1
|
Del Mauro L, Vergallito A, Devoto F, Locatelli G, Hassan G, Romero Lauro LJ. Beyond the Surface: Deep TMS Efficacy in Reducing Craving in Addictive Disorders. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY. COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND NEUROIMAGING 2025:S2451-9022(25)00125-9. [PMID: 40204236 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 03/21/2025] [Accepted: 03/23/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substance use disorders (SUDs) and Gambling Disorder (GD) are addictive diseases with a chronic course. Due to the limited efficacy of conventional treatments, there is growing interest in alternative approaches targeting the altered neural circuits underlying these disorders. Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) has emerged as a promising neuromodulation technique capable of reaching deep and bilateral brain regions. However, no definite recommendation for its use in addiction treatment exists. This study systematically reviewed and quantitatively analyzed dTMS effects in SUDs and GD. METHODS Following the PRISMA guidelines, we screened four electronic databases up to February 2024 and selected relevant English-written original research articles. Seventeen papers were included in the systematic review. As only a minority of studies employed a sham-controlled design, we ran the meta-analysis on a subset of 12 studies, computing the pre-post real stimulation standardized mean change (SMCC) as the effect size, using self-reported craving scores as the dependent variable. RESULTS The results showed a significant and large effect of real dTMS in reducing craving scores (SMCC = - 1.26, 95% CI [-1.67, - 0.86], p <.001). High heterogeneity across studies was found at both quantitative and qualitative levels. CONCLUSIONS Results provide preliminary evidence supporting the effectiveness of dTMS for SUDs treatment. Current limitations and future directions are critically discussed, highlighting the need for further rigorous research to refine the therapeutic potential and develop consensus-based guidelines for dTMS clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Francantonio Devoto
- Department of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Locatelli
- Department of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy; Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori IUSS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Gabriel Hassan
- Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonor J Romero Lauro
- Fondazione Eris ETS, Milan, Italy; Department of Psychology & NeuroMi, University of Milano Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Addicott MA, Kinney KR, Saldana S, Ip EHS, DeMaioNewton H, Bickel WK, Hanlon CA. A randomized controlled trial of intermittent theta burst stimulation to the medial prefrontal cortex for tobacco use disorder: Clinical efficacy and safety. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 258:111278. [PMID: 38579605 PMCID: PMC11088513 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of administering intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) to the medial prefrontal cortex for tobacco use disorder. METHODS A randomized sham-controlled trial was conducted, with 38 participants receiving 28 sessions of active (n=25) or sham (n=13) iTBS (2 sessions/day, 600 pulses/session, 110% resting motor threshold, AFz target) along with smoking cessation education (Forever Free © booklets) over 14 visits. Primary outcomes included self-reported cigarette consumption and abstinence, verified by urinary cotinine tests. Secondary outcomes included symptoms of tobacco use disorder, negative mood, and safety/tolerability. RESULTS Both active and sham groups reported reduced cigarette consumption (β = -0.12, p = 0.015), cigarette craving (β = -0.16, p = 0.002), and tobacco withdrawal symptoms (β = -0.05, p < 0.001). However, there were no significant time x group interaction effects for any measure. Similarly, the two groups had no significant differences in urinary cotinine-verified abstinence. Adverse events occurred with similar frequency in both groups. CONCLUSION There were no differences in cigarette consumption between the active and sham iTBS groups, both groups decreased cigarette consumption similarly. Further research is needed to compare iTBS to standard high-frequency rTMS and explore the potential differences in efficacy. Despite limitations, this study contributes to experimental design considerations for TMS as a novel intervention for tobacco and other substance use disorders, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive understanding of the stimulation parameters and target sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merideth A Addicott
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA.
| | - Kaitlin R Kinney
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
| | - Santiago Saldana
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
| | - Edward Hak-Sing Ip
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
| | - Hannah DeMaioNewton
- Department of Translational Neuroscience, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA
| | - Warren K Bickel
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA 24016, USA
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27101, USA; BrainsWay, Burlington, MA 01803, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Soleimani G, Joutsa J, Moussawi K, Siddiqi SH, Kuplicki R, Bikson M, Paulus MP, Fox MD, Hanlon CA, Ekhtiari H. Converging Evidence for Frontopolar Cortex as a Target for Neuromodulation in Addiction Treatment. Am J Psychiatry 2024; 181:100-114. [PMID: 38018143 PMCID: PMC11318367 DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.20221022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2023]
Abstract
Noninvasive brain stimulation technologies such as transcranial electrical and magnetic stimulation (tES and TMS) are emerging neuromodulation therapies that are being used to target the neural substrates of substance use disorders. By the end of 2022, 205 trials of tES or TMS in the treatment of substance use disorders had been published, with heterogeneous results, and there is still no consensus on the optimal target brain region. Recent work may help clarify where and how to apply stimulation, owing to expanding databases of neuroimaging studies, new systematic reviews, and improved methods for causal brain mapping. Whereas most previous clinical trials targeted the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, accumulating data highlight the frontopolar cortex as a promising therapeutic target for transcranial brain stimulation in substance use disorders. This approach is supported by converging multimodal evidence, including lesion-based maps, functional MRI-based maps, tES studies, TMS studies, and dose-response relationships. This review highlights the importance of targeting the frontopolar area and tailoring the treatment according to interindividual variations in brain state and trait and electric field distribution patterns. This converging evidence supports the potential for treatment optimization through context, target, dose, and timing dimensions to improve clinical outcomes of transcranial brain stimulation in people with substance use disorders in future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghazaleh Soleimani
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Juho Joutsa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Khaled Moussawi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Rayus Kuplicki
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Marom Bikson
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Martin P Paulus
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Michael D Fox
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| | - Hamed Ekhtiari
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis (Soleimani, Ekhtiari); Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, and Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland (Joutsa); Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh (Moussawi); Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics and Departments of Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston (Siddiqi, Fox); Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, Okla. (Kuplicki, Paulus, Ekhtiari); Department of Biomedical Engineering, City College of New York, New York (Bikson); Department Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, N.C. (Hanlon)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Van Hoornweder S, Nuyts M, Frieske J, Verstraelen S, Meesen RLJ, Caulfield KA. Outcome measures for electric field modeling in tES and TMS: A systematic review and large-scale modeling study. Neuroimage 2023; 281:120379. [PMID: 37716590 PMCID: PMC11008458 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electric field (E-field) modeling is a potent tool to estimate the amount of transcranial magnetic and electrical stimulation (TMS and tES, respectively) that reaches the cortex and to address the variable behavioral effects observed in the field. However, outcome measures used to quantify E-fields vary considerably and a thorough comparison is missing. OBJECTIVES This two-part study aimed to examine the different outcome measures used to report on tES and TMS induced E-fields, including volume- and surface-level gray matter, region of interest (ROI), whole brain, geometrical, structural, and percentile-based approaches. The study aimed to guide future research in informed selection of appropriate outcome measures. METHODS Three electronic databases were searched for tES and/or TMS studies quantifying E-fields. The identified outcome measures were compared across volume- and surface-level E-field data in ten tES and TMS modalities targeting two common targets in 100 healthy individuals. RESULTS In the systematic review, we extracted 308 outcome measures from 202 studies that adopted either a gray matter volume-level (n = 197) or surface-level (n = 111) approach. Volume-level results focused on E-field magnitude, while surface-level data encompassed E-field magnitude (n = 64) and normal/tangential E-field components (n = 47). E-fields were extracted in ROIs, such as brain structures and shapes (spheres, hexahedra and cylinders), or the whole brain. Percentiles or mean values were mostly used to quantify E-fields. Our modeling study, which involved 1,000 E-field models and > 1,000,000 extracted E-field values, revealed that different outcome measures yielded distinct E-field values, analyzed different brain regions, and did not always exhibit strong correlations in the same within-subject E-field model. CONCLUSIONS Outcome measure selection significantly impacts the locations and intensities of extracted E-field data in both tES and TMS E-field models. The suitability of different outcome measures depends on the target region, TMS/tES modality, individual anatomy, the analyzed E-field component and the research question. To enhance the quality, rigor, and reproducibility in the E-field modeling domain, we suggest standard reporting practices across studies and provide four recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sybren Van Hoornweder
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
| | - Marten Nuyts
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Joana Frieske
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefanie Verstraelen
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Raf L J Meesen
- REVAL - Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium; Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Department of Movement Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kevin A Caulfield
- Brain Stimulation Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jordan T, Apostol MR, Nomi J, Petersen N. Unraveling Neural Complexity: Exploring Brain Entropy to Yield Mechanistic Insight in Neuromodulation Therapies for Tobacco Use Disorder. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.09.12.557465. [PMID: 37745351 PMCID: PMC10515846 DOI: 10.1101/2023.09.12.557465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Neuromodulation therapies, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), have shown promise as treatments for tobacco use disorder (TUD). However, the underlying mechanisms of these therapies remain unclear, which may hamper optimization and personalization efforts. In this study, we investigated alteration of brain entropy as a potential mechanism underlying the neural effects of noninvasive brain stimulation by rTMS in people with TUD. We employed sample entropy (SampEn) to quantify the complexity and predictability of brain activity measured using resting-state fMRI data. Our study design included a randomized single-blind study with 42 participants who underwent 2 data collection sessions. During each session, participants received high-frequency (10Hz) stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) or a control region (visual cortex), and resting-state fMRI scans were acquired before and after rTMS. Our findings revealed that individuals who smoke exhibited higher baseline SampEn throughout the brain as compared to previously-published SampEn measurements in control participants. Furthermore, high-frequency rTMS to the dlPFC but not the control region reduced SampEn in the insula and dlPFC, regions implicated in TUD, and also reduced self-reported cigarette craving. These results suggest that brain entropy may serve as a potential biomarker for effects of rTMS, and provide insight into the neural mechanisms underlying rTMS effects on smoking cessation. Our study contributes to the growing understanding of brain-based interventions for TUD by highlighting the relevance of brain entropy in characterizing neural activity patterns associated with smoking. The observed reductions in entropy following dlPFC-targeted rTMS suggest a potential mechanism for the therapeutic effects of this intervention. These findings support the use of neuroimaging techniques to investigate the use of neuromodulation therapies for TUD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Jordan
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles CA
| | - Michael R. Apostol
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles CA
| | - Jason Nomi
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles CA
| | - Nicole Petersen
- Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ibrahim C, Tang VM, Blumberger DM, Malik S, Tyndale RF, Trevizol AP, Barr MS, Daskalakis ZJ, Zangen A, Le Foll B. Efficacy of insula deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with varenicline for smoking cessation: A randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:1501-1509. [PMID: 37806524 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current smoking cessation treatments are limited in terms of efficacy, particularly with regards to long term abstinence. There is a large amount of evidence implicating the insula in nicotine addiction. OBJECTIVE To examine the efficacy of bilateral repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) directed to the insular cortex with the H11 coil, relative to sham stimulation, on smoking abstinence and smoking outcomes in smokers who are receiving standard varenicline treatment. METHODS This randomized, double-blind, sham controlled trial recruited 42 participants who were randomized to receive either active (n = 24) or sham (n = 18) high frequency rTMS directed to the insula (4 weeks), while receiving varenicline treatment (12 weeks). The primary outcome was 7-day point prevalence abstinence at the end of 12 weeks. RESULTS Smokers in the active group had significantly higher abstinence rates than those in the sham group (82.4% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.013) at the end of treatment (Week 12). Secondary outcome measures of abstinence rate at the end of rTMS treatment (Week 4), abstinence rate at 6 months, and smoking outcomes (e.g., craving, withdrawal) showed no significant differences between groups. No differences were found in adverse events reported between the groups. CONCLUSION This study provides evidence of the potential benefit of having a combined treatment for smoking cessation using insula rTMS with the H11 coil and varenicline. Maintenance rTMS sessions and continuation of varenicline for those in abstinence may induce longer-term effects and should be considered in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Ibrahim
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victor M Tang
- Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daniel M Blumberger
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre of Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Saima Malik
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Rachel F Tyndale
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alisson P Trevizol
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Temerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre of Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mera S Barr
- Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Zafiris J Daskalakis
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego Health, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Abraham Zangen
- Department of Life Sciences and Zelman Centre for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva Israel
| | - Bernard Le Foll
- Translational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Addictions Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada; Institute for Mental Health Policy Research, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Acute Care Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Waypoint Research Institute, Waypoint Centre for Mental Health Care, Penetanguishene, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harmelech T, Hanlon CA, Tendler A. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as a Tool to Promote Smoking Cessation and Decrease Drug and Alcohol Use. Brain Sci 2023; 13:1072. [PMID: 37509004 PMCID: PMC10377606 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a noninvasive, drug-free, neural-circuit-based therapeutic tool that was recently cleared by the United States Food and Drug Associate for the treatment of smoking cessation. TMS has been investigated as a tool to reduce consumption and craving for many other substance use disorders (SUDs). This review starts with a discussion of neural networks involved in the addiction process. It then provides a framework for the therapeutic efficacy of TMS describing the role of executive control circuits, default mode, and salience circuits as putative targets for neuromodulation (via targeting the DLPFC, MPFC, cingulate, and insula bilaterally). A series of the largest studies of TMS in SUDs are listed and discussed in the context of this framework. Our review concludes with an assessment of the current state of knowledge regarding the use of rTMS as a therapeutic tool in reducing drug, alcohol, and nicotine use and identifies gaps in the literature that need to be addressed in future studies. Namely, while the presumed mechanism through which TMS exerts its effects is by modulating the functional connectivity circuits involved in executive control and salience of drug-related cues, it is also possible that TMS has direct effects on subcortical dopamine, a hypothesis that could be explored in greater detail with PET imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- BrainsWay Ltd., Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA
| | - Aron Tendler
- BrainsWay Ltd., Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA
- Department of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 84105, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Del Mauro L, Vergallito A, Gattavara G, Juris L, Gallucci A, Vedani A, Cappelletti L, Farneti PM, Romero Lauro LJ. Betting on Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation to Treat Gambling Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Brain Sci 2023; 13:698. [PMID: 37190663 PMCID: PMC10136786 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13040698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Gambling disorder (GD) is a behavioral addiction that severely impacts individuals' functioning, leading to high socioeconomic costs. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NiBS) has received attention for treating psychiatric and neurological conditions in recent decades, but there is no recommendation for its use for GD. Therefore, this study aimed to systematically review and analyze the available literature to determine the effectiveness of NiBS in treating GD. Following the PRISMA guidelines, we screened four electronic databases up to July 2022 and selected relevant English-written original articles. We included ten papers in the systematic review and seven in the meta-analysis. As only two studies employed a sham-controlled design, the pre-post standardized mean change (SMCC) was computed as effect size only for real stimulation. The results showed a significant effect of NiBS in reducing craving scores (SMCC = -0.69; 95% CI = [-1.2, -0.2], p = 0.010). Moreover, considering the GD's frequent comorbidity with mood disorders, we ran an exploratory analysis of the effects of NiBS on depressive symptoms, which showed significant decreases in post-treatment scores (SMCC = -0.71; 95% CI = [-1.1, -0.3], p < 0.001). These results provide initial evidence for developing NiBS as a feasible therapy for GD symptoms but further comprehensive research is needed to validate these findings. The limitations of the available literature are critically discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lilia Del Mauro
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
- Fondazione Eris Onlus, 20134 Milano, Italy
| | - Alessandra Vergallito
- Department of Psychology & Neuromi, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
| | - Gaia Gattavara
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
| | | | - Alessia Gallucci
- Ph.D. Program in Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy
| | - Anna Vedani
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Moraga-Amaro R, Muñoz P, Villalobos T, Linsambarth S, Maldonado F, Meirone V, Femopase B, Stehberg J. Real-world data of non-invasive stimulation of the human insula-prefrontal cortices using deep TMS to treat anxiety for occupational stress and generalized anxiety disorder. Psychiatry Res 2023; 320:115036. [PMID: 36586377 DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.115036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Activation of the insula is found in all anxiety-related disorders and increased insular-prefrontal cortex (PFC) functional connectivity is associated with reduced anxiety. In this study, the combined stimulation of the insula and PFC using the dTMS H4 (insula+LPFC) and H2 (PFC) coils were used to reduce anxiety in 13 subjects experiencing occupational stress, and 55 participants suffering from generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). The combined HF stimulation of the insula and PFC significantly decreased anxiety scores according to the HARS, CAS, and STAI anxiety scales, leading to a reduction in anxiety according to HARS of 88.7% and 70.7% in participants with occupational stress and the clinical sample of participants diagnosed with GAD, respectively. The findings suggest that the prefrontal-insular axis is critical for the regulation of anxiety and its stimulation can be used for the treatment of anxiety in people suffering from occupational stress and GAD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodrigo Moraga-Amaro
- Laboratorio de Neurobiología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
| | - Paula Muñoz
- Clínica Nova Vita. Del Inca 4446 of. 708. Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Tomás Villalobos
- Laboratorio de Neurobiología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Francisco Maldonado
- Laboratorio de Neurobiología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile
| | - Valeria Meirone
- Clínica Nova Vita. Del Inca 4446 of. 708. Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Bruno Femopase
- Clínica Nova Vita. Del Inca 4446 of. 708. Las Condes, Santiago, Chile
| | - Jimmy Stehberg
- Laboratorio de Neurobiología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas, Facultad de Medicina. Universidad Andres Bello, Santiago, Chile.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gutierrez MI, Poblete-Naredo I, Mercado-Gutierrez JA, Toledo-Peral CL, Quinzaños-Fresnedo J, Yanez-Suarez O, Gutierrez-Martinez J. Devices and Technology in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci 2022; 12:1218. [PMID: 36138954 PMCID: PMC9496961 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12091218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
The technology for transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has significantly changed over the years, with important improvements in the signal generators, the coils, the positioning systems, and the software for modeling, optimization, and therapy planning. In this systematic literature review (SLR), the evolution of each component of TMS technology is presented and analyzed to assess the limitations to overcome. This SLR was carried out following the PRISMA 2020 statement. Published articles of TMS were searched for in four databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, IEEE). Conference papers and other reviews were excluded. Records were filtered using terms about TMS technology with a semi-automatic software; articles that did not present new technology developments were excluded manually. After this screening, 101 records were included, with 19 articles proposing new stimulator designs (18.8%), 46 presenting or adapting coils (45.5%), 18 proposing systems for coil placement (17.8%), and 43 implementing algorithms for coil optimization (42.6%). The articles were blindly classified by the authors to reduce the risk of bias. However, our results could have been influenced by our research interests, which would affect conclusions for applications in psychiatric and neurological diseases. Our analysis indicates that more emphasis should be placed on optimizing the current technology with a special focus on the experimental validation of models. With this review, we expect to establish the base for future TMS technological developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ibrahin Gutierrez
- Subdirección de Investigación Tecnológica, División de Investigación en Ingeniería Médica, CONACYT —Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación LGII, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| | | | - Jorge Airy Mercado-Gutierrez
- Subdirección de Investigación Tecnológica, División de Investigación en Ingeniería Médica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación LGII, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| | - Cinthya Lourdes Toledo-Peral
- Subdirección de Investigación Tecnológica, División de Investigación en Ingeniería Médica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación LGII, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| | - Jimena Quinzaños-Fresnedo
- División de Rehabilitación Neurológica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación LGII, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| | - Oscar Yanez-Suarez
- Neuroimaging Research Laboratory, Electrical Engineering Department, Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana Unidad Iztapalapa, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| | - Josefina Gutierrez-Martinez
- Subdirección de Investigación Tecnológica, División de Investigación en Ingeniería Médica, Instituto Nacional de Rehabilitación LGII, Mexico City 14389, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Fiocchi S, Chiaramello E, Marrella A, Bonato M, Parazzini M, Ravazzani P. Modelling of magnetoelectric nanoparticles for non-invasive brain stimulation: a computational study. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36075197 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac9085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Recently developed magnetoelectric nanoparticles (MENPs) provide a potential tool to enable different biomedical applications. They could be used to overcome the intrinsic constraints posed by traditional neurostimulation techniques, namely the invasiveness of electrodes-based techniques, the limited spatial resolution, and the scarce efficiency of magnetic stimulation. APPROACH By using computational electromagnetic techniques, we modelled the behavior of recently designed biocompatible MENPs injected, in the shape of clusters, in specific cortical targets of a highly detailed anatomical head model. The distributions and the tissue penetration of the electric fields induced by MENPs clusters in each tissue will be compared to the distributions induced by traditional TMS coils for non-invasive brain stimulation positioned on the left prefrontal cortex of a highly detailed anatomical head model. MAIN RESULTS MENPs clusters can induce highly focused electric fields with amplitude close to the neural activation threshold in all the brain tissues of interest for the treatment of most neuropsychiatric disorders. Conversely, TMS coils can induce electric fields of several tens of V/m over a broad volume of the prefrontal cortex, but they are unlikely able to efficiently stimulate even small volumes of subcortical and deep tissues. SIGNIFICANCE Our numerical results suggest that the use of MENPs for brain stimulation may potentially led to a future pinpoint treatment of neuropshychiatric disorders, in which an impairment of electric activity of specific cortical and subcortical tissues and networks has been assumed to play a crucial role.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Fiocchi
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, ITALY
| | - Emma Chiaramello
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, ITALY
| | - Alessandra Marrella
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Area della Ricerca, via de Marini 6, Genova, 16149, ITALY
| | - Marta Bonato
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, ITALY
| | - Marta Parazzini
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, ITALY
| | - Paolo Ravazzani
- Istituto di Elettronica e di Ingegneria dell'Informazione e delle Telecomunicazioni Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, ITALY
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shevorykin A, Carl E, Mahoney MC, Hanlon CA, Liskiewicz A, Rivard C, Alberico R, Belal A, Bensch L, Vantucci D, Thorner H, Marion M, Bickel WK, Sheffer CE. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Long-Term Smoking Cessation: Preliminary Examination of Delay Discounting as a Therapeutic Target and the Effects of Intensity and Duration. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:920383. [PMID: 35874156 PMCID: PMC9300313 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.920383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a novel treatment for smoking cessation and delay discounting rate is novel therapeutic target. Research to determine optimal therapeutic targets and dosing parameters for long-term smoking cessation is needed. Due to potential biases and confounds introduced by the COVID-19 pandemic, we report preliminary results from an ongoing study among participants who reached study end prior to the pandemic. Methods In a 3 × 2 randomized factorial design, participants (n = 23) received 900 pulses of 20 Hz rTMS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) in one of three Durations (8, 12, or 16 days of stimulation) and two Intensities (1 or 2 sessions per day). We examined direction and magnitude of the effect sizes on latency to relapse, 6-month point-prevalence abstinence rates, research burden, and delay discounting rates. Results A large effect size was found for Duration and a medium for Intensity for latency to relapse. Increasing Duration increased the odds of abstinence 7–8-fold while increasing Intensity doubled the odds of abstinence. A large effect size was found for Duration, a small for Intensity for delay discounting rate. Increasing Duration and Intensity had a small effect on participant burden. Conclusion Findings provide preliminary support for delay discounting as a therapeutic target and for increasing Duration and Intensity to achieve larger effect sizes for long-term smoking cessation and will provide a pre-pandemic comparison for data collected during the pandemic. Clinical Trial Registration [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT03865472].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alina Shevorykin
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Ellen Carl
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Martin C Mahoney
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Colleen A Hanlon
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United States
| | | | - Cheryl Rivard
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Ronald Alberico
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Ahmed Belal
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Lindsey Bensch
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Darian Vantucci
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Hannah Thorner
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Matthew Marion
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, United States
| | - Warren K Bickel
- Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at Virginia Tech Carilion, Roanoke, VA, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Joutsa J, Moussawi K, Siddiqi SH, Abdolahi A, Drew W, Cohen AL, Ross TJ, Deshpande HU, Wang HZ, Bruss J, Stein EA, Volkow ND, Grafman JH, van Wijngaarden E, Boes AD, Fox MD. Brain lesions disrupting addiction map to a common human brain circuit. Nat Med 2022; 28:1249-1255. [PMID: 35697842 PMCID: PMC9205767 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01834-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Drug addiction is a public health crisis for which new treatments are urgently needed. In rare cases, regional brain damage can lead to addiction remission. These cases may be used to identify therapeutic targets for neuromodulation. We analyzed two cohorts of patients addicted to smoking at the time of focal brain damage (cohort 1 n = 67; cohort 2 n = 62). Lesion locations were mapped to a brain atlas and the brain network functionally connected to each lesion location was computed using human connectome data (n = 1,000). Associations with addiction remission were identified. Generalizability was assessed using an independent cohort of patients with focal brain damage and alcohol addiction risk scores (n = 186). Specificity was assessed through comparison to 37 other neuropsychological variables. Lesions disrupting smoking addiction occurred in many different brain locations but were characterized by a specific pattern of brain connectivity. This pattern involved positive connectivity to the dorsal cingulate, lateral prefrontal cortex, and insula and negative connectivity to the medial prefrontal and temporal cortex. This circuit was reproducible across independent lesion cohorts, associated with reduced alcohol addiction risk, and specific to addiction metrics. Hubs that best matched the connectivity profile for addiction remission were the paracingulate gyrus, left frontal operculum, and medial fronto-polar cortex. We conclude that brain lesions disrupting addiction map to a specific human brain circuit and that hubs in this circuit provide testable targets for therapeutic neuromodulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juho Joutsa
- Turku Brain and Mind Center, Clinical Neurosciences, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. .,Neurocenter and Turku PET Center, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland. .,Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Khaled Moussawi
- National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shan H Siddiqi
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Departments of Neurology Psychiatry and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Amir Abdolahi
- Clinical Affairs, Philips Healthcare, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - William Drew
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Departments of Neurology Psychiatry and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander L Cohen
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Departments of Neurology Psychiatry and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Computational Radiology Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Thomas J Ross
- National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Henry Z Wang
- Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Joel Bruss
- Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology & Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Elliot A Stein
- National Institute on Drug Abuse-Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nora D Volkow
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Jordan H Grafman
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Neurology, Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.,Department of Psychiatry, Feinberg School of Medicine and Department of Psychology, Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Edwin van Wijngaarden
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Aaron D Boes
- Departments of Pediatrics, Neurology & Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Michael D Fox
- Berenson-Allen Center for Noninvasive Brain Stimulation, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA. .,Center for Brain Circuit Therapeutics, Departments of Neurology Psychiatry and Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Electric Field Distribution Induced by TMS: Differences Due to Anatomical Variation. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/app12094509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a well-established technique for the diagnosis and treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases. The numerical calculation of the induced electric field (EF) distribution in the brain increases the efficacy of stimulation and improves clinical outcomes. However, unique anatomical features, which distinguish each subject, suggest that personalized models should be preferentially used. The objective of the present study was to assess how anatomy affects the EF distribution and to determine to what extent personalized models are useful for clinical studies. The head models of nineteen healthy volunteers were automatically segmented. Two versions of each head model, a homogeneous and a five-tissue anatomical, were stimulated by the model of a Hesed coil (H-coil), employing magnetic quasi-static simulations. The H-coil was placed at two standard stimulating positions per model, over the frontal and central areas. The results show small, but indisputable, variations in the EFs for the homogeneous and anatomical models. The interquartile ranges in the anatomical versions were higher compared to the homogeneous ones, indicating that individual anatomical features may affect the prediction of stimulation volumes. It is concluded that personalized models provide complementary information and should be preferably employed in the context of diagnostic and therapeutic TMS studies.
Collapse
|
15
|
Zangen A, Moshe H, Martinez D, Barnea‐Ygael N, Vapnik T, Bystritsky A, Duffy W, Toder D, Casuto L, Grosz ML, Nunes EV, Ward H, Tendler A, Feifel D, Morales O, Roth Y, Iosifescu D, Winston J, Wirecki T, Stein A, Deutsch F, Li X, George MS. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for smoking cessation: a pivotal multicenter double-blind randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry 2021; 20:397-404. [PMID: 34505368 PMCID: PMC8429333 DOI: 10.1002/wps.20905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation method increasingly used to treat psychiatric disorders, primarily depression. Initial studies suggest that rTMS may help to treat addictions, but evaluation in multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is needed. We conducted a multicenter double-blind RCT in 262 chronic smokers meeting DSM-5 criteria for tobacco use disorder, who had made at least one prior failed attempt to quit, with 68% having made at least three failed attempts. They received three weeks of daily bilat-eral active or sham rTMS to the lateral prefrontal and insular cortices, followed by once weekly rTMS for three weeks. Each rTMS session was administered following a cue-induced craving procedure, and participants were monitored for a total of six weeks. Those in abstinence were monitored for additional 12 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the four-week continuous quit rate (CQR) until Week 18 in the intent-to-treat efficacy set, as determined by daily smoking diaries and verified by urine cotinine measures. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02126124). In the intent-to-treat analysis set (N=234), the CQR until Week 18 was 19.4% following active and 8.7% following sham rTMS (X2 =5.655, p=0.017). Among completers (N=169), the CQR until Week 18 was 28.0% and 11.7%, respectively (X2 =7.219, p=0.007). The reduction in cigarette consumption and craving was significantly greater in the active than the sham group as early as two weeks into treatment. This study establishes a safe treatment protocol that promotes smoking cessation by stimulating relevant brain circuits. It represents the first large multicenter RCT of brain stimulation in addiction medicine, and has led to the first clearance by the US Food and Drug Administration for rTMS as an aid in smok-ing cessation for adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abraham Zangen
- Department of Life Sciences and Zlotowski Centre for NeuroscienceBen‐Gurion University of the NegevBeer‐ShevaIsrael
| | - Hagar Moshe
- Department of Life Sciences and Zlotowski Centre for NeuroscienceBen‐Gurion University of the NegevBeer‐ShevaIsrael
| | - Diana Martinez
- Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Noam Barnea‐Ygael
- Department of Life Sciences and Zlotowski Centre for NeuroscienceBen‐Gurion University of the NegevBeer‐ShevaIsrael
| | - Tanya Vapnik
- Pacific Institute of Medical ResearchLos AngelesCAUSA
| | | | | | - Doron Toder
- Department of Life Sciences and Zlotowski Centre for NeuroscienceBen‐Gurion University of the NegevBeer‐ShevaIsrael,Beer‐Sheva Mental Health Center, Ministry of HealthBeer‐ShevaIsrael
| | - Leah Casuto
- Lindner Center of HOPE, and University of Cincinnati Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral MedicineCincinnatiOHUSA
| | - Moran Lipkinsky Grosz
- Tel Aviv University Medical School, Tel Aviv and Be’er Yaacov Mental Health CenterBe'er YaacovIsrael
| | - Edward V. Nunes
- Department of PsychiatryColumbia University Irving Medical CenterNew YorkNYUSA
| | - Herbert Ward
- Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Florida College of MedicineGainesvilleFLUSA
| | - Aron Tendler
- Advanced Mental Health Care Inc.Royal Palm BeachFLUSA
| | | | | | - Yiftach Roth
- Department of Life Sciences and Zlotowski Centre for NeuroscienceBen‐Gurion University of the NegevBeer‐ShevaIsrael
| | - Dan V. Iosifescu
- New York University School of Medicine and Nathan Kline InstituteNew YorkNYUSA
| | | | | | - Ahava Stein
- A. Stein ‐ Regulatory Affairs Consulting Ltd.Kfar SabaIsrael
| | | | - Xingbao Li
- Brain Stimulation DivisionPsychiatry, Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSCUSA
| | - Mark S. George
- Brain Stimulation DivisionPsychiatry, Medical University of South CarolinaCharlestonSCUSA,Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical CenterCharlestonSCUSA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Journée SL, Journée HL, Berends HI, Reed SM, de Bruijn CM, Delesalle CJG. Comparison of Muscle MEPs From Transcranial Magnetic and Electrical Stimulation and Appearance of Reflexes in Horses. Front Neurosci 2020; 14:570372. [PMID: 33122992 PMCID: PMC7571265 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.570372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Transcranial electrical (TES) and magnetic stimulation (TMS) are both used for assessment of the motor function of the spinal cord in horses. Muscular motor evoked potentials (mMEP) were compared intra-individually for both techniques in five healthy horses. mMEPs were measured twice at increasing stimulation intensity steps over the extensor carpi radialis (ECR), tibialis cranialis (TC), and caninus muscles. Significance was set at p < 0.05. To support the hypothesis that both techniques induce extracranially elicited mMEPs, literature was also reviewed. Results Both techniques show the presence of late mMEPs below the transcranial threshold appearing as extracranially elicited startle responses. The occurrence of these late mMEPs is especially important for interpretation of TMS tracings when coil misalignment can have an additional influence. Mean transcranial motor latency times (MLT; synaptic delays included) and conduction velocities (CV) of the ECR and TC were significantly different between both techniques: respectively, 4.2 and 5.5 ms (MLT TMS --MLT TES ), and -7.7 and -9.9 m/s (CV TMS -CV TES ). TMS and TES show intensity-dependent latency decreases of, respectively, -2.6 (ECR) and -2.7 ms (TC)/30% magnetic intensity and -2.6 (ECR) and -3.2 (TC) ms/30V. When compared to TMS, TES shows the lowest coefficients of variation and highest reproducibility and accuracy for MLTs. This is ascribed to the fact that TES activates a lower number of cascaded interneurons, allows for multipulse stimulation, has an absence of coil repositioning errors, and has less sensitivity for varying degrees of background muscle tonus. Real axonal conduction times and conduction velocities are most closely approximated by TES. Conclusion Both intracranial and extracranial mMEPs inevitably carry characteristics of brainstem reflexes. To avoid false interpretations, transcranial mMEPs can be identified by a stepwise latency shortening of 15-20 ms when exceeding the transcranial motor threshold at increasing stimulation intensities. A ring block around the vertex is advised to reduce interference by extracranial mMEPs. mMEPs reflect the functional integrity of the route along the brainstem nuclei, extrapyramidal motor tracts, propriospinal neurons, and motoneurons. The corticospinal tract appears subordinate in horses. TMS and TES are interchangeable for assessing the functional integrity of motor functions of the spinal cord. However, TES reveals significantly shorter MLTs, higher conduction velocities, and better reproducibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Lotte Journée
- Equine Diagnostics, Wyns, Netherlands.,Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Research Group of Comparative Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Henricus Louis Journée
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.,Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Irene Berends
- Department of Orthopedics, University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Steven Michael Reed
- Rood & Riddle Equine Hospital, Lexington, KY, United States.,M.H. Gluck Equine Research Center, Department of Veterinary Science, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, United States
| | | | - Cathérine John Ghislaine Delesalle
- Department of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Research Group of Comparative Physiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ferrulli A, Macrì C, Terruzzi I, Massarini S, Ambrogi F, Adamo M, Milani V, Luzi L. Weight loss induced by deep transcranial magnetic stimulation in obesity: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:1849-1860. [PMID: 30957981 DOI: 10.1111/dom.13741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
AIM To test the hypothesis that deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) reduces food craving and causes weight loss via neuromodulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This pilot study was designed as a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study. A total of 33 obese people (nine men, 24 women, mean age 48.1 ± 10.6 years, body mass index [BMI] 36.9 ± 4.7 kg/m2 ) were randomized and completed the study: 13 participants underwent a 5-week treatment with high-frequency (HF) dTMS (18 Hz; HF group), 10 were treated with low-frequency (LF) dTMS (1 Hz; LF group), and 10 were sham-treated (sham group). Food craving, and metabolic and neuro-endocrine variables were evaluated at baseline, after the 5-week treatment, and at follow-up visits (1 month, 6 months, 1 year after the end of treatment). RESULTS The mixed-model analysis for repeated measures showed a significant interaction of time and groups for body weight (P = 0.001) and BMI (P = 0.001), with a significant body weight (-7.83 ± 2.28 kg; P = 0.0009) and BMI (-2.83 ± 0.83, P = 0.0009) decrease in the HF versus the sham group. A decreasing trend in food craving in the HF versus the LF and sham groups (P = 0.073) was observed. A significant improvement of metabolic and physical activity variables was found (P < 0.05) in the HF group. CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated the safety and efficacy of dTMS, in addition to physical exercise and a hypocaloric diet, in reducing body weight for up to 1 year in obese people. We hypothesize that a possible mechanism of HF dTMS treatment is modulation of the dopaminergic pathway and stimulation of physical activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Ferrulli
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Concetta Macrì
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Ileana Terruzzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Massarini
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Federico Ambrogi
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Adamo
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Valentina Milani
- Scientific Directorate, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
| | - Livio Luzi
- Endocrinology and Metabolism Department, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|