Identification of an A2a adenosine receptor domain specifically responsible for mediating short-term desensitization

Adenosine A2A receptor as a potential target for improving cancer immunotherapy

The adenosine nucleoside performs a wide range of actions on various human tissues by activating four cell surface receptors. Adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2ARs) are widely expressed in the striatum, olfactory bulb, platelets, leukocytes, spleen, and thymus. They promote vasodilatation, platelet antiaggregatory effect, protection from ischemic damage, and regulation of sensorimotor neurons in basal ganglia. Adenosine signaling plays a vital part in modulating in vivo pathophysiological responses. A_2ARs are potent negative regulators of the antitumor and proinflammatory actions of activated T cells. This axis offers several therapeutic targets, the most important of which are A_2ARs, HIF-1α, and CD39/CD73. Downregulation of this axis increases the effectiveness of modern immunotherapeutic approaches against cancer, such as αCTLA-4/αPD-1. These discoveries have led to a promising novel role of antagonists of A_2AR in blocking angiogenesis in immunotherapy of cancer. A small molecule, AZD4635, strongly inhibits A_2AR, lowering cancer volume and increasing anticancer immunity. Deletion of A_2AR with CRISPR/Cas9 in both human and murine CAR T cells produces a substantial increase in the efficiency of these cells. This review asserts that inhibition of the adenosinergic pathway can boost antitumor immunity, and this axis should be a target for future immunotherapeutic strategies.

Cathepsin D interacts with adenosine A2A receptors in mouse macrophages to modulate cell surface localization and inflammatory signaling

Adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR)–dependent signaling in macrophages plays a key role in the regulation of inflammation. However, the processes regulating A_2AR targeting to the cell surface and degradation in macrophages are incompletely understood. For example, the C-terminal domain of the A_2AR and proteins interacting with it are known to regulate receptor recycling, although it is unclear what role potential A_2AR-interacting partners have in macrophages. Here, we aimed to identify A_2AR-interacting partners in macrophages that may effect receptor trafficking and activity. To this end, we performed a yeast two-hybrid screen using the C-terminal tail of A_2AR as the “bait” and a macrophage expression library as the “prey.” We found that the lysosomal protease cathepsin D (CtsD) was a robust hit. The A_2AR–CtsD interaction was validated in vitro and in cellular models, including RAW 264.7 and mouse peritoneal macrophage (IPMΦ) cells. We also demonstrated that the A_2AR is a substrate of CtsD and that the blockade of CtsD activity increases the density and cell surface targeting of A_2AR in macrophages. Conversely, we demonstrate that A_2AR activation prompts the maturation and enzymatic activity of CtsD in macrophages. In summary, we conclude that CtsD is a novel A_2AR-interacting partner and thus describe molecular and functional interplay that may be crucial for adenosine-mediated macrophage regulation in inflammatory processes.

The C-terminal of the α1b-adreneroceptor is a key determinant for its structure integrity and biological functions

The C-terminal of G protein-coupled receptors is now recognized as being important for G protein activation and signaling function. To detect the role of C-terminal tail in receptor activation, we used the α1b-AR, which has a long C-terminal of 164 amino acids. We constructed the intramolecular FRET sensors, in which the C-terminal was truncated to 10 (∆C-10), 20 (∆C-20), 30 (∆C-30), 50 (∆C-50), 70 (∆C-70), or 90 (∆C-90). The truncated mutants of ∆C-10, ∆C-20, or ∆C-30 cannot induce FRET signal changes and downstream ERK1/2 phosphorylation. However, the truncated mutants of ∆C-50, ∆C-70, or ∆C-90 induce significant FRET signal changes and downstream ERK1/2 phosphorylation, especially ∆C-90. This is particularly true in the case of the ∆C-90, ∆C-70, or ∆C-50 which retained the potential phosphorylation sites (Ser401, Ser404, Ser408, or Ser410). The ∆C-90 showed an increase in agonist-induced FRET signal changes and ERK1/2 phosphorylation in PKC- or endocytosis-dependent and EGFR-, src-, or β-arrestin2-independent.

Role of Cardiac A2A Receptors Under Normal and Pathophysiological Conditions

This review presents an overview of cardiac A2A-adenosine receptors The localization of A2A-AR in the various cell types that encompass the heart and the role they play in force regulation in various mammalian species are depicted. The putative signal transduction systems of A2A-AR in cells in the living heart, as well as the known interactions of A2A-AR with membrane-bound receptors, will be addressed. The possible role that the receptors play in some relevant cardiac pathologies, such as persistent or transient ischemia, hypoxia, sepsis, hypertension, cardiac hypertrophy, and arrhythmias, will be reviewed. Moreover, the cardiac utility of A2A-AR as therapeutic targets for agonistic and antagonistic drugs will be discussed. Gaps in our knowledge about the cardiac function of A2A-AR and future research needs will be identified and formulated.

The Specificity of Downstream Signaling for A1 and A2AR Does Not Depend on the C-Terminus, Despite the Importance of This Domain in Downstream Signaling Strength

Recent efforts to determine the high-resolution crystal structures for the adenosine receptors (A₁R and A_2AR) have utilized modifications to the native receptors in order to facilitate receptor crystallization and structure determination. One common modification is a truncation of the unstructured C-terminus, which has been utilized for all the adenosine receptor crystal structures obtained to date. Ligand binding for this truncated receptor has been shown to be similar to full-length receptor for A_2AR. However, the C-terminus has been identified as a location for protein-protein interactions that may be critical for the physiological function of these important drug targets. We show that variants with A_2AR C-terminal truncations lacked cAMP-linked signaling compared to the full-length receptor constructs transfected into mammalian cells (HEK-293). In addition, we show that in a humanized yeast system, the absence of the full-length C-terminus affected downstream signaling using a yeast MAPK response-based fluorescence assay, though full-length receptors showed native-like G-protein coupling. To further study the G protein coupling, we used this humanized yeast platform to explore coupling to human-yeast G-protein chimeras in a cellular context. Although the C-terminus was essential for Gα protein-associated signaling, chimeras of A₁R with a C-terminus of A_2AR coupled to the A₁R-specific Gα (i.e., Gαi1 versus Gαs). This surprising result suggests that the C-terminus is important in the signaling strength, but not specificity, of the Gα protein interaction. This result has further implications in drug discovery, both in enabling the experimental use of chimeras for ligand design, and in the cautious interpretation of structure-based drug design using truncated receptors.

Cross-communication between Gi and Gs in a G-protein-coupled receptor heterotetramer guided by a receptor C-terminal domain

Background

G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) heteromeric complexes have distinct properties from homomeric GPCRs, giving rise to new receptor functionalities. Adenosine receptors (A₁R or A_2AR) can form A₁R-A_2AR heteromers (A₁-A_2AHet), and their activation leads to canonical G-protein-dependent (adenylate cyclase mediated) and -independent (β-arrestin mediated) signaling. Adenosine has different affinities for A₁R and A_2AR, allowing the heteromeric receptor to detect its concentration by integrating the downstream G_i- and G_s-dependent signals. cAMP accumulation and β-arrestin recruitment assays have shown that, within the complex, activation of A_2AR impedes signaling via A₁R.

Results

We examined the mechanism by which A₁-A_2AHet integrates G_i- and G_s-dependent signals. A₁R blockade by A_2AR in the A₁-A_2AHet is not observed in the absence of A_2AR activation by agonists, in the absence of the C-terminal domain of A_2AR, or in the presence of synthetic peptides that disrupt the heteromer interface of A₁-A_2AHet, indicating that signaling mediated by A₁R and A_2AR is controlled by both G_i and G_s proteins.

Conclusions

We identified a new mechanism of signal transduction that implies a cross-communication between G_i and G_s proteins guided by the C-terminal tail of the A_2AR. This mechanism provides the molecular basis for the operation of the A₁-A_2AHet as an adenosine concentration-sensing device that modulates the signals originating at both A₁R and A_2AR.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0491-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Allosteric Coupling of Drug Binding and Intracellular Signaling in the A2A Adenosine Receptor

Signaling across cellular membranes, the 826 human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) govern a wide range of vital physiological processes, making GPCRs prominent drug targets. X-ray crystallography provided GPCR molecular architectures, which also revealed the need for additional structural dynamics data to support drug development. Here, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy with the wild-type-like A2A adenosine receptor (A2AAR) in solution provides a comprehensive characterization of signaling-related structural dynamics. All six tryptophan indole and eight glycine backbone 15N-1H NMR signals in A2AAR were individually assigned. These NMR probes provided insight into the role of Asp522.50 as an allosteric link between the orthosteric drug binding site and the intracellular signaling surface, revealing strong interactions with the toggle switch Trp 2466.48, and delineated the structural response to variable efficacy of bound drugs across A2AAR. The present data support GPCR signaling based on dynamic interactions between two semi-independent subdomains connected by an allosteric switch at Asp522.50.

Characterisation of endogenous A2A and A2B receptor-mediated cyclic AMP responses in HEK 293 cells using the GloSensor™ biosensor: Evidence for an allosteric mechanism of action for the A2B-selective antagonist PSB 603

Endogenous adenosine A_2B receptors (A_2BAR) mediate cAMP accumulation in HEK 293 cells. Here we have used a biosensor to investigate the mechanism of action of the A_2BAR antagonist PSB 603 in HEK 293 cells. The A_2A agonist CGS 21680 elicited a small response in these cells (circa 20% of that obtained with NECA), suggesting that they also contain a small population of A_2A receptors. The responses to NECA and adenosine were antagonised by PSB 603, but not by the selective A_2AAR antagonist SCH 58261. In contrast, CGS 21680 responses were not antagonised by high concentrations of PSB 603, but were sensitive to inhibition by SCH 58261. Analysis of the effect of increasing concentrations of PSB 603 on the response to NECA indicated a non-competitive mode of action yielding a marked reduction in the NECA E_MAX with no significant effect on EC₅₀ values. Kinetics analysis of the effect of PSB 603 on the A_2BAR-mediated NECA responses confirmed a saturable effect that was consistent with an allosteric mode of antagonism. The possibility that PSB 603 acts as a negative allosteric modulator of A_2BAR suggests new approaches to the development of therapeutic agents to treat conditions where adenosine levels are high.

Calcium modulates calmodulin/α-actinin 1 interaction with and agonist-dependent internalization of the adenosine A2A receptor

Adenosine receptors are G protein-coupled receptors that sense extracellular adenosine to transmit intracellular signals. One of the four adenosine receptor subtypes, the adenosine A_2A receptor (A_2AR), has an exceptionally long intracellular C terminus (A_2AR-ct) that mediates interactions with a large array of proteins, including calmodulin and α-actinin. Here, we aimed to ascertain the α-actinin 1/calmodulin interplay whilst binding to A_2AR and the role of Ca²⁺ in this process. First, we studied the A_2AR-α-actinin 1 interaction by means of native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, isothermal titration calorimetry, and surface plasmon resonance, using purified recombinant proteins. α-Actinin 1 binds the A_2AR-ct through its distal calmodulin-like domain in a Ca²⁺-independent manner with a dissociation constant of 5-12μM, thus showing an ~100 times lower affinity compared to the A_2AR-calmodulin/Ca²⁺ complex. Importantly, calmodulin displaced α-actinin 1 from the A_2AR-ct in a Ca²⁺-dependent fashion, disrupting the A_2AR-α-actinin 1 complex. Finally, we assessed the impact of Ca²⁺ on A_2AR internalization in living cells, a function operated by the A_2AR-α-actinin 1 complex. Interestingly, while Ca²⁺ influx did not affect constitutive A_2AR endocytosis, it abolished agonist-dependent internalization. In addition, we demonstrated that the A_2AR/α-actinin interaction plays a pivotal role in receptor internalization and function. Overall, our results suggest that the interplay of A_2AR with calmodulin and α-actinin 1 is fine-tuned by Ca²⁺, a fact that might power agonist-mediated receptor internalization and function.

How does adenosine control neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration?

The adenosine modulation system mostly operates through inhibitory A₁ (A₁ R) and facilitatory A_2A receptors (A_2A R) in the brain. The activity-dependent release of adenosine acts as a brake of excitatory transmission through A₁ R, which are enriched in glutamatergic terminals. Adenosine sharpens salience of information encoding in neuronal circuits: high-frequency stimulation triggers ATP release in the 'activated' synapse, which is locally converted by ecto-nucleotidases into adenosine to selectively activate A_2A R; A_2A R switch off A₁ R and CB1 receptors, bolster glutamate release and NMDA receptors to assist increasing synaptic plasticity in the 'activated' synapse; the parallel engagement of the astrocytic syncytium releases adenosine further inhibiting neighboring synapses, thus sharpening the encoded plastic change. Brain insults trigger a large outflow of adenosine and ATP, as a danger signal. A₁ R are a hurdle for damage initiation, but they desensitize upon prolonged activation. However, if the insult is near-threshold and/or of short-duration, A₁ R trigger preconditioning, which may limit the spread of damage. Brain insults also up-regulate A_2A R, probably to bolster adaptive changes, but this heightens brain damage since A_2A R blockade affords neuroprotection in models of epilepsy, depression, Alzheimer's, or Parkinson's disease. This initially involves a control of synaptotoxicity by neuronal A_2A R, whereas astrocytic and microglia A_2A R might control the spread of damage. The A_2A R signaling mechanisms are largely unknown since A_2A R are pleiotropic, coupling to different G proteins and non-canonical pathways to control the viability of glutamatergic synapses, neuroinflammation, mitochondria function, and cytoskeleton dynamics. Thus, simultaneously bolstering A₁ R preconditioning and preventing excessive A_2A R function might afford maximal neuroprotection. The main physiological role of the adenosine modulation system is to sharp the salience of information encoding through a combined action of adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2A R) in the synapse undergoing an alteration of synaptic efficiency with an increased inhibitory action of A₁ R in all surrounding synapses. Brain insults trigger an up-regulation of A_2A R in an attempt to bolster adaptive plasticity together with adenosine release and A₁ R desensitization; this favors synaptotocity (increased A_2A R) and decreases the hurdle to undergo degeneration (decreased A₁ R). Maximal neuroprotection is expected to result from a combined A_2A R blockade and increased A₁ R activation. This article is part of a mini review series: "Synaptic Function and Dysfunction in Brain Diseases".

Human adenosine A2A receptor binds calmodulin with high affinity in a calcium-dependent manner

Understanding how ligands bind to G-protein-coupled receptors and how binding changes receptor structure to affect signaling is critical for developing a complete picture of the signal transduction process. The adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR) is a particularly interesting example, as it has an exceptionally long intracellular carboxyl terminus, which is predicted to be mainly disordered. Experimental data on the structure of the A2AR C-terminus is lacking, because published structures of A2AR do not include the C-terminus. Calmodulin has been reported to bind to the A2AR C-terminus, with a possible binding site on helix 8, next to the membrane. The biological meaning of the interaction as well as its calcium dependence, thermodynamic parameters, and organization of the proteins in the complex are unclear. Here, we characterized the structure of the A2AR C-terminus and the A2AR C-terminus-calmodulin complex using different biophysical methods, including native gel and analytical gel filtration, isothermal titration calorimetry, NMR spectroscopy, and small-angle X-ray scattering. We found that the C-terminus is disordered and flexible, and it binds with high affinity (Kd = 98 nM) to calmodulin without major conformational changes in the domain. Calmodulin binds to helix 8 of the A2AR in a calcium-dependent manner that can displace binding of A2AR to lipid vesicles. We also predicted and classified putative calmodulin-binding sites in a larger group of G-protein-coupled receptors.

Scanning mutagenesis in a yeast system delineates the role of the NPxxY(x)(5,6)F motif and helix 8 of the adenosine A(2B) receptor in G protein coupling

The adenosine receptor subfamily includes four subtypes: the A1, A2A, A2B and A3 receptors, which all belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The adenosine A2B receptor is the least investigated of the adenosine receptors, and the molecular mechanisms of its activation have hardly been explored. We used a single-GPCR-one-G protein yeast screening method in combination with mutagenesis studies, molecular modeling and bio-informatics to investigate the importance of the different amino acid residues of the NPxxY(x)6F motif and helix 8 in the human adenosine A2B receptor (hA2BR) activation. A scanning mutagenesis protocol was employed, yielding 11 single mutations and one double mutation of the NPxxY(x)6F motif and 16 single mutations of helix 8. The amino acid residues P287(7.50), Y290(7.53), R293(7.56) and I304(8.57) were found to be essential, since mutation of these amino acid residues to alanine led to a complete loss of function. Western blot analysis showed that mutant receptor R293(7.56)A was not expressed, whereas the other proteins were. Amino acid residues that are also important in receptor activation are: N286(7.49), V289(7.52), Y292(7.55), N294(8.47), F297(8.50), R298(8.51), H302(8.55) and R307(8.60). The mutation Y290(7.53)F lost 50% of efficacy, while F297(8.50)A behaved similar to wild type receptor. The double mutation, Y290(7.53)F/F297(8.50)Y, lost around 70% of efficacy and displayed a lower potency for the reference agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (NECA). This study provides new insight into the molecular interplay and impact of TM7 and helix 8 for hA2B receptor activation, which may be extrapolated to other adenosine receptors and possibly to other GPCRs.

Adenosine receptors: expression, function and regulation

Adenosine receptors (ARs) comprise a group of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) which mediate the physiological actions of adenosine. To date, four AR subtypes have been cloned and identified in different tissues. These receptors have distinct localization, signal transduction pathways and different means of regulation upon exposure to agonists. This review will describe the biochemical characteristics and signaling cascade associated with each receptor and provide insight into how these receptors are regulated in response to agonists. A key property of some of these receptors is their ability to serve as sensors of cellular oxidative stress, which is transmitted by transcription factors, such as nuclear factor (NF)-κB, to regulate the expression of ARs. Recent observations of oligomerization of these receptors into homo- and heterodimers will be discussed. In addition, the importance of these receptors in the regulation of normal and pathological processes such as sleep, the development of cancers and in protection against hearing loss will be examined.

G protein-coupled receptor accessory proteins and signaling: pharmacogenomic insights

The identification and characterization of the genes encoding G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and the proteins necessary for the processes of ligand binding, GPCR activation, inactivation, and receptor trafficking to the membrane are discussed in the context of human genetic disease. In addition to functional GPCR variants, the identification of genetic disruptions affecting proteins necessary to GPCR functions have provided insights into the function of these pathways. Gsα and Gβ subunit polymorphisms have been found to result in complex phenotypes. Disruptions in accessory proteins that normally modify or organize heterotrimeric G-protein coupling may also result in disease states. These include the contribution of variants of the regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein to hypertension; the role variants of the activator of G protein signaling (AGS) proteins to phenotypes (such as the type III AGS8 variant to hypoxia); the contribution of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) proteins, such as GRK4, in disorders such as hypertension. The role of accessory proteins in GPCR structure and function is discussed in the context of genetic disorders associated with disruption of the genes that encode them. An understanding of the pharmacogenomics of GPCR and accessory protein signaling provides the basis for examining both GPCR pharmacogenetics and the genetics of monogenic disorders that result from disruption of given receptor systems.

Second pathways in the pathophysiology of ischemic priapism and treatment alternatives

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the early therapeutic alternatives such as bosentan, an endothelin receptor blocker, theophylline, an adenosin receptor blocker, and a nonselective phosphodiesterase enzyme inhibitor, zinc protoporphyrin (ZnPP), a heme oxygenase 1 inhibitor, for the therapy of ischemic priapism in the rat models.

METHODS

Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly divided into 4 equal groups: control group, ZnPP group, bosentan group, and theophylline group. Erection was provided by vacuum constriction method and maintained for 4 hours for achieving the priapism in all groups. The rats in the control group were administered 1 mL/kg saline intraperitoneally (ip). The rats in group 2 were administered 25 mg/kg ZnPP ip. The rats in group 3 were administered 0.25 mg/kg bosentan ip. The rats in group 4 were administered 100 mg/kg theophylline ip. Six rats from each group were decapitated after 6 hours of drug administration. Then endothelin 1, adenosine deaminase, heme oxygenase 1 enzymatic activity, and apoptosis index in the cavernous tissues were estimated.

RESULTS

Cavernous tissue endothelin 1, adenosine deaminase, heme oxygenase 1 enzymatic activity levels, and apoptosis index were significantly decreased in bosentan, theophylline, and ZnPP-treated rats compared with the controls.

CONCLUSION

Inhibition of priapism induced apoptosis with bosentan, theophylline, and ZnPP seems promising on preserving erectile function.

A novel Gαs-binding protein, Gas-2 like 2, facilitates the signaling of the A2A adenosine receptor

The A2A adenosine receptor (A2AR) is a G-protein-coupled receptor that contains a long cytoplasmic carboxyl terminus (A2AR-C). We report here that Gas-2 like 2 (G2L2) is a new interacting partner of A2AR-C. The interaction between A2AR and G2L2 was verified by GST pull-down, co-immunoprecipitation, immunocytochemical staining, and fluorescence resonance energy transfer. Expression of G2L2 increased the intracellular cAMP content evoked by A2AR in an A2AR-C-dependent manner. Immunoprecipitation and pull-down assays demonstrated that G2L2 selectively bound to A2AR-C and the inactive form of Gαs to facilitate the recruitment of the trimeric G protein complex to the proximal position of A2AR for efficient activation. Collectively, G2L2 is a new effector that controls the action of A2AR by modulating its ability to regulate the Gαs-mediated cAMP contents.

Adenosine signaling: good or bad in erectile function?

The erectile status of penile tissue is governed largely by the tone of cavernosal smooth muscle cells, which is determined by the balance of vascular relaxants and constrictors. Vascular relaxants play a key role in regulating the tone of cavernosal smooth muscle and thus the initiation and maintenance of penile erection. Early studies drew attention to the potential role of adenosine signaling in this process. However, the serendipitous discovery of the effect of sildenafil on erectile physiology drew more attention toward nitric oxide (NO) as a vasodilator in the process of penile erection, and a recently discovered, unexpected erectile phenotype of adenosine deaminase-deficient mice reemphasizes the importance of adenosine as a key regulatory of erectile status. Adenosine, like NO, is a potent and short-lived vasorelaxant that functions via cyclic nucleotide second messenger signaling to promote smooth muscle relaxation. Recent studies reviewed here show that adenosine functions to relax the corpus cavernosum and promote penile erection. Excess adenosine in penile tissue contributes to the disorder called priapism, and impaired adenosine signaling is associated with erectile dysfunction. More recent research summarized in this review reveals that adenosine functions as a key endogenous vasodilator in the initiation and maintenance of normal penile erection. This new insight highlights adenosine signaling pathways operating in penile tissue as significant therapeutic targets for the treatment of erectile disorders.

The role of the A2a receptor agonist, regadenoson, in modulating hepatic artery flow in the porcine small-for-size liver graft

BACKGROUND

Hepatic artery vasoconstriction plays a major role in the pathophysiology of the small-for-size (SFS) liver graft injury and is reversed by adenosine. The A2a adenosine receptor (AR) has been suggested to be one of the key receptors that modulate hepatic hemodynamic changes. The aim of the study is to define the effects of the A2a AR agonist, regadenoson, in modulating hepatic artery flow (HAF) in SFS liver grafts of a porcine model.

METHODS

Seven female recipient pigs (66-70 kg) receiving 20% liver grafts were treated with regadenoson, 0.1 ug/kg/min starting on POD1 (n = 7). Results were compared with those with untreated 20% liver grafts (n= 8). The recipients were observed for 14 d. Hepatic artery flow (HAF) and portal vein flow (PVF) were recorded. Liver biopsies and serum samples were also taken at the designed time points through postoperative day (POD)14.

RESULTS

Dose-response curves of regadenoson established 0.1 ug/kg/min as the most effective dose of regadenoson for maintaining an increase in HAF. No adverse effects were seen with regadenoson infusion. HAF immediately increased by up to 2.2-fold after regadenoson infusion. The levels of daily average of HAF and percentage of HAF in total liver blood flow were 34.5% and 41.8%, respectively, higher in the regadenoson group than in the untreated group. Histologic scores of hepatic artery spasm and bile duct necrosis were significantly lower in the regadenoson group than in the untreated group (P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). The complication rates of hepatic artery thrombosis and gastrointestinal bleeding were lower in the regadenoson group than in the untreated group (0/7, 0% versus 2/8, 25% and 0/7, 0% versus 2/8 and 25%, respectively). The 14-d survival rates were 4/7 (57.1 %) in regadenoson group compared with 2/8 (25%) in the untreated group.

CONCLUSION

Adenosine A2a AR agonist, regadenoson, increases HAF in the recipients of SFS grafts with modest improvements in outcome.

Detrimental effects of adenosine signaling in sickle cell disease

Hypoxia can act as an initial trigger to induce erythrocyte sickling and eventual end organ damage in sickle cell disease (SCD). Many factors and metabolites are altered in response to hypoxia and may contribute to the pathogenesis of the disease. Using metabolomic profiling, we found that the steady-state concentration of adenosine in the blood was elevated in a transgenic mouse model of SCD. Adenosine concentrations were similarly elevated in the blood of humans with SCD. Increased adenosine levels promoted sickling, hemolysis and damage to multiple tissues in SCD transgenic mice and promoted sickling of human erythrocytes. Using biochemical, genetic and pharmacological approaches, we showed that adenosine A(2B) receptor (A(2B)R)-mediated induction of 2,3-diphosphoglycerate, an erythrocyte-specific metabolite that decreases the oxygen binding affinity of hemoglobin, underlies the induction of erythrocyte sickling by excess adenosine both in cultured human red blood cells and in SCD transgenic mice. Thus, excessive adenosine signaling through the A(2B)R has a pathological role in SCD. These findings may provide new therapeutic possibilities for this disease.

Adenosine receptor desensitization and trafficking

As with the majority of G-protein-coupled receptors, all four of the adenosine receptor subtypes are known to undergo agonist-induced regulation in the form of desensitization and trafficking. These processes can limit the ability of adenosine receptors to couple to intracellular signalling pathways and thus reduce the ability of adenosine receptor agonists as well as endogenous adenosine to produce cellular responses. In addition, since adenosine receptors couple to multiple signalling pathways, these pathways may desensitize differentially, while the desensitization of one pathway could even trigger signalling via another. Thus, the overall picture of adenosine receptor regulation can be complex. For all adenosine receptor subtypes, there is evidence to implicate arrestins in agonist-induced desensitization and trafficking, but there is also evidence for other possible forms of regulation, including second messenger-dependent kinase regulation, heterologous effects involving G proteins, and the involvement of non-clathrin trafficking pathways such as caveolae. In this review, the evidence implicating these mechanisms is summarized for each adenosine receptor subtype, and we also discuss those issues of adenosine receptor regulation that remain to be resolved as well as likely directions for future research in this field.

From cradle to twilight: the carboxyl terminus directs the fate of the A(2A)-adenosine receptor

The extended carboxyl terminus of the A(2A)-adenosine receptor is known to engage several proteins other than those canonically involved in signalling by GPCRs (i.e., G proteins, G protein-coupled receptor kinases/GRKs, arrestins). The list includes the deubiquinating enzyme USP4, α-actinin, the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for ARF6 ARNO, translin-X-associated protein, calmodulin, the neuronal calcium binding protein NECAB2 and the synapse associated protein SAP102. However, if the fate of the A(2A)-receptor is taken into account - from its birthplace in the endoplasmic reticulum to its presumed site of disposal in the lysosome, it is evident that many more proteins must interact with the A(2A)-adenosine receptor. There are several arguments that support the conjecture that these interactions will preferentially occur with the carboxyl terminus of the A(2A)-adeonsine receptor: (i) the extended carboxyl terminus (of 122 residues=) offers the required space to accommodate companions; (ii) analogies can be drawn with other receptors, which engage several of these binding partners with their C-termini. This approach allows for defining the nature of the unknown territory. As an example, we posit a chaperone/coat protein complex-II (COPII) exchange model that must occur on the carboxyl terminus of the receptor. This model accounts for the observation that a minimum size of the C-terminus is required for correct folding of the receptor. It also precludes premature recruitment of the COPII-coat to a partially folded receptor.

Deletion of the distal COOH-terminus of the A2B adenosine receptor switches internalization to an arrestin- and clathrin-independent pathway and inhibits recycling

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We have investigated the effect of deletions of a postsynaptic density, disc large and zo-1 protein (PDZ) motif at the end of the COOH-terminus of the rat A(2B) adenosine receptor on intracellular trafficking following long-term exposure to the agonist 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)-adenosine.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The trafficking of the wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor and deletion mutants expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells was studied using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in combination with immunofluorescence microscopy.

KEY RESULTS

The wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor and deletion mutants were all extensively internalized following prolonged treatment with NECA. The intracellular compartment through which the Gln(325)-stop receptor mutant, which lacks the Type II PDZ motif found in the wild type receptor initially trafficked was not the same as the wild type receptor. Expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2, dynamin or Eps-15 inhibited internalization of wild type and Leu(330)-stop receptors, whereas only dominant negative mutant dynamin inhibited agonist-induced internalization of Gln(325)-stop, Ser(326)-stop and Phe(328)-stop receptors. Following internalization, the wild type A(2B) adenosine receptor recycled rapidly to the cell surface, whereas the Gln(325)-stop receptor did not recycle.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Deletion of the COOH-terminus of the A(2B) adenosine receptor beyond Leu(330) switches internalization from an arrestin- and clathrin-dependent pathway to one that is dynamin dependent but arrestin and clathrin independent. The presence of a Type II PDZ motif appears to be essential for arrestin- and clathrin-dependent internalization, as well as recycling of the A(2B) adenosine receptor following prolonged agonist addition.

Adenosine A2A receptor is a unique angiogenic target of HIF-2alpha in pulmonary endothelial cells

Hypoxia, through the hypoxia-inducible transcription factors HIF-1alpha and HIF-2alpha (HIFs), induces angiogenesis by up-regulating a common set of angiogenic cytokines. Unlike HIF-1alpha, which regulates a unique set of genes, most genes regulated by HIF-2alpha overlap with those induced by HIF-1alpha. Thus, the unique contribution of HIF-2alpha remains largely obscure. By using adenoviral mutant HIF-1alpha and adenoviral mutant HIF-2alpha constructs, where the HIFs are transcriptionally active under normoxic conditions, we show that HIF-2alpha but not HIF-1alpha regulates adenosine A(2A) receptor in primary cultures of human lung endothelial cells. Further, siRNA knockdown of HIF-2alpha completely inhibits hypoxic induction of A(2A) receptor. Promoter studies show a 2.5-fold induction of luciferase activity with HIF-2alpha cotransfection. Analysis of the A(2A) receptor gene promoter revealed a hypoxia-responsive element in the region between -704 and -595 upstream of the transcription start site. By using a ChIP assay, we demonstrate that HIF-2alpha binding to this region is specific. In addition, we demonstrate that A(2A) receptor has angiogenic potential, as assessed by increases in cell proliferation, cell migration, and tube formation. Additional data show increased expression of A(2A) receptor in human lung tumor cancer samples relative to adjacent normal lung tissue. These data also demonstrate that A(2A) receptor is regulated by hypoxia and HIF-2alpha in human lung endothelial cells but not in mouse-derived endothelial cells.

Adenosine A(2A) receptor dynamics studied with the novel fluorescent agonist Alexa488-APEC

G protein-coupled receptors, such as the adenosine A(2A) receptor, are dynamic proteins, which undergo agonist-dependent redistribution from the cell surface to intracellular membranous compartments, such as endosomes. In order to study the kinetics of adenosine A(2A) receptor redistribution in living cells, we synthesized a novel fluorescent agonist, Alexa488-APEC. Alexa488-APEC binds to adenosine A(2A) (K(i)=149+/-27 nM) as well as A(3) receptors (K(i)=240+/-160 nM) but not to adenosine A(1) receptors. Further, we characterized the dose-dependent increase in Alexa488-APEC-induced cAMP production as well as cAMP response element binding (CREB) protein phosphorylation, verifying the ligand's functionality at adenosine A(2A) but not A(2B) receptors. In live-cell imaging studies, Alexa488-APEC-induced adenosine A(2A) receptor internalization, which was blocked by the competitive reversible antagonist ZM 241385 and hyperosmolaric sucrose. Further, internalized adenosine A(2A) receptors co-localized with clathrin and Rab5, indicating that agonist stimulation promotes adenosine A(2A) receptor uptake through a clathrin-dependent mechanism to Rab5-positive endosomes. The basic characterization of Alexa488-APEC described here showed that it provides a useful tool for tracing adenosine A(2A) receptors in vitro.

The A(2A)-adenosine receptor: a GPCR with unique features?

The A(2A)-adenosine receptor is a prototypical G(s)-coupled receptor. However, the A(2A)-receptor has several structural and functional characteristics that make it unique. In contrast to the classical model of collision coupling described for the beta-adrenergic receptors, the A(2A)-receptor couples to adenylyl cyclase by restricted collision coupling and forms a tight complex with G(s). The mechanistic basis for this is not clear; restricted collision coupling may arise from the interaction of the receptor with additional proteins or due to the fact that G protein-coupling is confined to specialized membrane microdomains. The A(2A)-receptor has a long C-terminus (of >120 residues), which is for the most part dispensable for coupling to G(s). It was originally viewed as the docking site for kinases and the beta-arrestin family to initiate receptor desensitization and endocytosis. The A(2A)-receptor is, however, fairly resistant to agonist-induced internalization. Recently, the C-terminus has also been appreciated as a binding site for several additional 'accessory' proteins. Established interaction partners include alpha-actinin, ARNO, USP4 and translin-associated protein-X. In addition, the A(2A)-receptor has also been reported to form a heteromeric complex with the D(2)-dopamine receptor and the metabotropic glutamate receptor-5. It is clear that (i) this list cannot be exhaustive and (ii) that all these proteins cannot bind simultaneously to the receptor. There must be rules of engagement, which allow the receptor to elicit different biological responses, which depend on the cellular context and the nature of the concomitant signal(s). Thus, the receptor may function as a coincidence detector and a signal integrator.

Pharmacogenomics of G protein-coupled receptor signaling: insights from health and disease

The identification and characterization of the processes of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) activation and inactivation have refined not only the study of the GPCRs but also the genomics of many accessory proteins necessary for these processes. This has accelerated progress in understanding the fundamental mechanisms involved in GPCR structure and function, including receptor transport to the membrane, ligand binding, activation and inactivation by GRK-mediated (and other) phosphorylation. The catalog of G(s)alpha and Gbeta subunit polymorphisms that result in complex phenotypes has complemented the effort to catalog the GPCRs and their variants. The study of the genomics of GPCR accessory proteins has also provided insight into pathways of disease, such as the contributions of regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein to hypertension and activator of G protein signaling (AGS) proteins to the response to hypoxia. In the case of the G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), identified originally in the retinal tissues that converge on rhodopsin, proteins such as GRK4 have been identified that have been subsequently associated with hypertension. Here, we review the structure and function of GPCR and associated proteins in the context of the gene families that encode them and the genetic disorders associated with their altered function. An understanding of the pharmacogenomics of GPCR signaling provides the basis for examining the GPCRs disrupted in monogenic disease and the pharmacogenetics of a given receptor system.

Internalization and desensitization of adenosine receptors

Until now, more than 800 distinct G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been identified in the human genome. The four subtypes of the adenosine receptor (A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ receptor) belong to this large family of GPCRs that represent the most widely targeted pharmacological protein class. Since adenosine receptors are widespread throughout the body and involved in a variety of physiological processes and diseases, there is great interest in understanding how the different subtypes are regulated, as a basis for designing therapeutic drugs that either avoid or make use of this regulation. The major GPCR regulatory pathway involves phosphorylation of activated receptors by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), a process that is followed by binding of arrestin proteins. This prevents receptors from activating downstream heterotrimeric G protein pathways, but at the same time allows activation of arrestin-dependent signalling pathways. Upon agonist treatment, adenosine receptor subtypes are differently regulated. For instance, the A₁Rs are not (readily) phosphorylated and internalize slowly, showing a typical half-life of several hours, whereas the A_2AR and A_2BR undergo much faster downregulation, usually shorter than 1 h. The A₃R is subject to even faster downregulation, often a matter of minutes. The fast desensitization of the A₃R after agonist exposure may be therapeutically equivalent to antagonist occupancy of the receptor. This review describes the process of desensitization and internalization of the different adenosine subtypes in cell systems, tissues and in vivo studies. In addition, molecular mechanisms involved in adenosine receptor desensitization are discussed.

Cross-regulation of carbon monoxide and the adenosine A2a receptor in macrophages

Adenosine and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) exert a wide range of anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory actions, making them crucial regulatory molecules. Despite the diversity in their modes of action, the similarity of biological effects of adenosine and HO-1 led us to hypothesize a possible interrelationship between them. We assessed a potential role for HO-1 in the ability of adenosine or 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA), a stable adenosine analog, to modify the response of LPS-stimulated macrophages. Adenosine and NECA markedly induced HO-1 and blocked LPS-induced TNF-alpha production via adenosine A2aR-mediated signaling; blocking of HO-1 by RNA interference abrogated the effects of adenosine and NECA on TNF-alpha. HO-1 overexpression or exposure to carbon monoxide (CO), a product of HO-1 enzymatic activity, resulted in augmented A2aR mRNA and protein levels in RAW264.7 cells and primary macrophages. The induction of A2aR expression by HO-1 or CO resulted in an increase in the sensitivity to the anti-inflammatory effects of adenosine and NECA, which was lost in macrophages isolated from A2aR-deficient mice. Moreover, a decrease in cAMP levels upon NECA stimulation of naive macrophages was counterbalanced by CO exposure to up-regulate A2aR levels. This implies adenosine receptor isoform switch as a selective modification in macrophage phenotype. Taken together, these data suggest the existence of a positive feedback loop among adenosine, HO-1, CO, and the A2aR in the chronological resolution of the inflammatory response.

EFFECTS OF ADENOSINE ON FUNCTIONS OF POLYMORPHONUCLEAR LEUKOCYTES FROM PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK

Inasmuch as polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) play a major role in antibacterial defense but can also cause substantial tissue injury, drugs are needed which are able to attenuate tissue-toxic PMN reactions without inhibiting bactericidal mechanisms. Adenosine as a retaliatory metabolite is produced in response to metabolically unfavorable conditions like inflammation. However, it is not known whether adenosine can selectively downregulate adverse PMN reactions in sepsis. In this prospective clinical study, we characterized the effects of adenosine ex vivo on PMN functions in patients with septic shock ([SS] n = 33) and healthy volunteers ([HV] n = 33). The PMNs were primed by tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and subsequently stimulated with N-formyl methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLP) to test for the formation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in response to soluble inflammatory stimuli. The PMNs were also challenged by opsonized zymosan particles to assess adhesion, phagocytosis, and the associated H2O2 production. As compared with HV, PMNs from SS patients showed strongly enhanced tissue-toxic H2O2 production elicited by TNF-alpha/fMLP. Increasing concentrations of adenosine dose-dependently reduced this tissue-toxic H2O2 production in both groups with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 25 nmol/L and 114 nmol/L in HV and SS patients, respectively. This 4.6-fold decrease in the adenosine-mediated inhibition of PMNs from patients with septic shock was compensated by a 3-fold increase in the plasma concentrations of the nucleoside (HV, 42.5 +/- 2.9 nmol/L vs. SS, 125.6 +/- 18.2 nmol/L; mean +/- SEM). When the effects of adenosine were tested at a very high A2A receptor saturating concentration of 10 mol/L, neither adhesion, phagocytosis, nor the associated H2O2 production induced by opsonized zymosan was affected in both groups. These results were confirmed by the highly selective A2A agonist, CGS21680.Thus, adenosine or A2A agonists may be useful to selectively inhibit the potentially tissue-toxic H2O2 production elicited by soluble inflammatory mediators in patients with septic shock.

Activation of adenosine A2A receptors alters postsynaptic currents and depolarizes neurons of the supraoptic nucleus

Supraoptic nucleus (SON) neurons secrete oxytocin or vasopressin in response to various physiological stimuli (e.g., lactation/suckling, dehydration). Released near fenestrated capillaries of the neurohypophysis, these peptides enter the blood and travel to peripheral target organs. The pervasive neuromodulator adenosine, acting at A1 receptors, is an important inhibitory regulator of magnocellular neuroendocrine cell activity. Another high-affinity adenosine receptor exists in this system, however. We examined the physiological effects of adenosine A2A receptor activation and determined its localization among various cell types within the SON. In whole cell patch-clamp recordings from rat brain slices, application of the selective adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS-21680 caused membrane depolarizations in SON neurons, often leading to increased firing activity. Membrane potential changes were persistent (>10 min) and could be blocked by the selective A2A receptor antagonist ZM-241385, or GDP-beta-S, the latter suggesting postsynaptic sites of action. However, +/--alpha-methyl-(4-carboxyphenyl)glycine or TTX also blocked CGS-21680 effects, indicating secondary actions on postsynaptic neurons. In voltage-clamp mode, application of CGS-21680 caused a slight increase (approximately 8%) in high-frequency clusters of excitatory postsynaptic currents. With the use of specific antibodies, adenosine A2A receptors were immunocytochemically localized to both the magnocellular neurons and astrocytes of the SON. Ecto-5'nucleotidase, an enzyme involved in the metabolism of ATP to adenosine, was also localized to astrocytes of the SON. These results demonstrate that adenosine acting at A2A receptors can enhance the excitability of SON neurons and modulate transmitter release from glutamatergic afferents projecting to the nucleus. We suggest that adenosine A2A receptors may function in neuroendocrine regulation through both direct neuronal mechanisms and via actions involving glia.

The G protein-coupled receptors: pharmacogenetics and disease

Genetic variation in G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is associated with a wide spectrum of disease phenotypes and predispositions that are of special significance because they are the targets of therapeutic agents. Each variant provides an opportunity to understand receptor function that complements a plethora of available in vitro data elucidating the pharmacology of the GPCRs. For example, discrete portions of the proximal tail of the dopamine D1 receptor have been discovered, in vitro, that may be involved in desensitization, recycling and trafficking. Similar in vitro strategies have been used to elucidate naturally occurring GPCR mutations. Inactive, over-active or constitutively active receptors have been identified by changes in ligand binding, G-protein coupling, receptor desensitization and receptor recycling. Selected examples reviewed include those disorders resulting from mutations in rhodopsin, thyrotropin, luteinizing hormone, vasopressin and angiotensin receptors. By comparison, the recurrent pharmacogenetic variants are more likely to result in an altered predisposition to complex disease in the population. These common variants may affect receptor sequence without intrinsic phenotype change or spontaneous induction of disease and yet result in significant alteration in drug efficacy. These pharmacogenetic phenomena will be reviewed with respect to a limited sampling of GPCR systems including the orexin/hypocretin system, the beta2 adrenergic receptors, the cysteinyl leukotriene receptors and the calcium-sensing receptor. These developments will be discussed with respect to strategies for drug discovery that take into account the potential for the development of drugs targeted at mutated and wild-type proteins.

Receptors subtypes involved in adenosine-mediated modulation of norepinephrine release from cardiac nerve terminals

The objective of this study was to determine which adenosine receptor subtypes were involved in the modulation of norepinephrine release from cardiac nerve terminals. In addition, the persistence of adenosine-mediated effects was evaluated. Rat hearts attached to the stellate ganglion were isolated and perfused. The ganglion was electrically stimulated twice (S1 and S2), allowing 10 min between the stimulations. To determine adenosine receptor subtypes, selective and nonselective adenosine agonists and antagonists were infused following S1 and until the end of S2. To evaluate the persistence of adenosine-mediated effect on norepinephrine release, the stellate ganglion was stimulated a third (S3) and fourth (S4) time. Coronary effluents were collected to determine norepinephrine content. Adenosine and a selective A1 receptor agonist, CCPA, inhibited norepinephrine release by 49% and 54%, respectively. This effect was reversed by simultaneous infusion of nonspecific (8-SPT) and specific (DPCPX) A1 receptor antagonists. Selective A2A (CGS 21680) and A3 (AB-MECA) receptor agonists had no discernible effect on norepinephrine release. Similarly, adenosine A2A receptor antagonists CSC and DMPX did not alter the dose-response relation between norepinephrine release and adenosine. Finally, the inhibitory effects of adenosine on norepinephrine release did not persist 10 min subsequent to the removal of adenosine. Adenosine inhibited norepinephrine release primarily via the adenosine A1 receptor. This effect of adenosine was of short duration. Adenosine A2A and A3 receptors were either absent or functionally insignificant in the regulation of norepinephrine release in the rat heart.

Animal models for the study of adenosine receptor function

Adenosine receptors represent a family of G-protein coupled receptors that are ubiquitously expressed in a wide variety of tissues. This family contains four receptor subtypes: A1 and A3, which mediate inhibition of adenylyl cyclase; and A2a and A2b, which mediate stimulation of this enzyme. Currently, all receptor subtypes have been genetically deleted in mouse models except for the A2b adenosine receptor, and some have been overexpressed in selective tissues of transgenic mice. Studies involving these transgenic mice indicated that receptor levels are rate limiting, as effects were amplified upon increases in receptor level. The knockout models pointed to clusters of activities related to the physiologies of the cardiovascular and the nervous systems, which are either reduced or enhanced upon specific receptor deletion. Interestingly, the trend of effects on these systems is similar in the A1 and A3 adenosine receptor knockout mice and opposite to the effects observed in the A2a adenosine receptor knockout model. This review summarizes in vitro studies on pathways affected by each adenosine receptor, and primarily focuses on the above in vivo models generated to investigate the physiologic role of adenosine receptors. Furthermore, it illustrates the need for multiple adenosine receptor subtype deficiency studies in mice and the deletion of the A2b subtype.

Functional role of adenosine receptor subtypes in the regulation of blood-brain barrier permeability: possible implications for the design of synthetic adenosine derivatives

The objective of this investigation was to determine the functional role of adenosine receptor subtypes in the regulation of blood-brain barrier (BBB) permeability. The presence of the equilibrative es and ei nucleoside transporters at the BBB was also determined. Studies were conducted in an experimental in vitro BBB model comprising bovine brain capillary endothelial cells (BCECs) and rat astrocytes (RAs). The presence of the receptors and transporters was investigated by a combination of RT-PCR and radioligand binding assays. Changes in paracellular permeability were investigated on basis of changes in trans-endothelial-electrical-resistance (TEER) and transport of paracellular markers. In BCECs the presence of A(2A) and A(3) receptors and the es nucleoside transporter was demonstrated. The A(1) receptor was absent, while the presence of the A(2B) receptor and the ei nucleoside transporter remained uncertain. In RAs the presence of all four receptor subtypes and the es and ei nucleoside transporters was demonstrated. Upon application of selective agonists no significant changes in TEER or the transport of the paracellular markers were observed. The functional role of adenosine receptor subtypes in regulating the paracellular permeability of the BBB is probably small. It is unlikely therefore that the BBB transport of synthetic adenosine analogues is modified by permeability changes. The es nucleoside transporter might play a role in the BBB transport of synthetic adenosine analogues.

Adenosine receptors: G protein-mediated signalling and the role of accessory proteins

Ever since the discovery of the effects of adenosine in the circulation, adenosine receptors continue to represent a promising drug target. Firstly, this is due to the fact that the receptors are expressed in a large variety of cells; in particular, the actions of adenosine (or, respectively, of the antagonistic methylxanthines) in the central nervous system, in the circulation, on immune cells and on other tissues can be beneficial in certain disorders. Secondly, there exists a large number of ligands, which have been generated by introducing several modifications in the structure of the lead compounds (adenosine and methylxanthine), some of them highly specific. Four adenosine receptor subtypes have been identified by molecular cloning; they belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors, which transfer signals by activating heterotrimeric G proteins. It has been appreciated recently that accessory proteins impinge on the receptor/G protein interaction and thus modulate the signalling reaction. These accessory components may be thought as adaptors that redirect the signalling pathway to elicit a cell-specific response. Here, we review the recent literature on adenosine receptors and place a focus on the role of accessory proteins in the organisation of adenosine receptor signalling. These components have been involved in receptor sorting, in the control of signal amplification and in the temporal regulation of receptor activity, while the existence of others is postulated on the basis of atypical cellular reactions elicited by receptor activation.

Purification and characterization of the human adenosine A(2a) receptor functionally expressed in Escherichia coli

The adenosine A(2a) receptor belongs to the seven transmembrane helix G-protein-coupled receptor family, is abundant in striatum, vasculature and platelets and is involved in several physiological processes such as blood pressure regulation and protection of cells during anoxia. For structural and biophysical studies we have expressed the human adenosine A(2a) receptor (hA2aR) at high levels inserted into the Escherichia coli inner membrane, and established a purification scheme. Expression was in fusion with the periplasmic maltose-binding protein to levels of 10-20 nmol of receptor per L of culture, as detected with the specific antagonist ligand [(3)H]ZM241385. As the receptor C-terminus was proteolyzed upon solubilization, a protease-resistant but still functional receptor was created by truncation to Ala316. Addition of the sterol, cholesteryl hemisuccinate, allowed a stable preparation of functional hA2aR solubilized in dodecylmaltoside to be obtained, and, increased the stability of the receptor solubilized in other alkylmaltosides. Purification to homogeneity was achieved in three steps, including ligand affinity chromatography based on the antagonist xanthine amine congener. The purified hA2aR fusion protein bound [(3)H]ZM241385 with a K(d) of 0.19 nm and an average B(max) of 13.7 nmol x mg(-1) that suggests 100% functionality. Agonist affinities for the purified solubilized receptor were higher than those for the membrane-bound form. Sufficient pure, functional hA2aR can now be prepared regularly for structural studies.

Rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the A(2B) adenosine receptor is mediated by a serine residue close to the COOH terminus

The G(s)-coupled rat A(2B) adenosine receptor (A(2B)-AR) was epitope-tagged at the NH(2) terminus with hemagglutinin (HA) and subjected to progressive deletions or point mutations of the COOH terminus in order to determine regions of the receptor that contribute to agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. When expressed stably in Chinese hamster ovary cells, a mutant receptor in which the final 2 amino acids were deleted, the Leu(330)-stop mutant, underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization as did the wild type (WT) receptor. However, the Phe(328) and the Gln(325)-stop mutants were resistant to rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. Co-expression of arrestin-2-green fluorescent protein (arrestin-2-GFP) with WT receptor or Leu(330)-stop mutant resulted in rapid translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane upon agonist addition. On the other hand, agonist activation of the Phe(328)-stop or Gln(325)-stop mutant did not result in translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol. A COOH terminus point mutant, S329G, was also unable to undergo rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization, indicating that Ser(329) is a critical residue for these processes. A further deletion mutant (Ser(326)-stop) unexpectedly underwent rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. However, activation of this mutant did not promote translocation of arrestin-2-GFP from cytosol to membrane. In addition, whereas WT receptor internalization was markedly inhibited by co-expression of dominant negative mutants of arrestin-2 (arrestin-2-(319-418)), dynamin (dynamin K44A), or Eps-15 (EDelta95-295), Ser(326)-stop receptor internalization was only inhibited by dominant negative mutant dynamin. Taken together these results indicate that Ser(329), close to the COOH terminus of the rat A(2B)-AR, is critical for the rapid agonist-induced desensitization and internalization of the receptor. However, deletion of the COOH terminus also uncovers a motif that is able to redirect internalization of the receptor to an arrestin- and clathrin-independent pathway.

Deltorphin II-induced rapid desensitization of delta-opioid receptor requires both phosphorylation and internalization of the receptor

Similar to other G protein-coupled receptors, rapid phosphorylation of the delta-opioid receptor in the presence of agonist has been reported. Hence, agonist-induced desensitization of the delta-opioid receptor has been suggested to be via the receptor phosphorylation, arrestin-mediated pathway. However, due to the highly efficient coupling between the delta-opioid receptor and the adenylyl cyclase, the direct correlation between the rates of receptor phosphorylation and receptor desensitization as measured by the adenylyl cyclase activity could not be established. In the current studies, using an ecdysone-inducible expression system to control the delta-opioid receptor levels in HEK293 cells, we could demonstrate that the rate of deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization is dependent on the receptor level. Only at receptor concentrations </=90 fmol/mg of protein were rapid desensitizations (t(12) <10 min) observed. Apparently, deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization involves cellular events in addition to receptor phosphorylation. Mutation of Ser(363) in the carboxyl tail of the delta-opioid receptor to Ala completely abolished the deltorphin II-induced receptor phosphorylation but not the desensitization response. Although the magnitude of desensitization was attenuated, the rate of deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization remained the same in the S363A mutant as compared with wild type. Also, the S363A mutant could internalize in the presence of deltorphin II. Only when the agonist-induced clathrin-coated pit-mediated receptor internalization was blocked by 0.4 m sucrose that the deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization was abolished in the S363A mutant. Similarly, 0.4 m sucrose could partially block the agonist-induced rapid desensitization in HEK293 cells expressing the wild type delta-opioid receptor. Taken together, these data supported the hypothesis that rapid desensitization of the delta-opioid receptor involves both the phosphorylation and the internalization of the receptor.

Receptor density and recycling affect the rate of agonist-induced desensitization of mu-opioid receptor

Previously, we reported that the time course for the rapid phosphorylation rate of mu-opioid receptor expressed in human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 cells did not correlate with the slow receptor desensitization rate induced by [D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4), Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO). However, others have suggested that receptor phosphorylation is the trigger for mu-opioid receptor desensitization. In this study, we demonstrated the relatively slow rate of receptor desensitization could be attributed partially to the recycling of internalized receptor as determined by fluorescence-activated cell-sorting analysis. However, the blockade of the endocytic and Golgi transport events in HEK293 cells with monensin and brefeldin A did not increase the initial rate of receptor desensitization. But the desensitization rate was increased by reduction of the mu-opioid receptor level with beta-furnaltrexamine (betaFNA). The reduction of the receptor level with 1 microM betaFNA significantly increased the rate of etorphine-induced receptor desensitization. By blocking the ability of receptor to internalize with 0.4 M sucrose, a significant degree of receptor being rapidly desensitized was observed in HEK293 cells pretreated with betaFNA. Hence, mu-opioid receptor is being resensitized during chronic agonist treatment. The significance of resensitization of the internalized receptor in affecting receptor desensitization was demonstrated further with human neuroblastoma SHSY5Y cells that expressed a low level of mu-opioid receptor. Although DAMGO could not induce a rapid desensitization in these cells, in the presence of monensin and brefeldin A, DAMGO desensitized the mu-opioid receptor's ability to regulate adenylyl cyclase with a t(1/2) = 9.9 +/- 2.1 min and a maximal desensitized level at 70 +/- 4.7%. Furthermore, blockade of receptor internalization with 0.4 M sucrose enhanced the DAMGO-induced receptor desensitization, and the inclusion of monensin prevented the resensitization of the mu-opioid receptor after chronic agonist treatment in SHSY5Y cells. Thus, the ability of the mu-opioid receptor to resensitize and to recycle, and the relative efficiency of the receptor to regulate adenylyl cyclase activity, contributed to the observed slow rate of mu-opioid receptor desensitization in HEK293 cells.

Polarity of A2b adenosine receptor expression determines characteristics of receptor desensitization

It is not known if, in polarized cells, desensitization events can be influenced by the domain on which the receptor resides. Desensitization was induced by 5'-(N-ethylcarboxamido)adenosine (NECA) and was quantitated by measurement of short-circuit current (I(sc)) in response to adenosine. NECA added to either the apical or basolateral compartments rapidly desensitized receptors on these respective domains. Although apical NECA had no effect on the basolateral receptor stimulation, basolateral NECA induced a complete desensitization of the apical receptor. We hypothesized that desensitization of apical receptor by basolateral desensitization could relate to a trafficking step in which A2b receptor is first targeted basolaterally upon synthesis and transported to the apical surface via vesicular transport/microtubules. Because desensitization is associated with downregulation of receptors, apical adenosine receptor can thus be affected by basolateral desensitization. Both low temperature and nocodazole inhibited I(sc) induced by apical and not basolateral adenosine.

IN CONCLUSION

1) a single receptor subtype, here modeled by the A2b receptor, differentially desensitizes based on the membrane domain on which it is expressed, 2) agonist exposure on one domain can result in desensitization of receptors on the opposite domain, 3) cross-domain desensitization can display strict polarity, and 4) receptor trafficking may play a role in the cross-desensitization process.

The role of receptor structure in determining adenosine receptor activity

Adenosine produces a wide variety of physiological effects through the activation of cell surface adenosine receptors (ARs). ARs are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor family, and currently, four subtypes, the A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR, are recognized. This review focuses on the role of receptor structure in governing various facets of AR activity. Ligand-binding properties of ARs are primarily dictated by amino acids in the transmembrane domains of the receptors, although a role for extracellular domains of certain ARs has been suggested. Studies have identified certain amino acids conserved amongst AR subtypes that are critical for ligand recognition, as well as additional residues that may differentiate between agonist and antagonist ligands. Receptor regions responsible for activation of Gs have been identified for the A2AAR. The location of these intracellular sites is consistent with findings described for other G-protein-coupled receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis has been employed to analyze the structural basis for the differences in the kinetics of the desensitization response displayed by various AR subtypes. For the A2AAR and A3AR, agonist-stimulated phosphorylation of the AR, presumably via a G-protein receptor kinase, has been shown to occur. For these AR subtypes, intracellular regions or individual amino acids that may be targets for this phosphorylation have been identified. Finally, the role of A1AR gene structure in regulating the expression of this AR subtype is reviewed.

Central adenosine A(2A) receptors: an overview

Recent advances in molecular biology, biochemistry, cell biology and behavioral pharmacology together with the development of more selective ligands to the various adenosine receptors have increased our understanding of the functioning of central adenosine A(2A) receptors. The A(2A) receptor is one of four adenosine receptors found in the brain. Its expression is highest in striatum, nucleus accumbens and olfactory tubercles, although it also occurs in neurons and microglia in most other brain regions. The receptor has seven transmembrane domains and couples via Gs to adenyl cyclase stimulation. Antagonistic interactions between A(2A) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors have been described, as stimulation of the A(2A) receptor leads to a reduction in the affinity of D(2) receptors for D(2) receptor agonists. The A(2A) receptor is thought to play a role in a number of physiological responses and pathological conditions. Indeed, A(2A) receptor antagonists may be useful for the treatment of acute and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as cerebral ischemia or Parkinson's disease. A(2A) receptor agonists may treat certain types of seizures or sleep disorders. This review discusses the characteristics, distribution, pharmacochemical properties and regulation of central A(2A) receptors, as well as A(2A) receptor-mediated behavioural responses and their potential role in various neuropsychiatric disorders.

Analysis of domain responsible for desensitization of beta1-adrenergic receptor

When the wild type beta1-adrenergic receptor (WT-beta1AR) was expressed in Sf9 cells, the beta1AR-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activities were desensitized by prior treatment with isoproterenol. The extent of beta1AR desensitization was not modified, and the onset was not promoted by the overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), GRK5 or GRK6. However, overexpression of the dominant negative mutant of GRK2 appeared to inhibit desensitization of the beta1AR. The change of the potential protein kinase A phosphorylation site located at the intracellular third loop did not affect beta1AR desensitization. Desensitization of the truncated mutant, in which nearly all of the serine and threonine residues from the carboxyl terminus were eliminated, was the same as that of the WT-beta1AR. A deletion mutant that lacked serine and threonine residues of the intracellular third loop was also desensitized by isoproterenol stimulation. Furthermore, the deletion of serine and threonine residues from both the intracellular third loop and carboxyl terminus did not affect desensitization of the beta1AR. These results suggested that phosphorylation by endogenous GRKs in Sf9 cells contributed to desensitization of the beta1AR and that the regions other than third intracellular loop and carboxyl terminus may be responsible for beta1AR desensitization.

G-protein coupled receptor kinases as modulators of G-protein signalling

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise one of the largest classes of signalling molecules. A wide diversity of activating ligands induce the active conformation of GPCRs and lead to signalling via heterotrimeric G-proteins and downstream effectors. In addition, a complex series of reactions participate in the 'turn-off' of GPCRs in both physiological and pharmacological settings. Some key players in the inactivation or 'desensitization' of GPCRs have been identified, whereas others remain the target of ongoing studies. G-protein coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) specifically phosphorylate activated GPCRs and initiate homologous desensitization. Uncoupling proteins, such as members of the arrestin family, bind to the phosphorylated and activated GPCRs and cause desensitization by precluding further interactions of the GPCRs and G-proteins. Adaptor proteins, including arrestins, and endocytic machinery participate in the internalization of GPCRs away from their normal signalling milieu. In this review we discuss the roles of these regulatory molecules as modulators of GPCR signalling.

Enhanced expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 selectively increases the sensitivity of A2A adenosine receptors to agonist-induced desensitization

1. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are thought to be important in mediating the agonist-induced phosphorylation and consequent desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) responses. We have previously shown that stable expression of a dominant negative mutant G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) construct in NG108-15 mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma cells suppresses the agonist-induced desensitization of A2A and A2B adenosine receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (Mundell et al., 1997). To further determine the role of GRK2 in agonist-induced desensitization of these adenosine receptors, we stably overexpressed wild type GRK2 in NG108-15 cells. 2. In homogenates prepared from cells overexpressing GRK2, the acute stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by activation of A2A and A2B adenosine receptors was markedly reduced, but could be reversed by pretreating the cells with AD (adenosine deaminase), to remove extracellular adenosine from the medium. On the other hand, acute stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by secretin, iloprost, NaF and forskolin was the same in GRK2 overexpressing cells and plasmid-transfected control cells. 3. Cells overexpressing GRK2 were more sensitive to adenosine receptor agonist-induced desensitization than plasmid-transfected control cells. This effect was selective since the agonist sensitivity of desensitization for secretin and IP-prostanoid receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was not affected by GRK2 overexpression. 4. These results further implicate GRK2 as the likely mechanism by which A2 adenosine receptors undergo short-term desensitization in NG108-15 cells, and indicate that even when overexpressed, GRK2 retains its substrate specificity for native receptors in intact cells. Furthermore, the susceptibility of GPCRs to desensitization appears to depend on the level of GRK expression, such that in cells that express high levels of GRK2, low agonist concentrations may be sufficient to trigger GRK-mediated desensitization.

Evidence for co-expression and desensitization of A2a and A2b adenosine receptors in NG108-15 cells

Using receptor-selective agonists and antagonists, the possible presence of both A2a and A2b adenosine receptor subtypes coupled to activation of adenylyl cyclase was investigated in NG108-15 neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid cells. The relatively non-selective adenosine receptor agonist 5'-(N-ethyl carboxamido)-adenosine (NECA; 1 nM-300 microM) produced a biphasic increase in adenylyl cyclase activity in cell homogenates, best fitted to two components with high (EC50 0.7 microM) and low (EC50 16.0 microM) potency, respectively. The selective adenosine A2a receptor agonist CGS-21680 (1 nM-300 microM) also produced a biphasic increase in adenylyl cyclase. The NECA-dependent increase in adenylyl cyclase activity was almost completely inhibited by the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist xanthine amine congener (XAC; 30 microM), but only partially inhibited by the selective A2a adenosine antagonist 8-(3-chlorostyryl)caffeine (CSC; 1 microM). Experiments were also performed to investigate the time course of NECA-induced desensitization of putative A2a and A2b receptor responses. The A2a-response was quantified using 10 microM CGS-21680, whilst the A2b response was quantified using 100 microM NECA in the presence of 1 microM CSC. The t0.5 for desensitization for each subtype was found to be around 20 min. Neither activation (with dibutyryl cAMP; 1 mM) nor inhibition (with H-89; 10 microM) of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase altered the ability of NECA pretreatment to desensitize A2a or A2b receptor-activated adenylyl cyclase. However zinc (200 microM), an inhibitor of G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), significantly reversed the agonist-induced desensitization of A2a and A2b receptor-activated adenylyl cyclase. These experiments suggest the co-existence of A2a and A2b receptors coupled in a stimulatory fashion to adenylyl cyclase in NG108-15 cells. Furthermore desensitization of A2a and A2b responses occurs at the same rate and may involve a G-protein-coupled receptor kinase.

Carboxyl terminus of delta opioid receptor is required for agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation

The wild-type delta opioid receptor (DOR) and a carboxyl terminus-truncated mutant DOR lacking the last 31 amino acids (DOR-T) were expressed in neuroblastoma x glioma hybrid NG108-15 cells to investigate the role of the carboxyl terminus of DOR in agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation. Stimulation of the cells with delta specific agonists significantly induced DOR phosphorylation whereas no phosphorylation of DOR-T was detected under the same conditions. Neither overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2 or GRK5) nor activation of protein kinase C promoted agonist-induced phosphorylation of DOR-T, in contrast to their strong stimulatory effect on the agonist-dependent phosphorylation of DOR. Furthermore, DOR-T failed to be internalized after agonist stimulation, probably due to its inability to be phosphorylated. Our results indicate that the carboxyl terminus of DOR is required for agonist-dependent receptor phosphorylation and the phosphorylation site(s) of DOR is likely located at its carboxyl terminus.