1
|
Roche F, Charier D, Pichot V. Heart rate deceleration capacity as a marker of perioperative risk: identifying relevant patient phenotypes and surgical procedures. Br J Anaesth 2024; 133:734-737. [PMID: 39112108 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Revised: 06/25/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Loss of regulation of the autonomic nervous system is found in many diseases from the age of 50 to 60 yr and even more so in older patients. The imbalance is usually manifested by an increase in sympathetic tone, long considered to be the most deleterious element in terms of cardiac rhythmic risk, but also by a reduction in the effectiveness of short-term regulation of the baroreflex arc (partial loss of parasympathetic control). Techniques for analysing this autonomic disorder by analysing heart rate regulation are widely available in outpatient clinics and provide interesting indicators of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risk. Deceleration capacity of cardiac autonomic control has been identified for its prognostic role in high-risk patients and in the general population. Further research is indicated to assess the value of this marker in anaesthetic risk management by targeting procedures with greater risk of intraoperative and postoperative autonomic dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frédéric Roche
- Clinical Physiology Department, University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France; Inserm U1059 Sainbiose, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France.
| | - David Charier
- Inserm U1059 Sainbiose, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France; Anesthesiology Department, University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Vincent Pichot
- Clinical Physiology Department, University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France; Inserm U1059 Sainbiose, Jean Monnet University, Saint Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Halvorsen S, Mehilli J, Cassese S, Hall TS, Abdelhamid M, Barbato E, De Hert S, de Laval I, Geisler T, Hinterbuchner L, Ibanez B, Lenarczyk R, Mansmann UR, McGreavy P, Mueller C, Muneretto C, Niessner A, Potpara TS, Ristić A, Sade LE, Schirmer H, Schüpke S, Sillesen H, Skulstad H, Torracca L, Tutarel O, Van Der Meer P, Wojakowski W, Zacharowski K. 2022 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular assessment and management of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:3826-3924. [PMID: 36017553 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehac270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 403] [Impact Index Per Article: 134.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
3
|
Morita Y, Kumasawa J, Miyamoto Y, Izawa J, Krishnamoorthy V, Raghunathan K, Bartz RR, Thompson A, Ohnuma T. No Association of Early Postoperative Heart Rate With Outcomes After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Am J Crit Care 2022; 31:402-410. [PMID: 36045044 DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2022545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elevated perioperative heart rate potentially causes perioperative myocardial injury because of imbalance in oxygen supply and demand. However, large multicenter studies evaluating early postoperative heart rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) are lacking. OBJECTIVE To assess the associations of 4 postoperative heart rate assessment methods with in-hospital MACCEs after elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS Using data from the eICU Collaborative Research Database in the United States from 2014 to 2015, the study evaluated postoperative heart rate measured during hospitalization within 24 hours after intensive care unit admission. Four heart rate assessment methods were evaluated: maximum heart rate, duration above heart rate 100/min, area above heart rate 100/min, and time-weighted average heart rate. The outcome was in-hospital MACCEs, defined as a composite of in-hospital death, myocardial infarction, angina, arrhythmia, heart failure, stroke, cardiac arrest, or repeat revascularization. RESULTS Among 2585 patients, the crude rate of in-hospital MACCEs was 6.2%. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, the adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for in-hospital MAC-CEs assessed by maximum heart rate in each heart rate category (beats per minute: >100-110, >110-120, >120-130, and >130) were 1.43 (0.95-2.15), 0.98 (0.56-1.64), 1.47 (0.76-2.69), and 1.71 (0.80-3.35), respectively. Similarly, none of the other 3 methods were associated with MACCEs. CONCLUSIONS More research is needed to assess the usefulness of heart rate measurement in patients after CABG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshihisa Morita
- Yoshihisa Morita is an assistant professor, Department of Anesthesiology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Junji Kumasawa
- Junji Kumasawa is an intensivist, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sakai City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshihisa Miyamoto
- Yoshihisa Miyamoto is a researcher, Division of Nephrology and Endocrinology, University of Tokyo, Japan
| | - Junichi Izawa
- Junichi Izawa is an intensivist, Department of Medicine, Okinawa Prefectural Yaeyama Hospital, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Japan
| | - Vijay Krishnamoorthy
- Vijay Krishnamoorthy is an associate professor, Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Karthik Raghunathan
- Karthik Raghunathan is an associate professor, CAPER Unit, Duke University Medical Center, and an anesthesiologist, Patient Safety Center of Inquiry, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Raquel R Bartz
- Raquel R. Bartz is an associate professor, CAPER Unit, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Annemarie Thompson
- Annemarie Thompson is a professor, CAPER Unit, Duke University Medical Center
| | - Tetsu Ohnuma
- Tetsu Ohnuma is an assistant professor, CAPER Unit, Duke University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ackland GL, Abbott TEF. Hypotension as a marker or mediator of perioperative organ injury: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2022; 128:915-930. [PMID: 35151462 PMCID: PMC9204667 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Perioperative hypotension has been repeatedly associated with organ injury and worse outcome, yet many interventions to reduce morbidity by attempting to avoid or reverse hypotension have floundered. In part, this reflects uncertainty as to what threshold of hypotension is relevant in the perioperative setting. Shifting population-based definitions for hypertension, plus uncertainty regarding individualised norms before surgery, both present major challenges in constructing useful clinical guidelines that may help improve clinical outcomes. Aside from these major pragmatic challenges, a wealth of biological mechanisms that underpin the development of higher blood pressure, particularly with increasing age, suggest that hypotension (however defined) or lower blood pressure per se does not account solely for developing organ injury after major surgery. The mosaic theory of hypertension, first proposed more than 60 yr ago, incorporates multiple, complementary mechanistic pathways through which clinical (macrovascular) attempts to minimise perioperative organ injury may unintentionally subvert protective or adaptive pathways that are fundamental in shaping the integrative host response to injury and inflammation. Consideration of the mosaic framework is critical for a more complete understanding of the perioperative response to acute sterile and infectious inflammation. The largely arbitrary treatment of perioperative blood pressure remains rudimentary in the context of multiple complex adaptive hypertensive endotypes, defined by distinct functional or pathobiological mechanisms, including the regulation of reactive oxygen species, autonomic dysfunction, and inflammation. Developing coherent strategies for the management of perioperative hypotension requires smarter, mechanistically solid interventions delivered by RCTs where observer bias is minimised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth L Ackland
- Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Tom E F Abbott
- Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shcherbakov A, Bisharat N. Associations between different measures of intra-operative tachycardia during noncardiac surgery and adverse postoperative outcomes: A retrospective cohort analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2022; 39:145-151. [PMID: 34690273 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intra-operative tachycardia during noncardiac surgery has been associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, harm thresholds for tachycardia have not been uniformly defined. The definition of intra-operative tachycardia that best correlates with adverse postoperative outcomes remains unclear. OBJECTIVE We aimed to identify the definition of intra-operative tachycardia during noncardiac surgery that is associated with the best predictive ability for adverse postoperative outcomes. DESIGN A single-centre retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING Secondary care hospital, Afula, Israel. PATIENTS AND METHODS Adults who underwent elective or nonelective noncardiac surgery during 2015 to 2019. Five intra-operative heart rate (HR) cut-off values and durations were applied with penalised logistic regression modelling for the outcome measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day mortality; the secondary outcome was myocardial ischaemia or infarction (MI) within 30 days after noncardiac surgery. RESULTS The derivation and validation datasets included 6490 and 4553 patients, respectively. Altogether, all-cause 30-day mortality and MI rates averaged 2.1% and 3.2%, respectively. Only two definitions of intra-operative tachycardia were significantly associated with the outcome measures: HR ≥ 100 bpm for ≥ 30 min and HR ≥ 120 bpm for ≥ 5 min. The C-statistics of the base models without tachycardia exposure for all-cause 30-day mortality and MI were 0.75 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.74 to 0.78) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.76), respectively. The addition of intra-operative tachycardia exposure to the base models significantly improved their predictive performance. The highest area under the curve (AUC) was achieved when tachycardia was defined as an intra-operative HR ≥ 100 bpm for at least 30 min: AUC 0.81 (95% CI, 0.80 to 0.84) and AUC 0.80 (95% CI, 0.79 to 0.82) for all-cause 30-day mortality and MI, respectively. CONCLUSION Intra-operative tachycardia, defined as an intra-operative HR ≥ 100 bpm for at least 30 min, was associated with the highest predictive power for adverse postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Shcherbakov
- From the Department of Anaesthesiology, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel (AS), Department of Medicine, Emek Medical Center, Afula, Israel (NB) and Ruth and Bruce Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel (NB)
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vernooij LM, van Klei WA, Moons KG, Takada T, van Waes J, Damen JA. The comparative and added prognostic value of biomarkers to the Revised Cardiac Risk Index for preoperative prediction of major adverse cardiac events and all-cause mortality in patients who undergo noncardiac surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 12:CD013139. [PMID: 34931303 PMCID: PMC8689147 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013139.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) is a widely acknowledged prognostic model to estimate preoperatively the probability of developing in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. However, the RCRI does not always make accurate predictions, so various studies have investigated whether biomarkers added to or compared with the RCRI could improve this. OBJECTIVES Primary: To investigate the added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Secondary: To investigate the prognostic value of biomarkers compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Tertiary: To investigate the prognostic value of other prediction models compared to the RCRI to preoperatively predict in-hospital MACE and other adverse outcomes in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. SEARCH METHODS We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1 January 1999 (the year that the RCRI was published) until 25 June 2020. We also searched ISI Web of Science and SCOPUS for articles referring to the original RCRI development study in that period. SELECTION CRITERIA We included studies among adults who underwent noncardiac surgery, reporting on (external) validation of the RCRI and: - the addition of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of biomarker(s) to the RCRI; or - the comparison of the predictive accuracy of the RCRI to other models. Besides MACE, all other adverse outcomes were considered for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We developed a data extraction form based on the CHARMS checklist. Independent pairs of authors screened references, extracted data and assessed risk of bias and concerns regarding applicability according to PROBAST. For biomarkers and prediction models that were added or compared to the RCRI in ≥ 3 different articles, we described study characteristics and findings in further detail. We did not apply GRADE as no guidance is available for prognostic model reviews. MAIN RESULTS We screened 3960 records and included 107 articles. Over all objectives we rated risk of bias as high in ≥ 1 domain in 90% of included studies, particularly in the analysis domain. Statistical pooling or meta-analysis of reported results was impossible due to heterogeneity in various aspects: outcomes used, scale by which the biomarker was added/compared to the RCRI, prediction horizons and studied populations. Added predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI Fifty-one studies reported on the added value of biomarkers to the RCRI. Sixty-nine different predictors were identified derived from blood (29%), imaging (33%) or other sources (38%). Addition of NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination improved the RCRI for predicting MACE (median delta c-statistics: 0.08, 0.14 and 0.12 for NT-proBNP, troponin and their combination, respectively). The median total net reclassification index (NRI) was 0.16 and 0.74 after addition of troponin and NT-proBNP to the RCRI, respectively. Calibration was not reported. To predict myocardial infarction, the median delta c-statistic when NT-proBNP was added to the RCRI was 0.09, and 0.06 for prediction of all-cause mortality and MACE combined. For BNP and copeptin, data were not sufficient to provide results on their added predictive performance, for any of the outcomes. Comparison of the predictive value of biomarkers to the RCRI Fifty-one studies assessed the predictive performance of biomarkers alone compared to the RCRI. We identified 60 unique predictors derived from blood (38%), imaging (30%) or other sources, such as the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (32%). Predictions were similar between the ASA classification and the RCRI for all studied outcomes. In studies different from those identified in objective 1, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 and 0.12 in favour of BNP and NT-proBNP alone, respectively, when compared to the RCRI, for the prediction of MACE. For C-reactive protein, the predictive performance was similar to the RCRI. For other biomarkers and outcomes, data were insufficient to provide summary results. One study reported on calibration and none on reclassification. Comparison of the predictive value of other prognostic models to the RCRI Fifty-two articles compared the predictive ability of the RCRI to other prognostic models. Of these, 42% developed a new prediction model, 22% updated the RCRI, or another prediction model, and 37% validated an existing prediction model. None of the other prediction models showed better performance in predicting MACE than the RCRI. To predict myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest, ACS-NSQIP-MICA had a higher median delta c-statistic of 0.11 compared to the RCRI. To predict all-cause mortality, the median delta c-statistic was 0.15 higher in favour of ACS-NSQIP-SRS compared to the RCRI. Predictive performance was not better for CHADS2, CHA2DS2-VASc, R2CHADS2, Goldman index, Detsky index or VSG-CRI compared to the RCRI for any of the outcomes. Calibration and reclassification were reported in only one and three studies, respectively. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Studies included in this review suggest that the predictive performance of the RCRI in predicting MACE is improved when NT-proBNP, troponin or their combination are added. Other studies indicate that BNP and NT-proBNP, when used in isolation, may even have a higher discriminative performance than the RCRI. There was insufficient evidence of a difference between the predictive accuracy of the RCRI and other prediction models in predicting MACE. However, ACS-NSQIP-MICA and ACS-NSQIP-SRS outperformed the RCRI in predicting myocardial infarction and cardiac arrest combined, and all-cause mortality, respectively. Nevertheless, the results cannot be interpreted as conclusive due to high risks of bias in a majority of papers, and pooling was impossible due to heterogeneity in outcomes, prediction horizons, biomarkers and studied populations. Future research on the added prognostic value of biomarkers to existing prediction models should focus on biomarkers with good predictive accuracy in other settings (e.g. diagnosis of myocardial infarction) and identification of biomarkers from omics data. They should be compared to novel biomarkers with so far insufficient evidence compared to established ones, including NT-proBNP or troponins. Adherence to recent guidance for prediction model studies (e.g. TRIPOD; PROBAST) and use of standardised outcome definitions in primary studies is highly recommended to facilitate systematic review and meta-analyses in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisette M Vernooij
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Wilton A van Klei
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Anesthesiologist and R. Fraser Elliott Chair in Cardiac Anesthesia, Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network and Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Karel Gm Moons
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Toshihiko Takada
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Judith van Waes
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna Aag Damen
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Cochrane Netherlands, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wallisch C, Zeiner S, Scholten P, Dibiasi C, Kimberger O. Development and internal validation of an algorithm to predict intraoperative risk of inadvertent hypothermia based on preoperative data. Sci Rep 2021; 11:22296. [PMID: 34785724 PMCID: PMC8595364 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-01743-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Intraoperative hypothermia increases perioperative morbidity and identifying patients at risk preoperatively is challenging. The aim of this study was to develop and internally validate prediction models for intraoperative hypothermia occurring despite active warming and to implement the algorithm in an online risk estimation tool. The final dataset included 36,371 surgery cases between September 2013 and May 2019 at the Vienna General Hospital. The primary outcome was minimum temperature measured during surgery. Preoperative data, initial vital signs measured before induction of anesthesia, and known comorbidities recorded in the preanesthetic clinic (PAC) were available, and the final predictors were selected by forward selection and backward elimination. Three models with different levels of information were developed and their predictive performance for minimum temperature below 36 °C and 35.5 °C was assessed using discrimination and calibration. Moderate hypothermia (below 35.5 °C) was observed in 18.2% of cases. The algorithm to predict inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia performed well with concordance statistics of 0.71 (36 °C) and 0.70 (35.5 °C) for the model including data from the preanesthetic clinic. All models were well-calibrated for 36 °C and 35.5 °C. Finally, a web-based implementation of the algorithm was programmed to facilitate the calculation of the probabilistic prediction of a patient's core temperature to fall below 35.5 °C during surgery. The results indicate that inadvertent intraoperative hypothermia still occurs frequently despite active warming. Additional thermoregulatory measures may be needed to increase the rate of perioperative normothermia. The developed prediction models can support clinical decision-makers in identifying the patients at risk for intraoperative hypothermia and help optimize allocation of additional thermoregulatory interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Wallisch
- Section for Clinical Biometrics, Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Zeiner
- Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | - P Scholten
- Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Dibiasi
- Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - O Kimberger
- Department of Anesthesia, General Intensive Care Medicine and Pain Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Digital Health and Patient Safety (LBI-DHPS), Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Okólska M, Łach J, Matusik PT, Pająk J, Mroczek T, Podolec P, Tomkiewicz-Pająk L. Heart Rate Variability and Its Associations with Organ Complications in Adults after Fontan Operation. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10194492. [PMID: 34640508 PMCID: PMC8509291 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10194492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Reduction of heart rate variability (HRV) parameters may be a risk factor and precede the occurrence of arrhythmias or the development of heart failure and complications in people with postinfarct left ventricular dysfunction and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Data on this issue in adults after a Fontan operation (FO) are scarce. This study assessed the association between HRV, exercise capacity, and multiorgan complications in adults after FO. Data were obtained from 30 FO patients (mean age 24 ± 5.4 years) and 30 healthy controls matched for age and sex. HRV was investigated in all patients by clinical examination, laboratory tests, echocardiography, a cardiopulmonary exercise test, and 24-h electrocardiogram. The HRV parameters were reduced in the FO group. Reduced HRV parameters were associated with patients’ age at the time of FO, time since surgery, impaired exercise capacity, chronotropic incompetence parameters, and multiorgan complications. Univariate analysis showed that saturated O2 at rest, percentage difference between adjacent NN intervals of >50 ms duration, and peak heart rate were associated with chronotropic index. Multivariable analysis revealed that all three variables were independent predictors of the chronotropic index. The results of this study suggest novel pathophysiological mechanisms that link HRV, physical performance, and organ damage in patients after FO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Okólska
- Cardiological Outpatient Clinic, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Jacek Łach
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland; (J.Ł.); (P.P.); (L.T.-P.)
| | - Paweł T. Matusik
- Department of Electrocardiology, Institute of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-12-614-23-81
| | - Jacek Pająk
- Department of Pediatric Heart Surgery and General Pediatric Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Tomasz Mroczek
- Department of Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Jagiellonian University, 30-663 Krakow, Poland;
| | - Piotr Podolec
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland; (J.Ł.); (P.P.); (L.T.-P.)
| | - Lidia Tomkiewicz-Pająk
- Department of Cardiac and Vascular Diseases, Institute of Cardiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, John Paul II Hospital, 31-202 Krakow, Poland; (J.Ł.); (P.P.); (L.T.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abbott TEF, Howell S, Pearse RM, Ackland GL. Mode of blood pressure monitoring and morbidity after noncardiac surgery: A prospective multicentre observational cohort study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2021; 38:468-476. [PMID: 33443380 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Control of blood pressure remains a key goal of peri-operative care, because hypotension is associated with adverse outcomes after surgery. OBJECTIVES We explored whether increased vigilance afforded by intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring may be associated with less morbidity after surgery. DESIGN A prospective observational cohort study. SETTING Four UK secondary care hospitals. PATIENTS A total of 4342 patients ≥45 years who underwent noncardiac surgery. METHODS We compared outcome of patients who received peri-operative intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring with those whose blood pressure was measured noninvasively. OUTCOMES The primary outcome was peri-operative myocardial injury (high-sensitivity troponin-T ≥ 15 ng l-1 within 72 h after surgery), compared between patients who received intra-arterial versus noninvasive blood pressure monitoring. Secondary outcomes were morbidity within 72 h of surgery (postoperative morbidity survey), and vasopressor and fluid therapy. Multivariable logistic regression analysis explored associations between morbidity and age, sex, location of postoperative care, mode of blood pressure/haemodynamic monitoring and Revised Cardiac Risk Index. RESULTS Intra-arterial monitoring was used in 1137/4342 (26.2%) patients. Myocardial injury occurred in 440/1137 (38.7%) patients with intra-arterial monitoring compared with 824/3205 (25.7%) with noninvasive monitoring [OR 1.82 (95% CI 1.58 to 2.11), P < 0.001]. Intra-arterial monitoring remained associated with myocardial injury when adjusted for potentially confounding variables [adjusted OR 1.56 (1.29 to 1.89), P < 0.001). The results were similar for planned ICU versus ward postoperative care. CONCLUSIONS Intra-arterial monitoring is associated with greater risk of morbidity after noncardiac surgery, after controlling for surgical and patient factors. These data provide useful insights into the design of a definitive monitoring trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom E F Abbott
- From the Translational Medicine & Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, EC1 M 6BQ (Abbott, Pearse, Ackland), and Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK (Howell)
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yüksek A. Utility of the Pleth Variability Index in predicting anesthesia-induced hypotension in geriatric patients. Turk J Med Sci 2021; 51:134-139. [PMID: 32892541 PMCID: PMC7991892 DOI: 10.3906/sag-1912-132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2019] [Accepted: 08/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/aim Anesthesia-induced hypotension may have negative consequences in geriatric patients. Therefore, predicting hypotension remains an important topic for anesthesiologists. Pleth Variability Index (PVI) measurement provides information about the fluid status and vascular tonus of patients. In this study, the ability of the Pleth Variability Index to predict hypotension after general anesthesia induction was evaluated. Materials and methods PVI values obtained from pulse oximetry were recorded, in addition to preoperative standard anesthesia monitoring. The correlation between the PVI value and mean arterial pressure (MAP), systolic arterial blood pressure (SAP) changes, and the power of PVI values to predict the incidence of hypotension after anesthesia induction (>20% MAP decrease) was tested. Results Eighty patients over 65 years of age who were operated under general anesthesia were included in the study. Hypotension was observed in 20 patients (25%). PVI values were mild and positively correlated with MAP changes (r = 0.195 and P = 0.041). According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, the incidence of hypotension increased in patients with PVI values above 15.45%. We also found the following diagnostic results for PVI value for predicting hypotension: P = 0.044 and area under the ROC curve of 0.651 ± 0.073 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.507–0.794), 40% sensitivity, 80% specificity, a PPV of 40%, an NPV of 80%, a cut-off value of 15.45, a positive likelihood ratio of 2, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.75, and a Youden Index of 0.2. Conclusion Predicting hypotension in geriatric patients is an important issue for anesthesiologists. As an easily applicable test, the Pleth Variability Index is useful in predicting MAP reduction in patients. This practical technique can be used routinely in all geriatric patient groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet Yüksek
- Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Bozok University, Yozgat, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shrimpton AJ, Walker SLM, Ackland GL. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers. BJA Educ 2021; 20:362-367. [PMID: 33456919 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjae.2020.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A J Shrimpton
- School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - S L M Walker
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - G L Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Le Manach Y, Meyhoff CS, Collins GS, Aasvang EK, London MJ. Of Railroads and Roller Coasters: Considerations for Perioperative Blood Pressure Management? Anesthesiology 2020; 133:489-492. [PMID: 32739992 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000003446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Bonnet JF, Buggy E, Cusack B, Sherwin A, Wall T, Fitzgibbon M, Buggy DJ. Can routine perioperative haemodynamic parameters predict postoperative morbidity after major surgery? Perioper Med (Lond) 2020; 9:9. [PMID: 32226624 PMCID: PMC7092574 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-020-0139-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative morbidity occurs in 10–15% of patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery. Predicting patients at higher risk of morbidity may help to optimize perioperative prevention. Preoperative haemodynamic parameters, systolic arterial pressure (SAP) < 100 mmHg, pulse pressure (PP) > 62 mmHg or < 53 mmHg, and heart rate (HR) > 87 min-1 are associated with increased postoperative morbidity. We evaluated the correlation between these and other routine haemodynamic parameters, measured intraoperatively, with postoperative morbidity. Postoperative morbidity was measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and length of stay (LOS). Additionally we correlated CCI with the cardiac risk biomarker, preoperative NT-ProBNP. Methods This is a retrospective analysis of patients in MET-REPAIR, a European observational study correlating self-reported physical activity with postoperative morbidity. Patients’ electronic anaesthetic records (EARs) including perioperative haemodynamic data were correlated with 30-day postoperative morbidity, CCI and LOS parameters. Statistical analysis to assess for correlation was by Kendall’s Correlation Coefficient for tied ranks (Tau-B) or Spearman’s Correlation Coefficient. Blood for N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) measurement was collected < 31 days before surgery. Results Data from n = 50 patients were analysed. When stratified according to age > 70 years and ASA > 3, the duration of MAP < 100 mmHg, < 75 mmHg or < 55 mmHg were associated with a higher CCI (tau = 0.57, p = 0.001) and duration < 75 mmHg was associated with prolonged LOS (tau = 0.39, p = 0.02). The intraoperative duration of PP > 62 mmHg was associated with LOS (tau = 0.317, p = 0.007). There was no correlation between preoperative NT-proBNP and either CCI or LOS. Conclusions In older and higher risk patients, duration of intraoperative hypotension by a variety of definitions, or PP > 62 mmHg, are associated with increased postoperative CCI and LOS. These findings warrant confirmation in larger databases with evaluation of whether real-time intraoperative intervention could reduce postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Francois Bonnet
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Eleanor Buggy
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Barbara Cusack
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aislinn Sherwin
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tom Wall
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maria Fitzgibbon
- 2Department of Medical Biochemistry, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donal J Buggy
- 1Department of Anaesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Mater University Hospital, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Otto JM, Levett DZH, Grocott MPW. Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Preoperative Evaluation: What Does the Future Hold? CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-020-00373-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Purpose of Review
Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) informs the preoperative evaluation process by providing individualised risk profiles; guiding shared decision-making, comorbidity optimisation and preoperative exercise training; and informing perioperative patient management. This review summarises evidence on the role of CPET in preoperative evaluation and explores the role of novel and emerging CPET variables and alternative testing protocols that may improve the precision of preoperative evaluation in the future.
Recent Findings
CPET provides a wealth of physiological data, and to date, much of this is underutilised clinically. For example, impaired chronotropic responses during and after CPET are simple to measure and in recent studies are predictive of both cardiac and noncardiac morbidity following surgery but are rarely reported. Exercise interventions are increasingly being used preoperatively, and endurance time derived from a high intensity constant work rate test should be considered as the most sensitive method of evaluating the response to training. Further research is required to identify the clinically meaningful difference in endurance time. Measuring efficiency may have utility, but this requires exploration in prospective studies.
Summary
Further work is needed to define contemporaneous risk thresholds, to explore the role of other CPET variables in risk prediction, to better characterise CPET’s role in combination with other tools in multifactorial risk stratification and increasingly to evaluate CPET’s utility for preoperative exercise prescription in prehabilitation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Manou-Stathopoulou V, Korbonits M, Ackland GL. Redefining the perioperative stress response: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:570-583. [PMID: 31547969 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 07/21/2019] [Accepted: 08/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The systemic stress response triggered by surgical trauma is characterised by sterile inflammation preceding metabolic and neuroendocrine dysregulation. However, the relevance of the classically described 'stress response' is now highly questionable in an era where profound physiological deconditioning is common in older, frail surgical patients. Commonly used assessment techniques do not accurately reflect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis integrity after major surgery. Clinical interpretation of plasma concentrations of cortisol, the prototypical stress hormone, is rarely accurate, because of study heterogeneity, the inherently dynamic characteristics of cortisol production, and assay variability. Before surgery, chronic psychosocial stress and common cardiorespiratory co-morbidities are clinically relevant modifiers of neuroendocrine activation to acute stress/inflammation. The frequent development of multi-morbidity after major surgery further clouds the compartmentalised, discrete model of neuroendocrine activation after initial tissue injury. Starvation, impaired mobility, and sepsis after surgery generate distinct neuroendocrine profiles that challenge the conventional model of neuroendocrine activation. Basic science studies suggest that high circulating levels of cortisol may directly cause organ injury. Conversely, randomised controlled clinical trials investigating glucocorticoid supplementation have delivered contrasting results, with some suggesting a protective effect in the perioperative period. Here, we consider many of the confounding factors that have emerged to challenge the conventional model of the surgical stress response, and suggest that a more nuanced understanding of changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis physiology is warranted to advance perioperative medicine. Re-examining the perioperative stress response presents opportunities for improving outcomes through enhancing the understanding of the neuroendocrine aspects of preparation for and recovery from surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vasiliki Manou-Stathopoulou
- Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Márta Korbonits
- Centre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Gareth L Ackland
- Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ackland GL, Abbott TEF, Minto G, Clark M, Owen T, Prabhu P, May SM, Reynolds JA, Cuthbertson BH, Wijesundera D, Pearse RM. Heart rate recovery and morbidity after noncardiac surgery: Planned secondary analysis of two prospective, multi-centre, blinded observational studies. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0221277. [PMID: 31433825 PMCID: PMC6703687 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Impaired cardiac vagal function, quantified preoperatively as slower heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise, is independently associated with perioperative myocardial injury. Parasympathetic (vagal) dysfunction may also promote (extra-cardiac) multi-organ dysfunction, although perioperative data are lacking. Assuming that cardiac vagal activity, and therefore heart rate recovery response, is a marker of brainstem parasympathetic dysfunction, we hypothesized that impaired HRR would be associated with a higher incidence of morbidity after noncardiac surgery. Methods In two prospective, blinded, observational cohort studies, we established the definition of impaired vagal function in terms of the HRR threshold that is associated with perioperative myocardial injury (HRR ≤ 12 beats min-1 (bpm), 60 seconds after cessation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The primary outcome of this secondary analysis was all-cause morbidity three and five days after surgery, defined using the Post-Operative Morbidity Survey. Secondary outcomes of this analysis were type of morbidity and time to become morbidity-free. Logistic regression and Cox regression tested for the association between HRR and morbidity. Results are presented as odds/hazard ratios [OR or HR; (95% confidence intervals). Results 882/1941 (45.4%) patients had HRR≤12bpm. All-cause morbidity within 5 days of surgery was more common in 585/822 (71.2%) patients with HRR≤12bpm, compared to 718/1119 (64.2%) patients with HRR>12bpm (OR:1.38 (1.14–1.67); p = 0.001). HRR≤12bpm was associated with more frequent episodes of pulmonary (OR:1.31 (1.05–1.62);p = 0.02)), infective (OR:1.38 (1.10–1.72); p = 0.006), renal (OR:1.91 (1.30–2.79); p = 0.02)), cardiovascular (OR:1.39 (1.15–1.69); p<0.001)), neurological (OR:1.73 (1.11–2.70); p = 0.02)) and pain morbidity (OR:1.38 (1.14–1.68); p = 0.001) within 5 days of surgery. Conclusions Multi-organ dysfunction is more common in surgical patients with cardiac vagal dysfunction, defined as HRR ≤ 12 bpm after preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Clinical trial registry ISRCTN88456378.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gareth L. Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
- * E-mail:
| | - Tom E. F. Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gary Minto
- Department of Anaesthesia, Derriford Hospital, Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust; Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Clark
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas Owen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Preston Hospital, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, United Kingdom
| | - Pradeep Prabhu
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, United Kingdom
| | - Shaun M. May
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph A. Reynolds
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Brian H. Cuthbertson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Duminda Wijesundera
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rupert M. Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abbott TEF, Pearse RM, Archbold RA, Ahmad T, Niebrzegowska E, Wragg A, Rodseth RN, Devereaux PJ, Ackland GL. A Prospective International Multicentre Cohort Study of Intraoperative Heart Rate and Systolic Blood Pressure and Myocardial Injury After Noncardiac Surgery: Results of the VISION Study. Anesth Analg 2019; 126:1936-1945. [PMID: 29077608 PMCID: PMC5815500 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000002560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between intraoperative cardiovascular changes and perioperative myocardial injury has chiefly focused on hypotension during noncardiac surgery. However, the relative influence of blood pressure and heart rate (HR) remains unclear. We investigated both individual and codependent relationships among intraoperative HR, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS). METHODS Secondary analysis of the Vascular Events in Noncardiac Surgery Cohort Evaluation (VISION) study, a prospective international cohort study of noncardiac surgical patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis tested for associations between intraoperative HR and/or SBP and MINS, defined by an elevated serum troponin T adjudicated as due to an ischemic etiology, within 30 days after surgery. Predefined thresholds for intraoperative HR and SBP were: maximum HR >100 beats or minimum HR <55 beats per minute (bpm); maximum SBP >160 mm Hg or minimum SBP <100 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were myocardial infarction and mortality within 30 days after surgery. RESULTS After excluding missing data, 1197 of 15,109 patients (7.9%) sustained MINS, 454 of 16,031 (2.8%) sustained myocardial infarction, and 315 of 16,061 patients (2.0%) died within 30 days after surgery. Maximum intraoperative HR >100 bpm was associated with MINS (odds ratio [OR], 1.27 [1.07-1.50]; P < .01), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.34 [1.05-1.70]; P = .02), and mortality (OR, 2.65 [2.06-3.41]; P < .01). Minimum SBP <100 mm Hg was associated with MINS (OR, 1.21 [1.05-1.39]; P = .01) and mortality (OR, 1.81 [1.39-2.37]; P < .01), but not myocardial infarction (OR, 1.21 [0.98-1.49]; P = .07). Maximum SBP >160 mm Hg was associated with MINS (OR, 1.16 [1.01-1.34]; P = .04) and myocardial infarction (OR, 1.34 [1.09-1.64]; P = .01) but, paradoxically, reduced mortality (OR, 0.76 [0.58-0.99]; P = .04). Minimum HR <55 bpm was associated with reduced MINS (OR, 0.70 [0.59-0.82]; P < .01), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.75 [0.58-0.97]; P = .03), and mortality (OR, 0.58 [0.41-0.81]; P < .01). Minimum SBP <100 mm Hg with maximum HR >100 bpm was more strongly associated with MINS (OR, 1.42 [1.15-1.76]; P < .01) compared with minimum SBP <100 mm Hg alone (OR, 1.20 [1.03-1.40]; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative tachycardia and hypotension are associated with MINS. Further interventional research targeting HR/blood pressure is needed to define the optimum strategy to reduce MINS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom E F Abbott
- From the William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rupert M Pearse
- From the William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Tahania Ahmad
- From the William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | - Philip J Devereaux
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gareth L Ackland
- From the William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abbott TEF, Pearse RM, Beattie WS, Phull M, Beilstein C, Raj A, Grocott MPW, Cuthbertson BH, Wijeysundera D, Ackland GL. Chronotropic incompetence and myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: planned secondary analysis of a prospective observational international cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2019; 123:17-26. [PMID: 31029407 PMCID: PMC6676775 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 02/12/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physiological measures of heart failure are common in surgical patients, despite the absence of a diagnosis. Heart rate (HR) increases during exercise are frequently blunted in heart failure (termed chronotropic incompetence), which primarily reflects beta-adrenoreceptor dysfunction. We examined whether chronotropic incompetence was associated with myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery. METHODS This was a predefined analysis of an international cohort study where participants aged ≥40 yr underwent symptom-limited cardiopulmonary exercise testing before noncardiac surgery. Chronotropic incompetence was defined as the ratio of increase in HR during exercise to age-predicted maximal increase in HR <0.6. The primary outcome was myocardial injury within 3 days after surgery, defined by high-sensitivity troponin assays >99th centile. Explanatory variables were biomarkers for heart failure (ventilatory efficiency slope [minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production] ≥34; peak oxygen consumption ≤14 ml kg-1 min-1; HR recovery ≤6 beats min-1 decrease 1 min post-exercise; preoperative N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT pro-BNP] >300 pg ml-1). Myocardial injury was compared in the presence or absence of sympathetic (i.e. chronotropic incompetence) or parasympathetic (i.e. impaired HR recovery after exercise) thresholds indicative of dysfunction. Data are presented as odds ratios (ORs) (95% confidence intervals). RESULTS Chronotropic incompetence occurred in 396/1325 (29.9%) participants; only 16/1325 (1.2%) had a heart failure diagnosis. Myocardial injury was sustained by 162/1325 (12.2%) patients. Raised preoperative NT pro-BNP was more common when chronotropic incompetence was <0.6 (OR: 1.57 [1.11-2.23]; P=0.011). Chronotropic incompetence was not significantly associated with myocardial injury (OR: 1.05 [0.74-1.50]; P=0.78), independent of rate-limiting therapy. HR recovery <12 beats min-1 decrease after exercise was associated with myocardial injury in the presence (OR: 1.62 [1.05-2.51]; P=0.03) or absence (OR: 1.60 [1.06-2.39]; P=0.02) of chronotropic incompetence. CONCLUSIONS Chronotropic incompetence is common in surgical patients. In contrast to parasympathetic dysfunction which was associated with myocardial injury, preoperative chronotropic incompetence (suggestive of sympathetic dysfunction) was not associated with postoperative myocardial injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Rupert M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - W Scott Beattie
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mandeep Phull
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Queens Hospital, Romford, UK
| | - Christian Beilstein
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Therapy, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ashok Raj
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Croydon University Hospital, Croydon, UK
| | - Michael P W Grocott
- Critical Care Research Group, NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Brian H Cuthbertson
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Duminda Wijeysundera
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gareth L Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fowler AJ, Abbott TEF, Prowle J, Pearse RM. Age of patients undergoing surgery. Br J Surg 2019; 106:1012-1018. [DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 123] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Revised: 12/10/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Advancing age is independently associated with poor postoperative outcomes. The ageing of the general population is a major concern for healthcare providers. Trends in age were studied among patients undergoing surgery in the National Health Service in England.
Methods
Time trend ecological analysis was undertaken of Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics data for England from 1999 to 2015. The proportion of patients undergoing surgery in different age groupings, their pooled mean age, and change in age profile over time were calculated. Growth in the surgical population was estimated, with associated costs, to the year 2030 by use of linear regression modelling.
Results
Some 68 205 695 surgical patient episodes (31 220 341 men, 45·8 per cent) were identified. The mean duration of hospital stay was 5·3 days. The surgical population was older than the general population of England; this gap increased over time (1999: 47·5 versus 38·3 years; 2015: 54·2 versus 39·7 years). The number of people aged 75 years or more undergoing surgery increased from 544 998 (14·9 per cent of that age group) in 1999 to 1 012 517 (22·9 per cent) in 2015. By 2030, it is estimated that one-fifth of the 75 years and older age category will undergo surgery each year (1·49 (95 per cent c.i. 1·43 to 1·55) million people), at a cost of €3·2 (3·1 to 3·5) billion.
Conclusion
The population having surgery in England is ageing at a faster rate than the general population. Healthcare policies must adapt to ensure that provision of surgical treatments remains safe and sustainable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A J Fowler
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- Department of Anaesthesia, Whittington Health, London, UK
| | - J Prowle
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - R M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Intra-operative heart rate and postoperative outcomes - rowing against the tide? Eur J Anaesthesiol 2019; 36:90-92. [PMID: 30624290 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000000909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Abbott TEF, Greaves KE, Patel A, Ahmad T, Haddow J, Futier E, Biais M, Slim K, Pearse RM, Pearse RM, Beattie S, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Fleisher LA, Grocott M, Haddow J, Hoeft A, Holt P, Moreno R, Pritchard N, Rhodes A, Wijeysundera D, Wilson M, Ahmed T, Everingham K, Hewson R, Januszewska M, Pearse RM, Phull MK, Halliwell R, Shulman M, Myles P, Schmid W, Hiesmayr M, Wouters P, Hert S, Lobo S, Beattie S, Wijeysundera D, Fang X, Rasmussen L, Futier E, Biais M, Venara A, Slim K, Sander M, Koulenti D, Arvaniti K, Chan M, Kulkarni A, Chandra S, Tantri A, Geddoa E, Abbas M, Della Rocca G, Sivasakthi D, Mansor M, Luna P, Bouwman A, Buhre W, Beavis V, Campbell D, Short T, Osinaike T, Matos R, Grigoras I, Kirov M, Protsenko D, Biccard B, Aldecoa C, Chew M, Hofer C, Hubner M, Ditai J, Szakmany T, Fleisher L, Ferguson M, MacMahon M, Shulman M, Cherian R, Currow H, Kanathiban K, Gillespie D, Pathmanathan E, Phillips K, Reynolds J, Rowley J, Douglas J, Kerridge R, Currow H, Garg S, Bennett M, Jain M, Alcock D, Terblanche N, Cotter R, Leslie K, Stewart M, Zingerle N, Clyde A, et alAbbott TEF, Greaves KE, Patel A, Ahmad T, Haddow J, Futier E, Biais M, Slim K, Pearse RM, Pearse RM, Beattie S, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Fleisher LA, Grocott M, Haddow J, Hoeft A, Holt P, Moreno R, Pritchard N, Rhodes A, Wijeysundera D, Wilson M, Ahmed T, Everingham K, Hewson R, Januszewska M, Pearse RM, Phull MK, Halliwell R, Shulman M, Myles P, Schmid W, Hiesmayr M, Wouters P, Hert S, Lobo S, Beattie S, Wijeysundera D, Fang X, Rasmussen L, Futier E, Biais M, Venara A, Slim K, Sander M, Koulenti D, Arvaniti K, Chan M, Kulkarni A, Chandra S, Tantri A, Geddoa E, Abbas M, Della Rocca G, Sivasakthi D, Mansor M, Luna P, Bouwman A, Buhre W, Beavis V, Campbell D, Short T, Osinaike T, Matos R, Grigoras I, Kirov M, Protsenko D, Biccard B, Aldecoa C, Chew M, Hofer C, Hubner M, Ditai J, Szakmany T, Fleisher L, Ferguson M, MacMahon M, Shulman M, Cherian R, Currow H, Kanathiban K, Gillespie D, Pathmanathan E, Phillips K, Reynolds J, Rowley J, Douglas J, Kerridge R, Currow H, Garg S, Bennett M, Jain M, Alcock D, Terblanche N, Cotter R, Leslie K, Stewart M, Zingerle N, Clyde A, Hambidge O, Rehak A, Cotterell S, Huynh WBQ, McCulloch T, Ben-Menachem E, Egan T, Cope J, Halliwell R, Fellinger P, Haselberger S, Holaubek C, Lichtenegger P, Scherz F, Schmid W, Hoffer F, Cakova V, Eichwalder A, Fischbach N, Klug R, Schneider E, Vesely M, Wickenhauser R, Grubmueller KG, Leitgeb M, Lang F, Toro N, Bauer M, Laengle F, Mayrhofer T, Buerkle C, Forstner K, Germann R, Rinoesl H, Schindler E, Trampitsch E, Fritsch G, Szabo C, Bidgoli J, Verdoodt H, Forget P, Kahn D, Lois F, Momeni M, Prégardien C, Pospiech A, Steyaert A, Veevaete L, De Kegel D, De Jongh K, Foubert L, Smitz C, Vercauteren M, Poelaert J, Van Mossevelde V, Abeloos J, Bouchez S, Coppens M, De Baerdemaeker L, Deblaere I, De Bruyne A, De Hert S, Fonck K, Heyse B, Jacobs T, Lapage K, Moerman A, Neckebroek M, Parashchanka A, Roels N, Van Den Eynde N, Vandenheuvel M, Van Limmen J, Vanluchene A, Vanpeteghem C, Wouters P, Wyffels P, Huygens C, Vandenbempt P, Van de Velde M, Dylst D, Janssen B, Schreurs E, Aleixo FB, Candido K, Batista HD, Guimarães M, Guizeline J, Hoffmann J, Lobo SM, Lobo FR, Nascimento V, Nishiyama K, Pazetto L, Souza D, Rodrigues RS, Santos AMV, Jardim J, Silva J, Nascimento Junior P, Baio TH, Castro GIP, Oliveira HRW, Amendola CP, Cardoso G, Ortega D, Brotto AF, De Oliveira MC, Réa-Neto Á, Dias F, Azambuja P, Knibel MF, Martins A, Almeida W, Neto CN, Tardelli MA, Caser E, Machado M, Aguzzoli C, Baldisserotto S, Tabajara FB, Bettega F, Júnior LHCR, Gasperi J, Faina L, Nolasco MF, Costa Fischer BF, Campos Ferreira MF, Hartmann C, Kliemann M, Ribeiro GLH, Fraga JM, Netto TM, Pozza LV, Wendling PR, Azevedo C, Garcia J, Lopes M, Maia B, Maselli P, Melo R, Mendes W, Neves M, Ney J, Piras C, Applewhaite C, Carr A, Chow L, Duttchen K, Foglia J, Greene M, Hinther A, Houston K, McCormick TJ, Mikhayel J, Montasser S, Ragan A, Suen A, Woolsey A, Yu HC, Funk D, Kowalski S, Legaspi R, McDonald H, Siddiqui F, Pridham J, Rowe B, Sampson S, Thiessen B, Zbitnew G, Bernard A, George R, Jones P, Moor R, Siddiqui N, Wolfer A, Tran D, Winch D, Dobson G, Hinther A, McCormick T, Montasser O, Suen A, Woolsey A, Bernard A, George R, Hall R, Bernard A, George R, Hall R, Applewhaite C, Baghirzada L, McCormick TJ, Suen A, Dai SY, Hare G, Lee E, Shastri U, Tsui A, Yagnik A, Alvares D, Choi S, Dwyer H, Flores K, McCartney C, Somascanthan P, Beattie S, Carroll J, Pazmino-Canizares J, Wijeysundera D, Wolfer A, Ami N, Chan V, Perlas A, Argue R, Lavis K, Mayson K, Cao Y, Gao H, Hu T, Lv J, Yang J, Yang Y, Zhong Y, Zhou J, Zou X, He M, Li X, Luo D, Wang H, Yu T, Chen L, Wang L, Cai Y, Cao Z, Li Y, Lian J, Sun H, Wang S, Wang Z, Wang K, Zhu Y, Du X, Fan H, Fu Y, Huang L, Huang Y, Hwan H, Luo H, Qu PS, Tao F, Wang Z, Wang G, Wang S, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Chen C, Wang W, Liu Z, Fan L, Tang J, Chen Y, Chen Y, Han Y, Huang C, Liang G, Shen J, Wang J, Yang Q, Zhen J, Zhou H, Chen J, Chen Z, Li X, Meng B, Ye H, Zhang X, Bi Y, Cao J, Guo F, Lin H, Liu Y, Lv M, Shi P, Song X, Sun C, Sun Y, Wang Y, Wang S, Zhang M, Chen R, Hou J, Leng Y, Meng QT, Qian L, Shen ZY, Xia ZY, Xue R, Zhang Y, Zhao B, Zhou XJ, Chen Q, Guo H, Guo Y, Qi Y, Wang Z, Wei J, Zhang W, Zheng L, Bao Q, Chen Y, Chen Y, Fei Y, Hu N, Hu X, Lei M, Li X, Lv X, Lv J, Miao F, Ouyang L, Qian L, Shen C, Sun Y, Wang Y, Wang D, Wu C, Xu L, Yuan J, Zhang L, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Zhao J, Zhao C, Zhao L, Zheng T, Zhou D, Zhou H, Zhou C, Lu K, Zhao T, He C, Chen H, Chen S, Cheng B, He J, Jin L, Li C, Li H, Pan Y, Shi Y, Wen XH, Wu S, Xie G, Zhang K, Zhao B, Lu X, Chen F, Liang Q, Lin X, Ling Y, Liu G, Tao J, Yang L, Zhou J, Chen F, Feng Y, Hou B, Lin J, Liu M, Luo F, Shi X, Xiong Y, Xu L, Yang S, Zhang Q, Zhang H, Zhao W, Zhao W, Yun B, Chen L, Chen S, Dai Q, Geng W, Han K, He X, Huang L, Ji B, Jia D, Jin S, Li Q, Liang D, Luo S, Lwang L, Mo Y, Pan Y, Qi X, Qian M, Qin J, Ren Y, Shi Y, Wang J, Wang J, Wang L, Xie J, Yan Y, Yao Y, Zhang M, Zhao J, Zhuang X, Ai Y, Du F, He L, Huang L, Li Z, Li H, Li Y, Li L, Meng S, Yuan Y, Zhang E, Zhang J, Zhao S, Ji Z, Pei L, Wang L, Chen C, Dong B, Li J, Miao Z, Mu H, Qin C, Su L, Wen Z, Xie K, Yu Y, Yuan F, Hu X, Zhang Y, Xiao W, Zhu Z, Dai Q, Fu K, Hu R, Hu X, Huang S, Li Y, Liang Y, Yu S, Guo Z, Jing Y, Tang N, Wu J, Yuan D, Zhang R, Zhao X, Li Y, Bai HP, Liu CX, Liu FF, Ren W, Wang XL, Xu GJ, Hu N, Li B, Ou Y, Tang Y, Yao S, Zhang S, Kong CC, Liu B, Wang T, Xiao W, Lu B, Xia Y, Zhou J, Cai F, Chen P, Hu S, Wang H, Wu J, Xu Q, Hu L, Jing L, Li J, Li B, Liu Q, Liu Y, Lu X, Peng ZD, Qiu X, Ren Q, Tong Y, Wang Z, Wang J, Wen Y, Wu Q, Xia J, Xie J, Xiong X, Xu S, Yang T, Ye H, Yin N, Yuan J, Zeng Q, Zhang B, Zheng K, Cang J, Chen S, Du F, Fan Y, Fu S, Ge X, Guo B, Huang W, Jiang L, Jiang X, Jin L, Liu Y, Pan Y, Ren Y, Shan Q, Wang J, Wang F, Wu C, Zhang X, Christiansen IC, Granum SN, Rasmussen BS, Daugaard M, Gambhir R, Steingrímsdóttir GE, Jensen-Gadegaard P, Olsen KS, Siegel H, Eskildsen KZ, Gätke MR, Wibrandt I, Heintzelmann SB, Lange KHW, Lundsgaard RS, Amstrup-Hansen L, Hovendal C, Larsen M, Lenstrup M, Kobborg T, Larsen JR, Pedersen AB, Larsen JR, Smith SH, Oestervig RM, Rasmussen L, Afshari A, Andersen C, Ekelund K, Secher EL, Brandsborg B, Beloeil H, Lasocki S, Venara A, Biais M, Ouattara A, Sineus M, Molliex S, Legouge ML, Wallet F, Tesniere A, Gaudin C, Lehur P, Forsans E, Rudnicki S, Maudet VS, Mutter D, Sojod G, Ouaissi M, Regimbeau JM, Futier E, Desbordes J, Comptaer N, Manser D, Ethgen S, Lebuffe G, Auer P, Härtl C, Deja M, Legashov K, Sonnemann S, Wiegand-Loehnert C, Falk E, Habicher M, Angermair S, Laetsch B, Schmidt K, Sonnemann S, Von Heymann C, Ramminger A, Jelschen F, Pabel S, Weyland A, Czeslick E, Gille J, Malcharek M, Sablotzki A, Lueke K, Wetzel P, Weimann J, Lenhart FP, Reichle F, Schirmer F, Hüppe M, Klotz K, Nau C, Schön J, Mencke T, Wasmund C, Bankewitz C, Baumgarten G, Fleischer A, Guttenthaler V, Hack Y, Hoeft A, Kirchgaessner K, Männer O, Schurig-Urbaniak M, Struck R, Zyl R, Wittmann M, Goebel U, Harris S, Veit S, Andreadaki E, Souri F, Katsiadramis I, Skoufi A, Vasileiou M, Aimoniotou-Georgiou E, Katsourakis A, Veroniki F, Vlachogianni G, Petra K, Chlorou D, Oloktsidou E, Ourailoglou V, Papapostolou K, Tsaousi G, Daikou P, Dedemadi G, Kalaitzopoulos I, Loumpias C, Bristogiannis S, Dafnios N, Gkiokas G, Kontis E, Kozompoli D, Papailia A, Theodosopoulos T, Bizios C, Koutsikou A, Moustaka A, Plaitakis I, Armaganidis A, Christodoulopoulou T, Lignos M, Theodorakopoulou M, Asimakos A, Ischaki E, Tsagkaraki A, Zakynthinos S, Antoniadou E, Koutelidakis I, Lathyris D, Pozidou I, Voloudakis N, Dalamagka M, Gkonezou E, Chronis C, Manolakaki D, Mosxogiannidis D, Slepova T, Tsakiridou I, Lampiri CL, Vachlioti AV, Panagiotakis CP, Sfyras DS, Tsimpoukas FT, Tsirogianni A, Axioti E, Filippopoulos A, Kalliafa E, Kassavetis G, Katralis P, Komnos I, Pilichos G, Ravani I, Totis A, Apagaki E, Efthymiadi A, Kampagiannis N, Paraforou T, Tsioka A, Georgiou G, Vakalos A, Bairaktari A, Charitos E, Markou G, Niforopoulou P, Papakonstantinou N, Tsigou E, Xifara A, Zoulamoglou M, Gkioni P, Karatzas S, Kyparissi A, Mainas E, Papapanagiotou I, Papavasilopoulou T, Fragandreas G, Georgopoulou E, Katsika E, Psarras K, Synekidou E, Verroiotou M, Vetsiou E, Zaimi D, Anagnou A, Apostolou K, Melissopoulou T, Rozenberg T, Tsigris C, Boutsikos G, Kalles V, Kotsalas N, Lavdaiou C, Paikou F, Panagou GL, Spring A, Arvaniti K, Botis I, Drimala M, Georgakakis G, Kiourtzieva E, Ntouma P, Prionas A, Xouplidis K, Dalampini E, Giannaki C, Iasonidou C, Ioannidis O, Lavrentieva A, Lavrentieva A, Papageorgiou G, Kokkinoy M, Stafylaraki M, Gaitanakis S, Karydakis P, Paltoglou J, Ponireas P, Chaloulis P, Provatidis A, Sousana A, Gardikou VV, Konstantivelli M, Lataniotou O, Lisari E, Margaroni M, Stamatiou K, Nikolaidis E, Pnevmatikos I, Sertaridou E, Andreou A, Arkalaki E, Athanasakis E, Chaniotaki F, Chatzimichali A, Christofaki M, Dermitzaki D, Fiorentza K, Frantzeskos G, Geromarkaki E, Kafkalaki K, Kalogridaki M, Karydi K, Kokkini S, Kougentakis G, Lefaki T, Lilitsis E, Makatounaki A, Malliotakis P, Michelakis D, Neonaki M, Nyktari V, Palikyra I, Papadakis E, Papaioannou A, Sfakianakis K, Sgouraki M, Souvatzis X, Spartinou A, Stefanidou N, Syrogianni P, Tsagkaraki G, Arnaoutoglou E, Arnaoutoglou C, Bali C, Bouris V, Doumos R, Gkini KP, Kapaktsi C, Koulouras V, Lena A, Lepida D, Michos E, Papadopoulos D, Paschopoulos M, Rompou VA, Siouti I, Tsampalas S, Ververidou O, Zilis G, Charlalampidoy A, Christodoulidis G, Flossos A, Stamoulis K, Chan M, Tsang MSC, Tsang MS, Lai ML, Yip CP, Chan HMH, Law B, Li WS, Chu HM, Koo EGY, Lam CCJ, Cheng KH, Chan M, Lam T, Chu S, Lai ML, Lam WY, Wong KWK, Kwok D, Hung CYJ, Chan WKJ, LamWong W, Chung CKE, Lai ML, Ma SK, Kaushik S, Shah B, Shah D, Shah S, Ar P, Muthuchellappan R, Agarwal V, Divatia J, Kulkarni A, Mishra S, Nimje G, Pande S, Savarkar S, Shrivastava A, Thomas M, Yegnaram S, Hidayatullah R, Chandra S, Tantri A, Puar N, Niman S, Indra I, Hamzah Z, Yuliana A, Abidin UN, Dursin AN, Kurnia A, Susanti A, Handayani D, Aribawa MA, Arya A, Senapathi TGA, Utara UH, Wid WM, Wima S, Wir WM, Jehosua B, Kaunang J, Lantang EY, Najoan R, Waworuntu N, Awad H, Fuad A, Geddoa E, Geddoa B, Khalaf AR, Al Hussaini S, Albaj S, Kenber M, Bettinelli A, Spadaro S, Volta CA, Giancarlo L, Sottosanti V, Della Rocca G, Spagnesi L, Toretti I, Alloj C, Cardellino S, Carmino L, Costanzo E, Fanfani LC, Novelli MT, Roasio A, Bellandi M, Beretta L, Bignami E, Bocchino S, Cabrini L, Corti D, Landoni G, Meroni R, Moizo E, Monti G, Pintaudi M, Plumari VP, Taddeo D, Testa V, Winterton D, Zangrillo A, Cloro LM, Colangelo C, Colangelo A, Rotunno G, Angel MP, Maria CP, Pata A, Parrini V, Gatta A, Nastasi M, Tinti C, Spagnesi L, Arrigo M, Benevento A, Bottini C, Cannavo M, Gastaldi C, Marchesi A, Pascazio A, Pata F, Pozzi E, Premoli A, Tessera G, Boschi L, D'Andrea R, Ghignone F, Poggioli G, Sibilio A, Taffurelli M, Ugolini G, Majid MAA, Rahman RA, Joseph J, Pathan F, Shah MHS, Yap HL, Cheah S, Chin II, Looi JK, Tan SC, Visvalingam S, Kwok FY, Lee CK, Tan TS, Wong SM, Abdullah NH, Liew CF, Luxuman L, Zin NHM, Norddin MF, Alias RLR, Wong JY, Yong J, Mustapha MTB, Chan WK, Dzulkipli N, Kuan PX, Lee YC, Alias A, Guok EC, Jee CC, Ramon BR, Weng CW, Ghafar FNIA, Aziz FZ, Hussain N, Lee HS, Sukawi I, Woon YL, Hadi HZA, Azam UAA, Alias AH, Kesut SA, Lee JM, Ooi DV, Sulaiman HA, Lih TAT, Mansor M, Veerakumaran J, Luna P, Rojas E, Resendiz GEA, Zapata DDM, López JCJA, Flores AAA, Amador JCB, Avila EJD, Aquino LPG, Rodriguez RL, Landa MT, Urias E, Hollmann M, Hulst A, Kirzner O, Preckel B, Gemert AKV, Bouwman A, Buise M, Tolenaar N, Weber E, Fretes J, Houweling P, Ormskerk P, Van Bommel J, Buhre W, Lance M, Smit-Fun V, Zundert T, Baas P, Boer HD, Sprakel J, Elferink-Vonk R, Noordzij P, Zeggeren L, Brand B, Spanjersberg R, Bokkel-Andela J, Numan S, Klei W, Zaane B, Boer C, Duivenvoorde Y, Hering JP, Zonneveldt H, Campbell D, Hoare S, Santa S, Allen SJ, Beavis V, Bell R, Choi HMD, Drake M, Farrell H, Higgie K, Holmes K, Jenkins N, Kim CJ, Kim S, Law KC, McAllister D, Park K, Pedersen K, Pfeifer L, Salmond T, Steynor M, Tan M, Waymouth E, Rahman ASA, Armstrong J, Dudson R, Jenkins N, Nilakant J, Richard S, Virdi P, Dixon L, Donohue R, Farrow M, Kennedy R, Marissa H, McKellow M, Nicola D, Pascoe R, Roberts SJ, Rowell G, Sumner M, Templer P, Chandrasekharan S, Fulton G, Jammer I, Ali M, More R, Wilson L, Chang YH, Foley J, Fowler C, Panckhurst J, Sara R, Stapelberg F, Campbell D, Cherrett V, Ganter DL, McAllister D, McCann L, Foley J, Gilmour F, Lumsden R, Moores M, Olliff S, Sardareva E, Stapelberg F, Tai J, Wikner M, Wong C, Chaddock M, Czepanski C, McKendry P, Polakovic D, Polakovich D, Robert A, Belda MT, Norton T, Stapelberg F, Alherz F, Barneto L, Ramirez A, Sayeed A, Smith N, Bennett C, McQuoid S, Bell R, Jansen TL, Nico Z, Scott J, Freschini D, Freschini A, Hopkins B, Manson L, Stoltz D, Bates A, Davis S, Freeman V, McGaughran L, Sharma SB, Burrows T, Byrne K, English D, Johnson R, Law KC, Manikkam B, McAllister D, Naidoo S, Rumball M, Whittle N, Franks R, Gibson-Lapsley H, McAllister D, Salter R, Walsh D, Cooper R, Perry K, Obobolo A, Sule UM, Ahmad A, Atiku M, Mohammed AD, Sarki AM, Adekola O, Akanmu O, Durodola A, Olukoju O, Raji V, Olajumoke T, Oyebamiji E, Adenekan A, Adetoye A, Faponle F, Olateju S, Owojuyigbe A, Talabi A, Adenike O, Adewale B, Collins N, Ezekiel E, Fatungase OM, Grace A, Sola S, Stella O, Ademola A, Adeolu AA, Adigun T, Akinwale M, Fasina O, Gbolahan O, Idowu O, Olonisakin RP, Osinaike BB, Asudo F, Mshelia D, Abdur-Rahman L, Agodirin O, Bello J, Bolaji B, Oyedepo OO, Ezike H, Iloabachie I, Okonkwo I, Onuora E, Onyeka T, Ugwu I, Umeh F, Alagbe-Briggs O, Dodiyi-Manuel A, Echem R, Obasuyi B, Onajin-Obembe B, Bandeira ME, Martins A, Tomé M, Costa ACMM, Krystopchuk A, Branco T, Esteves S, Melo MA, Monte J, Rua F, Martins I, Pinho-Oliveira VM, Rodrigues CM, Cabral R, Marques S, Rêgo S, Jesus JST, Marques MC, Romao C, Dias S, Santos AM, Alves MJ, Salta C, Cruz S, Duarte C, Paiva AAF, Nascimento Cabral T, Maia DFE, Silva RFMC, Langner A, Resendes HO, Conceição Soares M, Abrunhosa A, Faria F, Miranda L, Pereira H, Serra S, Ionescu D, Margarit S, Mitre C, Vasian H, Manga G, Stefan A, Tomescu D, Filipescu D, Paunescu MA, Stefan M, Stoica R, Gavril L, PĂtrĂșcanu E, Ristescu I, Rusu D, Diaconescu C, Iosep GF, Pulbere D, Ursu I, Balanescu A, Grintescu I, Mirea L, Rentea I, Vartic M, Lupu MN, Stanescu D, Streanga L, Antal O, Hagau N, Patras D, Petrisor C, Tosa F, Tranca S, Copotoiu SM, Ungureanu LL, Harsan CR, Papurica M, Cernea DD, Dragoescu NA, Aflori L, Vaida C, Ciobotaru OR, Aignatoaie M, Carp CP, Cobzaru I, Mardare O, Purcarin B, Tutunaru V, Ionita V, Arustei M, Codita A, Busuioc M, Chilinciuc I, Ciobanu C, Belciu I, Tincu E, Blaj M, Grosu R, Sandu G, Bruma D, Corneci D, Dutu M, Krepil A, Copaciu E, Dumitrascu CO, Jemna R, Mihaescu F, Petre R, Tudor C, Ursache E, Kulikov A, Lubnin A, Grigoryev E, Pugachev S, Protsenko D, Tolmasov A, Hussain A, Ilyina Y, Kirov M, Roshchina A, Iurin A, Chazova E, Dunay A, Karelov A, Khvedelidze I, Voldaeva O, Belskiy V, Dzhamullaev P, Grishkowez E, Kretov V, Levin V, Molkov A, Puzanov S, Samoilenko A, Tchekulaev A, Tulupova V, Utkin I, Allorto NL, Bishop DG, Builu PM, Cairns C, Dasrath A, Wet J, Hoedt M, Grey B, Hayes MP, Küsel BS, Shangase N, Wise R, Cacala S, Farina Z, Govindasamy V, Kruse CH, Lee C, Marais L, Naidoo TD, Rajah C, Rodseth RN, Ryan L, Rhaden R, Adam S, Alphonsus C, Ameer Y, Anderson F, Basanth S, Bechan S, Bhula C, Biccard BM, Biyase T, Buccimazza I, Cardosa J, Chen J, Daya B, Drummond L, Elabib A, Goad EHA, Goga IE, Goga R, Harrichandparsad R, Hodgson RE, Jordaan J, Kalafatis N, Kampik C, Landers AT, Loots E, Madansein R, Madaree A, Madiba TE, Manzini VT, Mbuyisa M, Moodley R, Msomi M, Mukama I, Naidoo D, Naidoo R, Naidu TK, Ntloko S, Padayachee E, Padayachee L, Phaff M, Pillay B, Pillay D, Pillay L, Ramnarain A, Ramphal SR, Ryan P, Saloojee A, Sebitloane M, Sigcu N, Taylor JL, Torborg A, Visser L, Anderson P, Conradie A, Swardt M, Villiers M, Eikman J, Liebenberg R, Mouton J, Paton A, Merwe L, Wilscott-Davids C, Barrett WJ, Bester M, Beer J, Geldenhuys J, Gouws H, Potgieter JH, Strydom M, Wilberforce-Turton E, Chetty RR, Chirkut S, Cronje L, Vasconcellos K, Dube NZ, Gama NS, Green GM, Green-Thompson R, Kinoo SM, Kistnasami P, Maharaj K, Moodley MS, Mothae SJ, Naidoo R, Aslam M, Noorbhai F, Rughubar V, Reddy J, Singh A, Skinner DL, Smith MJ, Singh B, Misra R, Naidoo M, Ramdharee P, Selibea Y, Sewpersad S, Sham S, Wessels JD, Africander C, Bejia T, Blakemore SP, Botes M, Bunwarie B, Hernandez CB, Jeeraz MA, Legutko DA, Lopez AG, De Meyer JN, Muzenda T, Naidoo N, Patel M, Pentela R, Junge M, Mansoor N, Rademan L, Scislowski P, Seedat I, Berg B, Merwe D, Wyk S, Govender K, Naicker D, Ramjee R, Saley M, Kuhn WP, Matos-Puig R, Moolla Z, Lisi A, Perez G, Beltran AV, Lozano A, Navarro CD, Duca A, Martinez EP, Ferrando C, Fuentes I, García-Pérez ML, Gracia E, Palomares AI, Katime A, Miñana A, Incertis R, Romero E, Garcia CSR, Rubio C, Artiles TS, Soro M, Valls P, Laguarda GA, Benavent P, Cuenca VC, Cueva A, Lafuente M, Parra AM, Rodrigo AR, Sanchez-Morcillo S, Tormo S, Redondo FJ, De Andres J, Diago LG, Cádiz MJH, Manuel GG, Peris R, Saiz C, Tatay J, Soto MTT, Brunete T, Cancho D, Delgado García DR, Zamudio D, Del Valle SG, Serrano ML, Alonso E, Anillo V, Maseda E, Salgado P, Suarez L, Suarez-de-la-Rica A, Villagrán MJ, Aldecoa C, Alonso JI, Cabezuelo E, Garcia-Saiz I, Moral OL, Martín S, Gonzalez AP, Doncel ST, Vera MA, Sánchez FJÁ, Castaño B, Moreira BC, Risco SF, Martín DP, Martín FP, Poza P, Ruiz A, Martínez WFS, Vicente BV, Dominguez SV, Fernández S, Munoz-López A, Bernat MJ, Mas A, Planas K, Jawad M, Saeed Y, Hedin A, Levander H, Chew M, Holmström S, Lönn D, Zoerner F, åkring I, Widmark C, Zettergren J, Liljequist VA, Nystrom L, Odeberg-Wernerman S, Oldner A, Reje P, Lyckner S, Sperber J, Adolfsson A, Klarin B, Hedin A, Ögren K, Barras JP, Bührer T, Despotidis V, Helmy N, Holliger S, Raptis DA, Schmid R, Meyer A, Jaquet Y, Kessler U, Muradbegovic M, Nahum SR, Rotunno T, Schiltz B, Voruz F, Worreth M, Christoforidis D, Popeskou SG, Furrer M, Prevost GA, Stocker A, Lang K, Breitenstein S, Ganter MT, Geisen M, Soll C, Korkmaz M, Lubach I, Schmitz M, Zu Schwabedissen MM, Zingg U, Hillermann T, Wildi S, Hofer C, Pinto BB, Walder B, Hübner M, Mariotti G, Slankamenac K, Namuyuga M, Kyomugisha E, Kituuka O, Shikanda AW, Kakembo N, Tom CO, Webombesa A, Bua E, Ditai J, Ssettabi EM, Epodoi J, Kabagenyi F, Kirya F, Dempsey G, Seasman C, Khan RBN, Kurasz C, Macgregor M, Shawki B, Hariharan V, Chau S, Ellis K, Butt G, Chicken DW, Christmas N, Allen S, Daniel GD, Dempster A, Kemp J, Matthews L, Mcglone P, Tambellini J, Trodd D, Freitas K, Garg A, Karpate S, Kulkarni A, O'Hara C, Troko J, Angus K, Bradley J, Brennan E, Brooks C, Brown J, Brown G, Finch A, Gratrix K, Hesketh S, Hill G, Jeffs C, Morgan M, Pemberton C, Slawson N, Spickett H, Swarbrick G, Thomas M, Van Duyvenvoorde G, Brennan A, Briscoe R, Cooper S, Lawton T, Northey M, Senaratne R, Stanworth H, Burrows L, Cain H, Craven R, Davies K, Jonas A, Pachucki M, Walkden G, Davies H, Gudaca M, Hobrok M, Arawwawala D, Fergey L, Gardiner M, Gunn J, Johnson L, Lofting A, Lyle A, Neela FM, Smolen S, Topliffe J, Williams S, Bland M, Kaura V, Lanka P, Naylor C, Smith N, Ahmed A, Myatt J, Shenoy R, Soon WC, Tan J, Karadia S, Self J, Durant E, Tripathi S, Bullock C, Campbell D, Ghosh A, Hughes T, Zsisku L, Bengeri S, Cowton A, Khalid MS, Limb J, McAdam C, Porritt M, Rafi MA, Shekar P, Harden C, Hollands H, King A, March L, Minto G, Patrick A, Waugh D, Kumara P, Simeson K, Yarwood J, Browning J, Hatton J, Julian H, Mitra A, Newton M, Pernu PK, Wilson A, Commey T, Foot H, Glover L, Gupta A, Lancaster N, Levin J, Mackenzie F, Mestanza C, Nofal E, Pout L, Varden R, Wild J, Jones S, Moreton S, Pulletz M, Davies C, Martin M, Thomas S, Burns K, McArthur C, Patel P, Lau G, Rich N, Davis F, Self J, Lyons R, Port B, Prout R, Smith C, Adelaja Y, Bennett V, Bidd H, Dumitrescu A, Murphy JF, Keen A, Mguni N, Ong C, Adams G, Boshier P, Brown R, Butryn I, Chatterjee J, Freethy A, Lockwood G, Tsakok M, Tsiligiannis S, Peat W, Stephenson L, Bradburn M, Pick S, Cunha P, Olagbaiye O, Tayeh S, Abernethy C, Balasubramaniam M, Bennett R, Bolton D, Martinson V, Naylor C, Smith N, Bell S, Heather B, Kushakovsky V, Alcock L, Alexander H, Anderson C, Baker P, Brookes M, Cawthorn L, Cirstea E, Colling K, Coulter I, Das S, Haigh K, Hamdan A, Hugill K, Kottam L, Lisseter E, Mawdsley M, McGivern J, Padala K, Phelps V, Kumar VR, Stewart K, Towse K, Tregonning J, Vahedi A, Walker A, Baines D, Bilolikar A, Chande S, Copley E, Dunk N, Kulkarni R, Kumar P, Metodiev Y, Ncomanzi D, Raithatha B, Raymode P, Szafranski J, Twohey L, Watt P, Weatherall L, Weatherill J, Whitman Z, Wighton E, Abayasinghe C, Chan A, Darwish S, Gill J, Glasgow E, Hadfield D, Harris C, Kochhar A, Mellis C, Pool A, Riozzi P, Selman A, Smith EJ, Vele L, Gercek Y, Guy K, Holden D, Watson N, Whysall K, Andreou P, Hales D, Thompson J, Bowrey S, McDonald S, Thompson J, Gilmore J, Hills V, Kelly C, Kelly S, Lloyd G, Abbott T, Gall L, Torrance H, Vivian M, Berntsen E, Nolan T, Turner A, Vohra A, Brown A, Clark R, Coughlan E, Daniel C, Patvardhan C, Pearson R, Predeep S, Saad H, Shanmugam M, Varley S, Vohra A, Wylie K, Cooper L, Makowski A, Misztal B, Moldovan E, Pegg C, Donovan A, Foot J, Large S, Claxton A, Netke B, Armstrong R, Calderwood C, Kwok A, Mohr O, Oyeniyi P, Patnaik L, Post B, Ali S, Arshad H, Baker G, Brenner L, Brincat M, Brunswicker A, Cox H, Cozar OI, Durst A, Fengas L, Flatt J, Glister G, Narwani V, Photi E, Rankin A, Rosbergen M, Tan M, Beaton C, Horn R, Hunt J, Rousseau G, Stancombe L, Absar M, Allsop J, Drinkwater Z, Hodgkiss T, Smith K, Brown J, Pick S, Alexander-Sefre F, Campey L, Dudgeon L, Hall K, Hitchcock R, James L, Smith K, Winstone U, Ahmad N, Bauchmuller K, Harrison J, Jeffery H, Miller D, Pinder A, Pothuneedi S, Rosser J, Sanghera S, Swift D, Walker R, Bester D, Cavanagh S, Cripps H, Daniel H, Lynch J, Paton A, Pyke S, Scholefield J, Whitworth H, Bottrill F, Ramalingam G, Webb S, Akerman N, Antill P, Bourner L, Buckley S, Castle G, Charles R, Eggleston C, Foster R, Gill S, Lindley K, Lklouk M, Lowery T, Martin O, Milne D, O'Connor P, Ratcliffe A, Rose A, Simeson K, Smith A, Varma S, Ward J, Simeson K, Barcraft-Barnes H, Camsooksai J, Colvin C, Reschreiter H, Tbaily L, Venner N, Hamilton C, Kelly L, Toth-Tarsoly P, Dodsworth K, Foord D, Gordon P, Hawes E, Lamb N, Mouland J, Nightingale J, Rose S, Schrieber J, Al Amri K, Aladin H, Arshad MA, Barraclough J, Bentley C, Bergin C, Carrera R, Clarkson A, Collins M, Cooper L, Denham S, Griffiths E, Ip P, Jeyanthan S, Joory K, Kaur S, Marriott P, Mitchell N, Nagaiah S, Nilsson A, Parekh N, Pope M, Seager J, Serag H, Tameem A, Thomas A, Thunder J, Torrance A, Vohra R, Whitehouse A, Wong T, Blunt M, Wong K, Giles J, Reed I, Weller D, Bell G, Birch J, Damant R, Maiden J, Mewies C, Prince C, Radford J, Balain B, Banerjee R, Barnett A, Burston B, Davies K, Edwards J, Evans C, Ford D, Gallacher P, Hill S, Jaffray D, Karlakki S, Kelly C, Kennedy J, Kiely N, Lewthwaite S, Marquis C, Ockendon M, Phillips S, Pickard S, Richardson J, Roach R, Smith T, Spencer-Jones R, Steele N, Steen J, Van Liefland M, White S, Faulds M, Harris M, Kelly C, Nicol S, Pearson SA, Chukkambotla S, Andrew A, Attrill E, Campbell G, Datson A, Fouracres A, Graterol J, Graves L, Hong B, Ishimaru A, Karthikeyan A, King H, Lawson T, Lee G, Lyons S, Hall AM, Mathoulin S, Mcintyre E, Mclaughlin D, Mulcahy K, Ratcliffe A, Robbins J, Sung W, Tayo A, Trembath L, Venugopal S, Walker R, Wigmore G, Boereboom C, Downes C, Humphries R, Melbourne S, Smith C, Tou S, Ullah S, Batchelor N, Boxall L, Broomby R, Deen T, Hellewell A, Helliwell L, Hutchings M, Hutchins D, Keenan S, Mackie D, Potter A, Smith F, Stone L, Thorpe K, Wassall R, Woodgate A, Baillie S, Campbell T, James S, King C, Araujo DM, Martin D, Morkane C, Neely J, Rajendram R, Burton M, James K, Keevil E, Minik O, Morgan J, Musgrave A, Rajanna H, Roberts T, Szakmany T, Adamson M, Jumbe S, Kendall J, Muthuswamy MB, Anderson C, Cruikshanks A, Pothuneedi S, Walker R, Wrench I, Zeidan L, Ardern D, Harris B, Hellstrom J, Martin J, Thomas R, Varsani N, Brown CW, Docherty P, Gillies M, McGregor E, Usher H, Craig J, Smith A, Ahmad T, Bodger P, Creary T, Everingham K, Fowler A, Hewson R, Ijuo E, Januszewska M, Jones T, Kantsedikas I, Lahiri S, McLean AL, Niebrzegowska E, Phull M, Wang D, Wickboldt N, Baldwin J, Doyle D, Mcmullan S, Oladapo M, Owen T, Tripathi S, Williams A, Daniel H, Gregory P, Husain T, Kirk-Bayley J, Mathers E, Montague L, White S, Avis J, Cook T, Dali-Kemmery L, Kerslake I, Lambourne V, Pearson A, Boyd C, Callaghan M, Lawson C, McCrossan R, Nesbitt V, O'connor L, Scott J, Sinclair R, Farid N, Morgese C, Bhatia K, Karmarkar S, Vohra A, Ahmed J, Branagan G, Hutton M, Swain A, Brookes J, Cornell J, Dolan R, Hulme J, Vuuren AJ, Jowitt T, Kalashetty G, Lloyd F, Patel K, Sherwood N, Brown L, Chandler B, Deighton K, Emma T, Haunch K, Cheeseman M, Dent K, Garg S, Gray C, Hood M, Jones D, Juj J, Mitra A, Rao R, Walker T, Anizi MA, Cheah C, Cheing Y, Coutinho F, Gondo P, Hadebe B, Hove MO, Khader A, Krishnachetty B, Rhodes K, Sokhi J, Baker KA, Bertram W, Looseley A, Mouton R, Arnold G, Arya S, Balfoussia D, Baxter L, Harris J, Jones C, Knaggs A, Markar S, Perera A, Scott A, Shida A, Sirha R, Wright S, Frost V, Gray C, MacGregor M, Andrews E, Arrandale L, Barrett S, Bidd H, Cifra E, Cooper M, Dragnea D, Elna C, Maclean J, Meier S, Milliken D, Munns C, Ratanshi N, Salvana A, Watson A, Ali H, Campbell G, Critchley R, Hicks C, Liddle A, Pass M, Ritchie C, Thomas C, Too L, Welsh S, Gill T, Johnson J, Reed J, Davis E, Papadopoullos S, Attwood C, Biffen A, Boulton K, Gray S, Hay D, Mills S, Montgomery J, Riddell R, Simpson J, Bhardwaj N, Paul E, Uwubamwen N, Vohra A, Berntsen E, Nolan T, Turner A, Alexander M, Arrich J, Arumugam S, Blackwood D, Boggiano V, Brown R, Chan YL, Chatterjee D, Chhabra A, Christian R, Costelloe H, Matthewman MC, Dalton E, Darko J, Davari M, Dave T, Deacon M, Deepak S, Edmond H, Ellis J, El-Sayed A, Eneje P, English R, Ewe R, Foers W, Franklin J, Gallego L, Garrett E, Goldberg O, Goss H, Greaves R, Harris R, Hennings C, Jones E, Kamali N, Kokkinos N, Lewis C, Lignos L, Malgapo EV, Malik R, Milne A, Mulligan JP, Nicklin P, Palipane N, Parsons T, Piper R, Prakash R, Ramesh B, Rasip S, Reading J, Rela M, Reyes A, Robert S, Rooms M, Shah K, Simons H, Solanki S, Spowart E, Stevens A, Thomas C, Waggett H, Yassaee A, Kennedy A, Scott S, Somanath S, Berg A, Hernandez M, Nanda R, Tank G, Wilson N, Wilson D, Al-Soudaine Y, Baldwin M, Cornish J, Davies Z, Davies L, Edwards M, Frewer N, Gallard S, Glasbey J, Harries R, Hopkins L, Kim T, Koompirochana V, Lawson S, Lewis M, Makzal Z, Scourfield S, Ahmad Y, Bates S, Blackwell C, Bryant H, Coulter S, Cruickshank R, Daniel S, Daubeny T, Edwards M, Golder K, Hawkins L, Helen B, Hinxman H, Levett D, Skinner B, Walsgrove J, Bradburn M, Dickson J, Constantin K, Karen M, O'Brien P, O'Donohoe L, Payne H, Sundayi S, Walker E, Brooke J, Cardy J, Humphreys S, Kessack L, Kubitzek C, Kumar S, Cotterill D, Hodzovic E, Hosdurga G, Miles E, Saunders G, Campbell M, Chan P, Jemmett K, Raj A, Naik A, Ramamoorthy R, Shah N, Sylvan A, Blyth K, Burtenshaw A, Freeman D, Johnson E, Lo P, Martin T, Plunkett E, Wollaston J, Allison J, Carroll C, Craw N, Craw S, Pitt-Kerby T, Rowland-Axe R, Spurdle K, McDonald A, Simon D, Sinha V, Smith T, Banner-Goodspeed V, Boone M, Campbell K, Lu F, Scannell J, Sobol J, Balajonda N, Clemmons K, Conde C, Funk B, Hall R, Hopkins T, Olaleye O, Omer O, Pender M, Porto A, Stevens A, Waweru P, Yeh E, Bodansky D, Evans A, Kleopoulos S, Maril R, Mathney E, Sanchez A, Tinuoye E, Bateman B, Eng K, Jiang N, Ladha K, Needleman J, Chen LL, Chen LL, Lane R, Robinowitz D, Ghushe N, Irshad M, Patel S, Takemoto S, Wallace A, Mazzeffi M, Rock P, Wallace K, Zhu X, Chua P, Fleisher L, Mattera M, Sharar R, Thilen S, Treggiari M, Morgan A, Sofjan I, Subramaniam K, Avidan M, Maybrier H, Muench M, Wildes T. Prospective observational cohort study on grading the severity of postoperative complications in global surgery research. Br J Surg 2019; 106:e73-e80. [PMID: 30620066 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11025] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Clavien-Dindo classification is perhaps the most widely used approach for reporting postoperative complications in clinical trials. This system classifies complication severity by the treatment provided. However, it is unclear whether the Clavien-Dindo system can be used internationally in studies across differing healthcare systems in high- (HICs) and low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). METHODS This was a secondary analysis of the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), a prospective observational cohort study of elective surgery in adults. Data collection occurred over a 7-day period. Severity of complications was graded using Clavien-Dindo and the simpler ISOS grading (mild, moderate or severe, based on guided investigator judgement). Severity grading was compared using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Data are presented as frequencies and ICC values (with 95 per cent c.i.). The analysis was stratified by income status of the country, comparing HICs with LMICs. RESULTS A total of 44 814 patients were recruited from 474 hospitals in 27 countries (19 HICs and 8 LMICs). Some 7508 patients (16·8 per cent) experienced at least one postoperative complication, equivalent to 11 664 complications in total. Using the ISOS classification, 5504 of 11 664 complications (47·2 per cent) were graded as mild, 4244 (36·4 per cent) as moderate and 1916 (16·4 per cent) as severe. Using Clavien-Dindo, 6781 of 11 664 complications (58·1 per cent) were graded as I or II, 1740 (14·9 per cent) as III, 2408 (20·6 per cent) as IV and 735 (6·3 per cent) as V. Agreement between classification systems was poor overall (ICC 0·41, 95 per cent c.i. 0·20 to 0·55), and in LMICs (ICC 0·23, 0·05 to 0·38) and HICs (ICC 0·46, 0·25 to 0·59). CONCLUSION Caution is recommended when using a treatment approach to grade complications in global surgery studies, as this may introduce bias unintentionally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - K E Greaves
- Adult Critical Care Unit, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - A Patel
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - T Ahmad
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | | | - E Futier
- Université Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, Inserm, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Clermont-Ferrand, Département de Médecine Périopératoire, F-63000 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - M Biais
- Bordeaux University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - K Slim
- Department of digestive surgery CHU Clermont-Ferrand Place Lucie Aubrac 63003 Clermont-Ferrand France
| | - R M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Abbott TEF, Pearse RM, Cuthbertson BH, Wijeysundera DN, Ackland GL. Cardiac vagal dysfunction and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery: a planned secondary analysis of the measurement of Exercise Tolerance before surgery study. Br J Anaesth 2018; 122:188-197. [PMID: 30686304 PMCID: PMC6354047 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.10.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Revised: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aetiology of perioperative myocardial injury is poorly understood and not clearly linked to pre-existing cardiovascular disease. We hypothesised that loss of cardioprotective vagal tone [defined by impaired heart rate recovery ≤12 beats min−1 (HRR ≤12) 1 min after cessation of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing] was associated with perioperative myocardial injury. Methods We conducted a pre-defined, secondary analysis of a multi-centre prospective cohort study of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Participants were aged ≥40 yr undergoing non-cardiac surgery. The exposure was impaired HRR (HRR≤12). The primary outcome was postoperative myocardial injury, defined by serum troponin concentration within 72 h after surgery. The analysis accounted for established markers of cardiac risk [Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT pro-BNP)]. Results A total of 1326 participants were included [mean age (standard deviation), 64 (10) yr], of whom 816 (61.5%) were male. HRR≤12 occurred in 548 patients (41.3%). Myocardial injury was more frequent amongst patients with HRR≤12 [85/548 (15.5%) vs HRR>12: 83/778 (10.7%); odds ratio (OR), 1.50 (1.08–2.08); P=0.016, adjusted for RCRI). HRR declined progressively in patients with increasing numbers of RCRI factors. Patients with ≥3 RCRI factors were more likely to have HRR≤12 [26/36 (72.2%) vs 0 factors: 167/419 (39.9%); OR, 3.92 (1.84–8.34); P<0.001]. NT pro-BNP greater than a standard prognostic threshold (>300 pg ml−1) was more frequent in patients with HRR≤12 [96/529 (18.1%) vs HRR>12 59/745 (7.9%); OR, 2.58 (1.82–3.64); P<0.001]. Conclusions Impaired HRR is associated with an increased risk of perioperative cardiac injury. These data suggest a mechanistic role for cardiac vagal dysfunction in promoting perioperative myocardial injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | - R M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - B H Cuthbertson
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada; University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - D N Wijeysundera
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada; Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - G L Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Association of preoperative anaemia with postoperative morbidity and mortality: an observational cohort study in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:1227-1235. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.08.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
|
24
|
Ackland GL, Galley HF, Shelley B, Lambert DG. Perioperative medicine and UK plc. Br J Anaesth 2018; 122:3-7. [PMID: 30579403 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 09/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G L Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - H F Galley
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - B Shelley
- Academic Unit of Anaesthesia, Pain & Critical Care Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - D G Lambert
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Management, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Preoperative systemic inflammation and perioperative myocardial injury: prospective observational multicentre cohort study of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2018; 122:180-187. [PMID: 30686303 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Revised: 08/26/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic inflammation is pivotal in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. As inflammation can directly cause cardiomyocyte injury, we hypothesised that established systemic inflammation, as reflected by elevated preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >4, predisposes patients to perioperative myocardial injury. METHODS We prospectively recruited 1652 patients aged ≥45 yr who underwent non-cardiac surgery in two UK centres. Serum high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) concentrations were measured on the first three postoperative days. Clinicians and investigators were blinded to the troponin results. The primary outcome was perioperative myocardial injury, defined as hsTnT≥14 ng L-1 within 3 days after surgery. We assessed whether myocardial injury was associated with preoperative NLR>4, activated reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation in circulating monocytes, or both. Multivariable logistic regression analysis explored associations between age, sex, NLR, Revised Cardiac Risk Index, individual leukocyte subsets, and myocardial injury. Flow cytometric quantification of ROS was done in 21 patients. Data are presented as n (%) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Preoperative NLR>4 was present in 239/1652 (14.5%) patients. Myocardial injury occurred in 405/1652 (24.5%) patients and was more common in patients with preoperative NLR>4 [OR: 2.56 (1.92-3.41); P<0.0001]. Myocardial injury was independently associated with lower absolute preoperative lymphocyte count [OR 1.80 (1.50-2.17); P<0.0001] and higher absolute preoperative monocyte count [OR 1.93 (1.12-3.30); P=0.017]. Monocyte ROS generation correlated with NLR (r=0.47; P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative NLR>4 is associated with perioperative myocardial injury, independent of conventional risk factors. Systemic inflammation may contribute to the development of perioperative myocardial injury. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01842568.
Collapse
|
26
|
Ladha K, Beattie W, Tait G, Wijeysundera D. Association between preoperative ambulatory heart rate and postoperative myocardial injury: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Anaesth 2018; 121:722-729. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2018] [Revised: 05/28/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
27
|
Pinto BB, Walder B. Heart rate as a predictor and a therapeutic target of cardiac ischemic complications after non-cardiac surgery. A narrative review. TRENDS IN ANAESTHESIA AND CRITICAL CARE 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tacc.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
28
|
Walker SLM, Abbott TEF, Brown K, Pearse RM, Ackland GL. Perioperative management of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers: a survey of perioperative medicine practitioners. PeerJ 2018; 6:e5061. [PMID: 30042876 PMCID: PMC6055831 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.5061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) are the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications in higher-risk surgical patients. However, there is no clinical consensus on their use in the perioperative period, in part, due to an inconsistent evidence-base. To help inform the design of a large multi-centre randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN17251494), we undertook a questionnaire-based survey exploring variability in ACEi/ARB prescribing in perioperative practice. Methods The online survey included perioperative scenarios to examine how consistent respondents were with their stated routine preoperative practice. Clinicians with an academic interest in perioperative medicine were primarily targeted between July and September 2017. STROBE guidelines for observational research and ANZCA Trials Group Survey Reporting recommendations were adhered to. Results 194 responses were received, primarily from clinicians practicing in the UK. A similar minority of respondents continue ACEi (n = 57; 30%) and ARBs (n = 62; 32%) throughout the perioperative period. However, timing of preoperative cessation was highly variable, and rarely influenced by the pharmacokinetics of individual ACE-i/ARBs. Respondents’ stated routine practice was frequently misaligned with their management of common pre- and postoperative scenarios involving continuation or restarting ACE-i/ARBs. Discussion This survey highlights many inconsistencies amongst clinicians’ practice in perioperative ACE-i/ARB management. Studies designed to reveal an enhanced understanding of perioperative mechanisms at play, coupled with randomised controlled trials, are required to rationally inform the clinical management of ACE-i/ARBs in patients most at risk of postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie L M Walker
- William Harvey Research Institute, QMUL, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Tom E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, QMUL, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Katherine Brown
- William Harvey Research Institute, QMUL, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rupert M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, QMUL, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth L Ackland
- William Harvey Research Institute, QMUL, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Duncan D, Wijeysundera DN. Preoperative Cardiac Evaluation of the Patient Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery. CURRENT ANESTHESIOLOGY REPORTS 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s40140-018-0247-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
30
|
Abbott TEF, Ahmad T, Phull MK, Fowler AJ, Hewson R, Biccard BM, Chew MS, Gillies M, Pearse RM. The surgical safety checklist and patient outcomes after surgery: a prospective observational cohort study, systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2018; 120:146-155. [PMID: 29397122 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Revised: 07/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The surgical safety checklist is widely used to improve the quality of perioperative care. However, clinicians continue to debate the clinical effectiveness of this tool. METHODS Prospective analysis of data from the International Surgical Outcomes Study (ISOS), an international observational study of elective in-patient surgery, accompanied by a systematic review and meta-analysis of published literature. The exposure was surgical safety checklist use. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. In the ISOS cohort, a multivariable multi-level generalized linear model was used to test associations. To further contextualise these findings, we included the results from the ISOS cohort in a meta-analysis. Results are reported as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS We included 44 814 patients from 497 hospitals in 27 countries in the ISOS analysis. There were 40 245 (89.8%) patients exposed to the checklist, whilst 7508 (16.8%) sustained ≥1 postoperative complications and 207 (0.5%) died before hospital discharge. Checklist exposure was associated with reduced mortality [odds ratio (OR) 0.49 (0.32-0.77); P<0.01], but no difference in complication rates [OR 1.02 (0.88-1.19); P=0.75]. In a systematic review, we screened 3732 records and identified 11 eligible studies of 453 292 patients including the ISOS cohort. Checklist exposure was associated with both reduced postoperative mortality [OR 0.75 (0.62-0.92); P<0.01; I2=87%] and reduced complication rates [OR 0.73 (0.61-0.88); P<0.01; I2=89%). CONCLUSIONS Patients exposed to a surgical safety checklist experience better postoperative outcomes, but this could simply reflect wider quality of care in hospitals where checklist use is routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - T Ahmad
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK
| | - M K Phull
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - A J Fowler
- Guys and St. Thomas's NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK
| | - R Hewson
- The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London E1 1BB, UK
| | - B M Biccard
- Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Groote Schuur Hospital, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - M S Chew
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 58185 Linköping, Sweden
| | - M Gillies
- Department of Anaesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH48 3DF, UK
| | - R M Pearse
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London EC1M 6BQ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abbott TEF, Gooneratne M, McNeill J, Lee A, Levett DZH, Grocott MPW, Swart M, MacDonald N. Inter-observer reliability of preoperative cardiopulmonary exercise test interpretation: a cross-sectional study. Br J Anaesth 2017; 120:475-483. [PMID: 29452804 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.11.071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 11/13/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the increasing importance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) for preoperative risk assessment, the reliability of CPET interpretation is unclear. We aimed to assess inter-observer reliability of preoperative CPET. METHODS We conducted a prospective, multi-centre, observational study of preoperative CPET interpretation. Participants were professionals with previous experience or training in CPET, assessed by a standardized questionnaire. Each participant interpreted 100 tests using standardized software. The CPET variables of interest were oxygen consumption at the anaerobic threshold (AT) and peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak). Inter-observer reliability was measured using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) with a random effects model. Results are presented as ICC with 95% confidence interval, where ICC of 1 represents perfect agreement and ICC of 0 represents no agreement. RESULTS Participants included 8/28 (28.6%) clinical physiologists, 10 (35.7%) junior doctors, and 10 (35.7%) consultant doctors. The median previous experience was 140 (inter-quartile range 55-700) CPETs. After excluding the first 10 tests (acclimatization) for each participant and missing data, the primary analysis of AT and VO2 peak included 2125 and 2414 tests, respectively. Inter-observer agreement for numerical values of AT [ICC 0.83 (0.75-0.90)] and VO2 peak [ICC 0.88 (0.84-0.92)] was good. In a post hoc analysis, inter-observer agreement for identification of the presence of a reportable AT was excellent [ICC 0.93 (0.91-0.95)] and a reportable VO2 peak was moderate [0.73 (0.64-0.80)]. CONCLUSIONS Inter-observer reliability of interpretation of numerical values of two commonly used CPET variables was good (>80%). However, inter-observer agreement regarding the presence of a reportable value was less consistent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T E F Abbott
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK; Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | | - A Lee
- William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - D Z H Levett
- Critical Care Research Group, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton-University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - M P W Grocott
- Critical Care Research Group, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton-University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - M Swart
- South Devon Healthcare NHS Trust, Torbay, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abbott T, Pearse R, Archbold R, Wragg A, Kam E, Ahmad T, Khan A, Niebrzegowska E, Rodseth R, Devereaux P, Ackland G. Association between preoperative pulse pressure and perioperative myocardial injury: an international observational cohort study of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:78-86. [DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|