Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding

Structures of the arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin receptor signaling complexes

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) are neurohypophysial hormones which share a high sequence and structure homology. These are two cyclic C-terminally amidated nonapeptides with different residues at position 3 and 8. In mammals, AVP and OT exert their multiple biological functions through a specific G protein-coupled receptor family: four receptors are identified, the V1a, V1b, V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R) and the OT receptor (OTR). The chemical structure of AVP and OT was elucidated in the early 1950s. Thanks to X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, it took however 70 additional years to determine the three-dimensional structures of the OTR and the V2R in complex with their natural agonist ligands and with different signaling partners, G proteins and β-arrestins. Today, the comparison of the different AVP/OT receptor structures gives structural insights into their orthosteric ligand binding pocket, their molecular mechanisms of activation, and their interfaces with canonical Gs, Gq and β-arrestin proteins. It also paves the way to future rational drug design and therapeutic compound development. Indeed, agonist, antagonist, biased agonist, or pharmacological chaperone analogues of AVP and OT are promising candidates to regulate different physiological functions and treat several pathologies.

Prediction of molecular interactions and physicochemical properties relevant for vasopressin V2 receptor antagonism

We have developed two ligand- and receptor-based computational approaches to study the physicochemical properties relevant to the biological activity of vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) antagonist and eventually to predict the expected binding mode to V2R. The obtained quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) model showed a correlation of the antagonist activity with the hydration energy (E_H2O), the polarizability (P), and the calculated partial charge on atom N7 (q6) of the common substructure. The first two descriptors showed a positive contribution to antagonist activity, while the third one had a negative contribution. V2R was modeled and further relaxed on a 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocoline (POPC) membrane by molecular dynamics simulations. The receptor antagonist complexes were guessed by molecular docking, and the stability of the most relevant structures was also evaluated by molecular dynamics simulations. As a result, amino acid residues Q96, W99, F105, K116, F178, A194, F307, and M311 were identified with the probably most relevant antagonist-receptor interactions on the studied complexes. The proposed QSAR model could explain the molecular properties relevant to the antagonist activity. The contributions to the antagonist-receptor interaction appeared also in agreement with the binding mode of the complexes obtained by molecular docking and molecular dynamics. These models will be used in further studies to look for new V2R potential antagonist molecules.

Isoliquiritigenin, a potent human monoamine oxidase inhibitor, modulates dopamine D1, D3, and vasopressin V1A receptors

Isoliquiritigenin (= 4,2′,4′-Trihydroxychalcone) (ILG) is a major constituent of the Glycyrrhizae Rhizoma that has significant neuroprotective functions. In the present study, we re-examined the potential of ILG to inhibit human monoamine oxidase (hMAO) in vitro and established its mechanism of inhibition through a kinetics study and molecular docking examination. ILG showed competitive inhibition of hMAO-A and mixed inhibition of hMAO-B with IC₅₀ values of 0.68 and 0.33 µM, respectively, which varied slightly from the reported IC₅₀ values. Since ILG has been reported to reduce dopaminergic neurodegeneration and psychostimulant-induced toxicity (both of which are related to dopamine and vasopressin receptors), we investigated the binding affinity and modulatory functions of ILG on dopamine and vasopressin receptors. ILG was explored as an antagonist of the D₁ receptor and an agonist of the D₃ and V_1A receptors with good potency. An in silico docking investigation revealed that ILG can interact with active site residues at target receptors with low binding energies. These activities of ILG on hMAO and brain receptors suggest the potential role of the compound to ameliorate dopaminergic deficits, depression, anxiety, and associated symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and other neuronal disorders.

Cryo-electron microscopy structure of the antidiuretic hormone arginine-vasopressin V2 receptor signaling complex

The antidiuretic hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) forms a signaling complex with the V2 receptor (V2R) and the G_s protein, promoting kidney water reabsorption. Molecular mechanisms underlying activation of this critical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling system are still unknown. To fill this gap of knowledge, we report here the cryo-electron microscopy structure of the AVP-V2R-G_s complex. Single-particle analysis revealed the presence of three different states. The two best maps were combined with computational and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy constraints to reconstruct two structures of the ternary complex. These structures differ in AVP and G_s binding modes. They reveal an original receptor-G_s interface in which the Gα_s subunit penetrates deep into the active V2R. The structures help to explain how V2R R137H or R137L/C variants can lead to two severe genetic diseases. Our study provides important structural insights into the function of this clinically relevant GPCR signaling complex.

The Biology of Vasopressin

Vasopressins are evolutionarily conserved peptide hormones. Mammalian vasopressin functions systemically as an antidiuretic and regulator of blood and cardiac flow essential for adapting to terrestrial environments. Moreover, vasopressin acts centrally as a neurohormone involved in social and parental behavior and stress response. Vasopressin synthesis in several cell types, storage in intracellular vesicles, and release in response to physiological stimuli are highly regulated and mediated by three distinct G protein coupled receptors. Other receptors may bind or cross-bind vasopressin. Vasopressin is regulated spatially and temporally through transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms, sex, tissue, and cell-specific receptor expression. Anomalies of vasopressin signaling have been observed in polycystic kidney disease, chronic heart failure, and neuropsychiatric conditions. Growing knowledge of the central biological roles of vasopressin has enabled pharmacological advances to treat these conditions by targeting defective systemic or central pathways utilizing specific agonists and antagonists.

Establishing GPCR Targets of hMAO Active Anthraquinones from Cassia obtusifolia Linn Seeds Using In Silico and In Vitro Methods

The present study examines the effect of human monoamine oxidase active anthraquinones emodin, alaternin (=7-hydroxyemodin), aloe-emodin, and questin from Cassia obtusifolia Linn seeds in modulating human dopamine (hD₁R, hD₃R, and hD₄R), serotonin (h5-HT_1AR), and vasopressin (hV_1AR) receptors that were predicted as prime targets from proteocheminformatics modeling via in vitro cell-based functional assays, and explores the possible mechanisms of action via in silico modeling. Emodin and alaternin showed a concentration-dependent agonist effect on hD₃R with EC₅₀ values of 21.85 ± 2.66 and 56.85 ± 4.59 μM, respectively. On hV_1AR, emodin and alaternin showed an antagonist effect with IC₅₀ values of 10.25 ± 1.97 and 11.51 ± 1.08 μM, respectively. Interestingly, questin and aloe-emodin did not have any observable effect on hV_1AR. Only alaternin was effective in antagonizing h5-HT_1AR (IC₅₀: 84.23 ± 4.12 μM). In silico studies revealed that a hydroxyl group at C1, C3, and C8 and a methyl group at C6 of anthraquinone structure are essential for hD₃R agonist and hV_1AR antagonist effects, as well as for the H-bond interaction of 1-OH group with Ser192 at a proximity of 2.0 Å. Thus, based on in silico and in vitro results, hV_1AR, hD₃R, and h5-HT_1AR appear to be prime targets of the tested anthraquinones.

The vasotocinergic system and its role in the regulation of stress in birds

The regulation of stress in birds includes a complex interaction of neural systems affecting the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. In addition to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus, a structure called the nucleus of the hippocampal commissure likewise affects the output of pituitary stress hormones and appears to be unique to avian species. Within the anterior pituitary, the avian V1a and V1b receptors were found in corticotropes. Based on our studies with central administration of hormones in the chicken, corticotropic releasing hormone (CRH) is a more potent ACTH secretagogue than arginine vasotocin (AVT). In contrast, when applied peripherally, AVT is more efficacious. Co-administration of AVT and CRH peripherally, resulted in a synergistic stimulation of corticosterone release. Data suggest receptor oligomerization as one possible mechanism. In birds, vasotocin receptors associated with stress responses include the V1a and V1b receptors. Three-dimensional, homology-based structural models of the avian V1aR were built to test agonists and antagonists for each receptor that were screened by molecular docking to map their binding sites on each receptor. Additionally, binding affinity values for each available peptide antagonist to the V1aR and V1bR were determined. An anterior pituitary primary culture system was developed to determine how effective each antagonist blocked the function of each receptor in culture when stimulated by a combination of AVT/CRH administration. Use of an antagonist in subsequent in vivo studies identified the V1aR in regulating food intake in birds. The V1aR was likewise found in circumventricular organs of the brain, suggesting a possible function in stress.

Receptor-Ligand Interaction Measured by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry and Selenium Labeling

In the search for an alternative strategy to the radioactivity measurement conventionally performed to probe receptor-ligand interactions in pharmacological assays, we demonstrated that selenium labeling of the studied ligand combined with elemental mass spectrometry was as efficient and robust as the reference method but devoid of its environmental and health hazards. The proof-of-concept was illustrated on two GPCR receptors, vasopressin (V_1A) and cholecystokinin B (CCK-B), involving peptides as endogenous ligands. We proposed several methodologies to produce selenium-labeled ligands according to peptide sequences along with binding affinity constraints. A selection of selenopeptides that kept high affinities toward the targeted receptor were engaged in saturation and competitive binding experiments with subsequent sensitive RP-LC-ICP-MS measurements. Experimental values of affinity constant ( K_i) were perfectly correlated to literature data, illustrating the general great potency of replacing radioactive iodine by selenium for ligand labeling to further undergo unaffected pharmacology experiments efficiently monitored by elemental mass spectrometry.

Identification of avian vasotocin receptor subtype-specific antagonists involved in the stress response of the chicken, Gallus gallus

Vasotocin 1a and 1b receptors (V1aR and V1bR) have been shown to play important roles in the neuroendocrine regulation of stress responses via the anterior pituitary (AP) of birds. To identify effective subtype-specific antagonists for the chicken V1aR (cV1aR) and cV1bR, potential antagonists to the mammalian V1R were screened against the cV1aR and cV1bR 3D structural models by molecular docking analysis with determination of binding pocket/amino acid residues involved in the interaction. The antagonistic effects of the selected ligands were examined by measuring pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) heteronuclear RNA (hnPOMC) levels following the in vitro stress administration to primary chicken AP cells. Results of in silico analysis showed that the Manning compound and several other antagonists were bound to cV1bR with higher affinity than the natural agonist, arginine vasotocin (AVT). Similarities and differences in the antagonist-receptor binding interface with receptors were characterized for each ligand. Non-peptide mammalian V1bR antagonists, SSR-149415 and L-368899, were shown to be effective and had an additive effect in blocking POMC hnRNA expression in pituitary cell culture studies. SR-49059 antagonized the effect(s) of AVT/CRH on the downregulation of the cV1aR and the upregulation of the cCRH-R2 expression but not the cV1bR and cCRH-R1. The Manning compound antagonized the downregulation of cV1aR, cV1bR and cCRH-R1 and the upregulation of cCRH-R2 expression. The specificity of antagonists apparently resulted from unique differences in the interacting residues and their binding affinities. Collectively, these results provide valuable leads for future development of novel compounds capable of blocking or attenuating the AP stress response of avian species and perhaps other non-mammalian vertebrates as well.

Investigation of Elemental Mass Spectrometry in Pharmacology for Peptide Quantitation at Femtomolar Levels

In the search of new robust and environmental-friendly analytical methods able to answer quantitative issues in pharmacology, we explore liquid chromatography (LC) associated with elemental mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) to monitor peptides in such complex biological matrices. The novelty is to use mass spectrometry to replace radiolabelling and radioactivity measurements, which represent up-to now the gold standard to measure organic compound concentrations in life science. As a proof of concept, we choose the vasopressin (AVP)/V1A receptor system for model pharmacological assays. The capacity of ICP-MS to provide highly sensitive quantitation of metallic and hetero elements, whatever the sample medium, prompted us to investigate this technique in combination with appropriate labelling of the peptide of interest. Selenium, that is scarcely present in biological media, was selected as a good compromise between ICP-MS response, covalent tagging ability using conventional sulfur chemistry and peptide detection specificity. Applying selenium monitoring by elemental mass spectrometry in pharmacology is challenging due to the very high salt content and organic material complexity of the samples that produces polyatomic aggregates and thus potentially mass interferences with selenium detection. Hyphenation with a chromatographic separation was found compulsory. Noteworthy, we aimed to develop a straightforward quantitative protocol that can be performed in any laboratory equipped with a standard macrobore LC-ICP-MS system, in order to avoid time-consuming sample treatment or special implementation of instrumental set-up, while allowing efficient suppression of all mass interferences to reach the targeted sensitivity. Significantly, a quantification limit of 57 ng Se L^-1 (72 femtomoles of injected Se) was achieved, the samples issued from the pharmacological assays being directly introduced into the LC-ICP-MS system. The established method was successfully validated and applied to the measurement of the vasopressin ligand affinity for its V1A receptor through the determination of the dissociation constant (Kd) which was compared to the one recorded with conventional radioactivity assays.

Structural Elements in the Gαs and Gαq C Termini That Mediate Selective G Protein-coupled Receptor (GPCR) Signaling

Although the importance of the C terminus of the α subunit of the heterotrimeric G protein in G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-G protein pairing is well established, the structural basis of selective interactions remains unknown. Here, we combine live cell FRET-based measurements and molecular dynamics simulations of the interaction between the GPCR and a peptide derived from the C terminus of the Gα subunit (Gα peptide) to dissect the molecular mechanisms of G protein selectivity. We observe a direct link between Gα peptide binding and stabilization of the GPCR conformational ensemble. We find that cognate and non-cognate Gα peptides show deep and shallow binding, respectively, and in distinct orientations within the GPCR. Binding of the cognate Gα peptide stabilizes the agonist-bound GPCR conformational ensemble resulting in favorable binding energy and lower flexibility of the agonist-GPCR pair. We identify three hot spot residues (Gαs/Gαq-Gln-384/Leu-349, Gln-390/Glu-355, and Glu-392/Asn-357) that contribute to selective interactions between the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2-AR)-Gαs and V1A receptor (V1AR)-Gαq The Gαs and Gαq peptides adopt different orientations in β2-AR and V1AR, respectively. The β2-AR/Gαs peptide interface is dominated by electrostatic interactions, whereas the V1AR/Gαq peptide interactions are predominantly hydrophobic. Interestingly, our study reveals a role for both favorable and unfavorable interactions in G protein selection. Residue Glu-355 in Gαq prevents this peptide from interacting strongly with β2-AR. Mutagenesis to the Gαs counterpart (E355Q) imparts a cognate-like interaction. Overall, our study highlights the synergy in molecular dynamics and FRET-based approaches to dissect the structural basis of selective G protein interactions.

Influence of thoracic epidural anesthesia on gastric oxygenation during hypothermia and hemorrhage

OBJECTIVE

Hypothermia preserves gastric mucosal microvascular oxygenation (μHbO2) during hemorrhagic shock. Additionally, hypothermia activates the sympathetic nervous system that leads to the release of vasopressin. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the effect of hypothermia is mediated via the sympathetic nervous system and/or via vasopressin.

METHODS

In prospective and randomized experiments on five anesthetized dogs (foxhounds, cross-over design, 6 groups with n=5 per group) we analyzed the effects of hemorrhage on μHbO2 during mild hypothermia (HT, 34 °C), during additional thoracic epidural anesthesia (HT/TEA) and during additional vasopressin V1 receptor blockade (HT/VB). As control groups, effects of hemorrhage were studied under normothermia alone (NT), during additional thoracic epidural anesthesia (NT/TEA) and during additional vasopressin V1 receptor blockade (NT/VB).

RESULTS

Hemorrhage decreased μHbO2 from 81 ± 3 to 49 ± 8%. In contrast, in the presence of hypothermia, μHbO2 was significantly higher during hemorrhagic shock (from 79 ± 3 to 66 ± 9%) despite a similar decrease in DO2. The effect of hypothermia on μHbO2 was reduced in the presence of thoracic epidural anesthesia or vasopressin receptor blockade.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypothermia preserves μHbO2 during hemorrhagic shock. This effect is partially abolished during thoracic epidural anesthesia or during vasopressin receptor blockade. The sympathetic nervous system and the vasopressin V1 receptor are partially involved in mediating the effect of hypothermia on gastric oxygenation during hemorrhage.

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14: G protein-coupled receptors

The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2013/14 provides concise overviews of the key properties of over 2000 human drug targets with their pharmacology, plus links to an open access knowledgebase of drug targets and their ligands (www.guidetopharmacology.org), which provides more detailed views of target and ligand properties. The full contents can be found at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.12444/full. G protein-coupled receptors are one of the seven major pharmacological targets into which the Guide is divided, with the others being G protein-coupled receptors, ligand-gated ion channels, ion channels, catalytic receptors, nuclear hormone receptors, transporters and enzymes. These are presented with nomenclature guidance and summary information on the best available pharmacological tools, alongside key references and suggestions for further reading. A new landscape format has easy to use tables comparing related targets. It is a condensed version of material contemporary to late 2013, which is presented in greater detail and constantly updated on the website www.guidetopharmacology.org, superseding data presented in previous Guides to Receptors and Channels. It is produced in conjunction with NC-IUPHAR and provides the official IUPHAR classification and nomenclature for human drug targets, where appropriate. It consolidates information previously curated and displayed separately in IUPHAR-DB and the Guide to Receptors and Channels, providing a permanent, citable, point-in-time record that will survive database updates.

Identification of antagonists to the vasotocin receptor sub-type 4 (VT4R) involved in stress by molecular modelling and verification using anterior pituitary cells

The vasotocin receptor family is homologous to the mammalian vasopressin G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) family. The vasotocin receptor 2 (VT2R) and 4 (VT4R) have recently been shown to play important role(s) in the neuroendocrine regulation of stress in birds. A homology-based structural model of VT4R of the domestic chicken, Gallus gallus, was built using the sophisticated SYBYL-X suite. The structure of VT4R built with and without extra- and intracellular unstructured loops showed a seven-helix transmembrane domain, which is a characteristic feature of GPCRs. Several agonists and antagonists were screened by molecular docking to map their potential binding sites on the structure of VT4R. Interestingly, the presence of the N-terminal, intracellular and extracellular loops and C-terminal amino acid sequences emerging from the transmembrane domains during molecular docking appeared to influence the binding interface of the peptide agonists and peptide/non-peptide antagonists on the VT4R. The presence of unstructured loops, however, did not affect the relative binding affinity ranking of the peptide antagonists to VT4R. In general, the natural ligand, arginine vasotocin and the peptide/non-peptide antagonists were observed to be more deeply buried in the receptor. Results of in vitro inhibition experiments, using cultured anterior pituitary cells, showed excellent agreement with the binding affinity of the antagonists predicted by molecular docking. The results of this study provide valuable clues for the rational design of novel pharmaceutical compounds capable of blocking or attenuating the stress response.

Interactions of vasopressin and oxytocin receptors with vasopressin analogues substituted in position 2 with 3,3'-diphenylalanine--a molecular docking study

Vasopressin and oxytocin receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and play an important role in many physiological functions. They are also involved in a number of pathological conditions being important drug targets. In this work, four vasopressin analogues substituted at position 2 with 3,3'-diphenylalanine have been docked into partially flexible vasopressin and oxytocin receptors. The bulky residue at position 2 acts as a structural restraint much stronger in the oxytocin receptor (OTR) than in the vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R), resulting in a different location of the analogues in these receptors. This explains the different, either agonistic or antagonistic, activities of the analogues in V2R and OTR, respectively. In all complexes, the conserved polar residues serve as anchor points for the ligand both in OTR and V2R. Strong interactions of the C-terminus of analogue II ([Mpa(1) ,d-Dpa(2) ,Val(4) ,d-Arg(8) ]VP) with extracellular loop 3 may be responsible for its highest activity at V2R. It also appears that V2R adapts more readily to the docking analogues by conformational changes in the aromatic side chains triggering receptor activation. A weak activity at V1a vasopressin receptor appears to be caused by weak receptor-ligand interactions. Results of this study may facilitate a rational design of new analogues with the highest activity/selectivity at vasopressin and OTRs.

Vasopressin V1a and V1b Receptors: From Molecules to Physiological Systems

The neurohypophysial hormone arginine vasopressin (AVP) is essential for a wide range of physiological functions, including water reabsorption, cardiovascular homeostasis, hormone secretion, and social behavior. These and other actions of AVP are mediated by at least three distinct receptor subtypes: V1a, V1b, and V2. Although the antidiuretic action of AVP and V2 receptor in renal distal tubules and collecting ducts is relatively well understood, recent years have seen an increasing understanding of the physiological roles of V1a and V1b receptors. The V1a receptor is originally found in the vascular smooth muscle and the V1b receptor in the anterior pituitary. Deletion of V1a or V1b receptor genes in mice revealed that the contributions of these receptors extend far beyond cardiovascular or hormone-secreting functions. Together with extensively developed pharmacological tools, genetically altered rodent models have advanced the understanding of a variety of AVP systems. Our report reviews the findings in this important field by covering a wide range of research, from the molecular physiology of V1a and V1b receptors to studies on whole animals, including gene knockout/knockdown studies.

Neural distribution of vasotocin receptor mRNA in two species of songbird

The neurohypophyseal hormones vasopressin and oxytocin are produced and released within the mammalian brain, where they act via multiple receptor subtypes. The neural distributions of these receptors, for example, V1a and oxytocin receptors, have been well described in many mammals. In birds, the distribution of binding sites for the homologous neuropeptides, vasotocin (VT) and mesotocin, has been studied in several species by using synthetic radioligands designed to bind to mammalian receptors. Such binding studies, however, may not reveal the specific distributions of each receptor subtype. To identify and map the receptors likely to bind VT and mesotocin, we generated partial cDNA sequences for four VT receptor subtypes, VT1, VT2 (V1b), VT3 (oxytocin-like), and VT4 (V1a), in white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis) and zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). These genes shared high sequence identity with the homologous avian and mammalian neurohypophyseal peptide receptors, and we found evidence for VT1, VT3, and VT4 receptor mRNA expression throughout the brains of both species. As has been described in rodents, there was striking interspecific and intraspecific variation in the densities and distribution of these receptors. For example, whereas the VT1 receptor mRNA was more widespread in zebra finch brain, the VT3 (oxytocin-like) receptor mRNA was more prevalent in the sparrow brain. Although VT2 (V1b) receptor mRNA was abundant in the pituitary, it was not found in the brain. Because of their association with brain regions implicated in social behavior, the VT1, VT3, and VT4 receptors are all likely candidates for mediating the behavioral effects of VT.

The action of fish peptide Orpotrin analogs on microcirculation

In order to investigate the relationship between the primary structure of Orpotrin, a vasoactive peptide previously isolated from the freshwater stingray Potamotrygon gr. orbignyi, and its microcirculatory effects, three Orpotrin analogs were synthesized. The analogs have a truncated N-terminal with a His residue deletion and two substituted amino acid residues, where one Nle is substituted for one internal Lys residue and the third analog has a substitution of a Pro for an Ala (Orp-desH(1) , Orp-Nle and Orp-Pro/Ala, respectively). Only Orp-desH(1) could induce a lower vasoconstriction effect compared with the natural Orpotrin, indicating that besides the N-terminal, the positive charge of Lys and the Pro residues located at the center of the amino acid chain is crucial for this vasoconstriction effect. Importantly, the suggestions made with bioactive peptides were based on the molecular modeling and dynamics of peptides, the presence of key amino acids and shared activity in microcirculation, characterized by intravital microscopy. Moreover, this study has demonstrated that even subtle changes in the primary structure of Orpotrin alter the biological effects of this native peptide significantly, which could be of interest for biotechnological applications.

Identification and characterization of mesotocin and V1a-like vasotocin receptors in a urodele amphibian, Taricha granulosa

The cDNA sequences encoding the mesotocin receptor (MTR) and vasotocin 1a receptor (VTR-1a) were identified in a urodele amphibian, the rough-skinned newt, Taricha granulosa. Saturation binding of [(3)H]oxytocin (OT) to the Taricha MTR (tMTR) was best fit by a two-state model; a high affinity-low abundance site and a lower affinity-high abundance site. Competition-binding studies found the following rank-order affinities for the tMTR: mesotocin (MT)>OT≈vasotocin (VT)>vasopressin (VP)>isotocin (IT). Inositol phosphate (IP) accumulation studies demonstrated functional activity of both the tMTR and Taricha VTR-1a (tVTR-1a) in a heterologous cell culture system. The rank-order potencies for the tMTR were MT>OT>VT≈VP>IT. The combined binding and IP results indicate that VT may act as a partial agonist of the tMTR. Rank-order potencies for the tVTR-1a were VT>VP>MT≈OT>IT. For both receptors, stimulation of IP accumulation was blocked by d(CH(2))(5)[Tyr(Me)(2)]AVP (Manning compound) and d(CH(2))(5)[Tyr(Me)(2),Thr(4),Tyr-NH(2)]OVT (OTA). OTA was a more potent antagonist for the transiently expressed tMTR while Manning compound was relatively more potent at inhibiting IP accumulation in tVTR-1a expressing cells. In contradiction to earlier assumptions, the absolute IC(50) of Manning compound was lower for the tMTR (27nM±13) than the tVTR-1a (586nM±166) indicating its potential higher affinity for the tMTR, a finding with special relevance to interpretation of comparative studies investigating the behavioral and physiological actions of neurohypophysial peptides in non-mammalian species.

NMR studies of new arginine vasopressin analogs modified with alpha-2-indanylglycine enantiomers at position 2 bound to sodium dodecyl sulfate micelles

In this paper, we use NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling to examine four new vasopressin analogs modified with alpha-2-indanylglycine (Igl) at position 2, [L-Igl(2)]AVP (I), [D-Igl(2)]AVP (II), [Mpa(1),L-Igl(2)]AVP (III) and [Mpa(1),D-Igl(2)]AVP (IV), embedded in a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) micelle. All the analogs display antiuterotonic activity. In addition, the analogs with D-Igl reveal antipressor properties. Each analog exhibits the tendency to adopt beta-turns at positions 2, 3 and/or 3, 4, which is characteristic of oxytocin-like peptides. Mutual arrangement of aromatic residues at positions 2 and 3 has been found to be crucial for binding antagonists with the OT and V(1a) receptors. The orientation of the Gln(4) side chain seems to be important for the V(1a) receptor affinity. In each of the peptides studied, the Gln(4) side chain is folded back over the ring moiety. However, it lies on the opposite face of the tocin moiety in analogs with L and D enantiomers of Igl.

Thiol antioxidants regulate angiotensin II AT1 and arginine vasopressin V1 receptor functions differently in vascular smooth muscle cells

BACKGROUND

We compared the effects of the sulfhydryl-containing (thiol) antioxidant dithiothreitol (DTT), which disrupts disulfide bonds, on cell signaling through angiotensin II (AngII) Type 1 receptors (AT1Rs) and arginine vasopressin (AVP) V1 receptors (V1Rs). The AT1R contains two extracellular disulfides bonds but its ligand contains none, whereas the V1R contains no extracellular disufides bonds but its ligand contains 1.

METHODS

We measured radioligand binding, intracellular calcium responses, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase phosphorylation in cultured rat aortic vascular smooth muscle cells and alterations in urine osmolality in intact rats.

RESULTS

Preincubation of cells with DTT, a maneuver designed to target receptor disulfides, resulted in concentration-dependent decreases in specific (125)I-AngII binding to AT1Rs and acute angiotensin-stimulated intracellular calcium mobilization but no decreases in specific (125)I-AVP binding to V1Rs or AVP-stimulated intracellular calcium mobilization. In contrast, preincubation of the ligands with DTT followed by acute exposure to the cells, a maneuver designed to target ligand disulfides, blunted calcium mobilization to AVP robustly but to AngII only minimally. In intact rats, the increase in urine osmolality caused by subcutaneous injection with the AVP analogue desmopressin was significantly diminished when the analogue was preincubated with an excess of DTT.

CONCLUSION

DTT inhibits cell signaling to AngII AT1Rs and AVP V1Rs, at least in part through disruption of disulfide linkages, but the pattern of response depends upon whether disulfides of ligand or receptor are targeted.

Fluorescent agonists and antagonists for vasopressin/oxytocin G protein-coupled receptors: usefulness in ligand screening assays and receptor studies

Different series of fluorescent agonists and antagonists have been developed and characterized for arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin G protein-coupled receptors. Both cyclic and linear peptide analogs of the neurohypophysial hormones are useful tools for investigating receptor localization and trafficking, analysing receptor structural organization, and developing new receptor-selective high-throughput ligand screening assays.

Toward efficient drug screening by homogeneous assays based on the development of new fluorescent vasopressin and oxytocin receptor ligands

A series of fluorescent ligands designed for vasopressin and oxytocin G protein-coupled receptors was synthesized and characterized to develop fluorescence polarization or homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) binding assays. These ligands, labeled with europium pyridine-bis-bipyridine cryptate or with Alexa 488,546,647 selectively bound to the vasopressin V1a and oxytocin receptors with high affinities and exhibited antagonistic properties. The affinities of several unlabeled ligands determined by our homogeneous assays on membrane preparations or on intact cells into 96- and 384-well plate formats were similar to those determined by usual radioligand binding methods. Compared to other binding assays, the polarization and HTRF binding assays are nonradiaoactive, therefore safer to perform, yet very sensitive and homogeneous, therefore easier and faster to automate. These methods are thus suitable for efficient drug high-throughput screening procedures and can easily be applied to other G protein-coupled receptor models.

Mechanism of Activation of a G Protein-coupled Receptor, the Human Cholecystokinin-2 Receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent a major focus in functional genomics programs and drug development research, but their important potential as drug targets contrasts with the still limited data available concerning their activation mechanism. Here, we investigated the activation mechanism of the cholecystokinin-2 receptor (CCK2R). The three-dimensional structure of inactive CCK2R was homology-modeled on the basis of crystal coordinates of inactive rhodopsin. Starting from the inactive CCK2R modeled structure, active CCK2R (namely cholecystokinin-occupied CCK2R) was modeled by means of steered molecular dynamics in a lipid bilayer and by using available data from other GPCRs, including rhodopsin. By comparing the modeled structures of the inactive and active CCK2R, we identified changes in the relative position of helices and networks of interacting residues, which were expected to stabilize either the active or inactive states of CCK2R. Using targeted molecular dynamics simulations capable of converting CCK2R from the inactive to the active state, we delineated structural changes at the atomic level. The activation mechanism involved significant movements of helices VI and V, a slight movement of helices IV and VII, and changes in the position of critical residues within or near the binding site. The mutation of key amino acids yielded inactive or constitutively active CCK2R mutants, supporting this proposed mechanism. Such progress in the refinement of the CCK2R binding site structure and in knowledge of CCK2R activation mechanisms will enable target-based optimization of nonpeptide ligands.

Molecular evolution of neuropeptide receptors with regard to maintaining high affinity to their authentic ligands

Recently, we cloned many of the bullfrog neuropeptide G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), including receptors for vasotocin (VT), mesotocin, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), neurotensin, apelin, and metastin. Bullfrog GPCRs usually have high affinity for bullfrog ligands but relatively low affinity for mammalian ligands. Reciprocally, synthetic agonists and antagonists developed based upon mammalian ligands display lower affinity at bullfrog receptors. Studies using chimeric or domain-swapped receptors indicate that the motifs responsible for differential ligand selectivity usually reside within transmembrane domain 6 (TMD6)-extracellular loop 3 (ECL3)-transmembrane domain 7 (TMD7). Triple mutation of mammalian V1aR (Phe(6.51) to Tyr, Ile(6.53) to Thr, and Pro(7.33) to Thr) increases VT affinity but greatly reduces arginine vasopressin affinity. This binding profile is similar to that of bullfrog VT1R. Changing just three amino acids in the bullfrog GnRH receptor-1 (i.e. Ser-Gln-Ser in the ECL3) to those found in the type-I mammalian GnRH receptor (i.e. Ser-Glu-Pro) reverses GnRH selectivity. In conclusion, specific receptor motifs that govern ligand selectivity can be determined by comparative molecular analyses of GPCRs and their ligands. Such analysis provides clues for understanding how GPCRs maintain high affinity to their authentic ligands.

Differential Mapping of the Amino Acids Mediating Agonist and Antagonist Coordination with the Human Thromboxane A2 Receptor Protein

Despite the well documented involvement of thromboxane A(2) receptor (TPR) signaling in the pathogenesis of thrombotic diseases, there are currently no rationally designed antagonists available for clinical use. To a large extent, this derives from a lack of knowledge regarding the topography of the TPR ligand binding pocket. On this basis, the purpose of the current study was to identify the specific amino acid residues in the TPR protein that regulate ligand coordination and binding. The sites selected for mutation reside within or in close proximity to a region we previously defined as a TPR ligand binding region (i.e. the C terminus of the second extracellular loop and the leading edge of the fifth transmembrane domain). Mutation of these residues caused varying effects on the TPR-ligand coordination process. Specifically, the D193A, D193Q, and D193R mutants lost SQ29,548 (antagonist) binding and exhibited a dramatically reduced calcium response, which could not be restored by elevated U46619 (agonist) doses. The F184Y mutant lost SQ29,548 binding and exhibited a reduced calcium response (which could be restored by elevated U46619); and the T186A and S191T mutants lost SQ29,548 binding and retained a normal U46619-induced calcium response. Furthermore, these last three mutants also revealed a divergence in the binding of two structurally different antagonists, SQ29,548 and BM13.505. Two separate mutants that exhibited SQ29,548 binding yielded either a normal (F196Y) or reduced (S201T) U46619 response. Finally, mutation of other residues directly adjacent to those described above (e.g. E190A and F200A) produced no detectable effects on either SQ29,548 binding or the U46619-induced response. In summary, these results identify key amino acids (in particular Asp(193)) involved in TPR ligand coordination. These findings also demonstrate that TPR-specific ligands interact with different residues in the ligand-binding pocket.

Computational elucidation of the structural basis of ligand binding to the dopamine 3 receptor through docking and homology modeling

The dopamine subtype 3 receptor (D3) is a promising therapeutic target for the treatment of cocaine addiction, schizophrenia, Parkinson's disease, and other disorders, but little is known about the binding of ligands to D3 at the atomic level. In the present study, binding of 29 known ligands to the D3 receptor was modeled computationally using four D3 receptor models which were obtained from homology modeling. The predicted binding models were validated with experimental data from site-directed mutagenesis, structure-activity relationship studies, and affinity labeling studies. Docking scores calculated for these 29 ligands correlate reasonably well with the experimentally determined binding affinities. A pharmacophore model is proposed that describes the binding of ligands at a single D3 receptor binding site and offers insights into the binding of structurally diverse D3 ligands to this receptor.

Probing the existence of G protein-coupled receptor dimers by positive and negative ligand-dependent cooperative binding

An increasing amount of ligand binding data on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is not compatible with the prediction of the simple mass action law. This may be related to the propensity of most GPCRs, if not all, to oligomerize. Indeed, one of the consequences of receptor oligomerization could be a possible cross-talk between the protomers, which in turn could lead to negative or positive cooperative ligand binding. We prove here that this can be demonstrated experimentally. Saturation, dissociation, and competition binding experiments were performed on vasopressin and oxytocin receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary or COS-7 cells. Linear, concave, and convex Scatchard plots were then obtained, depending on the ligand used. Moreover, some competition curves exhibited an increase of the radiotracer binding for low concentrations of competitors, suggesting a cooperative binding process. These data demonstrate that various vasopressin analogs display either positive or negative cooperative binding. Because positive cooperative binding cannot be explained without considering receptor as multivalent, these binding data support the concept of GPCR dimerization process. The results, which are in good accordance with the predictions of previous mathematical models, suggest that binding experiments can be used to probe the existence of receptor dimers.

Analysis of interactions responsible for vasopressin binding to human neurohypophyseal hormone receptors-molecular dynamics study of the activated receptor-vasopressin-G(alpha) systems

Vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH(2), AVP) is a semicyclic endogenous peptide, which exerts a variety of biological effects in mammals. The main physiological roles of AVP are the regulation of water balance and the control of blood pressure and adrenocorticotropin hormone (ACTH) secretion, mediated via three different subtypes of vasopressin receptors: V1a, V1b and V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R, respectively). They are the members of the class A, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). AVP also modulates several behavioral and social functions. In this study, the interactions responsible for AVP binding to vasopressin V1a and V2 receptors versus the closely related oxytocin ([I3,L8]AVP, OT) receptor (OTR) have been investigated. Three-dimensional models of the activated receptors were constructed using multiple sequence alignment, followed by homology modeling using the complex of activated rhodopsin with Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide of transducin MII-Gt(338-350) prototype as a template. AVP was docked into the receptor-G(alpha) systems. The three lowest-energy pairs of receptor-AVP-G(alpha) (two complexes per each receptor) were selected. The 1-ns unconstrained molecular dynamics (MD) of complexes embedded into the fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) lipid bilayer was conducted in the AMBER 7.0 force field. Six relaxed receptor-AVP-G(alpha) models were obtained. The residues responsible for AVP binding to vasopressin receptors have been identified and a different mechanism of AVP binding to V2R than to V1aR has been proposed.

Pharmacological Chaperone Activity of SR49059 to Functionally Recover Misfolded Mutations of the Vasopressin V1a Receptor

Pharmacological chaperones represent a new class of ligand with the potential to facilitate the delivery of misfolded, but still active, G-protein-coupled receptors to the cell surface. Using transfected HEK 293T cells, treatment with a nonpeptide antagonist, SR49059, dramatically increased ( approximately 60-fold) the surface expression of a misfolded, nonfunctional and intracellularly localized vasopressin V(1a) receptor (V(1a)R) mutant (D148A). This rescue of surface expression (111 +/- 7%) was almost identical to wild type assessed by confocal microscopy and quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-based techniques. Recovery was not specific to D148A, since other surface-impaired mutations, D148N and D148E, and wild type were also increased following SR49059 exposure. However, surface delivery was specific to SR49059, since V(1a)R-selective peptide ligands or unrelated ligands were unable to mimic this action, suggesting that SR49059 acts intracellularly. SR49059-mediated surface rescue was time-, mutant-, and concentration-dependent but not directly related to its binding affinity. Maximal recovery was achieved following 12 h of treatment and did not involve de novo receptor synthesis or a consequence of preventing endogenous constitutive activity and/or internalization. Once at the surface, all mutants displayed enhanced signaling ability, and D148A was able to undergo agonist-mediated internalization. SR49059 was not effectively removed from the receptor, since signaling (EC(50)) of both wild type and D148A was reduced approximately 40-fold. This is the first report of a pharmacological chaperone ligand to act on misfolded mutant V(1a) Rs. This work provides an excellent model to understand the mechanistic action of an important new class of drug that may have potential in the treatment of diseases caused by inherited mutations.

Investigation of mechanism of desmopressin binding in vasopressin V2 receptor versus vasopressin V1a and oxytocin receptors: Molecular dynamics simulation of the agonist-bound state in the membrane–aqueous system

The vasopressin V2 receptor (V2R) belongs to the Class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). V2R is expressed in the renal collecting duct (CD), where it mediates the antidiuretic action of the neurohypophyseal hormone arginine vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH2, AVP). Desmopressin ([1-deamino, 8-D]AVP, dDAVP) is strong selective V2R agonist with negligible pressor and uterotonic activity. In this paper, the interactions responsible for binding of dDAVP to vasopressin V2 receptor versus vasopressin V1a and oxytocin receptors has been examined. Three-dimensional activated models of the receptors were constructed using the multiple sequence alignment and the complex of activated rhodopsin with Gt(alpha) C-terminal peptide of transducin MII-Gt(alpha) (338-350) prototype (Slusarz, R.; Ciarkowski, J. Acta Biochim Pol 2004 51, 129-136) as a template. The 1-ns unconstrained molecular dynamics (MD) of receptor-dDAVP complexes immersed in the fully hydrated 1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (POPC) membrane model was conducted in an Amber 7.0 force field. Highly conserved transmembrane residues have been proposed as being responsible for V2R activation and G protein coupling. Molecular mechanism of the dDAVP binding has been suggested. The internal water molecules involved in an intricate network of the hydrogen bonds inside the receptor cavity have been identified and their role in the stabilization of the agonist-bound state proposed.

Adaptation to pregnancy leads to attenuated rat uterine artery smooth muscle sensitivity to oxytocin

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that oxytocin (OT) contracts blood vessels via vasopressin V1A (VP) receptors, and that this depends on pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

Concentration-contraction relationships (CCR) to OT and VP (10(-12)-10(-6) mol/L) were obtained in different blood vessels. CCR were obtained in uterine arteries (UA) from nonpregnant, mid-pregnant, and late pregnant rats (n = 6-10 per group) in the absence and presence of selective antagonists (10(-7) mol/L).

RESULTS

Sensitivity to OT, but not to VP, is attenuated in pregnant rat UA. Antagonists shifted CCR of OT and VP to the right, and, to a lesser extent, of the counterpart, in all UA. VP antagonist depresses oxytocin CCR much more than OT antagonist in pregnant rat UA.

CONCLUSION

OT and VP contract UA via their own receptors, although partial cross-activation is evident. Adaptation to pregnancy led to attenuated sensitivity of UA smooth muscle to OT and transformed OT receptors into VP-like ones.

N-Acetylcysteine Decreases Angiotensin II Receptor Binding in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells

Antioxidants seem to inhibit angiotensin II (Ang II) actions by consuming stimulated reactive oxygen species. An alternative hypothesis was investigated: Antioxidants that are also strong reducers of disulfide bonds inhibit the binding of Ang II to its surface receptors with consequent attenuation of signal transduction and cell action. Incubation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells, which possess Ang II type 1a receptors, with the reducing agent n-acetylcysteine (NAC) for 1 h at 37 degrees C resulted in decreased Ang II radioligand binding in a concentration-dependent pattern. NAC removal restored Ang II binding within 30 min. Incubation with n-acetylserine, a nonreducing analogue of NAC, did not lower Ang II binding, and oxidized NAC was less effective than reduced NAC in lowering Ang II binding. NAC did not decrease Ang II type 1a receptor protein content. Other antioxidants regulated Ang II receptors differently: alpha-Lipoic acid lowered Ang II binding after 24 h, and vitamin E did not lower Ang II binding at all. NAC inhibited Ang II binding in cell membranes at 21 or 37 but not 4 degrees C. Dihydrolipoic acid (the reduced form of alpha-lipoic acid), which contains free sulfhydryl groups as NAC does, decreased Ang II receptor binding in cell membranes, whereas alpha-lipoic acid, which does not contain free sulfhydryl groups, did not. Ang II-stimulated inositol phosphate formation was decreased by preincubation with NAC (1 h) or alpha-lipoic acid (24 h) but not vitamin E. In conclusion, certain antioxidants that are reducing agents lower Ang II receptor binding, and Ang II-stimulated signal transduction is decreased in proportion to decreased receptor binding.

Toward the active conformations of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic receptor

Using sets of experimental distance restraints, which characterize active or inactive receptor conformations, and the X-ray crystal structure of the inactive form of bovine rhodopsin as a starting point, we have constructed models of both the active and inactive forms of rhodopsin and the beta2-adrenergic G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). The distance restraints were obtained from published data for site-directed crosslinking, engineered zinc binding, site-directed spin-labeling, IR spectroscopy, and cysteine accessibility studies conducted on class A GPCRs. Molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of either "active" or "inactive" restraints were used to generate two distinguishable receptor models. The process for generating the inactive and active models was validated by the hit rates, yields, and enrichment factors determined for the selection of antagonists in the inactive model and for the selection of agonists in the active model from a set of nonadrenergic GPCR drug-like ligands in a virtual screen using ligand docking software. The simulation results provide new insights into the relationships observed between selected biochemical data, the crystal structure of rhodopsin, and the structural rearrangements that occur during activation.

Identification of Amino Acid Residues That Direct Differential Ligand Selectivity of Mammalian and Nonmammalian V1a Type Receptors for Arginine Vasopressin and Vasotocin

Arginine vasotocin (VT) is the ortholog in all nonmammalian vertebrates of arginine vasopressin (AVP) in mammals. We have previously cloned an amphibian V1atype vasotocin receptor (VT1R) that exhibited higher sensitivity for VT than AVP, while the mammalian V1a type receptor (V1aR) responded better to AVP than VT. In the present study, we identified the amino acid residues that confer differential ligand selectivity for AVP and VT between rat V1aR and bullfrog VT1R (bfVT1R). A chimeric rat V1aR having transmembrane domain (TMD) VI to the carboxyl-terminal tail (C-tail) of bfVT1R showed a reverse ligand preference for AVP and VT, whereas a chimeric VT1R with TMD VI to the C-tail of rat V1aR showed a great increase in sensitivity for AVP. A single mutation (Ile(315(6.53)) to Thr) in TMD VI of V1aR increased the sensitivity for VT, while a single mutation (Phe(313(6.51)) to Tyr or Pro(334(7.33)) to Thr) reduced sensitivity toward AVP. Interestingly the triple mutation (Phe(313(6.51)) to Tyr, Ile(6.53) to Thr, and Pro(7.33) to Thr) of V1aR increased sensitivity to VT but greatly reduced sensitivity to AVP, behaving like bfVT1R. Further, like V1aR, a double mutant (Tyr(306(6.51)) to Phe and Thr(327(7.33)) to Pro) of bfVT1R showed an increased sensitivity to AVP. These results suggest that Phe/Tyr(6.51), Ile/Thr(6.53), and Pro/Thr(7.33) are responsible for the differential ligand selectivity between rat V1aR and bfVT1R. This information regarding the molecular interaction of VT/AVP with their receptors may have important implications for the development of novel AVP analogs.

Key Amino Acids Located within the Transmembrane Domains 5 and 7 Account for the Pharmacological Specificity of the Human V1b Vasopressin Receptor

In mammals, the vasopressin V(1b) receptor (V(1b)-R) is known to regulate ACTH secretion and, more recently, stress and anxiety. The characterization of the molecular determinant responsible for its pharmacological selectivity was made possible by the recent discovery of the first V(1b) antagonist, SSR149415. Based upon the structure of the crystallized bovine rhodopsin, we established a three-dimensional molecular model of interaction between the human V(1b)-R (hV(1b)-R) and SSR149415. Four amino acids located in distinct transmembrane helices (fourth, fifth, and seventh) were found potentially responsible for the hV(1b)-R selectivity. To validate these assumptions, we selectively replaced the leucine 181, methionine 220, alanine 334, and serine 338 residues of hV(1a)-R by their corresponding amino acids present in the hV(1b)-R (phenylalanine 164, threonine 203, methionine 324, and asparagine 328, respectively). Four mutants, which all exhibited nanomolar affinities for vasopressin and good coupling to phospholipase C pathway, were generated. hV(1a) receptors mutated at position 220 and 334 exhibited striking increase in affinity for SSR149415 both in binding and phospholipase C assays at variance with the hV(1a)-R modified at position 181 or 338. In conclusion, this study provides the first structural features concerning the hV(1b)-R and highlights the role of few specific residues in its pharmacological selectivity.

Design of potent and selective agonists for the human vasopressin V1b receptor based on modifications of [deamino-cys1]arginine vasopressin at position 4

The glutamine(4) residue in [deamino-Cys(1)]arginine vasopressin (dAVP) was replaced by a broad series of aliphatic, aromatic, polar, and charged amino acids to give the following peptides: d[Gly(4)]AVP (1), d[Ala(4)]AVP (2), d[Abu(4)]AVP (3), d[Nva(4)]AVP (4), d[Nle(4)]AVP (5), d[Leu(4)]AVP (6), d[Ile(4)]AVP (7), d[Thi(4)]AVP (8), d[Phe(4)]AVP (9), d[Tyr(4)]AVP (10), d[Trp(4)]AVP (11), d[Asn(4)]AVP (12), d[Ser(4)]AVP (13), d[Thr(4)]AVP (14), d[Dap(4)]AVP (15), d[Dab(4)]AVP (16), d[Orn(4)]AVP (17), d[Lys(4)]AVP (18), d[Arg(4)]AVP (19), d[Har(4)]AVP (20), and d[Glu(4)]AVP (21). All peptides were synthesized by solid-phase methods using BOC chemistry for all but one peptide (8), which required the use of Fmoc chemistry. The binding and functional properties of these position 4 substituted analogues of dAVP (d[X(4)]AVP) and the previously reported d[Cha(4)]AVP (Derick et al. Endocrinology 2002, 143, 4655-4664) were evaluated on human arginine vasopressin (AVP) V(1a), V(1b), and V(2) receptors and on the human oxytocin (OT) receptor expressed in living Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. Binding studies revealed that broad modifications of the fourth residue of dAVP do not significantly alter affinity for the human V(1b) receptor. Only aromatic (Phe, Tyr, Trp) or negatively charged (Glu) residues reduce V(1b) affinity. By contrast, the human V(1a) and more particularly the human V(2) and the OT receptors are more sensitive to many of these modifications. Thus, the replacement of the Gln(4) residue of dAVP by aliphatic (Leu, Cha) or positively charged (Orn, Lys, Arg, Har) amino acids led to analogues exhibiting drastic reductions of their affinity for the human V(1a), V(2), and OT receptors. Consequently, in addition to the previously reported d[Cha(4)]AVP, peptides 6 and 17-20 display excellent selectivities for the human V(1b) receptor. The key structural requirement responsible for optimal V(1b) selectivity appears to be the length and branching of the aliphatic side chain of the fourth residue of dAVP. Functional studies performed on CHO cells expressing the different human AVP/OT receptors confirm the V(1b) selectivity of peptides 6, 17, 18, 20, and d[Cha(4)]AVP. However, d[Arg(4)]AVP (19), which triggers an excellent coupling between the human V(2) receptor and adenylyl cyclase, was found to exhibit both V(1b) and V(2) agonism in functional tests. More interestingly, these functional experiments revealed that, depending on the AVP/OT receptor, a given d[X(4)]AVP analogue may behave as a full agonist or as a partial agonist. This strongly suggests that the fourth residue of dAVP plays an important role in the coupling between the hormone-receptor complex, the heterotrimeric G protein, and the effectors. In conclusion, the synthesis of these d[X(4)]AVP analogues led to the discovery of new V(1b) agonists with high affinity and greatly enhanced selectivities. Thus, in addition to d[Cha(4)]AVP, d[Leu(4)]AVP (6), d[Orn(4)]AVP (17), d[Lys(4)]AVP (18), and d[Har(4)]AVP (20) are useful new tools for studying the structure and the function of the human V(1b) receptor.

Both oxytocin and vasopressin may influence alloparental behavior in male prairie voles

Neuropeptides, especially oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP), have been implicated in several features of monogamy including alloparenting. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of OT and AVP in alloparental behavior in reproductively naïve male prairie voles. Males received intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), OT, an OT receptor antagonist (OTA), AVP, an AVP receptor antagonist (AVPA), or combinations of OTA and AVPA and were subsequently tested for parental behavior. Approximately 45 min after treatment, animals were tested for behavioral responses to stimulus pups. In a 10-min test, spontaneous alloparental behavior was high in control animals. OT and AVP did not significantly increase the number of males that showed parental behavior, although more subtle behavioral changes were observed. Combined treatment with AVPA and OTA (10 ng each) significantly reduced male parental behavior and increased attacks; following a lower dose (1 ng OTA/1 ng AVPA), males were less likely to display kyphosis and tended to be slower to approach pups than controls. Since treatment with only one antagonist did not interfere with the expression of alloparenting, these results suggest that access to either OT or AVP receptors may be sufficient for the expression of alloparenting.

Identification of the binding sites of the SR49059 nonpeptide antagonist into the V1a vasopressin receptor using sulfydryl-reactive ligands and cysteine mutants as chemical sensors

To identify the binding site of the human V1a vasopressin receptor for the selective nonpeptide antagonist SR49059, we have developed a site-directed irreversible labeling strategy that combines mutagenesis of the receptor and use of sulfydryl-reactive ligands. Based on a three-dimensional model of the antagonist docked into the receptor, hypothetical ligand-receptor interactions were investigated by replacing the residues potentially involved in the binding of the antagonist into cysteines and designing analogues of SR49059 derivatized with isothiocyanate or alpha-chloroacetamide moieties. The F225C, F308C, and K128C mutants of the V1a receptor were expressed in COS-7 or Chinese hamster ovary cells, and their pharmacological properties toward SR49059 and its sulfydryl-reactive analogues were analyzed. We demonstrated that treatment of the F225C mutant with the isothiocyanate-derivative compound led to dose-dependent inhibition of the residual binding of the radio-labeled antagonist [125I]HO-LVA. This inhibition is probably the consequence of a covalent irreversible chemical modification, which is only possible when close contacts and optimal orientations exist between reactive groups created both on the ligand and the receptor. This result validated the three-dimensional model hypothesis. Thus, we propose that residue Phe225, located in transmembrane domain V, directly participates in the binding of the V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR49059. This conclusion is in complete agreement with all our previous data on the definition of the agonist/antagonist binding to members of the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family.

Molecular Modeling of the Three-Dimensional Structure of Dopamine 3 (D3) Subtype Receptor: Discovery of Novel and Potent D3 Ligands through a Hybrid Pharmacophore- and Structure-Based Database Searching Approach

The dopamine 3 (D3) subtype receptor has been implicated in several neurological conditions, and potent and selective D3 ligands may have therapeutic potential for the treatment of drug addiction, Parkinson's disease, and schizophrenia. In this paper, we report computational homology modeling of the D3 receptor based upon the high-resolution X-ray structure of rhodopsin, extensive structural refinement in the presence of explicit lipid bilayer and water environment, and validation of the refined D3 structural models using experimental data. We further describe the development, validation, and application of a hybrid computational screening approach for the discovery of several classes of novel and potent D3 ligands. This computational approach employs stepwise pharmacophore and structure-based searching of a large three-dimensional chemical database for the identification of potential D3 ligands. The obtained hits are then subjected to structural novelty screening, and the most promising compounds are tested in a D3 binding assay. Using this approach we identified four compounds with K(i) values better than 100 nM and eight compounds with K(i) values better than 1 microM out of 20 compounds selected for testing in the D3 receptor binding assay. Our results suggest that the D3 structural models obtained from this study may be useful for the discovery and design of novel and potent D3 ligands. Furthermore, the employed hybrid approach may be more effective for lead discovery from a large chemical database than either pharmacophore-based or structure-based database screening alone.

Conformational Changes of G Protein‐Coupled Receptors During Their Activation by Agonist Binding

The superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest and most diverse group of transmembrane proteins involved in signal transduction. Many of the over 1000 human GPCRs represent important pharmaceutical targets. However, despite high interest in this receptor family, no high-resolution structure of a human GPCR has been resolved yet. This is mainly due to difficulties in obtaining large quantities of pure and active protein. Until now, only a high-resolution x-ray structure of an inactive state of bovine rhodopsin is available. Since no structure of an active state has been solved, information of the GPCR activation process can be gained only by biophysical techniques. In this review, we first describe what is known about the ground state of GPCRs to then address questions about the nature of the conformational changes taking place during receptor activation and the mechanism controlling the transition from the resting to the active state. Finally, we will also address the question to what extent information about the three-dimensional GPCR structure can be included into pharmaceutical drug design programs.

Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-Protein Coupled Receptors suitable targets?

The aim of the current study is to investigate whether homology models of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) that are based on bovine rhodopsin are reliable enough to be used for virtual screening of chemical databases. Starting from the recently described 2.8 A-resolution X-ray structure of bovine rhodopsin, homology models of an "antagonist-bound" form of three human GPCRs (dopamine D3 receptor, muscarinic M1 receptor, vasopressin V1a receptor) were constructed. The homology models were used to screen three-dimensional databases using three different docking programs (Dock, FlexX, Gold) in combination with seven scoring functions (ChemScore, Dock, FlexX, Fresno, Gold, Pmf, Score). Rhodopsin-based homology models turned out to be suitable, indeed, for virtual screening since known antagonists seeded in the test databases could be distinguished from randomly chosen molecules. However, such models are not accurate enough for retrieving known agonists. To generate receptor models better suited for agonist screening, we developed a new knowledge- and pharmacophore-based modeling procedure that might partly simulate the conformational changes occurring in the active site during receptor activation. Receptor coordinates generated by this new procedure are now suitable for agonist screening. We thus propose two alternative strategies for the virtual screening of GPCR ligands, relying on a different set of receptor coordinates (antagonist-bound and agonist-bound states).

Expression of human vasopressin and oxytocin receptors in Escherichia coli

In order to produce large amounts of human vasopressin and oxytocin receptors compatible with direct structural biology approaches such as X-ray crystallography, NMR or mass spectrometry, we have expressed these neurohypophysial hormone receptors in Escherichia coli. To facilitate the level of expression, the coding sequence for the V1a vasopressin receptor and the oxytocin receptor were first optimized for bacterial expression. The resulting 'bacterial receptor cDNAs' were then subcloned into pET/T7-driven prokaryotic expression vectors. Different constructs have been prepared: each cDNA was incorporated alone or in fusion with a T7 tag sequence or a glutathione-S-transferase tag sequence at the N-terminus end. Moreover, a 6 x His tag sequence has been added at the C-terminus end for one-step purification of the receptors. Screening of BL21(DE3) and BL21(DE3)pLysS bacterial strains transformed with the different constructions was achieved by Coomassie blue-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels and by 6 x His antibody Western blotting. Several clones were selected for purification of the receptors. Expression levels of the receptors are now encouraging and will be optimized for further structural and functional studies. Moreover, at the same time, the construction of the bacterial-optimized sequence of the V2 vasopressin receptor and its expression will be performed.

An overview of SR121463, a selective non-peptide vasopressin V(2) receptor antagonist

SR121463 is a selective, orally active, non-peptide antagonist of vasopressin (AVP) V(2) receptors with powerful aquaretic properties in various animal species and humans. SR121463 belongs to a new class of drugs, called aquaretics, which are capable of inducing free-water excretion without affecting electrolyte balance. SR121463 displays high affinity for animal and human V(2) receptors and exhibits a remarkably selective V(2) receptor profile. SR121463 and [(3)H]SR121463 are used, therefore, as selective probes for characterization and labeling of V(2) receptors. In various functional studies in vitro, SR121463 behaves as a potent antagonist. It inhibits AVP-stimulated human renal adenylyl cyclase and dDAVP (1-desamino, 8-D arginine-vasopressin)-induced relaxation of rat aorta. SR121463 also behaves as an inverse agonist in cells expressing a constitutively activated human V(2) receptor mutant. In vitro, SR121463 rescued misfolded V(2) AVP receptor mutants by increasing cell surface expression and restoring V(2) function. In normally hydrated conscious rats, dogs and monkeys, SR121463, by either i.v. or p.o. administration, induced a dose-dependent aquaresis with no major changes in urinary Na+ and K+ excretion (unlike classical diuretics). In cirrhotic rats with ascites and impaired renal function, a 10-day treatment with SR121463 totally corrected hyponatremia and restored normal urine excretion. In a model of diabetic nephropathy in rats, SR121463 strongly reduced albumin excretion. SR121463 was also effective at extrarenal V(2) (or V(2)-like) receptors involved in vascular relaxation or clotting factor release in vitro and in vivo. In the rabbit model of ocular hypertension, SR121463 by either single or repeated instillation, decreased intraocular pressure. After acute and chronic administration to rats, dogs or healthy human volunteers, SR121463 was well absorbed and well tolerated. In all species studied the drug produced pronounced aquaresis without any agonist effect. Thus, SR121463 is a potent, orally active and selective antagonist at V(2) receptors with powerful aquaretic properties. It is a useful tool for further exploration of function of renal or extrarenal V(2) receptors. Pure V(2) receptor antagonists are likely to be therapeutically useful in several water-retaining diseases such as hyponatremia, Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH), congestive heart failure, liver cirrhosis, and other disorders possibly mediated by V(2) receptors (e.g., glaucoma).

Molecular modeling of interactions of the non-peptide antagonist YM087 with the human vasopressin V1a, V2 receptors and with oxytocin receptors

The nonapeptide hormones arginine vasopressin (CYFQNCPRG-NH2, AVP) and oxytocin (CYIQNCPLG-NH2, OT), control many essential functions in mammals. Their main activities include the urine concentration (via stimulation of AVP V2 receptors, V2R, in the kidneys), blood pressure regulation (via stimulation of vascular V1a AVP receptors, V1aR), ACTH control (via stimulation of V1b receptors, V1bR, in the pituitary) and labor and lactation control (via stimulation of OT receptors, OTR, in the uterus and nipples, respectively). All four receptor subtypes belong to the GTP-binding (G) protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. This work consists of docking of YM087, a potent non-peptide V1aR and V2R - but not OTR - antagonist, into the receptor models based on relatively new theoretical templates of rhodopsin (RD) and opiate receptors, proposed by Mosberg et al. (Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA). It is simultaneously demonstrated that this RD template satisfactorily compares with the first historical GPCR structure of bovine rhodopsin (Palczewski et al., 2000) and that homology-modeling of V2R, V1aR and OTR using opiate receptors as templates is rational, based on relatively high (20-60%) sequence homology among the set of 4 neurophyseal and 4 opiate receptors. YM087 was computer-docked to V1aR, V2R and OTR using the AutoDock (Olson et al., Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, USA) and subsequently relaxed using restrained simulated annealing and molecular dynamics, as implemented in AMBER program (Kollman et al., University of California, San Francisco, USA). From about 80 diverse configurations, sampled for each of the three ligand/receptor systems, 3 best energy-relaxed complexes were selected for mutual comparisons. Similar docking modes were found for the YM087/V1aR and YM087/V2R complexes, diverse from those of the YM087/OTR complexes, in agreement with the molecular affinity data.

Direct identification of human oxytocin receptor-binding domains using a photoactivatable cyclic peptide antagonist: comparison with the human V1a vasopressin receptor

Understanding of the molecular determinants responsible for antagonist binding to the oxytocin receptor should provide important insights that facilitate rational design of potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of preterm labor. To study ligand/receptor interactions, we used a novel photosensitive radioiodinated antagonist of the human oxytocin receptor, d(CH(2))(5) [Tyr(Me)(2),Thr(4),Orn(8),Phe(3(125)I,4N(3))-NH(2)9]vasotocin. This ligand had an equivalent high affinity for human oxytocin and V(1a) vasopressin receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Taking advantage of this dual specificity, we conducted photoaffinity labeling experiments on both receptors. Photolabeled oxytocin and V(1a) receptors appeared as a unique protein band at 70-75 kDa and two labeled protein bands at 85-90 and 46 kDa, respectively. To identify contact sites between the antagonist and the receptors, the labeled 70-75- and the 46-kDa proteins were cleaved with CNBr and digested with Lys-C and Arg-C endoproteinases. The fragmentation patterns allowed the identification of a covalently labeled region in the oxytocin receptor transmembrane domain III consisting of the residues Leu(114)-Val(115)-Lys(116). Analysis of contact sites in the V(1a) receptor led to the identification of the homologous region consisting of the residues Val(126)-Val(127)-Lys(128). Binding domains were confirmed by mutation of several CNBr cleavage sites in the oxytocin receptor and of one Lys-C cleavage site in the V(1a) receptor. The results are in agreement with previous experimental data and three-dimensional models of agonist and antagonist binding to members of the oxytocin/vasopressin receptor family.