1
|
Giovannini D, Antonelli F, Casciati A, De Angelis C, Denise Astorino M, Bazzano G, Fratini E, Ampollini A, Vadrucci M, Cisbani E, Nenzi P, Picardi L, Saran A, Marino C, Mancuso M, Ronsivalle C, Pazzaglia S. Comparing the effects of irradiation with protons or photons on neonatal mouse brain: Apoptosis, oncogenesis and hippocampal alterations. Radiother Oncol 2024; 195:110267. [PMID: 38614282 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Medulloblastoma (MB) is a common primary brain cancer in children. Proton therapy in pediatric MB is intensively studied and widely adopted. Compared to photon, proton radiations offer potential for reduced toxicity due to the characteristic Bragg Peak at the end of their path in tissue. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of irradiation with the same dose of protons or photons in Patched1 heterozygous knockout mice, a murine model predisposed to cancer and non-cancer radiogenic pathologies, including MB and lens opacity. MATERIALS AND METHODS TOP-IMPLART is a pulsed linear proton accelerator for proton therapy applications. We compared the long-term health effects of 3 Gy of protons or photons in neonatal mice exposed at postnatal day 2, during a peculiarly susceptible developmental phase of the cerebellum, lens, and hippocampus, to genotoxic stress. RESULTS Experimental testing of the 5 mm Spread-Out Bragg Peak (SOBP) proton beam, through evaluation of apoptotic response, confirmed that both cerebellum and hippocampus were within the SOBP irradiation field. While no differences in MB induction were observed after irradiation with protons or photons, lens opacity examination confirmed sparing of the lens after proton exposure. Marked differences in expression of neurogenesis-related genes and in neuroinflammation, but not in hippocampal neurogenesis, were observed after irradiation of wild-type mice with both radiation types. CONCLUSION In-vivo experiments with radiosensitive mouse models improve our mechanistic understanding of the dependence of brain damage on radiation quality, thus having important implications in translational research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Giovannini
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Antonelli
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Arianna Casciati
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | | | - Maria Denise Astorino
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Giulia Bazzano
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Emiliano Fratini
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ampollini
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Monia Vadrucci
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy; Italian Space Agency, Science and Research Directorate, Via del Politecnico 00133, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Nenzi
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Luigi Picardi
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Anna Saran
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Carmela Marino
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Mariateresa Mancuso
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy
| | - Concetta Ronsivalle
- Division of Physical Technologies and Security, ENEA Frascati Research Center, Frascati, Roma, Italy
| | - Simonetta Pazzaglia
- Division of Health Protection Technology, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhou S, Ding X, Zhang Y, Liu Y, Wang X, Guo Y, Zhang J, Liu X, Gong G, Su Y, Wang L, Zhao M, Hu M. Evaluation of specific RBE in different cells of hippocampus under high-dose proton irradiation in rats. Sci Rep 2024; 14:8193. [PMID: 38589544 PMCID: PMC11001863 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-58831-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The study aimed to determine the specific relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of various cells in the hippocampus following proton irradiation. Sixty Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly allocated to 5 groups receiving 20 or 30 Gy of proton or photon irradiation. Pathomorphological neuronal damage in the hippocampus was assessed using Hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining. The expression level of NeuN, Nestin, Caspase-3, Olig2, CD68 and CD45 were determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The RBE range established by comparing the effects of proton and photon irradiation at equivalent biological outcomes. Proton20Gy induced more severe damage to neurons than photon20Gy, but showed no difference compared to photon30Gy. The RBE of neuron was determined to be 1.65. Similarly, both proton20Gy and proton30Gy resulted in more inhibition of oligodendrocytes and activation of microglia in the hippocampal regions than photon20Gy and photon30Gy. However, the expression of Olig2 was higher and CD68 was lower in the proton20Gy group than in the photon30Gy group. The RBE of oligodendrocyte and microglia was estimated to be between 1.1 to 1.65. For neural stem cells (NSCs) and immune cells, there were no significant difference in the expression of Nestin and CD45 between proton and photon irradiation (both 20 and 30 Gy). Therefore, the RBE for NSCs and immune cell was determined to be 1.1. These findings highlight the varying RBE values of different cells in the hippocampus in vivo. Moreover, the actual RBE of the hippocampus may be higher than 1.1, suggesting that using as RBE value of 1.1 in clinical practice may underestimate the toxicities induced by proton radiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shengying Zhou
- School of Clinical Medicine, Shandong Second Medical University, Weifang, 261053, Shandong, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Xingchen Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Yiyuan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Yuanyuan Liu
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Xiaowen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
- Shandong University cancer center, Jinan, 250100, Shandong, China
| | - Yujiao Guo
- Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical College, Jining, 272067, Shandong, China
| | | | - Xiao Liu
- 960 Hospital of the Joint Logistics Support Force of the Chinese People's Liberation Army, Jinan, 250031, Shandong, China
| | - Guanzhong Gong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Ya Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Lizhen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China
| | - Miaoqing Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
| | - Man Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, NO.440 Ji Yan Road, Jinan, 250117, Shandong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kirova YM, Loap P. Improving the Treatment of Brain Metastases in HER2-Positive Breast Cancers: Eternal Dream or Reality? Results of the NRG Oncology-KROG/RTOG 1119 Phase 2 Randomized Trial and Future Directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1402-1403. [PMID: 38492969 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Faculty of Medicine, University Versailles St Quentin, Versailles St Quentin, France.
| | - Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Loap P, Giorgi M, Vu-Bezin J, Kirov K, Sampai JM, Prezado Y, Kirova Y. Dosimetric feasibility study ("proof of concept") of refractory ventricular tachycardia radioablation using proton minibeams. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:195-201. [PMID: 38599941 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical data demonstrated that the use of proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces the risk of toxicity in healthy tissue. Ventricular tachycardia radioablation is an area under clinical investigation in proton beam therapy. We sought to simulate a ventricular tachycardia radioablation with proton minibeams and to demonstrate that it was possible to obtain a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone with this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS An arrhythmogenic target volume was defined on the simulation CT scan of a patient, localized in the lateral wall of the left ventricle. A dose of 25Gy was planned to be delivered by proton minibeam radiotherapy, simulated using a Monte Carlo code (TOPAS v.3.7) with a collimator of 19 0.4 mm-wide slits spaced 3mm apart. The main objective of the study was to obtain a plan ensuring at least 93% of the prescription dose in 93% of the planning target volume without exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume. RESULTS The average dose in the planning treatment volume in proton minibeam radiotherapy was 25.12Gy. The percentage of the planning target volume receiving 93% (V93%), 110% (V110%), and 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 94.25%, 0%, and 92.6% respectively. The lateral penumbra was 6.6mm. The mean value of the peak-to-valley-dose ratio in the planning target volume was 1.06. The mean heart dose was 2.54Gy versus 5.95Gy with stereotactic photon beam irradiation. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept study shows that proton minibeam radiotherapy can achieve a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone, reducing the dose at the normal tissues. This technique, ensuring could theoretically reduce the risk of late pulmonary and breast fibrosis, as well as cardiac toxicity as seen in previous biological studies in proton minibeam radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Giorgi
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Inserm U1021, CNRS UMR3347, Institut Curie, université PSL, 91400 Orsay, France; Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - J Vu-Bezin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - K Kirov
- Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J M Sampai
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Y Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Inserm U1021, CNRS UMR3347, Institut Curie, université PSL, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France; Université Versailles, Saint-Quentin, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iturri L, Bertho A, Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Sébrié C, Jourdain L, de Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Muret J, Verrelle P, Prezado Y. Oxygen supplementation in anesthesia can block FLASH effect and anti-tumor immunity in conventional proton therapy. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE 2023; 3:183. [PMID: 38102219 PMCID: PMC10724215 DOI: 10.1038/s43856-023-00411-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced neurocognitive dysfunction is a major adverse effect of brain radiation therapy and has specific relevance in pediatric oncology, where serious cognitive deficits have been reported in survivors of pediatric brain tumors. Moreover, many pediatric patients receive proton therapy under general anesthesia or sedation to guarantee precise ballistics with a high oxygen content for safety. The present study addresses the relevant question of the potential effect of supplemental oxygen administered during anesthesia on normal tissue toxicity and investigates the anti-tumor immune response generated following conventional and FLASH proton therapy. METHODS Rats (Fischer 344) were cranially irradiated with a single high dose of proton therapy (15 Gy or 25 Gy) using FLASH dose rate proton irradiation (257 ± 2 Gy/s) or conventional dose rate proton irradiation (4 ± 0.02 Gy/s), and the toxicities in the normal tissue were examined by histological, cytometric and behavioral analysis. Glioblastoma-bearing rats were irradiated in the same manner and tumor-infiltrating leukocytes were quantified by flow cytometry. RESULTS Our findings indicate that supplemental oxygen has an adverse impact on both functional and anatomical evaluations of normal brain following conventional and FLASH proton therapy. In addition, oxygen supplementation in anesthesia is particularly detrimental for anti-tumor immune response by preventing a strong immune cell infiltration into tumoral tissues following conventional proton therapy. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate the need to further optimize anesthesia protocols used in radiotherapy with the goal of preserving normal tissues and achieving tumor control, specifically in combination with immunotherapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | | | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sébrié
- Service Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Universite Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- Service Hospitalier Frederic Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Universite Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie (LITO), Orsay, France
| | - Jane Muret
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus universitaire, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U1196, CNRS UMR9187, Chimie et Modélisation pour la Biologie du Cancer (CMBC), Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Clements N, Esplen N, Bazalova-Carter M. A feasibility study of ultra-high dose rate mini-GRID therapy using very-high-energy electron beams for a simulated pediatric brain case. Phys Med 2023; 112:102637. [PMID: 37454482 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102637] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s), spatially-fractionated minibeam GRID (mini-GRID) therapy using very-high-energy electrons (VHEE) was investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Multi-directional VHEE treatments with and without mini-GRID-fractionation were compared to a clinical 6 MV volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for a pediatric glioblastoma patient using dose-volume histograms, volume-averaged dose rates in critical patient structures, and planning target volume D98s. Peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs) and dose rates in organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated due to their relevance for normal-tissue sparing in FLASH and spatially-fractionated techniques. Depths of convergence, defined where the PVDR is first ≤1.1, and depths at which dose rates fall below the UHDR threshold were also evaluated. In a water phantom, the VHEE mini-GRID treatments presented a surface (5 mm depth) PVDR of (51±2) and a depth of convergence of 42 mm at 150 MeV and a surface PVDR of (33±1) with a depth of convergence of 57 mm at 250 MeV. For a pediatric GBM case, VHEE treatments without mini-GRID-fractionation produced 25% and 22% lower volume-averaged doses to OARs compared to the 6 MV VMAT plan and 8/9 and 9/9 of the patient structures were exposed to volume-averaged dose rates >40 Gy/s for the 150 MeV and 250 MeV plans, respectively. The 150 MeV and 250 MeV mini-GRID treatments produced 17% and 38% higher volume-averaged doses to OARs and 3/9 patient structures had volume-averaged dose rates above 40 Gy/s. VHEE mini-GRID plans produced many comparable dose metrics to the clinical VMAT plan, encouraging further optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Clements
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
| | - Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Corresponding author.
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gaito S, Marvaso G, Ortiz R, Crellin A, Aznar MC, Indelicato DJ, Pan S, Whitfield G, Alongi F, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Burnet N, Li MP, Rothwell B, Smith E, Colaco RJ. Proton Beam Therapy in the Oligometastatic/Oligorecurrent Setting: Is There a Role? A Literature Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092489. [PMID: 37173955 PMCID: PMC10177340 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Revised: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT) are well-established treatment options for selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. The use of PBT for SABR-SRS is attractive given the property of a lack of exit dose. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role and current utilisation of PBT in the oligometastatic/oligorecurrent setting. METHODS Using Medline and Embase, a comprehensive literature review was conducted following the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) criteria, which returned 83 records. After screening, 16 records were deemed to be relevant and included in the review. RESULTS Six of the sixteen records analysed originated in Japan, six in the USA, and four in Europe. The focus was oligometastatic disease in 12, oligorecurrence in 3, and both in 1. Most of the studies analysed (12/16) were retrospective cohorts or case reports, two were phase II clinical trials, one was a literature review, and one study discussed the pros and cons of PBT in these settings. The studies presented in this review included a total of 925 patients. The metastatic sites analysed in these articles were the liver (4/16), lungs (3/16), thoracic lymph nodes (2/16), bone (2/16), brain (1/16), pelvis (1/16), and various sites in 2/16. CONCLUSIONS PBT could represent an option for the treatment of oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease in patients with a low metastatic burden. Nevertheless, due to its limited availability, PBT has traditionally been funded for selected tumour indications that are defined as curable. The availability of new systemic therapies has widened this definition. This, together with the exponential growth of PBT capacity worldwide, will potentially redefine its commissioning to include selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. To date, PBT has been used with encouraging results for the treatment of liver metastases. However, PBT could be an option in those cases in which the reduced radiation exposure to normal tissues leads to a clinically significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Gaito
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94720, USA
| | - Adrian Crellin
- National Lead Proton Beam Therapy NHSe, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - Marianne C Aznar
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
| | - Daniel J Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, FL 32206, USA
| | - Shermaine Pan
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
| | - Filippo Alongi
- Advanced Radiation Oncology Department, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore don Calabria, 37024 Verona, Italy
- Division of Radiology and Radiotherapy, University of Brescia, 25121 Brescia, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Neil Burnet
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
| | - Michelle P Li
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Bethany Rothwell
- Division of Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ed Smith
- Proton Clinical Outcomes Unit, The Christie NHS Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
- Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
| | - Rovel J Colaco
- Department of Proton Beam Therapy, The Christie Proton Beam Therapy Centre, Manchester M20 3DA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang W, Li W, Lin Y, Wang F, Chen RC, Gao H. TVL1-IMPT: Optimization of Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratio Via Joint Total-Variation and L1 Dose Regularization for Spatially Fractionated Pencil-Beam-Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:768-778. [PMID: 36155212 PMCID: PMC10155885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel proton modality of spatially fractionated RT. pMBRT can reduce the radiation damage to normal tissues via biological dose sparing of high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). This work will develop a new spatially fractionated IMPT treatment planning method for pMBRT that jointly optimizes the plan quality and maximizes the PVDR. METHODS The new optimization method simultaneously maximizes the normal-tissue PVDR and optimizes the dose distribution at tumor targets and organs at risk. The PVDR maximization is through the joint total variation (TV) and L1 regularization with respect to the normal-tissue dose. That is, the beam-eye view projects dose slices of several depths for each beam angle; the TV of dose is maximized, corresponding to the PVDR maximization; and the L1 of dose is minimized, corresponding to the minimization of the organs-at-risk dose and maximization of survival fraction (SF). RESULTS The new IMPT method with TV and L1 regularization was validated in comparison with the conventional IMPT method for pMBRT in several clinical cases. The results show that TVL1 provided larger PVDR and SF than the conventional IMPT method for biological sparing of normal tissues, with preserved plan quality in terms of physical dose distribution. CONCLUSIONS A new spatially fractionated IMPT treatment planning method was developed for pMBRT that can optimize and improve normal-tissue PVDR and SF by incorporating TV and L1 dose regularization with properly chosen regularization parameters into IMPT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weijie Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Fen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Ronald C Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Brisebard E, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Ortiz R, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Lamirault C, Ramasamy G, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Evaluation of the Role of the Immune System Response After Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:426-439. [PMID: 35985455 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative technique that uses a spatial dose modulation. The dose distribution consists of high doses (peaks) in the path of the minibeam and low doses (valleys). The underlying biological mechanism associated with MBRT efficacy remains currently unclear and thus we investigated the potential role of the immune system after treatment with MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Rats bearing an orthotopic glioblastoma cell line were treated with 1 fraction of high dose conventional radiation therapy (30 Gy) or 1 fraction of the same mean dose in MBRT. Both immunocompetent (F344) and immunodeficient (Nude) rats were analyzed in survival studies. Systemic and intratumoral immune cell population changes were studied with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry (IHC) 2 and 7 days after the irradiation. RESULTS The absence of response of Nude rats after MBRT suggested that T cells were key in the mode of action of MBRT. An inflammatory phenotype was observed in the blood 1 week after irradiation compared with conventional irradiation. Tumor immune cell analysis by flow cytometry showed a substantial infiltration of lymphocytes, specifically of CD8 T cells and B cells in both conventional and MBRT-treated animals. IHC revealed that MBRT induced a faster recruitment of CD8 and CD4 T cells. Animals that were cured by radiation therapy did not suffer tumor growth after reimplantation of tumoral cells, proving the long-term immunity response generated after a high dose of radiation. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that MBRT can elicit a robust antitumor immune response in glioblastoma while avoiding the high toxicity of a high dose of conventional radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaig Bertho
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
| | - Lorea Iturri
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | | | - Marjorie Juchaux
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, Paris, France; Inserm U1288, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France; CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Laurent PA, Morel D, Meziani L, Depil S, Deutsch E. Radiotherapy as a means to increase the efficacy of T-cell therapy in solid tumors. Oncoimmunology 2022; 12:2158013. [PMID: 36567802 PMCID: PMC9788698 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2022.2158013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells have demonstrated significant improvements in the treatment of refractory B-cell malignancies that previously showed limited survival. In contrast, early-phase clinical studies targeting solid tumors have been disappointing. This may be due to both a lack of specific and homogeneously expressed targets at the surface of tumor cells, as well as intrinsic properties of the solid tumor microenvironment that limit homing and activation of adoptive T cells. Faced with these antagonistic conditions, radiotherapy (RT) has the potential to change the overall tumor landscape, from depleting tumor cells to reshaping the tumor microenvironment. In this article, we describe the current landscape and discuss how RT may play a pivotal role for enhancing the efficacy of adoptive T-cell therapies in solid tumors. Indeed, by improving homing, expansion and activation of infused T cells while reducing tumor volume and heterogeneity, the use of RT could help the implementation of engineered T cells in the treatment of solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Antoine Laurent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; UNICANCER, Villejuif, France,INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France,CONTACT Pierre-Antoine Laurent Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, UNICANCER, Villejuif94805, France; INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris-Saclay; SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France
| | - Daphne Morel
- Drug Development Department (D.I.T.E.P), Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; UNICANCER, Villejuif, France
| | - Lydia Meziani
- INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus; UNICANCER, Villejuif, France,INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiation Therapy and Therapeutic Innovation, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, University of Paris-Saclay, SIRIC SOCRATE, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Iturri L, Bertho A, Lamirault C, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Pouzoulet F, Verrelle P, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy and Immune Infiltration: Evaluation in an Orthotopic Glioma Rat Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022:S0360-3016(22)03639-2. [PMID: 36563907 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is a promising radiation technique that uses ultrahigh doses of radiation to increase the therapeutic window of the treatment. FLASH-RT has been observed to provide normal tissue sparing at high dose rates and similar tumor control compared with conventional RT, yet the biological processes governing these radiobiological effects are still unknown. In this study, we sought to investigate the potential immune response generated by FLASH-RT in a high dose of proton therapy in an orthotopic glioma rat model. METHODS AND MATERIALS We cranially irradiated rats with a single high dose (25 Gy) using FLASH dose rate proton irradiation (257 ± 2 Gy/s) or conventional dose rate proton irradiation (4 ± 0.02 Gy/s). We first assessed the protective FLASH effect that resulted in our setup through behavioral studies in naïve rats. This was followed by a comprehensive analysis of immune cells in blood, healthy tissue of the brain, and tumor microenvironment by flow cytometry. RESULTS Proton FLASH-RT spared memory impairment produced by conventional high-dose proton therapy and induced a similar tumor infiltrating lymphocyte recruitment. Additionally, a general neuroinflammation that was similar in both dose rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this study demonstrated that FLASH proton therapy offers a neuro-protective effect even at high doses while mounting an effective lymphoid immune response in the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Iturri
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Longitudinally Heterogeneous Tumor Dose Optimizes Proton Broadbeam, Interlaced Minibeam, and FLASH Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14205162. [PMID: 36291946 PMCID: PMC9601234 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14205162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Revised: 10/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The aim of any kind of external radiation therapy is to control a tumor with the highest possible probability of the lowest possible side effects. Here, we study further opportunities of reducing the side effects of proton therapy by applying longitudinally heterogeneous dose distributions in the tumor respecting the delivery of a minimum prescribed dose. In our simulations, the longitudinally heterogeneous dose distributions show a reduced dose in the healthy tissue already in the case of proton broadbeam irradiations, but a much higher (calculated) mean cell survival in the case of proton minibeam irradiation. This demonstrates its potential to substantially reduce side effects at a simultaneously higher tumor control probability, opening new opportunities of easier application when striving for high dose-rate applications of proton beams (>~10 Gy/s), in order to additionally profit from the so-called FLASH effects. Abstract The prerequisite of any radiation therapy modality (X-ray, electron, proton, and heavy ion) is meant to meet at least a minimum prescribed dose at any location in the tumor for the best tumor control. In addition, there is also an upper dose limit within the tumor according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) recommendations in order to spare healthy tissue as well as possible. However, healthy tissue may profit from the lower side effects when waving this upper dose limit and allowing a larger heterogeneous dose deposition in the tumor, but maintaining the prescribed minimum dose level, particularly in proton minibeam therapy. Methods: Three different longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes and a standard spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) irradiation mode are simulated for their depth-dose curves under the constraint of maintaining a minimum prescribed dose anywhere in the tumor region. Symmetric dose distributions of two opposing directions are overlaid in a 25 cm-thick water phantom containing a 5 cm-thick tumor region. Interlaced planar minibeam dose distributions are compared to those of a broadbeam using the same longitudinal dose profiles. Results and Conclusion: All longitudinally heterogeneous proton irradiation modes show a dose reduction in the healthy tissue compared to the common SOBP mode in the case of broad proton beams. The proton minibeam cases show eventually a much larger mean cell survival and thus a further reduced equivalent uniform dose (EUD) in the healthy tissue than any broadbeam case. In fact, the irradiation mode using only one proton energy from each side shows better sparing capabilities in the healthy tissue than the common spread-out Bragg peak irradiation mode with the option of a better dose fall-off at the tumor edges and an easier technical realization, particularly in view of proton minibeam irradiation at ultra-high dose rates larger than ~10 Gy/s (so-called FLASH irradiation modes).
Collapse
|
15
|
Fernandez-Palomo C, Chang S, Prezado Y. Should Peak Dose Be Used to Prescribe Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy?-A Review of Preclinical Studies. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153625. [PMID: 35892895 PMCID: PMC9330631 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Revised: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) is characterized by the coexistence of multiple hot and cold dose subregions throughout the treatment volume. In preclinical studies using single-fraction treatment, SFRT can achieve a significantly higher therapeutic index than conventional radiotherapy (RT). Published clinical studies of SFRT followed by RT have reported promising results for bulky tumors. Several clinical trials are currently underway to further explore the clinical benefits of SFRT. However, we lack the important understanding of the correlation between dosimetric parameters and treatment response that we have in RT. In this work, we reviewed and analyzed this important correlation from previous preclinical SFRT studies. We reviewed studies prior to 2022 that treated animal-bearing tumors with minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) or microbeam radiotherapy (MRT). Eighteen studies met our selection criteria. Increased lifespan (ILS) relative to control was used as the treatment response. The preclinical SFRT dosimetric parameters analyzed were peak dose, valley dose, average dose, beam width, and beam spacing. We found that valley dose was the dosimetric parameter with the strongest correlation with ILS (p-value < 0.01). For studies using MRT, average dose and peak dose were also significantly correlated with ILS (p-value < 0.05). This first comprehensive review of preclinical SFRT studies shows that the valley dose (rather than the peak dose) correlates best with treatment outcome (ILS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sha Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7512, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Technical aspects of proton minibeam radiation therapy: Minibeam generation and delivery. Phys Med 2022; 100:64-71. [PMID: 35750002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the normal tissue sparing of sub-millimetric, spatially fractionated beams with the improved ballistics of protons. This may allow a safe dose escalation in the tumour and has already proven to provide a remarkable increase of the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas in animal experiments. One of the main challenges in pMBRT concerns the generation of minibeams and the implementation in a clinical environment. This article reviews the different approaches for generating minibeams, using mechanical collimators and focussing magnets, and discusses the technical aspects of the implementation and delivery of pMBRT.
Collapse
|
17
|
Dose Profile Modulation of Proton Minibeam for Clinical Application. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14122888. [PMID: 35740553 PMCID: PMC9221247 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14122888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using multislit collimator (MSC) and scatterers has been proposed to spare healthy tissues and organs on the beam path and beyond the Bragg peak. An MSC that was much thicker than the maximum range of the proton beam could provide a sufficiently high peak-to-valley dose ratio at the patient’s skin, and the scatterers could actively convert the spatially fractionated proton beam to a uniform and broad beam in tumors by changing their thickness. The combination of the MSC and the scatterers can be a good solution for implementing pMBRT in clinical proton therapy facilities. Abstract The feasibility of proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) using a multislit collimator (MSC) and a scattering device was evaluated for clinical use at a clinical proton therapy facility. We fabricated, through Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, not only an MSC with a high peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) at the entrance of the proton beam, to prevent radiation toxicity, but also a scattering device to modulate the PVDR in depth. The slit width and center-to-center distance of the diverging MSC were 2.5 mm and 5.0 mm at the large end, respectively, and its thickness and available field size were 100 mm and 76 × 77.5 mm2, respectively. Spatially fractionated dose distributions were measured at various depths using radiochromic EBT3 films and also tested on bacterial cells. MC simulation showed that the thicker the MSC, the higher the PVDR at the phantom surface. Dosimetric evaluations showed that lateral dose profiles varied according to the scatterer’s thickness, and the depths satisfying PVDR = 1.1 moved toward the surface as their thickness increased. The response of the bacterial cells to the proton minibeams’ depth was also established, in a manner similar to the dosimetric pattern. Conclusively, these results strongly suggest that pMBRT can be implemented in clinical centers by using MSC and scatterers.
Collapse
|
18
|
McAuley GA, Lim CJ, Teran AV, Slater JD, Wroe AJ. Monte Carlo evaluation of high-gradient magnetically focused planar proton minibeams in a passive nozzle. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35421853 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac678b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To investigate the potential of using a single quadrupole magnet with a high magnetic field gradient to create planar minibeams suitable for clinical applications of proton minibeam radiation therapy.Approach. We performed Monte Carlo simulations involving single quadrupole Halbach cylinders in a passively scattered nozzle in clinical use for proton therapy. Pencil beams produced by the nozzle of 10-15 mm initial diameters and particle range of ∼10-20 cm in water were focused by magnets with field gradients of 225-350 T m-1and cylinder lengths of 80-110 mm to produce very narrow elongated (planar) beamlets. The corresponding dose distributions were scored in a water phantom. Composite minibeam dose distributions composed from three beamlets were created by laterally shifting copies of the single beamlet distribution to either side of a central beamlet. Modulated beamlets (with 18-30 mm nominal central SOBP) and corresponding composite dose distributions were created in a similar manner. Collimated minibeams were also compared with beams focused using one magnet/particle range combination.Main results. The focusing magnets produced planar beamlets with minimum lateral FWHM of ∼1.1-1.6 mm. Dose distributions composed from three unmodulated beamlets showed a high degree of proximal spatial fractionation and a homogeneous target dose. Maximal peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR) for the unmodulated beams ranged from 32 to 324, and composite modulated beam showed maximal PVDR ranging from 32 to 102 and SOBPs with good target dose coverage.Significance.Advantages of the high-gradient magnets include the ability to focus beams with phase space parameters that reflect beams in operation today, and post-waist particle divergence allowing larger beamlet separations and thus larger PVDR. Our results suggest that high gradient quadrupole magnets could be useful to focus beams of moderate emittance in clinical proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant A McAuley
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America
| | - Crystal J Lim
- School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA United States of America
| | - Anthony V Teran
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America.,Orange County CyberKnife and Radiation Oncology Center, Fountain Valley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jerry D Slater
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda CA, United States of America
| | - Andrew J Wroe
- School of Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA United States of America.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL, United States of America.,Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moghaddasi L, Reid P, Bezak E, Marcu LG. Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:3366. [PMID: 35328787 PMCID: PMC8954016 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Revised: 03/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The continuously evolving field of radiotherapy aims to devise and implement techniques that allow for greater tumour control and better sparing of critical organs. Investigations into the complexity of tumour radiobiology confirmed the high heterogeneity of tumours as being responsible for the often poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic subvolumes, a subpopulation of cancer stem cells, as well as the inherent or acquired radioresistance define tumour aggressiveness and metastatic potential, which remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-conventional irradiation techniques, such as spatially fractionated radiotherapy, have been developed to tackle some of these challenges and to offer a high therapeutic index when treating radioresistant tumours. The goal of this article was to highlight the current knowledge on the molecular and radiobiological mechanisms behind spatially fractionated radiotherapy and to present the up-to-date preclinical and clinical evidence towards the therapeutic potential of this technique involving both photon and proton beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leyla Moghaddasi
- Department of Medical Physics, Austin Health, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia;
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
| | - Paul Reid
- Radiation Health, Environment Protection Authority, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia;
| | - Eva Bezak
- School of Physical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia;
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Loredana G. Marcu
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
- Faculty of Informatics and Science, University of Oradea, 1 Universitatii Str., 410087 Oradea, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Scherthan H, Wagner SQ, Grundhöfer J, Matejka N, Müller J, Müller S, Rudigkeit S, Sammer M, Schoof S, Port M, Reindl J. Planar Proton Minibeam Irradiation Elicits Spatially Confined DNA Damage in a Human Epidermis Model. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14061545. [PMID: 35326696 PMCID: PMC8946044 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14061545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: High doses of ionizing radiation in radiotherapy can elicit undesirable side effects to the skin. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) may circumvent such limitations due to tissue-sparing effects observed at the macro scale. Here, we mapped DNA damage dynamics in a 3D tissue context at the sub-cellular level. Methods: Epidermis models were irradiated with planar proton minibeams of 66 µm, 408 µm and 920 µm widths and inter-beam-distances of 2.5 mm at an average dose of 2 Gy using the scanning-ion-microscope SNAKE in Garching, GER. γ-H2AX + 53BP1 and cleaved-caspase-3 immunostaining revealed dsDNA damage and cell death, respectively, in time courses from 0.5 to 72 h after irradiation. Results: Focused 66 µm pMBRT induced sharply localized severe DNA damage (pan-γ-H2AX) in cells at the dose peaks, while damage in the dose valleys was similar to sham control. pMBRT with 408 µm and 920 µm minibeams induced DSB foci in all cells. At 72 h after irradiation, DNA damage had reached sham levels, indicating successful DNA repair. Increased frequencies of active-caspase-3 and pan-γ-H2AX-positive cells revealed incipient cell death at late time points. Conclusions: The spatially confined distribution of DNA damage appears to underlie the tissue-sparing effect after focused pMBRT. Thus, pMBRT may be the method of choice in radiotherapy to reduce side effects to the skin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Scherthan
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
- Correspondence: (H.S.); (J.R.)
| | - Stephanie-Quinta Wagner
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Jan Grundhöfer
- Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany; (N.M.); (J.G.); (S.R.); (M.S.)
| | - Nicole Matejka
- Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany; (N.M.); (J.G.); (S.R.); (M.S.)
| | - Jessica Müller
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Steffen Müller
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Sarah Rudigkeit
- Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany; (N.M.); (J.G.); (S.R.); (M.S.)
| | - Matthias Sammer
- Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany; (N.M.); (J.G.); (S.R.); (M.S.)
| | - Sarah Schoof
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Matthias Port
- Institut für Radiobiologie der Bundeswehr in Verb. mit der Universität Ulm, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80937 München, Germany; (S.-Q.W.); (J.M.); (S.M.); (S.S.); (M.P.)
| | - Judith Reindl
- Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany; (N.M.); (J.G.); (S.R.); (M.S.)
- Correspondence: (H.S.); (J.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
22
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Prezado Y. Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 376:37-68. [PMID: 36997269 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
23
|
Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy and Arc Therapy: Proof of Concept of a Winning Alliance. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010116. [PMID: 35008280 PMCID: PMC8749801 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Normal tissue’s morbidity continues to limit the increase in the therapeutic index in radiation therapy. This study explores the potential advantages of combining proton arc therapy and proton minibeam radiation therapy, which have already individually shown a significant normal tissue’s sparing. This alliance aims to integrate the benefits of those techniques in a single approach. Abstract (1) Background: Proton Arc Therapy and Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy are two novel therapeutic approaches with the potential to lower the normal tissue complication probability, widening the therapeutic window for radioresistant tumors. While the benefits of both modalities have been individually evaluated, their combination and its potential advantages are being assessed in this proof-of-concept study for the first time. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were employed to evaluate the dose and LET distributions in brain tumor irradiations. (3) Results: a net reduction in the dose to normal tissues (up to 90%), and the preservation of the spatial fractionation of the dose were achieved for all configurations evaluated. Additionally, Proton Minibeam Arc Therapy (pMBAT) reduces the volumes exposed to high-dose and high-LET values at expense of increased low-dose and intermediate-LET values. (4) Conclusions: pMBAT enhances the individual benefits of proton minibeams while keeping those of conventional proton arc therapy. These results might facilitate the path towards patients’ treatments since lower peak doses in normal tissues would be needed than in the case of a single array of proton minibeams.
Collapse
|
24
|
Cavallone M, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. Converging Proton Minibeams with Magnetic Fields for Optimized Radiation Therapy: A Proof of Concept. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010026. [PMID: 35008189 PMCID: PMC8750079 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton MiniBeam Radiation Therapy (pMBRT) is a novel strategy that combines the benefits of minibeam radiation therapy with the more precise ballistics of protons to further optimize the dose distribution and reduce radiation side effects. The aim of this study is to investigate possible strategies to couple pMBRT with dipole magnetic fields to generate a converging minibeam pattern and increase the center-to-center distance between minibeams. Magnetic field optimization was performed so as to obtain the same transverse dose profile at the Bragg peak position as in a reference configuration with no magnetic field. Monte Carlo simulations reproducing realistic pencil beam scanning settings were used to compute the dose in a water phantom. We analyzed different minibeam generation techniques, such as the use of a static multislit collimator or a dynamic aperture, and different magnetic field positions, i.e., before or within the water phantom. The best results were obtained using a dynamic aperture coupled with a magnetic field within the water phantom. For a center-to-center distance increase from 4 mm to 6 mm, we obtained an increase of peak-to-valley dose ratio and decrease of valley dose above 50%. The results indicate that magnetic fields can be effectively used to improve the spatial modulation at shallow depth for enhanced healthy tissue sparing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Cavallone
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
- Correspondence: (M.C.); (L.D.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
26
|
Eley JG, Haga CW, Keller A, Lazenby EM, Raver C, Rusek A, Dilmanian FA, Krishnan S, Waddell J. Heavy Ion Minibeam Therapy: Side Effects in Normal Brain. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13246207. [PMID: 34944825 PMCID: PMC8699126 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13246207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to investigate whether minibeam therapy with heavy ions might offer improvements of the therapeutic ratio for the treatment of human brain cancers. To assess neurotoxicity, we irradiated normal juvenile rats using 120 MeV lithium-7 ions at an absorbed integral dose of 20 Gy. Beams were configured either as a solid parallel circular beam or as an array of planar parallel minibeams having 300-micron width and 1-mm center-to-center spacing within a circular array. We followed animals for 6 months after treatment and utilized behavioral testing and immunohistochemical studies to investigate the resulting cognitive impairment and chronic pathologic changes. We found both solid-beam therapy and minibeam therapy to result in cognitive impairment compared with sham controls, with no apparent reduction in neurotoxicity using heavy ion minibeams instead of solid beams under the conditions of this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G. Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
- Correspondence:
| | - Catherine W. Haga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Asaf Keller
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (A.K.); (C.R.)
| | - Ellis M. Lazenby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA;
| | - Charles Raver
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA; (A.K.); (C.R.)
| | - Adam Rusek
- Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA;
- NASA Space Radiation Laboratory, Upton, NY 11973, USA
| | - Farrokh Avraham Dilmanian
- Health Sciences Center, Departments of Radiation Oncology, Radiology, and Neurology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA;
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA;
| | - Jaylyn Waddell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Leite AMM, Ronga MG, Giorgi M, Ristic Y, Perrot Y, Trompier F, Prezado Y, Créhange G, De Marzi L. Secondary neutron dose contribution from pencil beam scanning, scattered and spatially fractionated proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34673555 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac3209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The Orsay Proton therapy Center (ICPO) has a long history of intracranial radiotherapy using both double scattering (DS) and pencil beam scanning (PBS) techniques, and is actively investigating a promising modality of spatially fractionated radiotherapy using proton minibeams (pMBRT). This work provides a comprehensive comparison of the organ-specific secondary neutron dose due to each of these treatment modalities, assessed using Monte Carlo (MC) algorithms and measurements. A MC model of a universal nozzle was benchmarked by comparing the neutron ambient dose equivalent,H*(10), in the gantry room with measurements obtained using a WENDI-II counter. The secondary neutron dose was evaluated for clinically relevant intracranial treatments of patients of different ages, in which secondary neutron doses were scored in anthropomorphic phantoms merged with the patients' images. The MC calculatedH*(10) values showed a reasonable agreement with the measurements and followed the expected tendency, in which PBS yields the lowest dose, followed by pMBRT and DS. Our results for intracranial treatments show that pMBRT yielded a higher secondary neutron dose for organs closer to the target volume, while organs situated furthest from the target volume received a greater quantity of neutrons from the passive scattering beam line. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare MC secondary neutron dose estimates in clinical treatments between these various proton therapy modalities and to realistically quantify the secondary neutron dose contribution of clinical pMBRT treatments. The method established in this study will enable epidemiological studies of the long-term effects of intracranial treatments at ICPO, notably radiation-induced second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M M Leite
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M G Ronga
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - M Giorgi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - Y Ristic
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Perrot
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - F Trompier
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Service de Dosimétrie, Laboratoire de Dosimétrie des Rayonnements Ionisants, F-92262 Fontenay-aux-Roses Cedex, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021- CNRS UMR 3347, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - G Créhange
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, F-91898 Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm LITO, F-91898 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mayerhofer M, Bergmaier A, Datzmann G, Hagn H, Helm R, Mitteneder J, Schubert R, Picardi L, Nenzi P, Ronsivalle C, Wirth HF, Dollinger G. Concept and performance evaluation of two 3 GHz buncher units optimizing the dose rate of a novel preclinical proton minibeam irradiation facility. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0258477. [PMID: 34634079 PMCID: PMC8504737 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
To demonstrate the large potential of proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) as a new method to treat tumor diseases, a preclinical proton minibeam radiation facility was designed. It is based on a tandem Van-de-Graaff accelerator providing a 16 MeV proton beam and a 3 GHz linac post-accelerator (designs: AVO-ADAM S.A, Geneva, Switzerland and ENEA, Frascati, Italy). To enhance the transmission of the tandem beam through the post-accelerator by a factor of 3, two drift tube buncher units were designed and constructed: A brazed 5-gap structure (adapted SCDTL tank of the TOP-IMPLART project (ENEA)) and a non-brazed low budget 4-gap structure. Both are made of copper. The performance of the two differently manufactured units was evaluated using a 16 MeV tandem accelerator beam and a Q3D magnetic spectrograph. Both buncher units achieve the required summed voltage amplitude of 42 kV and amplitude stability at a power feed of less than 800 W.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Mayerhofer
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Andreas Bergmaier
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Gerd Datzmann
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Hermann Hagn
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Ricardo Helm
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Johannes Mitteneder
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Ralf Schubert
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Hans-Friedrich Wirth
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Fakultät für Physik, München, Bavaria, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Neubiberg, Bavaria, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Polledo L, Liens A, Warfving N, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Patriarca A, de Marzi L, Prezado Y. First Evaluation of Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy of Glioma-Bearing Rats. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194865. [PMID: 34638352 PMCID: PMC8507607 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic approach based on a distinct dose delivery method: the dose distributions follow a pattern with regions of peaks (high doses) and valleys (low doses). pMBRT was shown to be able to widen the therapeutic window in glioma-bearing rats. In previous studies the irradiation was performed in one single fraction. The work reported in this manuscript is the first evaluation detailing the response of glioma-bearing rats to a temporal fractionation in proton minibeam radiation therapy, delivered under a crossfire geometry. A significant increase of the median survival time was obtained when the dose was delivered over two sessions as opposed to in a single fraction. This result could facilitate the path towards pMBRT treatments. Abstract (1) Background: Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new radiotherapy technique using spatially modulated narrow proton beams. pMBRT results in a significantly reduced local tissue toxicity while maintaining or even increasing the tumor control efficacy as compared to conventional radiotherapy in small animal experiments. In all the experiments performed up to date in tumor bearing animals, the dose was delivered in one single fraction. This is the first assessment on the impact of a temporal fractionation scheme on the response of glioma-bearing animals to pMBRT. (2) Methods: glioma-bearing rats were irradiated with pMBRT using a crossfire geometry. The response of the irradiated animals in one and two fractions was compared. An additional group of animals was also treated with conventional broad beam irradiations. (3) Results: pMBRT delivered in two fractions at the biological equivalent dose corresponding to one fraction resulted in the highest median survival time, with 80% long-term survivors free of tumors. No increase in local toxicity was noted in this group with respect to the other pMBRT irradiated groups. Conventional broad beam irradiations resulted in the most severe local toxicity. (4) Conclusion: Temporal fractionation increases the therapeutic index in pMBRT and could ease the path towards clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (C.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Laura Polledo
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Alethea Liens
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Nils Warfving
- AnaPath GmbH, AnaPath Services, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (A.L.); (N.W.)
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, 91401 Orsay, France; (C.S.); (L.J.)
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (A.P.); (L.d.M.)
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; (A.B.); (R.O.); (M.J.); (C.G.)
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Sotiropoulos M, Prezado Y. A scanning dynamic collimator for spot-scanning proton minibeam production. Sci Rep 2021; 11:18321. [PMID: 34526628 PMCID: PMC8443660 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97941-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
In proton minibeam radiation therapy, proton minibeams are typically produced by modulating a uniform field using a multislit collimator. Multislit collimators produce minibeams of fixed length and width, and a new collimator has to be manufactured each time a new minibeam array is required, limiting its flexibility. In this work, we propose a scanning dynamic collimator for the generation of proton minibeams arrays. The new collimator system proposed is able to produce any minibeam required on an on-line basis by modulating the pencil beam spots of modern proton therapy machines, rather than a uniform field. The new collimator is evaluated through Monte Carlo simulations and the produced proton minibeams are compared with that of a multislit collimator. Furthermore, a proof of concept experiment is conducted to demonstrate the feasibility of producing a minibeam array by repositioning (i.e. scanning) a collimator. It is concluded that besides the technical challenges, the new collimator design is producing equivalent minibeam arrays to the multislit collimator, whilst is flexible to produce any minibeam array desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France.
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Suckert T, Nexhipi S, Dietrich A, Koch R, Kunz-Schughart LA, Bahn E, Beyreuther E. Models for Translational Proton Radiobiology-From Bench to Bedside and Back. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4216. [PMID: 34439370 PMCID: PMC8395028 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13164216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The number of proton therapy centers worldwide are increasing steadily, with more than two million cancer patients treated so far. Despite this development, pending questions on proton radiobiology still call for basic and translational preclinical research. Open issues are the on-going discussion on an energy-dependent varying proton RBE (relative biological effectiveness), a better characterization of normal tissue side effects and combination treatments with drugs originally developed for photon therapy. At the same time, novel possibilities arise, such as radioimmunotherapy, and new proton therapy schemata, such as FLASH irradiation and proton mini-beams. The study of those aspects demands for radiobiological models at different stages along the translational chain, allowing the investigation of mechanisms from the molecular level to whole organisms. Focusing on the challenges and specifics of proton research, this review summarizes the different available models, ranging from in vitro systems to animal studies of increasing complexity as well as complementing in silico approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Suckert
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sindi Nexhipi
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, 01309 Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Robin Koch
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.K.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Leoni A. Kunz-Schughart
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Emanuel Bahn
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (R.K.); (E.B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay—National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, 01309 Dresden, Germany; (T.S.); (S.N.); (A.D.); (L.A.K.-S.)
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden—Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Yamamoto S, Yabe T, Akagi T. Possibility evaluation of the optical imaging of proton mini-beams. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34010817 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac02d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy using mini-beams is a promising method to reduce radiation damage to normal tissue. However, distribution measurements of mini-beams are difficult due to their small structures. Since optical imaging is a possible method to measure high-resolution two-dimensional dose distribution, we conducted optical imaging of an acrylic block during the irradiation of mini-beams of protons. Mini-beams were made from a proton pencil beam irradiated to 1 mm slits made of tungsten plate. During irradiation of the mini-beams to the acrylic block, we measured the luminescence of the acrylic block using a charge-coupled device camera. With the measurements, we could obtain slit beam images that have slit shapes in the shallow area while they were uniform in their Bragg peaks, which was similar to the case of simulated optical images by Monte Carlo simulations. We confirmed that high-resolution optical imaging of mini-beams is possible and provides a promising method for efficient quality assessment of mini-beams as well as research on mini-beam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichi Yamamoto
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Takuya Yabe
- Department of Integrated Health Science, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.,Department of Medical Technology, Nagoya University Hospital, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mayerhofer M, Datzmann G, Degiovanni A, Dimov V, Dollinger G. Magnetically focused 70 MeV proton minibeams for preclinical experiments combining a tandem accelerator and a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator. Med Phys 2021; 48:2733-2749. [PMID: 33759211 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy plays an important role for the treatment of tumor diseases in two-thirds of all cases, but it is limited by side effects in the surrounding healthy tissue. Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a promising option to widen the therapeutic window for tumor control at reduced side effects. An accelerator concept based on an existing tandem Van de Graaff accelerator and a linac enables the focusing of 70 MeV protons to form minibeams with a size of only 0.1 mm for a preclinical small animal irradiation facility, while avoiding the cost of an RFQ injector. METHODS The tandem accelerator provides a 16 MeV proton beam with a beam brightness of B = 4 nA mm 2 mrad 2 as averaged from 5 µs long pulses with a flat top current of 17 µA at 200 Hz repetition rate. Subsequently, the protons are accelerated to 70 MeV by a 3 GHz linear post-accelerator consisting of two Side Coupled Drift Tube Linac (SCDTL) structures and four Coupled Cavity Linac (CCL) structures [design: AVO-ADAM S.A (Geneva, Switzerland)]. A 3 GHz buncher and four magnetic quadrupole lenses are placed between the tandem and the post-accelerator to maximize the transmission through the linac. A quadrupole triplet situated downstream of the linac structure focuses the protons into an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 . The beam dynamics of the facility is optimized using the particle optics code TRACE three-dimensional (3D). Proton transmission through the facility is elaborated using the particle tracking code TRAVEL. RESULTS A study about buncher amplitude and phase shift between buncher and linac is showing that 49% of all protons available from the tandem can be transported through the post-accelerator. A mean beam current up to 19 nA is expected within an area of (0.1 × 0.1) mm2 at the beam focus. CONCLUSION An extension of existing tandem accelerators by commercially available 3 GHz structures is able to deliver a proton minibeam that serves all requirements to obtain proton minibeams to perform preclinical minibeam irradiations as it would be the case for a complete commercial 3 GHz injector-RFQ-linac combination. Due to the modularity of the linac structure, the irradiation facility can be extended to clinically relevant proton energies up to or above 200 MeV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerd Datzmann
- Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prezado Y, Hirayama R, Matsufuji N, Inaniwa T, Martínez-Rovira I, Seksek O, Bertho A, Koike S, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Polledo L, Warfving N, Liens A, Bergs J, Shimokawa T. A Potential Renewed Use of Very Heavy Ions for Therapy: Neon Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061356. [PMID: 33802835 PMCID: PMC8002595 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061356] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The treatment of hypoxic tumours continues to be one of the main challenges for radiation therapy. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) shows a highly promising reduction of to-xicity in normal tissue, so that very heavy ions, such as Neon (Ne) or Argon (Ar), with extremely high LET, might become applicable to clinical situations. The high LET in the target would be unrivalled to overcome hypoxia, while MBRT might limit the side effects normally preventing the use of those heavy ions in a conventional radiotherapeutic setting. The work reported in this manuscript is the first experimental proof of the remarkable reduction of normal tissue (skin) toxicities after Ne MBRT irradiations as compared to conventional Ne irradiations. This result might allow for a renewed use of very heavy ions for cancer therapy. Abstract (1) Background: among all types of radiation, very heavy ions, such as Neon (Ne) or Argon (Ar), are the optimum candidates for hypoxic tumor treatments due to their reduced oxygen enhancement effect. However, their pioneering clinical use in the 1970s was halted due to severe side effects. The aim of this work was to provide a first proof that the combination of very heavy ions with minibeam radiation therapy leads to a minimization of toxicities and, thus, opening the door for a renewed use of heavy ions for therapy; (2) Methods: mouse legs were irradiated with either Ne MBRT or Ne broad beams at the same average dose. Skin toxicity was scored for a period of four weeks. Histopathology evaluations were carried out at the end of the study; (3) Results: a significant difference in toxicity was observed between the two irradiated groups. While severe da-mage, including necrosis, was observed in the broad beam group, only light to mild erythema was present in the MBRT group; (4) Conclusion: Ne MBRT is significantly better tolerated than conventional broad beam irradiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Ryochi Hirayama
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
| | - Naruhiro Matsufuji
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Ionizing Radiation Research Group, Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), E-08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain;
| | - Olivier Seksek
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Université de Paris, IJCLab, Pole Santé, 91405 Orsay, France;
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France;
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Sachiko Koike
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (D.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, 91400 Orsay, France; (D.L.); (F.P.)
| | - Laura Polledo
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Nils Warfving
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Aléthéa Liens
- AnaPath Services GmbH, Hammerstrasse 49, 4410 Liestal, Switzerland; (L.P.); (N.W.); (A.L.)
| | - Judith Bergs
- Department of Radiology Charité—Universitätsmedizin Berlin, CCM Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany;
| | - Takashi Shimokawa
- Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan; (R.H.); (N.M.); (T.I.); (S.K.); (T.S.)
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Patriarca A, Juchaux M, Crepin D, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Le Dudal M, Hardy D, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Jouvion G, Prezado Y. Spatially Modulated Proton Minibeams Results in the Same Increase of Lifespan as a Uniform Target Dose Coverage in F98-Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat Res 2021; 194:715-723. [PMID: 32991712 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new approach in proton radiotherapy, by which a significant increase in the therapeutic index has already been demonstrated in RG2 glioma-bearing rats. In the current study we investigated the response of other types of glioma (F98) and performed a comparative evaluation of tumor control effectiveness by pMBRT (with different levels of dose heterogeneity) versus conventional proton therapy. The results of our study showed an equivalent increase in the lifespan for all evaluated groups (conventional proton irradiation and pMBRT) and no significant differences in the histopathological analysis of the tumors or remaining brain tissue. The reduced long-term toxicity observed with pMBRT in previous evaluations at the same dose suggests a possible use of pMBRT to treat glioma with less side effects while ensuring the same tumor control achieved with standard proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crepin
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Histologie, Embryologie et Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - David Hardy
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pathophysiology of Pediatric Genetic Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Sotiropoulos M, Brisebard E, Le Dudal M, Jouvion G, Juchaux M, Crépin D, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Labiod D, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. X-rays minibeam radiation therapy at a conventional irradiator: Pilot evaluation in F98-glioma bearing rats and dose calculations in a human phantom. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:44-49. [PMID: 33511291 PMCID: PMC7817429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a type of spatial fractionated radiotherapy that uses submillimetric beams. This work reports on a pilot study on normal tissue response and the increase of the lifespan of glioma-bearing rats when irradiated with a tabletop x-ray system. Our results show a significant widening of the therapeutic window for brain tumours treated with MBRT: an important proportion of long-term survivals (60%) coupled with a significant reduction of toxicity when compared with conventional (broad beam) irradiations. In addition, the clinical translation of the minibeam treatment at a conventional irradiator is evaluated through a possible human head treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Laboratoire d’Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l’Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Biopôle, Unité d’Histologie, d’Embryologie et d’Anatomie Pathologique Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crépin
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab-UMR 9012), CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay/Université de Paris, Campus Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sammer M, Girst S, Dollinger G. Optimizing proton minibeam radiotherapy by interlacing and heterogeneous tumor dose on the basis of calculated clonogenic cell survival. Sci Rep 2021; 11:3533. [PMID: 33574390 PMCID: PMC7878903 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-81708-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a spatial fractionation method using sub-millimeter beams at center-to-center (ctc) distances of a few millimeters to widen the therapeutic index by reduction of side effects in normal tissues. Interlaced minibeams from two opposing or four orthogonal directions are calculated to minimize side effects. In particular, heterogeneous dose distributions applied to the tumor are investigated to evaluate optimized sparing capabilities of normal tissues at the close tumor surrounding. A 5 cm thick tumor is considered at 10 cm depth within a 25 cm thick water phantom. Pencil and planar minibeams are interlaced from two (opposing) directions as well as planar beams from four directions. An initial beam size of σ0 = 0.2 mm (standard deviation) is assumed in all cases. Tissue sparing potential is evaluated by calculating mean clonogenic cell survival using a linear-quadratic model on the calculated dose distributions. Interlacing proton minibeams for homogeneous irradiation of the tumor has only minor benefits for the mean clonogenic cell survival compared to unidirectional minibeam irradiation modes. Enhanced mean cell survival, however, is obtained when a heterogeneous dose distribution within the tumor is permitted. The benefits hold true even for an elevated mean tumor dose, which is necessary to avoid cold spots within the tumor in concerns of a prescribed dose. The heterogeneous irradiation of the tumor allows for larger ctc distances. Thus, a high mean cell survival of up to 47% is maintained even close to the tumor edges for single fraction doses in the tumor of at least 10 Gy. Similar benefits would result for heavy ion minibeams with the advantage of smaller minibeams in deep tissue potentially offering even increased tissue sparing. The enhanced mean clonogenic cell survival through large ctc distances for interlaced pMBRT with heterogeneous tumor dose distribution results in optimum tissue sparing potential. The calculations show the largest enhancement of the mean cell survival in normal tissue for high-dose fractions. Thus, hypo-fractionation or even single dose fractions become possible for tumor irradiation. A widened therapeutic index at big cost reductions is offered by interlaced proton or heavy ion minibeam therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sammer
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579, Neubiberg, Germany.
| | - Stefanie Girst
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85579, Neubiberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mazal A, Vera Sanchez JA, Sanchez-Parcerisa D, Udias JM, España S, Sanchez-Tembleque V, Fraile LM, Bragado P, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Gordillo N, Garcia G, Castro Novais J, Perez Moreno JM, Mayorga Ortiz L, Ilundain Idoate A, Cremades Sendino M, Ares C, Miralbell R, Schreuder N. Biological and Mechanical Synergies to Deal With Proton Therapy Pitfalls: Minibeams, FLASH, Arcs, and Gantryless Rooms. Front Oncol 2021; 10:613669. [PMID: 33585238 PMCID: PMC7874206 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.613669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy has advantages and pitfalls comparing with photon therapy in radiation therapy. Among the limitations of protons in clinical practice we can selectively mention: uncertainties in range, lateral penumbra, deposition of higher LET outside the target, entrance dose, dose in the beam path, dose constraints in critical organs close to the target volume, organ movements and cost. In this review, we combine proposals under study to mitigate those pitfalls by using individually or in combination: (a) biological approaches of beam management in time (very high dose rate “FLASH” irradiations in the order of 100 Gy/s) and (b) modulation in space (a combination of mini-beams of millimetric extent), together with mechanical approaches such as (c) rotational techniques (optimized in partial arcs) and, in an effort to reduce cost, (d) gantry-less delivery systems. In some cases, these proposals are synergic (e.g., FLASH and minibeams), in others they are hardly compatible (mini-beam and rotation). Fixed lines have been used in pioneer centers, or for specific indications (ophthalmic, radiosurgery,…), they logically evolved to isocentric gantries. The present proposals to produce fixed lines are somewhat controversial. Rotational techniques, minibeams and FLASH in proton therapy are making their way, with an increasing degree of complexity in these three approaches, but with a high interest in the basic science and clinical communities. All of them must be proven in clinical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Daniel Sanchez-Parcerisa
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Sedecal Molecular Imaging, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Manuel Udias
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Samuel España
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Victor Sanchez-Tembleque
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Mario Fraile
- Grupo de Física Nuclear and IPARCOS, U. Complutense Madrid, CEI Moncloa, Madrid, Spain.,Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alvaro Gutierrez-Uzquiza
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. U. Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nuria Gordillo
- Department of Applied Physics, U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.,Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Gaston Garcia
- Center for Materials Microanalysis, (CMAM), U. Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Whole brain proton irradiation in adult Sprague Dawley rats produces dose dependent and non-dependent cognitive, behavioral, and dopaminergic effects. Sci Rep 2020; 10:21584. [PMID: 33299021 PMCID: PMC7726106 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78128-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy causes less off-target effects than X-rays but is not without effect. To reduce adverse effects of proton radiotherapy, a model of cognitive deficits from conventional proton exposure is needed. We developed a model emphasizing multiple cognitive outcomes. Adult male rats (10/group) received a single dose of 0, 11, 14, 17, or 20 Gy irradiation (the 20 Gy group was not used because 50% died). Rats were tested once/week for 5 weeks post-irradiation for activity, coordination, and startle. Cognitive assessment began 6-weeks post-irradiation with novel object recognition (NOR), egocentric learning, allocentric learning, reference memory, and proximal cue learning. Proton exposure had the largest effect on activity and prepulse inhibition of startle 1-week post-irradiation that dissipated each week. 6-weeks post-irradiation, there were no effects on NOR, however proton exposure impaired egocentric (Cincinnati water maze) and allocentric learning and caused reference memory deficits (Morris water maze), but did not affect proximal cue learning or swimming performance. Proton groups also had reduced striatal levels of the dopamine transporter, tyrosine hydroxylase, and the dopamine receptor D1, effects consistent with egocentric learning deficits. This new model will facilitate investigations of different proton dose rates and drugs to ameliorate the cognitive sequelae of proton radiotherapy.
Collapse
|
40
|
Sammer M, Dombrowsky AC, Schauer J, Oleksenko K, Bicher S, Schwarz B, Rudigkeit S, Matejka N, Reindl J, Bartzsch S, Blutke A, Feuchtinger A, Combs SE, Dollinger G, Schmid TE. Normal Tissue Response of Combined Temporal and Spatial Fractionation in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2020; 109:76-83. [PMID: 32805301 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy, a spatial fractionation concept, widens the therapeutic window. By reducing normal tissue toxicities, it allows a temporally fractionated regime with high daily doses. However, an array shift between daily fractions can affect the tissue-sparing effect by decreasing the total peak-to-valley dose ratio. Therefore, combining temporal fractions with spatial fractionation raises questions about the impact of daily applied dose modulations, reirradiation accuracies, and total dose modulations. METHODS AND MATERIALS Healthy mouse ear pinnae were irradiated with 4 daily fractions of 30 Gy mean dose, applying proton pencil minibeams (pMB) of Gaussian σ = 222 μm in 3 different schemes: a 16 pMB array with a center-to-center distance of 1.8 mm irradiated the same position in all sessions (FS1) or was shifted by 0.9 mm to never hit the previously irradiated tissue in each session (FS2), or a 64 pMB array with a center-to-center distance of 0.9 mm irradiated the same position in all sessions (FS3), resulting in the same total dose distribution as FS2. Reirradiation positioning and its accuracy were obtained from image guidance using the unique vessel structure of ears. Acute toxicities (swelling, erythema, and desquamation) were evaluated for 153 days after the first fraction. Late toxicities (fibrous tissue, inflammation) were analyzed on day 153. RESULTS Reirradiation of highly dose-modulated arrays at a positioning accuracy of 110 ± 52 μm induced the least severe acute and late toxicities. A shift of the same array in FS2 led to significantly inducted acute toxicities, a higher otitis score, and a slight increase in fibrous tissue. FS3 led to the strongest increase in acute and late toxicities. CONCLUSIONS The highest normal-tissue sparing is achieved after accurate reirradiation of a highly dose modulated pMB array, although high positioning accuracies are challenging in a clinical environment. Nevertheless, the same integral dose applied in highly dose-modulated fractions is superior to low daily dose-modulated fractions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sammer
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Annique C Dombrowsky
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany.
| | - Jannis Schauer
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Kateryna Oleksenko
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Sandra Bicher
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schwarz
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Sarah Rudigkeit
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Nicole Matejka
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Judith Reindl
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Andreas Blutke
- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Annette Feuchtinger
- Research Unit Analytical Pathology, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Institute for Applied Physics and Metrology, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany; Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Eley JG, Chadha AS, Quini C, Vichaya EG, Zhang C, Davis J, Sahoo N, Waddell J, Leiser D, Dilmanian FA, Krishnan S. Pilot study of neurologic toxicity in mice after proton minibeam therapy. Sci Rep 2020; 10:11368. [PMID: 32647361 PMCID: PMC7347840 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68015-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeams (MBs) comprised of parallel planar beamlets were evaluated for their ability to spare healthy brain compared to proton broad beams (BBs). Juvenile mice were given partial brain irradiation of 10 or 30 Gy integral dose using 100 MeV protons configured either as BBs or arrays of 0.3-mm planar MBs spaced 1.0 mm apart on center. Neurologic toxicity was evaluated during an 8-month surveillance: no overt constitutional or neurologic dysfunction was noted for any study animals. Less acute epilation was observed in MB than BB mice. Persistent chronic inflammation was noted along the entire BB path in BB mice whereas inflammation was confined to just within the MB peak regions in MB mice. The potential neurologic sparing, possibly via reduced volume of chronic inflammation, offers a compelling rationale for clinical advancement of this proton technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John G Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2220 Pierce Avenue, Preston Research Building B1003, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
| | - Awalpreet S Chadha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Caio Quini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Elisabeth G Vichaya
- Department of Symptom Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Cancan Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - James Davis
- Department of Pathology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jaylyn Waddell
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Dominic Leiser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 West Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - F Avraham Dilmanian
- Departments of Radiology, Neurology, and Radiation Oncology, Stony Brook Medicine, 101 Nicolls Road, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Road S., Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Charyyev S, Artz M, Szalkowski G, Chang C, Stanforth A, Lin L, Zhang R, Wang CC. Optimization of hexagonal‐pattern minibeams for spatially fractionated radiotherapy using proton beam scanning. Med Phys 2020; 47:3485-3495. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Serdar Charyyev
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | - Mark Artz
- UF Health Proton Therapy Institute Jacksonville FL 32206 USA
| | - Gregory Szalkowski
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of North Carolina Chapel Hill NC 27514 USA
| | - Chih‐Wei Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | | | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology Emory University Atlanta GA 30322 USA
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology Dartmouth College Hanover NH 03755 USA
| | - C.‐K. Chris Wang
- Medical Physics Program Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta GA 30332 USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Lansonneur P, Mammar H, Nauraye C, Patriarca A, Hierso E, Dendale R, Prezado Y, De Marzi L. First proton minibeam radiation therapy treatment plan evaluation. Sci Rep 2020; 10:7025. [PMID: 32341427 PMCID: PMC7184593 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63975-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel dose delivery method based on spatial dose fractionation. pMBRT has been shown to be promising in terms of reduced side effects and superior tumour control in high-grade glioma-bearing rats compared to standard irradiation. These findings, together with the recent optimized implementation of pMBRT in a clinical pencil beam scanning system, have triggered reflection on the possible application to patient treatments. In this context, the present study was designed to conduct a first theoretical investigation of the clinical potential of this technique. For this purpose, a dedicated dose engine was developed and used to evaluate two clinically relevant patient treatment plans (high-grade glioma and meningioma). Treatment plans were compared with standard proton therapy plans assessed by means of a commercial treatment planning system (ECLIPSE-Varian Medical systems) and Monte Carlo simulations. A multislit brass collimator consisting of 0.4 mm wide slits separated by a centre-to-centre distance of 4 or 6 mm was placed between the nozzle and the patient to shape the planar minibeams. For each plan, spread-out Bragg peaks and homogeneous dose distributions (±7% dose variations) can be obtained in target volumes. The Peak-to-Valley Dose Ratios (PVDR) were evaluated between 9.2 and 12.8 at a depth of 20 mm for meningioma and glioma, respectively. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) for target volumes and organs at risk were quantitatively compared, resulting in a slightly better target homogeneity with standard PT than with pMBRT plans, but similar DVHs for deep-seated organs-at-risk and lower average dose for shallow organs. The proposed delivery method evaluated in this work opens the way to an effective treatment for radioresistant tumours and will support the design of future clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Lansonneur
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - H Mammar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - C Nauraye
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - A Patriarca
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - E Hierso
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - R Dendale
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - L De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France. .,Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, 91898, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Schneider T, De Marzi L, Patriarca A, Prezado Y. Advancing proton minibeam radiation therapy: magnetically focussed proton minibeams at a clinical centre. Sci Rep 2020; 10:1384. [PMID: 31992757 PMCID: PMC6987213 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58052-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that has proven to significantly increase dose tolerances and sparing of normal tissue. It uses very narrow proton beams (diameter ≤1 mm), roughly one order of magnitude smaller than state-of-the-art pencil beams. The current implementation of pMBRT with mechanical collimators is suboptimal as it is inflexible, decreases efficiency and produces additional secondary neutrons. As a potential solution, we explore in this article minibeam generation through magnetic focussing and investigate possibilities for the integration of such a technique at existing clinical centres. For this, a model of the pencil beam scanning (PBS) nozzle and beam at the Orsay Proton Therapy Centre was established and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to determine its focussing capabilities. Moreover, various modifications of the nozzle geometry were considered. It was found that the PBS nozzle in its current state is not suitable for magnetic minibeam generation. Instead, a new, optimised nozzle design has been proposed and conditions necessary for minibeam generation were benchmarked. In addition, dose simulations in a water phantom were performed which showed improved dose distributions compared to those obtained with mechanical collimators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France. .,Université de Paris, IJCLab, 91405, Orsay, France.
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Dos Santos M, Delorme R, Salmon R, Prezado Y. Minibeam radiation therapy: A micro- and nano-dosimetry Monte Carlo study. Med Phys 2020; 47:1379-1390. [PMID: 31900944 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative strategy based on a distinct dose delivery method that is administered using a series of narrow (submillimetric) parallel beams. To shed light on the biological effects of MBRT irradiation, we explored the micro- and nanodosimetric characteristics of three promising MBRT modalities (photon, electron, and proton) using Monte Carlo (MC) calculations. METHODS Irradiation with proton (100 MeV), electron (300 MeV), and photon (effective energy of 69 keV) minibeams were simulated using Geant4 MC code and the Geant4-DNA extension, which allows the simulation of energy transfer points with nanometric accuracy. As the target of the simulations, cells containing spherical nuclei with or without a detailed description of the DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) geometry were placed at different depths in peak and valley regions in a water phantom. The energy deposition and number of events in the cell nuclei were recorded in the microdosimetry study, and the number of DNA breaks and their complexity were determined in the nanodosimetric study, where a multi-scale simulation approach was used for the latter. For DNA damage assessment, an adapted DBSCAN clustering algorithm was used. To compare the photon MBRT (xMBRT), electron MBRT (eMBRT), and proton MBRT (pMBRT) approaches, we considered the treatment of a brain tumor located at a depth of 75 mm. RESULTS Both mean energy deposition at micrometric scale and DNA damage in the "valley" cell nuclei were very low as compared with these parameters in the peak region at all depths for xMBRT and at depths of 0 to 30 mm and 0 to 50 mm for eMBRT and pMBRT, respectively. Only the charged minibeams were favorable for tumor control by producing similar effects in peak and valley cells after 70 mm. At the micrometer scale, the energy deposited per event pointed to a potential advantage of proton beams for tumor control, as more aggressive events could be expected at the end of their tracks. At the nanometer scale, all three MBRT modalities produced direct clustered DNA breaks, although the majority of damage (>93%) was composed of isolated single strand breaks. The pMBRT led to a significant increase in the proportion of clustered single strand breaks and double-strand breaks at the end of its range as compared to the entrance (7% at 75 mm vs 3% at 10 mm) in contrast to eMBRT and xMBRT. In the latter cases, the proportions of complex breaks remained constant, irrespective of the depth and region (peak or valley). CONCLUSIONS Enhanced normal tissue sparing can be expected with these three MBRT techniques. Among the three modalities, pMBRT offers an additional gain for radioresistant tumors, as it resulted in a higher number of complex DNA damage clusters in the tumor region. These results can aid understanding of the biological mechanisms of MBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dos Santos
- Department of Radiobiology and regenerative medicine (SERAMED), Laboratory of Radiobiology of Accidental exposures (LRAcc), IRSN, F-92260, Fontenay-aux-Roses, France
| | - R Delorme
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - R Salmon
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Y Prezado
- Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, F-91400, Orsay, France.,Université de Paris, IMNC, F-91400, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dilmanian FA, Venkatesulu BP, Sahoo N, Wu X, Nassimi JR, Herchko S, Lu J, Dwarakanath BS, Eley JG, Krishnan S. Proton minibeams-a springboard for physics, biology and clinical creativity. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190332. [PMID: 31944824 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam therapy (PMBT) is a form of spatially fractionated radiotherapy wherein broad beam radiation is replaced with segmented minibeams-either parallel, planar minibeam arrays generated by a multislit collimator or scanned pencil beams that converge laterally at depth to create a uniform dose layer at the tumor. By doing so, the spatial pattern of entrance dose is considerably modified while still maintaining tumor dose and efficacy. Recent studies using computational modeling, phantom experiments, in vitro and in vivo preclinical models, and early clinical feasibility assessments suggest that unique physical and biological attributes of PMBT can be exploited for future clinical benefit. We outline some of the guiding principle of PMBT in this concise overview of this emerging area of preclinical and clinical research inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Avraham Dilmanian
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Neurology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.,Departments of Psychiatry, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Bhanu P Venkatesulu
- Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Narayan Sahoo
- Departments of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Xiaodong Wu
- Biophysics Research Institute of America, Miami, FL, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Jessica R Nassimi
- Departments of Radiology, Health Sciences Center and Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Steven Herchko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Jiade Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, China
| | | | - John G Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guardiola C, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Verification of a Monte Carlo dose calculation engine in proton minibeam radiotherapy in a passive scattering beamline for preclinical trials. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190578. [PMID: 31868523 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the benefits of proton therapy with the remarkable normal tissue preservation observed with the use of submillimetric spatially fractionated beams. This promising technique has been implemented at the Institut Curie-Proton therapy centre (ICPO) using a first prototype of a multislit collimator. The purpose of this work was to develop a Monte Carlo-based dose calculation engine to reliably guide preclinical studies at ICPO. METHODS The whole "Y1"-passive beamline at the ICPO, including pMBRT implementation, was modelled using the Monte Carlo GATE v. 7.0 code. A clinically relevant proton energy (100 MeV) was used as starting point. Minibeam generation by means of the brass collimator used in the first experiments was modelled. A virtual source was modelled at the exit of the beamline nozzle and outcomes were compared with dosimetric measurements performed with EBT3 gafchromic films and a diamond detector in water. Dose distributions were recorded in a water phantom and in rat CT images (7-week-old male Fischer rats). RESULTS The dose calculation engine was benchmarked against experimental data and was then used to assess dose distributions in CT images of a rat, resulting from different irradiation configurations used in several experiments. It reduced computational time by an order of magnitude. This allows us to speed up simulations for in vivo trials, where we obtained peak-to-valley dose ratios of 1.20 ± 0.05 and 6.1 ± 0.2 for proton minibeam irradiations targeting the tumour and crossing the rat head. Tumour eradication was observed in the 67 and 22% of the animals treated respectively. CONCLUSION A Monte Carlo dose calculation engine for pMBRT implementation with mechanical collimation has been developed. This tool can be used to guide and interpret the results of in vivo trials. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This is the first Monte Carlo dose engine for pMBRT that is being used to guide preclinical trials in a clinical proton therapy centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS); Universités Paris 11 and Paris 7, Laboratoire d'Imagerie et Modélisation en Neurobiologie et Cancérologie (IMNC), Orsay Cedex, 91405, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Sammer M, Zahnbrecher E, Dobiasch S, Girst S, Greubel C, Ilicic K, Reindl J, Schwarz B, Siebenwirth C, Walsh DWM, Combs SE, Dollinger G, Schmid TE. Proton pencil minibeam irradiation of an in-vivo mouse ear model spares healthy tissue dependent on beam size. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0224873. [PMID: 31765436 PMCID: PMC6876838 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2019] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy using minibeams of sub-millimeter dimensions reduces side effects in comparison to conventional proton therapy due to spatial fractionation. Since the proton minibeams widen with depth, the homogeneous irradiation of a tumor can be ensured by adjusting the beam distances to tumor size and depth to maintain tumor control as in conventional proton therapy. The inherent advantages of protons in comparison to photons like a limited range that prevents a dosage of distal tissues are maintained by proton minibeams and can even be exploited for interlacing from different beam directions. A first animal study was conducted to systematically investigate and quantify the tissue-sparing effects of proton pencil minibeams as a function of beam size and dose distributions, using beam widths between σ = 95, 199, 306, 411, 561 and 883 μm (standard deviation) at a defined center-to-center beam distance (ctc) of 1.8 mm. The average dose of 60 Gy was distributed in 4x4 minibeams using 20 MeV protons (LET ~ 2.7 keV/μm). The induced radiation toxicities were measured by visible skin reactions and ear swelling for 90 days after irradiation. The largest applied beam size to ctc ratio (σ/ctc = 0.49) is similar to a homogeneous irradiation and leads to a significant 3-fold ear thickness increase compared to the control group. Erythema and desquamation was also increased significantly 3–4 weeks after irradiation. With decreasing beam sizes and thus decreasing σ/ctc, the maximum skin reactions are strongly reduced until no ear swelling or other visible skin reactions should occur for σ/ctc < 0.032 (extrapolated from data). These results demonstrate that proton pencil minibeam radiotherapy has better tissue-sparing for smaller σ/ctc, corresponding to larger peak-to-valley dose ratios PVDR, with the best effect for σ/ctc < 0.032. However, even quite large σ/ctc (e.g. σ/ctc = 0.23 or 0.31, i.e. PVDR = 10 or 2.7) show less acute side effects than a homogeneous dose distribution. This suggests that proton minibeam therapy spares healthy tissue not only in the skin but even for dose distributions appearing in deeper layers close to the tumor enhancing its benefits for clinical proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Sammer
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Esther Zahnbrecher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| | - Sophie Dobiasch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Girst
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christoph Greubel
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Katarina Ilicic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Judith Reindl
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Schwarz
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Christian Siebenwirth
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Dietrich W M Walsh
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Germany
| | - Günther Dollinger
- Institut für Angewandte Physik und Messtechnik (LRT2), Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Helmholtz Zentrum München (HMGU), Oberschleißheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|