Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (GISE) and Italian Society of Arterial Hypertension (SIIA) Position Paper on the role of renal denervation in the management of the difficult-to-treat hypertension

Renal denervation (RDN) is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension. The blood pressure (BP)-lowering efficacy of RDN is comparable to those of many single antihypertensive medications and it allows to consider the RDN as a valuable option for the treatment of difficult to treat hypertension together with lifestyle modifications and medical therapy. A multidisciplinary team is of pivotal importance from the selection of the patient candidate for the procedure to the post-procedural management. Further studies are needed to investigate the effect of RDN on clinical outcomes and to better identify the predictors of BP response to RDN in order to recognize the patients who are more likely to benefit from the procedure.

The role of renal denervation in cardiology and beyond: An updated comprehensive review and future directives

Renal denervation (RDN) is a minimally invasive intervention performed by denervation of the nervous fibers in the renal plexus, which decreases sympathetic activity. These sympathetic nerves influence various physiological functions that regulate blood pressure (BP), including intravascular volume, electrolyte composition, and vascular tone. Although proven effective in some trials, controversial trials, such as the Controlled Trial of Renal Denervation for Resistant Hypertension (SYMPLICITY-HTN3), have demonstrated contradictory results for the effectiveness of RDN in resistant hypertension (HTN). In the treatment of HTN, individuals with primary HTN are expected to experience greater benefits compared to those with secondary HTN due to the diverse underlying causes of secondary HTN. Beyond its application for HTN, RDN has also found utility in addressing cardiac arrhythmias, such as atrial fibrillation, and managing cases of heart failure. Non-cardiogenic applications of RDN include reducing the intensity of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), overcoming insulin resistance, and in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This article aims to provide a comprehensive review of RDN and its uses in cardiology and beyond, along with providing future directions and perspectives.

Current problems in renal denervation and a hope to break the stage

Renal denervation (RDN) is currently confronted with the considerable heterogeneity of different post-procedural blood pressure responses. The challenges predominantly arise from not only the lack of selection of appropriate responders but also the absence of detection for the successful endpoints of intervention. In this paper, we summarize the significant characteristics of potentially appropriate hypertensive patients and propose a hopeful way to improve the accuracy of RDN, that is, the application of three-dimensional reconstruction technology combined with electrical renal nerve stimulation to guide the radiofrequency catheter ablation, which may promote the development of selective and accurate RDN in real-world clinical practice. This paper focuses on two current critical concerns of renal denervation (RDN): appropriate patient selection and the improvement in the accuracy of selective RDN. A hopeful way of accurate RDN may be the combination of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems for the renal artery with modified renal nerve stimulation (RNS) techniques and technology for appropriate hypertensive candidates.

Evening home blood pressure and pulse rate: age-specific associations with nocturia severity

Previous studies have reported a significant relationship between hypertension and nocturia. However, the underlying pathophysiology associated with pulse rate (PR) remains unclear. In the Japan Morning Surge-Home Blood Pressure Study, a self-administered nocturia questionnaire and evening home blood pressure (BP) and PR measurements (taken on a mean of 11.2 days) were performed on 4310 patients with one or more cardiovascular risk factors (mean: 64.9 years old; 47% male). According to the number of nighttime voids, the study population was divided into three groups (no voids: n = 2382; 1 void: n = 847; ≥2 voids per night: n = 1082). In the multinomial logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounders, diuretic use (OR, 1.23; 95%CI, 1.01-1.50; p < 0.05) was significantly associated with one nocturnal void, whereas evening home systolic BP (SBP) (OR per 1 SD, 1.14; 95%CI, 1.05-1.24; p < 0.01) and evening home PR (OR per 1 SD, 1.12; 95%CI: 1.02-1.24; p < 0.05) were significantly associated with multiple nocturnal voids. In the younger group (<65 years), only evening home PR was significantly related to multiple nighttime voids (p < 0.01), whereas in the older group (≥65 years), only evening home SBP was significantly related to multiple nighttime voids (p = 0.02). In this study, both higher evening home PR and higher evening home SBP were associated with multiple nighttime voids, with the former playing a greater role in the younger participants, and the latter more often associating the older group. An age-stratified approach to reduce the burden of BP or PR might be important to improve sleep quality.

Renal Denervation as a Complementary Treatment Option for Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension: A Situation Assessment

Uncontrolled arterial hypertension is a major global health issue. Catheter-based renal denervation has shown to lower blood pressure in sham-controlled trials and represents a device-based, complementary treatment option for hypertension. In this situation assessment, the authors, who are practicing experts in hypertension, nephrology, general practice and cardiology in the Republic of Ireland, discuss the current evidence base for the BP-lowering efficacy and safety of catheter-based renal denervation with different modalities. Although important questions remain regarding the identification of responders, and long-term efficacy and safety of the intervention, renal denervation has the potential to provide much-needed help to address hypertension and its adverse consequences. The therapeutic approach needs to be multidisciplinary and personalised to take into account the perspective of patients and healthcare professionals in a shared decision-making process.

Radio frequency-based renal denervation: a story of simplicity?

Radio frequency-based renal denervation is a safe and effective way of lowering blood pressure, a common condition associated with high cardiovascular risk. Several catheters have been developed to administer energy to the renal arteries and their side branches, thereby modulating sympathetic renal activity. The Symplicity Flex™ and Symplicity Spyral™ are first- and second-generation devices, respectively, for radio frequency-based renal denervation. There is a continuous need to further improve and adjust interventional antihypertensive therapies. Several randomized controlled trials have been conducted to investigate the safety and efficacy of these catheters and most were able to show radio frequency-based renal denervation to be feasible, safe and effective in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients with and without concomitant antihypertensive medication. Herein, the authors discuss the pathophysiologic concepts of renal denervation and its procedural approaches, report catheter designs, summarize clinical trials outcomes and, finally, discuss real-world evidence.

Effects of Renal Denervation on Sympathetic Nerve Traffic and Correlates in Drug-Resistant and Uncontrolled Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether and to what extent the reported blood pressure (BP) lowering effects of renal denervation (RDN) are associated with a central sympathoinhibition is controversial. We examined this issue by performing a meta-analysis of the microneurographic studies evaluating the BP and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses to RDN in drug-resistant or uncontrolled hypertension (RHT).

METHODS

This analysis comprised 11 studies including a total of >400 RHT patients undergoing RDN and were followed up for 6 months. Evaluation was extended to the relationships of MSNA with clinic heart rate and BP changes associated with RDN.

RESULTS

MSNA showed a significant reduction after RDN (-4.78 bursts/100 heart beats; P<0.04), which was also accompanied by a significant systolic (-11.45 mm Hg; P<0.002) and diastolic (-5.24 mm Hg; P=0.0001) BP decrease. No significant quantitative relationship was found between MSNA and systolic (r=-0.96, P=0.19) or diastolic BP (r=-0.97, P=0.23) responses to RDN. This was also the case for clinic heart rate (r=0.53, P=0.78, respectively), whose post RDN values were not significant different from the pre-RDN ones. More than 10 renal nerves ablations were found to be needed for obtaining a significant sympathoinhibition.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis, the first ever done on the MSNA responses to RDN, shows that in a consistent number of RHT patients RDN is associated with a significant, although modest, central sympathoinhibition, which appears to be unrelated to the BP lowering effects of the procedure. Thus factors other than the central sympathetic outflow inhibition may concur at the BP lowering effects of RDN.

2022 Renal denervation therapy for the treatment of hypertension: a statement from the Thai Hypertension Society

Hypertension remains a significant risk factor for major cardiovascular events worldwide. Poor adherence to treatment is extremely common in clinical practice, leading to uncontrolled hypertension. However, some patients with resistant hypertension still have uncontrolled blood pressure despite good medical compliance. A specific group of patients also develop adverse reactions to many blood pressure-lowering medications. These scenarios indicate that innovative strategies to lower blood pressure in challenging cases of hypertension are needed. The blood pressure-lowering efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation therapy to decrease sympathetic tone has been confirmed in many publications in recent years. Apart from both the invasiveness and the expensiveness of this technology, appropriate case selection to undergo this procedure is still developing. The utilization of renal denervation therapy for hypertension treatment in Thailand has lasted for 10 years with a good response in most cases. Currently, only certain interventionists at a few medical schools in Thailand can perform this procedure. However, more physicians are now interested in applying this technology to their patients. The Thai Hypertension Society Committee has reviewed updated information to provide principles for the appropriate utilization of renal denervation therapy. The blood pressure-lowering mechanism, efficacy, suitable patient selection, pre- and postprocedural assessment and procedural safety of renal denervation are included in this statement.

Differential effects of renal denervation on skin and muscle sympathetic nerve traffic in resistant and uncontrolled hypertension

PURPOSE

Renal denervation (RDN) exerts sympathoinhibitory effects. No information is available, however, on whether these effects have a regional or a more generalized behavior.

METHODS

In 14 patients with resistant hypertension (RHT, age 58.3 ± 2.2 years, mean ± SEM), we recorded muscle and skin sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA and SSNA, respectively) using the microneurographic technique, before, 1 month, and 3 months after RDN. Measurements included clinic blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), 24-h BP and HR, as well as routine laboratory and echocardiographic variables. Ten age-matched RHT patients who did not undergo RDN served as controls.

RESULTS

MSNA, but not SSNA, was markedly higher in RHT. RDN caused a significant reduction in MSNA 1 month after RDN, with this reduction increasing after 3 months (from 68.1 ± 2.5 to 64.8 ± 2.4 and 63.1 ± 2.6 bursts/100 heartbeats, P < 0.05). This effect was not accompanied by any significant change in SSNA (from 13.1 ± 0.5 to 13.4 ± 0.6 and 13.3 ± 0.4 bursts/min, P = NS). No quantitative or, in some cases, qualitative relationship was found between BP and the MSNA reduction induced by RDN. No significant changes in various sympathetic markers were detected in the control group who did not undergo RDN and were followed for 3-months observation.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide the first evidence that RDN exerts heterogeneous effects on sympathetic cardiovascular drive, inducing a marked reduction in MSNA but not in SSNA, which appears to be within the normal range in this condition.These effects may depend on the different reflex modulation regulating neuroadrenergic drive in these cardiovascular districts.

Nighttime hemodynamic phenotype. A novel risk factor for cardiovascular disease, especially heart failure: the practitioner-based nationwide JAMP study

BACKGROUND

Non-dipper and riser patterns of nocturnal blood pressure (BP) are risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), including heart failure (HF). However, the risk associated with a disrupted nocturnal pattern of heart rate is not well known.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether the nighttime heart rate is a risk factor for HF, alongside nighttime BP phenotype.

METHODS

The practitioner-based, nationwide, prospective Japan Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring Prospective (JAMP) study included patients with ≥ 1 CVD risk factor but without symptomatic CVD at baseline. All patients underwent 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline and were followed annually. Nocturnal heart rate dipping (%) was calculated as 100•[1 - nighttime/daytime heart rate].

RESULTS

During a mean 4.5 years' follow-up in 6,359 patients (mean age 68.6 years), there were 306 CVD events (119 stroke, 99 coronary artery disease, and 88 HF). A 10-beats/min increase in nighttime heart rate was significantly associated with a 36-47% increase in the risk of total CVD, stroke and HF events independently of office SBP and nighttime SBP (all p < 0.005). The CVD and HF risk associated with nocturnal heart rate dipping status was independent of office and 24-h systolic BP and nocturnal BP dipping status (p < 0.001). Performance of the final model for predicting HF including BP parameters was significantly improved by the addition of nocturnal heart rate dipping patterns (p = 0.038; C-statistic 0.852).

CONCLUSION

Nighttime non-dipper and riser patterns of heart rate were associated with CVD especially HF, independently and additively of nocturnal BP dipping status, indicating the importance of antihypertensive strategies targeting nighttime hemodynamics.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/ ; Unique identifier: UMIN000020377.

The position of renal denervation in treatment of hypertension: an expert consensus statement

Hypertension is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease. In the Netherlands, there are approximately 2.8 million people with hypertension. Despite treatment recommendations including lifestyle changes and antihypertensive drugs, most patients do not meet guideline-recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. In order to improve BP control and lower the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN) has been introduced and studied as a non-pharmacological approach. While early data on the efficacy of RDN showed conflicting results, improvements in treatment protocols and study design resulted in robust new evidence supporting the potential of the technology to improve patient care in hypertensive subjects. Recently, 5 randomised sham-controlled trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the technology. Modelling studies have further shown that RDN is cost-effective in the Dutch healthcare setting. Given the undisputable disease burden along with the shortcomings of current therapeutic options, we postulate a new, clearly framed indication for RDN as an adjunct in the treatment of hypertension. The present consensus statement summarises current guideline-recommended BP targets, proposed workup and treatment for hypertension, and position of RDN for those patients with primary hypertension who do not meet guideline-recommended BP targets (see central illustration).

The enigma of resistant hypertension: from lifestyle changes and pharmacological treatment to renal denervation

Resistant hypertension consists in the failure to achieve effective control of blood pressure despite the use of at least three drugs, including a diuretic, at the maximum tolerated dosage. Despite the progress made in terms of improving awareness and effectiveness of the available therapeutic strategies, the percentage of patients with resistant hypertension represents up to 18% of the entire hypertensive population. The management of resistant hypertension includes the combination of different strategies from lifestyle changes to complex interventional procedures. Lifestyle interventions include reducing salt intake, weight loss, quitting smoking and alcohol consumption, and performing aerobic physical activity. With regard to drug therapy, international guidelines recommend the introduction of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist or, if not tolerated, of a loop diuretic, or of the beta-blocker bisoprolol, or of the alpha-blocker doxazosin. In the last few years, promising results have been obtained from studies that have evaluated the efficacy and safety of the denervation of the renal arteries by ablation. This procedure may constitute an increasingly widespread option for those patients suffering from resistant hypertension despite the use of different drug classes, or who are intolerant or poorly adherent to medical therapy.

Renal denervation in the antihypertensive arsenal - knowns and known unknowns

Even though it has been more than a decade since renal denervation (RDN) was first used to treat hypertension and an intense effort on researching this therapy has been made, it is still not clear how RDN fits into the antihypertensive arsenal. There is no question that RDN lowers blood pressure (BP), it does so to an extent at best corresponding to one antihypertensive drug. The procedure has an excellent safety record. However, it remains clinically impossible to predict whose BP responds to RDN and whose does not. Long-term efficacy data on BP reduction are still unconvincing despite the recent results in the SPYRAL HTN-ON MED trial; experimental studies indicate that reinnervation is occurring after RDN. Although BP is an acceptable surrogate endpoint, there is complete lack of outcome data with RDN. Clear indications for RDN are lacking although patients with resistant hypertension, those with documented increase in activity of the sympathetic system and perhaps those who desire to take fewest medication may be considered.

Renal Sympathetic Denervation for Hypertension

Arterial hypertension is the most prevalent global modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Despite the availability of numerous pharmacologic treatments, many patients do not achieve guideline-recommended blood pressure targets. Therefore, renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), a process in which catheter-directed techniques are used to ablate portions of the renal artery to reduce sympathetic activity, has been extensively investigated as a complementary and nonpharmacologic approach for the treatment of arterial hypertension. This review seeks to discuss the pathophysiological rationale of this strategy, to survey its history and development, and to highlight the current clinical evidence and possible future directions of its employment. In sum, RDN has demonstrated itself to be a safe and well-tolerated endovascular intervention that can reliably contribute to improved blood pressure control and, perhaps ultimately, significant cardiovascular prognosis.

Present Evidence of Determinants to Predict the Efficacy of Renal Denervation

Sympathetic overactivation is one of the main contributors to development and progress of hypertension. Renal denervation (RDN) has been evidenced by series of clinical trials for its efficacy and safety to treat overactivated sympathetic nervous system induced diseases. However, the results were inconsistent and not all patients benefited from RDN. Appropriate patient selection and intraoperative factors to improve the efficacy of RDN need to be solved urgently. Over the decade, research studies on the correlations between indicators and the antihypertensive effects have been conducted and made a fairly well progress. Herein, we comprehensively reviewed the research studies on how to make RDN more predictable or improve the efficacy of RDN and summarized these potential indicators or devices which might be applied in clinical settings.

Twenty-Four-Hour Pulsatile Hemodynamics Predict Brachial Blood Pressure Response to Renal Denervation in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Trial

Renal denervation (RDN) lowers blood pressure (BP), but BP response is variable in individual patients. We investigated whether measures of pulsatile hemodynamics, obtained during 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring, predict BP drop following RDN.

Renal denervation in resistant hypertension: a review of clinical trials and future perspectives

A previous report using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey demonstrated an increase in the prevalence of resistant hypertension, which does not respond to traditional therapy and medication. Studies using various animal hypertensive models have demonstrated significant blood pressure (BP) reduction following renal artery denervation (RDN). Catheter-based RDN became available in clinical trials as a possible treatment option for resistant hypertension. Although first clinical trials of RDN have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this treatment mortality for lowering BP in patients with resistant hypertension, the role of RDN has been questioned since the results of the Symplicity HTN-3 trial. Considering the ethnic differences demonstrated in the Symplicity HTN-Japan and Global Symplicity registry, by contrast, RDN might be an effective for resistant hypertension in Asian population. Here, we discuss RDN applications and technology, the old and new clinical evidence of RDN, patients' selection of RDN responder, and optimization of RDN procedure in this review. The available evidence demonstrates that RDN could be effective in carefully selected patients with resistant hypertension, paving the way for future research in this area.

An Update on Refractory Hypertension

Purpose of Review

To update on definition, diagnosis, prevalence, patient characteristics, pathophysiology, and treatment of refractory hypertension (RfHTN).

Recent Findings

Refractory hypertension (RfHTN) is defined as blood pressure (BP) that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 5 antihypertensive medications of different classes, including a long-acting thiazide diuretic and a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) at maximal or maximally tolerated doses. This new phenotype is different from resistant hypertension (RHTN), defined as BP that is uncontrolled despite using ≥ 3 medications, commonly a long-acting calcium channel blocker (CCB), a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]), and a diuretic. The RHTN phenotype includes controlled RHTN, BP that is controlled on 4 or more medications. RfHTN is largely attributable to increased sympathetic activity, unlike RHTN, which is mainly due to increased intravascular fluid volume frequently caused by hyperaldosteronism and chronic excessive sodium ingestion. Compared to those with controlled RHTN, patients with RfHTN have a higher prevalence of target organ damage and do not have elevated aldosterone levels. Ongoing clinical trials are assessing the safety and efficacy of using devices to aid with BP control in patients with RfHTN.

Summary

RfHTN is a separate entity from RHTN and is generally attributable to increased sympathetic activity.

Clinical Trial Design Principles and Outcomes Definitions for Device-Based Therapies for Hypertension: A Consensus Document From the Hypertension Academic Research Consortium

The clinical implications of hypertension in addition to a high prevalence of both uncontrolled blood pressure and medication nonadherence promote interest in developing device-based approaches to hypertension treatment. The expansion of device-based therapies and ongoing clinical trials underscores the need for consistency in trial design, conduct, and definitions of clinical study elements to permit trial comparability and data poolability. Standardizing methods of blood pressure assessment, effectiveness measures beyond blood pressure alone, and safety outcomes are paramount. The Hypertension Academic Research Consortium (HARC) document represents an integration of evolving evidence and consensus opinion among leading experts in cardiovascular medicine and hypertension research with regulatory perspectives on clinical trial design and methodology. The HARC document integrates the collective information among device-based therapies for hypertension to better address existing challenges and identify unmet needs for technologies proposed to treat the world’s leading cause of death and disability. Consistent with the Academic Research Consortium charter, this document proposes pragmatic consensus clinical design principles and outcomes definitions for studies aimed at evaluating device-based hypertension therapies.

Effect of Presence versus Absence of Hypertension on Admission Heart Rate-Associated Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background and Aims

Heart rate (HR) and hypertension are both important risk factors for adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with established coronary artery disease (CAD). We sought to evaluate whether hypertension can modify the effect of admission HR on adverse CV events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

A total of 1056 patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were analyzed. All patients were classified into three groups according to the tertiles of admission HR (T1: ≤66 bpm, n = 369; T2: 67–73 bpm, n = 322; and T3: ≥74 bpm, n = 365). The primary endpoint was defined as major adverse CV events (MACEs), including all-cause death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or unplanned repeat revascularization. The multivariate Cox regression model was performed to evaluate the association of admission HR with MACE stratified by hypertension.

Results

During the median follow-up of 30 months, a total of 232 patients developed at least one event. After adjusting for other covariates, elevated admission HR was significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE only in patients with hypertension (when T1 was taken as a reference, the adjusted HR of T2 was 1.143 [95% CI: 0.700–1.864] and that of T3 was 2.062 [95% CI: 1.300–3.270]); however, in patients without hypertension, admission HR was not associated with the risk of MACE (when T1 was taken as a reference, the adjusted HR of T2 was 0.744 [0.406–1.364] and that of T3 was 0.614 [0.342–1.101]) (P=0.025 for interaction).

Conclusions

In patients with ACS undergoing PCI, the association of elevated admission HR with an increased risk of MACE was present in individuals with hypertension but not in those without hypertension. This finding suggests a potential benefit of HR control for ACS patients when they concomitantly have hypertension.

Renal denervation: basic and clinical evidence

Renal nerves have critical roles in regulating blood pressure and fluid volume, and their dysfunction is closely related with cardiovascular diseases. Renal nerves are composed of sympathetic efferent and sensory afferent nerves. Activation of the efferent renal sympathetic nerves induces renin secretion, sodium absorption, and increased renal vascular resistance, which lead to increased blood pressure and fluid retention. Afferent renal sensory nerves, which are densely innervated in the renal pelvic wall, project to the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus in the brain to modulate sympathetic outflow to the periphery, including the heart, kidneys, and arterioles. The effects of renal denervation on the cardiovascular system are mediated by both efferent denervation and afferent denervation. The first half of this review focuses on basic research using animal models of hypertension and heart failure, and addresses the therapeutic effects of renal denervation for hypertension and heart failure, including underlying mechanisms. The second half of this review focuses on clinical research related to catheter-based renal denervation in patients with hypertension. Randomized sham-controlled trials using second-generation devices, endovascular radiofrequency-based devices and ultrasound-based devices are reviewed and their results are assessed. This review summarizes the basic and clinical evidence of renal denervation to date, and discusses future prospects and potential developments in renal denervation therapy for cardiovascular diseases.

Effect of Renal Denervation for the Management of Heart Rate in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective:

The effect of renal denervation (RDN) on heart rate (HR) in patients with hypertension had been investigated in many studies, but the results were inconsistent. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy of RDN on HR control.

Methods:

Databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov, were searched until September 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or non-RCTs of RDN in hypertensive patients with outcome indicators, such as HR, were selected. Weighted mean difference (WMD) was calculated for evaluating the changes in HR from baseline using fixed-effects or random-effects models. The Spearman's correlation coefficients were used to identify the relationship between the changes of HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP).

Results:

In the current meta-analysis, 681 subjects from 16 individual studies were included. This study showed that RDN could reduce office HR in patients with hypertension [WMD = −1.93 (95% CI: −3.00 to −0.85, p < 0.001)]. In addition, 24-h HR and daytime HR were decreased after RDN [WMD = −1.73 (95% CI: −3.51 to −0.31, p = 0.017) and −2.67 (95% CI: −5.02 to −0.32, p = 0.026) respectively], but nighttime HR was not significantly influenced by RDN (WMD = −2.08, 95% CI: −4.57 to 0.42, p = 0.103). We found that the reduction of HR was highly related to the decrease of SBP (r = 0.658, p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Renal denervation could reduce office, 24-h, and daytime HR, but does not affect nighttime HR. And the effect is highly associated with blood pressure (BP) control.

Systematic Review Registration:

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier: CRD42021283065.

[Renal denervation : Really an alternative to reducing blood pressure?]

Since the current guidelines were published in 2018, a total of 5 sham-controlled high-quality studies evaluating renal denervation have been conducted and the results were published. These five studies clearly confirmed the efficacy and safety of renal denervation, which correspond to the knowledge of the Clinical Consensus Conference. Thus, an update of the guidelines for the treatment of arterial hypertension regarding the clinical significance of renal denervation is urgently necessary. For this reason, the position paper of the working group of the European Society of Hypertension on the current state of renal denervation was reviewed. An approval of this procedure can soon be expected. In Germany there is a diagnosis-related group (DRG) for the reimbursement of renal denervation, which was suspended due to the erroneous Symplicity 3 study. This DRG should be revived in practice by a structured process of the implementation of renal denervation. It will then be a joint task of treating physicians and specialists in certified centers to identify eligible patients. In the future, antihypertensive treatment will consist of three pillars: lifestyle measures, pharmacotherapy and interventional treatment. These three treatment options should not be regarded as competitive (which is better) but alternative (patient preference) and additive (the aim is blood pressure control). It is the task of the treating physician to provide the patient with the ideal treatment concept. Clearly, renal denervation will not replace antihypertensive pharmacotherapy; however, it can lead to a reduction of the drug burden and increase of patient adherence to medication. It represents an option of modern antihypertensive treatment and will also become increasingly more important in special patient groups.

Arterial hypertension - Clinical trials update 2021

AIM

This review aims to summarize and discuss some of the most relevant clinical trials in epidemiology, diagnostics, and treatment of hypertension published in 2020 and 2021.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The trials included in this review are related to hypertension onset age and risk for future cardiovascular disease, reliability of different blood pressure monitoring methods, role of exercise-induced hypertension, treatment of hypertension in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, management of hypertension high-risk patient groups, e.g., in the elderly (≥80 years) and patients with atrial fibrillation, and the interplay between nutrition and hypertension, as well as recent insights into renal denervation for treatment of hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypertension onset age, nighttime blood pressure levels and a riser pattern are relevant for the prognosis of future cardiovascular diseases. The risk of coronary heart disease appears to increase linearly with increasing exercise systolic blood pressure. Renin-angiotensin system blockers are not associated with an increased risk for a severe course of COVID-19. In elderly patients, a risk-benefit assessment of intensified blood pressure control should be individually evaluated. A J-shaped association between cardiovascular disease and achieved blood pressure could also be demonstrated in patients with atrial fibrillation on anticoagulation. Salt restriction and lifestyle modification remain effective options in treating hypertensive patients at low cardiovascular risk. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists show BP-lowering effects. Renal denervation should be considered as an additional or alternative treatment option in selected patients with uncontrolled hypertension.

Catheter-Based Renal Denervation Therapy: Evolution of Evidence and Future Directions

Motivated by the persistence of uncontrolled blood pressure and its public health impact, the development and evaluation of device-based therapies for hypertension has advanced at an accelerated pace to complement pharmaceutical and lifestyle intervention strategies. Countering widespread interest from early studies, the lack of demonstrable efficacy for renal denervation (RDN) in a large, sham-controlled randomized trial motivated revision of trial design and conduct to account for confounding variables of procedural technique, medication variability, and selection of both patients and end points. Now amidst varied trial design and methods, several sham-controlled, randomized trials have demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in blood pressure with RDN. With this momentum, additional studies are underway to position RDN as a potential part of standard therapy for the world's leading cause of death and disability. In parallel, further studies will address unresolved issues including durability of blood pressure lowering and reduction in antihypertensive medications, late-term safety, and impact on clinical outcomes. Identifying predictors of treatment effect and surveys of patient-reported outcomes and treatment preferences are also evolving areas of investigation. Aside from confirmatory studies of safety and effectiveness, these additional studies will further inform patient selection, expand experience with RDN in broader populations with hypertension, and provide guidance to how RDN may be incorporated into treatment pathways.

Renal denervation for resistant hypertension

BACKGROUND

Resistant hypertension is highly prevalent among the general hypertensive population and the clinical management of this condition remains problematic. Different approaches, including a more intensified antihypertensive therapy, lifestyle modifications or both, have largely failed to improve patients' outcomes and to reduce cardiovascular and renal risk. As renal sympathetic hyperactivity is a major driver of resistant hypertension, in the last decade renal sympathetic ablation (renal denervation) has been proposed as a possible therapeutic alternative to treat this condition.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the short- and long-term effects of renal denervation in individuals with resistant hypertension on clinical end points, including fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, hospital admissions, quality of life, blood pressure control, left ventricular hypertrophy, cardiovascular and metabolic profile and kidney function, as well as the potential adverse events related to the procedure.

SEARCH METHODS

For this updated review, the Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to 3 November 2020: Cochrane Hypertension's Specialised Register, CENTRAL (2020, Issue 11), Ovid MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase. The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (via CENTRAL) and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for ongoing trials. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. The searches had no language restrictions.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We considered randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared renal denervation to standard therapy or sham procedure to treat resistant hypertension, without language restriction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data and assessed study risk of bias. We summarised treatment effects on available clinical outcomes and adverse events using random-effects meta-analyses. We assessed heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using Chi² and I² statistics. We calculated summary treatment estimates as a mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) for continuous outcomes, and a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). Certainty of evidence has been assessed using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 15 eligible studies (1416 participants). In four studies, renal denervation was compared to sham procedure; in the remaining studies, renal denervation was tested against standard or intensified antihypertensive therapy. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias for allocation concealment and blinding.  When compared to control, there was low-certainty evidence that renal denervation had little or no effect on the risk of myocardial infarction (4 studies, 742 participants; RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.45 to 3.84), ischaemic stroke (5 studies, 892 participants; RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.33 to 2.95), unstable angina (3 studies, 270 participants; RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.09 to 2.89) or hospitalisation (3 studies, 743 participants; RR 1.24, 95% CI 0.50 to 3.11). Based on moderate-certainty evidence, renal denervation may reduce 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) systolic BP (9 studies, 1045 participants; MD -5.29 mmHg, 95% CI -10.46 to -0.13), ABPM diastolic BP (8 studies, 1004 participants; MD -3.75 mmHg, 95% CI -7.10 to -0.39) and office diastolic BP (8 studies, 1049 participants; MD -4.61 mmHg, 95% CI -8.23 to -0.99). Conversely, this procedure had little or no effect on office systolic BP (10 studies, 1090 participants; MD -5.92 mmHg, 95% CI -12.94 to 1.10). Moderate-certainty evidence suggested that renal denervation may not reduce serum creatinine (5 studies, 721 participants, MD 0.03 mg/dL, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.13) and may not increase the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or creatinine clearance (6 studies, 822 participants; MD -2.56 mL/min, 95% CI -7.53 to 2.42).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In patients with resistant hypertension, there is low-certainty evidence that renal denervation does not improve major cardiovascular outomes and renal function. Conversely, moderate-certainty evidence exists that it may improve 24h ABPM and diastolic office-measured BP. Future trials measuring patient-centred instead of surrogate outcomes, with longer follow-up periods, larger sample size and more standardised procedural methods are necessary to clarify the utility of this procedure in this population.

Effect of Heart Rate on the Outcome of Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension

BACKGROUND

Sham-controlled trials demonstrated safety and efficacy of renal denervation (RDN) to lower blood pressure (BP). Association of baseline heart rate with BP reduction after RDN is incompletely understood.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the impact of baseline heart rate on BP reduction without antihypertensive medications in the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (Global Clinical Study of Renal Denervation With the Symplicity Spyral Multi-electrode Renal Denervation System in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension in the Absence of Antihypertensive Medications) Pivotal trial.

METHODS

Patients removed from any antihypertensive medications were enrolled with office systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥150 and <180 mm Hg and randomized 1:1 to RDN or sham control. Patients were separated according to baseline office heart rate <70 or ≥70 beats/min. BP changes from baseline to 3 months between treatment arms were adjusted for baseline SBP using analysis of covariance.

RESULTS

Scatter plots of 3-month changes in 24-hour and office SBP illustrate a wide range of changes in SBP for different baseline heart rates. Treatment difference at 3 months between RDN and sham control with baseline office heart rate ≥70 beats/min for 24-hour SBP was -6.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -9.0 to -3.5 mm Hg) (P < 0.001) and for baseline office heart rate <70 beats/min it was -0.1 mm Hg (-3.8 to 3.6 mm Hg) (P = 0.97) with an interaction P value of 0.008. Results were similar for changes in office, daytime, and nighttime SBP at 3 months, with a greater reduction in SBP with baseline office heart rate ≥70 beats/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction in mean office, 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime SBP for RDN at 3 months was greater with baseline office heart rate ≥70 than <70 beats/min, suggesting an association between baseline heart rate and BP reduction after RDN. (SPYRAL PIVOTAL-SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Study; NCT02439749).

Autonomic nervous system activity changes in patients with hypertension and overweight: role and therapeutic implications

The incidence and prevalence of hypertension is increasing worldwide, with approximately 1.13 billion of people currently affected by the disease, often in association with other diseases such as diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, dyslipidemia/hypercholesterolemia, and obesity. The autonomic nervous system has been implicated in the pathophysiology of hypertension, and treatments targeting the sympathetic nervous system (SNS), a key component of the autonomic nervous system, have been developed; however, current recommendations provide little guidance on their use. This review discusses the etiology of hypertension, and more specifically the role of the SNS in the pathophysiology of hypertension and its associated disorders. In addition, the effects of current antihypertensive management strategies, including pharmacotherapies, on the SNS are examined, with a focus on imidazoline receptor agonists.

Evaluation of elevated heart rate as a sympathetic nervous system biomarker in essential hypertension

BACKGROUND

There is a need for an easily accessible biomarker of sympathetic nervous activation in essential hypertension, but none exists. Heart rate (HR) has been suggested, but requires validation, now doubly important as an elevated HR in hypertension has emerged as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.

METHODS

Isotope dilution methodology was used to measure total and regional noradrenaline spillover and adrenaline secretion rates in 30 patients with unmedicated essential hypertension and in a comparator group of 48 healthy participants with normal blood pressure. The particular interest was in the relationship of measured HR to cardiac noradrenaline spillover, the measure of cardiac sympathetic activity.

RESULTS

Sympathetic activation was present in the patients with essential hypertension, evident in significantly increased mean cardiac, renal and total noradrenaline spillover rates. Adrenaline secretion was normal. HR in hypertension correlated directly with cardiac noradrenaline spillover (r = 0.82, P = 9.3 × 10), but not with renal noradrenaline spillover or adrenaline secretion. 67% of the variance in HR was attributable to differences in cardiac sympathetic activity. Among hypertensive patients there was no internal correlation between cardiac noradrenaline spillover, renal noradrenaline spillover and adrenaline secretion; the sympathetic activation commonly was not 'global'. In healthy participants HR did not correlate with measures of sympathetic activity or adrenaline secretion.

CONCLUSION

When sympathetic activation exists in essential hypertension it is differentiated, not necessarily involving all sympathetic outflows. An elevated HR proved to be a biomarker of cardiac sympathetic activation but not activation of the renal sympathetic outflow. Identifying activation of the cardiac sympathetic outflow as the prime mechanism of hypertension tachycardia is relevant to therapies which should now be considered to minimize cardiovascular risk in this clinical setting. Is an elevated HR a valid biomarker of sympathetic activation in essential hypertension? Yes, but only for the cardiac sympathetic outflow. The unavoidable principle is that regional differentiation of sympathetic responses in essential hypertension means that no simple test can ever represent each and every sympathetic outflow.

Resting Heart Rate as a Cardiovascular Risk Factor in Hypertensive Patients: An Update

A large body of evidence has shown that resting heart rate (RHR) holds important prognostic information in several clinical conditions. In the majority of the general population studies, a graded association between RHR and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular (CV) disease, ischemic heart disease, and stroke has been observed. These associations appeared even stronger and more consistent in hypertensive patients. Studies performed with 24-hour ambulatory recording have shown that an elevated nighttime heart rate may confer an additional risk on top of office RHR. The mechanisms by which tachycardia alone or in association with sympathetic overactivity induces CV damage are well understood. Fast RHR is a strong predictor of future hypertension, metabolic disturbances, obesity, and diabetes. Several experimental lines of research point to high RHR as a main risk factor for the development of atherosclerosis, large artery stiffness, and CV disease. Elevated RHR is a common feature in patients with hypertension. Thus, there is a large segment of the hypertensive population that would benefit from a treatment able to decrease RHR. Improvement of unhealthy lifestyle should be the first goal in the management of the hypertensive patient with elevated RHR. Most clinical guidelines now recommend the use of combination therapies even in the initial treatment of hypertension. Although no results of clinical trials specifically designed to investigate the effect of RHR lowering in human beings without CV diseases are available, in hypertensive patients with high RHR a combination therapy including a cardiac slowing drug at optimized dose seems a sensible strategy. Tachycardia can be considered both as a marker of sympathetic overactivity and as a risk factor for cardiovascular events. In this sketch, the main cardiovascular and metabolic effects of increased sympathetic tone underlying high heart rate are shown. The link between tachycardia and cardiovascular events can be explained also by the direct hemodynamic action of heart rate on the arteries and the left ventricular (LV) wall.

Device Therapy of Hypertension

In the past decade, efforts to improve blood pressure control have looked beyond conventional approaches of lifestyle modification and drug therapy to embrace interventional therapies. Based upon animal and human studies clearly demonstrating a key role for the sympathetic nervous system in the etiology of hypertension, the newer technologies that have emerged are predominantly aimed at neuromodulation of peripheral nervous system targets. These include renal denervation, baroreflex activation therapy, endovascular baroreflex amplification therapy, carotid body ablation, and pacemaker-mediated programmable hypertension control. Of these, renal denervation is the most mature, and with a recent series of proof-of-concept trials demonstrating the safety and efficacy of radiofrequency and more recently ultrasound-based renal denervation, this technology is poised to become available as a viable treatment option for hypertension in the foreseeable future. With regard to baroreflex activation therapy, endovascular baroreflex amplification, carotid body ablation, and programmable hypertension control, these are developing technologies for which more human data are required. Importantly, central nervous system control of the circulation remains a poorly understood yet vital component of the hypertension pathway and mandates further investigation. Technology to improve blood pressure control through deep brain stimulation of key cardiovascular control territories is, therefore, of interest. Furthermore, alternative nonsympathomodulatory intervention targeting the hemodynamics of the circulation may also be worth exploring for patients in whom sympathetic drive is less relevant to hypertension perpetuation. Herein, we review the aforementioned technologies with an emphasis on the preclinical data that underpin their rationale and the human evidence that supports their use.

Regional differences in office and self-measured home heart rates in Asian hypertensive patients: AsiaBP@Home study

Increased heart rate is a predictor of cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and all‐cause mortality. In those with high heart rates, interventions for heart rate reduction have been associated with reductions in coronary events. Asia is a diverse continent, and the prevalences of hypertension and cardiovascular disease differ among its countries. The present analysis of AsiaBP@Home study data investigated differences among resting heart rates (RHRs) in 1443 hypertensive patients from three Asian regions: East Asia (N = 595), Southeast Asia (N = 680), and South Asia (N = 168). This is the first study to investigate self‐measured RHR values in different Asian countries/regions using the same validated home BP monitoring device (Omron HEM‐7130‐AP/HEM‐7131‐E). Subjects in South Asia had higher RHR values compared with the other two regions, and the regional tendency found in RHR values was different from that found in BP values. Even after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, habitual alcohol consumption, current smoking habit, shift worker, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, history of heart failure, and beta‐blocker use, both office and home RHR values in South Asia were the highest among Asia (mean values ± SE of office: East Asia [E] 75.2 ± 1.5 bpm, Southeast Asia [Se] 76.7 ± 1.5 bpm, South Asia [S] 81.9 ± 1.4 bpm; home morning: [E] 69.0 ± 1.2 bpm, [Se] 72.9 ± 1.2 bpm, [S] 74.9 ± 1.1 bpm; home evening: [E] 74.6 ± 1.2 bpm, [Se] 78.3 ± 1.2 bpm, [S] 83.8 ± 1.1 bpm). Given what is known about the impact of RHR on heart disease, our findings suggest the possible benefit of regionally tailored clinical strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention.

The current status of renal denervation for the treatment of arterial hypertension

Despite the availability of safe and effective antihypertensive drugs, blood pressure (BP) control to guideline-recommended target values is poor. Several device-based therapies have been introduced to lower BP. The most extensively investigated approach is catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation (RDN), which aims to interrupt the activity of afferent and efferent renal sympathetic nerves by applying radiofrequency energy, ultrasound energy, or injection of alcohol in the perivascular space. The second generation of placebo-controlled trials have provided solid evidence for the BP-lowering efficacy of radiofrequency- and ultrasound-based RDN in patients with and without concomitant pharmacological therapy. In addition, the safety profile of RDN appears to be excellent in all registries and clinical trials. However, there remain unsolved issues to be addressed. This review summarizes the rationale as well as the current evidence and discusses open questions and possible future indications of catheter-based RDN.

Elevated heart rate and cardiovascular risk in hypertension

Epidemiological studies have shown that chronically elevated resting heart rate (HR) is significantly associated with organ damage, morbidity and mortality in a wide range of patients including hypertensive patients. Evidence is also available that an increased HR reflects sympathetic nervous system overdrive which is also known to adversely affect organ structure and function and to increase the risk of unfavourable outcomes in several diseases. The causal relationship between elevated HR, organ damage, and cardiovascular outcomes can thus be explained by its relationship with sympathetic cardiovascular influences although evidence of sympathetically-independent adverse effect of HR increases per se makes it more complex. Interventions that target HR by modulating the sympathetic nervous system have therefore a strong pathophysiological and clinical rationale. As most clinical guidelines now recommend the use of combination therapies in patients with hypertension, it might be desirable to consider as combination components drugs which lower HR, if HR is elevated such as, according to guideliines, when it is above 80 b/min.

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring to Predict Response to Renal Denervation: A Post Hoc Analysis of the RADIANCE-HTN SOLO Study

Renal denervation (RDN) is effective in lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. The issue remains how to best identify potential responders. Ambulatory BP monitoring may be useful. Baseline nighttime systolic BP (SBP) ≥136 mm Hg and its variability (SD) ≥12 mm Hg in DENER-HTN trial or 24-hour heart rate ≥73.5 bpm in SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Trial were shown to predict the BP response to RDN. We applied these criteria to the patients with hypertension in the sham-controlled RADIANCE-HTN SOLO trial to predict the BP response to ultrasound RDN at 2 months while patients were maintained off medications. BP responders were defined as: clinical with 24-hour SBP <130 mm Hg (RDN: 22/64 versus sham: 7/58); meaningful with 24-hour SBP reduction ≥10 mm Hg (RDN: 24/64, sham: 7/58); and extreme with 24-hour SBP reduction above mean+2 SD of the SBP decrease in the sham group, that is, ≥16.5 mm Hg (RDN: 10/64 versus sham: 2/58). The predictive criteria reported above were tested for sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. The predictive value varied according to the definition of response, with the clinical definition being strongly influenced by regression to the mean. Baseline nighttime SBP and its variability, especially when combined, offered good specificity (>90% irrespective of definition) but low sensitivity (from 9.1% to 30% depending on the definition) to predict responders; the heart rate criterion had insufficient predictive value. This analysis suggests the potential role of nighttime SBP and its variability to predict BP response to RDN in patients with hypertension. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02649426.

Sodium Handling and Interaction in Numerous Organs

Salt (NaCl) is a prerequisite for life. Excessive intake of salt, however, is said to increase disease risk, including hypertension, arteriosclerosis, heart failure, renal disease, stroke, and cancer. Therefore, considerable research has been expended on the mechanism of sodium handling based on the current concepts of sodium balance. The studies have necessarily relied on relatively short-term experiments and focused on extremes of salt intake in humans. Ultra-long-term salt balance has received far less attention. We performed long-term salt balance studies at intakes of 6, 9, and 12 g/day and found that although the kidney remains the long-term excretory gate, tissue and plasma sodium concentrations are not necessarily the same and that urinary salt excretion does not necessarily reflect total-body salt content. We found that to excrete salt, the body makes a great effort to conserve water, resulting in a natriuretic-ureotelic principle of salt excretion. Of note, renal sodium handling is characterized by osmolyte excretion with anti-parallel water reabsorption, a state-of-affairs that is achieved through the interaction of multiple organs. In this review, we discuss novel sodium and water balance concepts in reference to our ultra-long-term study. An important key to understanding body sodium metabolism is to focus on water conservation, a biological principle to protect from dehydration, since excess dietary salt excretion into the urine predisposes to renal water loss because of natriuresis. We believe that our research direction is relevant not only to salt balance but also to cardiovascular regulatory mechanisms.

Efficacy of catheter-based renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications (SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED Pivotal): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based renal denervation has significantly reduced blood pressure in previous studies. Following a positive pilot trial, the SPYRAL HTN-OFF MED (SPYRAL Pivotal) trial was designed to assess the efficacy of renal denervation in the absence of antihypertensive medications.

METHODS

In this international, prospective, single-blinded, sham-controlled trial, done at 44 study sites in Australia, Austria, Canada, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Japan, the UK, and the USA, hypertensive patients with office systolic blood pressure of 150 mm Hg to less than 180 mm Hg were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a renal denervation or sham procedure. The primary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in 24-h systolic blood pressure and the secondary efficacy endpoint was baseline-adjusted change in office systolic blood pressure from baseline to 3 months after the procedure. We used a Bayesian design with an informative prior, so the primary analysis combines evidence from the pilot and Pivotal trials. The primary efficacy and safety analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02439749.

FINDINGS

From June 25, 2015, to Oct 15, 2019, 331 patients were randomly assigned to either renal denervation (n=166) or a sham procedure (n=165). The primary and secondary efficacy endpoints were met, with posterior probability of superiority more than 0·999 for both. The treatment difference between the two groups for 24-h systolic blood pressure was -3·9 mm Hg (Bayesian 95% credible interval -6·2 to -1·6) and for office systolic blood pressure the difference was -6·5 mm Hg (-9·6 to -3·5). No major device-related or procedural-related safety events occurred up to 3 months.

INTERPRETATION

SPYRAL Pivotal showed the superiority of catheter-based renal denervation compared with a sham procedure to safely lower blood pressure in the absence of antihypertensive medications.

FUNDING

Medtronic.

Renal Denervation in Asia: Consensus Statement of the Asia Renal Denervation Consortium

The Asia Renal Denervation Consortium consensus conference of Asian physicians actively performing renal denervation (RDN) was recently convened to share up-to-date information and regional perspectives, with the goal of consensus on RDN in Asia. First- and second-generation trials of RDN have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this treatment modality for lowering blood pressure in patients with resistant hypertension. Considering the ethnic differences of the hypertension profile and demographics of cardiovascular disease demonstrated in the SYMPLICITY HTN (Renal Denervation in Patients With Uncontrolled Hypertension)-Japan study and Global SYMPLICITY registry data from Korea and Taiwan, RDN might be an effective hypertension management strategy in Asia. Patient preference for device-based therapy should be considered as part of a shared patient-physician decision process. A practical population for RDN treatment could consist of Asian patients with uncontrolled essential hypertension, including resistant hypertension. Opportunities to refine the procedure, expand the therapy to other sympathetically mediated diseases, and explore the specific effects on nocturnal and morning hypertension offer a promising future for RDN. Based on available evidence, RDN should not be considered a therapy of last resort but as an initial therapy option that may be applied alone or as a complementary therapy to antihypertensive medication.

Changes in Stroke Volume After Renal Denervation

Recent trial results support catheter-based renal denervation (RDN) for treatment of hypertension, while the exact mechanisms causing blood pressure to fall remain incompletely understood. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess the effects of RDN on cardiac function in patients with hypertension undergoing RDN and compared with sham treatment. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was used to assess stroke volume index, cardiac index, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance index, and stroke work index from aortic flow measurements. Patients with resistant hypertension from a randomized, sham-controlled RDN trial underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging before RDN and at follow-up (randomized cohort). Results were then validated in a cohort of patients with resistant hypertension undergoing RDN and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (validation cohort). In total, 162 patients were included 52 patients in the randomized trial (27 shams) and 110 patients in the validation cohort. In the randomized cohort, stroke volume index was reduced by 4.7±9.8 mL/m 2 in the RDN cohort and remained unchanged in the sham cohort ( P =0.008 for between-group comparison), while cardiac index and stroke work index tended to be reduced in RDN patients but not in sham patients (−0.10±5.9 versus 0.17±0.51 L/min per m 2 and −7.1±12.5 versus −1.4±10.4 g/m 2 , P =0.08 for both). In contrast, systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged after RDN. In the validation cohort, reduction of stroke volume index was confirmed, and cardiac index and stroke work index were also reduced significantly, whereas systemic vascular resistance index and heart rate remained unchanged at follow-up. In this study of patients with resistant hypertension, RDN resulted in a reduction of stroke volume when compared with sham.

Renal sympathetic nerve activity regulates cardiovascular energy expenditure in rats fed high salt

We recently reported that a 4% high-salt diet + saline for drinking (HS + saline) leads to a catabolic state, reduced heart rate, and suppression of cardiovascular energy expenditure in mice. We suggested that HS + saline reduces heart rate via the suppression of the sympathetic nervous system to compensate for the high salt intake-induced catabolic state. To test this hypothesis, we directly measured renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) in conscious Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats using a radiotelemetry system. We confirmed that HS + saline induced a catabolic state. HS + saline decreased heart rate, while also reducing RSNA in SD rats. In contrast, Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) rats exhibited no change in heart rate and increased RSNA during high salt intake. Renal denervation significantly decreased heart rate and attenuated the catabolic state independent of blood pressure in DSS rats fed HS + saline, suggesting that salt-sensitive animals were unable to decrease cardiovascular energy consumption due to abnormal renal sympathetic nerve activation during high salt intake. These findings support the hypothesis that RSNA mediates heart rate during high salt intake in SD rats. However, the insensitivity of heart rate and enhanced RSNA observed in DSS rats may be additional critical diagnostic factors for salt-sensitive hypertension. Renal denervation may benefit salt-sensitive hypertension by reducing its effects on catabolism and cardiovascular energy expenditure.

The year in cardiology: cardiovascular prevention

Collapse

The Current Status of Devices for the Treatment of Resistant Hypertension

Arterial hypertension is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although blood pressure-lowering therapies significantly reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events, blood pressure control remains unsatisfactorily low. Several device-based antihypertensive therapies have been investigated in patients with treatment-resistant hypertension and in patients unable or unwilling to adhere to antihypertensive medication. As the field of device-based therapies is subject to constant change, this review aims at providing an up-to-date overview of different device-based approaches for the treatment of hypertension. These approaches target the sympathetic nervous system (renal denervation, baroreflex amplification therapy, baroreflex activation therapy, and carotid body ablation) or alter mechanical arterial properties by creating an iliac arteriovenous fistula. Notably, the use of all of these treatment options is not recommended for the routine treatment of hypertension by current guidelines but should be investigated in the context of controlled clinical studies.