EAACI Biologicals Guidelines-Recommendations for severe asthma

Histopathologic features of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in patients from high-altitude Xizang region

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous inflammatory disease with varying patterns across regions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to investigate the clinical and histopathological features of CRSwNP in Xizang, a high-altitude region in China.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the histopathological features of CRSwNP patients from Shanghai and Xizang who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) between 2017 and 2024. Polyp tissue samples were assessed, and statistical analyses compared features between the two regions in CRSwNP, eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP), and noneosinophilic CRSwNP (neCRSwNP) patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients from Xizang and 35 from Shanghai were analyzed. All Shanghai patients were Han Chinese, and all Xizang patients were Tibetan. Compared to Shanghai, Tibetan patients had significantly lower rates of smoking and asthma. Overall inflammation levels in Xizang were lower, while eosinophil counts were lower in eCRSwNP patients. Neutrophil infiltration, mucosal ulceration, and squamous metaplasia were higher in Xizang patients, while neCRSwNP patients exhibited more neutrophil infiltration and less subepithelial edema.

CONCLUSIONS

The study revealed that Tibetan patients with CRSwNP have lower eosinophilic inflammation but higher neutrophil infiltration and squamous metaplasia compared to Shanghai patients, indicating the impact of high-altitude environments on inflammatory patterns.

Shared decision-making in severe asthma therapy: qualitative study of physician-patient communication

RATIONALE

Biologics are indicated for severe asthma, but little is known about the factors driving patient and physician decisions surrounding their use.

OBJECTIVES

To understand decision drivers for biologic use and conversational dynamics between patients with severe asthma and physicians.

METHODS

This retrospective database study used anonymized physician-patient conversations (recorded September 2018-August 2020) from routine clinical visits, captured in Verilogue's physician-patient syndicated database. Eligible conversations included those of patients with severe asthma, who were considering biologic therapy (Topic 1), had initiated biologic within 7 months of clinical visit (Topic 2), or were discontinuing/considering switching biologic treatment (Topic 3). Conversations were analyzed quantitatively and descriptively by topic.

RESULTS

Overall, 50 conversations between 14 physicians and 50 patients were included (considering biologic, n = 10; recent biologic initiation, n = 20; switched/discontinued biologic, n = 20). Physicians had 68-73% share of the conversation. When considering biologic treatment, the presence of symptoms (including coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath and chest tightness) drove the decision, with 3/10 patients providing additional symptom impact/severity details, and 2/10 describing adjustments to accommodate symptoms. Physicians set unspecified treatment goals and modest expectations for biologic efficacy, framing any symptom control as success (13/20 conversations). Patient symptom assessment drove the decision to continue, discontinue, or switch biologic treatment: in 5/20 cases, physicians asked patients if they were "better" or the medication is "helping".

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that patients relied on physicians to shape patient-physician interactions and treatment expectations. This suggests that shared decision-making may improve physicians' understanding of the impact severe asthma has on patients and facilitate the setting of treatment expectations.

Physical Activity in Adults with Severe Asthma On-Treatment with Biological Therapies: A 1-Year Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Data

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a complex airways disease that affects over 350-million people worldwide. It is estimated that up to 10% of adults and 2.5% of children with asthma have severe disease, which is associated with reduced physical activity. The introduction of biological therapies has revolutionised the management of severe asthma; however, it remains to be determined whether this translates into improvements in physical activity status.

METHOD

This 1-year retrospective study evaluated step-based physical activity (via a smartphone pedometer) in adults with severe asthma (n = 20) and two matched sub-groups (n = 20 mild asthma and n = 20 healthy controls).

RESULTS

The annual daily step count was significantly less in adults with severe asthma (4698 ± 1927) versus mild asthma (7239 ± 1815) (P = 0.009) and healthy controls (8252 ± 2115) (P = 0.001). No difference in physical activity was observed between those with mild asthma and healthy controls (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite long-term treatment with biological therapies, physical activity remains significantly lower in adults with severe asthma. The development of personalised evidence-based interventions to promote physical activity in people with severe asthma remains a priority.

Long-Term Clinical Remission on Benralizumab Treatment in Severe Eosinophilic Asthma: A Four-Year Real-Life Study

Background: The current availability of monoclonal antibodies against key mediators of type-2 (T2) inflammation has led to a redefinition of the ultimate objectives of severe asthma treatment to a more composite concept of disease remission. Objectives: The aim of this real-life study was to estimate the percentage of patients who achieved clinical remission over 4 years of treatment with benralizumab, and to identify baseline predictors for the achievement of such a composite outcome in the long term. Methods: Data from a 4-year follow-up of 23 patients who were prescribed benralizumab as an add-on therapy because of uncontrolled severe eosinophilic asthma were retrospectively analyzed and compared. Clinical remission was considered to be "complete" if oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was not required, there were no exacerbations, an asthma control test (ACT) score ≥ 20 was achieved and a pre-bronchodilation percent predicted a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1%) ≥ 80%. Clinical remission was considered to be "partial" if OCS use was not required, plus at least two of the other three aforementioned criteria. Results: The overall percentage of patients who achieved clinical remission was 86.9% after 12 months, and 91.3% after 24 and 48 months of treatment. The rate of complete remission over partial remission increased over time. After 12 months of treatment, 65% of patients fulfilled the criteria for complete remission and 35.0% for partial remission. After 48 months of treatment, 71.4% of patients were in a status of complete remission and 28.6% in a status of partial remission. A long-term composite outcome of complete clinical remission was more likely to be achieved by severe eosinophilic asthma patients with comorbid nasal polyposis, bronchiectasis and osteoporosis, and with OCS dependency, a predicted pre-bronchodilation FEV1% ≥ 80% and a predicted FEF25-75% < 65% at baseline. Conclusions: Our real-life experience suggests that treatment with benralizumab may allow the achievement and long-term maintenance of clinical remission in a high percentage of severe eosinophilic asthma patients, up to 4 years of follow-up.

Type 2 immunity in allergic diseases

Significant advancements have been made in understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms of type 2 immunity in allergic diseases such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic rhinosinusitis, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), food and drug allergies, and atopic dermatitis (AD). Type 2 immunity has evolved to protect against parasitic diseases and toxins, plays a role in the expulsion of parasites and larvae from inner tissues to the lumen and outside the body, maintains microbe-rich skin and mucosal epithelial barriers and counterbalances the type 1 immune response and its destructive effects. During the development of a type 2 immune response, an innate immune response initiates starting from epithelial cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), including dendritic cells and macrophages, and translates to adaptive T and B-cell immunity, particularly IgE antibody production. Eosinophils, mast cells and basophils have effects on effector functions. Cytokines from ILC2s and CD4+ helper type 2 (Th2) cells, CD8 + T cells, and NK-T cells, along with myeloid cells, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, and IL-13, initiate and sustain allergic inflammation via T cell cells, eosinophils, and ILC2s; promote IgE class switching; and open the epithelial barrier. Epithelial cell activation, alarmin release and barrier dysfunction are key in the development of not only allergic diseases but also many other systemic diseases. Recent biologics targeting the pathways and effector functions of IL4/IL13, IL-5, and IgE have shown promising results for almost all ages, although some patients with severe allergic diseases do not respond to these therapies, highlighting the unmet need for a more detailed and personalized approach.

Eosinophil-Driven vs. Eosinophil-Associated Severe Asthma: Practical Implications for Target Treatment

Severe asthma (SA) is a chronic inflammatory condition affecting approximately 10% of asthmatic patients, and eosinophils are considered key pathogenetic actors in a significant number of patients. Biological therapies have been demonstrated to improve asthma control by decreasing exacerbation rates and reducing the use of oral corticosteroids. In this context, phenotyping and endotyping patients with SA is essential for selecting the most effective therapeutic approach. For this purpose, biomarkers such as IgE, absolute blood eosinophil count, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) are crucial in defining a patient's inflammatory profile. Their integration provides a framework for classifying asthma into T2-high, T2-mild, or T2-low categories, guiding personalized treatment strategies. By incorporating multiple biomarkers into a unified model, it is possible to better stratify patients and optimize biologic therapy selection, paving the way for improved outcomes in SA management. This review aims to evaluate the role of phenotyping and endotyping SA patients, with particular attention to the impact of eosinophilic inflammation and combinatory biomarkers on decision-making processes for the selection of biological therapies.

Switching biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A multicenter Canadian experience

BACKGROUND

Type 2 biologics have been used increasingly for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, patterns of biologic switching are understudied, and established guidelines for sequential or simultaneous use do not yet exist.

METHODS

This is a Canadian multicenter retrospective study of real-world patient data. Patients were included if they had recurrent CRSwNP despite maximal medical and surgical management, and received at least one dose of a type 2 biologic. Patients who remained on their initial biologic comprised the continuous group. Patients with sequential or simultaneous use of more than one biologic comprised the switched group. We compared the characteristics of patients who continued and switched biologics.

RESULTS

Note that 225 consecutive patients were included. Thirty-six (16%) switched biologics at least once, and six (3%) switched twice. The most common switch was from mepolizumab to dupilumab, with poor control of CRSwNP symptoms being the leading cause for this switch. Lack of efficacy was the main reason for switching off mepolizumab and omalizumab, while adverse events were the leading cause for switching off dupilumab. Additionally, mepolizumab patients were more likely to switch biologics late in their treatment, while dupilumab patients rarely switched after 12 months of therapy (p-value < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Switching biologics for CRSwNP is frequent in Canadian rhinology practices, with 16% of patients switching at least once. The most common switch is from mepolizumab to dupilumab with inadequate CRSwNP control driving this switch. This study may help guide sequential or simultaneous use of biologics in CRSwNP patients.

Small airways dysfunction in severe asthma: Current treatment approaches and future directions

Severe asthma is a significant health concern due to its association with higher mortality rates, reduced quality of life, and increased healthcare costs. These challenges make it a persistent issue for both clinicians and researchers. The small airways, defined as distal airways with a diameter of less than 2 mm and comprising 98.8% of the total lung volume, play a significant role in airway resistance in individuals with asthma. Recent studies demonstrated that small airways dysfunction is found in all asthma severity levels, but it is most pronounced in severe asthma, and greater small airways dysfunction severity correlates with poorer asthma control and a higher frequency of exacerbations. Therefore, therapies aimed at targeting small airways dysfunction are essential for effective asthma management, especially in severe asthma.

An evaluation of mepolizumab as an add-on maintenance treatment for severe eosinophilic asthma

INTRODUCTION

Clinical experience with anti-interleukin (IL)-5 biologic therapies for severe asthma has been increasing, alongside deeper and broader research focusing on the role of IL-5 and the IL-5 targeted mepolizumab. This review aims to provide an update of the evidence on the role of IL-5 and mepolizumab, with discussions of the benefits of mepolizumab and its future potential, to promote the comprehension of the pathophysiology and therapeutic approaches to asthma.

AREAS COVERED

For this narrative review, we conducted a database search in PubMed and Embase using the keywords 'IL-5' and 'mepolizumab,' focusing on randomized controlled trials and real-world studies up to September 2024. An overview of the pathogenesis of severe asthma, new insights on the role of IL-5 and mepolizumab, and the evidence on the efficacy and safety of mepolizumab in the treatment of severe eosinophilic asthma is provided, and its benefits in clinical remission and future applications are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Mepolizumab holds considerable promise in asthma treatment due to its mechanism of action and multiple potential benefits. In clinical practice, it may be worth considering the exploratory initiation of mepolizumab add-on treatment from the time of medium-dose inhaled glucocorticosteroid use.

Real-world mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma decreased exacerbations, oral corticosteroid use, and healthcare resource utilization and costs over 4 years: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although the efficacy of mepolizumab in reducing exacerbations and oral corticosteroid (OCS) use in severe asthma is well-established, real-world long-term effectiveness data are limited. This study evaluated the real-world impact of mepolizumab treatment in patients with severe asthma over a 4-year follow-up period.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with asthma initiating mepolizumab (index date: first claim, November 2015-September 2019) using the Merative MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Databases. Outcomes included asthma exacerbations, OCS use, and exacerbation-related healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, assessed 12-months pre-index (baseline) and annually during the 4-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Among 189 eligible patients, mean asthma exacerbation rate (AER) declined progressively from baseline during follow-up: AER decreased by 53.8% at Year 1 and 73.8% by Year 4 (p < 0.001). The annual OCS prescription rate reduced from baseline by 41.1% at Year 1 and 62.2% at Year 4 (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with both no exacerbations and no OCS use progressively increased from 6.4% at baseline to 18.5% at Year 1 and 41.8% at Year 4. Exacerbation-related HCRU including inpatient, emergency room, and outpatient office visits decreased from baseline (9.0%, 21.7%, and 78.8%, respectively), at Year 1 (3.2%, 12.2%, and 49.2%), and Year 4 (0.0%, 4.8%, and 31.8%). Exacerbation-related healthcare costs declined from $4,635 at baseline to $1,487 at Year 1 and $217 at Year 4 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with mepolizumab demonstrated progressive and sustained long-term, real-world reductions in exacerbation frequency, OCS dependency, and exacerbation-related HCRU and costs over 4 years.

Biomarkers in asthma, potential for therapeutic intervention

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease characterized by multiple phenotypes with varying risk factors and therapeutic responses. This Commentary describes research on biomarkers for T2-"high" and T2-"low" inflammation, a hallmark of the disease. Patients with asthma who exhibit an increase in airway T2 inflammation are classified as having T2-high asthma. In this endotype, Type 2 cytokines interleukins (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, plus other inflammatory mediators, lead to increased eosinophilic inflammation and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). In contrast, T2-low asthma has no clear definition. Biomarkers are considered valuable tools as they can help identify various phenotypes and endotypes, as well as treatment response to standard treatment or potential therapeutic targets, particularly for biologics. As our knowledge of phenotypes and endotypes expands, biologics are increasingly integrated into treatment strategies for severe asthma. These treatments block specific inflammatory pathways or single mediators. While single or composite biomarkers may help to identify subsets of patients who might benefit from these treatments, only a few inflammatory biomarkers have been validated for clinical application. One example is sputum eosinophilia, a particularly useful biomarker, as it may suggest corticosteroid responsiveness or reflect non-compliance to inhaled corticosteroids. As knowledge develops, a meaningful goal would be to provide individualized care to patients with asthma.

Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies in allergy: Targeting IgE, cytokine, and alarmin pathways

The etiology of allergy is closely linked to type 2 inflammatory responses ultimately leading to the production of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE), a key driver of many allergic conditions. At a high level, initial allergen exposure disrupts epithelial integrity, triggering local inflammation via alarmins including IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which activate type 2 innate lymphoid cells as well as other immune cells to secrete type 2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13, promoting Th2 cell development and eosinophil recruitment. Th2 cell dependent B cell activation promotes the production of allergen-specific IgE, which stably binds to basophils and mast cells. Rapid degranulation of these cells upon allergen re-exposure leads to allergic symptoms. Recent advances in our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying allergic pathophysiology have significantly shaped the development of therapeutic intervention strategies. In this review, we highlight key therapeutic targets within the allergic cascade with a particular focus on past, current and future treatment approaches using monoclonal antibodies. Specific targeting of alarmins, type 2 cytokines and IgE has shown varying degrees of clinical benefit in different allergic indications including asthma, chronic spontaneous urticaria, atopic dermatitis, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. While multiple therapeutic antibodies have been approved for clinical use, scientists are still working on ways to improve on current treatment approaches. Here, we provide context to understand therapeutic targeting strategies and their limitations, discussing both knowledge gaps and promising future directions to enhancing clinical efficacy in allergic disease management.

Expert opinion on diagnosis and management of Severe Asthma in low and middle income countries (LMIC) with focus on India

OBJECTIVE

In this document, 9 Indian experts have evaluated the factors specific to LMICs when it came to Severe Asthma (SA) diagnosis, evaluation, biologic selection, non-biologic treatment options, and follow-up.

DATA SOURCES

A search was performed using 50 keywords, focusing on the Indian/LMICs perspective, in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The key areas of the search were focused on diagnosis, phenoendotyping, non-biological therapies, selecting a biologic, assessment of treatment response, and management of exacerbation.

STUDY SELECTIONS

The initial search revealed 1826 articles, from these case reports, observational studies, cohort studies, non-English language papers, etc., were excluded and we short-listed 20 articles for each area. Five relevant articles were selected by the experts for review.

RESULTS

In LMICs, SA patients may be referred to the specialist for evaluation a little late for Phenoendotyping of SA. While biologic therapy is now a standard of care, pulmonologists in LMICs may not have access to all the investigations to phenoendotype SA patients like fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), skin prick test (SPT), etc., but phenotyping of SA patients can also be done with simple blood investigations, eosinophil count and serum immunoglobulin E (IgE). Choosing a biologic in the overlapping phenotype of SA and ACO patients is also a challenge in the LMICs.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the limitations of LMIC, it is important to select the right patient and explain the potential benefits of biological therapy. Non-biologic add-on therapies can be attempted in a resource-limited setting where biological therapy is not available/feasible for patients.

Clinical and Economic Burden of Severe Asthma With Low Blood Eosinophil Counts

BACKGROUND

Type 2 low-severe asthma phenotype is often a result of corticosteroid-overtreated type 2 disease owing to persistent symptoms, often unrelated to asthma and unlikely to respond to high-dose corticosteroid treatment.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize patients with severe asthma with low eosinophil counts (<300 cells/μL) and describe their disease burden and treatment across health care settings in the United Kingdom.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients with severe asthma using linked Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum-Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and UK Severe Asthma Registry (UKSAR) data indexed patients according to the latest blood eosinophil count (BEC). Clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and health care resource use were described by baseline BEC (≤150 and >150 to <300 cells/μL).

RESULTS

Analysis included 701 (CPRD-HES) and 1,546 (UKSAR) patients; 60.5% and 59.4% had BECs 150 cells/μL or less at baseline, respectively. Across BEC groups, the proportion with uncontrolled asthma (two or more exacerbations) at follow-up (12 months after the index) was 5.4% in CPRD-HES and 45.2% in UKSAR. Maintenance oral corticosteroid use remained high across BEC groups (CPRD-HES: 29.4%; UKSAR: 51.7%), symptom control remained poor (>200 μg short-acting β2 agonist or >500 μg terbutaline/d in CPRD-HES: 48.8%; median Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 score in UKSAR: 2.0 [range, 1.0-3.3]). Health care resource use was similar across BEC groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients managed in primary care experienced infrequent exacerbations, whereas UKSAR patients had frequent exacerbations. Large proportions of both patient groups had poor symptom control and continued to receive high levels of maintenance oral corticosteroids, increasing the risk of corticosteroid-induced morbidity. These data highlight the need for rigorous assessment of underlying disease pathology to guide appropriate treatment.

Early response to Tezepelumab in type-2 severe asthma patients non-responders to other biological treatments: a real-life study

BACKGROUND

Biologic therapies play a crucial role in the treatment of severe asthma. Tezepelumab, a human monoclonal antibody (mAb), inhibits thymic stromal lymphopoietin, a pivotal factor in the pathophysiology of asthma. Although randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of Tezepelumab, evidence gaps remain in real-world scenarios.

OBJECTIVE

We sought investigate Tezepelumab's response in a clinical setting, focusing on patients who previously failed to other asthma mAbs.

METHODS

Real-life study with severe uncontrolled asthma patients despite mAb treatment, requiring a switch to Tezepelumab. Follow-up was done four to six months after initiation of Tezepelumab. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the response in patients with poor response or intolerance to other mAbs.

RESULTS

Nine patients were followed up during 7 months. Patients were predominantly middle-aged females with eosinophilic or eosinophilic-allergic phenotypes. Patients had a median failure rate of 2 mAbs (IQR 2-3), with an uncontrolled asthma (median of 2 severe exacerbations the previous year, airflow obstruction and 78% corticosteroid dependence). Tezepelumab demonstrated after 4 to 6 months of treatment reduce corticosteroid dependence (complete withdrawal in 2/7 patients), no exacerbations in 6/9, symptoms control improvement (Asthma Control Test score improved in 5/9) and modulate lung function (improving in 3/9 patients). These findings align with clinical trial results, suggesting Tezepelumab's potential in real-world settings.

CONCLUSION

In real-world scenarios, despite the study's limitations, our results underscore Tezepelumab's promise as a therapeutic option for uncontrolled severe asthma, and may be useful for non-responders to other mAbs. Further studies are needed to corroborate these findings.

Asthma and Cardiovascular Diseases: Navigating Mutual Pharmacological Interferences

Asthma and cardiovascular disease (CVD) often co-exist. When a patient has both conditions, management requires an approach that addresses the unique challenges of each condition separately, while also considering their potential interactions. However, specific guidance on the management of asthma in patients with CVD and on the management of CVD in patients with asthma is still lacking. Nevertheless, health care providers need to adopt a comprehensive approach that includes both respiratory and CVD health. The management of CVD in patients with asthma requires a delicate balance between controlling respiratory symptoms and minimising potential cardiovascular (CV) risks. In the absence of specific guidelines for the management of patients with both conditions, the most prudent approach would be to follow established guidelines for each condition independently. Careful selection of asthma medications is essential to avoid exacerbation of CV symptoms. In addition, optimal management of CV risk factors is essential. However, close monitoring of these patients is important as there is evidence that some asthma medications may have adverse effects on CVD and, conversely, that some CVD medications may worsen asthma symptoms. On the other hand, there is also increasing evidence of the potential beneficial effects of asthma medications on CVD and, conversely, that some CVD medications may reduce the severity of asthma symptoms. We aim to elucidate the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of asthma medications in patients with CVD, and the potential pulmonary risks and benefits for patients with asthma who are prescribed CVD medications.

Clinical remission and control in severe asthma: agreements and disagreements

Over the last two decades, we have witnessed great advancements in our understanding of the immunological pathways of asthma, leading to the development of targeted therapies, such as biologic drugs, that have radically and definitively changed the clinical outcomes of severe asthma. Despite the numerous therapeutic options available, ~4-10% of all people with asthma have severe or uncontrolled asthma, associated with an increased risk of developing chronic oral corticosteroid use, fixed airflow limitation, exacerbations, hospitalization and, finally, increased healthcare costs. The new concept of disease modification in asthma comes from the evolution of asthma management, which encompasses phenotyping patients with different inflammatory endotypes characterizing the disease, followed by the advent of more effective therapies capable of targeting the proximal factors of airway inflammation. This treat-to-target approach aims to achieve remission of the disease. Because the novel treatment paradigm for severe asthma with the advent of biologic therapies is no longer clinical control but rather clinical remission - a step closer to the concept of cure - a deeper and more accurate understanding of the critical causal mechanisms and endotypes of asthma is necessary to achieve the goal of clinical remission, which has the potential to generate real life-changing benefits for patients. This review aims to frame the evolution of the debated concept of clinical remission and provide clinicians with insights that may be helpful in achieving remission in the greatest number of patients.

Exploring Definitions and Predictors of Response to Biologics for Severe Asthma

BACKGROUND

Biologic effectiveness is often assessed as response, a term that eludes consistent definition. Identifying those most likely to respond in real-life has proven challenging.

OBJECTIVE

To explore definitions of biologic responders in adults with severe asthma and investigate patient characteristics associated with biologic response.

METHODS

This was a longitudinal cohort study using data from 21 countries, which shared data with the International Severe Asthma Registry. Changes in four asthma outcome domains were assessed in the 1-year period before and after biologic initiation in patients with a predefined level of prebiologic impairment. Responder cutoffs were 50% or greater reduction in exacerbation rate, 50% or greater reduction in long-term oral corticosteroid daily dose, improvement in one or more category in asthma control, and 100 mL or greater improvement in FEV1. Responders were defined using single and multiple domains. The association between prebiologic characteristics and postbiologic initiation response was examined by multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 2,210 patients were included. Responder rate ranged from 80.7% (n = 566 of 701) for exacerbation response to 10.6% (n = 9 of 85) for a four-domain response. Many responders still exhibited significant impairment after biologic initiation: 46.7% (n = 206 of 441) of asthma control responders with uncontrolled asthma before the biologic still had incompletely controlled disease postbiologic initiation. Predictors of response were outcome-dependent. Lung function responders were more likely to have higher prebiologic FeNO (odds ratio = 1.20 for every 25-parts per billion increase), and shorter asthma duration (odds ratio = 0.81 for every 10-year increase in duration). Higher blood eosinophil count and the presence of type 2-related comorbidities were positively associated with higher odds of meeting long-term oral corticosteroid, control, and lung function responder criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings underscore the multimodal nature of response, showing that many responders experience residual symptoms after biologic initiation and that predictors of response vary according to the outcome assessed.

Exploring the therapeutic potential of monoclonal antibodies targeting TSLP and IgE in asthma management

BACKGROUND

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the utilization of biologic therapies for the management of asthma. Both TSLP and IgE are important immune molecules in the development of asthma, and they are involved in the occurrence and regulation of inflammatory response.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed and Web of Science was conducted to gather information on anti-TSLP antibody and anti-IgE antibody.

RESULTS

This investigation elucidates the distinct mechanistic roles of Thymic Stromal Lymphopoietin (TSLP) and Immunoglobulin E (IgE) in the pathogenesis of asthma, with a particular emphasis on delineating the therapeutic mechanisms and pharmacological properties of monoclonal antibodies targeting IgE and TSLP. Through a meticulous examination of clinical trials involving paradigmatic agents such as omalizumab and tezepelumab, we offer valuable insights into the potential treatment modalities for diseases with shared immunopathogenic pathways involving IgE and TSLP.

CONCLUSION

The overarching objective of this comprehensive study is to delve into the latest advancements in asthma therapeutics and to provide guidance for future investigations in this domain.

Type 2 Inflammation and Asthma in Children: A Narrative Review

Increased understanding of the underlying pathophysiology has highlighted the heterogeneity of asthma and identified that most children with asthma have type 2 inflammation with elevated biomarkers, such as blood eosinophils and/or fractional exhaled nitric oxide. Although in the past most of these children may have been categorized as having allergic asthma, identifying the type 2 inflammatory phenotype provides a mechanism to explain both allergic and non-allergic triggers in pediatric patients with asthma. Most children achieve control with low to medium doses of inhaled corticosteroids. However, in a small but significant proportion of children, asthma remains uncontrolled despite maximum conventional treatment, with an increased risk of severe exacerbations. In this review, we focus on the role of type 2 inflammation and allergic processes in children with asthma, together with evidence of the efficacy of available treatment options for those who experience severe symptoms.

Treatment of Severe Asthma: Case Report of Fast Action of Mepolizumab in a Patient with Recent SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Asthma is one of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases of childhood with a heterogeneous impact on health and quality of life. Mepolizumab is an antagonist of interleukin-5, indicated as an adjunct therapy for severe refractory eosinophilic asthma in adolescents and children aged >6 years old. We present the case of a 9 year-old boy with severe asthma who experienced several asthmatic exacerbations following a SARS-CoV-2 infection, necessitating therapy with short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids, and hospitalization. We follow the patient using validated questionnaires for the evaluation of asthma control: Children Asthma Control Test, Asthma Control Questionnaire, respiratory function tests, and evaluation of exhaled nitric oxide fraction. After 12 weeks from the start of therapy with mepolizumab, we found significant improvements in lung function, a reduction in the degree of bronchial inflammation, and improvements in quality of life. No asthmatic exacerbations have been reported since the initiation of treatment with mepolizumab. Respiratory infections, such as those related to SARS-CoV-2, represent a significant risk factor for exacerbations in patients with moderate to severe forms of asthma. In our experience, following new episodes of exacerbation, the initiation of treatment with mepolizumab has allowed us to improve asthma control and enhance the quality of life of patients from the first doses. Although mepolizumab showed promise in this child with severe asthma during SARS-CoV-2 infection, the results from this single case cannot be generalized. Further studies are needed to confirm its safety and effectiveness.

Asthma severity: the patient's point of view

Objective

Initiated by the Severe Asthma Network Italy (SANI), this study aims to explore asthma patients' perceptions of disease severity, differentiating between mild and severe asthma. The objective is to identify factors influencing tailored treatment strategies for varying disease severities and to provide insights into asthma care in Italy.

Methods

Conducted between November 2020 and January 2021, a survey using Computer-Assisted Personal Interviewing (CAPI) collected data from 308 Italian adults, representing the population. A 25 item multiple choice questionnaire covered asthma diagnosis, symptoms, treatment approaches, associated conditions, and quality of life.

Results

Among participants, 83.8% reported having mild asthma, while 16.2% had severe asthma. Severe asthma patients had longer disease durations, more severe symptoms, frequent exacerbations, and higher hospital/ER visits. Although treatment adherence and symptom profiles generally aligned with international guidelines for self reported severe asthma, 22% of self identified mild asthmatics experienced severe respiratory symptoms. Oral corticosteroid (OCS) use was observed in 50% of severe cases and 22% of mild cases. Adherence was higher in severe asthma patients (76%) versus mild asthma patients (28%). Both groups experienced comorbidities, with 96% of severe asthmatics and 72% of mild asthmatics reporting impaired quality of life.

Conclusion

This study highlights the disparity between clinical categorization and patient perceptions of asthma severity. The prevalence of self reported severe asthma exceeds literature data. The burden of mild asthma remains significant, with treatment approaches not fully aligned, particularly regarding disproportionate OCS use. Addressing this gap requires enhancing patient education, improving diagnostic practices, and promoting adherence.

Mepolizumab in Severe Pediatric Asthma: Certainties and Doubts through a Single-Center Experience and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Although, in most children with asthma, good symptom control is achieved with a low to moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroids, a small group of patients still experiences frequent symptoms, and even severe exacerbations, impairment of lung function, and reduced quality of life. Some of these subjects with severe asthma require biologic drugs as add-on therapy. In the past decade, numerous monoclonal antibodies have been approved for children or adolescents with severe asthma, in addition to their increasing use in adult asthma. However, the available evidence on how to select the most appropriate biologic based on a single patient's clinical, functional, and laboratory characteristics is still scant, and is insufficient to guide clinicians in the decision-making process of a personalized treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report a case series of four patients with severe eosinophilic asthma treated with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, and review the existing literature on this treatment in children and adolescents.

RESULTS

Our patients, all with blood eosinophilia and elevated fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels, developed poor symptom control despite prolonged treatment with high-dose inhaled corticosteroids plus a second controller, addressing the addition of a biologic drug. In all of them, a 12-month treatment with subcutaneous mepolizumab showed a reduction in the blood eosinophil count and in asthma exacerbations, as well as an improvement on the Asthma Control Test. The results of the literature search focused on the strengths and limitations of the pediatric use of mepolizumab and highlighted the areas worthy of further research.

CONCLUSIONS

Mepolizumab has proven effective in improving symptom control in pediatric patients with severe asthma. Additional well-powered clinical trials will be helpful in developing evidence-based guidelines regarding biologic drugs in the pediatric population.

Big Data Research on Severe Asthma

The continuously increasing prevalence of severe asthma has imposed an increasing burden worldwide. Despite the emergence of novel therapeutic agents, management of severe asthma remains challenging. Insights garnered from big data may be helpful in the effort to determine the complex nature of severe asthma. In the field of asthma research, a vast amount of big data from various sources, including electronic health records, national claims data, and international cohorts, is now available. However, understanding of the strengths and limitations is required for proper utilization of specific datasets. Use of big data, along with advancements in artificial intelligence techniques, could potentially facilitate the practice of precision medicine in management of severe asthma.

Comparative efficacy of biologics for patients with inadequately controlled asthma: A network meta-analysis

Background

Few studies have evaluated the comparative efficacy of biologics for asthma. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of biologics.

Methods

This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of a biologic compared to a placebo or another biologic in patients with inadequately controlled asthma despite high-intensity treatment, published by January 6, 2022. Two researchers independently searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The outcomes of interest were the annual asthma exacerbation rate (AER), forced expiratory volume per second before bronchodilator use (preBD FEV1), the asthma control questionnaire (ACQ), and asthma quality of life questionnaire (AQLQ) results. A frequentist network meta-analysis was conducted, and a random effects model was used to draw pooled incidence rate ratio or standardized mean differences.

Results

Twenty-three RCTs with 8376 participants were retrieved. All biologics included in this study were associated with significantly better effects than placebo in AER, preBD FEV1, and ACQ outcomes. Although there were no significant differences between the biologics in the overall study population, patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL or eosinophilic asthma showed that dupilumab and tezepelumab were significantly better than anti-IL-5 biologics in improving preBD FEV1. Additionally, in patients with eosinophil levels ≥300 cells/μL, benralizumab, unlike reslizumab, performed significantly better than placebo in improving ACQ and AQLQ outcomes.

Conclusion

The comparative effects of biologics can be considered with phenotypes and biomarkers to help clinicians select an appropriate treatment for inadequately controlled asthma.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Omalizumab and Mepolizumab in Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease

INTRODUCTION

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) is heterogeneous in both phenotypes and endotypes. Due to insufficient head-to-head comparison studies, it is hard to decide which biological to initiate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of omalizumab and mepolizumab which can be used in the treatment of patients with severe eosinophilic asthma diagnosed with N-ERD.

METHODS

The population of this observational, cross-sectional study comprised of N-ERD patients who received omalizumab or mepolizumab for at least 6 months for severe asthma. Outcomes included the asthma control test (ACT), and sino-nasal outcome test scores (SNOT-22), blood eosinophil counts at initiation of biological treatment (T0, baseline) and at the end of 6th months (T6). Adverse effects related to biological treatment and changes of oral corticosteroids dose was recorded.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 22 patients, of whom 11 received mepolizumab and 11 received omalizumab. The change in ACT, SNOT-22, eosinophil counts, and adverse effects related to biologicals were similar at T6 (p = 0.606, p = 0.168, p = 0.05, p = 0.053, respectively). However, when examining the SNOT-22 and ACT based on the cumulative distribution curve (SUCRA), mepolizumab (SUCRA value: 0.61, 0.72, respectively) demonstrated greater efficacy compared to omalizumab (SUCRA value: 0.19, 0.35, respectively). The oral corticosteroids discontinuation rate was similar between the two groups (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

We found both omalizumab and mepolizumab to be effective in treatment; however, we determined that mepolizumab may have a potential superiority in efficacy.

Exploring the Interplay between Asthma and Hemoglobinopathies: A Comprehensive Review

Asthma, a prevalent chronic respiratory condition characterized by inflammation of the airways and bronchoconstriction, has demonstrated a potential association with hemoglobinopathies such as thalassemia and sickle cell disease (SCD). Numerous studies have highlighted a higher prevalence of asthma among thalassemia patients compared to the general population, with rates ranging around 30%. Similarly, asthma frequently coexists with SCD, affecting approximately 20-48% of patients. Children with SCD often experience heightened lower airway obstruction and airway hyper-reactivity. Notably, the presence of asthma in SCD exacerbates respiratory symptoms and increases the risk of severe complications like acute chest syndrome, stroke, vaso-occlusive episodes, and early mortality. Several studies have noted a decrease in various cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-10, along with higher levels of both IL-6 and IL-8, suggesting an overactivation of pro-inflammatory mechanisms in patients with hemoglobinopathies, which could trigger inflammatory conditions such as asthma. The exact mechanisms driving this association are better elucidated but may involve factors such as chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and immune dysregulation associated with thalassemia-related complications like chronic hemolytic anemia and iron overload. This review aims to comprehensively analyze the relationship between asthma and hemoglobinopathies, with a focus on thalassemia and SCD. It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration among pulmonologists, hematologists, and other healthcare professionals to effectively manage this complex interplay. Understanding this link is crucial for improving care and outcomes in affected individuals.

The effect of mobile game training designed for asthmatic children on asthma management and quality of life

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the effect of mobile game training designed for children with asthma on inhaler use skills, asthma symptoms and treatment needs, and quality of life.

DESIGN AND METHODS

This randomized controlled study was conducted between April and October 2023 at "Pediatric Asthma and Allergy Clinic" in Turkey. The sample of the study consists of a total of 74 children diagnosed with asthma, including the Mobile game (n: 37) and the Control group (n: 37). In the study, a mobile game was developed for children with asthma between the ages of 8-12. In collecting research data; Child and Parent Information Form, Inhaler Use Skill Evaluation Form, Asthma Symptom and Treatment Need Scoring (Asthma Symptom Score [ASS], Rhinitis Symptom Score [RSS] and Total Symptom Score [TSS]), DISABKIDS Asthma Scale were used.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of the demographic status of the children (p > 0.05). It was determined that the average inhaler use skill score and DISABKIDS asthma scale Child/Parent score average of the children in the mobile game group were higher than the control group (p < 0.05). When the children's final follow-up ASS, RSS and TSS total scores were examined; It was determined that there was a statistically significant difference between the children in the mobile game and control groups (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

As a result of this study, it was determined that mobile game training designed for children is an effective method in increasing children's ability to use inhaler medications, reducing asthma symptoms and treatment needs, and improving quality of life.

PRACTICE IMPLICATION

Nurses can improve children's quality of life by using mobile game training programs that attract children's attention.

Cost-Effectiveness and Impact on Health Care Utilization of Interventions to Improve Medication Adherence and Outcomes in Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Poor adherence to asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease maintenance therapies impairs health outcomes. Proven and cost-effective programs to promote adherence and persistence are not yet in regular widespread use. Implementation costs are a potential barrier to uptake of such programs.

OBJECTIVE

We undertook a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis of studies investigating the cost-effectiveness of treatment adherence-promoting programs or that determined their impact on health care budget directly or via health care resource use (HCRU).

METHODS

We identified relevant publications using Medline and PreMEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Embase.com, Elsevier), and EconLit for publications between January 2000 and July 2021. We also searched clinical trial databases and selected conference proceedings.

RESULTS

Of 1,910 potentially relevant articles, 26 met prespecified inclusion criteria and underwent data extraction. Eleven reported a direct assessment of adherence, 15 included economic evaluations, and 17 described HCRU. None included an analysis of biologic medication use. When they were studied, interventions were often found to be highly cost-effective, with dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios in some cases. Reductions in direct costs and HCRU (health care visits, hospital admissions, and/or the use of medications, including add-on/reliever treatment and antibiotics) were frequently reported. Reported use of maintenance treatments improved in some studies. Counseling and/or digitally informed programs were used in all cases in which favorable outcomes were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence-promoting interventions are mostly cost-effective and often result in reduced HCRU and associated costs. Multidisciplinary care involving one-to-one advice and digitally enhanced communications appear to offer the greatest benefit.

Neuroimmune interplay during type 2 inflammation: Symptoms, mechanisms, and therapeutic targets in atopic diseases

Type 2 inflammation is characterized by overexpression and heightened activity of type 2 cytokines, mediators, and cells that drive neuroimmune activation and sensitization to previously subthreshold stimuli. The consequences of altered neuroimmune activity differ by tissue type and disease; they include skin inflammation, sensitization to pruritogens, and itch amplification in atopic dermatitis and prurigo nodularis; airway inflammation and/or hyperresponsiveness, loss of expiratory volume, airflow obstruction and increased mucus production in asthma; loss of sense of smell in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps; and dysphagia in eosinophilic esophagitis. We describe the neuroimmune interactions that underlie the various sensory and autonomic pathologies in type 2 inflammatory diseases and present recent advances in targeted treatment approaches to reduce type 2 inflammation and its associated symptoms in these diseases. Further research is needed to better understand the neuroimmune mechanisms that underlie chronic, sustained inflammation and its related sensory pathologies in diseases associated with type 2 inflammation.

Inhibition of xanthine oxidase by allopurinol suppresses HMGB1 secretion and ameliorates experimental asthma

BACKGROUND

Extracellular high mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a key mediator in driving allergic airway inflammation and contributes to asthma. Yet, mechanism of HMGB1 secretion in asthma is poorly defined. Pulmonary metabolic dysfunction is recently recognized as a driver of respiratory pathology. However, the altered metabolic signatures and the roles of metabolic to allergic airway inflammation remain unclear.

METHODS

Male C57BL/6 J mice were sensitized and challenged with toluene diisocyanate (TDI) to generate a chemically induced asthma model. Pulmonary untargeted metabolomics was employed. According to results, mice were orally administered allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase (XO) inhibitor. Human bronchial epithelial cells (16HBE) were stimulated by TDI-human serum albumin (HSA).

RESULTS

We identified the purine metabolism was the most enriched pathway in TDI-exposed lungs, corresponding to the increase of xanthine and uric acid, products of purine degradation mediated by XO. Inhibition of XO by allopurinol ameliorates TDI-induced oxidative stress and DNA damage, mixed granulocytic airway inflammation and Th1, Th2 and Th17 immunology as well as HMGB1 acetylation and secretion. Mechanistically, HMGB1 acetylation was caused by decreased activation of the NAD+-sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) axis triggered by hyperactivation of the DNA damage sensor poly (ADP-ribose)-polymerase 1 (PARP-1). This was rescued by allopurinol, PARP-1 inhibitor or supplementation with NAD+ precursor in a SIRT1-dependent manner. Meanwhile, allopurinol attenuated Nrf2 defect due to SIRT1 inactivation to help ROS scavenge.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated a novel regulation of HMGB1 acetylation and secretion by purine metabolism that is critical for asthma onset. Allopurinol may have therapeutic potential in patients with asthma.

The pharmacological management of asthma in adults: 2023 update

INTRODUCTION

The pharmacotherapy of asthma is a dynamic process that changes as our knowledge of the underlying pathophysiology and treatment of this disease continues to evolve. This implies the need for continuous revision of the recommendations of asthma guidelines and strategies.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes the latest key practical information on the pharmacological management of asthma in adults. We provide the background to the 2023 update of the GINA strategy report, focusing on changes and discussing areas of uncertainty. We review current and emerging pharmacotherapy for uncontrolled asthma, including synthetic agents and new biologics, and provide expert perspectives and opinions on the treatment of uncontrolled asthma.

EXPERT OPINION

The current pharmacological treatment of asthma, based on a step-by-step, control-based approach, with ICSs, LABAs and LAMAs being the mainstay generally provides good symptom control. Biologic therapies are often effective in treating T2high severe asthma. However, there is still room for improvement, such as the discovery of new molecules that specifically target chronic inflammation and, most importantly, the ability to provide solutions to the various areas of uncertainty that still exist. Also finding solutions to improve the accessibility and affordability of rescue ICS in resource-constrained settings is critical.

Prevalence of type 2 inflammatory signatures and efficacy of dupilumab in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps from two phase 3 clinical trials: SINUS-24 and SINUS-52

BACKGROUND

This post hoc analysis of the international SINUS-24/-52 trials (NCT02912468/NCT02898454) aimed to assess dupilumab efficacy in patients with severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) according to different definitions of type 2 inflammatory signature.

METHODS

Six definitions of type 2 inflammation were used: ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥100 IU/mL with a coexisting type 2 condition; ≥150 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; ≥150 eosinophils/μL; ≥250 eosinophils/μL or total IgE ≥100 IU/mL; coexisting asthma or ≥300 eosinophils/μL; presence of a coexisting type 2 condition. Odds ratios (ORs; dupilumab vs. placebo) for achieving clinically meaningful improvement (≥1 point) from baseline to week 24 (pooled SINUS-24/-52) and week 52 (SINUS-52) were calculated for nasal polyp score (NPS; range 0-8), nasal congestion/obstruction score (NC; 0-3), and loss of smell score (LoS; 0-3).

RESULTS

At baseline (n = 724), most patients displayed a type 2 inflammatory signature across definitions (64.2%-95.3%). At week 24, ORs for clinically meaningful improvement ranged from 11.9 to 14.9 for NPS across type 2 definitions, 6.5-9.6 for NC, and 12.2-17.8 for LoS (all p < 0.0001). OR ranges were similar or greater at week 52: 19.0-36.6, 7.6-12.1, and 9.2-33.5, respectively (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Most patients with CRSwNP in the SINUS study had type 2 inflammation. Dupilumab demonstrated robust efficacy across definitions of type 2 inflammation, consistent with its profile as an inhibitor of Interleukin-4 and Interleukin-13 signaling, key and central drivers of type 2 inflammation in CRSwNP.

KEY POINTS

This study assessed type 2 inflammation prevalence and dupilumab efficacy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps according to algorithm-defined type 2 inflammation Dupilumab efficacy was similar across all type 2 definitions.

Advancing Care in Severe Asthma: The Art of Switching Biologics

Biologics targeting IgE, IL-5, IL-4/IL-13, and TSLP are crucial in severe asthma treatment. Research, including randomized controlled trials and real-world studies, has been conducted to assess their efficacy and identify patient characteristics that may predict positive responses. The effectiveness of switching biologics, especially given overlaps in treatment eligibility, and the clinical outcomes post-cessation are critical areas of investigation. This work reviews the effects of switching between these biologics and the indicators of treatment success or failure. Insights are primarily derived from real-world experiences, focusing on patients transitioning from one monoclonal antibody to another. Moreover, this review aims to provide insights into the effectiveness, safety, and broader implications of switching biologics, enhancing understanding for clinicians to optimize severe asthma management. The article underlines the importance of a patient-centered approach, biomarker assessment, and the evolving nature of asthma treatment in making informed decisions about biologic therapy.

Monoclonal antibodies in idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (ICEP) is a rare disease characterized by pulmonary radiological alterations, peripheral eosinophilia, and demonstrated pulmonary eosinophilia. Oral steroids (OSs) are the standard management, but relapses occur in up to 50% of patients during the decrease or suspension of steroids, usually requiring reinitiation of treatment, exposing patients to secondary events derived from the management. Management with monoclonal antibodies has been proposed in these cases to control the disease and limit the secondary effects. The objective is to describe the extent and type of evidence regarding the use of monoclonal antibodies for ICEP.

METHODS

A panoramic review of the literature was performed. Observational and experimental studies of pediatric and adult populations that managed recurrent ICEP with monoclonal antibodies were included. Data search, selection, and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers.

RESULTS

937 studies were found. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 37 titles remained for the final analysis: a retrospective, observational, real-life study, two case series publications, and 34 case reports published in academic poster sessions and letters to the editor. In general, the use of monoclonal antibodies approved for severe asthma could be useful for the control of ICEP, since most of the results show a good response for clinical and radiological outcomes. Biological drugs seem to be a safer option for controlling relapses in ICEP, allowing lowering/suspension of OSs, and sometimes replacing them in patients intolerant to them, patients with significant comorbidities, and patients who have already developed adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The extent of the evidence supporting management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies against IL-5 and IgE (omalizumab) is limited, but it could be promising in patients who present frequent relapses, in cortico-dependent individuals, or in patients in whom the use of steroids is contraindicated. The extent of the evidence for management with dupilumab is more limited. Studies with better design and structure are needed to evaluate quality of life and outcomes during a clear follow-up period. To our knowledge, this is the first scoping review of the literature showing the extent of the evidence for the management of ICEP with monoclonal antibodies.

Real-World Effectiveness of Statin Therapy in Adult Asthma

BACKGROUND

Blood lipids affect airway inflammation in asthma. Although several studies have suggested anti-inflammatory effects of statins on asthmatic airways, further studies are needed to clarify the long-term effectiveness of statins on asthma control and whether they are an effective treatment option.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term effectiveness of statins in the chronic management of adult asthma in real-world practice.

METHODS

Electronic medical record data spanning 28 years, collected from the Ajou University Medical Center in Korea, were used to conduct a retrospective study. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients with asthma who had maintained statin use (the statin group) and those not taking statins, whose blood lipid tests were always normal (the non-statin group). We performed propensity score matching and calculated hazard ratios with 95% CIs using the Cox proportional hazards model. Severe asthma exacerbation was the primary outcome; asthma exacerbation, asthma-related hospitalization, and new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension were secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score matching, the statin and non-statin groups each included 545 adult patients with asthma. The risk of severe asthma exacerbations and asthma exacerbations was significantly lower in the statin group than in the non-statin group (hazard ratios [95% CI] = 0.57 [0.35-0.90] and 0.71 [0.52-0.96], respectively). There were no significant differences in the risk of asthma-related hospitalization or new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus or hypertension between groups (0.76 [0.53-1.09], 2.33 [0.94-6.59], and 1.71 [0.95-3.17], respectively).

CONCLUSION

Statin use is associated with a lower risk of asthma exacerbation, with better clinical outcomes in adult asthma.

Early Assessment of Efficacy and Safety of Biologics in Pediatric Allergic Diseases: Preliminary Results from a Prospective Real-World Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the increasing interest in biologics for the management of allergic diseases, sparse real-world data are still available in the pediatric population. This study aimed to evaluate the early real-life efficacy and safety of omalizumab for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), and Dupilumab for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD).

METHODS

A prospective study enrolling children aged 6-18 years was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of biologic drugs at 16 weeks of treatment (T1). The effectiveness was measured using validated questionnaires (ACQ-5 for asthma, UAS7 for CSU, and EASI score for AD). Secondary outcome measures included reductions in inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) dosages, asthma-related hospitalizations/exacerbations, and quality of life (QoL) indicators (iNRS, sNRS, DLQI/cDLQI) for CSU and AD. Safety was expressed according to the descriptions of adverse events provided by EMA and FDA.

RESULTS

The study cohort consisted of eighteen children (mean age 12.9 ± 3.4 years). The omalizumab treatment significantly reduced ACQ-5 and UAS7 scores (p = 0.002 and p < 0.001, respectively). In patients with asthma, decreased ICS dosage and hospitalization/exacerbation rates were observed. QoL parameters significantly improved in CSU and AD patients. No severe adverse events were reported for either treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings validate omalizumab and dupilumab as effective and safe therapeutic options for managing moderate-to-severe allergic diseases in children and adolescents.

Moderate-High Blood Eosinophilia Is Associated with Increased Hospitalization and Other Asthma Comorbidities

(1) Background: Eosinophilia has traditionally been linked to eosinophilic asthma, for which it is the gold-standard prognostic biomarker. However, the association between eosinophilia and the presence of other diseases and comorbidities is yet unclear. (2) Methods: For this retrospective study, we reviewed the electronic medical records of 49,909 subjects with blood eosinophilia to gather data on the presence of asthma, COPD, sleep apnea, tuberculosis, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and other cardiovascular diseases and severe CRSwNP among these subjects. Demographic features including age, sex, and smoking habits were collected, as well as the number of hospitalizations and emergency department visits. T-tests, ANOVA, Fisher test, and logistic regression models were used. (3) Results: For all age groups studied, eosinophilia was significantly more prevalent among asthmatic subjects than nonasthmatics, especially in patients also presenting CRSwNP, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. The likelihood of developing asthma, COPD, and CRSwNP, and hospitalization, was increased when BEC was above 600 eosinophils/μL. The association between asthma, CRSwNP, and BEC was corroborated by multiple logistic regressions models. (4) Conclusions: We demonstrated the association of having over 600 blood eosinophils/μL with a higher number of hospitalizations and comorbidities (CRSwNP and COPD), which proves that BEC is a highly useful parameter to consider in subjects who present blood eosinophilia.

Safety of dupilumab in T2 airways conditions: focus on eosinophilia across trials and real-life evidence

INTRODUCTION

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the IL-4 receptor alpha subunit, effectively blocks both IL-4 and IL-13 mediated pathways. Its introduction has represented a significant advancement in the treatment of severe asthma and other Type 2 (T2) conditions, including nasal polyps, atopic dermatitis, and eosinophilic esophagitis. To date, Dupilumab has demonstrated optimal efficacy and safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

The safety profile of dupilumab has been extensively studied, especially for its effects on blood eosinophil count. Transient eosinophil increase during treatment is typically insignificant from a clinical point of view and related to its mechanism of action. Rare cases of hyper-eosinophilia associated with clinical conditions like eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) have been reported. Those cases are often related to the drug's steroid-sparing effect or the natural trajectory of the underlying disease rather than a direct cause-effect relationship with dupilumab.

EXPERT OPINION

The management of hyper-eosinophilia during dupilumab treatment requires comprehensive diagnostic work-up and strict follow-up monitoring for early detection of systemic disease progression in order to avoid unnecessary discontinuation of an effective treatment. This approach highlights the importance of a personalized treatment.

Contribution of monocyte and macrophage extracellular traps to neutrophilic airway inflammation in severe asthma

BACKGROUND

Increased blood/sputum neutrophil counts are related to poor clinical outcomes of severe asthma (SA), where we hypothesized that classical monocytes (CMs)/CM-derived macrophages (Mφ) are involved. We aimed to elucidate the mechanisms of how CMs/Mφ induce the activation of neutrophils/innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) in SA.

METHODS

Serum levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and soluble suppression of tumorigenicity 2 (sST2) were measured from 39 patients with SA and 98 those with nonsevere asthma (NSA). CMs/Mφ were isolated from patients with SA (n = 19) and those with NSA (n = 18) and treated with LPS/interferon-gamma. Monocyte/M1Mφ extracellular traps (MoETs/M1ETs) were evaluated by western blotting, immunofluorescence, and PicoGreen assay. The effects of MoETs/M1ETs on neutrophils, airway epithelial cells (AECs), ILC1, and ILC3 were assessed in vitro and in vivo.

RESULTS

The SA group had significantly higher CM counts with increased migration as well as higher levels of serum MCP-1/sST2 than the NSA group. Moreover, the SA group had significantly greater production of MoETs/M1ETs (from CMs/M1Mφ) than the NSA group. The levels of MoETs/M1ETs were positively correlated with blood neutrophils and serum levels of MCP-1/sST2, but negatively correlated with FEV1%. In vitro/in vivo studies demonstrated that MoETs/M1ETs could activate AECs, neutrophils, ILC1, and ILC3 by increased migration as well as proinflammatory cytokine production.

CONCLUSIONS

CM/Mφ-derived MoETs/M1ETs could contribute to asthma severity by enhancing neutrophilic airway inflammation in SA, where modulating CMs/Mφ may be a potential therapeutic option.

Eosinophils-from cradle to grave: An EAACI task force paper on new molecular insights and clinical functions of eosinophils and the clinical effects of targeted eosinophil depletion

Over the past years, eosinophils have become a focus of scientific interest, especially in the context of their recently uncovered functions (e.g. antiviral, anti-inflammatory, regulatory). These versatile cells display both beneficial and detrimental activities under various physiological and pathological conditions. Eosinophils are involved in the pathogenesis of many diseases which can be classified into primary (clonal) and secondary (reactive) disorders and idiopathic (hyper)eosinophilic syndromes. Depending on the biological specimen, the eosinophil count in different body compartments may serve as a biomarker reflecting the underlying pathophysiology and/or activity of distinct diseases and as a therapy-driving (predictive) and monitoring tool. Personalized selection of an appropriate therapeutic strategy directly or indirectly targeting the increased number and/or activity of eosinophils should be based on the understanding of eosinophil homeostasis including their interactions with other immune and non-immune cells within different body compartments. Hence, restoring as well as maintaining homeostasis within an individual's eosinophil pool is a goal of both specific and non-specific eosinophil-targeting therapies. Despite the overall favourable safety profile of the currently available anti-eosinophil biologics, the effect of eosinophil depletion should be monitored from the perspective of possible unwanted consequences.

Which biologic? New findings from a real-world study

See related article

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety Among Patients With Severe Eosinophilic Asthma Treated With Mepolizumab and Its Effect on Small Airways

BACKGROUND

The major problem at the Cleveland Allergy and Asthma Center was the need for additional therapy for severe eosinophilic asthma patients who were steroid-dependent or required frequent bursts of prednisone.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of monthly mepolizumab (MP) injections up to 6½ years using Asthma Control Quesitonnaire-7 (ACQ-7), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced expiratory flow at 25% to 75% (FEF25%-75%) overall and among super-responders, and to understand whether FEF25%-75% is an effective parameter to evaluate MP efficacy.

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 67 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and compared the results between 47 super-responders and the rest of the cohort regarding ACQ-6, ACQ-7, eosinophils, FEV1, and FEF25%-75%. The groups of super-responders and all other patients were described with respect to initial and current values of the study end points using medians and 25th and 75th percentiles. Changes from the initial to the current values in the study end points were measured using percent changes. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used within each group to test the null hypothesis of 0 median percent change.

RESULTS

After 6½ years, there were no significant changes in FEV1. The FEF25%-75%, had a significant median percent increase of 40% among the super-responders (P < .001), which was substantially higher (P = .026) than the median percent increase of 13.8% observed among all other patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of MP up to 6½ years was safe and effective, with significant changes to ACQ-7 and FEF25%-75% associated with MP treatment, but not the FEV1. A higher magnitude of changes was observed among super-responders than the rest of the cohort. Changes in FEF25%-75% were more meaningful than changes in FEV1 in evaluating pulmonary function responsiveness of severe eosinophilic asthma to MP.

The rs2601796 variant in ADCY9 gene is associated with severe asthma and less bronchodilator response

Asthma is a respiratory disease caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. The adenylyl cyclase type 9 (ADCY9) enzyme produces the cyclic-adenosinemonophosphate (cAMP), important mediator involved in bronchodilation and immunomodulatory response. The aim of this study was to investigate if rs2601796 and rs2532019 variants in the ADCY9 gene are associated with asthma and lung function. The study comprised 1,052 subjects. Logistic regressions were done using PLINK 1.9 adjusted by sex, age, BMI, smoke and principal components. Bronchodilator responsiveness was assessed using the percentage of difference in FEV1 before and after the bronchodilator use. The in silico analysis for gene expression was performed in the GTEx Portal. The variant rs2601796 (AA/AG genotype) was positively associated with asthma severity (OR: 1.60 IC95%: 1.08-2.39) and with obstruction in individuals with severe asthma (OR: 3.10, IC95%: 1.11-8.62). Individuals with severe asthma and the AA/AG genotype of rs2601796 had less responsiveness to bronchodilators and also a lower expression of ADCY9 in lung and whole blood. The variant rs2532019 (TT/GT genotype) also downregulated the ADCY9 gene expression, but no significant association with the studied phenotypes was found. Thus, the variant in ADCY9 was associated with worse asthma outcomes, including a lower response to bronchodilators, likely due to the impact on its gene expression rate. This variant may be useful in the future to assist in personalized management of patients with asthma.

Biologics in severe asthma: A pragmatic approach for choosing the right treatment for the right patient

The development of monoclonal antibody therapies targeting specific components of the pathways relevant to asthma pathophysiology has revolutionized treatment of severe asthma both in adults and children and helped to further unravel the heterogeneity of this disease. However, the availability of multiple agents, often with overlapping eligibility criteria, creates a need for pragmatic guidance for specialists undertaking care of patients with severe asthma. In this review, we provide an overview of the data supporting the clinical efficacy of biologics in distinct asthma phenotypes/endotypes. We also focus on the role of biomarkers and treatable traits, including comorbidities, in the choice of asthma biologics, highlight which treatments have been demonstrated to be steroid sparing in corticosteroid dependent asthma, and provide practical guidance that can drive shared decision making on treatment choice with patients. In addition, we summarize what is known to date regarding long-term safety of these drugs, and lastly, discuss future directions in biologics research.