Vismodegib in patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (STEVIE): a pre-planned interim analysis of an international, open-label trial

Evaluation of the Tolerability of Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors in the Treatment of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review of Treatment Strategies

Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) have broadened the treatment options available for patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) for whom traditional therapeutic approaches are not feasible or effective. Sonidegib and vismodegib are oral HHIs that were approved for treatment of patients with advanced BCC after demonstrating promising efficacy in the pivotal Phase II BOLT (NCT01327053) and ERIVANCE (NCT00833417) trials, respectively. However, the incidence and types of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) observed with these agents may limit continuous use of HHIs and ultimately impact clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the safety and tolerability profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib and discuss potential management strategies for HHI class-effect AEs, including muscle spasms, creatine phosphokinase increase, alopecia, and dysgeusia. These AEs primarily occur early in treatment and can lead to treatment discontinuation. Differences in the pharmacokinetic profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib may contribute to the variability noted in times to onset and resolution of these and other AEs. Evidence suggests that protocol modifications, such as treatment interruptions and dose reductions, are effective ways to manage AEs while maintaining disease control. Nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions may also be considered as part of an AE management strategy. Overall, healthcare providers and patients with advanced BCC should be aware of the HHI class-effect AEs and plan effective management strategies to avoid treatment discontinuation and optimize therapeutic response.

Effect of NFX-179 MEK inhibitor on cutaneous neurofibromas in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1

This phase 2a trial investigated the efficacy of NFX-179 Topical Gel, a metabolically labile MEK inhibitor, in the treatment of cutaneous neurofibromas (cNFs) in neurofibromatosis type 1. Forty-eight participants were randomized to four treatment arms: NFX-179 Topical Gel 0.05%, 0.15%, and 0.5% or vehicle applied once daily to five target cNFs for 28 days. Treatment with NFX-179 Topical Gel resulted in a dose-dependent reduction in p-ERK levels in cNFs at day 28, with a 47% decrease in the 0.5% NFX-179 group compared to the vehicle (P = 0.0001). No local or systemic toxicities were observed during the treatment period, and systemic concentrations of NFX-179 remained below 1 ng/ml. In addition, 20% of cNFs treated with 0.5% NFX-179 Topical Gel showed a ≥50% reduction in volume compared to 6% in the vehicle group by ruler measurement with calculated volume (P = 0.021). Thus, NFX-179 Topical Gel demonstrated significant inhibition of MEK in cNF with excellent safety and potential therapeutic benefit.

A multicenter real-world analysis of risk factors, therapeutics, and outcomes of patients with metastatic basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Metastatic basal cell carcinoma (mBCC) is rare and there are limited data regarding patient and tumor risk factors, optimal treatments, and disease prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess patient and tumor characteristics, therapeutics, and outcomes of mBCC stratified by location of metastasis.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of 53 patients with mBCC treated at 4 large academic centers in Boston, Massachusetts; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Cleveland, Ohio between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2021.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with mBCC were identified across 4 centers, 22 (42%) of whom had mBCC with spread limited to lymph nodes and 31 (58%) patients with distant organ spread (with or without lymph node involvement). Overall, half (n = 11) of patients with nodal metastasis achieved complete remission of disease, compared with just 1 (3%) patient with distant metastasis. The 5-year survival for nodal and distant metastatic patients was 89.3% and 61.0%, respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size due to disease rarity.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Patients with nodal disease are more likely to have disease remission whereas patients with distant metastasis are more likely to have persistent disease and die from their disease. However, 5-year survival rates exceed 50%, even for stage IV disease.

Targeted therapy in ophthalmic oncology: The current status

There have been rapid advancements in the field of ocular oncology for the diagnosis and management of intraocular, adnexal, and orbital tumors. Targeted therapy is in the forefront of medical research in all fields including ocular oncology. Targeted therapy include drugs that target specific genetic mutations, pathways or proteins involved in the development of cancer. In contrast to traditionally used chemotherapy, drugs used in targeted therapy are highly specific for tumor cells and preserve the function of normal cells. This review aims to familiarize ophthalmologists with the drugs that are currently approved or undergoing clinical trials for use in ocular oncology. Targeted therapy is particularly useful for locally advanced or metastatic tumors, including but not limited to eyelid and periocular basal cell carcinoma, periocular cutaneous and conjunctival squamous cell carcinoma, ocular adnexal lymphoma, conjunctival melanoma, and uveal melanoma. The results are promising with improved survival outcomes and better tolerability than chemotherapeutic drugs.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of basal cell carcinoma: a GRADE approach for evidence evaluation and recommendations by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common form of cancer, with a high impact on the public health burden and social costs. Despite the overall prognosis for patients with BCC being excellent, if lesions are allowed to progress, or in a small subset of cases harboring an intrinsically aggressive biological behavior, it can result in local spread and significant morbidity, and conventional treatments (surgery and radiotherapy) may be challenging. When a BCC is not amenable to either surgery or radiotherapy with a reasonable curative intent, or when metastatic spread occurs, systemic treatments with Hedgehog inhibitors are available. These guidelines were developed, applying the GRADE approach, on behalf of the Italian Association of Medical Oncologists (AIOM) to assist clinicians in treating patients with BCC. They contain recommendations with regard to the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up, from primitive tumors to those locally advanced or metastatic, addressing the aspects of BCC management considered as priorities by a panel of experts selected by AIOM and other national scientific societies. The use of these guidelines in everyday clinical practice should improve patient care.

Exploring multisite heterogeneity of human basal cell carcinoma proteome and transcriptome

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer. Due to multiple, potential underlying molecular tumor aberrations, clinical treatment protocols are not well-defined. This study presents multisite molecular heterogeneity profiles of human BCC based on RNA and proteome profiling. Three areas from lesions excised from 9 patients were analyzed. The focus was gene expression profiles based on proteome and RNA measurements of intra-tumor heterogeneity from the same patient and inter-tumor heterogeneity in nodular, infiltrative, and superficial BCC tumor subtypes from different patients. We observed significant overlap in intra- and inter-tumor variability of proteome and RNA expression profiles, showing significant multisite heterogeneity of protein expression in the BCC tumors. Inter-subtype analysis has also identified unique proteins for each BCC subtype. This profiling leads to a deeper understanding of BCC molecular heterogeneity and potentially contributes to developing new sampling tools for personalized diagnostics therapeutic approaches to BCC.

Giant Basal Cell Carcinoma Causing Axillary Contracture: A Case Report of an Unusual Localization of an Advanced Case

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of non-melanoma skin cancer. Although BCC arises most commonly in sun-exposed areas of the body, such as the head and neck, it infrequently can be seen in sun-protected parts as well. Axilla is one of the least encountered areas of BCC. Delay in the diagnosis or management alongside negligence of the patient can lead to a tumor reaching a giant size. We report a case of giant axillary BCC in a 59-years old female patient with no known risk factors for skin cancers. The tumor was excised with wide margins, and the tissue defect was reconstructed with latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap. A 3-year follow-up did not show any sign of recurrence or metastasis.

Immunotherapy and Its Timing in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Treatment

For patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), including locally advanced or metastatic BCC not amenable to curative surgery or radiotherapy, hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHI) vismodegib and sonidegib are approved as first-line systemic treatment. Results from clinical trials highlight that the overall discontinuation rate of HHI treatment varies from 88% to 92% with vismodegib and is approximately 92% with sonidegib, and half of patients will discontinue HHI after approximately 8 to 12 months. The main factors weighing in on the decision to discontinue HHI include efficacy (tumor response), adverse events and patient decision. In clinical practice, some of the patients that stop HHI may be re-evaluated if the tumor becomes amenable to surgery, or restart HHI at a later time, while others will need to switch to immunotherapy, depending on the reasons for HHI discontinuation. In this review, we revisit the therapeutic decisions considering a switch from HHI to immunotherapy with anti-PD-1 agent cemiplimab and we highlight the place of cemiplimab in the therapeutic ladder for patients with advanced BCC. We discuss the evidence on the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 agents as second-line systemic monotherapy, or in combination with other treatments, and the emergence of checkpoint immunotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment.

Real-World Experience with Vismodegib on Advanced and Multiple BCCs: Data from the RELIVIS Study

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib is approved for advanced cases of basal cell carcinomas not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy. Large studies on the use of vismodegib in clinical practice are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of the study was to analyse the evolution and therapeutic management of relapses and lack of response in patients who had received vismodegib for locally advanced and/or multiple basal cell carcinomas in a real-life multicentre setting.

METHODS

This nationwide retrospective study collected data on patients treated with vismodegib in 15 specialized centres. We included patients who first received vismodegib until intolerable toxicity, maximum response, or progressive disease. Exploratory research variables referred to patient and tumour characteristics, vismodegib effectiveness and safety, relapse rate and management, and mortality. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to identify predictors of complete clinical response.

RESULTS

133 patients with advanced BCC were included in the registry. The objective response rate (ORR) was 77.5% and nearly half of the patients (45.9%) achieved complete remission. Long-term information and detailed information of subsequent treatments after a regime of vismodegib was available for 115 patients. Only 34% of the patients in this group were subsequently treated with other therapies or vismodegib rechallenge. Sixty-nine percent of the patients who had shown a complete remission with vismodegib remained free of recurrence while 30.7% relapsed. Almost half of the patients who received additional therapies after the first course of vismodegib achieved complete tumour remission. Three and 2 out of 9 patients who were rechallenged with vismodegib achieved complete and partial responses, respectively, with an ORR of 55.5%.

CONCLUSION

Our study confirms efficacy of vismodegib in routine clinical practice. The risk of recurrence after achieving complete response with vismodegib was lower than previous reports. Rechallenge with vismodegib is feasible and most patients responded to re-treatment.

The initial rate of tumour response to vismodegib treatment, can predict a complete response outcome for periocular LA-BCC

PURPOSE

To establish a model to predict treatment outcome of periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA BCC) based on initial response to treatment with vismodegib (ErivedgeTM), a sonic hedgehog inhibitor.

DESIGN

Subgroup analysis of data from the STEVIE study database.

METHODS

Analysis of medical history, treatment protocol, and treatment outcome of POLA BCC tumours in a STEVIE study population of 244 POLA BCC patients treated with ≥1 dose of vismodegib.

RESULTS

A predictive model for complete response (CR) was established based on the initial treatment response. A cutoff value of 20% reduction in tumour size at 3 months of treatment identified the patients with a high probability (82.76%) to achieve CR. A second cutoff value of 67.7% reduction in tumour size at 6 months of treatment improved the prediction to a 95.42% probability of a CR outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

A treatment model was constructed based on the prediction of a CR outcome and the initial response to vismodegib treatment at 3 and 6 months. The study result provide significant new insights can facilitate decision-making on treatment management according to tumour response in patients with POLA BCC.

The current clinical approach to difficult-to-treat basal cell carcinomas

INTRODUCTION

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignant tumor in adult white populations. If BCCs are not treated for years, if they cause massive destruction of the surrounding tissues, if they are considered unresectable or not eligible for radiotherapy they become progressively 'locally advanced' (laBCC) or metastatic (mBCC). These tumors are defined as 'difficult-to-treat BCC.'

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive search on PubMed was conducted to identify relevant literature about the several approved and recommended treatment options for the management of difficult-to-treat BCC published from January 2012 to July 2022. Surgical options, radiotherapy, hedgehog inhibitors, immunotherapy, and combined treatments are discussed. The keywords used were basal cell carcinoma; difficult-to-treat BCC; management of difficult-to-treat BCC; surgical therapy; radiotherapy; hedgehog inhibitors; immunotherapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Identifying the best approach to DTT BCCs is one of the main challenges for the dermato-oncologist. The introduction of HHI for the treatment of advanced BCCs has revolutionized the clinical management of DTT BCCs. The immune checkpoint inhibitor cemiplimab has been approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic BCC refractory to HHI therapy or in patients intolerant to HHI therapy. Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) play a key role in managing these complex patients.

The role of Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathway in cancer

Notch and Hedgehog signaling are involved in cancer biology and pathology, including the maintenance of tumor cell proliferation, cancer stem-like cells, and the tumor microenvironment. Given the complexity of Notch signaling in tumors, its role as both a tumor promoter and suppressor, and the crosstalk between pathways, the goal of developing clinically safe, effective, tumor-specific Notch-targeted drugs has remained intractable. Drugs developed against the Hedgehog signaling pathway have affirmed definitive therapeutic effects in basal cell carcinoma; however, in some contexts, the challenges of tumor resistance and recurrence leap to the forefront. The efficacy is very limited for other tumor types. In recent years, we have witnessed an exponential increase in the investigation and recognition of the critical roles of the Notch and Hedgehog signaling pathways in cancers, and the crosstalk between these pathways has vast space and value to explore. A series of clinical trials targeting signaling have been launched continually. In this review, we introduce current advances in the understanding of Notch and Hedgehog signaling and the crosstalk between pathways in specific tumor cell populations and microenvironments. Moreover, we also discuss the potential of targeting Notch and Hedgehog for cancer therapy, intending to promote the leap from bench to bedside.

Long-Term Management of Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: Current Challenges and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

Local therapies are no longer an option for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. Abnormal activation of the hedgehog signaling pathway leads to uncontrolled tumor growth. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors are an effective treatment option for this kind of tumor. However, treatment-related toxicity under long-term treatment may lead to limitations in quality of life, and thus to therapy interruption or even discontinuation. This review summarizes pertinent treatment adjustments and novel therapeutic strategies for effective treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma.

Abstract

The first-line therapy for locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) is Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs), as they achieve good efficacy and duration of response. However, toxicity in the course of long-term treatment may lead to a decrease in the quality of life, and consequently to interruption or even discontinuation of therapy. As HHI therapy is a balancing act between effectiveness, adverse events, quality of life, and adherence, numerous successful treatment strategies have evolved, such as dose reduction and dose interruptions with on-off treatment schedules or interruptions with re-challenge after progression. As a small percentage of patients show primary or acquired resistance to HHIs, the inhibition of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) has been approved as a second-line therapy, which may also be accompanied by immune-related toxicities and non-response. Thus, optimization of current treatment schedules, novel agents, and combination strategies are urgently needed for laBCC. Here, we narratively model the treatment sequence for patients with laBCC and summarize the current state of approved treatment regimens and therapeutic strategies to optimize the long-term management of laBCC.

Canonical Hedgehog Pathway and Noncanonical GLI Transcription Factor Activation in Cancer

The Hedgehog signaling pathway is one of the fundamental pathways required for development and regulation of postnatal regeneration in a variety of tissues. The pathway has also been associated with cancers since the identification of a mutation in one of its components, PTCH, as the cause of Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome, which is associated with several cancers. Our understanding of the pathway in tumorigenesis has expanded greatly since that initial discovery over two decades ago. The pathway has tumor-suppressive and oncogenic functions depending on the context of the cancer. Furthermore, noncanonical activation of GLI transcription factors has been reported in a number of tumor types. Here, we review the roles of canonical Hedgehog signaling pathway and noncanonical GLI activation in cancers, particularly epithelial cancers, and discuss an emerging concept of the distinct outcomes that these modes have on cancer initiation and progression.

Hedgehog pathway inhibitor real-world treatment patterns in patients with basal cell carcinoma: a claims-based analysis

Aims: To examine real-world treatment patterns for Hedgehog pathway inhibitors (HHIs) for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma. Patients & methods: HHI initiators between January 2013 and June 2019 were identified from IBM MarketScan^® claims data. Time to treatment discontinuation and reinitiation were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods using a 60-day grace period. Results: Among 526 patients with basal cell carcinoma who initiated an HHI, median time to first discontinuation was 144 days, and risk of discontinuation by 12 months was 88.0%. Probability of reinitiation within 12 months was 19.7%, and median time to second discontinuation was 118 days. Conclusion: HHI discontinuation was common and reinitiation uncommon in clinical practice. Future research should evaluate persistence with recently approved therapies.

Update on Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitor Therapy for Patients with Basal Cell Naevus Syndrome or High-frequency Basal Cell Carcinoma

Some patients with basal cell carcinoma develop a large number of basal cell carcinomas during their lives. The most common underlying genetic disease that causes multiple basal cell carcinomas is basal cell naevus syndrome. Basal cell naevus syndrome is caused by a germline mutation in patched-1 (PTCH1), a tumour suppressor gene of the hedgehog signalling pathway. However, in a significant portion of patients with multiple basal cell carcinomas, no underlying genetic cause is found. Nevertheless, these patients can experience a treatment burden comparable to that of patients with basal cell naevus syndrome. They are referred to as high-frequency basal cell carcinoma patients. Hedgehog pathway inhibitors were the first group of targeted therapy for basal cell carcinomas. This study reviews the literature on hedgehog pathway inhibitor therapy for patients with basal cell naevus syndrome and high-frequency basal cell carcinoma, to provide an overview on efficacy, safety, dosing regimens, tumour resistance and reoccurrence, and health-related quality of life.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients with Basal Cell Carcinoma Following First-Line Hedgehog Inhibitor Discontinuation

INTRODUCTION

Until recently, patients discontinuing first-line (1L) hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) had few subsequent treatment options. The objective of this study was to describe the treatment journey and prognosis of patients discontinuing 1L HHI for BCC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with BCC who discontinued 1L HHI treatment in The US Oncology Network between 1 January 2012 and 1 January 2019 (with follow-up until 1 May 2020). Two cohorts were identified: patients who initiated a second-line (2L) treatment (2L initiators), and patients with 1L progression or toxicity without pathology-confirmed complete response who did not initiate 2L treatment (2L non-initiators). Patient demographics, treatment characteristics, and outcomes are reported for each cohort.

RESULTS

Among 115 patients with BCC who received 1L HHI treatment, 63.5% (n = 73/115) discontinued 1L HHIs. Of those, 50.7% (n = 37/73) discontinued because of documented toxicity or progression, without evidence of a complete response. We identified 4 patients who initiated 2L systemic treatment (median age 68.7 years, 100.0% female) and 15 patients who were eligible for the 2L non-initiator cohort (median age 80.2 years, 20.0% female). Median 1L HHI duration was 6.8 months (range 1.9-20.6 months) for the 2L non-initiator cohort and 8.6 months (range 6.8-42.2 months) for 2L initiators. At the end of follow-up, among 2L non-initiators (median follow-up duration 9.7 months), 40.0% were lost to follow-up, 33.3% had died, 20.0% continued observation, and 6.7% transitioned to an academic medical center or hospital; among 2L initiators (median follow-up duration 6.3 months), 50.0% were lost to follow-up, 25.0% had died, and 25.0% continued observation.

CONCLUSIONS

Following 1L HHI discontinuation, lack of standardized care and suboptimal outcomes were observed, including limited receipt of 2L treatment. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the impact of newer BCC treatment options.

An update on local and systemic therapies for non-melanoma skin cancer

INTRODUCTION

Nonmelanoma skin cancers (NMSC) as a group exceed the incidence of all other malignancies combined. NMSC includes basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. As the incidence continues to rise, it is important to appreciate the available treatment options.

AREAS COVERED

This article discusses the treatment of NMSC though surgical, topical, regional, and systemic modalities.

EXPERT OPINION

As there are many treatment options available for these diseases, selection of the appropriate method can be difficult. With time, we expect treatment decisions to become even more complex and personalized. The role of systemic immunotherapies and neoadjuvant therapies in the treatment of NMSC is still not well defined. Local treatment with intralesional injections and isolated limb infusion may prove to be promising alternative therapies.

Frequency and Genomic Aspects of Intrinsic Resistance to Vismodegib in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Vismodegib is approved for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC), but some cases demonstrate intrinsic resistance (IR) to the drug. We sought to assess the frequency of IR to vismodegib in laBCC and its underlying genomic mechanisms.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Response to vismodegib was evaluated in a cohort of 148 laBCC patients. Comprehensive genomic and transcriptomic profiling was performed in a subset of five intrinsically resistant BCC (IR-BCC).

RESULTS

We identified that IR-BCC represents 6.1% of laBCC in the studied cohort. Prior treatment with chemotherapy was associated with IR. Genetic events that were previously associated with acquired resistance (AR) in BCC or medulloblastoma were observed in three out of five IR-BCC. However, IR-BCCs were distinct by highly rearranged polyploid genomes. Functional analyses identified hyperactivation of the HIPPO-YAP and WNT pathways at RNA and protein levels in IR-BCC. In vitro assay on the BCC cell line further confirmed that YAP1 overexpression increases the cell proliferation rate.

CONCLUSIONS

IR to vismodegib is a rare event in laBCC. IR-BCCs frequently harbor resistance mutations in the Hh pathway, but also are characterized by hyperactivation of the HIPPO-YAP and WNT pathways.

Real-world assessment and treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: Findings from the RegiSONIC disease registry

BACKGROUND

Limited information is available regarding real-world treatment patterns and their effectiveness and safety in patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma, including patients not typically represented in clinical trials. The purpose of the current study was to describe how clinicians diagnose and treat locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in the United States.

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, observational registry study included patients with newly diagnosed, Hedgehog pathway inhibitor-naive locally advanced basal cell carcinoma without basal cell carcinoma nevus syndrome (n = 433) treated at 75 US academic and community practices, including dermatology, Mohs surgery, and medical oncology sites. The main outcomes of this study were treatment patterns and associated effectiveness and safety for patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma in real-world settings.

RESULTS

Determination of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma was mainly based on lesion size (79.6% of patients), histopathology (54.3%), extent of involvement (49.0%), and location (46.2%). Within 90 days of determination of locally advanced disease, 115 patients (26.6%) received vismodegib, 251 (58.0%) received surgery/other (non-vismodegib) treatment, and 67 (15.5%) had not yet received treatment (observation). Vismodegib-treated patients had a higher prevalence of high-risk clinical features predictive for locoregional recurrence than those with non-vismodegib treatment or observation. Clinical response rate was 85.1% with vismodegib and 94.9% with non-vismodegib treatment (primarily surgery). The most common adverse events with vismodegib were ageusia/dysgeusia, muscle spasms, alopecia, and weight loss. Rates of cutaneous squamous cell cancers were comparable between vismodegib and non-vismodegib treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective observational study offers insight on real-world practice, treatment selection, and outcomes for a nationally representative sample of US patients with locally advanced basal cell carcinoma. For patients with lesions that were not amenable to surgery, vismodegib treatment was associated with effectiveness and safety that was consistent with that observed in clinical trials.

Cemiplimab for locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) represents approximatively 1% of all BCCs. Metastatic BCC (mBCC) is even more rare. Most cases are observed in immunocompromised patients, particularly solid organ transplant recipients (OTRs). When surgery and/or radiation therapy for laBCC or mBCC is not reasonable, oral hedgehog inhibitor (HHI) therapy may be initiated. LaBCC or mBCC patients with primary or secondary resistance, progression or intolerance to HHIs could benefit from programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors as this has recently been published for cemiplimab, a recombinant IgG4 human monoclonal antibody anti-PD-1 for the intravenous treatment of laBCC and mBCC.

AREAS COVERED

Principal studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of cemiplimab for laBCC and mBCC are presented and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Cemiplimab is the first FDA (2021) approved anti-PD-1 antagonist for the systemic treatment of laBCC and mBCC which had previously shown disease progression on or intolerance to HHIs. Experts currently recommend cemiplimab as a first-line systemic alternative. As cemiplimab therapy is associated with a risk of organ graft rejection, advantages and disadvantages should be evaluated for every individual OTR patient with laBCC or mBCC, eligible for cemiplimab therapy.

Vismodegib improves quality of life in patients with periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: subgroup analysis, STEVIE trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma (POLA-BCC) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and the benefit of vismodegib treatment among participants in the Safety Events in Vismodegib (STEVIE) trial between 2011 and 2017.

METHODS

The STEVIE trial was conducted in patients with BCC (all anatomic locations) who were treated with vismodegib in 28-day cycles. Patients completed the Skindex-16, a validated questionnaire for the analysis symptoms, emotions, and functioning, at baseline, on day 1 of cycle 2, on day 1 of cycle 7, and at the end-of-study visit. For the present study, data mining techniques were used to construct an ophthalmic database of the STEVIE study. Skindex-16 scores were compared among patients with POLA-BCC between baseline and follow-up and between patients with POLA-BCC and patients with locally advanced BCC on other sites of the head and face (controls).

RESULTS

The cohort included 169 patients with POLA-BCC and 428 patients with non-periocular head BCC. Patients with POLA-BCC had a significantly worse overall functioning score at baseline than controls (p = 0.038) and a lower score specifically in activities of daily living (p = 0.001). At the last follow-up, patients with POLA-BCC showed significant improvement in scores for functioning (100%), symptoms (100%), and emotions (75%) relative to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary analysis of the results of the STEVIE trial showed that the HRQoL of patients with POLA-BCC is significantly impaired and can be greatly improved with vismodegib treatment.

Non-Surgical Treatments for Keratinocyte Carcinomas

Skin cancer is the most common malignancy worldwide, comprising approximately 30% of all human tumors. In recent decades, the incidence of keratinocyte carcinomas, which include basal cell carcinoma and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, has been steadily increasing globally (Rogers et al. in JAMA Dermatol 151(10):1081-1086. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1187 , 2015; Nehal and Bichakjian in N Engl J Med 379(4):363-374. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra1708701 , 2018). Most tumors are cured with surgical excision; however, some tumors are best treated with non-surgical approaches. Superficial tumors can often be cured with non-surgical methods whereas more advanced stage tumors may not be amenable to surgery. Additionally, surgical treatment may not be available for all populations depending on geographic location and accessibility to care. This article reviews commonly utilized nonsurgical options such as cryotherapy, photodynamic therapy, topical treatments, and radiation as well as systemic treatments including immunotherapies and chemotherapies.

Efficacy of sonic hedgehog inhibitors rechallenge, after initial complete response in recurrent advanced basal cell carcinoma: a retrospective study from the CARADERM database

BACKGROUND

Smoothened (SMO) inhibitors, blocking the sonic hedgehog pathway, have been approved for advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC). Safety analyses reveal a high rate of adverse events (AEs) and, most of the time, vismodegib is most commonly stopped when the best overall response is reached. The long-term evolution of aBCC after vismodegib discontinuation is poorly described. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the SMO inhibitors (SMOis) available (vismodegib and sonidegib) following rechallenge after complete response (CR) following an initial treatment by vismodegib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This real-life, retrospective, multicenter and descriptive study is based on an extraction from the CARADERM accredited database, including 40 French regional hospitals, of patients requiring BCC systemic treatment.

RESULTS

Of 303 patients treated with vismodegib, 110 achieved an initial CR. The vast majority of these patients (98.2%) stopped vismodegib, notably due to poorly tolerated AEs. The CARADERM database provided a median follow-up of 21 months (13.5-36.0 months) after CR. Of the 110 patients, 48.1% relapsed after a median relapse-free survival of 24 months (13.0-38.0 months). Among them, 35 patients were retreated by an SMOi and the overall response rate was 65.7% (34.3% of CR and 31.4% of partial response). The median duration of retreatment was 6.0 months (4.0-9.5 months).

CONCLUSION

Our real-life study, carried out on patients with complex clinical pictures, shows that after treatment discontinuation, 48.1% of patients achieved CR relapse within an average of 24 months (13.0-38.0 months). It emphasized that even though rechallenge can be considered as a therapeutic option, efficacy seems to decrease, suggesting the development of resistance mechanisms.

Real-World Experience of Vismodegib in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma at a Canadian Cancer Center

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib is a novel Hedgehog pathway inhibitor that has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) who are poor candidates for surgery or radiation. Few studies have explored the use of vismodegib to facilitate further surgery or radiotherapy, and the optimal treatment duration to balance outcomes with adverse effects.

OBJECTIVES

To characterize the disease response, progression, and recurrence outcomes of BCC patients, and to report the impact of subsequent therapies.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 46 adult patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (aBCC), including both locally advanced (laBCC) and metastatic (mBCC) disease, treated with vismodegib at a single center from 2012 to 2019.

RESULTS

Thirty-six had laBCC, and 10 had mBCC. Treatment was given over a mean of 21.9 months. Twenty-three (50%) had a complete response (CR), and 19 (41.3%) achieved partial response (PR). Median time to maximal response was 5.3 months. Eleven (23.9%) had resected disease at median 17.2 months, and 11 patients (23.9%) received radiotherapy. Thirty-two (69.6%) experienced progressive disease after achievement of CR or PR. Among 17 CR patients, who stopped treatment, 14 (82.3%) experienced subsequent relapse; 6 (85%) attained a repeat response. Twenty (43.5%) discontinued treatment at least once due to adverse effects.

CONCLUSIONS

With a response rate of 91%, London Regional Cancer Center's (LRCP)'s experience with vismodegib supports its effectiveness in treatment of aBCC. Moreover, a significant number of patients treated with vismodegib became amenable to surgery or radiotherapy. Toxicity remained an important factor that limited treatment duration.

The Role of Smoothened-Dependent and -Independent Hedgehog Signaling Pathway in Tumorigenesis

The Hedgehog (Hh)-glioma-associated oncogene homolog (GLI) signaling pathway is highly conserved among mammals, with crucial roles in regulating embryonic development as well as in cancer initiation and progression. The GLI transcription factors (GLI1, GLI2, and GLI3) are effectors of the Hh pathway and are regulated via Smoothened (SMO)-dependent and SMO-independent mechanisms. The SMO-dependent route involves the common Hh-PTCH-SMO axis, and mutations or transcriptional and epigenetic dysregulation at these levels lead to the constitutive activation of GLI transcription factors. Conversely, the SMO-independent route involves the SMO bypass regulation of GLI transcription factors by external signaling pathways and their interacting proteins or by epigenetic and transcriptional regulation of GLI transcription factors expression. Both routes of GLI activation, when dysregulated, have been heavily implicated in tumorigenesis of many known cancers, making them important targets for cancer treatment. Hence, this review describes the various SMO-dependent and SMO-independent routes of GLI regulation in the tumorigenesis of multiple cancers in order to provide a holistic view of the paradigms of hedgehog signaling networks involving GLI regulation. An in-depth understanding of the complex interplay between GLI and various signaling elements could help inspire new therapeutic breakthroughs for the treatment of Hh-GLI-dependent cancers in the future. Lastly, we have presented an up-to-date summary of the latest findings concerning the use of Hh inhibitors in clinical developmental studies and discussed the challenges, perspectives, and possible directions regarding the use of SMO/GLI inhibitors in clinical settings.

Efficacy and tolerability of vismodegib treatment in locally advanced and metastatic basal cell carcinoma: Retrospective real-life data

The study aims to evaluate the vismodegib treatment in local advanced (laBCC) and metastatic (mBCC) basal cell carcinoma. The data of 29 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical and histopathological features of the patients and adverse events of vismodegib were recorded. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The median follow-up period was 17 months (range: 1.6-57.3), and the median age at diagnosis 73 years (range: 39-88). The most common disease location was head and neck (86.2%), and the most common non-skin sites of disease were lymph nodes (13.8%), bone (13.8%), lung (6.9%), and brain (6.9%). Three (10.3%) patients had Gorlin's syndrome. The number of metastatic patients was 5 (17.2%). With vismodegib treatment, the complete response rate was 27.6%, partial response 55.2%, and stable response 10.3%. Treatment responses were most frequently seen within 2 months from the beginning of vismodegib. The median OS was 43.3 ± 9.0 months (25.6-61.1) for all patients. The median PFS in the laBCC was 15.7 ± 1.8 months (12.2-19.3), and 12.1 ± 4.6 months (2.9-21.2) in the mBCC. In the univariable analysis for the OS, only the treatment after the vismodegib was statistically significant, showing chemotherapy was better comparing to no treatment or surgery. The most common adverse events were fatigue-58.6%, muscle spasms-48.3%, alopecia-13.8%, and weight loss-13.8%. This real-life data study shows that vismodegib treatment in locally advanced and metastatic BCC was well tolerated and effective.

The Spectrum of Malnutrition/Cachexia/Sarcopenia in Oncology According to Different Cancer Types and Settings: A Narrative Review

Nutritional status in oncological patients may differ according to several modifiable and non-modifiable factors. Knowledge of the epidemiology of malnutrition/cachexia/sarcopenia may help to manage these complications early in the course of treatment, potentially impacting patient quality of life, treatment intensity, and disease outcome. Therefore, this narrative review aimed to critically evaluate the current evidence on the combined impact of tumor- and treatment-related factors on nutritional status and to draw some practical conclusions to support the multidisciplinary management of malnutrition in cancer patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed from January 2010 to December 2020 using different combinations of pertinent keywords and a critical evaluation of retrieved literature papers was conducted. The results show that the prevalence of weight loss and associated symptoms is quite heterogeneous and needs to be assessed with recognized criteria, thus allowing a clear classification and standardization of therapeutic interventions. There is a large range of variability influenced by age and social factors, comorbidities, and setting of cures (community-dwelling versus hospitalized patients). Tumor subsite is one of the major determinants of malnutrition, with pancreatic, esophageal, and other gastroenteric cancers, head and neck, and lung cancers having the highest prevalence. The advanced stage is also linked to a higher risk of developing malnutrition, as an expression of the relationship between tumor burden, inflammatory status, reduced caloric intake, and malabsorption. Finally, treatment type influences the risk of nutritional issues, both for locoregional approaches (surgery and radiotherapy) and for systemic treatment. Interestingly, personalized approaches based on the selection of the most predictive malnutrition definitions for postoperative complications according to cancer type and knowledge of specific nutritional problems associated with some new agents may positively impact disease course. Sharing common knowledge between oncologists and nutritionists may help to better address and treat malnutrition in this population.

Vismodegib in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma: First results of a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 trial (VISMONEO study): Neoadjuvant Vismodegib in Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the primary treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC). In locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC), surgery may cause functional or aesthetic damage. In laBCC, neoadjuvant administration of vismodegib, an inhibitor of the Hedgehog signaling pathway, may reduce tumor size, facilitate resection, and reduce functional and aesthetic consequences of surgery. The VISMONEO study assessed efficacy and safety of vismodegib in neoadjuvant treatment of laBCC.

METHODS

VISMONEO (NCT02667574) is an open-label, noncomparative, multicenter, phase 2 study. Patients with ≥1 histologically confirmed facial BCC, inoperable or operable with functional or major aesthetic sequelae risk, were included. Oral vismodegib 150 mg was administered once daily for 4 to 10 months before planned surgery, which was performed once the best response under vismodegib was observed. Primary endpoint was percentage of patients with BCC with tumor downstaging following surgical resection after neoadjuvant vismodegib. Downstaging was defined according to a 6-stage surgical classification related to the aesthetic and functional consequences of surgery.

FINDINGS

55 patients (median age: 73 years) with laBCC were included from November 2014 to June 2015. At inclusion, 4 patients were inoperable, 15 were operable with a major functional risk, and 36 were operable with a minor functional risk or a major aesthetic risk. Mean size of target lesion was 47.3 mm (SD: 27.2 mm). 44 patients presented with downstaging after vismodegib treatment (80%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 67 to 90). Of these 44 patients, 27 had a complete response (25 proved by biopsy). Mean treatment duration was 6.0 months. Overall Response Rate according to RECIST 1.1 criteria was 71% (95% CI, 59 to 88). At 3-years of follow-up, 16/44 patients had known recurrence (36%; 95%CI, 22 to 51).

INTERPRETATION

Neoadjuvant vismodegib allows for a downstaging of the surgical procedure for laBCCs in functionally sensitive locations.

FUNDING

VISMONEO was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Neoadjuvant Therapy for Non-melanoma Skin Cancer: Updated Therapeutic Approaches for Basal, Squamous, and Merkel Cell Carcinoma

OPINION STATEMENT

Recently introduced systemic therapies for locally advanced and metastatic non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs) are paving the way for neoadjuvant approach. Although none of the therapeutic options has currently gained indication in this setting, neoadjuvant approach for NMSCs is an open field and we are likely to see huge developments in the near future. Targeted therapy with sonic hedgehog pathway inhibitors is very effective in locally advanced or multiple basal cell carcinomas while immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors appears to be promising for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma and Merkel cell carcinoma. To date, targeted therapy and immunotherapy represent the frontiers in NMSC therapeutic management and, according to recent studies, good results can be achieved.

Hedgehog Pathway Inhibitors: Clinical Implications and Resistance in the Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common non-melanoma skin cancer and is on the rise. Most BCCs are benign; however, a very small percentage are locally advanced and metastatic. The pathway that normally regulates cell growth and proliferation is directed by the hedgehog pathway (HP). In BCC, it becomes over-stimulated due to genetic abnormalities. Treatments for BCC include local treatment by cryotherapy (liquid nitrogen), topical immunosuppression, surgery, or radiotherapy. Systemic treatment may be required in locally advanced lesions, metastatic BCC, or individuals who are inoperable.

The systemic treatments of BCC act to inhibit the HP and are called hedgehog pathway inhibitors. The first one being vismodegib and the second sonidegib.

Although these treatments have shown promising results, they have prominent side effects in almost all patients, with few patients having to discontinue the treatment. About 50% of patients did not respond to treatment from the beginning, some had partial responses, others had recurrence after discontinuing the drugs, and few had worsening of the disease. In this paper, we will explore the most common side effects, resistance, and different methods to overcome resistance to ensure the highest rate of cure for BCC.

A Mechanistic Overview of Taste Bud Maintenance and Impairment in Cancer Therapies

Since the early 20th century, progress in cancer therapies has significantly improved disease prognosis. Nonetheless, cancer treatments are often associated with side effects that can negatively affect patient well-being and disrupt the course of treatment. Among the main side effects, taste impairment is associated with depression, malnutrition, and morbid weight loss. Although relatively common, taste disruption associated with cancer therapies remains poorly understood. Here, we review the current knowledge related to the molecular mechanisms underlying taste maintenance and disruption in the context of cancer therapies.

Hedgehog signaling in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis and the gastrointestinal tumor microenvironment

The Hedgehog (HH) signaling pathway plays important roles in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis and the gastrointestinal tumor microenvironment (TME). Aberrant HH signaling activation may accelerate the growth of gastrointestinal tumors and lead to tumor immune tolerance and drug resistance. The interaction between HH signaling and the TME is intimately involved in these processes, for example, tumor growth, tumor immune tolerance, inflammation, and drug resistance. Evidence indicates that inflammatory factors in the TME, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ), macrophages, and T cell-dependent immune responses, play a vital role in tumor growth by affecting the HH signaling pathway. Moreover, inhibition of proliferating cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and inflammatory factors can normalize the TME by suppressing HH signaling. Furthermore, aberrant HH signaling activation is favorable to both the proliferation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and the drug resistance of gastrointestinal tumors. This review discusses the current understanding of the role and mechanism of aberrant HH signaling activation in gastrointestinal carcinogenesis, the gastrointestinal TME, tumor immune tolerance and drug resistance and highlights the underlying therapeutic opportunities.

Predictive Factors of Non-Response to Vismodegib in Locally Advanced Basal-Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib has shown clinical efficacy in the management of locally advanced basal cell carcinomas (laBCC). However, non-response to vismodegib is observed in 2-13.5% of patients in clinical studies. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with non-response to vismodegib in patients with laBCC.

METHODS

We carried out a retrospective multicenter study, including patients with laBCC treated with vismodegib, from July 2011 to May 2019. Response to treatment was assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. Patients were categorized as responders with a complete response or a partial response or non-responders with a stable disease or a progressive disease according to what has been observed during follow-up. Patient demographics, tumor profile, and treatment modalities were compared in responders and non-responders.

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients with laBCC were included in the study. Twenty-five (30.1%) were non-responders to vismodegib. History of treatment with radiotherapy, presence of muscle involvement and intermittent treatment with vismodegib were significantly associated with a non-response (p < 0.001, p = 0.025, p < 0.001). Bone involvement (p = 0.2) and morpheaform IaBCC subtype (p = 0.056) were more frequent in non-responders without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

In this study, non-response of laBCC to vismodegib therapy was associated with muscle involvement. Previous radiotherapy and intermittent use of vismodegib have been identified as causes favoring non-response to vismodegib. Due to the low numbers of patients included in the study, it is difficult to draw firm conclusions. Further studies are needed to confirm these data.

Eight years of experience with vismodegib for advanced and multiple basal cell carcinoma patients in the Netherlands: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Vismodegib has been used for the treatment of locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (laBCC) and metastatic BCC (mBCC) since 2011. Most efficacy and safety data are provided by clinical trials. This study evaluates the effectiveness of vismodegib for the treatment of laBCC, mBCC and basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS) patients, and the tumour characteristics associated with a higher probability of achieving a complete response in the Netherlands.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study that included all patients ≥18 years with histologically proven basal cell carcinoma that received ≥1 dose of vismodegib between July 2011 and September 2019 in the Netherlands.

RESULTS

In total, 48 laBCC, 11 mBCC and 19 BCNS patients were included. Median progression-free survival was 10.3 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 7.5-22.6) for laBCC, 11.7 (95% CI, 5.2-17.5) for mBCC and 19.1 (95% CI, 7.4-20.2) for BCNS. Larger laBCCs were associated with a lower probability of complete response (hazard ratio (HR) 0.77 per increase in cm, p = 0.02). Of all BCNS patients, 63% received ≥2 treatment sequences with vismodegib; all achieved partial responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Half of the aBCC patients progress within 1 year after the start of vismodegib treatment. More research is needed to investigate other treatment strategies after vismodegib progression and to evaluate long-term effects of repetitive vismodegib treatment.

Tailored Toxicity-Driven Administration of Vismodegib in Patients With Multiple or Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Pilot Analysis

In this pilot study, we describe our experience with vismodegib in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and evaluate the feasibility of a tailored toxicity-driven administration of vismodegib in patients with multiple or locally advanced BCC. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical charts of 17 consecutive patients with BCC who were treated with vismodegib. Therapy was started at the usual dosage of 150 mg per day per person, continuously; a rescheduled dosage of 150 mg per day for 4 weeks with a subsequent stop of 2 weeks was allowed during the treatment according to the standard practice of our institution. During treatment, 14 patients with responsive disease presented an adverse event (100% cramps and 20% dysgeusia), therefore, requiring a change in the treatment plan. Overall, in eight out of 17 patients (47% of the overall population), it was possible to re-schedule the treatment by postponing therapy for 2 weeks every 4 weeks. These patients were all still alive at the time of the present analysis and were showing complete response. Adverse events resolved during the first interruption of therapy. The intermittent vismodegib schedule assessed in this pilot series could be beneficial in improving duration of treatment, allowing to maintain a long-term treatment response, even in an elderly and fragile population. Based on these preliminary findings, dedicated studies may be planned to further evaluate an intermittent schedule of vismodegib administration.

Novel therapies for advanced skin carcinomas

Advanced skin carcinomas are a serious therapeutic problem. The statistical analysis shows a continuous increase in the incidence of both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers. Traditional therapies are characterized by low effectiveness and patients overall survival is not affected by them. By understanding the molecular pathways that lead to the neoplastic transformation and thanks to the knowledge of the immune system, it is possible to use personalized medicine in novel therapies for advanced skin carcinomas.

The SHH/GLI signaling pathway: a therapeutic target for medulloblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Medulloblastoma (MB) is a heterogeneous tumor of the cerebellum that is divided into four main subgroups with distinct molecular and clinical features. Sonic Hedgehog MB (SHH-MB) is the most genetically understood and occurs predominantly in childhood. Current therapies consist of aggressive and non-targeted multimodal approaches that are often ineffective and cause long-term complications. These problems intensify the need to develop molecularly targeted therapies to improve outcome and reduce treatment-related morbidities. In this scenario, Hedgehog (HH) signaling, a developmental pathway whose deregulation is involved in the pathogenesis of several malignancies, has emerged as an attractive druggable pathway for SHH-MB therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review provides an overview of the advancements in the HH antagonist research field. We place an emphasis on Smoothened (SMO) and glioma-associated oncogene homolog (GLI) inhibitors and immunotherapy approaches that are validated in preclinical SHH-MB models and that have therapeutic potential for MB patients. Literature from Pubmed and data reported on ClinicalTrial.gov up to August 2020 were considered.

EXPERT OPINION

Extensive-omics analysis has enhanced our knowledge and has transformed the way that MB is studied and managed. The clinical use of SMO antagonists has yet to be determined, however, future GLI inhibitors and multitargeting approaches are promising.

Metastatic Basal Cell Carcinoma of the Skin: A Comprehensive Literature Review, Including Advances in Molecular Therapeutics

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin is the most common type of malignant human tumor. In Europe, the incidence of BCC ranges from 44.6 to 128 cases per 100,000 inhabitants annually, whereas in the United States, the yearly incidence rate ranges between 500 and 1500. The global incidence has been calculated to be as high as 10 million cases of BCC per year. There are 2 main clinical patterns of BCC-the familial BCC in basal cell nevus syndrome and sporadic BCC. The etiology of cutaneous BCC is usually the result of the interaction between solar ultraviolet radiation and genetic factors. Somatic or germline mutations in the effector components of the hedgehog signaling pathway (ie, PTCH1, PTCH2, SMO or SUFU genes) are responsible for ∼90% of the cases of both sporadic and familial BCC, all causing a constitutive activation of the hedgehog pathway. Cutaneous BCC very rarely metastasizes, and diagnosis in metastatic sites can be very difficult. Metastatic BCC has weakly effective therapeutic options with a poor prognosis until few years ago. In 2012, small-molecule therapies, involving inactivation of the hedgehog signaling pathway, and capable of reducing tumor growth and progression have been introduced into clinical practice for advanced (locally advanced or metastatic) BCC. We performed a comprehensive literature review on metastatic BCC and found at least 915 cases reported to date. In addition, we extensively discussed the differential diagnosis of metastatic BCC, and outlined the advances in clinical therapeutics involving these small molecules.

Outcomes of Vismodegib for Periocular Locally Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma From an Open-label Trial

Importance

The outcomes of vismodegib treatment in a relatively large cohort of study participants with periocular locally advanced basal cell carcinoma (POLA-BCC) may guide physicians when considering this treatment.

Objective

To report the outcomes of vismodegib treatment in patients with POLA-BCC in the Safety Events in Vismodegib (STEVIE) study.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This post hoc subgroup analysis from the STEVIE single-arm, multicenter, open-label cohort study screened all 1215 participants for ocular or periocular involvement and identified 244 participants with POLA-BCC or metastatic BCC. Data for the first STEVIE trial were collected from 167 treatment locations in 36 countries from June 30, 2011, to June 14, 2017. This post hoc analysis was performed from April 1 to August 31, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Response to treatment and adverse events.

Results

Ocular or periocular involvement was found in 244 of 1215 STEVIE participants (20.1%), who constituted the analytic sample. The median age of the study participants was 72.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 60.0-82.0]) years, and they included 143 men (58.6%). Locally advanced BCC was diagnosed in 238 of the 244 participants (97.5%) and metastatic BCC, in 6 (2.5%). The median duration of exposure to vismodegib was 40.0 (IQR, 20.0-78.0) weeks, specifically 39.7 (IQR, 19.9-76.0) weeks for POLA-BCC and 92.4 (IQR, 53.2-163.0) weeks for metastatic BCC. Sixty-nine participants (28.3%) sustained serious adverse events (alopecia, muscle spasms, dysgeusia, weight loss, decreased appetite, asthenia, ageusia, nausea, fatigue, and diarrhea). Two hundred thirty-two study participants (95.1%) sustained more than 1 adverse effect. The overall mean (SD) number of drug-related adverse effects per study participant by first adverse event, regardless of the severity, was 5.48 (3.84). Discontinuation of vismodegib treatment owing to an adverse event was recorded in 58 participants (23.8%). During the study, 22 participants (9.0%) died, 70 (28.7%) achieved complete response, and 94 (38.5%) achieved partial response.

Conclusions and Relevance

Vismodegib was well tolerated by the study participants with POLA-BCC. The safety of vismodegib treatment according to the STEVIE trial findings is consistent with that reported in previous studies. These data may be helpful when considering vismodegib for patients with POLA-BCC.

The Evolution of Care of Cancers of the Head and Neck Region: State of the Science in 2020

Cancers that arise in the head and neck region are comprised of a heterogeneous group of malignancies that include carcinogen- and human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven mucosal squamous cell carcinoma as well as skin cancers such as cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. These malignancies develop in critical areas for eating, talking, and breathing and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality despite advances in treatment. Understanding of advances in the management of these various cancers is important for all multidisciplinary providers who care for patients across the cancer care continuum. Additionally, the recent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated adaptations to head and neck cancer care to accommodate the mitigation of COVID-19 risk and ensure timely treatment. This review explores advances in diagnostic criteria, prognostic factors, and management for subsites including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and the various forms of skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, Merkel cell carcinoma, and melanoma). Then, this review summarizes emerging developments in immunotherapy, radiation therapy, cancer survivorship, and the delivery of care during the COVID-19 era.

Treatment of periocular basal cell carcinoma with neoadjuvant vismodegib

Purpose

To report a case of a locally advanced periocular basal cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant Vismodegib therapy prior to surgery.

Observations

A 63-year-old female presented to the oculoplastics clinic with biopsy-proven basal cell carcinoma of the right periorbital region causing significant cicatricial ectropion of the right lower eyelid. The medial canthal lesion involved nearly the entire right lower eyelid with extension onto the cheek, the medial half of the right upper eyelid, the palpebral and bulbar conjunctiva, as well as the right lacrimal system. CT imaging was suggestive of involvement of the extraocular muscles and other post-septal tissues. Fortunately, the patient had no metastatic disease. The extent of the tumor would have necessitated aggressive resection to achieve surgical cure. However, the patient preferred to attempt globe-sparing therapy with a goal of preserving cosmesis as much as possible. Various treatment options were discussed with the patient, including the use of Vismodegib, and the patient elected to pursue this treatment strategy. The goal of Vismodegib treatment was to reduce the tumor size enough to permit surgical resection of all tumor without significantly affecting cosmesis. After 11 months of treatment with Vismodegib, the tumor size had reduced significantly to the point where surgical intervention with minimal disfigurement could be offered. The patient underwent multidisciplinary approach with Mohs micrographic excision of the tumor paired with oculoplastic reconstructive surgery resulting in negative margins and satisfactory cosmetic results.

Conclusions and importance

Although addition study is required regarding Vismodegib as a primary or adjuvant therapeutic approach to periorbital basal cell carcinoma, this case illustrates the potential usefulness of this drug as an option in this context. This case provides information that may help the comprehensive ophthalmologist or oculoplastic specialist in counseling patients with locally advanced periorbital basal cell carcinoma.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Basal Cell Carcinoma in Specialized Dermatology Units: A Clinical Practice Guideline

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer in the general population. BCC is managed in a variety of ways, and available international guidelines are difficult to put into practice in Spain. This guideline aims to improve the management of BCC based on current evidence and provide a point of reference for Spanish dermatologists.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Members of the Spanish Oncologic Dermatology and Surgery Group (GEDOC) with experience treating BCC were invited to participate in drafting this guideline. The drafters used the ADAPTE collaboration process to develop the new guideline based on existing ones, first summarizing the care pathway and posing relevant clinical questions. They then searched for guidelines, assessed them with the AGREEII (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation) tool, and searched the selected guidelines for answers to the clinical questions. Finally, the recommendations were drafted and submitted for external review.

RESULTS

The highest-scoring guidelines were from the Association of Dermatologists, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, the European Dermatology Forum, and the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. A total of 11 clinical questions were answered.

CONCLUSIONS

This new guideline answers the working group's clinical questions about the routine management of BCC in Spain. It provides dermatologists with a tool they can use for decision-making while taking into consideration the resources available and patient preferences.