1
|
Desmarais SL, Morrissey B, Lowder EM, Zottola SA. Patterns of Self-Reported Mental Health Symptoms and Treatment among People Booked into a Large Metropolitan County Jail. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01398-8. [PMID: 39014285 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01398-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
The Brief Jail Mental Health Screen (BJMHS) is one of the most well-known and frequently used tools to conduct routine mental health screening at jail intake. In prior research, the BJMHS results typically have been evaluated overall (i.e., yes/no positive screen). However, there is heterogeneity in symptom presentation and treatment histories among people with serious mental illness, and there are potential consequences of this heterogeneity for mental health administration and policy in jails. We conducted a latent class analysis of BJMHS item-level results using administrative data for 37,998 people booked into a southeastern, metropolitan, U.S. county jail over a 3.5-year period. A 4-class solution provided the best fitting and most interpretable model. The largest class (89.5%) comprised people unlikely to report symptoms or treatment histories (limited symptoms). The next class comprised people who were unlikely to report ongoing symptoms but reported medication and hospitalization (managed symptoms). The third class (2.5%) included people likely to report feeling useless/sinful, prior hospitalization, and current psychiatric medication (depressive symptoms). The fourth class (1.0%) comprised people likely to report thought control, paranoia, feeling useless/sinful, medication, and hospitalization (psychotic symptoms). Controlling for sociodemographic and booking characteristics, people in the managed, depressive, and psychotic symptoms classes had significantly longer jail stays compared to those in the limited symptoms class. People in the managed and depressive symptoms classes were at heightened risk of re-arrest compared to the limited symptoms class. Findings can inform case prioritization and the allocation of resources to support efficient and effective jail-based mental health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brandon Morrissey
- Policy Research Associates, Inc, Troy, 12180, NY, US
- North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27695, US
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsutsumi S, Takano A, Usami T, Kumakura Y, Kanazawa Y, Takebayashi T, Sugiyama D, Matsumoto T. Risk and protective factors for early dropout from telephone monitoring for individuals with drug convictions in community mental health centers in Japan. JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE USE AND ADDICTION TREATMENT 2024; 162:209347. [PMID: 38494050 DOI: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Individuals involved with the criminal justice system face challenges in receiving and maintaining substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and support. Although telephone monitoring (TM) could reduce these barriers, data on TM for community-dwelling individuals involved with the criminal justice system and research on individuals who drop out of TM are scarce. We examined the factors associated with dropping out early from the Voice Bridges Project, which provides TM for individuals on probation for drug-related convictions through community mental health centers in Japan. METHODS Participants (n = 546) were individuals aged ≥20 years with methamphetamine-related convictions who were on probation. Univariate analyses examine the associations between one-year follow-up status and baseline variables, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analyses identify the risk and protective factors associated with dropping out. Stratified analyses report results based on sex and halfway-house residency. RESULTS The one-year dropout rate was 43.6 % (n = 238). Multivariate analysis identified two risk factors for dropping out-halfway-house residency and suicide attempts in the past year, and two protective factors-higher education and the current use of SUD services. Sex-stratified analyses showed that halfway-house residency was a risk factor for both men and women. Attempted suicide was a risk factor for women. Conversely, higher education and current use of SUD services were protective factors for men. CONCLUSIONS Our results identify unique risk factors for women, such as a recent history of suicide attempts, and distinctive protective factors for men, including higher education and current use of SUD services, emphasizing the importance of sex-specific approaches. Furthermore, the study reveals that irrespective of sex, vulnerable individuals, such as halfway-house residents, are at a higher risk of dropping out from TM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiori Tsutsumi
- Department of Drug Dependence Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan; Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Ayumi Takano
- Department of Drug Dependence Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Takashi Usami
- Department of Drug Dependence Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan; Kitakyushu Municipal Mental Health and Welfare Center, 1-7-1 Bashaku, Kokurakita Ward, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yousuke Kumakura
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, The University of Tokyo Hospital, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuka Kanazawa
- Department of Neuropsychiatry, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toru Takebayashi
- Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Daisuke Sugiyama
- Graduate School of Health Management, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan; Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjyuku-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Faculty of Nursing and Medical Care, Keio University, 4411 Endo, Fujisawa-shi, Kanagawa, Japan.
| | - Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Department of Drug Dependence Research, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa-Higashi, Kodaira-shi, Tokyo, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bukten A, Stavseth MR. Estimated effects of opioid agonist treatment in prison on all-cause mortality and overdose mortality in people released from prison in Norway: a prospective analysis of data from the Norwegian Prison Release Study (nPRIS). Lancet Public Health 2024; 9:e421-e431. [PMID: 38942554 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00098-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overdose is the leading cause of death for people released from prison, and opioid agonist treatment is associated with reductions in mortality after imprisonment. However, few studies have explored the interplay of the potential modifiable risk factors and protective factors for mortality after release from prison. We aimed to describe all-cause mortality and overdose mortality among individuals released from Norwegian prisons during 2000-22 and to identify pre-existing risk factors associated with both types of mortality among these individuals for 6 months. METHODS For this prospective analysis, we used data from the Norwegian Prison Release Study (nPRIS), which includes all people in prison in Norway between Jan 1, 2000, and Dec 31, 2022; the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry; the Norwegian Prison Registry; the Norwegian Patient Registry; and Statistics Norway. All prisons in Norway that were open during this period were included. People who did not have a Norwegian personal identification number or were serving their sentence outside of prison units were excluded from this analysis. To identify pre-existing risk factors associated with all-cause and overdose mortality among people released from prison, we left-censored the observation period on Jan 1, 2010, creating a subsample of individuals. We calculated crude mortality rates (CMRs) and corresponding 95% CIs as the number of deaths per 100 000 person-years for several time periods after release. The primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and overdose mortality according to the ICD-10, assessed in all participants and analysed via two separate Cox proportional-hazards models. FINDINGS The total nPRIS cohort included 112 877 individuals released from prison in Norway between 2000 and 2022, 11 995 (10·6%) of whom were female and 100 865 (89·4%) of whom were male. We identified 13 004 instances of all-cause mortality and 3085 instances of overdose mortality during the 1 463 035 person-years. The estimated CMR for all-cause mortality was 889 (95% CI 874-904) per 100 000 person-years and for overdose mortality was 211 (203-218) per 100 000 person-years. Among people diagnosed with opioid use disorder before entering prison during 2010-22 (n=6830), provision of opioid agonist treatment was estimated to be associated with reductions in both all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 0·58, 95% CI 0·39-0·85) and overdose mortality (0·51, 0·31-0·82) in the 6 months after leaving prison after adjustment for sociodemographic, prison-related, and clinical characteristics. INTERPRETATION In people diagnosed with opioid use disorder released from Norwegian prisons, opioid agonist treatment provided while in prison was a protective factor for both all-cause and overdose mortality at 6 months. Provision of opioid agonist treatment while in prison is crucial in reducing mortality for 6 months after release and should be available to all people in prison who have treatment needs. FUNDING South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority and the Research Council of Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Marianne Riksheim Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mundt AP, Cifuentes-Gramajo PA, Baranyi G, Fazel S. Worldwide incidence of suicides in prison: a systematic review with meta-regression analyses. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:536-544. [PMID: 38823401 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00134-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suicide is a leading cause of death during imprisonment. This systematic review aimed to synthesise available evidence of prison suicide incidence worldwide. METHODS We systematically searched the scientific literature, data repositories, and prison system reports, supplemented by correspondence with prison administrations. We included reports on people living in prison but excluded studies in preselected groups (by age or offence type). Absolute numbers and incidence rates of suicide mortality per 100 000 person-years by sex and country were extracted from 2000 to 2021. IQRs were used to describe the suicide incidence in different world regions. Incidence rate ratios comparing suicides of people living in prison with age-standardised general populations were calculated. We conducted meta-regression analyses on national-level and prison-level factors to examine heterogeneity. The study protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021296819. FINDINGS We included three scientific studies, 124 official reports, and 11 datasets from email correspondence. Between 2000 and 2021, there were 29 711 reported suicides during 91·2 million person-years of imprisonment in 82 jurisdictions worldwide (sex-specific data available for 13 289 individuals: 12 544 [94·4%] male and 745 [5·6%] female individuals). There were large variations between countries, with most studies reporting suicide rates in the range of 24-89 per 100 000 person-years in both sexes (22-86 in male individuals and 25-107 in female individuals). In meta-regression analyses, Europe (vs other regions), high-income countries (vs low-income and middle-income countries), and countries with lower incarceration rates (vs those with higher incarceration rates) had higher suicide rates. Incidence rate ratios between people who are incarcerated and age-standardised general populations in the same jurisdictions were typically in the range of 1·9-6·0 in male and 10·4-32·4 in female individuals. INTERPRETATION Prison services worldwide, and particularly in Europe, should prioritise suicide prevention. Assessment and management of suicide risk in female individuals living in prison need particular attention due to excess mortality relative to community-based populations. Interpretation of synthesised data needs to be done with caution due to high heterogeneity between jurisdictions. FUNDING Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Economic and Social Research Council, and Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian P Mundt
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile; Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Pablo A Cifuentes-Gramajo
- Doctorado en Psicoterapia, Medical Faculties and Faculties of Social Sciences, Universidad de Chile and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala; Dirección General del Sistema de Investigación, Centro Universitario de Occidente, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, Quetzaltenango, Guatemala
| | - Gergő Baranyi
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; Centre for Longitudinal Studies, Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK
| | - Seena Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bromley E, Rahmanian Koushkaki S, Davis LG, Moon S, Resnick J, McCoy M, Bennett K, Rab S, Draxler CD, Jackson LT, Lovelace A, Sherin J. Addressing Mental Health Disability in Unsheltered Homelessness: Outpatient Conservatorship in Los Angeles. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:689-698. [PMID: 38268464 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The authors sought to describe a pilot program for gravely disabled individuals experiencing unsheltered homelessness in Los Angeles County that illustrates a promising public health framework to address mental health-related disability in homeless populations. METHODS Homeless outreach teams implementing the outpatient conservatorship (OPC) pilot program adopted a population health approach, multisystem care coordination, and prioritization of the least restrictive environments. The program allowed initiation of a Lanterman-Petris-Short (LPS) conservatorship outside of a hospital, with the goal of serving highly vulnerable individuals in the least restrictive settings. Between August 2020 and July 2021, the OPC pilot program served 43 clients, corresponding to 2% of those served by the outreach teams during that period. Using observational program evaluation data, the authors examined the impact of the program on this sample of participants. RESULTS At 12 months, 81% of OPC clients were no longer experiencing unsheltered homelessness; 65% accessed an LPS conservatorship. Although most OPC clients utilized a psychiatric hospital, 54% left locked settings earlier than would have been possible without the program. One-third of clients referred for LPS conservatorship used unlocked licensed residential facilities in the first year. Negative events, such as remaining in unsheltered homelessness, were more common among clients not referred for LPS conservatorship. CONCLUSIONS Timely receipt of street-based services and coordination of care before, during, and after referral for LPS conservatorship reduced use of restrictive settings. The OPC program's components constitute a promising triadic framework for addressing mental health disability among unsheltered individuals that warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Bromley
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Sara Rahmanian Koushkaki
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Lisa G Davis
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Stephanie Moon
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Jaclyn Resnick
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Matthew McCoy
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Karla Bennett
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Shayan Rab
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Connie D Draxler
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - La Tina Jackson
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Aubree Lovelace
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| | - Jonathan Sherin
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Jane and Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, David Geffen School of Medicine, and Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health and University of California Los Angeles Public Mental Health Partnership, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles (Bromley, Rahmanian Koushkaki, Davis, McCoy, Sherin); Mental Illness Research, Education and Clinical Center, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Los Angeles (Bromley, McCoy); Los Angeles County Department of Health Services, Los Angeles (Moon); Center for Community Health, Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute, University of California San Diego, La Jolla (Resnick); Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles (Bennett, Rab, Draxler, Jackson, Lovelace)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Capuzzi E, Di Forti CL, Caldiroli A, Cova F, Surace T, Buoli M, Clerici M. Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with prescription of first- versus second-generation long-acting antipsychotics in incarcerated adult males. Int Clin Psychopharmacol 2024; 39:276-283. [PMID: 37781763 DOI: 10.1097/yic.0000000000000516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
Information on patterns of prescription of long-acting injection (LAI) antipsychotics among people who are incarcerated is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate prescribing rates for first-generation antipsychotic (FGA)-LAI versus second-generation antipsychotic (SGA)-LAI and to identify the factors associated with the prescription of one of the two classes of LAI. A cross-sectional study was conducted among incarcerated adult males hosted in Monza detention center between January 2013 and April 2023. Socio-demographic and clinical data were retrospectively collected. Descriptive and univariate statistics as well as logistic regression analyses were performed. Data were available for 135 consecutive incarcerated adult males with different mental disorders who received a LAI as part of their treatment. 75.6% of our sample was treated with FGA-LAIs, with haloperidol as the most commonly prescribed drug, followed by zuclopentixol and aripiprazole. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder and concomitant administration of antidepressants were statistically significant predictors of SGA-LAI prescription. Some patients' characteristics may influence prescription patterns in prison. Further longitudinal studies with larger samples should confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Capuzzi
- Department of Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
| | | | - Alice Caldiroli
- Department of Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
| | - Francesca Cova
- Department of Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
| | - Teresa Surace
- Department of Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
| | - Massimiliano Buoli
- Department of Neurosciences and Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Clerici
- Department of Mental Health, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano Bicocca, Monza (MB)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bhugra D, Liebrenz M, Ventriglio A, Ng R, Javed A, Kar A, Chumakov E, Moura H, Tolentino E, Gupta S, Ruiz R, Okasha T, Chisolm MS, Castaldelli-Maia J, Torales J, Smith A. World Psychiatric Association-Asian Journal of Psychiatry Commission on Public Mental Health. Asian J Psychiatr 2024; 98:104105. [PMID: 38861790 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
Although there is considerable evidence showing that the prevention of mental illnesses and adverse outcomes and mental health promotion can help people lead better and more functional lives, public mental health remains overlooked in the broader contexts of psychiatry and public health. Likewise, in undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula, prevention and mental health promotion have often been ignored. However, there has been a recent increase in interest in public mental health, including an emphasis on the prevention of psychiatric disorders and improving individual and community wellbeing to support life trajectories, from childhood through to adulthood and into older age. These lifespan approaches have significant potential to reduce the onset of mental illnesses and the related burdens for the individual and communities, as well as mitigating social, economic, and political costs. Informed by principles of social justice and respect for human rights, this may be especially important for addressing salient problems in communities with distinct vulnerabilities, where prominent disadvantages and barriers for care delivery exist. Therefore, this Commission aims to address these topics, providing a narrative overview of relevant literature and suggesting ways forward. Additionally, proposals for improving mental health and preventing mental illnesses and adverse outcomes are presented, particularly amongst at-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dinesh Bhugra
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neurosciences, Kings College, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom.
| | - Michael Liebrenz
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Roger Ng
- World Psychiatric Association, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Anindya Kar
- Advanced Neuropsychiatry Institute, Kolkata, India
| | - Egor Chumakov
- Department of Psychiatry & Addiction, St Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
| | | | | | - Susham Gupta
- East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roxanna Ruiz
- University of Francisco Moaroquin, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | | | | | | | | | - Alexander Smith
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alon N, Macrynikola N, Jester DJ, Keshavan M, Reynolds CF, Saxena S, Thomas ML, Torous J, Jeste DV. Social determinants of mental health in major depressive disorder: Umbrella review of 26 meta-analyses and systematic reviews. Psychiatry Res 2024; 335:115854. [PMID: 38554496 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2024.115854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Revised: 03/05/2024] [Accepted: 03/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
There is a growing recognition of the impact of social determinants of mental health (SDoMHs) on people with, or at risk of, developing serious mental illnesses. Yet it is not known how associations of individual SDoMHs with risk for major depressive disorder (MDD) vary and roughly compare with one another. Following PRISMA guidelines, this umbrella review included 26 meta-analyses and systematic reviews that reported odds ratios, effect sizes, and/or pooled prevalence rates of MDD in samples with versus without specified SDoMHs. Childhood emotional, physical, or sexual abuse and neglect; intimate partner violence in females; and food insecurity were significantly associated with increased risk of MDD, with medium effect sizes. Natural disasters, terrorist acts, and military combat during deployment had small-size adverse effects, and homelessness, incarceration, and migration were associated with significantly elevated prevalence of MDD. Conversely, higher levels of parental care were significantly associated with reduced risk of MDD with medium effect sizes. Evidence supports the use of certain interventions at the individual and community level that can reduce the impact of these factors and promote health, although much more research is warranted in this area along with meaningful healthcare and societal policies to accomplish this goal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noy Alon
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Natalia Macrynikola
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dylan J Jester
- Women's Operational Military Exposure Network Center of Excellence (WOMEN CoE), VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Matcheri Keshavan
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Shekhar Saxena
- Global Health and Population, Harvard T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michael L Thomas
- Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - John Torous
- Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Dilip V Jeste
- Global Research Network on Social Determinants of Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Solbakken LE, Bergvik S, Wynn R. Breaking down barriers to mental healthcare access in prison: a qualitative interview study with incarcerated males in Norway. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:292. [PMID: 38632543 PMCID: PMC11025238 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05736-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health problems are highly prevalent in prison populations. Incarcerated persons generally come from disadvantaged backgrounds and are living under extraordinary conditions while in prison. Their healthcare needs are complex compared to the general population. Studies have found that incarcerated individuals are reluctant to seek help and that they experience challenges in accessing mental healthcare services. To some extent, seeking treatment depends on the degree of fit between potential users and health services, and actual use might be a better indication of accessibility than the fact that services are available. This study aimed to explore individual and systemic facilitators and barriers to accessing mental healthcare in a prison context. METHODS An analytical approach drawing on elements of constructivist Grounded theory was the methodological basis of this study. Fifteen male participants were recruited from three prisons in Northern Norway. Data was collected through in-depth interviews on topics such as help-seeking experiences, perceived access to services and availability of health information. RESULTS We found that distrust in the system, challenges with the referral routines, worries about negative consequences, and perceived limited access to mental healthcare were barriers to help-seeking among incarcerated individuals. How prison officers, and healthcare personnel respond to incarcerated persons reporting mental distress could also be critical for their future willingness to seek help. Providing information about mental health and available services, initiating outreaching mental health services, and integrating mental health interventions into treatment programs are examples of efforts that might reduce barriers to accessing services. CONCLUSIONS Facilitating access to mental health services is crucial to accommodate the mental health needs of those incarcerated. This study provides insights into the complex interplay of individual, social and systemic factors that may contribute to the utilization of mental health care among incarcerated persons. We suggest that correctional and healthcare systems review their practices to facilitate access to healthcare for people in prison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Elisabeth Solbakken
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9038, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Use, University Hospital of North, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Svein Bergvik
- Department of Psychology, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Rolf Wynn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, N-9038, Norway.
- Department of Education, ICT and Learning, Østfold University College, Tromsø, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Olagunju AT, Wu A, Boudreau J, Nagari S, Bradford JM, Chaimowitz GA. Detection of contraband drugs in forensic-correctional mental health services using TeknoScan-a gas chromatography tool. Forensic Sci Int 2024; 357:111992. [PMID: 38518570 DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2024.111992] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
Substance misuse is a major problem among individuals involved in forensic-correctional mental health services. Urine drug screening detects substance use and deters the entry of contraband into forensic-correctional units, albeit with limitations. For example, a point-of-care urine sample may not be possible and patients can alter or substitute samples to avoid detection, highlighting the role of ancillary tools to detect contraband substances. This study describes the pattern and types of substances detected from environmental samples using a gas chromatographic analyzer (TeknoScan TSI3000) in forensic-correctional populations to model the benefits of similar tools in similar settings. Samples collected over 18 months (January 2020 to June 2021) by trained staff members using the machine were reviewed. During this period, 217 environmental samples were recorded, and 66 (30%) samples were positive for contraband substances, including tetrahydrocannabinol (25%), methamphetamines (19%), and cocaine (16%). Other substances detected include methylene-dioxymethamphetamine, heroin, morphine, lysergic acid diethylamide, tramadol, and methyl-benzoate. Fewer positive samples were detected, especially during the time corresponding with the COVID-19 restriction on the forensic units. TeknoScan was beneficial as an ancillary tool to detect and deter contraband substances. It also provided evidence for risk management. Adequate training is needed for the successful implementation of the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew T Olagunju
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada; Discipline of Psychiatry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
| | - Aaron Wu
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Jay Boudreau
- Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada
| | - Satyadev Nagari
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada
| | - John Mw Bradford
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, 75 Laurier Ave. E, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
| | - Gary A Chaimowitz
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neurosciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada; Forensic Psychiatry Program, St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, 100 West 5th Street, Hamilton, ON L9C 0E3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Adejumo OA, Ogunbiyi EO, Fornili KS, Chen LY, Makanjuola AB, Ernest SK. Peer Facilitator Training for Diabetes Prevention in a Nigerian Drug Treatment Center. J Addict Nurs 2024; 35:67-75. [PMID: 38829996 DOI: 10.1097/jan.0000000000000575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) are at an increased risk of developing comorbid medical conditions, including Type 2 diabetes. Although the diabetes prevention program (DPP) is efficacious and cost-effective, there is no published evidence to support its implementation in Nigeria or within SUD treatment settings. In this first known DPP within an SUD treatment program, we implemented a multiphased, nurse-led DPP at a small outpatient drug treatment center in Nigeria. The aim of this article was to describe only the processes utilized for the initial peer facilitator (PF) training (Phase 1). METHODS In Phase 1, a diabetes prevention master trainer delivered a virtual DPP training to the facility's lead nurse, who return-demonstrated the DPP workshop skills and competencies over four 4-hour sessions. The lead nurse then independently delivered four 8-hour training sessions to a small number of client volunteers (n = 4) who subsequently delivered the DPP lifestyle interventions to their peers in the outpatient treatment program. RESULTS The client volunteers attended all PF workshop sessions and were observed to be proficient in all aspects of implementation. They indicated that the training objectives were easily achieved and expressed enthusiasm for delivering DPP content to their peers. The need to better contextualize the DPP curriculum specific to Nigerian food preferences was identified. CONCLUSION The Phase 1 training process appears to be an appropriate and effective approach for preparing PFs to deliver health programs, like the DPP, in environments with limited resources for populations facing numerous challenges.
Collapse
|
12
|
Favril L, Rich JD, Hard J, Fazel S. Mental and physical health morbidity among people in prisons: an umbrella review. Lancet Public Health 2024; 9:e250-e260. [PMID: 38553144 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(24)00023-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Revised: 02/01/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who experience incarceration are characterised by poor health profiles. Clarification of the disease burden in the prison population can inform service and policy development. We aimed to synthesise and assess the evidence regarding the epidemiology of mental and physical health conditions among people in prisons worldwide. METHODS In this umbrella review, five bibliographic databases (Web of Science, PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, and Global Health) were systematically searched from inception to identify meta-analyses published up to Oct 31, 2023, which examined the prevalence or incidence of mental and physical health conditions in general prison populations. We excluded meta-analyses that examined health conditions in selected or clinical prison populations. Prevalence data were extracted from published reports and study authors were contacted for additional information. Estimates were synthesised and stratified by sex, age, and country income level. The robustness of the findings was assessed in terms of heterogeneity, excess significance bias, small-study effects, and review quality. The study protocol was pre-registered with PROSPERO, CRD42023404827. FINDINGS Our search of the literature yielded 1909 records eligible for screening. 1736 articles were excluded and 173 full-text reports were examined for eligibility. 144 articles were then excluded due to not meeting inclusion criteria, which resulted in 29 meta-analyses eligible for inclusion. 12 of these were further excluded because they examined the same health condition. We included data from 17 meta-analyses published between 2002 and 2023. In adult men and women combined, the 6-month prevalence was 11·4% (95% CI 9·9-12·8) for major depression, 9·8% (6·8-13·2) for post-traumatic stress disorder, and 3·7% (3·2-4·1) for psychotic illness. On arrival to prison, 23·8% (95% CI 21·0-26·7) of people met diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorder and 38·9% (31·5-46·2) for drug use disorder. Half of those with major depression or psychotic illness had a comorbid substance use disorder. Infectious diseases were also common; 17·7% (95% CI 15·0-20·7) of people were antibody-positive for hepatitis C virus, with lower estimates (ranging between 2·6% and 5·2%) found for hepatitis B virus, HIV, and tuberculosis. Meta-regression analyses indicated significant differences in prevalence by sex and country income level, albeit not consistent across health conditions. The burden of non-communicable chronic diseases was only examined in adults aged 50 years and older. Overall, the quality of the evidence was limited by high heterogeneity and small-study effects. INTERPRETATION People in prisons have a specific pattern of morbidity that represents an opportunity for public health to address. In particular, integrating prison health within the national public health system, adequately resourcing primary care and mental health services, and improving linkage with post-release health services could affect public health and safety. Population-based longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the extent to which incarceration affects health. FUNDING Research Foundation-Flanders, Wellcome Trust, National Institutes of Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Favril
- Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy, Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Josiah D Rich
- Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Seena Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jahrami H, Saif Z, Ammar A, Husain W, Trabelsi K, Ghazzawi H, Pandi-Perumal SR, Seeman MV. Development and Validation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Evaluating the Nutritional Status of Patients with Serious Mental Illnesses (DIETQ-SMI) in Bahrain. Brain Sci 2024; 14:312. [PMID: 38671964 PMCID: PMC11047868 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14040312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/16/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
General food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) have not been tailored for or validated in individuals with psychiatric disorders. Given the unique eating behaviors of patients with serious mental illnesses (SMIs), custom-made tools are needed. Therefore, we developed and validated an FFQ customized to individuals with SMIs. A total of 150 adults with SMIs (schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depression) were recruited from Bahrain. The participants completed the 50-item Dietary Intake Evaluation Questionnaire for Serious Mental Illness (DIETQ-SMI) FFQ and a 3-day food record (FR). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing nutrient intake to FR intake using correlation and reliability statistics. The DIETQ-SMI demonstrated a good ranking validity compared to the FR based on correlation coefficients (rho 0.33 to 0.92) for energy and macro- and micronutrients. The FFQ had high internal consistency (McDonald's omega = 0.84; Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC > 0.90). The FFQ tended to estimate higher absolute intakes than the FR but adequately ranked the intakes. The FFQ value was correlated with the FR for all the items (p < 0.001). The DIETQ-SMI is a valid and reliable FFQ for ranking dietary intake in individuals with an SMI. It can help assess nutritional status and, subsequently, guide interventions in high-risk psychiatric populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitham Jahrami
- Psychiatric Hospital, Governmental Hospitals, Manama P.O. Box 12, Bahrain
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama P.O. Box 26671, Bahrain;
| | - Zahra Saif
- Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama P.O. Box 26671, Bahrain;
| | - Achraf Ammar
- Department of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany;
- Research Laboratory, Molecular Bases of Human Pathology, LR19ES13, Faculty of Medicine of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3029, Tunisia
| | - Waqar Husain
- Department of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad Campus, Park Road, Islamabad 45550, Pakistan;
| | - Khaled Trabelsi
- High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia;
- Research Laboratory, Education, Motricity, Sport and Health, EM2S, LR19JS01, University of Sfax, Sfax 3000, Tunisia
| | - Hadeel Ghazzawi
- Department of Nutrition and Food Technology, School of Agriculture, The University of Jordan, Amman 11942, Jordan;
| | - Seithikurippu R. Pandi-Perumal
- Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara 144411, Punjab, India;
- Saveetha Medical College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Mary V. Seeman
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada;
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Williams O, Gray BJ, Perrett SE. Identifying the public health needs of a UK probation cohort: a cross-sectional analysis. J Public Health (Oxf) 2024; 46:12-19. [PMID: 37738133 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdad183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The health needs of those under probation are likely high, but they have received very little public health attention. Limited evidence exists on the public health needs and interventions to support this cohort. METHODS Surveys were completed by 257 people on probation as part of a local health needs assessment. Results were compared with the general population responses from the National Survey for Wales (2021-22). RESULTS People on probation were 4.2 times more likely to self-report not-good general health (fair, bad or very bad) than the general population (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 4.2, 95% Confidence Intervals [CI] 3.2-5.4). The odds of having a mental health condition were over eight times higher than the general population (aOR 8.8, 95% CI 6.8-11.4). Prevalence of smoking (52%), drug use (60%), attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (21%), autism (4%) and dyslexia (15%) were all higher than the general population. General Practitioner usage and hospital stays were higher, but dentist or optician usage lower than the general population (P < 0.05). Emergency departments were accessed by 35%, with 9% frequenting them three or more times. CONCLUSIONS People on probation have poorer self-reported health, higher prevalence of unhealthy behaviours and higher accessing of reactive health services than the general population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Williams
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, Wales
| | - B J Gray
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, Wales
| | - S E Perrett
- Public Health Wales, 2 Capital Quarter, Tyndall Street, Cardiff, CF10 4BZ, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Bukten A, Virtanen S, Hesse M, Chang Z, Kvamme TL, Thylstrup B, Tverborgvik T, Skjærvø I, Stavseth MR. The prevalence and comorbidity of mental health and substance use disorders in Scandinavian prisons 2010-2019: a multi-national register study. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:95. [PMID: 38317111 PMCID: PMC10840271 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-05540-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mental health disorders are common among people in prison, but their prevalence in the Scandinavian prison population remain unclear. In this multinational register study, we examined the prevalence of mental health disorders and the comorbidity of substance use disorders (SUDs) with other mental health disorders in this population. Further, we investigated how the prevalence of mental disorders at prison entry had changed in Norway, Denmark, and Sweden over the study period. METHODS The three study cohorts included all individuals, aged 19 or older, whom had been imprisoned in Norway (2010-2019), Denmark (2011-2018), and Sweden (2010-2013). Mental disorders were defined as ICD-10 diagnoses (F-codes) registered in the national patient registers. The study prevalence was estimated based on recorded diagnoses during the entire study follow-up period in each respective country. The one-year prevalence of mental disorders was estimated for each calendar year for individuals entering prison during that year. RESULTS The Scandinavian prison cohorts included 119 507 individuals released 191 549 times during the study period. Across all three countries a high proportion of both women (61.3%-74.4%) and men (49.6%-57.9%) had at least one mental health disorder during the observation period. The most prevalent disorders were SUDs (39.1%-44.0%), depressive disorder (8.1%-17.5%), and stress related disorder (8.8%-17.1%). Women (31.8%-41.1%) had higher levels of mental health and substance use comorbidities compared to men (20.8%-27.6%). The one-year prevalence of any mental health disorder increased over time with a 33% relative increase in Norway, 8% in Denmark, and 10% in Sweden. The proportion of individuals entering prison with a comorbid SUD and other mental disorder had also increased. CONCLUSIONS While the incarceration rate has been decreasing during the past decade in the Scandinavian countries, an increasing proportion of people entering prison have a diagnosed mental health disorder. Our results suggest that prisons should provide adequate treatment and scale up services to accommodate the increasing proportion of people with complex health needs among incarcerated people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway.
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Suvi Virtanen
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Morten Hesse
- Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Birgitte Thylstrup
- Center for Alcohol and Drug Research, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Torill Tverborgvik
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway
| | - Ingeborg Skjærvø
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marianne R Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, N-0407, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Applegate BK, Pasquire N, Ouellette HM. The Prevalence of Physical and Mental Health Multimorbidity Among People Held in U.S. Jails. JOURNAL OF CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE 2024; 30:7-13. [PMID: 38100055 DOI: 10.1089/jchc.23.05.0040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
American jails process millions of bookings each year, and prior research has documented high rates of mental and physical ailments among people held in jails. The existing literature, however, provides only minimal insight into the occurrence of multiple health conditions. This study sought to estimate the prevalence of physical and mental health multimorbidity among people held in jails in the United States. Using a nationally representative sample of responses to the National Inmate Survey, 2011-2012 (N = 5,494), we analyzed reports of physical health conditions, mental health conditions, and disabilities among people in local jails. Prevalence of two or more conditions was 28.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 27.3%, 29.7%) for mental health, 55.5% (95% CI = 54.2%, 56.8%) for physical health, and 15.5% (95% CI = 14.6%, 16.5%) for disabilities. At least one condition across all three health domains was estimated at 29.4% (95% CI = 28.2%, 30.6%). Prevalence of two or more co-occurring conditions without regard for domain was 76.9% (95% CI = 75.8%, 78.0%). Rates were consistently higher among women than among men. Jailed people show a high rate of co-occurring mental and physical health conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon K Applegate
- Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Nicola Pasquire
- Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Heather M Ouellette
- Department of Criminal Justice, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Murray C, Coyle B, Morgan H, Marder I, Woods D, Haughey T, Maycock M, Genovesi F, Meek R, Parker A, Smith A, Kay C, Brink G, Rovers H, Haudenhuyse R, Roe D, Contreras-Osorio F, Donohue B, Bohall G, Martinez N, Martos-Garcia D, Whitley M, Norman M, Demalija R, Sherry E, Chitsawang N, Adebayo Aderonmu K, Breslin G. International consensus statement on the design, delivery and evaluation of sport-based interventions aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075792. [PMID: 38296285 PMCID: PMC10828872 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop an international consensus statement to advise on designing, delivering and evaluating sport-based interventions (SBIs) aimed at promoting social, psychological and physical well-being in prison. DESIGN Modified Delphi using two rounds of survey questionnaires and two consensus workshops. PARTICIPANTS A multidisciplinary panel of more than 40 experts from 15 international jurisdictions was formed, including representation from the following groups and stakeholders: professionals working in the justice system; officials from sport federations and organisations; academics with research experience of prisons, secure forensic mental health settings and SBIs; and policy-makers in criminal justice and sport. RESULTS A core research team and advisory board developed the initial rationale, statement and survey. This survey produced qualitative data which was analysed thematically. The findings were presented at an in-person workshop. Panellists discussed the findings, and, using a modified nominal group technique, reached a consensus on objectives to be included in a revised statement. The core research team and advisory board revised the statement and recirculated it with a second survey. Findings from the second survey were discussed at a second, virtual, workshop. The core research team and advisory board further revised the consensus statement and recirculated it asking panellists for further comments. This iterative process resulted in seven final statement items; all participants have confirmed that they agreed with the content, objectives and recommendations of the final statement. CONCLUSIONS The statement can be used to assist those that design, deliver and evaluate SBIs by providing guidance on: (1) minimum levels of competence for those designing and delivering SBIs; (2) the design and delivery of inclusive programmes prioritising disadvantaged groups; and (3) evaluation measures which are carefully calibrated both to capture proposed programme outcomes and to advance an understanding of the systems, processes and experiences of sport engagement in prison.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - David Woods
- Ulster University-Belfast Campus, Belfast, UK
| | | | - Matthew Maycock
- University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
- Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Rosie Meek
- Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, UK
| | - Andrew Parker
- University of Gloucestershire, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK
| | | | - Chris Kay
- Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
| | - Gerko Brink
- Nederlandse Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Hubert Rovers
- European Football for Development Network, Breda, The Netherlands
| | | | - Daniel Roe
- Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences GIH, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Greg Bohall
- Chicago School of Professional Psychology - Downtown Los Angeles Campus, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | | - Meredith Whitley
- Adelphi University, Garden City, New York, USA
- Centre for Sport Leadership, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
| | - Mark Norman
- University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Emma Sherry
- Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mundt AP, Delhey S, Martínez P, Irarrázaval M, Grasso L, Rivera-Arroyo G, Capistrano A, Trujillo N, Golcher F, Benavides Salcedo A, Dedik C, Cordero M, Torales J, Malpartida C, Almánzar Á. Types of Psychiatric Beds and Mental Health Services in 16 Latin American Countries, 1990-2020. Psychiatr Serv 2024; 75:48-54. [PMID: 37644830 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220590] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Latin America has undergone major changes in psychiatric services over the past three decades. The authors aimed to assess the availability of service data and changes in psychiatric services in this region during the 1990-2020 period. METHODS The authors formed a research network to collect data on psychiatric service indicators gathered between 1990 and 2020 from national registries in Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay. Indicators included psychiatric beds in psychiatric and general hospitals overall, for children and adolescents, and for forensic populations; residential beds for substance use treatment; treatment slots in residential facilities and day hospitals; and outpatient facilities. RESULTS Data availability varied among countries, service indicators, and time points. The median prevalence of psychiatric beds decreased in psychiatric hospitals from 5.1 to 3.0 per 100,000 people (-42%) and in general hospitals from 1.0 to 0.8 (-24%). The median prevalence estimates of specialized psychiatric beds for children and adolescents (0.18) and for forensic populations (0.04) remained unchanged. Increases in prevalence were observed for residential beds for substance use treatment (from 0.40 to 0.57, 43% increase), available treatment slots in residential facilities (0.67 to 0.79, 17%), treatment slots in day hospitals (0.41 to 0.54, 32%), and outpatient facilities (0.39 to 0.93, 138%). CONCLUSIONS The findings indicate that treatment capacity shifted from inpatient to outpatient and community care. Most countries had a bed shortage for acute psychiatric care, especially for children and adolescents and forensic patients. More comprehensive and standardized mental health service registries are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian P Mundt
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Sabine Delhey
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Pablo Martínez
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Matías Irarrázaval
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Luciano Grasso
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Guillermo Rivera-Arroyo
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Adelia Capistrano
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Natalia Trujillo
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Francisco Golcher
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Andrés Benavides Salcedo
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Corinne Dedik
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Martha Cordero
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Julio Torales
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - César Malpartida
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| | - Ángel Almánzar
- School of Medicine, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile (Mundt, Delhey); Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo School of Medicine, Santiago, Chile (Mundt); School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Charles-Le Moyne Research Center on Health Innovations, Longueuil, Québec, Canada (Martínez); Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C. (Irarrázaval); Department of Mental Health and Addiction, Ministry of Public Health, Buenos Aires (Grasso); Department of Psychology, Universidad Privada de Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia (Rivera-Arroyo); General Coordination of Mental Health, Alcohol, and Other Drugs, Ministry of Health, São Paulo, Brazil (Capistrano); Mental Health Group, National Faculty of Public Health, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia (Trujillo); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, San José, Costa Rica (Golcher); Ministry of Public Health, Quito, Ecuador (Benavides Salcedo); National Economic Research Center, Guatemala City (Dedik); Center for Global Mental Health Research, Ramón de la Fuente Muńiz National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City (Cordero); Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, San Lorenzo, Paraguay (Torales); Regional Institute for Health Research, Universidad Nacional de Caaguazú, Coronel Oviedo, Paraguay (Torales); Ministry of Health, Lima, Peru (Malpartida); Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Ministry of Public Health, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic (Almánzar)
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Austin A, Favril L, Craft S, Thliveri P, Freeman TP. Factors associated with drug use in prison: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative evidence. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 122:104248. [PMID: 37952319 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND About a third of people use drugs during their incarceration, which is associated with multiple adverse health and criminal justice outcomes. Many studies have examined factors associated with in-prison drug use, but this evidence has not yet been systematically reviewed. We aimed to systematically review and synthesise the evidence on factors related to drug use in prison. METHODS Three databases (PubMed, PsycINFO and Embase) were systematically searched as well as grey literature, for quantitative, qualitative and mixed-methods studies examining factors related to drug use inside prison. We excluded studies that did not explicitly measure in prison drug use or only measured alcohol and/or tobacco use. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) for quantitative studies and Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) for qualitative studies. The review was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42021295898). RESULTS Fifty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, reporting data on 26,399 people in prison. Most studies were of low or moderate-quality, and all used self-report to assess drug use. In quantitative studies, studies found that previous criminal justice involvement, poor prison conditions, pre-prison drug use and psychiatric diagnosis were positively associated with drug use in prison. In qualitative studies, reasons for drug use were closely linked to the prison environment lacking purposeful activity and the social context of the prison whereby drug use was seen as acceptable, necessary for cohesion and pressurised. CONCLUSION In the first systematic review of factors associated with drug use in prison, key modifiable risk factors identified from quantitative and qualitative studies were psychiatric morbidity and poor prison conditions. Non-modifiable factors included previous drug use and criminal history linked to substance use. Our findings indicate an opportunity to intervene and improve the prison environment to reduce drug use and associated adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Austin
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK
| | - Louis Favril
- Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Sam Craft
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK
| | - Phoebe Thliveri
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK
| | - Tom P Freeman
- Addiction and Mental Health Group (AIM), Department of Psychology, University of Bath, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Staton M, Tillson M, Levi MM, Dickson M, Webster M, Leukefeld C. Identifying and Treating Incarcerated Women Experiencing Substance Use Disorders: A Review. Subst Abuse Rehabil 2023; 14:131-145. [PMID: 38026785 PMCID: PMC10655602 DOI: 10.2147/sar.s409944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
While research on substance use disorder (SUD) treatment among justice-involved populations has grown in recent years, the majority of corrections-based SUD studies have predominantly included incarcerated men or men on community supervision. This review 1) highlights special considerations for incarcerated women that may serve as facilitating factors or barriers to SUD treatment; 2) describes selected evidence-based practices for women along the cascade of care for SUD including screening and assessment, treatment and intervention strategies, and referral to services during community re-entry; and 3) discusses conclusions and implications for SUD treatment for incarcerated women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Staton
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Martha Tillson
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Mary M Levi
- Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Megan Dickson
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Matt Webster
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Carl Leukefeld
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Beigel L, Forrester A, Torales J, Aboaja A, Rivera Aroyo G, Roche MO, Opitz-Welke A, Mundt AP. Mental health intervention research in Latin American correctional settings: A scoping review. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2023; 69:1560-1577. [PMID: 37332202 DOI: 10.1177/00207640231174372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Latin American prison population has grown faster than anywhere else globally over the past two decades, reaching a total of 1.7 million people at any given time. However, research on mental health prevention and treatment interventions in Latin American prisons remains scarce. AIMS This study aimed to systematically review and synthesize research on prison mental health interventions conducted in the region. METHODS We used a two-stage scoping review design guided by the JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. Searches took place in December 2021 in nine databases using descriptors and synonyms. First, all prison mental health research in Latin America was retained. Secondly, using title and abstract screening, all research possibly related to interventions was retained for full text evaluation. Studies reporting interventions were assessed by country, language, institution, population, intervention type, intervention focus and outcomes. RESULTS N = 34 studies were included in this review. These were 13 case reports, seven expert consensus papers and 14 quantitative studies (four randomized controlled trials, nine cohort studies, one quasi-experimental study). Fourteen interventions were targeted at promoting prosocial behavior, seven studies each aimed to improve mental health and to treat substance use disorders. Six studies involved the treatment of sexual offending behavior, and 3 focused on reducing criminal recidivism. Psychoeducation (n = 12) and motivational interviewing (n = 5) were the most frequent intervention types studied. Promising data from trials showed that anger management, depression, substance use and reoffending could be successfully addressed through interventions. CONCLUSIONS Implementation and effectiveness research of mental health interventions in Latin American prisons is scarce. Addressing mental health, substance use and prosocial behavior outcomes should be considered in future research. There is a particular dearth of controlled trials describing quantifiable outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Beigel
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Charité Campus Mitte, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
- Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Andrew Forrester
- Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, UK
| | - Julio Torales
- Department of Mental Health, Universidad Nacional de Asunción, Paraguay
| | - Anne Aboaja
- Mental Health and Addictions Research Group, University of York, UK
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, UK
| | | | | | - Annette Opitz-Welke
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
| | - Adrian P Mundt
- Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile
- Departamento de Psiquiatría y Salud Mental, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Plummer N, Guardado R, Ngassa Y, Montalvo C, Kotoujian PJ, Siddiqi K, Senst T, Simon K, Acevedo A, Wurcel AG. Racial Differences in Self-Report of Mental Illness and Mental Illness Treatment in the Community: An Analysis of Jail Intake Data. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2023; 50:966-975. [PMID: 37733128 PMCID: PMC10543583 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-023-01297-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Jails and prisons in the United States house people with elevated rates of mental health and substance use disorders. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate the frequency of racial/ethnic differences in the self-report of mental illness and psychiatric medication use at jail entry. Our sample included individuals who had been incarcerated between 2016 and 2020 at the Middlesex Jail & House of Correction, located in Billerica, MA. We used data from the "Offender Management System," the administrative database used by the jail containing data on people who are incarcerated, and COREMR, the electronic medical record (EMR) used in the Middlesex Jail & House of Correction. We evaluated two primary outcomes (1) self-reported mental illness history and (2) self-reported use of psychiatric medication, with the primary indicator of interest as race/ethnicity. At intake, over half (57%) of the sample self-reported history of mental illness and 20% reported the use of psychiatric medications. Among people who self-reported a history of mental illness, Hispanic (AOR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.60-0.90), Black (AOR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.43-0.64), Asian/Pacific Islander (Non-Hispanic) people (AOR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13-0.74), and people from other racial/ethnic groups (AOR: 0.33, 95% CI: 0.11-0.93) all had decreased odds of reporting psychiatric medications. Mental illness was reported in about one-half of people who entered jail, but only 20% reported receiving medications in the community prior to incarceration. Our findings build on the existing literature on jail-based mental illness and show racial disparities in self-report of psychiatric medications in people who self-reported mental illness. The timing, frequency, and equity of mental health services in both the community and the jail setting deserves further research, investment, and improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Narcissa Plummer
- Department of Population Health, Northeastern University, Boston, MA USA
| | - Rubeen Guardado
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - Yvane Ngassa
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| | - Cristina Montalvo
- Department of Psychiatry, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
- Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA USA
| | | | | | | | - Kevin Simon
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA USA
- Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA USA
| | - Andrea Acevedo
- Department of Community Health, Tufts University, Medford, MA USA
| | - Alysse G. Wurcel
- Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Herzog-Evans M, Keulen-de Vos M. Offence Paralleling Schema Modes in Institutional Violence. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OFFENDER THERAPY AND COMPARATIVE CRIMINOLOGY 2023:306624X231206516. [PMID: 37902405 DOI: 10.1177/0306624x231206516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2023]
Abstract
This study explored emotional patterns in relation to the Offence Paralleling Behavior and the schema mode frameworks. The study retrospectively assesses schema modes in the events prior and during criminal and institutional violent behavior. It draws upon observer-ratings of schema modes by 42 male patients who received mandated clinical care in a forensic hospital in the Netherlands. Wilcoxon Signed Ranked tests showed no differences between events prior crimes and incidents with regard to schema modes that relate to universal childhood needs with the exception of impulsive child mode. States of intoxication were more prevalent prior and during the crimes than during the incidents. Furthermore, modes tended to be less activated during incidents, particularly low self-control, conning and manipulating, and self-aggrandizer modes. It is hoped that criminal justice institutions and their staff would benefit from being more aware of schema mode in order to prevent and deal with incidental violence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marije Keulen-de Vos
- Forensic Psychiatric Centre de Rooyse Wissel, Venray, The Netherlands
- Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Harada T, Kanamori S, Baba T, Takano A, Nomura K, Villaroman A, Rey FI, Peralta J, Shirasaka T. Sociodemographic profiles and determinants of relapse risks among people with substance use disorders in the Philippines: A survey in community and residential care settings. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 251:110924. [PMID: 37633130 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Methamphetamine use is a major social and health issue in the Philippines. Former president Rodrigo Duterte prioritized combating illicit drugs, and the government launched an anti-drug campaign. People with substance use disorders (SUD) receive treatment and care in the community or residential treatment at Treatment and Rehabilitation Centers (TRCs) established by the Department of Health. However, since the content and quality of service are not sufficient, there is an urgent need for improvement. To this end, it is necessary to understand demographic characteristics, the severity of drug use, and treatment needs of this population. METHODS We conducted a questionnaire survey of people with SUD in the community (n=308) and all TRC patients (n=1770) to obtain their demographic profiles. We also used the Drug Abuse Screening Test-20 (DAST-20) and the Stimulant Relapse Risk Scale (SRRS). RESULTS Based on DAST-20 scores, the severity of dependence was not well-matched to the care provided; 12.4% of the community sample was in the severe or substantial categories and 14.2% of the TRC sample was in the low category. The TRC sample had a significantly higher relapse risk than the community sample, which was associated with a lower educational attainment level and comorbid alcohol dependence. CONCLUSIONS It is important to use standardized psychometric tools to match treatment with the severity of drug dependence. In addition, a wide variety of medical and social services need to be provided based on consideration of treatment needs to improve the well-being of this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takayuki Harada
- Faculty of Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Education, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Shogo Kanamori
- Department of Community and Global Health, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Toshiaki Baba
- National Center for Global Hearth and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ayumi Takano
- Department of Psychiatric Nursing, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazutaka Nomura
- School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Alfonso Villaroman
- Treatment and Rehabilitation Center Bicutan, Department of Health, the Philippines
| | - Frederick I Rey
- Department of Political Science, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, the Philippines
| | - Jasmin Peralta
- Treatment and Rehabilitation Center Cebu, Department of Health, Cebu City, the Philippines
| | - Tomohiro Shirasaka
- Department of Psychiatry, Teine Keijinkai Medical Center, Sapporo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Solbakken LE, Bergvik S, Wynn R. Beliefs about mental health in incarcerated males: a qualitative interview study. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1242756. [PMID: 37779608 PMCID: PMC10538968 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1242756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Beliefs about mental health are shaped by the sociocultural context. Prisons have unique environmental and social features, and the prevalence of mental health problems in incarcerated populations is exceptionally high. These features make prisons especially interesting settings for exploring health beliefs. The aim of this study was to explore the conceptualizations of mental health and coping preferences in a prison environment. Methods Individual in-depth interviews were conducted with fifteen incarcerated males from three prisons in Northern Norway. The design draws on central elements from Grounded Theory. Results Mental health was perceived as distinct from mental illness by many of the participants. They coped with the prison environment by focusing on the things that gave them a sense of meaning and autonomy - this also formed their conceptualization of mental health. Furthermore, social interaction and activities were perceived as important to enhance and maintain mental well-being, however there were institutional barriers to using these coping strategies. The prison environment was integrated in the participants conceptualizations of mental health problems, and psychosocial stressors were emphasized in causal attributions. Biological and dispositional factors were less frequently mentioned. The participants preferred non-medical management for mental health problems and most displayed a reserved attitude towards psychotropic medications. The exception was attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, for which they held neurobiological causal beliefs, together with a corresponding preference for medication as treatment. Conclusion The main finding was a firm integration of the prison context in in the participants' beliefs about mental health. We theorize that fusion of prison conditions and mental health beliefs were brought on by the processes of prisonization, observing mental distress in peers and attempts to protect self-esteem by externalizing the causes for mental health problems. Access to activities, social time, and "someone to talk to" were perceived to be crucial for improving and preserving mental health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Line Elisabeth Solbakken
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Substance Use, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Svein Bergvik
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Rolf Wynn
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Education, ICT and Learning, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fritz M, Karanassios G, Wolf V, Mayer J, Steiner I, Franke I, Klein V, Streb J, Dudeck M. The curse of experiencing and committing violence as a criminal recidivism predictor: A comparison between female forensic psychiatric patients with severe mental disorders and substance use disorder. Eur Psychiatry 2023; 66:e74. [PMID: 37665048 PMCID: PMC10594253 DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2023.2450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Violence occurs frequently in the life of forensic psychiatric patients, both as active aggression and in the form of victimization. Undoubtedly, these incidents shape personality, behavior, and affect the ability to interact adequately socially. Thus, such experiences may influence criminal recidivism and serve as forensic psychiatric/psychological predictors upon hospital discharge. METHODS Hence, this study aimed at characterizing two distinct female forensic psychiatric patient populations (nonsubstance use mental disorders [n = 110] versus substance use disorder [n = 415]) regarding their active and passive violent experiences as well as contextualizing these with their individual crime recidivism rates. The analysis followed a record-based, retrospective approach. RESULTS While both groups experienced aggression throughout childhood and youth equally often, substance use disorder patients were significantly more often exposed to violence during adulthood. On the other hand, severely mentally ill patients tended to react more often with violence during their hospital confinement. However, regarding their violent recidivism rate, no intergroup effects were observed. Finally, within the addicted group, a violent index crime as well as physical aggression during hospital confinement increased the odds for violent reoffending by approximately 2.4-fold (95% confidence interval 1.3-4.5) and 2.5-fold (95% confidence interval 1.1-5.9), respectively. CONCLUSION In summary, these findings underline the importance of active aggression rather than victimization as an influencing factor on resocialization especially in a substance use disorder patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Fritz
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- School of Health and Social Sciences, AKAD University of Applied Sciences, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Georgios Karanassios
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Viviane Wolf
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty, LVR-Clinic Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany
| | - Juliane Mayer
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany
| | - Ivonne Steiner
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany
| | - Irina Franke
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
- Forensic Psychiatry, Psychiatric Services of Grisons, Chur, Switzerland
| | - Verena Klein
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, kbo-Isar-Amper-Clinic Taufkirchen (Vils), Taufkirchen (Vils), Germany
| | - Judith Streb
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| | - Manuela Dudeck
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Bukten A, Skjærvø I, Stavseth MR. Exploring mental health comorbidities and opioid agonist treatment coverage among people in prison: A national cohort study 2010-2019. Drug Alcohol Depend 2023; 250:110896. [PMID: 37515826 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.110896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 07/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite a high prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among people in prison, there is little knowledge of how many receive the recommended opioid agonist treatment (OAT) and what characterizes those who receive OAT and those who do not when it comes to mental health comorbidities. We aimed to describe people with OUD in Norwegian prisons over a ten-year period and their OAT status, and to investigate comorbidity of mental health disorders stratified by gender. METHODS Data from the PriSUD study, including all people (≥19 years old) imprisoned in Norway between 2010 and 2019, linked to national patient registry data, including ICD-10 codes. We calculated the prevalence (1-year and 10-year) of OUD and OAT, and mental health comorbidity stratified on OAT-status and gender. RESULTS Among the cohort (n=51,148), 7 282 (14.2%) were diagnosed with OUD during the period of observation. Of those, 4 689 (64.4%) received OAT. People with OUD had high levels of comorbidity, including other drug use disorders (92.4% OAT, 90.3% non-OAT), alcohol use disorder (32.1% OAT, 44.4% non-OAT) and any other mental health disorders (61.6% OAT, 68.2% non-OAT). The proportion receiving OAT among people with OUD increased markedly during the ten years of observation; from 35.7% in 2010-70.9% in 2019. CONCLUSION People with OUD, both receiving OAT and not, had substantially more mental health comorbidities than the non-OUD population. Understanding how the prison population changes over time especially in terms of mental health needs related to OUD, is important for correctional health service planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway.
| | - I Skjærvø
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway
| | - M R Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Machetanz L, Hofmann AB, Möhrke J, Kirchebner J. Offenders and non-offenders with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: the crime-preventive potential of sufficient embedment in the mental healthcare and support system. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1231851. [PMID: 37711423 PMCID: PMC10498463 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1231851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Suffering from schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD) has been well-established as a risk factor for offending. However, the majority of patients with an SSD do not show aggressive or criminal behavior. Yet, there is little research on clinical key features distinguishing offender from non-offender patients. Previous results point to poorer impulse control, higher levels of excitement, tension, and hostility, and worse overall cognitive functioning in offender populations. This study aimed to detect the most indicative distinguishing clinical features between forensic and general psychiatric patients with SSD based on the course of illness and the referenced hospitalization in order to facilitate a better understanding of the relationship between violent and non-violent offenses and SSD. Methods Our study population consisted of forensic psychiatric patients (FPPs) with a diagnosis of F2x (ICD-10) or 295.x (ICD-9) and a control group of general psychiatric patients (GPPs) with the same diagnosis, totaling 740 patients. Patients were evaluated regarding their medical (and, if applicable, criminal) history and the referenced psychiatric hospitalization. Supervised machine learning (ML) was used to exploratively evaluate predictor variables and their interplay and rank them in accordance with their discriminative power. Results Out of 194 possible predictor variables, the following 6 turned out to have the highest influence on the model: olanzapine equivalent at discharge from the referenced hospitalization, a history of antipsychotic prescription, a history of antidepressant, benzodiazepine or mood stabilizer prescription, medication compliance, outpatient treatment(s) in the past, and the necessity of compulsory measures. Out of the seven algorithms applied, gradient boosting emerged as the most suitable, with an AUC of 0.86 and a balanced accuracy of 77.5%. Discussion Our study aimed to identify the most influential illness-related predictors, distinguishing between FPP and GPP with SSD, thus shedding light on key differences between the two groups. To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare a homogenous sample of FPP and GPP with SSD regarding their symptom severity and course of illness using highly sophisticated statistical approaches with the possibility of evaluating the interplay of all factors at play.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena Machetanz
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andreas B. Hofmann
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, and Psychosomatics, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Möhrke
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Kirchebner
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ciucă Anghel DM, Nițescu GV, Tiron AT, Guțu CM, Baconi DL. Understanding the Mechanisms of Action and Effects of Drugs of Abuse. Molecules 2023; 28:4969. [PMID: 37446631 DOI: 10.3390/molecules28134969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Drug abuse and addiction are major public health concerns, with millions of people worldwide affected by the negative consequences of drug use. To better understand this complex issue, a review was conducted to examine the mechanisms of action and effects of drugs of abuse, including their acute and chronic effects, the symptoms of abstinence syndrome, as well as their cardiovascular impacts. METHODS The analyzed data were obtained after surveying an electronic database, namely PubMed, with no time limit, grey literature sources, and reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS The review highlights the different categories of drugs of abuse, such as opioids, stimulants, depressants, hallucinogens, and cannabis, and discusses the specific ways that each drug affects the brain and body. Additionally, the review explores the short-term and long-term effects of drug abuse on the body and mind, including changes in brain structure and function, physical health problems, and mental health issues, such as depression and anxiety. In addition, the review explores the effects of drug abuse on cardiovascular health, focusing on electrocardiogram changes. Moreover, the analysis of relevant literature also highlighted possible genetic susceptibility in various addictions. Furthermore, the review delves into the withdrawal symptoms that occur when someone stops using drugs of abuse after a period of chronic use. CONCLUSION Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on drug abuse and addiction. The findings of this review can inform the development of evidence-based prevention and intervention strategies to address this critical public health issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gabriela Viorela Nițescu
- Ward ATI-Toxicology, Paediatric Clinic 2, "Grigore Alexandrescu" Emergency Clinical Hospital for Children, 011732 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andreea-Taisia Tiron
- Department of Medical Semiology, Sf. Ioan Emergency Clinical Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Claudia Maria Guțu
- Department of Toxicology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20021 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Daniela Luiza Baconi
- Department of Toxicology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 20021 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Svendsen VG, Stavseth MR, Skardhamar T, Bukten A. Psychiatric morbidity among women in Norwegian prisons, 2010-2019: a register-based study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:390. [PMID: 37268924 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-04886-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Research suggests that women in prison have more mental health problems than men and are prone to suffer from more severe psychiatric disorders. This study utilizes national registry data to describe demographic and psychiatric gender differences in Norwegian prisons, and to investigate comorbid psychiatric disorders and time trends in psychiatric morbidity among women. METHODS Longitudinal data from the Norwegian Prison Release Study linked with the Norwegian Patient Registry and data from Statistics Norway provided information on health care utilization, socioeconomic status, and history of psychiatric disorders among all individuals (nwomen = 5,429; nmen = 45,432) who were incarcerated in a Norwegian prison between 2010 and 2019. RESULTS Women were more likely than men to have a history of any psychiatric disorder (75% vs. 59%). Substance use disorders and dual disorders were highly prevalent in both genders, yet highest among women (56 and 38% respectively, versus 43 and 24% among men). From 2010 to 2019, we found a considerable increase in the 12-month prevalence of most diagnostic categories among women entering prison. CONCLUSION Psychiatric and dual disorders are highly prevalent in Norwegian prisons, and especially among women. The proportion of women entering prison with a recent history of mental health problems has increased rapidly over the last decade. Women's prison institutions need to adjust health and social services, and awareness about substance use and other psychiatric disorders in order to meet the increasing proportion of women facing these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vegard G Svendsen
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway.
| | - Marianne Riksheim Stavseth
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torbjørn Skardhamar
- Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Bukten
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, SERAF, University of Oslo, Building 45, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, 0450, Norway
- Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gilling McIntosh L, Rees C, Kelly C, Howitt S, Thomson LDG. Understanding the mental health needs of Scotland's prison population: a health needs assessment. Front Psychiatry 2023; 14:1119228. [PMID: 37265556 PMCID: PMC10229789 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1119228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study reports on an assessment of mental health needs among Scotland's prison population which aimed to describe the scale and nature of need as well as identify opportunities to improve upon the services available. The project was commissioned by the Scottish Government to ensure that future changes to the services available to support the mental health and wellbeing of people in prison would be evidence-based and person-centered. Methods A standardized approach to health needs assessments was employed. The study was comprised of four phases. In phase I a rapid literature review was undertaken to gather evidence on the prevalence of mental health needs experienced by people in prison in the UK. In Phase II a multi-method and multi-informant national mapping exercise involving providers to all Scottish prisons was undertaken to describe the mental health services available, and any gaps in these services, for people in and leaving prison. In Phase III prevalence estimates of several mental health needs were derived for Scotland's current prison population, modeled from a national survey dataset of Scotland's community population using logistic regression. Finally in Phase IV, professional stakeholders and individuals with lived experience were interviewed to understand their experiences and insights on challenges to supporting the mental health and wellbeing of people in prison, and ideas on how these challenges could be overcome. Results Evidence across the four phases of this needs assessment converged indicating that existing provision to support the mental health of people in prison in Scotland was considered inadequate to meet these needs. Barriers to effective partnership working for justice, health, social work and third sector providers appear to have led to inadequate and fragmented care, leaving prisoners without the support they need during and immediately following imprisonment. Conclusions Joint and coordinated action from justice, health and social care, and third sector providers is needed to overcome enduring and structural challenges to supporting the mental health of people in prison. Eighteen evidence-based recommendations were proposed to the Scottish Government relating to the high-level and operational-level changes required to adequately meet the prison population's mental health needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lindsey Gilling McIntosh
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Cheryl Rees
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline Kelly
- Forensic Mental Health Services Managed Care Network, Carstairs, United Kingdom
| | - Sheila Howitt
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, The State Hospitals Board for Scotland, Carstairs, United Kingdom
| | - Lindsay D. G. Thomson
- Centre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
- Forensic Mental Health Services Managed Care Network, Carstairs, United Kingdom
- Department of Forensic Psychiatry, The State Hospitals Board for Scotland, Carstairs, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Favril L. Drug use before and during imprisonment: Drivers of continuation. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 115:104027. [PMID: 37060886 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many people who enter prison have recently used drugs in the community, a substantial portion of whom will continue to do so while incarcerated. To date, little is known about what factors may contribute to the continuation of drug use during imprisonment. METHODS Self-reported data were collected from a random sample of 1326 adults (123 women) incarcerated across 15 prisons in Belgium. Multivariate regression was used to investigate associations between in-prison drug use and sociodemographic background, criminological profile, drug-related history, and mental health among participants who reported pre-prison drug use. RESULTS Of all 1326 participants, 719 (54%) used drugs in the 12 months prior to their incarceration and 462 (35%) did so while in prison. There was a strong association between drug use before and during imprisonment (OR = 6.77, 95% CI 5.16-8.89). Of those who recently used drugs in the community, half (52%) continued to do so while incarcerated. Factors independently associated with continuation (versus cessation) were young age, treatment history, polydrug use, and poor mental health. In a secondary analysis, initiation of drug use while in prison was further related to incarceration history and low education. CONCLUSION Persistence of drug use following prison entry is common. People who continue to use drugs inside prison can be differentiated from those who discontinue in terms of drug-related history and mental health. Routine screening for drug use and psychiatric morbidity on admission to prison would allow for identifying unmet needs and initiating appropriate treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Favril
- Faculty of Law and Criminology, Ghent University, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Brooker C, Sirdifield C, van Deinse T. Serious mental illness in probation: A review. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROBATION 2023; 15:60-70. [PMID: 38152573 PMCID: PMC10752355 DOI: 10.1177/20662203231162739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
Research into serious mental illness and probation is reviewed. In addition, there is a specific review of the role of specialist mental health probation staff in the United States (US). In the discussion, we compare progress with the care of the seriously mentally ill within probation in Europe and the US. We conclude that the specialist role for probation staff developed in the US has significant advantages which have been well evaluated which should be implemented, in a large multi-centre trial, across Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tonya van Deinse
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Gutkind S, Shmulewitz D, Hasin D. Sex differences in Cannabis use disorder and associated psychosocial problems among US adults, 2012-2013. Prev Med 2023; 168:107422. [PMID: 36641126 PMCID: PMC9974921 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
While men show greater prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) than women, whether cannabis use frequency drives this difference is unknown, and little is known about sex differences in problems associated with CUD. We therefore assessed the association of CUD with sex, adjusted for frequency of use, and compared the association of psychosocial and health-related problems with CUD between men and women. We included US adults age ≥ 18 who reported past-year cannabis use in the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (n = 3701). Cannabis use frequency, DSM-5 CUD and problems (interpersonal, financial, legal, health-related) were assessed. Associations between psychosocial problems, sex and DSM-5 CUD were assessed using prevalence differences (PD) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) from logistic regression models, controlling for demographics and cannabis use frequency, and effect modification by sex was assessed. We found that the prevalence of CUD among men versus women was not significantly greater after adjusting for use frequency. Women had significantly higher prevalence of interpersonal, financial and health-related problems than men, adjusting for frequency of use. Women showed significantly greater association of CUD with interpersonal problems with a boss or co-workers (p < 0.05) and a neighbor, relative or friend (p < 0.05) compared to men. Lack of sex differences in CUD after adjusting for frequency of use suggests use frequency may be an important target of CUD prevention efforts. CUD showed stronger associations for interpersonal problems among women than men, suggesting the need for particular emphasis on treating interpersonal problems related to cannabis use among women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Gutkind
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dvora Shmulewitz
- Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Deborah Hasin
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA; Columbia University, Department of Psychiatry, New York, NY, USA; New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yukhnenko D, Blackwood N, Lichtenstein P, Fazel S. Psychiatric disorders and reoffending risk in individuals with community sentences in Sweden: a national cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2023; 8:e119-e129. [PMID: 36669512 PMCID: PMC10914666 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00312-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community sentences are widely used in many countries, often comprising the majority of criminal justice sanctions. Psychiatric disorders are highly prevalent in community-sentenced populations and are thus potential targets for treatment interventions designed to reduce reoffending. We examined the association between psychiatric disorders and reoffending in a national cohort of individuals given community sentences in Sweden, with use of a sibling control design to account for unmeasured familial confounding. METHODS We did a longitudinal cohort study of 82 415 individuals given community sentences between Nov 1, 1991, and Dec 31, 2013, in Sweden using data from population-based registers. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs) for any reoffending and violent reoffending with Cox regression models. We compared community-sentenced siblings with and without psychiatric disorders to control for potential familial confounding. Additionally, we calculated population attributable fractions to assess the contribution of psychiatric disorders to reoffending behaviours. The primary outcomes of the study were any (general) reoffending and violent reoffending. FINDINGS Between Nov 1, 1991, and Dec 31, 2013, those given community sentences who were diagnosed with any psychiatric disorder had an increased reoffending risk in men (adjusted HR 1·59, 95% CI 1·56-1·63 for any reoffending; 1·60, 1·54-1·66 for violent reoffending) and women (1·71, 1·61-1·82 for any reoffending; 2·19, 1·88-2·54 for violent reoffending). Risk estimates remained elevated after adjustment for familial confounding. Schizophrenia spectrum disorders, personality disorders, and substance use disorders had stronger associations with violent reoffending than did other psychiatric disorders. Assuming causality, the adjusted population attributable risk of psychiatric disorders on violent reoffending was 8·3% (95% CI 6·6-10·0) in the first 2 years of community follow-up in men and 30·9% (22·7-39·0) in women. INTERPRETATION Psychiatric disorders were associated with an increased risk of any reoffending and violent reoffending in the community-sentenced population. The magnitude of the association between psychiatric disorders and reoffending varied by individual diagnosis. Substance use disorders had the highest absolute and relative risks. Most of the increased risk for any reoffending in individuals with psychiatric disorders could be attributed to comorbid substance misuse. Given their high prevalence, substance use disorders should be the focus of treatment programmes in community-sentenced populations. FUNDING Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nigel Blackwood
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Paul Lichtenstein
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Seena Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pagerols M, Valero S, Dueñas L, Bosch R, Casas M. Psychiatric disorders and comorbidity in a Spanish sample of prisoners at the end of their sentence: Prevalence rates and associations with criminal history. Front Psychol 2023; 13:1039099. [PMID: 36710755 PMCID: PMC9878681 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction This study examined, for the first time, the prevalence of mental disorders and comorbidities among inmates who were about to be released, and their association with criminal history. Methods A Spanish sample of 140 prisoners at the end of their sentence was recruited from an occupational program. Psychiatric disorders were determined according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria. Bivariate analyses followed by multivariate regression models were conducted to identify significant variables for repeat incarceration and violent offending. Results The lifetime prevalence of Axis I disorders was 81.4%, with substance use disorders (SUD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) being the most common diagnoses (51.4 and 31.4%, respectively). The current prevalence of Axis I disorders was 59.0%, including learning disorders (38.6%), ADHD (16.4%), and SUD (5.71%) among the most frequent syndromes. Thirty-six (26.5%) participants met criteria for a current Axis II disorder, which commonly was an antisocial personality disorder (12.5%). The majority of the sample (60.8%) suffered from two or more comorbid disorders during their lifetime, although the current prevalence fell to 23.3%. Childhood ADHD increased the number of imprisonments, while inmates convicted of a violent crime were more likely to present a learning disorder. Having a lifetime diagnosis of SUD or multiple psychiatric disorders appeared to be associated with both repeat incarceration and violent offending. Conclusion Given the high rate of mental disorders still present among subjects completing prison sentences and the challenges they may encounter to benefit from vocational programs, our results suggest that appropriate psychiatric care should be provided during imprisonment and after release to facilitate their community reintegration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireia Pagerols
- Programa MIND Escoles, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain,Unitat de Farmacologia, Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Departament de Fonaments Clínics, Universitat de Barcelona (UB), Barcelona, Spain,*Correspondence: Mireia Pagerols,
| | - Sergi Valero
- Ace Alzheimer Center Barcelona, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain,Networking Research Center on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Lourdes Dueñas
- Programa Reincorpora “la Caixa”, Departament de Justícia, Centre d’Iniciatives per a la Reinserció (CIRE), Generalitat de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rosa Bosch
- Programa MIND Escoles, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain,CIBER de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miquel Casas
- Programa MIND Escoles, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat, Spain,Departament de Psiquiatria i Medicina Legal, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Wurcel AG, Kraus C, Johnson O, Zaller ND, Ray B, Spaulding AC, Flynn T, Quinn C, Day R, Akiyama MJ, Del Pozo B, Meyer F, Glenn JE. Stakeholder-engaged research is necessary across the criminal-legal spectrum. J Clin Transl Sci 2022; 7:e5. [PMID: 36755540 PMCID: PMC9879908 DOI: 10.1017/cts.2022.501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 09/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
People with lived experience of incarceration have higher rates of morbidity and mortality compared to people without history of incarceration. Research conducted unethically in prisons and jails led to increased scrutiny of research to ensure the needs of those studied are protected. One consequence of increased restrictions on research with criminal-legal involved populations is reluctance to engage in research evaluations of healthcare for people who are incarcerated and people who have lived experience of incarceration. Ethical research can be done in partnership with people with lived experience of incarceration and other key stakeholders and should be encouraged. In this article, we describe how stakeholder engagement can be accomplished in this setting, and further, how such engagement leads to impactful research that can be disseminated and implemented across disciplines and communities. The goal is to build trust across the spectrum of people who work, live in, or are impacted by the criminal-legal system, with the purpose of moving toward health equity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alysse G. Wurcel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geographic Medicine and Infectious Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christina Kraus
- Tufts University Medical Student, JCOIN LEAP Scholar, Boston, MA, USA
| | - O’Dell Johnson
- University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | | | - Bradley Ray
- RTI International, Division for Applied Justice Research, 3040 Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC27709, USA
| | - Anne C. Spaulding
- Associate Professor of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tara Flynn
- Assistant Deputy Superintendent Health Services, Norfolk County Sheriff’s Office, Dedham, MA, USA
| | | | - Ronald Day
- The Fortune Society, Vice President of Programs and Research, Long Island City, New York, USA
| | - Matthew J. Akiyama
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | | | - Fred Meyer
- Deputy Chief (Retired), Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Las Vegas, NV, USA
| | - Jason E. Glenn
- Department of History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Crum RM, Green KM, Amin-Esmaeili M, Susukida R, Mojtabai R, Storr CL, Riehm KE, Young AS, Reboussin BA. The role of mood disorders in the progression of and recovery from alcohol and drug use problems: A latent transition analysis. Drug Alcohol Depend 2022; 238:109566. [PMID: 35917762 PMCID: PMC10187057 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109566] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 06/29/2022] [Accepted: 07/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Longitudinal research assessing whether mood disorders predict substance use behaviors is limited. We extend our prior work evaluating transition patterns with alcohol use to assess patterns with alcohol and drug use problems. METHOD Using National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions prospective data, waves 1 and 2, we completed latent class analyses to empirically define classes of alcohol and drug problems from DSM disorder criteria. Latent transition analyses were used to assess associations of lifetime mood disorders at baseline with transitions across classes of alcohol and drug problems during follow-up. RESULTS A three-class model of alcohol and drug problems was identified (No problems, Alcohol Problems Only, and Alcohol and Drug Problems) for males and females. Females with mood disorders were over two times more likely to transition from No Problems, and Alcohol Problems Only at baseline to having both Alcohol and Drug Problems at follow-up relative to those without mood disorders (aOR=2.30, 95 % CI=1.31-4.05, p = 0.004, and aOR=2.64, CI=1.24-5.62, p = 0.011, respectively). Furthermore, females with mood disorders were significantly less likely to recover from baseline Alcohol and Drug Problems to Alcohol Problems Only at follow-up (aOR=0.35, CI=0.12-0.98, p = 0.047) relative to those without mood disorders. There were no significant findings for males. DISCUSSION Our study provides evidence that mood disorders impact transitions through classes of alcohol and drug problems among females. The findings emphasize the need for ongoing evaluation of substance use among those with mood conditions, and recognition and treatment of mood disorders among those recovering from substance use problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa M Crum
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Kerry M Green
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, University of Maryland College Park School of Public Health, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Masoumeh Amin-Esmaeili
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ryoko Susukida
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Ramin Mojtabai
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carla L Storr
- Department of Family and Community Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kira E Riehm
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andrea S Young
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Beth A Reboussin
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Fazel S, Bromberg DJ, Altice FL. HIV, substance use, and mental health care in prisons. Lancet Psychiatry 2022; 9:694-695. [PMID: 35843228 PMCID: PMC9827418 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00243-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Seena Fazel
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Daniel J Bromberg
- Yale School of Public Health and Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Frederick L Altice
- Yale School of Public Health and Yale Center for Interdisciplinary Research on AIDS, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA; Section of Infectious Diseases, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wainwright V, Dawson A. The prevalence of comorbid substance use disorders and serious mental illnesses in prisons. THE LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 7:e492-e493. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(22)00115-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|