Orphanin-FQ/nociceptin: Lack of antinociceptive, hyperalgesic or allodynic effects in acute thermal or mechanical tests following intracerebroventricular or intrathecal administration to mice or rats

The NOP Receptor System in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders: Discrepancies, Peculiarities and Clinical Progress in Developing Targeted Therapies

The nociceptin opioid peptide (NOP) receptor and its endogenous ligand nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) are the fourth members of the opioid receptor and opioid peptide families. Although they have considerable sequence homology to the other family members, they are not considered opioid per se because they do not have pharmacological profiles similar to the other family members. The number of NOP receptors in the brain is higher than the other family members, and NOP receptors can be found throughout the brain. Because of the widespread distribution of NOP receptors, N/OFQ and other peptide and small molecule agonists and antagonists have extensive CNS activities. Originally thought to be anti-opioid, NOP receptor agonists block some opioid activities, potentiate others, and modulate other activities not affected by traditional opiates. Because the effect of receptor activation can be dependent upon site of administration, state of the animal, and other variables, the study of NOP receptors has been fraught with contradictions and inconsistencies. In this article, the actions and controversies pertaining to NOP receptor activation and inhibition are discussed with respect to CNS disorders including pain (acute, chronic, and migraine), drug abuse, anxiety and depression. In addition, progress towards clinical use of NOP receptor-directed compounds is discussed.

NOP-Related Mechanisms in Pain and Analgesia

Since the discovery of the NOP receptor and N/OFQ as the endogenous ligand, evidence has appeared demonstrating the involvement of this receptor system in pain. This was not surprising for members of the opioid receptor and peptide families, particularly since both the receptor and N/OFQ are highly expressed in brain regions involved in pain, spinal cord, and dorsal root ganglia. What has been surprising is the complicated picture that has emerged from 25 years of research. The original finding that N/OFQ decreased tail flick and hotplate latency, when administered i.c.v., led to the hypothesis that NOP receptor antagonists could have analgesic activity without abuse liability. However, as data accumulated, it became clear that not only the potency but the activity per se was different when N/OFQ or small molecule NOP agonists were administered in the brain versus the spinal cord and it also depended upon the pain assay used. When administered systemically, NOP receptor agonists are generally ineffective in attenuating heat pain but are antinociceptive in an acute inflammatory pain model. Most antagonists administered systemically have no antinociceptive activity of their own, even though selective peptide NOP antagonists have potent antinociceptive activity when administered i.c.v. Chronic pain models provide different results as well, as small molecule NOP receptor agonists have potent anti-allodynic and anti-hyperalgesic activity after systemic administration. A considerable number of electrophysiological and anatomical experiments, in particular with NOP-eGFP mice, have been conducted in an attempt to explain the complicated profile resulting from NOP receptor modulation, to examine receptor plasticity, and to elucidate mechanisms by which selective NOP agonists, bifunctional NOP/mu agonists, or NOP receptor antagonists modulate acute and chronic pain.

The role of nociceptin and dynorphin in chronic pain: implications of neuro-glial interaction

Nociceptin-opioid peptide (NOP) receptor, also known as opioid receptor like-1 (ORL1), was identified following the cloning of the kappa-opioid peptide (KOP) receptor, and the characterization of these receptors revealed high homology. The endogenous ligand of NOP, nociceptin (NOC), which shares high homology to dynorphin (DYN), was discovered shortly thereafter, and since then, it has been the subject of several investigations. Despite the many advances in our understanding of the involvement of NOC and DYN systems in pain, tolerance and withdrawal, the precise function of these systems has not been fully characterized. Here, we review the recent literature concerning the distribution of the NOC and DYN systems in the central nervous system and the involvement of these systems in nociceptive transmission, especially under chronic pain conditions. We discuss the use of endogenous and exogenous ligands of NOP and KOP receptors in pain perception, as well as the potential utility of NOP ligands in clinical practice for pain management. We also discuss the modulation of opioid effects by NOC and DYN. We emphasize the important role of neuro-glial interactions in the effects of NOC and DYN, focusing on their presence in neuronal and non-neuronal cells and the changes associated with chronic pain conditions. We also present the dynamics of immune and glial regulation of neuronal functions and the importance of this regulation in the roles of NOC and DYN under conditions of neuropathic pain and in the use of drugs that alter these systems for better control of neuropathic pain.

Recently patented and promising ORL-1 ligands: where have we been and where are we going?

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

The interactions of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and the opioid receptor-like receptor 1 (nociceptin opioid peptide--NOP) have been implicated in a variety of systems including cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, and the central and peripheral nervous systems.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

To elucidate the endogenous role of the N/OFQ-NOP system through the use of knockout and knockdown animal preparations, though most advances have been made using a host of synthetic agonists and antagonists. This review gives a brief history of the receptor-ligand discovery, the development of these agonists and antagonists within the last 10 years as published, and the therapeutic indications thereof focusing on pain.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

The use of NOP ligands in pain has been controversial at best; however, there are indications that both agonists and antagonists have a place in the clinical setting for acute and chronic pain. NOP ligands have potential as novel therapeutics, interestingly, when incorporated into a rationally-designed multi-target agent.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

The discovery of N/OFQ and NOP opened a new option for the treatment of pain with the potential for a decreased side effect profile. Numerous compounds have been designed to target this system, the most promising of which have mixed profiles.

Identification of an additional supraspinal component to the analgesic mechanism of action of buprenorphine

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Buprenorphine displays attributes of opioids, but also some features distinct from them. We examined spinal and supraspinal signal transduction of buprenorphine-induced anti-nociception in mice compared with morphine and fentanyl.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, Pertussis toxin (PTX), G(z) protein antisense and nociceptin/orphanin-FQ receptor agonist nociceptin, and antagonist, JTC-801, were injected supraspinally (intracerebroventricular) and spinally (intrathecal). Also the cell-permeable Ser/Thr protein phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid was given supraspinally.

KEY RESULTS

Spinal naloxone (20 microg) or PTX (1 microg) attenuated morphine, fentanyl and buprenorphine (s.c.) anti-nociception. Supraspinal naloxone or PTX attenuated morphine and fentanyl, but not buprenorphine anti-nociception. Spinal G(z) protein antisense did not alter buprenorphine, morphine or fentanyl anti-nociception and supraspinal G(z)-antisense did not alter morphine or fentanyl anti-nociception. However, supraspinal G(z)-antisense (not random sense) reduced buprenorphine anti-nociception. Peripheral JTC-801 (1 mgxkg(-1), i.p.) enhanced the ascending (3 mgxkg(-1)) and descending (30 mgxkg(-1)) portions of buprenorphine's dose-response curve, but only spinal, not supraspinal, nociceptin (10 nmolxL(-1)) enhanced buprenorphine anti-nociception. Intracereboventricular okadaic acid (0.001-10 pg) produced a biphasic low-dose attenuation, high-dose enhancement of buprenorphine(3 or 30 mgxkg(-1), s.c.) anti-nociception, but did not affect morphine or fentanyl anti-nociception.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Buprenorphine has an opioid component to its supraspinal mechanism of analgesic action. Our present results reveal an additional supraspinal component insensitive to naloxone, PTX and nociceptin/orphanin-FQ, but involving G(z) protein and Ser/Thr protein phosphatase. These data might help explain the unique preclinical and clinical profiles of buprenorphine.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ)-evoked bradycardia, hypotension, and diuresis are absent in N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptor knockout mice

Intracerebroventricular administration of the opioid-like peptide nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) produces bradycardia, hypotension, and diuresis in mice. We hypothesized that these responses are solely caused by selective activation of central N/OFQ peptide (NOP) receptors. To test this premise, we first examined whether i.c.v. N/OFQ produced dose-dependent diuretic and cardiovascular depressor responses in commercially available C57BL/6 mice. Next, using doses established in these studies, we examined the renal excretory and cardiovascular responses to i.c.v. N/OFQ in conscious transgenic NOP receptor knockout mice (NOP(-/-)). In metabolic studies, i.c.v. N/OFQ, but not saline vehicle, dose-dependently increased urine output (V) in NOP(+/+); this response was significant at 3 nmol (N/OFQ, V = 0.39 +/- 0.10 ml/2 h; saline, 0.08 +/- 0.05 ml/2 h). The N/OFQ-evoked diuresis was absent in littermate NOP(-/-) (N/OFQ, V = 0.06 +/- 0.06 ml/2 h; saline, 0.03 +/- 0.03 ml/2 h). There were no significant changes in urinary sodium or potassium excretion or free water clearance in either group. In telemetry studies, i.c.v. N/OFQ dose dependently lowered heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP). At 3 nmol N/OFQ, both HR and MAP were reduced in NOP(+/+) (peak DeltaHR = -217 +/- 31 bpm; peak DeltaMAP =-47 +/- 7 mm Hg) compared with saline (peak DeltaHR =-14 +/- 5 bpm; peak DeltaMAP = 2 +/- 3 mm Hg). These N/OFQ-evoked bradycardic and hypotensive responses were absent in NOP(-/-) (peak DeltaHR =-13 +/- 17 bpm; peak DeltaMAP =-2 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively). Basal 24-h cardiovascular and renal excretory function were not different between NOP(-/-) and NOP(+/+) mice. These results establish that the bradycardia, hypotension and diuresis produced by centrally administered N/OFQ are mediated by selective activation of NOP receptors.

Hypocretin/orexin and nociceptin/orphanin FQ coordinately regulate analgesia in a mouse model of stress-induced analgesia

Stress-induced analgesia (SIA) is a key component of the defensive behavioral "fight-or-flight" response. Although the neural substrates of SIA are incompletely understood, previous studies have implicated the hypocretin/orexin (Hcrt) and nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) peptidergic systems in the regulation of SIA. Using immunohistochemistry in brain tissue from wild-type mice, we identified N/OFQ-containing fibers forming synaptic contacts with Hcrt neurons at both the light and electron microscopic levels. Patch clamp recordings in GFP-tagged mouse Hcrt neurons revealed that N/OFQ hyperpolarized, decreased input resistance, and blocked the firing of action potentials in Hcrt neurons. N/OFQ postsynaptic effects were consistent with opening of a G protein-regulated inwardly rectifying K+ (GIRK) channel. N/OFQ also modulated presynaptic release of GABA and glutamate onto Hcrt neurons in mouse hypothalamic slices. Orexin/ataxin-3 mice, in which the Hcrt neurons degenerate, did not exhibit SIA, although analgesia was induced by i.c.v. administration of Hcrt-1. N/OFQ blocked SIA in wild-type mice, while coadministration of Hcrt-1 overcame N/OFQ inhibition of SIA. These results establish what is, to our knowledge, a novel interaction between the N/OFQ and Hcrt systems in which the corticotropin-releasing factor and N/OFQ systems coordinately modulate the Hcrt neurons to regulate SIA.

Role of nociceptin/orphanin FQ and the pseudopeptide [Phe1Psi(CH2NH)Gly2]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH2 and their interaction with classic opioids in the modulation of thermonociception in the land snail Helix aspersa

The role in nociception of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) and its receptor, the opioid receptor-like 1 (NOP), remains unclear because this peptide has been implicated in both suppression and enhancement of nociception. The present work characterises the effects of N/OFQ and the NOP receptor antagonist, the pseudopeptide [Phe(1)Psi(CH(2)NH)Gly(2)]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2) (Phe(1)Psi), on thermonociception in the snail Helix aspersa using the hot plate assay. Additionally, the possible interaction of each of these compounds with morphine or dynorphin A(1-17) and naloxone was studied. Compounds were administered into the hemocoel cavity of H. aspersa and the latency to the aversive withdrawal behaviour recorded. Dose-response and time course curves were done. N/OFQ and naloxone produced a similar dose-dependent pronociceptive effect; however, N/OFQ reached its peak effect earlier and was 30 times more potent than naloxone. [Phe(1)Psi(CH(2)NH)Gly(2)]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2) and the opioid agonists, morphine and dynorphin A(1-17) produced antinociception with a similar efficacy, but [Phe(1)Psi(CH(2)NH)Gly(2)]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2) reached its peak effect more rapidly and lasted longer than that of dynorphin A(1-17) and morphine. [Phe(1)Psi(CH(2)NH)Gly(2)]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2) was 50 times less potent than dynorphin A(1-17), but 30 times more potent than morphine. N/OFQ significantly reduced morphine and dynorphin A(1-17)-induced antinociception. Combined administration of low doses of [Phe(1)Psi(CH(2)NH)Gly(2)]-nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2) and morphine or dynorphin A(1-17) produced a potent antinociceptive effect. Sub-effective doses of naloxone and N/OFQ also synergised to produce pronociception. Data suggest that these two opioid classes regulate nociception through parallel systems. The H. aspersa model appears as a valuable experimental preparation to continue the study of these opioid receptor systems.

Nociceptin (1-13)NH2 inhibits stimulated calcitonin-gene-related-peptide release from primary cultures of rat trigeminal ganglia neurones

In this work we have developed and characterized primary cultures of neonatal rat trigeminal ganglia neurones; calcitonin-gene-related-peptide (CGRP) released from cells was taken as a marker of neuronal function. A significant and consistent increase in CGRP secretion was elicited by non-specific (56 mm KCl or veratridine) or specific (capsaicin) depolarizing stimuli. This paradigm was subsequently used to investigate the effects of nociceptin, an opioid-like peptide involved in central and peripheral control of nociception. We found that the nociceptin analogue nociceptin (1-13)NH2 (NOC) did not affect baseline CGRP release, but it reduced in a concentration-dependent manner CGRP release induced by all tested stimuli. NOC-induced reduction was statistically significant from 0.01 nm onward and achieved maximal effects at 10 nm. Such effects of NOC were seemingly mediated by the activation of specific ORL1 receptors, as a well-known nociceptin antagonist, N(Phe1)nociceptin (1-13)NH2, was able to completely revert NOC inhibition of capsaicin-stimulated CGRP release.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ blocks the antinociception induced by mu, kappa and delta opioid agonists on the cold water tail-flick test

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ), a 17-amino-acid peptide, is an endogenous agonist whose receptor is similar in sequence to mu, delta and kappa opioid receptors. It has been reported that N/OFQ can block antinociceptive effects induced by opioid receptor agonists in the radiant heat tail-flick test and warm water tail-withdrawal test. The present study was designed to see the effect of N/OFQ on antinociception induced by opioid receptor agonists in the cold water tail-flick (CWT) test, which measures a different type of pain. In adult male Sprague-Dawley (S-D) rats given subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of saline or morphine (8 mg/kg), intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of N/OFQ (18 microg) 15 min later produced a significant reversal of morphine antinociception (P<0.01, ANOVA followed by Duncan's test), compared to the corresponding saline control group. Saline (t=+15 min, i.c.v.) had no effect on s.c. morphine antinociception (P>0.01), compared to the corresponding saline control group. When the kappa opioid receptor agonist spiradoline (80 mg/kg, s.c.) was used instead of morphine, similar results were observed. In another series of experiments, it was found that i.c.v. injection of N/OFQ (18 microg) reversed the antinociception induced by i.c.v. injection of the selective mu opioid agonist PL017 (2 microg), delta opioid agonist DPDPE (50 ng) and kappa opioid agonist dynorphin (21.5 microg), respectively. These results indicate that N/OFQ may be an endogenous anti-opioid peptide in the brain of rats in the CWT test.

Attenuation of neuropathic pain by the nociceptin/orphanin FQ antagonist JTC-801 is mediated by inhibition of nitric oxide production

At the spinal level, the involvement of nociceptin/orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) in pain transmission is controversial. JTC-801, a selective nonpeptidergic N/OFQ antagonist, is a good tool to examine the involvement of endogenous N/OFQ in pathophysiological conditions. In the present study, we studied the effect of JTC-801 on neuropathic pain induced by L5 spinal nerve transection in mice. Thermal hyperalgesia was evident on day 3 postsurgery and maintained during the 10-day experimental period. Oral administration of JTC-801 relieved the thermal hyperalgesia in neuropathic mice in a dose-dependent manner. Following L5 nerve transection, the increase in nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity was observed in the superficial layer of dorsal horn and around the central canal in the spinal cord by NADPH diaphorase histochemistry. Using the novel fluorescent nitric oxide (NO) detection dye diaminofluorescein-FM, we confirmed that NO production increased in the spinal slice prepared from neuropathic mice and that the increase was more prominent in the ipsilateral side to the nerve transection than in the contralateral side. These increases in NOS activity and NO production in neuropathic mice were blocked by pretreatment of oral JTC-801. Although intraperitoneal injection of the nonselective NOS inhibitor NG.-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester transiently, but significantly, attenuated neuropathic hyperalgesia, inducible NOS-deficient mice showed neuropathic pain after L5 spinal nerve transection. These results suggest that N/OFQ is involved in the maintenance of neuropathic pain and that the analgesic effect of JTC-801 on neuropathic pain is mediated by inhibition of NO production by neuronal NOS.

Utilizing functional genomics to identify new pain treatments : the example of nociceptin

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ (noc/oFQ) is the first novel bioactive substance to have been discovered by the implementation of a functional genomics/reverse pharmacology approach. The neuropeptide was indeed identified in brain extracts as the natural ligand of a previously cloned orphan G protein-coupled receptor, the opioid receptor-like 1 (ORL1) receptor. Since its discovery in 1995, noc/oFQ has been the subject of intensive study to establish its role in normal brain function and its possible involvement in neurophysiopathology. Although the neuropeptide, an inhibitor of neuronal activity, has been found to have a wide spectrum of pharmacological effects in vivo, none has been as intensively investigated as its action on nociception and nociceptive processing. There is now substantial evidence that noc/oFQ has a modulatory role in nociception. However, dependent on the dose and site of injection, and possibly the animal's genetic background and even psychological status, the peptide has been variously reported to cause allodynia, hyperalgesia, analgesia, and even pain, in rodents. Overall, noc/oFQ tends to facilitate pain when administered supraspinally, and to inhibit it when administered spinally. These opposing effects beg the obvious, yet still unanswered, question as to what would be the net effect on nociception of an ORL1 receptor ligand, agonist or antagonist, able to target supraspinal and spinal sites simultaneously. Owing to the research effort of several drug companies, such ligands, i.e. nonpeptidic, brain-penetrating agonists and antagonists, have recently been produced whose systematic screening in animal models of acute and inflammatory pain may help validate the ORL1 receptor as the target for novel, non-opioid analgesics.

Characterization of nociceptin/orphanin FQ-induced pain responses by the novel receptor antagonist N-(4-amino-2-methylquinolin-6-yl)-2-(4-ethylphenoxymethyl) benzamide monohydrochloride

At the spinal level, nociceptin/orphanin FQ (Noc/OFQ) produces pronociceptive and allodynic effects at low doses (picogram range), while causing antinociceptive effects at high doses (microgram range). The discrepancy of pain modulation by Noc/OFQ at low and high doses raised a question whether Noc/OFQ exerted actions through the same Noc/OFQ receptor. In the present study, we examined the involvement of the Noc/OFQ receptor in pain responses with the novel nonpeptide antagonist N-(4-amino-2-methylquinolin-6-yl)-2-(4-ethylphenoxymethyl) benzamide monohydrochloride (JTC-801). Allodynia and hyperalgesia evoked by intrathecal administration of Noc/OFQ (50 pg/mouse) were dose dependently blocked by simultaneous administration of JTC-801 with IC(50) values of 32.2 and 363 pg, respectively. JTC-801 did not induce allodynia by itself. Subcutaneous injection of formalin into a hindpaw evoked biphasic pain behaviors such as flinching and biting in mice. Noc/OFQ at 10 pg increased the second-phase pain behaviors evoked by 1% formalin, whereas it strongly inhibited both the first-phase and second-phase pain evoked by 2% formalin at 1 microg. Although the pronociceptive effect by 10 pg of Noc/OFQ was dose dependently blocked by JTC-801 with an IC(50) value of 4.58 pg, the antinociceptive effects by 1 microg of Noc/OFQ were not antagonized by JTC-801. Furthermore, both phases of 2% formalin-induced pain behaviors were relieved by JTC-801. These results demonstrate that pronociceptive responses induced by a low dose of Noc/OFQ may be mediated through the Noc/OFQ receptor in the spinal cord and that JTC-801 can be a useful antagonist to examine the involvement of endogenous Noc/OFQ and mediation of the Noc/OFQ receptor under physiological and pathophysiological conditions including pain.

Involvement of endogenous opioid systems in nociceptin-induced spinal antinociception in rats

The present study investigates the involvement of opioid receptors in the antinociceptive effects of nociceptin in the spinal cord of the rat. Intrathecal administrations of 5 and 10 nmol of nociceptin significantly increase the withdraw response latencies to noxious thermal and mechanical stimulations. This nociceptin-induced antinociceptive effect is significantly attenuated by intrathecal injection of (Nphe(1))nociceptin(1-13)-NH(2), a selective antagonist of the nociceptin receptor (opioid receptor-like receptor ORL1), indicating an ORL1 receptor-mediated mechanism. This antinociceptive effect is also significantly attenuated by intrathecal injections of naloxone (a nonselective opioid receptor antagonist), naltrindole (a selective delta-opioid receptor antagonist), and beta-funaltrexamine (a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist) in a dose-dependent manner, but not by the selective kappa-opioid receptor antagonist norbinaltorphimine. Since it is unlikely that nociceptin acts by direct binding to opioid receptors, these results suggest a possible interaction between the nociceptin/ORL1 and opioid systems in the dorsal horn of the rat spinal cord.

The putative OP(4) antagonist, [Nphe(1)]nociceptin(1-13)NH(2), prevents the effects of nociceptin in neuropathic rats

Nociceptin or orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) is the natural ligand of the opioid receptor-like 1 receptor (ORL-1), which has been also classified as the fourth member of the opioid family of receptors and named OP(4). Elucidation of the biological role of N/OFQ has been hampered by the lack of compounds that selectively block the OP(4) receptor. Recently, a N/OFQ derivative, [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)NH(2), has been found to possess OP(4) antagonistic properties both in vitro and in vivo models. We investigated its spinal effect in the chronic constriction injury of the sciatic nerve in the rat, a model relevant to neuropathic pain in humans. Intrathecal (i.t.) administration of N/OFQ (0.2--20 nmoles) dose-dependently reversed mechanical allodynic-like behavior, while [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)NH(2) (20--120 nmoles, i.t.) was ineffective on its own. [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)NH(2) (60--120 nmoles, i.t.) antagonized N/OFQ (about 80% of reduction) but did not modify the activity of morphine (20 nmoles, i.t.). These results further support, for the first time in a chronic model of pain, the specific antagonistic profile of [Nphe(1)]N/OFQ(1-13)NH(2)vs the OP(4) receptor. This pseudopeptide is an interesting pharmacological tool to better clarify the role of N/OFQ in pathophysiology.

Nociceptin/orphanin FQ in spinal nociceptive mechanisms under normal and pathological conditions

Nociceptin and its receptor are present in dorsal spinal cord, indicating a possible role for this peptide in pain transmission. The majority of functional studies using behavioral and electrophysiological studies have shown that nociceptin applied at spinal level produces antinociception through pre- and post-synaptic mechanisms. The spinal inhibitory effect of nociceptin is not sensitive to antagonists of opioid receptors such as naloxone. Thus, nociceptin-induced antinociception is mediated by a novel mechanism independent of activation of classic opioid receptors. This has raised the possibility that agonists of the nociceptin receptor may represent a novel class of analgesics. Supporting this hypothesis, several groups have shown that intrathecal nociceptin alleviated hyperalgesic and allodynic responses in rats after inflammation or partial peripheral nerve injury. Electrophysiological studies have also indicated that the antinociceptive potency of spinal nociceptin is maintained or enhanced after nerve injury. It is concluded that the predominant action of nociceptin in the spinal cord appears to be inhibitory. The physiological role of nociceptin in spinal nociceptive mechanisms remains to be defined. Moreover, further evaluation of nociceptin as a new analgesic calls the development of non-peptide brain penetrating agents.

Effects of supraspinal orphanin FQ/nociceptin

The first reported behavioral action of the endogenous ligand for the "orphan" opioid receptor was a seemingly paradoxical increased sensitivity to nociception (i.e. hyperalgesia) after supraspinal injection into the cerebral ventricles of mice. In the continuing absence of an appropriate in vivo receptor antagonist, studies attempting to define the role of orphanin FQ/nociceptin (OFQ/N) in pain modulation and other behaviors have also featured central injection of peptide. This article reviews the findings of such studies. There appears to be concordance around the observation of anti-opioid actions of supraspinally injected OFQ/N, whereas the observations of hyperalgesia and/or analgesia are much less clear. A portion of the discrepant data may be explained in terms of methodological issues, stress-induced analgesia accompanying experimental protocols, and genotypic variation among subjects. Clarification of OFQ/N's role in nociception, as with other putative biologic functions, will probably depend upon the availability of a selective receptor antagonist.

A synthetic agonist at the orphanin FQ/nociceptin receptor ORL1: anxiolytic profile in the rat

The biochemical and behavioral effects of a nonpeptidic, selective, and brain-penetrant agonist at the ORL1 receptor are reported herein. This low molecular weight compound [(1S,3aS)-8- (2,3,3a,4,5, 6-hexahydro-1H-phenalen-1-yl)-1-phenyl-1,3,8-triaza- spiro[4. 5]decan-4-one] has high affinity for recombinant human ORL1 receptors and has 100-fold selectivity for ORL1 over other members of the opioid receptor family. It is a full agonist at these receptors and elicits dose-dependent anxiolytic-like effects in a set of validated models of distinct types of anxiety states in the rat (i.e., elevated plus-maze, fear-potentiated startle, and operant conflict). When given systemically, the compound has an efficacy and potency comparable to those of a benzodiazepine anxiolytic such as alprazolam or diazepam. However, this compound is differentiated from a classical benzodiazepine anxiolytic by a lack of efficient anti-panic-like activity, absence of anticonvulsant properties, and lack of effects on motor performance and cognitive function at anxiolytic doses (0.3 to 3 mg/kg i.p.). No significant change in intracranial self-stimulation performance and pain reactivity was observed in this dose range. Higher doses of this compound (>/=10 mg/kg) induced disruption in rat behavior. These data confirm the notable anxiolytic-like effects observed at low doses with the orphanin FQ/nociceptin neuropeptide given locally into the brain and support a role for orphanin FQ/nociceptin in adaptive behavioral fear responses to stress.

Strain-dependent effects of supraspinal orphanin FQ/nociceptin on thermal nociceptive sensitivity in mice

Despite much study since its discovery in 1995, the effects of orphanin FQ/nociceptin (OFQ/N), the endogenous ligand of the 'orphan' opioid receptor, on nociceptive sensitivity remain unclear. Different laboratories have variously reported hyperalgesic, analgesic, anti-analgesic or no effect of the peptide on thermal assays following supraspinal injection in rodents. We and others have argued previously that methodological inconsistencies and experimental parameters may explain some of the contradictions in the literature, especially in mice where intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injections proceed directly through the skull. We report presently that both the magnitude of stress-induced analgesia (SIA) produced by such i.c.v. injections, and the ability of OFQ/N to antagonize this opioid-mediated SIA, are strain-dependent. Specifically, significant injection-related SIA was observed in four of six strains studied (outbred: CD-1, SW; inbred: AKR/J, BALB/cJ, C3H/HeJ, CBA/J) on the 47.5 degrees C tail-withdrawal assay, and OFQ/N blocked this SIA in two strains. These data suggest that genetic variability among subject populations may underlie the inconsistent findings among researchers, and may in addition provide a promising avenue for future study of this novel neuromodulator.