1
|
Williams E, Trangenstein P, Patterson D, Kerr W. Higher Concentration of Marijuana Dispensaries in Neighborhoods with More Disadvantage Following Legalization in Washington. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3393457. [PMID: 37886567 PMCID: PMC10602076 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3393457/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Washington is one of 21 states that have legalized recreational marijuana resulting in neighborhoods that have experienced a change in physical environment with the emergence of dispensaries. This study examines the selection of dispensaries into disadvantage area, incorporating local policies and neighborhood characteristics. Marijuana and alcohol sales data were from the Washington State Liquor and Cannabis Board; and neighborhood characteristics were drawn from the American Community Survey 2010-2016 5-year estimates. Using factor analysis we created a neighborhood disadvantage index where census tracts were stratified into disadvantaged tertiles; and counties were stratified by urban/rural status. We examined the association between dispensaries, neighborhood characteristics, and local marijuana policies using Negative Binomial Regression with a natural log of land area as an offset, separately for 2014-2016. Dispensaries opened in high-disadvantaged CTs in 2014 and then dispersed across the state while retaining higher concentrations in disadvantaged urban CTs. Marijuana-specific policies (allotted dispensaries and retail cap) were found to be predictors of marijuana dispensary density. This study provides evidence that marijuana dispensaries were disproportionately located in areas with greater disadvantage. State and local marijuana policies emerged as important predictors, underscoring the importance of designing thoughtful and equitable license allocation procedures and policies.
Collapse
|
2
|
Auchincloss AH, Niamatullah S, Adams M, Melly SJ, Li J, Lazo M. Alcohol outlets and alcohol consumption in changing environments: prevalence and changes over time. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 2022; 17:7. [PMID: 35120532 PMCID: PMC8815126 DOI: 10.1186/s13011-021-00430-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine whether changes in density of neighborhood alcohol outlets affected changes in alcohol consumption 1-year after regulatory changes increased alcohol availability. METHODS Person-level data came from a population-based cohort (aged 21-64) residing in/around the Philadelphia, Pennsylvania metropolitan area (2016-2018, N = 772). Fifty-eight percent lived in a state that began implementing new regulations (Pennsylvania) and the remainder lived in states without major regulatory changes (Delaware and New Jersey). Alcohol consumption was assessed as days per week (pw), drinks pw, high consumption (≥8 drinks pw), and binge drinking. Availability of off-premise alcohol outlets was assessed using 1-mile density and distance. Regression models adjusted for age, gender, race/ethnicity, income, education, health status, state and population density. RESULTS Cross-sectional analyses found that higher outlet density was associated with more alcohol consumption (days, drinks, high consumption; all p < 0.03) and residing farther from an outlet was associated with less alcohol consumption (days and drinks; all p < 0.04). In longitudinal analyses, relative to no change in outlets, exposure to more outlets was associated with 64% higher odds of drinking on more days pw (p < 0.049) and 55% higher odds of consuming more drinks pw (p < 0.081). However, the longitudinal association between changes in outlets and changes in consumption did not differ for residents in Pennsylvania vs. nearby states. In cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, outlets were not related to binge drinking. CONCLUSION Off-premise outlets were associated with alcohol consumption consistently in cross-sectional analysis and in some longitudinal analyses. Results can inform future studies that wish to evaluate longer-term changes in increased alcohol availability and effects on consumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H Auchincloss
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. .,Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Saima Niamatullah
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Maura Adams
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Steven J Melly
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Jingjing Li
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Mariana Lazo
- Urban Health Collaborative, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.,Community Health and Prevention, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Phillips AZ, Rodriguez HP, Kerr WC, Ahern JA. Washington's liquor license system and alcohol-related adverse health outcomes. Addiction 2021; 116:1043-1053. [PMID: 33058384 PMCID: PMC8043979 DOI: 10.1111/add.15234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In June 2012, Washington state (USA) implemented Initiative 1183, privatizing liquor sales. As a result, off-premises outlets increased from 330 to over 1400 and trading hours lengthened. Increased availability of liquor may lead to increased consumption. This study examines the impact of Initiative 1183 on alcohol-related adverse health outcomes, measured by inpatient hospitalizations for alcohol-related disorders and accidental injuries. It further assesses heterogeneity by urbanicity, because outlets increased most in metropolitan-urban areas. DESIGN County-by-quarter difference-in-difference linear regression models, estimated statewide and within metropolitan/rural strata. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Data are from AHRQ Healthcare Cost and Utilization State Inpatient Database 2010-2014 and HHS Area Health Resource File 2010-2014. Changes in the rates of hospitalizations in the 2.5 years following Initiative 1183 in Washington (n = 39 counties) are compared with changes in Oregon (n = 36 counties). MEASUREMENTS County rates of hospitalizations per 1000 residents, including all records with any-listed ICD-9 Clinical Classification Software code denoting an alcohol-related disorder, and all records with any-listed external cause of injury code denoting an accidental injury. FINDINGS The increase in the rate of accidental injury hospitalizations in Washington's metropolitan-urban counties was on average 0.289 hospitalizations per 1000 county residents per quarter greater than the simultaneous increase observed in Oregon (P = 0.017). This result was robust to alternative specifications using a propensity score matched sample and synthetic control methods with data from other comparison states. The evidence did not suggest that Initiative 1183 was associated with differential changes in the rate of hospitalizations for alcohol-related disorders in metropolitan-urban (P = 0.941), non-metropolitan-urban (P = 0.162), or rural counties (P = 0.876). CONCLUSIONS Implementing Washington's Initiative 1183 (privatizing liquor sales) appears to have been associated with a significant increase in the rate of accidental injury hospitalizations in urban counties in that state but does not appear to be significantly associated with changes in the rate of hospitalizations specifically for alcohol-related disorders within 2.5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryn Z. Phillips
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Innovation Research, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA,Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Hector P. Rodriguez
- Center for Healthcare Organizational and Innovation Research, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA,University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | | | - Jennifer A. Ahern
- University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee JGL, Cristello JV, Buckton CH, Carey RN, Trucco EM, Schenk PM, Ikegwuonu T, Hilton S, Golden SD, Conway DI. Message framing to inform cancer prevention pricing interventions in the UK and USA: a factorial experiment, 2019. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e041324. [PMID: 33495253 PMCID: PMC7839858 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 12/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To advance understanding of how message framing can be used to maximise public support across different pricing policies for alcohol, tobacco and sugary drinks/foods that prevent consumption of cancer-causing products. DESIGN We designed a 3×4×3 randomised factorial experiment to test responses to messages with three pricing policies, four message frames and three products. SETTING Online survey panel (Qualtrics) in 2019. PARTICIPANTS Adults (N=1850) from the UK and USA. INTERVENTIONS Participants randomly viewed one of 36 separate messages that varied by pricing policy (increasing taxes, getting rid of price discounts, getting rid of low-cost products), four frames and product (alcohol, tobacco, sugary drinks/foods). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES We assessed the relationship between the message characteristics and four dependent variables. Three were related to policy support: (1) increasing taxes on the product mentioned in the message, (2) getting rid of price discounts and special offers on the product mentioned in the message and (3) getting rid of low-cost versions of the product mentioned in the message. One was related to reactance, a psychological response to having one's freedom limited. RESULTS We found no effect for pricing policy in the message. Frames regarding children and reducing cancer risk moderated some outcomes, showing promise for real-world use. We found differences in support by product and reactance with greatest support and least reactance for tobacco policies, less support and more reactance for alcohol policies, and the least support and most reactance for sugary drinks/foods policies. CONCLUSIONS Cancer prevention efforts using policy interventions can be informed by the message framing literature. Our results offer insights for cancer prevention advocacy efforts across the UK and USA and highlight that tax versus non-tax approaches to increasing the cost of cancer-causing products result in similar responses from consumers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph G L Lee
- Department of Health Education and Promotion, College of Health and Human Performance, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
- Cancer Prevention and Control, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Julie V Cristello
- Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Christina H Buckton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Rachel N Carey
- Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Elisa M Trucco
- Department of Psychology and Center for Children and Families, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Paulina M Schenk
- Department of Clinical, Educational & Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK
| | - Theresa Ikegwuonu
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shona Hilton
- MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Shelley D Golden
- Cancer Prevention and Control, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - David I Conway
- School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Nursing, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Subbaraman MS, Ye Y, Kerr WC. Reversal of voters' positions since the privatization of spirits sales in Washington State. Prev Med Rep 2020; 19:101112. [PMID: 32817810 PMCID: PMC7426215 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2011, Washington State voters approved Initiative 1183 (I-1183), the privatization of liquor sales. The aim here was to examine how voter support for privatization has changed since I-1183 passed. Data came from five state-representative surveys, with recruitment between 2014 and 2016 (N = 4,290). Primary outcomes were voting on I-1183 (vs. not), voting for (vs. against) I-1183, and changing vote for I-1183 to against among those who voted for it (vs. not changing). Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used for analyses. Results show that voting for (vs. against) I-1183 was related to 2.59 (P < 0.001) times greater odds of wanting to change one's vote. This difference was large enough to have changed the result of the election if voters could know their later opinions. Among those who voted for I-1183, odds of retracting support were positively related to total past 12-month drink volume. Those who agreed that number of stores selling liquor should decrease were more likely to change votes from for to against, while those who considered that youth alcohol abuse has remained the same since privatization were less likely to change votes. Thus, in the years immediately following liquor privatization in Washington State, public opinion has changed enough to shift the result of the election from supporting privatization to rejecting it. Findings are especially relevant for other US states and countries considering privatization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barnett SBL, Coe NB, Harris JR, Basu A. Washington's privatization of liquor: effects on household alcohol purchases from Initiative 1183. Addiction 2020; 115:681-689. [PMID: 31670853 PMCID: PMC8509083 DOI: 10.1111/add.14875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2017] [Revised: 03/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Washington Initiative 1183 (I-1183), a 2012 law that privatized liquor retail sales and distribution in Washington State, USA, has had two opposing effects on liquor purchases: it has increased access to liquor and imposed new fees on retailers and distributors. This study aimed to estimate the effect of I-1183 on monthly alcohol purchases during the post-I-1183 period (June 2012-December 2014) compared with the pre-I-1183 period (January 2010-May 2012). DESIGN DIFFERENCES-IN-DIFFERENCES STUDY: Setting and participants The study included households participating in the Nielsen Consumer Panel Dataset living in metropolitan and surrounding areas in Washington State and 10 control states. Measurements Outcomes were alcohol purchases by type (ounces of liquor, wine, beer and total alcohol or ethanol). Findings I-1183 was associated with a 6.34-ounce (P < 0.001) and a 2.01-ounce (P < 0.001) increase in monthly liquor and ethanol purchases, respectively, per household in the post-policy period spanning 31 months compared with monthly purchases in control states. In a longitudinal subgroup analysis, low and moderate alcohol purchasers increased monthly purchases of ethanol and high purchasers decreased purchases of ethanol. Conclusions Enacting 'Washington Initiative 1183', a law that privatized sale and distribution of liquor and imposed new fees on retailers and distributors, appears to have been associated with an approximate 82% increase in monthly liquor purchases and 26% increase in monthly ethanol purchases by households in metropolitan and surrounding areas in Washington State, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Beth L. Barnett
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound St. Ste 450, Emeryville, CA 94608,School of Public Health, UC Berkeley, 50 University Hall #7360, Berkeley, CA 94720,Corresponding author
| | - Norma B. Coe
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Blvd Building 421, Philadelphia, PA 19104,National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1050 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138
| | - Jeffrey R. Harris
- School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195
| | - Anirban Basu
- National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), 1050 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02138,School of Public Health, Department of Health Services, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195,School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific St, Seattle, WA 98195
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Johnson RM, Fleming CB, Cambron C, Dean LT, Brighthaupt SC, Guttmannova K. Race/Ethnicity Differences in Trends of Marijuana, Cigarette, and Alcohol Use Among 8th, 10th, and 12th Graders in Washington State, 2004-2016. PREVENTION SCIENCE : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR PREVENTION RESEARCH 2020; 20:194-204. [PMID: 29633175 DOI: 10.1007/s11121-018-0899-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
Accurate estimates of substance use in the teenage years by race/ethnicity may help identify when to intervene to prevent long-term substance use disparities. We examined trends in past 30-day use of marijuana, cigarette, and alcohol among 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in Washington State, which passed a recreational marijuana law in 2012 and initiated retail marijuana sales in 2014. Data are from the 2004-2016 Washington Healthy Youth Surveys (n = 161,992). We used time series regression models to assess linear and quadratic trends in substance use for the full sample and stratified on race/ethnicity and grade level and examined relative differences in prevalence of use by race/ethnicity. In Washington, across all racial/ethnic groups, marijuana use peaked in 2012. Although there was not a significant overall change in marijuana use for the full sample across the study period, there was a statistically significant increase in use among 12th graders and a statistically significant decrease among 8th graders. Relative to Whites, Asians had a lower prevalence of marijuana use, whereas all other race/ethnicity groups had a higher prevalence of use. Prevalence of marijuana use is particularly high among American Indian/Alaska Native and Black youth and has increased most rapidly among 12th grade Hispanic/Latinx youth. There were large and statistically significant decreases in alcohol and cigarette use across the study period for the full sample, as well as for each race/ethnicity group. These findings highlight the need for continued monitoring of trends in use among these groups and potentially warrant consideration of selective interventions that specifically focus on students of color and that include developmentally-appropriate strategies relevant to each grade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renee M Johnson
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, 8th Floor, Room 898, Baltimore, MD, 21205-1999, USA. .,Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Charles B Fleming
- Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Christopher Cambron
- School of Social Work, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.,Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Lorraine T Dean
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sherri-Chanelle Brighthaupt
- Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 North Broadway, 8th Floor, Room 898, Baltimore, MD, 21205-1999, USA
| | - Katarina Guttmannova
- Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Williams E, Kerr WC, Barnett SBL. Price Changes in Washington Following the 2012 Liquor Privatization: An Update Through 2016 With Comparisons to California, Idaho, and Oregon. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2019; 44:501-510. [PMID: 31851383 DOI: 10.1111/acer.14255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Washington State ended their wholesale and retail monopoly on liquor on June 1, 2012, resulting in a 5-fold increase in liquor outlets in diverse store types. The legislation also included taxes at the wholesale and retail levels. This study seeks to investigate whether prices have changed from 2014 through 2016, as a follow-up to a previous study finding increases in prices from 2012 to 2014, compared to prices in other states. METHODS We developed an index of 68 brands that were popular in Washington in early 2012. Data on final liquor prices (including taxes) in Washington and California were obtained through store visits and online sources between November 2013 and March 2014, and again between April and May 2016 for Washington only. Pricing data for Idaho and Oregon were obtained from the Statistics for Alcohol Management Database over both sampling periods. Primary analyses were conducted on the utmost brands available in the majority of the stores sampled. RESULTS Liquor prices in Washington rose an average of 3.9% for 750 ml and 6.5% for 1.75-l containers overall from 2014 to 2016, while bordering states Idaho (+2.9%) and Oregon (+1.5%) experienced smaller increases for 750-ml and declines for 1.75-l containers (Idaho: -2.9%, Oregon: -4.9%). In the analyses of spirits prices in Washington compared to California, prices in California were 24.1% lower for 750-ml containers and 29.6% lower for 1.75-l containers. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate liquor prices in Washington have increased since our 2014 assessment at a larger percentage than prices in the neighboring control states Oregon and Idaho, with varying effects on brands, container sizes, and store types. We demonstrate privatization is associated with a different pattern of prices across store types than seen in California.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwina Williams
- Public Health Institute, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, California
| | - William C Kerr
- Public Health Institute, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, California
| | - Sarah Beth L Barnett
- Public Health Institute, Alcohol Research Group, Emeryville, California.,University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kerr WC, Ye Y, Greenfield TK. Changes in spirits purchasing behaviours after privatisation of government-controlled sales in Washington, USA. Drug Alcohol Rev 2019; 38:294-301. [PMID: 30860305 DOI: 10.1111/dar.12915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS The privatisation of the Washington Liquor Monopoly in 2012 offered a unique opportunity to study spirits purchasing behaviour changes from a government to licensed system. DESIGN AND METHODS Four representative cross-sectional surveys of adults aged 18 and older in Washington state were recruited between January 2014 and October 2015 (Wave 1, N = 1202; W2, N = 804; W3, N = 823; W4, N = 662). Analyses compared spirits purchasing behaviours before privatisation from retrospective reports to current reports in the areas of travel distance, spirits quality, purchase frequency and size of bottle. Respondents also directly reported on changes in convenience, selection and prices. RESULTS No significant changes were found in these aspects of purchasing. However, subgroup analyses found that younger drinkers 18-29 reduced travel distance and increased purchase frequency while drinkers aged 50 and older travelled further. Reduced travel distances were associated with grocery and drug stores while increased travel distances were associated with liquor superstores, wholesale stores and government stores in bordering states. Respondents reported that liquor purchasing was more convenient after privatisation but that the selection of spirits was better and prices were lower in the government-controlled stores. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The government monopoly stores were viewed as offering a wider selection of products and as having lower prices than those in the privatised system. The variety of store types in the licensed system allowed drinkers to select stores based on convenience, selection or prices, so that travel times increased for some buyers, presumably those seeking lower prices or a wider selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, USA
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kerr WC, Ye Y, Greenfield TK. Spirits purchasing and marijuana use behaviors of risky drinkers in the state of Washington from 2014 to 2016. Drug Alcohol Depend 2019; 198:7-12. [PMID: 30856371 PMCID: PMC6467746 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have evaluated alcoholic beverage purchasing behaviors, which are relevant to the design and effectiveness of alcoholic beverage control policies. Focusing on spirits purchasing among spirits drinkers, this study compares purchasing behaviors between risky and non-risky drinkers and across drinking patterns among those observed drinking at both levels. METHODS A rolling panel of 794 spirits drinkers in the state of Washington were surveyed between two and five times at 6-month intervals during 2014, 2015 and 2016 regarding their alcohol use, spirits purchasing and marijuana use frequency. Purchasing behaviors assessed for spirits were the frequency of purchasing and the travel time, unit cost, bottle size and store type from the respondents most recent purchase. Alcohol use was categorized at each measurement as risky or not using US NIAAA guidelines. RESULTS Risky drinkers were more likely to purchase spirits, purchase spirits more frequently, purchase larger spirits containers and use marijuana occasionally, but not frequently. Among drinkers who were risky only in some survey waves, during risky waves they were more likely to purchase more frequently, pay less per liter for spirits purchased, buy larger sized containers of spirits and use marijuana occasionally. CONCLUSIONS Drinkers chose to purchase lower cost spirits in larger containers when they were drinking more heavily compared to times when they were drinking within US low-risk guidelines. Findings also support complementarity between heavier drinking and marijuana use among spirits drinkers in a state with legal recreational marijuana sales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA.
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
| | - Thomas K Greenfield
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound St, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
State Policies Targeting Alcohol Use during Pregnancy and Alcohol Use among Pregnant Women 1985-2016: Evidence from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Womens Health Issues 2019; 29:213-221. [PMID: 30876695 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2019.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2018] [Revised: 01/28/2019] [Accepted: 02/01/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most states have at least one policy targeting alcohol use during pregnancy. The public health impact of these policies has not been examined. We sought to examine the relationship between state-level policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy and alcohol use among pregnant women. METHODS Data include state-level alcohol and pregnancy policy data and individual-level U.S. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data about pregnant women's alcohol use from 1985 to 2016 (N = 57,194). Supportive policies include mandatory warning signs, priority substance abuse treatment, reporting requirements for data and treatment purposes, and prohibitions on criminal prosecution. Punitive policies include civil commitment, Child Protective Services reporting requirements, and child abuse/neglect. Analyses include logistic regression models that adjust for individual- and state-level controls, include fixed effects for state and year, account for clustering by state, and weight by probability of selection. RESULTS Relative to having no policies, supportive policy environments were associated with more any drinking, but not binge or heavy drinking. Of individual supportive policies, only the following relationships were statistically significant: mandatory warning signs was associated with lower odds of binge drinking, and priority treatment for pregnant women and women with children was associated with higher odds of any drinking. Relative to no policies, punitive policy environments were also associated with more drinking, but not with binge or heavy drinking. Of individual punitive policies, only child abuse/neglect was associated with lower odds of binge and heavy drinking. Mixed policy environments were not associated with any alcohol outcome. CONCLUSIONS Most policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy do not seem to be associated with less alcohol consumption during pregnancy.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kerr WC, Williams E, Ye Y, Subbaraman MS, Greenfield TK. Reply to: Effects of a Comprehensive Pro-alcohol Policy in Washington State. Alcohol Alcohol 2019; 54:120-121. [PMID: 30376038 PMCID: PMC6751384 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agy077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 10/09/2018] [Accepted: 10/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - Edwina Williams
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | | | - Thomas K Greenfield
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stockwell T, Sherk A, Norström T, Angus C, Ramstedt M, Andréasson S, Chikritzhs T, Gripenberg J, Holder H, Holmes J, Mäkelä P. Estimating the public health impact of disbanding a government alcohol monopoly: application of new methods to the case of Sweden. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:1400. [PMID: 30577827 PMCID: PMC6303908 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6312-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2018] [Accepted: 12/07/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Government alcohol monopolies were created in North America and Scandinavia to limit health and social problems. The Swedish monopoly, Systembolaget, reports to a health ministry and controls the sale of all alcoholic beverages with > 3.5% alcohol/volume for off-premise consumption, within a public health mandate. Elsewhere, alcohol monopolies are being dismantled with evidence of increased consumption and harms. We describe innovative modelling techniques to estimate health outcomes in scenarios involving Systembolaget being replaced by 1) privately owned liquor stores, or 2) alcohol sales in grocery stores. The methods employed can be applied in other jurisdictions and for other policy changes. METHODS Impacts of the privatisation scenarios on pricing, outlet density, trading hours, advertising and marketing were estimated based on Swedish expert opinion and published evidence. Systematic reviews were conducted to estimate impacts on alcohol consumption in each scenario. Two methods were applied to estimate harm impacts: (i) alcohol attributable morbidity and mortality were estimated utilising the International Model of Alcohol Harms and Policies (InterMAHP); (ii) ARIMA methods to estimate the relationship between per capita alcohol consumption and specific types of alcohol-related mortality and crime. RESULTS Replacing government stores with private liquor stores (Scenario 1) led to a 20.0% (95% CI, 15.3-24.7) increase in per capita consumption. Replacement with grocery stores (Scenario 2) led to a 31.2% (25.1-37.3%) increase. With InterMAHP there were 763 or + 47% (35-59%) and 1234 or + 76% (60-92%) more deaths per year, for Scenarios 1 and 2 respectively. With ARIMA, there were 850 (334-1444) more deaths per year in Scenario 1 and 1418 more in Scenario 2 (543-2505). InterMAHP also estimated 10,859 or + 29% (22-34%) and 16,118 or + 42% (35-49%) additional hospital stays per year respectively. CONCLUSIONS There would be substantial adverse consequences for public health and safety were Systembolaget to be privatised. We demonstrate a new combined approach for estimating the impact of alcohol policies on consumption and, using two alternative methods, alcohol-attributable harm. This approach could be readily adapted to other policies and settings. We note the limitation that some significant sources of uncertainty in the estimates of harm impacts were not modelled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Stockwell
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2 Canada
| | - Adam Sherk
- Canadian Institute for Substance Use Research (CISUR), Social Dimensions of Health Program, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC Canada
| | - Thor Norström
- Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Mats Ramstedt
- The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs (CAN), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sven Andréasson
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Tanya Chikritzhs
- Health Sciences, National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
| | - Johanna Gripenberg
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Stockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems (STAD), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Harold Holder
- Prevention Research Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkeley, CA USA
| | | | - Pia Mäkelä
- National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roberts SCM, Mericle AA, Subbaraman MS, Thomas S, Treffers RD, Delucchi KL, Kerr WC. Differential Effects of Pregnancy-Specific Alcohol Policies on Drinking Among Pregnant Women by Race/Ethnicity. Health Equity 2018; 2:356-365. [PMID: 30560228 PMCID: PMC6296158 DOI: 10.1089/heq.2018.0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Alcohol use during pregnancy is a significant public health concern. Nearly all U.S. states have enacted policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy, but there has been little research examining their impact, particularly across racial/ethnic groups. Methods: Using data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and about eight state-level, pregnancy-specific alcohol policies from 1985 to 2016, the aim of this study was to examine the differential effects of these policies on drinking among pregnant women by race/ethnicity. Results: We found evidence of differential effects for priority treatment, prohibitions on criminal prosecution, and civil commitment policies. In relation to priority treatment policies, effects benefited versus harmed different racial/ethnic groups depending on whether the priority treatment policies were for pregnant women only or if they gave priority to both pregnant women and pregnant women with children. Conclusions: Findings from this study suggest that benefits and harms from these policies do not appear to be equitably distributed across different racial/ethnic groups. Research considering the impact of alcohol/pregnancy policies should consider differential effects by race/ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C M Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California
| | - Amy A Mericle
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | | | - Sue Thomas
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Santa Cruz, California
| | - Ryan D Treffers
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE), Santa Cruz, California
| | - Kevin L Delucchi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Grossman ER, Binakonsky J, Jernigan D. The Use of Regulatory Power by U.S. State and Local Alcohol Control Agencies to Ban Problematic Products. Subst Use Misuse 2018; 53:1229-1238. [PMID: 29257916 PMCID: PMC6176862 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1402054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alcohol is responsible for 4,300 deaths a year in the U.S. among persons under 21. Alcohol companies innovate rapidly and produce new products, some of which prove popular among young people. The 18 "control jurisdictions" in the U.S. - those that exercise monopoly control over some aspect of alcohol distribution - have the ability to govern which products become available within their borders and have, at times, exercised that authority to block particular products from sale. OBJECTIVES This paper is an exploratory study examining how states use regulatory authority in control jurisdictions to restrict the sale of new alcohol products within their borders, and the reasoning used to justify those decisions. METHODS The authors, collaborating with the National Alcohol Beverage Control Association, surveyed control state officials regarding procedures and policies governing the sale of new products in their jurisdictions. RESULTS Control jurisdictions have banned/restricted different products (e.g., grain alcohol and alcoholic energy drinks) for a variety of reasons (e.g., flavorings/packaging appealing to underage drinkers, blurring of distinctions between alcoholic and non-alcoholic drinks, and judgment that the product was not socially responsible). Conclusions/ Importance: Although U.S. control jurisdictions universally have the authority to limit access to problematic alcohol products; they vary in the degree to which they use it. These states need to take action, and as of now, there is no systematic reasoning behind when and how states make decisions to ban/restrict these products. Greater exploration of regulatory authority in this arena could be protective of public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elyse R Grossman
- a Department of Health , Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , Maryland , USA
| | - Jane Binakonsky
- a Department of Health , Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , Maryland , USA
| | - David Jernigan
- a Department of Health , Behavior and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore , Maryland , USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Greenfield TK, Williams E, Kerr WC, Subbaraman MS, Ye Y. Washington State Spirits Privatization: How Satisfied were Liquor Purchasers Before and After, and by Type of Retail Store in 2014? Subst Use Misuse 2018; 53:1260-1266. [PMID: 29172860 PMCID: PMC5971128 DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1402055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2012 Washington State ended a wholesale/retail monopoly on liquor, permitting sale of spirits in stores with > 10,000 square feet. Implementation resulted in average price increases, but also five times the stores selling liquor. OBJECTIVES As part of a privatization evaluation, we studied pre-post and between-store-type purchase experiences. METHODS A 2010 Washington State Liquor Control Board (LCB) survey of liquor purchasers (n = 599), and the 2014 baseline of a repeated telephone survey (1,202 residents; n = 465 purchasers), each included 10 LCB questions on satisfaction with purchase experiences, each attribute with graded response scale A = 4 to D = 1 and F (0 = fail). Analyses used t-tests for satisfaction differences by time and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for 2014 between-store satisfaction-level differences. RESULTS Five purchase features were rated more favorably after privatization (ps < .05-.001), including product supply, staff professionalism, location convenience, store hours, and prices (though price rated lowest both times); selection offered, courtesy, and checkout speed were unaltered, and number of staff and staff knowledge declined (both p < .001). Eight consumer experiences differed by store type: five satisfaction aspects (supply, selection, number of staff, operating hours, and checkout speed) were highest for liquor superstores, while location convenience favored grocery and drug stores, and price satisfaction favored wholesale (Costco) stores, with staff knowledge highest at liquor stores. CONCLUSIONS Satisfaction with liquor purchases increased after privatization for half the consumer experiences. Availability (location convenience and store hours) was important to liquor purchasers. Such results are relevant to sustained support for the policy of privatizing spirits retail monopolies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas K Greenfield
- a Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California , USA
| | - Edwina Williams
- a Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California , USA
| | - William C Kerr
- a Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California , USA
| | | | - Yu Ye
- a Alcohol Research Group , Public Health Institute , Emeryville , California , USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kerr WC, Williams E, Ye Y, Subbaraman MS, Greenfield TK. Survey Estimates of Changes in Alcohol Use Patterns Following the 2012 Privatization of the Washington Liquor Monopoly. Alcohol Alcohol 2018; 53:470-476. [PMID: 29432516 PMCID: PMC6016611 DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agy004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Revised: 12/15/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS The US state of Washington's 333 state-run liquor stores were privatized on 1 June 2012 and purchases began in ~1500 licensed stores of a variety of types. A regime of taxes and fees was implemented to replace the revenues generated by the state stores and, 1 year later, the beer tax was reduced by two thirds. This study evaluates the impact of these changes on total alcohol and spirits consumption in a retrospective pre-test design. METHODS The study sample consists of 2289 adults recruited in three cross-sectional surveys during 2014 and 2015. Retrospective typical past month quantity-frequency measures for before privatization drinking and current past month quantity-frequency measures were compared within subjects, for all alcohol and for spirits only. RESULTS No change in alcohol volume was seen across privatization while spirits volume was found to decrease, suggesting a shift from spirits to beer. This decline in spirits volume came from a reduction in drinking days while overall drinking days were found to increase. This was offset by a reduction in drinks per drinking day and in heavy occasions. CONCLUSIONS These findings accurately mirror the overall flat trend in per capita alcohol sales but seem to exaggerate the very small shift towards beer seen in sales data. Effects of increased spirits availability appear to have been countered by increased spirits prices and a decreased beer tax, leading to a shift to beer consumption. SHORT SUMMARY Survey-based analyses of alcohol use across Washington's spirits privatization, beer tax reduction and marijuana legalization found no change in alcohol volume, a reduction in spirits volume and a shift to more moderate drinking patterns. Reductions in drinking occurred among marijuana users and those with lower educational attainment reduced spirits volume.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - Edwina Williams
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | | | - Thomas K Greenfield
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Subbaraman MS, Thomas S, Treffers R, Delucchi K, Kerr WC, Martinez P, Roberts SC. Associations Between State-Level Policies Regarding Alcohol Use Among Pregnant Women, Adverse Birth Outcomes, and Prenatal Care Utilization: Results from 1972 to 2013 Vital Statistics. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2018; 42:10.1111/acer.13804. [PMID: 29912478 PMCID: PMC6298847 DOI: 10.1111/acer.13804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2018] [Accepted: 05/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policies regarding alcohol use during pregnancy continue to be enacted and debated in the United States. However, no study to date has examined whether these policies are related to birth outcomes-the outcomes they ultimately aim to improve. Here, we assessed whether state-level policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy are related to birth outcomes, which has not been done comprehensively before. METHODS The study involved secondary analyses of birth certificate data from 148,048,208 U.S. singleton births between 1972 and 2013. Exposures were indicators of whether the following 8 policies were in effect during gestation: Mandatory Warning Signs (MWS), Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women, Priority Treatment for Pregnant Women/Women with Children, Reporting Requirements for Data and Treatment Purposes, Prohibitions Against Criminal Prosecution, Civil Commitment, Reporting Requirements for Child Protective Services Purposes, and Child Abuse/Child Neglect. Outcomes were low birthweight (<2,500 g), premature birth (<37 weeks), any prenatal care utilization (PCU), late PCU, inadequate PCU, and normal (≥7) APGAR score. Multivariable fixed-effect logistic regressions controlling for both maternal- and state-level covariates were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Of the 8 policies, 6 were significantly related to worse outcomes and 2 were not significantly related to any outcomes. The policy requiring MWS was related to the most outcomes: specifically, living in a state with MWS was related to 7% higher odds of low birthweight (p < 0.001); 4% higher odds of premature birth (p < 0.004); 18% lower odds of any PCU (p < 0.001); 12% higher odds of late PCU (p < 0.002); and 10% lower odds of a normal APGAR score (p < 0.001) compared to living in a state without MWS. CONCLUSIONS Most policies targeting alcohol use during pregnancy do not have their intended effects and are related to worse birth outcomes and less PCU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sue Thomas
- Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation
| | | | - Kevin Delucchi
- Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco
| | - William C. Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Priscilla Martinez
- Alcohol Research Group, 6001 Shellmound Ave, Suite 450, Emeryville, CA 94608, United States
| | - Sarah C.M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kerr WC, Ye Y, Subbaraman MS, Williams E, Greenfield TK. Changes in Marijuana Use Across the 2012 Washington State Recreational Legalization: Is Retrospective Assessment of Use Before Legalization More Accurate? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2018; 79:495-502. [PMID: 29885159 PMCID: PMC6005249 DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2018.79.495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2016] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in marijuana use prevalence and user characteristics across the 2012 recreational legalization in Washington State. Differences in change estimates between retrospective and contemporaneous pre-legalization measures are compared and considered in relation to potential social acceptability and illegality effects on reporting. METHOD Four representative surveys of the Washington State population 18 years and older were conducted by telephone, two in 2014 and two in 2015, which are combined by year for analyses (N = 3,451). Respondents reported their current past-year use frequency and retrospective frequency of use in 2012 before the election in which legalization was passed. They also provided demographic information and details of alcohol use, including simultaneous use with marijuana. RESULTS A small and not statistically significant increase of 1.2 percentage points in past-year use prevalence, from 24.3% (22.3-26.5) to 25.6% (23.6-27.6), was found when combining the surveys. No statistically significant change was found in the prevalence of simultaneous use with alcohol, which decreased from 12.9% (11.3-14.7) to 12.6% (11.0-14.4). In contrast, estimates from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) indicate substantially increased prevalence, from 15.5% (13.8-17.3) in 2010-2012 to 19.1% (16.9-21.4) in 2013-2014, although this change is not statistically significant. Other findings of interest from the Washington State surveys include new users after legalization tending to be older, White, and moderate drinkers who do not use marijuana simultaneously with alcohol. CONCLUSIONS A retrospective pre-legalization measure showed only a small increase in marijuana use prevalence in contrast to larger changes found in prospectively assessed use in the NSDUH. Changes in the social acceptability and legal status of marijuana after legalization may have increased reporting of pre-legalization use compared with concurrent assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William C. Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | - Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | | | - Edwina Williams
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Subbaraman MS, Kerr WC. Opinions on the Privatization of Distilled-Spirits Sales in Washington State: Did Voters Change Their Minds? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2017; 77:568-76. [PMID: 27340960 DOI: 10.15288/jsad.2016.77.568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In November 2011, voters in Washington State approved Initiative 1183 (I-1183), which ended the government monopoly on distilled-spirits sales. The current study examined the relationship between demographics, spirits use, and voting outcomes, as well as how these variables related to wanting to change one's vote. METHOD The sample consisted of 1,202 adults recruited through random-digit-dial methods and reached via telephone between January and April 2014. Bivariate tests and multivariable regressions were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS Most notably, those who voted Yes on I-1183 had almost eight times the odds of wanting to change their votes compared with those who voted No. Older age, higher education, and being a spirits buyer/drinker were significantly associated with voting (vs. not voting). Among nonvoters, a larger proportion of those who reported that I-1183 was a success (vs. not) were spirits drinkers/nonbuyers. Those who reported that I-1183 was not a success were more likely to report that the number of liquor stores should be decreased. Opinions on taxes were not related to wanting to change one's vote or thinking that I-1183 had been a success. CONCLUSIONS The result of the I-1183 election likely would have been different if voters could know their future opinions of the actual situation resulting from privatization. This finding is particularly important for states considering privatization. Results also indicate that spirits drinkers/buyers may be more invested in privatization than nonbuyers and that the increased availability of spirits may affect opinions regarding privatization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, California
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Ye Y, Kerr WC. Estimated increase in cross-border purchases by Washington residents following liquor privatization and implications for alcohol consumption trends. Addiction 2016; 111:1948-1953. [PMID: 27262730 PMCID: PMC5056797 DOI: 10.1111/add.13481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2015] [Revised: 11/25/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2016] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AIMS To estimate changes in liquor sales occurring in Washington, USA and bordering states following the privatization of government controlled liquor stores. DESIGN Trend analyses of data from January 2009 to October 2014 of a natural experiment beginning 1 June 2012, when liquor prices increased and the number of stores selling liquor increased in the state of Washington. Difference-in-differences (DID) models and interrupted time-series methods were used. SETTING Washington and bordering counties in Oregon and Idaho. MEASUREMENTS Monthly liquor sales in 9-l cases. FINDINGS DID model estimates of adjusted change in liquor sales as a result of privatization produced a cross-model average increase of 10.1% in Oregon and 8.2% in Idaho (both P < 0.001). Similar results were found using interrupted time-series. This represents a total loss to Washington of 89 865 l of liquor, 0.226% of total Washington sales, for June 2012 to May 2013. Adding these sales to Washington totals for fiscal years 2013 and 2014, we find that per-capita spirits sales were 5.80 l in both 2012 and 2013, declining slightly to 5.76 l in 2014. CONCLUSIONS The privatization of liquor sales in the state of Washington, USA in 2012 and the price increases associated with this resulted in a significant increase in sales in bordering counties in the states of Oregon and Idaho. However, the amount of alcohol sales and revenue lost by Washington was relatively small. Per-capita liquor sales in Washington appear to have remained flat after privatization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Ye
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA
| | - William C Kerr
- Alcohol Research Group, Public Health Institute, Emeryville, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Callinan S, Room R, Dietze P. Alcohol Price Policies as an Instrument of Health Equity: Differential Effects of Tax and Minimum Price Measures. Alcohol Alcohol 2015; 50:629-30. [DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agv061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|