidities. Further research is needed in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD, with an emphasis on novel therapies and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing these complex comorbidities.

A win ratio approach for comparing crossing survival curves in clinical trials

Many clinical trials include time-to-event or survival data as an outcome. To compare two survival distributions, the log-rank test is often used to produce a P-value for a statistical test of the null hypothesis that the two survival curves are identical. However, such a P-value does not provide the magnitude of the difference between the curves regarding the treatment effect. As a result, the P-value is often accompanied by an estimate of the hazard ratio from the proportional hazards model or Cox model as a measurement of treatment difference. However, one of the most important assumptions for Cox model is that the hazard functions for the two treatment groups are proportional. When the hazard curves cross, the Cox model could lead to misleading results and the log-rank test could also perform poorly. To address the problem of crossing curves in survival analysis, we propose the use of the win ratio method put forward by Pocock et al. as an estimand for analysing such data. The subjects in the test and control treatment groups are formed into all possible pairs. For each pair, the test treatment subject is labelled a winner or a loser if it is known who had the event of interest such as death. The win ratio is the total number of winners divided by the total number of losers and its standard error can be estimated using Bebu and Lachin method. Using real trial datasets and Monte Carlo simulations, this study investigates the power and type I error and compares the win ratio method with the log-rank test and Cox model under various scenarios of crossing survival curves with different censoring rates and distribution parameters. The results show that the win ratio method has similar power as the log-rank test and Cox model to detect the treatment difference when the assumption of proportional hazards holds true, and that the win ratio method outperforms log-rank test and Cox model in terms of power to detect the treatment difference when the survival curves cross.

SGLT2 inhibitors: an evidence-based update on cardiovascular implications

INTRODUCTION

Sodium Glucose co-Transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors (also known as 'gliflozins') represent a cornerstone to treat diabetes mellitus. Moreover, recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated important cardioprotective effects of gliflozins, independent of the presence of diabetes. Herein, we summarize the recent therapeutic progress in the cardiovascular field obtained with SGLT2 inhibitors.

AREA COVERED

We critically examine the rationale and results of recent clinical studies examining the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes, along with a brief overview of the main ongoing trials that have been designed in order to answer the many pending questions in the field of gliflozins and cardiovascular disease.

EXPERT OPINION

The favorable results of several clinical trials have broadened the therapeutic scenario for SGLT2 inhibitors, opening, at the same time, new challenges. Additionally, recent preclinical findings have evidenced off-target effects of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Pharmacological approaches to the prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus

About 1 in 10 adults worldwide are estimated to have diabetes mellitus. They are at risk of developing life-threatening complications resulting in reduced quality of life, increased mortality and higher healthcare costs. The ability to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by modifying some of its risk factors has been hypothesized for decades. The long and often gradual time-course of increasing dysglycemia prior to diabetes diagnosis suggests that interventions during that period could be effective in preventing T2DM. In addition to lifestyle modifications, certain drugs prevent or slow development of hyperglycemia. Recently, drugs used for obesity management were shown to prevent T2DM. In this review, we discuss various pharmacotherapeutic options for preventing T2DM.

Practical Pharmacological Treatment of Heart Failure: Does Ejection Fraction Matter Anymore?

Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome involving structural and/or functional abnormalities of the heart. Heart failure is often classified based on left ventricular ejection fraction, which serves as a predictor of mortality. The majority of the data supporting disease-modifying pharmacological therapies are from patients with reduced ejection fraction (less than 40%). However, with the recent results from the sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor trials, there is renewed interest in identifying potential beneficial pharmacological therapies. This review focuses on and includes pharmacological HF therapies across the spectrum of ejection fraction, providing an overview of the novel trials. We also examined the effects of the treatments on mortality, hospitalization, functional status, and biomarker levels to further investigate the interplay between ejection fraction and HF.

The win odds: statistical inference and regression

Generalized pairwise comparisons and win statistics (i.e., win ratio, win odds and net benefit) are advantageous in analyzing and interpreting a composite of multiple outcomes in clinical trials. An important limitation of these statistics is their inability to adjust for covariates other than by stratified analysis. Because the win ratio does not account for ties, the win odds, a modification that includes ties, has attracted attention. We review and combine information on the win odds to articulate the statistical inferences for the win odds. We also show alternative variance estimators based on the exact permutation and bootstrap as well as statistical inference via the probabilistic index. Finally, we extend multiple-covariate regression probabilistic index models to the win odds with a univariate outcome. As an illustration we apply the regression models to the data in the CHARM trial.

An overview of alamadine/MrgD signaling and its role in cardiomyocytes

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is a classical hormonal system involved in a myriad of cardiovascular functions. This system is composed of many different peptides that act in the heart through different receptors. One of the most important of these peptides is angiotensin II, which in pathological conditions triggers a set of actions that lead to heart failure. On the other hand, another RAS peptide, angiotensin-(1-7) is well known to develop powerful therapeutic effects in many forms of cardiac diseases. In the last decade, two new components of RAS were described, the heptapeptide alamandine and its receptor, the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor member D (MrgD). Since then, great effort was made to characterize their physiological and pathological function in the heart. In this review, we summarize the latest insights about the actions of alamandine/MrgD axis in the heart, with particular emphasis in the cardiomyocyte. More specifically, we focused on their antihypertrophic and contractility effects, and the related molecular events activated in the cardiomyocyte.

In Vitro Drug Repurposing: Focus on Vasodilators

Drug repurposing aims to identify new therapeutic uses for drugs that have already been approved for other conditions. This approach can save time and resources compared to traditional drug development, as the safety and efficacy of the repurposed drug have already been established. In the context of cancer, drug repurposing can lead to the discovery of new treatments that can target specific cancer cell lines and improve patient outcomes. Vasodilators are a class of drugs that have been shown to have the potential to influence various types of cancer. These medications work by relaxing the smooth muscle of blood vessels, increasing blood flow to tumors, and improving the delivery of chemotherapy drugs. Additionally, vasodilators have been found to have antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects on cancer cells, making them a promising target for drug repurposing. Research on vasodilators for cancer treatment has already shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. However, additionally research is needed to fully understand the mechanisms of action of vasodilators in cancer and determine the optimal dosing and combination therapy for patients. In this review, we aim to explore the molecular mechanisms of action of vasodilators in cancer cell lines and the current state of research on their repurposing as a treatment option. With the goal of minimizing the effort and resources required for traditional drug development, we hope to shed light on the potential of vasodilators as a viable therapeutic strategy for cancer patients.

The stratified win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit)

The win odds and the net benefit are related directly to each other and indirectly, through ties, to the win ratio. These three win statistics test the same null hypothesis of equal win probabilities between two groups. They provide similar p-values and powers, because the Z-values of their statistical tests are approximately equal. Thus, they can complement one another to show the strength of a treatment effect. In this article, we show that the estimated variances of the win statistics are also directly related regardless of ties or indirectly related through ties. Since its introduction in 2018, the stratified win ratio has been applied in designs and analyses of clinical trials, including Phase III and Phase IV studies. This article generalizes the stratified method to the win odds and the net benefit. As a result, the relations of the three win statistics and the approximate equivalence of their statistical tests also hold for the stratified win statistics.

Long-term mortality and cardiovascular events of seven angiotensin receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: Analysis of a national real-world database: A retrospective cohort study

Background and Aims

Although many angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used, comparative data regarding their impact on clinical outcomes are limited. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of seven ARBs on long-term cardiovascular outcomes in Korean patients with hypertension.

Methods

Using the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, the data of 780,785 patients with hypertension without cardiovascular disease (CVD) who initiated ARB treatment (candesartan, fimasartan, irbesartan, losartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, or valsartan) in 2014 and underwent this treatment for more than 6 months, were analyzed. Cox-regression analysis was performed using Losartan as a comparator, as it was the most widely used drug, by adjusting age, sex, diabetes, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcohol drinking, exercise, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, albuminuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and concomitant medications. The occurrence of mortality and the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) of the six ARBs was compared with that of losartan.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 5.94 (interquartile range, 5.87-5.97) years. In the crude analysis of all-cause mortality and MACEs, fimasartan exhibited the lowest event rates. In the Cox-regression analysis with adjustment, there was no significant difference in all-cause mortality among ARBs. The risk of MACEs with ARBs was similar to that with losartan, although the risks with irbesartan (hazard ratio [HR], 1.079; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.033-1.127; p = 0.007) and candesartan (HR: 1.066; 95% CI, 1.028-1.106; p = 0.015) were slightly higher.

Conclusion

In a Korean population of patients with hypertension without CVD, six different ARBs showed similar efficacy to losartan in terms of long-term mortality and MACEs. Further well-designed prospective studies are required to confirm our findings.

Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Associated with a Decreased Risk of Lung Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

There have been disputes in the association between angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) and the incidence of lung cancer. Our meta-analysis reevaluated this problem from the perspectives of race, age, drug type, comparison objects and smoking.

METHOD

We used the following databases to carry out our literature search: Pubmed, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Ovid (From 1 January 2020 to 28 November 2021). The correlation between ARBs and the incidence rate of lung cancer was calculated by risk ratios (RRs). Confidence intervals were selected with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 18 retrospective studies and 3 case-control studies were found to satisfy the inclusion criteria. The use of ARB drugs reduced the incidence of lung cancer. The pooled results of 10 retrospective studies revealed a decreased lung cancer incidence in patients treated with ARBs, especially in patients using Valsartan. A significantly lower lung cancer incidence was found in the ARB drugs than in calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Lung cancer occurrence was lower in Asian-based studies, especially in Mongolian-dominated and Caucasian-dominated patient populations. No significant decrease in lung cancer occurrence was found in RCTs or in patients receiving telmisartan, losartan, candesartan, irbesartan, or other placebo or in American and European-dominated patient populations.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ACEIs and CCBs, ARBs significantly reduce the risk of lung cancer, especially in Asian and Mongolian populations. Valsartan has the best effect in reducing the risk of lung cancer in ARB drugs.

Risk Factors with 30-Day Readmission and the Impact of Length of Hospital Stay on It in Patients with Heart Failure: A Retrospective Observational Study Using a Japanese National Database

Heart failure is a major disease, and its 30-day readmission (readmission within 30-day after discharge) negatively impacts patients and society. Thus, we need to stratify the risk and prevent readmission. We aimed to investigate risk factors associated with 30-day readmission and examine the impact of length of hospital stay (LOS) on 30-day readmission. Using the Diagnosis-Procedure-Combination database from April 2018 to March 2021, we conducted multiple logistic regression to investigate risk factors with 30-day readmission. Also, we conducted subgroup analysis in the short LOS group. To examine the association between LOS and 30-day readmission, we performed propensity score matching between the short and middle LOS groups. As a result, we categorized 10,283 patients and 169,842 patients into the readmission group and the no-readmission group. We identified the following factors as the risk of readmission: short LOS, female, smoking, older age, lower body mass index, lower barthel index, artificial ventilator, beta-blockers, thiazides, tolvaptan, loop diuretics, carperitides, class Ⅲ antiarrhythmic agents, myocardial infarction, diabetes, renal disease, atrial fibrillation, dilated cardiomyopathy, and discharge to home. As a subgroup analysis in the short LOS group, we revealed that the short LOS group risk factors differed from overall. After propensity score matching in the short LOS group and middle LOS group, 37,199 pairs were matched, and we revealed that shorter LOS increases the risk of readmission. These results demonstrated that shortened LOS increases 30-day readmission, and risk factors are unique to each LOS. We suggest stratifying the readmission risk and being careful with early discharge.

Effect of candesartan treatment on echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling in post-myocardial infarction patients

OBJECTIVE

Myocardial infarction has unfavorable effect on structural and functional properties of the myocardium, referred to as cardiac remodeling. Left ventricular mass, left ventricular mass index, and relative wall thickness are important predictors of cardiac remodeling. In this study, we investigated the effect of candesartan treatment in comparison with zofenopril treatment on echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling in post myocardial infarction patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective study, patients who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention were randomly assigned to a candesartan or zofenopril treatment. After randomization, echocardiographic indices of cardiac remodeling including left ventricular mass, left ventricular mass index, and relative wall thickness were evaluated before the start of treatment along with 1- and 6-month follow-ups.

RESULTS

According to our study, candesartan group showed significant reduction of estimated left ventricular mass and left ventricular mass index at 6-month follow-up visit compared to baseline values (199.53±38.51 g vs. 212.69±40.82 g; 99.05 g/m2 (90.00-116.5) vs. 106.0 g/m2 (96.0∼123.00), p<0.05, respectively). This trend was also observed in zofenopril group during the 6-month period (201.22±40.07 g vs. 207.52±41.61 g; 101.0 g/m2 (92.25-111.75.0) vs. 104.50 g/m2 (95.0∼116.75), p<0.05, respectively). Although both classes of drugs had favorable effects on post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling, the absolute benefit was more prominent in candesartan group as compared to zofenopril group (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that candesartan treatment following myocardial infarction may potentially be useful in terms of improving post-myocardial infarction cardiac remodeling.

Evaluation and Management of Patients With Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the development of heart failure. Furthermore, the prognosis of heart failure is worse in patients with diabetes mellitus than in those without it. Therefore, early diagnosis and proper management of heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus are important. This review discusses the current criteria for diagnosis and screening tools for heart failure and the currently recommended pharmacological therapies for heart failure. We also highlight the effects of anti-diabetic medications on heart failure.

Evaluation and Management of Patients with Diabetes and Heart Failure: A Korean Diabetes Association and Korean Society of Heart Failure Consensus Statement

Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for the development of heart failure. Furthermore, the prognosis of heart failure is worse in patients with diabetes mellitus than in those without it. Therefore, early diagnosis and proper management of heart failure in patients with diabetes mellitus are important. This review discusses the current criteria for diagnosis and screening tools for heart failure and the currently recommended pharmacological therapies for heart failure. We also highlight the effects of anti-diabetic medications on heart failure.

Advances in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Management - The Role of Sacubitril-Valsartan, Pirfenidone, Spironolactone and Empagliflozin: Is Success a Series of Small Victories?

BACKGROUND

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a syndrome characterized by marked heterogeneity in comorbidities and etiopathology substrates, leading to a diverse range of clinical manifestations and courses. Treatment options have been extremely limited and up to this day, there are virtually no pharmaceutical agents proven to reduce mortality in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this narrative review is to critically summarize existing evidence regarding the use of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI), spironolactone, pirfenidone and empagliflozin in HFpEF.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed) and Scopus were searched - from inception up to May 2022- using adequately selected keywords. Additional hand-search was also performed using the references of the articles identified as relevant (snowball strategy).

RESULTS

Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor (ARNI) and spironolactone, despite being very successful in HFrEF, did not do well in clinical trials of HFpEF, although there appear to be certain subsets of patients who may derive benefit. Data regarding pirfenidone are limited and come from small trials; as a result, it would be premature to draw firm conclusions, although it seems improbable that this agent will ever become a mainstay in the general population of HPpEF patients, while there may be a niche for the drug in individuals with comorbidities associated with an intense fibrotic activity. Finally, empagliflozin, largely welcomed as the first agent to have a "positive" randomized clinical trial in HFpEF, does not seem to evade the general pattern of reduced hospitalizations for HF with no substantial effect on mortality, seen in ARNI and spironolactone HFpEF trials.

CONCLUSION

Recent research in drug treatment for HFpEF has resulted in an overall mixed picture, with trials showing potential benefits from certain classes of drugs, such as sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, and no benefit from other drugs, which have shown to be effective in patient with reduced ejection fraction. However, small steps may be the way to go in HFpEF, and success is sometimes just a series of small victories.

Use of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older with Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Background

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Use of GDMT is recommended in all adults with HFrEF, but it is potentially underutilized in patients with advanced age. This study sought to characterize use of GDMT in octogenarians and nonagenarians with HFrEF and identify barriers to initiation and uptitration.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients aged 80-99 years at 3 heart failure clinics in the Lower Mainland region of British Columbia, Canada. Patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40% and heart failure hospitalization < 12 months were included. Data were collected between September 2019 and August 2021, for up to 24 months from the initial clinic visit.

Results

A total of 91 patients were included. The mean age was 85 years, and the mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30%. About 50% of patients had New York Heart Association class II symptoms. Throughout the study follow-up period, approximately 91% of patients were on a beta-blocker, 72% were on a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor, 31% were on a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and 4% were on a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor. The target dose was achieved in 19% of patients on a beta-blocker, 7% on an RAS inhibitor, 11% on an MRA, and 100% on an SGLT2 inhibitor. Frequent barriers to GDMT initiation and/or uptitration were renal dysfunction, hypotension, and hyperkalemia.

Conclusions

The levels of use of RAS inhibitors and beta-blockers in patients aged 80-99 years with HFrEF were reasonable, whereas the levels of use of MRAs and SGLT2 inhibitors were low. Achievement of target doses of GDMT was rare, owing to common adverse effects.

Win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect on time-to-event outcomes

Conventional analyses of a composite of multiple time-to-event outcomes use the time to the first event. However, the first event may not be the most important outcome. To address this limitation, generalized pairwise comparisons and win statistics (win ratio, win odds, and net benefit) have become popular and have been applied to clinical trial practice. However, win ratio, win odds, and net benefit have typically been used separately. In this article, we examine the use of these three win statistics jointly for time-to-event outcomes. First, we explain the relation of point estimates and variances among the three win statistics, and the relation between the net benefit and the Mann-Whitney U statistic. Then we explain that the three win statistics are based on the same win proportions, and they test the same null hypothesis of equal win probabilities in two groups. We show theoretically that the Z-values of the corresponding statistical tests are approximately equal; therefore, the three win statistics provide very similar p-values and statistical powers. Finally, using simulation studies and data from a clinical trial, we demonstrate that, when there is no (or little) censoring, the three win statistics can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect. However, when the amount of censoring is not small, and without adjustment for censoring, the win odds and the net benefit may have an advantage for interpreting the treatment effect; with adjustment (e.g., IPCW adjustment) for censoring, the three win statistics can complement one another to show the strength of the treatment effect. For calculations we use the R package WINS, available on the CRAN (Comprehensive R Archive Network).

Key considerations for choosing a statistical method to deal with incomplete treatment adherence in pragmatic trials

Pragmatic trials offer practical means of obtaining real-world evidence to help improve decision-making in comparative effectiveness settings. Unfortunately, incomplete adherence is a common problem in pragmatic trials. The commonly used methods in randomized control trials often cannot handle the added complexity imposed by incomplete adherence, resulting in biased estimates. Several naive methods and advanced causal inference methods (e.g., inverse probability weighting and instrumental variable-based approaches) have been used in the literature to deal with incomplete adherence. Practitioners and applied researchers are often confused about which method to consider under a given setting. This current work is aimed to review commonly used statistical methods to deal with non-adherence along with their key assumptions, advantages, and limitations, with a particular focus on pragmatic trials. We have listed the applicable settings for these methods and provided a summary of available software. All methods were applied to two hypothetical datasets to demonstrate how these methods perform in a given scenario, along with the R codes. The key considerations include the type of intervention strategy (point treatment settings, where treatment is administered only once versus sustained treatment settings, where treatment has to be continued over time) and availability of data (e.g., the extent of measured or unmeasured covariates that are associated with adherence, dependent confounding impacted by past treatment, and potential violation of assumptions). This study will guide practitioners and applied researchers to use the appropriate statistical method to address incomplete adherence in pragmatic trial settings for both the point and sustained treatment strategies.

Optimization of Drug Therapy for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction Based on Gender

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Over the last decades, several classes of drugs have been introduced for the treatment of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Their use has been supported by randomized controlled trials that have demonstrated improved patient outcomes. However, these trials enrolled a small number of female patients and sometimes have reported gender-related differences regarding the efficacy of the treatments. The aim of this review is to revise the available data about the influence of gender on the optimal treatment and drug dose in patients with HFrEF.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several gender-related differences in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of the drugs have been described. These characteristics could be responsible for a different response and tolerability in men and women also when current recommended treatment of HFrEF is considered. Some studies have shown that, in women, lower doses of beta-blockers and inhibitors of renin angiotensin aldosterone system could be equally effective than higher doses in men, whereas sacubitril/valsartan could exert its favorable effect at greater values of left ventricular ejection fraction. Although there is evidence about differences in the response to treatment of HFrEF in men and women, this has not been sufficient for differentiating current recommended therapy. Further studies should better clarify if the treatment of HFrEF should be based also on the patients' gender.

Roles of autophagy in angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte apoptosis

Autophagy is a self-degradation process of cytoplasmic components and occurs in the failing heart. Angiotensin II plays a critical role in the progression of heart failure and induces autophagy. We investigated the mechanism underlying angiotensin II-enhanced autophagy and examined the role of autophagy in angiotensin II-induced cardiomyocyte injury. Neonatal rat cardiomyocytes were treated with angiotensin II (1-100 nmol/L). Angiotensin II dose-dependently increased autophagy indicators of microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain (LC) 3-II and monodansylcadaverine-labelled vesicles. It also enhanced the intracellular production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), assessed by H2DCFDA, an intracellular ROS indicator. NADPH oxidase- and mitochondria-derived ROS production was increased by angiotensin II, while angiotensin II-induced LC3-II expression was suppressed by inhibitors of these sources of ROS. Confocal microscopy revealed that superoxide-producing mitochondria colocalized with lysosomes after the angiotensin II stimulation. Myocyte apoptosis was assessed by nuclear staining with DAPI and caspase-3 activity. A 6-h stimulation with angiotensin II did not affect myocyte apoptosis, while a co-treatment with 3-methyl-adenine (3MA), an autophagy inhibitor, augmented apoptosis. These results indicate that autophagy suppressed apoptosis because it removed damaged mitochondria in the early stages of the angiotensin II stimulation. A longer angiotensin II stimulation for 24 h induced apoptosis and propidium iodide-positive lethal myocytes, while the co-treatment with 3MA did not lead to further increases. In conclusion, angiotensin II-induced autophagy removes ROS-producing mitochondria. Autophagy is a beneficial phenomenon against myocyte apoptosis in the early phase, but its benefit was limited in the late phase of angiotensin II stimulation.