Enabling role of adenosine A1 receptors in adenosine A2A receptor-mediated striatal expression of c-fos

Antidepressant effects of selective adenosine receptor antagonists targeting the A1 and A2A receptors administered jointly with NMDA receptor ligands: behavioral, biochemical and molecular investigations in mice

BACKGROUND

The objective of the study was to ascertain the antidepressant potential of the co-administration of NMDA receptor ligands and selective adenosine A1 and A2A receptor antagonists.

METHODS

The forced swim test (FST) and spontaneous locomotor activity test were carried out in adult male naïve mice. Before the behavioral testing, animals received DPCPX (a selective adenosine A1 receptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg) or istradefylline (a selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, 0.5 mg/kg) in combination with L-701,324 (a potent NMDA receptor antagonist, 1 mg/kg), D-cycloserine (a partial agonist at the glycine recognition site of NMDA receptor, 2.5 mg/kg), CGP 37849 (a competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, 0.3 mg/kg) or MK-801 (a non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, 0.05 mg/kg). Additionally, serum BDNF level and the mRNA level of the Adora1, Comt, and Slc6a15 genes in the murine prefrontal cortex were determined.

RESULTS

The obtained results showed that DPCPX and istradefylline administered jointly with NMDA receptor ligands (except for DPCPX + D-cycloserine combination) produced an antidepressant effect in the FST in mice without enhancement in spontaneous motility of animals. An elevation in BDNF concentration was noted in the D-cycloserine-treated group. Adora1 expression increased with L-701,324, DPCPX + D-cycloserine, and DPCPX + CGP 37849, while D-cycloserine, CGP 37849, and MK-801 led to a decrease. Comt mRNA levels dropped with DPCPX + L-701,324, istradefylline + L-701,324/CGP 37849 but increased with D-cycloserine, MK-801, CGP 37849 and DPCPX + MK-801/ CGP 37849. Slc6a15 levels were reduced by D-cycloserine, DPCPX + L-701,324 but rose with DPCPX + CGP 37849/MK-801 and istradefylline + D-cycloserine/MK-801/CGP 37849.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that selective antagonists of adenosine receptors may enhance the antidepressant efficacy of NMDA receptor ligands highlighting a potential synergistic interaction between the adenosinergic and glutamatergic systems. Wherein, A2A receptor antagonists are seen as more promising candidates in this context. Given the intricate nature of changes in BDNF levels and the expression of Adora1, Comt, and Slc6a15 seen after drug combinations exerting antidepressant properties, further research and integrative approaches are crucial understand better the mechanisms underlying their antidepressant action.

GRIN lens applications for studying neurobiology of substance use disorder

Substance use disorder (SUD) is associated with severe health and social consequences. Continued drug use results in alterations of circuits within the mesolimbic dopamine system. It is critical to observe longitudinal impacts of SUD on neural activity in vivo to identify SUD predispositions, develop pharmaceuticals to prevent overdose, and help people suffering from SUD. However, implicated SUD associated areas are buried in deep brain which makes in vivo observation of neural activity challenging. The gradient index (GRIN) lens can probe these regions in mice and rats. In this short communications review, we will discuss how the GRIN lens can be coupled with other technologies such as miniaturized microscopes, fiberscopes, fMRI, and optogenetics to fully explore in vivo SUD research. Particularly, GRIN lens allows in vivo observation of deep brain regions implicated in SUD, differentiation of genetically distinct neurons, examination of individual cells longitudinally, correlation of neuronal patters with SUD behavior, and manipulation of neural circuits.

The Interaction of Selective A1 and A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonists with Magnesium and Zinc Ions in Mice: Behavioural, Biochemical and Molecular Studies

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether the co-administration of Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ with selective A1 and A2A receptor antagonists might be an interesting antidepressant strategy. Forced swim, tail suspension, and spontaneous locomotor motility tests in mice were performed. Further, biochemical and molecular studies were conducted. The obtained results indicate the interaction of DPCPX and istradefylline with Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ manifested in an antidepressant-like effect. The reduction of the BDNF serum level after co-administration of DPCPX and istradefylline with Mg²⁺ and Zn²⁺ was noted. Additionally, Mg²⁺ or Zn²⁺, both alone and in combination with DPCPX or istradefylline, causes changes in Adora1 expression, DPCPX or istradefylline co-administered with Zn²⁺ increases Slc6a15 expression as compared to a single-drug treatment, co-administration of tested agents does not have a more favourable effect on Comt expression. Moreover, the changes obtained in Ogg1, MsrA, Nrf2 expression show that DPCPX-Mg²⁺, DPCPX-Zn²⁺, istradefylline-Mg²⁺ and istradefylline-Zn²⁺ co-treatment may have greater antioxidant capacity benefits than administration of DPCPX and istradefylline alone. It seems plausible that a combination of selective A1 as well as an A2A receptor antagonist and magnesium or zinc may be a new antidepressant therapeutic strategy.

Potential antipsychotic action of the selective agonist of adenosine A1 receptors, 5'-Cl-5'-deoxy-ENBA, in amphetamine and MK-801 rat models

Background

Disturbances of dopaminergic and glutamatergic transmissions have been suggested to be involved in the pathomechanisms underlying psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia. In line with this concept, hyperlocomotion induced by the dopaminomimetic amphetamine and the uncompetitive antagonist of NMDA receptors MK-801 (dizocilpine) in rodents is a generally established model for screening of new potential antipsychotic drugs. Since recent studies have indicated that receptors for adenosine may be targets for antipsychotic therapy, the aim of the present study was to investigate an influence of 5′-Cl-5′-deoxy-ENBA, a potent and selective adenosine A₁ receptor agonist, on hyperlocomotion induced by amphetamine and MK-801.

Methods

Locomotor activity was measured by Force Plate Actimeters where four force transducers located below the corners of the floor of the cage tracked the animal position on a Cartesian plane at each time point.

Results

Hyperlocomotion induced by either amphetamine (1 mg/kg sc) or MK-801 (0.3 mg/kg ip) was inhibited by 5′-Cl-5′-deoxy-ENBA (0.1 mg/kg ip). The effect of 5′-Cl-5′-deoxy-ENBA on the amphetamine- and MK-801-induced hyperlocomotion was antagonized by the selective antagonist of adenosine A₁ receptor DPCPX at doses of 1 and 2 mg/kg ip, respectively.

Conclusion

The present study suggests that stimulation of adenosine A₁ receptors may produce antipsychotic effects.

Reduction of repetitive behavior by co-administration of adenosine receptor agonists in C58 mice

Repetitive behaviors are diagnostic for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and commonly observed in other neurodevelopmental disorders. Currently, there are no effective pharmacological treatments for repetitive behavior in these clinical conditions. This is due to the lack of information about the specific neural circuitry that mediates the development and expression of repetitive behavior. Our previous work in mouse models has linked repetitive behavior to decreased activation of the subthalamic nucleus, a brain region in the indirect and hyperdirect pathways in the basal ganglia circuitry. The present experiments were designed to further test our hypothesis that pharmacological activation of the indirect pathway would reduce repetitive behavior. We used a combination of adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonists that have been shown to alter the firing frequency of dorsal striatal neurons within the indirect pathway of the basal ganglia. This drug combination markedly and selectively reduced repetitive behavior in both male and female C58 mice over a six-hour period, an effect that required both A1 and A2A agonists as neither alone reduced repetitive behavior. The adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonist combination also significantly increased the number of Fos transcripts and Fos positive cells in dorsal striatum. Fos induction was found in both direct and indirect pathway neurons suggesting that the drug combination restored the balance of activation across these complementary basal ganglia pathways. The adenosine A1 and A2A receptor agonist combination also maintained its effectiveness in reducing repetitive behavior over a 7-day period. These findings point to novel potential therapeutic targets for development of drug therapies for repetitive behavior in clinical disorders.

Pivotal Role of Adenosine Neurotransmission in Restless Legs Syndrome

The symptomatology of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) includes periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS), dysesthesias, and hyperarousal. Alterations in the dopaminergic system, a presynaptic hyperdopaminergic state, seem to be involved in PLMS, while alterations in glutamatergic neurotransmission, a presynaptic hyperglutamatergic state, seem to be involved in hyperarousal and also PLMS. Brain iron deficiency (BID) is well-recognized as a main initial pathophysiological mechanism of RLS. BID in rodents have provided a pathogenetic model of RLS that recapitulates the biochemical alterations of the dopaminergic system of RLS, although without PLMS-like motor abnormalities. On the other hand, BID in rodents reproduces the circadian sleep architecture of RLS, indicating the model could provide clues for the hyperglutamatergic state in RLS. We recently showed that BID in rodents is associated with changes in adenosinergic transmission, with downregulation of adenosine A₁ receptors (A1R) as the most sensitive biochemical finding. It was hypothesized that A1R downregulation leads to hypersensitive striatal glutamatergic terminals and facilitation of striatal dopamine release. Hypersensitivity of striatal glutamatergic terminals was demonstrated by an optogenetic-microdialysis approach in the rodent with BID, indicating that it could represent a main pathogenetic factor that leads to PLMS in RLS. In fact, the dopaminergic agonists pramipexole and ropinirole and the α₂δ ligand gabapentin, used in the initial symptomatic treatment of RLS, completely counteracted optogenetically-induced glutamate release from both normal and BID-induced hypersensitive corticostriatal glutamatergic terminals. It is a main tenet of this essay that, in RLS, a single alteration in the adenosinergic system, downregulation of A1R, disrupts the adenosine-dopamine-glutamate balance uniquely controlled by adenosine and dopamine receptor heteromers in the striatum and also the A1R-mediated inhibitory control of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the cortex and other non-striatal brain areas, which altogether determine both PLMS and hyperarousal. Since A1R agonists would be associated with severe cardiovascular effects, it was hypothesized that inhibitors of nucleoside equilibrative transporters, such as dipyridamole, by increasing the tonic A1R activation mediated by endogenous adenosine, could represent a new alternative therapeutic strategy for RLS. In fact, preliminary clinical data indicate that dipyridamole can significantly improve the symptomatology of RLS.

Behavioral control by striatal adenosine A2A -dopamine D2 receptor heteromers

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) exhibit the ability to form receptor complexes that include molecularly different GPCR (ie, GPCR heteromers), which endow them with singular functional and pharmacological characteristics. The relative expression of GPCR heteromers remains a matter of intense debate. Recent studies support that adenosine A_2A receptors (A_2A R) and dopamine D₂ receptors (D₂ R) predominantly form A_2A R-D₂ R heteromers in the striatum. The aim of the present study was evaluating the behavioral effects of pharmacological manipulation and genetic blockade of A_2A R and D₂ R within the frame of such a predominant striatal heteromeric population. First, in order to avoid possible strain-related differences, a new D₂ R-deficient mouse with the same genetic background (CD-1) than the A_2A R knock-out mouse was generated. Locomotor activity, pre-pulse inhibition (PPI) and drug-induced catalepsy were then evaluated in wild-type, A_2A R and D₂ R knock-out mice, with and without the concomitant administration of either the D₂ R agonist sumanirole or the A_2A R antagonist SCH442416. SCH442416-mediated locomotor effects were demonstrated to be dependent on D₂ R signaling. Similarly, a significant dependence on A_2A R signaling was observed for PPI and for haloperidol-induced catalepsy. The results could be explained by the existence of one main population of striatal postsynaptic A_2A R-D₂ R heteromers, which may constitute a relevant target for the treatment of Parkinson's disease and other neuropsychiatric disorders.

Adenosine receptors as markers of brain iron deficiency: Implications for Restless Legs Syndrome

Deficits of sensorimotor integration with periodic limb movements during sleep (PLMS) and hyperarousal and sleep disturbances in Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) constitute two pathophysiologically distinct but interrelated clinical phenomena, which seem to depend mostly on alterations in dopaminergic and glutamatergic neurotransmission, respectively. Brain iron deficiency is considered as a main pathogenetic mechanism in RLS. Rodents with brain iron deficiency represent a valuable pathophysiological model of RLS, although they do not display motor disturbances. Nevertheless, they develop the main neurochemical dopaminergic changes found in RLS, such as decrease in striatal dopamine D₂ receptor density. On the other hand, brain iron deficient mice exhibit the characteristic pattern of hyperarousal in RLS, providing a tool to find the link between brain iron deficiency and sleep disturbances in RLS. The present study provides evidence for a role of the endogenous sleep-promoting factor adenosine. Three different experimental preparations, long-term (22 weeks) severe or moderate iron-deficient (ID) diets (3- or 7-ppm iron diet) in mice and short-term (3 weeks) severe ID diet (3-ppm iron diet) in rats, demonstrated a significant downregulation (Western blotting in mouse and radioligand binding saturation experiments in rat brain tissue) of adenosine A₁ receptors (A1R) in the cortex and striatum, concomitant to striatal D2R downregulation. On the other hand, the previously reported upregulation of adenosine A_2A receptors (A2AR) was only observed with severe ID in both mice and rats. The results suggest a key role for A1R downregulation in the PLMS and hyperarousal in RLS.

Neuroprotection by caffeine in the MPTP model of parkinson's disease and its dependence on adenosine A2A receptors

Considerable epidemiological and laboratory data have suggested that caffeine, a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist, may protect against the underlying neurodegeneration of parkinson's disease (PD). Although both caffeine and more specific antagonists of the A2A subtype of adenosine receptor (A2AR) have been found to confer protection in animal models of PD, the dependence of caffeine's neuroprotective effects on the A2AR is not known. To definitively determine its A2AR dependence, the effect of caffeine on 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6 tetra-hydropyridine (MPTP) neurotoxicity was compared in wild-type (WT) and A2AR gene global knockout (A2A KO) mice, as well as in central nervous system (CNS) cell type-specific (conditional) A2AR knockout (cKO) mice that lack the receptor either in postnatal forebrain neurons or in astrocytes. In WT and in heterozygous A2AR KO mice caffeine pretreatment (25mg/kgip) significantly attenuated MPTP-induced depletion of striatal dopamine. By contrast in homozygous A2AR global KO mice caffeine had no effect on MPTP toxicity. In forebrain neuron A2AR cKO mice, caffeine lost its locomotor stimulant effect, whereas its neuroprotective effect was mostly preserved. In astrocytic A2AR cKO mice, both caffeine's locomotor stimulant and protective properties were undiminished. Taken together, these results indicate that neuroprotection by caffeine in the MPTP model of PD relies on the A2AR, although the specific cellular localization of these receptors remains to be determined.

Allosteric mechanisms within the adenosine A2A-dopamine D2 receptor heterotetramer

The structure constituted by a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) homodimer and a G protein provides a main functional unit and oligomeric entities can be viewed as multiples of dimers. For GPCR heteromers, experimental evidence supports a tetrameric structure, comprised of two different homodimers, each able to signal with its preferred G protein. GPCR homomers and heteromers can act as the conduit of allosteric interactions between orthosteric ligands. The well-known agonist/agonist allosteric interaction in the adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR)-dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) heteromer, by which A2AR agonists decrease the affinity of D2R agonists, gave the first rationale for the use of A2AR antagonists in Parkinson's disease. We review new pharmacological findings that can be explained in the frame of a tetrameric structure of the A2AR-D2R heteromer: first, ligand-independent allosteric modulations by the D2R that result in changes of the binding properties of A2AR ligands; second, differential modulation of the intrinsic efficacy of D2R ligands for G protein-dependent and independent signaling; third, the canonical antagonistic Gs-Gi interaction within the frame of the heteromer; and fourth, the ability of A2AR antagonists, including caffeine, to also exert the same allosteric modulations of D2R ligands than A2AR agonists, while A2AR agonists and antagonists counteract each other's effects. These findings can have important clinical implications when evaluating the use of A2AR antagonists. They also call for the need of monitoring caffeine intake when evaluating the effect of D2R ligands, when used as therapeutic agents in neuropsychiatric disorders or as probes in imaging studies. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Purines in Neurodegeneration and Neuroregeneration'.

Caffeine induces behavioural sensitization and overexpression of cocaine-regulated and amphetamine-regulated transcript peptides in mice

This study examined whether repeated administration of caffeine would induce behavioural sensitization and overexpression of cocaine-regulated and amphetamine-regulated transcript (CART) peptides in mice. The involvement of dopaminergic receptors and adenosine receptors in caffeine-induced behavioural sensitization and CART overexpression was studied. The relevance of D₁R and D₂R, and A₁R and A(2A)R in the overexpression of CART peptides in mouse striatum was also evaluated. Repeated administration of caffeine induced behavioural sensitization in mice. Significant increases in CART mRNA levels were observed on day 3 and peaked at day 5 of caffeine administration, and then decreased gradually. Higher proportions of CART⁺ cells were observed in the dorsolateral and ventrolateral part of the caudate putamen than in the nucleus accumbens shell and core. The behavioural sensitization induced by caffeine was inhibited by dopaminergic receptor antagonists and adenosine receptor agonists. D₁R and D₂R, and cyclic AMP (cAMP)/protein kinase A (PKA)/phospho-cAMP response element-binding protein (pCREB) signalling were activated by caffeine, but A₁R and A(2A)R were inhibited. Overexpression of caffeine-induced CART peptides and pCREB activity were blocked by N-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, an A₁R agonist) and 4-[2-[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-β-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzenepropanoic acid hydrochloride (CGS 21680, an A(2A)R agonist), but not by R(+)-7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-1-phenyl-2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-1H-3-benzazepine hydrochloride (SCH 23390, a D₁R antagonist) or raclopride (a D₂R antagonist). Caffeine-induced overexpression of CART peptides was associated with the inhibition of A₁R and A(2A)R, and the activation of cAMP/PKA/pCREB signalling. Moreover, the A(2A)R-D₂R heterodimer might be involved in the overexpression of CART peptides induced by caffeine.

Differences between the nonselective adenosine receptor antagonists caffeine and theophylline in motor and mood effects: studies using medium to high doses in animal models

RATIONALE

Caffeine and theophylline are methylxanthines that are broadly consumed, sometimes at high doses, and act as minor psychostimulants. Both are nonselective adenosine antagonists for A1 and A2A receptors, which are colocalized with dopamine D1 and D2 receptors in striatal areas. Adenosine antagonists generally have opposite actions to those of dopamine antagonists. Although the effects of caffeine are widely known, theophylline has been much less well characterized, especially at high doses.

METHODS

Adult male CD1 mice were used to study the effect of a broad range of doses (25.0, 50.0 or 100.0mg/kg) of caffeine and theophylline on measures of spontaneous locomotion and coordination, as well as the pattern of c-Fos immunoreactivity in brain areas rich in adenosine and dopamine receptors. In addition, we evaluated possible anxiety and stress effects of these doses.

RESULTS

Caffeine, at these doses, impaired or suppressed locomotion in several paradigms. However, theophylline was less potent than caffeine at suppressing motor parameters, and even stimulated locomotion. Both drugs induced corticosterone release, however caffeine was more efficacious at intermediate doses. While caffeine showed an anxiogenic profile at all doses, theophylline only did so at the highest dose used (50mg/kg). Only theophylline increased c-Fos immunoreactivity in cortical areas.

CONCLUSION

Theophylline has fewer disruptive effects than caffeine on motor parameters and produces less stress and anxiety effects. These results are relevant for understanding the potential side effects of methylxanthines when consumed at high doses.

Caffeinated Alcoholic Beverages - An Emerging Trend in Alcohol Abuse

Alcohol use disorders are pervasive in society and their impact affects quality of life, morbidity and mortality, as well as individual productivity. Alcohol has detrimental effects on an individual’s physiology and nervous system, and is associated with disorders of many organ and endocrine systems impacting an individual’s health, behavior, and ability to interact with others. Youth are particularly affected. Unfortunately, adolescent usage also increases the probability for a progression to dependence. Several areas of research indicate that the deleterious effects of alcohol abuse may be exacerbated by mixing caffeine with alcohol. Some behavioral evidence suggests that caffeine increases alcohol drinking and binge drinking episodes, which in turn can foster the development of alcohol dependence. As a relatively new public health concern, the epidemiological focus has been to establish a need for investigating the effects of caffeinated alcohol. While the trend of co-consuming these substances is growing, knowledge of the central mechanisms associated with caffeinated ethanol has been lacking. Research suggests that caffeine and ethanol can have additive or synergistic pharmacological actions and neuroadaptations, with the adenosine and dopamine systems in particular implicated. However, the limited literature on the central effects of caffeinated ethanol provides an impetus to increase our knowledge of the neuroadaptive effects of this combination and their impact on cognition and behavior. Research from our laboratories indicates that an established rodent animal model of alcoholism can be extended to investigate the acute and chronic effects of caffeinated ethanol.

Stimulation of adenosine receptors in the nucleus accumbens reverses the expression of cocaine sensitization and cross-sensitization to dopamine D2 receptors in rats

Adenosine receptors co-localize with dopamine receptors on medium spiny nucleus accumbens (NAc) neurons where they antagonize dopamine receptor activity. It remains unclear whether adenosine receptor stimulation in the NAc restores cocaine-induced enhancements in dopamine receptor sensitivity. The goal of these studies was to determine whether stimulating A(1) or A(2A) receptors in the NAc reduces the expression of cocaine sensitization. Rats were sensitized with 7 daily treatments of cocaine (15 mg/kg, i.p.). Following one-week withdrawal, the effects of intra-NAc microinjections of the adenosine kinase inhibitor (ABT-702), the adenosine deaminase inhibitor (deoxycoformycin; DCF), the specific A(1) receptor agonist (CPA) and the specific A(2A) receptor agonist (CGS 21680) were tested on the behavioral expression of cocaine sensitization. The results indicate that intra-NAc pretreatment of ABT-702 and DCF dose-dependently blocked the expression of cocaine sensitization while having no effects on acute cocaine sensitivity, suggesting that upregulation of endogenous adenosine in the accumbens is sufficient to non-selectively stimulate adenosine receptors and reverse the expression of cocaine sensitization. Intra-NAc treatment of CPA significantly inhibited the expression of cocaine sensitization, which was reversed by both A(1) and A(2A) receptor antagonism. Intra-NAc treatment of CGS 21680 also significantly inhibited the expression of cocaine sensitization, which was selectively reversed by A(2A), but not A(1), receptor antagonism. Finally, CGS 21680 also inhibited the expression of quinpirole cross-sensitization. Together, these findings suggest that adenosine receptor stimulation in the NAc is sufficient to reverse the behavioral expression of cocaine sensitization and that A(2A) receptors blunt cocaine-induced sensitization of postsynaptic D(2) receptors.

Adenosine A₂A and A₂B receptors are both required for adenosine A₁ receptor-mediated cardioprotection

All four adenosine receptor subtypes have been shown to play a role in cardioprotection, and there is evidence that all four subtypes may be expressed in cardiomyocytes. There is also increasing evidence that optimal adenosine cardioprotection requires the activation of more than one receptor subtype. The purpose of this study was to determine whether adenosine A(2A) and/or A(2B) receptors modulate adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection. Isolated perfused hearts of wild-type (WT), A(2A) knockout (KO), and A(2B)KO mice, perfused at constant pressure and constant heart rate, underwent 30 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion. The adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA; 200 nM) was administrated 10 min before ischemia and for the first 10 min of reperfusion. Treatment with CHA significantly improved postischemic left ventricular developed pressure (74 ± 4% vs. 44 ± 4% of preischemic left ventricular developed pressure at 60 min of reperfusion) and reduced infarct size (30 ± 2% with CHA vs. 52 ± 5% in control) in WT hearts, effects that were blocked by the A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (100 nM). Treatments with the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS-21680 (200 nM) and the A(2B) agonist BAY 60-6583 (200 nM) did not exert any beneficial effects. Deletion of adenosine A(2A) or A(2B) receptor subtypes did not alter ischemia-reperfusion injury, but CHA failed to exert a cardioprotective effect in hearts of mice from either KO group. These findings indicate that both adenosine A(2A) and A(2B) receptors are required for adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated cardioprotection, implicating a role for interactions among receptor subtypes.

Pharmacological evidence for different populations of postsynaptic adenosine A2A receptors in the rat striatum

Adenosine A(2A) receptors (A(2A)Rs) are highly concentrated in the striatum. Two pharmacological different functional populations of A(2A)Rs have been recently described based on their different affinities for the A(2A)R antagonist SCH-442416. This compound has high affinity for A(2A)Rs not forming heteromers or forming heteromers with adenosine A(1) receptors (A(1)Rs) while showing very low affinity for A(2A)Rs forming heteromers with dopamine D(2) receptors (D(2)Rs). It has been widely described that striatal A(1)R-A(2A)R heteromers are preferentially localized presynaptically in the glutamatergic terminals that contact GABAergic dynorphinergic neurons, and that A(2A)R-D(2)R heteromers are localized postsynaptically in GABAergic enkephalinergic neurons. In the present study we provide evidence suggesting that SCH-442416 also targets postsynaptic A(2A)R not forming heteromers with D(2)R, which are involved in the motor depressant effects induced by D(2)R antagonists. SCH-442416 counteracted motor depression in rats induced by the D(2)R antagonist raclopride at a dose that did not produce motor activation or that blocked motor depression induced by an A(2A)R agonist. Furthermore, we re-evaluated the recently suggested key role of cannabinoid CB(1) receptors (CB(1)Rs) in the effects of A(2A)R antagonists acting at postsynaptic A(2A)Rs. By recording locomotor activity and monitoring striatal glutamate release induced by cortical electrical stimulation in rats after administration of A(2A)R and CB(1)R antagonists, we did not find evidence for any significant role of endocannabinoids in the post- or presynaptic effects of A(2A)R antagonists. The present results further suggest the existence of at least two functionally and pharmacologically different populations of striatal postsynaptic A(2A)Rs.

Xanthines as adenosine receptor antagonists

The natural plant alkaloids caffeine and theophylline were the first adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists described in the literature. They exhibit micromolar affinities and are non-selective. A large number of derivatives and analogues were subsequently synthesized and evaluated as AR antagonists. Very potent antagonists have thus been developed with selectivity for each of the four AR subtypes.

A role for adenosine A(1) receptor blockade in the ability of caffeine to promote MDMA "Ecstasy"-induced striatal dopamine release

Co-administration of caffeine profoundly enhances the acute toxicity of 3,4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in rats. The aim of this study was to determine the ability of caffeine to impact upon MDMA-induced dopamine release in superfused brain tissue slices as a contributing factor to this drug interaction. MDMA (100 and 300μM) induced a dose-dependent increase in dopamine release in striatal and hypothalamic tissue slices preloaded with [(3)H] dopamine (1μM). Caffeine (100μM) also induced dopamine release in the striatum and hypothalamus, albeit to a much lesser extent than MDMA. When striatal tissue slices were superfused with MDMA (30μM) in combination with caffeine (30μM), caffeine enhanced MDMA-induced dopamine release, provoking a greater response than that obtained following either caffeine or MDMA applications alone. The synergistic effects in the striatum were not observed in hypothalamic slices. As adenosine A(1) receptors are, one of the main pharmacological targets of caffeine, which are known to play an important role in the regulation of dopamine release, their role in the modulation of MDMA-induced dopamine release was investigated. 1μM 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX), a specific A(1) antagonist, like caffeine, enhanced MDMA-induced dopamine release from striatal slices while 1μM 2,chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA), a selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist, attenuated this. Treatment with either SCH 58261, a selective A(2A) receptor antagonist, or rolipram, a selective PDE-4 inhibitor, failed to reproduce a caffeine-like effect on MDMA-induced dopamine release. These results suggest that caffeine regulates MDMA-induced dopamine release in striatal tissue slices, via inhibition of adenosine A(1) receptors.

Indirect basal ganglia pathway mediation of repetitive behavior: attenuation by adenosine receptor agonists

Repetitive behaviors are diagnostic for autism and common in related neurodevelopmental disorders. Despite their clinical importance, underlying mechanisms associated with the expression of these behaviors remain poorly understood. Our lab has previously shown that the rates of spontaneous stereotypy in deer mice (Peromyscus maniculatus) were negatively correlated with enkephalin content, a marker of striatopallidal but not striatonigral neurons. To investigate further the role of the indirect basal ganglia pathway, we examined neuronal activation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) using cytochrome oxidase (CO) histochemistry in high- and low-stereotypy mice. CO activity in STN was significantly lower in high-stereotypy mice and negatively correlated with the frequency of stereotypy. In addition, exposure to environmental enrichment, which attenuated stereotypy, normalized the activity of STN. Co-administration of the adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS21680 and the A(1) receptor agonist CPA attenuated stereotypy dose-dependently. The significant reduction associated with the lowest dose of the drug combination tested was due to its effects on mice with lower baseline levels of stereotypy. Higher doses of the drug combination were required to show robust behavioral effects, and presumably requisite activation of the indirect pathway, in high-stereotypy mice. These findings support that decreased indirect pathway activity is linked to the expression of high levels of stereotypy in deer mice and that striatal A(1) and A(2A) receptors may provide promising therapeutic targets for the treatment of repetitive behaviors in neurodevelopmental disorders.

Improvement of postural adjustment steps in hemiparkinsonian rats chronically treated with caffeine is mediated by concurrent blockade of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors

Chronic treatment with the non-selective adenosine receptor antagonist caffeine produces full recovery of the contralateral adjusting steps in hemiparkinsonian rats. In order to disclose which adenosine receptor subtype mediates this effect, a group of hemiparkinsonian rats (n=9) was treated with caffeine (5.15 mumol/kg/day), or equimolar doses of selective A1 (DPCPX) or A2A (ZM 241385) adenosine receptor antagonists, administered in a counterbalanced order over periods of 3 weeks, interspersed with equivalent washout intervals. Treatment with ZM 241385 caused full recovery (102+/-6%) of the contralateral forepaw stepping, while the maximal effect of DPCPX was only 73+/-7% of that produced by caffeine. The maximal effect of caffeine and ZM 241385 remained stable throughout the treatment period. The response to DPCPX showed more fluctuations, but tolerance did not develop. Stepping improvement was significantly faster with DPCPX than with ZM 241385, while caffeine had intermediate values. Stepping decrease after treatment interruption was faster with ZM 241385 than with caffeine, while DPCPX had intermediate values. In other experiments with the same rats, addition of the A2AR agonist CGS 21680 (5.15 mumol/kg) or the A1R agonist CCPA (2.71 mumol/kg) during the second week of caffeine treatment reversed the improvement of contralateral stepping by 59+/-4% and 30+/-3%, respectively. The combined treatment with CGS 21680 and CCPA caused complete reversal of the contralateral stepping recovery afforded by caffeine, which was more than additive (114+/-5%) compared with the sum of the maximal inhibition produced by either agonist administered alone (89+/-4%). In all cases, after interrupting the adenosine agonists, the effect of caffeine was fully restored. None of the aforementioned treatments induced significant changes in the stepping of the ipsilateral forepaw. Collectively, these results suggest that the improvement of postural adjustments induced by chronic treatment with low doses of caffeine in hemiparkinsonian rats is mediated by concurrent blockade of A1 and A2A adenosine receptors, with a larger involvement of the latter.

GDNF control of the glutamatergic cortico-striatal pathway requires tonic activation of adenosine A receptors

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) affords neuroprotection in Parkinson's disease in accordance with its ability to bolster nigrostriatal innervation. We previously found that GDNF facilitates dopamine release in a manner dependent on adenosine A(2A) receptor activation. As motor dysfunction also involves modifications of striatal glutamatergic innervation, we now tested if GDNF and its receptor system, Ret (rearranged during transfection) and GDNF family receptor alpha1 controlled the cortico-striatal glutamatergic pathway in an A(2A) receptor-dependent manner. GDNF (10 ng/mL) enhanced (by approximately 13%) glutamate release from rat striatal nerve endings, an effect potentiated (up to approximately 30%) by the A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 (10 nM) and prevented by the A(2A) receptor antagonist, SCH 58261 (50 nM). Triple immunocytochemical studies revealed that Ret and GDNF family receptor alpha1 were located in 50% of rat striatal glutamatergic terminals (immunopositive for vesicular glutamate transporters-1/2), where they were found to be co-located with A(2A) receptors. Activation of the glutamatergic system upon in vivo electrical stimulation of the rat cortico-striatal input induced striatal Ret phosphorylation that was prevented by pre-treatment with the A(2A) receptor antagonist, MSX-3 (3 mg/kg). The results provide the first functional and morphological evidence that GDNF controls cortico-striatal glutamatergic pathways in a manner largely dependent on the co-activation of adenosine A(2A) receptors.

Adenosine receptors and reperfusion injury of the heart

Adenosine, a catabolite of ATP, exerts numerous effects in the heart, including modulation of the cardiac response to stress, such as that which occurs during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Over the past 20 years, substantial evidence has accumulated that adenosine, administered either prior to ischemia or during reperfusion, reduces both reversible and irreversible myocardial injury. The latter effect results in a reduction of both necrosis or myocardial infarction (MI) and apoptosis. These effects appear to be mediated via the activation of one or more G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), referred to as A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) adenosine receptor (AR) subtypes. Experimental studies in different species and models suggest that activation of the A(1) or A(3)ARs prior to ischemia is cardioprotective. Further experimental studies reveal that the administration of A(2A)AR agonists during reperfusion can also reduce MI, and recent reports suggest that A(2B)ARs may also play an important role in modulating myocardial reperfusion injury. Despite convincing experimental evidence for AR-mediated cardioprotection, there have been only a limited number of clinical trials examining the beneficial effects of adenosine or adenosine-based therapeutics in humans, and the results of these studies have been equivocal. This review summarizes our current knowledge of AR-mediated cardioprotection, and the roles of the four known ARs in experimental models of ischemia-reperfusion. The chapter concludes with an examination of the clinical trials to date assessing the safety and efficacy of adenosine as a cardioprotective agent during coronary thrombolysis in humans.

Functional relevance of neurotransmitter receptor heteromers in the central nervous system

The existence of neurotransmitter receptor heteromers is becoming broadly accepted and their functional significance is being revealed. Heteromerization of neurotransmitter receptors produces functional entities that possess different biochemical characteristics with respect to the individual components of the heteromer. Neurotransmitter receptor heteromers can function as processors of computations that modulate cell signaling. Thus, the quantitative or qualitative aspects of the signaling generated by stimulation of any of the individual receptor units in the heteromer are different from those obtained during coactivation. Furthermore, recent studies demonstrate that some neurotransmitter receptor heteromers can exert an effect as processors of computations that directly modulate both pre- and postsynaptic neurotransmission. This is illustrated by the analysis of striatal receptor heteromers that control striatal glutamatergic neurotransmission.

Neurotransmitter receptor heteromers and their integrative role in 'local modules': the striatal spine module

'Local module' is a fundamental functional unit of the central nervous system that can be defined as the minimal portion of one or more neurons and/or one or more glial cells that operates as an independent integrative unit. This review focuses on the importance of neurotransmitter receptor heteromers for the operation of local modules. To illustrate this, we use the striatal spine module (SSM), comprised of the dendritic spine of the medium spiny neuron (MSN), its glutamatergic and dopaminergic terminals and astroglial processes. The SSM is found in the striatum, and although aspects such as neurotransmitters and receptors will be specific to the SSM, some general principles should apply to any local module in the brain. The analysis of some of the receptor heteromers in the SSM shows that receptor heteromerization is associated with particular elaborated functions in this local module. Adenosine A(2A) receptor-dopamine D(2) receptor-glutamate metabotropic mGlu(5) receptor heteromers are located adjacent to the glutamatergic synapse of the dendritic spine of the enkephalin MSN, and their cross-talk within the receptor heteromers helps to modulate postsynaptic plastic changes at the glutamatergic synapse. A(1) receptor-A(2A) receptor heteromers are found in the glutamatergic terminals and the molecular cross-talk between the two receptors in the heteromer helps to modulate glutamate release. Finally, dopamine D(2) receptor-non-alpha(7) nicotinic acetylcholine receptor heteromers, which are located in dopaminergic terminals, introduce the new concept of autoreceptor heteromer.

Differential glutamate-dependent and glutamate-independent adenosine A1receptor-mediated modulation of dopamine release in different striatal compartments

Adenosine and dopamine are two important modulators of glutamatergic neurotransmission in the striatum. However, conflicting reports exist about the role of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the modulation of striatal dopamine release. It has been previously suggested that adenosine A(1) receptors localized in glutamatergic nerve terminals indirectly modulate dopamine release, by their ability to modulate glutamate release. In the present study, using in vivo microdialysis, we provide evidence for the existence of a significant glutamate-independent tonic modulation of dopamine release in most of the analyzed striatal compartments. In the dorsal, but not in the ventral, part of the shell of the nucleus accumbens (NAc), blockade of A(1) receptors by local perfusion with the selective A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dimethyl-xanthine or by systemic administration of the non-selective adenosine antagonist caffeine induced a glutamate-dependent release of dopamine. On the contrary, A(1) receptor blockade induced a glutamate-independent dopamine release in the core of the NAc and the nucleus caudate-putamen. Furthermore, using immunocytochemical and functional studies in rat striatal synaptosomes, we demonstrate that a fraction of striatal dopaminergic terminals contains adenosine A(1) receptors, which directly inhibit dopamine release independently of glutamatergic transmission.

Stimulation of adenosine receptors selectively activates gene expression in striatal enkephalinergic neurons

In the striatum, adenosine A2A and dopamine D2 receptors exert reciprocal antagonistic interactions that modulate the function of GABAergic enkephalinergic neurons. We have previously shown that stimulation of adenosine A1 receptors allows the stimulation of A2A receptors to overcome a tonic inhibitory effect of D2 receptors and induce striatal expression of c-fos. In the present work, by studying co-localization of c-Fos immunoreactivity and preproenkephalin and preprodynorphin transcripts, we show that co-administration of the A1 receptor agonist CPA and the A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680 increases the striatal expression of c-fos in GABAergic enkephalinergic but not in GABAergic dynorphinergic neurons. Co-administration of CPA and CGS 21680 also induced a significant increase in the striatal expression of preproenkephalin. The results underscore the role of adenosine in the activation of gene expression in the GABAergic enkephalinergic neuron.

The A2a/A2b receptor antagonist ZM-241385 blocks the cardioprotective effect of adenosine agonist pretreatment in in vivo rat myocardium

There is increasing evidence for interactions among adenosine receptor subtypes in the brain and heart. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the adenosine A(2a) receptor modulates the infarct size-reducing effect of preischemic administration of adenosine receptor agonists in intact rat myocardium. Adult male rats were submitted to in vivo regional myocardial ischemia (25 min) and 2 h reperfusion. Vehicle-treated rats were compared with rats pretreated with the A(1) agonist 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CCPA, 10 mug/kg), the nonselective agonist 5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA, 10 mug/kg), or the A(2a) agonist 2-[4-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino]-5'-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS-21680, 20 mug/kg). Additional CCPA- and NECA-treated rats were pretreated with the A(1) antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 100 mug/kg), the A(2a)/A(2b) antagonist 4-(-2-[7-amino-2-{2-furyl}{1,2,4}triazolo{2,3-a} {1,3,5}triazin-5-yl-amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM-241385, 1.5 mg/kg) or the A(3) antagonist 3-propyl-6-ethyl-5[(ethylthio)carbonyl]-2-phenyl-4-propyl-3-pyridine carboxylate (MRS-1523, 2 mg/kg). CCPA and NECA reduced myocardial infarct size by 50% and 35%, respectively, versus vehicle, but CGS-21680 had no effect. DPCPX blunted the bradycardia associated with CCPA and NECA, whereas ZM-241385 attenuated their hypotensive effects. Both DPCPX and ZM-241385 blocked the protective effects of CCPA and NECA. The A(3) antagonist did not alter the hemodynamic effects of CCPA or NECA, nor did it alter adenosine agonist cardioprotection. None of the antagonists alone altered myocardial infarct size. These findings suggest that although preischemic administration of an A(2a) receptor agonist does not induce cardioprotection, antagonism of the A(2a) and/or the A(2b) receptor blocks the cardioprotection associated with adenosine agonist pretreatment.

Involvement of adenosine in the neurobiology of schizophrenia and its therapeutic implications

Based on the neuromodulatory and homeostatic actions of adenosine, adenosine dysfunction may contribute to the neurobiological and clinical features of schizophrenia. The present model of adenosine dysfunction in schizophrenia takes into consideration the dopamine and glutamate hypotheses, since adenosine exerts neuromodulatory roles on these systems, and proposes that adenosine plays a role in the inhibitory deficit found in schizophrenia. Given the role of adenosine activation of adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) in mediating neurotoxicity in early stages of brain development, pre- and peri-natal complications leading to excessive adenosine release could induce primary brain changes (i.e., first hit). These events would lead to an adenosine inhibitory deficit through a partial loss of A1R that may emerge as reduced control of dopamine activity and increased vulnerability to excitotoxic glutamate action in the mature brain (i.e., second hit). Adenosine dysfunction is reasonably compatible with symptoms, gray and white matter abnormalities, progressive brain loss, pre- and peri-natal risk factors, age of onset, response to current treatments, impaired sensory gating and increased smoking in schizophrenia. Pharmacological treatments enhancing adenosine activity could be effective for symptom control and for alleviating deterioration in the course of the illness. Accordingly, allopurinol, which may indirectly increase adenosine, has been effective and well tolerated in the treatment of schizophrenia. Since much of the evidence for the adenosine hypothesis is preliminary and theoretical, further investigation in the field is warranted.

Role of adenosine A1 receptors in the modulation of dopamine D1 and adenosine A2a receptor signaling in the neostriatum

Adenosine is known to modulate the function of neostriatal neurons. Adenosine acting on A(2A) receptors increases the phosphorylation of dopamine- and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein of M(r) 32 kDa (DARPP-32) at Thr34 (the cAMP-dependent protein kinase [PKA] site) in striatopallidal neurons, and opposes dopamine D2 receptor signaling. In contrast, the role of adenosine A(1) receptors in the regulation of dopamine/DARPP-32 signaling is not clearly understood. Here, we investigated the effect of adenosine A(1) receptors on D(1), D(2) and A(2A) receptor signaling using mouse neostriatal slices. An A(1) receptor agonist, 2-chloro-N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (100 nM), caused a transient increase, followed by a transient decrease, in DARPP-32 Thr34 phosphorylation. Our data support the following model for the actions of the A(1) receptor agonist. The A(1) receptor-induced early increase in Thr34 phosphorylation was mediated by presynaptic inhibition of dopamine release, and the subsequent removal of tonic inhibition by D(2) receptors of A(2A) receptor/G(olf)/cAMP/PKA signaling. The A(1) receptor-induced late decrease in Thr34 phosphorylation was mediated by a postsynaptic G(i) mechanism, resulting in inhibition of D(1) and A(2A) receptor-coupled G(olf)/cAMP/PKA signaling in direct and indirect pathway neurons, respectively. In conclusion, A(1) receptors play a major modulatory role in dopamine and adenosine receptor signaling.

Effects of the A2A adenosine receptor antagonist KW6002 in the nucleus accumbens in vitro and in vivo

In this study, we have used the selective A 2A adenosine receptor antagonist KW6002 to investigate the function of A 2A receptors in the Lister hooded rat nucleus accumbens in vitro and in vivo. Radioligand binding studies confirmed a greater than 50-fold selectivity of KW6002 for A 2A receptors compared to A1 receptors. Release of [3H]-dopamine from nucleus accumbens slices in vitro was almost doubled in the presence of 300 nM KW6002, while GABA release was inhibited by approximately one third. In vivo, intraperitoneal administration of KW6002 (4 mg kg(-1)) increased dopamine overflow almost 4-fold in the nucleus accumbens. In behavioural testing, KW6002 elicited place preference and increased locomotor activity at 1, 2 and 4 mg kg(-1). Taken together, these results suggest a role for tonic activation of A 2A adenosine receptors in reward-related phenomena.

Adenosine and ATP-sensitive potassium channels modulate dopamine release in the anoxic turtle (Trachemys scripta) striatum

Excessive dopamine (DA) is known to cause hypoxic/ischemic damage to mammalian brain. The freshwater turtle Trachemys scripta, however, maintains basal striatal DA levels in anoxia. We investigated DA balance during early anoxia when energy status in the turtle brain is compromised. The roles of ATP-sensitive potassium (K(ATP)) channels and adenosine (AD) receptors were investigated as these factors affect DA balance in mammalian neurons. Striatal extracellular DA was determined by microdialysis with HPLC in the presence or absence of the specific DA transport blocker GBR-12909, the K(ATP) blocker 2,3-butanedione monoxime, or the nonspecific AD receptor blocker theophylline. We found that in contrast to long-term anoxia, blocking DA reuptake did not significantly increase extracellular levels in 1-h anoxic turtles. Low DA levels in early anoxia were maintained instead by activation of K(ATP) channels and AD receptors. Blocking K(ATP) resulted in a 227% increase in extracellular DA in 1-h anoxic turtles but had no effect after 4 h of anoxia. Similarly, blocking AD receptors increased DA during the first hour of anoxia but did not change DA levels at 4-h anoxia. Support for the role of K(ATP) channels in DA balance comes from normoxic animals treated with K(ATP) opener; infusing diazoxide but not adenosine into the normoxic turtle striatum resulted in an immediate DA decrease to 14% of basal values within 1.5 h. Alternative strategies to maintain low extracellular levels may prevent catastrophic DA increases when intracellular energy is compromised while permitting the turtle to maintain a functional neuronal network during long-term anoxia.

Lack of adenosine A1 and dopamine D2 receptor-mediated modulation of the cardiovascular effects of the adenosine A2A receptor agonist CGS 21680

Some behavioral and biochemical effects of the systemically administered adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5'-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS 21680) in rats are potentiated by adenosine A(1) receptor agonists and counteracted by dopamine D2 receptor agonists. In the present study we compared potentiating and antagonistic interactions between CGS 21680 and adenosine A(1) and dopamine D2 receptor agonists on motor activity and on cardiovascular responses (arterial blood pressure and heart rate). The motor-depressant effects produced by CGS 21680 (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) were potentiated by the adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 0.3 mg/kg, i.p.) and counteracted by the dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.). In contrast, neither CPA nor quinpirole significantly modified the decrease in arterial pressure or the increase in heart rate induced by CGS 21680. However, the adenosine A(2A) receptor antagonist 3-(3-hydroxypropyl)-8-(m-methoxystyryl)-7-methyl-1-propargylxanthine phosphate disodium salt (MSX-3, 3 mg/kg, i.p.) counteracted both the motor-depressant and cardiovascular effects of CGS 21680. Therefore, the effects of the systemically administered adenosine A(2A) receptor agonist CGS 21680 on cardiovascular function, in contrast to its effects on motor behavior, appear to be independent of the effects of adenosine A(1) and dopamine D2 receptor activity.

Opposite modulatory roles for adenosine A1 and A2A receptors on glutamate and dopamine release in the shell of the nucleus accumbens. Effects of chronic caffeine exposure

Previous studies have demonstrated opposing roles for adenosine A1 and A2A receptors in the modulation of extracellular levels of glutamate and dopamine in the striatum. In the present study, acute systemic administration of motor-activating doses of the A2A receptor antagonist MSX-3 significantly decreased extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the shell of the rat nucleus accumbens (NAc) and counteracted both dopamine and glutamate release induced by systemic administration of motor-activating doses of either the A1 receptor antagonist CPT or caffeine. Furthermore, exposure to caffeine in the drinking water (1 mg/mL, 14 days) resulted in tolerance to the effects of systemic injection of CPT or caffeine, but not MSX-3, on extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the NAc shell. The present results show: first, the existence of opposite tonic effects of adenosine on extracellular levels of dopamine and glutamate in the shell of the NAc mediated by A1 and A2A receptors; second, that complete tolerance to caffeine's dopamine- and glutamate-releasing effects which develops after chronic caffeine exposure is attributable to an A1 receptor-mediated mechanism. Development of tolerance to the dopamine-releasing effects of caffeine in the shell of the NAc may explain its weak addictive properties and atypical psychostimulant profile.