1
|
Pun TK, Khoshnevis M, Hosman T, Wilson GH, Kapitonava A, Kamdar F, Henderson JM, Simeral JD, Vargas-Irwin CE, Harrison MT, Hochberg LR. Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces. Commun Biol 2024; 7:1363. [PMID: 39433844 PMCID: PMC11494208 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-06784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 08/26/2024] [Indexed: 10/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) enable people with tetraplegia to gain intuitive cursor control from movement intentions. To translate to practical use, iBCIs should provide reliable performance for extended periods of time. However, performance begins to degrade as the relationship between kinematic intention and recorded neural activity shifts compared to when the decoder was initially trained. In addition to developing decoders to better handle long-term instability, identifying when to recalibrate will also optimize performance. We propose a method, "MINDFUL", to measure instabilities in neural data for useful long-term iBCI, without needing labels of user intentions. Longitudinal data were analyzed from two BrainGate2 participants with tetraplegia as they used fixed decoders to control a computer cursor spanning 142 days and 28 days, respectively. We demonstrate a measure of instability that correlates with changes in closed-loop cursor performance solely based on the recorded neural activity (Pearson r = 0.93 and 0.72, respectively). This result suggests a strategy to infer online iBCI performance from neural data alone and to determine when recalibration should take place for practical long-term use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsam Kiu Pun
- Biomedical Engineering Graduate Program, School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
| | - Mona Khoshnevis
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Tommy Hosman
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Guy H Wilson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Foram Kamdar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute and Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - John D Simeral
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Carlos E Vargas-Irwin
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Matthew T Harrison
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghazizadeh E, Naseri Z, Deigner HP, Rahimi H, Altintas Z. Approaches of wearable and implantable biosensor towards of developing in precision medicine. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 11:1390634. [PMID: 39091290 PMCID: PMC11293309 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1390634] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
In the relentless pursuit of precision medicine, the intersection of cutting-edge technology and healthcare has given rise to a transformative era. At the forefront of this revolution stands the burgeoning field of wearable and implantable biosensors, promising a paradigm shift in how we monitor, analyze, and tailor medical interventions. As these miniature marvels seamlessly integrate with the human body, they weave a tapestry of real-time health data, offering unprecedented insights into individual physiological landscapes. This log embarks on a journey into the realm of wearable and implantable biosensors, where the convergence of biology and technology heralds a new dawn in personalized healthcare. Here, we explore the intricate web of innovations, challenges, and the immense potential these bioelectronics sentinels hold in sculpting the future of precision medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Ghazizadeh
- Department of Bioinspired Materials and Biosensor Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Zahra Naseri
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Hans-Peter Deigner
- Institute of Precision Medicine, Furtwangen University, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany
- Fraunhofer Institute IZI (Leipzig), Rostock, Germany
- Faculty of Science, Eberhard-Karls-University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Hossein Rahimi
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Zeynep Altintas
- Department of Bioinspired Materials and Biosensor Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Materials Science, Kiel University, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li J, She Q, Meng M, Du S, Zhang Y. Three-stage transfer learning for motor imagery EEG recognition. Med Biol Eng Comput 2024; 62:1689-1701. [PMID: 38342784 DOI: 10.1007/s11517-024-03036-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/13/2024]
Abstract
Motor imagery (MI) paradigms have been widely used in neural rehabilitation and drowsiness state assessment. The progress in brain-computer interface (BCI) technology has emphasized the importance of accurately and efficiently detecting motor imagery intentions from electroencephalogram (EEG). Despite the recent breakthroughs made in developing EEG-based algorithms for decoding MI, the accuracy and efficiency of these models remain limited by technical challenges posed by cross-subject heterogeneity in EEG data processing and the scarcity of EEG data for training. Inspired by the optimal transport theory, this study aims to develop a novel three-stage transfer learning (TSTL) method, which uses the existing labeled data from a source domain to improve classification performance on an unlabeled target domain. Notably, the proposed method comprises three components, namely, the Riemannian tangent space mapping (RTSM), source domain transformer (SDT), and optimal subspace mapping (OSM). The RTSM maps a symmetric positive definite matrix from the Riemannian space to the tangent space to minimize the marginal probability distribution drift. The SDT transforms the source domain to a target domain by finding the optimal transport mapping matrix to reduce the joint probability distribution differences. The OSM finally maps the transformed source domain and original target domain to the same subspace to further mitigate the distribution discrepancy. The performance of the proposed method was validated on two public BCI datasets, and the average accuracy of the algorithm on two datasets was 72.24% and 69.29%. Our results demonstrated the improved performance of EEG-based MI detection in comparison with state-of-the-art algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhao Li
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qingshan She
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China.
| | - Ming Meng
- School of Automation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, 310018, Zhejiang, China
| | - Shengzhi Du
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa
| | - Yingchun Zhang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Houston, Houston, TX, 77204, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jung T, Zeng N, Fabbri JD, Eichler G, Li Z, Willeke K, Wingel KE, Dubey A, Huq R, Sharma M, Hu Y, Ramakrishnan G, Tien K, Mantovani P, Parihar A, Yin H, Oswalt D, Misdorp A, Uguz I, Shinn T, Rodriguez GJ, Nealley C, Gonzales I, Roukes M, Knecht J, Yoshor D, Canoll P, Spinazzi E, Carloni LP, Pesaran B, Patel S, Youngerman B, Cotton RJ, Tolias A, Shepard KL. Stable, chronic in-vivo recordings from a fully wireless subdural-contained 65,536-electrode brain-computer interface device. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.17.594333. [PMID: 38798494 PMCID: PMC11118429 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.17.594333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Minimally invasive, high-bandwidth brain-computer-interface (BCI) devices can revolutionize human applications. With orders-of-magnitude improvements in volumetric efficiency over other BCI technologies, we developed a 50-μm-thick, mechanically flexible micro-electrocorticography (μECoG) BCI, integrating 256×256 electrodes, signal processing, data telemetry, and wireless powering on a single complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) substrate containing 65,536 recording and 16,384 stimulation channels, from which we can simultaneously record up to 1024 channels at a given time. Fully implanted below the dura, our chip is wirelessly powered, communicating bi-directionally with an external relay station outside the body. We demonstrated chronic, reliable recordings for up to two weeks in pigs and up to two months in behaving non-human primates from somatosensory, motor, and visual cortices, decoding brain signals at high spatiotemporal resolution.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rosenthal IA, Bashford L, Bjånes D, Pejsa K, Lee B, Liu C, Andersen RA. Visual context affects the perceived timing of tactile sensations elicited through intra-cortical microstimulation. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.05.13.593529. [PMID: 38798438 PMCID: PMC11118490 DOI: 10.1101/2024.05.13.593529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
Intra-cortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a technique to provide tactile sensations for a somatosensory brain-machine interface (BMI). A viable BMI must function within the rich, multisensory environment of the real world, but how ICMS is integrated with other sensory modalities is poorly understood. To investigate how ICMS percepts are integrated with visual information, ICMS and visual stimuli were delivered at varying times relative to one another. Both visual context and ICMS current amplitude were found to bias the qualitative experience of ICMS. In two tetraplegic participants, ICMS and visual stimuli were more likely to be experienced as occurring simultaneously when visual stimuli were more realistic, demonstrating an effect of visual context on the temporal binding window. The peak of the temporal binding window varied but was consistently offset from zero, suggesting that multisensory integration with ICMS can suffer from temporal misalignment. Recordings from primary somatosensory cortex (S1) during catch trials where visual stimuli were delivered without ICMS demonstrated that S1 represents visual information related to ICMS across visual contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle A Rosenthal
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Lead Contact
| | - Luke Bashford
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Biosciences Institute, Newcastle University, UK
| | - David Bjånes
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Kelsie Pejsa
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| | - Brian Lee
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Charles Liu
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- USC Neurorestoration Center, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
- Rancho Los Amigos National Rehabilitation Center, Downey, CA 90242, USA
| | - Richard A Andersen
- Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
- T&C Chen Brain-machine Interface Center, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ali YH, Bodkin K, Rigotti-Thompson M, Patel K, Card NS, Bhaduri B, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Mifsud DM, Hou X, Nicolas C, Allcroft S, Hochberg LR, Au Yong N, Stavisky SD, Miller LE, Brandman DM, Pandarinath C. BRAND: a platform for closed-loop experiments with deep network models. J Neural Eng 2024; 21:026046. [PMID: 38579696 PMCID: PMC11021878 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad3b3a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are state-of-the-art tools for modeling and decoding neural activity, but deploying them in closed-loop experiments with tight timing constraints is challenging due to their limited support in existing real-time frameworks. Researchers need a platform that fully supports high-level languages for running ANNs (e.g. Python and Julia) while maintaining support for languages that are critical for low-latency data acquisition and processing (e.g. C and C++).Approach.To address these needs, we introduce the Backend for Realtime Asynchronous Neural Decoding (BRAND). BRAND comprises Linux processes, termednodes, which communicate with each other in agraphvia streams of data. Its asynchronous design allows for acquisition, control, and analysis to be executed in parallel on streams of data that may operate at different timescales. BRAND uses Redis, an in-memory database, to send data between nodes, which enables fast inter-process communication and supports 54 different programming languages. Thus, developers can easily deploy existing ANN models in BRAND with minimal implementation changes.Main results.In our tests, BRAND achieved <600 microsecond latency between processes when sending large quantities of data (1024 channels of 30 kHz neural data in 1 ms chunks). BRAND runs a brain-computer interface with a recurrent neural network (RNN) decoder with less than 8 ms of latency from neural data input to decoder prediction. In a real-world demonstration of the system, participant T11 in the BrainGate2 clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041) performed a standard cursor control task, in which 30 kHz signal processing, RNN decoding, task control, and graphics were all executed in BRAND. This system also supports real-time inference with complex latent variable models like Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systems.Significance.By providing a framework that is fast, modular, and language-agnostic, BRAND lowers the barriers to integrating the latest tools in neuroscience and machine learning into closed-loop experiments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahia H Ali
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kevin Bodkin
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Mattia Rigotti-Thompson
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Kushant Patel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Nicholas S Card
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Bareesh Bhaduri
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Samuel R Nason-Tomaszewski
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Domenick M Mifsud
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Xianda Hou
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Claire Nicolas
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Shane Allcroft
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
- School of Engineering and Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States of America
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Veterans Affairs Rehabilitation Research & Development Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, United States of America
| | - Nicholas Au Yong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Sergey D Stavisky
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Lee E Miller
- Department of Neuroscience, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States of America
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States of America
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - David M Brandman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA, United States of America
| | - Chethan Pandarinath
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pun TK, Khoshnevis M, Hosman T, Wilson GH, Kapitonava A, Kamdar F, Henderson JM, Simeral JD, Vargas-Irwin CE, Harrison MT, Hochberg LR. Measuring instability in chronic human intracortical neural recordings towards stable, long-term brain-computer interfaces. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.02.29.582733. [PMID: 38496552 PMCID: PMC10942277 DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.29.582733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) enable people with tetraplegia to gain intuitive cursor control from movement intentions. To translate to practical use, iBCIs should provide reliable performance for extended periods of time. However, performance begins to degrade as the relationship between kinematic intention and recorded neural activity shifts compared to when the decoder was initially trained. In addition to developing decoders to better handle long-term instability, identifying when to recalibrate will also optimize performance. We propose a method to measure instability in neural data without needing to label user intentions. Longitudinal data were analyzed from two BrainGate2 participants with tetraplegia as they used fixed decoders to control a computer cursor spanning 142 days and 28 days, respectively. We demonstrate a measure of instability that correlates with changes in closed-loop cursor performance solely based on the recorded neural activity (Pearson r = 0.93 and 0.72, respectively). This result suggests a strategy to infer online iBCI performance from neural data alone and to determine when recalibration should take place for practical long-term use.
Collapse
|
8
|
Mokienko O. Brain-Computer Interfaces with Intracortical Implants for Motor and Communication Functions Compensation: Review of Recent Developments. Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2024; 16:78-89. [PMID: 39421626 PMCID: PMC11482094 DOI: 10.17691/stm2024.16.1.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces allow the exchange of data between the brain and an external device, bypassing the muscular system. Clinical studies of invasive brain-computer interface technologies have been conducted for over 20 years. During this time, there has been a continuous improvement of approaches to neuronal signal processing in order to improve the quality of control of external devices. Currently, brain-computer interfaces with intracortical implants allow completely paralyzed patients to control robotic limbs for self-service, use a computer or a tablet, type text, and reproduce speech at an optimal speed. Studies of invasive brain-computer interfaces regularly provide new fundamental data on functioning of the central nervous system. In recent years, breakthrough discoveries and achievements have been annually made in this sphere. This review analyzes the results of clinical experiments of brain-computer interfaces with intracortical implants, provides information on the stages of this technology development, its main discoveries and achievements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O.A. Mokienko
- Senior Researcher, Mathematical Neurobiology of Learning Laboratory; Institute of Higher Nervous Activity and Neurophysiology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 5a Butlerova St., Moscow, 117485, Russia; Senior Researcher, Engineering Center; N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1 Ostrovityanova St., Moscow, 117997, Russia; Researcher, Brain–Computer Interface Group of Institute for Neurorehabilitation and Restorative Technologies; Research Center of Neurology, 80 Volokolamskoye Shosse, Moscow, 125367, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Holt MW, Robinson EC, Shlobin NA, Hanson JT, Bozkurt I. Intracortical brain-computer interfaces for improved motor function: a systematic review. Rev Neurosci 2024; 35:213-223. [PMID: 37845811 DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2023-0077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
In this systematic review, we address the status of intracortical brain-computer interfaces (iBCIs) applied to the motor cortex to improve function in patients with impaired motor ability. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Guidelines for Systematic Reviews. Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) were used to assess bias and quality. Advances in iBCIs in the last two decades demonstrated the use of iBCI to activate limbs for functional tasks, achieve neural typing for communication, and other applications. However, the inconsistency of performance metrics employed by these studies suggests the need for standardization. Each study was a pilot clinical trial consisting of 1-4, majority male (64.28 %) participants, with most trials featuring participants treated for more than 12 months (55.55 %). The systems treated patients with various conditions: amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, spinocerebellar degeneration without cerebellar involvement, and spinal cord injury. All participants presented with tetraplegia at implantation and were implanted with microelectrode arrays via pneumatic insertion, with nearly all electrode locations solely at the precentral gyrus of the motor cortex (88.88 %). The development of iBCI devices using neural signals from the motor cortex to improve motor-impaired patients has enhanced the ability of these systems to return ability to their users. However, many milestones remain before these devices can prove their feasibility for recovery. This review summarizes the achievements and shortfalls of these systems and their respective trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew W Holt
- Department of Natural Sciences, University of South Carolina Beaufort, 1 University Blvd, Bluffton, 29909, USA
| | | | - Nathan A Shlobin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Jacob T Hanson
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Englewood, CO 80112, USA
| | - Ismail Bozkurt
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Yuksek Ihtisas University, 06530 Ankara, Türkiye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Park Ankara Hospital, 06680 Ankara, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Verzhbinsky IA, Rubin DB, Kajfez S, Bu Y, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR, Cash SS, Halgren E. Co-occurring ripple oscillations facilitate neuronal interactions between cortical locations in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2312204121. [PMID: 38157452 PMCID: PMC10769862 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2312204121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
How the human cortex integrates ("binds") information encoded by spatially distributed neurons remains largely unknown. One hypothesis suggests that synchronous bursts of high-frequency oscillations ("ripples") contribute to binding by facilitating integration of neuronal firing across different cortical locations. While studies have demonstrated that ripples modulate local activity in the cortex, it is not known whether their co-occurrence coordinates neural firing across larger distances. We tested this hypothesis using local field-potentials and single-unit firing from four 96-channel microelectrode arrays in the supragranular cortex of 3 patients. Neurons in co-rippling locations showed increased short-latency co-firing, prediction of each other's firing, and co-participation in neural assemblies. Effects were similar for putative pyramidal and interneurons, during non-rapid eye movement sleep and waking, in temporal and Rolandic cortices, and at distances up to 16 mm (the longest tested). Increased co-prediction during co-ripples was maintained when firing-rate changes were equated, indicating that it was not secondary to non-oscillatory activation. Co-rippling enhanced prediction was strongly modulated by ripple phase, supporting the most common posited mechanism for binding-by-synchrony. Co-ripple enhanced prediction is reciprocal, synergistic with local upstates, and further enhanced when multiple sites co-ripple, supporting re-entrant facilitation. Together, these results support the hypothesis that trans-cortical co-occurring ripples increase the integration of neuronal firing of neurons in different cortical locations and do so in part through phase-modulation rather than unstructured activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A. Verzhbinsky
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Daniel B. Rubin
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Sophie Kajfez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Yiting Bu
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| | - Jessica N. Kelemen
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Ziv M. Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Leigh R. Hochberg
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI02912
| | - Sydney S. Cash
- Department of Neurology, Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA02114
| | - Eric Halgren
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA92093
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abbaspourazad H, Erturk E, Pesaran B, Shanechi MM. Dynamical flexible inference of nonlinear latent factors and structures in neural population activity. Nat Biomed Eng 2024; 8:85-108. [PMID: 38082181 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-023-01106-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
Modelling the spatiotemporal dynamics in the activity of neural populations while also enabling their flexible inference is hindered by the complexity and noisiness of neural observations. Here we show that the lower-dimensional nonlinear latent factors and latent structures can be computationally modelled in a manner that allows for flexible inference causally, non-causally and in the presence of missing neural observations. To enable flexible inference, we developed a neural network that separates the model into jointly trained manifold and dynamic latent factors such that nonlinearity is captured through the manifold factors and the dynamics can be modelled in tractable linear form on this nonlinear manifold. We show that the model, which we named 'DFINE' (for 'dynamical flexible inference for nonlinear embeddings') achieves flexible inference in simulations of nonlinear dynamics and across neural datasets representing a diversity of brain regions and behaviours. Compared with earlier neural-network models, DFINE enables flexible inference, better predicts neural activity and behaviour, and better captures the latent neural manifold structure. DFINE may advance the development of neurotechnology and investigations in neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamidreza Abbaspourazad
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Eray Erturk
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bijan Pesaran
- Departments of Neurosurgery, Neuroscience, and Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maryam M Shanechi
- Ming Hsieh Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Thomas Lord Department of Computer Science, Alfred E. Mann Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhang J, Li J, Huang Z, Huang D, Yu H, Li Z. Recent Progress in Wearable Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Devices Based on Electroencephalogram (EEG) for Medical Applications: A Review. HEALTH DATA SCIENCE 2023; 3:0096. [PMID: 38487198 PMCID: PMC10880169 DOI: 10.34133/hds.0096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Importance: Brain-computer interface (BCI) decodes and converts brain signals into machine instructions to interoperate with the external world. However, limited by the implantation risks of invasive BCIs and the operational complexity of conventional noninvasive BCIs, applications of BCIs are mainly used in laboratory or clinical environments, which are not conducive to the daily use of BCI devices. With the increasing demand for intelligent medical care, the development of wearable BCI systems is necessary. Highlights: Based on the scalp-electroencephalogram (EEG), forehead-EEG, and ear-EEG, the state-of-the-art wearable BCI devices for disease management and patient assistance are reviewed. This paper focuses on the EEG acquisition equipment of the novel wearable BCI devices and summarizes the development direction of wearable EEG-based BCI devices. Conclusions: BCI devices play an essential role in the medical field. This review briefly summarizes novel wearable EEG-based BCIs applied in the medical field and the latest progress in related technologies, emphasizing its potential to help doctors, patients, and caregivers better understand and utilize BCI devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayan Zhang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Junshi Li
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhe Huang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
- Shenzhen Graduate School,
Peking University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Dong Huang
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
- School of Electronics,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Huaiqiang Yu
- Sichuan Institute of Piezoelectric and Acousto-optic Technology, Chongqing, China
| | - Zhihong Li
- Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Integrated Circuits, Beijing, China
- National Key Laboratory of Advanced Micro and Nano Manufacture Technology, School of Integrated Circuits,
Peking University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boulingre M, Portillo-Lara R, Green RA. Biohybrid neural interfaces: improving the biological integration of neural implants. Chem Commun (Camb) 2023; 59:14745-14758. [PMID: 37991846 PMCID: PMC10720954 DOI: 10.1039/d3cc05006h] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
Implantable neural interfaces (NIs) have emerged in the clinic as outstanding tools for the management of a variety of neurological conditions caused by trauma or disease. However, the foreign body reaction triggered upon implantation remains one of the major challenges hindering the safety and longevity of NIs. The integration of tools and principles from biomaterial design and tissue engineering has been investigated as a promising strategy to develop NIs with enhanced functionality and performance. In this Feature Article, we highlight the main bioengineering approaches for the development of biohybrid NIs with an emphasis on relevant device design criteria. Technical and scientific challenges associated with the fabrication and functional assessment of technologies composed of both artificial and biological components are discussed. Lastly, we provide future perspectives related to engineering, regulatory, and neuroethical challenges to be addressed towards the realisation of the promise of biohybrid neurotechnology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolaine Boulingre
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Roberto Portillo-Lara
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| | - Rylie A Green
- Department of Bioengineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington, London, SW7 2AZ, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Shah NP, Avansino D, Kamdar F, Nicolas C, Kapitonava A, Vargas-Irwin C, Hochberg L, Pandarinath C, Shenoy K, Willett FR, Henderson J. Pseudo-linear Summation explains Neural Geometry of Multi-finger Movements in Human Premotor Cortex. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.10.11.561982. [PMID: 37873182 PMCID: PMC10592742 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.11.561982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
How does the motor cortex combine simple movements (such as single finger flexion/extension) into complex movements (such hand gestures or playing piano)? Motor cortical activity was recorded using intracortical multi-electrode arrays in two people with tetraplegia as they attempted single, pairwise and higher order finger movements. Neural activity for simultaneous movements was largely aligned with linear summation of corresponding single finger movement activities, with two violations. First, the neural activity was normalized, preventing a large magnitude with an increasing number of moving fingers. Second, the neural tuning direction of weakly represented fingers (e.g. middle) changed significantly as a result of the movement of other fingers. These deviations from linearity resulted in non-linear methods outperforming linear methods for neural decoding. Overall, simultaneous finger movements are thus represented by the combination of individual finger movements by pseudo-linear summation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Donald Avansino
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | - Claire Nicolas
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Carlos Vargas-Irwin
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Leigh Hochberg
- VA RR&D Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chethan Pandarinath
- Wallace H. Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering, Emory University and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Krishna Shenoy
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Francis R Willett
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jaimie Henderson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University
- Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
- Bio-X Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tian T, Zhang S, Yang M. Recent progress and challenges in the treatment of spinal cord injury. Protein Cell 2023; 14:635-652. [PMID: 36856750 PMCID: PMC10501188 DOI: 10.1093/procel/pwad003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts the structural and functional connectivity between the higher center and the spinal cord, resulting in severe motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction with a variety of complications. The pathophysiology of SCI is complicated and multifaceted, and thus individual treatments acting on a specific aspect or process are inadequate to elicit neuronal regeneration and functional recovery after SCI. Combinatory strategies targeting multiple aspects of SCI pathology have achieved greater beneficial effects than individual therapy alone. Although many problems and challenges remain, the encouraging outcomes that have been achieved in preclinical models offer a promising foothold for the development of novel clinical strategies to treat SCI. In this review, we characterize the mechanisms underlying axon regeneration of adult neurons and summarize recent advances in facilitating functional recovery following SCI at both the acute and chronic stages. In addition, we analyze the current status, remaining problems, and realistic challenges towards clinical translation. Finally, we consider the future of SCI treatment and provide insights into how to narrow the translational gap that currently exists between preclinical studies and clinical practice. Going forward, clinical trials should emphasize multidisciplinary conversation and cooperation to identify optimal combinatorial approaches to maximize therapeutic benefit in humans with SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ting Tian
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Sensen Zhang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
| | - Maojun Yang
- Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Protein Science, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Structural Biology, Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
- Cryo-EM Facility Center, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ali YH, Bodkin K, Rigotti-Thompson M, Patel K, Card NS, Bhaduri B, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Mifsud DM, Hou X, Nicolas C, Allcroft S, Hochberg LR, Yong NA, Stavisky SD, Miller LE, Brandman DM, Pandarinath C. BRAND: A platform for closed-loop experiments with deep network models. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.08.08.552473. [PMID: 37609167 PMCID: PMC10441362 DOI: 10.1101/2023.08.08.552473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/24/2023]
Abstract
Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are state-of-the-art tools for modeling and decoding neural activity, but deploying them in closed-loop experiments with tight timing constraints is challenging due to their limited support in existing real-time frameworks. Researchers need a platform that fully supports high-level languages for running ANNs (e.g., Python and Julia) while maintaining support for languages that are critical for low-latency data acquisition and processing (e.g., C and C++). To address these needs, we introduce the Backend for Realtime Asynchronous Neural Decoding (BRAND). BRAND comprises Linux processes, termed nodes , which communicate with each other in a graph via streams of data. Its asynchronous design allows for acquisition, control, and analysis to be executed in parallel on streams of data that may operate at different timescales. BRAND uses Redis to send data between nodes, which enables fast inter-process communication and supports 54 different programming languages. Thus, developers can easily deploy existing ANN models in BRAND with minimal implementation changes. In our tests, BRAND achieved <600 microsecond latency between processes when sending large quantities of data (1024 channels of 30 kHz neural data in 1-millisecond chunks). BRAND runs a brain-computer interface with a recurrent neural network (RNN) decoder with less than 8 milliseconds of latency from neural data input to decoder prediction. In a real-world demonstration of the system, participant T11 in the BrainGate2 clinical trial performed a standard cursor control task, in which 30 kHz signal processing, RNN decoding, task control, and graphics were all executed in BRAND. This system also supports real-time inference with complex latent variable models like Latent Factor Analysis via Dynamical Systems. By providing a framework that is fast, modular, and language-agnostic, BRAND lowers the barriers to integrating the latest tools in neuroscience and machine learning into closed-loop experiments.
Collapse
|
17
|
Maiseli B, Abdalla AT, Massawe LV, Mbise M, Mkocha K, Nassor NA, Ismail M, Michael J, Kimambo S. Brain-computer interface: trend, challenges, and threats. Brain Inform 2023; 10:20. [PMID: 37540385 PMCID: PMC10403483 DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00199-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 07/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interface (BCI), an emerging technology that facilitates communication between brain and computer, has attracted a great deal of research in recent years. Researchers provide experimental results demonstrating that BCI can restore the capabilities of physically challenged people, hence improving the quality of their lives. BCI has revolutionized and positively impacted several industries, including entertainment and gaming, automation and control, education, neuromarketing, and neuroergonomics. Notwithstanding its broad range of applications, the global trend of BCI remains lightly discussed in the literature. Understanding the trend may inform researchers and practitioners on the direction of the field, and on where they should invest their efforts more. Noting this significance, we have analyzed 25,336 metadata of BCI publications from Scopus to determine advancement of the field. The analysis shows an exponential growth of BCI publications in China from 2019 onwards, exceeding those from the United States that started to decline during the same period. Implications and reasons for this trend are discussed. Furthermore, we have extensively discussed challenges and threats limiting exploitation of BCI capabilities. A typical BCI architecture is hypothesized to address two prominent BCI threats, privacy and security, as an attempt to make the technology commercially viable to the society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baraka Maiseli
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
| | - Abdi T Abdalla
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Libe V Massawe
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Mercy Mbise
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Khadija Mkocha
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Nassor Ally Nassor
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Moses Ismail
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - James Michael
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Samwel Kimambo
- Department of Electronics and Telecommunications Engineering, College of Information and Communication Technologies, University of Dar es Salaam, 14113, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Dong Y, Wang S, Huang Q, Berg RW, Li G, He J. Neural Decoding for Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces. CYBORG AND BIONIC SYSTEMS 2023; 4:0044. [PMID: 37519930 PMCID: PMC10380541 DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain-computer interfaces have revolutionized the field of neuroscience by providing a solution for paralyzed patients to control external devices and improve the quality of daily life. To accurately and stably control effectors, it is important for decoders to recognize an individual's motor intention from neural activity either by noninvasive or intracortical neural recording. Intracortical recording is an invasive way of measuring neural electrical activity with high temporal and spatial resolution. Herein, we review recent developments in neural signal decoding methods for intracortical brain-computer interfaces. These methods have achieved good performance in analyzing neural activity and controlling robots and prostheses in nonhuman primates and humans. For more complex paradigms in motor rehabilitation or other clinical applications, there remains more space for further improvements of decoders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanrui Dong
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Shirong Wang
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Qiang Huang
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| | - Rune W. Berg
- Department of Neuroscience,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Guanghui Li
- Department of Neuroscience,
University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark
| | - Jiping He
- School of Mechatronical Engineering and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Intelligent Robots,
Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Verzhbinsky IA, Rubin DB, Kajfez S, Bu Y, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR, Cash SS, Halgren E. Co-occurring ripple oscillations facilitate neuronal interactions between cortical locations in humans. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.20.541588. [PMID: 37292943 PMCID: PMC10245779 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.20.541588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Synchronous bursts of high frequency oscillations ('ripples') are hypothesized to contribute to binding by facilitating integration of neuronal firing across cortical locations. We tested this hypothesis using local field-potentials and single-unit firing from four 96-channel microelectrode arrays in supragranular cortex of 3 patients. Neurons in co-rippling locations showed increased short-latency co-firing, prediction of each-other's firing, and co-participation in neural assemblies. Effects were similar for putative pyramidal and interneurons, during NREM sleep and waking, in temporal and Rolandic cortices, and at distances up to 16mm. Increased co-prediction during co-ripples was maintained when firing-rate changes were equated, and were strongly modulated by ripple phase. Co-ripple enhanced prediction is reciprocal, synergistic with local upstates, and further enhanced when multiple sites co-ripple. Together, these results support the hypothesis that trans-cortical co-ripples increase the integration of neuronal firing of neurons in different cortical locations, and do so in part through phase-modulation rather than unstructured activation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya A. Verzhbinsky
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Medical Scientist Training Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Daniel B. Rubin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Sophie Kajfez
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Yiting Bu
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Jessica N. Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Ziv M. Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114
- Program in Neuroscience, Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115
| | - Leigh R. Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI 02908, USA
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Sydney S. Cash
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Eric Halgren
- Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Carrillo-Ruiz JD, Carrillo-Márquez JR, Beltrán JQ, Jiménez-Ponce F, García-Muñoz L, Navarro-Olvera JL, Márquez-Franco R, Velasco F. Innovative perspectives in limbic surgery using deep brain stimulation. Front Neurosci 2023; 17:1167244. [PMID: 37274213 PMCID: PMC10233042 DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1167244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Limbic surgery is one of the most attractive and retaken fields of functional neurosurgery in the last two decades. Psychiatric surgery emerged from the incipient work of Moniz and Lima lesioning the prefrontal cortex in agitated patients. Since the onset of stereotactic and functional neurosurgery with Spiegel and Wycis, the treatment of mental diseases gave attention to refractory illnesses mainly with the use of thalamotomies. Neurosis and some psychotic symptoms were treated by them. Several indications when lesioning the brain were included: obsessive-compulsive disorder, depression, and aggressiveness among others with a diversity of targets. The indiscriminately use of anatomical sites without enough scientific evidence, and uncertainly defined criteria for selecting patients merged with a deficiency in ethical aspects, brought a lack of procedures for a long time: only select clinics allowed this surgery around the world from 1950 to the 1990s. In 1999, Nuttin et al. began a new chapter in limbic surgery with the use of Deep Brain Stimulation, based on the experience of pain, Parkinson's disease, and epilepsy. The efforts were focused on different targets to treat depression and obsessive-compulsive disorders. Nevertheless, other diseases were added to use neuromodulation. The goal of this article is to show the new opportunities to treat neuropsychiatric diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Damián Carrillo-Ruiz
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
- Research Direction, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
- Neuroscience Coordination, Psychology Faculty, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Rodrigo Carrillo-Márquez
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
- Alpha Health Sciences Leadership Program, Anahuac University, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Jesús Quetzalcóatl Beltrán
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Fiacro Jiménez-Ponce
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Luis García-Muñoz
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José Luis Navarro-Olvera
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - René Márquez-Franco
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Francisco Velasco
- Stereotactic, Functional & Radiosurgery Unit of Neurosurgery Service, Mexico General Hospital, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bhatt S, Masterson E, Zhu T, Eizadi J, George J, Graupe N, Vareberg A, Phillips J, Bok I, Dwyer M, Ashtiani A, Hai A. Wireless in vivo Recording of Cortical Activity by an Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistor. SENSORS AND ACTUATORS. B, CHEMICAL 2023; 382:133549. [PMID: 36970106 PMCID: PMC10035629 DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2023.133549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Wireless brain technologies are empowering basic neuroscience and clinical neurology by offering new platforms that minimize invasiveness and refine possibilities during electrophysiological recording and stimulation. Despite their advantages, most systems require on-board power supply and sizeable transmission circuitry, enforcing a lower bound for miniaturization. Designing new minimalistic architectures that can efficiently sense neurophysiological events will open the door to standalone microscale sensors and minimally invasive delivery of multiple sensors. Here we present a circuit for sensing ionic fluctuations in the brain by an ion-sensitive field effect transistor that detunes a single radiofrequency resonator in parallel. We establish sensitivity of the sensor by electromagnetic analysis and quantify response to ionic fluctuations in vitro. We validate this new architecture in vivo during hindpaw stimulation in rodents and verify correlation with local field potential recordings. This new approach can be implemented as an integrated circuit for wireless in situ recording of brain electrophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyash Bhatt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Emily Masterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Tianxiang Zhu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jenna Eizadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Judy George
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Nesya Graupe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Adam Vareberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jack Phillips
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Ilhan Bok
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Matthew Dwyer
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Alireza Ashtiani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Aviad Hai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Wisconsin Institute for Translational Neuroengineering (WITNe), Madison, WI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Branco MP, Geukes SH, Aarnoutse EJ, Ramsey NF, Vansteensel MJ. Nine decades of electrocorticography: A comparison between epidural and subdural recordings. Eur J Neurosci 2023; 57:1260-1288. [PMID: 36843389 DOI: 10.1111/ejn.15941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, electrocorticography (ECoG) has arisen as a neural signal recording tool in the development of clinically viable neural interfaces. ECoG electrodes are generally placed below the dura mater (subdural) but can also be placed on top of the dura (epidural). In deciding which of these modalities best suits long-term implants, complications and signal quality are important considerations. Conceptually, epidural placement may present a lower risk of complications as the dura is left intact but also a lower signal quality due to the dura acting as a signal attenuator. The extent to which complications and signal quality are affected by the dura, however, has been a matter of debate. To improve our understanding of the effects of the dura on complications and signal quality, we conducted a literature review. We inventorized the effect of the dura on signal quality, decodability and longevity of acute and chronic ECoG recordings in humans and non-human primates. Also, we compared the incidence and nature of serious complications in studies that employed epidural and subdural ECoG. Overall, we found that, even though epidural recordings exhibit attenuated signal amplitude over subdural recordings, particularly for high-density grids, the decodability of epidural recorded signals does not seem to be markedly affected. Additionally, we found that the nature of serious complications was comparable between epidural and subdural recordings. These results indicate that both epidural and subdural ECoG may be suited for long-term neural signal recordings, at least for current generations of clinical and high-density ECoG grids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariana P Branco
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Simon H Geukes
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik J Aarnoutse
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Nick F Ramsey
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rubin DB, Ajiboye AB, Barefoot L, Bowker M, Cash SS, Chen D, Donoghue JP, Eskandar EN, Friehs G, Grant C, Henderson JM, Kirsch RF, Marujo R, Masood M, Mernoff ST, Miller JP, Mukand JA, Penn RD, Shefner J, Shenoy KV, Simeral JD, Sweet JA, Walter BL, Williams ZM, Hochberg LR. Interim Safety Profile From the Feasibility Study of the BrainGate Neural Interface System. Neurology 2023; 100:e1177-e1192. [PMID: 36639237 PMCID: PMC10074470 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are being developed to restore mobility, communication, and functional independence to people with paralysis. Though supported by decades of preclinical data, the safety of chronically implanted microelectrode array BCIs in humans is unknown. We report safety results from the prospective, open-label, nonrandomized BrainGate feasibility study (NCT00912041), the largest and longest-running clinical trial of an implanted BCI. METHODS Adults aged 18-75 years with quadriparesis from spinal cord injury, brainstem stroke, or motor neuron disease were enrolled through 7 clinical sites in the United States. Participants underwent surgical implantation of 1 or 2 microelectrode arrays in the motor cortex of the dominant cerebral hemisphere. The primary safety outcome was device-related serious adverse events (SAEs) requiring device explantation or resulting in death or permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant evaluation period. The secondary outcomes included the type and frequency of other adverse events and the feasibility of the BrainGate system for controlling a computer or other assistive technologies. RESULTS From 2004 to 2021, 14 adults enrolled in the BrainGate trial had devices surgically implanted. The average duration of device implantation was 872 days, yielding 12,203 days of safety experience. There were 68 device-related adverse events, including 6 device-related SAEs. The most common device-related adverse event was skin irritation around the percutaneous pedestal. There were no safety events that required device explantation, no unanticipated adverse device events, no intracranial infections, and no participant deaths or adverse events resulting in permanently increased disability related to the investigational device. DISCUSSION The BrainGate Neural Interface system has a safety record comparable with other chronically implanted medical devices. Given rapid recent advances in this technology and continued performance gains, these data suggest a favorable risk/benefit ratio in appropriately selected individuals to support ongoing research and development. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00912041. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class IV evidence that the neurosurgically placed BrainGate Neural Interface system is associated with a low rate of SAEs defined as those requiring device explantation, resulting in death, or resulting in permanently increased disability during the 1-year postimplant period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Rubin
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| | - A Bolu Ajiboye
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Laurie Barefoot
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marguerite Bowker
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Sydney S Cash
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - David Chen
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John P Donoghue
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emad N Eskandar
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Gerhard Friehs
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Carol Grant
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jaimie M Henderson
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Robert F Kirsch
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Rose Marujo
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Maryam Masood
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Stephen T Mernoff
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jonathan P Miller
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jon A Mukand
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Richard D Penn
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jeremy Shefner
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Krishna V Shenoy
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - John D Simeral
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jennifer A Sweet
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Benjamin L Walter
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Ziv M Williams
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- From the Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (CNTR) (D.B.R., L.B., S.S.C., C.G., R.M., M.M., L.R.H.), Department of Neurology, and Department of Neurosurgery (Z.M.W.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston; Harvard Medical School (D.B.R., S.S.C., L.R.H.), Boston, MA; Department of Biomedical Engineering (A.B.A., R.F.K.), Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH; FES Center of Excellence, Rehab. R&D Service (A.B.A., R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S., B.L.W.), Louis Stokes Cleveland Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, OH; Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology (CfNN) (M.B., J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), Rehabilitation R&D Service, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Providence, RI; Legs and Walking Lab (D.C.), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (D.C.), Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, IL; Department of Neuroscience (J.P.D.), Robert J. and Nancy D. Carney Institute for Brain Science (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), School of Engineering (J.P.D., J.D.S., L.R.H.), and Department of Rehabilitation Medicine (J.A.M.), Brown University, Providence, RI; Department of Neurological Surgery (E.N.E.), Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; European University of Cyprus (G.F.), Nicosia, Cyprus; Department of Neurosurgery (J.M.H.), Stanford University School of Medicine, CA; Wu Tsai Neurosciences Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), Bio-X Institute (J.M.H., K.V.S.), and Departments of Neurobiology (K.V.S.), Electrical Engineering (K.V.S.), and Bioengineering (K.V.S.), Stanford University, CA; Department of Neurological Surgery (R.F.K., J.P.M., J.A.S.), University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH; Neurology Section (S.T.M.), VA Providence Health Care System, Providence, RI; Department of Neurology (S.T.M.), Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Sargent Rehabilitation Center (J.A.M.), Warwick, RI; Section of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Department of Surgery, University of Chicago; Department of Neurosurgery (R.D.P.), Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL; Department of Neurology (J.S.), Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ; Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University (K.V.S.); Center for Neurological Restoration (B.L.W.), Cleveland Clinic, OH; and Program in Neuroscience (Z.M.W.), Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bergeron D, Iorio-Morin C, Bonizzato M, Lajoie G, Orr Gaucher N, Racine É, Weil AG. Use of Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Technical and Ethical Considerations. J Child Neurol 2023; 38:223-238. [PMID: 37116888 PMCID: PMC10226009 DOI: 10.1177/08830738231167736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
Invasive brain-computer interfaces hold promise to alleviate disabilities in individuals with neurologic injury, with fully implantable brain-computer interface systems expected to reach the clinic in the upcoming decade. Children with severe neurologic disabilities, like quadriplegic cerebral palsy or cervical spine trauma, could benefit from this technology. However, they have been excluded from clinical trials of intracortical brain-computer interface to date. In this manuscript, we discuss the ethical considerations related to the use of invasive brain-computer interface in children with severe neurologic disabilities. We first review the technical hardware and software considerations for the application of intracortical brain-computer interface in children. We then discuss ethical issues related to motor brain-computer interface use in pediatric neurosurgery. Finally, based on the input of a multidisciplinary panel of experts in fields related to brain-computer interface (functional and restorative neurosurgery, pediatric neurosurgery, mathematics and artificial intelligence research, neuroengineering, pediatric ethics, and pragmatic ethics), we then formulate initial recommendations regarding the clinical use of invasive brain-computer interfaces in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Bergeron
- Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | | | - Marco Bonizzato
- Electrical Engineering Department, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Neuroscience Department and Centre
interdisciplinaire de recherche sur le cerveau et l’apprentissage (CIRCA), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Guillaume Lajoie
- Mathematics and Statistics Department, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Mila - Québec AI Institute, Montréal,
Québec, Canada
| | - Nathalie Orr Gaucher
- Department of Pediatric Emergency
Medicine, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Bureau de l’Éthique clinique, Faculté
de médecine de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Éric Racine
- Pragmatic Research Unit, Institute de
Recherche Clinique de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Medicine and Department
of Social and Preventative Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexander G. Weil
- Division of Neurosurgery, Department
of Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine (CHUSJ), Département de
Pédiatrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Neuroscience, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Brain and Development Research Axis,
CHU Sainte-Justine Research Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Valencia D, Leone G, Keller N, Mercier PP, Alimohammad A. Power-efficient in vivobrain-machine interfaces via brain-state estimation. J Neural Eng 2023; 20. [PMID: 36645913 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/acb385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Advances in brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) can potentially improve the quality of life of millions of users with spinal cord injury or other neurological disorders by allowing them to interact with the physical environment at their will.Approach.To reduce the power consumption of the brain-implanted interface, this article presents the first hardware realization of anin vivointention-aware interface via brain-state estimation.Main Results.It is shown that incorporating brain-state estimation reduces thein vivopower consumption and reduces total energy dissipation by over 1.8× compared to those of the current systems, enabling longer better life for implanted circuits. The synthesized application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC) of the designed intention-aware multi-unit spike detection system in a standard 180 nm CMOS process occupies 0.03 mm2of silicon area and consumes 0.63 µW of power per channel, which is the least power consumption among the currentin vivoASIC realizations.Significance.The proposed interface is the first practical approach towards realizing asynchronous BMIs while reducing the power consumption of the BMI interface and enhancing neural decoding performance compared to those of the conventional synchronous BMIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Valencia
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America.,Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States of America
| | - Gianluca Leone
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Nicholas Keller
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America
| | - Patrick P Mercier
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, United States of America
| | - Amir Alimohammad
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, San Diego State University, San Diego, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bhatt S, Masterson E, Zhu T, Eizadi J, George J, Graupe N, Vareberg A, Phillips J, Bok I, Dwyer M, Ashtiani A, Hai A. Wireless in vivo Recording of Cortical Activity by an Ion-Sensitive Field Effect Transistor. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.01.19.524785. [PMID: 36711824 PMCID: PMC9882301 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.19.524785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Wireless brain technologies are empowering basic neuroscience and clinical neurology by offering new platforms that minimize invasiveness and refine possibilities during electrophysiological recording and stimulation. Despite their advantages, most systems require on-board power supply and sizeable transmission circuitry, enforcing a lower bound for miniaturization. Designing new minimalistic architectures that can efficiently sense neurophysiological events will open the door to standalone microscale sensors and minimally invasive delivery of multiple sensors. Here we present a circuit for sensing ionic fluctuations in the brain by an ion-sensitive field effect transistor that detunes a single radiofrequency resonator in parallel. We establish sensitivity of the sensor by electromagnetic analysis and quantify response to ionic fluctuations in vitro . We validate this new architecture in vivo during hindpaw stimulation in rodents and verify correlation with local field potential recordings. This new approach can be implemented as an integrated circuit for wireless in situ recording of brain electrophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suyash Bhatt
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Emily Masterson
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Tianxiang Zhu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jenna Eizadi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Judy George
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Nesya Graupe
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Adam Vareberg
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Jack Phillips
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Ilhan Bok
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Matthew Dwyer
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Alireza Ashtiani
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Aviad Hai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Department of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Towards clinical application of implantable brain-computer interfaces for people with late-stage ALS: medical and ethical considerations. J Neurol 2023; 270:1323-1336. [PMID: 36450968 PMCID: PMC9971103 DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11464-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 10/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) frequently develop speech and communication problems in the course of their disease. Currently available augmentative and alternative communication technologies do not present a solution for many people with advanced ALS, because these devices depend on residual and reliable motor activity. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) use neural signals for computer control and may allow people with late-stage ALS to communicate even when conventional technology falls short. Recent years have witnessed fast progression in the development and validation of implanted BCIs, which place neural signal recording electrodes in or on the cortex. Eventual widespread clinical application of implanted BCIs as an assistive communication technology for people with ALS will have significant consequences for their daily life, as well as for the clinical management of the disease, among others because of the potential interaction between the BCI and other procedures people with ALS undergo, such as tracheostomy. This article aims to facilitate responsible real-world implementation of implanted BCIs. We review the state of the art of research on implanted BCIs for communication, as well as the medical and ethical implications of the clinical application of this technology. We conclude that the contribution of all BCI stakeholders, including clinicians of the various ALS-related disciplines, will be needed to develop procedures for, and shape the process of, the responsible clinical application of implanted BCIs.
Collapse
|
28
|
Merken L, Schelles M, Ceyssens F, Kraft M, Janssen P. Thin flexible arrays for long-term multi-electrode recordings in macaque primary visual cortex. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 36215972 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac98e2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Basic, translational and clinical neuroscience are increasingly focusing on large-scale invasive recordings of neuronal activity. However, in large animals such as nonhuman primates and humans-in which the larger brain size with sulci and gyri imposes additional challenges compared to rodents, there is a huge unmet need to record from hundreds of neurons simultaneously anywhere in the brain for long periods of time. Here, we tested the electrical and mechanical properties of thin, flexible multi-electrode arrays (MEAs) inserted into the primary visual cortex of two macaque monkeys, and assessed their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compatibility and their capacity to record extracellular activity over a period of 1 year.Approach.To allow insertion of the floating arrays into the visual cortex, the 20 by 100µm2shafts were temporarily strengthened by means of a resorbable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) coating.Main results. After manual insertion of the arrays, theex vivoandin vivoMRI compatibility of the arrays proved to be excellent. We recorded clear single-unit activity from up to 50% of the electrodes, and multi-unit activity (MUA) on 60%-100% of the electrodes, which allowed detailed measurements of the receptive fields and the orientation selectivity of the neurons. Even 1 year after insertion, we obtained significant MUA responses on 70%-100% of the electrodes, while the receptive fields remained remarkably stable over the entire recording period.Significance.Thus, the thin and flexible MEAs we tested offer several crucial advantages compared to existing arrays, most notably in terms of brain tissue compliance, scalability, and brain coverage. Future brain-machine interface applications in humans may strongly benefit from this new generation of chronically implanted MEAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Merken
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Maarten Schelles
- Micro- and Nanosystems (MNS), Electrical Engineering Department (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,ReVision Implant NV, Haasrode 3053, Belgium
| | | | - Michael Kraft
- Micro- and Nanosystems (MNS), Electrical Engineering Department (ESAT), KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Institute for Micro- and Nanotechnology (LIMNI), Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Peter Janssen
- Laboratory for Neuro- and Psychophysiology, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Song M, Huang Y, Visser HJ, Romme J, Liu YH. An Energy-Efficient and High-Data-Rate IR-UWB Transmitter for Intracortical Neural Sensing Interfaces. IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS 2022; 57:3656-3668. [PMID: 36743394 PMCID: PMC7614137 DOI: 10.1109/jssc.2022.3212672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
This paper presents an implantable impulse-radio ultra-wideband (IR-UWB) wireless telemetry system for intracortical neural sensing interfaces. A 3-dimensional (3-D) hybrid impulse modulation that comprises phase shift keying (PSK), pulse position modulation (PPM) and pulse amplitude modulation (PAM) is proposed to increase modulation order without significantly increasing the demodulation requirement, thus leading to a high data rate of 1.66 Gbps and an increased air-transmission range. Operating in 6 - 9 GHz UWB band, the presented transmitter (TX) supports the proposed hybrid modulation with a high energy efficiency of 5.8 pJ/bit and modulation quality (EVM< -21 dB). A low-noise injection-locked ring oscillator supports 8-PSK with a phase error of 2.6°. A calibration free delay generator realizes a 4-PPM with only 115 μW and avoids potential cross-modulation between PPM and PSK. A switch-cap power amplifier with an asynchronous pulse-shaping performs 4-PAM with high energy efficiency and linearity. The TX is implemented in 28 nm CMOS technology, occupying 0.155mm2 core area. The wireless module including a printed monopole antenna has a module area of only 1.05 cm2. The transmitter consumes in total 9.7 mW when transmitting -41.3 dBm/MHz output power. The wireless telemetry module has been validated ex-vivo with a 15-mm multi-layer porcine tissue, and achieves a communication (air) distance up to 15 cm, leading to at least 16× improvement in distance-moralized energy efficiency of 45 pJ/bit/meter compared to state-of-the-art.
Collapse
|
30
|
The 2021 yearbook of Neurorestoratology. JOURNAL OF NEURORESTORATOLOGY 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnrt.2022.100008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
31
|
Shi C, Song M, Gao Z, Bevilacqua A, Dolmans G, Liu YH. Galvanic-coupled Trans-dural Data Transfer for High-bandwidth Intra-cortical Neural Sensing. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MICROWAVE THEORY AND TECHNIQUES 2022; 70:4579-4589. [PMID: 36846311 PMCID: PMC7614244 DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2022.3198100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
A digital-impulse galvanic coupling as a new high-speed trans-dural (from cortex to the skull) data transmission method has been presented in this paper. The proposed wireless telemetry replaces the tethered wires connected in between implants on the cortex and above the skull, allowing the brain implant to be "free-floating" for minimizing brain tissue damage. Such trans-dural wireless telemetry must have a wide channel bandwidth for high-speed data transfer and a small form factor for minimum invasiveness. To investigate the propagation property of the channel, a finite element model is developed and a channel characterization based on a liquid phantom and porcine tissue is performed. The results show that the trans-dural channel has a wide frequency response of up to 250 MHz. Propagation loss due to micro-motion and misalignments is also investigated in this work. The result indicates that the proposed transmission method is relatively insensitive to misalignment. It has approximately 1 dB extra loss when there is a horizontal misalignment of 1mm. A pulse-based transmitter ASIC and a miniature PCB module are designed and validated ex-vivo with a 10-mm thick porcine tissue. This work demonstrates a high-speed and miniature in-body galvanic-coupled pulse-based communication with a data rate up to 250 Mbps with an energy efficiency of 2 pJ/bit, and has a small module area of only 26 mm2.
Collapse
|
32
|
Dastin-van Rijn EM, Provenza NR, Vogt GS, Avendano-Ortega M, Sheth SA, Goodman WK, Harrison MT, Borton DA. PELP: Accounting for Missing Data in Neural Time Series by Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets. Front Hum Neurosci 2022; 16:934063. [PMID: 35874161 PMCID: PMC9301255 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.934063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in wireless data transmission technology have the potential to revolutionize clinical neuroscience. Today sensing-capable electrical stimulators, known as "bidirectional devices", are used to acquire chronic brain activity from humans in natural environments. However, with wireless transmission come potential failures in data transmission, and not all available devices correctly account for missing data or provide precise timing for when data losses occur. Our inability to precisely reconstruct time-domain neural signals makes it difficult to apply subsequent neural signal processing techniques and analyses. Here, our goal was to accurately reconstruct time-domain neural signals impacted by data loss during wireless transmission. Towards this end, we developed a method termed Periodic Estimation of Lost Packets (PELP). PELP leverages the highly periodic nature of stimulation artifacts to precisely determine when data losses occur. Using simulated stimulation waveforms added to human EEG data, we show that PELP is robust to a range of stimulation waveforms and noise characteristics. Then, we applied PELP to local field potential (LFP) recordings collected using an implantable, bidirectional DBS platform operating at various telemetry bandwidths. By effectively accounting for the timing of missing data, PELP enables the analysis of neural time series data collected via wireless transmission-a prerequisite for better understanding the brain-behavior relationships underlying neurological and psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Dastin-van Rijn
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
| | - Nicole R Provenza
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Gregory S Vogt
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Michelle Avendano-Ortega
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sameer A Sheth
- Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Wayne K Goodman
- Menninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Matthew T Harrison
- Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - David A Borton
- School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, United States Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Kim HJ, Ho JS. Wireless interfaces for brain neurotechnologies. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS. SERIES A, MATHEMATICAL, PHYSICAL, AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES 2022; 380:20210020. [PMID: 35658679 DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Wireless interfaces enable brain-implanted devices to remotely interact with the external world. They are critical components in modern research and clinical neurotechnologies and play a central role in determining their overall size, lifetime and functionality. Wireless interfaces use a wide range of modalities-including radio-frequency fields, acoustic waves and light-to transfer energy and data to and from an implanted device. These forms of energy interact with living tissue through distinct mechanisms and therefore lead to systems with vastly different form factors, operating characteristics, and safety considerations. This paper reviews recent advances in the development of wireless interfaces for brain neurotechnologies. We summarize the requirements that state-of-the-art brain-implanted devices impose on the wireless interface, and discuss the working principles and applications of wireless interfaces based on each modality. We also investigate challenges associated with wireless brain neurotechnologies and discuss emerging solutions permitted by recent developments in electrical engineering and materials science. This article is part of the theme issue 'Advanced neurotechnologies: translating innovation for health and well-being'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han-Joon Kim
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
| | - John S Ho
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
- The N.1 Institute for Health National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
- Institute for Health Innovation and Technology, National University of Singapore, Queenstown, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rubin DB, Hosman T, Kelemen JN, Kapitonava A, Willett FR, Coughlin BF, Halgren E, Kimchi EY, Williams ZM, Simeral JD, Hochberg LR, Cash SS. Learned Motor Patterns Are Replayed in Human Motor Cortex during Sleep. J Neurosci 2022; 42:5007-5020. [PMID: 35589391 PMCID: PMC9233445 DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.2074-21.2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Revised: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Consolidation of memory is believed to involve offline replay of neural activity. While amply demonstrated in rodents, evidence for replay in humans, particularly regarding motor memory, is less compelling. To determine whether replay occurs after motor learning, we sought to record from motor cortex during a novel motor task and subsequent overnight sleep. A 36-year-old man with tetraplegia secondary to cervical spinal cord injury enrolled in the ongoing BrainGate brain-computer interface pilot clinical trial had two 96-channel intracortical microelectrode arrays placed chronically into left precentral gyrus. Single- and multi-unit activity was recorded while he played a color/sound sequence matching memory game. Intended movements were decoded from motor cortical neuronal activity by a real-time steady-state Kalman filter that allowed the participant to control a neurally driven cursor on the screen. Intracortical neural activity from precentral gyrus and 2-lead scalp EEG were recorded overnight as he slept. When decoded using the same steady-state Kalman filter parameters, intracortical neural signals recorded overnight replayed the target sequence from the memory game at intervals throughout at a frequency significantly greater than expected by chance. Replay events occurred at speeds ranging from 1 to 4 times as fast as initial task execution and were most frequently observed during slow-wave sleep. These results demonstrate that recent visuomotor skill acquisition in humans may be accompanied by replay of the corresponding motor cortex neural activity during sleep.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Within cortex, the acquisition of information is often followed by the offline recapitulation of specific sequences of neural firing. Replay of recent activity is enriched during sleep and may support the consolidation of learning and memory. Using an intracortical brain-computer interface, we recorded and decoded activity from motor cortex as a human research participant performed a novel motor task. By decoding neural activity throughout subsequent sleep, we find that neural sequences underlying the recently practiced motor task are repeated throughout the night, providing direct evidence of replay in human motor cortex during sleep. This approach, using an optimized brain-computer interface decoder to characterize neural activity during sleep, provides a framework for future studies exploring replay, learning, and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel B Rubin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Tommy Hosman
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Jessica N Kelemen
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Anastasia Kapitonava
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Francis R Willett
- Hughes Medical Institute at Stanford University, Palo Alto, California 94305
| | - Brian F Coughlin
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Eric Halgren
- Departments of Neurosciences and Radiology, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093
| | - Eyal Y Kimchi
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| | - Ziv M Williams
- Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Program in Neuroscience, Harvard-MIT Program in Health Sciences and Technology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115
| | - John D Simeral
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Leigh R Hochberg
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Department of Veterans Affairs, Providence, Rhode Island 02908
- Carney Institute for Brain Science and School of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Sydney S Cash
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Davis KC, Meschede-Krasa B, Cajigas I, Prins NW, Alver C, Gallo S, Bhatia S, Abel JH, Naeem JA, Fisher L, Raza F, Rifai WR, Morrison M, Ivan ME, Brown EN, Jagid JR, Prasad A. Design-development of an at-home modular brain-computer interface (BCI) platform in a case study of cervical spinal cord injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2022; 19:53. [PMID: 35659259 PMCID: PMC9166490 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01026-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a portable and modular brain-computer interface (BCI) software platform independent of input and output devices. We implemented this platform in a case study of a subject with cervical spinal cord injury (C5 ASIA A). BACKGROUND BCIs can restore independence for individuals with paralysis by using brain signals to control prosthetics or trigger functional electrical stimulation. Though several studies have successfully implemented this technology in the laboratory and the home, portability, device configuration, and caregiver setup remain challenges that limit deployment to the home environment. Portability is essential for transitioning BCI from the laboratory to the home. METHODS The BCI platform implementation consisted of an Activa PC + S generator with two subdural four-contact electrodes implanted over the dominant left hand-arm region of the sensorimotor cortex, a minicomputer fixed to the back of the subject's wheelchair, a custom mobile phone application, and a mechanical glove as the end effector. To quantify the performance for this at-home implementation of the BCI, we quantified system setup time at home, chronic (14-month) decoding accuracy, hardware and software profiling, and Bluetooth communication latency between the App and the minicomputer. We created a dataset of motor-imagery labeled signals to train a binary motor imagery classifier on a remote computer for online, at-home use. RESULTS Average bluetooth data transmission delay between the minicomputer and mobile App was 23 ± 0.014 ms. The average setup time for the subject's caregiver was 5.6 ± 0.83 min. The average times to acquire and decode neural signals and to send those decoded signals to the end-effector were respectively 404.1 ms and 1.02 ms. The 14-month median accuracy of the trained motor imagery classifier was 87.5 ± 4.71% without retraining. CONCLUSIONS The study presents the feasibility of an at-home BCI system that subjects can seamlessly operate using a friendly mobile user interface, which does not require daily calibration nor the presence of a technical person for at-home setup. The study also describes the portability of the BCI system and the ability to plug-and-play multiple end effectors, providing the end-user the flexibility to choose the end effector to accomplish specific motor tasks for daily needs. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02564419. First posted on 9/30/2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin C Davis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Benyamin Meschede-Krasa
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Noeline W Prins
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, University of Ruhuna, Matara, Sri Lanka
| | - Charles Alver
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Sebastian Gallo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Shovan Bhatia
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
| | - John H Abel
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Division of Sleep Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Jasim A Naeem
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Letitia Fisher
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Fouzia Raza
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
| | - Wesley R Rifai
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Matthew Morrison
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Emery N Brown
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Jonathan R Jagid
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, 1095 NW 14th Terrace, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| | - Abhishek Prasad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, 1251 Memorial Dr, MEA 204, Coral Gables, Miami, FL, 33146, USA.
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
An H, Nason-Tomaszewski SR, Lim J, Kwon K, Willsey MS, Patil PG, Kim HS, Sylvester D, Chestek CA, Blaauw D. A Power-Efficient Brain-Machine Interface System With a Sub-mw Feature Extraction and Decoding ASIC Demonstrated in Nonhuman Primates. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS 2022; 16:395-408. [PMID: 35594208 PMCID: PMC9375520 DOI: 10.1109/tbcas.2022.3175926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Intracortical brain-machine interfaces have shown promise for restoring function to people with paralysis, but their translation to portable and implantable devices is hindered by their high power consumption. Recent devices have drastically reduced power consumption compared to standard experimental brain-machine interfaces, but still require wired or wireless connections to computing hardware for feature extraction and inference. Here, we introduce a Neural Recording And Decoding (NeuRAD) application specific integrated circuit (ASIC) in 180 nm CMOS that can extract neural spiking features and predict two-dimensional behaviors in real-time. To reduce amplifier and feature extraction power consumption, the NeuRAD has a hardware accelerator for extracting spiking band power (SBP) from intracortical spiking signals and includes an M0 processor with a fixed-point Matrix Acceleration Unit (MAU) for efficient and flexible decoding. We validated device functionality by recording SBP from a nonhuman primate implanted with a Utah microelectrode array and predicting the one- and two-dimensional finger movements the monkey was attempting to execute in closed-loop using a steady-state Kalman filter (SSKF). Using the NeuRAD's real-time predictions, the monkey achieved 100% success rate and 0.82 s mean target acquisition time to control one-dimensional finger movements using just 581 μW. To predict two-dimensional finger movements, the NeuRAD consumed 588 μW to enable the monkey to achieve a 96% success rate and 2.4 s mean acquisition time. By employing SBP, ASIC brain-machine interfaces can close the gap to enable fully implantable therapies for people with paralysis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Dingle AM, Moxon K, Shokur S, Strauss I. Editorial: Getting Neuroprosthetics Out of the Lab: Improving the Human-Machine Interactions to Restore Sensory-Motor Functions. Front Robot AI 2022; 9:928383. [PMID: 35694207 PMCID: PMC9175017 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2022.928383] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron M. Dingle
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, WI, United States
- *Correspondence: Aaron M. Dingle,
| | - Karen Moxon
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA, United States
| | - Solaiman Shokur
- École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ivo Strauss
- Department of Excellence in Robotics and A.I, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Costello JT, Nason SR, An H, Lee J, Mender MJ, Temmar H, Wallace DM, Lim J, Willsey MS, Patil PG, Jang T, Phillips JD, Kim HS, Blaauw D, Chestek CA. A low-power communication scheme for wireless, 1000 channel brain-machine interfaces. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35613546 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac7352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Brain-machine interfaces (BMIs) have the potential to restore motor function but are currently limited by electrode count and long-term recording stability. These challenges may be solved through the use of free-floating "motes" which wirelessly transmit recorded neural signals, if power consumption can be kept within safe levels when scaling to thousands of motes. Here, we evaluated a pulse-interval modulation (PIM) communication scheme for infrared (IR)-based motes that aims to reduce the wireless data rate and system power consumption. APPROACH To test PIM's ability to efficiently communicate neural information, we simulated the communication scheme in a real-time closed-loop BMI with non-human primates. Additionally, we performed circuit simulations of an IR-based 1000-mote system to calculate communication accuracy and total power consumption. MAIN RESULTS We found that PIM at 1kb/s per channel maintained strong correlations with true firing rate and matched online BMI performance of a traditional wired system. Closed-loop BMI tests suggest that lags as small as 30 ms can have significant performance effects. Finally, unlike other IR communication schemes, PIM is feasible in terms of power, and neural data can accurately be recovered on a receiver using 3mW for 1000 channels. SIGNIFICANCE These results suggest that PIM-based communication could significantly reduce power usage of wireless motes to enable higher channel-counts for high-performance BMIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph T Costello
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd, B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Samuel R Nason
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Hyochan An
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Jungho Lee
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Matthew J Mender
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Hisham Temmar
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Dylan M Wallace
- Robotics Institute, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Jongyup Lim
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Matthew S Willsey
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical School, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, 48109-0624, UNITED STATES
| | - Parag G Patil
- Neurosurgery, University of Michigan, 1500 E Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109, UNITED STATES
| | - Taekwang Jang
- Department of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, ETH Zurich, ETH Zurich, Rämistrasse 101, Zurich, 8092, SWITZERLAND
| | - Jamie Dean Phillips
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Delaware, Evans Hall, 139 The Green,, Newark, Delaware, 19716-5600, UNITED STATES
| | - Hun-Seok Kim
- Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - David Blaauw
- University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| | - Cynthia A Chestek
- Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, 2800 Plymouth Rd B10, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-1382, UNITED STATES
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Quantum Brain Networks: A Perspective. ELECTRONICS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/electronics11101528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
We propose Quantum Brain Networks (QBraiNs) as a new interdisciplinary field integrating knowledge and methods from neurotechnology, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing. The objective is to develop an enhanced connectivity between the human brain and quantum computers for a variety of disruptive applications. We foresee the emergence of hybrid classical-quantum networks of wetware and hardware nodes, mediated by machine learning techniques and brain–machine interfaces. QBraiNs will harness and transform in unprecedented ways arts, science, technologies, and entrepreneurship, in particular activities related to medicine, Internet of Humans, intelligent devices, sensorial experience, gaming, Internet of Things, crypto trading, and business.
Collapse
|
40
|
Kiang L, Woodington B, Carnicer-Lombarte A, Malliaras G, Barone DG. Spinal cord bioelectronic interfaces: opportunities in neural recording and clinical challenges. J Neural Eng 2022; 19. [PMID: 35320780 DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac605f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Bioelectronic stimulation of the spinal cord has demonstrated significant progress in restoration of motor function in spinal cord injury (SCI). The proximal, uninjured spinal cord presents a viable target for the recording and generation of control signals to drive targeted stimulation. Signals have been directly recorded from the spinal cord in behaving animals and correlated with limb kinematics. Advances in flexible materials, electrode impedance and signal analysis will allow SCR to be used in next-generation neuroprosthetics. In this review, we summarize the technological advances enabling progress in SCR and describe systematically the clinical challenges facing spinal cord bioelectronic interfaces and potential solutions, from device manufacture, surgical implantation to chronic effects of foreign body reaction and stress-strain mismatches between electrodes and neural tissue. Finally, we establish our vision of bi-directional closed-loop spinal cord bioelectronic bypass interfaces that enable the communication of disrupted sensory signals and restoration of motor function in SCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Kiang
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, Singapore, 169608, SINGAPORE
| | - Ben Woodington
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Electrical Engineering Division, 9 JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Alejandro Carnicer-Lombarte
- Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Bioelectronics Laboratory, Cambridge, CB2 0PY, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - George Malliaras
- University of Cambridge, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| | - Damiano G Barone
- Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Electrical Engineering Division, 9 JJ Thomson Ave, Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 1TN, UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Huggins JE, Krusienski D, Vansteensel MJ, Valeriani D, Thelen A, Stavisky S, Norton JJS, Nijholt A, Müller-Putz G, Kosmyna N, Korczowski L, Kapeller C, Herff C, Halder S, Guger C, Grosse-Wentrup M, Gaunt R, Dusang AN, Clisson P, Chavarriaga R, Anderson CW, Allison BZ, Aksenova T, Aarnoutse E. Workshops of the Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: BCIs: The Next Frontier. BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES 2022; 9:69-101. [PMID: 36908334 PMCID: PMC9997957 DOI: 10.1080/2326263x.2021.2009654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Eighth International Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) Meeting was held June 7-9th, 2021 in a virtual format. The conference continued the BCI Meeting series' interactive nature with 21 workshops covering topics in BCI (also called brain-machine interface) research. As in the past, workshops covered the breadth of topics in BCI. Some workshops provided detailed examinations of specific methods, hardware, or processes. Others focused on specific BCI applications or user groups. Several workshops continued consensus building efforts designed to create BCI standards and increase the ease of comparisons between studies and the potential for meta-analysis and large multi-site clinical trials. Ethical and translational considerations were both the primary topic for some workshops or an important secondary consideration for others. The range of BCI applications continues to expand, with more workshops focusing on approaches that can extend beyond the needs of those with physical impairments. This paper summarizes each workshop, provides background information and references for further study, presents an overview of the discussion topics, and describes the conclusion, challenges, or initiatives that resulted from the interactions and discussion at the workshop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Huggins
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States 325 East Eisenhower, Room 3017; Ann Arbor, Michigan 48108-5744, 734-936-7177
| | - Dean Krusienski
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219
| | - Mariska J Vansteensel
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Dept of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Antonia Thelen
- eemagine Medical Imaging Solutions GmbH, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - James J S Norton
- National Center for Adaptive Neurotechnologies, US Department of Veterans Affairs, 113 Holland Ave, Albany, NY 12208
| | - Anton Nijholt
- Faculty EEMCS, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Gernot Müller-Putz
- Institute of Neural Engineering, GrazBCI Lab, Graz University of Technology, Stremayrgasse 16/4, 8010 Graz, Austria
| | - Nataliya Kosmyna
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Media Lab, E14-548, Cambridge, MA 02139, Unites States
| | | | | | - Christian Herff
- School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Christoph Guger
- g.tec medical engineering GmbH/Guger Technologies OG, Austria, Sierningstrasse 14, 4521 Schiedlberg, Austria, +43725122240-0
| | - Moritz Grosse-Wentrup
- Research Group Neuroinformatics, Faculty of Computer Science, Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, Data Science @ Uni Vienna University of Vienna
| | - Robert Gaunt
- Rehab Neural Engineering Labs, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 3520 5th Ave, Suite 300, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, 412-383-1426
| | - Aliceson Nicole Dusang
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, School of Engineering, Brown University, Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI
- Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Center for Neurorestoration and Neurotechnology, Rehabilitation R&D Service, Providence, RI
- Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery, Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ricardo Chavarriaga
- IEEE Standards Association Industry Connections group on neurotechnologies for brain-machine interface, Center for Artificial Intelligence, School of Engineering, ZHAW-Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Switzerland, Switzerland
| | - Charles W Anderson
- Department of Computer Science, Molecular, Cellular and Integrative Neurosience Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Brendan Z Allison
- Dept. of Cognitive Science, Mail Code 0515, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, United States, 619-534-9754
| | - Tetiana Aksenova
- University Grenoble Alpes, CEA, LETI, Clinatec, Grenoble 38000, France
| | - Erik Aarnoutse
- UMC Utrecht Brain Center, Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Tchoe Y, Bourhis AM, Cleary DR, Stedelin B, Lee J, Tonsfeldt KJ, Brown EC, Siler DA, Paulk AC, Yang JC, Oh H, Ro YG, Lee K, Russman SM, Ganji M, Galton I, Ben-Haim S, Raslan AM, Dayeh SA. Human brain mapping with multithousand-channel PtNRGrids resolves spatiotemporal dynamics. Sci Transl Med 2022; 14:eabj1441. [PMID: 35044788 DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.abj1441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Electrophysiological devices are critical for mapping eloquent and diseased brain regions and for therapeutic neuromodulation in clinical settings and are extensively used for research in brain-machine interfaces. However, the existing clinical and experimental devices are often limited in either spatial resolution or cortical coverage. Here, we developed scalable manufacturing processes with a dense electrical connection scheme to achieve reconfigurable thin-film, multithousand-channel neurophysiological recording grids using platinum nanorods (PtNRGrids). With PtNRGrids, we have achieved a multithousand-channel array of small (30 μm) contacts with low impedance, providing high spatial and temporal resolution over a large cortical area. We demonstrated that PtNRGrids can resolve submillimeter functional organization of the barrel cortex in anesthetized rats that captured the tissue structure. In the clinical setting, PtNRGrids resolved fine, complex temporal dynamics from the cortical surface in an awake human patient performing grasping tasks. In addition, the PtNRGrids identified the spatial spread and dynamics of epileptic discharges in a patient undergoing epilepsy surgery at 1-mm spatial resolution, including activity induced by direct electrical stimulation. Collectively, these findings demonstrated the power of the PtNRGrids to transform clinical mapping and research with brain-machine interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngbin Tchoe
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Andrew M Bourhis
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Daniel R Cleary
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Brittany Stedelin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Jihwan Lee
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Karen J Tonsfeldt
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.,Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Center for Reproductive Science and Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Erik C Brown
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Dominic A Siler
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Angelique C Paulk
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Jimmy C Yang
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA.,Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Hongseok Oh
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Yun Goo Ro
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Keundong Lee
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Samantha M Russman
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Mehran Ganji
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Ian Galton
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Sharona Ben-Haim
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| | - Ahmed M Raslan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA
| | - Shadi A Dayeh
- Integrated Electronics and Biointerfaces Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.,Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.,Graduate Program of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Huang Y, Jin J, Xu R, Miao Y, Liu C, Cichocki A. Multi-view optimization of time-frequency common spatial patterns for brain-computer interfaces. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 365:109378. [PMID: 34626685 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2021.109378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Common spatial pattern (CSP) is a prevalent method applied to feature extraction in motor imagery (MI)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) recorded by electroencephalogram (EEG). The selection of time windows and frequency bands prominently affects the performance of CSP algorithms. Concerning the joint optimization of these two parameters, several studies have utilized a unified framework based on different feature selection strategies and achieved considerable improvement. However, during the feature selection process, useful information could be discarded inevitably and the underlying internal structure of features could be neglected. NEW METHOD In this paper, we proposed a novel framework termed time window filter bank common spatial pattern with multi-view optimization (TWFBCSP-MVO) to further boost the decoding of MI tasks. Concretely, after extracting CSP features from different time-frequency decompositions of EEG signals, a preliminary screening strategy based on variance ratio was devised to filter out the unrelated spatial patterns. We then introduced a multi-view learning strategy for the simultaneous optimization of time windows and frequency bands. A support vector machine classifier was trained to determine the output of the brain. RESULTS An experimental study was conducted on two public datasets to verify the effectiveness of TWFBCSP-MVO. Results showed that the proposed TWFBCSP-MVO could help improve the performance of MI classification. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS In comparison to other competing methods, the proposed method performed significantly better (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The proposed method is a promising contestant to improve the performance of practical MI-based BCIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yitao Huang
- Key Laboratory of Smart Manufacturing in Energy Chemical Process, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Jin
- Key Laboratory of Smart Manufacturing in Energy Chemical Process, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
| | - Ren Xu
- Guger Technologies OG, Herbersteinstraße 60, 8020 Graz, Austria
| | - Yangyang Miao
- Key Laboratory of Smart Manufacturing in Energy Chemical Process, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Smart Manufacturing in Energy Chemical Process, Ministry of Education, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Andrzej Cichocki
- The Skolkowo Institute of Science and Technology, Moscow 143025, Russia; Nicolaus Copernicus University (UMK), 87-100 Torun, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Functional Characterization of Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Models of the Brain with Microelectrode Arrays. Cells 2021; 11:cells11010106. [PMID: 35011667 PMCID: PMC8750870 DOI: 10.3390/cells11010106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 12/22/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-derived neuron cultures have emerged as models of electrical activity in the human brain. Microelectrode arrays (MEAs) measure changes in the extracellular electric potential of cell cultures or tissues and enable the recording of neuronal network activity. MEAs have been applied to both human subjects and hPSC-derived brain models. Here, we review the literature on the functional characterization of hPSC-derived two- and three-dimensional brain models with MEAs and examine their network function in physiological and pathological contexts. We also summarize MEA results from the human brain and compare them to the literature on MEA recordings of hPSC-derived brain models. MEA recordings have shown network activity in two-dimensional hPSC-derived brain models that is comparable to the human brain and revealed pathology-associated changes in disease models. Three-dimensional hPSC-derived models such as brain organoids possess a more relevant microenvironment, tissue architecture and potential for modeling the network activity with more complexity than two-dimensional models. hPSC-derived brain models recapitulate many aspects of network function in the human brain and provide valid disease models, but certain advancements in differentiation methods, bioengineering and available MEA technology are needed for these approaches to reach their full potential.
Collapse
|
45
|
Lang Y, Tang R, Liu Y, Xi P, Liu H, Quan Z, Song D, Lv X, Huang Q, He J. Multisite Simultaneous Neural Recording of Motor Pathway in Free-Moving Rats. BIOSENSORS 2021; 11:bios11120503. [PMID: 34940260 PMCID: PMC8699182 DOI: 10.3390/bios11120503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
Neural interfaces typically focus on one or two sites in the motoneuron system simultaneously due to the limitation of the recording technique, which restricts the scope of observation and discovery of this system. Herein, we built a system with various electrodes capable of recording a large spectrum of electrophysiological signals from the cortex, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, and muscles of freely moving animals. The system integrates adjustable microarrays, floating microarrays, and microwires to a commercial connector and cuff electrode on a wireless transmitter. To illustrate the versatility of the system, we investigated its performance for the behavior of rodents during tethered treadmill walking, untethered wheel running, and open field exploration. The results indicate that the system is stable and applicable for multiple behavior conditions and can provide data to support previously inaccessible research of neural injury, rehabilitation, brain-inspired computing, and fundamental neuroscience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiran Lang
- Beijing Innovation Centre for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (R.T.); (X.L.); (Q.H.)
| | - Rongyu Tang
- Beijing Innovation Centre for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (R.T.); (X.L.); (Q.H.)
| | - Yafei Liu
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (P.X.); (H.L.)
| | - Pengcheng Xi
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (P.X.); (H.L.)
| | - Honghao Liu
- School of Mechatronical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (P.X.); (H.L.)
| | - Zhenzhen Quan
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Z.Q.); (D.S.)
| | - Da Song
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Medicine and Biotherapy, School of Life Science, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Z.Q.); (D.S.)
| | - Xiaodong Lv
- Beijing Innovation Centre for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (R.T.); (X.L.); (Q.H.)
| | - Qiang Huang
- Beijing Innovation Centre for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (R.T.); (X.L.); (Q.H.)
| | - Jiping He
- Beijing Innovation Centre for Intelligent Robots and Systems, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China; (Y.L.); (R.T.); (X.L.); (Q.H.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rapeaux AB, Constandinou TG. Implantable brain machine interfaces: first-in-human studies, technology challenges and trends. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2021; 72:102-111. [PMID: 34749248 DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Implantable brain machine interfaces (BMIs) are now on a trajectory to go mainstream, wherein what was once considered last resort will progressively become elective at earlier stages in disease treatment. First-in-human successes have demonstrated the ability to decode highly dexterous motor skills such as handwriting, and speech from human cortical activity. These have been used for cursor and prosthesis control, direct-to-text communication and speech synthesis. Along with these breakthrough studies, technology advancements have enabled the observation of more channels of neural activity through new concepts for centralised/distributed implant architectures. This is complemented by research in flexible substrates, packaging, surgical workflows and data processing. New regulatory guidance and funding has galvanised the field. This culmination of resource, efforts and capability is now attracting significant investment for BMI commercialisation. This paper reviews recent developments and describes the paradigm shift in BMI development that is leading to new innovations, insights and BMI translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrien B Rapeaux
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, UK; Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology, Imperial College London, UK; Care Research and Technology (CR&T) based at Imperial College London and the University of Surrey, UK Dementia Research Institute (UK DRI), UK
| | - Timothy G Constandinou
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, UK; Centre for Bio-Inspired Technology, Imperial College London, UK; Care Research and Technology (CR&T) based at Imperial College London and the University of Surrey, UK Dementia Research Institute (UK DRI), UK.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Cajigas I, Davis KC, Meschede-Krasa B, Prins NW, Gallo S, Naeem JA, Palermo A, Wilson A, Guerra S, Parks BA, Zimmerman L, Gant K, Levi AD, Dietrich WD, Fisher L, Vanni S, Tauber JM, Garwood IC, Abel JH, Brown EN, Ivan ME, Prasad A, Jagid J. Implantable brain-computer interface for neuroprosthetic-enabled volitional hand grasp restoration in spinal cord injury. Brain Commun 2021; 3:fcab248. [PMID: 34870202 PMCID: PMC8637800 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcab248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2021] [Revised: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Loss of hand function after cervical spinal cord injury severely impairs functional independence. We describe a method for restoring volitional control of hand grasp in one 21-year-old male subject with complete cervical quadriplegia (C5 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A) using a portable fully implanted brain-computer interface within the home environment. The brain-computer interface consists of subdural surface electrodes placed over the dominant-hand motor cortex and connects to a transmitter implanted subcutaneously below the clavicle, which allows continuous reading of the electrocorticographic activity. Movement-intent was used to trigger functional electrical stimulation of the dominant hand during an initial 29-weeks laboratory study and subsequently via a mechanical hand orthosis during in-home use. Movement-intent information could be decoded consistently throughout the 29-weeks in-laboratory study with a mean accuracy of 89.0% (range 78-93.3%). Improvements were observed in both the speed and accuracy of various upper extremity tasks, including lifting small objects and transferring objects to specific targets. At-home decoding accuracy during open-loop trials reached an accuracy of 91.3% (range 80-98.95%) and an accuracy of 88.3% (range 77.6-95.5%) during closed-loop trials. Importantly, the temporal stability of both the functional outcomes and decoder metrics were not explored in this study. A fully implanted brain-computer interface can be safely used to reliably decode movement-intent from motor cortex, allowing for accurate volitional control of hand grasp.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iahn Cajigas
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Kevin C Davis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Benyamin Meschede-Krasa
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Noeline W Prins
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
- Department of Electrical and Information Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Ruhuna, Hapugala, Galle 80000, Sri Lanka
| | - Sebastian Gallo
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Jasim Ahmad Naeem
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Anne Palermo
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Audrey Wilson
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Santiago Guerra
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Brandon A Parks
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Lauren Zimmerman
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
| | - Katie Gant
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Allan D Levi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - W Dalton Dietrich
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Letitia Fisher
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Steven Vanni
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - John Michael Tauber
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Indie C Garwood
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - John H Abel
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Emery N Brown
- Department of Brain and Cognitive Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
- Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Abhishek Prasad
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33146, USA
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Jonathan Jagid
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
- Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Fernández E, Alfaro A, Soto-Sánchez C, González-López P, Lozano Ortega AM, Peña S, Grima MD, Rodil A, Gómez B, Chen X, Roelfsema PR, Rolston JD, Davis TS, Normann RA. Visual percepts evoked with an Intracortical 96-channel microelectrode array inserted in human occipital cortex. J Clin Invest 2021; 131:151331. [PMID: 34665780 DOI: 10.1172/jci151331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A long-held dream of scientists is to transfer information directly to the visual cortex of blind individuals, thereby restoring a rudimentary form of sight. However, no clinically available cortical visual prosthesis yet exists. METHODS We implanted an intracortical microelectrode array consisting of 96 electrodes in the visual cortex of a 57-year-old person with complete blindness for a six- month period. We measured thresholds and the characteristics of the visual percepts elicited by intracortical microstimulation. RESULTS Implantation and subsequent explantation of intracortical microelectrodes were carried out without complications. The mean stimulation threshold for single electrodes was 66.8 ± 36.5 μA. We consistently obtained high-quality recordings from visually deprived neurons and the stimulation parameters remained stable over time. Simultaneous stimulation via multiple electrodes were associated with a significant reduction in thresholds (p<0.001, ANOVA test) and evoked discriminable phosphene percepts, allowing the blind participant to identify some letters and recognize object boundaries. Furthermore, we observed a learning process that helped the subject to recognize complex patterns over time. CONCLUSIONS Our results demonstrate the safety and efficacy of chronic intracortical microstimulation via a large number of electrodes in human visual cortex, showing its high potential for restoring functional vision in the blind. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02983370. FUNDING Funding was provided by grant RTI2018-098969-B-100 from the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia Innovación y Universidades, by grant PROMETEO/2019/119 from the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain), by the Bidons Egara Research Chair of the University Miguel Hernández (Spain) and by the John Moran Eye Center of the University of Utah (US).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arantxa Alfaro
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital Vega Baja, Elche, Spain
| | | | - Pablo González-López
- Servicio de Neurología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | | | - Sebastian Peña
- Bioengineering Institute, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche, Spain
| | | | - Alfonso Rodil
- Bioengineering Institute, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche, Spain
| | - Bernardeta Gómez
- Bioengineering Institute, University Miguel Hernandez, Elche, Spain
| | - Xing Chen
- Department of Vision & Cognition, Netherland Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pieter R Roelfsema
- Department of Vision & Cognition, Netherland Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - John D Rolston
- Department of Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States of America
| | - Tyler S Davis
- Department of Neurosurgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States of America
| | - Richard A Normann
- John Moran Eye Center and Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chandrasekaran S, Fifer M, Bickel S, Osborn L, Herrero J, Christie B, Xu J, Murphy RKJ, Singh S, Glasser MF, Collinger JL, Gaunt R, Mehta AD, Schwartz A, Bouton CE. Historical perspectives, challenges, and future directions of implantable brain-computer interfaces for sensorimotor applications. Bioelectron Med 2021; 7:14. [PMID: 34548098 PMCID: PMC8456563 DOI: 10.1186/s42234-021-00076-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Almost 100 years ago experiments involving electrically stimulating and recording from the brain and the body launched new discoveries and debates on how electricity, movement, and thoughts are related. Decades later the development of brain-computer interface technology began, which now targets a wide range of applications. Potential uses include augmentative communication for locked-in patients and restoring sensorimotor function in those who are battling disease or have suffered traumatic injury. Technical and surgical challenges still surround the development of brain-computer technology, however, before it can be widely deployed. In this review we explore these challenges, historical perspectives, and the remarkable achievements of clinical study participants who have bravely forged new paths for future beneficiaries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Santosh Chandrasekaran
- Neural Bypass and Brain Computer Interface Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Matthew Fifer
- Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Stephan Bickel
- The Human Brain Mapping Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Neurology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Luke Osborn
- Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Jose Herrero
- The Human Brain Mapping Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Breanne Christie
- Research and Exploratory Development Department, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, USA
| | - Junqian Xu
- Departments of Radiology and Psychiatry, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Rory K J Murphy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sandeep Singh
- Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Hospital, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Matthew F Glasser
- Departments of Radiology and Neuroscience, Washington University in St Louis, Saint Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jennifer L Collinger
- Rehabilitation Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Robert Gaunt
- Rehabilitation Neural Engineering Labs, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
- Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ashesh D Mehta
- The Human Brain Mapping Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA
| | - Andrew Schwartz
- McGowan Institute of Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Chad E Bouton
- Neural Bypass and Brain Computer Interface Laboratory, Feinstein Institutes for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, USA.
- Department of Molecular Medicine, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Manhasset, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Shokur S, Mazzoni A, Schiavone G, Weber DJ, Micera S. A modular strategy for next-generation upper-limb sensory-motor neuroprostheses. MED 2021; 2:912-937. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medj.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|