1
|
Smith R. Public health economics: Should it be more offensive? HEALTH ECONOMICS 2024. [PMID: 38837483 DOI: 10.1002/hec.4868] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Smith
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Madden M, Bartlett A, McCambridge J. Constructing public-private partnerships to undermine the public interest: critical discourse analysis of Working Together published by the International Alliance for Responsible Drinking. Global Health 2023; 19:103. [PMID: 38104100 PMCID: PMC10725627 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-01000-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The global burden of alcohol harm has increased and is forecast to grow further without effective policy implementation. Public-private partnerships aiming to address global health, and other societal challenges, are a burgeoning feature of neoliberal governance. Rhetorically distancing themselves from tobacco, the major alcohol companies are committed to tackling 'harmful drinking' and have created a distinct type of public relations organization for this purpose. The activities of such organizations are increasingly recognized as an impediment to the implementation of policies to reduce alcohol harm, including in low- and middle-income countries where markets are expanding. METHODS The approach of critical discourse analysis is used to examine the discursive tactics and strategies used in Working Together; a 'toolkit' published by the key global level alcohol industry public relations organization, the International Alliance for Responsible Drinking (IARD). This study considers how it works discursively to set the terms of, and overcome skepticism about partnerships, to define aims and position various actors by constructing their roles. The construction of prospective partners provides insights into the alcohol industry itself. RESULTS The toolkit operates as an ideological resource for forming public-private partnerships across the world based on the accumulated know-how of the major companies through IARD. This allows the largest alcohol companies to exercise leadership of the industry, while remaining off-stage. The toolkit relies on a form of rhetorical work which creates distance from obvious corporate interests and the harms caused to population health and society. This is accomplished by working against evidence-informed population level approaches, and thus avoiding policies that will make any significant difference to overall alcohol harm. Unspecific "complexity" affords opportunity for preferred types of "actions", and "partnership" provides opportunity to gain credibility by association, further minimizing the likelihood of any material harm being reduced. CONCLUSIONS The toolkit is designed to not only legitimate the inclusion of alcohol industry actors as initiating 'partners', but also assigns them roles as managers of a set of carefully constructed relationships. This vision of public-private partnership reproduces the hegemonic narrative that has successfully blocked policy advances for decades and led to growing alcohol harm globally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Madden
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, England.
| | - Andrew Bartlett
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, England
| | - Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, England
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maani N, CI van Schalkwyk M, Petticrew M. Under the influence: system-level effects of alcohol industry-funded health information organizations. Health Promot Int 2023; 38:daad167. [PMID: 38097395 PMCID: PMC10721437 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daad167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
There is now an established body of evidence that the alcohol industry seeks to obstruct public health policies that could affect the availability, affordability or marketing of alcohol. In parallel, the alcohol industry is active in funding corporate social responsibility initiatives, with a particular focus on 'responsible drinking' campaigns, often facilitated by national-level charities established and/or funded by the alcohol industry and associated organizations. While evidence continues to grow regarding biases in the content produced by such health information organizations, they remain active in partnerships with government health departments on national health promotion campaigns and provide a range of health-related information to the public, community organizations and schools. To understand the implications of such access for policymakers, researchers and the public, there is a need to consider the wider, system-level influences of such organizations and their place in wider alcohol industry strategies. In this article, we describe evolving evidence of the direct and indirect strategic effects of such organizations and demonstrate how they serve key roles in the alcohol industry through their existence, content, partnerships and public profiles. We end by considering the implications for how we conceptualize charities established or funded (entirely or partly) by harmful commodity industries, and to what extent current conflicts of interest guidelines are sufficiently effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nason Maani
- Global Health Policy Unit, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, 15a George Square, Edinburgh, EH8 9LD, UK
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - May CI van Schalkwyk
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Department of Public Health, Environments and Society, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
- UK PRP SPECTRUM Consortium, Usher Institute, Old Medical School, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hall W, Stjepanović D, Dawson D, Leung J. The implementation and public health impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada: a systematic review. Addiction 2023; 118:2062-2072. [PMID: 37380613 PMCID: PMC10953418 DOI: 10.1111/add.16274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
AIMS We provide a narrative summary of research on changes in cannabis arrests, cannabis products and prices, cannabis use and cannabis-related harm since legalization. METHODS We systematically searched for research on the impacts of cannabis legalization in Canada in PubMed, Embase, Statistics Canada and government websites and Google Scholar, published between 2006 and 2021. RESULTS Cannabis legalization in Canada has been followed by substantial reductions in cannabis-related arrests and cannabis prices. It has also increased adults' access to a diverse range of cannabis products, including edibles and extracts. The prevalence of cannabis use among young adults has increased, but there have been no marked increases or decreases in use among high school students or changes in the prevalence of daily or near-daily use. Legalization has been associated with increased adult hospital attendances for psychiatric distress and vomiting, unintentional ingestion of edible cannabis products by children and hospitalizations for cannabis use disorders in adults. There is conflicting evidence on whether cannabis-impaired driving has increased since legalization. There is suggestive evidence that presentations to emergency departments with psychoses and cannabis use disorders may have increased since legalization. CONCLUSIONS Legalization of cannabis in Canada appears to have reduced cannabis arrests and increased access to a variety of more potent cannabis products at lower prices. Since 2019, recent cannabis use in Canada has modestly increased among adults but not among adolescents. There is evidence of increased acute adverse effects of cannabis among adults and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayne Hall
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Daniel Stjepanović
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Danielle Dawson
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| | - Janni Leung
- National Centre for Youth Substance Use ResearchThe University of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Al-Rawi O. Manufacturing dissent: How unhealthy commodity industries subvert public health action against non-communicable diseases. Med Confl Surviv 2023; 39:271-280. [PMID: 37439566 DOI: 10.1080/13623699.2023.2231690] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Al-Rawi
- UCL Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care (IEHC), University College London (UCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lesch M, McCambridge J. Distilling the distillers: examining the political activities of the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States. Global Health 2023; 19:22. [PMID: 36991443 PMCID: PMC10054220 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-023-00923-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding of the alcohol industry's means of influencing public policy is increasingly well established. Less is known, however, about the specific organisations that lead the political strategies of the alcohol industry. To fill this gap, this paper explores the Distilled Spirits Council of the United States (DISCUS), a key trade association in the United States (US), which also operates internationally. METHODS This study explores how DISCUS is organised and the main political activities it pursues to advance its policy interests. The study triangulates data from several sources, including DISCUS documents, as well as federal lobbying and election expenditure data. RESULTS This study demonstrates that DISCUS is a key political actor in the US and global alcohol policymaking context. There are identifiable strategies used by DISCUS to shape alcohol policy debates, including framing and lobbying. We also find key synergies between these strategies and identify their operation at varying levels of policy decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Generating more secure inferences about the nature of the alcohol industry's efforts to advance its interests, and with what success and at what cost, requires researchers to investigate other trade associations in different contexts, and use other data sources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Lesch
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
McCambridge J, Mitchell G, Lesch M, Filippou A, Golder S, Garry J, Bartlett A, Madden M. The emperor has no clothes: a synthesis of findings from the Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science research programme. Addiction 2023; 118:558-566. [PMID: 36196477 PMCID: PMC10092733 DOI: 10.1111/add.16058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The Transformative Research on the Alcohol industry, Policy and Science (TRAPS) programme investigates the alcohol industry, with an innovative focus on public health sciences. TRAPS adds to an under-developed literature on the study of alcohol industry influence on alcohol science and policymaking. This paper provides a synthesis of TRAPS findings to inform future research. METHODS We conducted an interpretive review of TRAPS research findings across its component studies, identifying and integrating the key contributions made by individual studies to the literature on alcohol policymaking and science, and identifying areas where TRAPS progress was limited. This produced themes for consideration in future research agenda setting. RESULTS TRAPS explored the interventions of the alcohol industry in science and policymaking using various methods, including systematic reviews and qualitative interviews. These studies identified the industry's activities in several key areas, such as the debate over minimum unit pricing (MUP), cardiovascular health and alcohol research and a long-running public relations programme developed in close connection with the tobacco industry. Collectively, the research shows that alcohol policymaking has involved a contest between the research community and alcohol industry actors about whether and how science should be used to inform policy. CONCLUSIONS The TRAPS programme demonstrates the need for a transdisciplinary approach to understand the nature of corporate political activity; the crucial role industry involvement in science plays in the development of corporate political power; and how public health actors have successfully overcome industry opposition to evidence-based policies. Advances in alcohol policy should be underpinned by strong, reflexive public health sciences, alert to the role of industry in the alcohol harms under study and thorough in their investigation of the alcohol industry as an object of study in itself.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Gemma Mitchell
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Matthew Lesch
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | | | - Su Golder
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Jack Garry
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Andrew Bartlett
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| | - Mary Madden
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkHeslingtonYorkUK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kersey K, Hutton F, Lyons AC. Women, alcohol consumption and health promotion: the value of a critical realist approach. Health Promot Int 2023; 38:6974794. [PMID: 36617295 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Research on women's drinking occurs in largely disparate disciplines-including public health, health promotion, psychology, sociology, and cultural studies-and draws on differing philosophical understandings and theoretical frameworks. Tensions between the aims and paradigmatic underpinnings of this research (across and within disciplines) have meant that knowledge and insight can be frequently disciplinary-specific and somewhat siloed. However, in line with the social and economic determinants of the health model, alcohol research needs approaches that can explore how multiple gender-related factors-biological, psycho-social, material, and socio-cultural-combine to produce certain drinking behaviours, pleasures and potential harms. We argue that critical realism as a philosophical underpinning to research can accommodate this broader conceptualization, enabling researchers to draw on multiple perspectives to better understand women's drinking. We illustrate the benefit of this approach by presenting a critical realist theoretical framework for understanding women's drinking that outlines interrelationships between the psychoactive properties of alcohol, the role of embodied individual characteristics and the material, institutional and socio-cultural contexts in which women live. This approach can underpin and foster inter-disciplinary research collaboration to inform more nuanced health promotion practices and policies to reduce alcohol-related harm in a wide range of women across societies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Kersey
- School of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Fiona Hutton
- Institute of Criminology, Victoria University of Wellington, Kelburn Campus, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Antonia C Lyons
- Department of Social and Community Health; Centre for Addiction Research, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Walls H, Hawkins B, Durrance-Bagale A. Local Government Stakeholder Perceptions of Legitimacy and Conflict of Interest: The Alcohol Industry and the "Drink Free Days" Campaign in England. Int J Health Policy Manag 2022; 11:1505-1513. [PMID: 34273924 PMCID: PMC9808329 DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2021.59] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Industry involvement in alcohol policy is highly contentious. The Drink Free Days (DFD) campaign (2018- 2019) run by Public Health England (PHE), an executive agency of government, and Drinkaware, an industry-funded 'alcohol education charity' to encourage middle-aged drinkers to abstain from drinking on some days was criticised for perceived industry involvement. We examine the extent to which the DFD campaign was supported by local-authority Directors of Public Health (DPHs) in England - which have a statutory remit for promoting population health within their locality - and their reasons for this. METHODS Our mixed-methods approach included a stakeholder mapping, online survey, and semi-structured interviews. The stakeholder mapping provided the basis for sampling survey and interview respondents. In total, 25 respondents completed the survey, and we conducted 21 interviews with DPHs and their local authority (LA) representatives. We examined survey responses, and coded free-text survey and interview responses to identify key themes. RESULTS While some respondents supported the DFD campaign, others did not promote it, or actively opposed it, due mainly to concerns about conflicts of interest and the legitimacy of industry involvement in the campaign. These were considered to undermine PHE's independence and deflect attention from more important, evidence-based policy interventions such as alcohol pricing while conferring vicarious credibility on Drinkaware. We also found low levels of knowledge about alcohol-related harm, the effectiveness of different policies to address these and the policy-influencing strategies used by the alcohol industry. CONCLUSION The findings highlight the dangers of industry partnership and potential conflicts of interest for government agencies and the ineffectiveness of the campaigns they run at local and national levels. They demonstrate the need for caution in engaging with industry-associated bodies at all levels of government and are thus of potential relevance to studies of other health-harming industries and policy contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Walls
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thompson C, Clary C, Er V, Adams J, Boyland E, Burgoine T, Cornelsen L, de Vocht F, Egan M, Lake AA, Lock K, Mytton O, Petticrew M, White M, Yau A, Cummins S. Media representations of opposition to the 'junk food advertising ban' on the Transport for London (TfL) network: A thematic content analysis of UK news and trade press. SSM Popul Health 2021; 15:100828. [PMID: 34141852 PMCID: PMC8184652 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advertising of less healthy foods and drinks is hypothesised to be associated with obesity in adults and children. In February 2019, Transport for London implemented restrictions on advertisements for foods and beverages high in fat, salt or sugar across its network as part of a city-wide strategy to tackle childhood obesity. The policy was extensively debated in the press. This paper identifies arguments for and against the restrictions. Focusing on arguments against the restrictions, it then goes on to deconstruct the discursive strategies underpinning them. METHODS A qualitative thematic content analysis of media coverage of the restrictions (the 'ban') in UK newspapers and trade press was followed by a document analysis of arguments against the ban. A search period of March 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019 covered: (i) the launch of the public consultation on the ban in May 2018; (ii) the announcement of the ban in November 2018; and (iii) its implementation in February 2019. A systematic search of printed and online publications in English distributed in the UK or published on UK-specific websites identified 152 articles. RESULTS Arguments in favour of the ban focused on inequalities and childhood obesity. Arguments against the ban centred on two claims: that childhood obesity was not the 'right' priority; and that an advertising ban was not an effective way to address childhood obesity. These claims were justified via three discursive approaches: (i) claiming more 'important' priorities for action; (ii) disputing the science behind the ban; (iii) emphasising potential financial costs of the ban. CONCLUSION The discursive tactics used in media sources to argue against the ban draw on frames widely used by unhealthy commodities industries in response to structural public health interventions. Our analyses highlight the need for interventions to be framed in ways that can pre-emptively counter common criticisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Thompson
- Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care, School of Health and Social Work, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Christelle Clary
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vanessa Er
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Adams
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Boyland
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Burgoine
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Laura Cornelsen
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Frank de Vocht
- Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, United Kingdom
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West), Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Matt Egan
- Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amelia A. Lake
- Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health and Life Sciences Teesside University, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
- Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Karen Lock
- Department of Health Services Research & Policy, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oliver Mytton
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin White
- Centre for Diet & Activity Research, MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Yau
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Cummins
- Population Health Innovation Lab, Department of Public Health, Environments & Society, Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Alcohol policy, multi-level governance and corporate political strategy: The campaign for Scotland's minimum unit pricing in Edinburgh, London and Brussels. BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 2021; 23:391-409. [PMID: 34366695 PMCID: PMC8295958 DOI: 10.1177/1369148120959040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
The Scottish government's plans for a minimum unit price for alcohol were vehemently opposed by the alcohol industry leading to a 6-year delay in implementation after legislation was passed. This article seeks to explain the consequences of devolution and European Union membership for the development of minimum unit price in Scotland through the concepts of multi-level governance, veto points and venue shifting. Systems of multi-level governance create policy interdependencies between settings, an increased number of veto points at which policies can be blocked, and the potential for policy actors to shift decision-making to forums where favourable outcomes are more likely to be attained. In the minimum unit price debates, the alcohol industry engaged in multiple forms of venue shifting and used regulatory compliance procedures and legal challenges at the EU level to try to prevent and delay the policy. This has led to a 'chilling effect' on subsequent alcohol policy developments across the United Kingdom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Hawkins
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Carriedo A, Lock K, Hawkins B. Policy Process And Non-State Actors' Influence On The 2014 Mexican Soda Tax. Health Policy Plan 2021; 35:941-952. [PMID: 32672333 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czaa060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
In January 2014, Mexico introduced a soda tax of 1 Mexican Peso (MXP) per litre. The aim of this paper is to examine the political context out of which this policy emerged, the main drivers for the policy change, and the role of stakeholders in setting the policy agenda and shaping the policy design and outcomes. Thirty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with key stakeholders, and 145 documents, including peer-reviewed papers, policy briefs, press releases, industry, government, and CSO reports, were analysed. An iterative thematic analysis was conducted based on relevant theories of the policy process using a complementary approach, including Stages Heuristic Model, Policy Triangle Framework, and Multiple Streams Model. Results showed that a major motivation was the new administration seeking funds as they entered government. The soda tax was supported by a key group of legislators, civil society actors and by academics promoting evidence on health effects. However, the policy measure was challenged by the food and beverage industries (F&BI). Non-state actors were both formally and informally involved in setting the agenda, regardless of some of them having opposing interests on the soda tax policy. Approaches used by non-state actors to influence the agenda included: calls for action, marketing strategies, coalition building, challenging evidence, and engaging in public-private partnerships (PPPs). The effectiveness of the soda tax was highly debated and resulted in public polarization, although the framing of the outcomes was instrumental in influencing fiscal policies elsewhere. This study contributes to the debate around implementing fiscal policies for health and how power is exercised and framed in the agenda-setting phase of policy development. The article examines how the F&BI sought to influence the national strategy for obesity prevention. It argues that the experience of the soda tax campaign empowered policy advocates, strengthening national and international civil society networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Karen Lock
- Faculty of Public Health and Health Policy, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Benjamin Hawkins
- Faculty of Public Health and Health Policy, Global Health Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hawkins B, Durrance-Bagale A, Walls H. Co-regulation and alcohol industry political strategy: A case study of the Public Health England-Drinkaware Drink Free Days Campaign. Soc Sci Med 2021; 285:114175. [PMID: 34388623 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
This article examines the Drink Free Days (DFD) campaign run by Public Health England and the industry funded alcohol education charity, Drinkaware, in eight English regions in 2018-2019. More specifically, it examines uses, and usefulness, of the campaign to the alcohol producers which fund Drinkaware. It draws on 36 semi-structured interviews with policy actors and a framing analysis of industry social media accounts and news coverage of the campaign. Industry-associated bodies such as Drinkaware have been identified as key components of alcohol industry strategies to influence policy and shape the regulatory contexts in which they operate in three ways. First, funding such bodies forms part of corporate social responsibility programmes which allow companies to position themselves as legitimate policy actors and 'part of the solution' to alcohol related harms. Second, reliance on industry funding incentivises governments to co-operate with industry actors and provides leverage in policy debates. Third, their programmes absorb policy bandwidth and deflect from more effective, evidence based interventions (e.g. on pricing and advertising) which affect industry sales and profits. This is particularly effective if the perception of independence from the industry is created. The analysis presented below suggests that the DFD was not used explicitly by the industry actors for public relations purposes. However, it was useful to their broader strategic aims. It reinforced the position of Drinkaware as a key policy actor and promoted the particular, industry-favoured understanding of alcohol harms and their solutions which it promotes. This is in keeping with the previous insights from international research literature on corporate political activity in health harming industries which finds that policy influence is often subtle, indirect and designed to embed organisations within the policy architecture. It suggests that government agencies should proceed with great caution in entering into such partnerships with industry associated bodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Durrance-Bagale
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.
| | - Helen Walls
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Gillespie D, Hatchard J, Squires H, Gilmore A, Brennan A. Conceptualising changes to tobacco and alcohol policy as affecting a single interlinked system. BMC Public Health 2021; 21:17. [PMID: 33397324 PMCID: PMC7783976 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-10000-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Accepted: 12/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To support a move towards a coordinated non-communicable disease approach in public health policy, it is important to conceptualise changes to policy on tobacco and alcohol as affecting a single interlinked system. For health economic models to effectively inform policy, the first step in their development should be to develop a conceptual understanding of the system complexity that is likely to affect the outcomes of policy change. Our aim in this study was to support the development and interpretation of health economic models of the effects of changes to tobacco and alcohol policies by developing a conceptual understanding of the main components and mechanisms in the system that links policy change to outcomes. METHODS Our study was based on a workshop from which we captured data on participant discussions on the joint tobacco-alcohol policy system. To inform these discussions, we prepared with a literature review and a survey of participants. Participants were academics and policy professionals who work in the United Kingdom. Data were analysed thematically to produce a description of the main components and mechanisms within the system. RESULTS Of the people invited, 24 completed the survey (18 academic, 6 policy); 21 attended the workshop (16 academic, 5 policy). Our analysis identified eleven mechanisms through which individuals might modify the effects of a policy change, which include mechanisms that might lead to linked effects of policy change on tobacco and alcohol consumption. We identified ten mechanisms by which the tobacco and alcohol industries might modify the effects of policy changes, grouped into two categories: Reducing policy effectiveness; Enacting counter-measures. Finally, we identified eighteen research questions that indicate potential avenues for further work to understand the potential outcomes of policy change. CONCLUSIONS Model development should carefully consider the ways in which individuals and the tobacco and alcohol industries might modify the effects of policy change, and the extent to which this results in an unequal societal distribution of outcomes. Modelled evidence should then be interpreted in the light of the conceptual understanding of the system that the modelling necessarily simplifies in order to predict the outcomes of policy change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Duncan Gillespie
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK.
- SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK.
| | - Jenny Hatchard
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
- Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Hazel Squires
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anna Gilmore
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
- SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK
- Tobacco Control Research Group, Department for Health, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Alan Brennan
- School of Health and Related Research, The University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Nottingham, UK
- SPECTRUM Consortium, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mold A. Alcohol, health education and changing notions of risk in Britain, 1980–1990. DRUGS: EDUCATION, PREVENTION AND POLICY 2021; 28:48-58. [PMID: 33679012 PMCID: PMC7116859 DOI: 10.1080/09687637.2020.1724264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
This article explores the contentious definition and communication of alcohol consumption limits and their relationship to ideas about risk through an analysis of the development of health education materials during the 1980s. It argues that changing ideas about alcohol and risk, and their communication to the public, were a reflection of both specific developments in thinking about alcohol and the harm it could pose as well as broader shifts within public health policy, practice and outlook. Risk was understood as something experienced by individuals and populations, a conceptual framing that suggested different approaches. To get to grips with these issues, the article focuses on: (1) the definition of alcohol consumption limits; (2) the communication of these limits; and (3) the limits to limits. The problems experienced in defining and communicating limits suggests not only a ‘limit to limits’ but also to the entire notion of risk-based ‘sensible’ drinking as a strategy for health education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Mold
- Centre for History in Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Miller M, Wilkinson C, Room R, O'Brien P, Townsend B, Schram A, Gleeson D. Industry submissions on alcohol in the context of Australia's trade and investment agreements: A content and thematic analysis of publicly available documents. Drug Alcohol Rev 2020; 40:22-30. [PMID: 33230913 DOI: 10.1111/dar.13219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2020] [Revised: 10/03/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS Alcohol use is a leading risk factor for death and disability, responsible for 3 million deaths in 2016. The alcohol industry is a powerful player in shaping trade and investment rules in ways that can constrain the ability of governments to regulate alcoholic beverages to reduce harm. This paper analyses publicly available submissions about alcohol in the context of Australia's free trade agreements to determine the key themes put forward by industry. DESIGN AND METHODS We searched for submissions made to the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade by alcohol industry trade associations, alcohol manufacturers, distributors and retailers, general industry association, and government agencies with responsibilities for alcohol trade, about specific free trade agreements involving Australia. Thirty-one submissions in relation to eight trade agreements were included for analysis. The analysis involved both descriptive content analysis and thematic analysis. RESULTS Findings suggest that industry is actively seeking to shape trade negotiations around alcohol. Priority issues for the industry include improving market access, harmonising regulation, improving clarity and transparency, reducing the burden of regulation and preventing monopolies on product names. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION The alcohol industry and associated business and government organisations are actively working to influence trade agreement negotiations for industry economic gain, arguing for rules which may undermine public health goals. The analysis suggests that public health experts should pay attention to trade and investment agreements and develop counter frames to ensure agreements do not create barriers for coherent health policies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mia Miller
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Claire Wilkinson
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Drug Policy Modelling Program, Social Policy Research Centre, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Robin Room
- Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.,Centre for Social Research on Alcohol and Drugs, Department of Public Health Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Paula O'Brien
- Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Belinda Townsend
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Ashley Schram
- Menzies Centre for Health Governance, School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia
| | - Deborah Gleeson
- School of Psychology and Public Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Non-market strategy as a framework for exploring commercial involvement in health policy: A primer. Soc Sci Med 2020; 262:113257. [PMID: 32771875 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
This paper outlines the role of non-market strategy and its relevance to public health. Three broad categories of non-market activity are described: corporate political activity, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and legal activity, with examples relevant to public health. The importance to public health researchers of considering business activity through a non-market lens has been outlined. Using a non-market strategy perspective can assist with understanding the commercial determinants of health and analysing the writing of the 'rules of the game'.
Collapse
|
18
|
Healthier Societies For Healthy Populations Group. Healthier societies for healthy populations. Lancet 2020; 395:1747-1749. [PMID: 32505243 PMCID: PMC7272158 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31039-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
19
|
McCambridge J, Kypri K, Sheldon TA, Madden M, Babor TF. Advancing public health policy making through research on the political strategies of alcohol industry actors. J Public Health (Oxf) 2020; 42:262-269. [PMID: 31220307 PMCID: PMC7297281 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Development and implementation of evidence-based policies is needed in order to ameliorate the rising toll of non-communicable diseases (NCDs). Alcohol is a key cause of the mortality burden and alcohol policies are under-developed. This is due in part to the global influence of the alcohol industry. We propose that a better understanding of the methods and the effectiveness of alcohol industry influence on public health policies will support efforts to combat such influence, and advance global health. Many of the issues on the research agenda we propose will inform, and be informed by, research into the political influence of other commercial actors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Kypros Kypri
- School of Medicine & Public Health, University of Newcastle, Australia
| | - Trevor A Sheldon
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Mary Madden
- Department of Health Sciences, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York YO10 5DD, UK
| | - Thomas F Babor
- Department of Community Medicine and Health Care, UConn Health, Farmington, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Walls H, Cook S, Matzopoulos R, London L. Advancing alcohol research in low-income and middle-income countries: a global alcohol environment framework. BMJ Glob Health 2020; 5:e001958. [PMID: 32377401 PMCID: PMC7199708 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2019] [Revised: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol-related harm has gained increased attention in high-income countries (HICs) in recent years which, alongside government regulation, has effected a reduction in alcohol consumption. The alcohol industry has turned its attention to low-income and middle-income country (LMIC) markets as a new source of growth and profit, prompting increased consumption in LMICS. Alcohol use in LMICs is also increasing. There is a need to understand particularly in LMICs the impact of industry strategy in shaping local contexts of alcohol use. We draw on conceptualisations from food systems research, and research on the commercial determinants of health, to develop a new approach for framing alcohol research and discuss implications for alcohol research, particularly in LMICs, focusing on South Africa as an illustrative example. We propose a conceptualisation of the 'alcohol environment' as the system of alcohol provision, acquisition and consumption-including, critically, industry advertising and marketing-along with the political, economic and regulatory context of the alcohol industry that mediates people's alcohol drinking patterns and behaviours. While each country and region is different in terms of its context of alcohol use, we contrast several broadly distinct features of alcohol environments in LMICs and HICs. Improving understanding of the full spectrum of influences on drinking behaviour, particularly in LMICs, is vital to inform the design of interventions and policies to facilitate healthier environments and reduce the harms associated with alcohol consumption. Our framework for undertaking alcohol research may be used to structure mixed methods empirical research examining the role of the alcohol environment particularly in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen Walls
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Sarah Cook
- Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Richard Matzopoulos
- Burden of Disease Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Leslie London
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Public-private partnerships and the politics of alcohol policy in England: the Coalition Government's Public Health 'Responsibility Deal'. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1477. [PMID: 31747916 PMCID: PMC6865032 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7787-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The 2010-2015 Conservative-led Coalition Government launched their flagship Public Health Responsibility Deal (PHRD) for England in 2011; a year before their alcohol strategy. This co-regulatory regime placed alcohol industry actors at the heart of policy-making, but was viewed with scepticism by public health actors. This article examines the ways in which the PHRD structured the alcohol policy environment throughout this period, which included the rejection of evidence-based policies such as minimum unit pricing. METHODS This article draws on 26 semi-structured interviews with policy actors (parliamentarians, civil servants, civil society actors and academics) in 2018. Respondents were identified and recruited using purposive sampling. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic coding. RESULTS The PHRD shaped the context of alcohol policy development at Westminster throughout this period. It circumscribed the policy space by taking evidence-based measures not amenable to industry partnership off the agenda. While the PHRD created important opportunities for industry engagement with policy-makers, it undermined public health actors' access to government, particularly following their withdrawal from the process. Moreover, the PHRD demonstrates the enduring appeal of partnership as a policy idea for governments, despite a lack of evidence of their effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS This study of the PHRD demonstrates the ways in which industry actors are able to influence policy through long-term relationship building and partnership working on policy decision-making. Whilst such partnership approaches may appear to have the potential to mitigate some of alcohol harms, they create fundamental conflicts of interest, and may undermine the very causes they seek to further.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Hawkins
- Faculty fo Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Plave, London, WC1H9SH, UK.
| | - Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Karlsson T, Mäkelä P, Tigerstedt C, Keskimäki I. The Road to the Alcohol Act 2018 in Finland: A conflict between public health objectives and neoliberal goals. Health Policy 2019; 124:1-6. [PMID: 31708165 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Finnish alcohol policy has aimed for decades years to mitigate alcohol-related harm by using high taxation and restrictions on the physical availability of alcohol. The state monopoly on the retail of alcohol has played a central role in reducing the availability of alcohol. In 2011, preparations began for a comprehensive reform of the Alcohol Act 1994. Over time, the issue became highly politicised, lobbied and divisive. It took intense work of two consecutive governments to finalise the reform. The new Alcohol Act came into force in 2018. It expanded the rights of grocery stores to sell alcohol and reduced the administrative burden for on-premise sales. As a result, the state monopoly on the retail of alcohol was weakened, but it still has an important impact on the physical availability of alcohol. The Finnish public health community expected an increase in alcohol sales following the reform because of greater alcohol availability and expected price reductions related to greater competition of sales in grocery stores. However, prices decreased less than expected in 2018, partly due to a simultaneous increase in alcohol taxes. It is difficult to evaluate the impact of the reform at this early stage. However, after the reform, the 10-year (2008-2017) downward trend in the total per capita alcohol consumption was discontinued despite the tax increase. According to preliminary analyses, the change in the law may have slightly increased recorded alcohol sales but the effect was not statistically significant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Karlsson
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Public Health Solutions, Finland
| | - Pia Mäkelä
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Public Health Solutions, Finland
| | | | - Ilmo Keskimäki
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Social and Health Systems Research, Finland; Tampere University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Giesbrecht N, Bosma LM, Reisdorfer E. Reducing Harm Through Evidence-Based Alcohol Policies: Challenges and Options. WORLD MEDICAL & HEALTH POLICY 2019. [DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
24
|
Nakkash RT, Ghandour LA, Yassin N, Anouti S, Chalak A, Chehab S, El-Aily A, Afifi RA. "Everyone Has the Right to Drink Beer": A Stakeholder Analysis of Challenges to Youth Alcohol Harm-Reduction Policies in Lebanon. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:E2874. [PMID: 31408935 PMCID: PMC6719017 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16162874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Revised: 08/03/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol use is a major risk factor in premature death and disability, especially among youth. Evidence-based policies to prevent and control the detrimental effect of alcohol use have been recommended. In countries with weak alcohol control policies-such as Lebanon, stakeholder analysis provides critical information to influence policy interventions. This paper assesses the views of stakeholders regarding a national alcohol harm reduction policy for youth. METHODS We interviewed a total of 22 key stakeholders over a period of 8 months in 2015. Stakeholders were selected purposively, to include representatives of governmental and non-governmental organizations and industry that could answer questions related to core intervention areas: affordability, availability, regulation of marketing, and drinking and driving. We analyzed interview transcripts using thematic analysis. RESULTS Three themes emerged: Inadequacy of current alcohol control policies; weak governance and disregard for rule of law as a determinant of the status quo; and diverting of responsibility towards 'other' stakeholders. In addition, industry representatives argued against evidence-based policies using time-worn strategies identified globally. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that alcohol harm reduction policies are far from becoming a policy priority in Lebanon. There is a clear need to shift the narrative from victim blaming to structural conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rima T Nakkash
- Department of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Lilian A Ghandour
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Nasser Yassin
- Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Sirine Anouti
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Ali Chalak
- Department of Agriculture, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Sara Chehab
- Department of Health Promotion and Community Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Aida El-Aily
- Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon
| | - Rima A Afifi
- Department of Community and Behavioral Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, IA 52242, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Schrecker T, Milne E. Public health: the global and the local. J Public Health (Oxf) 2019; 41:1-2. [PMID: 30973958 DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdz027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
26
|
Williams R, Alexander G, Aspinall R, Batterham R, Bhala N, Bosanquet N, Severi K, Burton A, Burton R, Cramp ME, Day N, Dhawan A, Dillon J, Drummond C, Dyson J, Ferguson J, Foster GR, Gilmore I, Greenberg J, Henn C, Hudson M, Jarvis H, Kelly D, Mann J, McDougall N, McKee M, Moriarty K, Morling J, Newsome P, O'Grady J, Rolfe L, Rice P, Rutter H, Sheron N, Thorburn D, Verne J, Vohra J, Wass J, Yeoman A. Gathering momentum for the way ahead: fifth report of the Lancet Standing Commission on Liver Disease in the UK. Lancet 2018; 392:2398-2412. [PMID: 30473364 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32561-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 10/04/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
This report presents further evidence on the escalating alcohol consumption in the UK and the burden of liver disease associated with this major risk factor, as well as the effects on hospital and primary care. We reiterate the need for fiscal regulation by the UK Government if overall alcohol consumption is to be reduced sufficiently to improve health outcomes. We also draw attention to the effects of drastic cuts in public services for alcohol treatment, the repeated failures of voluntary agreements with the drinks industry, and the influence of the industry through its lobbying activities. We continue to press for reintroduction of the alcohol duty escalator, which was highly effective during the 5 years it was in place, and the introduction of minimum unit pricing in England, targeted at the heaviest drinkers. Results from the introduction of minimum unit pricing in Scotland, with results from Wales to follow, are likely to seriously expose the weakness of England's position. The increasing prevalence of obesity-related liver disease, the rising number of people diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and its complications, and increasing number of cases of end-stage liver disease and primary liver cancers from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease make apparent the need for an obesity strategy for adults. We also discuss the important effects of obesity and alcohol on disease progression, and the increased risk of the ten most common cancers (including breast and colon cancers). A new in-depth analysis of the UK National Health Service (NHS) and total societal costs shows the extraordinarily large expenditures that could be saved or redeployed elsewhere in the NHS. Excellent results have been reported for new antiviral drugs for hepatitis C virus infection, making elimination of chronic infection a real possibility ahead of the WHO 2030 target. However, the extent of unidentified cases remains a problem, and will also apply when new curative drugs for hepatitis B virus become available. We also describe efforts to improve standards of hospital care for liver disease with better understanding of current service deficiencies and a new accreditation process for hospitals providing liver services. New commissioning arrangements for primary and community care represent progress, in terms of effective screening of high-risk subjects and the early detection of liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Rachel Batterham
- National Institute of Health Research, UCLH Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Neeraj Bhala
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham and University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nick Bosanquet
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Anya Burton
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma UK and National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Matthew E Cramp
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | - John Dillon
- Medical Research Institute, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Colin Drummond
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London and South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - James Ferguson
- National Institute for Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Graham R Foster
- Barts Liver Centre, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Helen Jarvis
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK; The Royal College of General Practitioners, London, UK
| | - Deirdre Kelly
- Birmingham Women's and Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jake Mann
- Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Martin McKee
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Joanne Morling
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK; Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Philip Newsome
- National Institute for Health Research, Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Peter Rice
- Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP), Bath, UK
| | | | - Nick Sheron
- National Institute for Health Research Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Jyotsna Vohra
- Cancer Policy Research Centre, Cancer Research UK, London
| | - John Wass
- Department of Endocrinology, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Zatonski M, Hawkins B, McKee M. Framing the policy debate over spirits excise tax in Poland. Health Promot Int 2018; 33:515-524. [PMID: 28011653 DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daw093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Industry lobbying remains an obstacle to effective health-oriented alcohol policy. In 2013, an increase in excise tax on spirits was announced by the Polish government. This article presents a qualitative analysis of the public debate that ensued on the potential economic, health and social effects of the policy. It focuses on how competing groups, including industry actors, framed their position and sought to dominate the debate. Online archives of five Polish national newspapers, two spirits trade associations, and parliamentary and ministerial archives were searched. A thematic content analysis of the identified sources was conducted. The overall findings were compared with existing research on the framing of the Minimum Unit Pricing (MUP) debate in the UK. A total of 155 sources were analysed. Two main frames were identified: health, and economic. The spirits industry successfully promoted the economic frame in their own publications and in the media. The debate was dominated by arguments about potential growth of the grey market and losses in tax revenue that might result from the excise tax increase. The framing of the debate in Poland differed from the framing of the MUP debate in the United Kingdom. The Polish public health community was unsuccessful in making health considerations a significant element of the alcohol policy debate. The strategies pursued by UK health advocates offer lessons for how to make a more substantial impact on media coverage and promote health-oriented legislation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mateusz Zatonski
- Health Promotion Foundation, Warsaw, Poland.,London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Benjamin Hawkins
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Martin McKee
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bertscher A, London L, Orgill M. Unpacking policy formulation and industry influence: the case of the draft control of marketing of alcoholic beverages bill in South Africa. Health Policy Plan 2018; 33:786-800. [PMID: 29931204 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czy049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol is a major contributor to the Non-Communicable Disease burden in South Africa. In 2000, 7.1% of all deaths and 7% of total disability-adjusted life years were ascribed to alcohol-related harm in the country. Regulations proposed to restrict alcohol advertising in South Africa present an evidence-based upstream intervention. Research on policy formulation in low- and middle-income countries is limited. This study aims to describe and explore the policy formulation process of the 2013 draft Control of Marketing of Alcoholic Beverages Bill in South Africa between March 2011 and May 2017. Recognising the centrality of affected actors in policy-making processes, the study focused on the alcohol industry as a central actor affected by the policy, to understand how they-together with other actors-may influence the policy formulation process. A qualitative case study approach was used, involving a stakeholder mapping, 10 in-depth interviews, and review of approximately 240 documents. A policy formulation conceptual framework was successfully applied as a lens to describe a complex policy formulation process. Key factors shaping policy formulation included: (1) competing and shared values-different stakeholders promote conflicting ideals for policymaking; (2) inter-department jostling-different government departments seek to protect their own functions, hindering policy development; (3) stakeholder consultation in democratic policymaking-policy formulation requires consultations even with those opposed to regulation and (4) battle for evidence-evidence is used strategically by all parties to shape perceptions and leverage positions. This research (1) contributes to building an integrated body of knowledge on policy formulation in low- and middle-income countries; (2) shows that achieving policy coherence across government departments poses a major challenge to achieving effective health policy formulation and (3) shows that networks of actors with commercial and financial interests use diverse strategies to influence policy formulation processes to avoid regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Bertscher
- Division of Health Policy and Systems, University of Cape Town, Anzio Rd, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Leslie London
- Division of Public Health and Family Medicine, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, Health Sciences Faculty, University of Cape Town, Anzio Rd, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Marsha Orgill
- Division of Health Policy and Systems, University of Cape Town, Anzio Rd, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Pettigrew S, Hafekost C, Jongenelis M, Pierce H, Chikritzhs T, Stafford J. Behind Closed Doors: The Priorities of the Alcohol Industry as Communicated in a Trade Magazine. Front Public Health 2018; 6:217. [PMID: 30109222 PMCID: PMC6079248 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Efforts to reduce alcohol-related harm face strong resistance from the alcohol industry. It is important to monitor industry actions over time to assist in developing appropriate responses to this resistance. Monitoring can enable public health to identify industry positions on alcohol policy issues, stay abreast of current and emerging marketing tactics, and inform the development of possible counter-actions. One form of monitoring is the examination of industry trade publications where the industry converses with itself. The aim of this study was to assess industry strategic approaches as communicated in articles published in a leading Australian alcohol trade magazine to provide insights for policy makers and advocacy groups. Methods: Thematic analysis of 362 articles published in a trade magazine over a one-year period. Results: Three primary themes were evident in the articles: (1) the legitimization of alcohol as an important social and economic product, (2) the portrayal of the industry as trustworthy and benign, and (3) the strategic embedding of alcohol in various facets of everyday life. Conclusions: There was a general failure to acknowledge the substantial burden of disease caused by alcohol products, and instead much effort was expended on legitimizing the product and the companies responsible for its production, distribution, and promotion. The level of denial exhibited shows that additional regulation of the industry and its tactics will need to proceed without industry acceptance. Clear resistance to increasing consumer protections also points to the futility of inviting industry members to the policy table.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Claire Hafekost
- Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | | | - Hannah Pierce
- McCusker Centre for Action on Alcohol and Youth, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Tanya Chikritzhs
- National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Julia Stafford
- McCusker Centre for Action on Alcohol and Youth, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hawkins B, McCambridge J. Can internal tobacco industry documents be useful for studying the UK alcohol industry? BMC Public Health 2018; 18:808. [PMID: 29954357 PMCID: PMC6022490 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5722-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The release of internal documents now available in the Truth Tobacco Documents Library has offered important insights into the machinations of tobacco companies. These documents potentially offer additional insights into the nature of the alcohol industry, due to co-ownership and collaborative working across industries. This proof of concept study aims to build on the few examples of internal tobacco company documents being used to study alcohol industry activities, to identify the scope of information available on the UK alcohol industry. Methods We identified the principal company names of the major national brewers, including predecessor company names, until the late 1990s, contemporaneous to the bulk of the tobacco documents. Using these names as initial search terms, we searched the Library to identify relevant material. Documents returned were then analysed for evidence of alcohol industry connections to the tobacco industry in the UK. Results We found evidence of significant relationships between the two industries including previously unidentified data on co-ownership and cross industry shareholding; informal help-seeking between sectors; collaboration on issues of common interest; and cross industry ties via third party service providers, membership of common organisations and participation in shared events and platforms. Conclusions These findings call for further research to analyse in greater depth the information identified here, and to explore alcohol industry activities and links with tobacco companies in other national contexts. This preliminary investigation suggests there is much valuable data available in the Truth Tobacco Documents Library that can serve to guide research on the alcohol industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Hawkins
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
| | - Jim McCambridge
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Douglas N, Knai C, Petticrew M, Eastmure E, Durand MA, Mays N. How the food, beverage and alcohol industries presented the Public Health Responsibility Deal in UK print and online media reports. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2018. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2018.1467001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Douglas
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| | - Cecile Knai
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| | - Mark Petticrew
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| | - Elizabeth Eastmure
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| | - Mary Alison Durand
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| | - Nicholas Mays
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, Policy Innovation Research Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine , London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Shortt NK, Rind E, Pearce J, Mitchell R, Curtis S. Alcohol risk environments, vulnerability and social inequalities in alcohol consumption. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GEOGRAPHERS 2018; 108:1210-1227. [PMID: 32154488 PMCID: PMC7062511 DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2018.1431105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2017] [Revised: 12/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Alcohol and alcohol related harm are key public health challenges. Research has shown that individual level factors, such as age and sex, are important predictors of alcohol consumption, but such factors provide only a partial account of the drivers of consumption. In this paper we argue that individual level factors interact with features of the 'risk environment' to increase the vulnerability of individuals to such environments. Features of the alcohol 'risk environment' include the density of alcohol premises in a neighbourhood. Previous research has shown that neighbourhoods with a higher density of alcohol outlets have higher levels of both alcohol consumption and alcohol related harm. There has however been a distinct lack of attention paid to the differential ways in which particular socio-demographic groups may be more vulnerable to such 'risk environments'. In this paper we address the risk environment through a primary focus on the local supply and availability of alcohol products (captured using a measure of outlet density) and the relationship with the harmful use of alcohol. Using responses to the Scottish Health Survey (2008-2011) we explore vulnerability through the interaction between individual level socio-economic position, measured using household income, and environmental risk to assess differential social vulnerability to such environments. We report findings showing that those in the lowest income groups may be disproportionately affected by outlet density. This evidence suggests that risk environments may not affect us all equally and that there may be socially differentiated vulnerability to such environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niamh K Shortt
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, UK, EH8 9XP
| | - Esther Rind
- Institute of Occupational and Social Medicine & Health Services Research, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Jamie Pearce
- Centre for Research on Environment, Society and Health, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Drummond Street, Edinburgh, UK, EH8 9XP
| | - Richard Mitchell
- MRC/CSO Social & Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK, G2 3QB
| | - Sarah Curtis
- Department of Geography, Durham University, Durham, UK, DH1 3LE
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
McCambridge J, Mialon M, Hawkins B. Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review. Addiction 2018; 113:1571-1584. [PMID: 29542202 PMCID: PMC6100095 DOI: 10.1111/add.14216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To summarize the substantive findings of studies of alcohol industry involvement in national or supranational policymaking, and to produce a new synthesis of current evidence. METHODS This study examined peer-reviewed journal reports published in the English language between 1980 and 2016 of studies of alcohol industry involvement in policymaking. Included studies were required to provide information on data collection and analysis and to have sought explicitly to investigate interventions by alcohol industry actors within the process of public policymaking. Eight electronic databases were searched on 27 February 2017. The methodological strengths and limitations of individual studies and the literature as a whole were examined. A thematic synthesis using an inductive approach to the generation of themes was guided by the research aims and objectives. RESULTS Twenty reports drawn from 15 documentary and interview studies identify the pervasive influence of alcohol industry actors in policymaking. This evidence synthesis indicates that industry actors seek to influence policy in two principal ways by: (1) framing policy debates in a cogent and internally consistent manner, which excludes from policy agendas issues that are contrary to commercial interests; and (2) adopting short- and long-term approaches to managing threats to commercial interests within the policy arena by building relationships with key actors using a variety of different organizational forms. This review pools findings from existing studies on the range of observed impacts on national alcohol policy decision-making throughout the world. CONCLUSIONS Alcohol industry actors are highly strategic, rhetorically sophisticated and well organized in influencing national policymaking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ben Hawkins
- Department of Health SciencesUniversity of YorkYorkUK
- Faculty of Public Health and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hawkins B, Holden C, Eckhardt J, Lee K. Reassessing policy paradigms: A comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries. Glob Public Health 2018; 13:1-19. [PMID: 26998944 PMCID: PMC6620754 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2016.1161815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco is widely considered to be a uniquely harmful product for human health. Since the mid-1990s, the strategies of transnational tobacco corporations to undermine effective tobacco control policy has been extensively documented through internal industry documents. Consequently, the sale, use and marketing of tobacco products are subject to extensive regulation and formal measures to exclude the industry from policy-making have been adopted in the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. In contrast to tobacco, alcohol is subject to less stringent forms of regulation, and the alcohol industry continues to play a central role in policy-making in many countries and at the global level. This article examines whether there is a sufficient rationale for such different regulatory approaches, through a comparative analysis of the political economy of the tobacco and alcohol industries including the structure of the industries, and the market and political strategies they pursue. Despite some important differences, the extensive similarities which exist between the tobacco and alcohol industries in terms of market structure and strategy, and political strategy, call into question the rationale for both the relatively weak regulatory approach taken towards alcohol, and the continued participation of alcohol corporations in policy-making processes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Hawkins
- a Department of Global Health and Development , London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine , London , UK
| | - Chris Holden
- b Department of Social Policy & Social Work , University of York , Heslington , UK
| | - Jappe Eckhardt
- c Department of Politics , University of York , Heslington , UK
| | - Kelley Lee
- d Faculty of Health Sciences , Simon Fraser University , Burnaby , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
McKee M, Stuckler D. "Enemies of the People?" Public Health in the Era of Populist Politics Comment on "The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy". Int J Health Policy Manag 2017; 6:669-672. [PMID: 29179293 PMCID: PMC5675585 DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.46] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 04/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In this commentary, we review the growth of populist politics, associated with exploitation of what has been termed fake news. We explore how certain words have been used in similar contexts historically, in particular the term "enemy of the people," especially with regard to public health. We then set out 6 principles for public health professionals faced with these situations. First, using their epidemiological skills, they can provide insights into the reasons underlying the growth of populist politics. Second using their expertise in modelling and health impact assessment, they can anticipate and warn about the consequences of populist policies. Third, they can support the institutions that are necessary for effective public health. Fourth they can reclaim the narrative, rejecting hatred and division, to promote social solidarity. Fifth, they can support fact checking and the use of evidence. Finally, they should always remember the lessons of history, and in particular, the way that public health has, on occasions, collaborated with totalitarian and genocidal regimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin McKee
- ECOHOST, Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - David Stuckler
- Dipartimento di Analisi delle Politiche e Management Pubblico, Università Bocconi, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hill SR, Vale L, Hunter D, Henderson E, Oluboyede Y. Economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions: Is the evidence sufficient? A review of methodological challenges. Health Policy 2017; 121:1249-1262. [PMID: 29100609 PMCID: PMC5710990 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Revised: 09/15/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
There are few economic evaluations of alcohol prevention interventions. Consideration of impacts beyond an individual’s health in evaluations is limited. No published studies using other priority-setting methods in the alcohol area. Consideration of wider societal perspectives and health inequalities is minimal. Including inter-sectoral costs and consequences in evaluations is challenging.
Public health interventions have unique characteristics compared to health technologies, which present additional challenges for economic evaluation (EE). High quality EEs that are able to address the particular methodological challenges are important for public health decision-makers. In England, they are even more pertinent given the transition of public health responsibilities in 2013 from the National Health Service to local government authorities where new agents are shaping policy decisions. Addressing alcohol misuse is a globally prioritised public health issue. This article provides a systematic review of EE and priority-setting studies for interventions to prevent and reduce alcohol misuse published internationally over the past decade (2006–2016). This review appraises the EE and priority-setting evidence to establish whether it is sufficient to meet the informational needs of public health decision-makers. 619 studies were identified via database searches. 7 additional studies were identified via hand searching journals, grey literature and reference lists. 27 met inclusion criteria. Methods identified included cost-utility analysis (18), cost-effectiveness analysis (6), cost-benefit analysis (CBA) (1), cost-consequence analysis (CCA) (1) and return-on-investment (1). The review identified a lack of consideration of methodological challenges associated with evaluating public health interventions and limited use of methods such as CBA and CCA which have been recommended as potentially useful for EE in public health. No studies using other specific priority-setting tools were identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah R Hill
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK; Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - Luke Vale
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK; Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - David Hunter
- Centre for Public Policy and Health, School of Medicine, Pharmacy & Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK; Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - Emily Henderson
- Centre for Public Policy and Health, School of Medicine, Pharmacy & Health, Wolfson Research Institute, Durham University, Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees, TS17 6BH, UK; Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon-Tyne, UK.
| | - Yemi Oluboyede
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle upon-Tyne, NE2 4AX, UK; Fuse, UKCRC Centre for Translational Research in Public Health, Newcastle upon-Tyne, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Miller P, Martino F, Gross S, Curtis A, Mayshak R, Droste N, Kypri K. Funder interference in addiction research: An international survey of authors. Addict Behav 2017; 72:100-105. [PMID: 28390231 DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2016] [Revised: 03/10/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Scientific research is essential to the development of effective addiction treatment and drug policy. Actions that compromise the integrity of addiction science need to be understood. The aim of this study is to investigate funder (e.g. industry, government or charity) interference in addiction science internationally. METHOD Corresponding authors of all 941 papers published in an international specialist journal July 2004 to June 2009 were invited to complete a web questionnaire. A sensitivity analysis with extreme assumptions about non-respondents was undertaken. RESULTS The questionnaire was completed by 322 authors (response fraction 34%), 36% (n=117) of whom had encountered at least one episode (median=3, Interquartile range=4) of funder interference in their research: 56% in Australasia, 33% in Europe, and 30% in North America. Censorship of research outputs was the most common form of interference. The wording or writing of reports and articles, as well as where, when and how findings were released were the areas in which influence was most often reported. CONCLUSIONS Funder interference in addiction science appears to be common internationally. Strategies to increase transparency in the addiction science literature, including mandatory author declarations concerning the role of the funder, are necessary.
Collapse
|
38
|
Geiger BB, Cuzzocrea V. Corporate social responsibility and conflicts of interest in the alcohol and gambling industries: a post-political discourse? THE BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY 2017; 68:254-272. [PMID: 28369716 DOI: 10.1111/1468-4446.12249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The corporate pursuit of social goals - known as Corporate Social Responsibility or 'CSR' - has been subject to critique on a number of grounds. However, a hitherto underexplored potential consequence of CSR has been suggested in a recent paper by C. Garsten and K. Jacobsson ('Post-Political Regulation: Soft Power and Post-political Visions in Global Governance' (2013), Critical Sociology 39: 421-37). They suggest that CSR is part of an international trend towards 'post-political' governance discourses, where an emphasis on different actors' common goals obscures conflicts of interest, subverting the open political conflict necessary for a well-functioning democracy. This paper examines whether such post-political discourses - including an outright denial of conflict of interest - can be found within the alcohol and gambling industries, where conflicts of interest are likely to be particularly acute given the addictive nature of the goods/services in question. Based on interviews with CSR professionals in these industries in Italy, the UK, and at EU-level, we do indeed find evidence of a post-political discourse. In these discourses, alcohol/gambling industry staff deny potential conflicts of interest on the basis that any small benefits from sales to a small number of addicts are seen to be outweighed by the reputational damage that addicts cause. Crucially, however, this coexists with another, less post-political discourse, where addictions CSR professionals emphasize 'common ground' as a basis for CSR, while accepting some instances of possible conflict of interest. Here interviewees make considerable efforts to differentiate good (sustainable) from bad (short-term) self-interest in order to stress the genuineness of their own actions. We conclude the paper by considering whether CSR embedded within a 'common ground' discourse still hides conflicts of interests and subverts democratic debate, or overcomes the problems identified by Garsten and Jacobsson.
Collapse
|
39
|
Thornton M, Hawkins B. Between a rock and a hard place: Economic expansion and social responsibility in UK media discourses on the global alcohol industry. Soc Sci Med 2017; 175:169-176. [PMID: 28092758 PMCID: PMC5303881 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2016] [Revised: 11/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Transnational alcohol corporations (TACs) employ a range of strategies to achieve their business objectives, including attempts to frame perceptions of their activities in media debates. TACs aim to achieve a favourable regulatory environment by presenting themselves as socially responsible actors. However, the need to secure financial investment means they must also emphasise their potential for growth. This article investigates tensions between these objectives in coverage of the global alcohol industry in the UK print media. METHODS This article examines coverage of the world's four largest TACs in five British daily newspapers and one industry publication between March 2012 and February 2013. 477 articles were identified for analysis through keyword searches of the LexisNexis database. Thematic coding of articles was conducted using Nvivo software. FINDINGS Two conflicting framings of the alcohol industry emerge from our analysis. The first presents TACs as socially responsible actors; key partners to government in reducing alcohol-related harms. This is targeted at policy-makers and the public in an attempt to shape policy debates. The second framing highlights TACs' potential for economic growth by establishing new markets and identifying new customer bases. This is targeted at an audience of potential investors. CONCLUSIONS A fundamental contradiction lies at the heart of these framings, reflecting the tensions that exist between TACs' political and financial strategies. Alcohol industry involvement in policy-making thus involves a fundamental conflict of interests. Consequently, the UK government should reassess the prominence it currently affords to the industry in the development and delivery of alcohol policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Thornton
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Benjamin Hawkins
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Martino FP, Miller PG, Coomber K, Hancock L, Kypri K. Analysis of Alcohol Industry Submissions against Marketing Regulation. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0170366. [PMID: 28118411 PMCID: PMC5261775 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
A growing body of literature points to the role of vested interests as a barrier to the implementation of effective public health policies. Corporate political activity by the alcohol industry is commonly used to influence policy and regulation. It is important for policy makers to be able to critique alcohol industry claims opposed to improved alcohol marketing regulation. The Australian National Preventive Health Agency reviewed alcohol marketing regulations in 2012 and stakeholders were invited to comment on them. In this study we used thematic analysis to examine submissions from the Australian alcohol industry, based on a system previously developed in relation to tobacco industry corporate political activity. The results show that submissions were a direct lobbying tactic, making claims to government that were contrary to the evidence-base. Five main frames were identified, in which the alcohol industry claimed that increased regulation: (1) is unnecessary; (2) is not backed up by sufficient evidence; (3) will lead to unintended negative consequences; and (4) faces legal barriers to implementation; underpinned by the view (5) that the industry consists of socially responsible companies working toward reducing harmful drinking. In contrast with tobacco industry submissions on public policy, which often focused on legal and economic barriers, the Australian alcohol industry placed a heavier emphasis on notions of regulatory redundancy and insufficient evidence. This may reflect differences in where these industries sit on the ‘regulatory pyramid’, alcohol being less regulated than tobacco.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Graeme Miller
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- * E-mail:
| | - Kerri Coomber
- School of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - Linda Hancock
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts & Education, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Kypros Kypri
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia
- Injury Prevention Research Unit, Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Newton A, Lloyd-Williams F, Bromley H, Capewell S. Food for thought? Potential conflicts of interest in academic experts advising government and charities on dietary policies. BMC Public Health 2016; 16:735. [PMID: 27495802 PMCID: PMC4975877 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-016-3393-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A conflict of interest (CoI) can occur between public duty and private interest, in which a public official's private-capacity interest could improperly influence the performance of their official duties and responsibilities. The most tangible and commonly considered CoI are financial. However, CoI can also arise due to other types of influence including interpersonal relationships, career progression, or ideology. CoI thus exist in academia, business, government and non-governmental organisations. However, public knowledge of CoI is currently limited due to a lack of information. The mechanisms of managing potential conflicts of interest also remain unclear due to a lack of guidelines. We therefore examined the independence of academic experts and how well potential CoI are identified and addressed in four government and non-governmental organisations in the UK responsible for the development of food policy. METHODS Policy analysis. We developed an analytical framework to explore CoI in high-level UK food policy advice, using four case studies. Two government policy-making bodies: Department of Health 'Obesity Review Group' (ORG), 'Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition' (SACN) and two charities: 'Action on Sugar' (AoS), & 'Heart of Mersey' (HoM). Information was obtained from publicly available sources and declarations. We developed a five point ordinal scale based upon the ideology of the Nolan Principles of Public Life. Group members were individually categorised on the ordinal ConScale from "0", (complete independence from the food and drink industry) to "4", (employed by the food and drink industry or a representative organisation). RESULTS CoI involving various industries have long been evident in policy making, academia and clinical practice. Suggested approaches for managing CoI could be categorised as "deny", "describe", or "diminish". Declared CoI were common in the ORG and SACN. 4 out of 28 ORG members were direct industry employees. In SACN 11 out of 17 members declared industry advisory roles or industry research funding. The two charities appeared to have equally strong academic expertise but fewer conflicts. No HoM members declared CoI. 5 out of 21 AoS members declared links with industry, mainly pharmaceutical companies. We were unable to obtain information on conflicts for some individuals. CONCLUSIONS Conflicts of interest are unavoidable but potentially manageable. Government organisations responsible for policy development and implementation must institutionalize an approach to identify (disclose) and manage (mitigate or eliminate) perceived and actual CoI to improve public confidence in government decision-making relevant to food policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Newton
- Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Ffion Lloyd-Williams
- Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK.
| | - Helen Bromley
- Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| | - Simon Capewell
- Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3GB, UK
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Taking health geography out of the academy: Measuring academic impact. Soc Sci Med 2016; 168:265-272. [PMID: 27389849 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.06.048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2016] [Revised: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In recent years the academic landscape has been shifting and significantly affected by the introduction of an 'impact agenda'. Academics are increasingly expected to demonstrate their broader engagement with the world and evidence related outcomes. Whilst different countries are at various stages along this impact journey, the UK is the first country to link impact to funding outcomes; here impact now accounts for 20% of an academic unit of assessment's Research Excellence Framework (REF) result. This concept of 'research impact' implies that our work can effect change through one or more identifiable events in a direct, preferably linear and certainly measurable manner. In this paper, focusing on impact in social science, and policy-related impact in particular, we argue that such a cause and effect model is inappropriate. Furthermore that impact is not immediate or indeed linear within social science research. Drawing on recent work on alcohol and tobacco environments in Scotland we present a case study of impact, reflect on the process and respond to the challenges of moving beyond 'business as usual' public participation towards the measurement of outcomes. In doing so we critique the way in which 'impact' is currently measured and suggest a move towards an enlightenment model with greater recognition of process.
Collapse
|
43
|
|
44
|
Savell E, Fooks G, Gilmore AB. How does the alcohol industry attempt to influence marketing regulations? A systematic review. Addiction 2016; 111:18-32. [PMID: 26173765 PMCID: PMC4681589 DOI: 10.1111/add.13048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2014] [Revised: 12/03/2014] [Accepted: 07/03/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIM To systematically review, using a qualitative, narrative synthesis approach, papers examining alcohol industry efforts to influence alcohol marketing policy, and compare with those used by the tobacco industry. METHODS Literature searches were conducted between April and July 2011, and updated in March 2013. Papers were included if they: made reference to alcohol industry efforts to influence (a) policy debates concerning marketing regulations, (b) new specific marketing policies or (c) broad alcohol policy which included marketing regulations; were written in English; and concerned the period 1990-2013. Alcohol industry political activity was categorized into strategies/tactics and frames/arguments. Data extraction was undertaken by the lead author and 100% of the papers were fully second-reviewed. Seventeen papers met the review criteria. RESULTS Five main political strategies and five main frames were identified. The alcohol industry argues against marketing regulation by emphasizing industry responsibility and the effectiveness of self-regulation, questioning the effectiveness of statutory regulation and by focusing on individual responsibility. Arguments relating to industry responsibility are often reinforced through corporate social responsibility activities. The industry primarily conveys its arguments through manipulating the evidence base and by promoting ineffective voluntary codes and non-regulatory initiatives. CONCLUSIONS The alcohol industry's political activity is more varied than existing models of corporate political activity suggest. The industry's opposition to marketing regulation centres on claims that the industry is responsible and that self regulation is effective. There are considerable commonalities between tobacco and alcohol industry political activity, with differences due potentially to differences in policy contexts and perceived industry legitimacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Savell
- Department for HealthUniversity of BathBathUK
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol StudiesBathUK
| | - Gary Fooks
- School of Languages and Social ScienceAston UniversityBirminghamUK
| | - Anna B. Gilmore
- Department for HealthUniversity of BathBathUK
- UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol StudiesBathUK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rushmer RK, Cheetham M, Cox L, Crosland A, Gray J, Hughes L, Hunter DJ, McCabe K, Seaman P, Tannahill C, Van Der Graaf P. Research utilisation and knowledge mobilisation in the commissioning and joint planning of public health interventions to reduce alcohol-related harms: a qualitative case design using a cocreation approach. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2015. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr03330] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundConsiderable resources are spent on research to establish what works to improve the nation’s health. If the findings from this research are used, better health outcomes can follow, but we know that these findings are not always used. In public health, evidence of what works may not ‘fit’ everywhere, making it difficult to know what to do locally. Research suggests that evidence use is a social and dynamic process, not a simple application of research findings. It is unclear whether it is easier to get evidence used via a legal contracting process or within unified organisational arrangements with shared responsibilities.ObjectiveTo work in cocreation with research participants to investigate how research is utilised and knowledge mobilised in the commissioning and planning of public health services to reduce alcohol-related harms.Design, setting and participantsTwo in-depth, largely qualitative, cross-comparison case studies were undertaken to compare real-time research utilisation in commissioning across a purchaser–provider split (England) and in joint planning under unified organisational arrangements (Scotland) to reduce alcohol-related harms. Using an overarching realist approach and working in cocreation, case study partners (stakeholders in the process) picked the topic and helped to interpret the findings. In Scotland, the topic picked was licensing; in England, it was reducing maternal alcohol consumption.MethodsSixty-nine interviews, two focus groups, 14 observations of decision-making meetings, two local feedback workshops (n = 23 andn = 15) and one national workshop (n = 10) were undertaken. A questionnaire (n = 73) using a Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scale was issued to test the transferability of the 10 main findings. Given the small numbers, care must be taken in interpreting the findings.FindingsNot all practitioners have the time, skills or interest to work in cocreation, but when there was collaboration, much was learned. Evidence included professional and tacit knowledge, and anecdotes, as well as findings from rigorous research designs. It was difficult to identify evidence in use and decisions were sometimes progressed in informal ways and in places we did not get to see. There are few formal evidence entry points. Evidence (prevalence and trends in public health issues) enters the process and is embedded in strategic documents to set priorities, but local data were collected in both sites to provide actionable messages (sometimes replicating the evidence base).ConclusionsTwo mid-range theories explain the findings. If evidence hassaliency(relates to ‘here and now’ as opposed to ‘there and then’) andimmediacy(short, presented verbally or visually and with emotional appeal) it is more likely to be used in both settings. A second mid-range theory explains how differing tensions pull and compete as feasible and acceptable local solutions are pursued across stakeholders. Answering what works depends on answering for whom and where simultaneously to find workable (if temporary) ‘blends’. Gaining this agreement across stakeholders appeared more difficult across the purchaser–provider split, because opportunities to interact were curtailed; however, more research is needed.FundingThis study was funded by the Health Services and Delivery Research programme of the National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosemary K Rushmer
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Mandy Cheetham
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - Lynda Cox
- Clinical Directorates, NHS England, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Ann Crosland
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Joanne Gray
- Department of Public Health and Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - David J Hunter
- Centre for Public Policy and Health, School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Wolfsan Research Institute, Durham University, Durham, UK
| | - Karen McCabe
- Department of Pharmacy, Health and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Pete Seaman
- Glasgow Centre for Population Health, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - Peter Van Der Graaf
- School of Health and Social Care, Health and Social Care Institute, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Moewaka Barnes H, McCreanor T, Goodwin I, Lyons A, Griffin C, Hutton F. Alcohol and social media: drinking and drunkenness while online. CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2015.1058921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
47
|
Abstract
In the wake of the Steering Group Report on a National Substance Misuse Strategy in 2012, the Irish government announced in October 2013 that it had approved a number of alcohol policy measures to be incorporated into a Public Health (Alcohol) Bill to be drafted and enacted as quickly as possible. Against a historic backdrop of previous alcohol policy proposals in Ireland in recent decades, this article looks critically at this recent development with a view to determining to what extent it represents, in Kingdon’s terms, a “policy window” for the public health approach to alcohol issues. It is argued that while some specific public health measures may be introduced, the various “streams” of the Irish policy process have not joined together in an unambiguous, consensual acceptance of the public perspective on alcohol, and that the “politics stream” has not to date deemed this perspective to be consonant with the “national mood.”
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shane Butler
- School of Social Work & Social Policy, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Katikireddi SV, Hilton S. How did policy actors use mass media to influence the Scottish alcohol minimum unit pricing debate? Comparative analysis of newspapers, evidence submissions and interviews. DRUGS (ABINGDON, ENGLAND) 2015; 22:125-134. [PMID: 26045639 PMCID: PMC4438355 DOI: 10.3109/09687637.2014.977228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2014] [Revised: 09/15/2014] [Accepted: 10/11/2014] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Aims: To explore how policy actors attempted to deliberately frame public debate around alcohol minimum unit pricing (MUP) in the UK by comparing and contrasting their constructions of the policy in public (newspapers), semi-public (evidence submissions) and private (interviews). Methods: Content analysis was conducted on articles published in ten national newspapers between 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2012. Newsprint data were contrasted with alcohol policy documents, evidence submissions to the Scottish Parliament's Health and Sport Committee and 36 confidential interviews with policy stakeholders (academics, advocates, industry representatives, politicians and civil servants). Findings: A range of policy actors exerted influence both directly (through Parliamentary institutions and political representatives) and indirectly through the mass media. Policy actors were acutely aware of mass media's importance in shaping public opinion and used it tactically to influence policy. They often framed messages in subtly different ways, depending on target audiences. In general, newspapers presented the policy debate in a "balanced" way, but this arguably over-represented hostile perspective and suggested greater disagreement around the evidence base than is the case. Conclusions: The roles of policy actors vary between public and policy spheres, and how messages are communicated in policy debates depends on perceived strategic advantage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Understandings and Uses of Public Health Research Programme, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Public Health and Health Policy, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Shona Hilton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Understandings and Uses of Public Health Research Programme, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Guo X, Huang YG. The development of alcohol policy in contemporary China. J Food Drug Anal 2014; 23:19-29. [PMID: 28911442 PMCID: PMC9351742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfda.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2013] [Revised: 01/23/2014] [Accepted: 05/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Over recent years, an increase in alcohol-related problems has been noted in China. Taking effective measures against the problem requires clear reviewing and understanding of the evolution of the Chinese alcohol policy. This study is aimed to evaluate the alcohol policy with special focus on reviewing the alcohol production and consumption situation in China and assessing the changes in Chinese alcohol policy along with other related fields. This article finishes with a set of recommended policy changes that could help solve the recent alcohol-related problems and analyze the major impediments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu Guo
- School of Food Science and Technology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Yong-Guang Huang
- Liquor-making Science and Technology Publishing House, Guizhou Provincial Light Industry Scientific Research Institute, Guiyang, Guizhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Cairney P, Studlar D. Public Health Policy in the United Kingdom: After the War on Tobacco, Is a War on Alcohol Brewing? WORLD MEDICAL & HEALTH POLICY 2014. [DOI: 10.1002/wmh3.106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|