Efficacy and safety of sibutramine for weight loss in obese patients with hypertension well controlled by beta-adrenergic blocking agents: a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised trial

Insights on Dietary Polyphenols as Agents against Metabolic Disorders: Obesity as a Target Disease

Obesity is a condition that leads to increased health problems associated with metabolic disorders. Synthetic drugs are available for obesity treatment, but some of these compounds have demonstrated considerable side effects that limit their use. Polyphenols are vital phytonutrients of plant origin that can be incorporated as functional food ingredients. This review presents recent developments in dietary polyphenols as anti-obesity agents. Evidence supporting the potential application of food-derived polyphenols as agents against obesity has been summarized. Literature evidence supports the effectiveness of plant polyphenols against obesity. The anti-obesity mechanisms of polyphenols have been explained by their potential to inhibit obesity-related digestive enzymes, modulate neurohormones/peptides involved in food intake, and their ability to improve the growth of beneficial gut microbes while inhibiting the proliferation of pathogenic ones. Metabolism of polyphenols by gut microbes produces different metabolites with enhanced biological properties. Thus, research demonstrates that dietary polyphenols can offer a novel path to developing functional foods for treating obesity. Upcoming investigations need to explore novel techniques, such as nanocarriers, to improve the content of polyphenols in foods and their delivery and bioavailability at the target sites in the body.

State of the Art Review: Long-term Pharmacotherapy for Overweight and Obesity: A Review of Sibutramine, Orlistat, and Rimonabant

The objective of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy for long-term maintenance of weight loss in overweight and obese patients. Literature was obtained through a MEDLINE (1966 to July 2006) search and a bibliographic review of published articles. Key terms used included overweight, obesity, sibutramine, orlistat, and rimonabant. The search was further limited to clinical trials in humans and in the English language. Obesity is a chronic condition requiring long-term therapy. Two agents, sibutramine and orlistat, are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the long-term treatment of obesity. Rimonabant, marketed in Europe as Accomplia, has demonstrated efficacy for long term weight loss, however an Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted against its approval in June 2007 due to safety concerns (psychiatric effects). For clinically meaningful results, these agents must be used in conjunction with lifestyle therapy, including a hypocaloric diet, increased physical activity, and behavioral modification. This article reviews clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of sibutramine, orlistat, and rimonabant in reducing weight and examines other health benefits and risks associated with these agents.

Sibutramine update

The introduction of sibutramine has brought a new therapeutic option for the management of many overweight and obese patients. To date it has been used by more than eight million patients in over 70 countries. As part of a comprehensive programme that includes diet and lifestyle guidance, the additive effect of sibutramine (10 or 15 mg/day) facilitates patients to achieve and sustain greater weight loss. Overall weight loss is typically 5—10% of starting body weight, and this is almost entirely due to loss of excess adipose tissue. Commensurate with this level of weight loss, benefits have been noted in comorbidities such as insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and dyslipidaemia. Sibutramine is a serotonin-noradrenaline (norepinephrine) re-uptake inhibitor which acts centrally to induce satiety and maintain thermogenic expenditure. The main side effects are increased heart rate and blood pressure which are generally small, but require frequent checks.

Effect of antiobesity medications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Obesity is considered as a major health problem, as its prevalence continuously rises worldwide. One of the common health consequences of obesity is type 2 diabetes mellitus. Therefore, antiobesity management is a prerequisite in treating diabetic patients. Lifestyle modifications combined with pharmacological agents appear to be an effective approach. Sibutramine is a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, which acts centrally by promoting the feeling of satiety and decreasing caloric intake, thus resulting in weight loss. A potential association with cardiovascular side effects has been noted. Orlistat, a gastric and pancreatic lipase inhibitor, also achieves significant weight loss and improves glycaemic status, but it has gastrointestinal side effects. Rimonabant, the first endocannabinoid CB1 antagonist, is associated with weight reduction and it improves diabetic parameters; nevertheless, it is associated with psychiatric disorders; indeed, a recently conducted safety review led to the temporal suspension of its commercialization. The above-mentioned medications seem to be currently useful agents for treating obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Other medications used for diabetes management, such as exenatide, liraglutide and pramlintide, have also shown body weight reduction. Ongoing research is needed to scrutinize the precise impact of these agents in the daily clinical practice of management of obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

The use of sibutramine in the management of obesity and related disorders: an update

Aims:

To review the major trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of the use of sibutramine for weight loss and the impact of this agent on obesity-related disorders.

Methods and results:

The most important articles on sibutramine up to January 2009 were located by a PubMed and Medline search. Sibutramine reduces food intake and body weight more than placebo and has positive effects on the lipid profile (mainly triglycerides and high density lipoprotein cholesterol), glycemic control and inflammatory markers in studies for up to one year. Preliminary studies showed that sibutramine may also improve other obesity-associated disorders such as polycystic ovary syndrome, left ventricular hypertrophy, binge eating disorder and adolescent obesity. The high discontinuation rates and some safety issues mainly due to the increase in blood pressure and pulse rate have to be considered. Additionally, it has not yet been established that treatment with sibutramine will reduce cardiovascular events and total mortality.

Conclusions:

Sibutramine, in conjunction with lifestyle measures, is a useful drug for reducing body weight and improving associated cardiometabolic risk factors and obesity-related disorders. Studies of longer duration are required to determine the precise indications of the drug, to evaluate safety issues and to assess its efficacy on cardiovascular mortality.

Pioglitazone metabolic effect in metformin-intolerant obese patients treated with sibutramine

OBJECTIVE

Metformin is the drug of choice to treat obese type 2 diabetes patients because it reduces either insulin-resistance and body weight. We aimed to comparatively test the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone and sibutramine in metformin-intolerant obese type 2 diabetic patients treated with sibutramine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred and seventy-six consecutive Caucasian obese type 2 diabetic patients were evaluated during a 12-months period and fifty-two patients were resulted intolerant to metformin at maximum dosage (3,000 mg/day). All intolerant patients to metformin received a treatment with pioglitazone (45 mg/day) and sibutramine (10 mg/day) and they were compared with fifty-three patients treated with metformin (3,000 mg/day) and sibutramine (10 mg/day) for 6 months in a single-blind controlled trial. We assessed body mass index, waist circumference, glycated hemoglobin, Fasting Plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, postprandial plasma insulin, lipid profile, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate at baseline and after 3, and 6 months.

RESULTS

No body mass index change was observed at 3, and 6 months in pioglitazone + sibutramine group, while a significant reduction of body mass index and waist circumference was observed after 6 months in metformin + sibutramine group (p<0.05). A significant decrease of glycated hemoglobin, Fasting Plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, fasting plasma insulin, postprandial plasma insulin and HOMA index was observed after 3, and 6 months in both groups (p<0.05, and p<0.01, respectively). A significant Tg reduction was present after 6 months (p<0.05) in both groups respect to the baseline values. No systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and heart rate change was obtained after 3, and 6 months in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Pioglitazone and sibutramine combination appears to be a short-term equally efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic alternative respect to metformin-intolerant obese type 2 diabetic patients treated with sibutramine.

Can sibutramine alter systemic blood pressure in obese patients? Systematic review and meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Systemic arterial hypertension is part of the metabolic syndrome resulting from obesity.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of sibutramine on overweight and obese patients' blood pressure through a systematic review.

METHODS

All the studies included needed to be randomized controlled trials. The methodological quality of the selected trials was assessed using the criteria described in the Cochrane Handbook. The participants were overweight and obese patients; the intervention was sibutramine compared with placebo. The primary outcome measurement was systolic and diastolic blood pressure and the secondary measurement was blood pressure. Studies were identified by searching the following sources: Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde (Lilacs), Medline, Cochrane reviews, manual searches, personal communication and contact with the pharmaceutical industry. There were no language, date or other restrictions. Data collection and extraction was performed by two reviewers, who independently obtained the full articles of all eligible papers.

RESULTS

Three meta-analyses were produced: 1) systolic blood pressure outcome (eight studies) did not show statistical significance between sibutramine and placebo: weighted mean difference (WMD) 1.57, confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 3.18; 2) diastolic blood pressure outcome (ten studies) did not show statistical significance between sibutramine and placebo: WMD 1.13, CI -0.49 to 2.76; 3) blood pressure outcome (two studies) also did not show statistical significance between the groups: relative risk (RR) 0.69, CI 0.07 to 7.01.

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analyses presented in this systematic review show that sibutramine does not have a statistically significant effect on blood pressure, compared with placebo.

Sibutramine effect on metabolic control of obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with pioglitazone

Thiazolidinediones are supposed to be the pharmacologic agents that more physiologically fight the insulin resistance, but a possible adverse effect may be a weight increase. The aim of the study was to test the efficacy and tolerability of sibutramine on the metabolic effect of pioglitazone in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. All enrolled patients were required to have been diagnosed as being diabetic for at least 6 months and did not have glycemic control with diet and oral hypoglycemic agents such as sulfonylureas or metformin, both to the maximum tolerated dose. After a run-in period in which the eligible patients took a fixed dose of pioglitazone (30 mg/d), the patients were randomized to receive also sibutramine (10 mg/d) or placebo for 6 months. We assessed body mass index, hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), postprandial plasma insulin (PPI), lipid profile, lipoprotein parameters, and lipoprotein (a) at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. No body mass index change was observed after 3 and 6 months in the pioglitazone + placebo (pp) group. Significant decrease was present in the pioglitazone + sibutramine (ps) group after 3 (P < .05) and 6 months (P < .01) compared with the baseline values, and this variation was significant (P < .05) between groups. A significant HbA(1c) decrease was observed after 3 (P < .05) and 6 months (P < .01) in both groups with respect to the baseline values. There was no difference in HbA(1c) value between the 2 groups. No FPG, PPG, FPI, PPI, and homeostasis model assessment index change was observed at 3 months, whereas a significant decrease was present after 6 months (P < .05), in both groups with respect to the baseline values. There was no difference in FPG, PPG, FPI, PPI, and homeostasis model assessment index value between the pp and ps groups. No significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol change was observed at 3 months, whereas a significant decrease was present after 6 months (P < .05), in both groups with respect to the baseline values. There was no difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol value between the pp and ps groups. No triglyceride variation was present at 3 and 6 months in the pp group and at 3 months in the ps group, whereas a significant decrease was observed at 6 months (P < .05) in the ps group with respect to the baseline values. There was no difference in triglyceride value between both groups. No high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, and lipoprotein (a) changes were present in both groups with respect to the baseline values. Sibutramine appears to be a tolerable and efficacious drug when added to pioglitazone for the global management of obese diabetic patients.

Effects of sibutramine plus verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination on blood pressure and metabolic variables in obese hypertensive patients

OBJECTIVE

The management of obese hypertensive subjects may require the administration of anti-obesity and antihypertensive drugs. Sibutramine use has raised concerns regarding a potential increase in subjects' blood pressure and heart rate. The primary end-points of this study were an evaluation of the effect of sibutramine together with a verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination tablet versus verapamil sustained release/trandolapril alone on the blood pressure and heart rate in obese hypertensive patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN/METHODS

Patients received a low-fat low-calorie diet and were randomly allocated to open-label verapamil sustained release/trandolapril 180/2 mg (n = 26) or sibutramine 10 mg together with verapamil sustained release/trandolapril 180/2 mg (n = 28) daily for 6 months.

RESULTS

Significant reductions in the subjects' systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure were observed in both groups (p < 0.01 versus baseline). At 6 months a greater fall in blood pressure was observed in the sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group compared with the verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group (systolic blood pressure 21.9 +/- 8.1 versus 15.9 +/- 12.3 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure 15.7 +/- 8.1 versus 9.1 +/- 9.9 mmHg) but this was only significant (p = 0.03) for diastolic blood pressure. The subjects' heart rate did not change significantly in any group. No significant sibutramine-associated attenuation of blood pressure reduction was observed during the study. The sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril treatment resulted in significantly greater improvement in the subjects' anthropometric variables, homeostasis model assessment and lipid profiles compared with verapamil sustained release/trandolapril administration. The subjects' small dense low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and visfatin plasma levels were only measured in the sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril group (all decreased by p < 0.05 versus baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

The sibutramine/verapamil sustained release/trandolapril combination in obese hypertensive patients significantly reduced their blood pressure and improved their anthropometric and metabolic variables without affecting the heart rate.

Sibutramine-associated adverse effects: a practical guide for its safe use

Obesity is a multifactorial chronic disorder which comprises a serious health problem nowadays. The effective management of obesity is difficult in contemporary societies where abundance of hypercaloric food and sedentary lifestyle is the rule. Apart from lifestyle interventions, which include diet, exercise and behavioural treatment, weight-loss medications can also be used for the management of obesity. Sibutramine, a selective monoamine reuptake inhibitor, is a drug with established efficacy in sustained weight reduction and an overall favourable safety profile. However, its action on the sympathetic nervous system has linked sibutramine to blood pressure and heart rate elevations. These potentially adverse effects as well as other sibutramine-associated side effects and their possible underlying mechanisms are reviewed in the present article. Compelling evidence from the majority of data in the literature shows that sibutramine can be effectively used in conjunction with caloric restriction and exercise in obese patients. Hypertension, if adequately treated and frequently monitored, is not an absolute contraindication for the prescription of sibutramine.

State of the Art Review: Long-term Pharmacotherapy for Overweight and Obesity: A Review of Sibutramine, Orlistat, and Rimonabant

The objective of this review is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy for long-term maintenance of weight loss in overweight and obese patients. Literature was obtained through a MEDLINE (1966 to July 2006) search and a bibliographic review of published articles. Key terms used included overweight, obesity, sibutramine, orlistat, and rimonabant. The search was further limited to clinical trials in humans and in the English language. Obesity is a chronic condition requiring long-term therapy. Two agents, sibutramine and orlistat, are currently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the long-term treatment of obesity. Rimonabant, marketed in Europe as Accomplia, has demonstrated efficacy for long term weight loss, however an Food and Drug Administration advisory panel voted against its approval in June 2007 due to safety concerns (psychiatric effects). For clinically meaningful results, these agents must be used in conjunction with lifestyle therapy, including a hypocaloric diet, increased physical activity, and behavioral modification. This article reviews clinical trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of sibutramine, orlistat, and rimonabant in reducing weight and examines other health benefits and risks associated with these agents.

Secondary hypertension due to drugs and toxins

This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about drugs, other chemical substances, and toxins on blood pressure. Many classes of drugs, such as steroids, sympathomimetic amines, immunosuppressive agents, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, antidepressants, erythropoietin, substances of abuse and other agents can induce transient or sustained hypertension, exacerbate well-controlled hypertension, antagonize the effects of antihypertensive therapy, or precipitate hypertensive emergencies. Heightened awareness on the part of the physician is important to avoid unnecessary tests in search for other etiologies, and to reduce antihypertensive medication prescriptions by eliminating contributing agents whenever possible. These agents represent an important modifiable cause of secondary or resistant hypertension.

Cardiovascular responses to weight management and sibutramine in high-risk subjects: an analysis from the SCOUT trial

AIMS

The Sibutramine Cardiovascular OUTcomes (SCOUT) trial is a randomized, double-blind comparison of sibutramine vs. placebo, in addition to standard care for weight management, in overweight/obese subjects with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. The study had an initial single-blind, 6-week lead-in period with sibutramine plus weight management. We report the cardiovascular responses and weight loss during this period.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 10,742 subjects received treatment in the lead-in period; 97% had cardiovascular disease, 88% hypertension and 84% type 2 diabetes. Body weight decreased (median 2.2 kg [5th, 95th percentile changes -6.2, 0.5]); waist circumference was reduced by 2.0 cm (men: -8.5, 2.9; women: -9.0, 3.0), systolic blood pressure fell by 3.0 mmHg (-23.5, 12.5) and diastolic by 1.0 mmHg (-13.5, 10.0). Pulse rate increased by 1.5 b.p.m. (-11.0, 13.5). All changes were statistically significant (P < 0.001). Two consecutive increases in blood pressure or pulse rate of >10 mmHg/b.p.m. were observed in 4.7 and 3.5% of subjects, respectively. Fifteen subjects (0.1%) died; 10 deaths were attributed to a cardiovascular cause, equivalent to 1.2 and 0.8 deaths per 100 years of exposure, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Six-week treatment with sibutramine appears to be efficacious, tolerable and safe in this high-risk population for whom sibutramine is usually contraindicated.

Impact of weight-loss medications on the cardiovascular system: focus on current and future anti-obesity drugs

Overweight and obesity have been rising dramatically worldwide and are associated with numerous co-morbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, certain cancers, and sleep apnea. In fact, obesity is an independent risk factor for CVD and CVD risks have also been documented in obese children. The majority of overweight and obese patients who achieve a significant short-term weight loss do not maintain their lower bodyweight in the long term. This may be due to a lack of intensive counseling and support from a facilitating environment including dedicated healthcare professionals such as nutritionists, kinesiologists, and behavior specialists. As a result, there has been a considerable focus on the role of adjunctive therapy such as pharmacotherapy for long-term weight loss and weight maintenance. Beyond an unfavorable risk factor profile, overweight and obesity also impact upon heart structure and function. Since the beginning, the quest for weight loss drugs has encountered warnings from regulatory agencies and the withdrawal from the market of efficient but unsafe medications. Fenfluramine was withdrawn from the market because of unacceptable pulmonary and cardiac adverse effects. Nevertheless, there is extensive research directed at the development of new anti-obesity compounds. The effect of these molecules on CVD risk factors has been studied and reported but information regarding their impact on the cardiovascular system is sparse. Thus, instead of looking at the benefit of weight loss on metabolism and risk factor management, this article discusses the impact of weight loss medications on the cardiovascular system. The potential interaction of available and potential new weight loss drugs with heart function and structure is reviewed.

Safety of obesity drugs

The safety of obesity drugs has historically been poor. This and the stigmatisation of obesity in society ensured that a higher standard of safety for obesity drugs must be met. The authors review the safety disasters of obesity drugs that were withdrawn. The authors then review the safety of presently available drugs--benzphetamine, phendimetrazine, diethylpropion, phentermine, sibutramine and orlistat. The safety of rimonabant, a drug with a pending new drug application that has an independent effect on metabolic syndrome, is also reviewed. The authors compare the stage of obesity drug development to that of hypertension in the 1950s. As new and safer drugs with more downstream mechanisms are developed that have independent effects on the cardiovascular risks associated with obesity, third party reimbursement for obesity medicine is likely to improve. This may lead to obesity being treated like hypertension and other chronic diseases with long-term medication. With improved technological tools, the authors believe this process will be more rapid for obesity than it was for hypertension.

The effects of a new soluble dietary fiber on weight gain and selected blood parameters in rats

This study was designed to investigate a new dietary fiber, alpha-cyclodextrin, marketed under the trade name FBCx (Wacker Biochem, Adrian, MI), for beneficial effects on weight reduction and the improvement of certain blood parameters in rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into 4 groups and fed ad libitum for a period of 6 weeks: (1) a normal low-fat diet (LF; 4% fat wt/wt); (2) an LF diet with FBCx added; (3) a high-fat diet (HF, 40% fat wt/wt); and (4) an HF diet with FBCx. The FBCx was added at the rate of 10% (wt/wt) of the fat in the diet. Body weight and food intake were recorded 3 times per week. Plasma constituent levels and liver and fecal lipid contents, as well as body composition were determined at sacrifice. Adding FBCx to the diet significantly reduced weight gain in rats fed with an HF diet relative to rats fed with the HF control diet (P < .05). FBCx also elicited a reduction in plasma triglyceride levels of 30%, total cholesterol of 9%, and increased the fat content of the feces in the rats fed with the HF diet with FBCx. In addition, the serum leptin levels were normalized, and the calculated insulin sensitivity was improved. No adverse effects were observed in the rats consuming FBCx. It would appear that FBCx might be effective in reducing body weight gain and improving metabolic syndrome.

Efficacy and safety of sibutramine in 2225 subjects with cardiovascular risk factors: short-term, open-label, observational study

This study aims to determine the efficacy and tolerability of sibutramine hydrochloride in overweight and obese patients with cardiovascular risk factors. This was a 12-week, open-label, observational trial carried out in primary care settings. Patients' data were obtained from questionnaires received from 153 physicians. A total of 2225 overweight and obese (BMI> or =27 kg/m2) patients received sibutramine in single daily doses of 10 and/or 15 mg. The study population included patients in general good health and with controlled hypertension (41.2%), type II diabetes mellitus (15.6%), hyperlipidaemia (45.5%), and who were chronic tobacco users (smokers) (37.0%). The main outcome measures were changes in body weight, blood pressure and heart rate, and evaluation of reported adverse events. Reduction of body weight of at least >5% from baseline to week 12 was achieved in 2030 (91%) patients and >10% was achieved in 987 (44%) patients. Baseline differences in the percentages of male and female patients, presence or absence of hyperlipidaemia or smoking status did not appear to affect the rate of weight change. Weight loss was less in patients with type II diabetes mellitus and/or controlled systolic hypertension at baseline compared to those patients without these conditions. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate decreased from baseline to week 12. Overall, sibutramine was well tolerated. In conclusions, treatment with sibutramine resulted in clinically significant weight loss during short-term therapy in obese adults with a range of cardiovascular risk factors..

Paradoxical effect of sibutramine on autonomic cardiovascular regulation in obese hypertensive patients

BACKGROUND

Sibutramine, a serotonin and norepinephrine transporter blocker, is a common adjunctive obesity treatment. Acute studies in healthy subjects suggested that an inhibitory central nervous mechanism might attenuate the peripheral stimulatory effect on the sympathetic nervous system. This notion has not been tested in overweight and obese patients.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized, controlled clinical study in hypertensive patients with BMI > or = 27 to < 40 kg/m(2). After 4 week placebo run-in period patients were randomized to four different antihypertensive treatments or placebo. After 4 weeks of antihypertensive therapy, patients were additionally treated with sibutramine 15 mg o. d. for 3 months. Patients underwent cardiovascular autonomic reflex testing and a graded head-up tilt test at the end of each phase.

RESULTS

Mean body weight decreased from 98.5+/-4 to 94.7+/-4 kg (p<0.05) between end of placebo run-in and end of sibutramine treatment. Supine blood pressure was 154+/-3/80+/-2, 145+/-3/76+/-2 and 150+/-3/79+/-2mmHg at the end of placebo run-in, after antihypertensive titration (ns) and end of sibutramine treatment (ns), respectively. Blood pressure was affected similarly during head up tilt testing. The systolic blood pressure response to cold pressor testing was diminished with sibutramine (p<0.01). Sibutramine decreased low frequency systolic blood pressure oscillations in the supine position (p<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Resting blood pressure tends to increase with sibutramine, whereas blood pressure during sympathetic stimulation and low frequency blood pressure oscillations are decreased. These paradoxical changes are consistent with previous studies in healthy subjects and suggest a combination of peripheral and central nervous system mechanisms.

Sibutramine and the management of obesity

Sibutramine is a selective serotonin and noradrenaline re-uptake inhibitor approved for the long-term management of obesity. Its primary mechanism of action is increased satiety, although some evidence also suggests increased energy expenditure could play a role in sibutramine-induced weight loss. It has established general efficacy in long-term trials, with clinically-approved doses of 10 and 15 mg. Sibutramine has also been studied in a number of unique populations, including obese controlled hypertensives, diabetics and ethnic minorities, further establishing its effectiveness. However, it does have a consistent effect of increasing blood pressure and pulse. Thus, blood pressure and heart rate should be monitored in patients using sibutramine and it may not be applicable in obese patients with significant cardiovascular disease.

Drug Insight: appetite suppressants

The term 'appetite suppressant' is used to denote drugs that act primarily on the neurochemical transmitters of the central nervous system to reduce food intake. In addition to drugs that release or mimic the effect of norepinephrine (noradrenaline), this could include drugs that inhibit: reuptake of norepinephrine or 5-hydroxytryptamine (also known as serotonin); bind to the gamma-aminobutyric acid receptors or the cannabinoid receptors; and some peptides that reduce food intake. The sympathomimetic drugs phentermine, diethylpropion, benzphetamine, and phendimetrazine--so named because they mimic many effects of norepinephrine--are only approved in a few countries, and then only for short-term use. Sibutramine, a norepinephrine-5-hydroxytryptamine reuptake inhibitor, is approved for long-term use. Several new mechanisms for drug action are under investigation. Appetite suppressants should be viewed as useful adjuncts to diet and physical activity and might help selected patients to achieve and maintain weight loss.

Influence of Sibutramine on blood pressure: evidence from placebo-controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Sibutramine, a serotonin and norepinephrine transporter inhibitor, is widely used as an adjunctive obesity treatment. There have been concerns that norepinephrine reuptake inhibition with sibutramine could exacerbate arterial hypertension.

DESIGN

Combined analysis of two placebo-controlled trials.

SUBJECTS

The combined data set consisted of 1336 patients. Of these patients, 966 were randomized to sibutramine and 370 were randomized to placebo.

MEASUREMENTS

Body weight, blood pressure, heart rate (HR).

RESULTS

Sibutramine reduced body weight regardless of basal blood pressure. In the complete set of patients, systolic blood pressure did not change with either intervention over the 48-week period (-0.1+/-15.5 mmHg with sibutramine, -0.2+/-15.2 mmHg with placebo, P=0.9). The change in diastolic blood pressure over the 48 week period was 0.3+/-9.5 mmHg with sibutramine and -0.8+/-9.2 mmHg with placebo (P=0.049). The blood pressure response was not exacerbated in patients with grade 1 or 2 hypertension or in patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Sibutramine treatment caused a slight increase in supine HR that was sustained throughout the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Sibutramine treatment is unlikely to elicit a critical increase in blood pressure even in hypertensive patients. However, blood pressure and HR should be monitored closely. In patients who experience a clinically significant and sustained increase in blood pressure, the drug should probably be discontinued.

Efficacy and safety comparative evaluation of orlistat and sibutramine treatment in hypertensive obese patients

AIM

The aim of our study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of orlistat and sibutramine treatment in obese hypertensive patients, with a specific attention to cardiovascular effects and to side effects because of this treatment.

METHODS

Patients were enrolled, evaluated and followed at three Italian Centres of Internal Medicine. We evaluated 115 obese and hypertensive patients. (55 males and 60 females; 26 males and 29 females, aged 50 +/- 4 with orlistat; 28 males and 30 females, aged 51 +/- 5 with sibutramine). All patients took antihypertensive therapy for at least 6 months before the study. We administered orlistat or sibutramine in a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical study. We evaluated anthropometric variables, blood pressure and heart rate (HR) during 12 months of this treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 113 completed the 4 weeks with controlled energy diet and were randomized to double-blind treatment with orlistat (n = 55) or sibutramine (n = 58). Significant body mass index (BMI) improvement was present after 6 (p < 0.05), 9 (p < 0.02), and 12 (p < 0.01) months in both groups, and body weight (BW) improvement was obtained after 9 (p < 0.05) and 12 (p < 0.02) months in both groups. Significant waist circumference (WC), hip circumference (HC) and waist/hip ratio (W/H ratio) improvement was observed after 12 months (p < 0.05, respectively) in both groups. Significant systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) improvement (p < 0.05) was present in orlistat group after 12 months. Lipid profile [total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) and triglycerides] reduction (p < 0.05, respectively) was observed in orlistat group and triglyceride reduction (p < 0.05) in sibutramine group after 12 months. No significant change was observed in sibutramine group during the study. No significant HR variation was obtained during the study in both groups. Of the 109 patients who completed the study, 48.1% of patients in the orlistat group and 17.5% of patients in the sibutramine group had side effects (p < 0.05 vs. orlistat group). Side-effect profiles were different in the two treatment groups. All orlistat side effects were gastrointestinal events. Sibutramine caused an increase in blood pressure (both SBP and DBP) in two patients, but it has been controlled by antihypertensive treatment. The vitamin changes were small and all mean vitamin and beta-carotene values stayed within reference ranges. No patients required vitamin supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

Both orlistat and sibutramine are effective on anthropometric variables during the 12-month treatment; in our sample, orlistat has been associated to a mild reduction in blood pressure, while sibutramine assumption has not be associated to any cardiovascular effect and was generically better tolerated than orlistat.

Effect of low-dose metoprolol in combination with sibutramine therapy in normotensive obese patients: a randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

Sibutramine is an effective appetite suppresser agent, but treatment is often complicated with side effects, including palpitations and hypertension. In this study, we aimed to assess the effect of low-dose cardio-selective beta blocker combination with sibutramine treatment.

METHODS

In total, 57 obese subjects were enrolled in the study and separated into two groups in order to receive sibutramine 10 mg/day plus placebo (group P) or sibutramine 10 mg/day plus metoprolol 25 mg/day (group M). Patients were evaluated in the beginning and at the end of the third month with anthropometric measurements, biochemical analysis, peripheral insulin resistance, and ambulatory 24 h blood pressure monitoring. Side effects were evaluated with a visual analog scale.

RESULTS

During the study period, the drop-out rate was significantly higher in group P compared with group M (55 and 21%, respectively, P=0.014). Palpitations and headache were prominent symptoms in group P. Diastolic blood pressure (78.6+/-11.6 and 70.6+/-4.8 mmHg, respectively, P=0.013) and mean heart rate (84.3+/-6.1 and 75.8+/-8.4 beats/min, respectively, P=0.003) were significantly higher in group P compared with group M at the end of the third month. Weight loss was similar between the two groups (100.9+/-11.5 to 91.8+/-12.8 kg for group P, P<0.0001 and 97.9+/-13.2 to 88.9+/-13.8 kg for group M, P<0.0001). We did not find any deleterious effect of metoprolol on metabolic parameters.

CONCLUSION

Addition of low-dose metoprolol to sibutramine therapy increased patient compliance to the treatment, and decreased the frequency and severity of side effects including hypertension and palpitations, without decreasing the drug efficacy or causing significant deleterious changes in metabolic parameters.

Obesity and pharmacologic therapy

Obesity is a chronic, complex, multifactorial disorder with increasing prevalence in modern society. Lifestyle modification has had limited success in treating this disorder. Currently approved pharmacologic treatments for obesity include sibutramine and orlistat, which have been associated with significantly greater weight loss than that seen with dieting alone. In addition, a greater percentage of patients who receive medical treatment achieve weight losses of more than 5% to 10% of their initial body weight. This weight loss is associated with improvements in blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and dyslipidemia. Multiple new therapies that target several different regulatory pathways are currently in clinical trials.

Use of sibutramine to treat obesity

Medications are useful adjuncts to diet and exercise and may help patients lose weight and maintain significant weight loss (5%-10% from baseline). Pharmacologic approaches are indicated in those patients who have had prior weight-loss attempts, who have a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 or greater than or equal to 27 kg/m2 with comorbidity, and who are motivated and ready to undertake dietary and physical activity changes. This article provides a treatment algorithm to help physicians measure meaningful weight loss and proposes conservative blood pressure limits to guide the long-term prescription of sibutramine. Sibutramine can be a useful tool in the obesity treatment toolbox if used by knowledgeable practitioners.

Effect of sibutramine on weight loss and blood pressure: a meta-analysis of controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Sibutramine causes weight loss by suppressing the appetite and by promoting energy expenditure, but it can also increase blood pressure through a norepinephrine effect. The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials on the effects of sibutramine on blood pressure and weight loss.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Twenty-one placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trials of sibutramine were identified using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and a manual search. The effect sizes of sibutramine on weight and systolic (SBP) and diastolic (DBP) blood pressure changes were estimated. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to explore the relationship between effect sizes and the study characteristics.

RESULTS

The effect size of sibutramine on weight change was -1.00 (-1.17 to -0.84), whereas the effect sizes on SBP and DBP changes were 0.16 (0.08 to 0.24) and 0.26 (0.18 to 0.33), respectively. By subgroup analysis, the effect sizes on weight loss were significantly larger when the dosage was > or = 15 mg. The effect sizes on increased SBP were significantly larger when the initial body weight was > or = 92 kg and the age was < 44 years; similarly, the effect sizes on increased DBP were significantly larger when the initial weight was > or = 92 kg.

DISCUSSION

Sibutramine showed a large effect on weight loss. Because blood pressure was found to be increased slightly, but significantly, sibutramine should be used cautiously in patients with borderline or high blood pressure. Additional studies on its effect on blood pressure are needed.

Treatment of obesity: an update on anti-obesity medications

The information presented in this article provides an overview of physiological agents, therapeutics in current use, and medications that have been extensively used in the past but are no longer available, or are not classically considered as anti-obesity drugs. The authors present an extensive review on the criteria for anti-obesity management efficacy, on physiological mechanisms that regulate central and/or peripheral action energetic homeostasis (nutrients, monoamines and peptides), and on beta-phenethylamine pharmacological-derivative agents (fenfluramine, dexfenfluramine, phentermine, diethylpropion, fenproporex and sibutramine), tricyclic derivatives (mazindol), phenylpropanolamine derivatives (ephedrine, phenylpropanolamine), a phenylpropanolamine oxy-tri-fluor-phenyl derivative (fluoxetine), a naftilamine derivative (sertraline) and a lipstatine derivative (orlistat). An analysis of all clinical trials longer than 10 weeks in duration is also presented for medications used in the management of obesity.

Paradoxical effect of sibutramine on autonomic cardiovascular regulation

BACKGROUND

Sibutramine, a serotonin and norepinephrine transporter blocker, is widely used as an adjunctive obesity treatment. Norepinephrine reuptake inhibition with sibutramine conceivably could exacerbate arterial hypertension and promote cardiovascular disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 11 healthy subjects (7 men, age 27+/-2 years, body mass index 23.1+/-0.7 kg/m2), we compared the effect of sibutramine or matching placebo (ingested 26, 14, and 2 hours before testing) on cardiovascular responses to autonomic reflex tests and to a graded head-up tilt test. In addition, we tested sibutramine in combination with metoprolol. Testing was conducted in a double-blind and crossover fashion. Supine systolic blood pressure was 113+/-3 mm Hg with placebo, 121+/-3 mm Hg with sibutramine (P<0.001 versus placebo), and 111+/-2 mm Hg with the combination of sibutramine and metoprolol. Similarly, sibutramine increased upright blood pressure. Sibutramine substantially increased upright heart rate. This effect was abolished with metoprolol. The blood pressure response to cold pressor and handgrip testing was attenuated with sibutramine compared with placebo. Furthermore, sibutramine decreased low-frequency oscillations of blood pressure and plasma norepinephrine concentrations in the supine position.

CONCLUSIONS

The cardiovascular effect of the antiobesity drug sibutramine results from a complex interaction of peripheral and central nervous system effects. The inhibitory clonidine-like action of sibutramine on the central nervous system attenuates the peripheral stimulatory effect. Our findings strongly suggest that current concepts regarding the action of sibutramine on the sympathetic nervous system should be reconsidered.

Sibutramine lost and found

Obesity has now been identified as a chronic disease, a global epidemic (globesity) and a serious public health issue that leads to reduced life expectancy, an increased risk for many serious medical conditions and enormous healthcare costs. The prevalence of obesity and overweight in Italy in 2000 was respectively 9% and 33%, and has grown by 25% over the last five years. Even moderate weight loss can improve obesity-related morbidity and mortality. In November 1997, the US Food and Drug Administration approved sibutramine, a serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor, for the treatment of pathological obesity and the management and maintenance of weight loss. In March 2002, sibutramine was temporarily withdrawn from the Italian market on the basis of 47 adverse event reports received between April and December 2001. However, a worldwide review of efficacy and safety data has shown that the overall risk/benefit profile of sibutramine remains favourable, with the rate of fatal reports involving patients receiving sibutramine being 200 times less than the obese women's mortality rate in the Nurses' Health Study. There is strong evidence supporting the usefulness of the correct use of sibutramine in the management of obesity.

Drug treatment of obesity

At present only two drugs are approved for long-term treatment of obesity. Sibutramine inhibits the reuptake of serotonin and norepinephrine. In clinical trials it produces a dose-dependent 5-10% decrease in body weight. Its side effects include dry mouth, insomnia, asthenia, and constipation. In addition, sibutramine produces a small increase in blood pressure and pulse that is a contraindication to the use of this drug in some individuals with heart disease. Xenical is the other drug approved for long-term use in the treatment of obesity. It works by blocking lipase and thus increasing the fecal loss of triglyceride. One valuable consequence of this mechanism of action is the reduction of serum cholesterol that averages about 5% more than can be accounted for by weight loss alone. In clinical trials it produces a 5-10% loss of weight. Its side effects are entirely due to undigested fat in the intestine that can lead to increased frequency and change in the character of stools. It can also lower fat-soluble vitamins. The ingestion of a vitamin supplement before bedtime is a reasonable treatment strategy. The effect on weight loss during long-term trials with these two drugs is shown in Figs 7 and 8 above. Also in this figure is data on phentermine used in trials of six months or more. Although there were differences in mean weight losses with these drugs, when the placebo effect was taken into account they all had a surprisingly similar magnitude of weight loss.