Adjuvant nivolumab versus ipilimumab in resected stage IIIB-C and stage IV melanoma (CheckMate 238): 4-year results from a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Role of Surgery for Metastatic Melanoma in the Era of Checkpoint Blockade

Treatment paradigms have shifted with the introduction of checkpoint inhibitors, facilitating less extensive surgical procedures in some scenarios. Resection and adjuvant therapy are key components in patients with locally advanced or limited metastatic disease. Alternately, these patient populations may benefit from peri-operative systemic therapy based on recent clinical trial data. Resection is also integral to administering tumor infiltrating lymphocyte therapy in patients with treatment-refractory, unresectable melanoma. The role of surgery continues to evolve, and ranges the spectrum from resection with curative intent, to palliative interventions intended to effectively manage symptoms or disease-related complications.

Return to work after neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma patients

PURPOSE

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in stage III melanoma has recently been shown to improve event-free and distant metastasis-free survival compared to adjuvant therapy. Pathologic response allows for subsequent personalization of surgery and omission/application of adjuvant therapy. We addressed the question whether neoadjuvant therapy allows an earlier and more to a more extent return to work in this curatively treated patient population.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective analysis of patients participating at the Netherlands, we interviewed via the telephone 88 stage III melanoma patients treated with neoadjuvant versus adjuvant immunotherapy in regards of their stopping work during therapy, and when returning partially or fully to work.

RESULTS

Six, 12, and 24 months post start of therapy at least partially worked 80% versus 61%, 84% versus 73%, and 91% versus 82% in the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant groups. Full return to work was observed at 6 months in 52% versus 48%, at 1 year in 71% versus 52%, and at 2 years 82% versus 62%, respectively. Return to work (RTW) started in general in both groups after finishing the systemic therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the manner of therapy (neoadjuvant versus adjuvant) and potentially its treatment duration might be major factors influencing the timing and extent of RTW.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

A faster and full RTW is not only of importance for the patient's well-being and QoL, but has also a significant financial impact on patients and their families.

Effect of immuno-oncology on clinical and economic outcomes for a selection of cancers in Italy

OBJECTIVES

This study assesses the impact of immune-oncology (IO) drugs' availability on cancer incidence-adjusted mortality rates from melanoma, lung, and renal cancers at population level in Italy between 2008 and 2019.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on cross-sectional time-series aggregated data collected from publicly available sources and IQVIA proprietary databases. Three fixed-effects regression models were used to estimate how IO availability affects incidence-adjusted mortality for each cancer type. Estimated deaths were compared with deaths in a scenario with no IO drugs availability. Finally, the number of averted deaths was valued using the human capital approach.

RESULTS

A 1% increase in IO availability reduces incidence-adjusted mortality rates for melanoma, lung, and renal cancers by 0.125% (95% CI: 0.138-0.112; p < 0.01), 0.011% (95% CI: 0.013-0.009; p < 0.01) and 0.005% (95% CI: 0.006-0.003; p < 0.01) between the introduction of the drug in the therapeutic area and 2019. This reduction resulted in total savings of € 49.0 million, € 61.3 million, and € 10.9 million in indirect costs due to premature mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IO drugs introduction in Italy between 2008 and 2019 was associated with a significant decrease in deaths from each cancer and, consequently, in savings in indirect costs related to premature mortality.

Switching PD-1 to BRAF + MEK inhibition improves recurrence-free survival in patients receiving a second course of adjuvant melanoma therapy

BACKGROUND

PD-1 or BRAF + MEK inhibition is considered the current gold standard in adjuvant melanoma therapy. Little is known if, after the recurrence of the disease and surgery, a second course of adjuvant therapy might be beneficial.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective study investigating a second course of adjuvant therapy after recurrence and surgery in stage III-IV melanoma patients. Patients received nivolumab (NIV), pembrolizumab (PEM) or dabrafenib plus trametinib (D + T) between 01/2017 and 10/2021. The primary endpoint was 12-month recurrence-free survival (RFS2). Further analyses included descriptive and correlative statistics.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients from 22 centers in Germany, Austria and Switzerland were included. Thirty-two patients received D + T as second-course adjuvant therapy, 9 patients received PEM and 25 patients received NIV. Recurrence-free survival for the second-course adjuvant treatment (RFS2) was assessed after 12 and 24 months and showed a superiority of adjuvant BRAF + MEK over PD-1 therapy (12-months RFS2: 90.6% vs. 70.6%, HR 4.226 [95% CI 1.154-15.48]; p = 0.030; 24-months RFS2 71.9% vs. 52.9%, HR 3.154 [95% CI 1.374-7.242]; p = 0.007). There was no significant decrease in OS with either BRAF + MEK or PD-1 treatment (12-months OS: 100% both, 24-months OS: 100% vs. 93.8%). Furthermore, therapy sequences were investigated. For better comparability, only BRAF V600 mutated patients were assessed: RFS2 was significantly better for patients with a class switch from PD-1 to BRAF + MEK compared to BRAF + MEK to PD-1 (HR 4.401 (1.04-18.63), p = 0.044). No new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSION

In the investigated cohort, a second course of adjuvant melanoma treatment is feasible and provides similar RFS compared to an initial course of adjuvant therapy using BRAF + MEK inhibitors; however, RFS2 is reduced for PD-1 antibodies. In addition, both treatments were convincing with a 24-month OS of almost 100%. Switching from adjuvant PD-1 to BRAF + MEK treatment provided better overall RFS compared to switching from adjuvant BRAF + MEK to PD-1 treatment.

The prognostic value of halp score in predicting the efficacy of nivolumab treatment in metastatic malignant melanoma patients: A real-life, retrospective, single center analysis

Patients with metastatic malignant melanoma have a survival rate of less than one year. Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) receptor, has improved survival in patients without BRAF mutations. The HALP score, calculated from hemoglobin, albumin, lymphocyte, and platelet levels, provides information about a patient immune and nutritional status. High HALP scores have been associated with a better prognosis in various cancers. This study aimed to investigate the effect of high HALP scores on response to nivolumab treatment in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma. A retrospective study was conducted on 44 patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with nivolumab at Adana City Training and Research Hospital between 2014 and 2021. Patients who received dabrafenib-trametinib before nivolumab treatment were excluded. The HALP scores were calculated using laboratory parameters before the first nivolumab treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 25.0. The study included 22 female and 22 male patients with a mean age of 61.4 ± 15.6 years. Of the patients, 10 (27.2%) had a positive BRAF mutation, whereas 34 (77.3%) did not. The HALP score cutoff value was determined as 30.1. Patients with high HALP scores had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to those with low HALP scores (PFS: median 5.8 vs 3.1 months, P = .041; OS: median 54.9 vs 14.4 months, P = .005). In this study, we found that high HALP scores were significantly associated with longer PFS and OS in metastatic malignant melanoma patients receiving nivolumab treatment. HALP score was associated with both PFS and OS in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma treated with nivolumab. This immuno-nutritional parameter may be useful in various cancers; however, further prospective studies with larger patient cohorts are needed for clinical application.

Cardiac Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Adjuvant Setting: An FDA Pooled Analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment. By releasing blocks (checkpoints) on the immune system, they elicit powerful antitumor effects. Despite improving survival, ICIs are associated with serious cardiac toxicities. Previous reports have focused on advanced cancer; cardiotoxicity data are therefore limited in the curative setting. We evaluated ICI cardiotoxicity in the non-metastatic setting, where long-term cardiac safety is a growing public health concern.

METHODS

ICIs approved in the adjuvant setting were pooled and trials with combination chemotherapy were excluded. Cardiac adverse events (AEs) and emerging cardio-metabolic risks (hyperglycemia, weight gain, hypothyroidism) were assessed. The relative risk (RR) of cardiotoxicity was assessed.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials of atezolizumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab in multiple solid tumors were evaluated; among 9244 patients, 5338 received ICIs. No trial performed routine cardiac monitoring. Six percent of ICI patients vs. 4.6% in placebo (RR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04, 1.49) had a cardiac AE and 13 (0.2%) of ICI patients experienced a fatal cardiac AE (RR 4.76, 95% CI 1.07, 21.06). Older age and male sex were associated with a higher risk for cardiac fatality. Arrhythmia was the most common cardiac AE; hypothyroidism was more frequent (14% vs. 2.5%) among ICI-treated patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest pooled analysis of cardiac AEs associated with ICIs in the adjuvant setting. Despite no formalized testing for subclinical cardiotoxicity, ICI treatment increased cardiac AEs. These findings are relevant for long-term cancer survivors, clinicians, and particularly in new drug development, where cardiotoxicity may be substantially underestimated.

Monoclonal antibodies as adjuvant therapies for resected melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Systemic adjuvant therapy is indicated in patients with high-risk, resected melanoma to reduce recurrence risk and potentially improve survival rates. Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) target immune checkpoints and have made significant advances as systemic adjuvant therapies.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the main clinical trials that tested adjuvant mAbs in resected high-risk melanoma, including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1); in addition to newer immunotherapies being tested in the adjuvant setting, including anti-lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3). We also briefly discuss targeted therapies as an alternative choice. Moreover, we highlight the pros and cons of using mAbs in the adjuvant setting, the reported adverse events (AEs), and the quality of life impact. Finally, we report data related to biomarker studies tested in the context of these clinical trials.

EXPERT OPINION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to significantly improve relapse-free survival (RFS) as adjuvant therapy for high-risk melanoma. The long-term impact on overall survival (OS) was demonstrated in two trials that tested ipilimumab as compared to placebo (EORTC18071) and interferon-α (ECOG-ACRIN E1609). Furthermore, emerging data with neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery and adjuvant therapy utilizing ICIs have demonstrated improved outcomes in the management of locoregionally advanced disease when compared to upfront surgery followed by adjuvant therapy alone.

Clinical benefit of immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly cancer patients: Current evidence from immunosenescence pathophysiology to clinical trial results

The age-related decline in immunity appears to be associated not only with cancer development but also with differential responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Despite their increasing utility across various malignancies and therapeutic settings, limited data -derived primarily from subgroup analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), pooled meta-analyses, and retrospective studies- are available on the effects of aging on their efficacy and toxicity. Immunosenescence, characterized by the progressive decline of the function of the immune system, and inflammaging, a state of persistent low-grade sterile inflammation, may influence ICI outcomes. Additionally, the incidence, severity, and subtypes of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) may differ between older and younger individuals due to loss of immunotolerance. In the current review, starting from a a comprehensive discussion of the pathophysiology of immunosenescence, we proceed to critically review age-related retrospective and randomized evidence supporting FDA-approved ICIs. We highlight similarities or differences across age groups and the clinical benefit of ICIs in elderly versus younger cancer patients. The optimal integration of ICIs in geriatric oncology necessitates greater inclusion of this patient demographic in RCTs along with real-world data in order to acquire robust data which will guide evidence-based treatment decisions for this population.

Melanoma neoadjuvant treatment: review and update of recent trials

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is emerging as an effective approach for resectable stage III/IV melanoma, showing improvements in disease response and survival outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes findings from neoadjuvant treatment trials in melanoma patients. Using the PubMed search engine and including the keywords 'neoadjuvant,' 'immunotherapy,' and 'melanoma,' we selected 18 trials that showed efficacy in patients with melanoma, mainly testing checkpoint inhibitors alone or in combination. Across all trials examined, treatments showed objective disease responses, which frequently translated into improved disease-free survival.

EXPERT OPINION

Additional phase III studies comparing neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies are needed to establish the optimal standard of care. The variety of regimens and dosing schedules investigated highlights the need for further research to determine the most appropriate treatments in this clinical setting. Advances in the study of biomarkers that can identify specific subgroups of patients will guide future research in this field.

Adjuvant Anti-PD-1 Monotherapy Versus Observation for Stage III Acral Melanoma of the Sole: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japanese Patients

PURPOSE

Adjuvant anti-PD-1 (adj PD-1) antibodies are extensively used to improve survival in patients with resected melanoma. Clinical trials on adj PD-1 antibodies have revealed significant improvements in recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, few of these trials have included patients with acral melanoma (AM).

METHODS

Clinical data were retrospectively collected from Japanese patients who underwent resection of stage III sole AM between 2014 and 2021. Survival outcomes, including RFS, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS), were compared between patients without adjuvant therapy (OBS group) and those receiving adj PD-1 group.

RESULTS

This study included 139 patients (OBS: 79; adj PD-1: 60), with a median follow-up of 2.6 years. The baseline characteristics were comparable, except for age and nodal metastasis. No significant differences in survival were observed between the OBS and adj PD-1 groups (3-year RFS: 36.7% v 27.5%, P = .13; 3-year DMFS: 51.0% v 45.3%, P = .51; 3-year OS: 65.3% v 67.4%, P = .45). Multivariate analysis showed no survival benefit of adj PD-1 (RFS: hazard ratio [HR], 1.25, P = .29; DMFS: HR, 1.03, P = .89; and OS: HR, 0.69, P = .23). Each survival outcome after propensity score matching confirmed no significant difference between the matched OBS group (n = 52) and adj PD-1 group (n = 52; 3-year RFS: 34.3% v 25.9%, P = .22; 3-year DMFS: 45.6% v 46.5%, P = .85; 3-year OS: 60.7% v 68.9%, P = .29).

CONCLUSION

Adj PD-1 did not improve the prognosis in sole AM. However, further studies are essential to evaluate the efficacy of the adj anti-PD-1 antibody in AM.

Identification of the PROMs used to assess ICI toxicities and HRQoL in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in cancer care and their suitability: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the clinical identification of immunotherapy toxicities is a complex intervention. There has been very little work evaluating the clinical utility and generalisability of PROMs used after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment to date. We reviewed evidence on the use of PROMs assessing toxicities and health-related quality of life in patients treated with ICIs.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, the Cochrane Library were searched (January 2008 - October 2024). Quantitative studies reporting the use of PROMs to identify, assess and manage toxicities at any timepoint and HRQoL associated with ICI treatment in adult patients with cancer were included. A narrative synthesis describes the key characteristics of the PROMs identified.

RESULTS

43 studies were included; 12 on melanoma/skin, 12 on lung and 19 on other cancers. Study designs included 20 randomised controlled trials, 14 cohort studies, six cross-sectional studies and three non-randomised interventional trials. The lack of ICI-specific PROMs was highlighted, particularly as the PROMs used lacked sufficient sensitivity for ICI treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

There is need for an ICI-specific PROM for effective assessment of toxicities and a tailored PROM for assessment of HRQoL. Some suggested key domains by certain studies for ICI-specific PROMs include: (a) ICI-specific items (e.g. certain USD-I and PRO-CTCAE items) to capture symptoms associated with ICI treatments such as rash, myalgia, (b) role, psychological, emotional and social functioning domains within HRQoL assessments and (c) additional patient-reported toxicities not included in existing PROMs. Findings emphasize the importance of using a disease-specific PROM that is applicable, acceptable and sufficiently sensitive to identify toxicities and HRQoL issues across all stages.

Fixed-Dose Versus Weight-Adapted Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Melanoma: A Retrospective Monocentric Analysis of Efficacy and Immune-Related Adverse Events

Changes in the dosing schedules for immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in the treatment of metastatic melanoma, were introduced based on pharmacokinetic data and analysis of pre-existing clinical trial data in the absence of new clinical trials. Therefore, we sought to provide real-world data examining whether fixed-dose therapy (FDT) or weight-adapted therapy (WAT) influenced progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The electronic case notes of all patients (n = 77) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (ICI) in the first-line setting for melanoma in the Department of Dermatology, University of Luebeck, between the 1 January 2017 and the 31 December 2020, were retrospectively analysed. Although a higher proportion of patients in the WAT cohort were treated in the palliative setting, there were no correlations between dosing schedule, renal function, or BMI and PFS. Moreover, there were no differences between the cohorts in terms of PFS, OS, or the number and nature of irAEs. An elevated serum S100 concentration was associated with a decreased mean PFS in the FDT cohort (p < 0.001). This study, although inherently limited by its retrospective and monocentric nature, provides reassuring evidence that dosing schedule and pre-existing comorbidities do not influence efficacy or the irAE profile of ICI therapy in the management of melanoma.

Transcriptomic signatures in peripheral CD4+T-lymphocytes may reflect melanoma staging and immunotherapy responsiveness prior to ICI initiation

Background and purpose

Promoting adaptive immunity with ICIs has drastically improved melanoma prognosis, but not for all patients. Some cases relapse in the first few months, while others keep durable benefit, even after immunotherapy discontinuation. To identify cellular/molecular signatures in peripheral blood that could differentiate advanced from metastatic melanoma and predict dynamics for primary/secondary immune escape, we examined 100 consecutive patients with stage III/IV melanoma scheduled to start ICIs.

Materials and methods

At melanoma diagnosis, a multiparameter flow cytometric analysis and purification scheme using standard conjugated antibodies were performed for all individuals prior to ICI initiation. In each stage(III/IV) according to their RFS/PFS, we retrospectively selected the cases with the clearest clinical outcomes and focused our analysis on the extreme responders(n=7) and non-responders(n=7) to characterize the transcriptomes of circulating CD4+T-cells by bulk RNA-seq, Differential Expression Analysis(DEA)and Gene Ontology(GO)enrichment analysis. Based on our selected patient cohort, we examined for differentially expressed genes(DEGs)and key-pathways that appear preferentially activated in stage III vs. IV melanoma, and in long vs. short immunotherapy responders.

Results

Although circulating immune-cells did not numerically differ in both sets of analysis(staging and ICI responsiveness), DEA and GO data showed that patients could be clustered separately, identifying 189vs.92 DEGs in stage IV/III and 101vs.47 DEGs in early progressors/long responders. These DEGs were functionally implicated in distinct pathways. For metastatic cases: inflammatory response(logp-value=-9.2:ADGRE5/2,CYBA,GRN,HMOX1,IRF5,ITGAM), adaptive immunity(logp-value=-7.7:CD1C,CD74,CYBB,NCF2,CTSA,S100A8/9,BCL3,FCER1G), T-cell activation(logp-value=-6.3:BCL3,CD1C,CD74,FCER1G,FGL2)and lipid metabolism/catabolism(logp-value=-2.5/-2.6:ARF3,GPX1,MVD,OCRL,PCCB,CTSA,PNPLA2,NAGLU,GBA2,ABHD4); while in early-progressors to ICIs: immune effector processing(logp-value=-13.7:BCL6,FGR,HLA-DQA1/DQB1,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1/DRB5,NKG7,SLC11A1,TYROBP,SPON2,HAVCR2),PD-1(logp-value=-10.2:HLA-DQA1/DQB1,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1/DRB5)and IFN signaling(logp-value=-8.5: HLA-DQA1/DQB1,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1/DRB5,NCAM1,IFITM3),positive regulation of T-cell activation(logp-value=-7.7:BCL6,HLA-DQA1/DQB1,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1/DRB5,SASH3,HAVCR2)and CD28 co-stimulation(logp-value=-10.3:HLA-DQA1/DQB1,HLA-DRA,HLA-DRB1/DRB5), supporting an immune-mediated behavior.

Conclusions

Specific pathways and marker genes in the peripheral CD4+T-cells may predetermine melanoma staging and immunotherapy resistance.

Programmed Cell Death Ligand as a Biomarker for Response to Immunotherapy: Contribution of Mass Spectrometry-Based Analysis

Immune checkpoint inhibition is a major component in today's cancer immunotherapy. In recent years, the FDA has approved a number of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of melanoma, non-small-cell lung, breast and gastrointestinal cancers. These inhibitors, which target cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, programmed cell death (PD-1), and programmed cell death ligand (PD-L1) checkpoints have assumed a leading role in immunotherapy. The same inhibitors exert significant antitumor effects by overcoming tumor cell immune evasion and reversing T-cell exhaustion. The initial impact of this therapy in cancer treatment was justly described as revolutionary, however, clinical as well as research data which followed demonstrated that these innovative drugs are costly, are associated with potentially severe adverse effects, and only benefit a small subset of patients. These limitations encouraged enhanced research and clinical efforts to identify predictive biomarkers to stratify patients who are most likely to benefit from this form of therapy. The discovery and characterization of this class of biomarkers is pivotal in guiding individualized treatment against various forms of cancer. Currently, there are three FDA-approved predictive biomarkers, however, none of which on its own can deliver a reliable and precise response to immune therapy. Present literature identifies the absence of precise predictive biomarkers and poor understanding of the mechanisms behind tumor resistance as the main obstacles facing ICIs immunotherapy. In the present text, we discuss the dual role of PD-L1 as a biomarker for response to immunotherapy and as an immune checkpoint. The contribution of mass spectrometry-based analysis, particularly the impact of protein post-translational modifications on the performance of this protein is underlined.

An updated review on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis: epidemiology, pathogenesis, treatment strategies, and the role of traditional Chinese medicine

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced colitis (irColitis) is a common and severe adverse reaction to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), significantly impacting the treatment outcomes and quality of life of cancer patients. Epidemiological studies indicate that the incidence of irColitis is associated with factors such as the type of ICIs, the patient's gender, age, and medical history. Although the exact pathophysiology remains unclear, irColitis is thought to be related to immune system activation and dysregulation, gut microbiota imbalance, and impaired epithelial barrier function. This review summarized the epidemiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, and pathogenesis of irColitis. Additionally, the standard and novel therapeutic strategies of irColitis, including corticosteroids, biologics, and gut microbiota interventions, more importantly the potential and application of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM). Future researches call for deeper mechanistic investigations, the development of biomarkers, and reveal the integration of TCM therapies within individual immunotherapy frameworks.

Estimating Long-Term Survivorship Rates Among Patients With Resected Stage III/IV Melanoma: Analyses From CheckMate 238 and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 18071 Trials

PURPOSE

Standard-of-care treatments for patients with resected stage III/IV melanoma include the immuno-oncology (IO) agents nivolumab (NIVO) and ipilimumab (IPI). This study used mixture cure models (MCMs) to estimate cure rates among patients treated with NIVO or IPI in the phase III CheckMate 238 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02388906) and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 18071 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00636168) trials, and to assess the impact of use of adjuvant immunotherapy on cure rates versus watchful waiting.

METHODS

MCMs were applied to patient-level recurrence-free survival data from CheckMate 238 and EORTC 18071. Cured patients were assumed to experience no disease recurrence and mortality risks similar to the general population. Uncured patients were at risk of disease recurrence and all-cause death. The survival trend of the cured patients was estimated using life expectancy data for a general population with the same baseline demographic characteristics. A regression model assessed the odds ratios (ORs) of cure across key subgroups on the basis of baseline characteristics of the study populations.

RESULTS

In CheckMate 238, estimated cure rates were 48.3% (95% CI, 41.8 to 54.9) with NIVO and 38.2% (95% CI, 32.7 to 44.1) with IPI. In EORTC 18071, estimated cure rates were 38.0% (95% CI, 32.1 to 44.2) with IPI and 29.2% (95% CI, 24.4 to 34.6) with placebo. In the indirect comparison of the two trials, the odds of cure were significantly higher with NIVO than with placebo (OR, 2.33 [95% CI, 1.49 to 3.65]).

CONCLUSION

Analyses involving two large phase III trials investigating adjuvant IO treatment for resected melanoma demonstrate higher cure rates for both NIVO and IPI than placebo, with NIVO providing the highest cure rate. Similar cure rates were estimated for patients treated with IPI in both trials, despite staging and dosing differences.

Real-World Evidence of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Stage III and IV Melanoma Patients: CADIM Trial Final Results. Experience from 2 Tertiary Referral Centers

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials have validated the use of nivolumab and pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapies regarding relapse-free survival in patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma. Evidence in real-world patients is currently limited.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The CADIM trial (Characterization of adjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma patients) recruited a total of 81 patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma on nivolumab or pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy from February 2018 through December 2022.

RESULTS

The stage distribution rate was 81.5% (n=71) for stage III, while 15 patients (18.5%) had resected stage IV. Among stage III patients, 38 were stage IIIC (46.9%). With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 84% at one year and 81.5% at 2 years. The overall survival rate was 99% at one year and 91.4% at 2 years. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 12.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the results of resected stage III and IV melanoma patients on adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1, and eventually confirmed the safety and efficacy profile described by clinical trials. Comparing clinical trial data with real-world evidence is necessary for a more practical, reliable, and accessible use of these drugs.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma: pathological response as a surrogate endpoint?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review evaluates by analyzing recent studies whether pathological complete response (pCR) can be used as a reliable surrogate marker for overall survival (OS) in melanoma treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Trials like Neo-Combi, Neo-Trio and COMBI-Neo show that pCR is crucial for long-term success in targeted therapy for melanoma, while studies like OpACIN-neo and SWOG S1801 demonstrate that immunotherapy can provide durable benefits even with partial responses. Findings from NADINA and the INMC analysis highlight that immunotherapy achieves higher pathologic response rates and improved survival outcomes, offering broader benefits compared to the pCR-dependent outcomes of targeted therapy.

SUMMARY

pCR serves as a critical prognostic biomarker across cancer types, with strong validation in breast cancer where it predicts long-term survival, particularly in aggressive subtypes like triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. In melanoma, pCR is gaining prominence as a surrogate marker in neoadjuvant therapies, with its predictive value varying between targeted treatments - where achieving pCR is essential - and immunotherapies, which provide durable survival benefits even with partial responses. Despite its potential, the role of pCR as a universally reliable surrogate endpoint in melanoma requires further validation through cancer-specific studies to ensure accurate treatment guidance and personalized care.

Is there still a place for lymph node dissection for stage III melanoma since the approval of adjuvant therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to explore the evolving management strategies for stage III melanoma, focusing on the comparative effectiveness of traditional surgical approaches like complete lymph node dissection (CLND) versus modern adjuvant therapies. It also examines the latest evidence on the efficacy, risks, and complications of these strategies, emphasizing the role of shared decision-making between patients and clinicians.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent clinical trials and meta-analyses, including the MSLT-II and DeCOG-SLT studies, have demonstrated that CLND may not significantly improve survival outcomes in melanoma patients with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB)-positive status. Instead, a shift towards observation combined with adjuvant therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies (for BRAF-mutant melanoma) has been observed. These approaches have been associated with similar or improved recurrence-free survival rates and reduced treatment-related complications. However, challenges remain in establishing standardized protocols for adjuvant therapy use.

SUMMARY

The management of stage III melanoma is rapidly transitioning from routine CLND towards a more individualized approach that incorporates active surveillance and adjuvant therapies based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors. Multidisciplinary discussions are essential to guide treatment decisions, and further research is required to develop clear, evidence-based protocols.

Challenges and opportunities of predicting overall survival benefit from improvements to recurrence-free survival in stage II/III melanoma: a correlation meta-analysis

Background

We evaluated the association between treatment effects on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying resected stage II/III melanoma.

Methods

Hazard ratios (HRs) of RFS and OS were obtained from a literature review. Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis (BRMA) and weighted linear regression (WLR) models estimated correlations [95% confidence interval (CI)] between HRRFS and HROS. Slopes and intercepts of surrogacy equations were estimated. Surrogate threshold effect was derived from WLR for various sample sizes. Validity and predictive performance of WLR were assessed using leave-one-out cross-validation. Sensitivity analyses evaluated impact of RCTs violating proportional hazards assumption, publication year, treatments' mechanism of action, and cancer stage.

Results

Across 30 RCTs, treatments included interferon-α (n = 17), other immunotherapy-containing regimens (n = 10), immune checkpoint inhibitors (n = 3), and targeted therapies (n = 2). BRMA (0.68, 95% CI 0.45-0.82) and WLR (0.71, 95% CI 0.42-0.87) estimated moderate correlation between HRRFS and HROS. Surrogate threshold effect was 0.66/0.68 for studies with 800/1000 patients. Slope coefficients were statistically significant in both models (95% CI 0.09-0.61 BRMA; 95% CI 0.41-0.92 WLR). The 95% prediction intervals around the HROS predicted by WLR accurately contained 29/31 (93.5%) of observed HROS. Across sensitivity analyses correlations ranged between 0.69 and 0.84 (BRMA) and 0.55 and 0.77 (WLR).

Conclusions

Statistically meaningful correlation between HRRFS and HROS can assist earlier predictions of OS benefit from improvements in RFS for RCTs in resected stage II/III melanoma and provide insights for the earlier evaluation of emerging therapies. Primary model predictions should be approached with caution as nearly half of the evidence base comprised interferon-α trials.

[Translated article] Real-World Evidence of Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Resected Stage III and IV Melanoma Patients: CADIM Trial Final Results. Experience From 2 Tertiary Referral Centers

INTRODUCTION

Clinical trials have validated the use of nivolumab and pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapies regarding relapse-free survival in patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma. Evidence in real-world patients is currently limited.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The CADIM trial (characterization of adjuvant immunotherapy in melanoma patients) recruited a total of 81 patients with resected stage III and IV melanoma on nivolumab or pembrolizumab as adjuvant therapy from February 2018 to December 2022.

RESULTS

The stage distribution rate was 81.5% (n=71) for stage III, while 15 patients (18.5%) had resected stage IV. Among stage III patients, 38 were stage IIIC (46.9%). With a median follow-up of 22.8 months, the relapse-free survival in the intention-to-treat population was 84% at one year and 81.5% at 2 years. The overall survival rate was 99% at one year and 91.4% at 2 years. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were reported in 12.3% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows the results of resected stage III and IV melanoma patients on adjuvant therapy with anti-PD-1, and eventually confirmed the safety and efficacy profile described by clinical trials. Comparing clinical trial data with real-world evidence is necessary for a more practical, reliable, and accessible use of these drugs.

Immune-related encephalitis after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer treatment but can trigger immune-related encephalitis. We report one of the largest case series of patients with immune-related encephalitis and review of the literature.

METHODS

Retrospective series of patients with immune-related encephalitis and literature review.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients with cancer treated with ICI (50% combination therapy) developed immune-related encephalitis. Diagnostic testing revealed cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) lymphocytic pleocytosis (85%) and elevated protein (69%), abnormal brain magnetic resonance imaging(MRI) (33%) or brain FDG-PET (25%), electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormalities (30%), and autoantibodies (31%). Encephalitis treatment included: corticosteroids (86%), intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) (36%), plasmapheresis (7%), and rituximab (29%). There were no deaths and 12 patients had significant recovery, although long-term complications were observed. All patients discontinued ICI. Longitudinal follow-up demonstrated anti-cancer response to ICI at 3 months (85%) and 6 months post-ICI initiation (77%). A literature review identified 132 patients with immune-related encephalitis. Most were treated with PD-1 inhibitors (18% combination). Common abnormalities included elevated CSF protein (84%) or pleocytosis (77%), abnormal brain MRI (65%), or autoantibodies (47%). Nearly all were treated with corticosteroids, many required additional therapy with IVIg (26%) or rituximab (12%). Most patients had clinical improvement (81%) but a minority (10%) had a clinical relapse after completing corticosteroid taper. ICIs were resumed in 7 patients (5%), with relapse in 3.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Immune-related encephalitis is treatable and improves with corticosteroids in most cases but may require additional immunosuppression. Re-emergence of encephalitis is rare and does not typically result in adverse outcomes, and this should be considered in neurological immune-related adverse event management guidelines.

Adjuvant Immunotherapy After Resected Melanoma: Survival Outcomes, Prognostic Factors and Patterns of Relapse

BACKGROUND

Anti-PD-1-based immunotherapy has improved outcomes in stage IIB to IV resected melanoma patients in clinical trials. However, little is known about real-world outcomes, prognostic factors and patterns of relapse.

METHODS

This is a retrospective multicenter observational study including patients with resected melanoma treated with subsequent anti-PD-1-based adjuvant immunotherapy. Data on clinical and demographic characteristics, delivered treatment, prognostic factors, time and pattern of relapse were collected.

RESULTS

We included 245 patients from eight centers; 4% of patients were at stage IIB-C, 80% at stage IIIA-D and 16% at stage IV. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates at 18 and 36 months were 60% and 48%, respectively, with a median RFS of 33.7 months. Prognostic factors associated with recurrence were melanoma primary site (HR 2.64, 95% CI 1.15-6.01) and starting adjuvant therapy more than 12 weeks after the last resection (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.5); presence of serious immune-related adverse events was associated with better RFS (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.19-0.87). Early relapses accounted for 63% of the total recurrences, with a higher number of metastatic sites (18%); in contrast, late relapses presented more frequently with brain metastases (20%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our patients with resected melanoma who underwent anti-PD-1-based adjuvant immunotherapy, survival outcomes were worse than those reported in clinical trials. Primary melanoma site and time interval between the last resection and the start of adjuvant therapy were associated with survival.

Predictors of survival in immunotherapy-based treatments in advanced melanoma: a meta-analysis

The introduction of immunotherapy-based strategies has significantly improved the prognosis for melanoma patients. Nevertheless, some patients still have dismal outcomes, emphasizing the significance of survival predictive indicators in immunotherapy-based approaches. We systematically searched randomized controlled clinical trials investigating dual immunotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy versus placebo or mono-immunotherapy or chemotherapy alone in advanced melanoma patients. R version 4.3.0. was employed to perform all analyses. A comprehensive analysis was conducted on a total of 13,809 patients with advanced melanoma from 19 randomized clinical trials. Immunotherapy-based strategies (alone or in combination) could significantly lengthen the overall survival(OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) compared with corresponding controls. Mono-immunotherapy improved RFS and OS in PD-L1 positive patients, in stage AJCC IIIC, and with 4 or more positive lymph nodes, compared with chemotherapy. Combined immunotherapy statistically improved RFS and OS in those aged < 65, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status of 0, and LDH ≤ ULN at baseline compared with single treatment alone. Our findings indicated that certain clinicopathological and molecular features could assist in choosing appropriate melanoma patients for immune-based treatments.

From trials to practice: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for melanoma patients in Norway

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Norway has one of the highest rates of cutaneous melanoma (CM) incidence and mortality globally. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for CM was introduced between 2014 and 2017 to improve treatment and patient prognosis, but knowledge about its clinical usage is limited. This study investigates patient's characteristics and treatment patterns in real-world practice compared to clinical trial results.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All adult (≥18) CM patients treated with ICI therapy in Norway from 2014 to 2021 were included, utilizing high-coverage data from multiple national registries to describe patients' health, socioeconomic factors, and treatment management, stratified by first ICI therapy. We compared patient and tumour characteristics with findings from five randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

RESULTS

Among 2,083 patients receiving ICI therapy, 975 (47%) received nivolumab as their first treatment in the metastatic setting. Patients on combination therapy were younger and had higher education and income levels compared to those on monotherapy. Overall, real-world patients were older and had a higher incidence of brain metastases than those in RCTs. Approximately, 1 in 5 patients would have been excluded from RCTs due to pre-existing autoimmune diseases. Targeted therapy was the most common secondary systemic treatment after first-line PD-1 inhibitors.

INTERPRETATION

This study details ICI therapy in Norway, highlighting differences between real-world ICI users and clinical trial participants, raising questions about the effectiveness of this treatment for patients not eligible for trials.

Cancer immunotherapy response persists after lymph node resection

Lymphatic transport facilitates the presentation of cancer antigens in tumor-draining lymph nodes (tdLNs), leading to T cell activation and the generation of systemic antitumor immune surveillance. Surgical removal of LNs to control cancer progression is routine in clinical practice. However, whether removing tdLNs impairs immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) is still controversial. Our analysis demonstrates that melanoma patients remain responsive to PD-1 checkpoint blockade after LN dissection. We were able to recapitulate the persistent response to ICB after complete LN resection in murine melanoma and mammary carcinoma models. Mechanistically, soluble antigen and antigen-carrying migratory dendritic cells are diverted to non-directly tumor draining LNs (non-tdLNs) after tdLN dissection. Consistently, robust ICB responses in patients with head and neck cancer after primary tumor and tdLN resection correlated with the presence of reactive LNs in distant areas. These findings indicate that non-tdLNs sufficiently compensate for the removal of direct tdLNs and sustain the response to ICB.

Precision Oncology in Melanoma: Changing Practices

Over the last 2 decades, significant progress has been made in our understanding of the genomics, tumor immune microenvironment, and immunogenicity of malignant melanoma. Historically, the prognosis for metastatic melanoma was poor because of limited treatment options. However, after multiple landmark clinical trials displaying the efficacy of combined BRAF/MEK inhibition for BRAF-mutant melanoma and the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed death-1, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4, and lymphocyte activation gene-3 molecules, overall survival rates have dramatically improved. The role of immune checkpoint inhibition has since expanded to the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings with multiple regimens in routine use. Personalized therapies, including tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes that are extracted from a patient's melanoma and eventually reinfused into the patient, and messenger RNA vaccines used to target neoantigens unique to a patient's tumor, show promise. Improvements in accompanying imaging modalities, particularly within the field of nuclear medicine, have allowed for more accurate staging of disease and assessment of treatment response. Continued growth in the role of nuclear medicine in the evaluation of melanoma, including the incorporation of artificial intelligence into image interpretation and use of radiolabeled tracers allowing for intricate imaging of the tumor immune microenvironment, is expected in the coming years.

[Serious adverse effects with immunotherapies for the treatment of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and renal cell carcinoma: Real-world evidence study]

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are a key component of standard anticancer systemic therapy. While their immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) have been widely described, there are few data on grade≥3 irAEs. The primary aim of our descriptive study was to evaluate their incidence and characteristics.

METHODS

An observational, retrospective, monocentric study was conducted. It included patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer or renal cell carcinoma who initiated ICI therapy between 2016-2021 and experienced at least one grade≥3 irAEs coded according to the MedDRA® system.

RESULTS

All cancer types and ICIs combined, the incidence of grade≥3 irAEs was estimated at 11.7% [9.6-13.9]. These were mainly hepatobiliary (22%), gastrointestinal (17%), musculoskeletal (16%) and respiratory (16%) disorders. They occurred on average 6.2±6.2 months after the start of treatment, resulting in hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization in over 40 and 20% of cases, respectively. Resolution without sequelae was observed in 56% of cases, but four patients died.

DISCUSSION

This real-world study investigated three cancers and several ICIs, unlike previously published studies that focused on a single cancer and/or one ICI. It provides a better understanding of grade≥3 irAEs, most of which are reversible, which an aim to optimize patient care.

Immune checkpoint inhibition of metastatic melanoma: achieving high efficacy in the face of high toxicity

INTRODUCTION

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have advanced the treatment of metastatic melanoma by blocking immune system down-regulators enhancing T-cell-mediated anti-tumor responses. However, many ICIs induce immune-related adverse effects (irAEs) that can impact many organ systems.

AREAS COVERED

Strategies used to manage irAEs include corticosteroids, anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) agents, other biological therapies, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), and emerging regimens. In this review, we describe current evidence for the efficacy of ICIs, acute and chronic immune toxicities, and strategies to manage toxicities for patients treated with ICIs.

EXPERT OPINION

IrAE management will likely evolve by developing more tailored approaches to prevent toxicities, improving non-steroidal management strategies and tailoring the dose of steroids, and identifying biomarkers of severe toxicities.

Nanomedicines modulate the tumor immune microenvironment for cancer therapy

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the evolution of immunotherapy as a means to trigger a robust antitumor immune response has revolutionized cancer treatment. Despite its potential, the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy is hindered by low response rates and significant systemic side effects. Nanotechnology emerges as a promising frontier in shaping the future of cancer immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

This review elucidates the pivotal role of nanomedicine in reshaping the immune tumor microenvironment and explores innovative strategies pursued by diverse research groups to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. It discusses the hurdles encountered in cancer immunotherapy and the application of nanomedicine for small molecule immune modulators and nucleic acid therapeutics. It also highlights the advancements in DNA and mRNA vaccines facilitated by nanotechnology and outlines future trajectories in this evolving field.

EXPERT OPINION

Collectively, the integration of nanomedicine into cancer immunotherapy stands as a promising avenue to tackle the intricacies of the immune tumor microenvironment. Innovations such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and cancer vaccines have shown promise. Future developments will likely optimize nanoparticle design through artificial intelligence and create biocompatible, multifunctional nanoparticles, promising more effective, personalized, and durable cancer treatments, potentially transforming the field in the foreseeable future.

When to stop immunotherapy for advanced melanoma: the emulated target trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated their efficacy with a 7.5-year overall survival (OS) close to 50% for advanced stages. The design of clinical trials provides for treatment until progression or toxicity, or for a maximum duration of two years. Prolonged follow-up of responders after treatment cessation shows sustained response and a low risk of relapse in the months following cessation. To date, the optimal duration of anti-PD-1 therapy for metastatic melanoma remains unestablished. The objective of this work was to evaluate the optimal duration of ICI administration.

Methods

We emulated target trials using the cloning, weighting and censoring approach. Each emulation trial aimed to compare the effect of discontinuing versus continuing ICIs at a specific timepoint, among patients still under treatment and with disease control at that time. Patients were from MelBase between 2015 and 2021.

Findings

435 participants in the MelBase cohort were eligible and were included in the 6-month discontinuation emulated trial. The results showed significantly lower OS when treatment was discontinued, than when treatment was prolonged for at least three months. The 48-month survival difference was 37.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 19.8-60.5), and the corresponding restricted mean survival time difference was 8.3 months (95% CI: 4.1-12.7). Neither the 12-month nor the 18-month discontinuation emulated trials showed evidence of benefit of either discontinuing or continuing ICIs at either of these timepoints. The 24-month discontinuation emulated trial results were more in favor of discontinuing than continuing treatment at that time point, with an absolute 48-month survival rate that was 10.5% higher (95% CI 4.4-18.1).

Interpretation

These results suggest that a one-year course of immunotherapy is both necessary and sufficient for patients with advanced melanoma. Prolonged treatment beyond 2 years does not appear to be beneficial in terms of survival and could even be detrimental.

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp Dhome, Pierre Fabre, Novartis, Sun Pharm, Regeneron, Sanofi, Nektar, Therapeutics and Oncyte.

Monitoring circulating tumor DNA liquid biopsy in stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma patients undergoing adjuvant treatment

BACKGROUND

The introduction of adjuvant therapies for patients with resected cutaneous melanoma (CM) has increased the need for sensitive biomarkers for risk stratification and disease monitoring. This study aims to investigate the utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assessment in predicting and reflecting disease status during adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 32 patients with resected BRAF-mutated stage III CM receiving adjuvant targeted therapy or immunotherapy. Plasma samples of patients were collected at the baseline (treatment initiation) and during the therapy, and BRAF-mutated ctDNA was quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR).

RESULTS

Baseline ctDNA was detected in 11/32 (34.4%) patients and predicted postoperative high risk of relapse [HR 3.79, 95% CI 1.20-12.00, p = 0.023]. The three-year overall survival (OS) rate was 54.6% (95% CI 22.9-77.9) versus 95% (95% CI 69.5-99.3) in ctDNA-positive and negative groups, respectively, with significantly worse OS for ctDNA-positive patients [HR 7.92, 95% CI 1.56-40.36, p = 0.013]. Among the baseline ctDNA-positive group (high-risk patients), longitudinal ctDNA detection during adjuvant therapy reflected the clinical outcomes. Only non-relapsing patients cleared their plasma ctDNA by the end of the treatment, while persistent ctDNA detection provided early evidence of disease recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

ctDNA detection shows promising results in the post-operative setting for identifying cutaneous melanoma patients at the highest risk of relapse and for real-time monitoring of patients' clinical status and treatment response.

Surgical Textbook Outcomes in the Era of Neoadjuvant Systemic Treatment for Skin Cancers

Recent years have brought new, highly effective systemic treatments to clinical practice, which can be used to treat patients with locally advanced or metastatic skin cancers. Using these regimens in neoadjuvant strategy influences surgical treatment by facilitating surgical resection, avoiding extensive resections with complex reconstructions and even omitting surgery in some cases. Integrating systemic therapy with surgery is ongoing and requires novel quality measures of surgical treatment to capture the clinical benefits of multidisciplinary strategies better. The Textbook Outcome (TO) is a novel measure of surgical quality, which captures the short-term outcomes of surgery and reflects long-term survival. Textbook Outcomes match a particular type of surgery, are intuitive to interpret, and may be widely applied in surgical oncology and general surgery. Therefore, this review aims to describe recent findings on neoadjuvant skin cancer treatment and their implications for surgical proceedings in the context of Textbook Outcomes.

Final Results for Adjuvant Dabrafenib plus Trametinib in Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

The 5-year results of this trial showed that adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib resulted in longer relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with BRAF V600-mutated stage III melanoma. Longer-term data were needed, including data regarding overall survival.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 870 patients with resected stage III melanoma with BRAF V600 mutations to receive 12 months of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2 mg once daily) or two matched placebos. Here, we report the final results of this trial, including results for overall survival, melanoma-specific survival, relapse-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival.

RESULTS

The median duration of follow-up was 8.33 years for dabrafenib plus trametinib and 6.87 years for placebo. Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo, although the benefit was not significant (hazard ratio for death, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.01; P = 0.06 by stratified log-rank test). A consistent survival benefit was seen across several prespecified subgroups, including the 792 patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58 to 0.96). Relapse-free survival favored dabrafenib plus trametinib over placebo (hazard ratio for relapse or death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.63), as did distant metastasis-free survival (hazard ratio for distant metastasis or death, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.71). No new safety signals were reported, a finding consistent with previous trial reports.

CONCLUSIONS

After nearly 10 years of follow-up, adjuvant therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib was associated with better relapse-free survival and distant metastasis-free survival than placebo among patients with resected stage III melanoma. The analysis of overall survival showed that the risk of death was 20% lower with combination therapy than with placebo, but the benefit was not significant. Among patients with melanoma with a BRAF V600E mutation, the results suggest that the risk of death was 25% lower with combination therapy. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; COMBI-AD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01682083; EudraCT number, 2012-001266-15.).

Neoadjuvant Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in Resectable Stage III Melanoma

BACKGROUND

In phase 1-2 trials in patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was more efficacious than adjuvant immunotherapy.

METHODS

In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma to two cycles of neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by surgery or surgery followed by 12 cycles of adjuvant nivolumab. Only patients in the neoadjuvant group with a partial response or nonresponse received adjuvant treatment. The primary end point was event-free survival.

RESULTS

A total of 423 patients underwent randomization. At a median follow-up of 9.9 months, the estimated 12-month event-free survival was 83.7% (99.9% confidence interval [CI], 73.8 to 94.8) in the neoadjuvant group and 57.2% (99.9% CI, 45.1 to 72.7) in the adjuvant group. The difference in restricted mean survival time was 8.00 months (99.9% CI, 4.94 to 11.05; P<0.001; hazard ratio for progression, recurrence, or death, 0.32; 99.9% CI, 0.15 to 0.66). In the neoadjuvant group, 59.0% of patients had a major pathological response, 8.0% had a partial response, 26.4% had a nonresponse (>50% residual viable tumor), and 2.4% had progression; in 4.2%, surgery had not yet been performed or was omitted. The estimated 12-month recurrence-free survival was 95.1% in patients in the neoadjuvant group who had a major pathological response, 76.1% among those with a partial response, and 57.0% among those with a nonresponse. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher that were related to systemic treatment occurred in 29.7% of patients in the neoadjuvant group and in 14.7% in the adjuvant group.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with resectable, macroscopic stage III melanoma, neoadjuvant ipilimumab plus nivolumab followed by surgery and response-driven adjuvant therapy resulted in longer event-free survival than surgery followed by adjuvant nivolumab. (Funded by Bristol Myers Squibb and others; NADINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04949113.).

Reporting of late-onset immune-related adverse events with immune checkpoint inhibitors in VigiBase

BACKGROUND

To date, evidence on late-onset immune-related adverse events (irAEs) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is limited to a small number of clinical cases. This study aimed to identify drug- and patient-related characteristics potentially associated with the reporting of late-onset irAEs with ICIs in VigiBase, the WHO global database of individual case safety reports (ICSRs).

METHODS

Observational study comparing deduplicated ICSRs with ICIs reporting late-onset irAEs (occurred >90 days after ICI discontinuation) versus ICSRs with ICIs not reporting late-onset irAEs, collected in VigiBase from 2011 to December 31, 2022. Logistic regression was used to model the relationship between drug-related and patient-related characteristics of ICSRs and the reporting of late-onset irAEs. Significance was determined for variables with the lower bound of the 95% CI of the reporting OR (ROR) higher than 1 and a p value <0.05.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 6006 ICSRs with ICI-related irAEs (4574, 76.2%, originated from Europe; 3900, 64.9%, involved males; median patient age was 67 years, IQR 59-74 years). Of these, 344 (5.7%) ICSRs reported a total of 388 late-onset irAEs, among which the most frequent were thyroiditis (n=45), pneumonitis (n=37), interstitial lung disease (n=25), hepatitis (n=23) and vitiligo (n=19). Median time to onset since ICI discontinuation was 167 days (IQR 115-294 days), with negligible proportion (3.2%) of co-reported antineoplastic agents during the discontinuation period. Logistic regression models showed disproportionate reporting of late-onset irAEs with ICI combination therapy (ROR 2.33, 95% CI 1.19 to 4.57), reporting of multiple irAEs (ROR 3.96, 95% CI 2.85 to 5.52), reporting of cutaneous irAEs (ROR 1.83, 95% CI 1.24 to 2.71), and melanoma (ROR 1.47, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This global pharmacovigilance study provides the largest case series of late-onset irAEs with ICIs to date and identifies characteristics of ICSRs associated with disproportionate reporting. Dedicated prospective observational studies focused on long-term sequelae, quality of life and survival of patients developing late-onset irAEs with ICIs should be planned to confirm whether these reporting characteristics are predictors of actual occurrence. Furthermore, translational research should be encouraged to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying late-onset irAE development.

Seven-year analysis of adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in stage III melanoma in the EORTC1325 / KEYNOTE-054 trial

In the previously reported primary analyses of this phase 3 trial, 12 months of adjuvant pembrolizumab resulted in significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) than placebo in patients with resected high risk stage III melanoma. Stability of these benefits when the median follow-up was 3.5 and 5 years was published. Here we report results with a longer follow-up.

METHODS

We randomized 1019 patients to receive pembrolizumab 200 mg or placebo, intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 18 doses. RFS in the overall population and in the subgroup of patients with melanoma positive for the PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) were co-primary endpoints. DMFS in these two populations was a secondary and progression/recurrence-free survival 2 (PRFS2) an exploratory endpoint.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 6.9 years. In the overall intention-to-treat population, RFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.63, 95 % CI 0.53 to 0.74). RFS at 7 years was 50 % (95 % CI 46 % to 55 %) in the pembrolizumab and 36 % (95 % CI 32 % to 41 %) in the placebo group. Positive effects were present both for loco-regional recurrences and distant metastases, and across substages IIIA-IIIB-IIIC, and PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative as well as for BRAF mutant and BRAF wild type populations. DMFS was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.64, 95 % CI 0.54 to 0.76). DMFS at 7 years was 54 % (95 % CI 50 % to 59 %) in the pembrolizumab and 42 % (95 % CI 37 % to 46 %) in the placebo group. PRFS2 was longer in the pembrolizumab group than in the placebo group (HR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.57 to 0.84). PRFS2 at 7 years was 61 % (95 % CI 57 % to 66 %) in the pembrolizumab and 53 % (95 % CI 49 % to 57 %) in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-year analysis of adjuvant therapy with pembrolizumab demonstrated a sustained improvement in the long-term RFS, DMFS and PRFS2 compared with placebo in patients with resected stage III melanoma.

Adjuvant immunotherapy in older patients with stage III and resected stage IV melanoma: Toxicity and recurrence-free survival outcomes from the Dutch melanoma treatment registry

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy improves relapse free survival in stage III melanoma, but also leads to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Older patients are of particular interest due to comorbidities and frailty, which may impact their ability to tolerate irAEs and benefit from anti-PD-1 therapy. This study aimed to explore associations between clinical parameters and the occurrence of grade ≥ 3 irAEs and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in older patients with radically resected stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy.

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 65 with resected stage III/IV cutaneous melanoma treated with adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy between 2018 and 2022 were selected using real-world data from the nationwide Dutch Melanoma Treatment Registry (DMTR). A univariate and multivariable logistic regression was used to compare determinants of grade ≥ 3 irAEs, and univariate and multivariable Cox-proportional hazard models were fitted to identify factors influencing RFS.

RESULTS

The study included 885 patients, with 280 aged 75 and older. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 15.5 % in the 65-74 age group and 13.9 % in the ≥ 75 age group. No significant correlation was found between age and grade ≥ 3 irAEs. However, an increasing number of comorbidities was associated with a higher risk of grade ≥ 3 irAEs (multivariable analyses: OR 1.83, 95 % C.I. 0.99-3.40). The 1-year RFS rate of 80.0 % of this study was comparable to those reported in previous registration trials and real-world data. Having ≥ 3 comorbidities was significantly associated with a decrease in RFS (HR: 1.68, 95 % C.I. 1.15-2.44).

CONCLUSION

Older patients had similar benefit of adjuvant immunotherapy compared to older subgroups in previous trials. However, patients with multiple comorbidities were at increased risk of grade ≥ 3 irAEs and had a lower RFS. This should be considered when deciding upon adjuvant treatment.

Disparities in Receipt of Adjuvant Immunotherapy among Stage III Melanoma Patients

OBJECTIVE

Melanoma survival has greatly improved with the advent of immunotherapy, but unequal access to these medications may exist due to nonmedical patient factors such as insurance status, educational background, and geographic proximity to treatment.

METHODS

We used the National Cancer Database to assess patients with nonmetastatic cutaneous melanoma who underwent surgical resection and sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) with tumor involvement from 2015 to 2020. We evaluated rates of adjuvant immunotherapy among this patient population based on patient, tumor, and facility variables, including insurance status, socioeconomic status, pathologic stage (IIIA-IIID), and treatment facility type and volume.

RESULTS

Adjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved survival for stage III melanoma, with a slight increase in 5-year OS for stage IIIA (87.9% vs. 85.9%, P=0.044) and a higher increase in stages IIIB-D disease (70.3% vs. 59.6%, P<0.001). Receipt of adjuvant immunotherapy was less likely for patients who were older, low socioeconomic status, or uninsured. Low-volume and community cancer centers had higher rates of adjuvant immunotherapy overall for all stage III patients, whereas high-volume and academic centers used adjuvant immunotherapy much less often for stage IIIA patients compared with those in stages IIIB-D.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrate inconsistent use of adjuvant immunotherapy among patients with stage III melanoma despite a significant association with improved survival. Notably, there was a lower use of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients of lower SES and those treated at high-volume centers. Equity in access to novel standards of care represents an opportunity to improve outcomes for patients with melanoma.

Outcomes With Postrecurrence Systemic Therapy Following Adjuvant Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment for Resected Melanoma in CheckMate 238

PURPOSE

In phase III CheckMate 238, adjuvant nivolumab significantly improved recurrence-free survival compared with ipilimumab in patients with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma without a significant difference in overall survival (OS). Here, we investigate progression-free survival (PFS) and OS after postrecurrence systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 15 years or older with resected stage IIIB-C/IV melanoma were stratified by stage and tumor PD-L1 status and randomly assigned to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or ipilimumab 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks for four doses and then every 12 weeks for 1 year or until disease recurrence, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Patients with recurrence in each group were assessed for PFS and OS from subsequent systemic therapy (SST) initiation per recurrence timing (≤12 months [early] v >12 months [late] from initial therapy).

RESULTS

Recurrences occurred in 198 (44%) of 453 nivolumab-treated patients (122 early, 76 late) and 232 (51%) of 453 ipilimumab-treated patients (160 early, 72 late). Median PFS on next-line systemic therapy for nivolumab-treated patients recurring early versus late was 4.7 versus 12.4 months (24-month rates, 16% v 31%); median OS was 19.8 versus 42.8 months (24-month rates: 37% v 73%). In response to subsequent therapy, patients on nivolumab with late versus early recurrence were more likely to benefit from anti-PD-1 monotherapy. Nivolumab-treated patients with either an early or late recurrence benefitted from an ipilimumab-based therapy or targeted therapy, each with similar OS.

CONCLUSION

Postrecurrence survival was longer for patients who recurred >12 months. Patients on nivolumab who recurred early benefitted from SST but had better survival with ipilimumab-based regimens or targeted therapy compared with anti-PD-1 monotherapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Pre-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Setting: A Glimpse Beyond the Liver

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for most patients with non-metastatic HCC. In recent years, the management of patients with HCC has considerably changed, thanks to the improvement of molecular biology knowledge and the introduction of immunotherapy. To date, systemic therapy is authorized in the Western world only in patients with advanced HCC. However, this therapy could not only stabilize the tumour disease or improve survival but could display excellent response and lead to downstaging of the tumour that finally permits LT. There are increasing reports of patients that have performed LT after pretreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, due to the intrinsic mechanism of ICIs, graft rejection might be favoured. In addition, chronic adverse effects affecting other organs may also appear after the end of therapy. This review aims to evaluate the readiness and outcomes of LT in patients with advanced HCC who have previously undergone treatment with ICIs. It seeks to identify the challenges, risks, and benefits associated with this conversion therapy. The integration of ICIs into the treatment paradigm for advanced HCC necessitates a nuanced approach to LT. While early evidence supports the feasibility of LT following ICIs therapy, there is an urgent need for standardized guidelines and more extensive longitudinal studies to optimize patient selection, timing, and post-transplant management.

Immunotherapy after progression to double immunotherapy: pembrolizumab and lenvatinib versus conventional chemotherapy for patients with metastatic melanoma after failure of PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition

Background

Programmed cell death 1 receptor (PD-1) inhibition as monotherapy followed by Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibition in case of progression or as upfront double co-inhibition has drastically improved the survival outcomes of metastatic melanoma. Still, many patients develop primary or acquired resistance to both agents, relapse soon, and survive less. For these patients, the therapeutic options are very limited, and for many years, conventional chemotherapy (CC) was the standard of care. Recently, the phase II LEAP-004 trial supported that pembrolizumab/lenvatinib could potentially overcome anti-PD-1/anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy refractoriness.

Materials and methods

In the absence of any prospective comparative study and to evaluate in a real-world context the clinical benefit of re-administering a PD-1 inhibitor (pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks, Q3W) with a multi-kinase inhibitor (lenvatinib, but at a reduced dose 10 mg p.o. daily due to its known toxicity) in this frail population of unmet need, we conducted here a retrospective comparison of LEAP-004-proposed combination with CC (carboplatin 4 AUC and dacarbazine 850 mg/m2 i.v. Q3W) in melanoma patients who relapsed to both checkpoint inhibitors, either in combinatorial or in sequential setting, between July 2022 and January 2024. Baseline demographics, disease characteristics, and treatment outcomes (objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)) were recorded. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. All patients were also considered for safety analysis.

Results

A total of 84 patients were included in the effectiveness and safety analysis (pembrolizumab/lenvatinib, n=39 and CC, n=45). The median age was 67 (45-87) years and 64 (34-87) years, and men were 33.3% and 46.7%, respectively. The distribution of their metastatic sites was comparable, including 12.8% and 20% with brain involvement. Most patients had a good PS<2 (69.9% and 56.5%), increased lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (71.8% and 84.4%), BRAF-wild status (82.1% and 84.8%), and received ≥2 previous systemic therapies (61.5% and 53.3%). The median follow-up was 18 months. The ORR was 23.1% and 11.1% (p<0.0001), the median PFS was 4.8 months and 3.8 months [HR (95%CI), 0.57 (0.36-0.92); p=0.017], and the median OS was 14.2 months and 7.8 months [HR (95%CI), 0.39 (0.22-0.69), p=0.0009] in pembrolizumab/lenvatinib and CC arms, respectively. Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events were documented in 48.7% (pembrolizumab/lenvatinib) and 75.6% (CC) of patients (p=0.034), which led to treatment discontinuation in 10.3% and 17.8% of cases, respectively.

Conclusions

This is the first comparative study in patients with metastatic melanoma refractory to PD-1/CTLA-4 inhibition and showed significantly longer outcomes in cases treated with pembrolizumab/lenvatinib versus CC.

Adjuvant anti-PD1 immunotherapy of resected skin melanoma: an example of non-personalized medicine with no overall survival benefit

Randomized clinical trials demonstrated a recurrence-free survival benefit with adjuvant anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD1) inhibitors of resected stage IIB-IV melanoma. However, no improvement in overall survival has been observed thus far. Furthermore, there are no predictive markers for immunotherapy response in melanoma, therefore adjuvant treatment is offered to all comers based exclusively on the pathological and clinical stages. Additionally, one year of treatment duration and the risk of chronic immune-related adverse effects may negatively impact patients´ quality of life. In this review, we will try to answer whether the currently available data on adjuvant anti-PD1 therapy of stage IIB-IV resected melanoma is sufficient to make this strategy available to all patients. We will also discuss the economic impact of this therapy on healthcare system budgets. Recent studies suggest that the high cost of cancer drugs may affect access to these agents globally by raising questions of sustainability for patients and society.

Advances in Adjuvant and Neoadjuvant Therapy for Melanoma

Melanoma remains one of the most common cancers diagnosed in the United States, yet there have been substantial advancements in the treatment of resectable disease. Adjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and targeted therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors (BRAF/MEKi) have now become standard of care for resectable stage IIIB-IV melanoma. In this article, the authors discuss recent scientific developments pertinent to the treatment of resectable melanoma including ICB, targeted therapy with BRAF/MEKi, oncolytic viruses, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapy, and cancer vaccines.

Progress in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor for Melanoma Therapy

Melanoma has seen the most remarkable therapeutic improvements among all cancers in the past decade, primarily due to the development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). Initially developed in the patients with advanced disease, ICI are now used in adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. More recently, the development of LAG-3 blocking antibody and the combination of ICI with a personalized RNA-based vaccine have continued to lead the immunotherapeutic field. Despite these advances, primary and secondary resistances remain problematic and there is a high need for predictive biomarkers to optimize benefit/risk ratio of ICI use.

Access to melanoma drugs in Spain: a cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND

The development of highly active drugs has improved the survival of melanoma patients, but elevated drug prices place a significant burden on health care systems. In Spain, the public health care system is transferred to the 17 autonomous communities (AACC). The objective of this study is to describe the situation of drug access for melanoma patients in Spain and how this decentralized system is affecting equity.

METHODS

From July to September 2023, a cross-sectional survey was sent to members of the Spanish Multidisciplinary Melanoma Group (GEM Group). The questionnaire consulted about the real access to new drugs in each hospital. The responses were collected anonymously and analyzed according to several variables, including the AACC.

RESULTS

The survey was answered by 50 physicians in 15 AACC. No major differences on access between AACC were observed for indications that are reimbursed by the Spanish Health Care System (adjuvant immunotherapy for stage IIIC-IIID and resected stage IV melanoma). Important differences in drug access were observed among AACC and among centers within the same AACC, for most of the EMA indications that are not reimbursed (adjuvant immunotherapy for stages IIB-IIC-IIIA-IIIB) or that are not fully reimbursed (ipilimumab plus nivolumab in advanced stage). Homogeneously, access to adjuvant targeted drugs, TIL therapy and T-VEC, is extremely low or non-existing in all AACC.

CONCLUSIONS

For most indications that reimbursement is restricted out of the EMA indication, a great diversity on access was found throughout the different hospitals in Spain, including heterogeneity intra-AACC.

Adjuvant Therapy in Acral Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Background

Acral melanoma presents distinct biological characteristics compared to cutaneous melanoma. While adjuvant therapeutic strategies for high-risk resected acral melanoma closely resemble those for cutaneous melanoma, the evidence supporting the clinical application of adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma remains inadequate. Our aim was to systematically analyze the efficacy and safety profile of adjuvant therapy in acral melanoma.

Methods

This systematic review adhered to a pre-registered protocol. We comprehensively searched four electronic databases and reference lists of included articles to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was therapeutic efficacy, and the secondary outcome was adverse events (AEs).

Results

This systematic review included 11 studies with 758 acral melanoma patients undergoing adjuvant therapy. High-dose interferon α-2b (IFN) regimens showed no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS), though the longer regimen was linked to increased hepatotoxicity. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy demonstrated varying efficacy, with improved RFS in patients who experienced immune-related AEs. Targeted therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib achieved high 12-month RFS in patients with BRAF-mutated acral melanoma. Comparative studies suggested that adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy is similarly effective to IFN in prolonging survival for high-risk acral melanoma patients. Additionally, prior treatment with pegylated IFN enhanced RFS in patients receiving adjuvant pembrolizumab.

Conclusion

High-dose IFN was widely used as adjuvant therapy for acral melanoma, but serious AEs prompted the search for alternatives. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy shows promise, though it may be less effective than in non-acral melanoma. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal adjuvant treatment for acral melanoma.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Metastatic Melanoma: What Should We Focus on to Improve the Clinical Outcomes?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer treatment by enhancing anti-tumour immune responses, demonstrating significant efficacy in various malignancies, including melanoma. However, over 50% of patients experience limited or no response to ICI therapy. Resistance to ICIs is influenced by a complex interplay of tumour intrinsic and extrinsic factors. This review summarizes current ICIs for melanoma and the factors involved in resistance to the treatment. We also discuss emerging evidence that the microbiota can impact ICI treatment outcomes by modulating tumour biology and anti-tumour immune function. Furthermore, microbiota profiles may offer a non-invasive method for predicting ICI response. Therefore, future research into microbiota manipulation could provide cost-effective strategies to enhance ICI efficacy and improve outcomes for melanoma patients.

Outcomes of adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in melanoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma has improved the outcomes for patients. However, real-world data on efficacy and safety are limited. We investigated outcomes of melanoma patients treated with adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in the Ghent University Hospital.

METHODS

Patients with melanoma (stage III-IV), who received at least one cycle of ICI as adjuvant treatment between 2018 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Primary outcomes were recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Other outcomes of interest were relapse patterns and safety.

RESULTS

59 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 36 months. Disease recurrence or death of any cause was observed in 25/59 (42.4%) of the patients. The median RFS was 56.0 months (95%CI 36.1-75.9 months). At 48 months, RFS and OS were 55.9% and 84%, respectively. 9/23 (39%) recurrences were locoregional and 14/23 (60.9%) patients developed distant metastasis as first recurrence, including 2 (3.4%) with brain metastasis. Median time to recurrence was 9 months (range 2-56 months). 35/59 (59.3%) completed one year of adjuvant treatment, 12/59 (20.3%) stopped because of recurrence and 10/59 (16.9% because of toxicity. Immune-related adverse events wereseen in 29/59 (49.4%) patients, 10/59 (16.9%) developed grade 3-4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the real-world efficacy and safety of adjuvant ICI for melanoma, achieving RFS and OS comparableto the pivotal clinical trials. About 40% of patients develop arelapse, mainly during the adjuvant treatment. The outcomes ofpatients progressing during adjuvant ICI are poor, emphasizing the need of prospective and real-world studies on optimal management after progression on (neo)adjuvant treatment.