False Positive test Results for Pheochromocytoma from 2000 to 2008

[Pheochromocytoma. Preoperative approach]

Pheochromocytomas are rare neuroendocrine tumors that derive from the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla and secrete catecholamines. The measurement of plasma or fractionated urine metanephrines is the hormonal determination of choice for the biochemical diagnosis. Once the biochemical diagnosis is confirmed, the next step is the localization study. It is recommended to request a genetic study in all patients with pheochromocytomas since 40% of cases are hereditary. Once the diagnostic study is completed, preoperative treatment with alpha blockers should be instituted at least 7-14 days before adrenalectomy. However, in low-risk patients, the omission of presurgical treatment could be considered if the surgery is performed in centers with experience and a strict monitoring of the patient is carried out during the perioperative period. This document offers a practical guide on the diagnosis and perioperative approach in patients with pheochromocytomas.

Pitfalls in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Pheochromocytomas

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs), rare neuroendocrine tumors arising from chromaffin cells, present a significant diagnostic challenge due to their clinical rarity and polymorphic symptomatology. The clinical cases demonstrate the importance of an integrated approach that combines clinical assessment, biochemical testing, and imaging to distinguish PPGLs from mimicking conditions, such as obstructive sleep apnea and interfering medication effects, which can lead to false-positive biochemical results. Although a rare condition, false-negative metanephrine levels can occur in pheochromocytomas, but imaging findings can give some clues and increase suspicion for a pheochromocytoma diagnosis. This expert endocrine consult underscores the critical role of evaluating preanalytical conditions and pretest probability in the biochemical diagnosis of PPGLs. Moreover, a careful differentiation of PPGLs from similar conditions and careful selection and interpretation of diagnostic tests, with focus on understanding and reducing false positives to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes, is crucial.

Adrenal Emergencies

The adrenal glands drive physiologic homeostasis, with dysregulation in any direction causing multisystem dysfunction. Adrenal excess states include hyperaldosteronism which manifests with refractory hypertension and electrolyte abnormalities including hypernatremia and hypokalemia. Paragangliomas including pheochromocytoma can cause multisystem end-organ dysfunction due to catecholaminergic storm, which require rapid blood pressure control with phentolamine and identification of lesions amenable to surgical resection. Adrenal insufficiency states in contrast can result in hypotension and decompensation refractory to vasopressor administration, requiring adrenal supplementation via hydrocortisone.

Biochemical Assessment of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) require prompt consideration and efficient diagnosis and treatment to minimize associated morbidity and mortality. Once considered, appropriate biochemical testing is key to diagnosis. Advances in understanding catecholamine metabolism have clarified why measurements of the O-methylated catecholamine metabolites rather than the catecholamines themselves are important for effective diagnosis. These metabolites, normetanephrine and metanephrine, produced respectively from norepinephrine and epinephrine, can be measured in plasma or urine, with choice according to available methods or presentation of patients. For patients with signs and symptoms of catecholamine excess, either test will invariably establish the diagnosis, whereas the plasma test provides higher sensitivity than urinary metanephrines for patients screened due to an incidentaloma or genetic predisposition, particularly for small tumors or in patients with an asymptomatic presentation. Additional measurements of plasma methoxytyramine can be important for some tumors, such as paragangliomas, and for surveillance of patients at risk of metastatic disease. Avoidance of false-positive test results is best achieved by plasma measurements with appropriate reference intervals and preanalytical precautions, including sampling blood in the fully supine position. Follow-up of positive results, including optimization of preanalytics for repeat tests or whether to proceed directly to anatomic imaging or confirmatory clonidine tests, depends on the test results, which can also suggest likely size, adrenal vs extra-adrenal location, underlying biology, or even metastatic involvement of a suspected tumor. Modern biochemical testing now makes diagnosis of PPGL relatively simple. Integration of artificial intelligence into the process should make it possible to fine-tune these advances.

Paraganglioma in pregnancy, a mimic of preeclampsia: a case report

BACKGROUND

The new presentation of pheochromocytoma or paraganglioma in pregnancy is very rare and can be life-threatening for mother and child.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 26-year-old gravida 3 para 2 otherwise healthy Caucasian woman at 34 weeks gestation who presented with new onset hypertension associated with headaches, dry heaves, diaphoresis, and palpitations. She was initially diagnosed with preeclampsia and treated with labetalol and an urgent cesarean section, delivering a healthy baby girl. The diagnosis of preeclampsia came into question when, 6 weeks postpartum, she continued to have hypertension with atypical features. Testing revealed metastatic paraganglioma associated with a succinate dehydrogenase B gene mutation. The patient was then started on alpha-adrenergic blockade and has had close blood pressure monitoring while discussion of advances therapies is ongoing.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates how paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma can be misdiagnosed as preeclampsia due to the overlapping features of new-onset hypertension late in pregnancy accompanied by headache and proteinuria. It is impractical to routinely screen for paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma in all pregnant patients diagnosed with preeclampsia due to the rarity of these tumors and the harm from high false-positive rates. Therefore, it is incumbent on the provider to have a high degree of suspicion for paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma when clinical features are unusual for preeclampsia, such as intermittent palpitations, diaphoresis, orthostatic hypotension, or hyperglycemia. Early detection of paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma with interventions to mitigate the risk of hypertensive crisis greatly reduce maternal and fetal mortality. Fortunately, our patient delivered a healthy baby and did not have any additional pregnancy complications despite the delay in her diagnosis.

The clinical utility of plasma and urine metanephrines in hypertensive emergency

INTRODUCTION

Metanephrines (MTNs) are metabolites of catecholamines and are constantly produced in high amounts by pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Marked MTN elevations (> 3 times the upper limit of normal [ULN]) are highly suggestive of PPGL. The frequency of marked MTN elevations in non-PPGL hypertensive emergencies (HTNEs) is unknown.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed plasma free metanephrine (PMTN) and 24-h urinary fractionated metanephrine (UMTN) levels in 48 consecutive patients (59.7 ± 15.6 years; 48% female; BMI: 31 ± 9.7 kg/m²) hospitalized for HTNE, defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 120 mmHg with end-organ damage. PMTNs were measured in 47 patients, UMTNs were measured in 16 patients, and both PMTNs and UMTNs were measured in 15 patients.

RESULTS

PMTN/UMTN levels were not associated with SBP/DBP, comorbidities, end-organ damage, or interfering medications, the exception being that plasma normetanephrines (PNMNs) were significantly associated with comorbidities (Adj. R² = 0.16; p = 0.04) and interfering medications (Adj. R² = 0.15; p = 0.03), although with weak correlation. Marked MTN (specifically PNMN) elevations (647, 521, and 453 pg/mL; normal ≤ 148 pg/mL) were noted in only three patients (6%).

DISCUSSION

Marked MTN elevations in HTNE are uncommon. Therefore, we recommend against measuring MTN in the setting of an apparent precipitating cause of HTNE to avoid unnecessary testing and imaging. Testing for MTN in HTNE should be pursued only when there is no clear precipitating cause and in cases where there is strong underlying clinical suspicion for PPGL. However, should testing be performed, marked MTN elevations should not be disregarded as being a commonly occurring result of HTNE.

Clonidine suppression test for a reliable diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: When to use

OBJECTIVE

In clinical practice, false-positive results in biochemical testing for suspected pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) are not infrequent and may lead to unnecessary examinations. We aimed to evaluate the role of the clonidine suppression test (CST) in the era of analyses of plasma-free metanephrines for the diagnosis or exclusion of PPGL in patients with adrenal tumours and/or arterial hypertension.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This single-centre, prospective trial investigated the use of CST in 60 patients with suspected PPGL associated with out-patient elevations of plasma normetanephrine (NMN) and/or metanephrine (MN), in most cases accompanied with hypertension or an adrenal mass. Measurements of plasma catecholamines and free metanephrines were performed by liquid chromatography with electrochemical detection and tandem mass spectrometry, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients entered final analysis (n = 20 with PPGL and n = 26 with a nonfunctional adrenal mass and/or hypertension). CST reliably excluded false-positive baseline NMN results with a specificity of 100%. The sensitivity of CST improved from 85% to 94% when tumours with isolated MN increase (n = 3) were not considered. In patients with elevated baseline NMN (n = 24), CST correctly identified all patients without PPGL. Patients with falsely elevated baseline NMN results (n = 7, 26.9%) exhibited increases of baseline NMN up to 1.7-fold above the upper reference limit.

CONCLUSION

CST qualifies as a useful diagnostic tool for differential diagnosis of borderline elevated plasma-free NMN in patients with suspected PPGL. In this context, CST helps to correctly identify all false-positive NMN screening results.

Preanalytical Considerations and Outpatient Versus Inpatient Tests of Plasma Metanephrines to Diagnose Pheochromocytoma

CONTEXT

Sampling of blood in the supine position for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL) results in lower rates of false positives for plasma normetanephrine than seated sampling. It is unclear how inpatient vs outpatient testing and other preanalytical factors impact false positives.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify preanalytical precautions to minimize false-positive results for plasma metanephrines.

METHODS

Impacts of different blood sampling conditions on plasma metanephrines were evaluated, including outpatient vs inpatient testing, sampling of blood in semi- vs fully recumbent positions, use of cannulae vs direct venipuncture, and differences in outside temperature. A total of 3147 patients at 10 tertiary referral centers were tested for PPGL, including 278 with and 2869 without tumors. Rates of false-positive results were analyzed.

RESULTS

Outpatient rather than inpatient sampling resulted in 44% higher plasma concentrations and a 3.4-fold increase in false-positive results for normetanephrine. Low temperature, a semi-recumbent position, and direct venipuncture also resulted in significantly higher plasma concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine than alternative sampling conditions, although with less impact than outpatient sampling. Higher concentrations and rates of false-positive results for plasma normetanephrine with low compared with warm temperatures were only apparent for outpatient sampling. Preanalytical factors were without impact on plasma metanephrines in patients with PPGL.

CONCLUSION

Although inpatient blood sampling is largely impractical for screening patients with suspected PPGL, other preanalytical precautions (eg, cannulae, warm testing conditions) may be useful. Inpatient sampling may be reserved for follow-up of patients with difficult to distinguish true- from false-positive results.

Is the Adrenal Incidentaloma Functionally Active? An Approach-To-The-Patient-Based Review

Adrenal incidentalomas are a common occurrence. Most of them are adrenocortical adenomas that do not cause harm and do not require surgery, but a non-negligible proportion of incidentalomas is represented by functionally active masses, including cortisol-secreting adenomas (12%), pheochromocytomas (3–6%), aldosterone-secreting adenomas (2–3%), as well as malignant nodules, such as adrenocortical carcinomas (2–5%), which can be either functioning or non-functioning. All patients with an adrenal incidentaloma should undergo a few biochemical screening and confirmatory tests to exclude the presence of a functionally active mass. In this approach-to-the-patient-based review, we will summarize current recommendations on biochemical evaluation and management of functionally active adrenal incidentalomas. For this purpose, we will present four case vignettes, whereby we will describe how patients were managed, then we will review and discuss additional considerations tied to the diagnostic approach, and conclude with practical aspects of patient perioperative management. To improve the perioperative management of patients with functional adrenal incidentalomas, multidisciplinary meetings are advocated.

Draft of the clinical practice guidelines “Adrenal incidentaloma”

The wider application and technical improvement of abdominal imaging procedures in recent years has led to an increasingly frequent detection of adrenal gland masses — adrenal incidentaloma, which have become a common clinical problem and need to be investigated for evidence of hormonal hypersecretion and/or malignancy. Clinical guidelines are the main working tool of a practicing physician. Laconic, structured information about a specific nosology, methods of its diagnosis and treatment, based on the principles of evidence-based medicine, make it possible to give answers to questions in a short time, to achieve maximum efficiency and personalization of treatment. These clinical guidelines include data on the prevalence, etiology, radiological features and assessment of hormonal status of adrenal incidentalomas. In addition, this clinical practice guideline provides information on indications for surgery, postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up.

Inpatient Measurements of Urine Metanephrines are Indistinguishable from Pheochromocytoma: Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytoma is a rare cause of acute cardiovascular disease; however, any severe illness may have high catecholamines, simulating pheochromocytoma. We determined the spectrum of urine metanephrines from inpatient and outpatient collections without pheochromocytoma, compared with confirmed pheochromocytoma patients.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis using centralized laboratory data serving all outpatients and hospitals in southern Alberta. The analysis comprised 24-hour urine normetanephrine and metanephrine (UNM-UMN) results collected from hospital inpatients, community outpatients, and patients from a comprehensive provincial pheochromocytoma registry.

RESULTS

There were 974 unique inpatients (including 132 from intensive care), 6802 outpatients, and 58 pheochromocytoma patients. Among outpatient, general ward, and intensive care unit (ICU) patients, 18.7%, 34.4%, and 67.4% of results, respectively, were supranormal. Although pheochromocytoma patients had higher median UNM-UMN vs inpatients, there was substantial overlap. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed area under the curve (AUC) of 0.64-0.91 to detect true pheochromocytoma (P < .0001), with progressively poorer discrimination among hospitalized and ICU-dependent patients. A 24-hour urine normetanephrine >6.95 nmol/d had 98% specificity for pheochromocytoma when inpatient general ward samples were included, but only 46% sensitivity and 13% positive predictive value for pheochromocytoma. Considering ICU collections, 98% specificity required results more than fivefold above the upper reference limit and still had poor positive predictive value. A model combining both UNM and UMN results as a cross-product marginally improved the ROC AUC, but improved sensitivity in outpatients and ward patients but not ICU patients.

CONCLUSION

There is a high degree of overlap in UNM-UMN between hospitalized patients and pheochromocytoma; high test specificity is not achieved in this population unless >3-5 times the upper reference limit.

Recurrence Rate of Sporadic Pheochromocytomas After Curative Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Evidence on follow-up duration for patients with sporadic pheochromocytomas is absent, and current guidelines of the European Society of Endocrinology, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and Endocrine Surgeons, and the Endocrine Society are ambiguous about the appropriate duration of follow-up. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the recurrence rate of sporadic pheochromocytomas after curative adrenalectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed. A study was eligible if it included a clear report on the number of sporadic patients, recurrence rate, and follow-up duration. Studies with an inclusion period before 1990, <2 years of follow-up, <10 patients, and unclear data on the sporadic nature of pheochromocytomas were excluded. A meta-analysis on recurrence was performed provided that the heterogeneity was low (I2 < 25%) or intermediate (I2 26-75%). Hozo's method was used to calculate weighted mean follow-up duration and weighted time to recurrence with combined standard deviations (SDs).

RESULTS

A total of 13 studies, including 430 patients, were included in the synthesis. The meta-analysis results describe a pooled recurrence rate after curative surgery of 3% (95% confidence interval: 2-6%, I2 = 0%), with a weighted mean time to recurrence of 49.4 months (SD = 30.7) and a weighted mean follow-up period of 77.3 months (SD = 32.2).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows a very low recurrence rate of 3%. Prospective studies, including economical and health effects of limited follow-up strategies for patients with truly sporadic pheochromocytomas should be considered.

Urinary vanillylmandelic acid:creatinine ratio in dogs with pheochromocytoma

Pheochromocytoma diagnosis in dogs is challenging because biochemical tests are not always available. In humans, urinary vanillylmandelic acid (VMA) is part of a pheochromocytoma biochemical diagnostic profile, whereas its diagnostic accuracy is currently unknown in dogs with pheochromocytoma. Prospectively, VMA was determined by HPLC and expressed as the ratio with respect to urinary creatinine (VMA:C). The diagnostic accuracy of the VMA:C ratio was evaluated by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in 10 healthy dogs, 8 dogs with pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism, 8 dogs with adrenal-dependent hypercortisolism, and 7 dogs with pheochromocytoma. The pheochromocytoma diagnosis was confirmed by histology and immunohistochemistry in all tumors. The VMA:C ratio was significantly higher in dogs with pheochromocytoma (158 [53.4 to 230.8] × 10^-3) than in dogs with adrenal-dependent hypercortisolism (48.1 [24.3 to 144.9] × 10^-3; P < 0.05), dogs with pituitary-dependent hypercortisolism (37.5 [32 to 47.1] × 10^-3; P < 0.001), and healthy dogs (33.8 [13.3 to 87.9] × 10^-3; P < 0.001). When using a VMA:C ratio >58.2 × 10^-3 for pheochromocytoma diagnosis, a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 88.4% were obtained. Nevertheless, when using a cut-off ratio of 4 times the median VMA:C ratio determined in healthy dogs, there was no overlap (100% specificity). The area under the ROC curve indicated that the VMA:C ratio test could be used to discriminate between dogs with and without pheochromocytoma, what leads to the conclusion that it is useful for pheochromocytoma diagnosis in dogs.

The Impact of SARS-Cov-2 Virus Infection on the Endocrine System

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus has spread across the globe rapidly causing an unprecedented pandemic. Because of the novelty of the disease, the possible impact on the endocrine system is not clear. To compile a mini-review describing possible endocrine consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection, we performed a literature survey using the key words Covid-19, Coronavirus, SARS CoV-1, SARS Cov-2, Endocrine, and related terms in medical databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and MedARXiv from the year 2000. Additional references were identified through manual screening of bibliographies and via citations in the selected articles. The literature review is current until April 28, 2020. In light of the literature, we discuss SARS-CoV-2 and explore the endocrine consequences based on the experience with structurally-similar SARS-CoV-1. Studies from the SARS -CoV-1 epidemic have reported variable changes in the endocrine organs. SARS-CoV-2 attaches to the ACE2 system in the pancreas causing perturbation of insulin production resulting in hyperglycemic emergencies. In patients with preexisting endocrine disorders who develop COVID-19, several factors warrant management decisions. Hydrocortisone dose adjustments are required in patients with adrenal insufficiency. Identification and management of critical illness-related corticosteroid insufficiency is crucial. Patients with Cushing syndrome may have poorer outcomes because of the associated immunodeficiency and coagulopathy. Vitamin D deficiency appears to be associated with increased susceptibility or severity to SARS-CoV-2 infection, and replacement may improve outcomes. Robust strategies required for the optimal management of endocrinopathies in COVID-19 are discussed extensively in this mini-review.

Case report of a phantom pheochromocytoma

Plasma free metanephrines or urinary fractionated metanephrines are the biochemical tests of choice for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma as they have greater sensitivity and specificity than catecholamines for pheochromocytoma detection. This case highlights the preanalytical factors which can influence metanephrine measurement and cause a false positive result. It describes a patient with a high pre-test probability of pheochromocytoma due to hypertension and a past medical history of adrenalectomy for a purported pheochromocytoma in her home country. When biochemical screening revealed grossly elevated urine normetanephrine in the presence of a previously identified right adrenal lesion, there was high clinical suspicion of a pheochromocytoma. However, functional imaging did not support this view which prompted additional testing with plasma metanephrines. Results for plasma and urine metanephrines were discordant and preanalytical drug interference was suspected. Patient medications were reviewed and sulfasalazine, an anti-inflammatory drug was identified as the most likely analytical interferent. Urinary fractionated metanephrines were re-analysed using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and all metanephrines were within their reference intervals. This case illustrates how method-specific analytical drug interference prompted unnecessary expensive imaging, heightened patient anxiety and resulted in lengthy investigations for what turned out to be a phantom pheochromocytoma.

Update on Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma from the SSO Endocrine/Head and Neck Disease-Site Work Group. Part 1 of 2: Advances in Pathogenesis and Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

This first part of a two-part review of pheochromocytoma and paragangliomas (PPGLs) addresses clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, treatment, and outcomes. In this first part, the epidemiology, prevalence, genetic etiology, clinical presentation, and biochemical and radiologic workup are discussed. In particular, recent advances in the genetics underlying PPGLs and the recommendation for genetic testing of all patients with PPGL are emphasized. Finally, the newer imaging methods for evaluating of PPGLs are discussed and highlighted.

Pheochromocytoma: An approach to diagnosis

Pheochromocytomas are rare neuroendocrine chromaffin-derived tumors that arise within the adrenal medulla. They are usually benign, but if not diagnosed or if left untreated, they can have devastating consequences. Clinical consideration of the diagnosis is paramount, as they may have protean manifestations, and a high index of suspicion is essential if serious consequences are to be avoided. An accurate biochemical diagnosis is crucial for the management of these patients: either plasma or urinary metanephrines are both highly sensitive and specific if correctly employed, but knowledge of pre- and post-analytic interference is essential. Diagnostic imaging with cross-sectional CT and/or MRI offers high sensitivity in their detection, but lack specificity. The introduction of PET/CT/MR has led to a dramatic improvement in the localization of both pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, together with the increasing availability of new functional imaging radionuclides. Optimal investigation and accurate diagnosis is best achieved at 'centers of excellence' with expert multidisciplinary teams.

Pheochromocytoma

Pheochromocytomas are rare tumors originating in the adrenal medulla. They may be sporadic or in the context of a hereditary syndrome. A considerable number of pheochromocytomas carry germline or somatic gene mutations, which are inherited in the autosomal dominant way. All patients should undergo genetic testing. Symptoms are due to catecholamines over production or to a mass effect. Diagnosis is confirmed by raised plasma or urine metanephrines or normetanephrines. Radiology assists in the tumor location and any local invasion or metastasis. All the patients should have preoperative preparation with α-blockers and/or other medications to control hypertension, arrhythmia, and volume expansion. Surgery is the definitive treatment. Follow up should be life-long.

Endocrine causes of hypertension in pregnancy

Hypertension is a common and morbid complication of pregnancy. While endocrine causes of secondary hypertension are not rare, women with these conditions do not often conceive, and even less commonly are these disorders diagnosed during pregnancy. This review will consider conditions of adrenal hormone excess that cause secondary hypertension: primary aldosteronism (PA), Cushing syndrome (CS), and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. We emphasize that pregnancy itself elicits changes in the regulation of aldosterone and cortisol production and standard endocrine testing algorithms. Furthermore, conventional imaging modalities and pharmacotherapies are often contraindicated in pregnancy, which complicates diagnosis and management. Nevertheless, surgical management in the second trimester is the preferred treatment strategy for most of these rare cases when feasible. This article will discuss the approach to patients with endocrine causes of hypertension during pregnancy with emphasis on those aspects that deviate from the assessment and treatment of non-pregnant patients.

Pheochromocytoma: Positive predictive values of mildly elevated urinary fractionated metanephrines in a large cohort of community-dwelling patients

The diagnostic utility of different thresholds of elevated urinary fractionated metanephrine (UFM) for pheochromocytoma-paraganglioma (PPGL) was evaluated in 10 164 community-dwelling subjects (2012-2017). Levels were ≥1.5× the upper normal limit (UNL) in 276 subjects (2.7%) and ≥2×UNL in 138 (1.4%). PPGL was subsequently diagnosed in 59 (mean age 51.9 ± 14.3, 64% female); 58 (98.3%) with UFM ≥ 2×UNL. Positive predictive values (PPV) were 42% for UFM ≥ 2×UNL, 55% for UFM ≥ 2.5×UNL, and 69% for UFM ≥ 3×UNL. The main reason for PPGL screening (52.5%) was adrenal incidentaloma. Mean (median) metanephrine/normetanephrine levels were 6.7 ± 9×UNL (3 × UNL) and 6.1 ± 8.9×UNL (2.5 × UNL). Six patients (10.2%) had an extra-adrenal tumor (one malignant paraganglioma); one had bilateral pheochromocytoma. Only one patient presented with the "classic triad" (headache, palpitations, sweating). In conclusion, after excluding obvious reasons for false-positive results, thorough diagnostic assessment for PPGL is justified in all subjects with UFM ≥ ×2UNL. The PPV of milder UFM elevations is very low.

Pheochromocytoma and Pregnancy

Pheochromocytoma during pregnancy, although rare, is a perilous condition. The wellbeing of mother and fetus are at stake if not diagnosed and treated antenatally and timely. The diagnosis is frequently overlooked because of the aspecific nature of signs and symptoms and confusion with pregnancy-related hypertension. Measurements of plasma or urinary free metanephrines have the highest diagnostic accuracy. MRI is preferred over ultrasonography. The optimal time for surgical removal is before 24 weeks of gestation or at/after delivery. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy should be preceded by medical pretreatment. Cesarean delivery is preferred in these patients; vaginal delivery might be considered in selected pretreated patients.

Interpretation of Unexpectedly High Levels of Endocrine Tumor Markers

OBJECTIVE

Endocrine tumor markers (ETMs) are important and indispensable tools in the diagnosis and follow-up of endocrine tumors. Unexpectedly high level of ETM (UHLETM) is often encountered in clinical practice. The objectives of this article are to discuss the approach to UHLETMs and describe the most common UHLETMs.

METHODS

Literature review and personal experience with UHLETMs.

RESULTS

A UHLETM is defined as an ETM level much higher than what an endocrinologist would expect based on the patient's clinical information, other biochemical test results, and imaging findings. Most UHLETMs are false positive, in that they do not indicate the existence or growth of an endocrine tumor. The key issue, however, is how to convincingly prove that a UHLETM is false positive. The most important question to help resolve UHLETMs is whether the UHLETMs are due to false or true results. Some UHLETMs are due to interpretation errors, laboratory errors, or spurious test results, while the true levels of the ETMs are normal or unchanged from previous results. Other UHLETMs are due to nontumor conditions or medications, and the true levels of the ETMs are indeed very high. When it is not straightforward to assess whether certain UHLETMs are due to false or true results, they may be due to novel conditions.

CONCLUSION

UHLETMs provide endocrinologists great opportunities to learn the basic biology and measurement of ETMs. Unresolved UHLETMs are exciting clinical research opportunities which may lead to discovery of new diseases and new mechanisms of measurement interference.

ABBREVIATIONS

5-HIAAA = 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid; 5-HTP = 5-hydroxytryptophan; CGA = chromogranin A; ETM = endocrine tumor marker; MTC = medullary thyroid carcinoma; UHLETM = unexpectedly high level of endocrine tumor marker.

The challenge of improving the diagnostic yield from metanephrine testing in suspected phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma

Background

Plasma-free metanephrines (PFM) or urinary fractionated metanephrines (UFM) are the preferred biochemical tests for the diagnosis of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL). Borderline increased results should be followed up to either exclude or confirm diagnosis.

Methods

We extracted all PFM and UFM results reported by our laboratory over a six-month period from the laboratory information system. We categorized patients with borderline increased results according to whether follow-up testing had been performed as suggested in the initial laboratory report. Questionnaires were then sent to all requesting doctors and medical notes reviewed where available.

Results

Two hundred and four patients with borderline increased PFM or UFM were identified. Sixty-five (38.5%) of 169 patients with borderline increased PFM had a repeat test out of which 36 were normal and 29 did not normalize. Of 35 patients with borderline increased UFM, 17 (48.6%) had subsequent PFM measurement, out of which 15 were normal. Questionnaires were returned to 106 (52%) patients. Of these, the most frequent indication for testing was hypertension ( n = 50); 15 patients had an incidental adrenal mass and two of these patients were diagnosed with a phaeochromocytoma.

Conclusion

Only 38% of patients with borderline increased PFM had a repeat PFM measurement. This was not significantly higher when compared with the 28% in a previous audit that we reported in 2010 ( P = 0.10). Forty-nine per cent of patients with a borderline increased UFM had a repeat UFM or PFM measurement. There remains a substantial possibility of missed detection of PPGL.

Intraoperative Hemodynamic Instability and Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma During Excision of Adrenal Incidentaloma With Incomplete Workup: A Case Report

Preoperative evaluation of incidentalomas for pheochromocytoma is imperative. This case report describes a scheduled adrenalectomy in an asymptomatic patient with what was eventually determined to be an incomplete biochemical workup. The intraoperative course was complicated by labile and rapid increases in blood pressure and heart rate, suggesting the missed diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. It is important for anesthesiologists to ensure adequate preoperative biochemical workup before excluding the possibility of coexisting pheochromocytoma.

Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Indications, Interpretations, Limits, and Pitfalls

Imaging is critical in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). NETs share common imaging features, but each type exhibits unique features. Computed tomography scans or MRI of the abdomen is used to assess tumor burden routinely. Functional imaging with octreotide scan or gallium-68 somatostatin analog PET is used selectively to confirm diagnosis and guide therapy. Clinicians and radiologists should be familiar with the indications and interpretations of imaging modalities. Novel functional imaging modalities likely will be developed to detect small NETs, predict prognosis, guide therapeutic choices, and design novel therapies.

Plasma methoxytyramine: clinical utility with metanephrines for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

CONTEXT

Measurements of plasma methoxytyramine, the O-methylated dopamine metabolite, are useful for detecting rare dopamine-producing pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) and head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGLs), but utility for screening beyond that achieved using standard measurements of normetanephrine and metanephrine is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the additional utility of methoxytyramine compared to plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for diagnosis of PPGLs and HNPGLs.

DESIGN

Comparative prospective study.

METHODS

Comparison of mass spectrometric-based measurements of plasma methoxytyramine, normetanephrine and metanephrine in 1963 patients tested for PPGLs at six tertiary medical centers according to reference intervals verified in 423 normotensive and hypertensive volunteers.

RESULTS

Of the screened patients, 213 had PPGLs and 38 HNPGLs. Using an upper cut-off of 0.10 nmol/L for methoxytyramine, 0.45 nmol/L for metanephrine and age-specific upper cut-offs for normetanephrine, diagnostic sensitivity with the addition of methoxytyramine increased from 97.2% to 98.6% for patients with PPGLs and from 22.1% to 50.0% for patients with HNPGLs, with a small decrease in specificity from 95.9% to 95.1%. Addition of methoxytyramine did not significantly alter areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for patients with PPGLs (0.984 vs 0.991), but did increase (P < 0.05) areas for patients with HNPGLs (0.627 vs 0.801). Addition of methoxytyramine also increased the proportion of patients with PPGLs who showed highly positive predictive elevations of multiple metabolites (70.9% vs 49.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

While the benefit of additional measurements of plasma methoxytyramine for the detection of PPGLs is modest, the measurements do assist with positive confirmation of disease and are useful for the detection of HNPGLs.

Hypertension: The role of biochemistry in the diagnosis and management

Hypertension is defined as a persistently elevated blood pressure ≥140/90mmHg. It is an important treatable risk factor for cardiovascular disease, with a high prevalence in the general population. The most common cause, essential hypertension, is a widespread disease - however, secondary hypertension is under investigated and under diagnosed. Collectively, hypertension is referred to as a "silent killer" - frequently it displays no overt symptomatology. It is a leading risk factor for death and disability globally, with >40% of persons aged over 25 having hypertension. A vast spectrum of conditions result in hypertension spanning essential through resistant, to patients with an overt endocrine cause. A significant number of patients with hypertension have multiple cardiovascular risk factors at the time of presentation. Both routine and specialised biochemical investigations are paramount for the evaluation of these patients and their subsequent management. Biochemical testing serves to identify those hypertensive individuals who are at higher risk on the basis of evidence of dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, renal impairment, or target organ damage and to exclude identifiable causes of hypertension. The main target of biochemical testing is the identification of patients with a specific and treatable aetiology of hypertension. Information gleaned from biochemical investigation is used to risk stratify patients and tailor the type and intensity of subsequent management and treatment. We review the approach to the biochemical investigation of patients presenting with hypertension and propose a diagnostic algorithm for work-up.

No influence of antihypertensive agents on plasma free metanephrines

BACKGROUND

Hypertension can be the predominant sign of pheochromocytoma (PCC) and sympathetic paraganglioma (sPGL) and screening for PCC/sPGL is often performed in patients who are already being treated with antihypertensive agents. There is very little information about the influence of antihypertensive drugs on plasma free metanephrines. The aim of this study was to determine whether commonly prescribed antihypertensive drugs can falsely elevate plasma free metanephrines concentrations measured by LC-MS/MS analysis.

METHODS

In a prospective study we included patients with newly diagnosed hypertension, who started monotherapy with an antihypertensive agent (i.e. β-blocker, thiazide diuretic or angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor). Plasma free metanephrine (MN) and normetanephrine (NMN) levels were measured before and one month after the start of the medication quantified by LC-MS/MS.

RESULTS

Between 2009 and 2014, 39 patients were included (β-blocker n=13, thiazide diuretic n=14 and ACE inhibitor n=12). In the whole group, the median plasma free MN and NMN concentrations at baseline were 0.19 [0.17-0.26] nmol/L and 0.56 [0.38-0.95] nmol/L. One month after the start of antihypertensive treatment, the median plasma free MN and NMN concentrations were comparable; 0.20 [0-16-0.24] nmol/L and 0.63 [0.39-0.75] nmol/L, respectively (P=0.43 and P=0.39). Separate analysis for each of the three antihypertensive agents examined did not reveal any significant changes in the median plasma free MN and NMN concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of plasma free MN and NMN with LC-MS/MS is not affected by use of β-blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors. Withdrawal of these drugs prior to the quantification of plasma metanephrines is therefore not necessary.

Does this patient have pheochromocytoma? A systematic review of clinical signs and symptoms

Context

Pheochromocytoma is a rare disease but with high mortality if it is not being diagnosed early. Several biochemical tests with high accuracy have been obtained, but the clinical threshold for request of these tests is not determined clearly.

Objectives

To determine the Likelihood Ratios of clinical symptoms and signs in diagnosing pheochromocytoma. And also meta-analysis of their sensitivity in this disease.

Data sources

MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1960 to February 2014. Bibliographies were searched to find additional articles.

Study selection

We included original studies describing the sensitivity and/or likelihood ratios of signs and symptoms in clinical suspicion of pheochromocytoma. Their method of diagnosis should have been based on pathology. We excluded specific subtypes or syndromes related to pheochromocytoma, or specific ages or gender. Also we excluded studies before 1993 (JNC5) which no definition of hypertension was presented. 37 articles were chosen finally.

Data extraction

Two authors reviewed data from articles independently and gave discrepancies to third author for decision. The aim was extraction of raw numbers of patients having defined signs or symptoms, and draw 2 × 2 tables if data available. We meta-analyzed sensitivities by Statsdirect and Likelihood Ratios by Meta-disc soft wares. Because our data was heterogeneous based on I² > 50 % (except negative Likelihood ratio of hypertension), we used random effect model for doing meta-analysis. We checked publication bias by drawing Funnel plot for each sign/symptom, and also Egger test.

Data synthesis

The most prevalent signs and symptoms reported were hypertension (pooled sensitivity of 80.7 %), headache (pooled sensitivity of 60.4 %), palpitation (pooled sensitivity of 59.3 %) and diaphoresis (pooled sensitivity of 52.4 %). The definition of orthostatic hypotension was different among studies. The sensitivity was 23–50 %.

Paroxysmal hypertension, chest pain, flushing, and weakness were the signs/symptoms which had publication bias based on Funnel plot and Egger test (P value < 0.05). Seven of the articles had control group, and could be used for calculating LR of signs/symptoms. Diaphoresis (LR+ 2.2, LR- 0.45), Palpitation (LR+ 1.9, LR- 0.52) and headache (LR+ 1.6, LR- 0.24) were significant symptoms in clinical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Other signs and symptoms had been reported in only one study and could not have been meta-analyzed. Classic triad of headache, palpitation and diaphoresis in hypertensive patients had the LR+ 6.312 (95 % CI 0.217–183.217) and LR- 0.139 (95 % CI 0.059–0.331). Surprisingly, hypertension was not important in clinical suspicion of pheochromocytoma, and even normotension increased the probability of the disease.

Conclusions

By available data, there is no single clinical finding that has significant value in diagnosis or excluding pheochromocytoma. Combination of certain symptoms, signs and para-clinical exams is more valuable for physicians. Further studies should be done, to specify the value of clinical findings. Until that time the process of diagnosis will be based on clinical suspicion and lab tests followed by related imaging.

Does this patient have Pheochromocytoma? a systematic review of clinical signs and symptoms

Context

Pheochromocytoma is a rare disease but with high mortality if it is not being diagnosed early. Several biochemical tests with high accuracy have been obtained, but the clinical threshold for request of these tests is not determined clearly.

Objectives

To determine the Likelihood Ratios of clinical symptoms and signs in diagnosing pheochromocytoma. And also meta-analysis of their sensitivity in this disease.

Data sources

MEDLINE was searched for relevant English-language articles dated 1960 to February 2014. Bibliographies were searched to find additional articles.

Study selection

We included original studies describing the sensitivity and/or likelihood ratios of signs and symptoms in clinical suspicion of pheochromocytoma. Their method of diagnosis should have been based on pathology. We excluded specific subtypes or syndromes related to pheochromocytoma, or specific ages or gender. Also we excluded studies before 1993 (JNC5) which no definition of hypertension was presented. 37 articles were chosen finally.

Data extraction

Two authors reviewed data from articles independently and gave discrepancies to third author for decision. The aim was extraction of raw numbers of patients having defined signs or symptoms, and draw 2 × 2 tables if data available. We meta-analyzed sensitivities by Statsdirect and Likelihood Ratios by Meta-disc soft wares. Because our data was heterogeneous based on I² > 50 % (except negative Likelihood ratio of hypertension), we used random effect model for doing meta-analysis. We checked publication bias by drawing Funnel plot for each sign/symptom, and also Egger test.

Data synthesis

The most prevalent signs and symptoms reported were hypertension (pooled sensitivity of 80.7 %), headache (pooled sensitivity of 60.4 %), palpitation (pooled sensitivity of 59.3 %) and diaphoresis (pooled sensitivity of 52.4 %). The definition of orthostatic hypotension was different among studies. The sensitivity was 23–50 %.

Paroxysmal hypertension, chest pain, flushing, and weakness were the signs/symptoms which had publication bias based on Funnel plot and Egger test (P value < 0.05). Seven of the articles had control group, and could be used for calculating LR of signs/symptoms. Diaphoresis (LR+ 2.2, LR-0.45), Palpitation (LR+ 1.9, LR-0.52) and headache (LR+ 1.6, LR-0.24) were significant symptoms in clinical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Other signs and symptoms had been reported in only one study and could not have been meta-analyzed. Classic triad of headache, palpitation and diaphoresis in hypertensive patients had the LR+ 6.312 (95 % CI 0.217–183.217) and LR-0.139 (95 % CI 0.059–0.331). Surprisingly, hypertension was not important in clinical suspicion of pheochromocytoma, and even normotension increased the probability of the disease.

Conclusions

By available data, there is no single clinical finding that has significant value in diagnosis or excluding pheochromocytoma. Combination of certain symptoms, signs and para-clinical exams is more valuable for physicians. Further studies should be done, to specify the value of clinical findings.Until that time the process of diagnosis will be based on clinical suspicion and lab tests followed by related imaging.

PREDICTIVE VALUE OF CHROMOGRANIN A IN A DIAGNOSIS TOWARDS PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA IN ADRENAL INCIDENTALOMA

Context

Some adrenal tumors, such as pheochromocytoma, can be life-threatening. Therefore it is crucial to distinguish them from other lesions, especially prior to surgery. Chromogranin A (CgA) seems to potentially be a good marker for tumors of chromaffin origin.

Objective

To assess the differentiating value of CgA in the diagnostic work-up of pheochromocytoma.

Design

Retrospective study of operated patients with adrenal incidentaloma with lesions > 10 Hounsfield's units (HU) on CT.

Subjects and methods

Thirty patients (11 males, 19 females; aged 61.5±21 years) were enrolled in the study. Patients using medications interfering with the assessment of CgA and metanephrines were excluded. Two groups were formed: those with pheochromocytoma (Ph, n=16) and those with non-pheochromocytoma (N-Ph, n=14) lesions. Data included radiological features of masses, serum CgA and 24-hour urine metanephrines (24 - HUM) concentrations.

Results

No difference in 24-HUM level nor tumor size or density was found between groups Ph and N-Ph. Median serum CgA concentration was higher in Ph group compared to the N-Ph: 99.35 (68.12-172.73) vs. 52.92 (34.37-101.26) ng/mL, respectively (P=0.04). In Ph group, the size of the lesion correlated negatively with density (r= -0.53, P=0.042). No significant correlation in CgA, 24-HUM, density or size of the lesion was found. Performed curve receiver operating characteristic (ROC) showed AUC=0.7232 for CgA. Taking into account CgA serum value of ≤ 50 ng/mL (sensitivity: 93.75%, specificity: 50.00%, P=0.012), we proposed an algorithm for management of lesions > 10 HU on CT.

Conclusion

CgA level ≤ 50 ng/mL might be useful in initial screening evidence for the exclusion of pheochromocytoma. It is crucial to eliminate factors interfering with the measurements.

Urinary clonidine suppression testing for the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma (PPGL) involves detection of elevated levels of plasma and/or 24-h urine catecholamines and/or their metabolites, including metanephrines. Although these tests are reasonably sensitive, false-positive results are often encountered. Follow-up tests can provide additional information to correctly diagnose PPGL. In this regard, the utility of the urinary clonidine suppression test (UCST) remains unknown.

METHODS

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of the UCST in confirming or excluding PPGL, we conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a UCST between 2000 and 2013 (n = 59; 15 PPGLs) at a single centre. Twelve-hour urine catecholamines and metanephrines were assessed before and after clonidine administration, and examined in relation to final diagnosis, PPGL or non-PPGL. Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to identify optimal positivity cut-offs. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

Clonidine significantly decreased urine creatinine-corrected norepinephrine and normetanephrine in patients without PPGL (P < 0.001 pairwise) but not in patients with PPGL. Epinephrine and metanephrine levels were not significantly reduced in either group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area under the curve was 0.955 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.906-1.000, P < 0.001] and 0.823 (95% CI 0.706-0.940, P < 0.001) for norepinephrine and normetanephrine, respectively. Optimal cut-offs were established at 50 and 15% reductions in norepinephrine and normetanephrine, respectively, which provided high sensitivities (93.3% for both) and negative predictive values (97.4 and 96.3%). When both were concordant, higher diagnostic accuracy was achieved (100% sensitivity, 92.0% specificity). Results were similar in subgroups of individuals with borderline initial testing (n = 40) or on interfering drugs (n = 25).

CONCLUSION

The UCST appears to be a highly accurate test for PPGL. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these results before routine use is encouraged.

Diagnostic accuracy of plasma free metanephrines in a seated position compared with 24-hour urinary metanephrines in the investigation of pheochromocytoma

The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic efficacy of free metanephrines in plasma samples drawn in the seated position compared with 24-h urinary metanephrines in detecting pheochromocytomas in Asian patients. This prospective study was conducted at Samsung Medical Center between May 2010 and July 2011. The study contained 245 subjects, including 28 patients with histologically-proven pheochromocytoma, 44 with histologically-proven non-pheochromocytoma, 112 controls suspected of having tumors but with negative investigations during two or more years of follow-up, and 45 healthy normotensive volunteers. Plasma-free metanephrines were measured by LC-MS/MS. The cut-off values with optimal sensitivity and specificity for plasma metanephrine and plasma normetanephrine were 0.33 nmol/L and 0.61 nmol/L, respectively. Both the plasma metanephrines measurement and urinary metanephrines measurement had a sensitivity of 96.4% (p = 1.00). However, the urinary metanephrines measurement was significantly more specific than the plasma metanephrines measurement (94.2% vs. 75.6%; p < 0.001). When we applied cut-off values based on BMI, specificity improved from 75.6% to 87.2%, with a comparable gain in sensitivity. From a diagnostic perspective, measurement of free metanephrines in plasma drawn in the seated position is highly sensitive but insufficiently specific when compared with measurement of 24-h urinary fractionated metanephrines. The specificity may be improved by applying cut-off values based on BMI. We suggest that free metanephrines in plasma drawn from seated position can also be used as an initial screening test to ensure that pheochromocytomas are not missed in Asian patients.

Laboratory evaluation of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma

BACKGROUND

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are potentially lethal yet usually surgically curable causes of endocrine hypertension; therefore, once clinical suspicion is aroused it is imperative that clinicians choose the most appropriate laboratory tests to identify the tumors.

CONTENT

Compelling evidence now indicates that initial screening for PPGLs should include measurements of plasma free metanephrines or urine fractionated metanephrines. LC-MS/MS offers numerous advantages over other analytical methods and is the method of choice when measurements include methoxytyramine, the O-methylated metabolite of dopamine. The plasma test offers advantages over the urine test, although it is rarely implemented correctly, rendering the urine test preferable for mainstream use. To ensure optimum diagnostic sensitivity for the plasma test, reference intervals must be established for blood samples collected after 30 min of supine rest and after an overnight fast when measurements include methoxytyramine. Similarly collected blood samples during screening, together with use of age-adjusted reference intervals, further minimize false-positive results. Extents and patterns of increases in plasma normetanephrine, metanephrine, and methoxytyramine can additionally help predict size and adrenal vs extraadrenal locations of tumors, as well as presence of metastases and underlying germline mutations of tumor susceptibility genes.

SUMMARY

Carried out correctly at specialist endocrine centers, collection of blood for measurements of plasma normetanephrine, metanephrine, and methoxytyramine not only provides high accuracy for diagnosis of PPGLs, but can also guide clinical decision-making about follow-up imaging strategies, genetic testing, and therapeutic options. At other centers, measurements of urine fractionated metanephrines will identify most PPGLs.

Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to formulate clinical practice guidelines for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL).

PARTICIPANTS

The Task Force included a chair selected by the Endocrine Society Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee (CGS), seven experts in the field, and a methodologist. The authors received no corporate funding or remuneration.

EVIDENCE

This evidence-based guideline was developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to describe both the strength of recommendations and the quality of evidence. The Task Force reviewed primary evidence and commissioned two additional systematic reviews.

CONSENSUS PROCESS

One group meeting, several conference calls, and e-mail communications enabled consensus. Committees and members of the Endocrine Society, European Society of Endocrinology, and Americal Association for Clinical Chemistry reviewed drafts of the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

The Task Force recommends that initial biochemical testing for PPGLs should include measurements of plasma free or urinary fractionated metanephrines. Consideration should be given to preanalytical factors leading to false-positive or false-negative results. All positive results require follow-up. Computed tomography is suggested for initial imaging, but magnetic resonance is a better option in patients with metastatic disease or when radiation exposure must be limited. (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is a useful imaging modality for metastatic PPGLs. We recommend consideration of genetic testing in all patients, with testing by accredited laboratories. Patients with paraganglioma should be tested for SDHx mutations, and those with metastatic disease for SDHB mutations. All patients with functional PPGLs should undergo preoperative blockade to prevent perioperative complications. Preparation should include a high-sodium diet and fluid intake to prevent postoperative hypotension. We recommend minimally invasive adrenalectomy for most pheochromocytomas with open resection for most paragangliomas. Partial adrenalectomy is an option for selected patients. Lifelong follow-up is suggested to detect recurrent or metastatic disease. We suggest personalized management with evaluation and treatment by multidisciplinary teams with appropriate expertise to ensure favorable outcomes.

Pheochromocytoma: pitfalls in the biochemical evaluation

The current work-up of a patient suspected to have a pheochromocytoma starts with the measurement of plasma or urine metanephrines. Notably, up to a quarter of these patients will have a false positive result. When the plasma or urine metanephrines are less than the 4-fold upper limit of normal, clinicians struggle between the fear of missing a potentially fatal condition and ordering costly follow up tests. In many cases, ordering unnecessary imaging studies may only increase the level of patient anxiety. This article will review various physiologic factors, pathologic conditions and medications that may influence the levels of catecholamines and their metabolites yielding false positive or false negative results. Acquiring familiarity with these conditions as well as interfering medications will equip clinicians with better interpretation skills of the biochemical tests.

Malignant catatonia mimicking pheochromocytoma

Malignant catatonia is an unusual and highly fatal neuropsychiatric condition which can present with clinical and biochemical manifestations similar to those of pheochromocytoma. Differentiating between the two diseases is essential as management options greatly diverge. We describe a case of malignant catatonia in a 20-year-old male who presented with concurrent psychotic symptoms and autonomic instability, with markedly increased 24-hour urinary levels of norepinephrine at 1752 nmol/day (normal, 89-470 nmol/day), epinephrine at 1045 nmol/day (normal, <160 nmol/day), and dopamine at 7.9  μ mol/day (normal, 0.4-3.3  μ mol/day). The patient was treated with multiple sessions of electroconvulsive therapy, which led to complete clinical resolution. Repeat urine collections within weeks of this presenting event revealed normalization or near normalization of his catecholamine and metanephrine levels. Malignant catatonia should be considered in the differential diagnosis of the hypercatecholamine state, particularly in a patient who also exhibits concurrent catatonic features.

Levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease: influence on liquid chromatographic tandem mass spectrometric-based measurements of plasma and urinary normetanephrine, metanephrine and methoxytyramine

BACKGROUND

Medication-related interferences with measurements of catecholamines and their metabolites represent important causes of false-positive results during diagnosis of phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs). Such interferences are less troublesome with measurements by liquid chromatography with tandem mass-spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) than by other methods, but can still present problems for some drugs. Levodopa, the precursor for dopamine used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease, represents one potentially interfering medication.

METHODS

Plasma and urine samples, obtained from 20 Parkinsonian patients receiving levodopa, were analysed for concentrations of catecholamines and their O-methylated metabolites by LC-MS/MS. Results were compared with those from a group of 120 age-matched subjects and 18 patients with PPGLs.

RESULTS

Plasma and urinary free and deconjugated (free + conjugated) methoxytyramine, as well as urinary dopamine, showed 22- to 148-fold higher (P < 0.0001) concentrations in patients receiving levodopa than in the reference group. In contrast, plasma normetanephrine, urinary noradrenaline and urinary free and deconjugated normetanephrine concentrations were unaffected. Plasma free metanephrine, urinary adrenaline and urinary free and deconjugated metanephrine all showed higher (P < 0.05) concentrations in Parkinsonian patients than the reference group, but this was only a problem for adrenaline. Similar to normetanephrine, plasma and urinary metanephrine remained below the 97.5 percentiles of the reference group in almost all Parkinsonian patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These data establish that although levodopa treatment confounds identification of PPGLs that produce dopamine, the therapy is not a problem for use of LC-MS/MS measurements of plasma and urinary normetanephrine and metanephrine to diagnose more commonly encountered PPGLs that produce noradrenaline or adrenaline.

Reference intervals for plasma free metanephrines with an age adjustment for normetanephrine for optimized laboratory testing of phaeochromocytoma

BACKGROUND

Measurements of plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine provide a useful diagnostic test for phaeochromocytoma, but this depends on appropriate reference intervals. Upper cut-offs set too high compromise diagnostic sensitivity, whereas set too low, false-positives are a problem. This study aimed to establish optimal reference intervals for plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine.

METHODS

Blood samples were collected in the supine position from 1226 subjects, aged 5-84 y, including 116 children, 575 normotensive and hypertensive adults and 535 patients in whom phaeochromocytoma was ruled out. Reference intervals were examined according to age and gender. Various models were examined to optimize upper cut-offs according to estimates of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity in a separate validation group of 3888 patients tested for phaeochromocytoma, including 558 with confirmed disease.

RESULTS

Plasma metanephrine, but not normetanephrine, was higher (P < 0.001) in men than in women, but reference intervals did not differ. Age showed a positive relationship (P < 0.0001) with plasma normetanephrine and a weaker relationship (P = 0.021) with metanephrine. Upper cut-offs of reference intervals for normetanephrine increased from 0.47 nmol/L in children to 1.05 nmol/L in subjects over 60 y. A curvilinear model for age-adjusted compared with fixed upper cut-offs for normetanephrine, together with a higher cut-off for metanephrine (0.45 versus 0.32 nmol/L), resulted in a substantial gain in diagnostic specificity from 88.3% to 96.0% with minimal loss in diagnostic sensitivity from 93.9% to 93.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data establish age-adjusted cut-offs of reference intervals for plasma normetanephrine and optimized cut-offs for metanephrine useful for minimizing false-positive results.

Radiological and pathological findings of a metastatic composite paraganglioma with neuroblastoma in a man: a case report

Introduction

Composite tumors of the adrenal medulla or paraganglia are extremely rare and present a diagnostic dilemma. These tumors consist of a neuroendocrine component mixed with a neural component.

We describe the imaging characteristics together with the corresponding pathological findings of a composite tumor. Apart from any component-specific imaging findings, the hallmark of this entity is the presence of histologically distinguishable components.

Case presentation

A 61-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our hospital due to a suspect lesion found on chest computed tomography carried out for unclear thoracic pain. An abdominal computed tomography scan and ultrasound examination detected a retroperitoneal tumor comprising two different tumor components. Twenty-four-hour urine revealed high levels of normetanephrine, characteristic of a neuroendocrine tumor. An octreoscan prior to surgical procedures revealed multiple osseous and intra-hepatic metastases. The final histopathological workup revealed a composite paraganglioma with neuroblastoma. Our patient died ten months after the initial diagnosis from tumor-associated complications.

Conclusions

Composite paragangliomas with neuroblastoma are rare tumors of the retroperitoneum. Such tumors should be considered in the differential diagnosis of retroperitoneal masses.