Screening for Family Psychosocial Risk in Pediatric Cancer: Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Version 3

Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 and Long-term Mental Health Outcomes in Childhood Cancer

To identify childhood cancer patients and their families at the greatest risk for psychosocial difficulties, this study examined the predictive validity of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 (PAT2.0) on caregiver and patient-reported mental health outcomes at 1-year follow-up. The PAT2.0 was administered to caregivers a median of 0.08 years after cancer diagnosis. A brief psychosocial screening battery (Family Symptom Inventory and PROMIS v1.0 Pediatric Profile-25) was administered to patient-caregiver dyads (n=53) ∼1-year later. Linear regressions support the longitudinal predictive validity of the PAT2.0 for caregiver-reported child and caregiver mental health symptoms and child-reported peer relationships difficulties.

Illness cognitions and parental stress symptoms following a child's cancer diagnosis

Objective

This research aims to explore parents' cognitive beliefs, specifically illness cognitions, in response to their children being diagnosed with cancer. This study is an initial step toward providing regular psychosocial assessment as a standard for psychosocial care for children with cancer and their families in Latvia.

Methods

Data were collected from 120 parents (mostly mothers, n = 109) as an initial evaluation of the psychosocial risks faced by families participating in the support program "Holistic and Multidisciplinary Support for Children with Functional Disabilities and Their Family Members," which was managed by the Children's Hospital Foundation at the Children's Clinical University Hospital in Riga (Latvia) from 2020 to 2023. The patients comprised 66 boys and 54 girls (M age = 7.1, SD = 4.7, range: 0-17 years) with diverse cancer diagnoses. The parents completed the Latvian version of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool [adapted from PAT 3.1], with five subscales included in the data analysis (Social Support, Child Problems, Family Problems, Stress Reactions, and Family Beliefs). The Family Belief subscale was adjusted specifically to address the unique objectives and research questions of the current study.

Results

Significant correlations were found between children's psychological problems (e.g., getting upset about medical procedures, hyperactivity, excessive use of electronic devices, etc.) and parental stress reactions after diagnosis and with self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression. The associations were statistically significant, even after controlling for sociodemographic and medical factors such as diagnosis. The relationship between children's problems and parental stress reactions was partly mediated by Family Beliefs about illness. The most informative beliefs associated with parental stress symptoms and the family's psychosocial risk level were identified, and significant results were found according to the main component of beliefs (catastrophic vs. optimistic) that explained 42% of the variance in the Family Beliefs subscale.

Implication

Understanding the habitual responses to stress and identifying the thinking patterns of parents that lead to distorted views and maladaptive coping are essential for customizing personalized interventions to enhance treatment compliance. The Latvian version of PAT is a useful psychosocial screening measure in pediatric oncology settings.

Tailored approach to participant recruitment and retention to maximize health equity in pediatric cancer research

BACKGROUND

Lack of diversity in participants throughout the research process limits the generalizability of findings and may contribute to health disparities. There are unique challenges to recruitment of families to pediatric cancer research studies, especially for those from disadvantaged backgrounds. Thus, there is a need to evaluate the most effective recruitment and retention strategies to optimize equitable recruitment of diverse participants.

METHODS

The present study adapted and implemented methods outlined previously in the literature. These previous efforts were developed to address barriers to pediatric research, behavioral health intervention research and research with Black adolescents. Recruitment and retention strategies are described across four different time points: pre-approach, initial connection, building connection and follow-up. Eligible families of children with a pediatric cancer diagnosis were approached during a routine oncology visit. Once consented, enrollment and retention rates over three timepoints of data collection were recorded and evaluated.

RESULTS

Results indicated high rates of enrollment (86%) and retention (95%) for eligible participants. There were no trends in heightened attrition for any specific subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study are promising and suggest these recruitment and retention strategies may be useful in recruiting individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Development and psychometric analysis of a pediatric cancer survivors Psychosocial Late Effects Scale (PCSLES)

PURPOSE

Although the physiological late effects of childhood cancer survivors are more obvious, appropriate assessment of psychosocial effects is needed. Therefore, it was aimed to develop a scale to evaluate psychosocial late effects in cancer survivors and to test its validity and reliability.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This methodological study was conducted with 100 children and adolescents who survived were collected at the oncology center in the south of Türkiye in 2022. Data were collected with the "Personal Information Form" and "Pediatric Cancer Survivors Psychosocial Late Effects Scale (PCSLES)" IBM SPSS 24.0 and IBM AMOS 24.0 software programs were used for data analysis, and descriptive statistics were used to analyze numeric variables. Exploration and confirmatory factor analyses were performed to determine the scale's factorial structure.

RESULTS

The factorial analysis was used to test the structural validity of the scale. A four-factor structure consisting of 17 items was developed. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for "1" was 0.89, "2" was 0.87, "3" was 0.80, "4" was 0.82 and the total score was 0.92. Fit indices resulting from the study were χ2/SD: 1.497, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA): 0.071, goodnessof-fit index (GFI): 0.85, comparative-of-fit index (CFI): 0.94, and normed fit index (NFI): 0.85.

CONCLUSION

The scale is a valid and reliable scale that can be used to determine psychosocial late effects in pediatric cancer patients.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Utilizing the PCSLES can assist in identifying the psychosocial symptoms of child survivors/adolescents and facilitate the planning of appropriate interventions.

Consensus framework for conducting phase I/II clinical trials for children, adolescents, and young adults with pediatric low-grade glioma: Guidelines established by the International Pediatric Low-Grade Glioma Coalition Clinical Trial Working Group

Within the last few decades, we have witnessed tremendous advancements in the study of pediatric low-grade gliomas (pLGG), leading to a much-improved understanding of their molecular underpinnings. Consequently, we have achieved successful milestones in developing and implementing targeted therapeutic agents for treating these tumors. However, the community continues to face many unknowns when it comes to the most effective clinical implementation of these novel targeted inhibitors or combinations thereof. Questions encompassing optimal dosing strategies, treatment duration, methods for assessing clinical efficacy, and the identification of predictive biomarkers remain unresolved. Here, we offer the consensus of the international pLGG coalition (iPLGGc) clinical trial working group on these important topics and comment on clinical trial design and endpoint rationale. Throughout, we seek to standardize the global approach to early clinical trials (phase I and II) for pLGG, leading to more consistently interpretable results as well as enhancing the pace of novel therapy development and encouraging an increased focus on functional endpoints as well and quality of life for children faced with this disease.

Perceived social support and characteristics of social networks of families with children with special healthcare needs following the COVID-19 pandemic

Background

Children with special healthcare needs (CSHCN) require more support than the average of their peers. Support systems for CSHCN were particularly affected by pandemic control measures. Perceived social support is a resource for health and wellbeing for CSHCN and their families. Associations of social support, mental health and socioeconomic status (SES) have been described. This study aims to (1) assess perceived social support in families with and without CSHCN; (2) describe structure and types of social networks of families with and without CSHCN; and (3) explore associations between perceived social support, disease complexity, child and caregiver mental health, and SES.

Methods

This is the third of a sequential series of cross-sectional online surveys conducted among caregivers of children ≤ 18 years in Germany since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, administered between 1st December 2022 and 10 March 2023. The Brief Social Support Scale (BS6) assessed perceived social support. Child and parental mental health were assessed using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and WHO-5 Wellbeing index. The CSHCN-Screener identified CSHCN. Descriptive statistics and linear regression modeling assessed associations between perceived social support, parent-reported child mental health problems, disease complexity, caregiver mental wellbeing and SES.

Results

The final sample included 381 participants, among them 76.6% (n = 292) CSHCN. 46.2% (n = 176) of caregivers reported moderate, i.e., at least occasional social support. Social support was largely provided by informal social networks consisting of partners, relatives and neighbors/friends. Linear regression modeling revealed associations of lower perceived social support with higher disease complexity of the child, lower caregiver mental wellbeing, lower SES and increasing caregiver age.

Conclusion

The results of this study describe inequalities in perceived social support according to disease complexity of the child, caregiver mental health and socioeconomic status. They highlight the importance of social support and support networks as a resource for wellbeing of caregivers and CSHCN. Moving on from the COVID-19 pandemic, recovery strategies should focus on low-threshold interventions based in the community to improve social support for families with CSHCN and actively involve caregivers in identifying needs and co-creating new approaches.

Family Rules and Routines During the Early Phases of Pediatric Cancer Treatment: Associations With Child Emotional and Behavioral Health

OBJECTIVE

Consistent family rules and routines promote positive adaptation to stress and may be protective to child emotional and behavioral functioning. Few studies have quantified family engagement in these behaviors during pediatric cancer treatment or examined associations with child emotional and behavioral health.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional observational study, 86 primary caregivers of youth ages 2-14 years (M = 7.9) with an initial diagnosis of cancer within 16 weeks reported on their frequency of engagement in family rules and routines (e.g., sleep, schoolwork, and meal routines) before their child's cancer diagnosis and their current frequency of engagement in the same routines. Caregivers also reported demographics, psychosocial distress, and child emotional and behavioral health outcomes. Analyses examined demographic and psychosocial factors associated with engagement in rules and routines during cancer treatment, and associations with child emotional and behavioral health.

RESULTS

Families reported a lower frequency of engagement in rules and routines during cancer treatment, compared to before treatment (mean difference 0.8 SDs [95% confidence interval 0.7-1.1 SDs]). Caregiver factors associated with lower engagement in rules and routines during treatment included being married, having lower educational attainment, and higher levels of psychosocial distress. Families who engaged in higher levels of rules and routines during treatment reported fewer child externalizing and behavioral challenges. There was limited evidence of association between family rules and routines and child internalizing outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Results found that engaging in family rules and routines during cancer treatment was associated with fewer child behavioral challenges during treatment. Future directions include longitudinal examinations of family rules, routines, and child emotional/behavioral outcomes to examine directional impact over time.

Adaptation and pilot implementation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool for Autism Spectrum Disorders (PAT-ASD)

Recognizing the multifaceted and chronic demands on families of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and challenges in providing care matched to need, we adapted the Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT), a brief caregiver-report screener of family psychosocial risk, for this population. Study methods included literature review, focus groups with providers, and feedback from caregivers. The PAT-ASD is consistent with the original PAT, with new items reflecting core behavioral manifestations of ASD and parent and family challenges associated with chronicity. The PAT-ASD was implemented in a four-month pilot and was completed online by 59% of families. Although further testing of its validity is necessary, the PAT-ASD is a promising means of assessing family psychosocial risk for families of children with ASD.

Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 for paediatric burn patients

OBJECTIVE

The Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 (PAT-B) is an adaptation of an existing screening tool with the aim of the present study to examine its effectiveness and suitability to identify children and families at risk of emotional, behavioral, and social maladjustment following paediatric burns.

METHODS

Sixty-eight children aged between 6 months - 16 years (M = 4.40) admitted into hospital following paediatric burns, and their primary caregivers, were recruited. The PAT-B comprises several dimensions including family structure and resources, social support, as well as caregiver and child psychological difficulties. Caregivers completed the PAT-B and several standardized measures for validation purposes (e.g., caregiver reports of family functioning, child emotional and behavioural problems, caregiver distress). Children old enough to complete measures reported on their psychological functioning (e.g., posttraumatic stress and depression). Measures were completed within 3 weeks of child admission and then again at 3 months after burn.

RESULTS

The PAT-B demonstrated good construct validity, evidenced by moderate to strong correlations between the PAT-B Total and subscale scores and several criteria measures (family functioning, child behaviour and caregiver distress, child depressive symptoms, rs ranging from 0.33 -0.74). Preliminary support for criterion validity of the measure was observed when examined against the three tiers of the Paediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model. The proportion of families falling within these tiers of risk (Universal [low risk], 58.2%; Targeted, 31.3%; or Clinical range, 10.4%) was consistent with prior research. Sensitivity of the PAT-B to identify children and caregivers at high risk of psychological distress was 71% and 83%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The PAT-B appears to be a reliable and valid instrument for indexing psychosocial risk across families who have sustained a paediatric burn. However, further testing and replication using a larger sample size is recommended before the tool is integrated into routine clinical care.

Factors associated with mental health service use among families bereaved by pediatric cancer

OBJECTIVES

We identified types of interventions used by bereaved family members and examined associations with demographic and medical factors. Furthermore, we examined associations between distress and intervention use among bereaved families.

METHODS

Bereaved families (n = 85) were recruited from three children's hospitals 3-12 months after their child died of cancer. One eligible sibling (ages 8-17) per family was randomly selected for participation. During home visits 1-year post-death, parents reported on their own and the sibling's intervention use, helpfulness, and dose (self-help books, support groups, therapy, medication), and distress, defined as internalizing, externalizing, and total problems (Adult Self Report, Child Behavior Checklist).

RESULTS

Fifty percent of mothers used medications (n = 43); utilization was low among fathers (17%, n = 9) and siblings (5%, n = 4). Individuals with more total problems were more likely to use medications (mothers: rpb = 0.27; p = 0.02; fathers: rpb = 0.32; p = 0.02; siblings: rpb = 0.26; p = 0.02). Mothers and siblings with more total problems used more services (r = 0.24; p = 0.03 and r = 0.29; p = 0.01, respectively). Among mothers, the overall regression was significant, R2 = 0.11, F(2, 80) = 4.954, p = 0.01; the deceased child's age at death was significantly associated with total services used (b = 0.052, p = 0.022). Among fathers, the overall regression was significant, R2 = 0.216, F(3, 49) = 4.492, p = 0.007; race and years of education were significantly associated with total services used (b = 0.750, p = 0.030 and b = 0.154, p = 0.010). Among siblings, the overall regression was significant R2 = 0.088, F(2, 80) = 3.867, p = 0.025; greater total problems were significantly associated with total services used (b = 0.012, p = 0.007).

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

Although few background factors were related to intervention use, bereaved mothers and siblings may seek services if they have more distress. Healthcare providers should be aware of the types of services that are most often utilized and helpful to bereaved families to connect them with appropriate resources. Future research should investigate other predictors of intervention use and outcomes after the death of a child.

The course of health-related quality of life after the diagnosis of childhood cancer: a national cohort study

BACKGROUND

Comprehensive insight in the longitudinal development of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) after childhood cancer diagnosis could improve quality of care. Thus, we aimed to study the course and biopsychosocial determinants of HRQOL in a unique national cohort of children with cancer.

METHODS

HRQOL of 2154 children with cancer was longitudinally reported (median: 3 reports) between diagnosis and 5 years after, using the pediatric quality of life inventory generic core scales (PedsQL). HRQOL was modelled over time since diagnosis using mixed model analysis for children 2-7 years (caregiver-reports) and ≥ 8 years (self-reports). Differences in the course between hematological, solid and central nervous system malignancies were studied. Additional associations of demographics, disease characteristics (age at diagnosis, relapse, diagnosis after the national centralization of childhood cancer care and treatment components) and caregiver distress (Distress thermometer) were studied.

RESULTS

Overall, HRQOL improved with time since diagnosis, mostly in the first years. The course of HRQOL differed between diagnostic groups. In children aged 2-7 years, children with a solid tumor had most favorable HRQOL. In children aged ≥ 8 years, those with a hematological malignancy had lower HRQOL around diagnosis, but stronger improvement over time than the other diagnostic groups. In both age-groups, the course of HRQOL of children with a CNS tumor showed little or no improvement. Small to moderate associations (β: 0.18 to 0.67, p < 0.05) with disease characteristics were found. Centralized care related to better HRQOL (β: 0.25 to 0.44, p < 0.05). Caregiver distress was most consistently associated with worse HRQOL (β: - 0.13 to - 0.48, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The HRQOL course presented can aid in identifying children who have not fully recovered their HRQOL following cancer diagnosis, enabling early recognition of the issue. Future research should focus on ways to support children, especially those with a CNS tumor, for example by decreasing distress in their caregivers.

The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program-a Psychosocial Digital Health Intervention for English- and Spanish-Speaking Parents of Children With Cancer: Protocol for Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The psychosocial needs and risks of children with cancer and their families are well-documented including increased risk of parental distress, posttraumatic stress, and anxiety. There is a critical need to provide evidence-based psychosocial care to parents and caregivers of children with cancer. Digital health interventions are important to address many barriers to in-person intervention delivery but are not widely used in pediatric psychosocial cancer care. The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the need for flexible, acceptable, and accessible psychosocial digital health interventions. The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP) is an innovative digital health intervention for parents and caregivers of children with cancer, delivered through a combination of self-guided web-based content and supplemented by 3 telehealth follow-up sessions with a trained telehealth guide. A Spanish language adaptation of eSCCIP, El Programa Electronico de Intervencion para Superar Cancer Competentemente (eSCCIP-SP), has been developed. The self-guided web-based cores of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP are a mix of didactic video content, multifamily video discussion groups featuring parents of children with cancer, and hands-on web-based activities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to test eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP in a multisite randomized controlled trial, compared to an internet-based education control condition consisting of information specifically focused on concerns relevant to parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

METHODS

Using a randomized controlled clinical trial design, 350 eligible parents and caregivers of children with cancer will be randomly assigned to the intervention (eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP) or an education control condition. Data will be collected at 3 time points: preintervention (prior to randomization), immediately post intervention (after 6 weeks), and at a 3-month follow-up (from baseline). Participants randomized to either condition will receive study material (eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP intervention or education control website) in English or Spanish, based on the primary language spoken in the home and participant preference.

RESULTS

The primary study end point is a reduction in acute distress from baseline to postintervention, with secondary end points focused on reductions in symptoms of posttraumatic stress and anxiety, and improvements in coping self-efficacy and cognitive coping. An additional exploratory aim will be focused on implementation strategies and potential costs and cost-savings of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP, laying the groundwork for future trials focused on dissemination and implementation, stepped-care models, and intervention refinement.

CONCLUSIONS

This trial will provide necessary data to evaluate the efficacy of eSCCIP/eSCCIP-SP. This intervention has the potential to be an easily scalable and highly impactful psychosocial treatment option for parents and caregivers of children with cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05294302; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05294302.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/46339.

Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool Sibling Module Follow-Up Version

OBJECTIVE

Psychosocial screening is recommended to connect siblings of youth with cancer to psychosocial services, but the lack of validated sibling-specific screening tools is a barrier to routine screening. The current study aimed to validate and establish a clinical cutoff for the recently developed Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Sibling Module follow-up version to address this barrier.

METHODS

Parents (N = 246) completed the PAT Sibling Module follow-up version for all siblings within their families ages 0-17 years (N = 458) at three time points between 6- and 24-month post-cancer diagnosis. For one target sibling within each family aged 8-17 years, parents also completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire, and the target sibling completed the Child PTSD Symptom Scale. Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined internal consistency and convergent and predictive validity. Receiver operator characteristic analyses were used to establish a maximally sensitive and specific clinical cutoff.

RESULTS

Internal consistency was acceptable for all age versions (Kuder-Richardson 20s ≥ 0.79), except for the ages 0-2 version, which had low internal consistency at 18 months post-diagnosis (Kuder-Richardson 20 = 0.57). Convergent (r values >0.7, p values <.001) and predictive (r values >0.6, p values <.001) validity were strong at each time point. An optimal clinical cutoff of 0.32 was identified (range: 0.00-1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

The PAT Sibling Module follow-up version is a reliable and valid screener for sibling psychosocial risk following cancer diagnosis. Validation of a sibling-specific screener and establishment of a clinical cutoff are necessary first steps to addressing siblings' unmet psychosocial needs and improving trajectories of sibling functioning.

The Socioecology of Parental Adjustment to Pediatric Cancer: The Roles of Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status in Parental Social Support and Depressive Symptoms

OBJECTIVE

Parents of children with cancer are at risk for depressive symptoms, and previous research has linked their level of distress to various demographic, social, and economic factors. However, little research has examined associations between parental depressive symptoms and multiple socioecological factors at once. The current study examined how socioeconomic status (SES) at the individual and neighborhood level is related to parental depressive symptoms and social support satisfaction in Latinx and non-Latinx parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer, and whether social support satisfaction mediated associations between SES and depressive symptoms.

METHODS

Parents (N = 115; 82% female; 30% Latinx) completed questionnaires reporting their demographic information, social support satisfaction, and depressive symptoms. Neighborhood SES was coded by block group level based on participants' home addresses.

RESULTS

Individual, but not neighborhood, SES was positively associated with social support satisfaction, and higher social support satisfaction was associated with lower depressive symptoms. There was a significant indirect effect of individual (but not neighborhood) SES on depressive symptoms through social support satisfaction. Latinx parents reported lower individual SES, but not lower social support satisfaction or depressive symptoms than non-Latinx parents.

CONCLUSIONS

These results highlight the important role of social support in the adjustment of parents who have a child with pediatric cancer. Findings suggest that families may benefit from services that target multiple levels of their social ecology.

Acceptability and Feasibility of eSCCIP: Results From a Pilot Study of the Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program

BACKGROUND

Providing high-quality psychosocial care to parents and other primary caregivers of children with cancer (henceforth referred to as caregivers) is important, given the numerous challenges associated with a pediatric cancer diagnosis and the increased risk for negative psychosocial sequelae among caregivers. The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP) is a psychosocial eHealth intervention for caregivers, developed using an iterative, user-centered process.

METHOD

eSCCIP was tested in a single-arm pilot trial at Nemours Children's Hospital, Delaware (NCT05333601). The primary outcomes were intervention acceptability and feasibility, assessed via enrollment and retention targets, and item-level acceptability ratings. Enrollment and retention targets of 45% were set based on previous work, and an item-level acceptability threshold of 80% was set. A secondary exploratory analysis was conducted examining acute distress, anxiety, symptoms of post-traumatic stress, and family functioning.

RESULTS

44 caregivers enrolled in the study and 31 completed. The intervention was rated favorably by completers, with over 80% of the sample selecting "mostly true" or "very true" for all items of the eSCCIP Evaluation Questionnaire, which was used to assess acceptability and feasibility. Enrollment and retention rates were 54% and 70%, respectively. Exploratory psychosocial outcomes showed statistically significant decreases from pre-intervention to post-intervention for overall symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), cluster D symptoms of PTSD (negative mood and cognitions), and anxiety. Small-moderate effect sizes were observed for all psychosocial outcomes of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

eSCCIP is an acceptable and feasible intervention for caregivers. Results are promising regarding reductions in symptoms of post-traumatic stress and anxiety.

Inconsistent, uncoordinated, and reactive: The current state of sibling psychosocial care

BACKGROUND

Although providing sibling psychosocial services is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, initial survey research suggests that this standard is rarely achieved and siblings' support needs remain unmet. Which sibling psychosocial services are available and how centers provide such services is unknown. To identify targetable services gaps, this qualitative study characterizes current sibling psychosocial care practices at select pediatric cancer centers across the United States.

PROCEDURE

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of psychosocial care providers (N = 27) working across the United States in pediatric oncology centers of varied sizes. Interviews queried providers regarding sibling-focused parent psychoeducation, psychosocial screening, comprehensive assessment, and psychosocial support offerings. Interview data were analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis.

RESULTS

Across cancer centers, sibling care practices did not align with consensus-based recommendations. The nature and availability of sibling-focused psychoeducation, screening, assessment, and support were variable between and within centers. Siblings themselves were largely absent from sibling psychosocial care, and care was rarely sibling-specific. The flow of information about siblings was discontinuous and uncoordinated across the care continuum, resulting in psychosocial care provided reactively, typically in response to parental concerns.

CONCLUSIONS

Sibling psychosocial care provision falls short of established care recommendations, leaving sibling psychosocial needs unmet. Findings highlight the need for tools and strategies to facilitate the implementation of sibling psychosocial care across the care continuum, to support siblings' psychosocial functioning across the life course.

Traumatic stress symptoms in family caregivers of patients with acute leukaemia: protocol for a multisite mixed methods, longitudinal, observational study

INTRODUCTION

The diagnosis, progression or recurrence of cancer is often highly traumatic for family caregivers (FCs), but systematic assessments of distress and approaches for its prevention and treatment are lacking. Acute leukaemia (AL) is a life-threatening cancer of the blood, which most often presents acutely, requires intensive treatment and is associated with severe physical symptoms. Consequently, traumatic stress may be common in the FCs of patients with AL. We aim to determine the prevalence, severity, longitudinal course and predictors of traumatic stress symptoms in FCs of patients with AL in the first year after diagnosis, and to understand their lived experience of traumatic stress and perceived support needs.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This two-site longitudinal, observational, mixed methods study will recruit 223 adult FCs of paediatric or adult patients newly diagnosed with AL from two tertiary care centres. Quantitative data will be collected from self-report questionnaires at enrolment, and 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after admission to hospital for initial treatment. Quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive and machine learning approaches and a multilevel modelling (MLM) approach will be used to confirm machine learning findings. Semi-structured qualitative interviews will be conducted at 3, 6 and 12 months and analysed using a grounded theory approach.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study is funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR number PJT 173255) and has received ethical approval from the Ontario Cancer Research Ethics Board (CTO Project ID: 2104). The data generated have the potential to inform the development of targeted psychosocial interventions for traumatic stress, which is a public health priority for high-risk populations such as FCs of patients with haematological malignancies. An integrated and end-of-study knowledge translation strategy that involves FCs and other stakeholders will be used to interpret and disseminate study results.

Preliminary Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

Research suggests families whose infants are admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) experience elevated distress and may have pre-existing risk factors for maladjustment. This study sought to validate the newly developed Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT-NICU/Cardiac Intensive Care Unit [CICU]), a comprehensive screening measure for family psychosocial risk in the NICU.

METHODS

The sample included 171 mothers, who completed the PAT-NICU/CICU and other related measures within 2 weeks of their infant's NICU admission at a level 4 unit within a large pediatric hospital. PAT-NICU/CICU scores were compared to a companion risk survey completed by NICU social workers. Test-retest reliability was assessed through repeated measures at 2-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Analyses suggest the PAT-NICU/CICU is effective in classifying psychosocial risk. This is supported by statistically significant correlations between the PAT-NICU/CICU and validated measures, in addition to elevated scores on concurrent measures by risk classification. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and acceptability for the PAT-NICU/CICU were satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study demonstrates the validity, reliability, and acceptability of the PAT-NICU/CICU as a psychosocial screening tool to aid identification of families who may benefit from supportive services during NICU admission. This new measure is a more comprehensive tool that assesses a wide variety of risk factors and stress responses. However, future studies of this measure are needed with more diverse samples. Prompt screening of NICU parents may facilitate earlier linkage with appropriate levels of resources or intervention. This research is crucial in improving risk assessment and psychosocial care for families in the NICU.

Dissemination of an evidence-based behavioral intervention to alleviate distress in caregivers of children recently diagnosed with cancer: Bright IDEAS

BACKGROUND

Four multisite randomized clinical trials of > 1400 caregivers of children newly diagnosed with cancer showed that the Bright IDEAS (BI) paradigm of problem-solving skills training is an acceptable and efficacious approach to alleviating the high levels of distress they experience. To facilitate providing evidence-based caregiver support as recommended in the pediatric oncology standards of care, the project described here was designed to disseminate BI to 200 psychosocial professionals.

PROCEDURE

We partnered with the Children's Oncology Group (COG), Association of Pediatric Oncology Social Workers (APOSW), Association of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Nurses (APHON), and special interest group in pediatric hematology/oncology of the Society for Pediatric Psychology (SPP). Membership surveys revealed substantial enthusiasm for training in BI. We structured training to include review of the evidence base for BI, role plays, and strategies for implementation at individual sites. Four conference calls designed to enhance implementation were held one, two, three, and five months after training.

RESULTS

Ten 1.5-day workshops were held in conjunction with annual meetings of COG, APOSW, APHON, and SPP. A total of 209 psychosocial clinicians from 134 sites were trained. Evaluations were highly favorable. Trainees had provided BI to 545 individuals as of the last conference call.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial dissemination goals were met. BI is now available at numerous pediatric oncology centers, but it has not become part of routine care. Future work focused on implementation might consider top-down approaches that include direct communication with pediatric oncologists and hospital leaders about the benefits of incorporating this evidence-based intervention systemically.

Dyadic digital health interventions: Their rationale and implementation

While most psychosocial and behavioral digital health interventions have been designed to be consumed by an individual, intervening at the level of a dyad - two interdependent individuals - can more comprehensively address the needs of both individuals and their relationship. The clinical utility of the dyadic digital health intervention approach, as well as the practical implementation of this design, will be demonstrated via three examples: eSCCIP, FAMS, and OurRelationship.

Initial Validation of a New Psychosocial Screener for Siblings of Youth with Cancer The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Sibling Modules

OBJECTIVE

Psychosocial screening can facilitate the identification of families who have difficulty adjusting to and managing serious pediatric illness. Despite siblings' roles within the family and increased psychosocial risk, a systematic approach to screening siblings of youth with cancer remains rare. One barrier to systematic sibling screening is the lack of a validated screener. We aimed to establish initial validity of the new parent-reported Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) Sibling Modules for siblings ages 0-2, 3-4, 5-9, and 10+.

METHODS

Families (N=64) completed the PAT Sibling Modules and the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) regarding siblings' functioning at cancer diagnosis (13-23 items, depending on age version) and 6-months later (17-42 items). Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses examined internal consistency and convergent and predictive validity of the PAT Sibling Modules.

RESULTS

Baseline and follow-up versions of the modules have strong internal consistency (Kuder-Richardson 20 range: 0.82-0.93) and convergent validity at diagnosis (r-values ≥0.4, p-values <0.01) and follow-up (r-values >0.4, p-values <0.05). Predictive validity was supported by significant correlations between baseline PAT Sibling Module scores and 6-month SDQ scores (r=0.86, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Findings provide initial evidence that the PAT Sibling Modules are valid measures of sibling psychosocial risk. Availability of a validated screener is a first step toward addressing siblings' unmet psychosocial needs. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Implementation of Electronic Psychosocial Screening Among Caregivers in Pediatric Oncology

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to evaluate the reach and implementation of an electronic psychosocial screening program among caregivers of pediatric oncology patients, as well as characterize caregiver distress.

METHODS:

Participants (N = 2,013) included caregivers of patients age 0-17.99 years presenting across 9,280 outpatient oncology visits (median = 2; range = 1-52) from September 2018 to June 2019. At check-ins, caregivers electronically completed the pediatric distress thermometer via a patient-facing electronic health record (EHR) application. Caregiver distress ratings ≥ 8 triggered electronic alerts to medical teams to refer for social work support at point of care. Patient clinical and demographic differences in reach and fidelity were evaluated using univariate chi-square and t-tests. Caregivers reporting high distress were compared with caregivers without reports of high distress using univariate and multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS:

The e-screening program was able to reach a caregiver for nearly all children seen during the study period, with 95.5% (1,923/2,013) of patients having a caregiver-completed pediatric distress thermometer. On screeners where caregivers reported high distress, medical teams made appropriate referrals to social work 95.5% (471/493) of the time. Overall, 16.9% (325/1,923) of caregivers ever indicated high distress (score ≥ 8), with caregivers of newly diagnosed (odds ratio = 3.16; 95% CI, 2.12 to 4.71) and on-therapy (odds ratio = 2.81; 95% CI, 2.11 to 3.76) patients being more likely to report high distress, compared with those who were off-treatment for the entire study.

CONCLUSION:

Leveraging EHR technology to provide evidence-based psychosocial screening can aid in successfully reaching a significant proportion of caregivers of pediatric oncology patients to identify and respond to ongoing psychosocial distress.

Advancing health equity in pediatric cancer through implementation of universal family psychosocial risk screening

BACKGROUND

Unaddressed psychosocial risks may contribute to disparities in cancer care outcomes and may be addressed by early psychosocial risk screening. In a study implementing universal family psychosocial risk screening in 18 children's cancer programs in the United States, parents, clinicians, and organizational leaders described the importance of universal screening to health equity.

PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were to (1) describe the perspectives of parents, clinicians, and organizational leaders regarding the importance of universal family psychosocial risk screening in childhood cancer care and (2) identify barriers and facilitators to improving health equity and decreasing health disparities in childhood cancer through universal family psychosocial screening.

METHODS

Nineteen participants (parent advocates, clinicians, leaders in professional organizations and healthcare policy) were interviewed. Directed content analysis was used to identify thematic descriptions.

RESULTS

Theme 1: Personal (individual child and family) and systemic barriers to health care contribute to health disparities and can be identified by universal family psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer. Theme 2: Universal family psychosocial risk screening in pediatric cancer creates the opportunity for health equity through personalized psychosocial care. Theme 3: Recognition of health inequities and guidance from the Standards of Psychosocial Care for Children with Cancer and their Families suggest that clinicians and healthcare systems are ethically obligated to screen, provide resources, and advocate for services to meet identified needs.

CONCLUSIONS

Universal family psychosocial risk screening in pediatric oncology creates the opportunity to support efforts for health equity by guiding delivery of personalized psychosocial care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT04446728 23 June 2020.

Documentation of Psychosocial Distress and Its Antecedents in Children with Rare or Life-Limiting Chronic Conditions

Children with rare or life-limiting chronic conditions and their families are at high risk of psychosocial distress. However, despite its impact on patient and family health and functioning, psychosocial distress and its antecedents may not routinely be captured in medical records. The purpose of this study was to characterize current medical record documentation practices around psychosocial distress among children with rare or life-limiting chronic conditions and their families. Medical records for patients with rare or life-limiting chronic conditions (n = 60) followed by a pediatric complex care program were reviewed. Study team members extracted both structured data elements (e.g., diagnoses, demographic information) and note narratives from the most recent visit with a clinician in the program. Psychosocial topics were analyzed using a mixed quantitative (i.e., frequency counts of topics) and qualitative approach. Topics related to psychosocial distress that were documented in notes included child and parent emotional problems, parent social support, sibling emotional or physical problems, family structure (e.g., whether parents were together), and financial concerns. However, 35% of notes lacked any mention of psychosocial concerns. Although examples of psychosocial concerns were included in some notes, none were present in over one-third of this sample. For both patients with rare or life-limiting chronic conditions and their caregivers, more active elicitation and standard documentation of psychosocial concerns may improve the ability of healthcare providers to identify and intervene on psychosocial concerns and their risk factors.

Development and Preliminary Validation of a Multidimensional Psychosocial Assessment Strategy for Young Adults With Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Regular psychosocial assessment is a best-practice guideline for young adult oncology care, but multipurpose, multidimensional, developmentally appropriate patient-reported outcome measurement strategies for young adults with cancer are lacking. This study reported on the development and preliminary validation of the Young Adult Psychosocial Assessment Strategy (YA-PAS), a tool designed to meet this clinical need.

METHODS

The YA-PAS was developed based on the literature and clinician feedback. 20 young adults with cancer participated in cognitive interviews to provide feedback on complexity, readability, and applicability to inform measure refinement. Following refinements, 100 young adults with a history of cancer participated in an observational study including a preliminary evaluation of YA-PAS factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct and criterion validity, feasibility, and acceptability.

RESULTS

Cognitive interviews and psychometric evaluation informed modifications and resulted in a measure with 9 domains (anxiety, depression, cognitive functioning, post-traumatic stress, family stressors, support, social isolation, self-efficacy for symptom management, and self-efficacy for medication management) and nonscoring items assessing substance use, life stressors, resources, educational/vocational status, and relationship status. 8 of 9 domains demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.70), substantial (r = 0.61-0.80) or almost perfect (r > 0.80) test-retest reliability, and evidence of domain and cut-point validity. 89% of participants were able to complete the YA-PAS within 20 min and 87% were satisfied with the measure.

CONCLUSIONS

The YA-PAS demonstrated promising psychometric properties, feasibility, and acceptability. Clinical implications and research recommendations are discussed.

Screening for Factors Influencing Parental Psychological Vulnerability During a Child's PICU Admission

OBJECTIVES

To identify the risks of developing post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and/or depression in parents following their child's PICU admission using a brief screening instrument and to examine the associations with these risks.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional parental survey.

SETTING

A general 13-bed PICU at a large teaching hospital.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and seven parents of 75 children admitted to the PICU.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

All parents completed the 10-item Posttraumatic Adjustment Screen (PAS) before discharge. The PAS assesses risk factors known to be associated with poorer psychological outcome, including psychosocial variables pretrauma and peritrauma, and acute stress. Parents' scores on the PAS indicated that 64 (60%) were at risk of developing PTSD and 80 (75%) were at risk of developing depression following their child's admission. Univariate analyses suggested that psychosocial variables, such as preexisting stressors and a history of previous mental health problems, were more strongly associated with PAS risk scores for PTSD and depression than medical or sociodemographic factors. In logistic regression analyses, a history of previous mental health problems was significantly associated with risk of developing PTSD and depression (p < 0.001) explaining 28% and 43% of the variance in these outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that a significant number of parents on PICU are potentially at risk of developing PTSD and/or depression postdischarge and that psychosocial factors, pretrauma and peritrauma, are stronger determinants of this risk, and of acute distress, than other variables. Identification of vulnerable parents during admission, using a measure such as the PAS, could facilitate the targeting of support and monitoring, acutely and postdischarge, at those who might be most likely to benefit.

The Toll of Transition: Caregiver Perceptions of Family Adjustment During the Transition off Pediatric Cancer Therapy

OBJECTIVE

The role of transition-focused psychology appointments in managing the transition off therapy is unclear. The objective of this research was to explore caregiver perceived familial distress and the role of psychology in preparing families for transition.

METHODS

Fifty-seven caregivers of youth, who finished treatment, completed an online questionnaire through a quality improvement project on experiences of families at transition. Twenty-two percent of caregivers had children who completed a transition-focused psychology consult and 63% completed a cognitive assessment at transition. Retrospective analyses were conducted assessing the association of psychology visits on caregiver perceptions of being informed of and prepared to manage transition-related challenges.

RESULTS

Most caregivers reported experiencing adjustment concerns for family members. Caregivers of children completing a transition-focused psychology consult or cognitive assessment reported feeling more informed and greater preparedness to manage difficulties. Although decreased distress was not associated with the visit, those who felt more informed and prepared reported lower distress.

CONCLUSIONS

Caregivers perceive transitioning off therapy as stressful for their family, though they experience decreased familial distress when informed of and prepared to manage transition-related challenges. These findings highlight the importance of psychosocial support at transition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

The Social Networks and Social Support of Siblings of Children with Cancer

Siblings of children with cancer need support to ameliorate the challenges they encounter; however, little is known about what types and sources of support exist for siblings. This study addresses this gap in our understanding of the social networks and sources of support for adolescents with a brother or sister who has cancer. Additionally, we describe how the support siblings receive addresses what they feel are the hardest aspects of being a sibling of a child with cancer. During semi-structured interviews, siblings (ages 12–17) constructed ecomaps describing their support networks. Data were coded for support type (emotional, instrumental, informational, validation, companionship) and support provider (e.g., mother, teacher, friend). Network characteristics and patterns of support were explored. Support network size ranged from 3 to 10 individuals (M = 6 ± 1.9); siblings most frequently reported mothers as sources of support (n = 22, 91.7%), followed by fathers (n = 19, 79.2%), close friends (n = 19, 79.2%) and siblings (with or without cancer) (n = 17, 70.8%). Friends and brothers or sisters most often provided validation and companionship while instrumental and informational supports came from parents. This study provides foundational knowledge about siblings’ support networks, which can be utilized to design interventions that improve support for siblings of children with cancer.

Validating the Factor Structure of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool Using Internet-Based Data

OBJECTIVE

The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a well-validated, brief screener of family psychosocial risk. Since 2014 a web-based version of the PAT (WebPAT) has been available for use by clinicians and researchers, but the psychometric properties have not been examined. The objective of this article was to examine the factor structure and internal consistency of the WebPAT, which was administered to caregivers of youth with cancer.

METHODS

The WebPAT was administered to 1,252 caregivers of youth with cancer across 29 institutions. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to examine the factor structure of the WebPAT. Internal consistencies of the total and subscale scores were examined via the Kuder-Richardson 20 coefficient. The distribution of total PAT score across the three risk categories of the Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM) was also examined.

RESULTS

The CFA supported the original seven-factor structure of the PAT (Family Structure, Social Support, Child Problems, Sibling Problems, Family Problems, Stress Reactions, and Family Beliefs). Internal consistencies were strong for the total PAT score and four subscales (Social Support, Child Problems, Sibling Problems, and Family Problems). The distribution of total PAT scores across PPPHM risk categories was consistent with prior research.

CONCLUSIONS

The WebPAT is a psychometrically sound screener of psychosocial risk in families of youth with cancer. Healthcare providers can use the WebPAT to assess families' psychosocial risk and guide the provision of psychosocial care. Future research should evaluate the implementation of the PAT and identify barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Families following pediatric traumatic medical events: identifying psychosocial risk profiles using latent profile analysis

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) are often experienced by children and family members after pediatric traumatic medical events (PTMEs). Assessing families' psychosocial risk factors is a crucial part of trauma-informed practice as it helps identify risk for PTSS in the aftermath of PTME.

OBJECTIVES

Using the Psychosocial Assessment Tool 2.0 (PAT2.0), this study describes the psychosocial risk of families following PTMEs in two ways: 1. Describing the psychosocial risk defined by the PAT2.0 based on three-tiered risk levels; 2. Using latent profile analysis (LPA); identifying psychosocial risk profiles and examining how child- and injury-related factors can affect profile membership.

METHODS

Caregivers of 374 children following PTMEs admitted to a pediatric rehabilitation department in Israel completed the PAT2.0. Total PAT2.0 score and the seven PAT2.0 subscales (family structure/resources, social support, child problems, sibling problems, family problems, caregiver stress reactions, and family beliefs) were included in the first analysis. Mean PAT2.0 scores of three risk categories (universal, targeted, clinical) were calculated; LPA, which allows for cross-sectional latent variable mixture models to identify heterogeneity within a population, and multinomial logistic regressions using six out of the seven PAT2.0 subscales, were used to determine distinct profile differences and predictors of profile membership.

RESULTS

The three-tiered risk levels revealed were relatively high, as compared to levels in families of children with other clinical diagnoses. LPA yielded a three-profile solution: low family risk (63.53%); high caregiver stress, above-average levels of family risk (22.5%); and sibling problems, above-average levels of family risk (13.94%). Ethnicity and type of injury predicted group membership.

CONCLUSION

Families of children following PTMEs are at increased psychosocial risk. A clinically useful approach to identifying and preventing PTSS may be to evaluate specific domain patterns rather than just the total PAT2.0 risk level alone, based on the PAT2.0 subscales.

A community-based trial of a psychosocial eHealth intervention for parents of children with cancer

BACKGROUND

The Electronic Surviving Cancer Competently Intervention Program (eSCCIP), a psychosocial eHealth intervention for parents and caregivers of children with cancer (parents), was delivered in a community-based psychosocial oncology center. Primary endpoints were intervention acceptability, feasibility, and accessibility, with a secondary exploratory focus on psychosocial outcomes.

PROCEDURE

Oncology therapists in a psychosocial oncology center were trained in eSCCIP delivery. Participants were eligible for participation if they were the primary caregiver of a child with cancer between the ages 0 and 17, could read and write in English, and had reliable internet access to complete eSCCIP. Surveys were administered electronically at baseline and post intervention to evaluate study endpoints. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) were computed for exploratory psychosocial outcomes. Nineteen parents completed the intervention.

RESULTS

Parents rated eSCCIP as highly acceptable, feasible, and accessible. A large clinical effect was detected for acute distress (d = 0.79). Moderate clinical effects were reported for overall posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (d = 0.37), negative mood/cognitions (d = 0.59), and symptoms of anxiety (d = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Results indicate that eSCCIP is an acceptable, feasible, and accessible psychosocial intervention for parents. Exploratory analyses suggest that participation in eSCCIP may contribute to decreases in acute distress, symptoms of anxiety, and symptoms of PTSD.

A scoping review of the experiences and well-being of siblings of children with chronic kidney disease: implications for practice and research

BACKGROUND

Children with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and their families deal with challenging circumstances. While numerous studies have shown that both patients and parents in these families can experience a variety of challenges and concerns, the experience of siblings is less well understood. The focus of this scoping review was on research addressing the experiences and well-being of siblings of children with CKD.

METHODS

Following scoping review methodology, five databases were searched for peer-reviewed research or graduate theses published in English that addressed the experience or well-being of siblings aged 25 years or younger (biological, step or foster) of children with CKD; studies from any year or location were included. Two independent coders identified relevant studies. Findings were summarized and synthesized.

RESULTS

Of the 2990 studies identified, 19 were chosen for full text review and eight fit the inclusion criteria. Five of the selected studies were qualitative, two were quantitative and one used mixed-methods. Four broad themes across studies were identified including family functioning, significant relationships, psychological well-being, and coping strategies. While there was some convergence between qualitative and quantitative findings, these linkages were weak.

CONCLUSIONS

Several unmet needs of siblings were uncovered by this review. Sibling perceptions of differential parental treatment and desire for information about CKD emerged as priorities for practice. Using a strength-based approach in order to better understand sibling experiences and well-being was also recommended for future research. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Suicidal ideation and executive functioning in pediatric cancer

OBJECTIVE

Neurocognitive impairments and psychological distress are among the most common difficulties experienced by children treated for cancer. Elevated rates of suicidal ideation (SI) are documented among cancer survivors, and a link between neurocognitive deficits and SI is evident, yet the relationship between SI and pediatric cancer-related neurocognitive effects has not yet been studied.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Participants were 166 pediatric cancer patients (57.8% Brain Tumor, 31.3% leukemia, 10.8% other cancers) aged 6-23 (M = 11.57, SD = 3.82; 45.8% female) referred for neuropsychological surveillance. SI prevalence was measured by parent, teacher, or patient endorsement of self-harm related items on informant-report measures (e.g., the Child Behavior Checklist). Executive functioning (Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function), ADHD symptoms (ADHD Rating Scale), and performance-based measures were compared between those with SI and those without.

RESULTS

17.5% of pediatric cancer patients experienced SI, of which 44.7% had self-endorsement only, 58.5% parent-endorsement only, 20.6% teacher-endorsement only, and 24.1% had two endorsements. Those with SI had significantly greater impairments in global executive composite scores by both parent- and teacher-report (ps < 0.05). Parents of children with SI endorsed significantly more inattention symptoms (M = 6.10, SD = 15.48) than those without SI (M = 50.56, SD = 8.70; p < 0.01), but hyperactivity symptoms did not differ. Intellectual and executive function performance did not differ between those with and without SI (ps > 0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

An elevated number of children treated for cancer experience SI and related neurocognitive problems. Screening for SI and further assessment of the connection between executive functioning and SI in pediatric cancer populations is needed.

Social Support in Parents of Children With Cancer: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

Parents of children with cancer (PCCs) experience stress as they navigate managing their child's illness. Arguably, social support is critical to PCCs' well-being. This review examines the literature on social support in PCCs.

METHODS

Studies of social support in PCCs were collected from PsycINFO, CINHAL, and MEDLINE. Data were extracted from 37 studies published between January 2010 and May 2021 related to the conceptualization, measurement, and availability of social support in PCCs. Relationships between PCCs' social support, well-being, and unique parent and child factors were also synthesized. Risks of biases were assessed using domains of the Effective Public Health Practice Project.

RESULTS

Social support in PCCs is conceptualized as (a) perceived availability and satisfaction with social support and (b) social support seeking as a coping strategy. Parents of children with cancer report receiving as much or more support than typical adults, but PCCs engage in less social support seeking. Family and significant others are the most prevalent sources of support, and emotional support is the most received type of social support. Social support is positively related to well-being and negatively related to distress, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. Findings related to social support differences based on parent and child unique factors were minimal and present opportunities for future research. The risk of bias was generally low, with caution that most studies cannot demonstrate directionality of findings due to cross-sectional study designs.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the consistent positive association between social support and well-being in PCCs, clinicians should assess and encourage social support for this vulnerable population.

Social support and siblings of children with cancer: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

Social support is essential in healthy adjustment to life stressors. This scoping review examines how social support has been conceptualized, operationalized, and studied among siblings of children with cancer. Gaps in the current literature are identified, and future research directions are proposed.

METHODS

A rigorous systematic scoping review framework guided our process. Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Scopus were searched for literature regarding social support and siblings of children with cancer. After screening, 57 articles were identified (n = 26 quantitative, n = 21 qualitative, and n = 10 multi-method) and their content extracted for summarization.

RESULTS

The majority of studies (n = 43, 75.4%) were descriptive; 14 (24.6%) included interventions, and of those, four were experimental. Few studies used a clearly defined theoretical framework, or validated tools to measure social support. Studies explored perceived social support needs of siblings, the provision and availability of formal support through interventions and related outcomes, and informal family social supports. A variety of support types were found to be helpful to siblings in different ways.

CONCLUSIONS

Social support is a prevalent topic in the literature regarding siblings of children with cancer. It is unclear what types of support are most important due to how it has been conceptualized and measured. Despite some methodological limitations, greater levels of social support have been linked to better adaptation among siblings of children with cancer. Future work is warranted to identify the most beneficial types of support for siblings based on their age, developmental stage, and the cancer trajectory.

Trauma-Informed Care

Most children will experience some type of trauma during childhood, and many children suffer from significant adversities. Research in genetics, neuroscience, and epidemiology all provide evidence that these experiences have effects at the molecular, cellular, and organ level, with consequences on physical, emotional, developmental, and behavioral health across the life span. Trauma-informed care translates that science to inform and improve pediatric care and outcomes. To practically address trauma and promote resilience, pediatric clinicians need tools to assess childhood trauma and adversity experiences as well as practical guidance, resources, and interventions. In this clinical report, we summarize current, practical advice for rendering trauma-informed care across varied medical settings.

Protocol for mapping psychosocial screening to resources in pediatric oncology: a pilot randomized controlled trial

Background

A pediatric cancer diagnosis and its treatment can have a detrimental effect on the mental health of children and their families. Screening to identify psychosocial risk in families has been recognized as a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but there has been limited clinical application of this standard thus far. A significant impediment to the implementation of psychosocial screening is the dearth of information on how to translate psychosocial screening to clinical practice, and specifically, how to follow-up from screening results. This manuscript aims to describe a protocol of a new intervention examining the feasibility and acceptability of mapping via a Psychosocial Navigator (PSN) psychosocial screening results to specific recommendations of resources for families based on measured risk for psychosocial distress and mental health symptoms.

Methods

The pilot randomized control trial (RCT) consists of dyads of youth (10–17 years) newly diagnosed with cancer and their primary caregiver. This RCT includes two arms (intervention and control group), with each group completing measurements near diagnosis and 1 year later. After the initial assessment, dyads in the intervention group receive monthly screening results and recommendations from the study PSN that are tailored to these results. The patient’s primary healthcare team (nurse, social worker, oncologist) also receive the risk, distress, and mental health results as well as the recommendations from the PSN.

Discussion

This study addresses a significant barrier to the implementation of psychosocial screening in pediatric oncology: specifically, the limited knowledge of how to follow-up from screening results. Findings from this pilot will inform a future definitive RCT to test the effectiveness of the intervention on patient and family mental health outcomes. This project has implications for enhancing clinical care in pediatric oncology, as well as other pediatric populations.

Strengths and limitations of this study

This is the first study of screening and follow-up using a psychosocial navigator.

This study involves both patient and caregiver report.

The small sample size necessitates a future larger study to investigate the effects of intervention.

Trial registration

NCT04132856, Registered 10 October 2019—retrospectively registered.

Association of psychological distress and religious coping tendencies in parents of children recently diagnosed with cancer: A cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Parents of children with cancer exhibit high levels of psychological distress. Parents of children with serious illness report religion and spirituality are important coping resources. We sought to describe characteristics of religion, religious coping, social support, and resiliency in parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer and examine associations between psychological distress and self-reported religious coping, religiosity, resiliency, and social support.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional observational study of 100 parents of 81 unique children recently diagnosed with cancer. Parents provided demographic information and completed measures of psychological distress, importance of religion, religious coping, resiliency, and social support. Patients' type of tumor and intensity of treatment were collected by medical record abstraction.

RESULTS

Compared to nationally reported data for adults, parents of children with cancer reported high scores for psychological distress but similar levels of religiosity, religious coping, and resiliency. Negative religious coping (feelings of negativity related to the divine) was associated with higher levels of psychological distress. This effect was most prominent in parents who reported the highest levels of religiosity. Positive religious coping, religiosity, and social support were not associated with levels of psychological distress.

DISCUSSION

Findings confirm high levels of distress for parents of children with cancer. Negative religious coping was associated with higher levels of psychological distress but positive religious coping, religiosity, and other coping factors were not found to be significantly associated with distress. Further assessment of negative religious coping to inform interventions to promote resiliency is warranted as they may impact parental decision-making and care.

Using qualitative and participatory methods to refine implementation strategies: universal family psychosocial screening in pediatric cancer

Background

Children with cancer and their families are at risk for short- and long-term psychosocial difficulties. Screening for psychosocial risk remains inconsistent, leading to inequitable access to psychosocial services. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is an evidence-based caregiver report screener of family psychosocial risk ready for implementation in a nationwide cluster randomized trial that will test two implementation strategies across 18 pediatric cancer centers. The current study, conducted in preparation for the trial, solicited the perspectives of key stakeholders about two proposed implementation strategies identified during previous research which focus on health equity and screening of all families (universal screening). Results were used to refine the implementation strategies for testing in the subsequent trial.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with 19 key stakeholders (parents, health care providers, pediatric oncology organizations, and pediatric healthcare leaders) were conducted regarding the two implementation strategies. Strategy I is a training webinar; Strategy II is training + implementation enhanced resources, which includes a champion at each site and monthly peer support consultation calls. Data were analyzed using directed content analysis with deductively derived codes based on the Interactive Systems Framework and inductive codes based on emerging data.

Results

Stakeholder interviews provided rich data to rigorously modify the proposed implementation strategies. Implementation strategies were modified in consistent with these recommendations: engaging providers by framing family psychosocial screening as an opportunity for more efficient and effective practice; setting clear expectations about the importance of screening 100% of children and their families to achieve the goal of universal screening, equity of care, and reduction of disparities; and adapting successful strategies for systematic implementation of screening to ensure optimal engagement with children and their families throughout their care.

Conclusions

Stakeholder input strengthened implementation strategies by suggesting modifications that emphasized health equity and reduction in health disparities. Using implementation science methods to build on a long-standing program of research provided practical insights about immediate needs of families and historical insights regarding structural inequities such as language differences and access to services. Resulting strategies address all levels of the social ecology for children’s cancer care, including the patient, family, provider, healthcare system, and community.

Trial registration

NCT04446728 June 23, 2020

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-021-00163-4.

Neurodevelopmental and psychosocial interventions for individuals with CHD: a research agenda and recommendations from the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative

In 2018, the Neurodevelopmental and Psychosocial Interventions Working Group of the Cardiac Neurodevelopmental Outcome Collaborative convened through support from an R13 grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute to survey the state of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial intervention research in CHD and to propose a slate of critical questions and investigations required to improve outcomes for this growing population of survivors and their families. Prior research, although limited, suggests that individualised developmental care interventions delivered early in life are beneficial for improving a range of outcomes including feeding, motor and cognitive development, and physiological regulation. Interventions to address self-regulatory, cognitive, and social-emotional challenges have shown promise in other medical populations, yet their applicability and effectiveness for use in individuals with CHD have not been examined. To move this field of research forward, we must strive to better understand the impact of neurodevelopmental and psychosocial intervention within the CHD population including adapting existing interventions for individuals with CHD. We must examine the ways in which dedicated cardiac neurodevelopmental follow-up programmes bolster resilience and support children and families through the myriad transitions inherent to the experience of living with CHD. And, we must ensure that interventions are person-/family-centred, inclusive of individuals from diverse cultural backgrounds as well as those with genetic/medical comorbidities, and proactive in their efforts to include individuals who are at highest risk but who may be traditionally less likely to participate in intervention trials.

Creating a Pathway for Psychosocial Support in Siblings of Youth with a Chronic Illness: Findings from an International Summit

OBJECTIVE

Serious childhood illnesses such as cancer affect all family members. Siblings experience strong emotions and disruptions to their routines as families reorganize to confront the disease and manage treatment. Addressing siblings' psychosocial needs is a standard of care in pediatric oncology, but siblings' needs are rarely met because of systematic barriers in our health care system. Thus, we aimed to re-envision sibling care. We used an appreciative inquiry approach to inform systematic screening of siblings' psychosocial risk and unmet needs as a first step toward providing appropriate support.

METHOD

Sibling-focused researchers, clinicians, policymakers, advocates, and families of youth with cancer (N = 29) convened for a 2-day community stakeholder-centered international summit to create a vision for standardizing and optimizing sibling-focused psychosocial screening and assessment as a pathway to care, including crafting a research agenda and articulating best clinical practices.

RESULTS

Summit attendees created a detailed framework for best practices in universal sibling psychosocial screening and pathways to support. The framework emphasizes links between hospital- and community-based care. It highlights the need to prepare systems to feasibly and effectively attend to siblings' needs and recommends incorporating siblings into family-based psychosocial screening at cancer diagnosis, systematically conducting sibling-focused psychosocial screening during and after cancer treatment, and connecting siblings with community-based resources.

CONCLUSION

A systematic approach to sibling psychosocial services expands the idea of family-centered care to include siblings and ensures that siblings' needs are adequately recognized and met. This framework was created in the context of cancer but is applicable across illness groups.

Child and Family Factors Associated With Posttraumatic Stress Responses Following a Traumatic Medical Event: The Role of Medical Team Support

OBJECTIVES

This study examined the contribution of pretrauma psychosocial factors (child emotional functioning, family resources, family functioning, and social support) and environmental factors (mother's posttraumatic stress symptoms [PTSSs], medical team support [MTS]) to PTSSs of injured or seriously ill children within a pediatric rehabilitation setting. It was hypothesized that psychosocial variables would be strongly associated with child's PTSS; that mother's PTSS and MTS would mediate the association between psychosocial factors and child's PTSS; that mother's report on child's PTSS would mediate the association between mother's PTSS and child's PTSS.

METHODS

Participants were 196 children hospitalized following an injury/illness and assessed M = 47.7 days postevent. Children completed measures of PTSS, mothers completed measures of their own PTSS, child's PTSS, and pretrauma psychosocial factors. Family's therapist completed a MTS measure. Structural equation modeling was employed to evaluate the study hypotheses.

RESULTS

Pretrauma family structure and resources were associated with child's self-reported PTSS; each pretrauma variable and mother's report of child's PTSS was significantly associated. Although mother's PTSS was not directly associated with child's PTSS, this relationship was mediated by mother's report of child's PTSS. MTS mediated the relationship between pretrauma social support and mother's PTSS.

CONCLUSION

This study further explicates the utility of a biopsychosocial framework in predicting childhood PTSS. Findings confirm the role of pretrauma factors and environmental factors at the peritrauma period in the development of PTSS following a pediatric injury/illness. Mother's PTSS and MTS may be appropriate targets for prevention and early intervention.

Psychosocial Screening in Sickle Cell Disease: Validation of the Psychosocial Assessment Tool

OBJECTIVE

Families of youth with Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) can face psychosocial adversity including emotional distress, functional impairments, and sociodemographic risk factors. Systematic screening of psychosocial risk can identify families who may benefit from further assessment and evidence-based care. The Psychosocial Assessment Tool (PAT) is a brief caregiver-report screener based on the tri-level Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM).

METHODS

Findings are presented from the baseline assessment of a longitudinal study validating a Sickle Cell version of the PAT 2.0. Primary caregivers of 136 youth with SCD receiving care through a multidisciplinary SCD clinic in a children's hospital completed the PAT and validation measures. A subset of 25 caregivers completed the PAT a second time within 3-5 weeks.

RESULTS

Internal consistency for the total score was strong (α = .87), and for the subscales was moderate to strong (α  =  .74-.94), with the exception of the Family Structure (α  =  .38), Caregiver Beliefs (α  =  .48), and Stress Reactions (α  =  .56) subscales. Test-retest reliability was also strong (r = .86, p < .001). Moderate to strong correlations with all except two criteria measures provided validation for the total and subscale scores. Validation measures varied significantly across the three levels of the PPPHM.

CONCLUSIONS

Results provide support for the reliability and validity of the PAT in SCD. Systematic screening with the PAT can help identify families of youth with SCD at risk for psychosocial problems and potentially help connect them to appropriate services.

No increase in psychosocial stress of Dutch children with cancer and their caregivers during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic

We studied the psychosocial impact of the start of the COVID-19 pandemic on Dutch children with cancer in outpatient care and their caregivers (n = 799) using regular monitoring and screening outcomes. No differences were observed between the pre-COVID-19 and early-COVID-19 periods in health-related quality of life and fatigue of children. Fewer caregivers were distressed during the COVID-19 period than pre-COVID-19. In conclusion, the additional stress of COVID-19 did not deteriorate psychosocial functioning of children with cancer and their caregivers. Results may be explained by alleviating daily life changes, experience in coping with medical traumatic stress, and appropriate care and support.

Longitudinal predictors of caregiver resilience outcomes at the end of childhood cancer treatment

OBJECTIVE

Caregiver resilience in the context of childhood cancer treatment has been described using cross-sectional and retrospective studies, but little is known about prospective predictors of resilience outcomes. We examined associations of demographics, cancer-related variables, and intrapersonal and interpersonal factors at diagnosis (family psychosocial risk, perceived social support, and healthcare self-efficacy) and psychosocial services provided during treatment with caregiver resilience outcomes at the end of treatment.

METHODS

For a study validating a family psychosocial risk screener, 314 primary caregivers completed the measures at diagnosis of their child (aged 0-17 years) and when cancer treatment ended. Resilience outcomes were ratings of distress, posttraumatic stress, and posttraumatic growth. Multiple regression analyses evaluated the relative contribution of hypothesized predictors.

RESULTS

Caregivers endorsed clinically significant distress, moderate posttraumatic growth, and low posttraumatic stress based on norms. Posttraumatic growth was not associated with posttraumatic stress or distress, which were significantly associated with each other. Over and above resilience at diagnosis, family psychosocial risk was associated with resilience at the end of treatment. Perceived social support, healthcare self-efficacy, and psychosocial services provided demonstrated associations with resilience in univariate analyses, but demographics and cancer-related variables did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Resilience and family psychosocial risk at diagnosis were the strongest predictors of caregiver resilience outcomes at the end of the treatment. Intrapersonal and interpersonal predictors were weaker and varied by resilience measure. Consistent with psychosocial standards of care, broad evaluation of caregiver risks, resources, and resilience processes and outcomes is recommended at diagnosis and through the treatment trajectory including the end of treatment.

Pediatric Psychosocial Standards of Care in action: Research that bridges the gap from need to implementation

OBJECTIVE

To describe innovative models of psychosocial care delivery that align with published Standards of Psychosocial Care of Children with Cancer and their Families, in efforts to bridge the divide between research and practice.

METHODS

The Mattie Miracle Cancer Foundation, in partnership with the American Psychosocial Oncology Society reviewed 22 letters of intent and 13 full grants and awarded small grants to researchers with high quality projects that aimed to implement any of the published 15 Standards of Care. For three of the highest rated funded research projects, we describe the Standard implemented, the novel research design and implementation strategies, and how the research findings might inform the development, implementation, and dissemination of effective solutions for bridging Standard-to-practice gaps.

RESULTS

The first study presented is an innovative eHealth intervention for parents of children with cancer designed to improve family functioning and decrease symptoms of acute distress, anxiety, and posttraumatic stress. The second study addresses the acceptability and feasibility of using daily text message assessments of oral chemotherapy adherence in adolescents and young adults with leukemia, and the third creates a blueprint for providing psychosocial services to siblings, including ways to overcome common implementation barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Several themes emerged from the studies presented, including (1) attention to barriers to previous attempts at implementation; (2) technology's role in delivering care; (3) the need for stakeholder involvement; and (4) consideration for multi-pronged solutions that address heterogeneity in care settings. Next steps for integrating the Standards of Psychosocial Care into clinical practice are discussed.

Threshold score for the self-report Pediatric Distress Thermometer Rating Scale in childhood cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Although there is enthusiasm for identifying and treating psychosocial problems in childhood cancer patients, there are few validated instruments to help providers identify at-risk children for further assessment. The study objective was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the self-report pediatric Distress Thermometer Rating Scale (Peds DTRS) in childhood cancer survivors and identify a threshold score to help providers classify pediatric patients.

METHODS

We evaluated 54 children 7-17 years old using 178 Peds DTRS longitudinal data points from the cohort that was used for the original pediatric adaptation of the DTRS. We compared Peds DTRS scores against two established standardized measures using a generalized linear mixed model to deal with the dependency in the longitudinal data to estimate ROC curves and related statistics.

RESULTS

Results indicate that a score of 3 is a reasonable cutoff to identify distress with children 7-17 years old. This cutoff yielded high sensitivity (87.0%) and specificity (79.7%) using the PedsQL Emotional Domain score as the standard. Similar results were obtained using the CDI as the standard, but we are cautious as very few CDI scores reached the cutoff criterion. Exploratory analysis highlighted clinical factors that correlate with increased distress measured using the Peds DTRS.

CONCLUSIONS

The Peds DTRS is a very brief, convenient, and rapid screening tool for global distress in children. Further investigation of the Peds DTRS and other tools can improve the ability of providers to prevent and treat the negative emotional consequences of cancer and improve the quality of survivorship.

Psychological, educational, and social late effects in adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study

OBJECTIVE

To delineate the impact of treatment exposures and chronic health conditions on psychological, educational, and social outcomes in adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor.

METHODS

Parent reports from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study were analyzed for 666 adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor and 698 adolescent siblings. Adjusting for race and household income, survivors were compared to siblings on the Behavior Problems Index and educational outcomes. Multivariable modified Poisson regression estimated relative risks (RR) for therapeutic exposures and chronic health conditions (CTCAE 4.03 graded) among survivors, adjusting for sex, race, income, and age at diagnosis.

RESULTS

Compared to siblings, adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor were more likely to take psychoactive medication (9.4% vs. 5.1%, p < 0.001) and utilize special education services (25.5% vs. 12.6%, p < 0.001) but did not differ significantly in emotional and behavioral problems. Survivors were less likely to be friendless (7.2% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.04) but were more likely to have difficulty getting along with friends (14.5% vs. 7.8%, p < 0.001). Among survivors, use of special education services was associated with abdomen plus chest radiation (RR = 1.98, CI:1.18-3.34). Those with grade 2-4 cardiovascular conditions had higher risk for anxiety/depression (RR = 1.95, CI:1.19-3.19), headstrong behaviors (RR = 1.91, CI:1.26-2.89), and inattention (RR = 1.56, CI:1.02-2.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Adolescent survivors of Wilms tumor were similar to siblings with respect to mental health concerns overall but were more likely to require special education. Monitoring of psychosocial and academic problems through adolescence is warranted, especially among those treated with radiation to the abdomen plus chest or with cardiac conditions.

The impact of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant timing and psychosocial factors on family and caregiver adjustment

BACKGROUND

The impact of pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) on family functioning varies, but little is known about how the timing of HCT in children's treatment course contributes to this variability. This study examines how preexisting child, sibling, and family problems, the length of time between diagnosis to HCT, and children's age at HCT are associated with family and caregiver functioning.

PROCEDURE

Caregivers (n = 140) of children (≤18 years old) scheduled to undergo their first HCT completed the Psychological Assessment Tool-HCT and the Impact on Family Scale. Treatment information was extracted from electronic medical records. A bootstrapped multivariate path analysis was used to test the hypotheses.

RESULTS

More preexisting family problems related to greater caregiver perceived negative impact of their child's HCT across family and caregiver functioning domains. Less time between diagnosis and HCT was associated with greater caregiver personal strain, particularly for those with younger children undergoing HCT. Younger child age at HCT was also associated with a larger negative impact on family social functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Families with preexisting problems are the most at-risk for experiencing negative impacts related to their child's HCT. The timing of a child's HCT within their treatment course and the child's age during HCT may impact families' social functioning and caregiver adjustment. Screening families for preexisting family problems, particularly for families with young children or who are abruptly learning of their child's need for an HCT, may assist providers in identifying families who would benefit from earlier or more intensive psychosocial support.

A three-tier process for screening depression and anxiety among children and adolescents with cancer

OBJECTIVE

To establish and to evaluate the effectiveness of a three-tier screening process of depressive and anxiety disorders among children and adolescents with cancer based on questionnaires (first tier), semistructured psychiatric interviews (second tier), and referral for psychiatric assessment and recommendations for treatment (third tier). We also aimed to determine the rates of depressive and anxiety disorders among participants.

METHODS

Participants and their parents completed the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression and Anxiety modules. Then, they were interviewed separately using the semistructured Affective and Anxiety Modules of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children (K-SADS). PROMIS cutoff values for diagnosing depressive and anxiety disorders, based on the K-SADS, were calculated by receiver-operating characteristics (ROCs).

RESULTS

Of 91 participants 34 (37.4%) aged 7 to 21 years with cancer met the K-SADS criteria for depressive and/or anxiety disorders. The results of the ROC analyses were stronger for depressive disorders than for anxiety disorders and for more severe cases. The cutoff of 13 on the child-reported PROMIS for a major depressive episode had a sensitivity of 0.80 and a specificity of 0.82, and a cutoff of 14 on the parent-reported PROMIS for generalized anxiety disorder had a sensitivity of 0.78 and a specificity of 0.79.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the K-SADS, we found that anxiety and depressive disorders are very common in youngsters with cancer. The three-tier screening process we developed for depression and anxiety in this population provides practical cutoff values for identifying depressive and anxiety disorders in children with cancer.