1
|
Sanders WR, Barber JK, Temkin NR, Foreman B, Giacino JT, Williamson T, Edlow BL, Manley GT, Bodien YG. Recovery Potential in Patients Who Died After Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment: A TRACK-TBI Propensity Score Analysis. J Neurotrauma 2024. [PMID: 38739032 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2024.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Among patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), there is high prognostic uncertainty but growing evidence that recovery of independence is possible. Nevertheless, families are often asked to make decisions about withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WLST) within days of injury. The range of potential outcomes for patients who died after WLST (WLST+) is unknown, posing a challenge for prognostic modeling and clinical counseling. We investigated the potential for survival and recovery of independence after acute TBI in patients who died after WLST. We used Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) data and propensity score matching to pair participants with WLST+ to those with a similar probability of WLST (based on demographic and clinical characteristics), but for whom life-sustaining treatment was not withdrawn (WLST-). To optimize matching, we divided the WLST- cohort into tiers (Tier 1 = 0-11%, Tier 2 = 11-27%, Tier 3 = 27-70% WLST propensity). We estimated the level of recovery that could be expected in WLST+ participants by evaluating 3-, 6-, and 12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) and Disability Rating Scale outcomes in matched WLST- participants. Of 90 WLST+ participants (80% male, mean [standard deviation; SD] age = 59.2 [17.9] years, median [IQR] days to WLST = 5.4 [2.2, 11.7]), 80 could be matched to WLST- participants. Of 56 WLST- participants who were followed at 6 months, 31 (55%) died. Among survivors in the overall sample and survivors in Tiers 1 and 2, more than 30% recovered at least partial independence (GOSE ≥4). In Tier 3, recovery to GOSE ≥4 occurred at 12 months, but not 6 months, post-injury. These results suggest a substantial proportion of patients with TBI and WLST may have survived and achieved at least partial independence. However, death or severe disability is a common outcome when the probability of WLST is high. While further validation is needed, our findings support a more cautious clinical approach to WLST and more complete reporting on WLST in TBI studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William R Sanders
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jason K Barber
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Nancy R Temkin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Theresa Williamson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Brian L Edlow
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Radiology, Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cai LT, Moon J, Camacho PB, Anderson AT, Chwa WJ, Sutton BP, Markowitz AJ, Palacios EM, Rodriguez A, Manley GT, Shankar S, Bremer PT, Mukherjee P, Madduri RK. MaPPeRTrac: A Massively Parallel, Portable, and Reproducible Tractography Pipeline. Neuroinformatics 2024; 22:177-191. [PMID: 38446357 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-024-09650-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Large-scale diffusion MRI tractography remains a significant challenge. Users must orchestrate a complex sequence of instructions that requires many software packages with complex dependencies and high computational costs. We developed MaPPeRTrac, an edge-centric tractography pipeline that simplifies and accelerates this process in a wide range of high-performance computing (HPC) environments. It fully automates either probabilistic or deterministic tractography, starting from a subject's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data, including structural and diffusion MRI images, to the edge density image (EDI) of their structural connectomes. Dependencies are containerized with Singularity (now called Apptainer) and decoupled from code to enable rapid prototyping and modification. Data derivatives are organized with the Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) to ensure that they are findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable following FAIR principles. The pipeline takes full advantage of HPC resources using the Parsl parallel programming framework, resulting in the creation of connectome datasets of unprecedented size. MaPPeRTrac is publicly available and tested on commercial and scientific hardware, so it can accelerate brain connectome research for a broader user community. MaPPeRTrac is available at: https://github.com/LLNL/mappertrac .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanya T Cai
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA
| | - Joseph Moon
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA
| | - Paul B Camacho
- Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Aaron T Anderson
- Beckman Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 405 N Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Won Jong Chwa
- Department of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Bradley P Sutton
- Bioengineering Department, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 506 S Mathews Ave, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Eva M Palacios
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA
| | - Alexis Rodriguez
- Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, 400 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA
| | - Shivsundaram Shankar
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA
| | - Peer-Timo Bremer
- Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 7000 East Ave, Livermore, CA, 94550, USA
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, 185 Berry St., San Francisco, CA, 94107, USA.
| | - Ravi K Madduri
- Argonne National Laboratory, 9700 S Cass Ave, Lemont, IL, 60439, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tinti L, Lawson T, Molteni E, Kondziella D, Rass V, Sharshar T, Bodien YG, Giacino JT, Mayer SA, Amiri M, Muehlschlegel S, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Vespa PM, Menon DK, Citerio G, Helbok R, McNett M. Research considerations for prospective studies of patients with coma and disorders of consciousness. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae022. [PMID: 38344653 PMCID: PMC10853976 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Disorders of consciousness are neurological conditions characterized by impaired arousal and awareness of self and environment. Behavioural responses are absent or are present but fluctuate. Disorders of consciousness are commonly encountered as a consequence of both acute and chronic brain injuries, yet reliable epidemiological estimates would require inclusive, operational definitions of the concept, as well as wider knowledge dissemination among involved professionals. Whereas several manifestations have been described, including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome and minimally conscious state, a comprehensive neurobiological definition for disorders of consciousness is still lacking. The scientific literature is primarily observational, and studies-specific aetiologies lead to disorders of consciousness. Despite advances in these disease-related forms, there remains uncertainty about whether disorders of consciousness are a disease-agnostic unitary entity with a common mechanism, prognosis or treatment response paradigm. Our knowledge of disorders of consciousness has also been hampered by heterogeneity of study designs, variables, and outcomes, leading to results that are not comparable for evidence synthesis. The different backgrounds of professionals caring for patients with disorders of consciousness and the different goals at different stages of care could partly explain this variability. The Prospective Studies working group of the Neurocritical Care Society Curing Coma Campaign was established to create a platform for observational studies and future clinical trials on disorders of consciousness and coma across the continuum of care. In this narrative review, the author panel presents limitations of prior observational clinical research and outlines practical considerations for future investigations. A narrative review format was selected to ensure that the full breadth of study design considerations could be addressed and to facilitate a future consensus-based statement (e.g. via a modified Delphi) and series of recommendations. The panel convened weekly online meetings from October 2021 to December 2022. Research considerations addressed the nosographic status of disorders of consciousness, case ascertainment and verification, selection of dependent variables, choice of covariates and measurement and analysis of outcomes and covariates, aiming to promote more homogeneous designs and practices in future observational studies. The goal of this review is to inform a broad community of professionals with different backgrounds and clinical interests to address the methodological challenges imposed by the transition of care from acute to chronic stages and to streamline data gathering for patients with disorders of consciousness. A coordinated effort will be a key to allow reliable observational data synthesis and epidemiological estimates and ultimately inform condition-modifying clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenzo Tinti
- Department of Neuroscience, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Thomas Lawson
- Critical Care, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Erika Molteni
- Biomedical Engineering Department, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London SE1 7EU, UK
| | - Daniel Kondziella
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Verena Rass
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
| | - Tarek Sharshar
- Neuro-Intensive Care Medicine, Anaesthesiology and ICU Department, GHU-Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Pole Neuro, Sainte-Anne Hospital, Institute of Psychiatry and Neurosciences of Paris, INSERM U1266, Université Paris Cité, Paris 75006, France
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
| | - Stephan A Mayer
- Department of Neurology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
| | - Moshgan Amiri
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Susanne Muehlschlegel
- Department of Neurology and Anesthesiology/Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Chethan P Venkatasubba Rao
- Division of Vascular Neurology and Neurocritical Care, Baylor College of Medicine and CHI Baylor St Luke’s Medical Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Paul M Vespa
- Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1TN, UK
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- NeuroIntensive Care, IRCSS Fondazione San Gerardo dei Tintori, Monza 20900, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Università Milano Bicocca, Milan 20854, Italy
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck 6020, Austria
- Department of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University, Linz 4040, Austria
| | - Molly McNett
- College of Nursing, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Picon EL, Wardell V, Palombo DJ, Todd RM, Aziz B, Bedi S, Silverberg ND. Factors perpetuating functional cognitive symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2023; 45:988-1002. [PMID: 37602857 DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2023.2247601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Self-reported memory difficulties (forgetting familiar names, misplacing objects) often persist long after a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), despite normal neuropsychological test performance. This clinical presentation may be a manifestation of a functional cognitive disorder (FCD). Several mechanisms underlying FCD have been proposed, including metacognitive impairment, memory perfectionism, and misdirected attention, as well as depression or anxiety-related explanations. This study aims to explore these candidate perpetuating factors in mTBI, to advance our understanding of why memory symptoms frequently persist following mTBI. METHODS A cross-sectional study of 67 adults (n = 39 with mTBI mean = 25 months ago and n = 28 healthy controls). Participants completed standardized questionnaires (including the Functional Memory Disorder Inventory), a metacognitive task (to quantify discrepancies between their trial-by-trial accuracy and confidence), and a brief neuropsychological test battery. We assessed candidate mechanisms in two ways: (1) between-groups, comparing participants with mTBI to healthy controls, and (2) within-group, examining their associations with functional memory symptom severity (FMDI) in the mTBI group. RESULTS Participants with mTBI performed similarly to controls on objective measures of memory ability but reported experiencing much more frequent memory lapses in daily life. Contrary to expectations, metacognitive efficiency did not differentiate the mTBI and control groups and was not associated with functional memory symptoms. Memory perfectionism was strongly associated with greater functional memory symptoms among participants with mTBI but did not differ between groups when accounting for age. Depression and checking behaviors produced consistent results across between-groups and within-group analyses: these factors were greater in the mTBI group compared to the control group and were associated with greater functional memory symptoms within the mTBI group. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights promising (e.g., depression, checking behaviors) and unlikely (e.g., metacognitive impairment) mechanisms underlying functional memory symptoms after mTBI, to guide future research and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwina L Picon
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Victoria Wardell
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Daniela J Palombo
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rebecca M Todd
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Bilal Aziz
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sanjana Bedi
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Noah D Silverberg
- Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Centre for Aging SMART, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lindblad C, Rostami E, Helmy A. Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist as Therapy for Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurotherapeutics 2023; 20:1508-1528. [PMID: 37610701 PMCID: PMC10684479 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-023-01421-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a common type of acquired brain injury of varying severity carrying potentially deleterious consequences for the afflicted individuals, families, and society. Following the initial, traumatically induced insult, cellular injury processes ensue. These are believed to be amenable to treatment. Among such injuries, neuroinflammation has gained interest and has become a specific focus for both experimental and clinical researchers. Neuroinflammation is elicited almost immediately following trauma, and extend for a long time, possibly for years, after the primary injury. In the acute phase, the inflammatory response is characterized by innate mechanisms such as the activation of microglia which among else mediates cytokine production. Among the earliest cytokines to emerge are the interleukin- (IL-) 1 family members, comprising, for example, the agonist IL-1β and its competitive antagonist, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra). Because of its early emergence following trauma and its increased concentrations also after human TBI, IL-1 has been hypothesized to be a tractable treatment target following TBI. Ample experimental data supports this, and demonstrates restored neurological behavior, diminished lesion zones, and an attenuated inflammatory response following IL-1 modulation either through IL-1 knock-out experiments, IL-1β inhibition, or IL-1ra treatment. Of these, IL-1ra treatment is likely the most physiological. In addition, recombinant human IL-1ra (anakinra) is already approved for utilization across a few rheumatologic disorders. As of today, one randomized clinical controlled trial has utilized IL-1ra inhibition as an intervention and demonstrated its safety. Further clinical trials powered for patient outcome are needed in order to demonstrate efficacy. In this review, we summarize IL-1 biology in relation to acute neuroinflammatory processes following TBI with a particular focus on current evidence for IL-1ra treatment both in the experimental and clinical context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Lindblad
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, entrance 85 floor 2, Akademiska Sjukhuset, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Elham Rostami
- Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uppsala University Hospital, entrance 85 floor 2, Akademiska Sjukhuset, 751 85, Uppsala, Sweden
- Department of Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Adel Helmy
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kelly-Hedrick M, Liu SY, Temkin N, Barber J, Komisarow J, Manley G, Ohnuma T, Colton K, Treggiari MM, Monson EE, Vavilala MS, Grandhi R, Laskowitz DT, Mathew JP, Hernandez A, James ML, Raghunathan K, Goldstein B, Markowitz AJ, Krishnamoorthy V. Association of Early Beta-Blocker Exposure and Functional Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study. Crit Care Explor 2023; 5:e0958. [PMID: 37693305 PMCID: PMC10484371 DOI: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000958] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to 1) describe patterns of beta-blocker utilization among critically ill patients following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and 2) examine the association of early beta-blocker exposure with functional and clinical outcomes following injury. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING ICUs at 18 level I, U.S. trauma centers in the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study. PATIENTS Greater than or equal to 17 years enrolled in the TRACK-TBI study with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale of <13) were admitted to the ICU after a blunt TBI. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS Primary exposure was a beta blocker during the first 7 days in the ICU, with a primary outcome of 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). Secondary outcomes included: length of hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, 6-month and 12-month mortality, 12-month GOSE score, and 6-month and 12-month measures of disability, well-being, quality of life, and life satisfaction. MAIN RESULTS Of the 450 eligible participants, 57 (13%) received early beta blockers (BB+ group). The BB+ group was on average older, more likely to be on a preinjury beta blocker, and more likely to have a history of hypertension. In the BB+ group, 34 participants (60%) received metoprolol only, 19 participants (33%) received propranolol only, 3 participants (5%) received both, and 1 participant (2%) received atenolol only. In multivariable regression, there was no difference in the odds of a higher GOSE score at 6 months between the BB+ group and BB- group (odds ratio = 0.86; 95% CI, 0.48-1.53). There was no association between BB exposure and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS About one-sixth of subjects in our study received early beta blockers, and within this group, dose, and timing of beta-blocker administration varied substantially. No significant differences in GOSE score at 6 months were demonstrated, although our ability to draw conclusions is limited by overall low total doses administered compared with prior studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Kelly-Hedrick
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Sunny Yang Liu
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Departments of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Barber
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | - Geoffrey Manley
- Departments of Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Tetsu Ohnuma
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Miriam M Treggiari
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Departments of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Eric E Monson
- Libraries Center for Data and Visualization Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Monica S Vavilala
- Departments of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Ramesh Grandhi
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT
| | - Daniel T Laskowitz
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - Michael L James
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Karthik Raghunathan
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Ben Goldstein
- Departments of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- Departments of Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Vijay Krishnamoorthy
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Departments of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Velkinburgh JC, Herbst MD, Casper SM. Diffusion tensor imaging in the courtroom: Distinction between scientific specificity and legally admissible evidence. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:4477-4497. [PMID: 37469746 PMCID: PMC10353495 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i19.4477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Interest and uptake of science and medicine peer-reviewed literature by readers outside of a paper’s topical subject, field or even discipline is ever-expanding. While the application of knowledge from one field or discipline to others can stimulate innovative solutions to problems facing modern society, it is also fraught with danger for misuse. In the practice of law in the United States, academic papers are submitted to the courts as evidence in personal injury litigation from both the plaintiff (complainant) and defendant. Such transcendence of an academic publication over disciplinary boundaries is immediately met with the challenge of application by a group that inherently lacks in-depth knowledge on the scientific method, the practice of evidence-based medicine, or the publication process as a structured and internationally synthesized process involving peer review and guided by ethical standards and norms. A modern-day example of this is the ongoing conflict between the sensitivity of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and the legal standards for admissibility of evidence in litigation cases of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). In this review, we amalgamate the peer-reviewed research on DTI in mTBI with the court’s rationale underlying decisions to admit or exclude evidence of DTI abnormalities to support claims of brain injury. We found that the papers which are critical of the use of DTI in the courtroom reflect a primary misunderstanding about how diagnostic biomarkers differ legally from relevant and admissible evidence. The clinical use of DTI to identify white matter abnormalities in the brain at the chronic stage is a valid methodology both clinically as well as forensically, contributes data that may or may not corroborate the existence of white matter damage, and should be admitted into evidence in personal injury trials if supported by a clinician. We also delve into an aspect of science publication and peer review that can be manipulated by scientists and clinicians to publish an opinion piece and misrepresent it as an unbiased, evidence-based, systematic research article in court cases, the decisions of which establish precedence for future cases and have implications on future legislation that will impact the lives of every citizen and erode the integrity of science and medicine practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mark D Herbst
- Diagnostic Radiology, Independent Diagnostic Radiology Inc, St Petersburg, FL 33711, United States
| | - Stewart M Casper
- Personal Injury Law, Casper & DeToledo LLC, Stamford, CT 06905, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Toro C, Jain S, Sun S, Temkin N, Barber J, Manley G, Komisarow JM, Ohnuma T, Foreman B, Korley F, James ML, Laskowitz D, Vavilala MS, Hernandez A, Mathew JP, Markowitz AJ, Krishnamoorthy V. Association of Brain Injury Biomarkers and Circulatory Shock Following Moderate-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2023; 35:284-291. [PMID: 34967764 PMCID: PMC9243189 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Early circulatory shock following traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a multifactorial process; however, the impact of brain injury biomarkers on the risk of shock has not been evaluated. We examined the association between neuronal injury biomarker levels and the development of circulatory shock following moderate-severe TBI. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, we examined adults with moderate-severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale score <13) enrolled in the TRACK-TBI study, an 18-center prospective TBI cohort study. The exposures were day-1 levels of neuronal injury biomarkers (glial fibrillary acidic protein, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 [UCH-L1], S100 calcium-binding protein B [S100B], neuron-specific enolase), and of an inflammatory biomarker (high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). The primary outcome was the development of circulatory shock, defined as cardiovascular Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score ≥2 within 72 hours of admission. Association between day-1 biomarker levels and the development of circulatory shock was assessed with regression analysis. RESULTS The study included 392 subjects, with a mean age of 40 years; 314 (80%) were male and 165 (42%) developed circulatory shock. Median (interquartile range) day-1 levels of UCH-L1 (994.8 [518.7 to 1988.2] pg/mL vs. 548.1 [280.2 to 1151.9] pg/mL; P <0.0001) and S100B (0.47 μg/mL [0.25 to 0.88] vs. 0.27 [0.16 to 0.46] μg/mL; P <0.0001) were elevated in those who developed early circulatory shock compared with those who did not. In multivariable regression, there were associations between levels of both UCH-L1 (odds ratio, 1.63 [95% confidence interval, 1.25-2.12]; P <0.0005) and S100B (odds ratio, 1.73 [95% confidence interval 1.27-2.36]; P <0.0005) with the development of circulatory shock. CONCLUSION Neuronal injury biomarkers may provide the improved mechanistic understanding and possibly early identification of patients at risk for early circulatory shock following moderate-severe TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Toro
- Duke University School of Medicine. Durham, NC
| | - Sonia Jain
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego. San Diego, CA
| | - Shelly Sun
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego. San Diego, CA
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Department of Biostatistics, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington. Seattle, WA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington. Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurosurgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington. Seattle, WA
| | - Geoffrey Manley
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco. San Francisco, CA
| | | | - Tetsu Ohnuma
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati. Cincinnati, OH
| | - Frederick Korley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan. Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Michael L. James
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Neurology, Duke University. Durham, NC
| | - Daniel Laskowitz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Neurology, Duke University. Durham, NC
| | - Monica S. Vavilala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, and Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | - Amy J. Markowitz
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco. San Francisco, CA
| | - Vijay Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nair J, Welch JF, Marciante AB, Hou T, Lu Q, Fox EJ, Mitchell GS. APOE4, Age, and Sex Regulate Respiratory Plasticity Elicited by Acute Intermittent Hypercapnic-Hypoxia. FUNCTION 2023; 4:zqad026. [PMID: 37575478 PMCID: PMC10413930 DOI: 10.1093/function/zqad026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) shows promise for enhancing motor recovery in chronic spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. However, human trials of AIH have reported significant variability in individual responses. Objectives Identify individual factors (eg, genetics, age, and sex) that determine response magnitude of healthy adults to an optimized AIH protocol, acute intermittent hypercapnic-hypoxia (AIHH). Methods In 17 healthy individuals (age = 27 ± 5 yr), associations between individual factors and changes in the magnitude of AIHH (15, 1-min O2 = 9.5%, CO2 = 5% episodes) induced changes in diaphragm motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and inspiratory mouth occlusion pressures (P0.1) were evaluated. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes linked with mechanisms of AIH induced phrenic motor plasticity (BDNF, HTR2A, TPH2, MAOA, NTRK2) and neuronal plasticity (apolipoprotein E, APOE) were tested. Variations in AIHH induced plasticity with age and sex were also analyzed. Additional experiments in humanized (h)ApoE knock-in rats were performed to test causality. Results AIHH-induced changes in diaphragm MEP amplitudes were lower in individuals heterozygous for APOE4 (i.e., APOE3/4) compared to individuals with other APOE genotypes (P = 0.048) and the other tested SNPs. Males exhibited a greater diaphragm MEP enhancement versus females, regardless of age (P = 0.004). Additionally, age was inversely related with change in P0.1 (P = 0.007). In hApoE4 knock-in rats, AIHH-induced phrenic motor plasticity was significantly lower than hApoE3 controls (P < 0.05). Conclusions APOE4 genotype, sex, and age are important biological determinants of AIHH-induced respiratory motor plasticity in healthy adults. Addition to Knowledge Base AIH is a novel rehabilitation strategy to induce functional recovery of respiratory and non-respiratory motor systems in people with chronic spinal cord injury and/or neurodegenerative disease. Figure 5 Since most AIH trials report considerable inter-individual variability in AIH outcomes, we investigated factors that potentially undermine the response to an optimized AIH protocol, AIHH, in healthy humans. We demonstrate that genetics (particularly the lipid transporter, APOE), age and sex are important biological determinants of AIHH-induced respiratory motor plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayakrishnan Nair
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA
| | - Joseph F Welch
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, 3- B15 2TT, UK
| | - Alexandria B Marciante
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
| | - Tingting Hou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
| | - Emily J Fox
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
- Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, FL, 32216, USA
| | - Gordon S Mitchell
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 32603, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bodien YG, Barber J, Taylor SR, Boase K, Corrigan JD, Dikmen S, Gardner RC, Kramer JH, Levin H, Machamer J, McAllister T, Nelson LD, Ngwenya LB, Sherer M, Stein MB, Vassar M, Whyte J, Yue JK, Markowitz A, McCrea MA, Manley GT, Temkin N, Giacino JT. Feasibility and Utility of a Flexible Outcome Assessment Battery for Longitudinal Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A TRACK-TBI Study. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:337-348. [PMID: 36097759 PMCID: PMC9902043 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are difficult to measure in longitudinal cohort studies, because disparate pre-injury characteristics and injury mechanisms produce variable impairment profiles and recovery trajectories. In preparation for the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, which followed patients with injuries ranging from uncomplicated mild TBI to coma, we designed a multi-dimensional Flexible outcome Assessment Battery (FAB). The FAB relies on a decision-making algorithm that assigns participants to a Comprehensive (CAB) or Abbreviated Assessment Battery (AAB) and guides test selection across all phases of recovery. To assess feasibility of the FAB, we calculated the proportion of participants followed at 2 weeks (2w) and at 3, 6, and 12 months (3m, 6m, 12m) post-injury who completed the FAB and received valid scores. We evaluated utility of the FAB by examining differences in 6m and 12m Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores between participant subgroups derived from the FAB-enabled versus traditional approach to outcome assessment applied at 2w. Among participants followed at 2w (n = 2094), 3m (n = 1871), 6m (n = 1736), and 12m (n = 1607) post-injury, 95-99% received valid completion scores on the FAB, in full or in part, either in person or by telephone. Level of function assessed by the FAB-enabled approach at 2w was associated with 6m and 12m GOSE scores (proportional odds p < 0.001). These findings suggest that the participant classification methodology afforded by the FAB may enable more effective data collection to improve detection of natural history changes and TBI treatment effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yelena G. Bodien
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jason Barber
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Sabrina R. Taylor
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Kim Boase
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Raquel C. Gardner
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Joel H. Kramer
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Thomas McAllister
- University of Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Mark Sherer
- Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Murray B. Stein
- University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Mary Vassar
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - John Whyte
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John K. Yue
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Amy Markowitz
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | | | - Nancy Temkin
- University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Joseph T. Giacino
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nair J, Welch JF, Marciante AB, Hou T, Lu Q, Fox EJ, Mitchell GS. APOE4, Age & Sex Regulate Respiratory Plasticity Elicited By Acute Intermittent Hypercapnic-Hypoxia. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.06.522840. [PMID: 36711653 PMCID: PMC9881941 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.06.522840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Rationale Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) is a promising strategy to induce functional motor recovery following chronic spinal cord injuries and neurodegenerative diseases. Although significant results are obtained, human AIH trials report considerable inter-individual response variability. Objectives Identify individual factors ( e.g. , genetics, age, and sex) that determine response magnitude of healthy adults to an optimized AIH protocol, acute intermittent hypercapnic-hypoxia (AIHH). Methods Associations of individual factors with the magnitude of AIHH (15, 1-min O 2 =9.5%, CO 2 =5% episodes) induced changes in diaphragm motor-evoked potential amplitude (MEP) and inspiratory mouth occlusion pressures (P 0.1 ) were evaluated in 17 healthy individuals (age=27±5 years) compared to Sham. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes linked with mechanisms of AIH induced phrenic motor plasticity ( BDNF, HTR 2A , TPH 2 , MAOA, NTRK 2 ) and neuronal plasticity (apolipoprotein E, APOE ) were tested. Variations in AIHH induced plasticity with age and sex were also analyzed. Additional experiments in humanized ( h ) ApoE knock-in rats were performed to test causality. Results AIHH-induced changes in diaphragm MEP amplitudes were lower in individuals heterozygous for APOE 4 ( i.e., APOE 3/4 ) allele versus other APOE genotypes (p=0.048). No significant differences were observed between any other SNPs investigated, notably BDNFval/met ( all p>0.05 ). Males exhibited a greater diaphragm MEP enhancement versus females, regardless of age (p=0.004). Age was inversely related with change in P 0.1 within the limited age range studied (p=0.007). In hApoE 4 knock-in rats, AIHH-induced phrenic motor plasticity was significantly lower than hApoE 3 controls (p<0.05). Conclusions APOE 4 genotype, sex and age are important biological determinants of AIHH-induced respiratory motor plasticity in healthy adults. ADDITION TO KNOWLEDGE BASE Acute intermittent hypoxia (AIH) is a novel rehabilitation strategy to induce functional recovery of respiratory and non-respiratory motor systems in people with chronic spinal cord injury and/or neurodegenerative diseases. Since most AIH trials report considerable inter-individual variability in AIH outcomes, we investigated factors that potentially undermine the response to an optimized AIH protocol, acute intermittent hypercapnic-hypoxia (AIHH), in healthy humans. We demonstrate that genetics (particularly the lipid transporter, APOE ), age and sex are important biological determinants of AIHH-induced respiratory motor plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayakrishnan Nair
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
- Current address: Department of Physical Therapy, Thomas Jefferson University, PA
| | - Joseph F. Welch
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
- Current address: School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alexandria B. Marciante
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
| | - Tingting Hou
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida
| | - Qing Lu
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida
| | - Emily J. Fox
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
- Brooks Rehabilitation, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Gordon S. Mitchell
- Breathing Research and Therapeutics Center Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Åkerlund C, Andelic N, Aries M, Bashford T, Bell MJ, Bodien YG, Brett BL, Büki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Clark D, Clasby B, Cooper DJ, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dams-O’Connor K, De Keyser V, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Falvey É, Ferguson AR, Figaji A, Fitzgerald M, Foreman B, Gantner D, Gao G, Giacino J, Gravesteijn B, Guiza F, Gupta D, Gurnell M, Haagsma JA, Hammond FM, Hawryluk G, Hutchinson P, van der Jagt M, Jain S, Jain S, Jiang JY, Kent H, Kolias A, Kompanje EJO, Lecky F, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Markowitz A, McCrea M, Meyfroidt G, Mikolić A, Mondello S, Mukherjee P, Nelson D, Nelson LD, Newcombe V, Okonkwo D, Orešič M, Peul W, Pisică D, Polinder S, Ponsford J, Puybasset L, Raj R, Robba C, Røe C, Rosand J, Schueler P, Sharp DJ, Smielewski P, Stein MB, von Steinbüchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Temkin N, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas I, Espin AT, Turgeon AF, Unterberg A, Van Praag D, van Veen E, Verheyden J, Vyvere TV, Wang KKW, Wiegers EJA, Williams WH, Wilson L, Wisniewski SR, Younsi A, Yue JK, Yuh EL, Zeiler FA, Zeldovich M, Zemek R. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:1004-1060. [PMID: 36183712 PMCID: PMC10427240 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(22)00309-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 99.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) has the highest incidence of all common neurological disorders, and poses a substantial public health burden. TBI is increasingly documented not only as an acute condition but also as a chronic disease with long-term consequences, including an increased risk of late-onset neurodegeneration. The first Lancet Neurology Commission on TBI, published in 2017, called for a concerted effort to tackle the global health problem posed by TBI. Since then, funding agencies have supported research both in high-income countries (HICs) and in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). In November 2020, the World Health Assembly, the decision-making body of WHO, passed resolution WHA73.10 for global actions on epilepsy and other neurological disorders, and WHO launched the Decade for Action on Road Safety plan in 2021. New knowledge has been generated by large observational studies, including those conducted under the umbrella of the International Traumatic Brain Injury Research (InTBIR) initiative, established as a collaboration of funding agencies in 2011. InTBIR has also provided a huge stimulus to collaborative research in TBI and has facilitated participation of global partners. The return on investment has been high, but many needs of patients with TBI remain unaddressed. This update to the 2017 Commission presents advances and discusses persisting and new challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. In LMICs, the occurrence of TBI is driven by road traffic incidents, often involving vulnerable road users such as motorcyclists and pedestrians. In HICs, most TBI is caused by falls, particularly in older people (aged ≥65 years), who often have comorbidities. Risk factors such as frailty and alcohol misuse provide opportunities for targeted prevention actions. Little evidence exists to inform treatment of older patients, who have been commonly excluded from past clinical trials—consequently, appropriate evidence is urgently required. Although increasing age is associated with worse outcomes from TBI, age should not dictate limitations in therapy. However, patients injured by low-energy falls (who are mostly older people) are about 50% less likely to receive critical care or emergency interventions, compared with those injured by high-energy mechanisms, such as road traffic incidents. Mild TBI, defined as a Glasgow Coma sum score of 13–15, comprises most of the TBI cases (over 90%) presenting to hospital. Around 50% of adult patients with mild TBI presenting to hospital do not recover to pre-TBI levels of health by 6 months after their injury. Fewer than 10% of patients discharged after presenting to an emergency department for TBI in Europe currently receive follow-up. Structured follow-up after mild TBI should be considered good practice, and urgent research is needed to identify which patients with mild TBI are at risk for incomplete recovery. The selection of patients for CT is an important triage decision in mild TBI since it allows early identification of lesions that can trigger hospital admission or life-saving surgery. Current decision making for deciding on CT is inefficient, with 90–95% of scanned patients showing no intracranial injury but being subjected to radiation risks. InTBIR studies have shown that measurement of blood-based biomarkers adds value to previously proposed clinical decision rules, holding the potential to improve efficiency while reducing radiation exposure. Increased concentrations of biomarkers in the blood of patients with a normal presentation CT scan suggest structural brain damage, which is seen on MR scanning in up to 30% of patients with mild TBI. Advanced MRI, including diffusion tensor imaging and volumetric analyses, can identify additional injuries not detectable by visual inspection of standard clinical MR images. Thus, the absence of CT abnormalities does not exclude structural damage—an observation relevant to litigation procedures, to management of mild TBI, and when CT scans are insufficient to explain the severity of the clinical condition. Although blood-based protein biomarkers have been shown to have important roles in the evaluation of TBI, most available assays are for research use only. To date, there is only one vendor of such assays with regulatory clearance in Europe and the USA with an indication to rule out the need for CT imaging for patients with suspected TBI. Regulatory clearance is provided for a combination of biomarkers, although evidence is accumulating that a single biomarker can perform as well as a combination. Additional biomarkers and more clinical-use platforms are on the horizon, but cross-platform harmonisation of results is needed. Health-care efficiency would benefit from diversity in providers. In the intensive care setting, automated analysis of blood pressure and intracranial pressure with calculation of derived parameters can help individualise management of TBI. Interest in the identification of subgroups of patients who might benefit more from some specific therapeutic approaches than others represents a welcome shift towards precision medicine. Comparative-effectiveness research to identify best practice has delivered on expectations for providing evidence in support of best practices, both in adult and paediatric patients with TBI. Progress has also been made in improving outcome assessment after TBI. Key instruments have been translated into up to 20 languages and linguistically validated, and are now internationally available for clinical and research use. TBI affects multiple domains of functioning, and outcomes are affected by personal characteristics and life-course events, consistent with a multifactorial bio-psycho-socio-ecological model of TBI, as presented in the US National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) 2022 report. Multidimensional assessment is desirable and might be best based on measurement of global functional impairment. More work is required to develop and implement recommendations for multidimensional assessment. Prediction of outcome is relevant to patients and their families, and can facilitate the benchmarking of quality of care. InTBIR studies have identified new building blocks (eg, blood biomarkers and quantitative CT analysis) to refine existing prognostic models. Further improvement in prognostication could come from MRI, genetics, and the integration of dynamic changes in patient status after presentation. Neurotrauma researchers traditionally seek translation of their research findings through publications, clinical guidelines, and industry collaborations. However, to effectively impact clinical care and outcome, interactions are also needed with research funders, regulators, and policy makers, and partnership with patient organisations. Such interactions are increasingly taking place, with exemplars including interactions with the All Party Parliamentary Group on Acquired Brain Injury in the UK, the production of the NASEM report in the USA, and interactions with the US Food and Drug Administration. More interactions should be encouraged, and future discussions with regulators should include debates around consent from patients with acute mental incapacity and data sharing. Data sharing is strongly advocated by funding agencies. From January 2023, the US National Institutes of Health will require upload of research data into public repositories, but the EU requires data controllers to safeguard data security and privacy regulation. The tension between open data-sharing and adherence to privacy regulation could be resolved by cross-dataset analyses on federated platforms, with the data remaining at their original safe location. Tools already exist for conventional statistical analyses on federated platforms, however federated machine learning requires further development. Support for further development of federated platforms, and neuroinformatics more generally, should be a priority. This update to the 2017 Commission presents new insights and challenges across a range of topics around TBI: epidemiology and prevention (section 1 ); system of care (section 2 ); clinical management (section 3 ); characterisation of TBI (section 4 ); outcome assessment (section 5 ); prognosis (Section 6 ); and new directions for acquiring and implementing evidence (section 7 ). Table 1 summarises key messages from this Commission and proposes recommendations for the way forward to advance research and clinical management of TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - David K Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mathew Abrams
- International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Åkerlund
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Section of Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nada Andelic
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Marcel Aries
- Department of Intensive Care, Maastricht UMC, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Tom Bashford
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michael J Bell
- Critical Care Medicine, Neurological Surgery and Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Neurology and Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin L Brett
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - András Büki
- Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Randall M Chesnut
- Department of Neurological Surgery and Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Giuseppe Citerio
- School of Medicine and Surgery, Universita Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
- NeuroIntensive Care, San Gerardo Hospital, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Monza, Monza, Italy
| | - David Clark
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Betony Clasby
- Department of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - D Jamie Cooper
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Endre Czeiter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical School; ELKH-PTE Clinical Neuroscience MR Research Group; and Neurotrauma Research Group, Janos Szentagothai Research Centre, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary
| | - Marek Czosnyka
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Kristen Dams-O’Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation and Human Performance and Department of Neurology, Brain Injury Research Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Véronique De Keyser
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ramon Diaz-Arrastia
- Department of Neurology and Center for Brain Injury and Repair, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ari Ercole
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thomas A van Essen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center Haaglanden, The Hague, Netherlands
| | - Éanna Falvey
- College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Adam R Ferguson
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Anthony Figaji
- Division of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Melinda Fitzgerald
- Curtin Health Innovation Research Institute, Curtin University, Bentley, WA, Australia
- Perron Institute for Neurological and Translational Sciences, Nedlands, WA, Australia
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati Gardner Neuroscience Institute, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Dashiell Gantner
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University and The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Guoyi Gao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
| | - Joseph Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School and Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA, USA
| | - Benjamin Gravesteijn
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fabian Guiza
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Department of Neurosurgery, Neurosciences Centre and JPN Apex Trauma Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Mark Gurnell
- Metabolic Research Laboratories, Institute of Metabolic Science, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Gregory Hawryluk
- Section of Neurosurgery, GB1, Health Sciences Centre, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Peter Hutchinson
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mathieu van der Jagt
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Sonia Jain
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Swati Jain
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ji-yao Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Shanghai Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Hope Kent
- Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Angelos Kolias
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erwin J O Kompanje
- Department of Intensive Care, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Fiona Lecky
- Centre for Urgent and Emergency Care Research, Health Services Research Section, School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc Maegele
- Cologne-Merheim Medical Center, Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Witten/Herdecke University, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marek Majdan
- Institute for Global Health and Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences and Social Work, Trnava University, Trnava, Slovakia
| | - Amy Markowitz
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael McCrea
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Geert Meyfroidt
- Department and Laboratory of Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ana Mikolić
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefania Mondello
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Pratik Mukherjee
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Nelson
- Section for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Department of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Virginia Newcombe
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - David Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matej Orešič
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Wilco Peul
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Dana Pisică
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Louis Puybasset
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, APHP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France
| | - Rahul Raj
- Department of Neurosurgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Chiara Robba
- Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS for Oncology and Neuroscience, Genova, Italy, and Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche e Diagnostiche, University of Genoa, Italy
| | - Cecilie Røe
- Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jonathan Rosand
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - David J Sharp
- Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Peter Smielewski
- Brain Physics Lab, Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Murray B Stein
- Department of Psychiatry and Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, UCSD School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Nicole von Steinbüchel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - William Stewart
- Department of Neuropathology, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital and University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Nino Stocchetti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, Milan University, and Neuroscience ICU, Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Departments of Neurological Surgery, and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Olli Tenovuo
- Department of Rehabilitation and Brain Trauma, Turku University Hospital, and Department of Neurology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Alice Theadom
- National Institute for Stroke and Applied Neurosciences, Faculty of Health and Environmental Studies, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Ilias Thomas
- School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Abel Torres Espin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Alexis F Turgeon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Université Laval, CHU de Québec-Université Laval Research Center, Québec City, QC, Canada
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Dominique Van Praag
- Departments of Clinical Psychology and Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Ernest van Veen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Thijs Vande Vyvere
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (MOVANT), Antwerp University Hospital, and University of Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Eveline J A Wiegers
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - W Huw Williams
- Centre for Clinical Neuropsychology Research, Department of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK
| | - Stephen R Wisniewski
- University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander Younsi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - John K Yue
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Esther L Yuh
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Frederick A Zeiler
- Departments of Surgery, Human Anatomy and Cell Science, and Biomedical Engineering, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences and Price Faculty of Engineering, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - Roger Zemek
- Departments of Pediatrics and Emergency Medicine, University of Ottawa, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cairncross M, Gindwani H, Rita Egbert A, Torres IJ, Hutchison JS, Dams O'Connor K, Panenka WJ, Brubacher JR, Meddings L, Kwan L, Yeates KO, Green R, Silverberg ND. Criterion validity of the brief test of adult cognition by telephone (BTACT) for mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2022; 36:1228-1236. [PMID: 36099151 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2022.2109744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES There is a growing demand for remote assessment options for measuring cognition after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The current study evaluated the criterion validity of the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (BTACT) in distinguishing between adults with mTBI and trauma controls (TC) who sustained injuries not involving the head or neck. METHODS The BTACT was administered to the mTBI (n = 46) and TC (n = 35) groups at 1-2 weeks post-injury. Participants also completed the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire. RESULTS The BTACT global composite score did not significantly differ between the groups (t(79) = -1.04, p = 0.30); the effect size was small (d = 0.23). In receiver operating characteristic curve analyses, the BTACT demonstrated poor accuracy in differentiating between the groups (AUC = 0.567, SE = 0.065, 95% CI [0.44, 0.69]). The BTACT's ability to discriminate between mTBI and TCs did not improve after excluding mTBI participants (n = 15) who denied ongoing cognitive symptoms (AUC = 0.567, SE = 0.072, 95% CI [0.43, 0.71]). CONCLUSIONS The BTACT may lack sensitivity to subacute cognitive impairment attributable to mTBI (i.e., not explained by bodily pain, post-traumatic stress, and other nonspecific effects of injury).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly Cairncross
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Hiresh Gindwani
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Anna Rita Egbert
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ivan J Torres
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute; Vancouver, Canada
| | - James S Hutchison
- Department of Critical Care and Neuroscience and Mental Health Research Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, the Institute for Medical Science and the Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristen Dams O'Connor
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| | - William J Panenka
- Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,British Columbia Mental Health and Substance Use Services Research Institute; Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jeffrey R Brubacher
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Louise Meddings
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Lexynn Kwan
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Keith O Yeates
- Department of Psychology, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, and Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Robin Green
- KITE, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Noah D Silverberg
- Rehabilitation Research Program, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, Vancouver, Canada.,Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.,Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Assessment of Neurocognitive Functions, Olfaction, Taste, Mental, and Psychosocial Health in COVID-19 in Adults: Recommendations for Harmonization of Research and Implications for Clinical Practice. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2022; 28:642-660. [PMID: 34365990 PMCID: PMC8825876 DOI: 10.1017/s1355617721000862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To propose a set of internationally harmonized procedures and methods for assessing neurocognitive functions, smell, taste, mental, and psychosocial health, and other factors in adults formally diagnosed with COVID-19 (confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 + WHO definition). METHODS We formed an international and cross-disciplinary NeuroCOVID Neuropsychology Taskforce in April 2020. Seven criteria were used to guide the selection of the recommendations' methods and procedures: (i) Relevance to all COVID-19 illness stages and longitudinal study design; (ii) Standard, cross-culturally valid or widely available instruments; (iii) Coverage of both direct and indirect causes of COVID-19-associated neurological and psychiatric symptoms; (iv) Control of factors specifically pertinent to COVID-19 that may affect neuropsychological performance; (v) Flexibility of administration (telehealth, computerized, remote/online, face to face); (vi) Harmonization for facilitating international research; (vii) Ease of translation to clinical practice. RESULTS The three proposed levels of harmonization include a screening strategy with telehealth option, a medium-size computerized assessment with an online/remote option, and a comprehensive evaluation with flexible administration. The context in which each harmonization level might be used is described. Issues of assessment timelines, guidance for home/remote assessment to support data fidelity and telehealth considerations, cross-cultural adequacy, norms, and impairment definitions are also described. CONCLUSIONS The proposed recommendations provide rationale and methodological guidance for neuropsychological research studies and clinical assessment in adults with COVID-19. We expect that the use of the recommendations will facilitate data harmonization and global research. Research implementing the recommendations will be crucial to determine their acceptability, usability, and validity.
Collapse
|
15
|
Guberman GI, Stojanovski S, Nishat E, Ptito A, Bzdok D, Wheeler AL, Descoteaux M. Multi-tract multi-symptom relationships in pediatric concussion. eLife 2022; 11:e70450. [PMID: 35579325 PMCID: PMC9132577 DOI: 10.7554/elife.70450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The heterogeneity of white matter damage and symptoms in concussion has been identified as a major obstacle to therapeutic innovation. In contrast, most diffusion MRI (dMRI) studies on concussion have traditionally relied on group-comparison approaches that average out heterogeneity. To leverage, rather than average out, concussion heterogeneity, we combined dMRI and multivariate statistics to characterize multi-tract multi-symptom relationships. Methods Using cross-sectional data from 306 previously concussed children aged 9-10 from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development Study, we built connectomes weighted by classical and emerging diffusion measures. These measures were combined into two informative indices, the first representing microstructural complexity, the second representing axonal density. We deployed pattern-learning algorithms to jointly decompose these connectivity features and 19 symptom measures. Results Early multi-tract multi-symptom pairs explained the most covariance and represented broad symptom categories, such as a general problems pair, or a pair representing all cognitive symptoms, and implicated more distributed networks of white matter tracts. Further pairs represented more specific symptom combinations, such as a pair representing attention problems exclusively, and were associated with more localized white matter abnormalities. Symptom representation was not systematically related to tract representation across pairs. Sleep problems were implicated across most pairs, but were related to different connections across these pairs. Expression of multi-tract features was not driven by sociodemographic and injury-related variables, as well as by clinical subgroups defined by the presence of ADHD. Analyses performed on a replication dataset showed consistent results. Conclusions Using a double-multivariate approach, we identified clinically-informative, cross-demographic multi-tract multi-symptom relationships. These results suggest that rather than clear one-to-one symptom-connectivity disturbances, concussions may be characterized by subtypes of symptom/connectivity relationships. The symptom/connectivity relationships identified in multi-tract multi-symptom pairs were not apparent in single-tract/single-symptom analyses. Future studies aiming to better understand connectivity/symptom relationships should take into account multi-tract multi-symptom heterogeneity. Funding Financial support for this work came from a Vanier Canada Graduate Scholarship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (G.I.G.), an Ontario Graduate Scholarship (S.S.), a Restracomp Research Fellowship provided by the Hospital for Sick Children (S.S.), an Institutional Research Chair in Neuroinformatics (M.D.), as well as a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council CREATE grant (M.D.).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido I Guberman
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Sonja Stojanovski
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Eman Nishat
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Alain Ptito
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
| | - Danilo Bzdok
- McConnell Brain Imaging Centre (BIC), Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI), Faculty of Medicine, McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, School of Computer Science, McGill UniversityMontrealCanada
- Mila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence InstituteMontrealCanada
| | - Anne L Wheeler
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of TorontoTorontoCanada
- Neuroscience and Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick ChildrenTorontoCanada
| | - Maxime Descoteaux
- Department of Computer Science, Université de SherbrookeSherbrookeCanada
- Imeka Solutions IncSherbrookeCanada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Krishnamoorthy V, Temkin N, Barber J, Foreman B, Komisarow J, Korley FK, Laskowitz DT, Mathew JP, Hernandez A, Sampson J, James ML, Bartz R, Raghunathan K, Goldstein BA, Markowitz AJ, Vavilala MS. Association of Early Multiple Organ Dysfunction With Clinical and Functional Outcomes Over the Year Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury Study. Crit Care Med 2021; 49:1769-1778. [PMID: 33935162 PMCID: PMC8448900 DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000005055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Traumatic brain injury is a leading cause of death and disability in the United States. While the impact of early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome has been studied in many critical care paradigms, the clinical impact of early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome in traumatic brain injury is poorly understood. We examined the incidence and impact of early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome on clinical, functional, and disability outcomes over the year following traumatic brain injury. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Patients enrolled in the Transforming Clinical Research and Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury study, an 18-center prospective cohort study of traumatic brain injury patients evaluated in participating level 1 trauma centers. SUBJECTS Adult (age > 17 yr) patients with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale < 13). We excluded patients with major extracranial injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score ≥ 3). INTERVENTIONS Development of early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, defined as a maximum modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score greater than 7 during the initial 72 hours following admission. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS The main outcomes were: hospital mortality, length of stay, 6-month functional and disability domains (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended and Disability Rating Scale), and 1-year mortality. Secondary outcomes included: ICU length of stay, 3-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, 3-month Disability Rating Scale, 1-year Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, and 1-year Disability Rating Scale. We examined 373 subjects with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury. The mean (sd) Glasgow Coma Scale in the emergency department was 5.8 (3.2), with 280 subjects (75%) classified as severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale 3-8). Among subjects with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury, 252 (68%) developed early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Subjects that developed early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome had a 75% decreased odds of a favorable outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended 5-8) at 6 months (adjusted odds ratio, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.12-0.51) and increased disability (higher Disability Rating Scale score) at 6 months (adjusted mean difference, 2.04; 95% CI, 0.92-3.17). Subjects that developed early multiple organ dysfunction syndrome experienced an increased hospital length of stay (adjusted mean difference, 11.4 d; 95% CI, 7.1-15.8), with a nonsignificantly decreased survival to hospital discharge (odds ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.18-1.2). CONCLUSIONS Early multiple organ dysfunction following moderate-severe traumatic brain injury is common and independently impacts multiple domains (mortality, function, and disability) over the year following injury. Further research is necessary to understand underlying mechanisms, improve early recognition, and optimize management strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vijay Krishnamoorthy
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | - Fred K. Korley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Daniel T. Laskowitz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | | | - John Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | - Michael L. James
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Raquel Bartz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Karthik Raghunathan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research (CAPER) Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University. Durham, NC
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC
| | | | - Amy J. Markowitz
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Monica S. Vavilala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Egerod I, Poulsen I, Langhorn L, Aadal L. Inclusion, delivery, assessment, and outcomes in longitudinal research on sleep disturbance and agitation in TBI-rehabilitation: lessons learned and future considerations. Brain Inj 2021; 35:1616-1623. [PMID: 34550819 DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1978546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This article presents some issues for consideration before scaling from a pilot study to a larger investigation in longitudinal observational studies of traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present a case to discuss protocol improvements in longitudinal TBI-rehabilitation studies. The case was a pilot study conducted at two university hospitals in Denmark investigating 1-year outcomes related to sleep disturbance and agitation during neurointensive care. We included patients with moderate and severe TBI determined by the Glasgow Coma Scale, sleep disturbance was assessed using actigraphy, and agitation was assessed using the Agitated Behavior Scale. RESULTS Patients (n = 29) were more severely ill and had poorer six-month outcomes in Eastern vs. Western Denmark. Recovery was similar at one-year follow-up. Protocol improvements were needed in relation to inclusion criteria, intervention delivery, patient assessment, and follow-up outcomes. CONCLUSION In TBI-rehabilitation studies, we suggest adding the severity of disease score to the initial GCS score and a delirium detection score to the ABS score. Actigraphy should not be used during deep sedation. Established procedures should be in place along all stages of the study protocol, including preparation and periodic assessment of study nurses to optimize data quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Egerod
- University of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Department of Intensive Care, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Poulsen
- Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Department of Neurorehabilitation, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Leanne Langhorn
- Aarhus University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lena Aadal
- Hammel Neurorehabilitation and Research Center, Hammel, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu YJ, Rauen K, Zeldovich M, Voormolen DC, Covic A, Cunitz K, Plass AM, Polinder S, Haagsma JA, von Steinbuechel N. Reference Values and Psychometric Properties of the Quality of Life After Traumatic Brain Injury-Overall Scale in Italy, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:1319-1327. [PMID: 34452712 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.04.1282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Revised: 03/25/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Quality of Life after Brain Injury-Overall Scale (QOLIBRI-OS) is a short screening instrument for assessing disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after traumatic brain injury. To date, no reference values are available for the QOLIBRI-OS in general populations. Thus, this study aimed to establish reference values for the QOLIBRI-OS in general population samples from Italy, The Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. METHODS Data were collected using an online survey. The total sample comprised 11759 participants, consisting of 3549 Italian, 3564 Dutch, and 4646 British subjects. In this sample, 49% of the total sample did not report any health complaints, whereas 51% had at least 1 chronic health condition. Reference values were deduced for the QOLIBRI-OS for health-condition-related samples and total general population samples per country. To ensure the comparability of these values, measurement invariance was assessed using a multigroup confirmatory factor analysis. Covariates characterizing the reference values were selected with the help of regression analyses. RESULTS The confirmatory factor analysis confirmed that the QOLIBRI-OS scores measured the same traumatic brain injury-specific HRQoL construct across the 3 countries. Healthy individuals reported significantly higher HRQoL than individuals with at least 1 chronic health condition. Older age and higher education levels were significantly associated with higher HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Because the reference values displayed differences in terms of age and education level across the 3 countries, we recommend using country-specific reference values stratified by sociodemographic and health status in research and clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jhen Wu
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Rauen
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, University Hospital (ISD) LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Daphne C Voormolen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Amra Covic
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Katrin Cunitz
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anne-Marie Plass
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Juanita A Haagsma
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
McCrea MA, Cramer SC, Okonkwo DO, Mattke S, Paadre S, Bates D, Nejadnik B, Giacino JT. Determining minimally clinically important differences for outcome measures in patients with chronic motor deficits secondary to traumatic brain injury. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:1051-1058. [PMID: 34402352 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1968299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine minimally clinically important differences (MCIDs) for Disability Rating Scale (DRS), Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Subscale (FM-UE), Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Subscale (FM-LE), and Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale (FMMS) in patients with chronic motor deficits secondary to traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS Retrospective analysis from the 1-year, double-blind, randomized, surgical sham-controlled, Phase 2 STEMTRA trial (NCT02416492), in which patients with chronic motor deficits secondary to TBI (N = 61) underwent intracerebral stereotactic implantation of modified bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal (SB623) cells. MCIDs for DRS, FM-UE, FM-LE, and FMMS were triangulated with distribution-based, anchor-based, and Delphi panel estimates. RESULTS Triangulated MCIDs were: 1) -1.5 points for the Disability Rating Scale; 2) 6.2 points for the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Subscale; 3) 3.2 points for the Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity Subscale; and 4) 8.4 points for the Fugl-Meyer Motor Scale. CONCLUSIONS For the first time in the setting of patients with chronic motor deficits secondary to TBI, this study reports triangulated MCIDs for: 1) DRS, a measure of global outcome; and 2) Fugl-Meyer Scales, measures of motor impairment. These findings guide the use of DRS and Fugl-Meyer Scales in the assessment of global disability outcome and motor impairment in future TBI clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A McCrea
- Co-Director, Center For Neurotrauma Research; And Professor, Department Of Neurosurgery, Medical College Of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA
| | - Steven C Cramer
- Professor, Department Of Neurology, University Of California, Los Angeles; Los Angeles, Ca; And Medical Director Of Research, California Rehabilitation Institute; Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - David O Okonkwo
- Director, Neurotrauma Clinical Trials Center; And Professor, Department Of Neurological Surgery, University Of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Soeren Mattke
- Director, Center For Improving Chronic Illness Care, USC Dornsife, Los Angeles, Ca, USA
| | - Susan Paadre
- Associate Director, Biostatistics, Biostatistical Consulting Inc., Lexington, MA, USA
| | - Damien Bates
- Consultant, SanBio, Inc., Mountain View, CA, USA
| | - Bijan Nejadnik
- Chief Medical Officer, Global Head Of Regulatory, Medical Affairs, Research and Clinical Development, SanBio Inc., CA, USA
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Director Of Rehabilitation Neuropsychology; Director, SRN Disorders Of Consciousness Program; Project Director, Spaulding-Harvard TBI Model System, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, MA; And Consulting Neuropsychologist, Department Of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; And Professor, Department Of Physical Medicine And Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carmichael J, Hicks AJ, Spitz G, Gould KR, Ponsford J. Moderators of gene-outcome associations following traumatic brain injury. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2021; 130:107-124. [PMID: 34411558 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 07/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The field of genomics is the principal avenue in the ongoing development of precision/personalised medicine for a variety of health conditions. However, relating genes to outcomes is notoriously complex, especially when considering that other variables can change, or moderate, gene-outcome associations. Here, we comprehensively discuss moderation of gene-outcome associations in the context of traumatic brain injury (TBI), a common, chronically debilitating, and costly neurological condition that is under complex polygenic influence. We focus our narrative review on single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of three of the most studied genes (apolipoprotein E, brain-derived neurotrophic factor, and catechol-O-methyltransferase) and on three demographic variables believed to moderate associations between these SNPs and TBI outcomes (age, biological sex, and ethnicity). We speculate on the mechanisms which may underlie these moderating effects, drawing widely from biomolecular and behavioural research (n = 175 scientific reports) within the TBI population (n = 72) and other neurological, healthy, ageing, and psychiatric populations (n = 103). We conclude with methodological recommendations for improved exploration of moderators in future genetics research in TBI and other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai Carmichael
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
| | - Amelia J Hicks
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Gershon Spitz
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Kate Rachel Gould
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - Jennie Ponsford
- Monash-Epworth Rehabilitation Research Centre, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Australia; Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, School of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Toro C, Temkin N, Barber J, Manley G, Jain S, Ohnuma T, Komisarow J, Foreman B, Korley FK, Vavilala MS, Laskowitz DT, Mathew JP, Hernandez A, Sampson J, James ML, Goldstein BA, Markowitz AJ, Krishnamoorthy V. Association of Vasopressor Choice with Clinical and Functional Outcomes Following Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study. Neurocrit Care 2021; 36:180-191. [PMID: 34341913 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01280-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early hypotension following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is associated with increased mortality and poor long-term outcomes. Current guidelines suggest the use of intravenous vasopressors to support blood pressure following TBI; however, guidelines do not specify vasopressor type, resulting in variation in clinical practice. Minimal data are available to guide clinicians on optimal early vasopressor choice to support blood pressure following TBI. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter study to examine initial vasopressor choice for the support of blood pressure following TBI and its association with clinical and functional outcomes after injury. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients enrolled in the transforming research and clinical knowledge in traumatic brain injury (TRACK-TBI) study, an 18-center prospective cohort study of patients with TBI evaluated in participating level I trauma centers. We examined adults with moderate to severe TBI (defined as Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13) who were admitted to the intensive care unit and received an intravenous vasopressor within 48 h of admission. The primary exposure was initial vasopressor choice (phenylephrine versus norepinephrine), and the primary outcome was 6-month Glasgow Outcomes Scale Extended (GOSE), with the following secondary outcomes: length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, in-hospital mortality, new requirement for dialysis, and 6-month Disability Rating Scale. Regression analysis was used to assess differences in outcomes between patients exposed to norepinephrine versus phenylephrine, with propensity weighting to address selection bias due to the nonrandom allocation of the treatment groups and patient dropout. RESULTS The final study sample included 156 patients, of whom 79 (51%) received norepinephrine, 69 (44%) received phenylephrine, and 8 (5%) received an alternate drug as their initial vasopressor. 121 (77%) of patients were men, with a mean age of 43.1 years. Of patients receiving norepinephrine as their initial vasopressor, 32% had a favorable outcome (GOSE 5-8), whereas 40% of patients receiving phenylephrine as their initial vasopressor had a favorable outcome. Compared with phenylephrine, exposure to norepinephrine was not significantly associated with improved 6-month GOSE (weighted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 0.66-2.96, p = 0.37) or any secondary outcome. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients with moderate to severe TBI received either phenylephrine or norepinephrine as first-line agents for blood pressure support following brain injury. Initial choice of norepinephrine, compared with phenylephrine, was not associated with improved clinical or functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilo Toro
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason Barber
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Geoffrey Manley
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sonia Jain
- Biostatistics Research Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tetsu Ohnuma
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Brandon Foreman
- Department of Neurology and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Frederick K Korley
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Monica S Vavilala
- Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Daniel T Laskowitz
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Joseph P Mathew
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - John Sampson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael L James
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Neurology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Benjamin A Goldstein
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Amy J Markowitz
- Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Vijay Krishnamoorthy
- Critical Care and Perioperative Population Health Research Unit, Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions. Neurocrit Care 2021; 35:68-85. [PMID: 34236624 PMCID: PMC8266715 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background/Objective For patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) and their families, the search for new therapies has been a source of hope and frustration. Almost all clinical trials in patients with DoC have been limited by small sample sizes, lack of placebo groups, and use of heterogeneous outcome measures. As a result, few therapies have strong evidence to support their use; amantadine is the only therapy recommended by current clinical guidelines, specifically for patients with DoC caused by severe traumatic brain injury. To foster and advance development of consciousness-promoting therapies for patients with DoC, the Curing Coma Campaign convened a Coma Science Work Group to perform a gap analysis. Methods We consider five classes of therapies: (1) pharmacologic; (2) electromagnetic; (3) mechanical; (4) sensory; and (5) regenerative. For each class of therapy, we summarize the state of the science, identify gaps in knowledge, and suggest future directions for therapy development. Results Knowledge gaps in all five therapeutic classes can be attributed to the lack of: (1) a unifying conceptual framework for evaluating therapeutic mechanisms of action; (2) large-scale randomized controlled trials; and (3) pharmacodynamic biomarkers that measure subclinical therapeutic effects in early-phase trials. To address these gaps, we propose a precision medicine approach in which clinical trials selectively enroll patients based upon their physiological receptivity to targeted therapies, and therapeutic effects are measured by complementary behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiologic endpoints. Conclusions This personalized approach can be realized through rigorous clinical trial design and international collaboration, both of which will be essential for advancing the development of new therapies and ultimately improving the lives of patients with DoC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12028-021-01227-y.
Collapse
|
23
|
von Steinbuechel N, Rauen K, Krenz U, Wu YJ, Covic A, Plass AM, Cunitz K, Mueller I, Bockhop F, Polinder S, Wilson L, Steyerberg EW, Maas AIR, Menon D, Zeldovich M. Translation and Linguistic Validation of Outcome Instruments for Traumatic Brain Injury Research and Clinical Practice: A Step-by-Step Approach within the Observational CENTER-TBI Study. J Clin Med 2021; 10:2863. [PMID: 34203325 PMCID: PMC8269004 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Assessing outcomes in multinational studies on traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses major challenges and requires relevant instruments in languages other than English. Of the 19 outcome instruments selected for use in the observational Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI (CENTER-TBI) study, 17 measures lacked translations in at least one target language. To fill this gap, we aimed to develop well-translated linguistically and psychometrically validated instruments. We performed translations and linguistic validations of patient-reported measures (PROMs), clinician-reported (ClinRO), and performance-based (PerfO) outcome instruments, using forward and backward translations, reconciliations, cognitive debriefings with up to 10 participants, iterative revisions, and international harmonization with input from over 150 international collaborators. In total, 237 translations and 211 linguistic validations were carried out in up to 20 languages. Translations were evaluated at the linguistic and cultural level by coding changes when the original versions are compared with subsequent translation steps, using the output of cognitive debriefings, and using comprehension rates. The average comprehension rate per instrument varied from 88% to 98%, indicating a good quality of the translations. These outcome instruments provide a solid basis for future TBI research and clinical practice and allow the aggregation and analysis of data across different countries and languages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Katrin Rauen
- Department of Geriatric Psychiatry, Psychiatric Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Minervastrasse 145, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland; or
- Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Feodor-Lynen-Straße 17, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Ugne Krenz
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Yi-Jhen Wu
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Amra Covic
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Anne Marie Plass
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Katrin Cunitz
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Isabelle Mueller
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Fabian Bockhop
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.P.); (E.W.S.)
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LJ, UK;
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.P.); (E.W.S.)
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew I. R. Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium;
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 157, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK;
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; (U.K.); (Y.-J.W.); (A.C.); (A.M.P.); (K.C.); (I.M.); (F.B.); (M.Z.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Incidence and Clinical Impact of Myocardial Injury Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot TRACK-TBI Study. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 2021; 34:233-237. [PMID: 33901061 DOI: 10.1097/ana.0000000000000772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major global health problem. Little research has addressed extracranial organ dysfunction following TBI, particularly myocardial injury. Using a sensitive marker of myocardial injury-high sensitivity troponin (hsTn)-we examined the incidence of early myocardial injury following TBI and explored its association with neurological outcomes following moderate-severe TBI. METHODS We conducted a pilot cohort study of 133 adult (age above 17 y) subjects enrolled in the TRACK-TBI 18-center prospective cohort study. Descriptive statistics were used to examine the incidence of myocardial injury (defined as hsTn >99th percentile for a standardized reference population) across TBI severities, and to explore the association of myocardial injury with a 6-month extended Glasgow Outcome Score among patients with moderate-severe TBI. RESULTS The mean (SD) age of the participants was 44 (17) years, and 87 (65%) were male. Twenty-six patients (20%) developed myocardial injury following TBI; myocardial injury was present in 15% of mild TBI patients and 29% of moderate-severe TBI patients (P=0.13). Median (interquartile range) hsTn values were 3.8 ng/L (2.1, 9.0), 5.8 ng/L (4.5, 34.6), and 10.2 ng/L (3.0, 34.0) in mild, moderate, and severe TBI participants, respectively (P=0.04). Overall, 11% of participants with moderate-severe TBI and myocardial injury experienced a good outcome (6-mo extended Glasgow Outcome Score≥5) at 6 months, compared with 65% in the group that did not experience myocardial injury (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS Myocardial injury is common following TBI, with a likely dose-response relationship with TBI severity. Early myocardial injury was associated with poor 6-month clinical outcomes following moderate-severe TBI.
Collapse
|
25
|
Nessel I, Michael-Titus AT. Lipid profiling of brain tissue and blood after traumatic brain injury. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2021; 112:145-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 08/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
26
|
Riemann L, Voormolen DC, Rauen K, Zweckberger K, Unterberg A, Younsi A. Persistent postconcussive symptoms in children and adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury receiving initial head computed tomography. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2021; 27:538-547. [PMID: 33636701 DOI: 10.3171/2020.9.peds20421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this paper was to evaluate the prevalence of postconcussive symptoms and their relation to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in pediatric and adolescent patients with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) who received head CT imaging during initial assessment. METHODS Patients aged between 5 and 21 years with mTBI (Glasgow Coma Scale scores 13-15) and available Rivermead Post Concussion Questionnaire (RPQ) at 6 months of follow-up in the multicenter, prospectively collected CENTER-TBI (Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in TBI) study were included. The prevalence of postconcussive symptoms was assessed, and the occurrence of postconcussive syndrome (PSC) based on the ICD-10 criteria, was analyzed. HRQOL was compared in patients with and without PCS using the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 196 adolescent or pediatric mTBI patients requiring head CT imaging were included. High-energy trauma was prevalent in more than half of cases (54%), abnormalities on head CT scans were detected in 41%, and admission to the regular ward or intensive care unit was necessary in 78%. Six months postinjury, 36% of included patients had experienced at least one moderate or severe symptom on the RPQ. PCS was present in 13% of adolescents and children when considering symptoms of at least moderate severity, and those patients had significantly lower QOLIBRI total scores, indicating lower HRQOL, compared with young patients without PCS (57 vs 83 points, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Adolescent and pediatric mTBI patients requiring head CT imaging show signs of increased trauma severity. Postconcussive symptoms are present in up to one-third of those patients, and PCS can be diagnosed in 13% 6 months after injury. Moreover, PCS is significantly associated with decreased HRQOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Riemann
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Daphne C Voormolen
- 2Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; and
| | - Katrin Rauen
- 3University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, Department of Geriatric Psychiatry and Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Klaus Zweckberger
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Unterberg
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Younsi
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mikolić A, Polinder S, Steyerberg EW, Retel Helmrich IRA, Giacino JT, Maas AIR, van der Naalt J, Voormolen DC, von Steinbüchel N, Wilson L, Lingsma HF, van Klaveren D. Prediction of Global Functional Outcome and Post-Concussive Symptoms after Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Prognostic Models in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study. J Neurotrauma 2020; 38:196-209. [PMID: 32977737 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2020.7074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The majority of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) are categorized as mild, according to a baseline Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13-15. Prognostic models that were developed to predict functional outcome and persistent post-concussive symptoms (PPCS) after mild TBI have rarely been externally validated. We aimed to externally validate models predicting 3-12-month Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSE) or PPCS in adults with mild TBI. We analyzed data from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) project, which included 2862 adults with mild TBI, with 6-month GOSE available for 2374 and Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) results available for 1605 participants. Model performance was evaluated based on calibration (graphically and characterized by slope and intercept) and discrimination (C-index). We validated five published models for 6-month GOSE and three for 6-month PPCS scores. The models used different cutoffs for outcome and some included symptoms measured 2 weeks post-injury. Discriminative ability varied substantially (C-index between 0.58 and 0.79). The models developed in the Corticosteroid Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial for prediction of GOSE <5 discriminated best (C-index 0.78 and 0.79), but were poorly calibrated. The best performing models for PPCS included 2-week symptoms (C-index 0.75 and 0.76). In conclusion, none of the prognostic models for early prediction of GOSE and PPCS has both good calibration and discrimination in persons with mild TBI. In future studies, prognostic models should be tailored to the population with mild TBI, predicting relevant end-points based on readily available predictors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Mikolić
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Polinder
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ewout W Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Isabel R A Retel Helmrich
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Andrew I R Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Joukje van der Naalt
- Department of Neurology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daphne C Voormolen
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nicole von Steinbüchel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Georg-August-University, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Lindsay Wilson
- Division of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David van Klaveren
- Department of Public Health, Center for Medical Decision Making, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.,Predictive Analytics and Comparative Effectiveness Center, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies/Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Naess HL, Vikane E, Wehling EI, Skouen JS, Bell RF, Johnsen LG. Effect of Early Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2020; 2:100070. [PMID: 33543097 PMCID: PMC7853396 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To perform a systematic review to assess the current scientific evidence concerning the effect of EIR for trauma patients with or without an associated traumatic brain injury. Data Source We performed a systematic search of several electronic (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and SveMed+) and 2 clinical trial registers (clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant studies. Data Extraction Two review authors independently identified studies that were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome measures were functional-related outcomes and return to work. The secondary outcome measures were length of stay in hospital, number of days on respirator, complication rate, physical and mental health measures, quality of life, and socioeconomic costs. Data Synthesis Four studies with a total number of 409 subjects, all with traumatic brain–associated injuries, were included in this review. The included trials varied considerably in study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and had small numbers of participants. All studies were judged to have at least 1 high risk of bias. We found the quality of evidence, for both our primary and secondary outcomes, low. Conclusions No studies that matched our inclusion criteria for EIR for trauma patients without traumatic brain injuries could be found. For traumatic brain injuries, there are a limited number of studies demonstrating that EIR has a positive effect on functional outcomes and socioeconomic costs. This review highlights the need for further research in trauma care regarding early phase interdisciplinary rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Langseth Naess
- Regional Trauma Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eirik Vikane
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eike Ines Wehling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Biological and Medicine Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Sture Skouen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rae Frances Bell
- Regional Centre of Excellence in Palliative Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Gunnar Johnsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, University of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Trauma, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Evans E, Cook NE, Iverson GL, Townsend EL, Duhaime AC. Monitoring Outcome after Hospital-Presenting Milder Spectrum Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, Pediatric Revision. J Neurotrauma 2020; 37:1627-1636. [PMID: 32106753 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2019.6893] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
The Glasgow Outcome Scale, Pediatric Revision (GOSE-P) is an assessment of "global outcome" designed as a developmentally appropriate version of the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended for use in clinical trials of children with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Initial testing describes validity across a wide age and injury severity spectrum, yet the GOSE-P's utility for monitoring children with milder injuries is less clear. We examined the level of agreement between the GOSE-P and the Health and Behavior Inventory (HBI), a TBI-related symptom checklist used to assess children with mild TBI for clinical and research purposes. Participants included children and adolescents 3-16 years of age (n = 50) who presented to two level 1 trauma centers within 24 h of injury, with a GCS of 13-15, who underwent clinical neuroimaging. Outcome was assessed 2 weeks and 3 months following injury. We examined the severity of TBI-related symptoms across disability categories identified using the GOSE-P, and the level of agreement between the two measures in identifying deficits 2 weeks following injury and improvement from 2 weeks to 3 months. Using the GOSE-P, 62% had deficits at 2 weeks, and 42% improved from 2 weeks to 3 months. Agreement between the GOSE-P and HBI was fair 2 weeks after TBI (k = 0.24-0.33), and poor for identifying subsequent improvement (k = 0.10-0.16). Modest agreement between the GOSE-P and the HBI may reflect restricted participation from diverse causes, including TBI, other bodily injuries, and prescribed activity restrictions, and highlights the need for multi-dimensional outcome batteries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Evans
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,The Center for Gerontology and Healthcare Research, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
| | - Nathan E Cook
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Spaulding Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,MassGeneral Hospital for Children™ Sports Concussion Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grant L Iverson
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Spaulding Research Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,MassGeneral Hospital for Children™ Sports Concussion Program, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.,Home Base, A Red Sox Foundation and Massachusetts General Hospital Program, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Elise L Townsend
- Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ann-Christine Duhaime
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Minimum Competency Recommendations for Programs That Provide Rehabilitation Services for Persons With Disorders of Consciousness: A Position Statement of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2020; 101:1072-1089. [PMID: 32087109 DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Persons who have disorders of consciousness (DoC) require care from multidisciplinary teams with specialized training and expertise in management of the complex needs of this clinical population. The recent promulgation of practice guidelines for patients with prolonged DoC by the American Academy of Neurology, American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine (ACRM), and National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research (NIDILRR) represents a major advance in the development of care standards in this area of brain injury rehabilitation. Implementation of these practice guidelines requires explication of the minimum competencies of clinical programs providing services to persons who have DoC. The Brain Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the ACRM, in collaboration with the Disorders of Consciousness Special Interest Group of the NIDILRR-Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems convened a multidisciplinary panel of experts to address this need through the present position statement. Content area-specific workgroups reviewed relevant peer-reviewed literature and drafted recommendations which were then evaluated by the expert panel using a modified Delphi voting process. The process yielded 21 recommendations on the structure and process of essential services required for effective DoC-focused rehabilitation, organized into 4 categories: diagnostic and prognostic assessment (4 recommendations), treatment (11 recommendations), transitioning care/long-term care needs (5 recommendations), and management of ethical issues (1 recommendation). With few exceptions, these recommendations focus on infrastructure requirements and operating procedures for the provision of DoC-focused neurorehabilitation services across subacute and postacute settings.
Collapse
|
31
|
Finan JD, Udani SV, Patel V, Bailes JE. The Influence of the Val66Met Polymorphism of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor on Neurological Function after Traumatic Brain Injury. J Alzheimers Dis 2019; 65:1055-1064. [PMID: 30149456 DOI: 10.3233/jad-180585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Functional outcomes after traumatic brain injury (TBI) vary widely across patients with apparently similar injuries. This variability hinders prognosis, therapy, and clinical innovation. Recently, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs) that influence outcome after TBI have been identified. These discoveries create opportunities to personalize therapy and stratify clinical trials. Both of these changes would propel clinical innovation in the field. This review focuses on one of most well-characterized of these SNPs, the Val66Met SNP in the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene. This SNP influences neurological function in healthy subjects as well as TBI patients and patients with similar acute insults to the central nervous system. A host of other patient-specific factors including ethnicity, age, gender, injury severity, and post-injury time point modulate this influence. These interactions confound efforts to define a simple relationship between this SNP and TBI outcomes. The opportunities and challenges associated with personalizing TBI therapy around this SNP and other similar SNPs are discussed in light of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John D Finan
- Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Shreya V Udani
- Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Vimal Patel
- Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| | - Julian E Bailes
- Department of Neurosurgery, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kelsen J, Karlsson M, Hansson MJ, Yang Z, Fischer W, Hugerth M, Nordström CH, Åstrand R, Keep MF, Kilbaugh T, Wang KKW, Møller K, Juhler M, Elmér E. Copenhagen Head Injury Ciclosporin Study: A Phase IIa Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Biomarker Study of Ciclosporin in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Patients. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:3253-3263. [PMID: 31210099 PMCID: PMC6857463 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) contributes to almost one third of all trauma-related deaths, and those that survive often suffer from long-term physical and cognitive deficits. Ciclosporin (cyclosporine, cyclosporin A) has shown promising neuroprotective properties in pre-clinical TBI models. The Copenhagen Head Injury Ciclosporin (CHIC) study was initiated to establish the safety profile and pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in patients with severe TBI, using a novel parenteral lipid emulsion formulation. Exploratory pharmacodynamic study measures included microdialysis in brain parenchyma and protein biomarkers of brain injury in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Sixteen adult patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale 4–8) were included, and all patients received an initial loading dose of 2.5 mg/kg followed by a continuous infusion for 5 days. The first 10 patients received an infusion dosage of 5 mg/kg/day whereas the subsequent 6 patients received 10 mg/kg/day. No mortality was registered within the study duration, and the distribution of adverse events was similar between the two treatment groups. Pharmacokinetic analysis of CSF confirmed dose-dependent brain exposure. Between- and within-patient variability in blood concentrations was limited, whereas CSF concentrations were more variable. The four biomarkers, glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light, tau, and ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1, showed consistent trends to decrease during the 5-day treatment period, whereas the samples taken on the days after the treatment period showed higher values in the majority of patients. In conclusion, ciclosporin, as administered in this study, is safe and well tolerated. The study confirmed that ciclosporin is able to pass the blood–brain barrier in a TBI population and provided an initial biomarker-based signal of efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Kelsen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Karlsson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Mitochondrial Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,NeuroVive Pharmaceutical AB, Lund, Sweden
| | - Magnus J Hansson
- Mitochondrial Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,NeuroVive Pharmaceutical AB, Lund, Sweden
| | - Zhihui Yang
- Program for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics and Biomarkers Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Walter Fischer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | - Ramona Åstrand
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marcus F Keep
- NeuroVive Pharmaceutical AB, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Neurosurgery, Sanford Brain and Spine Institute, Sanford Medical Center, Fargo, North Dakota
| | - Todd Kilbaugh
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kevin K W Wang
- Program for Neurotrauma, Neuroproteomics and Biomarkers Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.,Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Gainesville, Florida
| | - Kirsten Møller
- Department of Neuroanesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Marianne Juhler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eskil Elmér
- Mitochondrial Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.,NeuroVive Pharmaceutical AB, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ranson J, Magnus BE, Temkin N, Dikmen S, Giacino JT, Okonkwo DO, Valadka AB, Manley GT, Nelson LD. Diagnosing the GOSE: Structural and Psychometric Properties Using Item Response Theory, a TRACK-TBI Pilot Study. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2493-2505. [PMID: 30907261 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
The Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) was designed to assess global outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Since its introduction, several empirically founded criticisms of the GOSE have been raised, including poor reliability; an insensitivity to small, but potentially meaningful, changes; a tendency to produce ceiling effects; inconsistent associations with neurocognitive, psychological, and quality-of-life measures; and an inability to assess the multi-dimensional nature of TBI outcome. The current project took a diagnostic approach to identifying the underlying causes of reported limitations by exploring the internal construct validity of the GOSE at 3 and 6 months post-injury using item response theory (IRT) techniques. Data were from the TRACK-TBI Pilot Study, a large (N = 586), prospective, multi-site project that included TBI cases of all injury severity levels. To assess the level of latent functional "impairment" captured by GOSE items independent of the assigned outcome category or GOSE total score, items were modified so that higher scores reflected greater impairment. Results showed that although the GOSE's items capture varying levels of impairment across a broad disability spectrum at 3 and 6 months, there was also evidence at each time point of item redundancy (multiple items capturing similar levels of impairment), item deficiency (lack of items capturing lower levels of impairment), and item inefficiency (items only capturing minimal impairment information). The findings illustrate the value of IRT to illuminate strengths and weaknesses of clinical outcome assessment measures and provide a framework for future measure refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Ranson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Brooke E Magnus
- Department of Psychology, Marquette University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Nancy Temkin
- Departments of Neurological Surgery and Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sureyya Dikmen
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Rehabilitation Neuropsychology, Spaulding Rehabilitation Center, Charlestown, Massachusetts
| | - David O Okonkwo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Alex B Valadka
- Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Geoffrey T Manley
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, and the Brain and Spinal Injury Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Lindsay D Nelson
- Departments of Neurosurgery and Neurology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Yamal JM, Hannay HJ, Gopinath S, Aisiku IP, Benoit JS, Robertson CS. Glasgow Outcome Scale Measures and Impact on Analysis and Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2019; 36:2484-2492. [PMID: 30973053 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.5939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The original unstructured Glasgow Outcome Scale (uGOS) and the newer structured interviews GOS and the Extended GOS (GOS-E) have been used widely as outcomes in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) trials. We compared outcome categories (ranging from dead [D] to good recovery [GR]) for each measure in a randomized trial of transfusion threshold and the implications of measure choice and analysis methods for the results of the trial. We planned to explore patient symptomology possibly driving any discrepancies between the patient's uGOS and GOS scores. Category correspondence between uGOS and GOS scores occurred in 160 (88.4%) of the 181 analyzed cases. The GOS-E and GOS instruments incorporated more behavioral/cognitive/social and other components, leading to a worse outcome in some cases than for the uGOS. Choice of outcome measure and analysis led to incongruous conclusions. Dichotomizing uGOS into favorable outcome (GR and moderate disability [MD] categories) versus unfavorable (severe disability [SD], vegetative state [VS], and D categories), we observed a significant effect of transfusion threshold (odds ratio [OR] = 0.51, p = 0.03; adjusted OR = 0.40, p = 0.02). For the same dichotomization of GOS and GOS-E, the effect was not statistically significant but the ORs were similar (ORs between 0.57 and 0.68, p > 0.15 for all). An effect was not detected using ordinal logistic regression or sliding dichotomy method for all three measures. Differences in categorizations of subjects between moderate and severe disability among the scales impacted conclusions of the trial. In future studies, particular attention should be given to implementing GOS measures and describing the methodology for how outcomes were ascertained.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jose-Miguel Yamal
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas
| | - H Julia Hannay
- Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas.,Texas Institute for Measurement Evaluation and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Shankar Gopinath
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Imoigele P Aisiku
- Harvard Medical School/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Julia S Benoit
- Texas Institute for Measurement Evaluation and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston, Houston, Texas.,Department of Basic Vision Sciences, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Wilde EA, Ware AL, Li X, Wu TC, McCauley SR, Barnes A, Newsome MR, Biekman BD, Hunter JV, Chu ZD, Levin HS. Orthopedic Injured versus Uninjured Comparison Groups for Neuroimaging Research in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 2018; 36:239-249. [PMID: 29786476 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To address controversy surrounding the most appropriate comparison group for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) research, mTBI patients 12-30 years of age were compared with an extracranial orthopedic injury (OI) patient group and an uninjured, typically developing (TD) participant group with comparable demographic backgrounds. Injured participants underwent subacute (within 96 h) and late (3 months) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI); TD controls underwent DTI once. Group differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) of commonly studied white matter tracts were assessed. For FA, subacute group differences occurred in the bilateral inferior frontal occipital fasciculus (IFOF) and right inferior longitudinal fasciculus (ILF), and for MD, differences were found in the total corpus callosum, right uncinate fasciculus, IFOF, ILF, and bilateral cingulum bundle (CB). In these analyses, differences (lower FA and higher MD) were generally observed between the mTBI and TD groups but not between the mTBI and OI groups. After a 3 month interval, groups significantly differed in left IFOF FA and in right IFOF and CB MD; the TD group had significantly higher FA and lower MD than both injury groups, which did not differ. There was one exception to this pattern, in which the OI group demonstrated significantly lower FA in the left ILF than the TD group, although neither group differed from the mTBI group. The mTBI and OI groups had generally similar longitudinal results. Findings suggest that different conclusions about group-level DTI analyses could be drawn, depending on the selected comparison group, highlighting the need for additional research in this area. Where possible, mTBI studies may benefit from the inclusion of both OI and TD controls.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabeth A Wilde
- 1 Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,2 George E. Wahlen Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.,3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,4 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,5 Department of Radiology, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,7 Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Ashley L Ware
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,8 Department of Psychology and Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Xiaoqi Li
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Trevor C Wu
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,9 Hauenstein Neurosciences, Mercy Health St. Mary's, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Stephen R McCauley
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,4 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,6 Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda Barnes
- 10 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Mary R Newsome
- 1 Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian D Biekman
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,8 Department of Psychology and Texas Institute for Measurement, Evaluation and Statistics (TIMES), University of Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Jill V Hunter
- 3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,5 Department of Radiology, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,11 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Zili D Chu
- 5 Department of Radiology, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,11 Department of Pediatric Radiology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Harvey S Levin
- 1 Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas.,3 Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,4 Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.,6 Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|