1
|
Ng SH, Kaur S, Cheah PY, Ong ZL, Lim J, Voo TC. Migration health ethics in Southeast Asia: a scoping review. Wellcome Open Res 2024; 8:391. [PMID: 38595706 PMCID: PMC11002524 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19572.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Asia hosts the second-largest international migrant population in the world. In Southeast Asia (SEA), key types of migration are labour migration, forced migration, and environmental migration. This scoping review seeks to identify key themes and gaps in current research on the ethics of healthcare for mobile and marginalised populations in SEA, and the ethics of research involving these populations. Methods We performed a scoping review using three broad concepts: population (stateless population, migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, internally displaced people), issues (healthcare and ethics), and context (11 countries in SEA). Three databases (PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science) were searched from 2000 until May 2023 over a period of four months (February 2023 to May 2023). Other relevant publications were identified through citation searches, and six bioethics journals were hand searched. All searches were conducted in English, and relevant publications were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were subsequently imported into NVivo 14, and thematic analysis was conducted. Results We identified 18 papers with substantial bioethical analysis. Ethical concepts that guide the analysis were 'capability, agency, dignity', 'vulnerability', 'precarity, complicity, and structural violence' (n=7). Ethical issues were discussed from the perspective of research ethics (n=9), clinical ethics (n=1) and public health ethics (n=1). All publications are from researchers based in Singapore, Thailand, and Malaysia. Research gaps identified include the need for more research involving migrant children, research from migrant-sending countries, studies on quality of migrant healthcare, participatory health research, and research with internal migrants. Conclusions More empirical research is necessary to better understand the ethical issues that exist in the domains of research, clinical care, and public health. Critical examination of the interplay between migration, health and ethics with consideration of the diverse factors and contexts involved is crucial for the advancement of migration health ethics in SEA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Hui Ng
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Bandar Sunway, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia
| | - Sharon Kaur
- Faculty of Law, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | - Phaik Yeong Cheah
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand
- Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Oxford, OX3 7LG, UK
| | - Zhen Ling Ong
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Jane Lim
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| | - Teck Chuan Voo
- Centre for Biomedical Ethics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 117597, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Linden RR, Schermer MHN. Exploring health and disease concepts in healthcare practice: an empirical philosophy of medicine study. BMC Med Ethics 2024; 25:38. [PMID: 38539209 PMCID: PMC10967067 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-024-01037-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
In line with recent proposals for experimental philosophy and philosophy of science in practice, we propose that the philosophy of medicine could benefit from incorporating empirical research, just as bioethics has. In this paper, we therefore take first steps towards the development of an empirical philosophy of medicine, that includes investigating practical and moral dimensions. This qualitative study gives insight into the views and experiences of a group of various medical professionals and patient representatives regarding the conceptualization of health and disease concepts in practice and the possible problems that surround them. This includes clinical, epistemological, and ethical issues. We have conducted qualitative interviews with a broad range of participants (n = 17), working in various health-related disciplines, fields and organizations. From the interviews, we highlight several different practical functions of definitions of health and disease. Furthermore, we discuss 5 types of problematic situations that emerged from the interviews and analyze the underlying conceptual issues. By providing theoretical frameworks and conceptual tools, and by suggesting conceptual changes or adaptations, philosophers might be able to help solve some of these problems. This empirical-philosophical study contributes to a more pragmatic way of understanding the relevance of conceptualizing health and disease by connecting the participants' views and experiences to the theoretical debate. Going back and forth between theory and practice will likely result in a more complex but hopefully also better and more fruitful understanding of health and disease concepts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rik R van der Linden
- department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Maartje H N Schermer
- department of Medical Ethics, Philosophy & History of Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brisson J, Ravitsky V, Williams-Jones B. A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Colombian Adolescents' Access to Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: The Need for a Relational Autonomy Approach. JOURNAL OF BIOETHICAL INQUIRY 2024:10.1007/s11673-024-10356-w. [PMID: 38532187 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-024-10356-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
This study's objective was to understand Colombian adolescents' experiences and preferences regarding access to sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS), either alone or accompanied. A mixed-method approach was used, involving a survey of 812 participants aged eleven to twenty-four years old and forty-five semi-structured interviews with participants aged fourteen to twenty-three. Previous research shows that adolescents prefer privacy when accessing SRHS and often do not want their parents involved. Such findings align with the longstanding tendency to frame the ethical principle of autonomy as based on independence in decision-making. However, the present study shows that such a conceptualization and application of autonomy does not adequately explain Colombian adolescent participants' preferences regarding access to SRHS. Participants shared a variety of preferences to access SRHS, with the majority of participants attaching great importance to having their parents involved, to varying degrees. What emerges is a more complex and non-homogenous conceptualization of autonomy that is not inherently grounded in independence from parental involvement in access to care. We thus argue that when developing policies involving adolescents, policymakers and health professionals should adopt a nuanced "relational autonomy" approach to better respect the myriad of preferences that Colombian (and other) adolescents may have regarding their access to SRHS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Brisson
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | - V Ravitsky
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| | - B Williams-Jones
- Department of Social & Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mertz M, Prince I, Pietschmann I. Values, decision-making and empirical bioethics: a conceptual model for empirically identifying and analyzing value judgements. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS 2023; 44:567-587. [PMID: 37589807 PMCID: PMC10643456 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-023-09640-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/18/2023]
Abstract
It can be assumed that value judgements, which are needed to judge what is 'good' or 'better' and what is 'bad' or 'worse', are involved in every decision-making process. The theoretical understanding and analysis of value judgements is, therefore, important in the context of bioethics, for example, to be able to ethically assess real decision-making processes in biomedical practice and make recommendations for improvements. However, real decision-making processes and the value judgements inherent in them must first be investigated empirically ('empirical bioethics'). For this to succeed, what exactly a 'value judgement' is and of what components it might consist must initially be theoretically clarified. A corresponding conceptual model can then support or even enable empirical data collection and analysis and, above all, subsequent ethical analysis and evaluation. This paper, therefore, presents a value judgement model with its theoretical derivation. It also illustrates its application in an interview study of decision-making between animal experimentation and alternative methods in the context of biomedical research. Though the model itself can be theoretically deepened and extended, the application of the model works in general and helps to uncover what value judgements can enter into decision-making. However, the empirical methods, for example, qualitative interviews, can also be better oriented towards eliciting value judgements (as understood according to the model). Further applications of the model to other topics or by means of other empirical methods are conceivable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Mertz
- Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Ilvie Prince
- Institute of Philosophy, Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ines Pietschmann
- Department for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Goettingen University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nakou P, Bennett R. The risk of normative bias in reporting empirical research: lessons learned from prenatal screening studies about the prominence of acknowledged limitations. THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS 2023; 44:589-606. [PMID: 37930620 PMCID: PMC10643326 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-023-09639-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
Empirical data can be an extremely powerful and influential tool in bioethical research. However, when researchers or policy makers look for answers to ethical questions by engaging with empirical research, there can be a tendency (conscious or unconscious) to shape, report, and use empirical research in a way that confirms their own preferred ethical conclusions. This skewing effect - what we call 'normative bias' - is often so subtle it falls short of clear misconduct and thus can be difficult to call out. However, we argue that this subtle influence of bias has the potential to significantly influence debate and policy around highly sensitive ethical issues and must be guarded against. In this paper we share the lessons we have learned through a journey of self-reflection around the effect that normative bias can have when reporting on and referring to empirical data relating to ethical issues. We use a variety of papers from our area of the ethics of routine prenatal screening to illustrate these subtle but often powerfully distorting effects of bias. Our aim in doing so is not to criticise the work of others, as we recognise our own normative bias, but to improve awareness of this issue, remind the need for reflexivity to guard against our own biases, and introduce a new criterion - the idea of a 'limitation prominence assessment' - that can work as a practical way to evaluate the seriousness of the limitations of an empirical study and thus, the risks of the study being misread or misinterpreted through superficial reading.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiota Nakou
- Department of Law, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Rebecca Bennett
- Department of Law, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schneider M, Vayena E, Blasimme A. Digital bioethics: introducing new methods for the study of bioethical issues. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2023; 49:783-790. [PMID: 34509981 PMCID: PMC10646908 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The online space has become a digital public square, where individuals interact and share ideas on the most trivial to the most serious of matters, including discussions of controversial ethical issues in science, technology and medicine. In the last decade, new disciplines like computational social science and social data science have created methods to collect and analyse such data that have considerably expanded the scope of social science research. Empirical bioethics can benefit from the integration of such digital methods to investigate novel digital phenomena and trace how bioethical issues take shape online.Here, using concrete examples, we demonstrate how novel methods based on digital approaches in the social sciences can be used effectively in the domain of bioethics. We show that a digital turn in bioethics research aligns with the established aims of empirical bioethics, integrating with normative analysis and expanding the scope of the discipline, thus offering ways to reinforce the capacity of bioethics to tackle the increasing complexity of present-day ethical issues in science and technology. We propose to call this domain of research in bioethics digital bioethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Schneider
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Effy Vayena
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alessandro Blasimme
- Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wexler A, Sullivan LS. Translational Neuroethics: A Vision for a More Integrated, Inclusive, and Impactful Field. AJOB Neurosci 2023; 14:388-399. [PMID: 34851808 PMCID: PMC9187971 DOI: 10.1080/21507740.2021.2001078] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
As early-career neuroethicists, we come to the field of neuroethics at a unique moment: we are well-situated to consider nearly two decades of neuroethics scholarship and identify challenges that have persisted across time. But we are also looking squarely ahead, embarking on the next generation of exciting and productive neuroethics scholarship. In this article, we both reflect backwards and turn our gaze forward. First, we highlight criticisms of neuroethics, both from scholars within the field and outside it, that have focused on speculation and lack of skepticism; the dearth of consideration of broader social issues such as justice and equality, both with regard to who speaks for neuroethics as a field and who benefits from its recommendations and findings; and the insufficient focus on the practical impact of our ethical work. Second, we embrace the concept of "translational neuroethics" to outline a vision for neuroethics that is integrated, inclusive, and impactful. Integration can help us identify more pertinent, real-world issues, and move away from speculation; inclusivity can help ensure that the questions we attend to are not merely relevant to a single subgroup but aim toward just distribution of benefits; and impact can help us think beyond guidelines and recommendations to focus on implementation. Our goal is for this call to action to help shape neuroethics into a discipline that develops rigorous research agendas through relationships with interdisciplinary partners, that is broadly inclusive and attends to issues beyond novel neurotechnologies, and that is devoted to the translation of scholarship into practice.
Collapse
|
8
|
Virtanen MJ. Socially enacted ethics: The inner life of an ethical advisory board. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2023; 45:1403-1420. [PMID: 37020392 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
This article addresses the need to grasp the actual processing of health ethical issues in ethics organisations by analysing the work of the Finnish National Advisory Board on Social Welfare and Health Care Ethics (ETENE). ETENE's ethics is approached ethigraphically: the advisory board enacts ethics in its social life, through its own norms and values. It is asked how this internal ethics is performed in the board practice and how ethical debate eventually becomes bounded in this practice. Based on the analysis of the board members' textual reflections and on-site observations of board meetings, ETENE's ethics appears as a tandem of a particular discussion culture and multi-perspectivity: mutual recognition and respect among board members are nurtured in the meetings, and a tactful mode of reflection is established throughout all terms of office. This shared discussion culture enables ETENE's forte-weighing multiple perspectives-by preventing asymmetries and avoiding merely technical decision-making procedures. Consequently, ETENE's ethics is not threatened by being externally bounded and formalised but is at risk of watering down endogenously, through the notable tactfulness of its discussion mode, which threatens to attenuate both substantial debate and the social shaping of board members' values in the discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikko J Virtanen
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bak MAR, Ploem MC, Tan HL, Blom MT, Willems DL. Towards trust-based governance of health data research. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2023; 26:185-200. [PMID: 36633724 PMCID: PMC9835739 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-022-10134-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
Developments in medical big data analytics may bring societal benefits but are also challenging privacy and other ethical values. At the same time, an overly restrictive data protection regime can form a serious threat to valuable observational studies. Discussions about whether data privacy or data solidarity should be the foundational value of research policies, have remained unresolved. We add to this debate with an empirically informed ethical analysis. First, experiences with the implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) within a European research consortium demonstrate a gap between the aims of the regulation and its effects in practice. Namely, strictly formalised data protection requirements may cause routinisation among researchers instead of substantive ethical reflection, and may crowd out trust between actors in the health data research ecosystem; while harmonisation across Europe and data sharing between countries is hampered by different interpretations of the law, which partly stem from different views about ethical values. Then, building on these observations, we use theory to argue that the concept of trust provides an escape from the privacy-solidarity debate. Lastly, the paper details three aspects of trust that can help to create a responsible research environment and to mitigate the encountered challenges: trust as multi-agent concept; trust as a rational and democratic value; and trust as method for priority setting. Mutual cooperation in research-among researchers and with data subjects-is grounded in trust, which should be more explicitly recognised in the governance of health data research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marieke A R Bak
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M Corrette Ploem
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hanno L Tan
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Heart Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M T Blom
- Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dick L Willems
- Department of Ethics, Law and Humanities, Amsterdam UMC (Location AMC), University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schwietering J, Langhof H, Strech D. Empirical studies on how ethical recommendations are translated into practice: a cross-section study on scope and study objectives. BMC Med Ethics 2023; 24:2. [PMID: 36631789 PMCID: PMC9835353 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00873-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empirical research can become relevant for bioethics in at least two ways. First, by informing the development or refinement of ethical recommendations. Second, by evaluating how ethical recommendations are translated into practice. This study aims to investigate the scope and objectives of empirical studies evaluating how ethical recommendations are translated into practice. METHODS A sample of the latest 400 publications from four bioethics journals was created and screened. All publications were included if they met one of the following three criteria: (1) evaluative empirical research, (2) non-evaluative empirical research and (3) borderline cases. For all publications categorized as evaluative empirical research we analyzed which objects (norms and recommendations) had been evaluated. RESULTS 234 studies were included of which 54% (n = 126) were categorized as non-evaluative empirical studies, 36% (n = 84) as evaluative empirical studies, and 10% (n = 24) as borderline cases. The object of evaluation were aspirational norms in 5 of the 84 included evaluative empirical studies, more specific norms in 14 (16%) studies and concrete best practices in 65 (77%) studies. The specific best practices can be grouped under five broader categories: ethical procedures, ethical institutions, clinical or research practices, educational programs, and legal regulations. CONCLUSIONS This mapping study shows that empirical evaluative studies can be found at all stages in the translational process from theory to best practices. Our study suggests two intertwined dimensions for structuring the field of evaluative/translational empirical studies in bioethics: First, three broader categories of evaluation objects and second five categories for types of best practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION The methodology used was described in a study protocol that was registered publicly on the Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/r6h4y/ ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Schwietering
- grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Holger Langhof
- grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Strech
- grid.484013.a0000 0004 6879 971XQUEST Center for Responsible Research, Berlin Institute of Health (BIH) at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lyreskog DM, Pavarini G, Jacobs E, Bennett V, Mawdsley G, Singh I. Testing Design Bioethics Methods: Comparing a Digital Game with a Vignette Survey for Neuroethics Research with Young People. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2023; 14:55-64. [PMID: 35993968 PMCID: PMC9612923 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2022.2110964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last decades, the neurosciences, behavioral sciences, and the social sciences have all seen a rapid development of innovative research methods. The field of bioethics, however, has trailed behind in methodological innovation. Despite the so-called "empirical turn" in bioethics, research methodology for project development, data collection and analysis, and dissemination has remained largely restricted to surveys, interviews, and research papers. We have previously argued for a "Design Bioethics" approach to empirical bioethics methodology, which develops purpose-built methods for investigation of bioethical concerns. In this paper we compare a research tool created using a design bioethics approach to a "methods-as-usual" approach in empirical bioethics. METHODS Our study compared dimensions of engagement with a digital game we created, called "Tracing Tomorrow," to a standard vignette survey. The two tools investigated the same subject matter, digital phenotyping for mental health, in a sample of 301 UK adolescents. RESULTS Participants who played the game reported a greater sense of presence, emotional engagement, cognitive absorption, and mental health ethics insight, compared to participants who completed the vignette survey. Perceived authenticity and curiosity/motivation to learn more was equivalent for both methods. CONCLUSION The results of this study highlights the importance of purpose-built methodology for empirical bioethics research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Lyreskog
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford, UK
- Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Oxford, UK
| | - Gabriela Pavarini
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford, UK
- Ethox Centre, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Edward Jacobs
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford, UK
| | - Vanessa Bennett
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Geoffrey Mawdsley
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ilina Singh
- NEUROSEC, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mihailov E, Provoost V, Wangmo T. Acceptable objectives of empirical research in bioethics: a qualitative exploration of researchers' views. BMC Med Ethics 2022; 23:140. [PMID: 36575520 PMCID: PMC9794471 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-022-00845-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is the first qualitative study to investigate how researchers, who do empirical work in bioethics, relate to objectives of empirical research in bioethics (ERiB). We explore reasons that make some objectives more acceptable, while others are deemed less acceptable. METHODS Using qualitative exploratory study design, we interviewed bioethics researchers, who were selected to represent different types of scholars working in the field. The interview data of 25 participants were analyzed in this paper using thematic analysis. RESULTS From the eight objectives presented to the study participants, understanding the context of a bioethical issue and identifying ethical issues in practice received unanimous agreement. Participants also supported other objectives of ERiB but with varying degrees of agreement. The most contested objectives were striving to draw normative recommendations and developing and justifying moral principles. The is-ought gap was not considered an obstacle to ERiB, but rather a warning sign to critically reflect on the normative implications of empirical results. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that the most contested objectives are also the more ambitious ones, whereas the least contested ones focus on producing empirical results. The potential of empirical research to be useful for bioethics was mostly based on the reasoning pattern that empirical data can provide a testing ground for elements of normative theory. Even though empirical research can inform many parts of bioethical inquiry, normative expertise is recommended to guide ERiB. The acceptability of ambitious objectives for ERiB boils down to finding firm ground for the integration of empirical facts in normative inquiry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilian Mihailov
- grid.5100.40000 0001 2322 497XFaculty of Philosophy, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Veerle Provoost
- grid.5342.00000 0001 2069 7798Bioethics Institute Ghent, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Tenzin Wangmo
- grid.6612.30000 0004 1937 0642Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hädicke M, Föcker M, Romer G, Wiesemann C. Healthcare Professionals' Conflicts When Treating Transgender Youth: Is It Necessary to Prioritize Protection Over Respect? Camb Q Healthc Ethics 2022; 32:1-9. [PMID: 36330826 DOI: 10.1017/s0963180122000251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Increasingly, transgender minors are seeking medical care such as puberty-suppressing or gender-affirming hormone therapies. Yet, whether these interventions should be performed at all is highly controversial. Some healthcare practitioners oppose irreversible interventions, considering it their duty to protect children from harm. Others view minors, like adults, as transgender individuals who must be protected from discrimination. The underlying ethical question is presented as a problem of priority. Is it primarily relevant that minors are involved? Or should decision makers focus on the fact that they treat transgender individuals? The paper explores the relevance for medical practice. We provide results of an interview study with German healthcare professionals. We discuss the general question whether prioritization among different group memberships of the same person is ethically defensible. We conclude that priority conflicts between group memberships of the same person can be deceptive and should be addressed by an intersectional approach. Eventually, we discuss practical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximiliane Hädicke
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Humboldtallee36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Manuel Föcker
- University Medical Center Münster, Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Schmeddingstraße 50, 48149Münster, Germany
| | - Georg Romer
- University Medical Center Münster, Clinic for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Schmeddingstraße 50, 48149Münster, Germany
| | - Claudia Wiesemann
- University Medical Center Göttingen, Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Humboldtallee36, 37073, Göttingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Cox S, Solbakk JH, Bernabe RDLC. Research ethics committees and post-approval activities: a qualitative study on the perspectives of European research ethics committee representatives. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:1897-1907. [PMID: 35993742 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2115773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the views of Research Ethics Committee (REC) representatives in the European Union (EU) on what the status quo is in terms of RECs' activities after the approval of trial protocols for clinical studies. METHOD This is a qualitative study. The participants in this study are members or representatives of a research ethics committee from the member countries of the European Network of Research Ethics Committees (EUREC) and the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis was the method to assess interview transcripts. RESULTS Interviews of REC representatives from 19 countries across Europe reveals that REC post-approval activities are predominantly limited to review and approval of protocol amendments. The majority of the RECs do not have mandatory continuing reviews or receipt of notifications of adverse events or protocol violations. In fact, most post-approval activities are the remit of the regulatory authorities. The interviewed members were also of the opinion that RECs in the EU do not have the legislative support, the organizational structure, the expert staff nor time to do active post approval follow-up. CONCLUSIONS Post-approval follow-up activities for clinical studies by RECs is a valuable resource and means for early detection and resolution of protocol deviations and violations. However, a majority of RECs within Europe do not have active post-approval follow-up of approved protocols. The interviews revealed that resource challenges such as time, personnel, and organizational structure contribute to the lack of follow-up by RECs. Some RECs in the represented countries do not identify post-approval follow-up as part of their mandate but instead place emphasis on the culture of trust between the RECs and researchers. Current EU Regulations do not directly address the role of the REC after the approval of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shereen Cox
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jan Helge Solbakk
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Rosemarie D L C Bernabe
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- The Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Kongsberg, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Miceli McMillan R. Psychedelic injustice: should bioethics tune in to the voices of psychedelic-using communities? MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2022; 48:269-272. [PMID: 35074926 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2021-012299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Psychedelic compounds are regaining widespread interest due to emerging evidence surrounding their therapeutic effects. The controversial nature of these compounds highlights the need for extensive bioethical input to guide the process of medicalisation. To date there is no bioethics literature that consults the voices of psychedelic-using communities in order to help guide normative considerations of psychedelic medicalisation. In this paper I argue that psychedelic-using communities ought to be included in bioethical discussions that guide normative elements of psychedelic medicalisation. I argue this by presenting two points. First, psychedelic-using communities hold a degree of epistemic expertise regarding psychedelics by virtue of their embodied experiences with these compounds. Therefore, these communities are able to identify normative considerations that communities without embodied experiences would overlook. Second, psychedelic-using communities are uniquely and heavily affected by psychedelic medicalisation. Therefore, the needs of these communities ought to be considered when evaluating and implementing normative changes that alter psychedelic usage in society. The counterargument that psychedelic-using communities should not guide normative considerations of psychedelic medicalisation is presented by highlighting empirical data that suggest groups of the public with embodied experiences regarding a topic are less able to engage in deliberative reasoning on the said topic than the lay public. However, I propose that even if this is the case, psychedelic-using communities are owed consultation by agents of psychedelic medicalisation in order to undo and cease perpetuating epistemic injustice against these communities.
Collapse
|
16
|
Hinga A, Jeena L, Awuor E, Kahindi J, Munene M, Kinyanjui S, Molyneux S, Marsh V, Kamuya D. Pandemic preparedness and responsiveness of research review committees: lessons from review of COVID-19 protocols at KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya. Wellcome Open Res 2022; 7:75. [PMID: 35855072 PMCID: PMC9257264 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17533.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The scale of the COVID-19 pandemic and novelty of SARS-CoV-2 presented unprecedented challenges in the review of COVID-19 protocols. We investigated how research at the KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) was reviewed, including by institutional and national level committees. Methods: A document review and in-depth interviews with researchers, regulators and research reviewers were conducted. Documents reviewed included research logs of all protocols submitted between April-1-2020 and March-31-2021, feedback letters from review committees for 10 new COVID-19 protocols (n=42), and minutes from 35 COVID-19 research review meetings. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with respondents purposively selected because of their experience of developing or reviewing COVID-19 protocols at the institution level (n=9 researchers, engagement officers and regulators) or their experience in reviewing proposals at a national-level (n=6 committee members). Data were managed and analyzed using MS Excel and NVivo12. Results: Between April-1-2020 and March-31-2021, 30 COVID-19-related submissions by KWTRP researchers were approved. Changes to the review system included strengthening the online system for protocol submission and review, recruiting more reviewers, and trialing a joint review process where one protocol was submitted to multiple review committees simultaneously . The turnaround time from submission to national approval/rejection over this period was faster than pre-pandemic, but slower than the national committee’s target. COVID-19-specific ethics questions centred on: virtual informed consent and data collection; COVID-19 prevention, screening and testing procedures; and the challenges of study design and community engagement during the pandemic. Conclusions: The unprecedented challenges of the pandemic and added bureaucratic requirements created a more complex review process and delayed final approval of research protocols. The feasibility of conducting joint review of research during public health emergencies in Kenya needs further investigation. Consideration of the unique COVID-19 ethics issues raised in this paper might aid expedience in current and future reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Hinga
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Lisha Jeena
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Esther Awuor
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Jane Kahindi
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Marianne Munene
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Samson Kinyanjui
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- Strathmore Business School, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Ole Sangare Road, P.O. Box 59857 – 00200, Kenya
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hinga A, Jeena L, Awuor E, Kahindi J, Munene M, Kinyanjui S, Molyneux S, Marsh V, Kamuya D. Pandemic preparedness and responsiveness of research review committees: lessons from review of COVID-19 protocols at KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme in Kenya. Wellcome Open Res 2022; 7:75. [PMID: 35855072 PMCID: PMC9257264 DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17533.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The scale of the COVID-19 pandemic and novelty of SARS-CoV-2 presented unprecedented challenges in the review of COVID-19 protocols. We investigated how research at the KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme (KWTRP) was reviewed, including by institutional and national level committees. Methods: A document review and in-depth interviews with researchers, regulators and research reviewers were conducted. Documents reviewed included research logs of all protocols submitted between April-1-2020 and March-31-2021, feedback letters from review committees for 10 new COVID-19 protocols (n=42), and minutes from 35 COVID-19 research review meetings. Fifteen in-depth interviews were conducted with respondents purposively selected because of their experience of developing or reviewing COVID-19 protocols at the institution level (n=9 researchers, engagement officers and regulators) or their experience in reviewing proposals at a national-level (n=6 committee members). Data were managed and analyzed using MS Excel and NVivo12. Results: Between April-1-2020 and March-31-2021, 30 COVID-19-related submissions by KWTRP researchers were approved. Changes to the review system included strengthening the online system for protocol submission and review, recruiting more reviewers, and trialing a joint review process where one protocol was submitted to multiple review committees simultaneously . The turnaround time from submission to national approval/rejection over this period was faster than pre-pandemic, but slower than the national committee's target. COVID-19-specific ethics questions centred on: virtual informed consent and data collection; COVID-19 prevention, screening and testing procedures; and the challenges of study design and community engagement during the pandemic. Conclusions: The unprecedented challenges of the pandemic and added bureaucratic requirements created a more complex review process and delayed final approval of research protocols. The feasibility of conducting joint review of research during public health emergencies in Kenya needs further investigation. Consideration of the unique COVID-19 ethics issues raised in this paper might aid expedience in current and future reviews.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Hinga
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Lisha Jeena
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Esther Awuor
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Jane Kahindi
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Marianne Munene
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
| | - Samson Kinyanjui
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
- Strathmore Business School, Strathmore University, Nairobi, Ole Sangare Road, P.O. Box 59857 – 00200, Kenya
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - Dorcas Kamuya
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, P.O. Box 230-80108, Kenya
- Centre for Tropical Medicine, Nuffield Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, Old Road Campus, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Buchanan K, Newnham E, Ireson D, Davison C, Geraghty S. Care ethics framework for midwifery practice: A scoping review. Nurs Ethics 2022; 29:1107-1133. [PMID: 35395917 DOI: 10.1177/09697330221073996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background: As a normative theory, care ethics has become widely theorized and accepted. However, there remains a lack of clarity in relation to its use in practice, and a care ethics framework for practice. Maternity care is fraught with ethical issues and care ethics may provide an avenue to enhance ethical sensitivity.Aim: The purpose of this scoping review is to determine how care ethics is used amongst health professions, and to collate the information in data charts to create a care ethics framework and definition for midwifery practice.Method: The scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) recommendations. The search was applied to the databases CINAHL, MEDLINE, PschInfo and Pubmed which were searched in September 2019 and again in July 2021. The inclusion criteria were guided by the mnemonic for search terms: Participants, Concept, and Context (PCC) and included variations of health care professionals, care ethics and utilization. The search was limited to qualitative studies published in English between 2010 and 2021. A data extraction tool was used to extract and synthesize data into categories. The articles were screened for eligibility by title, abstract and full text review, by two independent reviewers.Ethical Considerations: The scoping review was guided by ethical conduct respecting authorship and referencing sources.Results: Twelve of the initially identified 129 studies were included in the scoping review. Data synthesis yielded four categories of care ethics use by health professionals: relationship, context, attention to power and caring practices. In combination, the evidence forms a framework for care ethics use in midwifery practice.Conclusion: Care ethics use by health professionals enhances ethical sensitivity. A framework and definition for care ethics for midwifery practice is proposed. This review will be of interest to midwives and other health practitioners seeking to enhance ethical sensitivity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Buchanan
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, 2498Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia; 3431The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| | | | - Deborah Ireson
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, 2498Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
| | | | - Sadie Geraghty
- 3431The University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle, WA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lemoine MÈ, Brisson J, Blackburn É, Payment JP, Laliberté M. La place de la bioéthique au sein du régime d’examen des plaintes dans le réseau de santé et de services sociaux québécois. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS 2022. [DOI: 10.7202/1092952ar] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
20
|
Haselwarter D, Wild V, Kuehlmeyer K. Providing health care in politically charged contexts: a qualitative study about experiences during a public collective hunger strike of asylum seekers in Germany. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2022; 17:2018770. [PMID: 34971348 PMCID: PMC8740618 DOI: 10.1080/17482631.2021.2018770] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Role expectations of physicians providing health care for hunger strikers have been discussed in the context of prisons and detention centres. Ethical guidance for physicians in these situations is codified in the Declaration of Malta. In the last years, new forms of collective, public hunger strikes of asylum seekers have occurred. We have aimed at reconstructing the experiences of health-care personnel involved in one of such cases. Methods Semi-structured interviews with nine participants (physicians and paramedics) that had been involved in a public collective hunger strike of asylum seekers in Germany were conducted. Results We identified three health-care provider groups: voluntary physicians, emergency service providers and medical consultants for the authorities. Role conflicts arising from multiple loyalty situations with obligations towards different stakeholders (e.g., strikers, employers, authorities) were perceived as the greatest challenge especially for voluntary doctor and emergency service provider participants. Such conflicts culminated in feeling instrumentalized for political goals. Conclusion The results illustrate that professional challenges in the health care during a public collective hunger strike differ in various aspects from those described in the literature on custodial settings. We recommend expanding and adapting the medico-ethical guidance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Haselwarter
- Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Verina Wild
- Ethics of Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Katja Kuehlmeyer
- Institute of Ethics, History and Theory of Medicine, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Morberg Jämterud S, Snoek A, van Langen IM, Verkerk M, Zeiler K. Qualitative study of GPs' views and experiences of population-based preconception expanded carrier screening in the Netherlands: bioethical perspectives. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e056869. [PMID: 34887284 PMCID: PMC8663082 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Between 2016 and 2017, a population-based preconception expanded carrier screening (PECS) test was developed in the Netherlands during a pilot study. It was subsequently made possible in mid-2018 for couples to ask to have such a PECS test from specially trained general practitioners (GPs). Research has described GPs as crucial in offering PECS tests, but little is known about the GPs' views on PECS and their experiences of providing this test. This article presents a thematic analysis of the PECS practice from the perspective of GPs and a bioethical discussion of the empirical results. DESIGN Empirical bioethics. A thematic analysis of qualitative semi-structured interviews was conducted, and is combined with an ethical/philosophical discussion. SETTING The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS 7 Dutch GPs in the Netherlands, interviewed in 2019-2020. RESULTS Two themes were identified in the thematic analysis: 'Choice and its complexity' and 'PECS as prompting existential concerns'. The empirical bioethics discussion showed that the first theme highlights that several areas coshape the complexity of choice on PECS, and the need for shared relational autonomous decision-making on these areas within the couple. The second theme highlights that it is not possible to analyse the existential issues raised by PECS solely on the level of the couple or family. A societal level must be included, since these levels affect each other. We refer to this as 'entangled existential genetics'. CONCLUSION The empirical bioethical analysis leads us to present two practical implications. These are: (1) training of GPs who are to offer PECS should cover shared relational autonomous decision-making within the couple and (2) more attention should be given to existential issues evoked by genetic considerations, also during the education of GPs and in bioethical discussions around PECS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anke Snoek
- Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I M van Langen
- Department of Genetics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marian Verkerk
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kristin Zeiler
- Department of Thematic Studies, Linköping University, Linkoping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abstract
A standard of evidence is a rule or norm pertaining to the type or amount of evidence that is required to prove or support a conclusion. Standards of evidence play an important role in institutional review board (IRB) decision-making, but they are not mentioned in the federal research regulations. In this article, I examine IRB standards of evidence from a normative, epistemological perspective and argue that IRBs should rely on empirical evidence for making decisions, but that other sources of evidence, such as intuition, emotion, and rational reflection, can also play an important role in decision-making, because IRB decisions involve an ethical component which is not reducible to science. I also argue that an IRB should approve a study only if it has clear and convincing evidence that the study meets all the approval criteria and other relevant, ethical considerations; and that for studies which expose healthy volunteers to significant risks, an IRB should require that evidence be more than clear and convincing as a condition for approval. Additional empirical research is needed on how IRBs use evidence to make decisions and how standards of evidence influence IRB decision-making at the individual and group level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Resnik
- National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
The ethical implications of verbal autopsy: responding to emotional and moral distress. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:118. [PMID: 34481510 PMCID: PMC8418286 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00683-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Verbal autopsy is a pragmatic approach for generating cause-of-death data in contexts without well-functioning civil registration and vital statistics systems. It has primarily been conducted in health and demographic surveillance systems (HDSS) in Africa and Asia. Although significant resources have been invested to develop the technical aspects of verbal autopsy, ethical issues have received little attention. We explored the benefits and burdens of verbal autopsy in HDSS settings and identified potential strategies to respond to the ethical issues identified. Methods This research was based on a case study approach centred on two contrasting HDSS in Kenya and followed the Mapping-Framing-Shaping Framework for empirical bioethics research. Data were collected through individual interviews, focus group discussions, document reviews and non-participant observations. 115 participants were involved, including 86 community members (HDSS residents and community representatives), and 29 research staff (HDSS managers, researchers, census field workers and verbal autopsy interviewers). Results The use of verbal autopsy data for research and public health was described as the most common potential benefit of verbal autopsy in HDSS. Community members mentioned the potential uses of verbal autopsy data in addressing immediate public health problems for the local population while research staff emphasized the benefits of verbal autopsy to research and the wider public. The most prominent burden associated with the verbal autopsy was emotional distress for verbal autopsy interviewers and respondents. Moral events linked to the interview, such as being unsure of the right thing to do (moral uncertainty) or knowing the right thing to do and being constrained from acting (moral constraint), emerged as key causes of emotional distress for verbal autopsy interviewers. Conclusions The collection of cause-of-death data through verbal autopsy in HDSS settings presents important ethical and emotional challenges for verbal autopsy interviewers and respondents. These challenges include emotional distress for respondents and moral distress for interviewers. This empirical ethics study provides detailed accounts of the distress caused by verbal autopsy and highlights ethical tensions between potential population benefits and risks to individuals. It includes recommendations for policy and practice to address emotional and moral distress in verbal autopsy. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12910-021-00683-7.
Collapse
|
24
|
Hinga AN, Molyneux S, Marsh V. Towards an appropriate ethics framework for Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS): learning from issues faced in diverse HDSS in sub-Saharan Africa. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2020-004008. [PMID: 33408190 PMCID: PMC7789450 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2020] [Revised: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Health and Demographic Surveillance Systems (HDSS) collect data on births, deaths and migration from relatively small, geographically defined populations primarily in Africa and Asia. HDSS occupy a grey area between research, healthcare and public health practice and it is unclear how ethics guidance that rely on a research-practice distinction apply to HDSS. This topic has received little attention in the literature. In this paper, based on empirical research across sub-Saharan Africa, we map out key ethical issues for HDSS and assess the relevance of current ethics guidance in relation to these findings. Methods We conducted a qualitative study across seven HDSS sites in sub-Saharan Africa, including individual in-depth interviews and informal discussions with 68 research staff, document reviews and non-participant observations of surveillance activities. Qualitative data analysis drew on a framework approach led by a priori and emergent themes, drawing on the wider ethics and social science literature. Results There were diverse views on core ethical issues in HDSS, including regarding the strengths and challenges of community engagement, informed consent and data sharing processes. A key emerging issue was unfairness in the overall balance of benefits and burdens for residents and front-line staff when compared with other stakeholders, particularly given the socioeconomic contexts in which HDSS are generally conducted. Conclusion We argue that HDSS operate as non-traditional epidemiologic research projects but are often governed using ethics guidance developed for traditional forms of health research. There is a need for specific ethics guidance for HDSS which prioritises considerations around fairness, cost-effectiveness, ancillary care responsibilities, longitudinality and obligations of the global community to HDSS residents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alex Nginyo Hinga
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Sassy Molyneux
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| | - Vicki Marsh
- Health Systems and Research Ethics, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Pavarini G, McMillan R, Robinson A, Singh I. Design Bioethics: A Theoretical Framework and Argument for Innovation in Bioethics Research. THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS : AJOB 2021; 21:37-50. [PMID: 33502959 PMCID: PMC8676709 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1863508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Empirical research in bioethics has developed rapidly over the past decade, but has largely eschewed the use of technology-driven methodologies. We propose "design bioethics" as an area of conjoined theoretical and methodological innovation in the field, working across bioethics, health sciences and human-centred technological design. We demonstrate the potential of digital tools, particularly purpose-built digital games, to align with theoretical frameworks in bioethics for empirical research, integrating context, narrative and embodiment in moral decision-making. Purpose-built digital tools can engender situated engagement with bioethical questions; can achieve such engagement at scale; and can access groups traditionally under-represented in bioethics research and theory. If developed and used with appropriate rigor, tools motivated by "design bioethics" could offer unique insights into new and familiar normative and empirical issues in the field.
Collapse
|
26
|
Conroy M, Malik AY, Hale C, Weir C, Brockie A, Turner C. Using practical wisdom to facilitate ethical decision-making: a major empirical study of phronesis in the decision narratives of doctors. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:16. [PMID: 33602193 PMCID: PMC7890840 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00581-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical ethics has recently seen a drive away from multiple prescriptive approaches, where physicians are inundated with guidelines and principles, towards alternative, less deontological perspectives. This represents a clear call for theory building that does not produce more guidelines. Phronesis (practical wisdom) offers an alternative approach for ethical decision-making based on an application of accumulated wisdom gained through previous practice dilemmas and decisions experienced by practitioners. Phronesis, as an 'executive virtue', offers a way to navigate the practice virtues for any given case to reach a final decision on the way forward. However, very limited empirical data exist to support the theory of phronesis-based medical decision-making, and what does exist tends to focus on individual practitioners rather than practice-based communities of physicians. METHODS The primary research question was: What does it mean to medical practitioners to make ethically wise decisions for patients and their communities? A three-year ethnographic study explored the practical wisdom of doctors (n = 131) and used their narratives to develop theoretical understanding of the concepts of ethical decision-making. Data collection included narrative interviews and observations with hospital doctors and General Practitioners at all stages in career progression. The analysis draws on neo-Aristotelian, MacIntyrean concepts of practice- based virtue ethics and was supported by an arts-based film production process. RESULTS We found that individually doctors conveyed many different practice virtues and those were consolidated into fifteen virtue continua that convey the participants' 'collective practical wisdom', including the phronesis virtue. This study advances the existing theory and practice on phronesis as a decision-making approach due to the availability of these continua. CONCLUSION Given the arguments that doctors feel professionally and personally vulnerable in the context of ethical decision-making, the continua in the form of a video series and app based moral debating resource can support before, during and after decision-making reflection. The potential implications are that these theoretical findings can be used by educators and practitioners as a non-prescriptive alternative to improve ethical decision-making, thereby addressing the call in the literature, and benefit patients and their communities, as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mervyn Conroy
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aisha Y. Malik
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
- Department for Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Catherine Hale
- Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Catherine Weir
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alan Brockie
- Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chris Turner
- Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Corsico P. "It's all about delivery": researchers and health professionals' views on the moral challenges of accessing neurobiological information in the context of psychosis. BMC Med Ethics 2021; 22:11. [PMID: 33557813 PMCID: PMC7869514 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-020-00551-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The convergence of neuroscience, genomics, and data science holds promise to unveil the neurobiology of psychosis and to produce new ways of preventing, diagnosing, and treating psychotic illness. Yet, moral challenges arise in neurobiological research and in the clinical translation of research findings. This article investigates the views of relevant actors in mental health on the moral challenges of accessing neurobiological information in the context of psychosis. Methods Semi-structured individual interviews with two groups: researchers employed in the National Health Service (NHS) or a university in England (n = 14), and mental health professionals employed in NHS mental health services (n = 14). This article compares results in the two groups (total n = 28). Results This article presents findings around three conceptual areas: (1) research ethics as mostly unproblematic, (2) psychosis, neurobiological information, and mental health care, and (3) identity, relationships, and the future. These areas are drawn from the themes and topics that emerged in the interviews across the two groups of participants. Researchers and health professionals provided similar accounts of the moral challenges of accessing—which includes acquisition, communication, and use of—neurobiological information in the context of psychosis. Acquiring neurobiological information was perceived as mostly unproblematic, provided ethical safeguards are put in place. Conversely, participants argued that substantive moral challenges arise from how neurobiological information is delivered—that is, communicated and used—in research and in clinical care. Neurobiological information was seen as a powerful tool in the process through which individuals define their identity and establish personal and clinical goals. The pervasiveness of this narrative tool may influence researchers and health professionals’ perception of ethical principles and moral obligations. Conclusions This study suggests that the moral challenges that arise from accessing neurobiological information in the context of psychosis go beyond traditional research and clinical ethics concerns. Reflecting on how accessing neurobiological information can influence individual self-narratives will be vital to ensure the ethical translation of neuroscience and genomics into mental health. Trial registration The study did not involve a health care intervention on human participants. It was retrospectively registered on 11 July 2018, registration number: researchregistry4255.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Corsico
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester, Williamson Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lensink MA, Boers SN, Jongsma KR, Carter SE, van der Ent CK, Bredenoord AL. Organoids for personalized treatment of Cystic Fibrosis: Professional perspectives on the ethics and governance of organoid biobanking. J Cyst Fibros 2020; 20:443-451. [PMID: 33303364 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2020.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Organoid technology is emerging rapidly as a valuable tool for precision medicine, particularly in the field of Cystic Fibrosis (CF). However, biobank storage and use of patient-derived organoids raises specific ethical and practical challenges that demand sound governance. We examined the perspectives of professionals affiliated with CF or organoids on the ethical aspects of organoid biobanking for CF precision medicine. By conducting this study parallel to the process of innovation and development of organoid biobanking, its findings are valuable for the design of responsible governance frameworks. METHODS To identify relevant themes and attitudes we conducted 21 semi-structured qualitative interviews with professionals in the field of organoid technology, biobanking, or CF research and care. RESULTS We identified three key challenges, as well as the suggestions of professionals on how to address them: (1) The challenges associated with commercial involvement, trust, and ownership, (2) Navigating the blurring boundary between research and clinical care, (3) Appropriate approaches to the informed consent procedure. CONCLUSION Sound governance of organoid biobanks aimed at precision medicine requires coming to terms with the fact that its stakeholders no longer belong to separate domains. Responsible governance should be aimed at finding a sound, context-sensitive balance between integration of ongoing co-operation and mutual consideration of interests, and maintaining a feasible and sustainable research climate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Lensink
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sarah N Boers
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Karin R Jongsma
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Sarah E Carter
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis K van der Ent
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post KH.01.419.0, P.O. Box 85090, 3508 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Internal Post Str. 6.131, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Affiliation(s)
- Connie M Ulrich
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily E Anderson
- Stritch School of Medicine, Neiswanger Institute for Bioethics & Health Policy, Loyola University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jennifer K Walter
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mariani PC, Constantino CF, Nunes R. Classification of plastic surgery malpractice complaints brought before the São Paulo Medical Board that were treated as professional-misconduct cases: a cross-sectional study. SAO PAULO MED J 2020; 138:140-145. [PMID: 32159603 PMCID: PMC9662843 DOI: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.0363.09122019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nowadays, there is an ethical and moral necessity to establish rules that govern professional attitudes and conduct. In the medical field, these rules are multifaceted, given the health consequences inherent to medical procedures. Ethics is an even more delicate subject when it comes to plastic surgery, since one of the aims of this particular medical specialty is esthetic improvement of the body. OBJECTIVE To survey and classify São Paulo State Medical Board investigations of plastic-surgery complaints that were treated as professional-misconduct cases between 2007 and 2016. DESIGN AND SETTING Cross-sectional study conducted in a medical council. METHODS A total of 360 cases were reviewed. Among these, 8 (2.23%) were dismissed, 1 (0.27%) became an administrative lawsuit and 351 (97.50%) were treated as professional-misconduct cases. RESULTS A breakdown of the complaints filed over the nine-year period showed that complaints concerning malpractice were the most common (28.43%), followed by those regarding medical advertising (24.19%) and poor doctor-patient relationships (10.39%). CONCLUSION Overall, the number of complaints lodged decreased over the last two years reviewed, although complaints regarding malpractice and poor doctor-patient relationships increased by 10% over the same period. In order to further reduce the number of medical board investigations, the medical establishment needs to carefully review the medical training of students and doctors at every stage of their careers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulo Cézar Mariani
- MD. Doctoral Student, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| | | | - Rui Nunes
- PhD. Professor, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Pacyna JE, Sharp RR. When Moral Intuitions and Empirical Findings Collide: A Case for Revisiting Protectionist Tendencies in Bioethics. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2020; 11:24-26. [PMID: 32096724 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2020.1713245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joel E Pacyna
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Richard R Sharp
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Guntram L, Zeiler K. The Ethics of the Societal Entrenchment-approach and the case of live uterus transplantation-IVF. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2019; 22:557-571. [PMID: 31102175 PMCID: PMC6842335 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-019-09891-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
In 2014, the first child in the world was born after live uterus transplantation and IVF (UTx-IVF). Before and after this event, ethical aspects of UTx-IVF have been discussed in the medical and bioethical debate as well as, with varying intensity, in Swedish media and political fora. This article examines what comes to be identified as important ethical problems and solutions in the media debate of UTx-IVF in Sweden, showing specifically how problems, target groups, goals, benefits, risks and stakes are delineated and positioned. It also demonstrates how specific assumptions, norms and values are expressed and used to underpin specific positions within this debate, and how certain subjects, desires and risks become shrouded or simply omitted from it. This approach-which we label the Ethics of the Societal Entrenchment-approach, inspired by Koch and Stemerding (1994)-allows us to discuss how the identification of something as the problem helps to shape what gets to be described as a solution, and how specific solutions provide frameworks within which problems can be stated and emphasised. We also offer a critical discussion of whether some of these articulations and formations should be seen as ethically troubling, and if so, why.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Guntram
- Department of Thematic Studies – Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
| | - Kristin Zeiler
- Department of Thematic Studies – Technology and Social Change, Linköping University, 581 83 Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bartram A, Crabb S, Hanson-Easey S, Eliott J. "We Were Totally Supportive, of Course": How People Talk About Supporting a Significant Other to Stop or Reduce Their Drinking. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2019; 29:1120-1131. [PMID: 30484374 DOI: 10.1177/1049732318809945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Despite the strong influence our significant others have on health behaviors such as alcohol consumption, little is known about when they are willing to provide support for changing such behaviors. We conducted interviews with 13 Australian adults who had a partner, friend, or family member who stopped or significantly reduced their alcohol consumption within the past 2 years, to understand how these significant others accounted for providing support for this behavior change as reasonable. Through thematic discourse analysis, we identified three types of accounts: (a) deontological, referring to duty or obligation to support others; (b) consequentialist, where costs for providing support were minimized or balanced; and (c) relational, attending to the importance of maintaining relationships. By identifying the principles people draw on to justify supporting a significant other who changes their alcohol consumption, this study enhances our understanding about when significant others are likely to support health behavior changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashlea Bartram
- 1 The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- 2 University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Shona Crabb
- 1 The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Kool EM, van der Graaf R, Bos AME, Pieters JJPM, Custers IM, Fauser BCJM, Bredenoord AL. Stakeholders views on the ethical aspects of oocyte banking for third-party assisted reproduction: a qualitative interview study with donors, recipients and professionals. Hum Reprod 2019; 34:842-850. [PMID: 30927419 PMCID: PMC9185857 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2018] [Revised: 02/01/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the moral considerations held by donors, recipients and professionals towards the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor bank oocytes for third-party assisted reproduction? SUMMARY ANSWER Interviews with oocyte donors, oocyte recipients and professionals demonstrate a protective attitude towards the welfare of the donor and the future child. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The scarcity of donor oocytes challenges the approach towards the many ethical aspects that arise in establishing and operating an oocyte bank for third-party assisted reproduction. Including experiences and moral considerations originating from practice provides useful insight on how to overcome these challenges. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The project was set-up as a qualitative interview study and took place between October 2016 and August 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We conducted 25 semi-structured interviews with professionals engaged in the practice of oocyte banking (n = 10), recipients of donor oocytes (n = 7) and oocyte donors (n = 8). Key themes were formulated by means of a thematic analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Based on the interviews, we formulated four main themes describing stakeholders’ views regarding the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor bank oocytes. First, respondents articulated that when selecting donors and recipients, healthcare workers should prevent donors from making a wrong decision and safeguard the future child’s well-being by minimizing health risks and selecting recipients based on their parental capabilities. Second, they proposed to provide a reasonable compensation and to increase societal awareness on the scarcity of donor oocytes to diminish barriers for donors. Third, respondents considered the prioritization of recipients in case of scarcity a difficult choice, because they are all dependent on donor oocytes to fulfil their wish for a child. They emphasized that treatment attempts should be limited, but at least include one embryo transfer. Fourth and finally, the importance of good governance of oocyte banks was mentioned, including a homogenous policy and the facilitation of exchange of experiences between oocyte banks. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The possibility of selection bias exists, because we interviewed donors and recipients who were selected according to the criteria currently employed in the clinics. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Respondents’ moral considerations regarding the ethical aspects of the intake and distribution of donor oocytes demonstrate a protective attitude towards the welfare of the donor and the future child. At the same time, respondents also questioned whether such a (highly) protective attitude was justified. This finding may indicate there is room for reconsidering strategies for the collection and distribution of donor bank oocytes. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(s) This study was funded by ZonMw: The Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (Grant number 70-73000-98-200). A.M.E.B. and B.C.J.M.F. are the initiators of the UMC Utrecht oocyte bank. J.J.P.M.P. is the director of the MCK Fertility Centre. IMC is working as a gynaecologist at the AMC Amsterdam oocyte bank. During the most recent 5-year period, BCJM Fauser has received fees or grant support from the following organizations (in alphabetic order): Actavis/Watson/Uteron, Controversies in Obstetrics & Gynaecologist (COGI), Dutch Heart Foundation, Dutch Medical Research Counsel (ZonMW), Euroscreen/Ogeda, Ferring, London Womens Clinic (LWC), Merck Serono (GFI), Myovant, Netherland Genomic Initiative (NGI), OvaScience, Pantharei Bioscience, PregLem/Gedeon Richter/Finox, Reproductive Biomedicine Online (RBMO), Roche, Teva and World Health Organization (WHO). The authors have no further competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M Kool
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Centre, PO Box 85500, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R van der Graaf
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Centre, PO Box 85500, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A M E Bos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J J P M Pieters
- MCK Fertility Centre, Center of Reproductive Medicine, Simon Smithweg 16, Leiderdorp, The Netherlands
| | - I M Custers
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - B C J M Fauser
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynecology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Centre, PO Box 85500, Universiteitsweg 100, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Seidlein AH, Salloch S. Illness and disease: an empirical-ethical viewpoint. BMC Med Ethics 2019; 20:5. [PMID: 30626443 PMCID: PMC6327539 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0341-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The concepts of disease, illness and sickness capture fundamentally different aspects of phenomena related to human ailments and healthcare. The philosophy and theory of medicine are making manifold efforts to capture the essence and normative implications of these concepts. In parallel, socio-empirical studies on patients’ understanding of their situation have yielded a comprehensive body of knowledge regarding subjective perspectives on health-related statuses. Although both scientific fields provide varied valuable insights, they have not been strongly linked to each other. Therefore, the article aims to scrutinise the normative-ethical implications of patient perspectives in building a bridge to the empirical ethics debates. Main text Three potential fields of tension between the illness and the disease perspective are presented. Consequently, findings from empirical research examining patient perspectives on illness are displayed and the practical implications and associated ethical issues which arise are discussed. This leads to the conclusion that an explicit and elaborate empirical-ethical methodology is needed to deal appropriately with the complex interaction between patients’ views and the medico-professional view of disease. Kon’s four-stage model of normative-empirical collaboration is then applied against the background of empirical data on patient perceptions. Starting from this exemplary approach, the article suggests employing empirical-ethical frameworks for further research on the conceptual and normative issues, as they help to integrate perspectives from the philosophy of medicine with socio-empirical research. Conclusion The combination of theoretical and empirical perspectives suggested contributes to a more nuanced discussion of the normative impact of patients’ actual understanding of illness. Further empirical research in this area would profit from explicitly considering potential ethical issues to avoid naturalistic fallacies or crypto-normative conclusions that may compromise healthcare practice. Vice versa, medico-theoretical debates could be enriched by integrating subjective views of those people who are immediately affected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna-Henrikje Seidlein
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sabine Salloch
- Institute of Ethics and History of Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Ellernholzstr. 1-2, 17487, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Dunn M, Ives J, Molewijk B, Schildmann J. Setting standards for empirical bioethics research: a response to Carter and Cribb. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:66. [PMID: 30001699 PMCID: PMC6044088 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0302-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 05/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper responds to the commentaries from Stacy Carter and Alan Cribb. We pick up on two main themes in our response. First, we reflect on how the process of setting standards for empirical bioethics research entails drawing boundaries around what research counts as empirical bioethics research, and we discuss whether the standards agreed in the consensus process draw these boundaries correctly. Second, we expand on the discussion in the original paper of the role and significance of the concept of 'integrating' empirical methods and ethical argument as a standard for research practice within empirical bioethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Dunn
- The Ethox Centre, Nuffield Department of Population Health, Old Road Campus, University of Oxford, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
- Wellcome Centre for Ethics and the Humanities, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Jonathan Ives
- Centre for Ethics in Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Bert Molewijk
- Department of Medical Humanities, VU Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Mertz M, Schildmann J. Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies. MEDICINE, HEALTH CARE, AND PHILOSOPHY 2018; 21:207-214. [PMID: 28733796 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-017-9792-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Empirical bioethics is commonly understood as integrating empirical research with normative-ethical research in order to address an ethical issue. Methodological analyses in empirical bioethics mainly focus on the integration of socio-empirical sciences (e.g. sociology or psychology) and normative ethics. But while there are numerous multidisciplinary research projects combining life sciences and normative ethics, there is few explicit methodological reflection on how to integrate both fields, or about the goals and rationales of such interdisciplinary cooperation. In this paper we will review some drivers for the tendency of empirical bioethics methodologies to focus on the collaboration of normative ethics with particularly social sciences. Subsequently, we argue that the ends of empirical bioethics, not the empirical methods, are decisive for the question of which empirical disciplines can contribute to empirical bioethics in a meaningful way. Using already existing types of research integration as a springboard, five possible types of research which encompass life sciences and normative analysis will illustrate how such cooperation can be conceptualized from a methodological perspective within empirical bioethics. We will conclude with a reflection on the limitations and challenges of empirical bioethics research that integrates life sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Mertz
- Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy of Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hanover, Germany.
| | - Jan Schildmann
- Institute for Ethics, Wilhelm Löhe University of Applied Science, Fürth Merkurstraße 41/Südstadtpark, 90763, Fürth, Germany
- Department of Medicine III, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Großhadern, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Smit AK, Newson AJ, Morton RL, Kimlin M, Keogh L, Law MH, Kirk J, Dobbinson S, Kanetsky PA, Fenton G, Allen M, Butow P, Dunlop K, Trevena L, Lo S, Savard J, Dawkins H, Wordsworth S, Jenkins M, Mann GJ, Cust AE. The melanoma genomics managing your risk study: A protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of personal genomic risk information on skin cancer prevention behaviors. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 70:106-116. [PMID: 29802966 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Revised: 05/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/22/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reducing ultraviolet radiation (UV) exposure and improving early detection may reduce melanoma incidence, mortality and health system costs. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of providing information on personal genomic risk of melanoma in reducing UV exposure at 12 months, according to low and high traditional risk. METHODS In this randomized controlled trial, participants (target sample = 892) will be recruited from the general population, and randomized (1:1 ratio, intervention versus control). Intervention arm participants provide a saliva sample, receive personalized melanoma genomic risk information, a genetic counselor phone call, and an educational booklet on melanoma prevention. Control arm participants receive only the educational booklet. Eligible participants are aged 18-69 years, have European ancestry and no personal history of melanoma. All participants will complete a questionnaire and wear a UV dosimeter to objectively measure their sun exposure at baseline, 1- and 12-month time-points, except 1-month UV dosimetry will be limited to ~250 participants. The primary outcome is total daily Standard Erythemal Doses at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include objectively measured UV exposure for specific time periods (e.g. midday hours), self-reported sun protection and skin-examination behaviors, psycho-social outcomes, and ethical considerations surrounding offering genomic testing at a population level. A within-trial and modelled economic evaluation will be undertaken from an Australian health system perspective to assess the intervention costs and outcomes. DISCUSSION This trial will inform the clinical and personal utility of introducing genomic testing into the health system for melanoma prevention and early detection at a population-level. TRIAL REGISTRATION Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12617000691347.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia K Smit
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| | - Ainsley J Newson
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Rachael L Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Michael Kimlin
- University of the Sunshine Coast and Cancer Council Queensland, PO Box 201, Spring Hill, QLD 4004, Australia
| | - Louise Keogh
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Matthew H Law
- Statistical Genetics, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Locked Bag 2000, Brisbane, QLD 4029, Australia
| | - Judy Kirk
- Westmead Clinical School and Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Suzanne Dobbinson
- Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Peter A Kanetsky
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute and University of South Florida, 4202 E Fowler Ave, Tampa, FL 33620, USA
| | - Georgina Fenton
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Martin Allen
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Kate Dunlop
- The Centre for Genetics Education, NSW Health, Level 5 2c Herbert Street St Leonards, NSW 2065, Australia
| | - Lyndal Trevena
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Serigne Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Savard
- Sydney Health Ethics, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Hugh Dawkins
- Office of Population Health Genomics, Public Health Division, Government of Western Australia, Level 3 C Block 189 Royal Street, East Perth, WA 6004, Australia
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, The University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK
| | - Mark Jenkins
- Centre for Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Graham J Mann
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Centre for Cancer Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Anne E Cust
- Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Research, Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia; Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Wangmo T, Hauri S, Gennet E, Anane-Sarpong E, Provoost V, Elger BS. An update on the "empirical turn" in bioethics: analysis of empirical research in nine bioethics journals. BMC Med Ethics 2018; 19:6. [PMID: 29415709 PMCID: PMC5803920 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-018-0246-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2017] [Accepted: 01/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background A review of literature published a decade ago noted a significant increase in empirical papers across nine bioethics journals. This study provides an update on the presence of empirical papers in the same nine journals. It first evaluates whether the empirical trend is continuing as noted in the previous study, and second, how it is changing, that is, what are the characteristics of the empirical works published in these nine bioethics journals. Method A review of the same nine journals (Bioethics; Journal of Medical Ethics; Journal of Clinical Ethics; Nursing Ethics; Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics; Hastings Center Report; Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics; Christian Bioethics; and Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal) was conducted for a 12-year period from 2004 to 2015. Data obtained was analysed descriptively and using a non-parametric Chi-square test. Results Of the total number of original papers (N = 5567) published in the nine bioethics journals, 18.1% (n = 1007) collected and analysed empirical data. Journal of Medical Ethics and Nursing Ethics led the empirical publications, accounting for 89.4% of all empirical papers. The former published significantly more quantitative papers than qualitative, whereas the latter published more qualitative papers. Our analysis reveals no significant difference (χ2 = 2.857; p = 0.091) between the proportion of empirical papers published in 2004–2009 and 2010–2015. However, the increasing empirical trend has continued in these journals with the proportion of empirical papers increasing from 14.9% in 2004 to 17.8% in 2015. Conclusions This study presents the current state of affairs regarding empirical research published nine bioethics journals. In the quarter century of data that is available about the nine bioethics journals studied in two reviews, the proportion of empirical publications continues to increase, signifying a trend towards empirical research in bioethics. The growing volume is mainly attributable to two journals: Journal of Medical Ethics and Nursing Ethics. This descriptive study further maps the still developing field of empirical research in bioethics. Additional studies are needed to completely map the nature and extent of empirical research in bioethics to inform the ongoing debate about the value of empirical research for bioethics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Sirin Hauri
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Eloise Gennet
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Veerle Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Bernice S Elger
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Wareham CS. What is the ethics of ageing? JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2018; 44:128-132. [PMID: 28774959 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 07/20/2017] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
Applied ethics is home to numerous productive subfields such as procreative ethics, intergenerational ethics and environmental ethics. By contrast, there is far less ethical work on ageing, and there is no boundary work that attempts to set the scope for 'ageing ethics' or the 'ethics of ageing'. Yet ageing is a fundamental aspect of life; arguably even more fundamental and ubiquitous than procreation. To remedy this situation, I examine conceptions of what the ethics of ageing might mean and argue that these conceptions fail to capture the requirements of the desired subfield. The key reasons for this are, first, that they view ageing as something that happens only when one is old, thereby ignoring the fact that ageing is a process to which we are all subject, and second that the ageing person is treated as an object in ethical discourse rather than as its subject. In response to these shortcomings I put forward a better conception, one which places the ageing person at the centre of ethical analysis, has relevance not just for the elderly and provides a rich yet workable scope. While clarifying and justifying the conceptual boundaries of the subfield, the proposed scope pleasingly broadens the ethics of ageing beyond common negative associations with ageing.
Collapse
|
41
|
Wangmo T, Provoost V. The use of empirical research in bioethics: a survey of researchers in twelve European countries. BMC Med Ethics 2017; 18:79. [PMID: 29273030 PMCID: PMC5741864 DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0239-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2017] [Accepted: 12/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of empirical research methods in bioethics has been increasing in the last decades. It has resulted in discussions about the 'empirical turn of bioethics' and raised questions related to the value of empirical work for this field, methodological questions about its quality and rigor, and how this integration of the normative and the empirical can be achieved. The aim of this paper is to describe the attitudes of bioethics researchers in this field towards the use of empirical research, and examine their actual conduct: whether they use empirical research methods (and if so, what methods), and whether (and how) they have made attempts at integrating the empirical and the normative. METHODS An anonymous online survey was conducted to reach scholars working in bioethics/biomedical ethics/ethics institutes or centers in 12 European countries. A total of 225 bioethics researchers participated in the study. Of those, 200 questionnaires were fully completed, representing a response rate of 42.6%. The results were analysed using descriptive statistics. RESULTS Most respondents (n = 175; 87.5%) indicated that they use or have used empirical methods in their work. A similar proportion of respondents (61.0% and 59.0%) reported having had at least some training in qualitative or quantitative methods, respectively. Among the 'empirical researchers', more than a fifth (22.9%) had not received any methodological training. It appears that only 6% or less of the 'empirical researchers' considered themselves experts in the methods (qualitative or quantitative) that they have used. Only 35% of the scholars who have used empirical methods reported having integrated empirical data with normative analysis, whereas for their current projects, 59.8% plan to do so. CONCLUSIONS There is a need to evaluate the current educational programs in bioethics and to implement rigorous training in empirical research methods to ensure that 'empirical researchers' have the necessary skills to conduct their empirical research in bioethics. Also imperative is clear guidance on the integration of the normative and the empirical so that researchers who plan to do so have necessary tools and competences to fulfil their goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tenzin Wangmo
- Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Veerle Provoost
- Bioethics Institute Ghent, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Braverman DW, Marcus BS, Wakim PG, Mercurio MR, Kopf GS. Health Care Professionals' Attitudes About Physician-Assisted Death: An Analysis of Their Justifications and the Roles of Terminology and Patient Competency. J Pain Symptom Manage 2017; 54:538-545.e3. [PMID: 28716621 PMCID: PMC5632116 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 06/21/2017] [Accepted: 07/07/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Health care professionals (HCPs) are crucial to physician-assisted death (PAD) provision. OBJECTIVES To quantitatively assess the favorability of justifications for or against PAD legalization among HCPs, the effect of the terms "suicide" and "euthanasia" on their views and their support for three forms of PAD. METHODS Our questionnaire presented three cases: physician-assisted suicide, euthanasia for a competent patient, and euthanasia for an incompetent patient with an advance directive for euthanasia. Respondents judged whether each case was ethical and should be legal and selected their justifications from commonly cited reasons. The sample included physician clinicians, researchers, nonphysician clinicians, and other nonclinical staff at a major academic medical center. RESULTS Of 221 HCPs, the majority thought that each case was ethical and should be legal. In order of declining favorability, justifications supporting PAD legalization were relief of suffering, right to die, mercy, acceptance of death, nonabandonment, and saving money for the health care system; opposing justifications were the slippery slope argument, unnecessary due to palliative care, killing patients is wrong, religious views, and suicide is wrong. The use of suicide and euthanasia terminology did not affect responses. Participants preferred physician-assisted suicide to euthanasia for a competent patient (P < 0.0001) and euthanasia for an incompetent patient to euthanasia for a competent patient (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS HCPs endorsed patient-centered justifications over other reasons, including role-specific duties. Suicide and euthanasia language did not bias HCPs against PAD, challenging claims that such value-laden terms hinder dialogue. More research is required to understand the significance of competency in shaping attitudes toward PAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek W Braverman
- Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
| | | | - Paul G Wakim
- Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Service, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Gary S Kopf
- Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Ocak S, Köseoglu MA, Yildiz M. Business ethics research in healthcare management: A systematic review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/20479700.2017.1336882] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Saffet Ocak
- College of Health Management, Mugla Sitki Kocman University, Mugla, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Köseoglu
- School of Hotel and Tourism Management, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| | - Mehmet Yildiz
- Business School, Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
|
46
|
Mathews DJ, Hester DM, Kahn J, McGuire A, McKinney R, Meador K, Philpott-Jones S, Youngner S, Wilfond BS. A Conceptual Model for the Translation of Bioethics Research and Scholarship. Hastings Cent Rep 2016; 46:34-9. [DOI: 10.1002/hast.615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
|
47
|
Habets MGJL, van Delden JJM, Bredenoord AL. Studying the lay of the land: views and experiences of professionals in the translational pluripotent stem cell field. Regen Med 2015; 11:63-71. [PMID: 26679636 DOI: 10.2217/rme.15.78] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM The inherent uncertainty of first-in-human trials, combined with the technical complexity of pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), makes early phase PSC studies ethically challenging. Conducting parallel bioethics research based on experiences and views of professionals in the stem cell field is therefore important. MATERIALS & METHODS We conducted semistructured interviews with various stakeholders to get a lay of the land of ethical issues professionals find relevant to the translation of PSCs. RESULTS We identified four themes in the interviews: the uniqueness of PSCs, the suitability of the current research paradigm, the justification for early phase PSC studies and the involvement of patients and research participants. CONCLUSION We conclude that a debate should take place discussing the suitability of the current research paradigm for translational PSC studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle G J L Habets
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care & Health Services, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes J M van Delden
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care & Health Services, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annelien L Bredenoord
- Department of Medical Humanities, Julius Center for Primary Care & Health Services, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
The French bioethics public consultation and the anonymity doctrine: empirical ethics and normative assumptions. Monash Bioeth Rev 2015; 33:18-28. [PMID: 25783454 DOI: 10.1007/s40592-015-0021-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The French bioethics laws of 1994 contain the principles of the anonymity and non commodification of all donations of body parts and products including gametes in medically assisted reproduction. The two revisions of the law, in 2004 and 2011 have upheld the rule. In view of the latest revision process, the French government organized a large public consultation in 2009 ("Etats généraux de la bioéthique"). Within the event a "consensus conference" was held in Rennes about different aspects of assisted reproduction (access, anonymity, gratuity and surrogacy). In what follows we shall first describe the anonymity clause for gamete donations in the French law and the debates surrounding it. We shall then analyse the procedure used for the 2009 public consultation and the related consensus conference, as well as its upshot concerning the anonymity doctrine. In this respect we shall compare the citizens' own recommendations on the gamete anonymity issue and its translation in the consultation's final report drafted by a philosopher mandated by the organizing committee. Whereas the final report cited some fundamental ethical arguments as reason for upholding the provisions of the law-most notably the refusal of the 'all biological' approach to reproductive issues-citizens were more careful and tentative in their position although they also concluded that for pragmatic reasons the anonymity rule should continue to hold. We shall argue that the conservative upshot of the public consultation is due to some main underlying presuppositions concerning the citizens' role and expertise as well as to the specific design of the consensus conference. Our conclusion will be that public consultations and consensus conferences can only serve as an empirical support for devising suitable bioethics norms by using second-order normative assumptions.
Collapse
|
49
|
Care, Monitoring, and Companionship: Views on Care Robots from Older People and Their Carers. Int J Soc Robot 2015. [DOI: 10.1007/s12369-015-0322-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
50
|
Knight R. Empirical population and public health ethics: A review and critical analysis to advance robust empirical-normative inquiry. Health (London) 2015; 20:274-90. [PMID: 25956917 DOI: 10.1177/1363459315583156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The field of population and public health ethics (PPHE) has yet to fully embrace the generation of evidence as an important project. This article reviews the philosophical debates related to the 'empirical turn' in clinical bioethics, and critically analyses how PPHE has and can engage with the philosophical implications of generating empirical data within the task of normative inquiry. A set of five conceptual and theoretical issues pertaining to population health that are unresolved and could potentially benefit from empirical PPHE approaches to normative inquiry are discussed. Each issue differs from traditional empirical bioethical approaches, in that they emphasize (1) concerns related to the population, (2) 'upstream' policy-relevant health interventions - within and outside of the health care system and (3) the prevention of illness and disease. Within each theoretical issue, a conceptual example from population and public health approaches to HIV prevention and health promotion is interrogated. Based on the review and critical analysis, this article concludes that empirical-normative approaches to population and public health ethics would be most usefully pursued as an iterative project (rather than as a linear project), in which the normative informs the empirical questions to be asked and new empirical evidence constantly directs conceptualizations of what constitutes morally robust public health practices. Finally, a conceptualization of an empirical population and public health ethics is advanced in order to open up new interdisciplinary 'spaces', in which empirical and normative approaches to ethical inquiry are transparently (and ethically) integrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rod Knight
- Simon Fraser University, Canada; The University of British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|