1
|
Grams MP, Mateus CQ, Mashayekhi M, Mutter RW, Djonov V, Fazzari JM, Xiao H, Frechette KM, Wentworth AJ, Morris JM, Klebel B, Thull JC, Guenzel RM, Wismayer DJS, Lucien F, Park SS, Lester SC. Minibeam Radiation Therapy Treatment (MBRT): Commissioning and First Clinical Implementation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 120:1423-1434. [PMID: 39002850 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.06.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2024] [Revised: 06/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is characterized by the delivery of submillimeter-wide regions of high "peak" and low "valley" doses throughout a tumor. Preclinical studies have long shown the promise of this technique, and we report here the first clinical implementation of MBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS A clinical orthovoltage unit was commissioned for MBRT patient treatments using 3-, 4-, 5-, 8-, and 10-cm diameter cones. The 180 kVp output was spatially separated into minibeams using a tungsten collimator with 0.5 mm wide slits spaced 1.1 mm on center. Percentage depth dose (PDD) measurements were obtained using film dosimetry and plastic water for both peak and valley doses. PDDs were measured on the central axis for offsets of 0, 0.5, and 1 cm. The peak-to-valley ratio was calculated at each depth for all cones and offsets. To mitigate the effects of patient motion on delivered dose, patient-specific 3-dimensional-printed collimator holders were created. These conformed to the unique anatomy of each patient and affixed the tungsten collimator directly to the body. Two patients were treated with MBRT; both received 2 fractions. RESULTS Peak PDDs decreased gradually with depth. Valley PDDs initially increased slightly with depth, then decreased gradually beyond 2 cm. The peak-to-valley ratios were highest at the surface for smaller cone sizes and offsets. In vivo film dosimetry confirmed a distinct delineation of peak and valley doses in both patients treated with MBRT with no dose blurring. Both patients experienced prompt improvement in symptoms and tumor response. CONCLUSIONS We report commissioning results, treatment processes, and the first 2 patients treated with MBRT using a clinical orthovoltage unit. While demonstrating the feasibility of this approach is a crucial first step toward wider translation, clinical trials are needed to further establish safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | | | | | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Huaping Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Brandon Klebel
- Division of Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jack C Thull
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Fabrice Lucien
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Division of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Son J, Kim JS, Li X, Park H, Yoon E, Jeon SR, Kim JI, Lee JH, Choi CH. Development of a novel tool for high-precision focal irradiation using a clinical brachytherapy system. Phys Med 2024; 127:104825. [PMID: 39378781 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/23/2024] [Indexed: 10/10/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to emphasize the necessity of a focal irradiation tool for small animals and compare the beam characteristics of a tool developed using a brachytherapy system with a linear accelerator (LINAC)-based tool. METHODS A 1-mm tungsten collimator was designed for a Ir-192 brachytherapy system. The percent depth dose (PDD) and horizontal profile of the collimator were measured and compared with a 4-mm commercial cone in the LINAC. Monte Carlo simulations validated all the measurements. Mouse brains were irradiated using a focal irradiation tool, and immunohistochemistry was performed on the brain samples to assess the dose accuracy. RESULTS PDD showed that the maximum dose (dmax) for Ir-192 was at the surface in both measurements and simulations. At a depth of 1 mm, the collimator measured doses of 25.6 % and 21.0 %, respectively. At 6 MV in the LINAC, the dmax was observed at depths of 0.7 and 0.8 cm in measurements and simulations, respectively. The full width at half maximum (FWHM) at a depth of 1 mm was 1.0 and 1.1 mm for Ir-192 in the measurements and simulations, respectively. For small cone sizes at dmax, FWHM was 4.0 and 4.1 mm for the measurements and simulations, respectively. Immunohistochemistry results indicated that focal irradiation with Ir-192 affected small superficial brain areas while sparing the contralateral side and subventricular zone. CONCLUSION The focal irradiation tool accurately delivered doses to small regions and shallow depths in the mouse brain, making it valuable for precise radiotherapy during small animal experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaeman Son
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Sik Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Xue Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyojun Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiological Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Euntaek Yoon
- Interdisciplinary Program in Bioengineering, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sang-Rok Jeon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joo Ho Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Chang Heon Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahmad R, Barcellini A, Baumann K, Benje M, Bender T, Bragado P, Charalampopoulou A, Chowdhury R, Davis AJ, Ebner DK, Eley J, Kloeber JA, Mutter RW, Friedrich T, Gutierrez-Uzquiza A, Helm A, Ibáñez-Moragues M, Iturri L, Jansen J, Morcillo MÁ, Puerta D, Kokko AP, Sánchez-Parcerisa D, Scifoni E, Shimokawa T, Sokol O, Story MD, Thariat J, Tinganelli W, Tommasino F, Vandevoorde C, von Neubeck C. Particle Beam Radiobiology Status and Challenges: A PTCOG Radiobiology Subcommittee Report. Int J Part Ther 2024; 13:100626. [PMID: 39258166 PMCID: PMC11386331 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpt.2024.100626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Particle therapy (PT) represents a significant advancement in cancer treatment, precisely targeting tumor cells while sparing surrounding healthy tissues thanks to the unique depth-dose profiles of the charged particles. Furthermore, their linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness enhance their capability to treat radioresistant tumors, including hypoxic ones. Over the years, extensive research has paved the way for PT's clinical application, and current efforts aim to refine its efficacy and precision, minimizing the toxicities. In this regard, radiobiology research is evolving toward integrating biotechnology to advance drug discovery and radiation therapy optimization. This shift from basic radiobiology to understanding the molecular mechanisms of PT aims to expand the therapeutic window through innovative dose delivery regimens and combined therapy approaches. This review, written by over 30 contributors from various countries, provides a comprehensive look at key research areas and new developments in PT radiobiology, emphasizing the innovations and techniques transforming the field, ranging from the radiobiology of new irradiation modalities to multimodal radiation therapy and modeling efforts. We highlight both advancements and knowledge gaps, with the aim of improving the understanding and application of PT in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reem Ahmad
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Clinical Department Radiation Oncology Unit, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Kilian Baumann
- Institute of Medical Physics and Radiation Protection, University of Applied Sciences Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Marburg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Marburg, Germany
| | - Malte Benje
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Tamara Bender
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Paloma Bragado
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alexandra Charalampopoulou
- University School for Advanced Studies (IUSS), Pavia, Italy
- Radiobiology Unit, Development and Research Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Reema Chowdhury
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Anthony J. Davis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel K. Ebner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John Eley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| | - Jake A. Kloeber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Robert W. Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Thomas Friedrich
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Alexander Helm
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marta Ibáñez-Moragues
- Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation Unit, Technology Department, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Jeannette Jansen
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Miguel Ángel Morcillo
- Medical Applications of Ionizing Radiation Unit, Technology Department, Centro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT), Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Puerta
- Departamento de Física Atómica, Molecular y Nuclear, Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria (ibs.GRANADA), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Granada/Universidad de Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Emanuele Scifoni
- TIFPA-INFN - Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
| | - Takashi Shimokawa
- National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Olga Sokol
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | - Juliette Thariat
- Centre François Baclesse, Université de Caen Normandie, ENSICAEN, CNRS/IN2P3, LPC Caen UMR6534, Caen, France
| | - Walter Tinganelli
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- TIFPA-INFN - Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications, Trento, Italy
- Department of Physics, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | - Charlot Vandevoorde
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stengl C, Muñoz ID, Arbes E, Rauth E, Christensen JB, Vedelago J, Runz A, Jäkel O, Seco J. Dosimetric study for breathing-induced motion effects in an abdominal pancreas phantom for carbon ion mini-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:5618-5631. [PMID: 38631000 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Particle mini-beam therapy exhibits promise in sparing healthy tissue through spatial fractionation, particularly notable for heavy ions, further enhancing the already favorable differential biological effectiveness at both target and entrance regions. However, breathing-induced organ motion affects particle mini-beam irradiation schemes since the organ displacements exceed the mini-beam structure dimensions, decreasing the advantages of spatial fractionation. PURPOSE In this study, the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution was examined at the target and organs at risk(OARs) during carbon ion mini-beam irradiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS As a first step, the carbon ion mini-beam pattern was characterized with Monte Carlo simulations. To analyze the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution of a virtual pancreas tumor as target and related OARs, the anthropomorphic Pancreas Phantom for Ion beam Therapy (PPIeT) was irradiated with carbon ions. A mini-beam collimator was used to deliver a spatially fractionated dose distribution. During irradiation, varying breathing motion amplitudes were induced, ranging from 5 to 15 mm. Post-irradiation, the 2D dose pattern was analyzed, focusing on the full width at half maximum (FWHM), center-to-center distance (ctc), and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). RESULTS The mini-beam pattern was visible within OARs, while in the virtual pancreas tumor a more homogeneous dose distribution was achieved. Applied motion affected the mini-beam pattern within the kidney, one of the OARs, reducing the PVDR from 3.78 ± $\pm$ 0.12 to 1.478 ± $\pm$ 0.070 for the 15 mm motion amplitude. In the immobile OARs including the spine and the skin at the back, the PVDR did not change within 3.4% comparing reference and motion conditions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an initial understanding of how breathing-induced organ motion affects spatial fractionation during carbon ion irradiation, using an anthropomorphic phantom. A decrease in the PVDR was observed in the right kidney when breathing-induced motion was applied, potentially increasing the risk of damage to OARs. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the clinical viability of mini-beam radiotherapy with carbon ions when irradiating abdominal regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Rauth
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Koksal Akbas C, Vurro F, Fiorino C, Cozzarini C, Cavaliere F, Milani P, Broggi S, Del Vecchio A, Di Muzio N, Tacchetti C, Enrico Spinelli A. Preclinical photon minibeam radiotherapy using a custom collimator: Dosimetry characterization and preliminary in-vivo results on a glioma model. Phys Med 2024; 124:103420. [PMID: 38970950 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 05/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/08/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of a collimator for minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) with film dosimetry and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The outcome of MBRT with respect to conventional RT using a glioma preclinical model was also evaluated. METHODS A multi-slit collimator was designed to be used with commercial small animal irradiator. The collimator was built by aligning 0.6 mm wide and 5 mm thick parallel lead leaves at 0.4 mm intervals. Dosimetry characteristics were evaluated by Gafchromic (CG) films and TOPAS Monte Carlo (MC) code. An in vivo experiment was performed using a glioma preclinical model by injecting two million GL261cells subcutaneously and treating with 25 Gy, single fraction, with MBRT and conventional RT. Survival curves and acute radiation damage were measured to compare both treatments. RESULTS A satisfactory agreement between experimental results and MC simulations were obtained, the measured FWHM and distance between the peaks were respectively 0.431 and 1.098 mm. In vivo results show that MBRT can provide local tumor control for three weeks after RT treatment and a similar survival fraction of open beam radiotherapy. No severe acute effects were seen for the MBRT group. CONCLUSIONS We developed a minibeam collimator and presented its dosimetric features. Satisfactory agreement between MC and GC films was found with differences consistent with uncertainties due to fabrication and set-up errors. The survival curves of MBRT and open field RT are similar while atoxicity is dramatically lower with MBRT, preliminarily confirming the expected effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Canan Koksal Akbas
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy; Medical Physics Department, Istanbul University Oncology Institute, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Federica Vurro
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Fiorino
- Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
| | - Cesare Cozzarini
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Milani
- Department of Physics, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Broggi
- Medical Physics Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Nadia Di Muzio
- Radiotherapy Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Tacchetti
- Experimental Imaging Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Carver A, Baker S, Dumbill A, Horton S, Green S. Design and characterisation of a minibeam collimator utilising Monte Carlo simulation and a clinical linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:135001. [PMID: 38759691 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4d52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Spatially fractionated radiotherapy is showing promise as a treatment modality. Initial focus was on beams of photons at low energy produced from a synchrotron but more recently research has expanded to include applications in proton therapy. Interest in photon beams remains and this is the focus of this paperApproach.This study presents a 3D printed tungsten minibeam collimator intended to produce peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDR) of between seven and ten with a 1 MV, bremsstrahlung generated, photon beam. The design of the collimator is motivated by a Monte Carlo study estimating the PVDR for different collimator designs at different energies. This collimator was characterised on a clinical linear accelerator (Elekta VersaHD) as well as an orthovoltage unit.Main results.The performance of the fabricated collimator was measured on Elekta VersaHD running in unflattened mode with a 6 MV beam. On the Elekta VersaHD units the PVDR was measured to be between approximately 1.5 and 2.0 at 3 cm deep. For measurements with the orthovoltage unit PVDRs of greater than 10 were observed at a depth of 4 cm.Significance.The results confirmed that the predictions from simulation could be reproduced on linear accelerators currently in clinical usage, producing PVDRs between 2-2.5. Using the model to predict PVDRs using 1 MV photon beams, the threshold considered to produce enhanced normal tissue dose tolerance (>7) was surpassed. This suggests the possibility of using such techniques with versions of existing Linac technology which have been modified to operate at low energy and high beam currents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Carver
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Sam Baker
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Dumbill
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Steven Horton
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Green
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stengl C, Arbes E, Thai LYJ, Echner G, Vedelago J, Jansen J, Jäkel O, Seco J. Development and characterization of a versatile mini-beam collimator for pre-clinical photon beam irradiation. Med Phys 2023; 50:5222-5237. [PMID: 37145971 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interest in spatial fractionation radiotherapy has exponentially increased over the last decade as a significant reduction of healthy tissue toxicity was observed by mini-beam irradiation. Published studies, however, mostly use rigid mini-beam collimators dedicated to their exact experimental arrangement such that changing the setup or testing new mini-beam collimator configurations becomes challenging and expensive. PURPOSE In this work, a versatile, low-cost mini-beam collimator was designed and manufactured for pre-clinical applications with X-ray beams. The mini-beam collimator enables variability of the full width at half maximum (FWHM), the center-to-center distance (ctc), the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), and the source-to-collimator distance (SCD). METHODS The mini-beam collimator is an in-house development, which was constructed of 10 × 40 mm2 tungsten or brass plates. These metal plates were combined with 3D-printed plastic plates that can be stacked together in the desired order. A standard X-ray source was used for the dosimetric characterization of four different configurations of the collimator, including a combination of plastic plates of 0.5, 1, or 2 mm width, assembled with 1 or 2 mm thick metal plates. Irradiations were done at three different SCDs for characterizing the performance of the collimator. For the SCDs closer to the radiation source, the plastic plates were 3D-printed with a dedicated angle to compensate for the X-ray beam divergence, making it possible to study ultra-high dose rates of around 40 Gy/s. All dosimetric quantifications were performed using EBT-XD films. Additionally, in vitro studies with H460 cells were carried out. RESULTS Characteristic mini-beam dose distributions were obtained with the developed collimator using a conventional X-ray source. With the exchangeable 3D-printed plates, FWHM and ctc from 0.52 to 2.11 mm, and from 1.77 to 4.61 mm were achieved, with uncertainties ranging from 0.01% to 8.98%, respectively. The FWHM and ctc obtained with the EBT-XD films are in agreement with the design of each mini-beam collimator configuration. For dose rates in the order of several Gy/min, the highest PVDR of 10.09 ± 1.08 was achieved with a collimator configuration of 0.5 mm thick plastic plates and 2 mm thick metal plates. Exchanging the tungsten plates with the lower-density metal brass reduced the PVDR by approximately 50%. Also, increasing the dose rate to ultra-high dose rates was feasible with the mini-beam collimator, where a PVDR of 24.26 ± 2.10 was achieved. Finally, it was possible to deliver and quantify mini-beam dose distribution patterns in vitro. CONCLUSIONS With the developed collimator, we achieved various mini-beam dose distributions that can be adjusted according to the needs of the user in regards to FWHM, ctc, PVDR and SCD, while accounting for beam divergence. Therefore, the designed mini-beam collimator may enable low-cost and versatile pre-clinical research on mini-beam irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Long-Yang Jan Thai
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gernot Echner
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeannette Jansen
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tubin S, Vozenin M, Prezado Y, Durante M, Prise K, Lara P, Greco C, Massaccesi M, Guha C, Wu X, Mohiuddin M, Vestergaard A, Bassler N, Gupta S, Stock M, Timmerman R. Novel unconventional radiotherapy techniques: Current status and future perspectives - Report from the 2nd international radiation oncology online seminar. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 40:100605. [PMID: 36910025 PMCID: PMC9996385 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023] Open
Abstract
•Improvement of therapeutic ratio by novel unconventional radiotherapy approaches.•Immunomodulation using high-dose spatially fractionated radiotherapy.•Boosting radiation anti-tumor effects by adding an immune-mediated cell killing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Tubin
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - M.C. Vozenin
- Radiation Oncology Laboratory, Radiation Oncology Service, Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Y. Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay 91400, France
| | - M. Durante
- Biophysics Department, GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Planckstraße 1, Darmstadt 64291, Germany
- Technsiche Universität Darmstadt, Institute for Condensed Matter Physics, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - K.M. Prise
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast BT9 7AE, United Kingdom
| | - P.C. Lara
- Canarian Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Roque University Hospital & Fernando Pessoa Canarias University, C/Dolores de la Rocha 9, Las Palmas GC 35001, Spain
| | - C. Greco
- Department of Radiation Oncology Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasilia, Lisbon 1400-038, Portugal
| | - M. Massaccesi
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - C. Guha
- Montefiore Medical Center Radiation Oncology, 111 E 210th St, New York, NY, United States
| | - X. Wu
- Executive Medical Physics Associates, 19470 NE 22nd Road, Miami, FL 33179, United States
| | - M.M. Mohiuddin
- Northwestern Medicine Cancer Center Warrenville and Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, 4455 Weaver Pkwy, Warrenville, IL 60555, United States
| | - A. Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - N. Bassler
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - S. Gupta
- The Loop Immuno-Oncology Laboratory, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States
| | - M. Stock
- Medaustron Center for Ion Therapy, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Marie-Curie Strasse 5, Wiener Neustadt 2700, Austria
| | - R. Timmerman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Inwood Road Dallas, TX 2280, United States
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schneider T, Malaise D, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Orthovoltage X-ray Minibeam Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Ocular Tumours-An In Silico Evaluation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030679. [PMID: 36765637 PMCID: PMC9913874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapeutic treatments of ocular tumors are often challenging because of nearby radiosensitive structures and the high doses required to treat radioresistant cancers such as uveal melanomas. Although increased local control rates can be obtained with advanced techniques such as proton therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, these modalities are not always accessible to patients (due to high costs or low availability) and side effects in structures such as the lens, eyelids or anterior chamber remain an issue. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) could represent a promising alternative in this regard. MBRT is an innovative new treatment approach where the irradiation field is composed of multiple sub-millimetric beamlets, spaced apart by a few millimetres. This creates a so-called spatial fractionation of the dose which, in small animal experiments, has been shown to increase normal tissue sparing while simultaneously providing high tumour control rates. Moreover, MBRT with orthovoltage X-rays could be easily implemented in widely available and comparably inexpensive irradiation platforms. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOPAS toolkit to evaluate orthovoltage X-ray MBRT as a potential alternative for treating ocular tumours. Dose distributions were simulated in CT images of a human head, considering six different irradiation configurations. (3) Results: The mean, peak and valley doses were assessed in a generic target region and in different organs at risk. The obtained doses were comparable to those reported in previous X-ray MBRT animal studies where good normal tissue sparing and tumour control (rat glioma models) were found. (4) Conclusions: A proof-of-concept study for the application of orthovoltage X-ray MBRT to ocular tumours was performed. The simulation results encourage the realisation of dedicated animal studies considering minibeam irradiations of the eye to specifically assess ocular and orbital toxicities as well as tumour response. If proven successful, orthovoltage X-ray minibeams could become a cost-effective treatment alternative, in particular for developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Denis Malaise
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schneider T, Fernandez-Palomo C, Bertho A, Fazzari J, Iturri L, Martin OA, Trappetti V, Djonov V, Prezado Y. Combining FLASH and spatially fractionated radiation therapy: The best of both worlds. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:169-177. [PMID: 35952978 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Revised: 07/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) are two new therapeutical strategies that use non-standard dose delivery methods to reduce normal tissue toxicity and increase the therapeutic index. Although likely based on different mechanisms, both FLASH-RT and SFRT have shown to elicit radiobiological effects that significantly differ from those induced by conventional radiotherapy. With the therapeutic potential having been established separately for each technique, the combination of FLASH-RT and SFRT could therefore represent a winning alliance. In this review, we discuss the state of the art, advantages and current limitations, potential synergies, and where a combination of these two techniques could be implemented today or in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | | | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Jennifer Fazzari
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Olga A Martin
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland; Division of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, 305 Grattan St, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia; University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Verdiana Trappetti
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Valentin Djonov
- Institute of Anatomy, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 2, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Technical aspects of proton minibeam radiation therapy: Minibeam generation and delivery. Phys Med 2022; 100:64-71. [PMID: 35750002 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy that combines the normal tissue sparing of sub-millimetric, spatially fractionated beams with the improved ballistics of protons. This may allow a safe dose escalation in the tumour and has already proven to provide a remarkable increase of the therapeutic index for high-grade gliomas in animal experiments. One of the main challenges in pMBRT concerns the generation of minibeams and the implementation in a clinical environment. This article reviews the different approaches for generating minibeams, using mechanical collimators and focussing magnets, and discusses the technical aspects of the implementation and delivery of pMBRT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Johnson TR, Bassil AM, Williams NT, Brundage S, Kent CL, Palmer G, Mowery YM, Oldham M. An investigation of kV mini-GRID spatially fractionated radiation therapy: dosimetry and preclinical trial. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c. [PMID: 35100573 PMCID: PMC9167045 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac508c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Objective. To develop and characterize novel methods of extreme spatially fractionated kV radiation therapy (including mini-GRID therapy) and to evaluate efficacy in the context of a pre-clinical mouse study.Approach. Spatially fractionated GRIDs were precision-milled from 3 mm thick lead sheets compatible with mounting on a 225 kVp small animal irradiator (X-Rad). Three pencil-beam GRIDs created arrays of 1 mm diameter beams, and three 'bar' GRIDs created 1 × 20 mm rectangular fields. GRIDs projected 20 × 20 mm2fields at isocenter, and beamlets were spaced at 1, 1.25, and 1.5 mm, respectively. Peak-to-valley ratios and dose distributions were evaluated with Gafchromic film. Syngeneic transplant tumors were induced by intramuscular injection of a soft tissue sarcoma cell line into the gastrocnemius muscle of C57BL/6 mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to four groups: unirradiated control, conventional irradiation of entire tumor, GRID therapy, and hemi-irradiation (half-beam block, 50% tumor volume treated). All irradiated mice received a single fraction of 15 Gy.Results. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved (bar GRIDs: 11.9 ± 0.9, 13.6 ± 0.4, 13.8 ± 0.5; pencil-beam GRIDs: 18.7 ± 0.6, 26.3 ± 1.5, 31.0 ± 3.3). Pencil-beam GRIDs could theoretically spare more intra-tumor immune cells than bar GRIDs, but they treat less tumor tissue (3%-4% versus 19%-23% area receiving 90% prescription, respectively). Bar GRID and hemi-irradiation treatments significantly delayed tumor growth (P < 0.05), but not as much as a conventional treatment (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in tumor growth delay between GRID and hemi-irradiation.Significance. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved with kV grids: two-to-five times higher than values reported in literature for MV grids. GRID irradiation and hemi-irradiation delayed tumor growth, but neither was as effective as conventional whole tumor uniform dose treatment. Single fraction GRID therapy could not initiate an anti-cancer immune response strong enough to match conventional RT outcomes, but follow-up studies will evaluate the combination of mini-GRID with immune checkpoint blockade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy R Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Alex M Bassil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Nerissa T Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Simon Brundage
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Collin L Kent
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Greg Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Yvonne M Mowery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery & Communication Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| | - Mark Oldham
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
AbstractSpatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.
Collapse
|
15
|
Gomes ER, Franco MS. Combining Nanocarrier-Assisted Delivery of Molecules and Radiotherapy. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14010105. [PMID: 35057001 PMCID: PMC8781448 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14010105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Revised: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is responsible for a significant proportion of death all over the world. Therefore, strategies to improve its treatment are highly desired. The use of nanocarriers to deliver anticancer treatments has been extensively investigated and improved since the approval of the first liposomal formulation for cancer treatment in 1995. Radiotherapy (RT) is present in the disease management strategy of around 50% of cancer patients. In the present review, we bring the state-of-the-art information on the combination of nanocarrier-assisted delivery of molecules and RT. We start with formulations designed to encapsulate single or multiple molecules that, once delivered to the tumor site, act directly on the cells to improve the effects of RT. Then, we describe formulations designed to modulate the tumor microenvironment by delivering oxygen or to boost the abscopal effect. Finally, we present how RT can be employed to trigger molecule delivery from nanocarriers or to modulate the EPR effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eliza Rocha Gomes
- Department of Pharmaceutical Products, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte 31270-901, Brazil;
| | - Marina Santiago Franco
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), 85764 München, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-89-3187-48767
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Prezado Y. Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 376:37-68. [PMID: 36997269 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bazyar S, O’Brien ET, Benefield T, Roberts VR, Kumar RJ, Gupta GP, Zhou O, Lee YZ. Immune-Mediated Effects of Microplanar Radiotherapy with a Small Animal Irradiator. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:155. [PMID: 35008319 PMCID: PMC8750301 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy has been shown to have effects on the immune system that differ from conventional radiotherapy (CRT). We compared several aspects of the immune response to CRT relative to a model of spatially fractionated radiotherapy (RT), termed microplanar radiotherapy (MRT). MRT delivers hundreds of grays of radiation in submillimeter beams (peak), separated by non-radiated volumes (valley). We have developed a preclinical method to apply MRT by a commercial small animal irradiator. Using a B16-F10 murine melanoma model, we first evaluated the in vitro and in vivo effect of MRT, which demonstrated significant treatment superiority relative to CRT. Interestingly, we observed insignificant treatment responses when MRT was applied to Rag-/- and CD8-depleted mice. An immuno-histological analysis showed that MRT recruited cytotoxic lymphocytes (CD8), while suppressing the number of regulatory T cells (Tregs). Using RT-qPCR, we observed that, compared to CRT, MRT, up to the dose that we applied, significantly increased and did not saturate CXCL9 expression, a cytokine that plays a crucial role in the attraction of activated T cells. Finally, MRT combined with anti-CTLA-4 ablated the tumor in half of the cases, and induced prolonged systemic antitumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soha Bazyar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Maryland, MD 21201, USA;
| | - Edward Timothy O’Brien
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
| | - Thad Benefield
- Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
| | | | - Rashmi J. Kumar
- Medical Scientist Training Program, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
| | - Gaorav P. Gupta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
| | - Otto Zhou
- Department of Applied Physics Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
| | - Yueh Z. Lee
- Department of Radiology, The University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA;
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
- Biomedical Research Imaging Center, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prezado Y. Proton minibeam radiation therapy: a promising therapeutic approach for radioresistant tumors. C R Biol 2021; 344:409-420. [DOI: 10.5802/crbiol.71] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
19
|
Lamirault C, Brisebard E, Patriarca A, Juchaux M, Crepin D, Labiod D, Pouzoulet F, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Le Dudal M, Hardy D, De Marzi L, Dendale R, Jouvion G, Prezado Y. Spatially Modulated Proton Minibeams Results in the Same Increase of Lifespan as a Uniform Target Dose Coverage in F98-Glioma-Bearing Rats. Radiat Res 2021; 194:715-723. [PMID: 32991712 DOI: 10.1667/rade-19-00013.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 08/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is a new approach in proton radiotherapy, by which a significant increase in the therapeutic index has already been demonstrated in RG2 glioma-bearing rats. In the current study we investigated the response of other types of glioma (F98) and performed a comparative evaluation of tumor control effectiveness by pMBRT (with different levels of dose heterogeneity) versus conventional proton therapy. The results of our study showed an equivalent increase in the lifespan for all evaluated groups (conventional proton irradiation and pMBRT) and no significant differences in the histopathological analysis of the tumors or remaining brain tissue. The reduced long-term toxicity observed with pMBRT in previous evaluations at the same dose suggests a possible use of pMBRT to treat glioma with less side effects while ensuring the same tumor control achieved with standard proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Lamirault
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Laboratoire d'Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l'Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crepin
- Laboratoire Imagerie et Modelisation pour la Neurobiologie et la Cancerologie, CNRS-Paris 7-Paris 11, Campus d'Orsay, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Experimental Radiotherapy Platform Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BioMaps, Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm,Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 Orsay, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Histologie, Embryologie et Anatomie Pathologique, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - David Hardy
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.,Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| | - Remi Dendale
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Department of Global Health, Experimental Neuropathology Unit, Institut Pasteur, 75015 Paris, France.,Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Pathophysiology of Pediatric Genetic Diseases, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Armand-Trousseau, UF Génétique Moléculaire, Paris, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University Paris Saclay, PSL Research University, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sotiropoulos M, Brisebard E, Le Dudal M, Jouvion G, Juchaux M, Crépin D, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Labiod D, Lamirault C, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. X-rays minibeam radiation therapy at a conventional irradiator: Pilot evaluation in F98-glioma bearing rats and dose calculations in a human phantom. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2021; 27:44-49. [PMID: 33511291 PMCID: PMC7817429 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2021.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a type of spatial fractionated radiotherapy that uses submillimetric beams. This work reports on a pilot study on normal tissue response and the increase of the lifespan of glioma-bearing rats when irradiated with a tabletop x-ray system. Our results show a significant widening of the therapeutic window for brain tumours treated with MBRT: an important proportion of long-term survivals (60%) coupled with a significant reduction of toxicity when compared with conventional (broad beam) irradiations. In addition, the clinical translation of the minibeam treatment at a conventional irradiator is evaluated through a possible human head treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marios Sotiropoulos
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Elise Brisebard
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Laboratoire d’Histopathologie, VetAgro-Sup, Université de Lyon, Marcy l’Etoile, Lyon, France
| | - Marine Le Dudal
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
- Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d’Alfort, Biopôle, Unité d’Histologie, d’Embryologie et d’Anatomie Pathologique Université Paris-Est, Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - Gregory Jouvion
- Institut Pasteur, Neuropathologie Expérimentale, 75015 Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Delphine Crépin
- Laboratoire de Physique des 2 Infinis Irène Joliot-Curie (IJCLab-UMR 9012), CNRS/Université Paris-Saclay/Université de Paris, Campus Universitaire, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Laurene Jourdain
- BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, 91401 ORSAY, France
| | - Dalila Labiod
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frederic Pouzoulet
- Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Treibel F, Nguyen M, Ahmed M, Dombrowsky A, Wilkens JJ, Combs SE, Schmid TE, Bartzsch S. Establishment of Microbeam Radiation Therapy at a Small-Animal Irradiator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:626-636. [PMID: 33038461 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Microbeam radiation therapy is a preclinical concept in radiation oncology. It spares normal tissue more effectively than conventional radiation therapy at equal tumor control. The radiation field consists of peak regions with doses of several hundred gray, whereas doses between the peaks (valleys) are below the tissue tolerance level. Widths and distances of the beams are in the submillimeter range for microbeam radiation therapy. A similar alternative concept with beam widths and distances in the millimeter range is presented by minibeam radiation therapy. Although both methods were developed at large synchrotron facilities, compact alternative sources have been proposed recently. METHODS AND MATERIALS A small-animal irradiator was fitted with a special 3-layered collimator that is used for preclinical research and produces microbeams of flexible width of up to 100 μm. Film dosimetry provided measurements of the dose distributions and was compared with Monte Carlo dose predictions. Moreover, the micronucleus assay in Chinese hamster CHO-K1 cells was used as a biological dosimeter. The focal spot size and beam emission angle of the x-ray tube were modified to optimize peak dose rate, peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR), beam shape, and field homogeneity. An equivalent collimator with slit widths of up to 500 μm produced minibeams and allowed for comparison of microbeam and minibeam field characteristics. RESULTS The setup achieved peak entrance dose rates of 8 Gy/min and PVDRs >30 for microbeams. Agreement between Monte Carlo simulations and film dosimetry is generally better for larger beam widths; qualitative measurements validated Monte Carlo predicted results. A smaller focal spot enhances PVDRs and reduces beam penumbras but substantially reduces the dose rate. A reduction of the beam emission angle improves the PVDR, beam penumbras, and dose rate without impairing field homogeneity. Minibeams showed similar field characteristics compared with microbeams at the same ratio of beam width and distance but had better agreement with simulations. CONCLUSION The developed setup is already in use for in vitro experiments and soon for in vivo irradiations. Deviations between Monte Carlo simulations and film dosimetry are attributed to scattering at the collimator surface and manufacturing inaccuracies and are a matter of ongoing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Treibel
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Mai Nguyen
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mabroor Ahmed
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Annique Dombrowsky
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Physics Department, Technical University of Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas E Schmid
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Bartzsch
- School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany; Institute for Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Centre Munich, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Moradi F, Khandaker M, Abdul Sani S, Uguru E, Sulieman A, Bradley D. Feasibility study of a minibeam collimator design for a 60Co gamma irradiator. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
23
|
Conventional dose rate spatially-fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatment response and its association with dosimetric parameters-A preclinical study in a Fischer 344 rat model. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0229053. [PMID: 32569277 PMCID: PMC7307781 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To identify key dosimetric parameters that have close associations with tumor treatment response and body weight change in SFRT treatments with a large range of spatial-fractionation scale at dose rates of several Gy/min. Methods Six study arms using uniform tumor radiation, half-tumor radiation, 2mm beam array radiation, 0.3mm minibeam radiation, and an untreated arm were used. All treatments were delivered on a 320kV x-ray irradiator. Forty-two female Fischer 344 rats with fibrosarcoma tumor allografts were used. Dosimetric parameters studied are peak dose and width, valley dose and width, peak-to-valley-dose-ratio (PVDR), volumetric average dose, percentage volume directly irradiated, and tumor- and normal-tissue EUD. Animal survival, tumor volume change, and body weight change (indicative of treatment toxicity) are tested for association with the dosimetric parameters using linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results The dosimetric parameters most closely associated with tumor response are tumor EUD (R2 = 0.7923, F-stat = 15.26*; z-test = -4.07***), valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.7636, F-stat = 12.92*; z-test = -4.338***), and percentage tumor directly irradiated (R2 = 0.7153, F-stat = 10.05*; z-test = -3.837***) per the linear regression and Cox Proportional Hazards models, respectively. Tumor response is linearly proportional to valley (minimum) doses and tumor EUD. Average dose (R2 = 0.2745, F-stat = 1.514 (no sig.); z-test = -2.811**) and peak dose (R2 = 0.04472, F-stat = 0.6874 (not sig.); z-test = -0.786 (not sig.)) show the weakest associations to tumor response. Only the uniform radiation arm did not gain body weight post-radiation, indicative of treatment toxicity; however, body weight change in general shows weak association with all dosimetric parameters except for valley (minimum) dose (R2 = 0.3814, F-stat = 13.56**), valley width (R2 = 0.2853, F-stat = 8.783**), and peak width (R2 = 0.2759, F-stat = 8.382**). Conclusions For a single-fraction SFRT at conventional dose rates, valley, not peak, dose is closely associated with tumor treatment response and thus should be used for treatment prescription. Tumor EUD, valley (minimum) dose, and percentage tumor directly irradiated are the top three dosimetric parameters that exhibited close associations with tumor response.
Collapse
|
24
|
Mazal A, Prezado Y, Ares C, de Marzi L, Patriarca A, Miralbell R, Favaudon V. FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy. Br J Radiol 2020; 93:20190807. [PMID: 32003574 PMCID: PMC7066940 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥106 Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC, University Paris-Sud and Paris-Saclay, CNRS/IN2P3, Orsay, France
| | - Carme Ares
- Centro de Protonterapia Quironsalud, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ludovic de Marzi
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France.,Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Institut Curie, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Centre de protonthérapie d'Orsay, Campus universitaire, bâtiment 101, Orsay 91898, France
| | | | - Vincent Favaudon
- Institut Curie, Inserm U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Paris-Saclay and PSL Research Universities, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bartzsch S, Corde S, Crosbie JC, Day L, Donzelli M, Krisch M, Lerch M, Pellicioli P, Smyth LML, Tehei M. Technical advances in x-ray microbeam radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:02TR01. [PMID: 31694009 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab5507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
In the last 25 years microbeam radiation therapy (MRT) has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional radiation therapy at large, third generation synchrotrons. In MRT, a multi-slit collimator modulates a kilovoltage x-ray beam on a micrometer scale, creating peak dose areas with unconventionally high doses of several hundred Grays separated by low dose valley regions, where the dose remains well below the tissue tolerance level. Pre-clinical evidence demonstrates that such beam geometries lead to substantially reduced damage to normal tissue at equal tumour control rates and hence drastically increase the therapeutic window. Although the mechanisms behind MRT are still to be elucidated, previous studies indicate that immune response, tumour microenvironment, and the microvasculature may play a crucial role. Beyond tumour therapy, MRT has also been suggested as a microsurgical tool in neurological disorders and as a primer for drug delivery. The physical properties of MRT demand innovative medical physics and engineering solutions for safe treatment delivery. This article reviews technical developments in MRT and discusses existing solutions for dosimetric validation, reliable treatment planning and safety. Instrumentation at synchrotron facilities, including beam production, collimators and patient positioning systems, is also discussed. Specific solutions reviewed in this article include: dosimetry techniques that can cope with high spatial resolution, low photon energies and extremely high dose rates of up to 15 000 Gy s-1, dose calculation algorithms-apart from pure Monte Carlo Simulations-to overcome the challenge of small voxel sizes and a wide dynamic dose-range, and the use of dose-enhancing nanoparticles to combat the limited penetrability of a kilovoltage energy spectrum. Finally, concepts for alternative compact microbeam sources are presented, such as inverse Compton scattering set-ups and carbon nanotube x-ray tubes, that may facilitate the transfer of MRT into a hospital-based clinical environment. Intensive research in recent years has resulted in practical solutions to most of the technical challenges in MRT. Treatment planning, dosimetry and patient safety systems at synchrotrons have matured to a point that first veterinary and clinical studies in MRT are within reach. Should these studies confirm the promising results of pre-clinical studies, the authors are confident that MRT will become an effective new radiotherapy option for certain patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Bartzsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany. Helmholtz Centre Munich, Institute for Radiation Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Minibeam radiation therapy at a conventional irradiator: Dose-calculation engine and first tumor-bearing animals irradiation. Phys Med 2020; 69:256-261. [PMID: 31918378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel therapeutic strategy, whose exploration was hindered due to its restriction to large synchrotrons. Our recent implementation of MBRT in a wide-spread small animal irradiator offers the possibility of performing systematic radiobiological studies. The aim of this research was to develop a set of dosimetric tools to reliably guide biological experiments in the irradiator. METHODS A Monte Carlo (Geant4)-based dose calculation engine was developed. It was then benchmarked against a series of dosimetric measurements performed with gafchromic films. Two voxelized rat phantoms (ROBY, computer tomography) were used to evaluate the treatment plan of F98 tumor-bearing rats. The response of a group of 7 animals receiving a unilateral irradiation of 58 Gy was compared to a group of non-irradiated controls. RESULTS The good agreement between calculations and the experimental data allowed the validation of the dose-calculation engine. The latter was first used to compare the dose distributions in computer tomography images of a rat's head and in a digital model of a rat's head (ROBY), obtaining a good general agreement. Finally, with respect to the in vivo experiment, the increase of mean survival time of the treated group with respect to the controls was modest but statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS The developed dosimetric tools were used to reliably guide the first MBRT treatments of intracranial glioma-bearing rats outside synchrotrons. The significant tumor response obtained with respect to the non-irradiated controls, despite the heterogenous dose coverage of the target, might indicate the participation of non-targeted effects.
Collapse
|
27
|
De Marzi L, Nauraye C, Lansonneur P, Pouzoulet F, Patriarca A, Schneider T, Guardiola C, Mammar H, Dendale R, Prezado Y. Spatial fractionation of the dose in proton therapy: Proton minibeam radiation therapy. Cancer Radiother 2019; 23:677-681. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2019.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/01/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
28
|
Guardiola C, Prezado Y, Roulin C, Bergs JW. Effect of X-ray minibeam radiation therapy on clonogenic survival of glioma cells. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:7-13. [PMID: 30211325 PMCID: PMC6134191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2018.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 07/26/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The goal is to compare, in vitro, the efficiency of minibeam radiotherapy (MBRT) and standard RT in inducing clonogenic cell death in glioma cell lines. With this aim, we report on the first in vitro study performed in an X-ray Small Animal Radiation Research Platform (SARRP) modified for minibeam irradiations. F98 rat and U87 human glioma cells were irradiated with either an array of minibeams (MB) or with conventional homogeneous beams (broad beam, BB). A specially designed multislit collimator was used to generate the minibeams with a with of a center-to-center distance of 1465 (±10) μm, and a PVDR value of 12.4 (±2.3) measured at 1 cm depth in a water phantom. Cells were either replated for clonogenic assay directly (immediate plating, IP) or 24 h after irradiation (delayed plating, DP) to assess the effect of potentially lethal damage repair (PLDR) on cell survival. Our hypothesis is that with MBRT, a similar level of clonogenic cell death can be reached compared to standard RT, when using equal mean radiation doses. To prove this, we performed dose escalations to determine the minimum integrated dose needed to reach a similar level of clonogenic cell death for both treatments. We show that this minimum dose can vary per cell line: in F98 cells a dose of 19 Gy was needed to obtain similar levels of clonogenic survival, whereas in U87 cells there was still a slightly increased survival with MB compared to BB 19 Gy treatment. The results suggest also an impairment of DNA damage repair in F98 cells as there is no difference in clonogenic cell survival between immediately and delayed plated cells for each dose and irradiation mode. For U87 cells, a small IP-DP effect was observed in the case of BB irradiation up to a dose of 17 Gy. However, at 19 Gy BB, as well as for the complete dose range of MB irradiation, U87 cells did not show a difference in clonogenic survival between IP and DP. We therefore speculate that MBRT might influence PLDR. The current results show that X-ray MBRT is a promising method for treatment of gliomas: future preclinical and clinical studies should aim at reaching a minimum radiation (valley) dose for effective eradication of gliomas with increased sparing of normal tissues compared to standard RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Consuelo Guardiola
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Christophe Roulin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Translational Research Department, Experimental Radiotherapy Platform, Orsay, France
| | - Judith W.J. Bergs
- IMNC-UMR 8165, CNRS Paris-Saclay University, 15 rue Georges Clemenceau, 91406 Orsay cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Esplen NM, Chergui L, Johnstone CD, Bazalova-Carter M. Monte Carlo optimization of a microbeam collimator design for use on the small animal radiation research platform (SARRP). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:175004. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad7e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|