Change in the regulatory framework for zolpidem: What is the impact on the landscape of the prescription of sedative medications? The French national ZORRO study

The effect of education regarding treatment guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorders on psychiatrists' hypnotic medication prescribing behavior: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

To examine whether the "Effectiveness of Guideline for Dissemination and Education in psychiatric treatment (EGIUDE)" project affects the rate of prescriptions of hypnotic medication and the type of hypnotic medications prescribed among psychiatrists, for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder in Japan.

METHODS

The EGUIDE project is a nationwide prospective study of evidence-based clinical guidelines for schizophrenia and major depressive disorder in Japan. From 2016 to 2021, clinical and prescribing data from patients discharged from hospitals participating in the EGUIDE project were used to examine hypnotic medication prescriptions The prescribing rate of hypnotics and the prescribing rate of each type of hypnotic (benzodiazepine receptor agonist, nonbenzodiazepine receptor agonist, melatonin receptor agonist, and orexin receptor antagonist) were compared among patients who had been prescribed medication by psychiatrists participating in the EGUIDE project and patients who had been prescribed medication by nonparticipating psychiatrists. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the effect of the EGUIDE project on the prescription of hypnotic medications.

RESULTS

A total of 12,161 patients with schizophrenia and 6,167 patients with major depressive disorder were included. Psychiatrists participating in the EGUIDE project significantly reduced the rate of prescribing hypnotic medication and benzodiazepine receptor agonists for both schizophrenia (P < 0.001) and major depressive disorder (P < 0.001) patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to investigate the educational effects of guidelines for the treatment of psychiatric disorders on psychiatrists in terms of prescribing hypnotic medications to patients. The EGUIDE project may play an important role in reducing hypnotic medication prescription rates, particularly with respect to benzodiazepine receptor agonists. The results suggest that the EGUIDE project may result in improved therapeutic behavior.

Evolution of the profiles of new psychotropic drug users before and during the COVID-19 crisis: an original longitudinal approach through multichannel sequence analysis using the French health-care database

The COVID-19 pandemic has had a substantial impact on mental health. An increase in the use of anxiolytic, hypnotic, and antidepressant drugs has been highlighted in France, but with no information at the individual level (trajectories) or concerning patient characteristics. The objective of this study was to describe the profile of new psychotropic drug users since the beginning of the pandemic. We formed two historical cohorts using the Pays-de-la-Loire regional component of the National Health Data System (SNDS): a "COVID-19 crisis cohort" (2020-2021) and a "control cohort" (2018-2019). We analyzed reimbursements for psychotropic medications (anxiolytics, antidepressants, hypnotics, mood stabilizers, and antipsychotics) using a multichannel sequence analysis and performed clustering analysis of sequences. The proportion of new consumers of psychotropic drugs was higher in the COVID-19 crisis cohort (18.0%) than that in the control cohort (16.0%). In the COVID-19 cohort, three clusters of psychotropic drug users were identified, whereas four clusters were identified in the control cohort. A time lag in treatment initiation was observed in the COVID-19 crisis cohort (September) compared with the control cohort (July). This study is one of the first to analyze the profile of psychotropic treatment users during the COVID-19 crisis. Our analysis sheds light on changes in patterns of psychotropic drug use during the COVID-19 pandemic, possibly associated with changes in prescribing conditions and mental health conditions during the crisis. This study also provides an example of the application of an innovative longitudinal analysis methodology in the field of pharmacoepidemiology.

Unintended impact of pharmacovigilance regulatory interventions: A systematic review

AIMS

Studies assessing the impact of pharmacovigilance regulatory interventions often focus on the expected (or intended) outcomes, while any possible unintended impact may be overlooked. The update of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practice guideline in 2017 elaborated on impact assessment, emphasizing the need also to assess possible unintended impact. This systematic literature review investigated how often the unintended impact of regulatory interventions was considered in publications of studies investigating pharmacovigilance regulatory interventions in Europe.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of the literature on MEDLINE and EMBASE from 1 January 2012 to 28 February 2022 to identify publications that investigated the impact of regulatory interventions in Europe. The primary outcome of the study was the number of publications reporting assessments of unintended impact. In addition, we studied the characteristics of these publications, including the type of outcomes assessed, the analytical methods applied and the type of data used.

RESULTS

In total, 96 publications were included in the analysis. The unintended impact of pharmacovigilance regulatory interventions was investigated in 23 of 96 publications (24%). The drug classes most frequently studied in the publications assessing unintended impact of regulatory interventions were oral glucose-lowering drugs (n = 6, 26%), opioids (n = 4, 17%), antidepressants (n = 4, 17%) and antipsychotics (n = 3, 13%). The reported methods to assess the unintended impact were interrupted time series (n = 10, 43%) and descriptive statistics with or without significance testing (n = 2 [9%] and n = 9 [39%], respectively). The outcomes selected for unintended impact assessments included the use of other drugs (n = 16, 70%), health outcomes (n = 8, 35%) and behavioural changes (n = 4, 17%). Most of the publications reported on the use of electronic health record databases (n = 13, 57%) or claims databases (n = 13, 57%), while registries were used in 4 publications (17%).

CONCLUSION

The unintended impact of pharmacovigilance regulatory interventions was reported in only a quarter of identified publications. There was no apparent increase in attention to unintended impact assessments after the update of the Good Pharmacovigilance Practice guidelines.

Systematic assessment of non-medical use of prescription drugs using doctor-shopping indicators: A nation-wide, repeated cross-sectional study

AIMS

The aim of this study was to present the first nation-wide, systematic, repeated assessment of doctor-shopping (i.e. visiting multiple physicians to be prescribed the same drug) during 10 years for more than 200 psychoactive prescription drugs in the 67 million inhabitants in France.

DESIGN

This was a nation-wide, repeated cross-sectional study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Data are from the French National Health Data System in 2010, 2015 and 2019 for 214 psychoactive prescription drugs (i.e. anaesthetics, analgesics, antiepileptics, anti-Parkinson drugs, psycholeptics, psychoanaleptics, other nervous system drugs and antihistamines for systemic use).

MEASUREMENTS

The detection and quantification of doctor-shopping relied upon an algorithm that detects overlapping prescriptions from repeated visits to different physicians. We used two doctor-shopping indicators aggregated at population level for each drug dispensed to more than 5000 patients: (i) the quantity doctor-shopped, expressed in defined daily doses (DDD), which measures the total quantity doctor-shopped by the study population for a given drug; and (ii) the proportion doctor-shopped, expressed as a percentage, which standardizes the quantity doctor-shopped according to the use level of the drug.

FINDINGS

The analyses included approximately 200 million dispensings to approximately 30 million patients each year. Opioids (e.g. buprenorphine, methadone, morphine, oxycodone and fentanyl), benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepine hypnotics (Z-drugs) (e.g. diazepam, oxazepam, zolpidem and clonazepam) had the highest proportions doctor-shopped during the study period. In most cases, the proportion and the quantity doctor-shopped increased for opioids and decreased for benzodiazepines and Z-drugs. Pregabalin had the sharpest increase in the proportion doctor-shopped (from 0.28 to 1.40%), in parallel with a sharp increase in the quantity doctor-shopped (+843%, from 0.7 to 6.6 DDD/100 000 inhabitants/day). Oxycodone had the sharpest increase in the quantity doctor-shopped (+1000%, from 0.1 to 1.1 DDD/100 000 inhabitants/day), in parallel with a sharp increase in the proportion doctor-shopped (from 0.71 to 1.41%). Detailed results for all drugs during the study period can be explored interactively at: https://soeiro.gitlab.io/megadose/.

CONCLUSIONS

In France, doctor-shopping occurs for many drugs from many pharmacological classes, and mainly involves opioid maintenance drugs, some opioids analgesics, some benzodiazepines and Z-drugs and pregabalin.

Long-term use of benzodiazepines in chronic insomnia: a European perspective

Chronic insomnia occurs in ~10% of the general population and has numerous negative health effects. The recommended first line treatment of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia is not widely available for patients in Europe, so pharmacotherapies such as benzodiazepine receptor agonist agents (benzodiazepines and Z-drugs) are commonly used. However, their use is only recommended for ≤4 weeks due to unproven long-term efficacy in treatment of chronic insomnia, and the risk of tolerance, and the potential for dependence and misuse. In Europe, recommendations limiting the use of benzodiazepines (lowest dose and shortest duration) in chronic insomnia are not always followed, likely due to the lack of approved effective alternative therapies. Here we present a recent pilot survey of the pharmacological treatment landscape in chronic insomnia in five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom) and physicians' attitude toward treatment. The results suggest that benzodiazepines and Z-drugs are the most widely used treatments in chronic insomnia and are being used for longer than their recommended duration. Country variations in prescription rates were observed. Due to the known association between long-term benzodiazepine use and potential for developing dependence, further analysis of the literature was performed on the use and misuse of benzodiazepines. The results show that long-term use of benzodiazepines is associated with multiple consequences of treatment, including dependence, but also that previous use of benzodiazepines may increase the risk of opioid use disorder.

Prescribing Z-drugs in Greece: an analysis of the national prescription database from 2018 to 2021

BACKGROUND

The Z-drugs are indicated for the short-treatment of insomnia, but they are associated with abuse, dependence and side-effects. There are only sparse data about Z-drug prescribing in Greece.

METHODS

We analyzed data from the Greek prescription database, considering prescriptions for the available Z-drugs in Greece, i.e., zolpidem and zopiclone, during the period from 01.10.2018 to 01.10.2021 in order to examine the prevalence, monthly number and characteristics of Z-drug prescriptions in Greece.

RESULTS

There were 1,229,842 prescriptions for Z-drugs (zolpidem: 89.7%) during the investigated period from 2018 to 2021, which corresponded to 156,554 patients (73.1% ≥ 65 years, 64.5% female). More than half of the patients (65.8%) had more than one prescription with a median number of 8, interquartile range IQR [3, 17], prescriptions during the three-year study period. Most patients (76.1%) were prescribed by medical specialties other than psychiatrists and neurologists, despite a considerable frequency of psychiatric comorbidities (53.7%). About half of patients with anxiety/depression were not prescribed anxiolytics or antidepressants, a practice more frequently observed among medical specialties other than psychiatrists and neurologists. The average annual prevalence of at least one prescription for Z-drugs in the Greek population during 2019-2020 was approximately 0.9% (higher in females and older adults). The monthly number of prescriptions was relatively stable with a median number of 334.2 IQR [310.4; 351.6] prescriptions per 100,000 persons.

CONCLUSIONS

A considerable number of patients are prescribed Z-drugs in Greece, more often older adults, females and patients with psychiatric comorbidities. The prescribing physicians were in the majority (70%) internists and general practitioners, while psychiatrists (10.9%) and neurologists (6.1%) accounted for a smaller proportion. Due to the limitations inherent to medical claims databases, further research is warranted in order to elucidate the potential abuse and misuse of Z-drugs.

French national addictovigilance follow-up of zolpidem between 2014 and 2020: evolution of drug abuse, misuse and dependence before and after the regulatory change

BACKGROUND

Since the appearance of zolpidem on the market, the occurrence of serious cases of abuse, misuse and dependence have come to the attention of authorities. In view of the increase in the number and severity of cases among zolpidem users and the predominant presence of zolpidem in falsified prescriptions, the French Health Authorities implemented part of the narcotics regulation for zolpidem in April 2017. The objective of this article was to describe the evolution of the abuse, dependence and misuse of zolpidem.

METHODS

We used three data sources: (i) zolpidem is a reimbursable and strictly prescription drug in France. Medic'AM is a public database that indicates the number of tablets reimbursed each month in France for each reimbursable drug. This database has been analyzed as a proxy of the exposure of the French population to zolpidem; (ii) all French cases of drug dependence or abuse reported by health professionals (regulatory obligation) and (iii) an epidemiological tool based on the surveillance of falsified prescriptions over two periods: the 3-year period before the regulatory measure (2014-16) and the 3-year period after the regulatory measure (2018-20).

RESULTS

This regulatory change had two immediate consequences: a sharp decline in falsified prescriptions and a decrease of ∼57% between the two study periods in the zolpidem reimbursement data. Markers of problematic consumption remained after the regulatory change with worsening cases, particularly for people who were genuinely dependent and/or had comorbidities or misusers for whom zolpidem was the substance of interest, whose proportion increased significantly in the addictovigilance notification system, from 43.6% (N = 107) to 59.3% (N = 127) (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Further monitoring is needed in light of these persistent markers of problematic consumption.

Did the New French Regulation of Zolpidem Decrease the Problematic Consumption of Zolpidem? A Field Study among Users

Background: The French national drug regulatory authority stated, in 2017, that a secured prescription pad must be used for zolpidem prescriptions. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution of the problematic consumption of zolpidem at the individual level since the new regulation. Methods: Two nationwide populations of at-risk users of zolpidem were recruited: one in general practitioner (GP) offices and one in specialized care centers dedicated to drug dependence (SCDDs). Participants were asked about their zolpidem consumption before and after the regulation change. The primary outcome was the evolution of problematic zolpidem consumption, as defined by at least one of the following criteria: overconsumption, fraudulent ways of obtaining, effects sought other than hypnotic, and modes of administration other than oral. Results: A total of 243 participants were included: 125 from GP offices and 118 from SCDDs. In the GP population, the prevalence of patients who were identified as problematic consumers decreased from 24.8% to 20.8% (p = 0.593), whereas the prevalence decreased from 73.7% to 51.7% in the SCDD population (p < 0.001). The most prevalent criteria for problematic status were overconsumption and fraudulent ways. Conclusions: The new French regulation of zolpidem had different impacts among two different populations of at-risk zolpidem consumers.

Perception of the Regulatory Change for Zolpidem Prescription by French General Practitioners and Its Relation to Prescription Behavior

Background: To “limit the risk of abuse and misuse” and “encourage correct usage”, the French drug regulatory authority stated that—from April 2017—zolpidem prescription must be performed on a secured prescription pad. This national study aims to evaluate the perception of general practitioners (GPs) towards this new regulation and its link with prescription strategies. Methods: We conducted structured interviews of GPs. Data were collected about GPs’ perception of the measure and therapeutic strategies towards zolpidem. The primary outcome was the description of the GPs’ strategy of prescription, based on the perception towards the new regulation for zolpidem. Results: For 206 GPs, the new regulation was mainly perceived as helpful (61%) and as a difficulty (55%). Other perceptions were the awareness of the risks of zolpidem (18%), awareness of the risks of hypnotics (13%), and nothing changed (5%). Four clusters of GPs were identified. In the clusters with the perception as a difficulty (only or associated with helpful), the GPs who applied the strategy “no modification” for >50% of their patients were more frequently compared to awareness and helpful only clusters (60.8%; 42.9%; 20.4%; 26.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: We highlighted an association between the perception of the new regulation of zolpidem prescription by GPs and a strategy of prescription.

Weighted blanket and sleep medication use among adults with psychiatric diagnosis - a population-based register study

OBJECTIVE

To measure rate of subscription of common sleep medication and diagnoses of substance use disorder (SUD) before and after receiving a prescribed weighted blanket (WB) among patients with psychiatric diagnoses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using register-based data of health-related factors in a Swedish region, a total of 1785 adult individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis, received a WB and resided in the region during the study period were identified. Using each individual as their own control, the rate of one-year prior prescription of WB or diagnosed SUD was compared to rate after a half year wash-out after prescription of WB for a full year.

RESULTS

The number of patients without prescription of sleep medication increased by 3.3% (95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.2-6.4, p=.04). Furthermore, the proportion without a prescription of benzodiazepine receptor agonist/antihistamines sleep medication increased by 5.5% (95%CI: 2.2-8.8, p=.001). Melatonin prescription increased after WB by 3.6% (95%CI: 1.1-6.2, p=.006). Younger age and unipolar-, anxiety-, attention-deficit/hyperactivity-, and post-traumatic stress disorder was associated with decreased use while psychotic-/bipolar- and personality disorder was not associated with a decrease in the use of sleep medication. The number of alcohol SUD diagnoses did not increase while sedative SUD rate increased statistically significantly by 0.7% (odds ratio = 1.63, p=.02). In a multivariate model, only younger age predicted discontinuation of sleep medication while psychotic-/bipolar- and personality disorder had statistically less decrease.

CONCLUSION

This observational register study found a statistically significant association between WB use and decreased use of common sleep medication except melatonin that increased slightly.

Use of State Sequence Analysis in Pharmacoepidemiology: A Tutorial

While state sequence analysis (SSA) has been long used in social sciences, its use in pharmacoepidemiology is still in its infancy. Indeed, this technique is relatively easy to use, and its intrinsic visual nature may help investigators to untangle the latent information within prescription data, facilitating the individuation of specific patterns and possible inappropriate use of medications. In this paper, we provide an educational primer of the most important learning concepts and methods of SSA, including measurement of dissimilarities between sequences, the application of clustering methods to identify sequence patterns, the use of complexity measures for sequence patterns, the graphical visualization of sequences, and the use of SSA in predictive models. As a worked example, we present an application of SSA to opioid prescription patterns in patients with non-cancer pain, using real-world data from Italy. We show how SSA allows the identification of patterns in prescriptions in these data that might not be evident using standard statistical approaches and how these patterns are associated with future discontinuation of opioid therapy.