Aspartic acid residue 124 in the third transmembrane domain of the somatostatin receptor subtype 3 is essential for somatostatin-14 binding

The heptapeptide somatostatin analogue TT-232 exerts analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions via SST4 receptor activation: In silico, in vitro and in vivo evidence in mice

Since the conventional and adjuvant analgesics have limited effectiveness frequently accompanied by serious side effects, development of novel, potent pain killers for chronic neuropathic and inflammatory pain conditions is a big challenge. Somatostatin (SS) regulates endocrine, vascular, immune and neuronal functions, cell proliferation through 5 G_i protein-coupled receptors (SST₁-SST₅). SS released from the capsaicin-sensitive peptidergic sensory nerves mediates anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive effects without endocrine actions via SST₄. The therapeutic use of the native SS is limited by its diverse biological actions and short plasma elimination half-life. Therefore, SST₄ selective SS analogues could be promising analgesic and anti-inflammatory drug candidates with new mode of action. TT-232 is a cyclic heptapeptide showing great affinity to SST₄ and SST₁. Here, we report the in silico SST₄ receptor binding mechanism, in vitro binding (competition assay) and cAMP- decreasing effect of TT-232 in SST₄-expressing CHO cells, as well as its analgesic and anti-inflammatory actions in chronic neuropathic pain and arthritis models using wildtype and SST₄-deficient mice. TT-232 binds to SST₄ with similar interaction energy (-11.03 kcal/mol) to the superagonist J-2156, displaces somatostatin from SST₄ binding (10 nM to 30 µM) and inhibits forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation (EC₅₀: 371.6 ± 58.03 nmol; E_max: 78.63 ± 2.636 %). Its i.p. injection (100, 200 µg/kg) results in significant, 35.7 % and 50.4 %, analgesic effects upon single administration in chronic neuropathic pain and repeated injection in arthritis models in wildtype, but not in SST₄-deficient mice. These results provide evidence that the analgesic effect of TT-232 is mediated by SST₄ activation, which might open novel drug developmental potentials. Chemical compounds Chemical compounds studied in this article TT-232 (PubChem CID: 74053735).

Exploration of Somatostatin Binding Mechanism to Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 4

Somatostatin (also named as growth hormone-inhibiting hormone or somatotropin release-inhibiting factor) is a regulatory peptide important for the proper functioning of the endocrine system, local inflammatory reactions, mood and motor coordination, and behavioral responses to stress. Somatostatin exerts its effects via binding to G-protein-coupled somatostatin receptors of which the fourth subtype (SSTR4) is a particularly important receptor mediating analgesic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-depressant effects without endocrine actions. Thus, SSTR4 agonists are promising drug candidates. Although the knowledge of the atomic resolution-binding modes of SST would be essential for drug development, experimental elucidation of the structures of SSTR4 and its complexes is still awaiting. In the present study, structures of the somatostatin–SSTR4 complex were produced using an unbiased, blind docking approach. Beyond the static structures, the binding mechanism of SST was also elucidated in the explicit water molecular dynamics (MD) calculations, and key binding modes (external, intermediate, and internal) were distinguished. The most important residues on both receptor and SST sides were identified. An energetic comparison of SST binding to SSTR4 and 2 offered a residue-level explanation of receptor subtype selectivity. The calculated structures show good agreement with available experimental results and indicate that somatostatin binding is realized via prerequisite binding modes and an induced fit mechanism. The identified binding modes and the corresponding key residues provide useful information for future drug design targeting SSTR4.

A computational study of somatostatin subtype-4 receptor agonist binding

The somatostatin subtype-4 receptor (sst4) is highly expressed in neocortical and hippocampal areas, which are affected by amyloid beta accumulation. Sst4 agonists enhance downstream activity of amyloid beta peptide catabolism through neprilysin and may slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Sst4 is a G protein coupled receptor (GPCR), the structure of which has yet to be resolved. A newly constructed sst4 homology model, along with a previously reported model-built sst4 receptor structure, were used in the present study to gain insights into binding requirements of sst4 agonists employing a set of compounds patented by Boehringer Ingelheim. Besides aiming at delineating binding at the macromolecular level of these recently disclosed compounds, our objectives included the generation of a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) global model to explore the relationship between chemical structure and affinity. Through the implementation of model building, docking, and QSAR, plausible correlations between structural properties and the binding affinity are established. This study sheds light on understanding binding requirements at the sst4 receptor.

Graphical abstract

Structure and dynamics of the somatostatin receptor 3-ligand binding in the presence of lipids examined using computational structural biology methods

In the past two decades, the structural biology studies on G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are on the rise. Understanding the relation between the structure and function of GPCRs is important as they play a huge role in various signaling mechanisms in a eukaryotic cell. Somatostatin receptor 3 (SSTR3), one of the GPCRs, is one such important receptor which oversees different cellular processes including cell-to-cell signaling. However, the information available regarding the structural features of SSTR3 responsible for their bioactivity is scarce. In this study, we report a structural understanding of SSTR3-ligand binding that could be helpful in demystifying the structural complexities related to functioning of the receptor. An integrated protocol consisting of different computational structural biology tools including protein structure prediction via comparative modeling, binding site characterization, three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship based on comparative molecular field analysis and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis, density functional theory, and molecular dynamics simulations were performed. Different understandings from the simulation of SSTR3-ligand complexes, mainly the conditions that are favorable for the formation of lowest bioactive state of SSTR3 ligands are reported. In addition to that, we report the important physicochemical descriptors of SSTR3 ligands that could significantly influence their bioactivity. The results of the study could be helpful in developing novel SSTR3 ligands (both agonists and antagonists) with high potency and receptor selectivity.

Plasticity in ligand recognition at somatostatin receptors

Somatostatin is a signaling peptide that plays a pivotal role in physiologic processes relating to metabolism and growth through its actions at somatostatin receptors (SSTRs). Members of the SSTR subfamily, particularly SSTR2, are key drug targets for neuroendocrine neoplasms, with synthetic peptide agonists currently in clinical use. Here, we show the cryogenic-electron microscopy structures of active-state SSTR2 in complex with heterotrimeric Gi3 and either the endogenous ligand SST14 or the FDA-approved drug octreotide. Complemented by biochemical assays and molecular dynamics simulations, these structures reveal key details of ligand recognition and receptor activation at SSTRs. We find that SSTR ligand recognition is highly diverse, as demonstrated by ligand-induced conformational changes in ECL2 and substantial sequence divergence across subtypes in extracellular regions. Despite this complexity, we rationalize several known sources of SSTR subtype selectivity and identify an additional interaction for specific binding. These results provide valuable insights for structure-based drug discovery at SSTRs.

Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of 3,4,5-trisubstituted-1,2,4-triazoles: high affinity and selective somatostatin receptor-4 agonists for Alzheimer's disease treatment

Somatostatin receptor-4 (SST₄) is highly expressed in brain regions affiliated with learning and memory. SST₄ agonist treatment may act to mitigate Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. An integrated approach to SST₄ agonist lead optimization is presented herein. High affinity and selective agonists with biological efficacy were identified through iterative cycles of a structure-based design strategy encompassing computational methods, chemistry, and preclinical pharmacology. 1,2,4-Triazole derivatives of our previously reported hit (4) showed enhanced SST₄ binding affinity, activity, and selectivity. Thirty-five compounds showed low nanomolar range SST₄ binding affinity, 12 having a K _i < 1 nM. These compounds showed >500-fold affinity for SST₄ as compared to SST_2A. SST₄ activities were consistent with the respective SST₄ binding affinities (EC₅₀ < 10 nM for 34 compounds). Compound 208 (SST₄ K _i = 0.7 nM; EC₅₀ = 2.5 nM; >600-fold selectivity over SST_2A) display a favorable physiochemical profile, and was advanced to learning and memory behavior evaluations in the senescence accelerated mouse-prone 8 model of AD-related cognitive decline. Chronic administration enhanced learning with i.p. dosing (1 mg kg^-1) compared to vehicle. Chronic administration enhanced memory with both i.p. (0.01, 0.1, 1 mg kg^-1) and oral (0.01, 10 mg kg^-1) dosing compared to vehicle. This study identified a novel series of SST₄ agonists with high affinity, selectivity, and biological activity that may be useful in the treatment of AD.

In Silico, In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Characterization of Novel Analgesic Drug Candidate Somatostatin SST4 Receptor Agonists

Background: Somatostatin released from the capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves mediates analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects via its receptor subtype 4 (SST₄) without influencing endocrine functions. Therefore, SST₄ is considered to be a novel target for drug development in pain, especially chronic neuropathy which is a great unmet medical need.

Purpose and Experimental Approach: Here, we examined the in silico binding, SST₄-linked G protein activation and β-arrestin activation on stable SST₄ expressing cells and the effects of our novel pyrrolo-pyrimidine molecules (20, 100, 500, 1,000, 2,000 µg·kg⁻¹) on partial sciatic nerve ligation-induced traumatic mononeuropathic pain model in mice.

Key Results: The novel compounds bind to the high affinity binding site of SST₄ the receptor and activate the G protein. However, unlike the reference SST₄ agonists NNC 26-9100 and J-2156, they do not induce β-arrestin activation responsible for receptor desensitization and internalization upon chronic use. They exert 65–80% maximal anti-hyperalgesic effects in the neuropathy model 1 h after a single oral administration of 100–500 µg·kg⁻¹ doses.

Conclusion and Implications: The novel orally active compounds show potent and effective SST₄ receptor agonism in vitro and in vivo. All four novel ligands proved to be full agonists based on G protein activation, but failed to recruit β-arrestin. Based on their potent antinociceptive effect in the neuropathic pain model following a single oral administration, they are promising candidates for drug development.

In vitro anti-echinococcal activity of octreotide: Additive effect of metformin linked to autophagy

Cystic echinococcosis (CE) is a worldwide zoonosis caused by the Echinococcus granulosus larval stage. The currently available therapy for this disease is based on benzimidazoles, which are rarely curative and cause several adverse effects. Therefore, new treatment options are needed. Octreotide (Oct) is a somatostatin analogue which exhibits anti-proliferative and anti-secretory effects over several cancer cell lines expressing somatostatin receptors. Here, we assessed the in vitro pharmacological effect of Oct against the E. granulosus larval stage. The drug caused a significant dose-dependent decrease in the viability of both protoscoleces and metacestodes. SEM and TEM analysis showed ultrastructural damage in both larval forms under drug treatment. Based on this, we investigated the possible presence of an Oct binding receptor in the parasite. The putative somatostatin/allatostatin-like receptor (Eg-s/ast) conserves the characteristic topology and signature sequences of the prototype somatostatin receptor common to vertebrates and is expressed in both metacestodes and protoscoleces. Moreover, Oct treated-parasites showed the presence of autophagic structures and a significant increase in transcriptional expression of autophagy key genes such as Eg-atg6, Eg-atg8, Eg-atg12 and Eg-atg16. In addition, by in toto immunolocalization assays, an increase in the punctate pattern and Eg-Atg8 protein expression was detected in Oct-treated metacestodes. Subsequently, the combination of Oct and Met had an additive effect on the viability of both larval forms. Our results provide additional evidence for the participation of PI3K/AKT/TOR/autophagy pathway in the Echinococcus survival and suggest the concomitant use of these drugs as potential therapeutic agents in treating of CE.

International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. CV. Somatostatin Receptors: Structure, Function, Ligands, and New Nomenclature

Somatostatin, also known as somatotropin-release inhibitory factor, is a cyclopeptide that exerts potent inhibitory actions on hormone secretion and neuronal excitability. Its physiologic functions are mediated by five G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) called somatostatin receptor (SST)1-5. These five receptors share common structural features and signaling mechanisms but differ in their cellular and subcellular localization and mode of regulation. SST₂ and SST₅ receptors have evolved as primary targets for pharmacological treatment of pituitary adenomas and neuroendocrine tumors. In addition, SST₂ is a prototypical GPCR for the development of peptide-based radiopharmaceuticals for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions. This review article summarizes findings published in the last 25 years on the physiology, pharmacology, and clinical applications related to SSTs. We also discuss potential future developments and propose a new nomenclature.

Analogues of Arylamide Phenylpiperazine Ligands To Investigate the Factors Influencing D3 Dopamine Receptor Bitropic Binding and Receptor Subtype Selectivity

We have previously reported on the ability of arylamide phenylpiperazines to bind selectively to the D3 versus the D2 dopamine receptor subtype. For these studies, we used LS-3-134 as the prototypic arylamide phenylpiperazine ligand because it binds with high affinity at D3 dopamine receptor (0.17 nM) and exhibits >150-fold D3 vs D2 receptor binding selectivity. Our goal was to investigate how the composition and size of the nonaromatic ring structure at the piperazine position of substituted phenylpiperazine analogues might influence binding affinity at the human D2 and D3 dopamine receptors. Two factors were identified as being important for determining the binding affinity of bitropic arylamide phenylpiperazines at the dopamine D3 receptor subtype. One factor was the strength of the salt bridge between the highly conserved residue Asp^3.32 with the protonated nitrogen of the nonaromatic ring at the piperazine position. The second factor was the configuration of the unbound ligand in an aqueous solution. These two factors were found to be related to the logarithm of the affinities using a simple correlation model, which could be useful when designing high affinity subtype selective bitropic ligands. While this model is based upon the interaction of arylamide phenylpiperazines with the D2 and D3 D2-like dopamine receptor subtypes, it provides insights into the complexity of the factors that define a bitropic mode of the binding at GPCRs.

Theoretical analysis of somatostatin receptor 5 with antagonists and agonists for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

We report on SSTR5 receptor modeling and its interaction with reported antagonist and agonist molecules. Modeling of the SSTR5 receptor was carried out using multiple templates with the aim of improving the precision of the generated models. The selective SSTR5 antagonists, agonists and native somatostatin SRIF-14 were employed to propose the binding site of SSTR5 and to identify the critical residues involved in the interaction of the receptor with other molecules. Residues Q2.63, D3.32, Q3.36, C186, Y7.34 and Y7.42 were found to be highly significant for their strong interaction with the receptor. SSTR5 antagonists were utilized to perform a 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship study. A comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) was conducted using two different alignment schemes, namely the ligand-based and receptor-based alignment methods. The best statistical results were obtained for ligand-based ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] = 0.988, noc = 4) and receptor-guided methods (docked mode 1:[Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], noc = 5), (docked mode 2:[Formula: see text] = 0.555, [Formula: see text], noc = 5). Based on CoMFA contour maps, an electropositive substitution at [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] position and bulky group at [Formula: see text] position are important in enhancing molecular activity.

Theoretical analysis of somatostatin receptor 5 with antagonists and agonists for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors

We report on SSTR5 receptor modeling and its interaction with reported antagonist and agonist molecules. Modeling of the SSTR5 receptor was carried out using multiple templates with the aim of improving the precision of the generated models. The selective SSTR5 antagonists, agonists and native somatostatin SRIF-14 were employed to propose the binding site of SSTR5 and to identify the critical residues involved in the interaction of the receptor with other molecules. Residues Q2.63, D3.32, Q3.36, C186, Y7.34 and Y7.42 were found to be highly significant for their strong interaction with the receptor. SSTR5 antagonists were utilized to perform a 3D quantitative structure-activity relationship study. A comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) was conducted using two different alignment schemes, namely the ligand-based and receptor-based alignment methods. The best statistical results were obtained for ligand-based ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] = 0.988, noc = 4) and receptor-guided methods (docked mode 1:[Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], noc = 5), (docked mode 2:[Formula: see text] = 0.555, [Formula: see text], noc = 5). Based on CoMFA contour maps, an electropositive substitution at [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] position and bulky group at [Formula: see text] position are important in enhancing molecular activity.

The predicted ensemble of low-energy conformations of human somatostatin receptor subtype 5 and the binding of antagonists

Human somatostatin receptor subtype 5 (hSSTR5) regulates cell proliferation and hormone secretion. However, the identification of effective therapeutic small-molecule ligands is impeded because experimental structures are not available for any SSTR subtypes. Here, we predict the ensemble of low-energy 3D structures of hSSTR5 using a modified GPCR Ensemble of Structures in Membrane BiLayer Environment (GEnSeMBLE) complete sampling computational method. We find that this conformational ensemble displays most interhelical interactions conserved in class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plus seven additional interactions (e.g., Y2.43-D3.49, T3.38-S4.53, K5.64-Y3.51) likely conserved among SSTRs. We then predicted the binding sites for a series of five known antagonists, leading to predicted binding energies consistent with experimental results reported in the literature. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of 50 ns in explicit water and lipid retained the predicted ligand-bound structure and formed new interaction patterns (e.g. R3.50-T6.34) consistent with the inactive μ-opioid receptor X-ray structure. We suggest more than six mutations for experimental validation of our prediction. The final predicted receptor conformations and antagonist binding sites provide valuable insights for designing new small-molecule drugs targeting SSTRs.

A structure-based approach to understanding somatostatin receptor-4 agonism (sst4)

It has been reported that somatostatin receptor subtypes 4 and 5 would be high-impact templates for homology modeling if their 3D structures became available. We have generated a homology model of the somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (sst4), using the newest active state β(2) adrenoreceptor crystal structure, and subsequently docked a variety of agonists into the model-built receptor to elucidate the binding modes of reported agonists. Using experimental restraints, we were able to explain observed activity profiles. We propose two binding modes that can consistently explain findings for high-affinity agonists and reason why certain structures display low affinities for the receptor.

GPCR somatostatin receptor extracellular loop 2 is a key ectodomain for making subtype-selective antibodies with agonist-like activities in the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor BON cell line

OBJECTIVES

The extracellular loop 2 (ECL2) ectodomain of the G protein-coupled receptor class A is thought to function like an inactivation "lid." We created polyclonal somatostatin receptor ECL2 (anti-SSTR ECL2) antibodies to target this lid and to examine if these antibodies can selectively activate the SSTR.

METHODS

Western blots and live-cell immunofluorescence microscopy determined anti-SSTR ECL2 antibody receptor binding selectivity. 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium assay (MTS assay) and cell cycle assay (fluorescence-activated cell sorting) checked for antibody effect on antiproliferation. Nexin assay examined the antibody's ability to induce apoptosis. LANCE cAMP kit (Perkin Elmer) detected antibody-dependent cAMP decrease. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay measured antibody effect on suppressing serotonin secretion. Ligand-receptor binding interference assay with the fluorescent somatostatin (FAM-SST) was used to examine antibody interference to SST-SSTR binding.

RESULTS

Anti-SSTR ECL2 antibodies are SSTR subtype selective and agonist-like, and they suppress cell proliferation via cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In addition, these antibodies decrease cAMP production and inhibit serotonin secretion. Interestingly, these antibodies do not interfere with SST-SSTR binding.

CONCLUSIONS

The ECL2 is an important ectodomain for G protein-coupled receptor activation and required for ligand binding selectivity. The anti-SSTR2, anti-SSTR3, and anti-SSTR5 ECL2 antibodies independently inhibited BON proliferation and decreased hormone secretion. Unlike octreotide, our antibodies do not interfere with SST-SSTR binding.

[Orn5]URP acts as a pure antagonist of urotensinergic receptors in rat cortical astrocytes

Cultured rat astrocytes, which express functional urotensin II (UII)/UII-related peptide (URP) receptors (UT), represent a very suitable model to investigate the pharmacological profile of UII and URP analogs towards native UT. We have recently designed three URP analogs [D-Trp4]URP, [Orn5]URP and [D-Tyr6]URP, that act as UT antagonists in the rat aortic ring bioassay. However, it has been previously reported that UII/URP analogs capable of inhibiting the contractile activity of UII possess agonistic activity on UT-transfected cells. In the present study, we have compared the ability of URP analogs to compete for [125 I]URP binding and to modulate cytosolic calcium concentration ([Ca2+]c) in cultured rat astrocytes. All three analogs displaced radioligand binding: [D-Trp4]URP and [D-Tyr6]URP interacted with high- and low-affinity sites whereas [Orn5]URP only bound high-affinity sites. [D-Trp4]URP and [D-Tyr6]URP both induced a robust increase in [Ca2+]c in astrocytes while [Orn5]URP was totally devoid of activity. [Orn5]URP provoked a concentration-dependent inhibition of URP- and UII-evoked [Ca2+]c increase and a rightward shift of the URP and UII dose-response curves. The present data indicate that [D-Trp4]URP and [D-Tyr6]URP, which act as UII antagonists in the rat aortic ring assay, behave as agonists in the [Ca2+]c mobilization assay in cultured astrocytes, whereas [Orn5]URP is a pure selective antagonist in both rat aortic ring contraction and astrocyte [Ca2+]c mobilization assays.

Evidence for endogenous urotensin-II as an inhibitor of insulin secretion. Study in the perfused rat pancreas

In the perfused rat pancreas, infusion of urotensin-II (UII), a somatostatin-like peptide, inhibits glucose-induced insulin secretion. We have resorted to specific antagonists of the UII receptor (UT), palosuran and urantide, to investigate whether endogenous UII also behaves as an inhibitor of beta-cell secretion. The insulinostatic effect of UII was counteracted by palosuran and by urantide but not by a somatostatin-receptor antagonist (cyclo-somatostatin). Furthermore, the insulinostatic effect of somatostatin was not reversed by palosuran. These results suggest that UII and somatostatin blocked beta-cell secretion via distinct receptors. Finally, in the absence of exogenous UII, both palosuran and urantide potentiated glucose-induced insulin release, thus supporting the concept that endogenous UII is an insulinostatic peptide. By virtue of their insulinotropic effect, UT antagonists may be considered potential drugs for treating the impaired insulin secretion characteristic of type 2 diabetic patients.

Development and pharmacological characterization of "caged" urotensin II analogs

Urotensin-II (U-II) is a cyclic 11-amino acid peptide known as a potent mammalian vasoconstrictor. To study some purported intracellular actions of U-II, masked analogs of this peptide, becoming biologically active only upon UV exposure, were developed. Those analogs described as "caged" were derivatized with a photolabile 4,5-dimethoxynitrobenzyl group on the side chain of Lys-8 or Tyr-9. Both caged analogs of U-II showed a major decrease in their affinity towards the UT receptor. Nevertheless, upon UV irradiation, the native and biologically active U-II peptide was recovered. Thus, this work describes the development of new "caged" U-II derivatives and demonstrates that vasoactivity of U-II can be controlled by masking and unmasking two key residues.

Somatostatin receptors and autoimmune-mediated diabetes

Somatostatin (SST) peptide is produced by various SST-secreting cells throughout the body and acts as a neurotransmitter or paracrine/autocrine regulator in response to ions, nutrients, peptides hormones and neurotransmitters. SST is also widely distributed in the periphery to regulate the inflammatory and immune cells in response to hormones, growth factors, cytokines and other secretive molecules. SST peptides are considered the most important physiologic regulator of the islet cell, gastrointestinal cell and immune cell functions, and the importance of SST production levels has been implicated in several diseases including diabetes. The expression of SST receptors has also been found in T lymphocytes and primary immunologic organs. Interaction of SST and its receptors is also involved in T-cell proliferation and thymocyte selection. SSTR gene-ablated mice developed diabetes with morphologic, physiologic and immunologic alterations in the endocrine pancreas. Increased levels of mononuclear cell infiltration of the islets are associated with the increased levels of antigen-presenting cells located in the islets and peripancreatic lymph nodes. Increased levels of SST were also found in antigen-presenting cells and are associated with a significant increase of CD8 expression levels on CD4(+)/CD8(+) immature thymocytes. These findings highlight the crucial role of this neuroendocrine peptide and its receptors in regulating autoimmune functions.

Somatostatin receptor subtypes: basic pharmacology and tissue distribution

The heptahelical receptor superfamily constitutes the largest single family of transmembrane-signalling molecules that regulate a wide range of physiological processes. The five somatostatin receptors represent a distinct subgroup of this seven transmembrane receptor superfamily. They range in size from 356 to 391 amino acids with 39-57% protein identity between the subtypes with 100 residues strictly conserved among the somatostatin receptor sequences. A high grade of mRNA homology exists in somatostatin receptor subtypes cloned from different species. Following somatostatin receptor binding and functional activity studies, two alternative models of ligand-binding interaction have been hypothesised. One relies on the presence of a binding pocket within the receptor structure constituted by specific amino acids residues, the other denies the presence of such binding structures and suggests that it is the interaction of agonists with specific extracellular and/or transmembrane domains that determine stable receptor structure conformation. Somatostatin receptors, as, indeed, all G-protein-coupled receptors are able to regulate their responsiveness to agonist exposure. This agonist-specific regulation includes three main events, namely, desensitisation, receptor internalisation and receptor degradation. The cell expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes, at the mRNA level, has been characterised in rodent and in human organs with multiple subtype expression in brain and peripheral tissues.

Somatostatin receptors

In 1972, Brazeau et al. isolated somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor, SRIF), a cyclic polypeptide with two biologically active isoforms (SRIF-14 and SRIF-28). This event prompted the successful quest for SRIF receptors. Then, nearly a quarter of a century later, it was announced that a neuropeptide, to be named cortistatin (CST), had been cloned, bearing strong resemblance to SRIF. Evidence of special CST receptors never emerged, however. CST rather competed with both SRIF isoforms for specific receptor binding. And binding to the known subtypes with affinities in the nanomolar range, it has therefore been acknowledged to be a third endogenous ligand at SRIF receptors. This review goes through mechanisms of signal transduction, pharmacology, and anatomical distribution of SRIF receptors. Structurally, SRIF receptors belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled (GPC) receptors, sharing the characteristic seven-transmembrane-segment (STMS) topography. Years of intensive research have resulted in cloning of five receptor subtypes (sst(1)-sst(5)), one of which is represented by two splice variants (sst(2A) and sst(2B)). The individual subtypes, functionally coupled to the effectors of signal transduction, are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian organism, with corresponding differences in physiological impact. It is evident that receptor function, from a physiological point of view, cannot simply be reduced to the accumulated operations of individual receptors. Far from being isolated functional units, receptors co-operate. The total receptor apparatus of individual cell types is composed of different-ligand receptors (e.g. SRIF and non-SRIF receptors) and co-expressed receptor subtypes (e.g. sst(2) and sst(5) receptors) in characteristic proportions. In other words, levels of individual receptor subtypes are highly cell-specific and vary with the co-expression of different-ligand receptors. However, the question is how to quantify the relative contributions of individual receptor subtypes to the integration of transduced signals, ultimately the result of collective receptor activity. The generation of knock-out (KO) mice, intended as a means to define the contributions made by individual receptor subtypes, necessarily marks but an approximation. Furthermore, we must now take into account the stunning complexity of receptor co-operation indicated by the observation of receptor homo- and heterodimerisation, let alone oligomerisation. Theoretically, this phenomenon adds a novel series of functional megareceptors/super-receptors, with varied pharmacological profiles, to the catalogue of monomeric receptor subtypes isolated and cloned in the past. SRIF analogues include both peptides and non-peptides, receptor agonists and antagonists. Relatively long half lives, as compared to those of the endogenous ligands, have been paramount from the outset. Motivated by theoretical puzzles or the shortcomings of present-day diagnostics and therapy, investigators have also aimed to produce subtype-selective analogues. Several have become available.

Construction of a sequence motif characteristic of aminergic G protein-coupled receptors

An approach to discover sequence patterns characteristic of ligand classes is described and applied to aminergic G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Putative ligand-binding residue positions were inferred from considering three lines of evidence: conservation in the subfamily absent or underrepresented in the superfamily, any available mutation data, and the physicochemical properties of the ligand. For aminergic GPCRs, the motif is composed of a conserved aspartic acid in the third transmembrane (TM) domain (rhodopsin position 117) and a conserved tryptophan in the seventh TM domain (rhodopsin position 293); the roles of each are readily justified by molecular modeling of ligand-receptor interactions. This minimally defined motif is an appropriate computational tool for identifying additional, potentially novel aminergic GPCRs from a set of experimentally uncharacterized "orphan" GPCRs, complementing existing sequence matching, clustering, and machine-learning techniques. Motif sensitivity stems from the stepwise addition of residues characteristic of an entire class of ligand (and not tailored for any particular biogenic amine). This sensitivity is balanced by careful consideration of residues (evidence drawn from mutation data, correlation of ligand properties to residue properties, and location with respect to the extracellular face), thereby maintaining specificity for the aminergic class. A number of orphan GPCRs assigned to the aminergic class by this motif were later discovered to be a novel subfamily of trace amine GPCRs, as well as the successful classification of the histamine H4 receptor.

Somatostatin and somatostatin receptor physiology

Since the discovery of somatostatin (SST) over three decades ago, its ubiquitous distribution and manifold functions are still being documented. SST is synthesized in the hypothalamus and transported to the anterior pituitary gland where it tonicaly inhibits GH and TSH secretion as well as being responsible for GH pulsatile release. Several internal feedback loops, sleep, exercise, and chemical agents control and influence SST release. SST also impacts the function of a wide variety of cells and organ systems throughout the body. Knowledge of the structures of the SSTs has resulted in recognition of the essential four core conserved residues responsible for their actions. The SSTs act through six separate SST cell surface receptors (SSTRs), members of the family of G protein-coupled receptors. Receptor ligand binding (SST/SSTR) results in cellular activities specific for each receptor, or receptor combinations, and their tissue/cell localization. Understanding the structure/function relationship of the SSTs and their receptors, including the internalization of SST/SSTR complexes, has facilitated the development of a variety of novel pharmacologic agents for the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors and unfolding new applications.

Non-invasive gamma camera imaging of gene transfer using an adenoviral vector encoding an epitope-tagged receptor as a reporter

A model epitope-tagged receptor was constructed by fusing the hemagglutinin (HA) sequence on the extracellular N-terminus of the human somatostatin receptor subtype 2 (hSSTr2) gene. This construct was placed in an adenoviral (Ad-HAhSSTr2) vector. This study evaluated Ad-HAhSSTr2 in vitro and in vivo using FACS, fluorescent microscopy, radioactive binding assays, and gamma camera imaging techniques. Infection of A-427 non-small cell lung cancer cells with Ad-HAhSSTr2 or Ad-hSSTr2 resulted in similar expression of hSSTr2 by FACS analysis and binding assays using a (99m)Tc-labeled somatostatin analogue ((99m)Tc-P2045). HAhSSTr2 expression in A-427 cells was specific for infection with Ad-HAhSSTr2. FITC-labeled anti-HA antibody (FITC-HA) confirmed surface expression in live A-427 cells and the absence of internalization. Gamma camera imaging and gamma counter analysis of normal mice showed significantly greater (P<0.05) liver uptake of (99m)Tc-labeled anti-HA antibody ((99m)Tc-anti-HA) in mice injected i.v. 48 h earlier with Ad-HAhSSTr2 (53.6+/-6.9% ID/g) as compared to mice similarly injected with Ad-hSSTr2 (9.0+/-1.3% ID/g). In a mouse tumor model, imaging detected increased tumor localization of (99m)Tc-anti-HA due to direct intratumor injection Ad-HAhSSTr2. Gamma counter analysis confirmed significantly greater (P<0.05) uptake of (99m)Tc-anti-HA in tumors injected with Ad-HAhSSTr2 (12.5+/-4.1% ID/g) as compared to Ad-hSSTr2-infected tumors (5.1+/-1.5% ID/g). These studies demonstrate the feasibility of using an epitope-tagged reporter receptor for non-invasively imaging gene transfer.

Functional annotation of two orphan G-protein-coupled receptors, Drostar1 and -2, from Drosophila melanogaster and their ligands by reverse pharmacology

By combining a Drosophila genome data base search and reverse transcriptase-PCR-based cDNA isolation, two G-protein-coupled receptors were cloned, which are the closest known invertebrate homologs of the mammalian opioid/somatostatin receptors. However, when functionally expressed in Xenopus oocytes by injection of Drosophila orphan receptor RNAs together with a coexpressed potassium channel, neither receptor was activated by known mammalian agonists. By applying a reverse pharmacological approach, the physiological ligands were isolated from peptide extracts from adult flies and larvae. Edman sequencing and mass spectrometry of the purified ligands revealed two decapentapeptides, which differ only by an N-terminal pyroglutamate/glutamine. The peptides align to a hormone precursor sequence of the Drosophila genome data base and are almost identical to allatostatin C from Manduca sexta. Both receptors were activated by the synthetic peptides irrespective of the N-terminal modification. Site-directed mutagenesis of a residue in transmembrane region 3 and the loop between transmembrane regions 6 and 7 affect ligand binding, as previously described for somatostatin receptors. The two receptor genes each containing three exons and transcribed in opposite directions are separated by 80 kb with no other genes predicted between. Localization of receptor transcripts identifies a role of the new transmitter system in visual information processing as well as endocrine regulation.

Novel G-protein-coupled receptor genes expressed in the brain: continued discovery of important therapeutic targets

The rhodopsin family of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is the largest known group of cell-surface mediators of signal transduction. The vast majority of these receptors were discovered by methods based upon shared sequence homologies found throughout this family. While such efforts identified a multitude of receptor subtypes for previously known ligands, numerous receptors have been discovered for which endogenous ligands were unknown. These receptors are commonly referred to as orphan receptors. One of the most important tasks of modern pharmacology lies in elucidating the functions of these receptors. Of particular interest are receptors with recognised expression in the central nervous system, given that many psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders are mediated by unknown mechanisms. Hence, this collection of putative neurotransmitter and neuromodulator signal mediators represents a substantial and untapped resource for novel drug discovery. Recently, various methodologies have accelerated the discovery of novel ligands for these orphan receptors, identifying the basic components required for further physiological ligand/receptor system characterisation. Equipped with proven ligand identification strategies, the characterisation of all orphan GPCRs and the exploitation of their exciting potential as targets for the discovery of novel drugs is anticipated.

Glycosylation affects agonist binding and signal transduction of the rat somatostatin receptor subtype 3

The somatostatin receptor subtypes, sst1-sst5, bind their natural ligands, somatostatin-14, somatostatin-28 and cortistatin-17, with high affinity but do not much discriminate between them. Detailed understanding of the interactions between these receptors and their peptide ligands may facilitate the development of selective compounds which are needed to identify the biological functions of individual receptor subtypes. The influence of the amino-terminal domain and of the two putative N-linked glycosylation sites located in this region of rat sst3 was analysed. Biochemical studies in transfected cell lines suggested that the amino-terminus of sst3 is glycosylated at both sites. Mutation of the N-linked glycosylation site, Asn18Thr, had only a small effect on binding properties and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The double mutant Asn18Thr/Asn31Thr lacking both glycosylation sites showed a significant reduction in high affinity binding and inhibition of adenylyl cyclase while peptide selectivity was not affected. Truncation of the amino-terminal region by 32 amino acid residues including the two glycosylation sites caused similar but much stronger effects. Immunocytochemical analysis of receptor localisation revealed that the amino-terminal domain but not the carbohydrates appear to be involved in the transport of the receptor polypeptide to the cell surface.

Identification of urotensin II as the endogenous ligand for the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR14

Urotensin II (UII) is a neuropeptide with potent cardiovascular effects. Its sequence is strongly conserved among different species and has structural similarity to somatostatin. No receptor for UII has been molecularly identified from any species so far. GPR14 was cloned as an orphan G protein-coupled receptor with similarity to members of the somatostatin/opioid receptor family. We have now demonstrated that GPR14 is a high affinity receptor for UII and designate it UII-R1a. HEK293 cells and COS-7 cells transfected with rat GPR14 showed strong, dose-dependent calcium mobilization in response to fish, frog, and human UII. Radioligand binding analysis showed high affinity binding of UII to membrane preparations isolated from HEK293 cells stably expressing rat GPR14. In situ hybridization analysis showed that GPR14 was expressed in motor neurons of the spinal cord, smooth muscle cells of the bladder, and muscle cells of the heart. The identification of the first receptor for UII will allow better understanding of the physiological and pharmacological roles of UII.

Immunohistochemical distribution of the somatostatin receptor subtype 5 in the adult rat brain: predominant expression in the basal forebrain

Somatostatin exerts its actions by means of a family of G protein-coupled receptors, five of which have so far been cloned. Whereas mRNAs for receptor subtypes sst(1)-sst(4) have been unequivocally localized in the brain, the data concerning the fifth subtype, sst(5), are contradictory. Moreover, whereas sst(1) and sst(2A) receptor proteins have been localized by immunohistochemistry, the distribution of sst(3)-sst(5) receptor proteins and/or subtype-specific binding remains to be determined in the central nervous system. In the present study, we investigated the distribution of immunoreactive sst(5) in adult rat brain and pituitary and demonstrated the presence of this receptor protein in the central nervous system by using an affinity-purified antibody generated against the C-terminus of the receptor. The specificity of the antibody for sst(5) was established by immunoblotting experiments on membranes prepared from cells transfected with cDNA encoding different somatotropin release inhibiting (SRIF) receptor subtypes as well as from anterior pituitary. In both systems, the antibody specifically recognized a band at approximately 50 kDa molecular mass, corresponding well to the reported size of the cloned receptor (48 kDa). Immunofluorescence in COS-7 cells transfected with individual SRIF receptor subtypes as well as in sections of rat pituitary demonstrated the antibody's applicability to the immunohistochemical detection of sst(5) receptors. In rat brain sections, sst(5) immunoreactivity was predominantly associated with neuronal perikarya and primary dendrites. Immunolabeling was most prominent in the olfactory tubercle, islands of Calleja, diagonal band of Broca, substantia innominata, and magnocellular preoptic nucleus of the basal forebrain as well as in the reticular nucleus of the thalamus. Other, less intensely labeled areas included the cerebral cortex, hippocampus, amygdala, preoptic area as well as the lateroanterior nucleus of the hypothalamus. The present findings provide the first characterization of the anatomic distribution of sst(5) receptors in the rat brain. They demonstrate a prominent expression of these receptors in the basal forebrain, suggesting that they may be involved in the mediation of somatostatin effects on the sleep-wake cycle through their association with cortically projecting subcortical systems.

Somatostatin and its receptor family

Somatostatin (SST), a regulatory peptide, is produced by neuroendocrine, inflammatory, and immune cells in response to ions, nutrients, neuropeptides, neurotransmitters, thyroid and steroid hormones, growth factors, and cytokines. The peptide is released in large amounts from storage pools of secretory cells, or in small amounts from activated immune and inflammatory cells, and acts as an endogenous inhibitory regulator of the secretory and proliferative responses of target cells that are widely distributed in the brain and periphery. These actions are mediated by a family of seven transmembrane (TM) domain G-protein-coupled receptors that comprise five distinct subtypes (termed SSTR1-5) that are endoded by separate genes segregated on different chromosomes. The five receptor subtypes bind the natural SST peptides, SST-14 and SST-28, with low nanomolar affinity. Short synthetic octapeptide and hexapeptide analogs bind well to only three of the subtypes, 2, 3, and 5. Selective nonpeptide agonists with nanomolar affinity have been developed for four of the subtypes (SSTR1, 2, 3, and 4) and putative peptide antagonists for SSTR2 and SSTR5 have been identified. The ligand binding domain for SST ligands is made up of residues in TMs III-VII with a potential contribution by the second extracellular loop. SSTRs are widely expressed in many tissues, frequently as multiple subtypes that coexist in the same cell. The five receptors share common signaling pathways such as the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase, activation of phosphotyrosine phosphatase (PTP), and modulation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) through G-protein-dependent mechanisms. Some of the subtypes are also coupled to inward rectifying K(+) channels (SSTR2, 3, 4, 5), to voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels (SSTR1, 2), a Na(+)/H(+) exchanger (SSTR1), AMPA/kainate glutamate channels (SSTR1, 2), phospholipase C (SSTR2, 5), and phospholipase A(2) (SSTR4). SSTRs block cell secretion by inhibiting intracellular cAMP and Ca(2+) and by a receptor-linked distal effect on exocytosis. Four of the receptors (SSTR1, 2, 4, and 5) induce cell cycle arrest via PTP-dependent modulation of MAPK, associated with induction of the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein and p21. In contrast, SSTR3 uniquely triggers PTP-dependent apoptosis accompanied by activation of p53 and the pro-apoptotic protein Bax. SSTR1, 2, 3, and 5 display acute desensitization of adenylyl cyclase coupling. Four of the subtypes (SSTR2, 3, 4, and 5) undergo rapid agonist-dependent endocytosis. SSTR1 fails to be internalized but is instead upregulated at the membrane in response to continued agonist exposure. Among the wide spectrum of SST effects, several biological responses have been identified that display absolute or relative subtype selectivity. These include GH secretion (SSTR2 and 5), insulin secretion (SSTR5), glucagon secretion (SSTR2), and immune responses (SSTR2).

Structural and compositional determinants of cortistatin activity

Cortistatin-14 (CST-14) is a putative novel neuropeptide that shares 11 of its 14 residues with somatostatin-14 (SRIF-14), yet its effects on sleep physiology, locomotor behavior and hippocampal function are different from those of somatostatin. We studied the structural basis for cortistatin's distinct biological activities. As with SRIF-14, CST-14 does not show any preferred conformation in solution, as determined by circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance. Synthetic cortistatin analogs were designed and synthesized based on the cyclic structure of octreotide. Biological assays were carried out to determine their binding affinities to five somatostatin receptors (sstl-5) and their ability to produce changes in locomotor activity and to modulate hippocampal physiology and sleep. The results show that the compound with N-terminal proline and C-terminal lysine amide exhibits cortistatin-like biological activities, including reduction of population spike amplitudes in the hippocampal CA1 region, decrease in locomotor activity and enhancement of slow-wave sleep 2. These findings suggest that both proline and lysine are necessary for cortistatin binding to its specific receptor.

Identification of amino acids in the N-terminal domain of corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 that are important determinants of high-affinity ligand binding

The aim of the present study was to identify the N-terminal regions of human corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) receptor type 1 (hCRF-R1) that are crucial for ligand binding. Mutant receptors were constructed by replacing specific residues in hCRF-R1 with amino acids from the corresponding position in the N-terminal region of the human vasoactive intestinal peptide receptor type 2 (hVIP-R2). In cyclic AMP stimulation and CRF binding assays, it was established that two regions within the N-terminal domain were crucial for the binding of CRF receptor agonists and antagonists: one region mapping to amino acids 43-50 and a second amino acid sequence extending from position 76 to 84 of hCRF-R1. Recently, it was found that the latter sequence plays a very important role in determining the high ligand selectivity of the Xenopus CRF-R1 (xCRF-R1). Replacement of amino acids 76-84 of hCRF-R1 with residues from the same segment of the hVIP-R2 N terminus markedly reduced the binding affinity of CRF ligands. Mutation of Arg76 or Asn81 but not Gly83 of hCRF-R1 to the corresponding amino acids of xCRF-R1 or hVIP-R2 resulted in 100-1,000-fold lower affinities for human/rat CRF, rat urocortin, and astressin. These data underline the importance of the N-terminal domain of CRF-R1 in high-affinity ligand binding.

Rat somatostatin receptor subtype 4 can be made sensitive to agonist-induced internalization by mutation of a single threonine (residue 331)

A sequence motif of 20 amino acid residues within the C-terminal portion of the rat somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (SSTR4) has been shown to prevent rapid agonist-dependent receptor internalization in transfected human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells. Molecular dissection of this motif by biochemical ligand-binding assays revealed that the block was released by mutating a single residue (threonine 331) to an alanine. These data are in line with confocal microscopic analysis of cultured primary neurons microinjected with cDNA constructs encoding either SSTR4 or the mutant T331A. Immunocytochemical analysis showed that the mutant receptor, but not SSTR4, was internalized. However, internalized T331A was not recycled to the cell surface, suggesting that it lacks sequence elements that determine intracellular sorting after endocytosis. Neither wildtype SSTR nor the mutant T331A exhibited functional desensitization when assayed for their ability to inhibit adenylate cyclase. In agreement with this, the wt receptor and its mutant were not phosphorylated in response to agonist treatment. Lack of desensitization of SSTR4 has been electrophysiologically verified by coexpressing the receptor with a G-protein-gated, inwardly rectifying potassium channel in Xenopus oocytes. A strong somatostatin 14 (SST14)-activated inward potassium current was observed that was long-lasting and which decayed only slowly after washout of the agonist. This is in contrast to another somatostatin receptor subtype, SSTR3, which mediates rapidly desensitizing currents. Binding experiments on HEK cells transfected with either SSTR3 or 4 indicated that this difference is not attributable to slow dissociation of the agonist from the receptor, suggesting that SSTR4 mediates long-lasting signalling, a property which may be relevant for clinical therapy.

A single position in the third transmembrane domains of the human B1 and B2 bradykinin receptors is adjacent to and discriminates between the C-terminal residues of subtype-selective ligands

In order to identify agonist- and antagonist-binding epitopes in the human B1 and B2 bradykinin (BK) receptors, we exploited the ability of these receptors to discriminate between peptide ligands that differ only by the absence (B1) and presence (B2) of a C-terminal Arg. This was done by constructing chimeric proteins in which specific domains were exchanged between these receptors as recently described by us (Leeb, T., Mathis, S. A., and Leeb-Lundberg, L. M. F. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 311-317). The constructs were then expressed in HEK293 and A10 cells and assayed by radioligand binding and by agonist-stimulated inositol phospholipid hydrolysis and intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Substitution of the third transmembrane domain (TM-III) of the B1 receptor in the B2 receptor (B2(B1III)) dramatically reduced the affinities of B2-selective peptide ligands including both the agonist BK and the antagonist NPC17731. High affinity binding of both ligands to B2(B1III) was fully regained when one residue, Lys111, in TM-III of this chimera was replaced with the corresponding wild-type (WT) B2 receptor residue, Ser (B2(B1IIIS111)). Replacement of Ser111 with Lys in the WT B2 receptor decreased the affinities of BK and NPC17731 and increased the affinity of the B1-selective des-Arg10 analog of NPC17731, NPC18565. The results show that the C-terminal residue of peptide agonists and antagonists when bound to the B2 receptor is adjacent to Ser111 in the receptor. A Lys at this position, as is the case in the WT B1 receptor, provides a positive charge that repels the C-terminal Arg in B2-selective peptides and attracts the negative charge of the C terminus of B1-selective peptides, which lack the C-terminal Arg. Therefore, the residues at this one single position are crucial in determining the peptide selectivity of B1 and B2 BK receptors.

Mapping of the ligand-selective domain of the Xenopus laevis corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1: implications for the ligand-binding site

The nonselective human corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 (hCRF-R1) and the ligand-selective Xenopus CRF-R1 (xCRF-R1) were compared. To understand the interactions of sauvagine and ovine CRF, both high-affinity ligands for hCRF-R1 but surprisingly weak ligands for xCRF-R1, chimeric receptors of hCRF-R1 and xCRF-R1 followed by double or multiple point mutations were constructed. Binding studies and cAMP assays demonstrated that the N-terminal domain exhibited the complete ligand selectivity of xCRF-R1. The important region was mapped between amino acids 70 and 89; replacement of amino acids Arg76, Asn81, Gly83, Leu88, and Ala89 in hCRF-R1 with the corresponding amino acids of xCRF-R1 (Gln76, Gly81, Val83, His88, and Leu89) resulted in a receptor that had approximately 30-fold higher affinity for human/rat CRF than for sauvagine. Mutagenesis of these amino acids in xCRF-R1 to the human sequence completely abolished the ligand selectivity of xCRF-R1. Mutagenesis of amino acids 88 and 89 in hCRF-R1 or xCRF-R1 had only a minor (approximately 2.5-fold) effect on the ligand selectivity of the mutant receptor. Substitution of Arg76, Asn81, and Gly83 in hCRF-R1 with the corresponding sequence of xCRF-R1 (Gln76, Gly81, and Val83) resulted in a receptor with approximately 11-fold higher affinity for human/rat CRF compared with ovine CRF or sauvagine. When only two of these three amino acids were mutated, no effect on the ligand selectivity was observed. On the basis of these data, it is suggested that amino acids 70-89 of CRF-R1 are important for the ligand binding site.

Mode matches and their locations in the hydrophobic free energy sequences of peptide ligands and their receptor eigenfunctions

Patterns in sequences of amino acid hydrophobic free energies predict secondary structures in proteins. In protein folding, matches in hydrophobic free energy statistical wavelengths appear to contribute to selective aggregation of secondary structures in "hydrophobic zippers." In a similar setting, the use of Fourier analysis to characterize the dominant statistical wavelengths of peptide ligands' and receptor proteins' hydrophobic modes to predict such matches has been limited by the aliasing and end effects of short peptide lengths, as well as the broad-band, mode multiplicity of many of their frequency (power) spectra. In addition, the sequence locations of the matching modes are lost in this transformation. We make new use of three techniques to address these difficulties: (i) eigenfunction construction from the linear decomposition of the lagged covariance matrices of the ligands and receptors as hydrophobic free energy sequences; (ii) maximum entropy, complex poles power spectra, which select the dominant modes of the hydrophobic free energy sequences or their eigenfunctions; and (iii) discrete, best bases, trigonometric wavelet transformations, which confirm the dominant spectral frequencies of the eigenfunctions and locate them as (absolute valued) moduli in the peptide or receptor sequence. The leading eigenfunction of the covariance matrix of a transmembrane receptor sequence locates the same transmembrane segments seen in n-block-averaged hydropathy plots while leaving the remaining hydrophobic modes unsmoothed and available for further analyses as secondary eigenfunctions. In these receptor eigenfunctions, we find a set of statistical wavelength matches between peptide ligands and their G-protein and tyrosine kinase coupled receptors, ranging across examples from 13.10 amino acids in acid fibroblast growth factor to 2.18 residues in corticotropin releasing factor. We find that the wavelet-located receptor modes in the extracellular loops are compatible with studies of receptor chimeric exchanges and point mutations. A nonbinding corticotropin-releasing factor receptor mutant is shown to have lost the signatory mode common to the normal receptor and its ligand. Hydrophobic free energy eigenfunctions and their transformations offer new quantitative physical homologies in database searches for peptide-receptor matches.

Ligand binding pocket of the human somatostatin receptor 5: mutational analysis of the extracellular domains

The ligand binding domain of G protein-coupled receptors for peptide ligands consists of a pocket formed by extracellular and transmembrane domain (TM) residues. In the case of somatostatin (SRIF), however, previous studies have suggested that the binding cavity of the octapeptide analog SMS201-995 (SMS) is lined by residues in TMs III-VII. The additional involvement of the extracellular domains for binding SMS or the natural SRIF ligands (SRIF-14, SRIF-28) has not been clarified. Using a cassette construct cDNA for the human somatostatin 5 receptor (sst5R), we systematically examined the role of exofacial structures in ligand binding by creating a series of mutants in which the extracellular portions have been altered by conservative segment exchange (CSE) mutagenesis for the extracellular loops (ECLs) and by deletion (for the NH2-terminal segment) or truncation analysis (ECL3). CHO-K1 cells were stably transfected with wild type or mutant human sst5R constructs, and agonist binding was assessed using membrane binding assays with 125I-LTT SRIF-28 ligand. Deletion of the NH2 terminus or CSE mutagenesis of ECL1 and ECL3 produced minor 2-8-fold decreases in affinity for SRIF-14, SRIF-28, and SMS ligands. Truncation of ECL3 to mimic the size of this loop in sst1R and sst4R (the two subtypes that do not bind SMS) did not interfere with the binding of SMS, SRIF-14, or SRIF-28. In contrast, both ECL2 mutants failed to bind 125I-LTT SRIF-28. Immunocytochemical analysis of nonpermeabilized cells with a human sst5R antibody revealed that the mutant receptors were targeted to the plasma membrane. Labeled SMS (125I-Tyr3 SMS) also failed to bind to the mutant ECL2 receptors. These results suggest a potential contribution of ECL2 (in addition to the previously identified residues in TMs III-VII) to the SRIF ligand binding pocket.

Phosphorylation of four amino acid residues in the carboxyl terminus of the rat somatostatin receptor subtype 3 is crucial for its desensitization and internalization

Agonist-dependent internalization of the rat somatostatin receptor subtype 3 (SSTR3) requires four hydroxyl amino acids (Ser341, Ser346, Ser351, and Thr357) in the receptor C terminus (Roth, A., Kreienkamp, H.-J., Nehring, R., Roostermann, D., Meyerhof, W. and Richter, D. (1997) DNA Cell Biol. 16, 111-119). Here we report on the molecular mechanism responsible for the endocytotic process by analyzing the agonist-dependent phosphorylation of wild-type and mutant receptors expressed in human embryonic kidney cells. Wild-type SSTR3 is phosphorylated in response to agonist treatment. Phosphorylation is markedly reduced in a S341A/S346A/S351A triple mutant and is also reduced, but to a lesser extent, in the T357A point mutant. Internalization of the wild-type receptor is preceded by a functional desensitization of the receptor; in contrast, the triple serine mutant does not desensitize after treatment with agonists as assayed by its ability to inhibit forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity. After internalization via a clathrin-coated vesicle mediated endocytotic pathway, SSTR3 efficiently recycles to the cell surface, suggesting that agonist mediated endocytosis is necessary for the functional resensitization of a phosphorylated and desensitized receptor.

Endocytosis of the rat somatostatin receptors: subtype discrimination, ligand specificity, and delineation of carboxy-terminal positive and negative sequence motifs

Endocytosis of the five rat somatostatin receptor subtypes (SSTR1-5) was investigated in transfected HEK cells by biochemical ligand binding assays and confocal microscopic analysis. Phenylarsine oxide-sensitive internalization of SSTR1-3 is dependent on SST-14 or SST-28, whereas only the octacosapeptide triggers this reaction with SSTR5. SSTR4 is not internalized with either SST. Internalized SSTR3 is cycled back to the plasma membrane while endocytosed rho-Ala1-SST-14 remains inside the cell. Delineation of sequence motifs responsible for internalization of SSTR3 revealed multiple serines and a threonine (Ser-341, Ser-346, Ser-351, and Thr-357) within the carboxy-terminal tail of which Ser-351 and Thr-357 were the most effective ones. Chimeras in which various segments of the carboxyl terminus of SSTR4 were replaced by the corresponding regions of SSTR3 were internalized as long as they contain the Ser/Thr motif. However, this internalization reaction was suppressed when the chimeras were extended by the carboxyl terminus of SSTR4 (residues 320-384), suggesting the presence of a negative control element in that region. Step-wise truncation of the carboxyl terminus of wild-type SSTR4 revealed a motif of three amino acid residues Glu-Thr-Thr (SSTR4-330-332) that is responsible for preventing internalization and may be important in regulating endocytosis of this receptor subtype.