Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients with multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of data from four clinical studies

Escalation to Anti-CD20 Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis Following Natalizumab-Associated Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy

Objectives

Disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for multiple sclerosis (MS) after natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is controversial due to concern for recurrent PML. We describe DMT utilization for over a decade in a patient with MS who survived PML.

Methods

Case report.

Results

A 36-year-old woman was diagnosed with MS in 2002 and treated with interferon beta-1a until 2006, when she transitioned to natalizumab due to relapses. She presented in 2012 with 2 months of progressive cognitive and gait concerns and was diagnosed with PML by positive CSF JC virus testing with concordant clinical and MRI findings. She was treated with plasma exchange and then corticosteroids for PML immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome before starting glatiramer acetate for DMT. She transitioned to dimethyl fumarate in 2013 after MS activity on MRI with negative CSF JC virus testing. Owing to worsening footdrop consistent with progression, she transitioned to ocrelizumab in 2017 and then to ofatumumab in 2020 due to logistics of medication administration. There has been no clinicoradiographic or CSF evidence of recurrent PML.

Discussion

DMT selection is challenging for patients with MS who survive PML. We used an escalation approach extending to ocrelizumab and ofatumumab due to MS progression. Anti-CD20 DMTs are a high-efficacy option post-PML.

Classification of Evidence

This provides Class IV evidence. It is a single observational study without controls.

Treatment Monitoring in Multiple Sclerosis - Efficacy and Safety

Magnetic resonance imaging is the most sensitive method for detecting inflammatory activity in multiple sclerosis, particularly in the brain where it reveals subclinical inflammation. Established MRI markers include contrast-enhancing lesions and active T2 lesions. Recent promising markers like slowly expanding lesions and phase rim lesions are being explored for monitoring chronic inflammation, but require further validation for clinical use. Volumetric and quantitative MRI techniques are currently limited to clinical trials and are not yet recommended for routine clinical use. Additionally, MRI is crucial for detecting complications from disease-modifying treatments and for implementing MRI-based pharmacovigilance strategies, such as in patients treated with natalizumab.

Association of B-cell activating factor gene variants with serum anti-JCV antibody positivity in male patients with multiple sclerosis under natalizumab treatment: Implications for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk stratification

INTRODUCTION

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a potentially life-threatening complication among Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients under natalizumab treatment, with serum anti-JCV antibody titers being used for stratification risk. Given the critical role of interferon (IFN)/B-cell activating factor (BAFF) axis in humoral immune responses against viruses, we explored whether it is involved in the generation of serum anti-JCV antibodies among these patients.

METHODS

162 consecutive patients with relapsing-remitting MS under natalizumab treatment were included. Serum anti-JCV antibodies were measured at baseline, as well as 12 and 24 months after treatment initiation. Type I and II IFN-inducible genes and BAFF expression were quantitated in peripheral blood by qRT-PCR. Moreover, BAFF rs9514828, rs1041569, and rs9514827 gene variants were assessed by RFLP-PCR.

RESULTS

While type I and II IFN inducible gene expression were not associated with anti-JCV serum titers, the latter were significantly correlated with BAFF gene expression. Of interest, the TTT haplotype of the studied BAFF variants was more frequently detected in male, but not female anti-JCV (+) MS patients compared to anti-JCV (-) counterparts at baseline, as well as at 12 months and 24 months of natalizumab treatment. Measures of clinical validity/utility for the BAFF TTT haplotype showed 88% specificity, 45%, positive predictive value, and sensitivity of 70% for the discrimination of anti-JCV (+) male MS patients after 24 months of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests an implication of the BAFF axis in the production of serum anti-JCV antibodies. Additionally, the BAFF TTT haplotype derived from the rs9514828, rs1041569, and rs9514827 variants may represent a novel risk factor for anti-JCV seropositivity and indirectly for PML development among male MS patients treated with natalizumab.

Early use of high-efficacy therapies in multiple sclerosis in the United States: benefits, barriers, and strategies for encouraging adoption

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by progressive neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration from disease onset that, if left untreated, can result in the accumulation of irreversible neurological disability. Early intervention with high-efficacy therapies (HETs) is increasingly recognized as the best strategy to delay or mitigate disease progression from the earliest stages of the disease and to prevent long-term neurodegeneration. Although there is growing clinical and real-world evidence supporting early HET intervention, foregoing this strategy in favor of a traditional escalation approach prioritizing lower-efficacy disease-modifying therapies remains a common approach in clinical practice. This review explores potential health care professional- and patient-related barriers to the early use of HETs in patients with MS in the United States. Barriers can include regulatory and reimbursement restrictions; knowledge gaps and long-term safety concerns among health care professionals; and various individual, cultural, and societal factors affecting patients. Potential strategies for overcoming these barriers and encouraging early HET use are proposed.

Vaccine Safety and Immunogenicity in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis Treated With Natalizumab

Importance

Vaccination in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis (MS) requiring prompt treatment initiation may result in impaired vaccine responses and/or treatment delay.

Objective

To assess the immunogenicity and safety of inactivated vaccines administered during natalizumab treatment.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This self-controlled, prospective cohort study followed adult patients with MS from 1 study center in Spain from September 2016 to February 2022. Eligible participants included adults with MS who completed immunization for hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis A virus (HAV), and COVID-19 during natalizumab therapy. Data analysis was conducted from November 2022 to February 2023.

Exposures

Patients were categorized according to their time receiving natalizumab treatment at the time of vaccine administration as short-term (≤1 year) or long-term (>1 year).

Main Outcomes and Measures

Demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics were collected during the year before vaccination (prevaccination period) and the year after vaccination (postvaccination period). Seroprotection rates and postvaccination immunoglobulin G titers were determined for each vaccine within both periods. Additionally, differences in annualized relapse rate (ARR), new T2 lesions (NT2L), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores, and John Cunningham virus (JCV) serostatus between the 2 periods were assessed.

Results

Sixty patients with MS (mean [SD] age, 43.2 [9.4] years; 44 female [73.3%]; 16 male [26.7%]; mean [SD] disease duration, 17.0 [8.7] years) completed HBV, HAV, and mRNA COVID-19 immunization during natalizumab treatment, with 12 patients in the short-term group and 48 patients in the long-term group. The global seroprotection rate was 93% (95% CI, 86%-98%), with individual vaccine rates of 92% for HAV (95% CI, 73%-99%), 93% for HBV (95% CI, 76%-99%), and 100% for the COVID-19 messenger RNA vaccine (95% CI, 84%-100%). Between the prevaccination and postvaccination periods there was a significant reduction in the mean (SD) ARR (0.28 [0.66] vs 0.01 [0.12]; P = .004) and median (IQR) NT2L (5.00 [2.00-10.00] vs 0.81 [0.00-0.50]; P = .01). No changes in disability accumulation were detected (median [IQR] EDSS score 3.5 [2.0-6.0] vs 3.5 [2.0-6.0]; P = .62). No differences in safety and immunogenicity were observed for all vaccines concerning the duration of natalizumab treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings of this cohort study suggest that immunization with inactivated vaccines during natalizumab therapy was both safe and immunogenic, regardless of the treatment duration. Natalizumab may be a valuable option for proper immunization, averting treatment delays in patients with highly active MS; however, this strategy needs to be formally evaluated.

Safety and efficacy of extended versus standard interval dosing of natalizumab in multiple sclerosis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, immune-mediated disease affecting the central nervous system. Natalizumab, an FDA-approved monoclonal antibody for MS, has been explored for its off-label extended interval dosing (EID), suggesting a potential reduction in the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) compared to standard interval dosing (SID). Our objective was to assess the efficacy and safety of EID in comparison to SID for natalizumab treatment in patients with MS.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, WOS, Scopus, Ovid, Science Direct, Clinical trials.gov, and Cochrane Library. Our assessed outcomes were clinical relapses, MRI activity, change in expanded disability status scale [EDSS], and the risk of PML. The EID group was defined as 5 to 8 weeks [EID (Q5-8W)]. The analysis was conducted using RevMan ver. 5.4. The effect estimates were presented as a risk ratio [RR] or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals [CI] using SID group as the reference for comparisons.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies met our inclusion criteria: 2 RCTs, 1 switched single-arm trial, and 12 observational studies. No significant differences were found in all efficacy outcomes of interest. Risk of clinical relapses [RR = 0.90, (95%CI 0.80, 1.02)], risk of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense MRI lesions [RR = 0.78, (95%CI 0.59, 1.04)], risk gadolinium enhancing lesions [RR = 1.30, (95%CI 0.98, 1.72)], change in EDSS [MD = 0.09 (95%CI - 0.57, 0.76)], risk of PML [RR = 1.09, 95%CI (0.24, 4.94)].

CONCLUSION

In summary, our meta-analysis indicates that natalizumab maintains its effectiveness under extended interval dosing [up to 8 weeks], presenting comparable risks for clinical relapses, MRI lesions, EDSS, and PML. Caution is advised given study limitations and heterogeneity. Robust conclusions necessitate well-designed high-quality prospective studies.

Fragility index analysis for randomized controlled trials of approved biologicals and small molecule drugs in inflammatory bowel diseases

INTRODUCTION

Biologics and small molecules have been increasingly applied in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). But the robustness of their trials has not been evaluated.

METHODS

We initially collected all the approved biologics or small molecules for CD or UC up to December 1, 2022. Databases were then queried by keywords in chemical name and CD or UC. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the two-arm, 1:1 design were included. Fragility index (FI) and fragility quotient (FQ) were subsequently calculated.

RESULTS

We included twenty-eight RCTs, including nine pivotal trials listed in approval labels, nineteen non-pivotal trials not included in the labels. The median sample size was 99 [IQR, 60-262] and the median number of loss-of-follow-up (LFU) was 14 [IQR, 8-43]. Pivotal trials in the labels had the median FI of 8 [IQR, 4-14, n = 6] that was marginally higher than non-pivotal trials (3 [IQR, 2-4], p = 0.08). The median FQ was 0.0330 [IQR, 0.1220-0.0466] and 0.0310 [IQR, 0.0129-0.0540] for pivotal and non-pivotal trials, respectively (p = 1.0). The sample size and FI were significantly correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient [r] = 0.56, 95 %CI 0.21-0.78, p = 0.003). The number of total events was also significantly correlated with FI (r = 0.53, 95 %CI 0.17-0.77, p = 0.006). Study p-values were significantly associated with FI (p = 0.01): trials with p-values < 0.001 had the highest median FI of 10 [IQR, 6-17]. No factor was found strongly correlated with FQ.

CONCLUSION

Results from trials assessing administration-approved biologics or small molecules for treating CD or UC were vulnerable to small changes by measuring FI or FQ. Pivotal studies contributing to regulatory approvals exhibited a relatively higher degree of resilience compared to non-pivotal trials.

Long-term clinical outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis who are initiating disease-modifying therapy with natalizumab compared with BRACETD first-line therapies

Background

Aggressive disease control soon after multiple sclerosis (MS) diagnosis may prevent irreversible neurological damage, and therefore early initiation of a high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy (DMT) is of clinical relevance.

Objectives

Evaluate long-term clinical outcomes in patients with MS who initiated treatment with either natalizumab or a BRACETD therapy (interferon beta, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide, or dimethyl fumarate).

Design

This retrospective analysis utilized data from MSBase to create a matched population allowing comparison of first-line natalizumab to first-line BRACETD.

Methods

This study included patients who initiated treatment either with natalizumab or a BRACETD DMT within 1 year of MS diagnosis and continued treatment for ⩾6 months, after which patients could switch DMTs or discontinue treatment. Patients had a minimum follow-up time of ⩾60 months from initiation. A subgroup analysis compared the natalizumab group to patients in the BRACETD group who escalated therapy after 6 months. Outcomes included unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs), time-to-first relapse, time-to-first confirmed disability improvement (CDI), and time-to-first confirmed disability worsening (CDW).

Results

After 1:1 propensity score matching, 355 BRACETD patients were matched to 355 natalizumab patients. Patients initiating natalizumab were less likely to experience a relapse over the duration of follow-up, with ARRs [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.080 (0.070-0.092) for natalizumab patients and 0.191 (0.178-0.205) for BRACETD patients (p < 0.0001). A Cox regression model of time-to-first relapse showed a reduced risk of relapse for natalizumab patients [hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.52 (0.42-0.65); p < 0.001] and a more favorable time-to-first CDI. The risk of CDW was similar between groups. The subgroup analysis showed an increased relapse risk as well as a significantly higher risk of CDW for BRACETD patients.

Conclusion

Early initiation of natalizumab produced long-term benefits in relapse outcomes in comparison with BRACETD, regardless of a subsequent escalation in therapy.

Personalized Use of Disease-Modifying Therapies in Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is an important neurological disease affecting millions of young patients globally. It is encouraging that more than ten disease-modifying drugs became available for use in the past two decades. These disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have different levels of efficacy, routes of administration, adverse effect profiles and concerns for pregnancy. Much knowledge and caution are needed for their appropriate use in MS patients who are heterogeneous in clinical features and severity, lesion load on magnetic resonance imaging and response to DMT. We aim for an updated review of the concept of personalization in the use of DMT for relapsing MS patients. Shared decision making with consideration for the preference and expectation of patients who understand the potential efficacy/benefits and risks of DMT is advocated.

Multiple sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis remains one of the most common causes of neurological disability in the young adult population (aged 18-40 years). Novel pathophysiological findings underline the importance of the interaction between genetics and environment. Improvements in diagnostic criteria, harmonised guidelines for MRI, and globalised treatment recommendations have led to more accurate diagnosis and an earlier start of effective immunomodulatory treatment than previously. Understanding and capturing the long prodromal multiple sclerosis period would further improve diagnostic abilities and thus treatment initiation, eventually improving long-term disease outcomes. The large portfolio of currently available medications paved the way for personalised therapeutic strategies that will balance safety and effectiveness. Incorporation of cognitive interventions, lifestyle recommendations, and management of non-neurological comorbidities could further improve quality of life and outcomes. Future challenges include the development of medications that successfully target the neurodegenerative aspect of the disease and creation of sensitive imaging and fluid biomarkers that can effectively predict and monitor disease changes.

[Current and innovative Approaches to Multiple Sclerosis Therapy]

The landscape of immunotherapies in the management of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is currently particularly dynamic. Over 21 immunotherapeutic options are approved by the European Meidcines Agency (EMA), Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and newer approaches are ongoing in clinical trials. With advancements in the understanding of MS pathophysiology and further development of diagnosis criteria, newer and more specific disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have emerged in recent years. The selection and timing of proper therapeutic approaches is increasingly complex. We provide an overview of the available immunotherapies for a personalized MS treatment and discuss practical insights into their application. The importance of early intervention, distinction between escalation and induction approaches, and consideration of high-efficacy treatments for specific patient groups are in discussed. We emphasize the significance of a patient-centered approach, taking into account various factors such as comorbidities, family planning, administration preferences and potential side effects in treatment decision-making.

Multiple sclerosis: time for early treatment with high-efficacy drugs

This review addresses current changes in the approach to treating patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The widely practiced approach of utilizing agents with lower treatment efficacy (LETA) at onset with subsequent escalation has been challenged by new data suggesting that MS patients derive greater benefit when therapy is initiated with high-efficacy treatment agents (HETA). Several recent studies compared treatment efficacy and safety of early administration of HETA versus LETA. The results of randomized, double blind, phase III studies with LETA as a control arm and population-based larger and longer studies using propensity scoring, marginal structural modeling and weighted cumulative exposure analysis support the benefit of early treatment with HETA. Patients initiating their treatment with HETA, regardless of prognostic factors and MRI burden at baseline, showed significantly lower annualized relapse rate (ARR) and reduced disability progression in follow-up periods of up to 10-15 years. Moreover, the safety profile of recently approved HETA ameliorates concerns about off-target effects associated with a number of earlier high-efficacy drugs. Patient perception has also changed with an increasing preference for medication profiles that both improve symptoms and prevent disease progression. Accumulating data from randomized studies and the results of large population-based studies demonstrating short-term and longer-term patient benefits support the view that HETA should be more widely used. The adoption of early treatment with HETA capitalizes on a window of opportunity for anti-inflammatory drugs to maximally impact disease pathology and heralds a sea change in clinical practice toward pro-active management and away from a philosophy routed in generating clinical benefit as a consequence of treatment failure.

Association between inflammatory burden index and all-cause mortality in the general population aged over 45 years: Data from NHANES 2005-2017

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between inflammatory burden index (IBI) and all-cause mortality in the general population aged over 45 years.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study included 8827 participants from the National Health and Examination Nutrition Survey (NHANES) who were aged over 45 years. The IBI was calculated using three markers: C-reaction protein × neutrophil/lymphocyte, and all the participants were classified into four groups (Quartile 1: IBI ≤0.178, N = 2206; Quartile 2: 0.178 1.099, 2207). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the association between IBI and all-cause mortality. During a median follow-up of 129 month, 2431 deaths occurred. The all-cause mortality rate in Quartile 1, Quartile 2, Quartile 3 and Quartile 4 was 14.76 %, 17.67 %, 23.18 % and 29.69 %, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustment for demographic, and potential clinical factors, higher IBI was significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (Quartile 3 vs. Quartile 1: HR = 1.26, 95 % CI: 1.08 to 1.46, p = 0.003; Quartile 4 vs. Quartile 1: HR = 1.59, 95 % CI: 1.40 to 1.80, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the results of the restricted cubic spline analysis suggested that the association between IBI and all-cause mortality was nonlinear and positive, without specific threshold value.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports that higher IBI is associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in the general population aged over 45 years.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy analyzed using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has been reported as the development of drugs with immunomodulatory properties, such as anticancer, immunosuppressive, and biological agents, has accelerated. To clarify an incidence profile of drug-associated PML in real-world clinical practice, we analyzed reported patients with PML using the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database.

METHODS

We analyzed PML reports extracted from the JADER database based on the preferred term of "progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy" from between 2004 and 2021. This was a retrospective, observational study. We evaluated the effects of causative drugs, underlying diseases, and the age of the patients on the annual number of PML reports.

RESULTS

The JADER database contained 773,966 reports published between April 2004 and March 2022, from which we identified 361 PML events. These PML events may include multiple counts of the same case reported by different pathways and patients diagnosed with probable or possible PML. The number of PML reports and reporting ratios have gradually increased over the past decade. The annual number of PML reports associated with biologics, immunosuppressants, and antineoplastic drugs showed an increasing trend. Females aged ≥30 years showed an increase in PML reports; in contrast, there the number of reports for males aged ≥50 years increased.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of PML reports and reporting ratios have gradually increased in the past decade in Japan, and it considered that it was related to change in the treatment of malignancies and autoimmune diseases, and the increasing use of biologics, immunosuppressive agents, and antineoplastic agents.

Lessons learned after 20 years of real-world experience with natalizumab

BACKGROUND

While natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), it is associated with an increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). After 20 years (2002-2022) of experience with NTZ at our center, we observed no cases of PML.

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the likelihood of experiencing PML in a subset of our treatment cohort, as well as reviewed treatment practices at our center that may mitigate PML risk.

METHODS

For this retrospective study, we reviewed patient characteristics, treatment practices, and clinical and MRI findings in patients receiving NTZ from 2006 to 2020. Observation of no PML cases was compared to the global and US PML incidences, and to the expected incidence based on published risk estimates.

RESULTS

766 patients were evaluated. The number of NTZ infusions received ranged from 1 to 126, with a mean of 28. Patients received neurological examination prior to each infusion, which sometimes resulted in a pause in therapy to rule out PML if clinical worsening occurred. Extended interval dosing (EID) was the overall dosing schedule for 31% of patients. EID did not result in higher rates of radiological disease worsening than standard interval dosing (SID) patients. Depending on the analysis conducted, the finding of 0 PML cases in our cohort ranged from slightly unexpected to slightly expected.

CONCLUSIONS

The utilization of EID as well as regular clinical monitoring of patients may have lowered PML risk while still maintaining NTZ efficacy.

Natalizumab Treatment of Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Has No Long-Term Effects on the Proportion of Circulating Regulatory T Cells

INTRODUCTION

Natalizumab (NTZ), a monoclonal antibody against the integrin α4β1 (VLA-4) found on activated T cells and B cells, blocks the interaction of this integrin with adhesion molecules of central nervous system (CNS) endothelial cells and lymphocyte migration through the blood-brain barrier, effectively preventing new lesion formation and relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS). Whether NTZ treatment has additional effects on the peripheral immune system cells, and how its actions compare with other MS disease-modifying treatments, have not been extensively investigated. In particular, its effect on the proportions of circulating regulatory T cells (Treg) is unclear.

METHODS

In this study, we investigated the effect of NTZ treatment in 12 patients with relapsing MS, at 6 and 12 months after the start of treatment. We evaluated the proportions of regulatory T cells (Treg), defined by flow cytometry as CD4+ CD25++ FoxP3+ cells and CD4+ CD25++ CD127- cells at these intervals. As an exploratory study, we also investigated the NTZ effects on the proportions of bulk T and B lymphocyte populations, and of those expressing novel the markers CD195 (CCR5), CD196 (CCR6), or CD161 (KLRB1), which are involved in MS pathogenesis but have been studied less in the context of MS treatment. The effects of NTZ were compared to those obtained with 11 patients under interferon-beta-1a (IFN-β1a) treatment, and against 9 healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

We observed a transient increment in the proportion of Treg cells at 6 months, which was not sustained at 12 months. We observed a reduction in the proportion of T cells expressing CD195 (CCR5) and CD161 (KLRB1) subsets of T cells.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that NTZ does not have an effect on the proportion of Treg cells over 1 year, but it may affect the expression of molecules important for some aspects MS pathogenesis, in a manner that is not shared with IFN-β1a.

Positive Association Between the Immunogenetic Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Profiles of Multiple Sclerosis and Brain Cancer

Previous research has documented elevated risk of brain cancer in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Separately, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) has been implicated in protection or susceptibility for both conditions. The aim of the current study was to assess a possible role of shared immunogenetic influence on risk of MS and brain cancer. We first identified an immunogenetic profile for each condition based on the covariance between the population frequency of 127 high-resolution HLA alleles and the population prevalence of each condition in 14 Continental Western European countries and then evaluated the correspondence between MS and brain cancer immunogenetic profiles. Also, since each individual carries 12 HLA alleles (2 × 6 genes), we estimated HLA protection and susceptibility for MS and brain cancer at the individual level. We found that the immunogenetic profiles of MS and brain cancer were highly correlated overall (P < .001) and across all 6 HLA genes with the strongest association observed for DRB1, followed by DQB1 and HLA-A. These findings of immunogenetic overlap between MS and brain cancer are discussed in light of the role of HLA in the immune system response to viruses and other foreign antigens.

Learning CNS immunopathology from therapeutic interventions

Modulation of immune cell trafficking across the blood-brain barrier has not only introduced a therapeutic avenue for multiple sclerosis (MS) but also represents an example of reverse translational medicine. Data from clinical trials of drugs such as natalizumab and fingolimod have revealed the involvement of different compartments in relapsing versus non-relapsing MS immune biology, contributed to our understanding of central nervous system (CNS) immune surveillance, and stimulated new fields of research. Here, we discuss the results of these trials, as well as patient biomaterial-based scientific projects, and how both have informed our understanding of CNS immunopathology.

Practical Clinical Guidelines for Natalizumab Treatment in Patients With Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) was the first high-efficacy monoclonal antibody disease-modifying therapy (DMT) approved as a monotherapy for the treatment of adults with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS), including clinically isolated syndrome, relapsing-remitting MS, and active secondary progressive MS. Because natalizumab is administered by intravenous infusion, infusion nurses play a key role in the care of natalizumab-treated patients. In the 16 years since approval, substantial data have been gathered on the long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety of natalizumab. This article provides a synopsis of this data, as well as practical information for optimizing patient care. This includes information on strategies to mitigate the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in natalizumab-treated patients, natalizumab use during pregnancy, and use with vaccines. It also includes guidance on the preparation and administration of natalizumab and monitoring of natalizumab-treated patients.

Negative association between multiple sclerosis immunogenetic profile and in silico immunogenicities of 12 viruses

Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) is involved in both multiple sclerosis (MS) and immune response to viruses. Here we investigated the virus-HLA immunogenicity (V-HLA) of 12 viruses implicated in MS with respect to 17 HLA Class I alleles positively associated to MS prevalence in 14 European countries. Overall, higher V-HLA immunogenicity was associated with smaller MS-HLA effect, with human herpes virus 3 (HHV3), JC human polyoma virus (JCV), HHV1, HHV4, HHV7, HHV5 showing the strongest association, followed by HHV8, HHV6A, and HHV6B (moderate association), and human endogenous retrovirus (HERV-W), HHV2, and human papilloma virus (HPV) (weakest association). These findings suggest that viruses with proteins of high HLA immunogenicity are eliminated more effectively and, consequently, less likely to be involved in MS.

Revisiting JC virus and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy

Since its definition 65 years ago, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has continued to devastate a growing population of immunosuppressed patients despite major advances in our understanding of the causative JC virus (JCV). Unless contained by the immune system, JCV lyses host oligodendrocytes collateral to its life cycle, leading to demyelination, neurodegeneration, and death. Novel treatments have stagnated in the absence of an animal model while current antiviral agents fail to address the now ubiquitous polyomavirus. In this review, we highlight the established pathogenesis by which JCV infection progresses to PML, highlighting major challenges that must be overcome to eliminate the underlying virus and, therefore, the debilitating disease.

Escalation Versus Induction/High-Efficacy Treatment Strategies for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: Which is Best for Patients?

After more than 2 decades of recommending an escalating strategy for the treatment of most patients with multiple sclerosis, there has recently been considerable interest in the use of high-efficacy therapies in the early stage of the disease. Early intervention with induction/high-efficacy disease-modifying therapy may have the best risk-benefit profile for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who are young and have active disease, numerous focal T2 lesions on spinal and brain magnetic resonance imaging, and no irreversible disability. Although we have no curative treatment, at least seven classes of high-efficacy drugs are available, with two main strategies. The first strategy involves the use of high-efficacy drugs (e.g., natalizumab, sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators, or anti-CD20 drugs) to achieve sustained immunosuppression. These can be used as a first-line therapy in many countries. The second strategy entails the use of one of the induction drugs (short-term use of mitoxantrone, alemtuzumab, cladribine, or autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant) that are mainly recommended as a second-line or third-line treatment in patients with very active or aggressive multiple sclerosis disease. Early sustained immunosuppression exposes patients to heightened risks of infection and cancer proportionate to cumulative exposure, and induction drugs expose patients to similar risks during the initial post-treatment period, although these risks decrease over time. Their initial potential safety risks should now be revisited, taking account of long-term data and some major changes in their regimens: natalizumab with the long-term monitoring of John Cunningham virus; use of monthly courses of mitoxantrone with maximum cumulative doses of 36-72 mg/m2, followed by a safer disease-modifying drug; cladribine with only 2-weekly treatment courses required in years 1 and 2 and no systematic treatment for the following 2 years; alemtuzumab, whose safety and clinical impacts have now been documented for more than 6 years after the last infusion; and autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant, which dramatically reduces transplantation-related mortality with a new regimen and guidelines. Escalation and induction/high-efficacy treatments need rigorous magnetic resonance imaging monitoring. Monitoring over the first few years, using the MAGNIMS score or American Academy of Neurology guidelines, considerably improves prediction accuracy and facilitates the selection of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis requiring aggressive treatment.

Real-world treatment outcomes and safety of natalizumab in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients

Objectives

The primary objective was to evaluate long-term treatment persistence and safety of natalizumab in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. The secondary objectives were to assess patient characteristics, use of natalizumab-related safety protocol, and treatment persistence in patients with different anti-John Cunningham virus antibody statuses (John Cunningham virus status).

Materials & Methods

All adult multiple sclerosis patients in the Finnish multiple sclerosis register who started natalizumab between 1/2006 and 12/2018 were included in this study and followed retrospectively until treatment discontinuation or end of follow-up (12/2019).

Results

In total, 850 patients were included. Median duration of natalizumab treatment was 7.8 years in John Cunningham virus negative (n = 229) and 2.1 years in John Cunningham virus positive patients (n = 115; p < 0.001). The most common cause for treatment discontinuation was John Cunningham virus positivity. After natalizumab discontinuation, patients who had a washout duration of less than 6 weeks had fewer relapses during the first 6 months (p = 0.012) and 12 months (p = 0.005) compared with patients who had a washout duration of over 6 weeks. During the median follow-up of 3.6 years, 76% of patients remained stable or improved on their Expanded Disability Status Scale.

Conclusions

Treatment persistence was very high among John Cunningham virus negative patients. The study supports long-term effectiveness of natalizumab and a washout duration of less than 6 weeks after discontinuation.

Phase 2 study of natalizumab plus standard corticosteroid treatment for high-risk acute graft-versus-host disease

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the main cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Arbor (AA) scores derived from serum biomarkers at onset of GVHD quantify GI crypt damage; AA2/3 scores correlate with resistance to treatment and higher NRM. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study using natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks T-cell trafficking to the GI tract through the α4 subunit of α4β7 integrin, combined with corticosteroids as primary treatment for patients with new onset AA2/3 GVHD. Seventy-five patients who were evaluable were enrolled and treated; 81% received natalizumab within 2 days of starting corticosteroids. Therapy was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events in >10% of patients. Outcomes for patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids were compared with 150 well-matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone. There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and those treated with corticosteroids alone (60% vs 58%; P = .67% and 48% vs 48%; P = 1.0, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared with controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39%; P = .80% and 46% vs 54%; P = .48, respectively). In this multicenter biomarker-based phase 2 study, natalizumab combined with corticosteroids failed to improve outcome of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02133924.

Therapeutic Antibodies in Medicine

Antibody engineering has developed into a wide-reaching field, impacting a multitude of industries, most notably healthcare and diagnostics. The seminal work on developing the first monoclonal antibody four decades ago has witnessed exponential growth in the last 10-15 years, where regulators have approved monoclonal antibodies as therapeutics and for several diagnostic applications, including the remarkable attention it garnered during the pandemic. In recent years, antibodies have become the fastest-growing class of biological drugs approved for the treatment of a wide range of diseases, from cancer to autoimmune conditions. This review discusses the field of therapeutic antibodies as it stands today. It summarizes and outlines the clinical relevance and application of therapeutic antibodies in treating a landscape of diseases in different disciplines of medicine. It discusses the nomenclature, various approaches to antibody therapies, and the evolution of antibody therapeutics. It also discusses the risk profile and adverse immune reactions associated with the antibodies and sheds light on future applications and perspectives in antibody drug discovery.

Latin American consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in people with multiple sclerosis treated with disease modifying drugs

INTRODUCTION

The emergence of several therapeutic options in multiple sclerosis (MS), which significantly modify the immune system functioning, has led to the need for the consideration of additional factors, such as risk of infections, in the decision-making process. The aim of these consensus recommendations was to discuss and perform a practical guide to Latin American neurologists on the risk of infections at diagnosis, follow-up and prior to initiation of DMDs.

METHODS

A panel of Latin American neurologists, experts in demyelinating diseases and dedicated to management and care of MS patients, gathered during 2021 and 2022 to make consensus recommendations on the risk of infections in PwMS treated with DMDs in Latin America. The RAND/UCLA methodology was developed to synthesize the scientific evidence and expert opinions on health care topics and was used for reaching a formal agreement.

RESULTS

Recommendations were established based on relevant published evidence and expert opinion, focusing on: 1- baseline infection disease and vaccination status; 2- opportunistic infections; 3- progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy; 4- genitourinary system infections; 5- respiratory tract infections; 6- digestive system infections, 7-others local infections and 8- COVID-19.

CONCLUSION

The recommendations of this consensus seek to optimize the care, management and treatment of PwMS in Latin America. The standardized evidence-based care of pwMS infections will allow better outcomes.

Long-term effects of natalizumab on MRI activity and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) is the most common phenotype of multiple sclerosis (MS), and its active stage is characterized by active T2 lesions with or without gadolinium (Gd) enhancement on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Natalizumab is indicated as monotherapy in adults with active RRMS in Japan. The main objective of this study was to investigate the long-term effect of natalizumab on disease progression in Japanese patients with RRMS using MRI data.

METHODS

This retrospective, chart review study was conducted at a single center in Japan. The main study outcome was the yearly proportion of patients with active T2-weighted image lesions detected with or without Gd enhancement on brain MRI (incidence rate) after treatment initiation for up to 5 years. Additional endpoints included annual relapse rate (ARR) and expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score.

RESULTS

This study included data from 85 patients with RRMS who had received natalizumab for ≥ 1 year; of these, 65 (76.5%) were female and the mean ± standard deviation (SD) age at baseline was 37.5 ± 10.0 years. The incidence rate of active T2 lesions was 52.9% (45/85) in the year prior to natalizumab treatment (Year - 1), which decreased to 2.4% and 1.6% in Year 0.5-1.5 and Year 1.5-2.5, respectively. No active T2 lesions were detected in Year 2.5-5.5 in patients who continued natalizumab treatment. EDSS score was stable, improved, and worsened in 61.8%, 26.3%, and 11.8% of patients, respectively. The median (range) EDSS score was 2.0 (0.0-7.0) at baseline (n = 85) and remained within a similar range (median score between 1.0 and 2.25 during Years 1-5). ARR decreased from 1.12 relapses per year at baseline to 0.12 relapses per year during Year 1 and remained below 0.15 relapses per year up to Year 5.

CONCLUSION

The results of this first long-term study evaluating the effect of natalizumab on MRI activity and clinical outcomes in Japanese patients with RRMS suggest that natalizumab markedly reduced disease activity and maintained effectiveness over several years.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy with natalizumab extended or standard interval dosing in the United States and the rest of the world

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), an important identified risk for natalizumab, has been described for standard interval dosing (SID; dosing interval every-4-weeks). Information on PML with natalizumab extended interval dosing (EID; dosing interval >every-4-weeks) in the US and the rest of the world (ROW) is limited.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patient demographics, risk factors, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes was conducted on confirmed natalizumab EID and SID PML cases evaluated from Biogen pharmacovigilance systems.

RESULTS

Of 857 confirmed natalizumab PML cases, EID and SID accounted for 7.5% and 92.5%, respectively (US: 12.9% and 87.1%; ROW: 5.4% and 94.6%). PML risk factors included anti-JCV index > 1.5 (US: EID, 56.7% and SID, 12.8%; ROW: EID, 44.1% and SID, 21.0%), mean duration of natalizumab treatment (US: 90.0 and 70.2 months; ROW: 54.1 and 49.8 months), and prior immunosuppressive therapy (US: 20.0% and 21.7%; ROW:11.8% and 18.0%). In the EID and SID groups, 68.8% and 76.0% of patients, respectively, were alive at up to 2 years after diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis provides insights on PML in patients receiving natalizumab that extend current knowledge, particularly regarding PML in patients receiving natalizumab EID, which can be built upon in the future.

High levels of endothelial ICAM-1 prohibit natalizumab mediated abrogation of CD4+ T cell arrest on the inflamed BBB under flow in vitro

INTRODUCTION

The humanized anti-α4 integrin blocking antibody natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective treatment for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) that is associated with the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). While extended interval dosing (EID) of NTZ reduces the risk for PML, the minimal dose of NTZ required to maintain its therapeutic efficacy remains unknown.

OBJECTIVE

Here we aimed to identify the minimal NTZ concentration required to inhibit the arrest of human effector/memory CD4⁺ T cell subsets or of PBMCs to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) under physiological flow in vitro.

RESULTS

Making use of three different human in vitro BBB models and in vitro live-cell imaging we observed that NTZ mediated inhibition of α4-integrins failed to abrogate T cell arrest to the inflamed BBB under physiological flow. Complete inhibition of shear resistant T cell arrest required additional inhibition of β2-integrins, which correlated with a strong upregulation of endothelial intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 on the respective BBB models investigated. Indeed, NTZ mediated inhibition of shear resistant T cell arrest to combinations of immobilized recombinant vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1 and ICAM-1 was abrogated in the presence of tenfold higher molar concentrations of ICAM-1 over VCAM-1. Also, monovalent NTZ was less potent than bivalent NTZ in inhibiting T cell arrest to VCAM-1 under physiological flow. In accordance with our previous observations ICAM-1 but not VCAM-1 mediated T cell crawling against the direction of flow.

CONCLUSION

Taken together, our in vitro observations show that high levels of endothelial ICAM-1 abrogate NTZ mediated inhibition of T cell interaction with the BBB. EID of NTZ in MS patients may thus require consideration of the inflammatory status of the BBB as high levels of ICAM-1 may provide an alternative molecular cue allowing for pathogenic T cell entry into the CNS in the presence of NTZ.

Natalizumab extended-interval dosing in a real-life setting

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab is a high-efficacy therapy for recurrent multiple sclerosis (RMS) with a four-week administration interval. Controlled trials have shown that extending this interval to six weeks led to better safety without increasing the risk of relapse. We aimed to analyze the safety of extending the natalizumab interdose interval from 4 to 6 weeks in a real-life setting.

METHODS

This monocentric retrospective self-controlled study included adult patients with RMS treated with natalizumab with a four-week interval between infusions for a minimum of six months, before switching to a six-week interval. The main outcomes were the incidence of MS relapse, new MRI lesions, and MRI activity signs during the two periods, with patients being their own controls.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The mean (95%CI) annualized relapse rate (AAR) before natalizumab introduction was 1.03 (0.52; 1.55). During the four-week interval dosing period, no patient presented with an MS relapse, and seven (13.5%) patients had new MRI lesions. During the six-week interval dosing period, no relapse was observed and two (3.6%) patients had new MRI lesions.

CONCLUSION

We did not observe more relapses or signs of MRI activity when extending the interval between natalizumab infusions from four to six weeks.

Integrin β6 deficiency protects mice from experimental colitis and colitis-associated carcinoma by altering macrophage polarization

Background

Given the key role of integrins in maintaining intestinal homeostasis, anti-integrin biologics in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are being investigated in full swing. However, the unsatisfactory efficacy and safety of current anti-integrin biologics in clinical trials limit their widespread use in clinic. Therefore, it is particularly important to find a target that is highly and specifically expressed in the intestinal epithelium of patients with IBD.

Methods

The function of integrin αvβ6 in IBD and colitis-associated carcinoma (CAC) with the underlying mechanisms has been less studied. In the present study, we detected the level of integrin β6 within inflammation including colitis tissues in human and mouse. To investigate the role of integrin β6 in IBD and CAC, integrin β6 deficient mice were hence generated based on the construction of colitis and CAC model.

Results

We noted that integrin β6 was significantly upregulated in inflammatory epithelium of patients with IBD. Integrin β6 deletion not only reduced infiltration of pro-inflammatory cytokines, but also attenuated disruption of tight junctions between colonic epithelial cells. Meanwhile, lack of integrin β6 affected macrophage infiltration in mice with colitis. This study further revealed that lack of integrin β6 could inhibit tumorigenesis and tumor progression in CAC model by influencing macrophage polarization, which was also involved in attenuating the degree of intestinal symptoms and inflammatory responses in mice suffering from colitis.

Conclusions

The present research provides a potentially new perspective and option for the treatment of IBD and CAC.

Efficacy and Safety of Proposed Biosimilar Natalizumab (PB006) in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Antelope Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Proposed biosimilar natalizumab (biosim-NTZ) PB006 is the first biosimilar monoclonal antibody therapy developed for multiple sclerosis (MS) treatment.

Objective

To evaluate matching efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity between biosim-NTZ and reference natalizumab (ref-NTZ) in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS).

Design, Setting, and Participants

The Antelope trial was a phase 3, parallel-group, randomized, active-controlled study, conducted between October 2019 and March 2021, with last patient follow-up visit on August 23, 2021. The study took place in 48 centers in 7 countries. Of 531 patients with RRMS aged 18 to 60 years screened, 266 were excluded before randomization in line with study criteria. Eligible participants had 1 or more documented relapse within the previous year and either 1 or more gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted or 9 or more T2-weighted brain lesions, Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0 to 5.0 (inclusive), and John Cunningham virus index of 1.5 or less at screening. One patient withdrew consent before dosing.

Interventions

Intravenous infusions every 4 weeks of biosim-NTZ, 300 mg, or ref-NTZ, 300 mg (1:1 randomization), from week 0 to week 44 (end-of-study visit: week 48). At week 24, the ref-NTZ group was rerandomized and 30 patients were switched to biosim-NTZ for the remainder of the study.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was the cumulative number of new active lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (new gadolinium-enhancing T1-weighted lesions and new/enlarging T2-weighted lesions without double counting) over 24 weeks. Additional end points included further magnetic resonance imaging parameters, annualized relapse rate, and Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale score. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity assessments included adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and positivity for anti-John Cunningham virus antibodies and antinatalizumab antibodies.

Results

A total of 264 participants (mean [SD] age, 36.7 [9.38] years; 162 [61.4%] female) received treatment with biosim-NTZ (n = 131) or ref-NTZ (n = 133). At week 24, the model-based mean difference in cumulative number of new active lesions between biosim-NTZ and ref-NTZ treatment groups was 0.17 (least square means [SE]: biosim-NTZ, 0.34 [0.34]; ref-NTZ, 0.45 [0.28]; 95% CI, -0.61 to 0.94 within the prespecified margins of ±2.1). No significant differences between treatment groups were observed across secondary efficacy end points, safety, tolerability, or immunogenicity assessments.

Conclusions and Relevance

Biosim-NTZ matched ref-NTZ in efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity for patients with RRMS in the tested setting. This phase 3 trial supports proposed biosim-NTZ as a biosimilar alternative to ref-NTZ for treating RRMS.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04115488.

Lessons from immunotherapies in multiple sclerosis

The improved understanding of multiple sclerosis (MS) neurobiology alongside the development of novel markers of disease will allow precision medicine to be applied to MS patients, bringing the promise of improved care. Combinations of clinical and paraclinical data are currently used for diagnosis and prognosis. The addition of advanced magnetic resonance imaging and biofluid markers has been strongly encouraged, since classifying patients according to the underlying biology will improve monitoring and treatment strategies. For example, silent progression seems to contribute significantly more than relapses to overall disability accumulation, but currently approved treatments for MS act mainly on neuroinflammation and offer only a partial protection against neurodegeneration. Further research, involving traditional and adaptive trial designs, should strive to halt, repair or protect against central nervous system damage. To personalize new treatments, their selectivity, tolerability, ease of administration, and safety must be considered, while to personalize treatment approaches, patient preferences, risk-aversion, and lifestyle must be factored in, and patient feedback used to indicate real-world treatment efficacy. The use of biosensors and machine-learning approaches to integrate biological, anatomical, and physiological parameters will take personalized medicine a step closer toward the patient's virtual twin, in which treatments can be tried before they are applied.

Ratio of lymphocyte to monocyte area under the curve as a novel predictive factor for severe infection in multiple sclerosis

Background

Individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS) are vulnerable to all types of infection, because MS itself involves immunodeficiency, in addition to involving treatment with immunosuppressants. Simple predictive variables for infection that are easily assessed in daily examinations are warranted. Lymphocyte area under the curve (L_AUC), defined as the sum of serial absolute lymphocyte counts under the lymphocyte count-time curve, has been established as a predictive factor for several infections after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We assessed whether L_AUC could also be a useful factor for predicting severe infection in MS patients.

Methods

From October 2010 to January 2022, MS patients, diagnosed based on the 2017 McDonald criteria, were retrospectively reviewed. We extracted patients with infection requiring hospitalization (IRH) from medical records and matched with controls in a 1:2 ratio. Variables including clinical severity and laboratory data were compared between the infection group and controls. L_AUC was calculated along with the AUC of total white blood cells (W_AUC), neutrophils (N_AUC), lymphocytes (L_AUC), and monocytes (M_AUC). To correct for different times of blood examination and extract mean values of AUC per time point, we divided the AUC by follow-up duration. For example, in evaluating lymphocyte counts, we defined the ratio of [L_AUC] to [follow-up duration] as [L_AUC/t]. Multivariate regression analysis was conducted to extract predictive factors associated with IRH. Also, discriminative analysis was conducted using candidate variables from multivariate analysis.

Results

The total case-control sample included 177 patients of MS with IRH (n=59) and non-IRH (controls) (n=118). Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the risk of serious infection in patients with MS with higher baseline expanded disability status scale (EDSS) (OR 1.340, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.070-1.670, p = 0.010) and lower ratio of L_AUC/t to M_AUC/t (OR 0.766, 95%CI 0.591-0.993, p = 0.046) were significant. Notably, the kind of treatment, including glucocorticoids (GCs), disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and other immunosuppressants agents, and dose of GCs were not significantly associated with serious infection after correlated with EDSS and ratio of L_AUC/t to M_AUC/t. In discriminative analysis, sensitivity was 88.1% (95%CI 76.5-94.7%) and specificity was 35.6% (95%CI 27.1-45.0%), using EDSS ≥ 6.0 or ratio of L_AUC/t to M_AUC/t ≤ 3.699, while sensitivity was 55.9% (95%CI 42.5-68.6%) and specificity was 83.9% (95%CI 75.7-89.8%), using both EDSS ≥ 6.0 and ratio of L_AUC/t to M_AUC/t ≤ 3.699.

Conclusion

Our study revealed the impact of the ratio L_AUC/t to M_AUC/t as a novel prognostic factor for IRH. Clinicians should pay more attention to laboratory data such as lymphocyte or monocyte counts itself, directly presenting individual immunodeficiency, rather than the kind of drug to prevent infection as a clinical manifestation.

Exploratory clinical efficacy and patient-reported outcomes from NOVA: A randomized controlled study of intravenous natalizumab 6-week dosing versus continued 4-week dosing for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab (TYSABRI®) 300 mg administered intravenously every-4-weeks (Q4W) is approved for treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis but is associated with increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Extended natalizumab dosing intervals of approximately every-6-weeks (Q6W) are associated with a lower risk of PML. Primary and secondary clinical outcomes from the NOVA randomized clinical trial (NCT03689972) suggest that effective disease control is maintained in patients who were stable during treatment with natalizumab Q4W for ≥12 months and who then switched to Q6W dosing. We compared additional exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) from NOVA to assess the efficacy of Q6W dosing.

METHODS

Prespecified exploratory clinical efficacy endpoints in NOVA included change from baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score, Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25FW), dominant- and nondominant-hand 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). Exploratory patient-reported outcome (PRO) efficacy endpoints included change from baseline in the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM), Neuro-QoL fatigue questionnaire, Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29), EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D-5 L) index score, Clinical Global Impression (CGI)-Improvement (patient- and clinician-assessed) and CGI-Severity (clinician-assessed) rating scales. Estimated proportions of patients with confirmed EDSS improvement were based on Kaplan-Meier methods. Estimates of mean treatment differences for Q6W versus Q4W in other outcomes were assessed by least squares mean (LSM) and analyzed using a linear mixed model of repeated measures or ordinal logistic regression (CGI-scale).

RESULTS

Exploratory clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed in patients who received ≥1 dose of randomly assigned study treatment and had ≥1 postbaseline efficacy assessment (Q6W group, n = 247, and Q4W group, n = 242). Estimated proportions of patients with EDSS improvement at week 72 were similar for Q6W and Q4W groups (11.7% [19/163] vs 10.8% [17/158]; HR 1.02 [95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53-1.98]; P = 0.9501). At week 72, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for T25FW (0.00, P = 0.975), 9HPT (dominant [0.22, P = 0.533] or nondominant [0.09, P = 0.862] hand), or SDMT (-1.03, P = 0.194). Similarly, there were no significant differences between Q6W and Q4W groups in LSM change from baseline for any PRO (TSQM, -1.00, P = 0.410; Neuro-QoL fatigue, 0.52, P = 0.292; MSIS-29 Psychological, 0.67, P = 0.572; MSIS-29 Physical, 0.74, P = 0.429; EQ-5D-5 L, 0.00, P = 0.978). For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W patients than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening (≥0.5 standard deviation increase in the EQ-5D-5 L index score; P = 0.0475). From baseline to week 72 for Q6W versus Q4W, odds ratio (ORs) of LSM change in CGI scores did not show meaningful differences between groups (CGI-Improvement [patient]: OR [95% CI] 1.2 [0.80-1.73]; CGI-Improvement [physician]: 0.8 [0.47-1.36]; CGI-Severity [physician]: 1.0 [0.71-1.54]).

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences were observed in change from baseline to week 72 between natalizumab Q6W and Q4W groups for all exploratory clinical or PRO-related endpoints assessed. For the EQ-5D-5 L, a higher proportion of Q6W than Q4W patients demonstrated worsening.

Real-World Effectiveness of Natalizumab Extended Interval Dosing in a French Cohort

INTRODUCTION

Natalizumab, a therapy for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), is associated with a risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Over the last several years, practitioners have used off-label extended interval dosing (EID) of natalizumab to reduce PML risk, despite the absence of a large-scale efficacy evaluation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, multicenter cohort study among adults with RRMS receiving stable standard interval dosing (SID), defined as a ≥ 12-month consecutive period of ≥ 11 natalizumab infusions/year in France. We compared the 12-month risk difference of remaining relapse-free (primary endpoint) between patients who switched to EID (≤ 9 natalizumab infusions) and those who remained on SID, with a noninferiority margin of - 11%. We used propensity score methods such as inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). Secondary endpoints were annualized relapse rate, disease progression, and safety.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving EID (n = 147) and SID (n = 156). The proportion of relapse-free patients 12 months postbaseline was 142/147 in the EID (96.6%) and 144/156 in the SID group (92.3%); risk difference (95% CI) 4.3% (- 1.3 to 9.8%); p < 0.001 for non-inferiority. There were no significant differences between relapse rates (0.043 vs. 0.083 per year, respectively; p = 0.14) or Expanded Disability Status Scale mean scores (2.43 vs. 2.72, respectively; p = 0.18); anti-JC virus index values were similar (p = 0.23); and no instances of PML were reported. The comparisons using IPTW (n = 306) and PSM (n = 204) were consistent.

CONCLUSION

These results support the pertinence of using an EID strategy for RRMS patients treated with natalizumab.

CLINICAL TRIALS

gov identifier (NCT04580381).

Updates and advances in multiple sclerosis neurotherapeutics

The multiple sclerosis (MS) neurotherapeutic landscape is rapidly evolving. New disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) with improved efficacy and safety, in addition to an expanding pipeline of agents with novel mechanisms, provide more options for patients with MS. While treatment of MS neuroinflammation is well tailored in the existing DMT armamentarium, concerted efforts are currently underway for identifying neuropathological targets and drug discovery for progressive MS. There is also ongoing research to develop agents for remyelination and neuroprotection. Further insights are needed to guide DMT initiation and sequencing as well as to determine the role of autologous stem cell transplantation in relapsing and progressive MS. This review provides a summary of these updates.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: epidemiology and spectrum of predisposing conditions

Population-based data on the epidemiology of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, its predisposing conditions and mortality rate are lacking, although such data are crucial to raise awareness among clinicians and to lay foundations for future therapeutic trials in immunomodulating therapies. In our study, patients were identified by interrogating the French national healthcare reimbursement database from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017, using progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy International Classification of Diseases code and a patient's selection algorithm. Overall incidence rate, 1-year all-cause mortality rate and survival patterns were calculated, and factors associated with death were identified using a multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model. Our cohort is the largest to date, comprising 584 patients with incident progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. The overall incidence in France from 2010 to 2017 was stable during the study period at 0.11 per 100 000 person-years, 95% confidence interval [0.10-0.12]. Predisposing diseases were HIV infection (43.7%), followed by haematological malignancies (21.9%), chronic inflammatory diseases (20.2%), solid organ transplantation (4.3%), solid neoplasm (4.1%) and primary immune deficiency (1.5%). The 1-year mortality rate was 38.2%, with a 95% confidence interval (34.2-42.2). In multivariate analysis, factors independently associated with death were older age [adjusted hazard ratio 0.33 (0.20-0.53) for patients aged 20 to 40 compared with patients aged over 60], male gender [adjusted hazard ratio 0.73 (0.54-0.99) for females compared with males] and predisposing immunosuppressive disease, with the highest risk for solid neoplasms [adjusted hazard ratio 4.34 (2.25-8.37)], followed by haematological malignancies [adjusted hazard ratio 3.13 (1.85-5.30)] and HIV infection [adjusted hazard ratio 1.83 (1.12-3.00)], compared with chronic inflammatory diseases. Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was notified in 7.0% of patients. In conclusion, incidence of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy is stable in France, and HIV infection remains the main predisposing disease. This large-size cohort uncovers a higher risk of mortality for male patients compared to females, and the worst prognosis for patients with solid neoplasm, while prognosis in patients with haematological malignancies appeared less dismal than in previous studies.

Safety and Monitoring of the Treatment with Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

BACKGROUND

Disease-Modifying Therapies (DMTs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) are widely used given their proven efficacy in the relapsing form of the disease, while recently, Siponimod and Ocrelizumab have been approved for the progressive forms of the disease. Currently, 22 diseasemodifying drugs are approved by the FDA, while in 2012, only nine were present in the market. From March 2019 until August 2020, six new drugs were approved. This rapid development of new DMTs highlighted the need to update our knowledge about their short and long-term safety.

OBJECTIVE

This review summarizes the available safety data for all the Disease-Modifying Therapies for Multiple Sclerosis and presents the monitoring plan before and during the treatment.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using PUBMED and COCHRANE databases. Key journals and abstracts from major annual meetings of Neurology, references of relevant reviews, and relative articles were also manually searched. We prioritized systematic reviews, large randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective cohort studies, and other observational studies. Special attention was paid to guidelines and papers focusing on the safety and monitoring of DMTs.

CONCLUSION

Data for oral (Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators, Fumarates, Teriflunomide, Cladribine), injectables (Interferons, Glatiramer acetate, Ofatumumab), and infusion therapies (Natalizumab, Ocrelizumab, Alemtuzumab) are presented.

Comparative effectiveness of natalizumab versus ocrelizumab in multiple sclerosis: a real-world propensity score-matched study

Background

For treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS), a broad range of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) is available. However, few comparative effectiveness studies between different drugs have been performed.

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and treatment continuation of natalizumab and ocrelizumab in a real-world cohort of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from two German university hospitals.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of RRMS patients who initiated treatment with natalizumab or ocrelizumab between January 2016 and April 2019 at the German university hospitals of Mainz and Düsseldorf. Bayesian propensity score matching was conducted to correct for differences in baseline characteristics. Our primary outcome was no evidence of disease activity [NEDA-3: no relapses, no confirmed disability progression, and no magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity] and its subcomponents. Secondary outcomes included measurement of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in serum, analysis of premature discontinuation, and evidence of rebound activity in patients switching from natalizumab to ocrelizumab.

Results

We identified 63 patients starting treatment with natalizumab and 76 patients starting with ocrelizumab. Binary logistic regression showed that treatment with natalizumab or a higher number of relapses in the previous year were independently associated with a higher risk for relapses. Patients receiving natalizumab had a higher probability of premature discontinuation of therapy (p = 0.002). After propensity score matching of the two treatment arms, 55 patients remained per group. NEDA-3 after 30 months of follow-up was reached by 53.1% in the ocrelizumab group and 36.1% in the natalizumab group (p = 0.177). Ocrelizumab was superior to natalizumab concerning the occurrence of relapses in log-rank test (p = 0.019). NfL levels in serum were low under both treatments. Patients who switched from natalizumab to ocrelizumab showed no increased rebound activity.

Discussion

This study provides class IV evidence that treatment of RRMS patients with ocrelizumab and natalizumab show comparable effectiveness in combined endpoints, while ocrelizumab might be more effective in preventing the occurrence of relapses.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy genetic risk variants for pharmacovigilance of immunosuppressant therapies

Background

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a rare and often lethal brain disorder caused by the common, typically benign polyomavirus 2, also known as JC virus (JCV). In a small percentage of immunosuppressed individuals, JCV is reactivated and infects the brain, causing devastating neurological defects. A wide range of immunosuppressed groups can develop PML, such as patients with: HIV/AIDS, hematological malignancies (e.g., leukemias, lymphomas, and multiple myeloma), autoimmune disorders (e.g., psoriasis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus), and organ transplants. In some patients, iatrogenic (i.e., drug-induced) PML occurs as a serious adverse event from exposure to immunosuppressant therapies used to treat their disease (e.g., hematological malignancies and multiple sclerosis). While JCV infection and immunosuppression are necessary, they are not sufficient to cause PML.

Methods

We hypothesized that patients may also have a genetic susceptibility from the presence of rare deleterious genetic variants in immune-relevant genes (e.g., those that cause inborn errors of immunity). In our prior genetic study of 184 PML cases, we discovered 19 candidate PML risk variants. In the current study of another 152 cases, we validated 4 of 19 variants in both population controls (gnomAD 3.1) and matched controls (JCV+ multiple sclerosis patients on a PML-linked drug ≥ 2 years).

Results

The four variants, found in immune system genes with strong biological links, are: C8B, 1-57409459-C-A, rs139498867; LY9 (alias SLAMF3), 1-160769595-AG-A, rs763811636; FCN2, 9-137779251-G-A, rs76267164; STXBP2, 19-7712287-G-C, rs35490401. Carriers of any one of these variants are shown to be at high risk of PML when drug-exposed PML cases are compared to drug-exposed matched controls: P value = 3.50E-06, OR = 8.7 [3.7-20.6]. Measures of clinical validity and utility compare favorably to other genetic risk tests, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 screening for breast cancer risk and HLA-B^*15:02 pharmacogenetic screening for pharmacovigilance of carbamazepine to prevent Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis.

Conclusion

For the first time, a PML genetic risk test can be implemented for screening patients taking or considering treatment with a PML-linked drug in order to decrease the incidence of PML and enable safer use of highly effective therapies used to treat their underlying disease.

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate

Background and objectives

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an oral disease-modifying therapy with an established benefit and well-described safety profile, is among the most commonly used therapies for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. As of 31 December 2021, >560,000 patients have been treated with DMF, representing >1,190,000 person-years of exposure. Of these, 6413 patients (14,292 person-years) were from clinical trials.

Methods and results

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia (<0.91 × 10⁹/L) in patients treated with DMF. We present detailed clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 12 confirmed PML cases occurring in MS patients on DMF as of 21 July 2021. The PML incidence in DMF-treated patients is 1.07 per 100,000 person-years of DMF exposure. Lymphopenia is the common risk for PML in DMF treatment.

Discussion

DMF-related PML is rare but has occurred in the setting of lymphopenia, supporting the current recommendations for absolute lymphocyte count monitoring in all patients, regardless of age and time on therapy.

Natalizumab extended-interval dosing in multiple sclerosis to mitigate progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk: initial study evidence and real-world experience

The high efficacy of natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) is without controversy. Indeed, effective disease control was not only demonstrated in the pivotal trials but has been corroborated impressively in real-world observations. This monoclonal IgG4 antibody blocks the α4β1 integrin-mediated leukocyte-endothelial interaction and thereby inhibits the migration of immune cells to the brain parenchyma. However, treatment with natalizumab carries the risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). This potentially lethal side effect is a significant limitation for treatment initiation and long-term therapy. Natalizumab is given intravenously or subcutaneously in the standard dose of 300 mg every 4 weeks, allowing drug concentrations at levels that ensure continuous α4β1 integrin receptor saturation on the surface of immune cells. Extended-interval dosing (EID) is an emerging treatment approach that aims to mitigate the natalizumab-related PML risk by prolonging the standard infusion intervals to 6 weeks or even more. This treatment approach may abrogate the PML risk due to improved immune surveillance within the central nervous system while maintaining clinical efficacy. Moreover, even an individual interval dosing can be envisioned based on the availability of a biomarker that is capable of monitoring both safety and efficacy aspects. This review summarizes the early and encouraging evidence for EID from observational and randomized-controlled trials and discusses current limitations and upcoming challenges for introducing a tailored treatment approach.

Reducing infection risk in multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a Brazilian reference center's approach

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) are the most common autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system (CNS). They present chronic relapsing courses that demand treatment with disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) to prevent inflammatory activity. Disease-modifying drugs lead to immunomodulation or immunosuppression through diverse mechanisms (e.g., shifting lymphocyte and cytokine profile, suppressing specific lymphocyte subpopulations). Thus, patients are more prone to infectious complications and associated worsening of disease.

OBJECTIVE

To present feasible strategies for mitigating the infection risk of MS and NMOSD treated patients.

METHODS

Targeted literature review concerning the management of infection risk with an emphasis on vaccination, therapy-specific measures, and particularities of the Brazilian endemic infectious diseases' scenario.

CONCLUSION

We propose a vaccination schedule, infectious screening routine, and prophylactic measures based on the current scientific evidence. Awareness of emergent tropical diseases is necessary due to evidence of demyelinating events and possible parainfectious cases of MS and NMOSD.

Changes in John Cunningham Virus Index in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Different Disease-Modifying Therapies

BACKGROUND

Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) is an opportunistic infection caused by John Cunningham virus (JCV) reactivation, potentially associated with natalizumab (NTZ) treatment for Multiple Sclerosis (MS). The anti-JCV antibodies titre (JCV index) increases during NTZ treatment; however, the effects of other disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) on the JCV index have not been fully explored.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate changes in the JCV index during treatment with several DMTs.

METHODS

This longitudinal study evaluated the JCV index before starting DMT (T0) and during treatment with DMT (T1).

RESULTS

A total of 260 participants (65.4 % females, mean age 43 ± 11.3 ) were enrolled: 68 (26.2 %) treated with fingolimod (FTY), 65 (25 %) rituximab or ocrelizumab (RTX/OCR), 37 (14.2 %) dimethyl-fumarate (DMF), 29 (11.2 %) cladribine (CLD), 23 (8.8 %) teriflunomide (TFM), 20 (7.7 %) interferon or glatiramer acetate (IFN/GA), and 18 (6.9 %) alemtuzumab (ALM). At T1, the percentage of patients with JCV index <0.90 was found to be significantly increased in the ALM group (16.7 % versus 66.7 %, p = 0.05), while the percentage of patients with JCV index >1.51 was found to be significantly reduced in the RTX/OCR group (51.6 % versus 37.5 %, p = 0.04). In the FTY group, a significant reduction in the percentage of patients with JCV index <0.90 was also found (23.5 % versus 1.4 %, p = 0.0006). The mean JCV index was reduced in the RTX/OCR and ALM groups, while a significant increase was observed in the FTY group.

CONCLUSION

DMTs with a T and/or B depleting mechanism of action induced a significant reduction in the JCV index. These results may suggest new possible sequencing strategies potentially maximizing disease control while reducing the PML risk.

A real world multi center study on efficacy and safety of natalizumab in Indian patients with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Natalizumab (NTZ) is increasingly being used in Indian multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. There are no reports on its safety and efficacy, especially with respect to the occurrence of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the patient characteristics, treatment outcomes, and adverse events, especially the occurrence of PML in NTZ-treated patients.

METHODS

A multicentre ambispective study was conducted across 18 centres, from Jan 2012 to Dec 2021. Patients at and above the age of 18 years treated with NTZ were included. Descriptive and comparative statistics were applied to analyze data.

RESULTS

During the study period of 9 years, 116 patients were treated with NTZ. Mean age of the cohort was 35.6 ± 9.7 years; 83/116 (71.6%) were females. Relapse rate for the entire cohort in the year before NTZ was 3.1 ± 1.51 while one year after was 0.20±0.57 (p = 0.001; CI 2.45 -3.35). EDSS of the entire cohort in the year before NTZ was 4.5 ± 1.94 and one year after was 3.8 ± 2.7 (p = 0.013; CI 0.16-1.36). At last follow up (38.3 ± 22.78 months) there were no cases of PML identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Natalizumab is highly effective and safe in Indian MS patients, with no cases of PML identified at last follow up.

Multiple sclerosis and the risk of infection: Association of British Neurologists consensus guideline

Infection in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) is of major concern, particularly for those receiving disease-modifying therapies. This article explores the risk of infection in people with MS and provides guidance-developed by Delphi consensus by specialists involved in their management-on how to screen for, prevent and manage infection in this population.