1
|
Walker MF, Zhang J, Steiner W, Ku PI, Zhu JF, Michaelson Z, Yen YC, Lee A, Long AB, Casey MJ, Poddar A, Nelson IB, Arveseth CD, Nagel F, Clough R, LaPotin S, Kwan KM, Schulz S, Stewart RA, Tesmer JJG, Caspary T, Subramanian R, Ge X, Myers BR. GRK2 kinases in the primary cilium initiate SMOOTHENED-PKA signaling in the Hedgehog cascade. PLoS Biol 2024; 22:e3002685. [PMID: 39138140 PMCID: PMC11322411 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
During Hedgehog (Hh) signal transduction in development and disease, the atypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) SMOOTHENED (SMO) communicates with GLI transcription factors by binding the protein kinase A catalytic subunit (PKA-C) and physically blocking its enzymatic activity. Here, we show that GPCR kinase 2 (GRK2) orchestrates this process during endogenous mouse and zebrafish Hh pathway activation in the primary cilium. Upon SMO activation, GRK2 rapidly relocalizes from the ciliary base to the shaft, triggering SMO phosphorylation and PKA-C interaction. Reconstitution studies reveal that GRK2 phosphorylation enables active SMO to bind PKA-C directly. Lastly, the SMO-GRK2-PKA pathway underlies Hh signal transduction in a range of cellular and in vivo models. Thus, GRK2 phosphorylation of ciliary SMO and the ensuing PKA-C binding and inactivation are critical initiating events for the intracellular steps in Hh signaling. More broadly, our study suggests an expanded role for GRKs in enabling direct GPCR interactions with diverse intracellular effectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison F. Walker
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Jingyi Zhang
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California, United States of America
| | - William Steiner
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Pei-I Ku
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Ju-Fen Zhu
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Zachary Michaelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Yu-Chen Yen
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Annabel Lee
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Alyssa B. Long
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Mattie J. Casey
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Abhishek Poddar
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Isaac B. Nelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Corvin D. Arveseth
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | | | - Ryan Clough
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Sarah LaPotin
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Kristen M. Kwan
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Stefan Schulz
- 7TM Antibodies GmbH, Jena, Germany
- Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Rodney A. Stewart
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - John J. G. Tesmer
- Department of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Tamara Caspary
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America
| | - Radhika Subramanian
- Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Xuecai Ge
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, California, United States of America
| | - Benjamin R. Myers
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klauer MJ, Willette BKA, Tsvetanova NG. Functional diversification of cell signaling by GPCR localization. J Biol Chem 2024; 300:105668. [PMID: 38272232 PMCID: PMC10882132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2024.105668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface receptors and a critical class of regulators of mammalian physiology. Also known as seven transmembrane receptors (7TMs), GPCRs are ubiquitously expressed and versatile, detecting a diverse set of endogenous stimuli, including odorants, neurotransmitters, hormones, peptides, and lipids. Accordingly, GPCRs have emerged as the largest class of drug targets, accounting for upward of 30% of all prescription drugs. The view that ligand-induced GPCR responses originate exclusively from the cell surface has evolved to reflect accumulating evidence that receptors can elicit additional waves of signaling from intracellular compartments. These events in turn shape unique cellular and physiological outcomes. Here, we discuss our current understanding of the roles and regulation of compartmentalized GPCR signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Klauer
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Blair K A Willette
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nikoleta G Tsvetanova
- Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kolb P, Kenakin T, Alexander SPH, Bermudez M, Bohn LM, Breinholt CS, Bouvier M, Hill SJ, Kostenis E, Martemyanov K, Neubig RR, Onaran HO, Rajagopal S, Roth BL, Selent J, Shukla AK, Sommer ME, Gloriam DE. Community Guidelines for GPCR Ligand Bias: IUPHAR Review XX. Br J Pharmacol 2022; 179:3651-3674. [PMID: 35106752 PMCID: PMC7612872 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 83] [Impact Index Per Article: 41.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors modulate a plethora of physiological processes and mediate the effects of one-third of FDA-approved drugs. Depending on which ligand activates a receptor, it can engage different intracellular transducers. This 'biased signaling' paradigm requires that we now characterize physiological signaling not just by receptors but by ligand-receptor pairs. Ligands eliciting biased signaling may constitute better drugs with higher efficacy and fewer adverse effects. However, ligand bias is very complex, making reproducibility and description challenging. Here, we provide guidelines and terminology for any scientists to design and report ligand bias experiments. The guidelines will aid consistency and clarity, as the basic receptor research and drug discovery communities continue to advance our understanding and exploitation of ligand bias. Scientific insight, biosensors, and analytical methods are still evolving and should benefit from and contribute to the implementation of the guidelines, together improving translation from in vitro to disease-relevant in vivo models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Kolb
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Terry Kenakin
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, North, Carolina, USA
| | | | - Marcel Bermudez
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Laura M Bohn
- Department of Molecular Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | - Christian S Breinholt
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michel Bouvier
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Stephen J Hill
- School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Evi Kostenis
- Molecular, Cellular, and Pharmacobiology Section, Institute for Pharmaceutical Biology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Kirill Martemyanov
- Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | - Rick R Neubig
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - H Ongun Onaran
- Molecular Biology and Technology Development Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sudarshan Rajagopal
- Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.,Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Bryan L Roth
- Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, North, Carolina, USA
| | - Jana Selent
- Research Programme on Biomedical Informatics, Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute, Department of Experimental and Health Sciences, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arun K Shukla
- Department of Biological Sciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur, India
| | - Martha E Sommer
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Current affiliation: ISAR Bioscience Institute, Munich-Planegg, Germany
| | - David E Gloriam
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tadinada SM, Weatherford ET, Collins GV, Bhardwaj G, Cochran J, Kutschke W, Zimmerman K, Bosko A, O'Neill BT, Weiss RM, Abel ED. Functional resilience of C57BL/6J mouse heart to dietary fat overload. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2021; 321:H850-H864. [PMID: 34477461 PMCID: PMC8616610 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00419.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Molecular mechanisms underlying cardiac dysfunction and subsequent heart failure in diabetic cardiomyopathy are incompletely understood. Initially we intended to test the role of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), a potential mediator of cardiac dysfunction in diabetic cardiomyopathy, but found that control animals on HFD did not develop cardiomyopathy. Cardiac function was preserved in both wild-type and GRK2 knockout animals fed high-fat diet as indicated by preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) although heart mass was increased. The absence of cardiac dysfunction led us to rigorously evaluate the utility of diet-induced obesity to model diabetic cardiomyopathy in mice. Using pure C57BL/6J animals and various diets formulated with different sources of fat-lard (32% saturated fat, 68% unsaturated fat) or hydrogenated coconut oil (95% saturated fat), we consistently observed left ventricular hypertrophy, preserved LVEF, and preserved contractility measured by invasive hemodynamics in animals fed high-fat diet. Gene expression patterns that characterize pathological hypertrophy were not induced, but a modest induction of various collagen isoforms and matrix metalloproteinases was observed in heart with high-fat diet feeding. PPARα-target genes that enhance lipid utilization such as Pdk4, CD36, AcadL, and Cpt1b were induced, but mitochondrial energetics was not impaired. These results suggest that although long-term fat feeding in mice induces cardiac hypertrophy and increases cardiac fatty acid metabolism, it may not be sufficient to activate pathological hypertrophic mechanisms that impair cardiac function or induce cardiac fibrosis. Thus, additional factors that are currently not understood may contribute to the cardiac abnormalities previously reported by many groups.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Dietary fat overload (DFO) is widely used to model diabetic cardiomyopathy but the utility of this model is controversial. We comprehensively characterized cardiac contractile and mitochondrial function in C57BL6/J mice fed with lard-based or saturated fat-enriched diets initiated at two ages. Despite cardiac hypertrophy, contractile and mitochondrial function is preserved, and molecular adaptations likely limit lipotoxicity. The resilience of these hearts to DFO underscores the need to develop robust alternative models of diabetic cardiomyopathy.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Age Factors
- Animals
- Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/enzymology
- Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/etiology
- Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/pathology
- Diabetic Cardiomyopathies/physiopathology
- Diet, High-Fat
- Disease Models, Animal
- Energy Metabolism
- Female
- Fibrosis
- G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2/genetics
- G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2/metabolism
- Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/enzymology
- Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/etiology
- Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/pathology
- Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular/physiopathology
- Male
- Mice, Inbred C57BL
- Mice, Knockout
- Mitochondria, Heart/enzymology
- Mitochondria, Heart/pathology
- Myocardium/enzymology
- Myocardium/pathology
- Obesity/complications
- Stroke Volume
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/enzymology
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/etiology
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/pathology
- Ventricular Dysfunction, Left/physiopathology
- Ventricular Function, Left
- Ventricular Remodeling
- Mice
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satya Murthy Tadinada
- Department of Neuroscience and Pharmacology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Eric T Weatherford
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Greg V Collins
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Gourav Bhardwaj
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Jesse Cochran
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - William Kutschke
- Abboud Cardiovascular Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Kathy Zimmerman
- Abboud Cardiovascular Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Alyssa Bosko
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Brian T O'Neill
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Robert M Weiss
- Abboud Cardiovascular Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - E Dale Abel
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arveseth CD, Happ JT, Hedeen DS, Zhu JF, Capener JL, Klatt Shaw D, Deshpande I, Liang J, Xu J, Stubben SL, Nelson IB, Walker MF, Kawakami K, Inoue A, Krogan NJ, Grunwald DJ, Hüttenhain R, Manglik A, Myers BR. Smoothened transduces Hedgehog signals via activity-dependent sequestration of PKA catalytic subunits. PLoS Biol 2021; 19:e3001191. [PMID: 33886552 PMCID: PMC8096101 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The Hedgehog (Hh) pathway is essential for organ development, homeostasis, and regeneration. Dysfunction of this cascade drives several cancers. To control expression of pathway target genes, the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) Smoothened (SMO) activates glioma-associated (GLI) transcription factors via an unknown mechanism. Here, we show that, rather than conforming to traditional GPCR signaling paradigms, SMO activates GLI by binding and sequestering protein kinase A (PKA) catalytic subunits at the membrane. This sequestration, triggered by GPCR kinase (GRK)-mediated phosphorylation of SMO intracellular domains, prevents PKA from phosphorylating soluble substrates, releasing GLI from PKA-mediated inhibition. Our work provides a mechanism directly linking Hh signal transduction at the membrane to GLI transcription in the nucleus. This process is more fundamentally similar between species than prevailing hypotheses suggest. The mechanism described here may apply broadly to other GPCR- and PKA-containing cascades in diverse areas of biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Corvin D. Arveseth
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - John T. Happ
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Danielle S. Hedeen
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Ju-Fen Zhu
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Jacob L. Capener
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Dana Klatt Shaw
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Ishan Deshpande
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jiahao Liang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Jiewei Xu
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Sara L. Stubben
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Isaac B. Nelson
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Madison F. Walker
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Kouki Kawakami
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Asuka Inoue
- Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Nevan J. Krogan
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - David J. Grunwald
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Ruth Hüttenhain
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Quantitative Biosciences Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
- J. David Gladstone Institutes, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Aashish Manglik
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - Benjamin R. Myers
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Department of Biochemistry, Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chaudhary PK, Kim S. The GRKs Reactome: Role in Cell Biology and Pathology. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22073375. [PMID: 33806057 PMCID: PMC8036551 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22073375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Revised: 03/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are protein kinases that function in concert with arrestins in the regulation of a diverse class of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) signaling. Although GRKs and arrestins are key participants in the regulation of GPCR cascades, the complex regulatory mechanisms of GRK expression, its alternation, and their function are not thoroughly understood. Several studies together with the work from our lab in recent years have revealed the critical role of these kinases in various physiological and pathophysiological processes, including cardiovascular biology, inflammation and immunity, neurodegeneration, thrombosis, and hemostasis. A comprehensive understanding of the mechanisms underlying functional interactions with multiple receptor proteins and how these interactions take part in the development of various pathobiological processes may give rise to novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. In this review, we summarize the current research linking the role of GRKs to various aspects of cell biology, pathology, and therapeutics, with a particular focus on thrombosis and hemostasis.
Collapse
|
7
|
The Open Question of How GPCRs Interact with GPCR Kinases (GRKs). Biomolecules 2021; 11:biom11030447. [PMID: 33802765 PMCID: PMC8002388 DOI: 10.3390/biom11030447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which regulate a vast number of eukaryotic processes, are desensitized by various mechanisms but, most importantly, by the GPCR kinases (GRKs). Ever since GRKs were first identified, investigators have sought to determine which structural features of GRKs are used to select for the agonist-bound states of GPCRs and how this binding event in turn enhances GRK catalytic activity. Despite a wealth of molecular information from high-resolution crystal structures of GRKs, the mechanisms driving activation have remained elusive, in part because the GRK N-terminus and active site tether region, previously proposed to serve as a receptor docking site and to be key to kinase domain closure, are often disordered or adopt inconsistent conformations. However, two recent studies have implicated other regions of GRKs as being involved in direct interactions with active GPCRs. Atomic resolution structures of GPCR–GRK complexes would help refine these models but are, so far, lacking. Here, we assess three distinct models for how GRKs recognize activated GPCRs, discuss limitations in the approaches used to generate them, and then experimentally test a hypothetical GPCR interaction site in GRK2 suggested by the two newest models.
Collapse
|
8
|
Targeting GRK5 for Treating Chronic Degenerative Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:ijms22041920. [PMID: 33671974 PMCID: PMC7919044 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22041920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell-surface receptors and they are responsible for the transduction of extracellular signals, regulating almost all aspects of mammalian physiology. These receptors are specifically regulated by a family of serine/threonine kinases, called GPCR kinases (GRKs). Given the biological role of GPCRs, it is not surprising that GRKs are also involved in several pathophysiological processes. Particular importance is emerging for GRK5, which is a multifunctional protein, expressed in different cell types, and it has been found located in single or multiple subcellular compartments. For instance, when anchored to the plasma membrane, GRK5 exerts its canonical function, regulating GPCRs. However, under certain conditions (e.g., pro-hypertrophic stimuli), GRK5 translocates to the nucleus of cells where it can interact with non-GPCR-related proteins as well as DNA itself to promote “non-canonical” signaling, including gene transcription. Importantly, due to these actions, several studies have demonstrated that GRK5 has a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of chronic-degenerative disorders. This is true in the cardiac cells, tumor cells, and neurons. For this reason, in this review article, we will inform the readers of the most recent evidence that supports the importance of targeting GRK5 to prevent the development or progression of cancer, cardiovascular, and neurological diseases.
Collapse
|
9
|
Gurevich EV, Gurevich VV. GRKs as Modulators of Neurotransmitter Receptors. Cells 2020; 10:cells10010052. [PMID: 33396400 PMCID: PMC7823573 DOI: 10.3390/cells10010052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 12/30/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Many receptors for neurotransmitters, such as dopamine, norepinephrine, acetylcholine, and neuropeptides, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A general model posits that GPCRs undergo two-step homologous desensitization: the active receptor is phosphorylated by kinases of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) family, whereupon arrestin proteins specifically bind active phosphorylated receptors, shutting down G protein-mediated signaling, facilitating receptor internalization, and initiating distinct signaling pathways via arrestin-based scaffolding. Here, we review the mechanisms of GRK-dependent regulation of neurotransmitter receptors, focusing on the diverse modes of GRK-mediated phosphorylation of receptor subtypes. The immediate signaling consequences of GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation, such as arrestin recruitment, desensitization, and internalization/resensitization, are equally diverse, depending not only on the receptor subtype but also on phosphorylation by GRKs of select receptor residues. We discuss the signaling outcome as well as the biological and behavioral consequences of the GRK-dependent phosphorylation of neurotransmitter receptors where known.
Collapse
|
10
|
Lavington S, Watts A. Lipid nanoparticle technologies for the study of G protein-coupled receptors in lipid environments. Biophys Rev 2020; 12:10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5. [PMID: 33215301 PMCID: PMC7755959 DOI: 10.1007/s12551-020-00775-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a large family of integral membrane proteins which conduct a wide range of biological roles and represent significant drug targets. Most biophysical and structural studies of GPCRs have been conducted on detergent-solubilised receptors, and it is clear that detergents can have detrimental effects on GPCR function. Simultaneously, there is increasing appreciation of roles for specific lipids in modulation of GPCR function. Lipid nanoparticles such as nanodiscs and styrene maleic acid lipid particles (SMALPs) offer opportunities to study integral membrane proteins in lipid environments, in a form that is soluble and amenable to structural and biophysical experiments. Here, we review the application of lipid nanoparticle technologies to the study of GPCRs, assessing the relative merits and limitations of each system. We highlight how these technologies can provide superior platforms to detergents for structural and biophysical studies of GPCRs and inform on roles for protein-lipid interactions in GPCR function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Lavington
- Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK
| | - Anthony Watts
- Biochemistry Department, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3QU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Naveenkumar N, Sowdhamini R, Srinivasan N. Specialized structural and functional roles of residues selectively conserved in subfamilies of the pleckstrin homology domain family. FEBS Open Bio 2019; 9:1848-1859. [PMID: 31436855 PMCID: PMC6823287 DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous domains embedded in multidomain proteins of different domain architectures (DA) may exhibit subtle, but important, differences in their structure and function. Here, we consider two multidomain proteins, Arf nucleotide binding site opener (ARNO) and G protein‐coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), which have very different DAs, but both contain pleckstrin homology (PH) domains. We analyzed the roles of residues selectively conserved in these subfamilies of PH domains from ARNO and GRK2 proteins. DA‐specific residues in PH domain are found to contribute to structural and functional specialization of ARNO and GRK2 in terms of (a) specific intra‐ and interprotein interactions; (b) specificity for phospholipids; and (c) participation in conformational excursions, leading to various functional forms. Our approach can also be applied to subfamilies of other protein families to identify subfamily‐specific residues and their specialized roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nagarajan Naveenkumar
- National Centre for Biological Sciences, TIFR, Bangalore, India.,Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India.,Molecular Biophysics Unit, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are classically known for their role in regulating the activity of the largest known class of membrane receptors, which influence diverse biological processes in every cell type in the human body. As researchers have tried to uncover how this family of kinases, containing only 7 members, achieves selective and coordinated control of receptors, they have uncovered a growing number of noncanonical activities for these kinases. These activities include phosphorylation of nonreceptor targets and kinase-independent molecular interactions. In particular, GRK2, GRK3, and GRK5 are the predominant members expressed in the heart. Their canonical and noncanonical actions within cardiac and other tissues have significant implications for cardiovascular function in healthy animals and for the development and progression of disease. This review summarizes what is currently known regarding the activity of these kinases, and particularly the role of GRK2 and GRK5 in the molecular alterations that occur during heart failure. This review further highlights areas of GRK regulation that remain poorly understood and how they may represent novel targets for therapeutic development.
Collapse
|
13
|
Steury MD, McCabe LR, Parameswaran N. G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases in the Inflammatory Response and Signaling. Adv Immunol 2017; 136:227-277. [PMID: 28950947 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ai.2017.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are serine/threonine kinases that regulate a large and diverse class of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Through GRK phosphorylation and β-arrestin recruitment, GPCRs are desensitized and their signal terminated. Recent work on these kinases has expanded their role from canonical GPCR regulation to include noncanonical regulation of non-GPCR and nonreceptor substrates through phosphorylation as well as via scaffolding functions. Owing to these and other regulatory roles, GRKs have been shown to play a critical role in the outcome of a variety of physiological and pathophysiological processes including chemotaxis, signaling, migration, inflammatory gene expression, etc. This diverse set of functions for these proteins makes them popular targets for therapeutics. Role for these kinases in inflammation and inflammatory disease is an evolving area of research currently pursued in many laboratories. In this review, we describe the current state of knowledge on various GRKs pertaining to their role in inflammation and inflammatory diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura R McCabe
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Penela P. Chapter Three - Ubiquitination and Protein Turnover of G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinases in GPCR Signaling and Cellular Regulation. PROGRESS IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE 2016; 141:85-140. [PMID: 27378756 DOI: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2016.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are responsible for regulating a wide variety of physiological processes, and distinct mechanisms for GPCR inactivation exist to guarantee correct receptor functionality. One of the widely used mechanisms is receptor phosphorylation by specific G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), leading to uncoupling from G proteins (desensitization) and receptor internalization. GRKs and β-arrestins also participate in the assembly of receptor-associated multimolecular complexes, thus initiating alternative G-protein-independent signaling events. In addition, the abundant GRK2 kinase has diverse "effector" functions in cellular migration, proliferation, and metabolism homeostasis by means of the phosphorylation or interaction with non-GPCR partners. Altered expression of GRKs (particularly of GRK2 and GRK5) occurs during pathological conditions characterized by impaired GPCR signaling including inflammatory syndromes, cardiovascular disease, and tumor contexts. It is increasingly appreciated that different pathways governing GRK protein stability play a role in the modulation of kinase levels in normal and pathological conditions. Thus, enhanced GRK2 degradation by the proteasome pathway occurs upon GPCR stimulation, what allows cellular adaptation to chronic stimulation in a physiological setting. β-arrestins participate in this process by facilitating GRK2 phosphorylation by different kinases and by recruiting diverse E3 ubiquitin ligase to the receptor complex. Different proteolytic systems (ubiquitin-proteasome, calpains), chaperone activities and signaling pathways influence the stability of GRKs in different ways, thus endowing specificity to GPCR regulation as protein turnover of GRKs can be differentially affected. Therefore, modulation of protein stability of GRKs emerges as a versatile mechanism for feedback regulation of GPCR signaling and basic cellular processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Penela
- Department of Molecular Biology and Centre of Molecular Biology "Severo Ochoa" (CSIC-UAM), Madrid, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain; Spain Health Research Institute The Princesa, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yang P, Homan KT, Li Y, Cruz-Rodríguez O, Tesmer JJG, Chen Z. Effect of Lipid Composition on the Membrane Orientation of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2-Gβ1γ2 Complex. Biochemistry 2016; 55:2841-8. [PMID: 27088923 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.6b00354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Interactions between proteins and cell membranes are critical for biological processes such as transmembrane signaling, and specific components of the membrane may play roles in helping to organize or mandate particular conformations of both integral and peripheral membrane proteins. One example of a signaling enzyme whose function is dependent on membrane binding and whose activity is affected by specific lipid components is G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase 2 (GRK2). Efficient GRK2-mediated phosphorylation of activated GPCRs is dependent not only on its recruitment to the membrane by heterotrimeric Gβγ subunits but also on the presence of highly negatively charged lipids, in particular phosphatidylinositol 4',5'-bisphosphate (PIP2). We hypothesized that PIP2 may favor a distinct orientation of the GRK2-Gβγ complex on the membrane that is more optimal for function. In this study, we compared the possible orientations of the GRK2-Gβγ complex and Gβγ alone on model cell membranes prepared with various anionic phospholipids as deduced from sum frequency generation vibrational and attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic methods. Our results indicate that PIP2 affects the membrane orientation of the GRK2-Gβ1γ2 complex but not that of complexes formed with anionic phospholipid binding deficient mutations in the GRK2 pleckstrin homology (PH) domain. Gβ1γ2 exhibits a similar orientation on the lipid bilayer regardless of its lipid composition. The PIP2-induced orientation of the GRK2-Gβ1γ2 complex is therefore most likely caused by specific interactions between PIP2 and the GRK2 PH domain. Thus, PIP2 not only helps recruit GRK2 to the membrane but also "fine tunes" the orientation of the GRK2-Gβγ complex so that it is better positioned to phosphorylate activated GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pei Yang
- Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan , 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Kristoff T Homan
- Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Yaoxin Li
- Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan , 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Osvaldo Cruz-Rodríguez
- Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States.,Ph.D. Program in Chemical Biology, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - John J G Tesmer
- Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Life Sciences Institute, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Zhan Chen
- Department of Chemistry, University of Michigan , 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zheng M, Zhang X, Guo S, Zhang X, Min C, Cheon SH, Oak MH, Kim YR, Kim KM. Agonist-induced changes in RalA activities allows the prediction of the endocytosis of G protein-coupled receptors. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR CELL RESEARCH 2015; 1863:77-90. [PMID: 26477566 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Revised: 10/10/2015] [Accepted: 10/13/2015] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
GTP binding proteins are classified into two families: heterotrimeric large G proteins which are composed of three subunits, and one subunit of small G proteins. Roles of small G proteins in the intracellular trafficking of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) were studied. Among various small G proteins tested, GTP-bound form (G23V) of RalA inhibited the internalization of dopamine D2 receptor independently of the previously reported downstream effectors of RalA, such as Ral-binding protein 1 and PLD. With high affinity for GRK2, active RalA inhibited the GPCR endocytosis by sequestering the GRK2 from receptors. When it was tested for several GPCRs including an endogenous GPCR, lysophosphatidic acid receptor 1, agonist-induced conversion of GTP-bound to GDP-bound RalA, which presumably releases the sequestered GRK2, was observed selectively with the GPCRs which have tendency to undergo endocytosis. Conversion of RalA from active to inactive state occurred by translocation of RGL, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor, from the plasma membrane to cytosol as a complex with Gβγ. These results suggest that agonist-induced Gβγ-mediated conversion of RalA from the GTP-bound form to the GDP-bound form could be a mechanism to facilitate agonist-induced internalization of GPCRs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mei Zheng
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Xiaohan Zhang
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Shuohan Guo
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Xiaowei Zhang
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Chengchun Min
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Hoon Cheon
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Ho Oak
- College of Pharmacy, Mokpo National University, Muan-gun, Jeollanamdo 534-729, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Ran Kim
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyeong-Man Kim
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Chonnam National University, Gwang-Ju 500-757, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are serine/threonine protein kinases originally discovered for their role in G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) phosphorylation. Recent studies have demonstrated a much broader function for this kinase family including phosphorylation of cytosolic substrates involved in cell signaling pathways stimulated by GPCRs, as well as by non-GPCRs. In addition, GRKs modulate signaling via phosphorylation-independent functions. Because of these various biochemical functions, GRKs have been shown to affect critical physiological and pathophysiological processes, and thus are considered as drug targets in diseases such as heart failure. Role of GRKs in inflammation and inflammatory diseases is an evolving area of research and several studies including work from our lab in the recent years have demonstrated critical role of GRKs in the immune system. In this review, we discuss the classical and the newly emerging functions of GRKs in the immune system and their role in inflammation and disease processes.
Collapse
|
18
|
Inagaki S, Ghirlando R, Vishnivetskiy SA, Homan KT, White JF, Tesmer JJG, Gurevich VV, Grisshammer R. G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2 (GRK2) and 5 (GRK5) Exhibit Selective Phosphorylation of the Neurotensin Receptor in Vitro. Biochemistry 2015; 54:4320-9. [PMID: 26120872 PMCID: PMC4512254 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
![]()
G protein-coupled
receptor kinases (GRKs) play an important role
in the desensitization of G protein-mediated signaling of G protein-coupled
receptors (GPCRs). The level of interest in mapping their phosphorylation
sites has increased because recent studies suggest that the differential
pattern of receptor phosphorylation has distinct biological consequences. In vitro phosphorylation experiments using well-controlled
systems are useful for deciphering the complexity of these physiological
reactions and understanding the targeted event. Here, we report on
the phosphorylation of the class A GPCR neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1)
by GRKs under defined experimental conditions afforded by nanodisc
technology. Phosphorylation of NTSR1 by GRK2 was agonist-dependent,
whereas phosphorylation by GRK5 occurred in an activation-independent
manner. In addition, the negatively charged lipids in the immediate
vicinity of NTSR1 directly affect phosphorylation by GRKs. Identification
of phosphorylation sites in agonist-activated NTSR1 revealed that
GRK2 and GRK5 target different residues located on the intracellular
receptor elements. GRK2 phosphorylates only the C-terminal Ser residues,
whereas GRK5 phosphorylates Ser and Thr residues located in intracellular
loop 3 and the C-terminus. Interestingly, phosphorylation assays using
a series of NTSR1 mutants show that GRK2 does not require acidic residues
upstream of the phospho-acceptors for site-specific phosphorylation,
in contrast to the β2-adrenergic and μ-opioid
receptors. Differential phosphorylation of GPCRs by GRKs is thought
to encode a particular signaling outcome, and our in vitro study revealed NTSR1 differential phosphorylation by GRK2 and GRK5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayaka Inagaki
- †Membrane Protein Structure Function Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
| | - Rodolfo Ghirlando
- ‡Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, United States
| | - Sergey A Vishnivetskiy
- §Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Kristoff T Homan
- ∥Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Jim F White
- †Membrane Protein Structure Function Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
| | - John J G Tesmer
- ∥Departments of Pharmacology and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
| | - Vsevolod V Gurevich
- §Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37232, United States
| | - Reinhard Grisshammer
- †Membrane Protein Structure Function Unit, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland 20852, United States
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sato PY, Chuprun JK, Schwartz M, Koch WJ. The evolving impact of g protein-coupled receptor kinases in cardiac health and disease. Physiol Rev 2015; 95:377-404. [PMID: 25834229 PMCID: PMC4551214 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00015.2014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are important regulators of various cellular functions via activation of intracellular signaling events. Active GPCR signaling is shut down by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and subsequent β-arrestin-mediated mechanisms including phosphorylation, internalization, and either receptor degradation or resensitization. The seven-member GRK family varies in their structural composition, cellular localization, function, and mechanism of action (see sect. II). Here, we focus our attention on GRKs in particular canonical and novel roles of the GRKs found in the cardiovascular system (see sects. III and IV). Paramount to overall cardiac function is GPCR-mediated signaling provided by the adrenergic system. Overstimulation of the adrenergic system has been highly implicated in various etiologies of cardiovascular disease including hypertension and heart failure. GRKs acting downstream of heightened adrenergic signaling appear to be key players in cardiac homeostasis and disease progression, and herein we review the current data on GRKs related to cardiac disease and discuss their potential in the development of novel therapeutic strategies in cardiac diseases including heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Priscila Y Sato
- Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| | - J Kurt Chuprun
- Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Mathew Schwartz
- Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Walter J Koch
- Center for Translational Medicine and Department of Pharmacology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Peptide substrates for G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. FEBS Lett 2014; 588:2129-32. [PMID: 24813628 DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2014] [Revised: 04/04/2014] [Accepted: 04/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) control the signaling and activation of G protein-coupled receptors through phosphorylation. In this study, consensus substrate motifs for GRK2 were identified from the sequences of GRK2 protein substrates, and 17 candidate peptides were synthesized to identify peptide substrates with high affinity for GRK2. GRK2 appears to require an acidic amino acid at the -2, -3, or -4 positions and its consensus phosphorylation site motifs were identified as (D/E)X1-3(S/T), (D/E)X1-3(S/T)(D/E), or (D/E)X0-2(D/E)(S/T). Among the 17 peptide substrates examined, a 13-amino-acid peptide fragment of β-tubulin (DEMEFTEAESNMN) showed the highest affinity for GRK2 (Km, 33.9 μM; Vmax, 0.35 pmol min(-1) mg(-1)), but very low affinity for GRK5. This peptide may be a useful tool for investigating cellular signaling pathways regulated by GRK2.
Collapse
|
21
|
Vasudevan NT, Mohan ML, Gupta MK, Martelli EE, Hussain AK, Qin Y, Chandrasekharan UM, Young D, Feldman AM, Sen S, Dorn GW, Dicorleto PE, Naga Prasad SV. Gβγ-independent recruitment of G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 drives tumor necrosis factor α-induced cardiac β-adrenergic receptor dysfunction. Circulation 2013; 128:377-87. [PMID: 23785004 DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα) induces β-adrenergic receptor (βAR) desensitization, but mechanisms proximal to the receptor in contributing to cardiac dysfunction are not known. METHODS AND RESULTS Two different proinflammatory transgenic mouse models with cardiac overexpression of myotrophin (a prohypertrophic molecule) or TNFα showed that TNFα alone is sufficient to mediate βAR desensitization as measured by cardiac adenylyl cyclase activity. M-mode echocardiography in these mouse models showed cardiac dysfunction paralleling βAR desensitization independent of sympathetic overdrive. TNFα-mediated βAR desensitization that precedes cardiac dysfunction is associated with selective upregulation of G-protein coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) in both mouse models. In vitro studies in β2AR-overexpressing human embryonic kidney 293 cells showed significant βAR desensitization, GRK2 upregulation, and recruitment to the βAR complex following TNFα. Interestingly, inhibition of phosphoinositide 3-kinase abolished GRK2-mediated βAR phosphorylation and GRK2 recruitment on TNFα. Furthermore, TNFα-mediated βAR phosphorylation was not blocked with βAR antagonist propranolol. Additionally, TNFα administration in transgenic mice with cardiac overexpression of Gβγ-sequestering peptide βARK-ct could not prevent βAR desensitization or cardiac dysfunction showing that GRK2 recruitment to the βAR is Gβγ independent. Small interfering RNA knockdown of GRK2 resulted in the loss of TNFα-mediated βAR phosphorylation. Consistently, cardiomyocytes from mice with cardiac-specific GRK2 ablation normalized the TNFα-mediated loss in contractility, showing that TNFα-induced βAR desensitization is GRK2 dependent. CONCLUSIONS TNFα-induced βAR desensitization is mediated by GRK2 and is independent of Gβγ, uncovering a hitherto unknown cross-talk between TNFα and βAR function, providing the underpinnings of inflammation-mediated cardiac dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neelakantan T Vasudevan
- Department of Molecular Cardiology, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Williams JT, Ingram SL, Henderson G, Chavkin C, von Zastrow M, Schulz S, Koch T, Evans CJ, Christie MJ. Regulation of μ-opioid receptors: desensitization, phosphorylation, internalization, and tolerance. Pharmacol Rev 2013; 65:223-54. [PMID: 23321159 DOI: 10.1124/pr.112.005942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 593] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Morphine and related µ-opioid receptor (MOR) agonists remain among the most effective drugs known for acute relief of severe pain. A major problem in treating painful conditions is that tolerance limits the long-term utility of opioid agonists. Considerable effort has been expended on developing an understanding of the molecular and cellular processes that underlie acute MOR signaling, short-term receptor regulation, and the progression of events that lead to tolerance for different MOR agonists. Although great progress has been made in the past decade, many points of contention and controversy cloud the realization of this progress. This review attempts to clarify some confusion by clearly defining terms, such as desensitization and tolerance, and addressing optimal pharmacological analyses for discerning relative importance of these cellular mechanisms. Cellular and molecular mechanisms regulating MOR function by phosphorylation relative to receptor desensitization and endocytosis are comprehensively reviewed, with an emphasis on agonist-biased regulation and areas where knowledge is lacking or controversial. The implications of these mechanisms for understanding the substantial contribution of MOR signaling to opioid tolerance are then considered in detail. While some functional MOR regulatory mechanisms contributing to tolerance are clearly understood, there are large gaps in understanding the molecular processes responsible for loss of MOR function after chronic exposure to opioids. Further elucidation of the cellular mechanisms that are regulated by opioids will be necessary for the successful development of MOR-based approaches to new pain therapeutics that limit the development of tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John T Williams
- Vollum Institute, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Gurevich EV, Tesmer JJG, Mushegian A, Gurevich VV. G protein-coupled receptor kinases: more than just kinases and not only for GPCRs. Pharmacol Ther 2011; 133:40-69. [PMID: 21903131 DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2011.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 319] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2011] [Accepted: 08/01/2011] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) are best known for their role in homologous desensitization of GPCRs. GRKs phosphorylate activated receptors and promote high affinity binding of arrestins, which precludes G protein coupling. GRKs have a multidomain structure, with the kinase domain inserted into a loop of a regulator of G protein signaling homology domain. Unlike many other kinases, GRKs do not need to be phosphorylated in their activation loop to achieve an activated state. Instead, they are directly activated by docking with active GPCRs. In this manner they are able to selectively phosphorylate Ser/Thr residues on only the activated form of the receptor, unlike related kinases such as protein kinase A. GRKs also phosphorylate a variety of non-GPCR substrates and regulate several signaling pathways via direct interactions with other proteins in a phosphorylation-independent manner. Multiple GRK subtypes are present in virtually every animal cell, with the highest expression levels found in neurons, with their extensive and complex signal regulation. Insufficient or excessive GRK activity was implicated in a variety of human disorders, ranging from heart failure to depression to Parkinson's disease. As key regulators of GPCR-dependent and -independent signaling pathways, GRKs are emerging drug targets and promising molecular tools for therapy. Targeted modulation of expression and/or of activity of several GRK isoforms for therapeutic purposes was recently validated in cardiac disorders and Parkinson's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenia V Gurevich
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, 2200 Pierce Avenue, Preston Research Building, Rm. 454, Nashville, TN 37232, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
In the human body, over 1000 different G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate a broad spectrum of extracellular signals at the plasma membrane, transmitting vital physiological features such as pain, sight, smell, inflammation, heart rate and contractility of muscle cells. Signaling through these receptors is primarily controlled and regulated by a group of kinases, the GPCR kinases (GRKs), of which only seven are known and thus, interference with these common downstream GPCR regulators suggests a powerful therapeutic strategy. Molecular modulation of the kinases that are ubiquitously expressed in the heart has proven GRK2, and also GRK5, to be promising targets for prevention and reversal of one of the most severe pathologies in man, chronic heart failure (HF). In this article we will focus on the structural aspects of these GRKs important for their physiological and pathological regulation as well as well known and novel therapeutic approaches that target these GRKs in order to overcome the development of cardiac injury and progression of HF.
Collapse
|
25
|
Regulation of G-protein signaling by RKTG via sequestration of the G betagamma subunit to the Golgi apparatus. Mol Cell Biol 2010; 30:78-90. [PMID: 19884349 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01038-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Upon ligand binding, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) impart the signal to heterotrimeric G proteins composed of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits, leading to dissociation of the G alpha subunit from the G betagamma subunit. While the G alpha subunit is imperative for downstream signaling, the G betagamma subunit, in its own right, mediates a variety of cellular responses such as GPCR desensitization via recruiting GRK to the plasma membrane and AKT stimulation. Here we report a mode of spatial regulation of the G betagamma subunit through alteration in subcellular compartmentation. RKTG (Raf kinase trapping to Golgi apparatus) is a newly characterized membrane protein specifically localized at the Golgi apparatus. The N terminus of RKTG interacts with G beta and tethers G betagamma to the Golgi apparatus. Overexpression of RKTG impedes the interaction of G betagamma with GRK2, abrogates the ligand-induced change of subcellular distribution of GRK2, reduces isoproterenol-stimulated phosphorylation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta 2AR), and alters beta 2AR desensitization. In addition, RKTG inhibits G betagamma- and ligand-mediated AKT phosphorylation that is enhanced in cells with downregulation of RKTG. Silencing of RKTG also alters GRK2 internalization and compromises ligand-induced G beta translocation to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results reveal that RKTG can modulate GPCR signaling through sequestering G betagamma to the Golgi apparatus and thereby attenuating the functions of G betagamma.
Collapse
|
26
|
Kahsai AW, Zhu S, Fenteany G. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 activates radixin, regulating membrane protrusion and motility in epithelial cells. BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-MOLECULAR CELL RESEARCH 2009; 1803:300-10. [PMID: 19913059 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2009.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2009] [Revised: 11/03/2009] [Accepted: 11/04/2009] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins are membrane-cytoskeleton linkers that also have roles in signal transduction. Here we show that G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) regulates membrane protrusion and cell migration during wound closure in Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) epithelial cell monolayers at least partly through activating phosphorylation of radixin on a conserved, regulatory C-terminal Thr residue. GRK2 phosphorylated radixin exclusively on Thr 564 in vitro. Expression of a phosphomimetic (Thr-564-to-Asp) mutant of radixin resulted in increased Rac1 activity, membrane protrusion and cell motility in MDCK cells, suggesting that radixin functions "upstream" of Rac1, presumably as a scaffolding protein. Phosphorylation of ERM proteins was highest during the most active phase of epithelial cell sheet migration over the course of wound closure. In view of these results, we explored the mode of action of quinocarmycin/quinocarcin analog DX-52-1, an inhibitor of cell migration and radixin function with considerable selectivity for radixin over the other ERM proteins, finding that its mechanism of inhibition of radixin does not appear to involve binding and antagonism at the site of regulatory phosphorylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alem W Kahsai
- Department of Chemistry, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Huang CC, Yoshino-Koh K, Tesmer JJG. A surface of the kinase domain critical for the allosteric activation of G protein-coupled receptor kinases. J Biol Chem 2009; 284:17206-17215. [PMID: 19364770 PMCID: PMC2719358 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m809544200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2008] [Revised: 03/10/2009] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate activated GPCRs and initiate their desensitization. Many prior studies suggest that activated GPCRs dock to an allosteric site on the GRKs and thereby stimulate kinase activity. The extreme N-terminal region of GRKs is clearly involved in this process, but its role is not understood. Using our recent structure of bovine GRK1 as a guide, we generated mutants of solvent-exposed residues in the GRK1 kinase domain that are conserved among GRKs but not in the extended protein kinase A, G, and C family and evaluated their catalytic activity. Mutation of select residues in strands beta1 and beta3 of the kinase small lobe, alphaD of the kinase large lobe, and the protein kinase A, G, and C kinase C-tail greatly impaired receptor phosphorylation. The most dramatic effect was observed for mutation of an invariant arginine on the beta1-strand (approximately 1000-fold decrease in k(cat)/K(m)). These residues form a continuous surface that is uniquely available in GRKs for protein-protein interactions. Surprisingly, these mutants, as well as a 19-amino acid N-terminal truncation of GRK1, also show decreased catalytic efficiency for peptide substrates, although to a lesser extent than for receptor phosphorylation. Our data suggest that the N-terminal region and the newly identified surface interact and stabilize the closed, active conformation of the kinase domain. Receptor binding is proposed to promote this interaction, thereby enhancing GRK activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chih-Chin Huang
- From the Life Sciences Institute, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2216
| | - Kae Yoshino-Koh
- From the Life Sciences Institute, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2216
| | - John J G Tesmer
- From the Life Sciences Institute, Department of Pharmacology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2216.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Kageyama K, Suda T. Role and action in the pituitary corticotroph of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in the hypothalamus. Peptides 2009; 30:810-6. [PMID: 19124055 DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2008] [Revised: 12/04/2008] [Accepted: 12/04/2008] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), produced in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus (PVN) in response to stress, stimulates the synthesis and secretion of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) via CRF receptor type 1 (CRF(1) receptor) in the anterior pituitary (AP) of mammals. CRF is critical for the circadian rhythmicity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and the augmented release of ACTH from the pituitary in response to the stress. A higher molecular weight form of immunoreactive beta-endorphin, putative proopiomelanocortin (POMC), is increased in CRF-knockout mice (CRF KO), suggesting the important role of CRF in the processing of POMC. In fact, CRF is able to modulate the processing of POMC through changes in prohormone convertase (PC)-1 expression levels. Multiple forms of ACTH-related peptides containing unprocessed ones are present in some cases of ACTH-producing tumors, presumably without action of PC-1 under the control of CRF. Following CRF-activated stimulation of the receptor signaling, CRF(1) receptor is down-regulated and desensitized. In fact, CRF facilitates the degradation of CRF(1) receptor mRNA via the protein kinase A pathway. Prolonged agonist activation of CRF(1) receptor leads to a loss of responsiveness, or desensitization of the receptor. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 is involved in desensitization of CRF(1) receptor by CRF in the corticotroph.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kageyama
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Zaifu-cho, Aomori, Japan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
|
30
|
Tran TM, Jorgensen R, Clark RB. Phosphorylation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor in plasma membranes by intrinsic GRK5. Biochemistry 2007; 46:14438-49. [PMID: 18034461 DOI: 10.1021/bi700922h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Characterization of the GRKs participating in the phosphorylation of the beta2-adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) have in part been limited by the lack of a simple cell-free assay with membrane-bound beta2AR and GRKs. We describe here a cell-free assay for GRK phosphorylation of the beta2AR in a postnuclear 600g fraction and washed membranes by intrinsic GRK activity using the GRK phosphosite-specific antibody that recognizes pS(355,356). Treatment of these cell-free preparations with 1.0 microM isoproterenol (ISO) caused a rapid maximal 10-15-fold increase in GRK site phosphorylation of the beta2AR (t1/2 = 1 min) with an EC50 for ISO stimulation of approximately 80 nM. Extensively washed plasma membrane fractions retained the 10-15-fold ISO stimulation of GRK site phosphorylation and GRK5 levels while being depleted of GRK2 and GRK6. Stimulation of GRK site phosphorylation by a range of partial agonists correlated well with their intrinsic efficacy for stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. GRK phosphorylation of the beta2AR in the washed membrane fraction caused minimal desensitization of ISO stimulation of adenylyl cyclase activity. Association of GRK5 with the beta2AR in intact cells was demonstrated by a high level of basal BRET2 using beta2AR-Rluc and GRK5-GFP2 that was not diminished by agonist stimulation. BRET2 between the beta2AR-Rluc and GFP2-betaarrestin 2 was increased by agonist, whereas BRET2 between the beta2AR and GRK2-GFP2 was not significant. On the basis of the level of GRK5-mediated phosphorylation we observe in isolated membrane fractions and co-localization of the beta2AR and GRK5, we conclude that GRK5 plays a distinctive role in the phosphorylation of the beta2AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tuan M Tran
- The University of Texas Health Science Center Houston, P.O Box 20708, Houston, Texas 77225, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sherrill JD, Miller WE. Desensitization of herpesvirus-encoded G protein-coupled receptors. Life Sci 2007; 82:125-34. [PMID: 18054964 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2007.10.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2007] [Revised: 10/15/2007] [Accepted: 10/31/2007] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Members of the herpesvirus family, including human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV/HHV-8), encode G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) homologs, which strongly activate classical G protein signal transduction networks within the cell. In animal models of herpesvirus infection, the viral GPCRs appear to play physiologically important roles by enabling viral replication within tropic tissues and by promoting reactivation from latency. While a number of studies have defined intracellular signaling pathways activated by herpesviral GPCRs, it remains unclear if their physiological function is subjected to the process of desensitization as observed for cellular GPCRs. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK) and arrestin proteins have been recently implicated in regulating viral GPCR signaling; however, the role that these desensitization proteins play in viral GPCR function in vivo remains unknown. Here, we review what is currently known regarding viral GPCR desensitization and discuss potential biological ramifications of viral GPCR regulation by the host cell desensitization machinery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph D Sherrill
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0524, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Sherrill JD, Miller WE. G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase 2 regulates agonist-independent Gq/11 signaling from the mouse cytomegalovirus GPCR M33. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:39796-805. [PMID: 17088245 PMCID: PMC2767100 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m610026200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The mouse cytomegalovirus M33 protein is highly homologous to mammalian G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) yet functions in an agonist-independent manner to activate a number of classical GPCR signal transduction pathways. M33 is functionally similar to the human cytomegalovirus-encoded US28 GPCR in its ability to induce inositol phosphate accumulation, activate NF-kappaB, and promote smooth muscle cell migration. This ability to promote cellular migration suggests a role for viral GPCRs like M33 in viral dissemination in vivo, and accordingly, M33 is required for efficient murine cytomegalovirus replication in the mouse. Although previous studies have identified several M33-induced signaling pathways, little is known regarding the membrane-proximal events involved in signaling and regulation of this receptor. In this study, we used recombinant retroviruses to express M33 in wild-type and Galpha(q/11)(-/-) mouse embryonic fibroblasts and show that M33 couples directly to the G(q/11) signaling pathway to induce high levels of total inositol phosphates in an agonist-independent manner. Our data also show that GRK2 is a potent regulator of M33-induced G(q/11) signaling through its ability to phosphorylate M33 and sequester Galpha(q/11) proteins. Taken together, the results from this study provide the first genetic evidence of a viral GPCR coupling to a specific G protein signaling pathway as well as identify the first viral GPCR to be regulated specifically by both the catalytic activity of the GRK2 kinase domain and the Galpha(q/11) binding activity of the GRK2 RH domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William E. Miller
- To whom correspondence should be addressed: Dept. of Molecular Genetics, Biochemistry, and Microbiology, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0524. Tel.: 513-558-0866; Fax: 513-558-8474;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Hansen JL, Theilade J, Aplin M, Sheikh SP. Role of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 in the heart--do regulatory mechanisms open novel therapeutic perspectives? Trends Cardiovasc Med 2006; 16:169-77. [PMID: 16781951 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2006.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2006] [Revised: 03/03/2006] [Accepted: 03/09/2006] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
G-protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 2 regulates a plethora of cellular processes, including cardiac expression and function of key seven-transmembrane receptors (7TM receptors) such as the beta-adrenergic and angiotensin receptors (Penela P, Murga C, Ribas C, et al.: 2006. Mechanisms of regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases [GRKs] and cardiovascular disease. Cardiovasc Res 69:46-56, Rockman HA, Koch WJ, Lefkowitz RJ: 2002. Seven-transmembrane-spanning receptors and heart function. Nature 415:206-212). Interestingly, these two G-protein-coupled receptor systems are targeted by modern heart failure treatment including beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers. Although GRK2 is ubiquitously expressed, its particular importance in the heart has been demonstrated by interesting phenotypes of genetically altered mice that suggest GRK2 inhibition can ameliorate heart failure. In essence, this work suggests GRK2 could be an endogenous receptor blocker targeting both the beta-adrenergic and angiotensin receptors in the heart. This notion immediately suggests it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms that regulate GRK2 activity in the heart. In this review, we provide a detailed presentation of the tight regulation of GRK2 expression levels and protein activity, and we discuss the cardiovascular GRK2 functions and possible therapeutic perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Lerche Hansen
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, H:S Rigshospitalet 9312, Department of Medicine B, University of Copenhagen, Juliane Mariesvej 20, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kageyama K, Hanada K, Moriyama T, Nigawara T, Sakihara S, Suda T. G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 involvement in desensitization of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1 by CRF in murine corticotrophs. Endocrinology 2006; 147:441-50. [PMID: 16195412 DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-0376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Hypothalamic CRF stimulates synthesis and secretion of ACTH via CRF receptor type 1 (CRFR1) in the anterior pituitary gland. After agonist-activated stimulation of receptor signaling, CRFR1 is down-regulated and desensitized. Generally, it is thought that G protein-coupled receptors may be desensitized by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). However, the role of GRKs in corticotropic cells has not been determined. In this study we focused on involvement of GRKs in desensitization of CRFR1 by CRF in corticotropic cells. We found that GRK2 (but not GRK3) mRNA and protein were expressed in rat anterior pituitary cells and AtT-20 cells (a line of mouse corticotroph tumor cells). To determine the role of GRK2 in CRF-induced desensitization of CRFR1 in mouse corticotrophs, AtT-20 cells were transfected with a dominant-negative mutant GRK2 construct. CRF desensitized the cAMP-dependent response by CRFR1. Desensitization of CRFR1 by CRF was significantly less in AtT-20 cells transfected with the dominant-negative mutant GRK2 construct compared with desensitization in control (an empty vector-transfected) AtT-20 cells. Furthermore, pretreatment with a protein kinase A inhibitor also partially blocked desensitization of CRFR1 by CRF. These results suggest that GRK2 is involved in CRF-induced desensitization of CRFR1 in AtT-20 cells, and the protein kinase A pathway may also have an important role in desensitization of CRFR1 by CRF seen in corticotropic cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazunori Kageyama
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism, and Infectious Diseases, Hirosaki University School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Aomori 036-8562, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Premont RT. Once and future signaling: G protein-coupled receptor kinase control of neuronal sensitivity. Neuromolecular Med 2005; 7:129-47. [PMID: 16052042 DOI: 10.1385/nmm:7:1-2:129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2005] [Accepted: 03/02/2005] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most numerous class of cell surface receptor, and substances acting through GPCRs mediate many critical signaling events and physiological processes. GPCR sensitivity and signaling is dynamic, responding rapidly to adjust to changes in the ambient level of stimulation of target cells. One important mediator of such receptor sensitivity is the family of GPCR kinases (GRKs). Like heterotrimeric G proteins, GRKs recognize agonist-bound, activated receptors, and this recognition promotes catalytic activation of GRKs, resulting in the preferential phosphorylation of activated receptors. GRK-phosphorylated receptors are then targeted by arrestin proteins, which bind to phosphorylated receptors. Arrestin-bound receptors are uncoupled from heterotrimeric G proteins, resulting in decreased sensitivity to further receptor stimulation (desensitization). Arrestin-bound receptors are also accelerated into internalization pathways and linked to distinct arrestin-mediated signaling pathways. GRKs thus serve as gatekeepers for receptors, terminating some signaling pathways and initiating others. One major outstanding question concerning GRKs understanding the mechanisms by which any particular receptor subtype (of the 800 or so in the body) is regulated by a specific GRK(s), and the consequences of this specificity. An understanding of this regulatory specificity could allow targeting of GRK function to ameliorate diseases involving GPCR dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard T Premont
- Liver Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Charbonneau A, Melancon A, Lavoie C, Lavoie JM. Alterations in hepatic glucagon receptor density and in Gsalpha and Gialpha2 protein content with diet-induced hepatic steatosis: effects of acute exercise. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2005; 289:E8-14. [PMID: 15687107 DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00570.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to test the hypothesis that a high-fat diet-induced liver lipid infiltration is associated with a reduction of hepatic glucagon receptor density (B(max)) and affinity (K(d)), and with a decrease in stimulatory G protein (G(s)alpha) content while enhancing inhibitory G protein (G(i)alpha(2)) expression. We also hypothesized that, under this dietary condition, a single bout of endurance exercise would restore hepatic glucagon receptor parameters and G protein expression to standard levels. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were fed either a standard (SD) or a high-fat diet (HF; 40% kcal) for 2 wk (n = 20 rats/group). Each dietary group was thereafter subdivided into a nonexercised (Rest) and an acute-exercised group (Ac-Ex). The acute exercise consisted of a single bout of endurance exercise on a treadmill (30 min, 26 m/min, and 0% slope) immediately before being killed. The HF compared with the SD diet was associated with significantly (P < 0.05) higher values in hepatic triglyceride concentrations (123%), fat pad weight, and plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentrations. The HF diet also resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) lower hepatic glucagon receptor density (45%) and G(s)alpha protein content (75%), as well as higher (P < 0.05) G(i)alpha(2) protein content (27%), with no significant effects on glucagon receptor affinity. Comparisons of all individual liver triglyceride and B(max) values revealed that liver triglycerides were highly (P < 0.003) predictive of the decreased glucagon receptor density (R = -0.512). Although the 30-min exercise bout resulted in some typical exercise effects (P < 0.05), such as an increase in FFA (SD diet), a decrease in insulin levels, and an increase in plasma glucagon concentrations (SD diet), it did not change any of the responses related to liver glucagon receptors and G proteins, with the exception of a significant (P < 0.05) decrease in G(i)alpha(2) protein content under the HF diet. The present results indicate that the feeding of an HF diet is associated with a reduction in plasma membrane hepatic glucagon receptor density and G(s)alpha protein content, which is not attenuated by a 30-min exercise bout. It is suggested that liver lipid infiltration plays a role in reducing glucagon action in the liver through a reduction in glucagon receptor density and glucagon-mediated signal transduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Charbonneau
- Département de Kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3C 3J7
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lodowski DT, Barnhill JF, Pyskadlo RM, Ghirlando R, Sterne-Marr R, Tesmer JJG. The Role of Gβγ and Domain Interfaces in the Activation of G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 2†. Biochemistry 2005; 44:6958-70. [PMID: 15865441 DOI: 10.1021/bi050119q] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In response to extracellular signals, G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) catalyze guanine nucleotide exchange on Galpha subunits, enabling both activated Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits to target downstream effector enzymes. One target of Gbetagamma is G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), an enzyme that initiates homologous desensitization by phosphorylating activated GPCRs. GRK2 consists of three distinct domains: an RGS homology (RH) domain, a protein kinase domain, and a pleckstrin homology (PH) domain, through which it binds Gbetagamma. The crystal structure of the GRK2-Gbetagamma complex revealed that the domains of GRK2 are intimately associated and left open the possibility for allosteric regulation by Gbetagamma. In this paper, we report the 4.5 A structure of GRK2, which shows that the binding of Gbetagamma does not induce large domain rearrangements in GRK2, although small rotations of the RH and PH domains relative to the kinase domain are evident. Mutation of residues within the larger domain interfaces of GRK2 generally leads to diminished expression and activity, suggesting that these interfaces are important for stability and remain intact upon activation of GRK2. Geranylgeranylated Gbetagamma, but not a soluble mutant of Gbetagamma, protects GRK2 from clostripain digestion at a site within its kinase domain that is 80 A away from the Gbetagamma binding site. Equilibrium ultracentrifugation experiments indicate that neither abnormally large detergent micelles nor protein oligomerization can account for the observed protection. The Gbetagamma-mediated binding of GRK2 to CHAPS micelles or lipid bilayers therefore appears to rigidify the kinase domain, perhaps by encouraging stable contacts between the RH and kinase domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Lodowski
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, 78712-0165, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Penela P, Ribas C, Mayor F. Mechanisms of regulation of the expression and function of G protein-coupled receptor kinases. Cell Signal 2004; 15:973-81. [PMID: 14499340 DOI: 10.1016/s0898-6568(03)00099-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 204] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are key modulators of G protein-coupled receptor signalling. Increasing evidence points to the occurrence of complex mechanisms able to modulate the subcellular localization, activity and expression levels of GRKs, revealing new functional interactions of these kinases with different cellular proteins and transduction cascades. GRK activity and subcellular targeting is tightly regulated by interaction with receptor domains, G protein subunits, lipids, anchoring proteins, caveolin and calcium-sensing proteins. In addition, GRK phosphorylation by several other kinases has recently been shown to modulate its functionality, thus putting forward new feedback mechanisms connecting different signalling pathways to G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) regulation. On the other hand, the mechanisms governing GRK expression at both transcriptional and protein stability levels are just beginning to be unveiled. Namely, GRK2 has been shown to be rapidly degraded by the proteasome pathway in a process dependent on beta-arrestin and c-Src function, and also to be proteolyzed by m-calpain. A better knowledge of GRK regulatory mechanisms would contribute to greater understanding of GRK physiological function and also its reported alterations in different pathological situations, such as congestive heart failure, hypertension or inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petronila Penela
- Departamento de Biología Molecular, Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Celver J, Xu M, Jin W, Lowe J, Chavkin C. Distinct domains of the mu-opioid receptor control uncoupling and internalization. Mol Pharmacol 2004; 65:528-37. [PMID: 14978231 DOI: 10.1124/mol.65.3.528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous desensitization of the micro opioid receptor (muOR) can be resolved into distinct processes that include the uncoupling of the muOR from its G-protein effectors and internalization of cell surface receptors. Using electrophysiological recordings of muOR activation of G-protein-coupled K+ channels (Kir3) in Xenopus laevis oocytes and AtT20 cells, confocal microscopy of receptor localization, and radioligand binding of cell surface receptors, we resolved these desensitization mechanisms to determine the domain of muOR important for receptor uncoupling. Activation of muOR by saturating concentrations of [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO), methadone, or fentanyl, but not morphine, produced robust internalization of a green fluorescent protein-tagged muOR. A subsaturating concentration of DAMGO (100 nM) did not cause receptor internalization but markedly reduced the subsequent responsiveness of Kir3 by uncoupling muOR. muOR desensitization in AtT20 cells was confirmed to be homologous, because desensitization by 100 nM DAMGO was blocked by dominant-negative forms of either G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) or arrestin, and pretreatment with DAMGO did not affect the Kir3 response to somatostatin receptor activation. Alanine substitution of a single threonine in the second cytoplasmic loop of the muOR (Threonine 180) blocked agonist-dependent receptor uncoupling without affecting receptor internalization. These results suggest that GRK-dependent phosphorylation of muOR required threonine 180 for uncoupling but that a different GRK and arrestin-dependent mechanism controlled muOR internalization in AtT20 cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Celver
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington 98195-7280, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Sarnago S, Roca R, de Blasi A, Valencia A, Mayor F, Murga C. Involvement of intramolecular interactions in the regulation of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2. Mol Pharmacol 2003; 64:629-39. [PMID: 12920199 DOI: 10.1124/mol.64.3.629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) kinase GRK2 phosphorylates G protein-coupled receptors in an agonist-dependent manner. GRK2 activity is modulated through interactions of diverse domains of the kinase with G protein betagamma subunits, several lipids, anchoring proteins, and activated receptors. We report that kinase activity toward either GPCR (rhodopsin) or a synthetic peptide substrate is enhanced in the presence of GST-GRK2 fusion proteins or peptides corresponding to either N- or C-terminal sequences of GRK2. This direct stimulatory action of intrinsic domains on GRK2 activity does not add to the effect of other regulators, such as Gbetagamma subunits, and strongly suggests the existence of some mode of autoregulation. The existence of regulatory intramolecular interactions in GRK2 is supported by the facts that a C-terminal peptide protects the N-terminal region from proteolytic cleavage and that two domains of GRK2 independently coexpressed in cells associate as assessed by immunoprecipitation. Molecular modeling suggests that intramolecular interactions among the N-terminal, C-terminal and kinase domains would keep GRK2 in a constrained conformation characteristic of an inactive, basal state. Our model proposes that disruption of such intramolecular contacts by intermolecular interactions with regulatory proteins (mimicked by exogenously added kinase fragments in vitro) would promote the conformational changes required to bring about GRK2 translocation and activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Sarnago
- Centro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lodowski DT, Pitcher JA, Capel WD, Lefkowitz RJ, Tesmer JJG. Keeping G proteins at bay: a complex between G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 and Gbetagamma. Science 2003; 300:1256-62. [PMID: 12764189 DOI: 10.1126/science.1082348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 307] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The phosphorylation of heptahelical receptors by heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) is a universal regulatory mechanism that leads to desensitization of G protein signaling and to the activation of alternative signaling pathways. We determined the crystallographic structure of bovine GRK2 in complex with G protein beta1gamma2 subunits. Our results show how the three domains of GRK2-the RGS (regulator of G protein signaling) homology, protein kinase, and pleckstrin homology domains-integrate their respective activities and recruit the enzyme to the cell membrane in an orientation that not only facilitates receptor phosphorylation, but also allows for the simultaneous inhibition of signaling by Galpha and Gbetagamma subunits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David T Lodowski
- Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Mak JCW, Hisada T, Salmon M, Barnes PJ, Chung KF. Glucocorticoids reverse IL-1beta-induced impairment of beta-adrenoceptor-mediated relaxation and up-regulation of G-protein-coupled receptor kinases. Br J Pharmacol 2002; 135:987-96. [PMID: 11861327 PMCID: PMC1573209 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0704545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
1. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of glucocorticoid dexamethasone on airway responsiveness to albuterol after intratracheal instillation of saline or IL-1beta in Brown-Norway rats in vivo and to elucidate the molecular mechanism of this effect. 2. IL-1beta caused a significant reduction in albuterol-mediated relaxation to protect against MCh-induced bronchoconstriction. Dexamethasone attenuated the IL-1beta-induced impaired relaxation while alone had no effect when compared to rats treated identically with saline. 3. The density of beta(2)-adrenoceptors was significantly reduced in lung membranes harvested from IL-1beta-treated rats, which was associated with impaired isoproterenol- and forskolin-stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation and adenylyl cyclase (AC) activity ex vivo. Dexamethasone did not prevent IL-1beta-induced down-regulation of beta(2)-adrenoceptors but completely blocked IL-1beta-induced impairment of cyclic AMP accumulation and AC activity stimulated by isoproterenol and forskolin. 4. The inhibitory G-protein subtypes, G(ialpha1), G(ialpha2) and G(ialpha3), were detected in lung membranes prepared from all groups of rats but the intensity of G(ialpha1) and G(ialpha2) was markedly increased in IL-1beta-treated rats, which were not prevented by dexamethasone. 5. The activity of cytosolic GRK and the expression of GRK2 and GRK5 were elevated in the lung of IL-1beta-treated rats, which were completely abolished by dexamethasone. 6. These results indicate that treatment of rats with IL-1beta results in desensitization of pulmonary beta(2)-adrenoceptors. In light of data obtained in this study, we propose that both the decrease in AC activity and the increase in GRK activity, which are reversed by dexamethasone, may underlie beta(2)-adrenoceptor desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith C W Mak
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY
| | - Takeshi Hisada
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY
| | - Michael Salmon
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY
| | - Peter J Barnes
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY
| | - K Fan Chung
- Department of Thoracic Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College School of Medicine, Dovehouse Street, London SW3 6LY
- Author for correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Murray D, McLaughlin S, Honig B. The role of electrostatic interactions in the regulation of the membrane association of G protein beta gamma heterodimers. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:45153-9. [PMID: 11557749 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m101784200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
In this paper we report calculations of electrostatic interactions between the transducin (G(t)) betagamma heterodimer (G(t)betagamma) and phospholipid membranes. Although membrane association of G(t)betagamma is due primarily to the hydrophobic penetration into the membrane interior of a farnesyl chain attached to the gamma subunit, structural studies have revealed that there is a prominent patch of basic residues on the surface of the beta subunit surrounding the site of farnesylation that is exposed upon dissociation from the G(t)alpha subunit. Moreover, phosducin, which produces dissociation of G(t)betagamma from membranes, interacts directly with G(t)betagamma and introduces a cluster of acidic residues into this region. The calculations, which are based on the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann method, account for a number of experimental observations and suggest that charged residues play a role in mediating protein-membrane interactions. Specifically, the calculations predict the following. 1) Favorable electrostatic interactions enhance the membrane partitioning due to the farnesyl group by an order of magnitude although G(t)betagamma has a large net negative charge (-12). 2) This electrostatic attraction positions G(t)betagamma so that residues implicated in mediating the interaction of G(t)betagamma with its membrane-bound effectors are close to the membrane surface. 3) The binding of phosducin to G(t)betagamma diminishes the membrane partitioning of G(t)betagamma by an order of magnitude. 4) Lowering the ionic strength of the solution converts the electrostatic attraction into a repulsion. Sequence analysis and homology model building suggest that our conclusions may be generalized to other Gbetagamma and phosducin isoforms as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Murray
- Department of Biochemistry, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Claing A, Chen W, Miller WE, Vitale N, Moss J, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. beta-Arrestin-mediated ADP-ribosylation factor 6 activation and beta 2-adrenergic receptor endocytosis. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:42509-13. [PMID: 11533043 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m108399200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 189] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
beta-Arrestins are multifunctional adaptor proteins known to regulate internalization of agonist-stimulated G protein-coupled receptors by linking them to endocytic proteins such as clathrin and AP-2. Here we describe a previously unappreciated mechanism by which beta-arrestin orchestrates the process of receptor endocytosis through the activation of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6), a small GTP-binding protein. Involvement of ARF6 in the endocytic process is demonstrated by the ability of GTP-binding defective and GTP hydrolysis-deficient mutants to inhibit internalization of the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor. The importance of regulation of ARF6 function is shown by the ability of the ARF GTPase-activating protein GIT1 to inhibit and of the ARF nucleotide exchange factor, ARNO, to enhance receptor endocytosis. Endogenous beta-arrestin is found in complex with ARNO. Upon agonist stimulation of the receptor, beta-arrestin also interacts with the GDP-liganded form of ARF6, thereby facilitating ARNO-promoted GTP loading and activation of the G protein. Thus, the agonist-driven formation of a complex including beta-arrestin, ARNO, and ARF6 provides a molecular mechanism that explains how the agonist-stimulated receptor recruits a small G protein necessary for the endocytic process and controls its activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Claing
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mou L, Jackson DA. Transient hypoxia differentially decreases GRK2 protein levels in CHO cells stably expressing the m1 mAChR. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2001; 286:848-51. [PMID: 11527375 DOI: 10.1006/bbrc.2001.5487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
G protein-coupled kinase 2 (GRK2) has a key role in regulating signaling activities of a variety of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Several recent studies have directly implicated GRK2 phosphorylation in desensitization of GPCRs. In addition, binding by G(betagamma) or phosphorylation by PKC or c-Src [corrected] has been shown to activate or enhance GRK2 activity, respectively. Conversely, the calcium binding protein calmodulin or the serine/threonine kinase ERK has been implicated in inhibiting GRK2 activity. However, with the exception of a recent report indicating that activation of beta2-adrenergic receptor results in the ubiquitination and rapid degradation of GRK2, very little is known about cellular mechanisms that alter the protein levels of GRK2 [corrected]. Here, we report a novel serendipitous observation regarding alteration of GRK2 [corrected] protein levels. Exposure of CHO cells stably expressing the m1 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) to transient hypoxia caused near ablation of the GRK2 protein. In contrast, GRK2 protein levels remained unchanged in the parental CHO cells or in CHO cells stably expressing the m2 mAChR when exposed to transient hypoxia. The present study reports a novel observation that is unveiled by transient hypoxia in which GRK2 protein levels are altered by cellular mechanisms involving the m1 mAChR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Mou
- Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Neuroscience Institute, Morehouse School of Medicine, MRC Building Room 206, Atlanta, Georgia 30310-1495, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cong M, Perry SJ, Lin FT, Fraser ID, Hu LA, Chen W, Pitcher JA, Scott JD, Lefkowitz RJ. Regulation of membrane targeting of the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 by protein kinase A and its anchoring protein AKAP79. J Biol Chem 2001; 276:15192-9. [PMID: 11278469 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m009130200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 130] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The beta2 adrenergic receptor (beta2AR) undergoes desensitization by a process involving its phosphorylation by both protein kinase A (PKA) and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). The protein kinase A-anchoring protein AKAP79 influences beta2AR phosphorylation by complexing PKA with the receptor at the membrane. Here we show that AKAP79 also regulates the ability of GRK2 to phosphorylate agonist-occupied receptors. In human embryonic kidney 293 cells, overexpression of AKAP79 enhances agonist-induced phosphorylation of both the beta2AR and a mutant of the receptor that cannot be phosphorylated by PKA (beta2AR/PKA-). Mutants of AKAP79 that do not bind PKA or target to the beta2AR markedly inhibit phosphorylation of beta2AR/PKA-. We show that PKA directly phosphorylates GRK2 on serine 685. This modification increases Gbetagamma subunit binding to GRK2 and thus enhances the ability of the kinase to translocate to the membrane and phosphorylate the receptor. Abrogation of the phosphorylation of serine 685 on GRK2 by mutagenesis (S685A) or by expression of a dominant negative AKAP79 mutant reduces GRK2-mediated translocation to beta2AR and phosphorylation of agonist-occupied beta2AR, thus reducing subsequent receptor internalization. Agonist-stimulated PKA-mediated phosphorylation of GRK2 may represent a mechanism for enhancing receptor phosphorylation and desensitization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cong
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Roseberry AG, Bünemann M, Elavunkal J, Hosey MM. Agonist-dependent delivery of M(2) muscarinic acetylcholine receptors to the cell surface after pertussis toxin treatment. Mol Pharmacol 2001; 59:1256-68. [PMID: 11306711 DOI: 10.1124/mol.59.5.1256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
The internalization of the M(2) muscarinic cholinergic receptor (mAChR) proceeds through an atypical pathway that is independent of arrestin and clathrin function and shows a unique sensitivity to dynamin when the receptor is expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells. In this report we demonstrate that the internalization of the M(2) mAChR was modulated by activation of heterotrimeric G proteins, because treatment with pertussis toxin, which ADP-ribosylates G proteins of the G(i/o) family, caused a significant delay in the onset of internalization of the M(2) mAChR. The effects of pertussis toxin could not be explained by alteration of the agonist-dependent phosphorylation of the M(2) mAChR. The modulation of internalization by pertussis toxin was revealed to be due to recruitment of intracellular receptors to the cell surface upon agonist treatment. Pretreatment with pertussis toxin also greatly increased both the rate and extent of recovery of M(2) mAChRs to the cell surface after agonist-mediated internalization. These results demonstrate a novel aspect involved in the regulation of GPCRs. As with the tightly controlled internalization of GPCRs, the delivery of GPCRs to the cell surface is also highly regulated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Roseberry
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Biological Chemistry, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
Treatment of ovariectomized female rats with estrogen for 2 days reduces alpha2-adrenoceptor binding density by 25%, increases G protein coupled receptor kinase (GRK) activity by 50% and elevates GRK 2 protein levels by 50% in the frontal cortex. These results suggest that estrogen may decrease alpha2-adrenoceptor expression in the frontal cortex of female rats by regulating GRK 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M A Ansonoff
- Department of Neuroscience, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chakrabarti S, Oppermann M, Gintzler AR. Chronic morphine induces the concomitant phosphorylation and altered association of multiple signaling proteins: a novel mechanism for modulating cell signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001; 98:4209-14. [PMID: 11274443 PMCID: PMC31204 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.071031798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Traditional mechanisms thought to underlie opioid tolerance include receptor phosphorylation/down-regulation, G-protein uncoupling, and adenylyl cyclase superactivation. A parallel line of investigation also indicates that opioid tolerance development results from a switch from predominantly opioid receptor G(i alpha) inhibitory to G(beta gamma) stimulatory signaling. As described previously, this results, in part, from the increased relative abundance of G(beta gamma)-stimulated adenylyl cyclase isoforms as well as from a profound increase in their phosphorylation [Chakrabarti, S., Rivera, M., Yan, S.-Z., Tang, W.-J. & Gintzler, A. R. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 655-662; Chakrabarti, S., Wang, L., Tang, W.-J. & Gintzler, A. R. (1998) Mol. Pharmacol. 54, 949--953]. The present study demonstrates that chronic morphine administration results in the concomitant phosphorylation of three key signaling proteins, G protein receptor kinase (GRK) 2/3, beta-arrestin, and G(beta), in the guinea pig longitudinal muscle myenteric plexus tissue. Augmented phosphorylation of all three proteins is evident in immunoprecipitate obtained by using either anti-GRK2/3 or G(beta) antibodies, but the phosphorylation increment is greater in immunoprecipitate obtained with G(beta) antibodies. Analyses of coimmunoprecipitated proteins indicate that phosphorylation of GRK2/3, beta-arrestin, and G(beta) has varying consequences on their ability to associate. As a result, increased availability of and signaling via G(beta gamma) could occur without compromising the membrane content (and presumably activity) of GRK2/3. Induction of the concomitant phosphorylation of multiple proteins in a multimolecular complex with attendant modulation of their association represents a novel mechanism for increasing G(beta gamma) signaling and opioid tolerance formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Chakrabarti
- Department of Biochemistry, State University of New York, Downstate Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY 11203, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Schutzer WE, Reed JF, Bliziotes M, Mader SL. Upregulation of G protein-linked receptor kinases with advancing age in rat aorta. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2001; 280:R897-903. [PMID: 11171671 DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.3.r897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
The age-related decline in beta-adrenergic receptor (beta-AR)-mediated vasorelaxation is associated with desensitization of beta-ARs without significant downregulation. The primary mode of this homologous beta-AR desensitization, in general, is via G protein receptor kinases (GRK). Therefore, we hypothesize that age-related changes in GRKs are causative to this etiology in rat aorta. Herein, we investigate the activity and cellular distribution (cytoplasmic vs. membrane) of several GRK isoforms and beta-arrestin proteins. GRK activity was assessed in extracts from aortic tissue of 6-wk, 6-mo, 12-mo, and 24-mo-old male Fischer-344 rats using a rhodopsin phosphorylation assay. We also performed immunoblots on lysates from aorta with specific antibodies to GRK-2, -3, -5, and beta-arrestin-1. Results show an age-related increase in GRK activity. Furthermore, expression of GRK-2 (cytoplasmic and membrane), GRK-3 (cytoplasmic and membrane), and beta-arrestin (soluble) increased with advancing age, whereas GRK-5 (membrane) expression remained unchanged. These results suggest that age is associated with increased activity and expression of specific GRKs. This increase likely results in enhanced phosphorylation and desensitization of beta-ARs. These biochemical changes are consistent with observed aging physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W E Schutzer
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Research Service, Portland, Oregon 97201, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|