Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment on Acute Kidney Injury Events in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

Lowering systolic blood pressure to less than 120 mm Hg versus less than 140 mm Hg in patients with high cardiovascular risk with and without diabetes or previous stroke: an open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

Uncertainty exists about whether lowering systolic blood pressure to less than 120 mm Hg is superior to that of less than 140 mm Hg, particularly in patients with diabetes and patients with previous stroke.

METHODS

In this open-label, blinded-outcome, randomised controlled trial, participants with high cardiovascular risk were enrolled from 116 hospitals or communities in China. We used minimised randomisation to assign participants to intensive treatment targeting standard office systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg or standard treatment targeting less than 140 mm Hg. The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, revascularisation, hospitalisation for heart failure, stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes, assessed by the intention-to-treat principle. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04030234.

FINDINGS

Between Sept 17, 2019, and July 13, 2020, 11 255 participants (4359 with diabetes and 3022 with previous stroke) were assigned to intensive treatment (n=5624) or standard treatment (n=5631). Their mean age was 64·6 years (SD 7·1). The mean systolic blood pressure throughout the follow-up (except the first 3 months of titration) was 119·1 mm Hg (SD 11·1) in the intensive treatment group and 134·8 mm Hg (10·5) in the standard treatment group. During a median of 3·4 years of follow-up, the primary outcome event occurred in 547 (9·7%) participants in the intensive treatment group and 623 (11·1%) in the standard treatment group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·88, 95% CI 0·78-0·99; p=0·028). There was no heterogeneity of effects by diabetes status, duration of diabetes, or history of stroke. Serious adverse events of syncope occurred more frequently in the intensive treatment group (24 [0·4%] of 5624) than in standard treatment group (eight [0·1%] of 5631; HR 3·00, 95% CI 1·35-6·68). There was no significant between-group difference in the serious adverse events of hypotension, electrolyte abnormality, injurious fall, or acute kidney injury.

INTERPRETATION

For hypertensive patients at high cardiovascular risk, regardless of the status of diabetes or history of stroke, the treatment strategy of targeting systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg, as compared with that of less than 140 mm Hg, prevents major vascular events, with minor excess risk.

FUNDING

The Ministry of Science and Technology of China and Fuwai Hospital.

TRANSLATION

For the Mandarin translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Revisiting Hypertension Treatment in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Despite being the world's top risk factor for death and disability, hypertension awareness and control within the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population have decreased. This is particularly important considering the heightened severity and management challenges of hypertension in CKD patients, whose outcomes are often worse compared with persons with normal kidney function. Therefore, finding novel therapeutics to improve blood pressure control within this vulnerable group is paramount. Although medications that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system remain a mainstay for blood pressure control in most stages of CKD, we discuss novel approaches that may expand their use in advanced CKD. We also review newer tools for blood pressure management that have emerged in recent years, including aldosterone synthase inhibitors, endothelin receptor antagonists, and renal denervation. Overall, the future of hypertension management in CKD appears brighter, with a growing arsenal of tools and a deeper understanding of this complex disease.

Effect of Intensive Blood Pressure Control on Kidney Outcomes: Long-Term Electronic Health Record-Based Post-Trial Follow-Up of SPRINT

BACKGROUND

Intensive BP lowering in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) produced acute decreases in kidney function and higher risk for AKI. We evaluated the effect of intensive BP lowering on long-term changes in kidney function using trial and outpatient electronic health record (EHR) creatinine values.

METHODS

SPRINT data were linked with EHR data from 49 (of 102) study sites. The primary outcome was the total slope of decline in eGFR for the intervention phase and the post-trial slope of decline during the observation phase using trial and outpatient EHR values. Secondary outcomes included a ≥30% decline in eGFR to <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 and a ≥50% decline in eGFR or kidney failure among participants with baseline eGFR ≥60 and <60 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 , respectively.

RESULTS

EHR creatinine values were available for a median of 8.3 years for 3041 participants. The total slope of decline in eGFR during the intervention phase was -0.67 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.79 to -0.56) in the standard treatment group and -0.96 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.08 to -0.85) in the intensive treatment group ( P < 0.001). The slopes were not significantly different during the observation phase: -1.02 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.24 to -0.81) in the standard group and -0.85 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year (95% CI, -1.07 to -0.64) in the intensive group. Among participants without CKD at baseline, intensive treatment was associated with higher risk of a ≥30% decline in eGFR during the intervention (hazard ratio, 3.27; 95% CI, 2.43 to 4.40), but not during the postintervention observation phase. In those with CKD at baseline, intensive treatment was associated with a higher hazard of eGFR decline only during the intervention phase (hazard ratio, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.03 to 3.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive BP lowering was associated with a steeper total slope of decline in eGFR and higher risk for kidney events during the intervention phase of the trial, but not during the postintervention observation phase.

Estimated Population Health Benefits of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Treatment Among SPRINT-Eligible US Adults

BACKGROUND

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) demonstrated an intensive (<120 mm Hg) vs. standard (<140 mm Hg) systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal lowered cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Estimating the effect of intensive SBP lowering among SPRINT-eligible adults most likely to benefit can guide implementation efforts.

METHODS

We studied SPRINT participants and SPRINT-eligible participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES). A published algorithm of predicted CVD benefit with intensive SBP treatment was used to categorize participants into low, medium, or high predicted benefit. CVD event rates were estimated with intensive and standard treatment.

RESULTS

Median age was 67.0, 72.0, and 64.0 years in SPRINT, SPRINT-eligible REGARDS, and SPRINT-eligible NHANES participants, respectively. The proportion with high predicted benefit was 33.0% in SPRINT, 39.0% in SPRINT-eligible REGARDS, and 23.5% in SPRINT-eligible NHANES. The estimated difference in CVD event rate (standard minus intensive) was 7.0 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-10.7), 8.4 (95% CI 8.2-8.5), and 6.1 (95% CI 5.9-6.3) per 1,000 person-years in SPRINT, SPRINT-eligible REGARDS participants, and SPRINT-eligible NHANES participants, respectively (median 3.2-year follow-up). Intensive SBP treatment could prevent 84,300 (95% CI 80,800-87,920) CVD events per year in 14.1 million SPRINT-eligible US adults; 29,400 and 28,600 would be in 7.0 million individuals with medium or high predicted benefit, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the population health benefit from intensive SBP goals could be achieved by treating those characterized by a previously published algorithm as having medium or high predicted benefit.

Systolic blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and adverse kidney outcome: results from KNOW-CKD

It is unknown whether intensive control of blood pressure (BP) and lipids can delay the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This study examined the combined association of strict targets of systolic BP (SBP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels with adverse kidney outcomes. In total, 2012 patients from the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcomes in Patients With CKD (KNOW-CKD) were classified into four groups according to SBP of 120 mmHg and LDL-C of 70 mg/dl: group 1, <120 and <70; group 2, <120 and ≥70; group 3, ≥120 and <70; group 4, ≥120 and ≥70. We constructed time-varying models treating two variables as time-varying exposures. The primary outcome was the progression of CKD, defined as a ≥50% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate from the baseline or the onset of kidney failure requiring replacement therapy. The primary outcome events occurred in 27.9%, 26.7%, 40.3%, and 39.1% from groups 1 to 4. In the time-varying model, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the primary outcome were 0.48 (0.33-0.69), 0.78 (0.63-0.96), and 0.96 (0.74-1.23) for groups 1 to 3, respectively, compared with group 4. When less stringent cut-offs of SBP of 130 mmHg and LDL-C of 100 mg/dl were used, this graded association was lost, while only SBP was associated with adverse kidney outcomes. In this study, the lower targets of SBP of <120 mmHg and LDL-C < 70 mg/dl were synergistically associated with a lower risk of adverse kidney outcomes.

Rationale and design of the Effects of intensive Systolic blood Pressure lowering treatment in reducing RIsk of vascular evenTs (ESPRIT): A multicenter open-label randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Lowering blood pressure (BP) effectively reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events in high CV risk individuals. The optimal target of BP lowering among high CV risk individuals remains unclear.

METHODS

The Effects of intensive Systolic blood Pressure lowering treatment in reducing RIsk of vascular evenTs (ESPRIT) trial is a multi-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of intensive BP lowering strategy (Systolic BP target <120 mm Hg) and standard BP lowering strategy (Systolic BP target <140 mm Hg). Participants aged at least 50 years old with baseline systolic BP within 130 to 180 mm Hg at high CV risk, defined by established CV diseases or 2 major CV risk factors, were enrolled. The primary outcome is a composite CV outcome of myocardial infarction, coronary or non-coronary revascularization, hospitalization or emergency department visit from new-onset heart failure or acute decompensated heart failure, stroke, or death from CV diseases. Secondary outcomes include components of the primary composite outcome, all-cause death, a composite of the primary outcome or all-cause death, kidney outcomes, as well as cognitive outcomes.

RESULTS

Despite of the interruption of COVID-19 outbreak, the ESPRIT trial successfully enrolled and randomized 11,255 participants from 116 hospitals or primary health care institutions. The mean age of the participants was 64.6 (standard deviation [SD], 7.1) years, 4,650 (41.3%) were women. Among them 28.9%, 26.9% and 38.7% had coronary heart disease, prior stroke and diabetes mellitus, respectively. COVID-19 outbreak affected the BP lowering titration process of the trial, and delayed the reach of BP target.

CONCLUSIONS

The ESPRIT trial will address the important question on the optimal BP lowering target for individuals with high CV risk, and generate high quality evidence for treating millions of patients from East Asian countries.

Associations of systolic blood pressure and in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury

PURPOSE

Although systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with acute renal injury (AKI), the relationship between baseline SBP and prognosis in critically ill patients with AKI is unclear. We aimed to assess the linearity and profile of the relationship between SBP at intensive care unit (ICU) admission and in-hospital mortality in these patients.

METHODS

Data of AKI patients in the ICU settings were extracted from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III database. The association between seven SBP categories (< 100, 100-109, 110-119, 120-129, 130-139, 140-149, and ≥ 150 mmHg) and all-cause in-hospital mortality was assessed by Cox proportional hazard models. Restricted cubic spline analysis for the multivariate Cox model was performed to explore the shape of the relationship between SBP and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 24,202 patients with AKI were included in this study. A typically U-shaped relationship was found between SBP at admission and in-hospital mortality. Among all SBP categories, the lowest risk of death was observed in patients with SBP around 110-119 mmHg, whereas the highest was noted in patients with extremely low SBP (< 100 mmHg), followed by those with extremely high SBP (≥ 150 mmHg). SBP showed a significant interaction with vasopressor use and AKI stage in relation to the risk of in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SBP upon admission showed a non-linear association with all-cause in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with AKI. Patients with low or high SBP show an increased risk of mortality compared to patients with normal SBP.

Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection

OBJECTIVE

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in patients with aortic diseases; however, it has not been extensively studied in acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD). AKI is known to be associated with adverse kidney outcomes and premature death. This study investigated the incidence and impact of AKI in patients with acute TBAD.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study including data from two tertiary vascular centres in the UK. Case notes and electronic records were reviewed for consecutive patients presenting with acute symptomatic TBAD. Patients were managed according to a uniform clinical protocol; both patients who underwent surgery and those managed conservatively were included in this analysis. Serum creatinine values were used to calculate the number of patients who developed AKI, based on validated Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes definitions. Associations between incidence of AKI, death, and Major Adverse Kidney Events (MAKE; defined as death, dialysis and/or drop in estimated glomerular filtration rate > 25%) were explored.

RESULTS

Overall, 66 (42.6%) of 155 patients developed AKI within one week of presenting with TBAD. Of these, 23 patients (34.8%) had stage 1, 26 patients (39.4%) stage 2, and 17 patients (25.8%) stage 3 AKI. MAKE at 30 and 90 days occurred in 17 (11.0%) and 12 patients (7.7%), respectively. AKI was associated with significantly worse outcomes, with a 24.2% mortality rate in the AKI group compared with 7.8% among those with no AKI (p <.001); this association was also significant in adjusted analyses, both in patients who did and did not undergo surgery.

CONCLUSION

AKI is very common among patients presenting with acute TBAD, even in clinically uncomplicated disease. There was a significant association with mortality and MAKE, whether patients underwent surgery or not. This warrants further investigation to better understand the underlying causes of the AKI and investigate management strategies which may improve outcomes.

Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease: An Update on Diagnosis and Management

Hypertension (HTN) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are pathophysiologic states that are intimately related, such that long-term HTN can lead to poor kidney function, and renal function decline can lead to worsening blood pressure (BP) control. HTN in CKD is caused by an interplay of factors, including salt and water retention, with extracellular volume expansion, sympathetic nervous system overactivity, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system activation, and endothelial dysfunction. BP variability in the CKD population is significant, however, and thus requires close monitoring for appropriate management. With accumulating evidence, the diagnosis as well as management of HTN in CKD has been evolving in the last decade. In this comprehensive review based on current evidence and recommendations, we summarize the basics of pathophysiology, BP variability, diagnosis, and management of HTN in CKD with an emphasis on special populations with CKD.

Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Diabetic Kidney Disease

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common cause of end-stage kidney disease. Blood pressure (BP) control can reduce the risks of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity, mortality, and kidney disease progression. Recently, the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines have suggested the implementation of a more intensive BP control with a target systolic BP (SBP) of <120 mmHg based on the evidence that the CV benefits obtained is outweighed by the kidney injury risk associated with a lower BP target. However, an extremely low BP level may paradoxically aggravate renal function and CV outcomes. Herein, we aimed to review the existing literature regarding optimal BP control using medications for DKD.

Intensive Versus Standard Blood Pressure Lowering and Days Free of Cardiovascular Events and Serious Adverse Events: a Post Hoc Analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

BACKGROUND

Communication of the benefits and harms of blood pressure lowering strategy is crucial for shared decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the effect of intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure lowering in terms of the number of event-free days DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial PARTICIPANTS: A total of 9361 adults 50 years or older without diabetes or stroke who had a systolic blood pressure of 130-180 mmHg and elevated cardiovascular risk INTERVENTIONS: Intensive (systolic blood pressure goal <120 mmHg) versus standard blood pressure lowering (<140 mmHg) MAIN MEASURES: Days free of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious adverse events (SAE), and monitored adverse events (hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, electrolyte abnormalities, injurious falls, or acute kidney injury) over a median follow-up of 3.33 years KEY RESULTS: The intensive treatment group gained 14.7 more MACE-free days over 4 years (difference, 14.7 [95% confidence interval: 5.1, 24.4] days) than the standard treatment group. The benefit of the intensive treatment varied by cognitive function (normal: difference, 40.7 [13.0, 68.4] days; moderate-to-severe impairment: difference, -15.0 [-56.5, 26.4] days; p-for-interaction=0.009) and self-rated health (excellent: difference, -22.7 [-51.5, 6.1] days; poor: difference, 156.1 [31.1, 281.2] days; p-for-interaction=0.001). The mean overall SAE-free days were not significantly different between the treatments (difference, -14.8 [-35.3, 5.7] days). However, the intensive treatment group had 28.5 fewer monitored adverse event-free days than the standard treatment group (difference, -28.5 [-40.3, -16.7] days), with significant variations by frailty status (non-frail: difference, 38.8 [8.4, 69.2] days; frail: difference, -15.5 [-46.6, 15.7] days) and self-rated health (excellent: difference, -12.9 [-45.5, 19.7] days; poor: difference, 180.6 [72.9, 288.4] days; p-for-interaction <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Over 4 years, intensive systolic blood pressure lowering provides, on average, 14.7 more MACE-free days than standard treatment, without any difference in SAE-free days. Whether this time-based effect summary improves shared decision-making remains to be elucidated.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Registration: NCT01206062.

Hypertension in chronic kidney disease: What lies behind the scene

Hypertension is a frequent condition encountered during kidney disease development and a leading cause in its progression. Hallmark factors contributing to hypertension constitute a complexity of events that progress chronic kidney disease (CKD) into end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Multiple crosstalk mechanisms are involved in sustaining the inevitable high blood pressure (BP) state in CKD, and these play an important role in the pathogenesis of increased cardiovascular (CV) events associated with CKD. The present review discusses relevant contributory mechanisms underpinning the promotion of hypertension and their consequent eventuation to renal damage and CV disease. In particular, salt and volume expansion, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) hyperactivity, upregulated renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), oxidative stress, vascular remodeling, endothelial dysfunction, and a range of mediators and signaling molecules which are thought to play a role in this concert of events are emphasized. As the control of high BP via therapeutic interventions can represent the key strategy to not only reduce BP but also the CV burden in kidney disease, evidence for major strategic pathways that can alleviate the progression of hypertensive kidney disease are highlighted. This review provides a particular focus on the impact of RAAS antagonists, renal nerve denervation, baroreflex stimulation, and other modalities affecting BP in the context of CKD, to provide interesting perspectives on the management of hypertensive nephropathy and associated CV comorbidities.

Kidney tubule health, mineral metabolism and adverse events in persons with CKD in SPRINT

BACKGROUND

Measures of kidney tubule health are risk markers for acute kidney injury (AKI) in persons with chronic kidney disease (CKD) during hypertension treatment, but their associations with other adverse events (AEs) are unknown.

METHODS

Among 2377 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) participants with CKD, we measured at baseline eight urine biomarkers of kidney tubule health and two serum biomarkers of mineral metabolism pathways that act on the kidney tubules. Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate biomarker associations with risk of a composite of pre-specified serious AEs (hypotension, syncope, electrolyte abnormalities, AKI, bradycardia and injurious falls) and outpatient AEs (hyperkalemia and hypokalemia).

RESULTS

At baseline, the mean age was 73 ± 9 years and mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 46 ± 11 mL/min/1.73 m2. During a median follow-up of 3.8 years, 716 (30%) participants experienced the composite AE. Higher urine interleukin-18, kidney injury molecule-1, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), lower urine uromodulin (UMOD) and higher serum fibroblast growth factor-23 were individually associated with higher risk of the composite AE outcome in multivariable-adjusted models including eGFR and albuminuria. When modeling biomarkers in combination, higher NGAL [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.08 per 2-fold higher biomarker level, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.13], higher MCP-1 (HR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.19) and lower UMOD (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.97) were each associated with higher composite AE risk. Biomarker associations did not vary by intervention arm (P > 0.10 for all interactions).

CONCLUSIONS

Among persons with CKD, several kidney tubule biomarkers are associated with higher risk of AEs during hypertension treatment, independent of eGFR and albuminuria.

Prevalence, risk factors, and cardiovascular disease outcomes associated with persistent blood pressure control: The Jackson Heart Study

BACKGROUND

Maintaining blood pressure (BP) control over time may contribute to lower risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) among individuals who are taking antihypertensive medication.

METHODS

The Jackson Heart Study (JHS) enrolled 5,306 African-American adults ≥21 years of age and was used to determine the proportion of African Americans that maintain persistent BP control, identify factors associated with persistent BP control, and determine the association of persistent BP control with CVD events. This analysis included 1,604 participants who were taking antihypertensive medication at Visit 1 and had BP data at Visits 1 (2000-2004), 2 (2005-2008), and 3 (2009-2013). Persistent BP control was defined as systolic BP <140 mm Hg and diastolic BP <90 mm Hg at all three visits. CVD events were assessed from Visit 3 through December 31, 2016. Hazard ratios (HR) for the association of persistent BP control with CVD outcomes were adjusted for age, sex, systolic BP, smoking, diabetes, and total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol at Visit 3.

RESULTS

At Visit 1, 1,226 of 1,604 participants (76.4%) with hypertension had controlled BP. Overall, 48.9% of participants taking antihypertensive medication at Visit 1 had persistent BP control. After multivariable adjustment for demographic, socioeconomic, clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial factors, and access-to-care, participants were more likely to have persistent BP control if they were <65 years of age, women, had family income ≥$25,000 at each visit, and visited a health professional in the year prior to each visit. The multivariable adjusted HR (95% confidence interval) comparing participants with versus without persistent BP control was 0.71 (0.46-1.10) for CVD, 0.68 (0.34-1.34) for coronary heart disease, 0.65 (0.27-1.52) for stroke, and 0.55 (0.33-0.90) for heart failure.

CONCLUSION

Less than half of JHS participants taking antihypertensive medication had persistent BP control, putting them at increased risk for heart failure.

Acute Changes in Serum Creatinine Are Not a Meaningful Metric in Randomized Controlled Trials and Clinical Care

BACKGROUND

Acute changes in serum creatinine are labeled clinically as acute kidney injury (AKI). However, not all acute changes in serum creatinine are deleterious and need to be acted upon.

SUMMARY

Intravenous fluids in response to AKI should be judiciously administered, and volume overload should be avoided. Since congestion is the driver of poor outcomes in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and must be managed, AKI that occurs at the expense of decongestion does not confer increased risk. We still do not have evidence of therapies that reduce AKI which will translate into any meaningful improvements in clinical outcomes. Finally, particularly in the setting of application of therapies designed to reduce cardiorenal risk, acute changes in serum creatinine are often in the opposite direction of the ultimate clinical outcomes, both renal and nonrenal.

KEY MESSAGES

Given the complexities and the nuance of acute changes in serum creatinine, it has ruled itself as an unreliable surrogate for randomized controlled trials and often hinders appropriate care in the clinical setting.

The evolution of "pillars of therapy" to reduce heart failure risk and slow diabetic kidney disease progression

The evolution of therapy to slow chronic kidney disease progression has changed dramatically over the last five years and is anticipated to change even more in the coming two to four years. What was traditionally noted as "renal sparing therapy" with blockers of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has now expanded to the use of inhibitors of sodium-glucose transport 2 (SGLT2) agents as well as the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, finerenone. These three "pillars of therapy" have slowed kidney disease progression by more than 50% compared to RAS blockers alone. Additionally, finerenone and SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduce heart failure hospitalizations and the development of heart failure. Moreover, they improve exercise tolerance and reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, even though they do not affect atherosclerotic heart disease development. These data, taken together, demonstrate a "three pillar" therapy approach for cardiorenal risk reduction in people with type 2 diabetes who have any level of kidney disease.

Use of Guideline-Based Therapy for Diabetes, Coronary Artery Disease, and Chronic Kidney Disease After Acute Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Observational Study

Background

Survivors of acute kidney injury (AKI) are at a high risk for cardiovascular complications. An underrecognition of this risk may contribute to the low utilization of relevant guideline-based therapies in this population.

Objective

We sought to assess accordance with guideline-based recommendations for survivors of AKI with diabetes, coronary artery disease (CAD), and preexisting chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a post-AKI clinic, and identify factors that may be associated with guideline accordance.

Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Post-AKI clinics at 2 tertiary care centers in Ontario, Canada.

Patients

We included adult patients seen in both post-AKI clinics between 2013 and 2019 who had at least 2 clinic visits within 24 months of an index AKI hospitalization.

Measurements

We assessed accordance to recommendations from the most recent North American and international guidelines available at the time of study completion for diabetes, CAD, and CKD.

Methods

We compared guideline accordance between visits using the Cochran Mantel Haenszel test. We used multivariable Poisson regression to identify prespecified factors associated with accordance.

Results

Of 213 eligible patients, 192 (90%) had Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes Stage 2-3 AKI, 91 (43%) had diabetes, 76 (36%) had CAD, and 88 (41%) had preexisting CKD. From the first clinic visit to the second, there was an increase in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACE-I/ARB) use across all disease groups-from 33% to 46% (P = .028) in patients with diabetes, from 30% to 57% (P = .002) in patients with CAD, and from 16% to 35% (P < .001) in patients with preexisting CKD. Statin use increased in patients with preexisting CKD from 64% to 71% (P = .034). Every 25 μmol/L rise in the discharge serum creatinine was associated with a 19% (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-28%) and 12% (95% CI, 2%-21%) lower likelihood of being on an ACE-I/ARB in patients with diabetes and preexisting CKD, respectively.

Limitations

The study lacked a comparison group that received usual care. The small sample and multiple comparisons make false positives possible.

Conclusion

There is room to improve guideline-based cardiovascular risk factor management in survivors of AKI, particularly ACE-I/ARB use in patients with an elevated discharge serum creatinine.

Effect of Intensive versus Standard BP Control on AKI and Subsequent Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality: Findings from the SPRINT EHR Study

Background

Adjudication of inpatient AKI in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was based on billing codes and admission and discharge notes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of intensive versus standard BP control on creatinine-based inpatient and outpatient AKI, and whether AKI was associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality.

Methods

We linked electronic health record (EHR) data from 47 clinic sites with trial data to enable creatinine-based adjudication of AKI. Cox regression was used to evaluate the effect of intensive BP control on the incidence of AKI, and the relationship between incident AKI and CVD and all-cause mortality.

Results

A total of 3644 participants had linked EHR data. A greater number of inpatient AKI events were identified using EHR data (187 on intensive versus 155 on standard treatment) as compared with serious adverse event (SAE) adjudication in the trial (95 on intensive versus 61 on standard treatment). Intensive treatment increased risk for SPRINT-adjudicated inpatient AKI (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.08) and for creatinine-based outpatient AKI (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15 to 1.70), but not for creatinine-based inpatient AKI (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.48). Irrespective of the definition (SAE or creatinine based), AKI was associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality, but only creatinine-based inpatient AKI was associated with increased risk for CVD.

Conclusions

Creatinine-based ascertainment of AKI, enabled by EHR data, may be more sensitive and less biased than traditional SAE adjudication. Identifying ways to prevent AKI may reduce mortality further in the setting of intensive BP control.

Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral Blood Flow: Secondary Analysis of the SPRINT MIND Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Antihypertensive treatments benefit cerebrovascular health and cognitive function in patients with hypertension, but it is uncertain whether an intensive blood pressure target leads to potentially harmful cerebral hypoperfusion.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control vs standard control with whole-brain cerebral blood flow (CBF).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This substudy of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) randomized clinical trial compared the efficacy of 2 different blood pressure-lowering strategies with longitudinal brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including arterial spin labeled perfusion imaging to quantify CBF. A total of 1267 adults 50 years or older with hypertension and increased cardiovascular risk but free of diabetes or dementia were screened for the SPRINT substudy from 6 sites in the US. Randomization began in November 2010 with final follow-up MRI in July 2016. Analyses were performed from September 2020 through December 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Study participants with baseline CBF measures were randomized to an intensive SBP target less than 120 mm Hg or standard SBP target less than 140 mm Hg.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in whole-brain CBF from baseline. Secondary outcomes were change in gray matter, white matter, and periventricular white matter CBF.

RESULTS

Among 547 participants with CBF measured at baseline, the mean (SD) age was 67.5 (8.1) years and 219 (40.0%) were women; 315 completed follow-up MRI at a median (IQR) of 4.0 (3.7-4.1) years after randomization. Mean whole-brain CBF increased from 38.90 to 40.36 (difference, 1.46 [95% CI, 0.08-2.83]) mL/100 g/min in the intensive treatment group, with no mean increase in the standard treatment group (37.96 to 37.12; difference, -0.84 [95% CI, -2.30 to 0.61] mL/100 g/min; between-group difference, 2.30 [95% CI, 0.30-4.30; P = .02]). Gray, white, and periventricular white matter CBF showed similar changes. The association of intensive vs standard treatment with CBF was generally similar across subgroups defined by age, sex, race, chronic kidney disease, SBP, orthostatic hypotension, and frailty, with the exception of an indication of larger mean increases in CBF associated with intensive treatment among participants with a history of cardiovascular disease (interaction P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Intensive vs standard antihypertensive treatment was associated with increased, rather than decreased, cerebral perfusion, most notably in participants with a history of cardiovascular disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

Improving outcomes for older hypertensive patients: is more intensive treatment better?

INTRODUCTION

With population aging, late-life hypertension is becoming an increasingly important issue. Mounting evidence has documented additional cardiovascular benefits induced by a more intensive target, lower than what are recommended in most current guidelines for systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction in older patients with hypertension. However, the optimal target remains less clear.

AREAS COVERED

In the present review, we summarized the evolution of the perspective into late-life hypertension and the development of the 'optimal' target for SBP reduction in older patients with hypertension. More importantly, new evidence from latest antihypertensive drug-placebo studies, blood pressure target studies, and high-quality meta-analysis regarding the effect of intensive SBP treatment in older patients were covered and discussed in detail.

EXPERT OPINION

In summary, robust evidence supports that a SBP target of <130 mmHg is safe and will induce additional cardiovascular benefits in general older patients with hypertension. This benefit seems to be consistent, but less degreed in older patients with comorbidities such as chronic kidney disease or diabetes mellitus. However, such an intensive SBP target should be judiciously applied in older patients under extreme conditions. Collectively, edging down the relaxed SBP targets to <130 mmHg in most of the current guidelines is in imperative need.

Fasting during Ramadan and acute kidney injury (AKI): a retrospective, propensity matched cohort study

Background

During the month of Ramadan, Muslims abstain from daytime consumption of fluids and foods, although some high-risk individuals are exempt. Because fasting's effects on the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) have not been established, this study assesses the relationship between fasting and risk of AKI and identifies patients at high risk.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective, propensity-score matched, cohort study was conducted with data collected from adult patients admitted to the emergency room during Ramadan and the following month over two consecutive years (2016 and 2017). AKI was diagnosed based on the 2012 definition from the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes clinical practice guideline. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the correlation and measure the effect of fasting on the incidence of AKI, and assess the effect of different variables on the incidence of AKI between the matching cohorts.

Results

A total of 1199 patients were included; after matching, each cohort had 499 patients. In the fasting cohort, the incidence of AKI and the risk of developing AKI were significantly lower (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 0.65;95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44–0.98). The most indicative risk factors for AKI were hypertension (AOR 2.17; 95% CI 1.48–3.18), history of AKI (AOR 5.05; 95% CI 3.46–7.39), and liver cirrhosis (AOR 3.01; 95% CI 1.04–8.70). Patients with these factors or most other comorbidities in the fasting cohort had a lower risk of AKI as compared with their nonfasting counterparts.

Conclusion

The data show a strong reduction in the risk of developing AKI as a benefit of fasting, particularly in patients with comorbid conditions. Therefore, most patients with comorbid conditions are not harmed from fasting during Ramadan. However, larger prospective studies are needed to investigate the benefit of fasting in reducing the risk of developing AKI.

Heterogeneity of Treatment Effects for Intensive Blood Pressure Therapy by Individual Components of FRS: An Unsupervised Data-Driven Subgroup Analysis in SPRINT and ACCORD

Background

Few studies have answered the guiding significance of individual components of the Framingham risk score (FRS) to the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) after antihypertensive treatment. This study on the systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes blood pressure trial (ACCORD-BP) aimed to reveal previously undetected association patterns between individual components of the FRS and heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTEs) of intensive blood pressure control.

Methods

A self-organizing map (SOM) methodology was applied to identify CVD-risk-specific subgroups in the SPRINT (n = 8,773), and the trained SOM was utilized directly in 4,495 patients from the ACCORD. The primary endpoints were myocardial infarction (MI), non-myocardial infarction acute coronary syndrome (non-MI ACS), stroke, heart failure (HF), death from CVD causes, and a primary composite cardiovascular outcome. Cox proportional hazards models were then used to explore the potential heterogeneous response to intensive SBP control.

Results

We identified four SOM-based subgroups with distinct individual components of FRS profiles and the CVD risk. For individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the ACCORD or without diabetes in the SPRINT, subgroup I characterized by male with the lowest concentrations for total cholesterol (TC) and high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol measures, experienced the highest risk for major CVD. Conversely, subgroup III characterized by a female with the highest values for these measures represented as the lowest CVD risk. Furthermore, subgroup II, with the highest systolic blood pressure (SBP) and no antihypertensive agent use at baseline, had a significantly greater frequency of non-MI ACS under intensive BP control, the number needed to harm (NNH) was 84.24 to cause 1 non-MI ACS [absolute risk reduction (ARR) = −1.19%; 95% CI: −2.08, −0.29%] in the SPRINT [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.62; 95% CI: 1.33, 9.81; P = 0.012], and the NNH of was 43.19 to cause 1 non-MI ACS (ARR = −2.32%; 95% CI: −4.63, 0.00%) in the ACCORD (HR = 1.81; 95% CI: 1.01–3.25; P = 0.046). Finally, subgroup IV characterized by mostly younger patients with antihypertensive medication use and smoking history represented the lowest risk for stroke, HF, and relatively low risk for death from CVD causes and primary composite CVD outcome in SPRINT, however, except stroke, a low risk for others were not observed in ACCORD.

Conclusion

Similar findings in patients with hypertensive with T2DM or without diabetes by multivariate subgrouping suggested that the individual components of the FRS could enrich or improve CVD risk assessment. Further research was required to clarify the potential mechanism.

Thinking Outside the Box: Novel Kidney Protective Strategies in Kidney Transplantation

Despite the reduction in the incidence of acute rejection, a major risk factor for graft loss, there has been only modest improvement in long-term graft survival. Most cases of kidney graft loss have an identifiable cause that is not idiopathic fibrosis/atrophy or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity. Distinct immunologic and nonimmunologic factors conspire to lead to a common pathway of allograft fibrosis. It remains plausible that mitigating nonimmunologic damage using strategies proven effective in native kidney disease may yield benefit in kidney transplantation. In this review, we will focus on nonimmunologic aspects of kidney transplant care that may prove to be valuable adjuncts to a well-managed immunosuppression regimen. Topics to be addressed include the roles of hypertension and agents used to treat it, lipid lowering, sodium and water intake, elevated uric acid, metabolic acidosis, and the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on long-term kidney transplant health.

SPRINT Revisited: Updated Results and Implications

The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) results have influenced clinical practice but have also generated discussion regarding the validity, generalizability, and importance of the findings. Following the SPRINT primary results manuscript in 2015, additional results and analyses of the data have addressed these concerns. The primary objective of this article is to respond to key questions that have been raised.

Serum uric acid change in relation to antihypertensive therapy with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers

PURPOSE

We investigated serum uric acid changes in relation to the achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after 8 weeks of antihypertensive therapy with two dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study participants were patients with clinic and ambulatory hypertension, enrolled in a randomised controlled trial that compared amlodipine (5-10 mg, n = 215) and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS, 30-60 mg, n = 203). Hyperuricaemia was defined as a serum uric acid concentration of ≥420 µmol/L in men and ≥360 µmol/L in women. Analysis of covariance and multiple regression analyses were performed to study the associations between serum uric acid changes and the achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure during follow-up.

RESULTS

At baseline, 67 (16.0%) of the 418 patients had hyperuricaemia. Antihypertensive treatment reduced clinic and 24-h daytime and night-time systolic/diastolic blood pressure by a mean (±standard error [SE]) change of -17.4 ± 0.6/-8.6 ± 0.4 mm Hg and -13.7 ± 0.5/-8.3 ± 0.3 mm Hg, -13.8 ± 0.6/-8.4 ± 0.4 mm Hg, and -12.7 ± 0.7/-8.0 ± 0.4 mm Hg, respectively. Antihypertensive treatment reduced serum uric acid by a mean (±SE) change of -9.3 ± 2.8 μmol/L. The serum uric acid changes differed according to the achieved clinic and ambulatory blood pressure, and were statistically significant (mean ± SE -20.6 ± 6.6 to -10.7 ± 2.9 μmol/L, p ≤ 0.04) at the systolic/diastolic ranges of 130-139/≥90 mm Hg in clinic pressure, and <130/75-84 mm Hg, <145/80-84 mm Hg and <120/65-69 mm Hg in 24-h, daytime and night-time ambulatory pressure.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that antihypertensive therapy with a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker was associated with reduced serum uric acid, especially when 24-h ambulatory systolic blood pressure was controlled.

SPRINT-A Kidney-Centric Narrative Review: Recent Advances in Hypertension

Hypertension is a potent cardiovascular risk factor with deleterious end-organ effects and is especially prevalent among patients with chronic kidney disease. The SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) enrolled patients at an elevated cardiac risk including patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease and found that an intensive systolic blood pressure goal of <120 mm Hg significantly reduced the rates of adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality and nonsignificantly reduced the rates of probable dementia; these results were consistent whether one had chronic kidney disease or not. However, results of intensive blood pressure therapy on chronic kidney disease progression were inconclusive, and there was an increased risk of incident chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury, but the declines in kidney function appear to be hemodynamically driven and reversible. Overall, an intensive blood pressure target is effective in reducing cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality and may reduce the risk of probable dementia in patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease. More studies are needed to determine its long-term effects on kidney function.

Effects of Different Systolic Blood Pressure Targets on Myocardial Function: A One-Year Follow-Up in Geriatric Hypertension

Background

A lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target reduces major cardiovascular events and mortality from any cause of geriatric hypertension. However, the effect of different SBP targets on myocardial function remains unclear. This study aimed to determine changes in left ventricular (LV) strain in older hypertensive patients after 1 year of different SBP goals, and to evaluate its effects on myocardial mechanics in this population.

Methods

We studied 313 hypertensive adults aged 60 years or older after 1 year of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial. They were divided into the intensive group (target SBP: 110–130 mmHg) and the standard group (target SBP: 130–150 mmHg). All participants underwent echocardiography within 1 week after enrollment and 1 year after participating in the study. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) of the LV (endocardial, middle, and epicardial layer: GLS-end, GLS-mid, and GLS-epi, respectively) and the improvement of GLS at 1 year (ΔGLS-end, ΔGLS-mid, and ΔGLS-epi) were measured.

Results

At 1 year, GLS-end in the intensive group was slightly improved compared with that before the trial (−23.78%±3.10% vs −22.58%±3.11%, P<0.05). The ΔGLS-end and ΔGLS-mid in the intensive group were higher than those in the standard group (1.20±0.23 vs 0.58±0.59% and 0.70±0.21 vs 0.52±0.17, P<0.05). Moreover, SBP at 1 year and an angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist were independent factors that affected ΔGLS-end (β= −0.005, P=0.004; β= 0.080, P<0.001, respectively).

Conclusion

These trial results suggest that a lower SBP target can slightly improve myocardial function in older hypertensive patients at 1 year.

Blood pressure control in patients with chronic kidney disease

Uncontrolled blood pressure (BP) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) can lead to serious adverse outcomes. To prevent the occurrence of cardiovascular events (CVEs), and end-stage kidney disease, achieving an optimal BP level is important. Recently, there has been a paradigm shift in the management of BP largely as a result of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), which showed a reduction in CVEs by lowering systolic BP to 120 mmHg. A lower systolic blood pressure (SBP) target has been accepted by the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2021 guidelines. However, whether intensive control of SBP targeting < 120 mmHg is also effective in patients with CKD is controversial. Notably, this lower target SBP is associated with a higher risk of adverse kidney outcomes. Unfortunately, there have been no randomized controlled trials on this issue involving only patients with CKD, particularly those with advanced CKD. In this review, we discuss the optimal control of BP in patients with CKD in terms of reduction in death and CVEs as well as attenuation of CKD progression based on the evidence-based literature.

Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control

BACKGROUND

In a previously reported randomized trial of standard and intensive systolic blood-pressure control, data on some outcome events had yet to be adjudicated and post-trial follow-up data had not yet been collected.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 9361 participants who were at increased risk for cardiovascular disease but did not have diabetes or previous stroke to adhere to an intensive treatment target (systolic blood pressure, <120 mm Hg) or a standard treatment target (systolic blood pressure, <140 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, acute decompensated heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes. Additional primary outcome events occurring through the end of the intervention period (August 20, 2015) were adjudicated after data lock for the primary analysis. We also analyzed post-trial observational follow-up data through July 29, 2016.

RESULTS

At a median of 3.33 years of follow-up, the rate of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality during the trial were significantly lower in the intensive-treatment group than in the standard-treatment group (rate of the primary outcome, 1.77% per year vs. 2.40% per year; hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63 to 0.86; all-cause mortality, 1.06% per year vs. 1.41% per year; hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.61 to 0.92). Serious adverse events of hypotension, electrolyte abnormalities, acute kidney injury or failure, and syncope were significantly more frequent in the intensive-treatment group. When trial and post-trial follow-up data were combined (3.88 years in total), similar patterns were found for treatment benefit and adverse events; however, rates of heart failure no longer differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients who were at increased cardiovascular risk, targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 120 mm Hg resulted in lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and lower all-cause mortality than targeting a systolic blood pressure of less than 140 mm Hg, both during receipt of the randomly assigned therapy and after the trial. Rates of some adverse events were higher in the intensive-treatment group. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01206062.).

Patient Selection for Intensive Blood Pressure Management Based on Benefit and Adverse Events

BACKGROUND

Intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) treatment prevents cardiovascular disease (CVD) events in patients with high CVD risk on average, though benefits likely vary among patients.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to predict the magnitude of benefit (reduced CVD and all-cause mortality risk) along with adverse event (AE) risk from intensive versus standard SBP treatment.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial). Separate benefit outcomes were the first occurrence of: 1) a CVD composite of acute myocardial infarction or other acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or CVD death; and 2) all-cause mortality. Treatment-related AEs of interest included hypotension, syncope, bradycardia, electrolyte abnormalities, injurious falls, and acute kidney injury. Modified elastic net Cox regression was used to predict absolute risk for each outcome and absolute risk differences on the basis of 36 baseline variables available at the point of care with intensive versus standard treatment.

RESULTS

Among 8,828 SPRINT participants (mean age 67.9 years, 35% women), 600 CVD composite events, 363 all-cause deaths, and 481 treatment-related AEs occurred over a median follow-up period of 3.26 years. Individual participant risks were predicted for the CVD composite (C index = 0.71), all-cause mortality (C index = 0.75), and treatment-related AEs (C index = 0.69). Higher baseline CVD risk was associated with greater benefit (i.e., larger absolute CVD risk reduction). Predicted CVD benefit and predicted increased treatment-related AE risk were correlated (Spearman correlation coefficient = -0.72), and 95% of participants who fell into the highest tertile of predicted benefit also had high or moderate predicted increases in treatment-related AE risk. Few were predicted as high benefit with low AE risk (1.8%) or low benefit with high AE risk (1.5%). Similar results were obtained for all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

SPRINT participants with higher baseline predicted CVD risk gained greater absolute benefit from intensive treatment. Participants with high predicted benefit were also most likely to experience treatment-related AEs, but AEs were generally mild and transient. Patients should be prioritized for intensive SBP treatment on the basis of higher predicted benefit. (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial [SPRINT]; NCT01206062).

Restricted mean survival time versus conventional measures for treatment decision-making

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Restricted mean survival time (RMST) summarizes treatment effect in terms of a gain or loss in the event-free days. It remains uncertain whether communicating treatment benefit and harm using RMST-based summary is more effective than conventional summary based on absolute and relative risk reduction. We compared the effect of RMST-based approach and conventional approach on decisional conflict using an example of intensive versus standard blood pressure-lowering strategies.

DESIGN

On-line survey.

SETTING

A convenience sample of patients in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Two hundred adults aged 65 and older with hypertension requiring anti-hypertensive treatment (response rate 85.5%).

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomly assigned to either RMST-based summary or conventional summary about the benefit and harm of blood pressure-lowering strategies.

MEASUREMENTS

Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), ranging from 0 (no conflict) to 100 (high conflict), and preference for intensive blood pressure-lowering strategy.

RESULTS

Participants assigned to RMST-based approach (n = 100) and conventional approach (n = 100) had similar age (mean [standard deviation, SD]: 72.3 [5.6] vs 72.8 [5.5] years) and proportions of female (50 [50.0%] vs 61 [61.0%]) and white race (92 [92.0%] vs 92 [92.0%]). The mean (SD) DCS score was 25.2 (15.0) for RMST-based approach and 25.6 (14.1) for conventional approach (p = 0.84). The number (%) of participants who preferred intensive strategy was 10 (10.0%) for RMST-based approach and 14 (14.0%) for conventional approach (p = 0.52). The results were consistent in subgroups defined by age, sex, education level, cardiovascular disease status, and predicted mortality risk categories.

CONCLUSION

In a sample of relatively healthy older adults with hypertension, RMST-based approach was as effective as conventional approach on decisional conflict about choosing a blood pressure-lowering strategy. This study provides proof-of-concept evidence that RMST-based approach can be used in conjunction with absolute and relative risk reduction for communicating treatment benefit and harm in a decision aid.

Biomarkers of Kidney Tubule Health, CKD Progression, and Acute Kidney Injury in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) Participants

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) compared the effect of intensive versus standard systolic blood pressure targets on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In this ancillary study, we evaluated the use of exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to combine biomarkers of kidney tubule health in urine and plasma and then study their role in longitudinal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) change and risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).

STUDY DESIGN

Observational cohort nested in a clinical trial.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

2,351 SPRINT participants with eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m² at baseline.

EXPOSURE

Levels of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), interleukin 18 (IL-18), chitinase-3-like protein (YKL-40), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), α₁-microglobulin (A1M) and β₂-microglobulin (B2M), uromodulin (UMOD), fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF-23), and intact parathyroid hormone (PTH).

OUTCOME

Longitudinal changes in eGFR and risk of AKI.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

We performed EFA to capture different tubule pathophysiologic processes. We used linear mixed effects models to evaluate the association of each factor with longitudinal changes in eGFR. We evaluated the association of the tubular factors scores with AKI using Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

From 10 biomarkers, EFA generated 4 factors reflecting tubule injury/repair (NGAL, IL-18, and YKL-40), tubule injury/fibrosis (KIM-1 and MCP-1), tubule reabsorption (A1M and B2M), and tubule reserve/mineral metabolism (UMOD, FGF-23, and PTH). Each 1-SD higher tubule reserve/mineral metabolism factor score was associated with a 0.58% (95% CI, 0.39%-0.67%) faster eGFR decline independent of baseline eGFR and albuminuria. Both the tubule injury/repair and tubule injury/fibrosis factors were independently associated with future risk of AKI (per 1 SD higher, HRs of 1.18 [95% CI, 1.10-1.37] and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.02-1.48], respectively).

LIMITATIONS

The factors require validation in other settings.

CONCLUSIONS

EFA allows parsimonious subgrouping of biomarkers into factors that are differentially associated with progressive eGFR decline and AKI. These subgroups may provide insights into the pathological processes driving adverse kidney outcomes.

Optimal systolic blood pressure and reduced long-term mortality in older hypertensive women with prior coronary events - An analysis from INVEST☆

Background

Hypertension and coronary artery disease (CAD) are a prevalent combination in older women, however limited data are available to guide blood pressure (BP) management. We hypothesized that older women with hypertension and CAD may not derive long-term benefit by achieving systolic BP (SBP) < 130 mmHg.

Methods

We analyzed long-term all-cause mortality data from the International Verapamil SR/Trandolapril Study (INVEST), stratified by risk attributable to clinical severity of CAD (women with prior coronary events of myocardial infarction or revascularization considered high risk, all others at low risk) and by age group (50–64 or ≥65 years). The prognostic impact of achieving mean in-trial SBP <130 (referent group) was compared with 130–139 and ≥ 140 mmHg using Cox proportional hazards, adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

SBPs <130, 130–139, and ≥140 were achieved in 2960, 3024, and 3232 women, respectively. Among high-risk women aged ≥65 years, those achieving SBP 130–139 mmHg had lower mortality up to 16.7 years later than those with SBP <130 (hazard ratio [HR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.69–0.96). High-risk women aged 50–64 achieving SBP 130–139 had a similar mortality risk as those with SBP <130 (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.87–1.68), while those achieving SBP ≥140 mmHg had a higher mortality risk than SBP < 130 (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.37–2.68). A similar pattern was observed among low-risk women ≥65 and <65 years old.

Conclusion

Among women ≥65 years old with hypertension and prior coronary events, in-trial SBP between 130 and 139 mmHg was associated with lower mortality over the long term versus SBP <130 mmHg.

•

Question: Is mean SBP <130 mmHg associated with optimal long-term mortality in high-risk, older women with HTN and CAD?.

•

Analysis: Association between mean achieved in-trial SBP and long-term, all-cause mortality of women from INVEST.

•

Results: Older women at high risk achieving SBP 130-139 mmHg had lower long-term mortality than those with SBP <130 mmHg.

Modification of the effects of intensive systolic blood pressure control on kidney outcomes by baseline body mass index

AIM

Obesity and intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control are independently associated with greater risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) and incident chronic kidney disease (CKD). We examined whether baseline body mass index (BMI) modifies the effects of intensive SBP lowering on AKI or incident CKD.

METHODS

The systolic blood pressure intervention trial (SPRINT) randomized 9361 participants with high blood pressure to an SBP target of either <120 mm Hg or < 140 mm Hg. In a secondary analysis of 9210 SPRINT participants with a baseline BMI of ≥18.5 and < 50 kg/m² , we examined the interactions of baseline BMI and SPRINT SBP intervention on subsequent AKI and incident CKD.

RESULTS

Each 5 kg/m² increase in baseline BMI was associated with higher risk of AKI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01 to 1.25) and incident CKD (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.32). Intensive SBP control increased the risk of AKI (HR 1.68, 95% CI 1.22-2.11) and incident CKD (HR 3.49, 95% CI 2.47-4.94). The increased risk of AKI with intensive SBP control was consistent across the baseline BMI spectrum (linear interaction p = 0.55); however, the risk of incident CKD with SPRINT intervention increased with higher BMI (linear interaction p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

The increased risk of adverse kidney events seen with intensive SBP control in the SPRINT persisted across the baseline BMI spectrum. A higher baseline BMI was associated with an augmented risk of incident CKD with intensive SBP control.

Expressions and related mechanisms of miR-212 and KLF4 in rats with acute kidney injury

Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 30%-70% of critically ill patients. Multiple organ failure (MOF), which is most often secondary to hypotension and septicemia, is a global public health problem. The prognosis of patients is poor. Currently, there is no specific therapeutic method. Finding new therapeutic targets is significant to improve the prognosis of AKI patients. This study explores expressions and related mechanisms of miR-212 and Kruppel-like factor 4 (KLF4) in rats with AKI. Sixty Wistar rats were randomly divided into 6 groups: Control group, sham operation group, model group, miR-212-agomir group, miR-212-antagomir group, miR-212-agomir+APTO-253 (joint group), n = 10. The expressions of miR-212, KLF4, inflammatory factors [tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin 6 (IL-6)], oxidative stress factors [superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA)], and apoptosis-related proteins (bax, bcl-2) in renal tissue of rats were detected, and the relationship between miR-212 and KLF4 and the severity of AKI in rats were analyzed. The expression level of miR-212 increased (P < 0.05) and the expression level of KLF4 decreased (P < 0.05) in renal tissue of rats with AKI. miR-212 was negatively correlated with KLF4 expression (P < 0.05). MiR-212 was positively correlated with expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, MDA, and bax (P < 0.05), negatively correlated with expressions of SOD and bcl-2 (P < 0.05), KLF4 was negatively correlated with expressions of TNF-α, IL-6, MDA and bax (P < 0.05), and positively correlated with expressions of SOD and bcl-2 (P < 0.05). MiR-212 mimics can inhibit the luciferase activity of Wt-KLF4 (P < 0.05), and miR-212 inhibitor can promote the luciferase activity of Wt-KLF4 (P < 0.05). Down-regulation of miR-212 plays a protective role by targeting up-regulation of KLF4 to inhibit renal tissue inflammation, oxidative stress, and apoptosis in rats with AKI, which may be a potential target for clinical treatment of AKI in the future.

Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Antihypertensive drug treatment is cost-effective for adults at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the cost-effectiveness in people with stage 1 hypertension (140–159 mm Hg systolic blood pressure) at lower CVD risk remains unclear. The objective was to establish the 10-year CVD risk threshold where initiating antihypertensive drug treatment for primary prevention in adults, with stage 1 hypertension, becomes cost-effective. A lifetime horizon Markov model compared antihypertensive drug versus no treatment, using a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted for groups ranging between 5% and 20% 10-year CVD risk. Health states included no CVD event, CVD and non-CVD death, and 6 nonfatal CVD morbidities. Interventions were compared using cost-per-quality-adjusted life-years. The base-case age was 60, with analyses repeated between ages 40 and 75. The model was run separately for men and women, and threshold CVD risk assessed against the minimum plausible risk for each group. Treatment was cost-effective at 10% CVD risk for both sexes (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £10 017/quality-adjusted life-year [$14 542] men, £8635/QALY [$12 536] women) in the base-case. The result was robust in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses but was sensitive to treatment effects. Treatment was cost-effective for men regardless of age and women aged >60. Initiating treatment in stage 1 hypertension for people aged 60 is cost-effective regardless of 10-year CVD risk. For other age groups, it is also cost-effective to treat regardless of risk, except in younger women.

Concordance Between Blood Pressure in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial and in Routine Clinical Practice

IMPORTANCE

There are concerns with translating results from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) into clinical practice because the standardized protocol used to measure blood pressure (BP) may not be consistently applied in routine clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the concordance between BPs obtained in routine clinical practice and those obtained using the SPRINT protocol and whether concordance varied by target trial BP.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This observational prognostic study linking outpatient vital sign information from electronic health records (EHRs) with data from 49 of the 102 SPRINT sites was conducted from November 8, 2010, to August 20, 2015, among 3074 adults 50 years or older with hypertension without diabetes or a history of stroke. Statistical analysis was performed from May 21, 2019, to March 20, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Blood pressures measured in routine clinical practice and SPRINT.

RESULTS

Participant-level EHR data was obtained for 3074 participants (2482 men [80.7%]; mean [SD] age, 68.5 [9.1] years) with 3 or more outpatient and trial BP measurements. In the period from the 6-month study visit to the end of the study intervention, the mean systolic BP (SBP) in the intensive treatment group from outpatient BP recorded in the EHR was 7.3 mm Hg higher (95% CI, 7.0-7.6 mm Hg) than BP measured at trial visits; the mean difference between BP recorded in the outpatient EHR and trial SBP was smaller for participants in the standard treatment group (4.6 mm Hg [95% CI, 4.4-4.9 mm Hg]). Bland-Altman analyses demonstrated low agreement between outpatient BP recorded in the EHR and trial BP, with wide agreement intervals ranging from approximately -30 mm Hg to 45 mm Hg in both treatment groups. In addition, the difference between BP recorded in the EHR and trial BP varied widely by site.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Outpatient BPs measured in routine clinical practice were generally higher than BP measurements taken in SPRINT, with greater mean SBP differences apparent in the intensive treatment group. There was a consistent high degree of heterogeneity between the BPs recorded in the EHR and trial BPs, with significant variability over time, between and within the participants, and across clinic sites. These results highlight the importance of proper BP measurement technique and an inability to apply 1 common correction factor (ie, approximately 10 mm Hg) to approximate research-quality BP estimates when BP is not measured appropriately in routine clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

SPRINT ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

Recent advances in managing primary hypertension

Hypertension remains a leading risk factor for cardiovascular mortality and morbidity globally despite the availability of effective and well-tolerated antihypertensive medications. Accumulating evidence suggests a more aggressive blood pressure regulation aimed at lower targets, particularly for selected patient groups. Our concepts of the optimal method for blood pressure measurement have radically changed, maintaining appropriate standard office measurements for initial assessment but relying on out-of-office measurement to better guide our decisions. Thorough risk stratification provides guidance in decision making; however, an individualized approach is highly recommended to prevent overtreatment. Undertreatment, on the other hand, remains a major concern and is mainly attributed to poor adherence and resistant or difficult-to-control forms of the disease. This review aims to present modern perspectives, novel treatment options, including innovative technological applications and developing interventional and pharmaceutical therapies, and the major concerns emerging from several years of research and epidemiological observations related to hypertension management.

Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Control on All-Cause Hospitalizations

Intensive blood pressure control decreases the rate of cardiovascular events by >25% compared with standard blood pressure control. We sought to determine whether the decrease in cardiovascular events seen with intensive blood pressure control is associated with an increased rate of other causes of hospitalization. This is a post hoc analysis of SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial) in 9361 adult participants with hypertension and elevated cardiovascular risk. Participants were randomly assigned to an intensive or standard systolic blood pressure goal (<120 or <140 mm Hg, respectively). The primary outcome was hospitalization rates per 100 person-years for hospitalizations not associated with SPRINT primary events. After excluding hospitalizations linked to SPRINT primary events, there were 4678 participants with a rate of 19.70 hospitalizations per 100 person-years, compared with 4683 participants with a rate of 19.65 (P=0.37). Equivalence testing shows that these hospitalization rates were statistically equivalent at the P=0.05 level. Of those with hospitalizations, >1 hospitalization was seen in 38.8% of intensive arm participants and 41.9% of standard arm participants (P=0.08). The mean cumulative count of nonprimary event hospitalizations was comparable between the two arms. The most common causes of hospitalization were cardiovascular (23.6%) followed by injuries, including bone and joint therapeutic procedures (15.7%), infections (12.0%), and nervous systems disorders (10.7%). No categories of hospitalization were statistically more common in the intensive arm compared with the standard arm. Thus, the decrease in cardiovascular events seen with intensive blood pressure control is not associated with an increased rate of other causes of hospitalization. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

Baseline characteristics predicting clinical outcomes and serious adverse events in middle-aged hypertensive women: a subanalysis of the SPRINT in women aged <65 years

Background/aim

The predictability of clinical outcomes in hypertension in specific patient groups, especially underrepresented populations is the key to rational treatment. This study aimed to investigate the impact of baseline characteristics of <65-year-old hypertensive women with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, managed with standard- or intensive-approach, on their clinical outcomes and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Materials and methods

Baseline characteristics of <65-year-old hypertensive women (n = 1247) in SPRINT, a multicenter randomized trial to compare standard and intensive antihypertensive treatment, were analyzed with Cox-regression method to determine potential predictors of the clinical outcomes and SAEs. The primary outcome was the composite of myocardial infarction (MI), non-MI acute coronary syndrome, stroke, heart failure, or cardiovascular death.

Results

The primary outcome occurred in 3.1% and SAEs in 27.6% of the population. The treatment groups were similar in terms of the primary outcome, SAEs, or their individual components. The primary outcome occurred significantly more in current smokers vs. nonsmokers (HR: 2.85, 95% CI: 1.34–6.09). The subjects who were on aspirin in the intensive-group were significantly more likely to develop the primary outcome (HR: 3.17, 95% CI: 1.23-8.19) and MI (HR: 10.15, 95% CI: 1.19-86.88) compared with those not using aspirin. The risk of overall SAEs was significantly higher in blacks vs. nonblacks (HR: 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.58), in current-smokers vs. nonsmokers (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.23-2.05), and those with vs. without chronic kidney disease (CKD), (HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.08-1.77). The likelihood of SAEs significantly increased with age (HR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07).

Conclusion

Smoking, aspirin, CKD, black race, and age seemed as important baseline characteristics in follow-up of <65-year-old hypertensive women, also depending on therapeutic strategy. Clinicians are expected to consider these critical parameters for effective antihypertensive management that promotes better outcomes in this middle-aged female population.

Intensive BP Control and eGFR Declines: Are These Events Due to Hemodynamic Effects and Are Changes Reversible?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Acute declines in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) are often observed during intensive blood pressure (BP) lowering. This review focuses on identifying the various mechanisms of eGFR decline associated with intensive BP lowering and evaluates the evidence linking BP control with kidney and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

In 2017, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) began recommending treatment of all individuals to a BP target of < 130/80 mmHg. Since then, multiple post hoc analyses of BP trials have associated intensive BP lowering with acute declines in kidney function and acute kidney injury; whether these represent reversible changes in the kidney is still debated. There is ample evidence that intensive BP lowering is associated with declines in eGFR. The clinical implications of these events remain unclear. Individualizing the risks and benefits of intensive BP therapy continues to be warranted.

Serious adverse events in patients with target-oriented blood pressure management: a systematic review

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text

On the basis of the benefits of antihypertensive treatment, progressively intensive treatment is advocated. However, it remains controversial whether intensive blood pressure control might increase the frequency of serious adverse events (SAEs) compared with moderate control. This review assessed the occurrence of SAEs in blood pressure treatment with predefined blood pressure targets. Seven original studies and eight post hoc analyses (derived from two original studies) met the inclusion criteria. Compared with moderate blood pressure treatment, intensive treatment was associated with a significant increase in treatment-related SAEs (Sign-test: P = 0.0002, Wilcoxon signed-rank test: P = 0.001). However, comparability between studies was limited, due to unclear determinations about the treatment-relatedness of adverse events, missing definitions of SAEs and variations in recording methods. Thus, a meta-analysis was not justified. The definitions of serious adverse events and methods of recording and reporting need to be improved and standardized to facilitate the comparison of results.

Kidney Disease, Intensive Hypertension Treatment, and Risk for Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment: The Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial

BACKGROUND

Intensively treating hypertension may benefit cardiovascular disease and cognitive function, but at the short-term expense of reduced kidney function.

METHODS

We investigated markers of kidney function and the effect of intensive hypertension treatment on incidence of dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in 9361 participants in the randomized Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial, which compared intensive versus standard systolic BP lowering (targeting <120 mm Hg versus <140 mm Hg, respectively). We categorized participants according to baseline and longitudinal changes in eGFR and urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio. Primary outcomes were occurrence of adjudicated probable dementia and MCI.

RESULTS

Among 8563 participants who completed at least one cognitive assessment during follow-up (median 5.1 years), probable dementia occurred in 325 (3.8%) and MCI in 640 (7.6%) participants. In multivariable adjusted analyses, there was no significant association between baseline eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m² and risk for dementia or MCI. In time-varying analyses, eGFR decline ≥30% was associated with a higher risk for probable dementia. Incident eGFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m² was associated with a higher risk for MCI and a composite of dementia or MCI. Although these kidney events occurred more frequently in the intensive treatment group, there was no evidence that they modified or attenuated the effect of intensive treatment on dementia and MCI incidence. Baseline and incident urinary ACR ≥30 mg/g were not associated with probable dementia or MCI, nor did the urinary ACR modify the effect of intensive treatment on cognitive outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Among hypertensive adults, declining kidney function measured by eGFR is associated with increased risk for probable dementia and MCI, independent of the intensity of hypertension treatment.

Recent advances in the management of secondary hypertension: chronic kidney disease

Hypertension in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is the most commonly observed comorbidity and is a risk factor for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) as well as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. Therefore, suitable blood pressure (BP) control in CKD patients is very important in preventing both CVD and ESRD. We herein describe the recommendations of target BP and the pharmacological drug options from the evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for CKD in 2018 by the Japanese Society of Nephrology (JSN CKD 2018) and recent advances in the management of hypertension in CKD, including sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor blockers, and renal denervation. In particular, SGLT2 inhibitors are a new class of "antihypertensive drugs" that have a homeostatic mechanism that regulates body fluid volume in addition to diuretic action, which may be closely associated with their cardiorenal protective properties.

Lower serum bicarbonate is associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury

BACKGROUND

Lower serum bicarbonate levels are associated with an increased risk of kidney disease progression. Whether lower serum bicarbonate levels are associated with an increased risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI) is unclear.

METHODS

We included 8393 patients from the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) that had baseline serum bicarbonate levels and complete data available. AKI was a predetermined adjudicated adverse event that was determined by hospital admission and discharge records with AKI as a recorded diagnosis. Serum bicarbonate was examined in clinically significant cutoffs ≤ 24, 25-28 and > 28 mEq/L, with 25-28 mEq/L as the reference group. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association between serum bicarbonate and development of AKI.

RESULTS

The mean (SD) age, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and serum bicarbonate level at baseline were 68 (9) years, 77 (23) ml/min/1.73m² and 26.3 (2.6) mEq/L, respectively. Participants with serum bicarbonate levels ≤ 24 mEq/L were more likely to be male and to have lower baseline eGFR. After a median follow-up time of 3.3 years, 293 participants developed AKI. More patients in the lower bicarbonate group developed AKI (6.1% vs 2.8% in the 25-28 mEq/L and 2.1% in the > 28 mEq/L). A bicarbonate level ≤ 24 mEq/L was associated with a significantly increased risk of AKI compared to those with a bicarbonate level of 25-28 mEq/L after full adjustment (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.1-1.8).

CONCLUSION

Lower serum bicarbonate levels are an independent risk factor for the development of AKI.