Arterial and venous thrombosis in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: incidence and risk factors in a cohort of 1491 patients

Massive arterial and venous thrombosis from smouldering multiple myeloma: further evidence for monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance

A man in his 40s presented to the emergency department after 2 weeks of abdominal pain and bloating. Radiological investigations revealed multiple unusual sites of thrombosis, including large thrombi in his portal and mesenteric veins, and a left ventricular thrombus with resultant embolic infarcts to his spleen, kidneys, coronary arteries and brain. Standard causes of underlying thrombophilia were excluded. A serum protein electrophoresis and serum-free light chains, with subsequent bone marrow biopsy, lead to the diagnosis of smouldering multiple myeloma (sMM), albeit an unusual presentation with severe clinical sequelae. Although sMM is known to be associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism, it is not recognised to cause thrombosis in both venous and arterial vascular beds simultaneously. Physicians encountering patients with multiple thrombi in unusual vascular beds without clear aetiology should consider an underlying monoclonal gammopathy in their list of differentials.

Diagnosis and management of smouldering myeloma: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper

Multiple myeloma is a bone marrow-based plasma cell tumour that develops from asymptomatic pre-cursor conditions smouldering myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and all are characterised by the presence of a monoclonal protein in the blood. Diagnosis and distinction between these conditions is based on blood tests, the bone marrow biopsy and cross sectional imaging. There are various risk stratification models that group patients with smouldering myeloma into risk groups based on risk of progression to symptomatic disease. Management is mainly observational for patients with smouldering myeloma although clinical trials for high-risk disease may be available. Restaging is required if evidence for progression.

Investigation and management of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper

This Good Practice Paper provides recommendations for the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). It describes the recently recognised entity of the monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance (MGCS), and recommends how it should be managed. The potential for targeted population screening for MGUS is also discussed.

Acute venous thromboembolic events in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: An analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) is a premalignant plasma cell disorder which despite being clinically silent carries an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a population-based study to investigate the risk of VTE in these patients.

METHODS

We utilized the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the year 2016 to compare the incidence of acute VTE between patients who carry the diagnosis of MGUS and those who don't. We excluded hospitalizations with age < 18 years and those that had a diagnosed lymphoma, leukemia, solid malignancy, or other plasma cell dyscrasia. We utilized the ICD-10-CM coding system to search the database for codes of VTE, MGUS, and other comorbid conditions. Multivariate logistic regression models were used for comparative analysis adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. Baseline comorbidities were described as frequencies and proportions for categorical variables and as medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables.

RESULTS

A total of 33,115 weighted hospitalizations were included in the MGUS group. These were compared to 27,418,403 weighted hospitalizations without the diagnosis of MGUS. The MGUS group had higher odds of composite venous thromboembolism (adjusted OR 1.33, 95 % CI 1.22-1.44), deep vein thrombosis (adjusted OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.29-1.65), and pulmonary embolism (adjusted OR 1.22, 95 % CI 1.09-1.37).

CONCLUSION

Patients with MGUS had increased odds of developing acute venous thromboembolism compared to patients with no history of MGUS.

Patients with multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance have variably increased thrombin generation and different sensitivity to the anticoagulant effect of activated protein C

BACKGROUND

Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) are at high risk of thrombosis especially when receiving immunomodulatory therapy. Thrombotic risk in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may also be increased. Although activated protein C (APC) resistance has been linked to an increased risk of thrombosis in MM, little is known about how APC influences thrombotic risk in MGUS. We compared thrombin generation (TG) in MM and MGUS patients to that of healthy controls (HCs) and investigated the exogenous effect of APC on TG in these groups.

METHODS

Hemostasis tests including factor VIII (FVIII) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels were measured in platelet-poor plasma in 14 untreated MM patients, 34 MGUS patients, and 30 age and sex-matched HCs. TG assay was performed with or without the addition of APC.

RESULTS

Peak thrombin and velocity index were significantly higher in MM and MGUS patients compared to HCs, while MM patients also had elevated endogenous thrombin potential (ETP). In MGUS cases, ETP and peak thrombin values significantly correlated with FVIII and vWF levels. In the presence of APC, peak thrombin and ETP were reduced in MGUS and control plasmas whereas lagtime and time to peak were significantly prolonged. In contrast, adding APC to MM plasma had no effect on any TG parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypercoagulability was observed in MM and even in MGUS cases with very low monoclonal protein concentration. In MM patients, APC had no effect on TG, but it attenuated TG in MGUS patients.

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Thrombotic Significance

The current review provides an overview of the thrombotic risk observed in patients with MG who do not otherwise require treatment. We discuss clinical and biomarker studies that highlight the heterogenous hemostatic profile observed in these patients and how knowledge has evolved over the past 20 years. Biomarker studies suggest shared biologic features between multiple myeloma and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), which involves both hypercoagulability and platelet activation. Hemostatic abnormalities identified in MGUS patients cannot be translated into clinical practice as they lack correlation to clinical events. The prothrombotic phenotype of MGUS patients has not been ascertained yet, but novel data on coagulation markers are promising. We also review rare conditions associated with the thrombogenic properties of the monoclonal protein that predispose to arterial, venous or microthrombotic events and demonstrate that the M-protein can be linked to clinically significant thrombotic events. Cryoglobulinemia, cryofibrinogenemia, cryo-crystaloglobulinemia and MG-related antiphospholipid syndrome are reviewed. We propose the new umbrella term "monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance" (MGTS) to refer to significant, recurrent thrombotic events in patients with MGUS that provide a rationale for targeting the underlying plasma cell clone. Identifying MGUS patients at high risk for thrombotic events is currently a challenge.

Cardiovascular Morbidity in Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance: A Danish Nationwide Study

Background

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is associated with renal dysfunction, inflammation, and increased cardiovascular mortality, but the cardiovascular risks are not fully understood.

Objectives

The authors explored the association of MGUS with a spectrum of cardiovascular diseases using the Danish nationwide databases.

Methods

Between 1995 and 2018, patients 18 years and older with MGUS were age- and sex-matched (1:10) with control patients and followed prospectively until December 31, 2018, for the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. Patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma, lymphoma, or amyloidosis were excluded. Multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression.

Results

Patients with MGUS (n = 8,189; mean age 69.8 ± 11.7 years; 51.2% male) had higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors at baseline, including hypertension (48.0% vs 38.5%) and type 2 diabetes (13.0% vs 9.3%), compared with control patients. Outcomes included an increased risk of heart failure (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.41-1.69), acute myocardial infarction (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.40), ischemic stroke (HR: 1.16; 95% CI: 1.03-1.30), atrial fibrillation (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.23-1.42), aortic aneurysm (HR: 1.55; 95% CI: 1.28-1.89), aortic stenosis (HR: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.41-1.82), aortic regurgitation (HR: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34-2.07), heart block (HR: 1.32; 95% CI: 1.08-1.61), peripheral artery disease (HR: 1.69; 95% CI: 1.47-1.95), cor pulmonale (HR: 2.06; 95% CI: 1.55-2.73), and venous thromboembolism (HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.24-1.65). A sensitivity analysis including only patients without certain comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, hypertension, acute myocardial infarction, and chronic kidney disease) yielded similar results.

Conclusions

MGUS is associated with a broad spectrum of cardiovascular diseases, with greater relative risks observed for diseases previously associated with infiltrative and inflammatory disorders. Further studies are warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms.

Prevention of venous thromboembolic events occurring in myeloma patients treated with second-generation novel agents

Thrombosis and neoplasms are strictly linked, and the diagnosis of a malignancy is a relevant risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). In particular, between gammopathies, the VTE risk is known to be increased in both monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and in multiple myeloma, with a 3- and 9-fold increase respectively, when compared to the general population. The risk appears to be further increased in patients treated with immunomodulating drugs, such as thalidomide, especially when in combination with dexamethasone or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapies, and lenalidomide. In 2008 the International Myeloma Working Group put out thrombosis prophylaxis recommendations for myeloma patients treated with IMiDs. Current recommendations for thromboprophylaxis suggest the use of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid in patients with low risk for thrombosis and therapeutic dose anticoagulation with LMWH or warfarin for high-risk patients. However, these recommendations have been frequently not followed in the clinical practice, due to various reasons that involve the patients' will, the level of evidence of the recommendations and some selection biases in the studies that were taken as basis for writing down the indications. The new direct oral anticoagulants have been preliminarily evaluated for the prophylaxis of thrombotic events in IMiDs-treated myelomas, being promising, even if more expensive. Currently, the most reliable tool for a correct thrombotic risk stratification appears to be the complete clinical and anamnestic evaluation of the myeloma patients added to a strong physician awareness of the evidences that the literature contains until now.

A Real-Life Survey of Venous Thromboembolic Events Occurring in Myeloma Patients Treated in Third Line with Second-Generation Novel Agents

Compared to the general population, patients with multiple myeloma (MM) have a nine-fold increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). Little is known about VTE prophylaxis in relapsed/refractory (RR) MM patients treated with next generation anti-myeloma drugs, such as pomalidomide (Poma) and carfilzomib (K), and monoclonal antibodies daratumumab (Dara) and elotuzumab (Elo), alone or in combination with dexamethasone at high- (D, 40 mg/week) or low-dose (d, 20 mg/week). Here, we describe the incidence of VTE in a retrospective cohort of 112 consecutive relapsed and refractory myeloma (RRMM) patients who received a third line of treatment from April 2013 to February 2020. Anti-MM regimens included combinations of pomalidomide and dexamethasone (PomaD, N = 61), carfilzomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd, N = 31), and elotuzumab, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (EloRd, N = 10), while the remaining 10 patients received daratumumab as a single agent. According to National Comprehnsive Cancer Network (NCCN), International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) and 2015 European Myeloma Network (EMN) guidelines, 42 patients (38%) were classified as high-risk patients. According to the IMPEDE VTE score, 32 patients (28%) were classified as low-risk, with a score ≤ 3 (most of them in the PomaD and Dara group), 70 (63%) were classified as intermediate-risk, with a score of 4–7 (most of them in PomaD and KRd group), and 10 (9%) were classified as high-risk, with a score ≥8 (most of them in the PomaD group). All patients received a prophylaxis, consisting generally of low-doses of acetylsalicylic acid. VTE was recorded in 9% of our patients, all of them with an intermediate or high-risk IMPEDE score, treated with low doses aspirin (ASA). No VTE occurred in patients treated with daratumumab. Thus, our real-life experience documents that (1) in RRMM patients treated with continuative regimens of third line, the incidence of VTE is similar to the setting of newly-diagnosed patients; (2) many patients in real-life received prophylaxis with ASA, irrespective of the risk classification; (3) the IMPEDE VTE score seems to be more appropriate to define the risk categories. Randomized clinical trials are required to better define the VTE prophylaxis strategy in the RRMM setting.

Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism with apixaban for multiple myeloma patients receiving immunomodulatory agents

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) have improved survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and comprise the therapeutic backbone at all phases of therapy. Although well-tolerated, IMiDs increase rates of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this phase IV, single-arm pilot study, fifty patients with MM on IMiDs received apixaban 2·5 mg orally twice daily for primary prevention of VTE and were prospectively monitored for six months. The primary safety outcomes were rates of major haemorrhage and clinically relevant non-major haemorrhage over six months. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of symptomatic VTE over six months. IMiDs used were lenalidomide (58%) or pomalidomide (42%). During the six-month evaluation period, no patients experienced major haemorrhage or VTE. Three patients experienced clinically relevant, non-major haemorrhage which was managed medically, and all were able to resume apixaban. One patient stopped therapy shortly after initiation due to an allergic reaction to apixaban. No patients experienced stroke, myocardial infarction, or death. In this pilot study, low-dose apixaban was safe and well-tolerated as a primary prevention therapy of VTE for patients with MM receiving IMiDs. Further studies are needed to validate low-dose apixaban as a standard primary prevention anti-thrombotic strategy for patients with MM receiving IMiDs.

Cytomegalovirus infection with pulmonary embolism, splenic vein thrombosis and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a case and systematic review

A 62-year-old immunocompetent woman was admitted with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, pulmonary embolism, splenic vein thrombosis and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Anticoagulation therapy was started. Two months later, seroconversion of CMV IgM to IgG was observed, while the monoclonal protein was no longer detectable. This suggests a relationship between acute CMV infection, transient MGUS and thrombosis. In accordance with current best practice guidelines for provoked venous thromboembolism (VTE), anticoagulation therapy could be discontinued after 3 months instead of 6 for unprovoked VTE, thereby reducing unnecessary time at risk of bleeding complications. While the relationships between CMV and both MGUS and thrombosis have been described independently, we are first to describe these three conditions occurring simultaneously.Furthermore, we provide a systematic review on the relation between CMV, MGUS and thrombosis.

Monoclonal gammopathies of unknown significance and smoldering myeloma: Assessment and management of the elderly patients

Monoclonal gammopathy of unknown significance (MGUS) is the most frequent plasma cell disorder that commonly affects elderly patients. Although it is an asymptomatic condition, as well as smoldering myeloma (SMM), the risk of progression to multiple myeloma requiring therapy or other B-cell disorders varies greatly for individual patients, remaining low for MGUS (1% per year), while higher and not uniform for SMM patients (10% per year). This scenario implies some special considerations regarding assessment and follow-up, especially in the elderly. In this review, we provide the updated diagnostic criteria of monoclonal gammopathies proposed by the International Myeloma Working Group (IMGW); the current recommendations for the assessment of asymptomatic plasma cell disorders, with some concerns about the need of geriatric evaluation in the elderly population, the importance of distinguishing myeloma-related symptomatology from signs or symptoms caused by multiple chronic conditions typically found in the elderly. Finally, the identification of predictor markers of progression has enabled a proposal of risk-adapted follow-up strategies in MGUS and SMM that should be implemented in clinical practice. Although the standard of care is observation for MGUS and SMM patients as well, a recent randomized trial targeting high-risk SMM showed the clinical benefit of early intervention. The change of the treatment paradigm is also very promising and feasible for elderly patients, as long as a comprehensive geriatric assessment is conducted to optimize early treatment and reach maximum benefit with minimum toxicity, in other words, to ensure a better quality of life for these patients.

Incidence of venous thromboembolism and use of anticoagulation in hematological malignancies: Critical review of the literature

Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) frequently complicates the course of hematologic malignancies (HM) and its incidence is similar to that observed in high-risk solid tumors. Despite that, pharmacologic prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in patients with HM is challenging, mainly because a severe thrombocytopenia frequently complicates the course of treatments or may be present since diagnosis, thus increasing the risk of bleeding. Therefore, in this setting, safe and effective methods of VTE prophylaxis and treatment have not been well defined and hematologists generally refer to guidelines produced for cancer patients that give indications on anticoagulation in patients with thrombocytopenia. In this review, besides to summarize the incidence and the available data on prophylaxis and treatment of VTE in HM, we give some advices on how to use antithrombotic drugs in patients with HM according to platelets count.

Áinle F. Plasma Thrombin Generation and Sensitivity to Activated Protein C Among Patients With Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance

The etiology of the prothrombotic state in myeloma has yet to be definitively characterized. Similarly, while recent evidence suggests that patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) may also be at increased risk of thrombosis, the magnitude and the etiology of this risk have also yet to be defined. The present study aims to characterize patterns of plasma thrombin generation and sensitivity to the anticoagulant activity of activated protein C (APC) at the time of initial diagnosis of myeloma and in response to therapy in comparison to that observed among patients with MGUS and matched, healthy volunteers. Patients presenting with newly diagnosed/newly relapsed myeloma (n = 8), MGUS (n = 8), and matched healthy volunteers (n = 8) were recruited. Plasma thrombin generation was determined by calibrated automated thrombography. Peak thrombin generation was significantly higher in patients with myeloma (383.4 ± 33.4 nmol/L) and MGUS (353.4 ± 16.5 nmol/L) compared to healthy volunteers (276.7 ± 20.8 nmol/L; P < .05). In the presence of APC, endogenous thrombin potential was significantly lower in control plasma (228.6 ± 44.5 nmol/L × min) than in either myeloma (866.2 ± 241.3 nmol/L × min, P = .01) or MGUS plasma (627 ± 91.5 nmol/L × min, P = .003). Within the myeloma cohort, peak thrombin generation was significantly higher at diagnosis (353.2 ± 15.9 nmol/L) than following completion of the third cycle of therapy (282.1 ± 15.2 nmol/L; P < .005). Moreover, sensitivity to APC increased progressively with each cycle of chemotherapy. Further study of the etiology and evolving patterns of hypercoagulability among patients with these conditions is warranted and may have future implications for thromboprophylaxis strategies.

Neoplastic and non-neoplastic complications of solid organ transplantation in patients with preexisting monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) occurs in 3-7% of the elderly population, with higher prevalence in renal failure patients, and is associated with a 25-fold increased lifetime risk for plasma cell myeloma (PCM), also known as multiple myeloma. Using the California State Inpatient, Emergency Department, and Ambulatory Surgery Databases components of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), we sought to determine whether patients with MGUS who undergo solid organ allograft (n = 22,062) are at increased adjusted relative risk (aRR) for hematologic malignancy and other complications. Among solid organ transplant patients, patients with preexisting MGUS had higher aRR of PCM (aRR 19.46; 95% CI 7.05, 53.73; p < 0.001), venous thromboembolic events (aRR 1.66; 95% CI 1.15, 2.41; p = 0.007), and infection (aRR 1.24; 95% CI 1.06, 1.45; p = 0.007). However, when comparing MGUS patients with and without solid organ transplant, there was decreased aRR for PCM with transplant (aRR 0.34; 95% CI 0.13, 0.88; p = 0.027), and increased venous thromboembolic events (aRR 2.33; 95% CI 1.58, 3.44; p < 0.001) and infectious risks (aRR 1.44; 95% CI 1.23, 1.70; p < 0.001). While MGUS increased the risk of PCM overall following solid organ transplantation, there was lower risk of PCM development compared to MGUS patients who did not receive a transplant. MGUS should not preclude solid organ transplant.

Thrombosis and hemostatic abnormalities in hematological malignancies

There is a paucity of data that pertain to thrombosis in patients with hematological malignancies. Recent studies showed that patients with lymphoma, multiple myeloma, and acute leukemia have an increased thrombotic risk, particularly at the time of diagnosis and during chemotherapy. We searched the PubMed database for articles on thromboembolic complications in patients with hematological malignancies published between 1996 and 2013. The incidence of thrombotic events is variable, and is influenced by the type and the stage of hematological malignancy, the antitumor therapy, and the use of central venous devices. The pathogenesis of thromboembolic disease in hematological malignancies is multifactorial. Tumor cell-derived procoagulant, fibrinolytic, or proteolytic factors, and inflammatory cytokines affect clotting activation, and chemotherapy and immunomodulatory drugs increase the thrombotic risk in patients with lymphoma, acute leukemia, and multiple myeloma. Infections might also contribute to the pathogenesis of the thromboembolic complications: endotoxins from gram-negative bacteria induce the release of tissue factor, tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1b, and gram-positive organisms can release bacterial mucopolysaccharides that directly activate factor XII. In the setting of plasma cell dyscrasias, hyperviscosity, decreased fibrinolysis, procoagulant autoantibody production, inflammatory cytokines, acquired activated protein C resistance, and the prothrombotic effects of antimyeloma agents might be the cause of thromboembolic complications. Anticoagulant therapy is very complicated because of high risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, an accurate estimate of a patient's thrombotic risk is essential to allow physicians to target thromboprophylaxis in high-risk patients.

The clinical relevance and management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and related disorders: recommendations from the European Myeloma Network

Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance is one of the most common pre-malignant disorders. IgG and IgA monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance are precursor conditions of multiple myeloma; light-chain monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of light-chain multiple myeloma; and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance of Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and other lymphoproliferative disorders. Clonal burden, as determined by bone marrow plasma cell percentage or M-protein level, as well as biological characteristics, including heavy chain isotype and light chain production, are helpful in predicting risk of progression of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance to symptomatic disease. Furthermore, alterations in the bone marrow microenvironment of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients result in an increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, infections, osteoporosis, and bone fractures. In addition, the small clone may occasionally be responsible for severe organ damage through the production of a monoclonal protein that has autoantibody activity or deposits in tissues. These disorders are rare and often require therapy directed at eradication of the underlying plasma cell or lymphoplasmacytic clone. In this review, we provide an overview of the clinical relevance of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. We also give general recommendations of how to diagnose and manage patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.

Rapidly progressing glaucoma associated with monoclonal gammopathy

A 63 year old woman with surgically controlled primary open-angle glaucoma developed sudden visual field deterioration and subjective visual loss despite stable intraocular pressure in both eyes. An extensive systemic workup was performed which revealed a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Further work-up should be considered when the extent of a patient's vision changes is not consistent with a known preexisting disease such as glaucoma.