Birth and early developmental screening outcomes associated with cannabis exposure during pregnancy

The Impact of Self-Reported Alcohol, Tobacco, and Recreational Drug Use during Pregnancy on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in First-Time Mothers

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to derive profiles of alcohol, tobacco, and recreational drug use during pregnancy for first-time mothers with latent class growth analysis (LCGA) and determine the association of these classes with the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APO).

STUDY DESIGN

A secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of Nulliparous Outcomes in Pregnancy: Monitoring Mothers-to-Be was conducted in eight medical centers across the United States from September 30, 2010, to September 23, 2013. Self-reported use of any alcohol, tobacco, or recreational drugs in the 1 month prior to the visit was assessed at up to four visits throughout pregnancy, and APOs included a composite of preterm birth, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (HDP), small for gestational age (SGA) infant, or stillbirth, and each adverse outcome separately.

RESULTS

Four latent classes were identified from the LCGA for 10,031 nulliparous pregnant women that were on average 26.9 years old (standard deviation [SD] = 5.7) and mostly non-Hispanic White (59.7%). Classes included consistent tobacco users (N = 517, 5.2%), nonusers (N = 8,945, 89.2%), alcohol users (N = 500, 5.0%), and a combination of alcohol/tobacco/drug users (N = 69, 0.7%). Logistic regression demonstrated that the class of tobacco users was more likely to have an APO (odds ratio [OR] = 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.22-1.81), preterm birth (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.15-2.02), and SGA (OR = 1.79, 95% CI = 1.36-2.35) relative to the class of nonusers. The class of alcohol users was more likely to have HDP (OR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.11-1.70) and less likely to have preterm birth (OR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.38-0.90) and SGA (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.40-0.93) compared to nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Trajectories of substance use are associated with APOs; thus, interventions to mitigate the use when encountered early in pregnancy are warranted.

KEY POINTS

· Four classes of substance use were identified.. · Tobacco users were at a higher risk of APO and alcohol users were at higher risk of HDP.. · Mitigation strategies are warranted to reduce APO..

Exploring the Relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and Mental Health in Low Birthweight Children

Low birthweight is associated with poor health, developmental, and social outcomes throughout the lifespan. Exposure to adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) is also associated with negative mental and physical health outcomes in adulthood. The aims of this study were to explore the relationship between low birthweight (LBW), exposure to ACES, and subsequent utilization of mental health service. Data analysis was conducted using a subset of data from children ages 6-17 years from the National Survey of Children's Health (NSCH) for 2018-2019 (n = 40,656). Welch ANOVA, Pearson's chi-square, and logistic regression investigated the relationship between LBW, ACEs, and mental health. LBW children in this sample had higher exposure to ACEs when compared to not low birthweight (NBW) children. LBW children also had a higher reported incidence of identified mental health (MH) issues. There was no significant association between birthweight and unmet MH service needs. LBW children with an ACE score or two or more were more likely to have an unidentified MH issue and/or an unmet MH service need. The results demonstrate LBW children experience higher levels of adversity. Children with ACE scores of two or more and those with unidentified MH issues have a higher likelihood of unmet MH needs. Professionals working in the health, education, and social service sectors can use this information to raise awareness of the increased vulnerability and more effectively meet the mental health needs of LBW children.

Are Health Care Providers Caring for Pregnant and Postpartum Women Ready to Confront the Perinatal Cannabis Use Challenge?

OBJECTIVE

 The purpose of this study was to assess health care providers' knowledge and practices related to cannabis use among pregnant and postpartum women.

STUDY DESIGN

 A survey of health care providers (n = 75 responders) was conducted across four main regions in the state of Virginia to assess knowledge of adverse health effects associated with perinatal cannabis use, screening tools, follow-up for positive screening, barriers to having discussions about cannabis use, and treatment among pregnant and postpartum women.

RESULTS

 An astonishing 34.7% of the providers surveyed responded as not being aware of the impacts of cannabis use on the health of the mother and infant, and 66.7% of them reported that they would like some training on feeling comfortable with their knowledge about the impact of perinatal cannabis use on the population they are serving. When asked about providing resources and/or patient education related to cannabis use during pregnancy and/or breastfeeding, 62.7% reported they did not but they would be interested in providing both resources and education. Over one-third of the providers did not have a follow-up process for positive screening. In addition, numerous barriers to asking/screening and/or discussing cannabis use and potential harm reduction methods for the pregnant and postpartum populations emerged such as inadequate or lack of resources for positive screening, lack of knowledge on the topic, unsure about the policies of reporting a positive screening, etc. CONCLUSION:  The findings of this study indicate that health care providers caring for pregnant and postpartum women are not equipped to make appropriate recommendations to patients and guide them through decision-making. Health care providers caring for pregnant and postpartum women need to be knowledgeable on how to best support patients with cannabis use for effective counseling and guidance due to health risks. State policies and resources are needed to ensure training for clinicians on perinatal cannabis.

KEY POINTS

· Providers are not knowledgeable about perinatal cannabis.. · Providers lack resources and do not have a follow-up process.. · Providers would like to receive training on the impact of perinatal cannabis on health outcomes..

Reduced fetal cerebral blood flow predicts perinatal mortality in a mouse model of prenatal alcohol and cannabinoid exposure

BACKGROUND

Children exposed prenatally to alcohol or cannabinoids individually can exhibit growth deficits and increased risk for adverse birth outcomes. However, these drugs are often co-consumed and their combined effects on early brain development are virtually unknown. The blood vessels of the fetal brain emerge and mature during the neurogenic period to support nutritional needs of the rapidly growing brain, and teratogenic exposure during this gestational window may therefore impair fetal cerebrovascular development.

STUDY DESIGN

To determine whether prenatal polysubstance exposure confers additional risk for impaired fetal-directed blood flow, we performed high resolution in vivo ultrasound imaging in C57Bl/6J pregnant mice. After pregnancy confirmation, dams were randomly assigned to one of four groups: drug-free control, alcohol-exposed, cannabinoid-exposed or alcohol-and-cannabinoid-exposed. Drug exposure occurred daily between Gestational Days 12-15, equivalent to the transition between the first and second trimesters in humans. Dams first received an intraperitoneal injection of either cannabinoid agonist CP-55,940 (750 µg/kg) or volume-equivalent vehicle. Then, dams were placed in vapor chambers for 30 min of inhalation of either ethanol or room air. Dams underwent ultrasound imaging on three days of pregnancy: Gestational Day 11 (pre-exposure), Gestational Day 13.5 (peri-exposure) and Gestational Day 16 (post-exposure).

RESULTS

All drug exposures decreased fetal cranial blood flow 24-hours after the final exposure episode, though combined alcohol and cannabinoid co-exposure reduced internal carotid artery blood flow relative to all other exposures. Umbilical artery metrics were not affected by drug exposure, indicating a specific vulnerability of fetal cranial circulation. Cannabinoid exposure significantly reduced cerebroplacental ratios, mirroring prior findings in cannabis-exposed human fetuses. Post-exposure cerebroplacental ratios significantly predicted subsequent perinatal mortality (p = 0.019, area under the curve, 0.772; sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 85.70%) and retroactively diagnosed prior drug exposure (p = 0.005; AUC, 0.861; sensitivity, 86.40%; specificity, 66.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Fetal cerebrovasculature is significantly impaired by exposure to alcohol or cannabinoids, and co-exposure confers additional risk for adverse birth outcomes. Considering the rising potency and global availability of cannabis products, there is an imperative for research to explore translational models of prenatal drug exposure, including polysubstance models, to inform appropriate strategies for treatment and care in pregnancies affected by drug exposure.

Cannabis Use in Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: To determine whether prenatal cannabis use alone increases the likelihood of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Study Design: We searched bibliographic databases, such as PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane reviews, PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Google Scholar from inception through February 14, 2022. Cohort or case-control studies with prespecified fetal or neonatal outcomes in pregnancies with prenatal cannabis use. Primary outcomes were preterm birth (PTB; <37 weeks of gestation), small-for-gestational-age (SGA), birthweight (grams), and perinatal mortality. Two independent reviewers screened studies. Studies were extracted by one reviewer and confirmed by a second using a predefined template. Risk of bias assessment of studies, using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation for evaluating the certainty of evidence for select outcomes were performed by two independent reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted, using adjusted and unadjusted effect estimates, to compare groups according to prenatal exposure to cannabis use status. Results: Fifty-three studies were included. Except for birthweight, unadjusted and adjusted meta-analyses had similar results. We found very-low- to low-certainty evidence that cannabis use during pregnancy was significantly associated with greater odds of PTB (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19 to 1.69; I2, 93%; p=0.0001), SGA (aOR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.05; I2, 86%; p<0.0001), and perinatal mortality (aOR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.39 to 1.62; I2, 0%; p<0.0001), but not significantly different for birthweight (mean difference, -40.69 g; 95% CI, -124.22 to 42.83; I2, 85%; p=0.29). Because of substantial heterogeneity, we also conducted a narrative synthesis and found comparable results to meta-analyses. Conclusion: Prenatal cannabis use was associated with greater odds of PTB, SGA, and perinatal mortality even after accounting for prenatal tobacco use. However, our confidence in these findings is limited. Limitations of most existing studies was the failure to not include timing or quantity of cannabis use. This review can help guide health care providers with counseling, management, and addressing the limited existing safety data. Protocol Registration: PROSPERO CRD42020172343.

Vaporized Δ9-THC in utero results in reduced birthweight, increased locomotion, and altered wake-cycle activity dependent on dose, sex, and diet in the offspring

AIMS

Preclinical studies have found that chronic ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) treatment is directly associated with weight gain when introduced during adolescence and adulthood, but the effect of prenatal THC is unclear. Clinical studies have demonstrated prenatal exposure to THC is a prospective predictor of increased health risks associated with obesity. Our study aims to examine prenatal THC impact on obesity risks in males and females throughout adolescence using a clinically relevant inhalation model.

METHODS

Pregnant rats were exposed to one of the following from gestational day 2 through birth: 10 mg THC, 40 mg THC, or air. Daily 10-min inhalations were conducted in each animal from 0900 to 1200. Offspring from each treatment group were given either a high-fat diet (HFD) or a normal diet (ND). Food and bodyweights were collected daily, while circadian activity, locomotion, and exercise were measured periodically (PND 21-60). Pregnancy weight gain and birth weight were collected to determine early-life developmental effects.

RESULTS

Rats prenatally treated with low-dose THC (LDTHC) generally had lower dark-cycle activity compared with control counterparts, but this altered activity was not observed at the higher dose of THC (HDTHC). In terms of open-field activity, THC doses displayed a general increase in locomotion. In addition, the LDTHC male rats in the ND showed significantly greater exploratory behavior. Prenatal THC had dose-dependent effects on maternal weight gain and birth weight.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings indicate there are some activity-related and developmental effects of prenatal THC, which may be related to obesity risks later in life.

The association between prenatal cannabis use and congenital birth defects in offspring: A cumulative meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between prenatal cannabis use and structural birth defects in exposed offspring.

METHODS

In line with the preregistered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD42022368623), we systematically searched PubMed/Medline, CINHAL, EMBASE, Web of Science, ProQuest, Psych-Info, and Google Scholar for published articles until 25 January 2024. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised by the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). A meta-analysis was carried out to report the pooled effect estimates from the included studies. We further performed subgroup, leave-one-out sensitivity, and meta-regression analyses, which increased the robustness of our findings.

RESULTS

In this cumulative meta-analysis, thirty-six observational studies, consisting of 18 case-control and 18 cohort studies, with 230, 816 cases of birth defects and 18,049,013 controls (healthy babies) were included in the final analysis. We found that offspring exposed to maternal prenatal cannabis are at greater risks of a wide range of structural birth defects: cardiovascular/heart [OR = 2.35: 95 % CI 1.63 - 3.39], gastrointestinal [OR = 2.42: 95 % CI 1.61 - 3.64], central nervous system [OR = 2.87: 95 % CI 1.51 - 5.46], genitourinary [OR = 2.39: 95 % CI 1.11 - 5.17], and any (unclassified) birth defects [OR = 1.25: 95 % CI 1.12 - 1.41].

CONCLUSION

The findings from the current study suggest that maternal prenatal cannabis exposure is associated with a higher risk of different forms of structural birth defects in offspring. The findings underscore the significance of implementing preventive strategies, including enhanced preconception counselling, to address cannabis use during pregnancy and mitigate the risk of birth defects in offspring.

Prenatal Exposure to Cannabis: Effects on Childhood Obesity and Cardiometabolic Health

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To consolidate information on the obesogenic and cardiometabolic effects of prenatal exposure to cannabis.

RECENT FINDINGS

A PubMed search strategy updated from January 1, 2014, through 14 June 2023, produced a total of 47 epidemiologic studies and 12 animal studies. Prenatal exposure to cannabis is consistently associated with small for gestational age and low birth weight. After birth, these offspring gain weight rapidly and have increased adiposity and higher glucose (fat mass percentage) in childhood. More preclinical and prospective studies are needed to deepen our understanding of whether these associations vary by sex, dose, timing, and composition of cannabis (e.g., ratio of delta-Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol [Δ9-THC] to cannabidiol [CBD]). Addressing these gaps may help to solidify causality and identify intervention strategies. Based on the available data, clinicians and public health officials should continue to caution against cannabis use during pregnancy to limit its potential obesogenic and adverse cardiometabolic effects on the offspring.

Birth, cognitive and behavioral effects of intrauterine cannabis exposure in infants and children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the principal psychoactive component of cannabis, has been implicated in affecting fetal neurodevelopment by readily crossing the placenta. However, little is known regarding the long-term effects of intrauterine cannabis exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized prospective and cross-sectional human studies to measure the effects of intrauterine cannabis exposure on birth, behavioral, psychological and cognitive outcomes in infancy until early childhood.

METHODS

Reporting according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, cross-sectional and prospective studies published from database inception until June 2023, investigating developmental outcomes of infants, toddlers and young children with intrauterine cannabis exposure were considered. All articles were obtained from PubMed or PsycINFO databases.

RESULTS

The literature search resulted in 932 studies, in which 57 articles met eligibility criteria. The meta-analysis revealed that intrauterine cannabis exposure increases the risk of preterm delivery [odds ratio (OR) = 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-2.71, P = 0.03], low birth weight (OR = 2.60, CI = 1.71-3.94, P < 0.001) and requirement for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (OR = 2.51, CI = 1.46-4.31; P < 0.001). Our qualitative synthesis suggests that intrauterine cannabis exposure may be associated with poorer attention and externalizing problems in infancy and early childhood. We found no evidence for impairments in other cognitive domains or internalizing behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal cannabis use appears to be associated with lower birth weight, preterm birth and neonatal intensive care unit admission in newborns, but there is little evidence that prenatal cannabis exposure adversely impacts behavioral or cognitive outcomes in early childhood, with the exception of attention and externalizing problems.

The Effects of Cannabis Use during Pregnancy on Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to summarize the literature regarding the effects of cannabis use during pregnancy on low birth weight (LBW), preterm birth (PTB), and small for gestational age (SGA).

STUDY DESIGN

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, EBSCO, and Web of Science in May 2021 and updated in November 2021. Only studies that assessed the isolated use of cannabis during pregnancy, controlling for cigarette smoking, and other illicit drug use were included. Data were synthesized using a narrative summary and pooled adjusted estimates, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each outcome. Data were analyzed using Stata 13.0 with METAN software package, using random effects. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q and Higgins I2 tests.

RESULTS

In total, 32 studies were included with data from approximately 5.5 million women with the LBW outcome and 23 million with the PTB and SGA outcomes. Pregnant women using cannabis are at increased risk for LBW (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.52; 95% CI = [1.18; 1.96]), PTB (aOR = 1.39; 95% CI = [1.28; 1.51]), and SGA (aOR = 1.47; 95% CI = [1.38; 1.58]). Studies that assessed the type of PTB and gestational age at birth indicate higher risks of spontaneous PTB and of early or very-early PTBs associated with cannabis use during pregnancy. The few studies that assessed the timing and frequency of consumption suggest a dose-response effect, with higher odds of negative outcomes among women who reported heavy use and with continued use during the second and third trimesters of gestation.

CONCLUSION

There is an effect of cannabis irrespective of other illicit drugs and tobacco despite high heterogeneity and low quality of evidence. There is a need to discuss public policies regarding cannabis' regulation and how it influences its consumption. Future studies should focus on the effects of cannabis's type (medicinal or recreational), timing, and dosage during pregnancy on perinatal outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· Cannabis use during pregnancy is increasing.. · Cannabis has an independent effect on PTB, LBW, and SGA.. · Future studies should focus on the timing of exposure during pregnancy, mode of use, and dosage..

Prenatal Exposure to Cannabis and Risk of Major Structural Birth Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review and perform a meta-analysis of observational studies that examined associations between prenatal cannabis exposure and major structural birth defects.

DATA SOURCES

Information sources included Google Scholar, BIOSIS, PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Study titles and abstracts were reviewed with Abstrackr software. We included observational studies that examined the risk of major structural birth defects in people who used cannabis during pregnancy compared with those who had not used cannabis. We excluded case reports, ecologic studies, conference abstracts, manuscript preprints, studies designed to examine effects of cannabis used concurrently with other drugs, and studies that included synthetic cannabinoids. This process yielded 23 studies that analyzed data from birth years 1968-2021.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We clustered and meta-analyzed measures of association for birth defects by anatomic group. Eleven articles reported an association between cannabis use and the risk of a nonspecific outcome (eg, congenital anomaly). We estimated a pooled odds ratio of 1.33 (95% CI 1.14-1.56) and a pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.22 (95% CI 1.00-1.50). Anatomic groups examined were cardiac (nine studies), oral cleft (three studies), digestive (four studies), genitourinary (three studies), musculoskeletal (seven studies), and nervous system (five studies). Across most outcomes, we reported positive pooled unadjusted associations that were usually attenuated after the inclusion of only adjusted estimates. Two specific anomalies, with limited data, had pooled effect estimates that did not attenuate to the null after adjustment: Ebstein anomaly (two studies, aOR 2.19, 95% CI 1.25-3.82) and gastroschisis (five studies, aOR 2.50, 95% CI 1.09-5.740).

CONCLUSION

Studies examining associations between prenatal exposure to cannabis and major structural birth defects were heterogeneous. Most published effect estimates were unadjusted and scored low on our risk-of-bias assessment. Overall, we found inconsistent evidence to suggest that prenatal cannabis exposure is associated with birth defects. However, findings related to specific anomalies should be considered in further research.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022319041.

Cannabis and Pregnancy: A Review

Importance

Prenatal cannabis use is rising and is a major public health issue. Cannabis use in pregnancy and during lactation has been associated with increased maternal and offspring morbidity and mortality.

Objective

This review aims to summarize the existing literature and current recommendations for cannabis use during pregnancy or lactation.

Evidence Acquisition

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar literature search using the following terms was performed to gather relevant data: "cannabis," "cannabinoid," "delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol," "THC," "cannabidiol," "fetal outcomes," "perinatal outcomes," "pregnancy," and "lactation."

Results

Available studies on cannabis use in pregnancy and during lactation were reviewed and support an association with increased risk of preterm birth, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low birth weight, and small-for-gestational-age infants.

Conclusion and Relevance

There is a critical need for research on the effects of cannabis use in pregnancy and during lactation. This is a necessary first step before furthering patient education, developing interventions, and targeting antenatal surveillance to ameliorate the adverse impacts on maternal and fetal health.

Cannabis use, cannabis use disorder and mental health disorders among pregnant and postpartum women in the US: A nationally representative study

BACKGROUND

Cannabis use and cannabis use disorder (CUD) are associated with mental health disorders, however the extent of this matter among pregnant and recently postpartum (e.g., new moms) women in the US is unknown. Associations between cannabis use, DSM-5 CUD and DSM-5 mental health disorders (mood, anxiety, personality and post-traumatic stress disorders) were examined among a nationally representative sample of pregnant and postpartum women.

METHODS

The 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III was used to examine associations between past-year cannabis use, CUD and mental health disorders. Weighted logistic regression models were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aORs). The sample (N=1316) included 414 pregnant and 902 postpartum women (pregnant in the past year), aged 18-44 years old.

RESULTS

The prevalence of past-year cannabis use and CUD was 9.8% and 3.2%, respectively. The odds of cannabis use (aORs range 2.10-3.87, p-values<0.01) and CUD (aORs range 2.55-10.44, p-values< 0.01) were higher among women with versus without any past-year mood, anxiety or posttraumatic stress disorders or any lifetime personality disorder. aORs for the association of cannabis use with specific mood, anxiety or personality disorders ranged from 1.95 to 6.00 (p-values<0.05). aORs for the association of CUD with specific mood, anxiety or personality disorders ranged from 2.36 to 11.60 (p-values<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

From pregnancy up to one year postpartum is a critical period where women may be particularly vulnerable to mental health disorders, cannabis use and CUD. Treatment and prevention are essential.

A systematic review of in utero cannabis exposure and risk for structural birth defects

Introduction

Cannabis use among pregnant women has increased over time. Therefore, there is a great public health need to understand the consequences of in utero cannabis exposure. While several meta-analyses and reviews have summarized the evidence of in utero cannabis exposure on adverse obstetric outcomes (e.g., low birth weight and preterm birth) and long-term offspring development, there has not been a focus on in utero cannabis exposure and risk for structural birth defects.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review using PRISMA guidelines to evaluate the association between in utero cannabis exposure and structural birth defects.

Results

We identified 20 articles to include in our review and focused on interpreting findings from the 12 that adjusted for potential confounders. We report findings by seven organ systems. Within the 12 articles, four reported on cardiac malformations, three reported on central nervous system malformations, one reported on eye malformations, three reported on gastrointestinal malformations, one reported on genitourinary malformations, one reported on musculoskeletal malformations, and two reported on orofacial malformations.

Discussion

Findings on associations between in utero cannabis exposure and birth defects reported in more than two articles were mixed (i.e., findings for cardiac, gastrointestinal, central nervous system malformations). Findings for associations between in utero cannabis exposure and birth defects reported in two articles (i.e., orofacial malformations) or in a single article (eye, genitourinary, and musculoskeletal) suggested that cannabis exposure was not associated with these types of malformations, but strong conclusions cannot be drawn from such sparce research. We review the limitations and gaps in the existing literature and call for more research to rigorously evaluate associations between in utero cannabis exposure and structural birth defects.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier CRD42022308130.

The effect of prenatal cannabis exposure on offspring preterm birth: a cumulative meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mixed results have been reported on the association between prenatal cannabis exposure and preterm birth. This study aimed to examine the magnitude and consistency of associations reported between prenatal cannabis exposure and preterm birth.

METHODS

This review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. We performed a comprehensive search of the literature on the following electronic databases: PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Psych-INFO and Web of Science. The revised version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to appraise the methodological quality of the studies included in this review. Inverse variance weighted random-effects cumulative meta-analysis was undertaken to pool adjusted odds ratios (aOR) after sequential inclusion of each newly published study over time. The OR and 95% confidence interval (CI) limits required (stability threshold) for a new study to move the cumulative odds ratio to the null were also computed.

RESULTS

A total of 27 observational studies published between 1986 and 2022 were included in the final cumulative meta-analysis. The sample size of the studies ranged from 304 to 4.83 million births. Prenatal cannabis exposure was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (pooled aOR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.24-1.48). The stability threshold was 0.74 (95% CI limit = 0.81) by the end of 2022.

CONCLUSIONS

Offspring exposed to maternal prenatal cannabis use was associated with higher risk of preterm birth, which warrants public health messages to avoid such exposure, particularly during pregnancy.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2023 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The American Heart Association, through its Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update with review of published literature through the year before writing. The 2023 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort in 2022 by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. The American Heart Association strives to further understand and help heal health problems inflicted by structural racism, a public health crisis that can significantly damage physical and mental health and perpetuate disparities in access to health care, education, income, housing, and several other factors vital to healthy lives. This year's edition includes additional COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) publications, as well as data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population, with an enhanced focus on health equity across several key domains.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Effects of Prenatal Cannabinoids Exposure upon Placenta and Development of Respiratory Neural Circuits

Cannabis use has risen dangerously during pregnancy in the face of incipient therapeutic use and a growing perception of safety. The main psychoactive compound of the Cannabis sativa plant is the phytocannabinoid delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (A-9 THC), and its status as a teratogen is controversial. THC and its endogenous analogues, anandamide (AEA) and 2-AG, exert their actions through specific receptors (eCBr) that activate intracellular signaling pathways. CB1r and CB2r, also called classic cannabinoid receptors, together with their endogenous ligands and the enzymes that synthesize and degrade them, constitute the endocannabinoid system. This system is distributed ubiquitously in various central and peripheral tissues. Although the endocannabinoid system's most studied role is controlling the release of neurotransmitters in the central nervous system, the study of long-term exposure to cannabinoids on fetal development is not well known and is vital for understanding environmental or pathological embryo-fetal or postnatal conditions. Prenatal exposure to cannabinoids in animal models has induced changes in placental and embryo-fetal organs. Particularly, cannabinoids could influence both neural and nonneural tissues and induce embryo-fetal pathological conditions in critical processes such as neural respiratory control. This review aims at the acute and chronic effects of prenatal exposure to cannabinoids on placental function and the embryo-fetal neurodevelopment of the respiratory pattern. The information provided here will serve as a theoretical framework to critically evaluate the teratogen effects of the consumption of cannabis during pregnancy.

Substance Exposure and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the independent and combined effects of in utero exposures on birth outcomes in a rural population.

STUDY DESIGN

The study used population-level data (2020-2022) from a state-wide surveillance tool (Working in Appalachia to identify at-risk infants, Critical congenital heart disease, and Hearing loss) in West Virginia. Outcomes included low birth weight, preterm birth, small for gestational age, and birth weight in grams. Exposure included a composite variable with 8 levels of 3 exposure (opioids, stimulants, and cannabis) categories. Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic covariates using multiple logistic and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 34 412 singleton live births, 1 in 8 newborns (12.2%) had in utero exposure(s) to opioids, stimulants, and/or cannabis, 11.5% were preterm, 7.9% had low birthweight, 9.6% were small for gestational age, and mean birth weight was 3249 ± 563.6 g. Preterm birth was associated with stimulant alone exposure (aOR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.03-1.89) and stimulant and cannabis concurrent exposure (aOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.16, 2.47). Low birthweight was associated with opioids alone (aOR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.10, 1.63), cannabis alone (aOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.13 to -1.52), opioid and cannabis (aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.12 to -2.31), and opioids, stimulants, and cannabis concurrent exposures (aOR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.43-3.61). Five exposure categories were associated with lower birth weights (adjusted mean difference range. -72 to -211 g). Small for gestational age was associated with opioids alone (aOR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.24-1.78), cannabis alone (aOR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69), and opioids and cannabis concurrent exposures (aOR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.36-2.67).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed complex associations between in utero substance exposures, preterm birth, birth weight, and sociodemographic factors in a rural population. The results may inform policy efforts to improve maternal and child health in socioeconomically disadvantaged and underserved rural populations.

Reasons Washington State Women Use Marijuana During Pregnancy/Breastfeeding, Their Trusted Information Sources, and Communication Strategies for Informed Decision-Making

OBJECTIVE

To understand reproductive-aged women's marijuana use beliefs and attitudes.

METHODS

Qualitative research (10 focus groups and 2 bulletin boards) with 95 Washington State women, aged 18 to 44 years, segmented by marijuana-using pregnant/breastfeeding; marijuana-using not-pregnant/breastfeeding; and nonmarijuana users. Participants completed up to 10 survey questions. We used deductive and inductive coding to analyze findings.

RESULTS

Marijuana-using pregnant/breastfeeding participants use marijuana to manage physical/mental pain and because of stigma, feel guilty, and sometimes hide use. Medicines have failed to address symptoms. Participants perceived marijuana safer than alcohol, tobacco, and illicit substances. Participants believed in the legitimacy of marijuana for health maintenance and want others to take their personally experienced benefits seriously. Participants interpreted lack of conclusive research as marijuana use not being unsafe. They want more information. All segments preferred hearing from other women about marijuana use experiences, with the marijuana-using pregnant/breastfeeding segment feeling strongest about this.

CONCLUSIONS

Personal experiences with, and anecdotes from family/friends about, the effects of marijuana use during pregnancy/breastfeeding influence marijuana-using participants' decision making.

NURSING IMPLICATIONS

It is important to speak with perinatal patients in a nonjudgmental/nonthreatening manner that acknowledges why reproductive-aged women may use marijuana and that conveys validation of patients' positive experiences with marijuana and a harm-reduction goal.

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2022 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

The American Heart Association, in conjunction with the National Institutes of Health, annually reports the most up-to-date statistics related to heart disease, stroke, and cardiovascular risk factors, including core health behaviors (smoking, physical activity, diet, and weight) and health factors (cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose control) that contribute to cardiovascular health. The Statistical Update presents the latest data on a range of major clinical heart and circulatory disease conditions (including stroke, congenital heart disease, rhythm disorders, subclinical atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, heart failure, valvular disease, venous disease, and peripheral artery disease) and the associated outcomes (including quality of care, procedures, and economic costs).

METHODS

The American Heart Association, through its Statistics Committee, continuously monitors and evaluates sources of data on heart disease and stroke in the United States to provide the most current information available in the annual Statistical Update. The 2022 Statistical Update is the product of a full year's worth of effort by dedicated volunteer clinicians and scientists, committed government professionals, and American Heart Association staff members. This year's edition includes data on the monitoring and benefits of cardiovascular health in the population and an enhanced focus on social determinants of health, adverse pregnancy outcomes, vascular contributions to brain health, and the global burden of cardiovascular disease and healthy life expectancy.

RESULTS

Each of the chapters in the Statistical Update focuses on a different topic related to heart disease and stroke statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The Statistical Update represents a critical resource for the lay public, policymakers, media professionals, clinicians, health care administrators, researchers, health advocates, and others seeking the best available data on these factors and conditions.

Marijuana use in Pregnant Women with Disabilities in the United States

OBJECTIVES

While perinatal marijuana use is increasing, limited research exists related to its use during pregnancy among vulnerable subpopulations of women with disabilities. The purpose of this study is to assess marijuana use in pregnant U.S. women with disabilities.

METHODS

The analytic sample using 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) data included 3657 pregnant women. Descriptive statistics were performed and adjusted logistic regression models estimated the size and direction of the association between the type of disability and marijuana use.

RESULTS

Approximately 13.0% of pregnant women with disabilities used marijuana in the past month, which was higher than pregnant women without disabilities (4.4%). The highest prevalence of past month marijuana use was observed among pregnant women with sensory disabilities (17.2%) followed by women with cognitive disabilities (14.6%) and daily living limitations (11.7%). Marijuana use was also associated with younger age (≤ 25 years old), Black non-Hispanic, high school education or less, non-married, and past month alcohol/tobacco use. Overall, pregnant women with any disability, and particularly those with sensory disabilities (AOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.21, 4.47), were significantly more likely (AOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.02, 2.69) to use marijuana than their counterparts without disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

The higher prevalence of marijuana use among pregnant women with disabilities in this study supports the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommendations for universal screening of maternal substance use. Screening for marijuana use in vulnerable populations is crucial and it may require training of health care providers to administer such screenings to women with disabilities.

Adverse childhood experiences and marijuana use during pregnancy: Findings from the North Dakota and South Dakota PRAMS, 2017-2019

BACKGROUND

Emerging research suggests that adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may be a risk factor for prenatal marijuana use. This study is the first to use a representative sample from state surveillance systems to assess the connection between accumulating ACEs and marijuana use during pregnancy.

METHODS

Data are from the North Dakota and South Dakota Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) from years 2017-2019 (N = 5399). The bivariate association between number of ACEs and marijuana use during pregnancy is assessed using a chi-square test. The multivariable association is assessed using linear probability modeling.

RESULTS

Only 0.9% of women with zero ACEs reported marijuana use during pregnancy, compared to 11.7% of women with four or more ACEs. Findings from linear probability models showed that mothers reporting two ACEs (b =0.023, 95% CI =0.003,.043), three ACEs (b =0.042, 95% CI =0.014,.069), and four or more ACEs (b =0.053, 95% CI =0.035,.071) are more likely to report marijuana use during pregnancy relative to those with zero ACEs, net of demographic and socioeconomic control variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Accumulating maternal ACEs -especially four or more- is associated with increased likelihood of using marijuana during pregnancy. These findings demonstrate the early life trauma is a key social determinant of health over the life course and highlights how ACEs can contribute to intergenerational harm via the worsening of health behaviors during pregnancy.

Congenital anomaly epidemiological correlates of Δ8THC across USA 2003-16: panel regression and causal inferential study

Δ8-Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8THC) is marketed in many US states as 'legal weed'. Concerns exist relating to class-wide genotoxic cannabinoid effects. We conducted an epidemiological investigation of Δ8THC-related genotoxicity expressed as 57 congenital anomaly (CA) rates (CARs) in the USA. CARs were taken from the Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia. Drug exposure data were taken from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health, with a response rate of 74.1%. Ethnicity and income data were taken from the US Census Bureau. National cannabinoid exposure was taken from Drug Enforcement Agency publications and multiplied by state cannabis use data to derive state-based estimates of Δ8THC exposure. At bivariate continuous analysis, Δ8THC was associated with 23 CAs on raw CA rates, 33 CARs after correction for early termination for anomaly estimates and 41 on a categorical analysis comparing the highest and lowest exposure quintiles. At inverse probability weighted multivariable additive and interactive models lagged to 0, 2 and 4 years, Δ8THC was linked with 39, 8, 4 and 9 CAs. Chromosomal, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, limb, central nervous system (CNS) and face systems were particularly affected. The minimum E-values ranged to infinity. Both the number of anomalies implicated and the effect sizes demonstrated were much greater for Δ8THC than for tobacco and alcohol combined. Δ8THC appears epidemiologically to be more strongly associated with many CAs than for tobacco and alcohol and is consistent with a cannabinoid class genotoxic/epigenotoxic effect. Quantitative causality criteria were fulfilled, and causal relationships either for Δ8THC or for cannabinoid/s, for which it is a surrogate marker, may be in operation.

The associations between prenatal cannabis use disorder and neonatal outcomes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) during pregnancy has increased dramatically in the United States (US). This study examined the associations between prenatal CUD and adverse neonatal outcomes and heterogeneities in the associations by mothers' tobacco use status and race/ethnicity.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

California, USA.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 4.83 million mothers who delivered a live singleton birth during 2001 to 2012 and their paired infants. Data were obtained from mother-infant linked hospital discharge records and birth and death certificates. Identified by ICD-9 codes recorded at delivery, 20 237 mothers had prenatal CUD.

MEASUREMENTS

Neonatal outcomes included length of gestation, preterm birth, birth weight, admission into neonatal intensive care unit, hospitalization within 1 year of birth, and death within 1 year of birth. Propensity score matching was used to balance maternal, paternal, and infant characteristics in the comparisons between infants exposed and unexposed to prenatal CUD.

FINDINGS

CUD increased from 2.8 to 6.9 per 1000 deliveries during 2001 to 2012. Multivariable regressions in matched samples estimated that prenatal CUD was associated with greater odds of being small for gestational age (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.08, 1.18), preterm birth (OR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.01, 1.12), low birth weight (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.07, 1.20), and death within 1 year of birth (OR = 1.35, 95% CI = 1.12, 1.62). Compared with infants whose mothers were tobacco non-users, infants whose mothers were tobacco users had greater odds of preterm birth, low birth weight, hospitalization, and death in association with prenatal CUD. Compared with infants whose mothers were non-Hispanic White, infants whose mothers were Hispanic had greater odds of hospitalization and death and infants whose mothers were non-Hispanic Black had greater odds of being small for gestational age in association with prenatal CUD.

CONCLUSION

Prenatal cannabis use disorder appears to be associated with escalated odds of major adverse neonatal outcomes, with heterogeneities in the associations by mothers' tobacco use status and race/ethnicity.

Marijuana Use Among Women of Reproductive Age With Disabilities

INTRODUCTION

Despite the increasing prevalence and potential adverse health outcomes associated with marijuana use, limited research exists related to its use in women of reproductive age with disabilities. The purpose of this study is to examine the past-month marijuana use in women of reproductive age with disabilities.

METHODS

Data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health included 76,765 women of reproductive age (18-44 years). Descriptive statistics and adjusted logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the associations between past-month marijuana use and overall disability, including the type of disability.

RESULTS

In this sample, 12.6% of women reported past-month marijuana use. Approximately, 21% of women with disabilities reported past-month marijuana use, compared with only 11.1% of women without a disability. Marijuana use was more prevalent in women with disabilities who were younger (aged ≤25 years), who were non-Hispanic White, who were nonmarried, who had at least some college education, and who used alcohol or tobacco. Women with disabilities had 1.68 (95% CI=1.57, 1.80) higher odds of reporting past-month marijuana use than those with no disabilities. The odds of past-month marijuana use were higher among those with cognitive (AOR=1.78, 95% CI=1.64, 1.94), sensory (AOR=1.30, 95% CI=1.12, 1.51), and daily activities-related (AOR=1.64, 95% CI=1.49, 1.80) disabilities than among their counterparts without disabilities.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found an increased prevalence of past-month marijuana use among women of reproductive age with disabilities. Enhanced screening and counseling using evidence-based practices during routine care for women with disabilities may be necessary to mitigate marijuana use.

Pregnant people's experiences discussing their cannabis use with prenatal care providers in a state with legalized cannabis

BACKGROUND

As cannabis legalization spreads, so do concerns about potential harms from use during pregnancy. Legalization may facilitate improved patient-provider interactions about cannabis use. Yet little is known about pregnant people's discussions of cannabis use with healthcare providers in an environment where recreational cannabis is legal.

METHODS

In May-August 2019, we conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 33 pregnant or postpartum people in California who used cannabis during pregnancy, and explored their discussions with healthcare providers about their cannabis use. We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews, and conducted thematic analysis using inductive and deductive methods.

RESULTS

Participants were diverse by age, race/ethnicity, and socio-economic position. Most reported daily cannabis use, both before and during pregnancy. Most participants did not disclose their cannabis use to their prenatal care providers, due to fears of being reported to child protective services (CPS), or fears of provider judgment. Participants reported that few providers initiated any discussions about cannabis use in pregnancy with them; some participants interpreted this omission as tacit endorsement of cannabis use in pregnancy. When participants and providers did discuss cannabis use in pregnancy, participants heard a wide range of sometimes-conflicting health messages, as well as some legal threats.

CONCLUSIONS

This study documents notable deficits in patient-provider interactions about cannabis. Pregnant patients' fears of being reported to CPS and separated from their children for cannabis use persist despite cannabis legalization. Providers' role as potential reporters to CPS appears to pose a significant barrier to comprehensive, compassionate counseling and education on cannabis use in pregnancy.

Maternal Exposure and Neonatal Effects of Drugs of Abuse

The public health crisis of pregnant women being exposed to drugs of abuse and of its impact on their unborn children continues to grow at an alarming rate globally. The state of pregnancy is unique, with physiological changes that can lead to changes in the way drugs are handled by the body in both pharmacokinetics and response. These changes place the pregnant woman, fetus, and newborn infant at risk, as many of these drugs can cross the placenta and into breast milk. The substances most commonly linked to harmful effects include alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, stimulants, and opioids. The pharmacological and toxicological changes caused by in utero exposure or breastfeeding exposure are difficult to study, and the full extent of the mechanisms involved are not fully understood. However, these changes can significantly affect the risks of substance abuse and influence optimal treatment of pregnant women with a substance use disorder. In addition, newborns who were exposed to drugs of abuse in utero can experience withdrawal syndromes. Pharmacological management in infants is used to guide and treat withdrawal symptoms, with the goal being to improve the infant's sleep, eating, and comfort. Several barriers may prevent pregnant women from seeking help for substance use, including stigma and interactions with the legal system. Understanding changes in pharmacology, including pharmacokinetic changes that happen during pregnancy, is essential for anticipating the extent of maternal exposure and neonatal adverse effects.

Marijuana Use during Pregnancy and Lactation and Long-term Outcomes

Recent surveys have shown increased use of marijuana during the perinatal period, possibly linked to increased legalization in many countries. Available information on the association between marijuana exposure and the effects on growth and development, as well as brain structure and function of the fetus, is growing but has not been uniform. Interpretation of these data is often challenging because of the influence of confounding factors and the sociodemographic variabilities in the study subjects. In this review, we present a synthesis of current information on the epidemiology and effects of marijuana use during pregnancy and evaluate the evidence for the immediate and long-term effects on affected neonates. We also describe the current knowledge and implications of breastfeeding and marijuana use and summarize selected current references about this practice. Finally, we provide the rationale for additional biological and population-based investigations to determine the various fetal outcomes of in-utero marijuana exposure that may assist in the establishment of prevention measures and applicable public health policies in the future.

Frequency of cannabis use during pregnancy and adverse infant outcomes, by cigarette smoking status - 8 PRAMS states, 2017

BACKGROUND

Research on prenatal cannabis use and adverse infant outcomes is inconsistent, and findings vary by frequency of use or cigarette use. We assess (1) the prevalence of high frequency (≥once/week), low frequency (

METHODS

Cross-sectional data from 8 states' 2017 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (n = 5548) were analyzed. We calculated adjusted prevalence ratios (aPR) between cannabis use frequency and infant outcomes with Modified Poisson regression.

RESULTS

Approximately 1.7 % and 2.6 % of women reported low and high frequency prenatal cannabis use, respectively. Prevalence of use was higher among women with small-for-gestational age (SGA) (10.2 %) and low birthweight (9.7 %) deliveries, and cigarette use during pregnancy (21.2 %). Among cigarette smokers (aPR: 1.8; 95 % CI: 1.1-3.0) and non-smokers (aPR: 2.1; 95 % CI: 1.1-3.9), high frequency cannabis use doubled the risk of low birthweight delivery but did not increase preterm or SGA risk. Regardless of cigarette use, low frequency cannabis use did not significantly increase infant outcome risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Prenatal cannabis use was more common among women who smoked cigarettes during pregnancy. High frequency cannabis use was associated with low birthweight delivery, regardless of cigarette use. Healthcare providers can implement recommended substance use screening and provide evidence-based counseling and cessation services to help pregnant women avoid tobacco and cannabis use.

Collapse

Key Words

• Cannabis
• Low birthweight
• Maternal
• Prenatal
• Preterm birth
• Small for gestational age

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adult
• Cannabis
• Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology
• Cross-Sectional Studies
• Female
• Health Behavior
• Humans
• Infant, Newborn
• Infant, Small for Gestational Age
• Marijuana Use/epidemiology
• Pregnancy
• Premature Birth/epidemiology
• Prevalence
• Risk Assessment
• Tobacco Products
• United States/epidemiology
• Young Adult

Collapse

Grants

• CC999999 Intramural CDC HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Sarah C Haight Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Brian A King The Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
Jennifer M Bombard Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
Kelsey C Coy Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, US Department of Energy, United States
Cynthia D Ferré Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
Althea M Grant Office of the Director, Deputy Director for Non-Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; United States Public Health Service, Commissioned Corps, Rockville, MD, United States
Jean Y Ko Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States; United States Public Health Service, Commissioned Corps, Rockville, MD, United States

Collapse

Attitudes about marijuana use, potential risks, and legalization: a single-center survey of pregnant women

OBJECTIVE

There is an association between recreational marijuana use in pregnancy and legalization. As more states legalize marijuana, its use in pregnancy may increase. The objective of this study was to evaluate pregnant women's knowledge and opinions about marijuana use, potential risks, and legalization.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey of pregnant women at a regional perinatal center in New Jersey was performed from January-December 2019. Pregnant subjects were invited to complete a voluntary, anonymous 23-question survey about marijuana use in pregnancy, potential risks, and legalization. Subjects were excluded if they could not read in English or Spanish. Survey questions were based on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neutral, 4 = disagree, and 5 = strongly disagree). Likelihood of agreeing or disagreeing with potential risks, with neutral responses as the reference, were estimated based on the relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval [CI]). Associations were examined with prior tobacco/marijuana use and education level.

RESULTS

During the study period, approximately 1133 consecutive patients were approached and 843 completed the study (74.4% response rate). The majority of participants were English-speaking, college educated, and employed. 204 (25.2%) reported prior marijuana use and 36 (4.5%) reported marijuana use during pregnancy. Overall, pregnant women had poor knowledge about potential risks of marijuana use in pregnancy. Although 234 (29.0%) patients were opposed to legalization, more than 90% of pregnant subjects indicated that they would be more likely to use marijuana in pregnancy if it were legalized. Associations of marijuana risks by prior tobacco use showed that nonsmokers had more awareness about risks. Nonsmokers had higher likelihood of agreeing that marijuana use may be harmful to a pregnancy (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.12-1.76), may hurt the growth of a baby (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74), may cause preterm birth (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.00-1.40), and may hurt a child's ability to learn (RR 1.20, 95% CI 0.95-1.51). Similar trends were observed for subjects who reported no prior marijuana use and for subjects with more than high school education.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of surveyed pregnant women demonstrated poor knowledge about the possible risks of marijuana in pregnancy and indicated that they would be more likely to use marijuana in pregnancy if it were legalized. As the use of marijuana increases, providers should focus on educating their patients about potential risks associated with marijuana use in pregnancy while additional research is needed to clarify associated risks.

Association between gestational cannabis exposure and maternal, perinatal, placental, and childhood outcomes

Globally, the availability and formulations for the administration of cannabis are changing with decriminalization or legalization of recreational use in some jurisdictions, and the prescription of cannabis also occurring. These changes are likely to affect the prevalence of use, including by women of childbearing age. The effects of in utero and infant alcohol and tobacco exposure are well-documented, but the outcomes of cannabis exposure are less certain. The content of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive component of cannabis has progressively increased over several decades. This review explores the limited knowledge surrounding the epidemiology of gestational and postnatal cannabis exposure and implications for the mother-placenta-fetus/neonate triad. We examine cannabis' effects from antenatal and lactation exposure on (a) pregnancy and perinatal outcomes, (b) placental health, and (c) longer term cardiometabolic and neurodevelopmental risks and outcomes. Though definitive outcomes are lacking, gestational cannabis has been associated with increased risk of other substance use during pregnancy; impaired placental blood flow; increased risk of small for gestational age births; and associated complications. Childhood and adolescent outcomes are sparsely assessed, with suggested outcomes including increased risk of depression and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Cardiometabolic implications of gestational cannabis use may include maternal fatty liver, obesity, insulin resistance, and increased risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with potential consequences for the fetus. Clinical implications for pediatric practice were explored in a bid to understand any potential risk or impact on child health and development.

Cannabis in Pregnancy and Lactation - A Review

Cannabis (marijuana) is now legal for either medicinal use or recreational use in 33 states with more states considering legalization for medicinal and/or recreational use. More women planning pregnancy, pregnant, or breastfeeding will present with exposure to marijuana. A familiarity with the pharmacology and potential effects for pregnancy and lactation is important for the obstetrical care provider to permit optimal counseling for the gravida. This paper provides a pertinent review of cannabis for the obstetrical care provider. The literature available for review concludes that no amount of marijuana and associated product use in pregnancy and lactation is safe. Cannabis and associated product use has the potential for adverse maternal, fetal, and long-term childhood development and its use should be discouraged during pregnancy and lactation.

Update on the developmental consequences of cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation

There is a strong increase in prevalence trends for cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation as more states legalize use of this drug. Information on the teratogenic risk of cannabis is limited but some important themes can be gleaned. Studies have not found a unique phenotypic signature of prenatal exposure but an increased risk of congenital anomalies, particularly gastroschisis, has been reported. Changes in fetal growth have been described in some epidemiological studies but long-term patterns of physical growth appear unaffected. Prenatal exposure to cannabis is not generally associated with reductions in global IQ but specific cognitive skills, especially attention and memory, can be negatively impacted. Long-term impacts on psychological health include increased rates of depressive symptoms and anxiety as well as delinquency. Relatively little is known about the risk of maternal cannabis use during lactation but data suggest that infant exposure is relatively low compared to maternal exposure. As delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) levels increase to meet consumer demand and routes of exposure diversify, there is a strong need for prospective birth-cohort studies that collect biological samples to quantify exposure. Data from such studies will be critical to overcoming the weaknesses of past cannabis research and are essential to establishing reliable information on the risks of maternal use. Until that time, health care providers should be encouraged to talk about the risks and benefits associated with cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation with their patients, emphasizing that fetal and neonatal risks cannot be excluded at this time.

Prenatal Cannabinoid Exposure: Emerging Evidence of Physiological and Neuropsychiatric Abnormalities

Clinical reports of cannabis use prevalence during pregnancy vary widely from 3% to upwards of 35% in North America; this disparity likely owing to underestimates from self-reporting in many cases. The rise in cannabis use is mirrored by increasing global legalization and the overall perceptions of safety, even during pregnancy. These trends are further compounded by a lack of evidence-based policy and guidelines for prenatal cannabis use, which has led to inconsistent messaging by healthcare providers and medically licensed cannabis dispensaries regarding prenatal cannabis use for treatment of symptoms, such as nausea. Additionally, the use of cannabis to self-medicate depression and anxiety during pregnancy is a growing medical concern. This review aims to summarize recent findings of clinical and preclinical data on neonatal outcomes, as well as long-term physiological and neurodevelopmental outcomes of prenatal cannabis exposure. Although many of the outcomes under investigation have produced mixed results, we consider these data in light of the unique challenges facing cannabis research. In particular, the limited longitudinal clinical studies available have not previously accounted for the exponential increase in (-)-Δ9- tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC; the psychoactive compound in cannabis) concentrations found in cannabis over the past two decades. Polydrug use and the long-term effects of individual cannabis constituents [Δ9-THC vs. cannabidiol (CBD)] are also understudied, along with sex-dependent outcomes. Despite these limitations, prenatal cannabis exposure has been linked to low birth weight, and emerging evidence suggests that prenatal exposure to Δ9-THC, which crosses the placenta and impacts placental development, may have wide-ranging physiological and neurodevelopmental consequences. The long-term effects of these changes require more rigorous investigation, though early reports suggest Δ9-THC increases the risk of cognitive impairment and neuropsychiatric disease, including psychosis, depression, anxiety, and sleep disorders. In light of the current trends in the perception and use of cannabis during pregnancy, we emphasize the social and medical imperative for more rigorous investigation of the long-term effects of prenatal cannabis exposure.