1
|
Pataky RE, Izadi-Najafabadi S, Smith LW, Gottschlich A, Ionescu D, Proctor L, Ogilvie GS, Peacock S. Strategies to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer in British Columbia, Canada: a modelling study. CMAJ 2024; 196:E716-E723. [PMID: 38830680 PMCID: PMC11142038 DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.231682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To eliminate cervical cancer in Canada by 2040, defined as an annual age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) lower than 4.0 per 100 000 women, the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer (CPAC) identified 3 priorities for action: increasing human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage, implementing HPV-based screening and increasing screening participation, and improving follow-up after abnormal screen results. Our objective was to explore the impact of these priorities on the projected time to elimination of cervical cancer in British Columbia. METHODS We used OncoSim-Cervical, a microsimulation model led and supported by CPAC and developed by Statistics Canada that simulates HPV transmission and the natural history of cervical cancer for the Canadian population. We updated model parameters to reflect BC's historical participation rates and program design. We simulated the transition to HPV-based screening and developed scenarios to explore the additional impact of achieving 90% vaccination coverage, 95% screening recruitment, 90% ontime screening, and 95% follow-up compliance. We projected cervical cancer incidence, ASIR, and year of elimination for the population of BC for 2023-2050. RESULTS HPV-based screening at current vaccination, participation, and follow-up rates can eliminate cervical cancer by 2034. Increasing on-time screening and follow-up compliance could achieve this target by 2031. Increasing vaccination coverage has a small impact over this time horizon. INTERPRETATION With the implementation of HPV-based screening, cervical cancer can be eliminated in BC before 2040. Efforts to increase screening participation and follow-up through this transition could potentially accelerate this timeline, but the transition from cytology- to HPV-based screening is fundamental to achieving this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reka E Pataky
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Sara Izadi-Najafabadi
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Laurie W Smith
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Anna Gottschlich
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Diana Ionescu
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Lily Proctor
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Gina S Ogilvie
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| | - Stuart Peacock
- Cancer Control Research (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi, Smith, Peacock), BC Cancer; Canadian Centre for Applied Research in Cancer Control (Pataky, Izadi-Najafabadi); Women's Health Research Institute (Smith, Ogilvie), BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Karmanos Cancer Institute (Gottschlich), Wayne State University, Detroit Mich.; Faculty of Medicine (Ionescu, Proctor), University of British Columbia; Cervix Screening Program (Ionescu, Proctor), BC Cancer; School of Population and Public Health (Ogilvie), University of British Columbia; Faculty of Health Sciences (Peacock), Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Vaccination and screening strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination in Norway: a model-based analysis. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1951-1959. [PMID: 38643338 PMCID: PMC11183251 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02682-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Experts have proposed an 'EVEN FASTER' concept targeting age-groups maintaining circulation of human papillomavirus (HPV). We explored effects of the vaccination component of these proposals compared with cervical cancer (CC) screening-based interventions on age-standardized incidence rate (ASR) and CC elimination (<4 cases/100,000) timing in Norway. METHODS We used a model-based approach to evaluate HPV vaccination and CC screening scenarios compared with a status-quo scenario reflecting previous vaccination and screening. For cohorts ages 25-30 years, we examined 6 vaccination scenarios that incrementally increased vaccination coverage from current cohort-specific rates. Each vaccination scenario was coupled with three screening strategies that varied screening frequency. Additionally, we included 4 scenarios that alternatively increased screening adherence. Population- and cohort-level outcomes included ASR, lifetime risk of CC, and colposcopy referrals. RESULTS Several vaccination strategies coupled with de-intensified screening frequencies lowered ASR, but did not accelerate CC elimination. Alternative strategies that increased screening adherence could both accelerate elimination and improve ASR. CONCLUSIONS The vaccination component of an 'EVEN FASTER' campaign is unlikely to accelerate CC elimination in Norway but may reduce population-level ASR. Alternatively, targeting under- and never-screeners may both eliminate CC faster and lead to greater health benefits compared with vaccination-based interventions we considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen YC, Chen YY, Su SY, Jhuang JR, Chiang CJ, Yang YW, Lin LJ, Wu CC, Lee WC. Projected Time for the Elimination of Cervical Cancer Under Various Intervention Scenarios: Age-Period-Cohort Macrosimulation Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2024; 10:e46360. [PMID: 38635315 PMCID: PMC11066752 DOI: 10.2196/46360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization aims for the global elimination of cervical cancer, necessitating modeling studies to forecast long-term outcomes. OBJECTIVE This paper introduces a macrosimulation framework using age-period-cohort modeling and population attributable fractions to predict the timeline for eliminating cervical cancer in Taiwan. METHODS Data for cervical cancer cases from 1997 to 2016 were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. Future incidence rates under the current approach and various intervention strategies, such as scaled-up screening (cytology based or human papillomavirus [HPV] based) and HPV vaccination, were projected. RESULTS Our projections indicate that Taiwan could eliminate cervical cancer by 2050 with either 70% compliance in cytology-based or HPV-based screening or 90% HPV vaccination coverage. The years projected for elimination are 2047 and 2035 for cytology-based and HPV-based screening, respectively; 2050 for vaccination alone; and 2038 and 2033 for combined screening and vaccination approaches. CONCLUSIONS The age-period-cohort macrosimulation framework offers a valuable policy analysis tool for cervical cancer control. Our findings can inform strategies in other high-incidence countries, serving as a benchmark for global efforts to eliminate the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chu Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yun-Yuan Chen
- Head Office, Taiwan Blood Services Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Yung Su
- Master Program in Statistics, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jing-Rong Jhuang
- Institute of Statistical Science, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ju Chiang
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei city, Taiwan
| | | | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Chun Wu
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chung Lee
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Taiwan Cancer Registry, Taipei city, Taiwan
- Institute of Health Data Analytics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garg A, Galvin AM, Griner SB, Rosberger Z, Daley EM, Thompson EL. HPV self-sampling among women in the United States: preferences for implementation. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:167-176. [PMID: 37633857 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01778-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE With the inclusion of primary HPV testing in 2018 U.S. Preventive Services Taskforce guidelines, at-home HPV self-sampling may provide a future option for cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations in the U.S. This study evaluated the association of implementation preferences with the willingness of at-home HPV self-sampling. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional study in 2018 among U.S. women ages 30-65 years, without a hysterectomy (n = 812). The outcome was willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling (yes/no). Primary predictor variables (i.e., information source, methods of payment, methods of sending or receiving self-sampling kits) measured self-sampling implementation preferences. Adjusted logistic regression identified associations with willingness to have at-home HPV self-sampling. RESULTS Participants who preferred receiving information from healthcare providers (OR = 2.64; 95% CI 1.54,4.52) or from media or other sources (OR = 2.30; 95% CI 1.51,3.48) had higher HPV self-sampling willingness than participants who did not prefer those sources. Participants who did not want to pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.21; 95% CI 0.14,0.32) or did not know if they would pay for self-sampling (OR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.22,0.54) had lower odds of HPV self-sampling willingness compared to participants willing to pay. Participants who did not know which method they preferred for receiving a self-sampling kit (OR = 0.15, 95% CI 0.07,0.31) or preferred delivering the sample to the lab themselves (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.36,0.96) had lower odds for self-sampling willingness compared to participants who preferred the mail. CONCLUSION Understanding the preferences of women regarding the implementation of HPV self-sampling can improve uptake in cervical cancer screening, especially among hard-to-reach populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashvita Garg
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
| | - Annalynn M Galvin
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stacey B Griner
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Systems, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Department of Oncology, Psychiatry and Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ellen M Daley
- College of Public Health, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Erika L Thompson
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rahangdale L, Teodoro N, Chinula L, Brewer NT. Eliminating cervical cancer as a global public health problem requires equitable action. BMJ 2023; 383:2978. [PMID: 38135345 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.p2978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Rahangdale
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
- Center for AIDS Research, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Nicholas Teodoro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Wits Health Consortium Clinical HIV Research Unit, Women's Cancer Research Division, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Lameck Chinula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- UNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Simms KT, Keane A, Nguyen DTN, Caruana M, Hall MT, Lui G, Gauvreau C, Demke O, Arbyn M, Basu P, Wentzensen N, Lauby-Secretan B, Ilbawi A, Hutubessy R, Almonte M, De Sanjosé S, Kelly H, Dalal S, Eckert LO, Santesso N, Broutet N, Canfell K. Benefits, harms and cost-effectiveness of cervical screening, triage and treatment strategies for women in the general population. Nat Med 2023; 29:3050-3058. [PMID: 38087115 PMCID: PMC10719104 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-023-02600-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
In 2020, the World Health Organization (WHO) launched a strategy to eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem. To support the strategy, the WHO published updated cervical screening guidelines in 2021. To inform this update, we used an established modeling platform, Policy1-Cervix, to evaluate the impact of seven primary screening scenarios across 78 low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs) for the general population of women. Assuming 70% coverage, we found that primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening approaches were the most effective and cost-effective, reducing cervical cancer age-standardized mortality rates by 63-67% when offered every 5 years. Strategies involving triaging women before treatment (with 16/18 genotyping, cytology, visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) or colposcopy) had close-to-similar effectiveness to HPV screening without triage and fewer pre-cancer treatments. Screening with VIA or cytology every 3 years was less effective and less cost-effective than HPV screening every 5 years. Furthermore, VIA generated more than double the number of pre-cancer treatments compared to HPV. In conclusion, primary HPV screening is the most effective, cost-effective and efficient cervical screening option in LMICs. These findings have directly informed WHO's updated cervical screening guidelines for the general population of women, which recommend primary HPV screening in a screen-and-treat or screen-triage-and-treat approach, starting from age 30 years with screening every 5 years or 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate T Simms
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Adam Keane
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Diep Thi Ngoc Nguyen
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Michaela T Hall
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Gigi Lui
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Cindy Gauvreau
- Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- SUCCESS Project, Expertise France, Paris, France
| | - Owen Demke
- Global Diagnostics, Clinton Health Access Initiative, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Partha Basu
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Beatrice Lauby-Secretan
- Evidence Synthesis and Classification Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France
| | - Andre Ilbawi
- Department for the Management of Noncommunicable Diseases, Disability, Violence and Injury Prevention, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Raymond Hutubessy
- Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Maribel Almonte
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Silvia De Sanjosé
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
- ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Helen Kelly
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Shona Dalal
- Department of Global HIV, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections Programmes, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Linda O Eckert
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Nancy Santesso
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Nathalie Broutet
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Trentham-Dietz A, Corley DA, Del Vecchio NJ, Greenlee RT, Haas JS, Hubbard RA, Hughes AE, Kim JJ, Kobrin S, Li CI, Meza R, Neslund-Dudas CM, Tiro JA. Data gaps and opportunities for modeling cancer health equity. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:246-254. [PMID: 37947335 PMCID: PMC11009506 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Population models of cancer reflect the overall US population by drawing on numerous existing data resources for parameter inputs and calibration targets. Models require data inputs that are appropriately representative, collected in a harmonized manner, have minimal missing or inaccurate values, and reflect adequate sample sizes. Data resource priorities for population modeling to support cancer health equity include increasing the availability of data that 1) arise from uninsured and underinsured individuals and those traditionally not included in health-care delivery studies, 2) reflect relevant exposures for groups historically and intentionally excluded across the full cancer control continuum, 3) disaggregate categories (race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, sexual orientation, etc.) and their intersections that conceal important variation in health outcomes, 4) identify specific populations of interest in clinical databases whose health outcomes have been understudied, 5) enhance health records through expanded data elements and linkage with other data types (eg, patient surveys, provider and/or facility level information, neighborhood data), 6) decrease missing and misclassified data from historically underrecognized populations, and 7) capture potential measures or effects of systemic racism and corresponding intervenable targets for change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Trentham-Dietz
- Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Douglas A Corley
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Natalie J Del Vecchio
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer S Haas
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Rebecca A Hubbard
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy E Hughes
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jane J Kim
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sarah Kobrin
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Christopher I Li
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia (BC) Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Jasmin A Tiro
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Chicago Biological Sciences Division, and University of Chicago Medicine Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Spencer JC, Burger EA, Campos NG, Regan MC, Sy S, Kim JJ. Adapting a model of cervical carcinogenesis to self-identified Black women to evaluate racial disparities in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2023; 2023:188-195. [PMID: 37947333 PMCID: PMC10637021 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Self-identified Black women in the United States have higher cervical cancer incidence and mortality than the general population, but these differences have not been clearly attributed across described cancer care inequities. METHODS A previously established microsimulation model of cervical cancer was adapted to reflect demographic, screening, and survival data for Black US women and compared with a model reflecting data for all US women. Each model input with stratified data (all-cause mortality, hysterectomy rates, screening frequency, screening modality, follow-up, and cancer survival) was sequentially replaced with Black-race specific data to arrive at a fully specified model reflecting Black women. At each step, we estimated the relative contribution of inputs to observed disparities. RESULTS Estimated (hysterectomy-adjusted) cervical cancer incidence was 8.6 per 100 000 in the all-race model vs 10.8 per 100 000 in the Black-race model (relative risk [RR] = 1.24, range = 1.23-1.27). Estimated all-race cervical cancer mortality was 2.9 per 100 000 vs 5.5 per 100 000 in the Black-race model (RR = 1.92, range = 1.85-2.00). We found the largest contributors of incidence disparities were follow-up from positive screening results (47.3% of the total disparity) and screening frequency (32.7%). For mortality disparities, the largest contributor was cancer survival differences (70.1%) followed by screening follow-up (12.7%). CONCLUSION To reduce disparities in cervical cancer incidence and mortality, it is important to understand and address differences in care access and quality across the continuum of care. Focusing on the practices and policies that drive differences in treatment and follow-up from cervical abnormalities may have the highest impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Spencer
- Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nicole G Campos
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mary Caroline Regan
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Zhao X, Gopalappa C. Joint modeling HIV and HPV using a new hybrid agent-based network and compartmental simulation technique. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0288141. [PMID: 37922306 PMCID: PMC10624270 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Persons living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have a disproportionately higher burden of human papillomavirus infection (HPV)-related cancers. Causal factors include both behavioral and biological. While pharmaceutical and care support interventions help address biological risk of coinfection, as social conditions are common drivers of behaviors, structural interventions are key part of behavioral interventions. Our objective is to develop a joint HIV-HPV model to evaluate the contribution of each factor, to subsequently inform intervention analyses. While compartmental modeling is sufficient for faster spreading HPV, network modeling is suitable for slower spreading HIV. However, using network modeling for jointly modeling HIV and HPV can generate computational complexities given their vastly varying disease epidemiology and disease burden across sub-population groups. We applied a recently developed mixed agent-based compartmental (MAC) simulation technique, which simulates persons with at least one slower spreading disease and their immediate contacts as agents in a network, and all other persons including those with faster spreading diseases in a compartmental model, with an evolving contact network algorithm maintaining the dynamics between the two models. We simulated HIV and HPV in the U.S. among heterosexual female, heterosexual male, and men who have sex with men (men only and men and women) (MSM), sub-populations that mix but have varying HIV burden, and cervical cancer among women. We conducted numerical analyses to evaluate the contribution of behavioral and biological factors to risk of cervical cancer among women with HIV. The model outputs for HIV, HPV, and cervical cancer compared well with surveillance estimates. Model estimates for relative prevalence of HPV (1.67 times) and relative incidence of cervical cancer (3.6 times), among women with HIV compared to women without, were also similar to that reported in observational studies in the literature. The fraction attributed to biological factors ranged from 22-38% for increased HPV prevalence and 80% for increased cervical cancer incidence, the remaining attributed to behavioral. The attribution of both behavioral and biological factors to increased HPV prevalence and cervical cancer incidence suggest the need for behavioral, structural, and pharmaceutical interventions. Validity of model results related to both individual and joint disease metrics serves as proof-of-concept of the MAC simulation technique. Understanding the contribution of behavioral and biological factors of risk helps inform interventions. Future work can expand the model to simulate sexual and care behaviors as functions of social conditions to jointly evaluate behavioral, structural, and pharmaceutical interventions for HIV and cervical cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinmeng Zhao
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America
| | - Chaitra Gopalappa
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sokale IO, Thrift AP, Montealegre J, Adekanmbi V, Chido-Amajuoyi OG, Amuta A, Reitzel LR, Oluyomi AO. Geographic Variation in Late-Stage Cervical Cancer Diagnosis. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2343152. [PMID: 37955896 PMCID: PMC10644213 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance There are stark disparities in cervical cancer burden in the United States, notably by race and ethnicity and geography. Late-stage diagnosis is an indicator of inadequate access to and utilization of screening. Objective To identify geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer at time of diagnosis in Texas. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based cross-sectional study used incident cervical cancer data from the Texas Cancer Registry from 2014 to 2018 of female patients aged 18 years or older. Late-stage cervical cancer cases were geocoded at the census tract level (n = 5265) using their residential coordinates (latitude and longitude) at the time of diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed from April to September 2023. Exposures Census tract of residence at diagnosis. Main Outcome and Measures Late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis (ie, cases classified by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results summary stages 2 to 4 [regional spread] or 7 [distant metastasis]). A Poisson probability-based model of the SaTScan purely spatial scan statistics was applied at the census tract-level to identify geographic clusters of higher (hot spots) or lower (cold spots) proportions than expected of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis and adjusted for age. Results Among a total of 6484 female patients with incident cervical cancer cases (mean [SD] age, 48.7 [14.7] years), 2300 (35.5%) were Hispanic, 798 (12.3%) were non-Hispanic Black, 3090 (47.6%) were non-Hispanic White, and 296 (4.6%) were other race or ethnicity. Of the 6484 patients, 2892 with late-stage diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 51.8 [14.4] years were analyzed. Among patients with late-stage diagnosis, 1069 (37.0%) were Hispanic, 417 (14.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 1307 (45.2%) were non-Hispanic White, and 99 (3.4%) were other race or ethnicity. SaTScan spatial analysis identified 7 statistically significant clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas, of which 4 were hot spots and 3 were cold spots. Hot spots included 1128 census tracts, predominantly in the South Texas Plains, Gulf Coast, and Prairies and Lakes (North Texas) regions. Of the 2892 patients with late-stage cervical cancer, 880 (30.4%) were observed within hot spots. Census tract-level comparison of characteristics of clusters suggested that hot spots differed significantly from cold spots and the rest of Texas by proportions of racial and ethnic groups, non-US born persons, and socioeconomic status. Conclusions and Relevance In this cross-sectional study examining geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis, place-based disparities were found in late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas. These findings suggest that these communities may benefit from aggressive cervical cancer interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itunu O. Sokale
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Aaron P. Thrift
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jane Montealegre
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Victor Adekanmbi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston
| | | | - Ann Amuta
- School of Health Promotion and Kinesiology, Texas Woman’s University, Denton
| | - Lorraine R. Reitzel
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
| | - Abiodun O. Oluyomi
- Department of Medicine, Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Herweijer E, Wang J, Hu K, Valdimarsdóttir UA, Adami HO, Sparén P, Sundström K, Fang F. Overall and Cervical Cancer Survival in Patients With and Without Mental Disorders. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336213. [PMID: 37773493 PMCID: PMC10542737 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Individuals with a mental disorder experience substantial health disparity and are less likely to participate in cervical screening and human papillomavirus vaccination. Additionally, this population may benefit less from tertiary cancer prevention. Objective To compare clinical characteristics and survival patterns between patients with cervical cancer with and without a preexisting diagnosis of a mental disorder at the time of cervical cancer diagnosis. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study obtained data from Swedish population-based (Swedish Cancer Register, Swedish Cause of Death Register, Swedish Total Population Register, Swedish Patient Register, and Swedish Longitudinal Integration Database for Health Insurance and Labor Market Studies) and quality registries (Swedish Quality Register of Gynecologic Cancer and Swedish National Cervical Screening Register) on patients with cervical cancer. Patients who were included in the analysis were identified using the Swedish Cancer Register and were diagnosed with cervical cancer between 1978 and 2018. The Swedish Patient Register was used to identify patients with mental disorders using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision and Ninth Revision and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision. Because data on clinical characteristics at the time of cancer diagnosis were available for only for part of the study population, 2 patient groups were created: those with cervical cancer diagnosed from 2002 to 2016 and all patients diagnosed with cervical cancer (1978-2018). Data analyses were carried out between March and September 2022. Exposure Clinical diagnoses of a mental disorder, including substance abuse, psychotic disorders, depression, anxiety, stress-related disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, autism, and intellectual disability, prior to cervical cancer. Main Outcomes and Measures Death due to any cause or due to cervical cancer as ascertained from the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Results The sample included 20 177 females (mean [SD] age, 53.4 [17.7] years) diagnosed with cervical cancer from 1978 to 2018. In a subgroup of 6725 females (mean [SD] age, 52.2 [18.0] years) with cervical cancer diagnosed from 2002 to 2016, 893 (13.3%) had a preexisting diagnosis of a mental disorder. Compared with patients with no preexisting mental disorder diagnosis, those with a preexisting mental disorder had a higher risk of death due to any cause (hazard ratio [HR], 1.32; 95% CI, 1.17-1.48) and due to cervical cancer (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.07-1.42). These risks were lower after adjustment for cancer characteristics at the time of cancer diagnosis (death due to any cause: HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.06-1.34] and death due to cervical cancer: HR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.97-1.30]). Risk of death was higher for patients with substance abuse, psychotic disorders, or mental disorders requiring inpatient care. Among patients with cervical cancer diagnosed from 1978 to 2018, the estimated 5-year survival improved continuously during the study period regardless of preexisting diagnosis of a mental disorder status. For example, in 2018, the estimated 5-year overall survival proportion was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.60-0.71) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.72-0.76) for patients with and without a preexisting diagnosis of a mental disorder, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance Findings of this cohort study suggest that patients with cervical cancer and a preexisting diagnosis of a mental disorder have worse overall and cervical cancer-specific survival than patients without a preexisting mental disorder diagnosis, which may be partly attributable to cancer and sociodemographic characteristics at diagnosis. Hence, individuals with mental disorders deserve special attention in the tertiary prevention of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Herweijer
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jiangrong Wang
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kejia Hu
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Unnur A. Valdimarsdóttir
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Centre of Public Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Iceland, Reykjavik
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Hans-Olov Adami
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Effectiveness Group, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Pär Sparén
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Karin Sundström
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fang Fang
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Haldar SD, Vilar E, Maitra A, Zaidi N. Worth a Pound of Cure? Emerging Strategies and Challenges in Cancer Immunoprevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2023; 16:483-495. [PMID: 37001882 PMCID: PMC10548442 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-22-0478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Cancer immunoprevention applies immunologic approaches such as vaccines to prevent, rather than to treat or cure, cancer. Despite limited success in the treatment of advanced disease, the development of cancer vaccines to intercept premalignant states is a promising area of current research. These efforts are supported by the rationale that vaccination in the premalignant setting is less susceptible to mechanisms of immune evasion compared with established cancer. Prophylactic vaccines have already been developed for a minority of cancers mediated by oncogenic viruses (e.g., hepatitis B and human papillomavirus). Extending the use of preventive vaccines to non-virally driven malignancies remains an unmet need to address the rising global burden of cancer. This review provides a broad overview of clinical trials in cancer immunoprevention with an emphasis on emerging vaccine targets and delivery platforms, translational challenges, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav D. Haldar
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Eduardo Vilar
- Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anirban Maitra
- Sheikh Ahmed Pancreatic Cancer Research Center, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Neeha Zaidi
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Prem K, Choi YH, Bénard É, Burger EA, Hadley L, Laprise JF, Regan MC, Drolet M, Sy S, Abbas K, Portnoy A, Kim JJ, Brisson M, Jit M. Global impact and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose human papillomavirus vaccination schedules: a comparative modelling analysis. BMC Med 2023; 21:313. [PMID: 37635227 PMCID: PMC10463590 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-02988-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To eliminate cervical cancer as a public health problem, the World Health Organization had recommended routine vaccination of adolescent girls with two doses of the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine before sexual initiation. However, many countries have yet to implement HPV vaccination because of financial or logistical barriers to delivering two doses outside the infant immunisation programme. METHODS Using three independent HPV transmission models, we estimated the long-term health benefits and cost-effectiveness of one-dose versus two-dose HPV vaccination, in 188 countries, under scenarios in which one dose of the vaccine gives either a shorter duration of full protection (20 or 30 years) or lifelong protection but lower vaccine efficacy (e.g. 80%) compared to two doses. We simulated routine vaccination with the 9-valent HPV vaccine in 10-year-old girls at 80% coverage for the years 2021-2120, with a 1-year catch-up campaign up to age 14 at 80% coverage in the first year of the programme. RESULTS Over the years 2021-2120, one-dose vaccination at 80% coverage was projected to avert 115.2 million (range of medians: 85.1-130.4) and 146.8 million (114.1-161.6) cervical cancers assuming one dose of the vaccine confers 20 and 30 years of protection, respectively. Should one dose of the vaccine provide lifelong protection at 80% vaccine efficacy, 147.8 million (140.6-169.7) cervical cancer cases could be prevented. If protection wanes after 20 years, 65 to 889 additional girls would need to be vaccinated with the second dose to prevent one cervical cancer, depending on the epidemiological profiles of the country. Across all income groups, the threshold cost for the second dose was low: from 1.59 (0.14-3.82) USD in low-income countries to 44.83 (3.75-85.64) USD in high-income countries, assuming one dose confers 30-year protection. CONCLUSIONS Results were consistent across the three independent models and suggest that one-dose vaccination has similar health benefits to a two-dose programme while simplifying vaccine delivery, reducing costs, and alleviating vaccine supply constraints. The second dose may become cost-effective if there is a shorter duration of protection from one dose, cheaper vaccine and vaccination delivery strategies, and high burden of cervical cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiesha Prem
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Yoon Hong Choi
- Modelling and Economics Unit, Data, Analytics and Surveillance, UK Health Security Agency, London, UK
| | - Élodie Bénard
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Liza Hadley
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Disease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Mary Caroline Regan
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mélanie Drolet
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Stephen Sy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kaja Abbas
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Marc Brisson
- Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raveinthiranathan N, Simkin J, Donken R, Ogilvie G, Smith L, Van Niekerk D, Lee M, Woods RR. Age-Specific Trends of Invasive Cervical Cancer Incidence in British Columbia, Canada, 1971-2017. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:7692-7705. [PMID: 37623038 PMCID: PMC10453046 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30080557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This study examined invasive cervical cancer (ICC) incidence trends in British Columbia (BC) by age and stage-at-diagnosis relative to World Health Organization ICC elimination targets (4 per 100,000 persons). Incident ICC cases (1971-2017) were obtained from the BC Cancer Registry. Annual age-standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) per 100,000 persons were generated using the direct method. ASIRs were examined among all ages 15+ years and eight age groups using Joinpoint Regression with the Canadian 2011 standard population. Standardized rate ratios (SRRs) compared stage II-IV (late) versus stage I (early) ASIRs by age (2010-2017). ICC ASIRs did not reach the elimination target. ASIRs declined from 18.88 to 7.08 per 100,000 persons (1971-2017). Stronger declines were observed among ages 45+ years, with the largest decline among ages 70-79 years (AAPC = -3.2%, 95% CI = -3.9% to -2.6%). Among ages 25-69 years, varying levels of attenuation in declining trends and stabilization were observed since the 1980s. SRRs indicated higher rates of late-stage ICC among ages 55+ years (SRR-55-69 years = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.08-1.71). Overall, ICC incidence declined in BC since 1971 but did not reach the elimination target. The pace of decline varied across age groups and increased with age. Continued efforts are needed to progress cervical cancer elimination among all age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nivedha Raveinthiranathan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Jonathan Simkin
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Robine Donken
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Gina Ogilvie
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Laurie Smith
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Dirk Van Niekerk
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Cervical Cancer Screening Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1G1, Canada
| | - Marette Lee
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Service, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Ryan R. Woods
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gao M, Hu S, Zhao X, You T, Jit M, Liu Y, Qiao Y, Zhao F, Wang C. Health and economic impact of delaying large-scale HPV vaccination and screening implementation on cervical cancer in China: a modelling study. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2023; 36:100768. [PMID: 37547038 PMCID: PMC10398607 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2023.100768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Current uptake of HPV vaccination and screening in China is far below World Health Organization 2030 targets for cervical cancer elimination. We quantified health and economic losses of delaying large-scale HPV vaccination and screening implementation in China. Methods We used a previously validated transmission model to project lifetime health benefits, costs, effectiveness, and timeline for cervical cancer elimination of alternative scenarios, including combining HPV vaccination initiated from 2022 to 2030 with screening in different modalities and coverage increase rates, as well as screening alone. All women living or projected to be born in China during 2022-2100 were considered. We employed a societal perspective. Findings Regardless of vaccine type, immediate large-scale vaccination initiated in 2022 and achieving 70% coverage of HPV-based screening in 2030 (no-delay scenario) would be the least costly and most effective. Compared with the no-delay scenario, delaying vaccination by eight years would result in 434,000-543,000 additional cervical cancer cases, 138,000-178,000 deaths, and $2863-4437 million costs, and delay elimination by 9-10 years. Even with immediate vaccination, the gradual scale-up of LBC-based screening to 70% coverage in 2070 would result in 2,530,000-3,060,000 additional cases, 909,000-1,040,000 deaths, and $5098-5714 million costs compared with no-delay scenario, and could not achieve elimination if domestic 2vHPV or 4vHPV vaccines are used (4.09-4.21 cases per 100,000 woman in 2100). Interpretation Delaying large-scale HPV vaccination and/or high-performance screening implementation has detrimental consequences for cervical cancer morbidity, mortality, and expenditure. These findings should spur health authorities to expedite large-scale vaccine rollout and improve screening. Funding Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-031449 and INV-003174) and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (2021-I2M-1-004).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Gao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shangying Hu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xuelian Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting You
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Mark Jit
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- School of Public Health, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Youlin Qiao
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Fanghui Zhao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chen Wang
- School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ji L, Chen M, Yao L. Strategies to eliminate cervical cancer in China. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1105468. [PMID: 37333817 PMCID: PMC10273099 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1105468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer is a widely distributed disease that is preventable and controllable through early intervention. The World Health Organization has identified three key measures, coverage populations and coverage targets to eliminate cervical cancer. The WHO and several countries have conducted model predictions to determine the optimal strategy and timing of cervical cancer elimination. However, specific implementation strategies need to be developed in the context of local conditions. China has a relatively high disease burden of cervical cancer but a low human papillomavirus vaccination rate and cervical cancer screening population coverage. The purpose of this paper is to review interventions and prediction studies for the elimination of cervical cancer and to analyze the problems, challenges and strategies for the elimination of cervical cancer in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lu Ji
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Manli Chen
- School of Management, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan, China
| | - Lan Yao
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Onyeaka HK, Muoghalu C, Deary EC, Ajayi KV, Kyeremeh E, Dosunmu TG, Jawla M, Onaku E, Nwani SP, Asante KO, Amonoo HL. The Role of Health Information Technology in Improving Awareness of Human Papillomavirus and Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Among U.S. Adults. Telemed J E Health 2023; 29:886-895. [PMID: 36394492 PMCID: PMC10277992 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2022.0381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Revised: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Although human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines prevent cancer-causing HPV infections and cervical precancers, there is suboptimal awareness and limited global accessibility of HPV and HPV vaccine. Emerging evidence suggests that health information technology (HIT) may influence HPV-related awareness and improve vaccine adoption. The objective of this study was to evaluate the link between HIT and HPV-related awareness Methods: Data were obtained from 1,866 U.S. adults aged 18-45 years who completed the 2017 and 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey. We conducted multivariable logistic regression to analyze the association between HIT utilization and HPV-related awareness. Results: Awareness of HPV and HPV vaccine were 72.7% and 67.5%, respectively. Participants who used electronic means to look up health information (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.05; p = 0.001), communicate with health care provider (aOR = 1.68; p = 0.026), look up test results (aOR = 1.94; p = 0.005), and track health costs (aOR = 1.65; p = 0.04) were more likely to report HPV awareness than those who did not. Participants who used an electronic device to look up health information (aOR = 3.10; p = 0.003), communicate with clinicians (aOR = 1.72; p = 0.008), look up test results (aOR = 1.63; p = 0.021), and track health care charges (aOR = 1.90; p = 0.006) were more likely to report HPV vaccine awareness than those who did not. Discussion and Conclusion: Our findings suggest a positive association between HIT utilization and HPV-related awareness. Given the rapid and exponential increase in mobile technology access globally, these results are encouraging and offer a potential opportunity to leverage digital technology in primary cancer prevention for HPV-related cancers, especially in low- and middle-income countries with unsophisticated health infrastructures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry K. Onyeaka
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Chioma Muoghalu
- Department of Clinical Informatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Presbyterian Hospital, Clovis, New Mexico, USA
| | - Emma C. Deary
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kobi V. Ajayi
- Department of Health and Kinesiology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
- Laboratory of Community Health Evaluation Science and Systems (CHESS), Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas, USA
| | - Emmanuel Kyeremeh
- Department of Sociology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Muhammed Jawla
- Department of Epidemiology, Louisiana State University School of Health Sciences, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | | | - Somtochi P Nwani
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Nigeria, Enugu, Nigeria
| | | | - Hermioni L. Amonoo
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ashique S, Hussain A, Fatima N, Altamimi MA. HPV pathogenesis, various types of vaccines, safety concern, prophylactic and therapeutic applications to control cervical cancer, and future perspective. Virusdisease 2023:1-19. [PMID: 37363362 PMCID: PMC10208188 DOI: 10.1007/s13337-023-00824-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Over 98% of cervical cancers (CC) are caused by regular infections with "high risk" genotype of the human papilloma virus (HPV). However, this is not always the causative factor. Therefore, production of HPV vaccinations represents a significant chance to minimize the risk of CC. Phase III studies for a number of preventative HPV vaccines based on L1-virus-like particle (VLPs) have just been completed and the preliminary results are very convincing. However, there are a lot of practical concerns that need to be resolved before the use of these vaccinations. These vaccines were challenged with obvious queries such as protection time, subject receiving vaccines, time of vaccination, and how to include them into ongoing screening programs. Although these vaccines were 90% effective at preventing HPV infection as these offered only modest advantages for the removal of pre-existing infections. New advancements in the creation of therapeutic vaccinations have been explored for further improvement and post-vaccination surveillance. Therapeutic vaccines attempted to boost cell-mediated immunities and these are detrimental to the infected cell as opposed to neutralizing antibodies (different from prophylactic vaccines).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sumel Ashique
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Bharat Institute of Technology (BIT), Meerut, Uttar Pradesh 250103 India
| | - Afzal Hussain
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia
| | - Neda Fatima
- Department of Pharmacology, Sai College of Pharmacy, Mau, Uttar Pradesh 275102 India
| | - Mohammad A. Altamimi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451 Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perkins R, Mitchell E. Cervical cancer disparities. J Natl Med Assoc 2023; 115:S19-S25. [PMID: 37202000 DOI: 10.1016/j.jnma.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Perkins
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Edith Mitchell
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Jefferson, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kojalo U, Tisler A, Parna K, Kivite-Urtane A, Zodzika J, Stankunas M, Baltzer N, Nygard M, Uuskula A. An overview of cervical cancer epidemiology and prevention in the Baltic States. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:660. [PMID: 37029357 PMCID: PMC10080753 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15524-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/09/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS To inform future Baltic States-specific policy analyses, we aimed to provide an overview of cervical cancer epidemiology and existing prevention efforts in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. METHODS A structured desk review: we compiled and summarized data on current prevention strategies, population demography and epidemiology (high risk human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence and cervical cancer incidence and mortality over time) for each Baltic State by reviewing published literature and official guidelines, performing registry-based analyses using secondary data and having discussions with experts in each country. RESULTS We observed important similarities in the three Baltic States: high burden of the disease (high incidence and mortality of cervical cancer, changes in TNM (Classification of Malignant Tumors) stage distribution towards later stage at diagnosis), high burden of high-risk HPV in general population and suboptimal implementation of the preventive strategies as low screening and HPV vaccination coverage. CONCLUSIONS Cervical cancer remains a substantial health problem in the region and the efforts in addressing barriers by implementing a four-step plan for elimination cervical cancer in Europe should be made. This goal is achievable through evidence-based steps in four key areas: vaccination, screening, treatment, and public awareness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Una Kojalo
- Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Anna Tisler
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Kersti Parna
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | | | - Jana Zodzika
- Institute of Public Health, Riga Stradins University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Mindaugas Stankunas
- Department of Health Management, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | | | | | - Anneli Uuskula
- Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jalil AT, Khan MUF, Muhammed HA, Kawen AA, Saeed BQ, Karevskiy A. Detection of HPV16 viral load in L2 gene as a related predictor of cervical cancer among women in Dhi-Qar province by qRT-PCR. Mol Biol Rep 2022; 49:11847-11853. [PMID: 36214947 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-022-07955-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The most common infection among young women that increases the risk of developing cervical cancer (CC) is human papillomavirus (HPV). In this study, we are going to assess whether HPV16 DNA concentration helps indicate cervical cancer progression ,As well as for age groups and their relationship to cervical cancer. METHODS Present study included 93 adult females suffering from cervical cancer during the period from 2017 to 2020. Molecular detection of HPV was done using amplification of the L2 gene (minor capsid protein). RESULTS Present results showed that 60 (65%) of the patients from 93 cervical cancer cases were infected by HPV16 while only 5 (8%) of healthy patients from the control group were positive for HPV16. So, the current study revealed high HPV16 load in cervical cancer ranged from 1.09 × 102 IU/ml to 5.07 × 103 IU/ml with a mean ± SD of viral load was 1043.25 ± 8.50 IU/ml while in healthy individuals very low viral load ranging from 88 IU/ml to 101 IU/ml and mean ± SD of viral load was 91.25 ± 2.90 IU/ml was reported. CONCLUSION HPV16 viral load is significantly associated with cervical carcinoma among women in Dhi-Qar Province.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abduladheem Turki Jalil
- Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Ozhesko str., 22, Grodno, Belarus. .,Department, Medical Laboratories Techniques, Al-Mustaqbal University College, Babylon, 51001, Hilla, Iraq.
| | | | | | | | - Balsam Qubais Saeed
- Clinical Sciences Department, College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, Sharjah, UAE
| | - Aleksandr Karevskiy
- Dean Faculty of Biology and Ecology, Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno, Ozhesko str., 22, Grodno, Belarus
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Jansen EEL, de Kok IMCM, Kaljouw S, Demirel E, de Koning HJ, Hontelez JAC. Rapid elimination of cervical cancer while maintaining the harms and benefits ratio of cervical cancer screening: a modelling study. BMC Med 2022; 20:433. [PMID: 36352410 PMCID: PMC9645325 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02631-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination and intensifying screening expedite cervical cancer (CC) elimination, yet also deteriorate the balance between harms and benefits of screening. We aimed to find screening strategies that eliminate CC rapidly but maintain an acceptable harms-benefits ratio of screening. METHODS Two microsimulation models (STDSIM and MISCAN) were applied to simulate HPV transmission and CC screening for the Dutch female population between 2022 and 2100. We estimated the CC elimination year and harms-benefits ratios of screening for 228 unique scenarios varying in vaccination (coverage and vaccine type) and screening (coverage and number of lifetime invitations in vaccinated cohorts). The acceptable harms-benefits ratio was defined as the number of women needed to refer (NNR) to prevent one CC death under the current programme for unvaccinated cohorts (82.17). RESULTS Under current vaccination conditions (bivalent vaccine, 55% coverage in girls, 27.5% coverage in boys), maintaining current screening conditions is projected to eliminate CC by 2042, but increases the present NNR with 41%. Reducing the number of lifetime screens from presently five to three and increasing screening coverage (61% to 70%) would prevent an increase in harms and only delay elimination by 1 year. Scaling vaccination coverage to 90% in boys and girls with the nonavalent vaccine is estimated to eliminate CC by 2040 under current screening conditions, but exceeds the acceptable NNR with 23%. Here, changing from five to two lifetime screens would keep the NNR acceptable without delaying CC elimination. CONCLUSIONS De-intensifying CC screening in vaccinated cohorts leads to little or no delay in CC elimination while it substantially reduces the harms of screening. Therefore, de-intensifying CC screening in vaccinated cohorts should be considered to ensure acceptable harms-benefits ratios on the road to CC elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik E L Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sylvia Kaljouw
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Erhan Demirel
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A C Hontelez
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Heidelberg Institute of Global Health, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Burger EA, de Kok IMCM, O'Mahony JF, Rebolj M, Jansen EEL, de Bondt DD, Killen J, Hanley SJ, Castanon A, Regan MC, Kim JJ, Canfell K, Smith MA. A model-based analysis of the health impacts of COVID-19 disruptions to primary cervical screening by time since last screen for current and future disruptions. eLife 2022; 11:e81711. [PMID: 36222673 PMCID: PMC9555861 DOI: 10.7554/elife.81711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
We evaluated how temporary disruptions to primary cervical cancer (CC) screening services may differentially impact women due to heterogeneity in their screening history and test modality. We used three CC models to project the short- and long-term health impacts assuming an underlying primary screening frequency (i.e., 1, 3, 5, or 10 yearly) under three alternative COVID-19-related screening disruption scenarios (i.e., 1-, 2-, or 5-year delay) versus no delay in the context of both cytology-based and human papillomavirus (HPV)-based screening. Models projected a relative increase in symptomatically detected cancer cases during a 1-year delay period that was 38% higher (Policy1-Cervix), 80% higher (Harvard), and 170% higher (MISCAN-Cervix) for underscreened women whose last cytology screen was 5 years prior to the disruption period compared with guidelines-compliant women (i.e., last screen 3 years prior to disruption). Over a woman's lifetime, temporary COVID-19-related delays had less impact on lifetime risk of developing CC than screening frequency and test modality; however, CC risks increased disproportionately the longer time had elapsed since a woman's last screen at the time of the disruption. Excess risks for a given delay period were generally lower for HPV-based screeners than for cytology-based screeners. Our independent models predicted that the main drivers of CC risk were screening frequency and screening modality, and the overall impact of disruptions from the pandemic on CC outcomes may be small. However, screening disruptions disproportionately affect underscreened women, underpinning the importance of reaching such women as a critical area of focus, regardless of temporary disruptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUnited States
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of OsloOsloNorway
| | - Inge MCM de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy & Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College DublinDublinIreland
| | - Matejka Rebolj
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Erik EL Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
| | - Daniel D de Bondt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
| | - James Killen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| | - Sharon J Hanley
- Hokkaido University Center for Environmental and Health SciencesSapporoJapan
| | - Alejandra Castanon
- Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King’s College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Mary Caroline Regan
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUnited States
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonUnited States
| | - Karen Canfell
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSWSydneyAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Burger EA, de Kok IMCM, O'Mahony JF, Rebolj M, Jansen EEL, de Bondt DD, Killen J, Hanley SJ, Castanon A, Kim JJ, Canfell K, Smith MA, Regan MC. Health impacts of COVID-19 disruptions to primary cervical screening by time since last screen: A model-based analysis for current and future disruptions. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2022:2022.07.25.22278011. [PMID: 35923317 PMCID: PMC9347288 DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.25.22278011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background We evaluated how temporary disruptions to primary cervical cancer (CC) screening services may differentially impact women due to heterogeneity in their screening history and test modality. Methods We used three CC models to project the short- and long-term health impacts assuming an underlying primary screening frequency (i.e., 1, 3, 5, or 10 yearly) under three alternative COVID-19-related screening disruption scenarios (i.e., 1-, 2- or 5-year delay) versus no delay, in the context of both cytology-based and HPV-based screening. Results Models projected a relative increase in symptomatically-detected cancer cases during a 1-year delay period that was 38% higher (Policy1-Cervix), 80% higher (Harvard) and 170% higher (MISCAN-Cervix) for under-screened women whose last cytology screen was 5 years prior to the disruption period compared with guidelines-compliant women (i.e., last screen three years prior to disruption). Over a woman's lifetime, temporary COVID-19-related delays had less impact on lifetime risk of developing CC than screening frequency and test modality; however, CC risks increased disproportionately the longer time had elapsed since a woman's last screen at the time of the disruption. Excess risks for a given delay period were generally lower for HPV-based screeners than for cytology-based screeners. Conclusions Our independent models predicted that the main drivers of CC risk were screening frequency and screening modality, and the overall impact of disruptions from the pandemic on CC outcomes may be small. However, screening disruptions disproportionately affect under-screened women, underpinning the importance of reaching such women as a critical area of focus, regardless of temporary disruptions. Funding This study was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute (U01CA199334). The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute. Megan A Smith receives salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (APP1159491) and Cancer Institute NSW (ECF181561). Matejka Rebolj is funded by Cancer Research UK (reference: C8162/A27047). James O'Mahony is funded by Ireland's Health Research Board (EIA2017054). Karen Canfell receives salary support from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (APP1194679). Emily A. Burger receives salary support from the Norwegian Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James F O'Mahony
- Centre for Health Policy & Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Matejka Rebolj
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Erik E L Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel D de Bondt
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - James Killen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Sharon J Hanley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Alejandra Castanon
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karen Canfell
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Mary Caroline Regan
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schuman A, Anderson KS, Day AT, Ferrell J, Sturgis EM, Dahlstrom KR. Is 2045 the best we can do? Mitigating the HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer epidemic. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:751-761. [PMID: 35679626 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2088514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) will be among the most common cancers in men by 2045 due to a rapid rise in human papillomavirus (HPV)-related OPC. Those who survive their cancer often suffer life-long treatment effects and early death. HPV vaccination could prevent virtually all HPV-related cancers but is not an effective preventive strategy for those already exposed. Without a dramatic increase in vaccine uptake in the U.S., HPV vaccination will have a negligible effect on OPC incidence through 2045 and no substantial impact until 2060. Additionally, targeted screening for earlier diagnosis may soon be feasible for those inadequately protected by vaccination. AREAS COVERED PubMed search for English-language articles related to incidence, screening, and prevention of HPV-related malignancies, focused on OPC in the U.S. EXPERT OPINION HPV-related OPC incidence will continue to increase for the foreseeable future with prophylactic vaccination offering no substantial public health impact for decades. Consequently, we must rapidly increase vaccination rates and develop screening methods to identify high-risk individuals. Such individuals would be eligible for potential preventive treatments and screening to diagnose early-stage HPV-related OPC allowing less morbid treatments. These methods will bridge the population into an era of decreasing incidence after vaccination takes effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ari Schuman
- Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Karen S Anderson
- Center for Personalized Diagnostics, Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Andrew T Day
- and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jay Ferrell
- and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science CenterDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head, San Antonio, TX, USA
| | - Erich M Sturgis
- Department of Otolaryngology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Kristina R Dahlstrom
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Trends and Determinants in Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening in Spain: An Analysis of National Surveys from 2017 and 2020. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14102481. [PMID: 35626086 PMCID: PMC9140061 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14102481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cervical cancer rates have declined in industrialized nations as a result of cytology screening programs. However, there are still sizeable differences in screening adherence in Spain. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of cervical cancer screening among women in Spain, to analyze trends in that prevalence from 2017 and 2020 and to identify socio-demographic, health, and lifestyle factors related with adherence to this screening test. We conducted a cross-sectional study of 13,619 women aged 25−65 who participated in the 2017 Spanish National Health Survey and the 2020 European Health Survey for Spain. We used logistic regression to examine the relationship between socio-demographic, health and lifestyle factors and cervical cancer adherence. The prevalence of adherence was 73.18%. Additionally, there was a significant decrease in cervical cancer screening uptake from 2017 and 2020 among women aged 25−44 years (2017: 77.80%, 2020: 75.20%, p = 0.02), but an increase in the age group of 45−65 years (2017: 68.93%, 2020: 72.39%, p < 0.01) and in foreigners (2017: 64.29%, 2020: 72.29%, p < 0.01). Screening for cervical cancer is related with age, educational level, social class, insurance status, visits to the family doctor, alcohol consumption and free time physical exercise.
Collapse
|
27
|
Smith MA, Sherrah M, Sultana F, Castle PE, Arbyn M, Gertig D, Caruana M, Wrede CD, Saville M, Canfell K. National experience in the first two years of primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening in an HPV vaccinated population in Australia: observational study. BMJ 2022; 376:e068582. [PMID: 35354610 PMCID: PMC8965648 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-068582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To review the first two years of the primary human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical screening programme in an HPV vaccinated population. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Australia. PARTICIPANTS 3 745 318 women with a primary HPV test between 1 December 2017 and 31 December 2019; most women aged <40 years had previously been offered vaccination against HPV16 and HPV18. INTERVENTIONS Primary HPV screening with referral if HPV16 or HPV18 (HPV16/18) positive and triage with liquid based cytology testing (threshold atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) for women who were positive for high risk HPV types other than 16/18. A 12 month follow-up HPV test was recommended in triaged women with a negative or low grade cytology result, with referral if they tested positive for any high risk HPV type at follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of women who had attended for their first HPV screening test, tested positive, and were referred for colposcopy; and short term risk of detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or worse, CIN grade 3 or worse, or cancer. RESULTS 54.6% (n=3 507 281) of an estimated 6 428 677 eligible women aged 25-69 had undergone their first HPV test by the end of 2019. Among those attending for routine screening, positivity for HPV16/18 and for HPV types not 16/18 was, respectively, 2.0% and 6.6% in women aged 25-69 (n=3 045 844) and 2.2% and 13.3% in highly vaccinated cohorts of women aged 25-34 (n=768 362). Colposcopy referral (ages 25-69 years) was 3.5%, increasing to an estimated 6.2% after accounting for women who had not yet had a 12 month repeat test. Cervical cancer was detected in 0.98% (456/46 330) of women positive for HPV16/18 at baseline, including 0.32% (89/28 003) of women with HPV16/18 and negative cytology. Women with HPV types not 16/18 and negative or low grade cytology at both baseline and 12 months were at low risk of serious disease (3.4% CIN grade 3 or worse; 0.02% cancer; n=20 019) but estimated to account for 62.0% of referrals for this screening algorithm. CONCLUSIONS Colposcopy referral thresholds need to consider underlying cancer risk; on this basis, women with HPV16/18 in the first round of HPV screening were found to be at higher risk regardless of cytology result, even in a previously well screened population. Women with HPV types not 16/18 and negative or low grade cytology showed a low risk of serious abnormalities but constitute most referrals and could be managed safely with two rounds of repeat HPV testing rather than one. HPV16/18 driven referrals were low in HPV vaccinated cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney NSW 2011 Australia
| | - Maddison Sherrah
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney NSW 2011 Australia
| | - Farhana Sultana
- National Cancer Screening Register, Telstra Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Philip E Castle
- Division of Cancer Prevention, and Senior Investigator, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, US National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Belgian Cancer Centre, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dorota Gertig
- National Cancer Screening Register, Telstra Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Caruana
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney NSW 2011 Australia
| | - C David Wrede
- Oncology and Dysplasia Unit, The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Marion Saville
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karen Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney NSW 2011 Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nguyen DTN, Simms KT, Keane A, Mola G, Bolnga JW, Kuk J, Toliman PJ, Badman SG, Saville M, Kaldor J, Vallely A, Canfell K. Towards the elimination of cervical cancer in low-income and lower-middle-income countries: modelled evaluation of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of point-of-care HPV self-collected screening and treatment in Papua New Guinea. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2021-007380. [PMID: 35241461 PMCID: PMC8896000 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction WHO has launched updated cervical screening guidelines, including provisions for primary HPV screen-and-treat. Papua New Guinea (PNG) has a high burden of cervical cancer, but no national cervical screening programme. We recently completed the first field trials of a screen-and-treat algorithm using point-of-care self-collected HPV and same-day treatment (hereafter self-collected HPV S&T) and showed this had superior clinical performance and acceptability to visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA). We, therefore, evaluated the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and resource implications of a national cervical screening programme using self-collected HPV S&T compared with VIA in PNG. Methods An extensively validated platform (‘Policy1-Cervix’) was calibrated to PNG. A total of 38 strategies were selected for investigation, and these incorporated variations in age ranges and screening frequencies and allowed for the identification of the optimal strategy across a wide range of possibilities. A selection of strategies that were identified as being the most effective and cost-effective were then selected for further investigation for longer-term outcomes and budget impact estimation. In the base case, we assumed primary HPV testing has a sensitivity to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 (CIN2+) + of 91.8% and primary VIA of 51.5% based on our earlier field evaluation combined with evidence from the literature. We conservatively assumed HPV sampling and testing would cost US$18. Costs were estimated from a service provider perspective based on data from local field trials and local consultation. Results Self-collected HPV S&T was more effective and more cost-effective than VIA. Either twice or thrice lifetime self-collected HPV S&T would be cost-effective at 0.5× gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: US$460–US$656/life-years saved; 1GDPper-capita: US$2829 or PGK9446 (year 2019)) and could prevent 33 000–42 000 cases and 23 000–29 000 deaths in PNG over the next 50 years, if scale-up reached 70% coverage from 2023. Conclusion Self-collected HPV S&T was effective and cost-effective in the high-burden, low-resource setting of PNG, and, if scaled-up rapidly, could prevent over 20 000 deaths over the next 50 years. VIA screening was not effective or cost-effective. These findings support, at a country level, WHO updated cervical screening guidelines and indicate that similar approaches could be appropriate for other low-resource settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kate T Simms
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adam Keane
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Glen Mola
- Department of Reproductive Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Papua New Guinea, Port Moresby, CND, Papua New Guinea.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Port Moresby General Hospital, Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea
| | - John Walpe Bolnga
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Modilion Hospital, Mango, Madang, Papua New Guinea
| | - Joseph Kuk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mt Hagen Provincial Hospital, Mt Hagen, Western Highlands Province, Papua New Guinea
| | - Pamela J Toliman
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea
| | - Steven G Badman
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marion Saville
- Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Kaldor
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Vallely
- Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research, Goroka, Papua New Guinea
| | - Karen Canfell
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yang J, Yeasman F, Kliewer G, Nation J, Dickinson J, Yang H, Kopciuk K. Evidence to support change of clinical pathway following colposcopy treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Canada. JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA 2022; 44:650-657.e1. [PMID: 35218935 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogc.2022.01.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing can be incorporated into the post-treatment pathway of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) to confirm disease-free status. To inform a post-treatment strategy based on risk of recurrence, we modelled disease and economic outcomes. METHODS The current Alberta, Canada, post-treatment care pathway-cytology testing with colposcopy assessment-was compared with 6 other scenarios incorporating cytology, HPV testing, or both tests at different time points in a modelling study based on a microsimulation program. Input parameter values for the screening participation, screening age groups, and follow-up options and test compliance for HPV, cytology, and colposcopy were varied, based on Alberta cervical cancer screening program data. Health outcomes over the short- and long-term were projected, which incorporated the increasing population-level coverage of HPV vaccination. Lifetime incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to evaluate economic outcomes and descriptive statistics compared with numbers of tests, visits, and procedures as well as changes in incidence and mortality rates between the scenarios. RESULTS At 5 years after implementation of the "HPV testing alone at 6 and 18 months" post-treatment pathway, the number of colposcopies dropped by 36% and the number of pre-cancer treatments, by 6%. Lifetime ICERs were CAD $6170 versus $248,495 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with the status quo pathway. Cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates decreased significantly and similarly in all scenarios. CONCLUSION Strategies that involve HPV testing in CIN post-treatment follow-up care are expected to be more cost effective with improved clinical outcomes than traditional cytology and colposcopy-based follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Yang
- Alberta Health Services, 10301 Southport Lane SW, Calgary, AB T2W 1S7 Canada
| | - Fahmida Yeasman
- University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Canada
| | - Gordon Kliewer
- Alberta Health Services, 2210 - 2 St. SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3 Canada
| | - Jill Nation
- University of Calgary, 1403 29 Street NW, Calgary, AB T2N 2T9 Canada
| | - James Dickinson
- University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1 Canada
| | - Huiming Yang
- Alberta Health Services, 2210 - 2 St. SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3 Canada
| | - Karen Kopciuk
- University of Calgary, Alberta Health Services, Box ACB, 2210 - 2 St. SW, Calgary, AB T2S 3C3 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Portnoy A, Nygård M, Trogstad L, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Impact of Delaying Effective and Cost-Effective Policy Decisions: An Example From Cervical Cancer Prevention in Norway. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683211071093. [PMID: 35024449 PMCID: PMC8744166 DOI: 10.1177/23814683211071093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction. Delayed implementation of evidence-driven
interventions has consequences that can be formally evaluated. In Norway,
programs to prevent cervical cancer (CC)—screening and treatment of precancerous
lesions and prophylactic vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV)
infection—have been implemented, but each encountered delays in policy
implementation. To examine the effect of these delays, we project the outcomes
that would have been achieved with timely implementation of two policy changes
compared with the de facto delays in implementation (in Norway).
Methods. We used a multimodeling approach that combined HPV
transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the health outcomes and
timeline for CC elimination associated with the implementation of two CC
prevention policy decisions: a multicohort vaccination program of women up to
age 26 years with bivalent vaccine in 2009 compared with actual “delayed”
implementation in 2016, and a switch from cytology to primary HPV-based testing
in 2015 compared with “delayed” rollout in 2020. Results. Timely
implementation of two policy changes compared with current Norwegian prevention
policy timeline could have averted approximately 970 additional cases (range of
top 10 sets: 830–1060) and accelerated the CC elimination timeline by around 4
years (from 2039 to 2035). Conclusions. If delaying implementation
of effective and cost-effective interventions is being considered, the
decision-making process should include quantitative analyses on the effects of
delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mari Nygård
- Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jane J Kim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Emily A Burger
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Suk R, Hong YR, Rajan SS, Xie Z, Zhu Y, Spencer JC. Assessment of US Preventive Services Task Force Guideline-Concordant Cervical Cancer Screening Rates and Reasons for Underscreening by Age, Race and Ethnicity, Sexual Orientation, Rurality, and Insurance, 2005 to 2019. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2143582. [PMID: 35040970 PMCID: PMC8767443 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cervical cancer screening rates are suboptimal in the US. Population-based assessment of reasons for not receiving screening is needed, particularly among women from historically underserved demographic groups. OBJECTIVE To estimate changes in US Preventive Service Task Force guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening over time and assess the reasons women do not receive up-to-date screening by sociodemographic factors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This pooled population-based cross-sectional study used data from the US National Health Interview Survey from 2005 and 2019. A total of 20 557 women (weighted, 113.1 million women) aged 21 to 65 years without previous hysterectomy were included. Analyses were conducted from March 30 to August 19, 2021. EXPOSURES Sociodemographic factors, including age, race and ethnicity, sexual orientation, rurality of residence, and health insurance type. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes were US Preventive Services Task Force guideline-concordant cervical cancer screening rates and self-reported primary reasons for not receiving up-to-date screening. For 2005, up-to-date screening was defined as screening every 3 years for women aged 21 to 65 years. For 2019, up-to-date screening was defined as screening every 3 years with a Papanicolaou test alone for women aged 21 to 29 years and screening every 3 years with a Papanicolaou test alone or every 5 years with high-risk human papillomavirus testing or cotesting for women aged 30 to 65 years. Population estimation included sampling weights. RESULTS Among 20 557 women (weighted, 113.1 million women) included in the study, most were aged 30 to 65 years (16 219 women; weighted, 86.3 million women [76.3%]) and had private insurance (13 571 women; weighted, 75.8 million women [67.0%]). With regard to race and ethnicity, 997 women (weighted, 6.9 million women [6.1%]) were Asian, 3821 women (weighted, 19.5 million women [17.2%]) were Hispanic, 2862 women (weighted, 14.8 million women [13.1%]) were non-Hispanic Black, 12 423 women (weighted, 69.0 million women [61.0%]) were non-Hispanic White, and 453 women (weighted, 3.0 million women [2.7%]) were of other races and/or ethnicities (including Alaska Native and American Indian [weighted, 955 000 women (0.8%)] and other single and multiple races or ethnicities [weighted, 2.0 million women (1.8%)]). In 2019, women aged 21 to 29 years had a significantly higher rate of overdue screening (29.1%) vs women aged 30 to 65 years (21.1%; P < .001). In both age groups, the proportion of women without up-to-date screening increased significantly from 2005 to 2019 (from 14.4% to 23.0%; P < .001). Significantly higher rates of overdue screening were found among those of Asian vs non-Hispanic White race and ethnicity (31.4% vs 20.1%; P = .01), those identifying as LGBQ+ (gender identity was not assessed because of a small sample) vs heterosexual (32.0% vs 22.2%; P < .001), those living in rural vs urban areas (26.2% vs 22.6%; P = .04), and those without insurance vs those with private insurance (41.7% vs 18.1%; P < .001). The most common reason for not receiving timely screening across all groups was lack of knowledge, ranging from 47.2% of women identifying as LGBQ+ to 64.4% of women with Hispanic ethnicity. Previous receipt of a human papillomavirus vaccine was not a primary reason for not having up-to-date screening (<1% of responses). From 2005 to 2019, among women aged 30 to 65 years, lack of access decreased significantly as a primary reason for not receiving screening (from 21.8% to 9.7%), whereas lack of knowledge (from 45.2% to 54.8%) and not receiving recommendations from health care professionals (from 5.9% to 12.0%) increased significantly. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cross-sectional study found that cervical cancer screening that was concordant with US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines decreased in the US between 2005 and 2019, with lack of knowledge reported as the biggest barrier to receiving timely screening. Campaigns addressing patient knowledge and provider communication may help to improve screening rates, and cultural adaptation of interventions is needed to reduce existing disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Suk
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Young-Rock Hong
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville
| | - Suja S. Rajan
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Zhigang Xie
- Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville
| | - Yenan Zhu
- Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston School of Public Health, Houston
| | - Jennifer C. Spencer
- Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Duffy SW, Wald NJ. When primary prevention replaces screening. J Med Screen 2021; 29:67. [PMID: 34894856 DOI: 10.1177/09691413211065931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen W Duffy
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Nicholas J Wald
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Whitworth H, Changalucha J, Baisley K, Watson-Jones D. Adolescent Health Series: HPV infection and vaccination in sub-Saharan Africa: 10 years of research in Tanzanian female adolescents - narrative review. Trop Med Int Health 2021; 26:1345-1355. [PMID: 34310816 DOI: 10.1111/tmi.13660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality in many sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries, including Tanzania. Most cervical cancer cases worldwide are attributable to infection of the cervix with Human Papillomavirus (HPV), a vaccine-preventable sexually transmitted infection (STI). Over the past 10 years, we have conducted a programme of HPV research in pre-adolescents and adolescents in Mwanza, the second-largest city in Tanzania, which is situated in a malaria-endemic region. In this narrative review article, we summarise the contribution of our work, alongside work of others, to improve the understanding of HPV epidemiology in SSA and development of setting-appropriate, evidence-based intervention strategies. We present evidence for very high prevalence and incidence of HPV infection among female SSA adolescents around the time of sexual debut, describe risk factors for HPV acquisition, and discuss associations between HPV, HIV and other STIs, which are also highly prevalent within this population. We summarise findings from early clinical trials of HPV vaccines in SSA, the first of which was an immunogenicity and safety trial conducted in Mwanza, Tanzania, and Dakar, Senegal. Within the trial, we evaluated for the first time the potential impact of malaria and helminth infection on vaccine-induced antibody responses in Tanzanian girls. We describe research evaluating optimal HPV vaccine delivery strategies within this setting, perceived requirements for and barriers to vaccine implementation among key informants from LMIC, vaccine acceptability among girls and parents, and opportunities for co-delivery of interventions alongside HPV vaccination to an adolescent population. Finally, we discuss country-level barriers to vaccine uptake in LMIC, and ongoing studies in Tanzania and other SSA countries of reduced-dose HPV vaccination schedules that may alleviate cost and logistical barriers to vaccine implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Whitworth
- Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute of Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - John Changalucha
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kathy Baisley
- Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute of Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Deborah Watson-Jones
- Mwanza Intervention Trials Unit, National Institute of Medical Research, Mwanza, Tanzania
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Smith MA, Burger EA, Castanon A, de Kok IMCM, Hanley SJB, Rebolj M, Hall MT, Jansen EEL, Killen J, O'Farrell X, Kim JJ, Canfell K. Impact of disruptions and recovery for established cervical screening programs across a range of high-income country program designs, using COVID-19 as an example: A modelled analysis. Prev Med 2021; 151:106623. [PMID: 34029578 PMCID: PMC9433770 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2021] [Revised: 05/02/2021] [Accepted: 05/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
COVID-19 has disrupted cervical screening in several countries, due to a range of policy-, health-service and participant-related factors. Using three well-established models of cervical cancer natural history adapted to simulate screening across four countries, we compared the impact of a range of standardised screening disruption scenarios in four countries that vary in their cervical cancer prevention programs. All scenarios assumed a 6- or 12-month disruption followed by a rapid catch-up of missed screens. Cervical screening disruptions could increase cervical cancer cases by up to 5-6%. In all settings, more than 60% of the excess cancer burden due to disruptions are likely to have occurred in women aged less than 50 years in 2020, including settings where women in their 30s have previously been offered HPV vaccination. Approximately 15-30% of cancers predicted to result from disruptions could be prevented by maintaining colposcopy and precancer treatment services during any disruption period. Disruptions to primary screening had greater adverse effects in situations where women due to attend for screening in 2020 had cytology (vs. HPV) as their previous primary test. Rapid catch-up would dramatically increase demand for HPV tests in 2021, which it may not be feasible to meet because of competing demands on the testing machines and reagents due to COVID tests. These findings can inform future prioritisation strategies for catch-up that balance potential constraints on resourcing with clinical need.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Smith
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Alejandra Castanon
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Inge M C M de Kok
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Sharon J B Hanley
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan.
| | - Matejka Rebolj
- King's College London, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Michaela T Hall
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia; School of Mathematics and Statistics, UNSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Erik E L Jansen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - James Killen
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Xavier O'Farrell
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Karen Canfell
- Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sonawane K, Suk R, Chiao EY, Schmeler KM, Montealegre J, Fernandez ME, Deshmukh AA. Evaluation of Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake and Adherence Among Women Without Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the US. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2131129. [PMID: 34698852 PMCID: PMC8548945 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.31129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This cross-sectional study compares uptake rates of cervical cancer screening and adherence among US women who were vaccinated for human papillomavirus vs those who were not vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kalyani Sonawane
- Center for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy & Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
- Center for Healthcare Data, Department of Management, Policy & Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Ryan Suk
- Center for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy & Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Elizabeth Y. Chiao
- Department of Epidemiology, Division of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kathleen M. Schmeler
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Jane Montealegre
- Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Maria E. Fernandez
- Center for Health Promotion and Prevention Research, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashish A. Deshmukh
- Center for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy & Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhang Y, Fakhry C, D'Souza G. Projected Association of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination With Oropharynx Cancer Incidence in the US, 2020-2045. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:e212907. [PMID: 34473210 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Importance Oropharynx cancer (OPC) incidence has increased for several decades in the US. It is unclear when and how this trend will be affected by current HPV vaccination trends. Objective To assess the association of HPV vaccination with future OPC incidence in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants This population-based age-period-cohort analysis obtained OPC incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program from 69 562 patients 34 to 83 years of age diagnosed with OPC. The HPV vaccination data were obtained from the National Immunization Survey-Teen (60 124 participants) and National Health Interview Survey (16 904 participants). Data were collected from January 1, 1992, to December 31, 2017. Age-period-cohort forecasting models projected expected 2018 to 2045 OPC incidence under a counterfactual scenario of no HPV vaccination and current levels of HPV vaccination, stratifying by sex. Data analyses were completed by December 2020. Exposures Age- and sex-specific cumulative prevalence of HPV vaccination in 2016 to 2017 projected forward. Main Outcomes and Measures Projected OPC incidence and number of OPC cases expected to be prevented by HPV vaccination. Results Under current HPV vaccination rates, between 2018 and 2045, OPC incidence is projected to decrease in younger individuals (36-45 years of age: from 1.4 to 0.8 per 100 000 population; 46-55 years of age: from 8.7 to 7.2 per 100 000 population) but continue to increase among older individuals (70-83 years of age: from 16.8 to 29.0 per 100 000 population). The association of HPV vaccination with overall OPC incidence through 2045 will remain modest (no vaccination vs vaccination: 14.3 vs 13.8 per 100 000 population in 2045). By 2045 HPV vaccination is projected to reduce OPC incidence among individuals 36 to 45 years of age (men: 48.1%; women: 42.5%) and 46 to 55 years of age (men: 9.0%; women: 22.6%), but among those 56 years or older, rates are not meaningfully reduced. Between 2018 and 2045, a total of 6334 OPC cases will be prevented by HPV vaccination, of which 88.8% of such cases occur in younger age (≤55 years) groups. Conclusions and Relevance According to the projections of this population-based age-period-cohort study, current HPV vaccination rates will have a limited association with overall OPC incidence through 2045 because older individuals who have not yet been vaccinated remain at high risk for OPC. However, reductions in OPC incidence should occur among young and middle-aged adults, the group at lowest risk of diagnosis. These findings forecast a continued shift in the landscape of OPC to an older population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuehan Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carole Fakhry
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.,Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gypsyamber D'Souza
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Spencer JC, Brewer NT, Coyne-Beasley T, Trogdon JG, Weinberger M, Wheeler SB. Reducing Poverty-Related Disparities in Cervical Cancer: The Role of HPV Vaccination. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2021; 30:1895-1903. [PMID: 34503948 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-21-0307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Near elimination of cervical cancer in the United States is possible in coming decades, yet inequities will delay this achievement for some populations. We sought to explore the effects of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on disparities in cervical cancer incidence between high- and low-poverty U.S. counties. METHODS We calibrated a dynamic simulation model of HPV infection to reflect average counties in the highest and lowest quartile of poverty (percent of population below federal poverty level), incorporating data on HPV prevalence, cervical cancer screening, and HPV vaccination. We projected cervical cancer incidence through 2070, estimated absolute and relative disparities in incident cervical cancer for high- versus low-poverty counties, and compared incidence with the near-elimination target (4 cases/100,000 women annually). RESULTS We estimated that, on average, low-poverty counties will achieve near-elimination targets 14 years earlier than high-poverty counties (2029 vs. 2043). Absolute disparities by county poverty will decrease, but relative differences are estimated to increase. We estimate 21,604 cumulative excess cervical cancer cases in high-poverty counties over the next 50 years. Increasing HPV vaccine coverage nationally to the Healthy People 2020 goal (80%) would reduce excess cancer cases, but not alter estimated time to reach the near-elimination threshold. CONCLUSIONS High-poverty U.S. counties will likely be delayed in achieving near-elimination targets for cervical cancer and as a result will experience thousands of potentially preventable cancers. IMPACT Alongside vaccination efforts, it is important to address the role of social determinants and health care access in driving persistent inequities by area poverty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Spencer
- Center for Health Decision Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. .,Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Noel T Brewer
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Tamera Coyne-Beasley
- Departments of Pediatrics and Internal Medicine, Division of Adolescent Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Justin G Trogdon
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Morris Weinberger
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Precision Prevention: The 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/jmp2030023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The approach to cervical cancer prevention has evolved significantly over the past two decades. HPV immunization has decreased the specificity of screening modalities and HPV-based testing has been replacing our previously successful morphology-only approach. Additionally, there is much more emphasis on providing precision prevention, rather than the previously used “one-fits-all” management strategies. A number of new biomarkers are entering clinical practice and being integrated into cervical cancer screening and management in order to enable a more personalized assessment of the risk for precancer/cancer for an individual patient. The 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines expand on the concept of “equal management for equal risk”. They consider a patient’s history in addition to current test results to provide recommendations for increased surveillance/treatment in patients at higher risk for CIN3+ while minimizing interventions for lower-risk patients who have new versus persistent HPV infection. Clinical management decisions are based on immediate risk and 5-year risk estimates for CIN3+, which are determined by referencing an extensive risk table compiled by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). The course of action for a given patient is recommended by comparison of the risk in the risk database, to the predetermined clinical action thresholds. These guidelines address the need for simplification and offer some stability for the provider while being conducive to the incorporation of anticipated continued technologic advances in methods for cervical cancer prevention. Their enduring nature will allow for changes needed based on risk reduction as HPV vaccination uptake increases and vaccinated women reach screening age. Similarly, the design allows for the addition of new tests into the risk assessment calculations after their approval by applicable regulatory agencies and review/consensus approval by the ASCCP new technology and enduring guidelines workgroups. As cytopathologists, we must be familiar with the scientific advancements in primary and secondary prevention, evolving screening and management guidelines, and participate actively in the multidisciplinary approach for the prevention of cervical cancer.
Collapse
|
39
|
Davies-Oliveira JC, Smith MA, Grover S, Canfell K, Crosbie EJ. Eliminating Cervical Cancer: Progress and Challenges for High-income Countries. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:550-559. [PMID: 34315640 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In 2020, the World Health Organization launched a major initiative to eliminate cervical cancer globally. The initiative is built around the three key pillars of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, cervical screening and treatment, with associated intervention targets for the year 2030. The '90-70-90' targets specify that 90% of adolescent girls receive prophylactic HPV vaccination, 70% of adult women receive a minimum twice-in-a-lifetime cervical HPV test and 90% receive appropriate treatment for preinvasive or invasive disease. Modelling has shown that if these targets are met, the elimination of cervical cancer, defined as fewer than four cases per 100 000 women per annum, will be achieved within a century. Many high-income countries are well positioned to eliminate cervical cancer within the coming decades, but few have achieved '90-70-90' and many challenges must still be addressed to deliver these critical interventions effectively. This review considers the current status of cervical cancer control in relation to each of the three elimination pillars in high-income countries and discusses some of the developments that will assist countries in reaching these ambitious targets by 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Davies-Oliveira
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| | - M A Smith
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - S Grover
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - K Canfell
- The Daffodil Centre, The University of Sydney, a joint venture with Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - E J Crosbie
- Gynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester, UK; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Attitudes of transgender men and non-binary people to cervical screening: a cross-sectional mixed-methods study in the UK. Br J Gen Pract 2021; 71:e614-e625. [PMID: 34001539 PMCID: PMC8136582 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp.2020.0905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Transgender men and non-binary people assigned female at birth (TMNB) who have not had surgery to remove the cervix are recommended to undertake cervical screening with the same frequency as cisgender women, but evidence suggests that TMNB have lower odds of lifetime and up-to-date cervical screening uptake. Aim To understand the attitudes towards and preferences for cervical screening among UK-based TMNB. Design and setting Cross-sectional survey of TMNB at an NHS gender identity clinic (GIC) and an NHS sexual health service specialising in care of transgender people. Method Recruitment was via email invitations to patients of the GIC and sexual health service. Inclusion criteria were: female sex assigned at birth; transgender man, masculine, or non-binary gender identity; aged ≥18 years; and UK resident. Quantitative results were analysed using descriptive statistics, and free-text comments were analysed thematically. Results In total there were 137 participants; 80% identified as transmasculine,18% as non-binary, and the remaining participants reported other noncisgender identities. Sixty-four participants (47%) were eligible for cervical screening and 37 (58%) of those had been screened. Only 34 (53%) of those eligible felt they had sufficient information about cervical screening. Just over half (n = 71/134, 53%) stated they would like the option to self-swab for high-risk human papillomavirus. Only half (n = 68/134, 51%) of participants were in favour of an automatic invitation for cervical screening. Thematic analysis identified a number of additional barriers to and facilitators of screening. Conclusion TMNB have identified numerous potential areas for change that may improve cervical screening uptake and patient experience.
Collapse
|
41
|
Miao W, Qiuji W, Congkuan S, Yixin L, Xulong W, Boyu Z, Guizhen Q, Jun Z, Yongchang W. Small cell carcinoma as an independent prognostic factor for cervical cancer patients: a population-based analysis. Future Oncol 2021; 17:3175-3185. [PMID: 34156306 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-1081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: To compare cervical small cell carcinoma (SmCC) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in patient characteristics and survival outcomes. Methods: Cervical SmCC and SCC patients in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2004 to 2015 were enrolled. Propensity-score matching analysis (PSM) paired subjects with similar background variables. Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier and stratified analyses were conducted before and after PSM. Results: Cervical SmCC patients showed a higher rate of larger tumor size, advanced grade disease, lymph node involvement and distant metastasis (p < 0.001). Before and after PSM, SmCC histology and advanced Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (p < 0.001) were principal prognostic factors of survival, and cervical SmCC was associated with worse survival in all stages (stage I-IV). Conclusion: SmCC was an independent poor prognostic factor in cervical cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Miao
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Wu Qiuji
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Song Congkuan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430071, China
| | - Liu Yixin
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Wang Xulong
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Zhang Boyu
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Qin Guizhen
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Zhang Jun
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| | - Wei Yongchang
- Department of Radiation & Medical Oncology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Key Laboratory of Tumor Biological Behaviors Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China.,Hubei Cancer Clinical Study Center Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, 169, Donghu Road, Wuchang District, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430071, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rosalik K, Tarney C, Han J. Human Papilloma Virus Vaccination. Viruses 2021; 13:v13061091. [PMID: 34201028 PMCID: PMC8228159 DOI: 10.3390/v13061091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papilloma virus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide causing a variety of benign and malignant conditions. A significant portion of the global population is infected with HPV, with the virus attributed to causing up to 5% of cancers worldwide. Bivalent, quadrivalent, and nine-valent vaccinations exist to aid in the prevention of these diseases and have been proven to be effective at preventing both benign and malignant disease. While vaccination is readily accessible in more developed countries, barriers exist to worldwide distribution and acceptance of vaccination. Vaccination and screening of HPV infection when used in combination are proven and predicted to decrease HPV related pathology. Improvements in vaccination formulations, for treatment as well as prevention, are actively being sought from a variety of mechanisms. Despite these advancements, and the data supporting their efficacy, there has been substantial delay in obtaining adequate vaccination coverage. In reviewing these challenges and looking forward to new vaccine development—especially within the current pandemic—it is clear from the challenges of HPV we require methods to more effectively encourage vaccination, ways to dispel vaccination myths as they occur, and implement better processes for vaccine distribution globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kendal Rosalik
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 9040A Jackson Ave, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA 98431, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Christopher Tarney
- Madigan Army Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 9040A Jackson Ave, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, WA 98431, USA;
| | - Jasmine Han
- General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4430 Missouri Ave, Ford Leonard Wood, MO 65473, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
The immunoprevention of cancer and cancer recurrence is an important area of concern for the scientific community and society as a whole. Researchers have been working for decades to develop vaccines with the potential to alleviate these health care and economic burdens. So far, vaccines have made more progress in preventing cancer than in eliminating already established cancer. In particular, vaccines targeting oncogenic viruses, such as the human papillomavirus and the hepatitis B virus, are exceptional examples of successful prevention of virus-associated cancers, such as cervical cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer-preventive vaccines targeting nonviral antigens, such as tumor-associated antigens and neoantigens, are also being extensively tested. Here, we review the currently approved preventive cancer vaccines; discuss the challenges in this field by covering ongoing preclinical and clinical human trials in various cancers; and address various issues related to maximizing cancer vaccine benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomohiro Enokida
- Department of Medicine, Precision Immunology Institute, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Medicine, Precision Immunology Institute, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- The Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nina Bhardwaj
- Department of Medicine, Precision Immunology Institute, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- The Kimberly and Eric J. Waldman Department of Dermatology at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
- Extramural member of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Burger EA, Jansen EE, Killen J, Kok IMD, Smith MA, Sy S, Dunnewind N, G Campos N, Haas JS, Kobrin S, Kamineni A, Canfell K, Kim JJ. Impact of COVID-19-related care disruptions on cervical cancer screening in the United States. J Med Screen 2021; 28:213-216. [PMID: 33730899 DOI: 10.1177/09691413211001097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To quantify the secondary impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic disruptions to cervical cancer screening in the United States, stratified by step in the screening process and primary test modality, on cervical cancer burden. METHODS We conducted a comparative model-based analysis using three independent NCI Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network cervical models to quantify the impact of eight alternative COVID-19-related screening disruption scenarios compared to a scenario of no disruptions. Scenarios varied by the duration of the disruption (6 or 24 months), steps in the screening process being disrupted (primary screening, surveillance, colposcopy, excisional treatment), and primary screening modality (cytology alone or cytology plus human papillomavirus "cotesting"). RESULTS The models consistently showed that COVID-19-related disruptions yield small net increases in cervical cancer cases by 2027, which are greater for women previously screened with cytology compared with cotesting. When disruptions affected all four steps in the screening process under cytology-based screening, there were an additional 5-7 and 38-45 cases per one million screened for 6- and 24-month disruptions, respectively. In contrast, under cotesting, there were additional 4-5 and 35-45 cases per one million screened for 6- and 24-month disruptions, respectively. The majority (58-79%) of the projected increases in cases under cotesting were due to disruptions to surveillance, colposcopies, or excisional treatment, rather than to primary screening. CONCLUSIONS Women in need of surveillance, colposcopies, or excisional treatment, or whose last primary screen did not involve human papillomavirus testing, may comprise priority groups for reintroductions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily A Burger
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Erik El Jansen
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - James Killen
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia
| | - Inge McM de Kok
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Megan A Smith
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Sy
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Niels Dunnewind
- Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Department of Public Health, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Sarah Kobrin
- National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Aruna Kamineni
- Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ortiz AP, Ortiz-Ortiz KJ, Colón-López V, Tortolero-Luna G, Torres-Cintrón CR, Wu CF, Deshmukh AA. Incidence of Cervical Cancer in Puerto Rico, 2001-2017. JAMA Oncol 2021; 7:456-458. [PMID: 33443548 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.7488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Patricia Ortiz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.,Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Karen J Ortiz-Ortiz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.,Graduate School of Public Health, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.,Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Vivian Colón-López
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico.,Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Carlos R Torres-Cintrón
- Puerto Rico Central Cancer Registry, Cancer Control and Population Sciences Division, Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Center for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - Ashish A Deshmukh
- Center for Health Services Research, Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Whop LJ, Smith MA, Butler TL, Adcock A, Bartholomew K, Goodman MT, Winer RL, Milosevic E, Lawton B. Achieving cervical cancer elimination among Indigenous women. Prev Med 2021; 144:106314. [PMID: 33678228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Revised: 09/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Achieving the World Health Organisation (WHO) cervical cancer elimination target of fewer than four new cases per 100,000 woman-years requires scaling up HPV vaccination of girls, cervical screening, and pre-cancer and cancer treatment. We reviewed data from four high-income colonised countries (Australia, Canada, Aotearoa New Zealand (NZ), and the United States (US)) to identify how each is currently performing compared to the cervical cancer incidence elimination and triple-intervention targets, nationally and in Indigenous women. We also summarise barriers and enablers to meeting targets for Indigenous women. To achieve elimination, cervical cancer incidence must be reduced by 74% in Indigenous women in Australia, and 63% in Maori women in NZ; data were not published in sufficient detail to compare incidence in Indigenous women in Canada or the US to the WHO target. Only Australia meets the vaccination coverage target, but uptake appears comparatively equitable within Australia, NZ and the US, whereas there appears to be a substantial gap in Canada. Screening coverage is lower for Indigenous women in all four countries though the differential varies by country. Currently, only Australia universally offers HPV-based screening. Data on pre-cancer and cancer treatment were limited in all countries. Large inequities in cervical cancer currently exist for Indigenous peoples in Australia, Canada, New Zealand and the US, and elimination is not on track for all women in these countries. Current data gaps hinder improvements. These countries must urgently address their systemic failure to care and provide health care for Indigenous women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Whop
- National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, Research School of Population Health, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia; Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Megan A Smith
- Cancer Research Division, Cancer Council NSW, Sydney, Australia; School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - Tamara L Butler
- Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
| | - Anna Adcock
- Te Tātai Hauora o Hine Centre for Women's Health Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Karen Bartholomew
- Waitematā District Health Board (DHB) and Auckland DHB, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer and Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Rachel L Winer
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Elizabeth Milosevic
- Canadian Partnership Against Cancer, Toronto, Canada; Global Health Program, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Beverley Lawton
- Te Tātai Hauora o Hine Centre for Women's Health Research, Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Portnoy A, Pedersen K, Trogstad L, Hansen BT, Feiring B, Laake I, Smith MA, Sy S, Nygård M, Kim JJ, Burger EA. Impact and cost-effectiveness of strategies to accelerate cervical cancer elimination: A model-based analysis. Prev Med 2021; 144:106276. [PMID: 33678239 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Following the global call for action by the World Health Organization to eliminate cervical cancer (CC), we evaluated how each CC policy decision in Norway influenced the timing of CC elimination, and whether introducing nonavalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine would accelerate elimination timing and be cost-effective. We used a multi-modeling approach that captured HPV transmission and cervical carcinogenesis to estimate the CC incidence associated with six past and future CC prevention policy decisions compared with a pre-vaccination scenario involving 3-yearly cytology-based screening. Scenarios examined the introduction of routine HPV vaccination of 12-year-old girls with quadrivalent vaccine in 2009, a temporary catch-up program for females aged up to 26 years in 2016-2018 with bivalent vaccine, the universal switch to bivalent vaccine in 2017, expansion to include 12-year-old boys in 2018, the switch from cytology- to HPV-based screening for women aged 34-69 in 2020, and the potential switch to nonavalent vaccine in 2021. Introducing routine female vaccination in 2009 enabled elimination to be achieved by 2056 and prevented 17,300 cases. Cumulatively, subsequent policy decisions accelerated elimination to 2039. According to our modeling assumptions, switching to the nonavalent vaccine would not be considered 'good value for money' at relevant cost-effectiveness thresholds in Norway unless the incremental cost was $19 per dose or less (range: $17-24) compared to the bivalent vaccine. CC control policies implemented over the last decade in Norway may have accelerated the timeframe to elimination by more than 17 years and prevented over 23,800 cases by 2110.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Kine Pedersen
- Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Lill Trogstad
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Berit Feiring
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ida Laake
- The Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Megan A Smith
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Stephen Sy
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jane J Kim
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emily A Burger
- Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Center for Health Decision Science, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Health Management and Health Economics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Gago J, Pendharkar D, Tripathi C, Ginsburg O. Making the Best Use of Resources in Global Cancer Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2021; 40:e361-e366. [PMID: 32614655 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_290311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Inequitable access to high-quality cancer control and care remains one of the greatest public health challenges in countries at all resource levels. Core issues include the limited oncology health care workforce and equitable access to affordable (essential) cancer diagnostics, medicines, surgery, systemic therapies, and radiotherapy, compounded by existing social inequalities. To reduce cancer health disparities globally and subnationally, countries can enhance their capabilities to deliver high-quality, affordable care closer to where most people live. Decentralization and integration of health services can be part of the solution, offloading the strained capacity of tertiary facilities where possible and expanding cadres of trained providers to support some aspects of cancer prevention and control that require a lesser degree of specialization. The strategy to eliminate cervical cancer provides a salient example of a data-driven effort that optimizes resources to dramatically reduce one of the greatest cancer health disparities globally. Here, we highlight two responses to meet the challenge through greater engagement of the primary care workforce and by adoption of universal health care coverage to ensure access to cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Gago
- NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Ophira Ginsburg
- Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.,Section for Global Health, Department of Population Health, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ginsburg O, Basu P, Kapambwe S, Canfell K. Eliminating cervical cancer in the COVID-19 era. NATURE CANCER 2021; 2:133-134. [PMID: 35122078 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-021-00178-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ophira Ginsburg
- Section for Global Health, Department of Population Health and Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Partha Basu
- International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | | | - Karen Canfell
- Cancer Council New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kjaer SK, Nygård M, Sundström K, Munk C, Berger S, Dzabic M, Fridrich KE, Waldstrøm M, Sørbye SW, Bautista O, Group T, Luxembourg A. Long-term effectiveness of the nine-valent human papillomavirus vaccine in Scandinavian women: interim analysis after 8 years of follow-up. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2020; 17:943-949. [PMID: 33326342 PMCID: PMC8018381 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1839292] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
A long-term follow-up (LTFU) of the nine-valent human papillomavirus (9vHPV) vaccine efficacy study in young women aged 16–26 years was initiated to evaluate if vaccine effectiveness for up to 14 years post-vaccination will remain above 90%. Vaccine effectiveness is measured as percent reduction in the incidence of HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58-related high-grade cervical dysplasia in the LTFU cohort relative to expected incidence in a similar unvaccinated cohort. We report an interim analysis 8 years post-vaccination. Overall, 2029 participants from Denmark, Norway, and Sweden who received the 9vHPV vaccine during the clinical efficacy study continued into the LTFU study. National health registries were used to identify screening attendance and cervical pre-cancer/cancer diagnoses. Tissue samples were retrieved for HPV testing by PCR and pathology diagnosis adjudication. A control chart method was used to detect signals indicative of vaccine effectiveness waning below 90%. No new cases of HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58-related high-grade cervical dysplasia were observed during the LTFU study period over 4084.2 person-years’ follow-up (per-protocol effectiveness population; n = 1448). Thus, there were no signals indicative of vaccine effectiveness waning below 90%. These observations show that the 9vHPV vaccine provides continued statistically significant protection through at least 6 years, with indications of continued effectiveness through 8 years. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00543543, NCT02653118.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanne K Kjaer
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle & Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Department of Gynecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mari Nygård
- Unit of HPV-Related Epidemiological Research, Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Karin Sundström
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Munk
- Unit of Virus, Lifestyle & Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Sophie Berger
- Unit of HPV-Related Epidemiological Research, Department of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mensur Dzabic
- Karolinska University Laboratory, Clinical Pathology, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Marianne Waldstrøm
- Department of Pathology Vejle Hospital, Lillebaelt Hospital, Beriderbakken, Denmark.,Institute of Regional Health Science, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|